Election 2001 Campaign Spending We Are an Independent Body That Was Set up by Parliament

Election 2001 Campaign spending We are an independent body that was set up by Parliament. We aim to gain public confidence and encourage people to take part in the democratic process within the United Kingdom by modernising the electoral process, promoting public awareness of electoral matters, and regulating political parties.

On 1 April 2002, The Boundary Committee for England (formerly the Local Government Commission for England) became a statutory committee of The Electoral Commission. Its duties include reviewing local election boundaries.

List of tables, appendices and returns 2 Conclusions 45 Preface 5 Political parties 45 Executive summary 7 Third parties 46 Spending by political parties 7 Candidates’ expenses 46 Spending by third parties 7 Future work programme 47 Spending by candidates 7 Introduction 9 Appendices The role of The Electoral Commission 10 Appendix 1 49 Campaign expenditure by political parties 11 Appendix 2 50 The spending limit 12 Appendix 3 87 Interpretation of legislation 12 Appendix 4 89 Public and media interest in the campaign 13 Appendix 5 90 Commission guidance 13 Appendix 6 97 Completing and reviewing the expenditure returns 13 Candidates’ election expenses at the Analysis of returns 14 2001 general election 99 Northern Ireland analysis 15 Great Britain analysis 17 Problems in categorising expenditure 18 Breakdown of total expenditure: the main three British parties 18 Other parties and trends 19 Apportionment and spending in England, Scotland and Wales 20 England, Scotland and Wales analysis 22 Unpaid and late claims 24 Controlled expenditure by recognised third parties 25 The regulated period: third parties 25 Interpretation of the legislation 25 Registration 26 Commission guidance 27 Third parties’ expenditure 27 Campaign expenditure by candidates 30 Prescribed limits on spending 31 Election expenses 32 Spending by candidates 32 Spending patterns by nation 34 Spending patterns by party affiliation 35 Marginal constituencies and successful candidates 39 Spending patterns by category of expenditure 40

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 2 List of tables, appendices and returns

Tables Appendices Table 1 Campaign expenditure incurred by parties in Appendix 1 List of parties that contested the general Northern Ireland, June 2001 election in Northern Ireland and Great Britain

Table 2 Campaign expenditure incurred by British Appendix 2 Information submitted in campaign parties represented at Westminster, June 2001 expenditure return

Table 3 Proportion of total party expenditure spent on Appendix 3 Categories of campaign expenditure: Schedule different categories of campaign activity, 8 to PPERA June 2001 Appendix 4 List of recognised third parties at the Table 4 Campaign expenditure in England, June 2001 general election

Table 5 Campaign expenditure in Scotland, June 2001 Appendix 5 Information submitted in controlled expenditure return Table 6 Campaign expenditure in Wales, June 2001 Appendix 6 Candidates at the general election who failed Table 7 Candidates’ election expenses at Parliamentary to submit a return or who declared expenditure general elections, 1945-2001 in excess of the statutory expenses limit Table 8 Candidates’ election expenses, by country, June 2001 Returns: political parties Table 9 All candidates, by percentage of permitted Return 1 British National Party maximum spent, by country, June 2001 Return 2 Communist Party Return 3 Conservative and Unionist Party (GB) Table 10 All candidates, by percentage of permitted Return 4 Co-operative Party maximum spent, by party, June 2001 Return 5 Fancy Dress Party Return 6 Free Party Table 11 Elected candidates, by percentage of Return 7 Green Party permitted maximum spent, by party, June 2001 Return 8 Grey Party Table 12 Elected candidates, by percentage of Return 9 Labour Party permitted maximum spent, by nation, Return 10 Legalise Cannabis Alliance June 2001 Return 11 Liberal Democrats Return 12 Liberal Party Table 13 Candidates’ election expenses, by party, Return 13 Marxist Party June 2001 Return 14 Mebyon Kernow Return 15 Muslim Party Table 14 Candidates’ election expenses, June 2001 Return 16 National Front Return 17 New Britain Return 18 Pacifist Party Return 19 Pensioner Coalition

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 3

Return 20 Plaid Cymru Return 21 ProLife Alliance Return 22 Residents and Motorists of Great Britain Return 23 Scottish Green Party Return 24 Scottish National Party Return 25 Scottish Socialist Party Return 26 Socialist Alliance Return 27 Socialist Labour Party Return 28 United Kingdom Independence Party Return 29 Welsh Socialist Alliance Return 30 Alliance Party of NI Return 31 Conservative and Unionist Party (NI) Return 32 Democratic Unionist Party Return 33 Social Democratic and Labour Party Return 34 Sinn Fein Return 35 Ulster Unionist Party Return 36 United Kingdom Unionist Party

Returns: recognised third parties Return 37 Campaign for an Independent Britain Return 38 Charter 88 Return 39 Democracy Movement Return 40 Manufacturing, Science and Finance Union Return 41 Society for the Protection of Unborn Children Return 42 Tacticalvoter.Net Ltd Return 43 South Molton Declaration Return 44 Unison Return 45 Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers Return 46 Yes Campaign

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002

5 Preface

This is the first report of its kind. It The provisions of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000, which came into effect for the first brings together details of the time at the election last year, requires parties to provide the campaign spending by political Commission with detailed information on their national campaign spending. This report provides a detailed parties, third parties and candidates commentary on how they used the funds available to them at the 2001 general election under the newly imposed spending limits to conduct their campaigns. This kind of information has not previously been available.

Although the Government previously published figures for candidates spending, this report provides for the first time an analysis of the information highlighting the variations in spending patterns between candidates and parties.

By bringing together spending at both the national and local level we are able to see a much fuller picture of the overall spending by parties. I am sure the information in this report will be of continuing interest to parties, academics, media and others with an interest in elections.

The report marks an important step in bringing greater transparency and openness to the campaign spending of political parties. It also highlights a number of challenges for the Commission and parties in dealing with the new regulatory framework.

Sam Younger Chairman, The Electoral Commission November 2002

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002

7 Executive summary

Spending by political parties unsolicited material to electors. In Northern Ireland, the main areas of expenditure were advertising and party • The general election of 2001 was the first where party political broadcasts. campaign expenditure was regulated, following the commencement of the Political Parties, Elections and • Political parties reported that they had had some Referendums Act 2000 (PPERA). PPERA introduced difficulty in accurately and consistently categorising spending limits and restricted the number of people expenditure to meet the reporting format. The within a party who could authorise campaign Commission also identified that there were a number of expenditure. failures by parties to apportion correctly expenditure between England, Scotland and Wales. • The legislation created difficulties of interpretation for The Electoral Commission as well as parties contesting the • A number of parties were unaware that PPERA made it general election. The Commission advised parties on illegal to pay any claims for campaign expenditure that items that should be included in the campaign were received more than 21 days after the date of the expenditure return, including VAT. There was some poll, or to pay claims that were received during the confusion about the distinction between candidates’ permitted period more than 42 days after the date of election expenses and party expenditure. the poll. • A total of 80 registered political parties fielded Spending by third parties candidates at the election and were bound by the new requirements. However, of these parties, only 36 • For the first time, spending on national election material incurred any expenditure that had to be reported to distributed by groups not fielding candidates for election the Commission. was regulated. • £26,689,901 was spent across the UK by the 36 parties • A total of 10 organisations promoting a variety of that incurred campaign expenditure at the election. Of different views registered as recognised third parties this, £26,258,260 was spent in Great Britain and during the regulated period for the general election in £431,641 was spent in Northern Ireland. 2001. This was fewer than the number that had been expected to register. A number of organisations that • £22,348,075 campaign expenditure was incurred in contacted the Commission about the need to register England, £2,523,086 in Scotland and £1,387,099 subsequently took the view that they were not in Wales. distributing material which fell within the scope of • Of the total expenditure incurred by parties in the UK, the controls. £23,696,932, or 88.8%, was incurred by the Conservative • £1,210,510 was spent across the UK by the 10 and Labour parties. Of total expenditure incurred 96.7% recognised third parties. Of this, £1,189,195 was spent in was spent by parties that won seats at the election. Great Britain and £21,315 was spent in Northern Ireland. • All registered parties, including Labour and the • Controlled expenditure of £1,040,663 was incurred in Conservatives, were comfortably within the overall England, £95,825 in Scotland and £52,707 in Wales. national spending limits of £15.384m in Britain and £432,000 in Northern Ireland. Spending by candidates • The main items of expenditure varied across parties. However, common areas of high expenditure among the • A total of 3,319 candidates stood in 659 constituencies largest parties in Britain were advertising, transport and at the 2001 general election, and 3,291 candidates

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 8

submitted returns detailing their campaign expenditure to • 85% of the total amount declared by candidates the Returning Officer for each constituency. (£10, 076,830) was spent on publicity, including advertising, printing, publishing and postage or • Candidates spent just under £11.9 million in total, other distribution. compared to £12.9 million at the 1997 general election. In real terms, spending decreased by almost 17% • For a quarter of all candidates (842 in total) publicity compared to 1997. The average amount spent by was their only expenditure. In contrast, only £63,637 candidates was £3,581. (equivalent to just over half of 1% of all expenditure) was spent on the hire of meeting rooms during the election. • Individual constituency spending limits were calculated by a formula, which took into account the size of the • Fewer than half of all candidates, 1,390 in total, declared electorate and nature of each constituency. The personal expenses. The total amount of personal constituency spending limits ranged from £6,846 in the expenses declared was some £306,560, and the Western Isles, to £11,957 in the Isle of Wight. average expenditure of those candidates who declared personal expenses was just over £220, up from £110 • Over the whole of the UK, 702 candidates (21% of all in 1997. candidates) spent more than 80% of the permitted maximum in their constituency, while 1,761 candidates • Seven candidates declared expenses in excess of the (53%) spent less than 30%, including 105 (3%) who statutory maximum. declared no election expenditure. • On average, candidates in Northern Ireland spent more than those elsewhere in the UK, while candidates in Scotland spent less than the average. The average expenditure declared by candidates in England and Wales broadly mirrored that of the UK as a whole. • Candidates representing the six parties which each fielded more than 100 candidates spent some £10,498,055, while candidates from the smaller parties spent a total of £1,214,042. Independent candidates, or candidates who stood with no description, spent a total of £173,689. • Candidates from the larger parties were more likely to spend a high proportion of the legally allowed amount. • Candidates contesting marginal seats were more likely to spend close to the legally permitted maximum. In nine of the Conservative party’s top 10 target marginal seats its candidates spent more than 90% of the maximum permitted amount. • In 26 of the 29 seats that changed hands at the election the successful candidate spent more than 80% of the maximum amount.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 9 Introduction

The Electoral Commission’s report on This second companion report contains details of the election campaign expenditure returns submitted by the the 2001 general election was political parties and candidates that contested the general published in July 2001 (Election election, plus the campaign expenditure of recognised third parties. 2001: The Official Results).1 That report provided an overview of the The report has three main sections. The first part details the national campaign spending of 80 registered political election and the Commission’s parties that fielded candidates at the election.2 PPERA assessment of the election introduced for the first time controls governing national campaign expenditure by political parties at an election. campaign, the attitudes of voters and Under PPERA, the regulated period during which the way in which the election itself expenditure must be accounted for is normally 365 days, ending on the date of the poll. However, since the Act came was administered. It also contained into effect on 16 February 2001, the regulated period for the the official results for all 659 2001 general election ran from 16 February to 7 June 2001. parliamentary constituencies, Parties that contested the 2001 general election were together with an analysis of the required to submit a report to The Electoral Commission detailing all campaign expenditure incurred by the party results conducted by a team led by during the campaign period. For parties that spent less than Professors Colin Rallings and £250,000, expenditure reports were due by 7 September 2001, and for parties that spent more than £250,000, reports Michael Thrasher at the University were due by 7 December 2001. Reports submitted by of Plymouth. parties that spent more than £250,000 were required to be accompanied by an assessment from an independent auditor. This report is based on the information contained in the returns submitted by the political parties and the results of the Commission’s compliance reviews of those returns.

Some of the information on party campaign expenditure published in this volume in relation to the 2001 general election has previously been made public via the Commission’s website.

The second part of the report deals with the campaign expenses of registered third-party organisations. These are 1 The report can be viewed on the Commission’s website – bodies that do not field candidates but campaign for a party www.electoralcommission.org.uk. or category of candidates. Non-party organisations and 2 A total of 80 registered parties fielded candidates at the 2001 general election, and are listed at Appendix 1. One party failed to submit an individuals that wished to campaign at the general election expenditure report. Ten recognised third parties registered with the in 2001 and spend more than £10,000 in England or £5,000 Commission and submitted expenditure reports. in Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland were required to

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 10

register with the Commission and to submit a breakdown of The role of The Electoral Commission expenditure incurred at the election. PPERA gives the Commission a general responsibility for The third part of this report contains details of the election monitoring compliance with: expenses returns of 3,291 candidates who contested seats • Parts V and VI of the Act, which deal with campaign at the election.3 Under the provisions of the Representation spending by parties and third parties; of the People Act 1983 (RPA 1983), the election agent of every candidate is required to submit a return and • The restrictions and other requirements relating to declaration of election expenses incurred in the conduct of candidates’ election expenses and donations (although the election. Previously, a report listing candidates’ election the provisions relating to donations did not come into expenses was published by the Government and laid before effect until 1 July, after the general election). Parliament some time after each general election (the report on the general election of May 1997 was published in Parties are responsible for reporting details of campaign February 1999). The Electoral Commission has now taken spending to the Commission, within a set period. Following on responsibility for this function. With the assistance of the return of the campaign expenditure reports, the Returning Officers and Acting Returning Officers in Commission undertook a programme of work to examine England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, The the extent of compliance by parties in relation to the Electoral Commission has received and analysed the legislation (details of the Commission’s compliance reviews information contained in the candidates’ expenses returns. are set out in the following section). The results of that work We again acknowledge the assistance of Professors have aided the preparation of this document. Rallings and Thrasher and their team in the compilation of this information. Returning and Acting Returning Officers were required to send the Commission copies of the candidates’ election expenses returns submitted to them after the election. In analysing the information provided to us it has emerged that some candidates failed to submit expense returns or spent more than the permitted limit

The Commission’s compliance focus has been very much on the new controls introduced by PPERA and the need to ensure that parties fully understand the requirements to which they are now subject during a general election. We recognise that our compliance role as regards candidates’ expenses requires further development, particularly in the light of the new rules introduced from 1 July 2001. We have started the process by designing a new expenses reporting form and will be considering what other steps might be necessary both to ensure that we can effectively carry out 3 3,319 candidates contested seats at the election – 28 failed to submit our compliance role and that candidates are fully aware of election expense returns. the rules to which they are subject.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 11 Campaign expenditure by political parties

PPERA introduced new UK-wide PPERA introduced limits on the amount of expenditure that controls governing national campaign can be incurred by a political party in the ‘regulated period’ before an election in response to concerns about the expenditure incurred by political escalating ‘arms race’ in campaign spending between the parties in the period before an major parties and subsequent pressure on fundraising.5 In order to ensure that parties can comply with these spending election. The legislation regulates the limits, campaign expenditure can only be approved and expenditure incurred specifically by incurred by individuals authorised to do so,6 and invoices relating to campaign expenditure must be received and parties and is separate from the paid within specified time limits. Following a relevant controls relating to candidates’ election, parties that contested the election are required to submit a report detailing all campaign expenditure incurred 4 expenses. by the party to The Electoral Commission. Reports submitted by parties that spent more than £250,000 must be accompanied by a report prepared by an independent auditor.

PPERA defines campaign expenditure as expenses incurred in respect of: • party political broadcasts; • advertising; • unsolicited material; • manifestos and other documents; • market research; • press conferences and dealings with the media; • transport; and 4 These are set out in RPA 1983. 5 For general elections the regulated period is the 365 days ending with • rallies and other events. the date of the poll, while for elections to the European and Scottish Parliaments and to the National Assembly for Wales and Northern As well as counting expenditure actually incurred by a party Ireland Assembly, the regulated period is normally four months, ending with the date of the poll. Party expenditure at a local election counts against the expenditure limit, parties are also required to against the spending total only when it falls within a regulated period. include the cost of notional expenditure on any of the items 6 Only the registered party treasurer or campaigns officer, any registered listed above against the limit. Notional expenditure is any deputy treasurer or campaigns officer, or any person authorised in goods, services, property or facilities provided to a party for writing by the registered treasurer/campaigns officer or a deputy treasurer/campaigns officer, are allowed to authorise free or at a discount of more than 10% from normal campaign expenditure. commercial terms.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 12

Thus, if a supporter of a party provided printing facilities at Parties contesting an election in each part of Great Britain half the normal commercial cost to enable the party to print are subject to specific limits for each of England, Scotland its manifesto, in its return to The Electoral Commission the and Wales, and are required to apportion expenditure party would be required to report the amount paid as a between them. Therefore, the Scottish National Party was campaign expense, and in addition indicate the value of the subject to the total limit for Scotland’s 72 Westminster seats discount on the normal price as notional expenditure. Both of £1.728m, while Plaid Cymru was subject to the £960,000 would count against the party’s overall expenditure limit. limit for Wales’ 40 seats. Parties contesting England’s 529 seats were subject to a limit of £12,696,000. The spending limit For those parties that contested a smaller number of seats, The general election of 7 June 2001 was the first at which the expenditure limit was either the constituency amount the new controls on campaign expenditure were in force. multiplied by the number of seats contested, or: £810,000 in Since this provision of PPERA came into effect on 16 England; £120,000 in Scotland; and £60,000 in Wales, February 2001, the regulated period for the election ran from whichever limit was greater. that date to 7 June 2001, rather than for the usual 365-day 7 campaign period. The expenditure limits for the election Interpretation of legislation were reduced by Parliament to account for the shorter regulated period, with parties allowed to incur up to £24,000 The difficulty both for the political parties contesting the for each seat contested, rather than the £30,000 that will election and The Electoral Commission lay in interpreting normally be applicable per constituency contested at UK the new legislation: agreeing which expenditure should be Parliamentary elections. included as campaign expenditure and in what category, assessing what value should be attributed to national For a party that contested all 641 constituencies in Great expenditure and calculating how the expenditure should be Britain, therefore, the overall expenditure limit was set at apportioned between nations. Although the Commission £15.384m. Since traditionally the main parties do not had supplied all political parties with guidance on the new contest the seat in which the Speaker is seeking re-election, legislation governing campaign expenditure when they the Labour, Conservative and Liberal Democrat parties registered, it also worked closely with parties in the months could have had a maximum spending limit of £15.36m.8 The before and after the election to achieve consistency in the overall Northern Ireland limit stood at £432,000. Although treatment of these issues. The cases raised with the the Conservative Party fielded three candidates in Northern Commission were often complex, requiring the input of the Ireland (and accordingly had a spending limit there of Commission’s legal team who, in the absence of any case £72,000), this did not affect the expenditure limit that law, had to enter new territory in advising on whether in their applied to the party in Great Britain. view, various items of expenditure should be included in the return or not.

All three main parties raised similar issues in relation to 7 Campaign expenditure incurred before the regulated period but used for campaign expenditure. The Commission advised that the purposes of the campaign during the regulated period is required to be treated as campaign expenditure. Although in 2001 the legislation campaign expenditure should be calculated inclusive of VAT, was not in force before the regulated period commenced, some parties and that the cost of providing transport facilities for the did include expenditure incurred before 16 February 2001 in their returns media was, in its view, campaign expenditure. Parties and on the basis that it had been incurred in connection with the campaign. other organisations sought guidance on whether the paid 8 The Liberal Democrats withdrew their candidate in the constituency of Wyre Forest, and fielded 639 candidates; they were therefore subject to secondment of staff from companies and other an expenditure limit of £15.336m. organisations to political parties for the duration of the

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 13

campaign was campaign expenditure and/or a donation. Public and media interest in the campaign The Commission took the view that although the Act Party campaign expenditure in itself was not an issue at the excludes salary and other remuneration in relation to normal election. Although there was a substantial amount of and temporary party staff from being treated as campaign coverage about political donations – the first reports of expenditure, it requires any remuneration to non-party donations to parties coincided with the beginning of the employees seconded to the party, or to agency staff taken official campaign period in May and the Commission’s on by the party for the campaign period, to be treated as website recorded large numbers of people logging on to campaign expenditure. In the case of staff seconded to view the first returns – there were fewer reports in the media parties, where these services were received for free, the about the amount of money being spent by the parties actual cost was regarded as notional expenditure and during the campaign. Whether this was because it was additionally reported as a donation to the party. assumed that the issue of campaign expenditure had been resolved by PPERA, or because the election itself was such This is one example among many in which there was an that it did not come to the fore remains unclear. However, overlap between the new controls on donations and the media interest in Spring 2002 surrounding party campaign expenditure. It is also an area that the donations and state funding suggests that interest in the Commission will review. The effect of the legislation is to finances of political parties rarely remains dormant for long. require the inclusion of costs incurred in employing agency staff, but not directly recruited temporary party staff. Commission guidance However, as both are costs incurred directly as a result of the campaign, it would seem consistent for all such costs to The Commission recognised that further and more be included, regardless of who the employer is. This would substantial guidance was needed in relation to the require a change to the legislation. distinction between candidates’ election expenses and party campaign expenditure in addition to other aspects of All political parties contesting the election were concerned campaign expenditure. It was decided that this should be about the distinction between what should be regarded as a produced after the Commission had assessed the 2001 candidate’s election expense (and reported accordingly) general election returns, since the experience of the election and what should be classified as party campaign would provide the most useful indicator of where expenditure. Several sought guidance from the Commission clarification was required. Accordingly, the Commission’s on this. The difficulties of interpretation were exacerbated by post-election work plan provided for a project to produce the lack of any existing clear guidance on what should be core guidance on campaign expenditure, to be distributed included in a candidate’s election expenses return. The to parties in time for the 2003 elections to the devolved Commission’s view on the matter was that expenses that legislatures. That project is underway and consultations would previously have been treated as a candidate’s have been held with the political parties on the contents of election expense and included in an individual’s return the guidance. The project is due to be completed by the should still be treated as such, since PPERA did not aim to end of 2002. alter the treatment of candidates’ expenses, but to regulate expenditure incurred in addition to these expenses. Completing and reviewing the expenditure returns However, despite the Commission’s efforts to clarify the position, difficulties and some confusion remained, as was At the end of the election campaign, political parties faced a evident from the campaign expenditure returns, in which demanding task in compiling their expenditure returns. several parties reported expenses that had also been Appendix 2 indicates the information that had to be reported as candidates’ expenses. submitted. For all parties, the requirement to submit details

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 14

of every single item of campaign expenditure, no matter requirements of PPERA, and particularly that all expenditure how small, was a stringent one: for parties contesting had been properly authorised and paid. several hundred seats and spending millions of pounds, the task was enormous. Furthermore, the fact that the returns of The compliance visits were also an opportunity to discuss parties that spend more than £250,000 on a campaign must issues raised in the compliance team’s initial reports. In be accompanied by an independent auditors’ report stating some cases, this meant amending the figures reported to that the return ‘fairly presents in all material respects the the Commission. This occurred, for example, where parties campaign expenditure incurred by or on behalf of the party’ had incorrectly apportioned expenditure between different added to the pressure to ensure that full records were kept.9 parts of Britain or allocated spending to the wrong category. Some items of expenditure were also considered to be Campaign expenditure returns are required by law to be outside the definition of campaign expenditure: for submitted to the Commission within three and six months of example, spending incurred after the regulated period, or the date of the poll, according to whether a party spent less on items not regarded as campaign expenditure (e.g., party than or more than £250,000. Therefore, returns from parties staff costs). that contested the general election were due by 7 September 2001 and 7 December 2001 respectively. On The compliance process ended with the issue of a final receipt of the returns, The Electoral Commission’s report to each party that confirmed the campaign compliance team began the task of assessing the parties’ expenditure totals to be reported and detailed agreed action compliance with the new controls. plans for improvements and the sharing of best practice, as well as providing other points of advice. Further guidance The first step was to ensure that they complied with the and advice on these improvements and areas of best reporting requirements: parties whose returns did not meet practice will also be contained in the proposed Core these requirements were asked to submit the outstanding guidance on campaign expenditure. It is intended that the information to the Commission. In addition, returns in Commission will review progress with parties following the excess of £5,000 were subject to more detailed campaign expenditure returns prepared for the 2003 examination. A number of common issues were identified, devolved legislature elections. such as the apportionment of expenditure across Britain, and the categorisation of expenditure, and initial reports The compliance reviews were the first carried out by the were prepared for the registered treasurer or campaigns Commission in relation to national campaign expenditure. officer, requesting further information or clarification of The process has been necessarily detailed and lengthy in payments and giving points of advice on the return. order to ensure that the returns were properly monitored. It is anticipated that following future elections, where parties Following the issue of the initial reports, the Commission’s will be able to use the Commission’s core guidance to help compliance team visited parties in order to review the them produce their returns, fewer issues will arise, and the control and reporting systems which had underpinned compliance process will be less detailed. preparation of the campaign expenditure return. The aim of these systems reviews was to gain an assurance that the Analysis of returns procedures enabled each party to prepare an accurate and complete expenditure return in compliance with the Of the 80 parties that contested the election, only 36 reported to the Commission that they had incurred 9 Source: Statement from auditor’s reports submitted by parties that campaign expenditure. The following review deals spent more than £250,000 at the 2001 general election. separately with the returns submitted by parties on the

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 15

register of parties for Northern Ireland and those on the Table 1: Campaign expenditure incurred by parties in register of parties for Great Britain. Northern Ireland

Returns 1-36 show the information contained in the Party No. of No. of Campaign Average campaign expenditure returns submitted to the Commission seats seats expenditure spending per by each party that contested the general election in Britain contested won incurred constituency and Northern Ireland and reported that they had incurred (nearest £) (nearest £) campaign expenditure. The analysis of the returns is based Ulster Unionist on The Electoral Commission’s compliance team’s reviews Party 17 6 167,495 9,853 of the returns, and in some cases the original figures SDLP 18 3 155,565 8,642 submitted in a return have been revised and amended in DUP 14 5 73,230 5,231 agreement with the relevant party. Where figures have been amended, a revised return showing original and amended Sinn Fein 18 4 18,508 1,028 figures is shown. Alliance 10 - 8,960 896 Conservative and Parties in the annexed list of parties that contested the Unionist Party 3 - 7,309 2,436 general election (Appendix 1), for whom no expenditure is United Kingdom shown, reported that they had not incurred any expenditure Unionist Party 1 - 574 574 separate to that declared to the relevant electoral officer in the party’s candidates’ expenses returns. As expected, in the average constituency spend by each party. This shows both Britain and Northern Ireland, several parties that fielded that both the Ulster Unionist Party and the Social a low number of candidates, in addition to the many Democratic and Labour Party spent several thousand individuals that had registered as a political party to allow pounds more per constituency than the DUP and Sinn Fein. them to use a description on the ballot paper, submitted this With the exception of the United Kingdom Unionist Party, type of nil return. which spent just £574 in the single constituency that it contested, the Alliance Party and Sinn Fein had by far the Some parties mistakenly duplicated in their returns to The lowest campaign expenditure, at an average of £896 and Electoral Commission some or all of the information that £1,028 per constituency respectively. they had submitted to the Returning Officer, although when checks were made, it was confirmed that the ‘party Clearly, some parties have access to greater resources and expenditure’ reported to the Commission was actually the will spend more than a rival political party during the course candidate’s expenses. of an election campaign. However, a further reason for this differential may be traced to the way in which different Northern Ireland analysis parties organise their election campaigns. Some parties All the parties that contested the election in Northern Ireland appear to prefer greater central spending and others target constituencies and that incurred campaign expenses spent their spending at constituency level. less than £250,000, and were therefore required to submit returns to The Electoral Commission by 7 September 2001. Sinn Fein and the Alliance Party are examples of parties that Returns 30-36 indicate the breakdown of campaign chose to concentrate their activity at constituency level. A expenditure by each political party. comparison of each party’s campaign expenditure return and candidates’ election expenses return indicates that Table 1 opposite lists the total expenditure incurred by each although both incurred low levels of central party party, the number of constituencies contested and won, and Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 16

expenditure, they incurred a proportionately greater amount which minimised costs by producing just a single broadcast of candidates’ expenditure. Sinn Fein, for example, outspent using voiceovers. the SDLP in several constituencies despite its relatively low party expenditure. In other seats, the Alliance outspent one The remaining campaign expenditure incurred by the main or both of the Unionist and Nationalist parties. political parties in Northern Ireland varied significantly between parties. While both the DUP and UUP spent Thus, although there is no clear correlation to suggest that substantial amounts on manifestos and other party the candidates of those parties that spent less centrally documents, neither Sinn Fein, the SDLP nor the Alliance spent more than their rivals locally – in fact, candidates of spent more than a couple of thousand pounds in this area. each of the four main parties outspent their rivals in at least The SDLP spent over £35,000 on market research and one constituency – the figures for both national and local canvassing, but among the other main parties, only the party campaign expenditure enable a general assessment UUP incurred any expenditure in this area, and even then of how parties chose to manage their campaigns. In its just £342. compliance checks of the campaign expenditure returns, one of the key points that the Commission considered is A contrast with the style of campaigning seen in Great whether the political parties that made returns apportioned Britain is evident from lack of significant expenditure by any their expenditure between party and candidates in a party in respect of transport or media. Whereas in the rest of consistent manner. However, the Commission found no the UK, a substantial proportion of expenditure was incurred evidence that parties reported the same type of in the cost of transporting politicians around constituencies expenditure differently. in ‘battle-buses’ with accompanying media facilities, in Northern Ireland, a considerably smaller geographical area, For all of the four main parties in Northern Ireland, politicians appeared to travel in a more low-key fashion, by advertising – including newspaper advertising and billboard car, covering the costs themselves. advertising – accounted for by far the greatest proportion of campaign expenditure. There was some concern amongst Despite the lack of common trends in the campaign parties at the rising commercial cost of this, with advertising expenditure incurred by political parties in Northern Ireland, accounting for more than half of the total party expenditure there are nonetheless some conclusions that can be drawn. by the SDLP, UUP and Sinn Fein. The other common item of major expenditure was the party election broadcasts, the Overall, the amount of campaign expenditure incurred by production costs of which are borne by political parties. The parties in Northern Ireland was relatively low. However, four main parties in Northern Ireland (the DUP, SDLP, Sinn parties do appear to target their spending to gain the most Fein and UUP) were allowed four party election broadcast benefit. Very little is spent in those constituencies in which a transmissions (on each of BBC1, BBC2, UTV and Radio party has no chance of success, and the returns of Ulster), and the Alliance Party two broadcasts. individual candidates’ expenses not surprisingly show a wide variation in the amount of expenditure by the same It was up to each political party to determine whether or not party across different constituencies. Resources are to produce a separate broadcast for each transmission, or focused in constituencies where the impact is most likely to to repeat the same broadcast. Parties’ decisions in this area deliver success. are likely to have been partly responsible for the significant differences in the amount of money spent by each party on Compliance visits to the parties have not revealed that any its broadcast(s): the UUP, for example, which produced party has incorrectly reported party expenditure or included three broadcasts, spent nearly £25,000 more than Sinn Fein, candidates’ election expenditure in their return. There was therefore a significant difference in national campaign

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 17

spending between the major parties in Northern Ireland. Parties were required to establish internal control systems PPERA can therefore be said to have achieved the aim of that were robust enough to extend across those parts of transparency in relation to campaign expenditure. In the Britain in which seats were to be contested, ensuring that light of the substantial differentials in spending, it will be only those people duly authorised by the party interesting to compare the parties’ annual accounts when treasurer/campaigns officer (or their deputies) incurred these are first submitted to The Electoral Commission in campaign expenditure, and that all campaign invoices were 200310 and the spending by each party at the elections to paid on time and expenditure fully recorded. Furthermore, the Northern Ireland Assembly in May 2003. the reporting process was complicated by the need to apportion expenditure between England, Scotland and Great Britain analysis Wales according to the number of candidates standing for the party in each country. This requirement was imposed by The analysis below of the campaign expenditure returns PPERA in order to ensure that the campaign expenditure made by political parties in Great Britain considers the reported included an accurate reflection of the amount of general trends, as well as particular spending patterns in money spent by parties in relation to each part of Britain. individual parts of Britain. The campaign expenditure returns submitted for Britain In many ways, those parties that contested the general reported the expenditure and activity of a wide range of election in Great Britain faced a significantly more difficult parties, from the country’s largest and most represented job in controlling and reporting the campaign expenditure parties to the much smaller groups that contested just a that they had incurred in comparison with parties in handful of seats. Returns 1-29 show the amount of Northern Ireland. The large number of seats that any one expenditure incurred by each party. Four parties party in Britain can contest (641) and the resulting higher (Conservatives, Labour, Liberal Democrats and the United expenditure levels meant that the administrative issues Kingdom Independence Party) incurred campaign facing parties during the campaign and afterwards were expenditure of more than £250,000.11 The Scottish National much greater. Party spent £226,203. Plaid Cymru, the Greens, the British National Party and the Socialist Alliance reported that they Table 2: Campaign expenditure incurred by GB parties had spent between £15,000 and £80,000. A further 20 represented at Westminster parties reported that they had incurred campaign expenditure of less than £10,000, in some cases only a few Party No. of No. of Campaign Average seats seats expenditure campaign hundred pounds or less. contested won incurred expenditure (nearest £) per constituency contested (nearest £) Labour 640 412 10,945,119 17,102 Conservatives 640 166 12,751,813 19,925 10 Part III of PPERA, which requires that registered parties submit their Liberal Democrats 639 52 1,361,377 2,130 annual accounts to The Electoral Commission for inspection, came into SNP 72 5 226,203 3,142 force on 1 January 2002. The first annual accounts, which must be audited for parties whose accounts are of more than £250,000, will Plaid Cymru 40 4 87,121 2,178 therefore be submitted during 2003. 11 The Scottish National Party originally reported that they had spent IKKH 1 1 0 0 £262,542. However, compliance reviews resulted in this figure being Note: Excludes Speaker. reduced below the £250,000 threshold. See Return 24. Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 18

Problems in categorising expenditure country working on various aspects of the campaign) it is far less clear which category of expenditure they should be An obvious area of interest in analysing the campaign allocated to. For future returns, the Commission may expenditure returns is the variation in how each party consider a specific category to include this type of costs, in allocated its expenditure among different types of spending. order to reflect the distinction between expenditure on direct The eight categories of expenditure used for classification campaigning (e.g., market research, printed material, were taken from Schedule 8 to PPERA 2000 (Appendix 3). battle-bus costs), and more indirect costs (e.g., expenses However, it must be acknowledged that most parties felt claims etc.). that the categories of expenditure specified in the return were limited and somewhat ambiguous, and created Breakdown of total expenditure: the main three difficulties for parties in accurately categorising the British parties expenditure incurred. Table 3 indicates what proportion of overall expenditure the Several parties felt that the given categories did not country’s largest three parties spent on each specified type accurately reflect costs such as increased overheads and of expenditure. In comparing the parties’ main areas of administrative costs incurred during the campaign, and that expenditure, there is a need to consider the problems of it was far from clear in which category certain items should accurately categorising expenditure, as identified earlier. be placed, e.g. dealings with the media and providing However, even allowing for a degree of uncertainty caused transport facilities for them could fall into either the media by this, interesting differences between the spending or transport category. This understandably led to some patterns of the Labour and Conservative parties, and in inconsistencies in how parties reported similar items particular between these two parties and the Liberal of expenditure. Democrats, emerge.

In order to improve the comparability of the campaign For example, the Liberal Democrats spent just under expenditure returns, the Commission’s core guidance £600,000 on transport, just below 44% of the party’s overall project is considering how to clarify the categories of expenditure (£1.36m). In contrast, Labour spent nearly expenditure so that they more accurately reflect how parties £775,000, a much lower proportion of their overall spend their money during a campaign. This will be expenditure of £10.95m, while the Conservatives spent facilitated by the compliance team’s examination of the nearly £1.49m on transport, out of £12.75m. Compliance returns, which has revealed much about the indirect costs of reviews have revealed that part of the expenditure reported the campaign. The returns have highlighted, for example, by the Liberal Democrats was in fact the cost of increased the substantial amount of money that is spent by parties in overheads incurred during the campaign period: in the supporting those who participate in the campaign, be it absence of an obvious category in which to report this politicians, party officials or activists. type of general cost, the party allocated it to the transport category. For the 2001 election returns, there was no specific expenditure category for individual travel expenses and However, in spite of this, the fact that the relatively low- personal costs (e.g., hotel bills or other costs incurred by spending Liberal Democrats spent around half a million party politicians and activists) and thus, while in some pounds on transport suggests that this level of expenditure instances these costs might have fallen obviously into one on transport is considered a necessity in traditional British category of expenditure (e.g., the hotel costs of those campaigning. This accounts to some degree for the involved in organising a rally in the north), in other cases substantially lower amount of resources available to the (e.g., the expenses of party officials who travelled the Liberal Democrats for other campaign spending, once travel costs are accounted for. Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 19

£5.02m on advertising, approximately 45% of its entire Table 3: Proportion of total party expenditure spent on different categories of campaign activity campaign spending. The Liberal Democrats spent considerably less, at close to £200,000, or just under 15%. Conservatives Labour Liberal Democrats Conservative spending on advertising fell in between, at 35% (£4.41m) of their total expenditure. Advertising Advertising Transport (34.58%) (45.90%) (43.58%) It is interesting to assess how the differences in the parties’ Rallies and other Unsolicited material Media spending patterns are reflected in how they conducted their events to electors (16.95%) campaigns. As stated earlier, both the Labour and (15.47%) (13.26%) Conservative campaigns relied heavily on advertising. Both Market research/ Rallies and other Advertising parties ran widespread billboard advertising campaigns that canvassing events (14.45%) had been planned and started several months in advance of (13.47%) (11.73%) polling date. In contrast, the Lib Dem campaign centred on Transport Market research/Manifesto/Party more traditional methods of campaigning, such as daily (11.66%) canvassing policy document London press conferences (reflected in the high proportion (7.94%) (6.69%) of media expenditure) and traditional bus tours. Unsolicited material Transport Rallies and other to electors (7.07%) events (5.42%) Other parties and trends (9.53%) The other high-spending party was the United Kingdom Manifesto/Party Media Market research/ Independence Party. UKIP incurred expenditure of £743,904 policy document (6.88%) canvassing (8.04%) (4.85%) during the campaign. However, a large proportion of this expenditure (£588,398) was notional expenditure, and only Party Political Manifesto/Party Party Political £150,260 was actually spent by the party.12 The bulk of Broadcasts policy document Broadcasts UKIP’s spend was notional expenditure on party advertising: (4.45%) (4.73%) (4.07%) a party supporter paid £524,876 on the party’s behalf for Media Party Political Unsolicited material advertisements promoting the party and its main message. (2.80%) Broadcasts to electors After advertising, the majority of the party’s expenditure was (2.49%) (3.99%) on unsolicited material distributed to electors (£147,351) and the party political broadcast (£39,421). The party also The differential between the spending on transport by the spent significant amounts on rallies and other events, and Conservatives and Labour is also noteworthy, and may in on producing the party manifesto. part be explained by the notional expenditure incurred by the Conservative party in respect of helicopter use. The The Green Party incurred a smaller but still significant costs of the use of the helicopter, which was provided for amount of expenditure, spending £44,912 in contesting 135 the party’s use by a supporter, are required by PPERA to be seats in England and six seats in Wales (the independently valued at commercial rate. Thus, although the party did not registered Scottish Green Party contested four seats in actually incur this level of expenditure, it is required to count Scotland, spending just £440). The bulk of this expenditure it against the overall expenditure limit. was devoted to the production of the party’s election broadcast and manifesto: £21,545 was spent on the party’s A further example of different spending patterns is the amount spent by each party on advertising: Labour spent 12 The party also reported a disputed claim of £5,246.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 20

election broadcast, including the costs of establishing a Dress Party (£151) and Pacifist Party (£2,154). It appears telephone hotline to respond to queries relating to the that in the case of some, but not all, small parties broadcast, while £16,855 was spent on the party manifesto. expenditure reported in candidates’ election expenses The party also spent over £3,000 on dealings with the returns may also have been reported to the Commission. media, and over £1,000 on unsolicited material to electors. A notable feature is that the pattern of spending by smaller A number of other medium-sized parties reported that they parties is different to that of the larger parties. Although had incurred expenditure that ran into thousands of pounds: advertising accounts for a major proportion of expenditure the Communist Party spent £5,614 (largely devoted to party by parties of all sizes, along with party broadcasts where policy documents and advertising); the Marxist Party spent parties are entitled to them, smaller parties spend much £2,078 (including £1,777 on the party manifesto and other higher proportions of their campaign budget on party policy policy documents); and the Socialist Alliance spent £27,062. documents, including manifestos, and considerably less on The Alliance, which fielded 92 candidates in England, spent transport, media, market research, etc. This is entirely over £12,000, £5,000 and £4,000 on party advertising, consistent with the fact that smaller, less well-resourced broadcasts and policy documents respectively. Like the parties are less likely to be able to fund more expensive Socialist Alliance, the ProLife Alliance, which spent £8,010 media or market research-based projects. With less well- contesting 27 seats in England, three seats in Scotland known leaders and fielding smaller numbers of candidates, and seven seats in Wales, also concentrated its expenditure they are also less likely to undertake large-scale on advertising, the party broadcast, and party policy campaigning tours, and hence incur lower transport costs. documents (£3,527; £2,245; and £2,108 respectively). The Socialist Labour Party spent £9,855 across England, Apportionment of spending in England, Scotland Scotland and Wales contesting 114 constituencies. and Wales Various problems in the compilation of the returns emerged The British National Party reported that it had spent over during The Electoral Commission’s compliance reviews. The £15,000, solely on the production and distribution of difficulties in categorising certain types of expenditure, and unsolicited material to electors: however, compliance the resulting difficulties in accurate comparative analysis, reviews revealed that the expenditure reported was actually have already been described. A further problem reported by candidates’ expenses. The Co-operative Party, which fielded some parties that contested the election on a Great Britain- 29 joint candidates with Labour, reported that it had incurred wide basis was the difficulty of apportioning election £8,373 across England, Scotland and Wales: a small expenditure to England, Scotland and Wales. This led to proportion of this figure was its share of the money that had some adjustment of the figures reported as having been been spent on the joint candidates in terms of party spent in each part of Britain. advertising, but the more significant amount (£6,818) was the cost to the party of producing its own manifesto, which Again, an element of this mis-reporting was undoubtedly outlined its independent aims. The Pensioner Coalition, due to unfamiliarity with the requirements, with parties which fielded just one candidate, spent nearly £5,000 on required to make subjective judgements about whether to party advertising and the party manifesto, out of a total apportion different items of expenditure. However, the result spend of £5,243, while the Liberal Party spent £2,422 in of this is that some of those parties that contested the contesting 14 seats, the majority of which (£1,659) was election in more than one part of Britain under-allocated spent on media activities. expenditure to Scotland and Wales, leading to the initial reporting of lower levels of overall expenditure in these Other small parties also reported varying levels of countries than was actually incurred, and conversely, a expenditure, such as the Muslim Party (£2,484), Fancy disproportionately higher amount of expenditure in England. Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 21

Whilst the staging of a rally in a certain part of Britain, for spending correctly. The Commission will offer advice to example Devon, might obviously be classified as parties with the aim of ensuring that campaign expenditure expenditure incurred in England alone, other expenditure – is in future apportioned appropriately to England, Scotland e.g., national advertising campaigns, the cost of press and Wales. conferences – which clearly impact on the whole of Britain, is required by PPERA to be apportioned. Having decided It is worth noting that although parties are required to whether to apportion an item of expenditure, parties then apportion their expenditure in different parts of Britain, there also had to calculate the amount of expenditure to be is no mechanism for regulating party (as opposed to allocated to England, Scotland and Wales. candidate) spending in each individual constituency. Therefore, while parties usually have a nominal expenditure PPERA specifies that parties should apportion general limit of £30,000 per constituency that they contest (£24,000 expenditure on the basis of the number of seats contested in 2001), PPERA does not require that parties adhere to this in each part of Britain. In some cases, this was not done, limit in each constituency, but merely that they do not and in several of the returns there are obvious failures to exceed the overall limit which that multiplier gives them. apportion expenditure that should have been divided Thus, parties might exceed the £30,000 figure in focussing between each of England, Scotland and Wales. Where on key, marginal constituencies, while remaining significantly expenditure was not apportioned, it was usually attributed below it in other seats where the campaign is less critical. solely to England. Examples of this include the failure to apportion the costs of organising tours (in terms of Some individuals who contacted the Commission after the equipment, etc.) that covered the whole of Britain; election expressed concern that the ability of parties to accommodation costs for people working on national target expenditure in this way undermined the election aspects of the campaign; and the costs incurred in the expenses limits imposed on candidates. preparation of a party’s manifesto. One example was of a marginal Scottish constituency Compliance visits to the parties revealed that in some targeted by a call centre based in England. Under PPERA, cases, there were justifiable reasons for not apportioning the expenditure of a national call centre of this type should expenditure across Britain exactly on the basis of the be apportioned between England, Scotland and Wales. number of seats contested by a party in each part of Great However, there is little doubt that the call centre would have Britain. Parties were concerned, for example, that where an targeted certain constituencies over others, and a advert had been placed in a newspaper that does not complainant argued that this should have to be declared, if circulate equally across Britain, they should be able to not by the candidate, then on a constituency basis in the apportion on a basis reasonably calculated in proportion to party return. So long as it did not, it was argued, national the newspapers circulation. In other cases, parties carried party machinery helped the candidate to an extent that the out quite separate campaigning in different parts of Britain: party campaign expenditure return did not reflect, and to the for example, market research commissioned in England detriment of other candidates. covered England alone, while market research in Wales was carried out independently; or a separate Scottish manifesto This is an issue that may be raised again in future, although was produced. In these examples, there was no need to the Commission has no immediate plans for considering apportion the expenditure across Britain. changes. The Commission’s initial view is that it would be intrinsically difficult to implement a system regulating party The returns submitted following the general election in 2001 campaign expenditure on a constituency-specific basis, have been revised to take account of the failure to apportion given the national nature of most campaigning.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 22

England, Scotland and Wales analysis unsolicited material to electors. Just under half of Labour’s expenditure in England was on advertising (£4.11m), whilst As Table 4 shows, the Conservatives outspent Labour in over a million pounds was spent on unsolicited material and England by over £2 million. Nearly a third of the rallies and other events. The Liberal Democrat’s total Conservative Party’s expenditure was on advertising expenditure in England was £1.10m, of which nearly half (£3.78m), and more than a million pounds was spent on was incurred on transport (£485,541) and significant rallies and other events, market research, transport and amounts were spent on media (£177,306) and advertising (£160,726). Like the two highest spending parties, UKIP’s Table 4: Campaign expenditure in England at the 2001 main item of expenditure was advertising, which accounted general election (£) for £486,677 of its £693,274 expenditure.

Political party Expenditure incurred at Table 5 shows that in 2001 in Scotland, the Labour Party the 2001 general election was the biggest spender, incurring expenditure of Conservative and Unionist Party 11,336,022 £1,113,426. The Conservatives spent £972,967 while the SNP and Liberal Democrats spent £226,203 and £178,146 Labour Party 9,120,963 respectively. The main items of expenditure by the SNP were Liberal Democrats 1,079,777 the party’s election broadcast (£38,794), advertising United Kingdom Independence Party 693,274 (£51,723), unsolicited material to electors (£65,127) and Green Party 43,087 media costs (£38,551). The party also spent over £10,000 Socialist Alliance 27,062 Socialist Labour Party 8,299 Table 5: Campaign expenditure in Scotland at the 2001 Mebyon Kernow 6,470 general election (£) Co-operative Party 5,862 Political party Expenditure incurred at the 2001 Pensioner Coalition 5,243 general election ProLife Alliance 4,207 Labour 1,113,426 The Communist Party 4,176 Conservatives 972,967 Muslim Party 2,484 SNP 226,203 Liberal Party 2,248 Liberal Democrats 178,146 Pacifist Party 2,154 UKIP 15,583 Marxist Party 2,078 Scottish Socialists 12,332 Free Party 1,832 Co-operative Party 1,675 New Britain 1,572 Socialist Labour Party 1,037 Residents and Motorists of Great Britain 508 Communist Party 581 Legalise Cannabis Alliance 302 Pro-Life Alliance 467 Grey Party 244 Scottish Green Party 440 Fancy Dress Party 151 Liberal Party 174 National Front 60 Legalise Cannabis Alliance 55

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 23

on its manifesto, over £5,000 on rallies and other events, The three main parties that contested the maximum number and just under £3,000 on market research and on transport. of seats across Britain apportioned a substantial amount of The Scottish Socialist Party spent £12,332 on its campaign, their overall expenditure on an approximate proportion of slightly less than UKIP, who spent over £15,000. 83% (England), 11% (Scotland) and 6% (Wales), reflecting the number of seats contested in each part of Britain. As a In Wales, too, Labour spent more than any other party with result of apportionment, spending patterns in Scotland and a significantly wider differential between their spending and Wales by the big parties broadly reflect overall trends, the Conservatives’ than in Scotland. Plaid Cymru’s although there were some notable differences in the types expenditure across Wales’ 40 constituencies amounted to of expenditure that were incurred in greater proportions in £87,121: not far below the Liberal Democrats’ expenditure of Scotland and Wales in comparison to England. £103,454 but significantly below the Conservatives’ spending of £442,824 and Labour’s £710,730 expenditure For both Labour and the Conservatives, a large proportion (see Table 6). Plaid Cymru’s main items of expenditure were of spending in Scotland and Wales was the allocation of advertising (£23,549), manifesto costs (£18,544), market party advertising costs in proportion to the number of seats research (£17,255), and unsolicited material (£16,007). In contested. The Conservatives also allocated a large amount addition, the party also spent over £7,000 on its party of their transport costs to Scotland and Wales, contrasting political broadcast, over £1,500 was spent on dealings significantly with the small amounts spent on transport by with the media and on rallies, but just £249 was spent the two nationalist parties, whilst Labour allocated over on transport. £100,000 of spending on unsolicited material.

Neither Labour nor the Conservatives prioritised market Table 6: Campaign expenditure in Wales at the 2001 research in Scotland or Wales – less than 11 % and 6% of general election overall spending in this category was spent in Scotland and Wales – in contrast to the Liberal Democrats, who reported Political party Expenditure incurred at the a relatively higher level of spending on market research in 2001 general election (£) Scotland. The Liberal Democrats, and to a lesser extent Labour 710,730 Labour, also prioritised the production of manifesto and Conservatives 442,824 policy documents in Scotland and Wales: by contrast, the Liberal Democrats 103,454 Conservatives allocated 87% of their expenditure on manifesto documents to England. Indeed, the Plaid Cymru 87,121 Conservatives were the only party that allocated more UKIP 35,047 than 83% of their overall spending to England in each Pro-Life Alliance 3,336 category of expenditure. Green Party 1,825 Unpaid and late claims Communist Party 857 One aspect of the legislation that caused difficulties for Co-operative Party 836 political parties of all sizes in Britain and Northern Ireland, Welsh Socialist Alliance 550 was the requirement under PPERA for invoices to be Socialist Labour Party 519 submitted not later than 21 days after the end of the campaign period, i.e. 21 days after the date of the poll. Claims received within this time period have to be paid not later than 42 days after the end of the campaign period.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 24

Where claims are not received, or not paid, within the respective time limits, they cannot be paid unless a court order is obtained.

Several parties felt that these requirements were unrealistic and inflexible. Some parties accidentally failed to pay invoices that they had received within 21 days (i.e., by 28 June) by the 42-day deadline (i.e., 19 July). Many were surprised to discover that in paying claims after 19 July, they had not complied with the legislation. Other parties, more familiar with the new requirements, were irritated that they had to seek a court order to pay for claims that, by accident, had not been paid on time. Some less well- resourced parties struggled to meet the payment deadlines because of liquidity problems. Finally, numerous parties expressed the concern that the law simply did not take account of the reality of how commercial firms operate (in that firms do not consider PPERA when sending invoices and demanding payments), or of the fact that the time for sending in and paying claims was the summer holiday period.

When parties contacted the Commission, while compiling their returns, to explain that they had unpaid claims, the Commission advised them of the requirements of PPERA in regard to court applications to pay claims. However, when reviewing the returns, the Commission has taken the decision that, where claims were paid outside of the relevant time period, no action will be taken against the party, since the election was the first time that the legislation had been in place. This is an area of PPERA that the Commission intends to keep under review.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 25 Controlled expenditure by recognised third parties

Part VI of PPERA introduced limits on Third parties that do not register with The Electoral Commission are restricted by the legislation from spending the amount of ‘controlled more than £10,000 in England, and £5,000 in Scotland, expenditure’ – that is, expenditure Wales and Northern Ireland respectively. Organisations or individuals that choose to register with the Commission as incurred in producing election ‘recognised third parties’ are allowed to spend substantially material supporting a category of more on election material,13 but are subject to the requirements of PPERA in terms of the controls and candidates or party – that can be reporting requirements relating to campaign expenditure incurred by organisations not and donations.14 themselves fielding candidates for The regulated period: third parties election. The aim of this part of the Interpretation of the legislation Act is to ensure that third parties Organisations wishing to campaign had to decide whether intending to spend significant sums to register as a recognised third party. In order to assess whether or not they might come within the scope of the at elections are subject to similar controls, third parties had to judge whether or not the controls as political parties. material that they produced could be classified as ‘election material which is made available to the public at large [and] that can reasonably be regarded as intended to promote or procure electoral success for political parties or a category of candidates’. PPERA specifies that material can be regarded as election material ‘even though it can reasonably be regarded as intended to achieve any other purpose as well’.

This broad definition caused concern for a number of organisations, and difficulties for the Commission itself, which was asked to provide a view on whether or not 13 Recognised third parties may incur up to £793,500 in England; £108,000 in Scotland; £60,000 in Wales; and £27,000 in Northern publications produced by an organisation counted as Ireland, on controlled expenditure during the regulated period of 365 election material. Many organisations felt that although they days. These limits were reduced in accordance with the shorter did not consider themselves to be in any way political or regulated period of 16 February – 7 June and recognised third parties supporters of a particular party or category of candidates, could accordingly spend up to £634,800; £86,400; £48,000; and £21,600 respectively. the definition of election material was sufficiently wide for 14 Under PPERA, organisations or individuals that register as recognised them to be in danger of incurring controlled expenditure in third parties, like political parties, can only accept donations of more excess of the £10,000 (or £5,000) limit. They sought than £200 from permissible donors. Donations of more than £200 from guidance from the Commission, submitting documents on a impermissible or unidentifiable sources cannot be accepted and must be returned. Recognised third parties are required to make a report of number of matters including the single European currency, any relevant donations as part of their controlled expenditure return. animal welfare and countryside issues.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 26

Guidance was also sought on whether material that could election material and that they therefore did not need to be classified as election material, but which was only register as a recognised third party. distributed to the organisation’s membership would be considered as ‘being made available to the public at large’. It has been noted that several organisations that traditionally The Commission advised that even though organisations distributed material relating to an election were not among might not consider their aims and activities to be political, those that registered with the Commission as recognised they might nevertheless produce material that could be third parties. It remains to be seen whether this is because defined as election material. However, where material, they took the view that PPERA did not apply to their whether political in nature or not, addressed issues that fell activities, or because they were deterred from their usual within the aims and objectives of the organisation in activity by the new legislation. However, research by question, the Commission’s view was that distributing this to academics at the University of Sheffield16 suggests that in their own members would not bring them within the scope the case of trade unions, PPERA did not act as a deterrent. of PPERA. The Commission did emphasise, though, that if Their report focused in particular on how the new legislation the material referred to matters outside the aims of the impacted on those trade unions that are affiliated to the organisation, it could be subject to the controls. In several Labour Party. (It makes the point that unions that are not cases the Commission advised that the material produced affiliated to the Labour Party are prevented by their could potentially be regarded as election material, and that constitutions from advocating a political party, and therefore it might therefore be prudent to register as a recognised would not campaign in support of a party or category of third party. candidates, regardless of the introduction of PPERA.)

The Commission also received a number of enquiries from The report found that, although the late passage of the trade unions about whether the preparation and distribution PPERA and subsequent difficulties associated with the of material to members constituted controlled expenditure. interpretation of it had caused uncertainty, the legislation Again, the Commission advised that under normal had not deterred trade unions from at least some of their circumstances,15 members of unions received material in usual activity in seeking to persuade their members to vote their capacity as union members rather than as members of for the Labour Party. Thus, the main reason for the fact that the general public, and that this was therefore not controlled just three trade unions registered as recognised third parties expenditure. However, the Commission stressed in all cases appears to be due to the Commission’s advice that the that organisations should seek their own legal advice, and distribution of internal material to union members was not that it might be prudent to err on the side of caution. controlled expenditure, and not because union campaigning had been reduced by the PPERA. The report’s authors also Registration felt that, despite the non-registration by many unions, there The Commission had advertised in the national press the remained a ‘willingness to register and commit resources to requirements for third parties to register, once the election had been called. In the event, only 10 organisations registered as recognised third parties (these organisations are listed at Appendix 4). The majority of the recognised 15 Normal circumstances were defined as expenditure that was met from a third parties had not been in contact with the Commission trade union’s political fund, as provided for under the Trade Union and prior to their registration. In the case of a number of Labour Relations (Consolidations) Act 1992. organisations that did seek clarification of their position, 16 ‘The Impact of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 on Trade Unions in the 2001 General Election Campaign’; Dr Steve many chose to reject the Commission’s more cautious Ludlam, Dr Andrew Taylor and Dr Paul Allender, Department of Politics, approach, taking the view that their publications were not University of Sheffield.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 27

open campaigning should circumstances arise in which their expenditure should be treated as controlled such campaigning was deemed necessary’.17 expenditure and reported to the Commission. Unlike the statutory exclusion of party staff costs from classification as A further complicating factor was the restrictions governing campaign expenditure, for example, the Commission the activity of registered charities. Several organisations that advised recognised third parties that they must include all contacted the Commission about PPERA were registered costs incurred in the production of election material as charities, and therefore subject to clear guidelines on the controlled expenditure, including staff costs. The difficulty in political activities in which they can engage. For some, separating these costs became apparent when the returns registration as a recognised third party might have implied of expenditure from recognised third parties were received. that these guidelines had been breached, and this could have restricted some activity. Third parties’ expenditure Recognised third parties were required to submit different However, at least one organisation that the Commission information in their expenditure returns than political parties. advised to register under its broad interpretation of ‘election Appendix 5 shows the information that had to be submitted. material’ took the view that as its activities were within the Recognised third parties were, however, subject to the same Charity Commission’s guidelines on political activity it did compliance process as political parties. As with political not need to register. This suggests that there may be some parties, the requirement to provide a detailed return of inconsistency between the definition of political material relevant expenditure was a demanding one, made more under PPERA and charity law. difficult by continuing uncertainty about whether to include certain costs. Others have suggested that the opinion polls giving an apparently clear majority for the ruling Labour Party in the Returns 37-46 show the total amount of controlled weeks leading up to the general election might alternatively expenditure incurred by each recognised third party. The have been a factor in deterring third parties from taking an reports they submitted varied significantly, reflecting both active role in the election. the breadth of organisations and activities and the uncertainty over the need to register. In fact, four spent less Whatever the precise reasons, it must be acknowledged than the threshold required for registration. that the legislation governing third parties did not have the impact that might have been anticipated, and that the There were significant differences in the spending reported number and differing types of organisations that might have by the trade unions that registered as recognised third been expected to register did not choose to do so. The parties. The return submitted by the Manufacturing, Science Commission intends to review the law in relation to third and Finance Union (MSF) revealed that it had not in fact parties in order to ensure that there is greater clarity in needed to register, having spent just £4,726 across Great relation to the need to register. Britain on two leaflets that outlined the record of the Labour government and urged people to apply for a postal vote to Commission guidance ensure that they cast their vote for Labour. For those organisations that did register as recognised third parties, similar issues arose in the estimation of controlled 17 The report did find, however, that PPERA had had an effect in terms of expenditure as had occurred for political parties and reducing the amount of in-kind donations (usually the secondment of campaign expenditure. In some respects, organisations that union officials to work for the party during the campaign period) to the Labour Party, which in turn affected the party’s campaigning at local were not ordinarily engaged in political activities (unlike level. It also recommended that Parliament increase constituency political parties) faced more difficulties in assessing whether spending levels.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 28

The Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers (Usdaw) Charter 88 contacted the Commission at an early stage after reported that it had spent £84,279 on its campaign. Usdaw PPERA came into effect in February 2001 in order to seek aimed to promote itself (in terms of what the union does for clarification of its status under the Act. As an organisation its members) and the Labour Party jointly. Therefore it that is issue-focused, it could be argued that Charter 88 is distributed promotional products (bags, posters and ballots not obviously political. However, on the basis that some etc.) featuring a joint Usdaw/Labour message, to both candidates have an obvious sympathy for the organisation’s members and non-members. There was no question that objectives, it had been advised that it was potentially caught this was election material regulated by PPERA. by the provisions of PPERA. The Commission took the view that Charter 88’s publications, which were intended to Compliance reviews revealed that the union had spent a outline the organisation’s views and directly compare them large proportion of this expenditure (£61,780) prior to with the views of candidates, could reasonably be regarded registration as a recognised party, and that just £22,499 of as election material. the expenditure was incured after the union was registered. The Commission wrote to the union to advise it of the law, Charter 88’s spending, was concentrated on publications but decided not to take further action on this occasion. and advertising. The organisation’s advertising campaign was the most expensive part of the campaign, and Unison was the highest spender amongst the recognised accounted for around £136,000 in design and publication third parties, and the only recognised third party required to costs. Adverts appeared in sections of the national media submit an audit report to support its return, having incurred and included one that was more directly political in that it £774,796 of expenditure across the UK. The funds used by attacked the Labour government for not calling a the union to support its campaign were from the General referendum on proportional representation. Political Fund, which is supported by members of Unison who do not wish to wish their levies to be paid directly to the In its return, Charter 88 reported that it had received over Labour Party. £170,000 of funding from the Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust, an organisation with charitable status that seeks to Consequently, Unison reported that it had not received any promote social research and democracy. This funding, donations in support of its campaign, since the which was paid in March and May 2001, was sufficient to contributions that support the fund are less than the cover Charter 88’s £154,144 spending on its ‘Unlocking reporting threshold for individual donations. £772,016 of Democracy’ campaign. The campaign covered Unison’s expenditure was spent on national advertising, England alone. featuring a billboard campaign and a series of adverts across the national press. Compliance reviews revealed that Charter 88 had incurred £13,292 of expenditure prior to registering as a third party, in After Unison, the other high-spending recognised third excess of the allowed limit of £10,000. The Commission parties were Charter 88, an organisation committed to wrote to the organisation to advise them of the law, but promoting constitutional reform, and the Democracy decided not to take further action on this occasion. Movement, an organisation campaigning against the single European currency. These two organisations are both The Democracy Movement took an actively political role in examples of organisations that took the view that they might the campaign, spending £103,300. The organisation be caught by PPERA as their campaigns featured a targeted individual sitting MPs who support the introduction distinctly political message. of the euro in the UK, taking advantage of amended

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 29

legislation that allows third parties at constituency level to spend up to £500 in backing or disparaging an individual candidate.

The returns submitted by third parties are not required to report expenditure by type, but the invoices and receipts submitted in support of the return indicate quite clearly the traditional campaigning methods in which the Democracy Movement was engaged at local level: invoices show that the organisation produced numerous leaflets and newspapers for delivery in various parts of Britain. In addition, the return includes invoices for newspaper adverts, for PR work on a ‘Keep the Power’ campaign, as well as for local distribution of unsolicited materials.

The activities of the Yes Campaign, South Molton Declaration, and Campaign for an Independent Britain during the regulated period were less clear, although they appear to be concerned with the UK’s relationship with Europe and/or the single currency. The Yes Campaign’s return indicated that it had incurred £404 of expenditure before registering with the Commission, but just £185 after that date, and had received donations worth £668. The Campaign for an Independent Britain received donations of £1,550, spending just short of £1,700 across the UK. The organisation’s expenditure would appear to be connected to a public meeting and a general election manifesto. The South Molton Declaration, a small organisation that campaigns on a pro-Britain platform, incurred the bulk of its total of £20,915 expenditure on large-scale advertisements in the national press.

Tacticalvoter.Net Limited spent £4,615 on a campaign to encourage tactical voting. The return indicates that some of this expenditure was on printing, and various administrative costs. Finally, the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children submitted a return stating that it had incurred £61,452 prior to registering as a recognised third party. Compliance reviews confirmed that this was controlled expenditure, since the organisation had run billboard and magazine advertising campaigns. The Commission therefore wrote to the organisation to advise it of the law, but decided not to take further action on this occasion.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 30 Campaign expenditure by candidates

Following a parliamentary election Under RPA 1983, candidates’ election expenses at the 2001 general election were defined as ‘expenses incurred, and within 35 days after the whether before, during or after the election, on account of or declaration of the result, the agent of in respect of the conduct or management of the election.’19 A more detailed description of the items that might fall within each candidate must submit a the definition of election expenses is given below. At a complete statement of election parliamentary general election, a candidate’s election expenses relate only to his or her expenses in a particular campaign expenses to the returning constituency, and do not cover expenses incurred in officer for the constituency in which promoting a party in a particular part or parts of the UK.20 the candidate stood, together with a Upon receipt of a candidate’s expenses return, the declaration by the candidate verifying Returning Officer must supply a copy of the return to The Electoral Commission, and make it available for public the return. For most constituencies at inspection for the next two years. The Returning Officer must the 2001 general election, that date also publish a notice of election expenses returns for the constituency, including details of any candidates failing to 18 was 13 July 2001. submit a return, in at least two local newspapers. Any person may exercise the right to inspect the returns.

Prior to the implementation of Schedule 18 of PPERA on 1 July 2001, the form of the return to be submitted by candidates was prescribed by RPA 1983, and included a number of separate headings giving details of certain categories of expenditure. Since 1 July 2001, The Electoral Commission may prescribe a form of return for election expenses (Section 81 (10A) of RPA 1983), although candidates and agents are under no legal obligation to use the prescribed form.

The Electoral Commission asked Returning Officers to complete a separate form detailing the expenses of 18 Assuming the result was declared after midnight on 7 June 2001. candidates in each constituency. With the assistance of a For those constituencies where the result was declared before team led by Professors Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher midnight on 7 June, the last day for the return of election expenses at the University of Plymouth, we have collated the was 12 July 2001. information in these forms. The main table of candidates’ 19 Section 118 RPA 1983. 20 The campaign expenditure returns of registered political parties at the expenses expenses (Table 14 page 99) details the total 2001 general election are detailed earlier in this report. amount spent by each candidate in their election campaign. 21 Reports of election expences were previously published jointly by the These election expenses are categorised under the Home Office, Scottish Office and Northern Ireland Office.The report of headings which were specified in the form required by RPA the May 1997 general election was published by the Stationery Office in February 1999. 1983, and which have been published in previous election expenses reports.21

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 31

Under electoral law, there are a number of offences him or her conforms to the requirements of electoral law pertaining to non-compliance with the legal requirements relating to candidates expenses as set out in RPA 1983. relating to election expenses. Failure to submit a return Equally, it is not his or her responsibility to initiate within the given time period is an illegal practice.22 proceedings against any candidate who appears to Knowingly incurring election expenses in excess of the have contravened the legal requirements relating to statutory maximum limit is also an illegal practice.23 An illegal election expenses. PPERA now gives The Electoral practice is an offence under the criminal law as well as an Commission a statutory role in monitoring compliance act that has consequences under electoral law, and a with the RPA requirements. person convicted of an illegal practice may be penalised by a fine, disqualified from standing as a candidate or acting Prescribed limits on spending as an election agent, and the election may be declared void. Knowingly making a false declaration as to election Each candidate is allowed to incur expenses up to a expenses is a corrupt practice,24 and is also an offence prescribed limit during his or her election campaign, under the Perjury Act 1911.25 A person convicted of a although his or her agent must make all payments. corrupt practice may be fined, but may also be imprisoned. Expenses subject to this legal limit include payments for He or she may be disqualified from standing as a candidate agents, clerks, printing and publicity, public meetings and or acting as an election agent, and the election may be committee rooms, and are discussed in more detail below. declared void. However, the legal limit is not required to cover the candidate’s personal expenses, which include such things The outcome of a parliamentary constituency election may as reasonable travelling expenses or the cost of living in be challenged on the grounds of corrupt or illegal practices hotels or elsewhere during the election. A candidate at a in connection with election expenses. The mechanism is the parliamentary election may incur personal expenses to any issue of an election petition, which can be made by a voter amount, although any expenditure over £600 must be paid at that election or a voter who had the right to vote in it, or by the candidate’s agent. A statement of the candidate’s by an unsuccessful candidate or an alleged candidate. An personal expenses must be sent to his or her agent within election petition alleging corrupt or illegal practices in 21 days of the declaration of the result of the election. connection with election expenses must be made within 21 days after the tenth day after the end of the time allowed for The statutory maximum limit for candidates’ election the delivery of candidates’ election expenses returns.26 At a expenses is calculated separately for each constituency, parliamentary election, the petition is tried by two High Court and is based on a formula that takes into account the size Judges of the Queen’s Bench Division, and will usually take and nature of each individual constituency. The prescribed place in the constituency. The election court may confirm limit is revised periodically by Parliament, usually before the result of the election, substitute another candidate as each general election, in order to take account of the rate of the member, or order the election to be re-run. inflation since the previous election.

An allegation of a corrupt or illegal practice may also be In 2001, this limit was determined in the following way: prosecuted through the judicial system. The Director of (a) for county constituencies (mainly rural in nature), Public Prosecutions may give authority to the police or the candidates were allowed to spend 6.2 pence for every Crown Prosecution Service to prosecute a candidate or agent for offences contrary to the provisions of RPA 1983. 22 Section 84 RPA 1983. 23 Section 76(1B) RPA 1983. 24 Section 82(6) RPA 1983. It is important to note that the Returning Officer is under no 25 Section 5(b) Perjury Act 1911. obligation to check that any expenses return received by 26 See footnote 17.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 32

entry in the register of electors to be used in the election, • Public meetings plus a further £5,483; The expenses of holding meetings during the election, including payments to speakers. (b) for borough constituencies (primarily urban and some suburban areas), the limit was 4.6 pence for every • Committee rooms elector, plus a further £5,483.27 Expenses relating to the hire of committee rooms for use during the election. In 2001, the average size of a constituency was just over • Miscellaneous matters 67,000 electors. In a county constituency of this size, each All other expenditure in respect of miscellaneous matters candidate would be allowed to spend up to about £9,640. In not separately specified. a borough constituency, the limit would be £8,565. However, given the actual variation in size of the constituencies, the prescribed limit in county constituencies ranged from £6,846 Spending by candidates to £11,957, while in borough constituencies the expenses The total number of candidates contesting seats at the 2001 limit ranged from £7,630 to £9,461. general election was 3,319 – 381 fewer than the number at the previous general election in May 1997. We have received Election expenses the election expenses returns for 3,291 candidates, and the figures in this report are based on those returns. As noted earlier, candidates’ election expenses at the 2001 general election were defined as expenses incurred before, A total of 28 candidates were reported to us as not having during or after an election on account of or in respect of the submitted a declaration of their election expenses to the conduct or management of the election. The specified form Returning Officer for the constituency in which they stood, of return had previously provided some guidance in and they are listed in Appendix 6 to this report. Following identifying what might constitute such expenses, setting out the election, Returning Officers published notices of various items that were clearly election expenses. However, candidates’ election expenses returns and wrote to all these categories, which are listed below, were by no means election agents, including those of candidates who had considered exhaustive, and all items of expenditure would failed to submit an expenses return. A number of Returning continue to be judged against the statutory definition Officers also wrote directly to agents of candidates who had mentioned above. failed to submit an expenses return notifying them of their • Agents legal responsibilities. The Commission has decided not to Fees paid to election agents, sub-agents and polling take any action against these individuals but will consider agents for their duties at the election. what action might be appropriate in the future, in the event of failure to submit returns. • Clerks, etc. Payment for clerks and messengers during the election. In total, the expenditure declared by candidates (excluding • Printing, stationery, etc. personal expenses) was just under £11.9 million. In real The expenses of printing, advertising and stationery, terms, therefore, the total amount spent by candidates at including issuing and distributing addresses and notices. the 2001 general election was almost 17% down on the While the return does not mention expenditure in amount spent in 1997. relation to the use of telephones, faxes and the internet, they would reasonably fall to be included in a return of election expenses, and have been included in this category. 27 Representation of the People (Variation of Limits of Candidates’ Election Expenses) Order 2001. Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 33

Table 7: Candidates’ election expenses at Parliamentary general elections, 1945 – 2001

Parliamentary Number of Number of Number of Personal Total expenses Average elections electors constituencies candidates expenses subject to expenditure (£) legal maximum (£) per candidate (£) 1945, 5 July 33,240,391 640 1,683 63,690 1,009,256 600 1950, 23 February 34,412,255 625 1,868 64,032 1,106,092 592 1951, 25 October 34,919,331 625 1,376 51,150 894,868 650 1955, 26 May 34,852,179 630 1,409 52,257 852,420 605 1959, 8 October 35,397,304 630 1,536 61,008 990,211 645 1964, 15 October 35,894,054 630 1,757 70,626 1,158,577 659 1966, 31 March 35,957,245 630 1,707 66,136 1,070,746 627 1970, 18 June 39,344,798 630 1,837 73,184 1,392,796 758 1974, 28 February 40,255,805 635 2,135 87,747 2,008,660 941 1974, 10 October 40,255,611 635 2,252 92,714 2,168,514 963 1979, 3 May 41,572,574 635 2,576 131,817 3,557,441 1,381 1983, 9 June 42,703,516 650 2,578 169,469 6,145,463 2,384 1987, 11 June 43,665,985 650 2,325 266,547 8,039,174 3,458 1992, 9 April 43,718,660 651 2,948 345,739 10,433,407 3,539 1997, 1 May 44,223,866 659 3,724 415,754 12,929,207 3,472 2001, 7 June 44,403,238 659 3,319 306,560 11,885,785 3,581

The average amount spent per candidate in 2001 was £3,581. However, the variation in the amount spent by candidates was significant. Over the whole of the UK, 702 candidates (21% of all candidates) spent more than 80% of the permitted maximum in their constituency, while 1,761 candidates (53%) spent less than 30%, including 105 (3%) who declared no election expenditure.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 34

Table 8: Candidates’ election expenses, by nation, June 2001

Personal† Agents Clerks Printing Meetings Committee Misc. Total expenses (£) (£) (£) (£) (£) (£) subject to legal maximum (£) England 247,694.69 257,815.74 87,114.93 8,057,963.82 52,560.83 272,532.44 793,293.14 9,521,280.90 Wales 22,813.29 9,836.35 5,520.63 623,698.65 3,262.24 26,312.44 81,820.00 750,935.19 * Scotland 30,177.40 20,988.50 8,008.80 1,000,182.59 7,308.72 56,437.40 93,958.88 1,186,884.89 Northern Ireland 5,874.87 1,100.00 - 394,984.59 505.26 1,372.00 28,722.41 426,684.26 United Kingdom 306,560.25 289,740.59 100,644.36 10,076,829.65 63,637.05 356,654.28 997,794.43 11,885,785.24 *

Note: † Not included in total expenses. * Total includes an extra £484.88. One candidate declared only the total amount spent, without giving detailed figures under the prescribed headings.

A total of seven candidates declared expenses totalling Spending patterns by nation more than the maximum amount for their constituency, and they are also listed in Appendix 6 to this report. Any The pattern of spending was broadly similar across the UK, candidate or agent knowingly incurring election expenses in with the exception of Northern Ireland. Candidates excess of the statutory maximum limit commits an illegal contesting constituencies in Northern Ireland spent an practice. Relief may be obtained by the candidate or his/her average of £4,267 (£686 more than the average for the UK agent against the consequences of acts in which they have as a whole). Only six candidates in Northern Ireland (6% of not participated, or which are merely due to inadvertence.28 the overall total) spent less than 10% of the legal maximum, In particular, relief has previously been granted in compared to an overall UK figure of 903 candidates (27% of circumstances where the legal maximum expenses limit was the total). Nevertheless, they were just as likely to spend exceeded owing to a miscalculation of the number of close to the permitted maximum in their constituencies as electors, or where the agent or candidate calculated the candidates elsewhere in the UK, with 22 candidates (22% of limit as a county constituency when it was actually a the overall total) spending more than 80% of the borough constituency. legal maximum.

The Commission has been in contact with these seven Conversely, candidates in Scotland were less likely to spend candidates (see Appendix 6) and has decided not to take close to the permitted maximum in their constituencies, with any action against them. However, it will consider what only 53 candidates (13% of the overall total) spending more action might be appropriate in similar circumstances in than 80% of the legal maximum, compared to an overall UK the future. figure of 21%. The overall average expenditure for candidates in Scottish constituencies was £2,916, some £665 less than the average for the UK as a whole. Spending by candidates contesting seats in Wales broadly mirrored those in England, and the UK as a whole.

28 Section 167 RPA 1983.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 35

Table 9: All candidates, by percentage of permitted maximum spent, by nation, June 2001

Number of candidates Not declared 0 0-10% 10-20% 20-30% 30-40% 40-50% 50-60% 60-70% 70-80% 80-90% 90-100% 100%+ TOTAL England 25 79 627 431 220 170 123 109 102 125 189 382 6 2,588 Wales 1 7 55 43 17 17 11 8 5 10 20 30 - 224 Scotland 2 19 112 68 41 27 15 20 19 31 17 35 1 407 Northern Ireland - - 6 23 13 9 9 9 1 8 7 15 - 100 United Kingdom 28 105 800 565 291 223 158 146 127 174 233 462 7 3,319 (percentage of 1 3 24 17 9 7 5 4 4 5 7 14 0 100 all candidates)

Spending patterns by party affiliation In contrast, candidates representing the larger political parties were more likely to spend a higher proportion of the As might be expected, candidates representing the larger, permitted amount on their campaign: more established political parties spent more than those from minor parties or independent candidates. In total, • Only 17% of candidates representing the four largest candidates representing the six parties which each fielded parties spent less than 10% of the maximum permitted more than 100 candidates spent some £10,498,055, while amount. candidates from the 73 smaller parties spent a total of • 45% of candidates representing the four largest parties 29 £1,214,042. Independent candidates, or candidates who spent more than 50% of the maximum permitted amount. stood with no description, spent a total of £173,689. Candidates from the four parties fielding the largest number • 28% of candidates representing the four largest parties of candidates (Labour, the Conservatives, the Liberal spent more than 80% of the maximum permitted amount, Democrats and the UK Independence Party) also spent a compared to an overall average for the UK of 21%. greater proportion of the overall UK total expenditure. While 71% of all candidates at the 2001 general election stood as Of the four parties fielding the largest number of candidates, representatives of these four parties, their campaign those representing the Labour and Conservative parties expenditure accounted for just over 87% of the total were again much more likely to spend close to the legal amount spent by candidates. maximum in their constituencies than rival candidates from the Liberal Democrats or the UK Independence Party: Many independent candidates and candidates from the • 37% of Conservative candidates and 23% of Labour smaller parties spent very little on their campaigns: candidates spent more than 90% of the maximum • Just over half of independent candidates and those who permitted amount, whereas 9% of Liberal Democrat stood without a description spent less than 10% of the candidates and only one candidate representing the UK maximum permitted amount. Independence Party spent such a high proportion of the legal maximum. • Only 8% of independent candidates and those who stood without a description spent more than 50% of the 29 Candidates who stood for the Conservative Party in Great Britain and maximum permitted amount. Northern Ireland have been treated as standing for the same party.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 36

• 70% of Conservative candidates and 68% of Labour • The average amount spent by candidates from these five candidates spent more than 50% of the maximum parties ranged from £2,348 by Alliance Party candidates permitted amount. In contrast, 52% of Liberal Democrats to £6,313 by Ulster Unionist candidates. and 83% of UK Independence Party candidates spent • Only 10% of candidates representing the Alliance Party less than 20% of the maximum permitted amount. spent more than 50% of the legal maximum, while 50% of Democratic Unionist candidates and 41% of Ulster In Wales and Scotland, candidates representing Plaid Unionist candidates spent more than 80% of the Cymru and the Scottish National Party were also less likely maximum permitted amount. to spend close to the legal maximum: • Only 10% of Plaid Cymru candidates and 4% of SNP Candidates representing the smaller Alliance Party were candidates spent more than 90% of the maximum more likely to spend a smaller proportion of the permitted permitted amount in their constituencies. maximum in their constituency than their opponents from the larger parties: • 68% of Plaid Cymru candidates and 69% of SNP candidates spent less than 50% of the maximum • 40% of Alliance Party candidates spent less than 20% of permitted amount. the maximum permitted amount in respect of their campaigns, compared to only 6% of Ulster Unionist In Northern Ireland, spending by candidates representing candidates and 7% of Democratic Unionist candidates. the five parties contesting the largest number of • 33% of SDLP candidates and 22% of Sinn Fein constituencies (the Alliance Party of Northern Ireland, the candidates spent less than 20% of the maximum Democratic Unionist Party, the Social Democratic and permitted amount. Labour Party, Sinn Fein and the Ulster Unionist Party) did not follow any clearly defined pattern:

Table 10: All candidates, by percentage of permitted maximum spent, by party, June 2001

Number of candidates Not declared 0 0-10% 10-20% 20-30% 30-40% 40-50% 50-60% 60-70% 70-80% 80-90% 90-100% 100%+ TOTAL AC ---1------1 AL ---1------1 APNI - - - 4 3 1 1 - 1 - - - - 10 Bean - - 1 ------1 BNP -12551-1------33 CD --1------1 Ch --1------1 Comm - - 1 4 1 ------6 Con 1 1 2584343422927581042314643 Country - - - 1 ------1

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 37

Table 10: All candidates, by percentage of permitted maximum spent, by party, June 2001 (continued)

Number of candidates Not declared 0 0-10% 10-20% 20-30% 30-40% 40-50% 50-60% 60-70% 70-80% 80-90% 90-100% 100%+ TOTAL CPA ----1------1 Cust - - 1 ------1 DUP - - - 1 1 2 2 1 - - 3 4 - 14 DW --1------1 EC --1------1 Elvis - - 1 ------1 FDP -1------1 FP -3------3 Grey - - - 1 ------1 Grn - 5 113 19 3 1 ------141 Ind 7164424134 - 4 - 1 2 2 -117 IOW - - 1 ------1 JLDP - 1 ------1 JP ---1------1 JWP ---1------1 KHHC ------1 ------1 LA ------1----- 1 Lab - - 230616154517270911453640 LCA2-101------13 LD - 71441797253293219212360-639 LE ---1------1 Lib - 2 6 4 - - 1 1 - - - - - 14 LP ---1------1 M --4------4 Marx - - - - 1 ------1 MK --21------3 MRLP 1 6 8 ------15 NBP1------1 NF 32------5

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 38

Table 10: All candidates, by percentage of permitted maximum spent, by party, June 2001 (continued)

Number of candidates Not declared 0 0-10% 10-20% 20-30% 30-40% 40-50% 50-60% 60-70% 70-80% 80-90% 90-100% 100%+ TOTAL NIU ------2------2 NIWC ------1 ------1 NPT --1------1 Pac ----1------1 PC ---114844--54-40 PD -----1------1 PEC ------1----- 1 Pens------1------1 PJP ----1----2--- 3 PL -22654------37 Prog U - - - 2 ------2 Ref 1111---1----- 5 RM --1------1 RRL114--1------7 RUK --1------1 S Alt ----2------2 SA 3 - 14 39 13 14 5 3 1 - - - - 92 Sc Grn--13------4 Sc Ref1------1 SDLP - - - 6 3 - - - - 4 2 3 - 18 SF - -1343 -2 -212 -18 SL 22677711------114 SNP ---1318136649-3-72 Speaker ------1 - - 1 SSP11654------1-72 St --1------1 SU ---11------2 Tatton - - - - 1 ------1 Tr ----1------1

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 39

Table 10: All candidates, by percentage of permitted maximum spent, by party, June 2001 (continued)

Number of candidates Not declared 0 0-10% 10-20% 20-30% 30-40% 40-50% 50-60% 60-70% 70-80% 80-90% 90-100% 100%+ TOTAL TW --1------1 UKI 3 24 217 116 34 15 6 4 3 5 - - 1 428 UKP - - - 1 ------1 UKU------1--- 1 UPP -1------1 UTW - - 1 ------1 UU - - -11214 -116 -17 Vote --4------4 WP ---6------6 WR 1--1------2 WRP - - 2 4 ------6 WSA-1311------6 no label - 3 10 2 1 - 1 2 - - - - - 19 TOTAL 28 105 800 565 291 223 158 146 127 174 233 462 7 3,319 (see Table 15 for list of party abbreviations)

Marginal constituencies and hands, Wyre Forest, did the successful candidate spend successful candidates less than 50% of the legal maximum. It is interesting to note, however, that the second- and third-placed candidates in Unsurprisingly, candidates contesting marginal seats were the Wyre Forest constituency each spent 96% of the more likely to spend close to the legally permitted legal limit. maximum. For instance, in nine of the Conservative party’s top 10 target marginal seats its candidates spent more than Indeed, successful candidates at the 2001 general election 90% of the maximum permitted amount, and none spent declared generally high levels of expenditure. Of the 659 less than 85% of the maximum amount. The candidates elected candidates in the UK, a total of 412 candidates defending those seats spent between 79% and 99% of the (63%) spent more than 80% of the legal maximum, and legal maximum. 269 (41%) spent over 90%. Only 51 successful candidates (8%) spent less than half of the legally permitted amount, In 26 of the 29 seats that changed hands at the election, the and no winning candidate spent less than 30% of the successful candidate spent more than 80% of the maximum maximum amount. amount. In only one of the constituencies that changed

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 40

Table 11: Elected candidates, by percentage of permitted maximum spent, by party, June 2001

Number of candidates 30-40% 40-50% 50-60% 60-70% 70-80% 80-90% 90-100% 100%+ TOTAL Lab 14 33 33 55 66 79 130 2 412 Con - 2 3 6 23 45 85 2 166 LD - - - 1 2 13 36 - 52 UU-11---4-6 DUP-----23-5 SNP - - 1 1 2 - 1 - 5 PC-----22-4 SF----112-4 SDLP ----1-2-3 KHHC - 1 ------1 Speaker -----1--1 TOTAL 14 37 38 63 95 143 265 4 659

Table 12: Elected candidates, by percentage of permitted maximum spent, by nation, June 2001

Number of candidates 30-40% 40-50% 50-60% 60-70% 70-80% 80-90% 90-100% 100%+ TOTAL England 7 30 32 51 67 114 225 3 529 Wales 4 - 1 3 6 12 14 - 40 Scotland 3 6 4 9 20 14 15 1 72 Northern Ireland - 1 1 - 2 3 11 - 18 United Kingdom 14 37 38 63 95 143 265 4 659 (percentage of all elected candidates) 2 6 6 10 15 22 40 1 100

Spending patterns by category of expenditure publicity, including advertising, printing, publishing and postage or other distribution. Indeed, for about a quarter of As detailed earlier, candidates’ election expenses returns all candidates (842 in total) this was their only expenditure. specified a number of categories of expenditure. From the In contrast, only £63,637 (equivalent to just over half of 1% data contained in these returns, it is possible to draw some of all expenditure) was spent on the hire of meeting rooms conclusions on spending patterns at the 2001 general during the election. Just over 22% of all candidates, 742 in election. Interestingly, some 85% of the total amount total, declared any expenditure in this category. declared by candidates (£10,076,830) was spent on

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 41

The pattern of spending on the various categories of spent consistently high proportions of their total expenditure expenditure was broadly similar across constituencies in on promoting their campaigns, regardless of whether they Great Britain. However, candidates in Northern Ireland represented small or large parties, and smaller party declared a higher proportion of their campaign expenditure candidates were not more likely to spend smaller amounts on printing and publicity. Of the total amount spent in in percentage terms on advertising and printing. Non-party Northern Ireland 93% was in relation to publicity, in candidates were also just as likely to allocate a high comparison with an overall UK proportion of 85% of the proportion of their total expenditure to publicity as total amount. As a consequence of this, candidates in candidates representing registered political parties, with Northern Ireland allocated a smaller proportion of their publicity accounting for some 88% of the total amount spent expenses to the other categories of expenditure than their by independent candidates and those who stood without a counterparts in constituencies in Great Britain. description.

Likewise, the pattern of expenditure varied little between Fewer than half of all candidates, 1,390 in total, declared candidates representing different political parties. As personal expenses. The total amount of personal expenses highlighted earlier, publicity was the largest category of declared was some £306,560, and the average expenditure expenditure for most candidates. For 2,504 candidates (just of those candidates who declared personal expenses was over 75% of all candidates) publicity and printing accounted just over £220, up from £110 in 1997. for more than 80% of their total expenditure. Candidates

Table 13: Candidates’ election expenses, by party, June 2001

Personal† Agents Clerks Printing Meetings Committee Misc Total expenses (£) (£) (£) (£) (£) (£) (£) subject to legal maximum (£) AC - - - 1,351.75 - - - 1,351.75 AL---900.00---900.00 APNI - - - 19,310.68 - 97.00 4,069.45 23,477.13 Bean - - - 20.00 - - 30.00 50.00 BNP 305.00 - - 22,620.46 25.00 - 2,004.02 24,649.48 CD 500.00 - - 768.00 - - - 768.00 Ch---353.00---353.00 Comm 1,298.50 60.00 - 7,027.14 169.00 60.00 351.78 7,667.92 Con 118,503.43 241,968.27 85,198.42 3,387,363.78 17,607.19 104,255.67 313,372.59 4,149,765.92 Country 143.87 - - 944.14 - - - 944.14 CPA - - - 1,782.00 - - 412.00 2,194.00 Cust 500.00 - - 375.14 - - - 375.14 DUP 243.30 100.00 - 71,662.03 - 520.00 10,623.39 82,905.42 DW---660.00---660.00

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 42

Table 13: Candidates’ election expenses, by party, June 2001 (continued)

Personal† Agents Clerks Printing Meetings Committee Misc. Total expenses (£) (£) (£) (£) (£) (£) (£) subject to legal maximum (£) EC - - - 250.00 - - 650.00 900.00 Elvis - - - 103.94 - - - 103.94 FDP------FP------Grey 65.73 - - 1,724.43 - - - 1,724.43 Grn 2,490.05 920.00 - 79,250.73 963.39 746.50 8,103.45 89,984.07 Ind 11,450.29 5,625.54 - 131,093.67 1,329.77 2,564.38 10,648.42 151,746.66* IOW 1,274.00 - - 482.97 - - 235.94 718.91 JLDP 500.00 ------JP - - - 442.12 - - 500.00 942.12 JWP - - - 1,326.50 - 15.00 162.85 1,504.35 KHHC 315.91 - - 4,165.54 184.50 300.00 222.25 4,872.29 LA - - - 4,267.92 270.00 - 158.46 4,696.38 Lab 55,964.99 15,525.82 6,879.16 3,089,027.81 12,059.05 183,317.38 443,414.09 3,750,223.31 LCA 2,245.50 23.00 - 5,623.66 30.00 10.00 2,094.28 7,780.94 LD 47,599.01 13,424.43 8,388.13 1,785,829.04 9,976.66 33,120.59 84,551.55 1,935,290.40 LE - - - 1,597.80 - - 191.50 1,789.30 Lib 97.50 - - 16,102.30 - 6.43 591.83 16,700.56 LP 17.50 - - 1,139.20 - - 31.19 1,170.39 M - - - 1,812.80 - - - 1,812.80 Marx - - - 1,282.99 143.00 - 340.00 1,765.99 MK - 15.00 - 3,002.80 - - 563.00 3,580.80 MRLP 21.73 - 6.15 1,590.30 - - 705.69 2,302.14 NBP------NF------NIU 179.88 - - 8,027.56 - - 113.47 8,141.03 NIWC 38.00 - - 3,253.85 80.00 - - 3,333.85 NPT - - - 811.55 - - 6.00 817.55 Pac - - - 2,097.63 - - 715.50 2,813.13 PC 1,849.17 104.55 - 144,426.97 1,002.52 2,774.02 5,043.45 153,351.51

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 43

Table 13: Candidates’ election expenses, by party, June 2001 (continued)

Personal† Agents Clerks Printing Meetings Committee Misc. Total expenses (£) (£) (£) (£) (£) (£) (£) subject to legal maximum (£) PD - - - 3,409.00 - - 7.97 3,416.97 PEC 150.00 - - 4,877.37 - - 51.50 4,928.87 Pens - - - 4,686.49 - - - 4,686.49 PJP 6,150.00 - - 11,204.82 1,320.00 - 2,992.81 15,517.63 PL 1,511.60 63.75 - 21,968.77 52.78 - 2,813.89 24,899.19 Prog U - - - 1,976.00 - - - 1,976.00 Ref 650.00 - - 4,564.00 - 400.00 558.94 5,522.94 RM---508.42---508.42 RRL 30.69 - - 1,191.18 - - 2,811.98 4,003.16 RUK - - - 649.62 - - 26.81 676.43 S Alt 350.00 - - 2,755.48 401.00 - 571.83 3,728.31 SA 4,187.32 1,102.00 - 141,433.86 7,907.40 3,034.04 14,761.31 168,238.61 Sc Grn 234.56 - - 3,474.72 - - 552.07 4,026.79 Sc Ref------SDLP 1,007.00 - - 83,242.28 - 156.00 1,594.85 84,993.13 SF - - - 72,056.38 425.26 - 1,291.14 73,772.78 SL 2,070.63 - - 37,985.75 458.00 50.00 4,075.77 42,569.52 SNP 1,992.41 213.60 - 220,002.35 2,518.89 15,289.70 12,659.64 250,684.18 Speaker 80.00 200.00 - 6,229.77 141.00 - 385.00 6,955.77 SSP 102.50 16.00 12.50 37,390.12 476.79 452.91 3,524.25 41,872.57 St 68.00 - - 15.00 - - 5.00 20.00 SU - - - 2,851.50 - - - 2,851.50 Tatton - - - 2,172.46 - - - 2,172.46 Tr - - - 1,000.00 - - 1,000.00 2,000.00 TW---700.00---700.00 UKI 35,025.76 9,378.63 10.00 461,273.69 5,748.44 7,479.51 46,331.66 530,221.93 UKP - - 150.00 1,115.00 - - 500.00 1,765.00 UKU 550.00 - - 5,585.00 - - 1,617.77 7,202.77 UPP------UTW---565.28---565.28

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 44

Table 13: Candidates’ election expenses, by party, June 2001 (continued)

Personal† Agents Clerks Printing Meetings Committee Misc. Total expenses (£) (£) (£) (£) (£) (£) (£) subject to legal maximum (£) UU 2,123.69 1,000.00 - 97,436.17 - 399.00 8,490.59 107,325.76 Vote 1,733.00 - - 1,145.00 - - 70.40 1,215.40 WP - - - 8,223.80 - - - 8,223.80 WR - - - 1,398.00 - - 231.94 1,629.94 WRP 525.00 - - 4,960.22 210.45 954.65 21.91 6,147.23 WSA - - - 3,985.35 15.00 116.50 578.90 4,695.75 no label 2,414.73 - - 20,924.60 121.96 535.00 360.35 21,941.91 TOTAL 306,560.25 289,740.59 100,644.36 10,076,829.65 63,637.05 356,654.28 997,794.43 11,885,785.24*

Note: † Not included in total expenses. * Total includes an extra £484.88. One candidate declared only the total amount spent, without giving detailed figures under the prescribed headings. (see Table 15 for list of party abbreviations)

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 45 Conclusions

With the measures introduced by Political parties PPERA, the public, media and The two main parties spent well below the total expenditure limit set for the election. It seems likely that this was a academics have for the first time reflection of a number of factors unrelated to the limit itself. access to detailed campaign That limit has not therefore been tested and it remains to be seen how comfortably the two major parties can live within it expenditure information submitted by in a more closely contested election. parties that contested a UK general Although parties did their best to comply with the new election. A clearer picture emerges of controls, the interpretation and application of the legislation how parties used the funds available proved extremely complex. As a result, it was to be expected that parties would interpret the rules in different to them to fight a general election ways: while all took the view that it was safer to err on the side of caution and remain well within the financial limits and report every possible item of campaign expenditure, it is clear that inconsistencies in the inclusion, calculation and categorisation of campaign expenditure occurred across parties. The Commission will work with parties to resolve these issues ahead of the next elections at which campaign expenditure controls will apply: the 2003 elections to the devolved legislatures.

A further factor preventing a full assessment of the new legislation at this stage is the fact that we have yet to see parties manage campaign expenditure over an entire 365- day regulated period. The difficulty for parties is, of course, that elections to Westminster are not fixed and parties do not know when the 365-day period begins. It can only be calculated retrospectively once the Prime Minister announces the date of the election. Parties have, effectively, to keep continuous records of any campaign spending (including for local elections, since such expenditure also counts against the national limit if it falls within the regulated period) so that they are able to calculate how much of the spending limit remains for the election itself. It remains to be seen how this works in practice.

Also, at future general elections parties will have to take account of the fact that PPERA specifically provides for campaign expenditure incurred before the regulated period (but used during it) to count against a party’s expenditure

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 46

limit, a factor which was complicated and not consistently election, the Commission intends to review the impact of applied at the 2001 election because of the fact that the PPERA on third parties as part of our wider review of legislation had not been in place before February 2001. legislation and practice (see below).

At present, we have little insight into how much of a party’s A further aspect of the legislation that merits review is ordinary annual expenditure in a non-election year would be whether or not to require third parties that operate at classified as campaign expenditure during a regulated constituency level to account for their expenditure. PPERA period, although a clearer picture may emerge when parties increased the parliamentary constituency third party submit their annual accounts to The Electoral Commission spending limit from £5 to £500, but did not impose a for inspection.30 Given that the two main parties spent nearly requirement on third parties to account for this expenditure. £11m and over £12.7m in the four months prior to the It seems inconsistent with the aim of introducing financial election, how much they spend in the preceding eight transparency into campaign spending to increase this limit months will be critical if they are not to breach the so substantially without an accompanying requirement for a expenditure limits. spending declaration.

Third parties Candidates’ expenses It is arguable whether PPERA fully achieved its aims with The returns of election expenses submitted by more regard to third parties during the 2001 election. Far fewer than 3,000 candidates provide a comprehensive and third parties registered with the Commission than we had detailed picture of spending patterns at constituency level expected. It is not known whether more organisations at the 2001 general election. The detailed accounts of carried out activities that fell within the scope of PPERA but campaign expenditure have enabled us to draw some failed to register. However, the transparency gained in broad conclusions. respect of the activities of those organisations that did register as recognised third parties is welcomed. Despite A small number of candidates did not feel bound by the the advertisements placed in national newspapers about the legal requirement to submit a return as to their election new rules relating to third parties, it seems doubtful that expenses. While it is possible that many of those candidates these are widely understood among those organisations may not have conducted particularly active campaigns, and that might wish to campaign at an election. The would not have incurred any significant expense, it remains Commission will need to consider what more might be done important that returns are submitted as required, in order to to publicise the new arrangements. We have no reason to provide a complete and transparent record of expenditure believe that they have had the effect of deterring and to allow both opponents and electors to review organisations from campaigning but we recognise that this campaign spending. There is little evidence, however, to will need careful monitoring. suggest that the expenditure limits themselves are impractical or unrealistic. Most candidates spent within the We also recognise that clear guidelines about what limit imposed by Parliament, and many spent little or nothing constitutes election material and controlled expenditure are at all. required to ensure that there is consistency in the interpretation of PPERA by all to achieve the transparency 30 Part III of PPERA, which requires that registered parties submit their that the Act envisaged. We need in particular to look at any annual accounts to The Electoral Commission for inspection, came into force on 1 January 2002. The first annual accounts, which must be possible conflict with the legislation governing organisations audited for parties whose accounts are of more than £250,000, will with charitable status. As stated in our report on the general therefore be submitted during 2003.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 47

Nevertheless, it is clear that some of the headings under Amendments to RPA 1983 also provide for benefits in kind which expenses are declared are no longer clear or relevant (i.e. notional expenditure) given to candidates to be to modern campaign methods, and do not allow for a more regarded as election expenses, bringing the classification of detailed breakdown of how expenditure was incurred. Over candidates’ expenses into line with that of party campaign 80% of all expenditure at the 2001 general election was expenditure. Goods or services supplied to candidates free declared within a single category, encompassing all printing, of charge or at a discount of more than 10% from normal stationery and publicity costs. The degree of transparency commercial terms must now be declared in the candidate’s provided by the declaration of candidates’ expenses may election expenses at the market value for the use of the be compromised if the great majority of expenditure property or goods.33 declared is categorised under a single heading. The new provisions also regulate donations to candidates, We also note that there was confusion, in some instances, so that candidates may now only accept donations of more regarding the correct legal limit for candidates’ election than £50 made for the purpose of meeting election expenses. While it is clearly the duty of the individual expenses if they are from a permissible donor.34 These must candidate and his or her agent to ensure that they are fully also be reported. aware of the correct limit, some additional guidance on calculating that figure may assist candidates, agents and PPERA also provided for The Electoral Commission to returning officers. We intend to issue further advice to prescribe a new form of return for candidates’ election returning officers on best practice in calculating the expenses.35 A draft election expenses return form (CEER02) maximum expenses limit and on disseminating that was placed on the Commission’s website in March 2002, information to candidates and agents. for use at the May 2002 English local elections. The Commission intends to introduce a new form following As detailed previously in this report, the legislation feedback from these elections, which will more accurately governing candidates’ election expenses has changed reflect the true pattern of spending by candidates for since the general election of 2001. PPERA included a future elections. number of provisions amending the relevant legislation, bringing the treatment of individual candidates’ expenses Future work programme and donations more closely into line with the new controls on party campaign expenditure. The Commission recognises that more detailed guidance is required for both parties and candidates on the new The new provisions, which came into force on 1 July 2001, legislation regulating expenditure. Our analysis of the have clarified the definition of election expenses, and the campaign expenditure returns for the 2001 general election, meaning of a ‘candidate’ in relation to election expenses. In on which this report is based, will inform our work on the particular, expenditure must now be regarded as an election production of additional information for parties on complying expense if it is used for the purposes of a candidate’s with the legislation on campaign expenditure. In addition, election after the date on which he/she becomes a candidate, regardless of when the expenditure was actually incurred.31 Importantly, the changes have also amended the 31 Section 90A RPA 1983, as inserted by Section 134(1) PPERA 2000. definition of a candidate within electoral law to more clearly 32 Section 118A RPA 1983, as inserted by Section 135(1) PPERA 2000. 33 Section 90C RPA 1983, as inserted by Section 134(1) PPERA 2000. specify the date on which a person becomes 34 Schedule 2A RPA 1983, as inserted by Schedule 16 PPERA 2000. a candidate.32 35 Section 81 (10A) RPA 1983, as inserted by Schedule 18 PPERA 2000.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 48

the Commission intends to use the experience of the new legislation governing candidates’ expenses at the English local elections in May 2002 as a basis for the production of a guidance document for candidates.

Finally, The Electoral Commission also intends to consider a number of policy issues that have arisen from the review of expenditure at the 2001 election, and indeed from the introduction of PPERA in general. The expenditure returns identified the significance of the parties’ spending on party broadcasts and advertising, and the Commission is currently conducting a review of party election broadcasts; in the longer term, it will run a project to consider the case for a code on political advertising. The Commission has also begun a project looking at the wider impact of PPERA as a whole. Amongst other things, this project will consider the effect of PPERA on small parties, since the campaign expenditure returns indicated the differences in the resources and activities of different sized parties, and raised the issue of whether it is productive for all parties to be subject to the same controls.

The full programme of reviews are described in the Commission’s Corporate Plan 2002-2006 which can be viewed on our website, www.electoralcommission.org.uk.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 49 Appendix 1 – List of parties

Parties that contested the 2001 general Liberal Democrats election in Northern Ireland Liberal Party Alliance Party of Northern Ireland Liberated Party Conservative and Unionist Party Lower Excise Duty Party Democratic Unionist Party Marxist Party Northern Ireland Unionist Party Mebyon Kernow – The Party for Cornwall Northern Ireland Women's Coalition Muslim Party Progressive Unionist Party of Northern Ireland National Front Social Democratic and Labour Party Neath-Port Talbot Ratepayers Association Sinn Fein New Britain Ulster Third Way New Millennium Bean Party Ulster Unionist Party Official Monster Raving Loony Party United Kingdom Unionist Party Pacifist Party – Peace Vote For Yourself Pensioner Coalition Workers’ Party People's Choice! Exclusively for All People's Justice Party Plaid Cymru – Party of Wales Parties that contested the 2001 general Pro Euro Conservative Party election in Great Britain Progressive Democratic Party Anti-Corruption Forum ProLife Alliance Asian League Reform 2000 Party British National Party Reform UK Party Christian Democratic Party Residents and Motorists of Great Britain Christian Peoples Alliance Rock 'N Roll Loony Party Church of the Militant Elvis Party Scottish Freedom Referendum Party Co-operative Party Scottish Green Party Communist Party of Britain Scottish National Party Conservative and Unionist Party Scottish Socialist Party Countryside Party Scottish Unionist Party Defend The Welfare State Against Blairism Socialist Alliance Direct Customer Service Party Socialist Alternative Extinction Club Socialist Labour Party Fancy Dress Party Stuckist Party Free Party Tatton Group Green Party Truth Party Grey Party Third Way Independent Kidderminster Hospital and Health Concern United Kingdom Independence Party Isle of Wight Party United Kingdom Pathfinders Jam Wrestling Party Unrepresented Peoples Party* John Lilburne Democratic Party Welsh Socialist Alliance Justice Party Wessex Regionalist Party Labour Party Workers Revolutionary Party Left Alliance Legalise Cannabis Alliance * The Unrepresented Peoples Party was the only party that contested the 2001 election that failed to submit an expenditure return. Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 50 Appendix 2 – Information submitted in campaign expenditure return

Breakdown of campaign expenditure reporting • In addition to items of actual and notional expenditure incurred by the party, parties were also required to • Parties were required to report each individual item of submit details of any unpaid or disputed claims for campaign expenditure incurred by the party between 16 payment. The information required comprised: February-7 June 2001, however small. • the name and address of supplier; • Parties contesting the election in more than one part of • the amount of the claim (correctly apportioned Great Britain were required to apportion certain items of between England, Scotland and Wales as expenditure between each of the nations in which the applicable); party fielded candidates. Therefore, although expenditure • the date the expense was incurred and the invoice that related solely to one part of Britain need not be received (unpaid claims); or apportioned (e.g., costs of a rally in Yorkshire), • the date the disputed claim was said to have been expenditure that was incurred on a GB-wide basis (e.g., incurred and the invoice received (disputed claims); a national billboard advertising campaign) was divided • any extra information, such as the reason the claim between each part of Britain on the basis of the number had not been paid, or the grounds for the dispute of candidates being fielded in England, Scotland and with the supplier. Wales. For each individual item of expenditure submitted, whether • For each payment made, parties supplied details of: actual, notional, unpaid or disputed, parties were required to • the name and address of the supplier; specify which category of expenditure the item fell into. The • the date the expense was incurred; categories of expenditure parties could use were: • the date of claim for payment; • party political broadcasts; • the date payment was made; • advertising; • the amount of the item of expenditure (correctly • unsolicited material; apportioned between England, Scotland and Wales • manifestos and other documents; as applicable); • market research; • the category of expenditure to which the payment • press conferences and dealings with the media; could be attributed. • transport; and All payments of more than £200 were required to be • rallies and other events. supported by a receipt or invoice. In addition to listing each item of expenditure incurred by • Parties were also required to submit the following details the party, parties were also required to submit a table in respect of any items of notional expenditure incurred: specifying the amount of expenditure incurred in respect of • the name and address of the supplier; each of the categories listed above, and also the total • the nature of the expense incurred; values of: • the period/date when the expense was incurred; • actual payments made; • the amount of the item of expenditure (correctly • notional expenditure incurred; apportioned between England, Scotland and Wales • unpaid claims; as applicable). • disputed claims. Instead of an invoice or receipt, a declaration of value by the responsible party officer was required for items of notional expenditure of more than £200.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 51

Returns 1-36: campaign expenditure by parties Note: Some returns were amended following compliance checks. The original figures submitted to the Commission are shown in light blue italic. Some rounding errors may occur on reports originally submitted in ££pp

1. The British National Party (revised)

Total expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ Total £ Payments made 0 - 0 0 Payments made 15,498 - 0 15,498 Notional expenditure incurred 0 - 0 0 Unpaid claims 0 - 0 0 Disputed claims 0 - 0 0 TOTAL 0 - 0 0 TOTAL 15,498 - 0 15,498

Number of constituencies contested 32 - 1 33

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts 0 - 0 0 B. Advertising 0 - 0 0 C. Unsolicited material to electors 0 - 0 0 D. Manifesto/party policy document 0 - 0 0 E. Market research/canvassing 0 - 0 0 F. Media 0 - 0 0 G. Transport 0 - 0 0 H. Rallies and other events 0 - 0 0 TOTAL 0 - 0 0

The British National Party initially reported total campaign expenditure of £15,498 on unsolicited material in England. However, compliance reviews revealed all the expenditure reported was candidates’ expenses.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 52

2. Communist Party (revised)

Total expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ Total £ Payments made 4,176 581 857 5,614 Payments made 4,828 305 480 5,613 Notional expenditure incurred 0000 Unpaid claims 0000 Disputed claims 0000 TOTAL 4,176 581 857 5,614 TOTAL 4,828 305 480 5,613

Number of constituencies contested 3126

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts 0000 B. Advertising 610 204 407 1,221 B. Advertising 1220 0 0 1,220 C. Unsolicited material to electors 0000 D. Manifesto/party policy document 3,148 305 305 3,758 E. Market research/canvassing 0000 F. Media 130 43 87 260 F. Media 260 0 0 260 G. Transport 200 0 0 200 H. Rallies and other events 88 29 58 175 H. Rallies and other events 0 0 175 175 TOTAL 4,176 581 857 5,614

No change in the total campaign expenditure reported. However, the allocation of expenditure across England, Scotland and Wales was amended, as items of national expenditure had been allocated solely to England rather than being allocated across Great Britain. The net result is a transfer of expenditure from England of £653 to Scotland (£276) and Wales (£377).

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 53

3. Conservative and Unionist Party (GB) (revised)

Total expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ Total £ Payments made 10,756,915 835,572 405,861 11,998,348 Payments made 10,774,031 835,650 405,882 12,015,563 Notional expenditure incurred 579,107 64,979 36,963 681,049 Notional expenditure incurred 579,086 65,000 36,963 681,049 Unpaid claims 0000 Disputed claims 0 72,416 0 72,416 TOTAL 11,336,022 972,967 442,824 12,751,813 TOTAL 11,353,117 973,067 442,845 12,769,028

Number of constituencies contested 529 71 40 640

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts 500,720 48,983 17,583 567,286 A. Party political broadcasts 501,328 49,490 17,604 568,423 B. Advertising 3,786,974 437,073 185,522 4,409,569 B. Advertising 3,856,686 436,908 185,522 4,479,116 C. Unsolicited material to electors 1,121,314 59,582 35,874 1,216,770 C. Unsolicited material to electors 1,159,555 59,793 35,993 1,255,341 D. Manifesto/party policy document 886,250 79,241 59,714 1,025,205 D. Manifesto/party policy document 960,148 78,998 59,714 1,098,860 E. Market research/canvassing 1,624,870 64,688 27,535 1,717,093 E. Market research/canvassing 1,604,842 63,495 27,416 1,695,754 F. Media 282,241 69,466 4,932 356,639 F. Media 385,198 69,466 4,932 459,597 G. Transport 1,285,083 129,422 72,382 1,486,887 G. Transport 1,268,810 130,404 72,381 1,471,596 H. Rallies and other events 1,848,569 84,512 39,281 1,972,362 H. Rallies and other events 1,616,547 84,512 39,281 1,740,340 TOTAL 11,336,022 972,967 442,824 12,751,813

A total of £17,216 was deducted from the overall campaign expenditure from various categories. This includes £7,300 expenditure incurred in Northern Ireland for which the party subsequently submitted a separate return. The remaining net adjustments included expenditure incurred after the election and expenditure of a routine nature that would have been incurred regardless of whether or not an election was being held.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 54

4. Co-operative Party (original)

Total expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ Total £ Payments made 5,862 1,675 836.00 8,373 Notional expenditure incurred 0000 Unpaid claims 0000 Disputed claims 0000 TOTAL 5,862 1,675 836 8,373

Number of constituencies contested 21 6 2 29

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts 0000 B. Advertising 1,089 311 155 1,555 C. Unsolicited material to electors 0000 D. Manifesto/party policy document 4,773 1,364 681 6,818 E. Market research/canvassing 0000 F. Media 0000 G. Transport 0000 H. Rallies and other events 0000 TOTAL 5,862 1,675 836 8,373

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 55

5. Fancy Dress Party (original)

Total expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ Total £ Payments made 151 - - 151 Notional expenditure incurred 0 - - 0 Unpaid claims 0 - - 0 Disputed claims 0 - - 0 TOTAL 151 - - 151

Number of constituencies contested 1 - - 1

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts 0 - - 0 B. Advertising 0 - - 0 C. Unsolicited material to electors 0 - - 0 D. Manifesto/party policy document 126 - - 126 E. Market research/canvassing 0 - - 0 F. Media 0 - - 0 G. Transport 0 - - 0 H. Rallies and other events 25 - - 25 TOTAL 151 - - 151

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 56

6. Free Party (original)

Total expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ Total £ Payments made 1,632 - - 1,632 Notional expenditure incurred 0 - - 0 Unpaid claims 200 - - 200 Disputed claims 0 - - 0 TOTAL 1,832 - - 1,832

Number of constituencies contested 3 - - 3

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts 0 - - 0 B. Advertising 0 - - 0 C. Unsolicited material to electors 180 - - 180 D. Manifesto/party policy document 0 - - 0 E. Market research/canvassing 0 - - 0 F. Media 0 - - 0 G. Transport 420 - - 420 H. Rallies and other events 1,232 - - 1,232 TOTAL 1,832 - - 1,832

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 57

7. Green Party (revised)

Total expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ Total £ Payments made 40,898 - 1,735 42,633 Payments made 40,203 - 2,923 43,126 Notional expenditure incurred 2,189 - 90.00 2,279 Notional expenditure incurred 1,983 - 138 2,121 Unpaid claims 0 - 0 0 Disputed claims 0 - 0 0 TOTAL 43,087 - 1,825 44,912 TOTAL 42,186 - 3,061 45,247

Number of constituencies contested 135 - 6 141

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts 20,642 - 903 21,545. A. Party political broadcasts 20,489 - 1,549 22,038 B. Advertising 942 - 42 984 B. Advertising 849 - 64 913 C. Unsolicited material to electors 1,879 - 84 1,963 C. Unsolicited material to electors 1,678 - 127 1,805 D. Manifesto/party policy document 16,206 - 649 16,855 D. Manifesto/party policy document 13,898 - 941 14,839 E. Market research/canvassing 0 - 0 0 F. Media 3,046 - 135 3,181 F. Media 2,925 - 221 3,146 G. Transport 372 - 12 384 G. Transport 364 - 20 384 H. Rallies and other events 0 - 0 0 TOTAL 43,087 - 1,825 44,912

Total campaign expenditure was reduced by £335 from the original return. The original return showed £45,247 on analysis by type of expenditure and £43,125 on analysis by category, as the notional expenditure declared had not been included in the analysis of the expenditure across categories. The net adjustments to the campaign expenditure total include an increase in the total notional expenditure by £158, to reflect the additional cost of work not charged for in respect of party documents, and a reduction against PPB by £493 as a result of a duplicate payment being identified.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 58

8. Grey Party (original)

Total expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ Total £ Payments made 244 - - 244 Notional expenditure incurred 0 - - 0 Unpaid claims 0 - - 0 Disputed claims 0 - - 0 TOTAL 244 - - 244

Number of constituencies contested: 1 - - 1

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts 0 B. Advertising 50 - - 50 C. Unsolicited material to electors 0 - - 0 D. Manifesto/party policy document 194 - - 194 E. Market research/canvassing 0 - - 0 F. Media 0 - - 0 G. Transport 0 - - 0 H. Rallies and other events 0 - - 0 TOTAL 244 - - 244

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 59

9. Labour Party (revised)

Total expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ Total £ Payments made 8,990,518 1,108,826 710,730 10,810,074 Payments made 9,455,897 935,652 613,425 11,004,974 Notional expenditure incurred 71,049 4,600 0 75,649 Notional expenditure incurred 71,049 4,600 0 75,649 Unpaid claims 59,396 0 0 59,396 Unpaid claims 59,396 0 0 59,396 Disputed claims 0000 TOTAL 9,120,963 1,113,426 710,730 10,945,119 TOTAL 9,586,342 940,252 613,425 11,140,019

Number of constituencies contested 529 71 40 640

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts 227,544 26,995 18,310 272,849 A. Party political broadcasts 196,687 26,990 18,078 241,755 B. Advertising 4,112,222 580,887 331,150 5,024,258 B. Advertising 4,198,032 544,580 306,593 5,049,205 C. Unsolicited material to electors 1,160,191 139,090 152,497 1,451,777 C. Unsolicited material to electors 1,297,991 124,906 142,550 1,565,447 D. Manifesto/party policy document 396,884 64,509 56,571 517,965 D. Manifesto/party policy document 424,109 61,269 54,428 539,806 E. Market research/canvassing 707,027 106,716 55,595 869,338 E. Market research/canvassing 851,387 54,404 26,098 931,889 F. Media 646,913 69,160 34,322 750,396 F. Media 661,816 66,117 32,153 760,086 G. Transport 745,668 23,808 5,340 774,815 G. Transport 781,771 3,741 1,414 786,926 H. Rallies and other events 1,124,514 102,262 56,945 1,283,720 H. Rallies and other events 1,174,549 58,245 32,111 1,264,905 TOTAL 9,120,963 1,113,426 710,730 10,945,119 A total of £194,900 was deducted from the overall campaign expenditure from various categories. The majority of the expenditure deducted from the original return was candidates’ expenses incurred in the East Midlands region, totalling £155,631. The remaining net adjustments include: the re- allocation of expenditure between England, Scotland and Wales, where it had previously been allocated to England; the re-categorisation of expenditure to ensure a consistent approach; and the re-allocation of expenditure across England, Scotland and Wales due to the party recording an incorrect number of seats contested in Scotland.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 60

10. Legalise Cannabis Alliance (original)

Total expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ Total £ Payments made 302 55 - 357 Notional expenditure incurred 0 0 - 0 Unpaid claims 0 0 - 0 Disputed claims 0 0 - 0 TOTAL 302 55 - 357

Number of constituencies contested 11 2 - 13

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts 0 0 - 0 B. Advertising 0 0 - 0 C. Unsolicited material to electors 182 33 - 215 D. Manifesto/party policy document 89 16 - 105 E. Market research/canvassing 0 0 - 0 F. Media 0 0 - 0 G. Transport 31 6 - 37 H. Rallies and other events 0 0 - 0 TOTAL 302 55 - 357

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 61

11. Liberal Democrats (revised)

Total expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ Total £ Payments made 1,043,971 171,380 100,949 1,316,300 Payments made 980,354 162,527 96,464 1,239,345 Notional expenditure incurred 35,806 6,766 2,505 45,077 Notional expenditure incurred 102,384 15,722 7,543 125,649 Unpaid claims 0000 Disputed claims 0000 TOTAL 1,079,777 178,146 103,454 1,361,377 TOTAL 1,082,738 178,249 104,007 1,364,994

Number of constituencies contested 528 71 40 639

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts 35,362 5,754 14,237 55,353 A. Party political broadcasts 37,235 6,006 14,378 57,619 B. Advertising 160,726 20,143 15,726 196,595 B. Advertising 162,881 20,143 16,164 199,188 C. Unsolicited material to electors 46,074 3,821 4,392 54,287 C. Unsolicited material to electors 46,074 3,821 4,450 54,345 D. Manifesto/party policy document 68,364 11,669 10,971 91,004 D. Manifesto/party policy document 34,252 7,045 8,376 49,673 E. Market research/canvassing 50,798 11,521 3,697 66,016 E. Market research/canvassing 42,249 10,403 3,067 55,719 F. Media 177,306 39,816 13,665 230,787 F. Media 189,575 41,463 14,591 245,629 G. Transport 485,541 72,374 35,503 593,418 G. Transport 549,489 82,907 40,340 672,736 H. Rallies and other events 55,605 13,048 5,264 73,917 H. Rallies and other events 20,983 6,461 2,641 30,085 TOTAL 1,079,777 178,146 103,454 1,361,377

There was a net overall reduction of £3,617. The main issues arising were: deduction of £25,998 from actual payments, the majority of which was one invoice for £17,157 for the election night party; an addition of £284 to actual payments, and an addition of £22,096 to notional expenditure in respect of the party theme tune as reported in Q2 donation report. The other significant amendment is the transfer of £103,264 notional expenditure to actual expenditure. The original return included actual costs for additional overheads incurred by the party as notional expenditure.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 62

12. Liberal Party (original)

Total expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ Total £ Payments made 2,248 174 - 2,422 Notional expenditure incurred 0 0 - 0 Unpaid claims 0 0 - 0 Disputed claims 0 0 - 0 TOTAL 2,248 174 - 2,422

Number of constituencies contested: 13 1 - 14

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts 0 0 - 0 B. Advertising 0 0 - 0 C. Unsolicited material to electors 140 11 - 151 D. Manifesto/party policy document 568 44 - 612 E. Market research/canvassing 0 0 - 0 F. Media 1,540 119 - 1,659 G. Transport 0 0 - 0 H. Rallies and other events 0 0 - 0 TOTAL 2,248 174 - 2,422

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 63

13. Marxist Party (original)

Total expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ Total £ Payments made 2,078 - - 2,078 Notional expenditure incurred 0 - - 0 Unpaid claims 0 - - 0 Disputed claims 0 - - 0 TOTAL 2,078 - - 2,078

Number of constituencies contested 1 - - 1

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts 0 - - 0 B. Advertising 0 - - 0 C. Unsolicited material to electors 0 - - 0 D. Manifesto/party policy document 1,777 - - 1,777 E. Market research/canvassing 0 - - 0 F. Media 0 - - 0 G. Transport 0 - - 0 H. Rallies and other events 301 - - 301 TOTAL 2,078 - - 2,078

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 64

14. Mebyon Kernow (original)

Total expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ Total £ Payments made 6,470 - - 6,470 Notional expenditure incurred 0 - - 0 Unpaid claims 0 - - 0 Disputed claims 0 - - 0 TOTAL 6,470 - - 6,470

Number of constituencies contested: 3 - - 3

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts 0 - - 0 B. Advertising 250 - - 250 C. Unsolicited material to electors 6,170 - - 6,170 D. Manifesto/party policy document 0 - - 0 E. Market research/canvassing 0 - - 0 F. Media 50 - - 50 G. Transport 0 - - 0 H. Rallies and other events 0 - - 0 TOTAL 6,470 - - 6,470

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 65

15. Muslim Party (original)

Total expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ Total £ Payments made 2,484 - - 2,484 Notional expenditure incurred 0 - - 0 Unpaid claims 0 - - 0 Disputed claims 0 - - 0 TOTAL 2,484 - - 2,484

Number of constituencies contested 4 - - 4

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts 0 - - 0 B. Advertising 510 - - 510 C. Unsolicited material to electors 0 - - 0 D. Manifesto/party policy document 0 - - 0 E. Market research/canvassing 0 - - 0 F. Media 1,974 - - 1,974 G. Transport 0 - - 0 H. Rallies and other events 0 - - 0 TOTAL 2,484 - - 2,484

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 66

16. National Front (original)

Total expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ Total £ Payments made 60 - - 60 Notional expenditure incurred 0 - - 0 Unpaid claims 0 - - 0 Disputed claims 0 - - 0 TOTAL 60 - - 60

Number of constituencies contested 5 - - 5

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts 0 - - 0 B. Advertising 0 - - 0 C. Unsolicited material to electors 60 - - 60 D. Manifesto/party policy document 0 - - 0 E. Market research/canvassing 0 - - 0 F. Media 0 - - 0 G. Transport 0 - - 0 H. Rallies and other events 0 - - 0 TOTAL 60 - - 60

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 67

17. New Britain (original)

Total expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ Total £ Payments made 1,572 - - 1,572 Notional expenditure incurred 0 - - 0 Unpaid claims 0 - - 0 Disputed claims 0 - - 0 TOTAL 1,572 - - 1,572

Number of constituencies contested 1 - - 1

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts 0 - - 0 B. Advertising 0 - - 0 C. Unsolicited material to electors 1,572 - - 1,572 D. Manifesto/party policy document 0 - - 0 E. Market research/canvassing 0 - - 0 F. Media 0 - - 0 G. Transport 0 - - 0 H. Rallies and other events 0 - - 0 TOTAL 1,572 - - 1,572

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 68

18. Pacifist Party (original)

Total expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ Total £ Payments made 2,154 - - 2,154 Notional expenditure incurred 0 - - 0 Unpaid claims 0 - - 0 Disputed claims 0 - - 0 TOTAL 2,154 - - 2,154

Number of constituencies contested 1 - - 1

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts 0 - - 0 B. Advertising 0 - - 0 C. Unsolicited material to electors 2,109 - - 2,109 D. Manifesto/party policy document 0 - - 0 E. Market research/canvassing 0 - - 0 F. Media 25 - - 25 G. Transport 20 - - 20 H. Rallies and other events 0 - - 0 TOTAL 2,154 - - 2,154

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 69

19. Pensioner Coalition (original)

Total Expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ Total £ Payments made 5,243 - - 5,243 Notional expenditure incurred 0 - - 0 Unpaid claims 0 - - 0 Disputed claims 0 - - 0 TOTAL 5,243 - - 5,243

Number of constituencies contested 1 - - 1

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts 0 - - 0 B. Advertising 3,034 - - 3,034 C. Unsolicited material to electors 86 - - 86 D. Manifesto/party policy document 1,800 - - 1,800 E. Market research/canvassing 0 - - 0 F. Media 0 - - 0 G. Transport 0 - - 0 H. Rallies and other events 323 - - 323 TOTAL 5,243 - - 5,243

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 70

20. Plaid Cymru (revised)

Total expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ Total £ Payments made - - 59,787 59,787 Payments made --44,614 44,614 Notional expenditure incurred - - 0 0 Unpaid claims - - 27,334 27,334 Unpaid claims --27,334 27,334 Disputed claims - - 0 0 TOTAL - - 87,121 87,121 TOTAL --71,948 71,948

Number of constituencies contested - - 40 40

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts - - 7,306 7,306 A. Party political broadcasts --7,306 7,306 B. Advertising - - 23,549 23,549 B. Advertising --18,882 18,882 C. Unsolicited material to electors - - 16,007 16,007 C. Unsolicited material to electors --16,727 16,727 D. Manifesto/party policy document - - 18,544 18,544 D. Manifesto/party policy document --18,244 18,244 E. Market research/canvassing - - 17,255 17,255 E. Market research/canvassing --7,320 7,320 F. Media - - 2,019 2,019 F. Media --1,577 1,577 G. Transport - - 249 249 G. Transport --210 210 H. Rallies and other events - - 2,192 2,192 H. Rallies and other events --1,682 1,682 TOTAL - - 87,121 87,121

A total of £15,173 was added to the overall campaign expenditure from various categories. The net adjustments included expenditure on market research advertising costs and costs for telephone canvassing. Amounts deducted from the return include candidates’ expenses, routine expenditure that would have been incurred regardless of whether an election was held, and the costs of purchases by the central party that were sold on to candidates.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 71

21. ProLife Alliance (revised)

Total expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ Total £ Payments made 4,207 467 3,336 8,010 Payments made 5,845 650 1,515 8,010 Notional expenditure incurred 0000 Unpaid claims 0000 Disputed claims 0000 TOTAL 4,207 467 3,336 8,010 TOTAL 5,845 650 1,515 8,010

Number of constituencies contested 27 3 7 37

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts 0 0 2,245 2,245 A. Party political broadcasts 0 0 2,245 2,245 B. Advertising 2,574 286 667 3,527 B. Advertising 1,176 1,176 1,176 3,528 C. Unsolicited material to electors 0000 D. Manifesto/party policy document 1,538 171 399 2,108 D. Manifesto/party policy document 702 702 702 2,107 E. Market research/canvassing 0000 F. Media 95 10 25 130 F. Media 43 43 43 129 G. Transport 0000 H. Rallies and other events 0000 TOTAL 4,207 467 3,336 8,010

No change in the total campaign expenditure. However, the allocation of expenditure across England, Scotland and Wales was amended, as items of national expenditure had not been correctly apportioned across Great Britain. The net result is a transfer of expenditure from England of £1,638 and from Scotland of £183 to Wales (£1,821).

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 72

22. Residents and Motorists of Great Britain (original)

Total expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ Total £ Payments made 508 - - 508 Notional expenditure incurred 0 - - 0 Unpaid claims 0 - - 0 Disputed claims 0 - - 0 TOTAL 508 - - 508

Number of constituencies contested 1 - - 1

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts 0 - - 0 B. Advertising 70 - - 70 C. Unsolicited material to electors 438 - - 438 D. Manifesto/party policy document 0 - - 0 E. Market research/canvassing 0 - - 0 F. Media 0 - - 0 G. Transport 0 - - 0 H. Rallies and other events 0 - - 0 TOTAL 508 - - 508

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 73

23. Scottish Green party (original)

Total Expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ Total £ Payments made - 440 - 440 Notional expenditure incurred - 0 - 0 Unpaid claims - 0 - 0 Disputed claims - 0 - 0 TOTAL - 440 - 440

Number of constituencies contested: - 4 - 4

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts - 0 - 0 B. Advertising - 0 - 0 C. Unsolicited material to electors - 0 - 0 D. Manifesto/party policy document - 345 - 345 E. Market research/canvassing - 0 - 0 F. Media - 95 - 95 G. Transport - 0 - 0 H. Rallies and other events - 0 - 0 TOTAL - 440 - 440

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 74

24. Scottish National Party (revised)

Total expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ Total £ Payments made - 225,853 - 225,853 Payments made - 262,192 - 262,192 Notional expenditure incurred - 350 - 350 Notional expenditure incurred - 350 - 350 Unpaid claims - 0 - 0 Disputed claims - 0 - 0 TOTAL - 226,203 - 226,203 TOTAL - 262,542 - 262,542

Number of constituencies contested - 72 - 72

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts - 38,794 - 38,794 B. Advertising - 51,723 - 51,723 B. Advertising - 56,776 - 56,776 C. Unsolicited material to electors - 65,127 - 65,127 D. Manifesto/party policy document - 13,641 - 13,641 E. Market research/canvassing - 2,971 - 2,971 E. Market research/canvassing - 3,370 - 3,370 F. Media - 38,551 - 38,551 F. Media - 69,049 - 69,049 G. Transport - 9,799 - 9,799 G. Transport - 3,910 - 3,910 H. Rallies and other events - 5,597 - 5,597 H. Rallies and other events - 11,875 - 11,875 TOTAL - 226,203 - 226,203

The total expenditure was reduced by £36,339, the majority of which related to costs for permanent staff (£32,322), which are exempt from being treated as campaign expenditure. The remaining reduction relates to expenditure incurred prior to PPERA coming into force, the benefit of which was used entirely before 16 February 2001.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 75

25. Scottish Socialist Party (revised)

Total expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ Total £ Payments made - 2,648 - 2,648 Payments made - 2,550 - 2,550 Notional expenditure incurred - 8,484 - 8,484 Notional expenditure incurred - 0 - 0 Unpaid claims - 1,200 - 1,200 Disputed claims - 0 - 0 TOTAL - 12,332 - 12,332 TOTAL - 3,750 - 3,750

Number of constituencies contested - 72 - 72

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts - 1,200 - 1,200 B. Advertising - 8,484 - 8,484 B. Advertising - 0 - 0 C. Unsolicited material to electors - 0 - 0 D. Manifesto/party policy document - 1,298 - 1,298 D. Manifesto/party policy document - 1,200 - 1,200 E. Market research/canvassing - 1,350 - 1,350 F. Media - 0 - 0 G. Transport - 0 - 0 H. Rallies and other events - 0 - 0 TOTAL - 12,332 - 12,332

An increase in total campaign expenditure of £8,582 due to inclusion of notional expenditure incurred from advertisements placed with the Scottish Socialist Voice at no charge (£8,484) and an additional £98 in respect of incorrect reporting of an invoice.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 76

26. Socialist Alliance (revised)

Total expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ Total £ Payments made 26,062 - - 26,062 Payments made 26,427 --26,427 Notional expenditure incurred 1,000 - - 1,000 Notional expenditure incurred 0 --0 Unpaid claims 0 - - 0 Disputed claims 0 - - 0 TOTAL 27,062 - - 27,062 TOTAL 26,427 --26,427

Number of constituencies contested 92 - - 92

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts 6,649 - - 6,649 A. Party political broadcasts 6,014 --6,014 B. Advertising 12,603 - - 12,603 C. Unsolicited material to electors 1,146 - - 1,146 D. Manifesto/party policy document 4,308 - - 4,308 E. Market research/canvassing 0 - - 0 F. Media 1,457 - - 1,457 G. Transport 345 - - 345 H. Rallies and other events 554 - - 554 TOTAL 27,062 - - 27,062

An additional £635 expenditure was added to the expenditure total, reflecting an additional £1,000 notional expenditure incurred in the production of the party’s election broadcasts and the deduction of a duplicate payment of £365 identified in the same category of expenditure.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 77

27. Socialist Labour party (revised)

Total expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ Total £ Payments made 8,299 1,037 519 9,855 Payments made 9,855 0 0 9,855 Notional expenditure incurred 0000 Unpaid claims 0000 Disputed claims 0000 TOTAL 8,299 1,037 519 9,855 TOTAL 9,855 0 0 9,855

Number of constituencies contested 96 12 6 114

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts 1,615 202 101 1,918 A. Party political broadcasts 1,417 0 0 1,417 B. Advertising 705 88 45 838 B. Advertising 837 0 0 837 C. Unsolicited material to electors 4,547 568 284 5,399 C. Unsolicited material to electors 5,400 0 0 5,400 D. Manifesto/party policy document 0000 E. Market research/canvassing 0000 F. Media 0000 G. Transport 1,432 179 89 1,700 G. Transport 2,201 0 0 2,201 H. Rallies and other events 0000 TOTAL 8,299 1,037 519 9,855

No change in the total campaign expenditure. However, the party contested 114 seats across Great Britain; and the original return wrongly showed all seats in England. Therefore, there has been a reallocation of expenditure from England (£1,556) to Scotland (£1,037) and Wales (£519).

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 78

28. United Kingdom Independance Party (revised)

Total expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ Total £ Payments made 147,776 739 1,745 150,260 Payments made 150,546 1,259 2,237 154,042 Notional expenditure incurred 540,252 14,844 33,302 588,398 Notional expenditure incurred 541,072 14,844 33,399 589,315 Unpaid claims 5,246 0 0 5,246 Disputed claims 0000 Disputed claims 5,246 0 0 5,246 TOTAL 693,274 15,583 35,047 743,904 TOTAL 696,864 16,103 35,636 748,603

Number of constituencies contested 392 11 25 428

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts 36,036 1,006 2,379 39,421 B. Advertising 486,677 11,554 26,645 524,876 B. Advertising 486,855 12,074 27,234 526,163 C. Unsolicited material to electors 139,009 2,864 5,478 147,351 C. Unsolicited material to electors 139,751 2,864 5,478 148,093 D. Manifesto/party policy document 6,177 114 256 6,547 D. Manifesto/party policy document 8,297 114 256 8,667 E. Market research/canvassing 3,477 45 100 3,622 E. Market research/canvassing 3,677 45 100 3,822 F. Media 1,018 0 0 1,018 G. Transport 1,928 0 0 1,928 H. Rallies and other events 18,952 0 189 19,141 H. Rallies and other events 19,302 189 0 19,491 TOTAL 693,274 15,583 35,047 743,904

Total campaign expenditure was reduced by £4,699. This was as a result of: an arithmetical error, which resulted in the return being £707 overstated; a reduction of £1,532 relating to candidates expenses included in the return; and a further reduction of £4,295 (including £820 notional expenditure) due to claims being duplicated in the return. The final figure also included two invoices totalling £1,835 that had been correctly submitted with the return but not included in the party’s calculations.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 79

29. Welsh Socialist Alliance (original)

Total expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ Total £ Payments made - - 550 550 Notional expenditure incurred - - 0 0 Unpaid claims - - 0 0 Disputed claims - - 0 0 TOTAL - - 550 550

Number of constituencies contested: - - 6 6

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts - - - 0 B. Advertising - - 500 500 C. Unsolicited material to electors - - 0 0 D. Manifesto/party policy document - - 0 0 E. Market research/canvassing - - 0 0 F. Media - - 50 50 G. Transport - - 0 0 H. Rallies and other events - - 0 0 TOTAL - - 550 550

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 80

30. Alliance Party of Northern Ireland (revised)

Total expenditure Total £ Payments made 8,960 Payments made 8,660 Notional expenditure incurred 0 Notional expenditure incurred 6,000 Unpaid claims Disputed claims TOTAL 8,960 TOTAL 14,660

Number of constituencies contested 10

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts 7,755 B. Advertising 628 B. Advertising 471 C. Unsolicited material to electors 0 D. Manifesto/party policy document 70 D. Manifesto/party policy document 53 E. Market research/canvassing 0 F. Media 507 F. Media 380 G. Transport 0 H. Rallies and other events 0 TOTAL 8,960

The original return indicated £6,000 notional expenditure on rent-free accommodation for the party, and a total expenditure of £14,660. However, this was deducted from the return, as it is provided to the party irrespective of whether there is an election.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 81

31. Conservative and Unionist Party (NI) (revised)

Total expenditure Total £ Payments made 7,309 Payments made 0 Notional expenditure incurred 0 Unpaid claims 0 Disputed claims 0 TOTAL 7,309 TOTAL 0

Number of constituencies contested 3

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts 7,021 A. Party political broadcasts 0 B. Advertising 0 C. Unsolicited material to electors 0 D. Manifesto/party policy document 0 E. Market research/canvassing 0 F. Media 0 G. Transport 288 G. Transport 0 H: Rallies and other events 0 TOTAL 7,309

The party originally submitted a nil return for Northern Ireland: however, expenditure in relation to Northern Ireland was identified within the return for Great Britain. The party subsequently submitted a revised return.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 82

32. Democratic Unionist Party (original)

Total Expenditure Total £ Payments made 73,230 Notional expenditure incurred 0 Unpaid claims 0 Disputed claims 0 TOTAL 73,230

Number of constituencies contested 14

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts 17,102 B. Advertising 34,535 C. Unsolicited material to electors 0 D. Manifesto/party policy document 21,593 E. Market research/canvassing 0 F. Media 0 G. Transport 0 H. Rallies and other events 0 TOTAL 73,230

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 83

33. Social Democratic and Labour Party (revised)

Total expenditure Total £ Payments made 153,765 Payments made 153,751 Notional expenditure incurred 1,800 Unpaid claims 0 Disputed claims 0 TOTAL 155,565 TOTAL 155,551

Number of constituencies contested 18

Expenditure by type A. Party Political Broadcasts 18,694 A. Party Political Broadcasts 18,693 B. Advertising 93,018 B. Advertising 93,004 C. Unsolicited material to electors 0 D. Manifesto/party policy document 1,490 E. Market research/canvassing 35,599 F. Media 2,632 G. Transport 2,255 G. Transport 455 H. Rallies and other events 1,878 TOTAL 155,565

On its original return to the Commission, the party did not include the £1,800 notional expenditure in the allocation of expenditure across categories. Transport costs were therefore increased from £455 by £1,800 to £2,255.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 84

34. Sinn Fein (revised)

Total expenditure Total £ Payments made 18,508 Notional expenditure incurred 0 Unpaid claims 0 Disputed claims 0 TOTAL 18,508 TOTAL 18,408

Number of constituencies contested: 18

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts 1,068 B. Advertising 15,485 B. Advertising 15,385 C. Unsolicited material to electors 0 D. Manifesto/party policy document 1,955 E. Market research/canvassing 0 F. Media 0 G. Transport 0 H. Rallies and other events 0 TOTAL 18,508

Owing to a miscalculation, the party initially reported £15,385 expenditure on advertising and £18,408 expenditure overall. This was increased by £100.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 85

35. Ulster Unionist Party (revised)

Total expenditure Total £ Payments made 167,495 Payments made 167,784 Notional expenditure incurred 0 Unpaid claims 0 Disputed claims 0 TOTAL 167,495 TOTAL 167,784

Number of constituencies contested 17

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts 26,028 A. Party political broadcasts 26,035 B. Advertising 90,559 C. Unsolicited material to electors £0 D. Manifesto/party policy document 38,559 D. Manifesto/party policy document 38,830 E. Market research/canvassing 342 F. Media 1,521 G. Transport 0 H. Rallies and other events 10,486 H. Rallies and other events 10,497 TOTAL 167,495

The campaign expenditure return was reduced by £289 after expenditure incurred following the election was deducted.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 86

36. United Kingdom Unionist Party (original)

Total expenditure Total £ Payments made 574 Notional expenditure incurred 0 Unpaid claims 0 Disputed claims 0 TOTAL 574

Number of constituencies contested 1

Expenditure by type A. Party political broadcasts 0 B. Advertising 0 C. Unsolicited material to electors 0 D. Manifesto/party policy document 0 E. Market research/canvassing 0 F. Media 574 G. Transport 0 H. Rallies and other events 0 TOTAL 574

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 87 Appendix 3 – Categories of campaign expenditure (Schedule 8 to PPERA 2000)

SCHEDULE 8 CAMPAIGN EXPENDITURE: QUALIFYING EXPENSES PART I QUALIFYING EXPENSES

Expenses qualifying where incurred for election purposes

1. For the purposes of section 72(2) the expenses falling within this Part of this Schedule are expenses incurred in respect of any of the matters set out in the following list.

List of matters

(1) Party political broadcasts.

Expenses in respect of such broadcasts include agency fees, design costs and other costs in connection with preparing or producing such broadcasts.

(2) Advertising of any nature (whatever the medium used).

Expenses in respect of such advertising include agency fees, design costs and other costs in connection with preparing, producing, distributing or otherwise disseminating such advertising or anything incorporating such advertising and intended to be distributed for the purpose of disseminating it.

(3) Unsolicited material addressed to electors (whether addressed to them by name or intended for delivery to households within any particular area or areas).

Expenses in respect of such material include design costs and other costs in connection with preparing, producing or distributing such material (including the cost of postage).

(4) Any manifesto or other document setting out the party's policies.

Expenses in respect of such a document include design costs and other costs in connection with preparing or producing or distributing or otherwise disseminating any such document.

(5) Market research or canvassing conducted for the purpose of ascertaining polling intentions.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 88

(6) The provision of any services or facilities in connection with press conferences or other dealings with the media.

(7) Transport (by any means) of persons to any place or places with a view to obtaining publicity in connection with an election campaign.

Expenses in respect of the transport of such persons include the costs of hiring a particular means of transport for the whole or part of the period during which the election campaign is being conducted.

(8) Rallies and other events, including public meetings (but not annual or other party conferences) organised so as to obtain publicity in connection with an election campaign or for other purposes connected with an election campaign.

Expenses in respect of such events include costs incurred in connection with the attendance of persons at such events, the hire of premises for the purposes of such events or the provision of goods, services or facilities at them.

Exclusions

2. Nothing in paragraph 1 shall be taken as extending to -

(a) any expenses in respect of newsletters or similar publications issued by or on behalf of the party with a view to giving electors in a particular electoral area information about the opinions or activities of, or other personal information relating to, their elected representatives or existing or prospective candidates; (b) any expenses incurred in respect of unsolicited material addressed to party members; (c) any expenses in respect of any property, services or facilities so far as those expenses fall to be met out of public funds; (d) any expenses incurred in respect of the remuneration or allowances payable to any member of the staff (whether permanent or otherwise) of the party; or (e) any expenses incurred in respect of an individual by way of travelling expenses (by any means of transport) or in providing for his accommodation or other personal needs to the extent that the expenses are paid by the individual from his own resources and are not reimbursed to him.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 89 Appendix 4 – List of recognised third parties at the 2001 general election

Campaign for an Independent Britain Charter 88 Democracy Movement Manufacturing, Science and Finance Union (MSF) Society for the Protection of Unborn Children Tacticalvoter.Net Limited The South Molton Declaration UNISON – The Public Service Union Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers (USDAW) Yes Campaign Ltd

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 90 Appendix 5 – Information submitted in controlled expenditure return

Breakdown of controlled expenditure reporting • In addition to items of actual and notional expenditure incurred by the third party, recognised third parties were • Recognised third parties were required to report each also required to submit details of any unpaid or disputed individual item of controlled expenditure incurred during claims for payment. For these the following information the period in which the organisation or individual was was required: registered as a recognised third party, however small. • the name and address of supplier; • Recognised third parties campaigning in more than one • the amount of the claim (correctly apportioned part of Great Britain were required to apportion items of between England, Scotland and Wales as expenditure between the relevant parts of Britain. applicable); Therefore, although expenditure that related solely to one • the date the expense was incurred and the invoice part of Britain need not be apportioned (e.g., costs of a received (unpaid claims); or rally in Yorkshire), expenditure that was incurred on a • the date the disputed claim was said to have been GB-wide basis (e.g., a national billboard advertising incurred and the invoice received (disputed claims), campaign) was divided between each part of Britain on • any extra information, such as the reason the claim the basis of the number of constituences in England, had not been paid, or the grounds for the dispute Scotland and Wales. with the supplier.

For each payment made, recognised third parties In addition to information about individual payments, supplied details of: recognised third parties were required to submit the total • the name and address of the supplier; values of: • the date the expense was incurred; • actual payments made; • the date of claim for payment; • notional expenditure incurred; • the date payment was made; • unpaid claims; • the amount of the item of expenditure (correctly • disputed claims; apportioned between England, Scotland and Wales • the amount of controlled expenditure incurred during as applicable). the regulated period before becoming a recognised All payments of more than £200 were required to be third party. supported by a receipt or invoice. During the regulated period, recognised third parties were • Recognised third parties were also required to submit also subject to controls on donations that are similar to the the following details in respect of any items of notional controls introduced on donations to political parties by expenditure incurred: PPERA in February 2001. As part of its return to the • the name and address of the supplier; Commission, each recognised third party had to include, a • the nature of the expense incurred; record of all permissible donations of more than £5,000, • the period/date when the expense was incurred; and details of any donations of more than £200 received • the amount of the item of expenditure (correctly from impermissible or unidentifiable sources. The following apportioned between England, Scotland and Wales details were required: as applicable). Instead of an invoice or receipt, a declaration of value by • For each permissible donation of more than £5,000: the person registered as the responsible officer of the • the name, address and status of the donor (and third party was required for items of notional expenditure company registration number if the donor was a of more than £200.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 91

registered company, or details of the contributors to • For each donation of more than £200 from an the trust if the donor was an exempt trust); unidentifiable donor: • the amount (or value and nature if the donation was • the manner in which the donation was made; not made in cash) of the donation; • the amount (or value and nature if the donation was • the date on which the donation was received; not made in cash) of the donation; • the date on which the donation was accepted. • the date on which the donation was received; • the date on which the donation was returned; • For each impermissible of more than £200: • the name and address of the organisation to which • the name and address of the donor; the donation was returned. • the amount (or value and nature if the donation was not made in cash) of the donation; Recognised third parties were also required to submit the • the date on which the donation was received; total value of all accepted donations of more than £200 but • the date on which the donation was returned; less than £5000 (i.e., donations that were not reportable • the name and address of the person or organisation individually). to whom the donation was returned.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 92

Returns 37-46: Controlled expenditure by recognised third parties Note: Some returns were amended following compliance checks. The original figures submitted to the Commission are shown in light blue italic. Some rounding errors may occur on reports originally submitted in ££pp

37. Campaign for an Independent Britain (original)

Expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ NI £ Total £ Pre-registration expenditure 0 0 0 0 0

Post-registration expenditure Payments made 1,398 190 106 0 1,694 Notional expenditure incurred 0 0 0 0 0 Unpaid claims 0 0 0 0 0 Disputed claims 0 0 0 0 0 Total 1,398 190 106 0 1,694

OVERALL TOTAL EXPENDITURE 1,398 190 106 0 1,694

38. Charter 88 (revised)

Expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ NI £ Total £ Pre-registration expenditure 13,292 0 0 - 13,292 Pre-registration expenditure 0 0 0 - 0

Post-registration expenditure Payments made 140,852 0 0 - 140,852 Payments made 180,868 0 0 - 180,868 Notional expenditure incurred 0 0 0 - 0 Unpaid claims 0 0 0 - 0 Disputed claims 0 0 0 - 0 Total 140,852 0 0 - 140,852 Total 180,868 0 0 - 180,868

OVERALL TOTAL EXPENDITURE 154,144 0 0 - 154,144

The original submission to the Commission indicated that the total controlled expenditure had been incurred after the organisation registered as a recognised third party. The total controlled expenditure reported was reduced by £26,724 in respect of costs for permanent staff that had been included in the return. Of the remaining controlled expenditure that was correctly reported, £13,292 was incurred prior to registration as a recognised third party.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 93

39. Democracy Movement (revised)

Expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ NI £ Total £ Pre-registration expenditure 0 0 0 - 0

Post-registration expenditure Payments made 102,466 769 65 - 103,300 Payments made 103,294 769 65 - 104,128 Notional expenditure incurred 0 0 0 - 0 Unpaid claims 0 0 0 - 0 Disputed claims 0 0 0 - 0 Total 102,466 769 65 - 103,300 Total 103,294 769 65 - 104,128

OVERALL TOTAL EXPENDITURE 102,466 769 65 - 103,300

Total expenditure was reduced by £827 owing to a credit note supplied to the organisation.

40. Manufacturing, Science and Finance Union (original)

Expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ NI £ Total £ Pre-registration expenditure 0 0 0 - 0

Post-registration expenditure Payments made 4,055 435 236 - 4,726 Notional expenditure incurred 0 0 0 - 0 Unpaid claims 0 0 0 - 0 Disputed claims 0 0 0 - 0 Total 4,055 435 236 - 4,726

OVERALL TOTAL EXPENDITURE 4,055 435 236 - 4,726

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 94

41. Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (original)

Expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ NI £ Total £ Pre-registration expenditure 49,161 6,760 3,687 1,844 61,452

Post-registration expenditure Payments made 0 0 0 0 0 Notional expenditure incurred 0 0 0 0 0 Unpaid claims 0 0 0 0 0 Disputed claims 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0

OVERALL TOTAL EXPENDITURE 49,161 6,760 3,687 1,844 61,452

Compliance reviews confirmed that all expenditure had been incurred prior to registration as a recognised third party.

42. Tacticalvoter.Net Ltd (original)

Expenditure England Scotland £ Wales £ NI £ Total £ Pre-registration expenditure 0 0 0 - 0

Post-registration expenditure Payments made 3,809 518 288 - 4,615 Notional expenditure incurred 0 0 0 - 0 Unpaid claims 0 0 0 - 0 Disputed claims 0 0 0 - 0 Total 3,809 518 288 - 4,615

OVERALL TOTAL EXPENDITURE 3,809 518 288 - 4,615

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 95

43. The South Molton Declaration (original)

Expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ NI £ Total £ Pre-registration expenditure 2,730 - - - 2,730

Post-registration expenditure Payments made 18,185 - - - 18,185 Notional expenditure incurred 0 - - - 0 Unpaid claims 0 - - - 0 Disputed claims 0 - - - 0 Total 18,185 - - - 18,185

OVERALL TOTAL EXPENDITURE 20,915 - - - 20,915

44. Unison (revised)

Expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ NI £ Total £ Pre-registration expenditure 0 0 0 0 0

Post-Registration expenditure Payments made 634,175 77,822 43,268 19,471 774,796 Payments made 621,935 86,412 47,027 19,422 774,796 Notional expenditure incurred 0 0 0 0 0 Unpaid claims 0 0 0 0 0 Disputed claims 0 0 0 0 0 Total 634,175 77,882 43,268 19,471 774,736 Total 621,935 86,412 47,027 19,422 774,736

OVERALL TOTAL EXPENDITURE 634,175 77,882 43,268 19,471 774,796

Expenditure totalling £61,957 that had been allocated across England, Scotland and Wales actually related to England alone. Therefore there was a re-allocation of £12,240 to England from Scotland (£8,530) and Wales (£3,759).

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 96

45. Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers (revised)

Expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ NI £ Total £ Pre-registration expenditure 51,277 6,796 3,707 - 61,780 Pre-registration expenditure 0 0 0 - 0

Post-registration expenditure Payments made 15,188 2,013 1,098 - 18,299 Payments made 66,455 8,809 4,805 - 80,079 Notional expenditure incurred 3,486 462 252 - 4,200 Notional expenditure incurred 3,486 462 252 - 4,200 Unpaid claims 0 0 0 - 0 Disputed claims 0 0 0 - 0 Total 18,674 2,475 1,350 - 22,499 Total 69,951 9,271 5,057 - 84,279

OVERALL TOTAL EXPENDITURE 69,951 9,271 5,057 - 84,279

The original return indicated that expenditure had been incurred after the organisation registered as a recognised third party. However, the expenditure had in fact been incurred prior to registration as a recognised third party.

46. Yes Campaign (original)

Expenditure England £ Scotland £ Wales £ NI £ Total £ Pre-registration expenditure 404 - - - 404

Post-registration expenditure Payments made 185 - - - 185 Notional expenditure incurred 0 - - - 0 Unpaid claims 0 - - - 0 Disputed claims 0 - - - 0 Total 185 - - - 185

OVERALL TOTAL EXPENDITURE 589 0 0 - 589

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 97 Appendix 6

Candidates at the 2001 general election reported to the Commission as having failed to submit a return as to election expenses.

Constituency Candidate name Party affiliation Bethnal Green & Bow Dennis Delderfield NBP Bradford South Ateeq Siddique SA Brecon & Radnorshire Elizabeth Phillips UKI Calder Valley Philip Lockwood LCA Chelmsford West Christopher Philbin LCA Chesterfield Simon Hitchcock Con Chesterfield Pauline Robinson SA Chesterfield William Harrison SL Chesterfield Christopher Rawson Ind Cumbernauld & Kilsyth Thomas Taylor Sc Ref Doncaster North John Wallis UKI East Ham Roderick Finlayson SL Hamilton North & Bellshill Shareen Blackall SSP Hertfordshire North East Michael Virgo UKI Islington South & Finsbury Thomas McCarthy Ind Lancashire West David Braid Ind Northampton North Gordon White SA Southwark North & Bermondsey Lianne Shore NF Swindon South Christopher Gillard RRL Tatton William Batchelor Ind Thanet North Thomas Holmes NF Thanet South Bernard Franklin NF Tottenham Unver Shefki Ref Vauxhall Martin Boyd Ind Westmorland & Lonsdale Timothy Bell Ind Winchester Henrietta Rous WR Witney Barry Beadle Ind Wokingham Peter Owen MRLP

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 98

Candidates at the 2001 general election declaring election expenses in excess of the statutory maximum

Constituency Candidate name Party affiliation Beckenham Jacqueline Lait Con Bexhill & Battle Nigel Farage UKI Gillingham Paul Clark Lab Maidenhead Theresa May Con Newbury Richard Benyon Con Rushcliffe Paul Fallon Lab Western Isles Calum MacDonald Lab

In July 2001, Paul Clark MP and his election agent were The Commission sought comments from all the other granted exception from the provisions of Section 76(1) of candidates reported as having overspent the relevant RPA 1983 by the High Court, after the Returning Officer for statutory election expenses limit. In a number of cases, the the Gillingham constituency advised candidates of an Commission was advised that confusion over the number of incorrect election expenses limit. Although the Gillingham electors on the electoral register led them to exceed the constituency is a borough constituency, the Returning legal maximum. As stated in our conclusion, this is an issue Officer calculated the legal maximum using the formula for a that the Commission intends to address. Other explanations county constituency, leading to an overestimation of the cited were a miscalculation of the correct expenses limit and allowable expenses. confusion relating to whether or not VAT was included in a price agreed with a supplier.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 99 Table 14: Candidates’ election expenses at the 2001 general election

Explanatory notes and definitions DW The Welfare State Against Blairism EC Extinction Club Constituency details Elvis Church of the Militant Elvis Party Name of constituency FDP Fancy Dress Party Constituencies are listed in alphabetical order. FP Free Party Grey Grey Party Type of constituency Grn Green Party The type of constituency, borough (B) or county (C) is Ind Independent candidate not representing indicated after the constituency name, since the type of a registered party constituency governs the formula to be used in determining IOW Isle of Wight Party the legal maximum for a candidate’s expenses. JLDP John Lilburne Democratic Party JP Justice Party Names of candidates JWP Jam Wrestling Party The names of candidates are listed in order of the number KHHC Independent Kidderminster Hospital of votes polled. Consequently, the first candidate listed in and Health Concern each constituency is the candidate elected. LA Left Alliance Lab Labour Party Party LCA Legalise Cannabis Alliance The party affiliation of the candidate. Candidates may only LD Liberal Democrats include a description in their nomination papers and on the LE Lower Excise Duty Party ballot paper if it has been authorised by a registered Lib Liberal Party political party (rule 6A (1) of the parliamentary election rules, LP Liberated Party as amended by section 38 (3) of the Political Parties, M Muslim Party Elections and Referendums Act 2000). All unaffiliated Marx Marxist Party candidates must either use the label ‘Independent’ with no MK Mebyon Kernow – The Party for Cornwall further description, or provide no description on the ballot MRLP Official Monster Raving Loony Party paper at all. Registered party names and abbreviations for NBP New Britain Party descriptions used by candidates are listed below. NF National Front NIU Northern Ireland Unionist Party Abbreviation Party NIWC Northern Ireland Women’s Coalition AC Anti-Corruption Forum NPT Neath-Port Talbot Rate Payers Association AL Asian League Pac Pacifist Party APNI Alliance Party of Northern Ireland PC Plaid Cymru – Party of Wales Bean New Millennium Bean Party PD Progressive Democratic Party BNP British National Party PEC Pro Euro Conservative Party CD Christian Democratic Party Pens Pensioner Coalition Ch People’s Choice! Exclusively for All PJP People’s Justice Party Comm Communist Party of Britain PL ProLife Alliance Con Conservative and Unionist Party Prog U Progressive Unionist Party of Country Countryside Party Northern Ireland CPA Christian Peoples Alliance Ref Reform 2000 Cust Customer Service Party RM Residents and Motorists of Great Britain DUP Democratic Unionist Party RRL Rock ’N Roll Loony Party

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 100

RUK Reform UK Party A total of 29 Labour candidates, jointly sponsored by the S Alt Socialist Alternative Co-operative Party, are described in the results as ‘Lab’. The SA Socialist Alliance following constituencies had Lab/Co-op candidates: Sc Grn Scottish Green Party Basildon Sc Ref Scottish Freedom Referendum Party Brighton Pavilion SDLP Social Democratic and Labour Party Bristol North West SF Sinn Fein Cardiff South & Penarth SL Socialist Labour Party Carrick, Cumnock & Doon Valley SNP Scottish National Party Corby Speaker The Speaker seeking re-election Dumbarton SSP Scottish Socialist Party Edinburgh North & Leith St Stuckist Party Edmonton SU Scottish Unionist Party Feltham & Heston Tatton Tatton Group Glasgow Pollok Tr Truth Party Glasgow Rutherglen TW Third Way Hemel Hempstead UKI United Kingdom Independence Party Heywood & Middleton UKP United Kingdom Pathfinders Huddersfield UKU United Kingdom Unionist Party Ilford South UPP Unrepresented Peoples Party Islwyn UTW Ulster Third Way Kirkaldy UU Ulster Unionist Party Leicestershire North West Vote Vote For Yourself Party Liverpool Riverside WP Workers’ Party Loughborough WR Wessex Regionalist Party Plymouth Sutton WRP Workers Revolutionary Party Preston WSA Welsh Socialist Alliance Richmond (Yorks.) no label Candidate who gave no description Sheffield Heeley Stroud Three candidates gave descriptions that did not match with West Bromwich West the name of a registered political party. These were: Wolverhampton North East Dhillon, Ealing Southall Wolverhampton South East Independent Community Candidate – Empowering Categories of election expenses Change Details of election expenditure for each candidates are shown Bhutta, Ealing Southall under the categories previously specified by the form of return Qari to be submitted by candidates. The penultimate column shows the total declared expenditure subject to the legal Lit, Ealing Southall maximum limit, which is shown in the final column. Chairman of Sunrise Radio Candidates’ personal expenses are not subject to the legal limit. All have been coded as Independents in this report. Conventions used in the tables A hyphen (-) is used to denote nil.

Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 101 Scrimgeour Area Constituency No. Name11 Aberavon1 Aberavon1 Aberavon Constitu- 1 Electorate Aberavon1 Candidate Aberavon1 Aberavon2 Aberavon ency type2 Aberdeen Central2 Aberdeen Central C2 Candidate Aberdeen Central2 Aberdeen Central Forename3 49,524 Aberdeen Central David Hywel3 Aberdeen North Party B3 Aberdeen North3 Aberdeen North3 Personal Aberdeen North 50,190 Lisa4 Frank Surname Francis Aberdeen North Christopher Gareth4 Aberdeen South Mohammad Ali4 B Aberdeen South Andrew James Davies4 Aberdeen South Captain Gordon Wayne 4 Aberdeen South Lab Martin Eleanor5 52,876 Miraj Aberdeen South Malcolm Kemp Stewart Norman Gunn5 Tutton Aberdeenshire W & Kincardine Andrew5 Turnbull Doran Whyte LD B Aberdeenshire W & Kincardine C Gault5 expenses Aberdeenshire W & Kincardine5 Savidge Alasdair James Aberdeenshire W & Kincardine Beany 59,0256 61,391 - Con Jim Aberdeenshire W & Kincardine Anne Robert NPT PC6 Agents Anderson Chapman Richard Airdrie & Shotts Expenses subject to legal maximum Lab Con6 Shona SNP Airdrie & Shotts £500.006 Allan Cumbers Lab - £117.20 Airdrie & Shotts Clerks6 Bean Ian Gillan Tom Airdrie & Shotts LD WSA £400.006 £19.00 Moray Fenton John Kevin Airdrie & Shotts6 Ian James John Gorman - Airdrie & Shotts SSP Printing -7 £4,149.25 Smith - David Alan Airdrie & Shotts B Begg Cowling £150.00 -7 SNP Donaldson - - Meetings Aldershot £25.007 - Foreman Aldershot Macdonald - Committee7 - Yuill 58,349 Aldershot Hutchens Green Helen7 LD - - Aldershot Con Angus - Kerr LD7 - - - Con Lab Aldershot - SSP - -7 Misc £557.16 - Aldershot - - Lab8 Watt - Aldershot £1,474.35 Alison Jean - Manley £1,324.05 £1,080.00 SNP LD Legal Aldridge - Brownhills £211.00 £270.00 John Whyte £665.00 -8 SNP - Gordon - C8 Con - - - - £492.69 Aldridge - Brownhills Mary Total £6,930.46 Liddell -8 - - - - Aldridge - Brownhills Kenneth £1,895.00 - £811.55 £8,561.92 - £3,557.269 SSP 78,255 £150.00 - - SSP Aldridge - Brownhills Lindsay Christopher £4,074.46 - James Gerald Douglas B9 £65.20 £400.00 Max - - Love Altrincham & Sale West £5,786.49 - £800.00 Howarth9 - Altrincham & Sale West - - -10 Lab £20.00 £645.00 62,361 Altrincham & Sale West £800.00 - McIntosh - - -10 Alyn & Deeside - Richard Charles - - SNP Adrian Paul - - B -10 Alyn & Deeside - Herriot - £475.54 £300.00 McGuigan - Luke Con Dempsey - - - - -10 Alyn & Deeside £350.00 £5,465.39 LD - Derek Leonard £26.1510 £156.12 Alyn & Deeside - - - Con - - 72,288 Shepherd Adam Julian £52.00 £300.00 £1,368.41 £1,914.05 £7,067.1310 £20.00 Alyn & Deeside £6,203.42 Graham Stuart £8,784.00 - £40.00 - - - Arthur Uther SSP - £140.00 Ian David10 Alyn & Deeside SU - - £1,650.50 Collett Alan £1,673.10 £1,236.12 £5,465.39 SL Monica10 - £11.25 Alyn & Deeside £959.57 C £15.00 - - Rumsey £10.00 £5,821.31 £7,794.36 - £4,533.81 £8,561.92 Con John Douglas -11 Alyn & Deeside £300.00 £600.00 £685.00 £1.75 £6.00 £419.27 - £7,794.36 - £2,880.56 - Janet Everall £40.00 £14.69 - Brady Amber Valley £235.00 - Stacey - £303.00 £8,561.92 60,478 - Akehurst £7,046.06 Christopher Michael - £510.00 £3,903.33 Pendragon Mark Richard - £7,918.24 £6,867.05 £350.00 £1,896.75 LD £500.00 - UKI £161.36 £513.46 Geary £30.00 £4,089.15 £156.90 £817.55 - - - Gaskell Rothery - £8,561.92 - - - £4,655.56 - - £7,794.36 £8,561.92 - £5.00 - Howes Ind £835.00 - Baugh - Lab Grn £192.47 - Con Hope £300.00 £8,574.74 £1,041.00 Mark £9,258.90 - £6,867.05 £142.97 £150.00 - Tami £361.12 £5,812.63 - £9,289.24 Derek William £7,794.36 Lawrence £50.00 - £300.00 £9,289.24 £800.00 £5,510.39 £2,540.28 Burnham C SA - Lab LD Richard - £6,895.89 £8,561.92 £5.00 £7,794.36 - - £7,918.24 £341.25 £102.00 - £645.00 £150.00 - Klaus £8,201.28 - LD - £6,436.71 Lab £8,561.92 £1,538.90 William - £7,374.09 73,798 £1,308.00 - MRLP - - - Judy £800.00 - - Max £5,510.39 - - - £8,201.28 £787.68 £541.99 LD £549.00 Lab - £78.07 Glyn £7,918.24 £575.76 - £150.00 £1,433.61 £220.27 £150.00 £187.04 - Isherwood £38.50 - £70.00 - - £9,289.24 - £7,804.73 - - £1,758.03 Coombs £1,673.10 - £961.26 £2,958.63 £787.68 £7,580.22 £8,201.28 - £514.12 £6,356.26 - £1,901.00 - £7,918.24 £7,918.24 - - £763.26 £240.00 £8,201.28 £4,090.37 - - Armstrong-Braun £8,189.73 Con - Crawford Grn £9,289.24 - £15.60 £7,804.73 - - PC £5,293.88 £421.64 - Mallaber - £7,245.89 Cooksey £8,201.28 - £650.00 - - - £10,334.81 Davies - - - UKI - - £3,643.33 £15.00 - - - - £8,233.35 £150.00 £8,351.74 - Lab £62.00 - Ind - - £372.50 ------£240.04 £361.12 £500.00 £440.00 - - Comm - £445.76 - - £9,289.24 £4,402.93 £370.43 - - - £275.00 £2,114.00 £1,410.34 £744.00 £424.00 £5,131.09 £823.29 £20.00 £1,308.00 £7,902.02 - - - - £6,051.81 - - - - £8,189.73 £8,808.24 £70.00 £10,334.81 - - £549.00 £335.00 - - - £1,125.00 £8,189.73 - - - - £465.00 - £529.72 - - - £120.00 £1,367.67 £8,189.73 - £215.42 - £1,901.00 £1,637.45 - - - - £15.00 - £8,189.73 - £602.55 - £1,454.00 £3,858.75 - £1,251.25 - - £182.00 £7,303.54 - £10,334.81 £210.65 - - - £650.00 £9,232.63 - - £5,125.48 £10,334.81 £5.00 £6 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 102 Area Constituency No. Name1111 Amber Valley12 Amber Valley12 Angus Constitu- 12 Angus Electorate12 Candidate Angus12 Angus13 Angus ency type13 Antrim East13 Antrim East13 Antrim East Candidate13 Antrim East Forename13 Antrim East C13 Antrim East Party Gillian Catherine14 Antrim East 59,004 Catharine Mary14 Antrim North Michael Fraser C14 Antrim North Personal 14 Antrim North Shaw Surname14 Antrim North 60,897 Smith Roy15 Antrim North Marcus Ashley William Weir15 Antrim South Ian Andrew Booth15 Antrim South Joseph Peter 15 Con Antrim South C Bruce Sammy15 Antrim South LD John15 Antrim South SNP Danny 74,45116 Antrim South Con expenses McFatridge Ian Richard Kyle Robert Lindsay Nield £65.0016 Argyll & Bute Beggs Janette16 C Argyll & Bute Alan James £900.0016 Agents Argyll & Bute Lab £214.46 Expenses subject to legal maximum Paisley Wilson16 Argyll & Bute Wallace Lexie Mason - 70,651 -17 £200.00 Argyll & Bute Sean David Wilson Boyd LD £750.00 UU Mathews Clerks17 Arundel & South Downs John Joseph O'Connor £282.8417 Arundel & South Downs Jayne £4,717.39 Greer Burnside Graffin DUP17 C Arundel & South Downs SSP DUP Ind Printing18 Robert Thomas William Arundel & South Downs - APNI C SDLP -18 Sean Anthony Ashfield McCrea - Meetings 49,175 Kelly £163.3018 Martin Ashfield - Alan Scott UU - - Committee - 70,95618 David R.J. Ashfield Con Farren SF £7,491.60 Howard Emerson18 Norman Jonathan Ashfield - - - £75.00 Dunlop18 DUP Ashfield - McKee - £30.00 - - £160.0019 Hugh Ashfield Misc Flight - SF - Boyd19 David Dick £1,073.67 Ashford UU £934.71 - - Derek Roger £4,819.42 £300.00 SDLP19 Agnes Carmichael Ashford Legal Charles Spencer Ford - Meehan £1,394.2819 Desmond Ashford APNI Robert Henry Fairfax - - - SDLP Reid C £6,827.10 £204.8619 Ashford - - - - Total - £300.00 Samuel £10,058.00 20 Ashford - - Perrin Con Taylor - NIU - - Deedman20 Ashton under Lyne Petrie 73,428 £8,776.46 SF - - Geoffrey William20 Raven Ashton under Lyne - Max APNI - £6,649.36 £665.19 £9,141.00 - -20 Ashton under Lyne - £1,740.50 £4,275.58 £485.00 - - Divers LD SNP - - -20 - Ashton under Lyne LD - - £50.00 - C UKI21 £227.00 Ashton under Lyne £1,000.00 Lab £4,708.81 Hoon Julian Charles Thomas £375.35 Con21 B Aylesbury £2,753.08 £2,467.89 £1,903.00 - £9,138.16 - Lab - £1,271.80 - James William Elliot £268.00 Leigh -21 Aylesbury £750.00 - - 76,699 £30.00 £94.01 - Melvin £5,711.61 - - Damian Howard21 Aylesbury SSP £557.74 - - £227.00 72,820 £5.00 George - £9,141.00 - Smith22 Aylesbury £886.25 David Alan £2,789.28 - £5,030.02 Katrina Rosemary £660.00 £1,590.00 £1,474.2822 - Lab Ayr £1,167.68 - - - - £10,058.00 -22 - Ayr £7,981.31 £9,141.00 - - £3,699.30 Green - £800.00 - Con £14.68 John Paul - -22 Ayr - Howse - £100.00 - Keith - £1,775.07 Leonard - Tim Ayr - £110.00 £2,642.00 £2,287.08 - £105.00 £474.48 - LD - £538.00 Richard Thomas - Kate Anne - £115.93 C £277.93 Harby Heyes - - - David Leonard - £481.86 - Watson Roger Ian £1,372.65 £1,590.49 - - £1,545.06 £8,424.43 - £6,537.63 £5,981.97 Con Nigel Arthur - £600.00 £10,144.53 80,002 £1,856.43 £4,553.51 SL - - Boden £216.00 £320.57 - Adams David Roy - - - £9,720.02 Charlesworth - £9,141.00 £9,291.29 - £30.00 - £3,971.62 £8,877.76 - £3,752.56 - - Waller £9,896.47 £5,308.81 Lab Ind £103.00 - SA £9,882.27 - - - Fletcher £1,815.00 £1,800.70 - - - - Con £2,788.46 £2,769.33 Fitchett £50.00 £446.00 - £9,291.29 £3,287.88 £1,389.77 C £717.97 Woods Rolland £9,291.29 Maxwell Peter £700.00 £4,122.89 £1,000.37 Grn Lab £170.78 - - £400.00 £285.00 - Michael Keith - £2,753.08 £200.00 £744.50 £1,903.00 - - £375.35 £30.00 Lidington - 55,630 - £120.97 Justin David UKI LD £9,291.29 - £250.00 Sandra £9,291.29 - £16.50 - £9,141.00 - - LD £8,981.68 - £204.47 £4,199.51 - £591.00 £552.00 BNP - £3,641.91 Grn £7,863.13 - £9,896.47 £3,729.30 Jones - £2,789.28 £200.00 £7,567.46 £556.12 £10,144.53 £1,590.00 - £302.70 £8,531.85 Con White - £9,291.29 £12.10 £15.00 - - - £63.31 - £7,745.92 £19.75 £9,291.29 - £5.00 Phil £81.06 - Harper £479.59 - - £8,531.85 Jim £133.55 - £1,675.35 £152.00 £100.00 £250.00 £1,602.59 Stuart David - £2,642.00 £452.16 £10,144.53 £2,287.08 - - - Osborne LD - - - £4,424.62 - £10,144.53 £10,144.53 - £9,896.47 £460.00 £2.50 £4,818.98 - £3,073.66 £8,531.85 Lab £234.50 - £3,454.88 £4,071.62 £8,531.85 - - £248.00 - UKI £9,882.27 - £9,882.27 £9,896.47 £453.22 - - £2,260.70 £1,397.27 £1,050.00 - Lab £3,525.05 Ritchie - - £4,146.16 £9,896.47 - £9,882.27 £331.55 - - £1,486.75 £10,035.53 £96.00 - Gallie - £1,815.00 - £670.00 - Mather - £6,350.90 - £9,896.47 £372.17 - £9,097.01 £735.00 £930.00 £10,315.03 - £7,956.46 - - - LD £12.00 - - £966.67 - - £409.50 - - Con - £335.08 £928.29 SNP £4,649.51 £192.00 - £1,509.45 £10,035.53 £8,531.85 - - - £3,120.00 - £73.60 £508.12 £440.00 - £320.00 - £375.00 - £32.51 - - £500.00 £10.00 £124.00 - - £4,368.25 - £893.00 - - - £6,587.41 - £452.16 £8,832.72 £334.25 £3,630.94 £10,315.03 - £10,035.53 £953.22 - - - £5,381.70 £10,035.53 - £2.00 - - - £5 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 103 Area Constituency No. Name2222 Ayr23 Ayr23 Banbury Constitu- 23 Banbury Electorate23 Candidate Banbury23 Banbury24 Banbury ency type24 Banff & Buchan24 Banff & Buchan24 Banff & Buchan Candidate24 Banff & Buchan C Forename24 Banff & Buchan25 Banff & Buchan Party25 Barking C 84,371 Antony Brian25 Barking25 Barking Personal 56,66926 Barking Alex Elliot Anderson James Scott Surname26 Barnsley Central Joseph William Leslie Frederick26 Barnsley Central Baldry Salmond Anthony William26 Barnsley Central Bevis Malory27 Barnsley Central Sandy Stephen Andrew Stewart27 Smith Barnsley East & Mexborough Edward Murray Sibley B27 SNP Worgan Barnsley East & Mexborough Douglas C Con B27 Barnsley East & Mexborough Alice Janette Gilbertson Harris Rowan27 Barnsley East & Mexborough Eric Robert Still Cotton expenses 55,229 Harris28 SSP Margaret Eve Barnsley East & Mexborough 65,655 60,086 Lab UKI Jeffrey £161.3828 LD & Penistone Barnsley West Eric Evlyn Wallace28 Agents & Penistone Barnsley West - Expenses subject to legal maximum Davidson29 & Penistone Barnsley West Herbison SSP £450.00 C UKI Grn Michael Richard29 Barrow & Furness Hodge Lab £69.71 Sharron Clerks Singhe Anura Kumara Alan William29 Barrow & Furness £10.00 £200.00 Matthew James - Con Mark 65,291 Ian Alexander29 Barrow & Furness UKI Keppetipola - Michael Terence Illsley LD Henry30 Barrow & Furness Weatherley - Ennis George Colin £8,874.78 Printing30 Basildon Lab LD - £200.0030 Basildon Offord - - - Meetings C £325.00 Hartley -30 Basildon McCord Con - £466.20 William Patrick - Committee Brook30 Basildon - £700.00 Miles Lab - - 64,746 Savage31 Basildon Lab £25.00 John Matthew Patrick Robinson Clapham £20.00 Tolman31 £13.50 Basingstoke £245.20 Con - Rajch - £155.00 LD31 - Con - Basingstoke Misc £3,918.79 Hutton Rowe - - - -31 Basingstoke LD £100.00 - -32 UKI Basingstoke SL £485.90 Lab £39.61 Legal James B £4,398.97 £853.17 £109.2432 Bassetlaw BNP - £250.00 - Barry Maciek - -32 £6,783.77 Bassetlaw - - £3,547.92 £462.59 John Norman Crompton SA £10,165.68 - - Lab Total - Con32 74,121 Bassetlaw £10,714.00 - £56.11 £100.00 £300.00 Angela Evans £3,324.35 -33 Bassetlaw - C - £768.48 - -33 Bath Max £442.91 £750.00 - LD - £1,265.40 - Rabone £300.00 -33 Bath - £497.00 - - - - - Smith 79,113 Airey33 Bath £5,189.47 Andrew Robert Frederick Dominic John - Hunter Smith -33 £2,832.12 - Bath - - - £150.00 £8,996.48 £1,884.52 - - Jane £10.00 - - £1,749.00 C34 Bath - - Michael Francis - - LD - -34 Batley & Spen £28.70 £1,270.41 - - Richard - £121.11 -34 - £2,930.22 Batley & Spen Jon UKI - 68,417 Schofield - - Con34 Batley & Spen John £463.13 Con Steven Roy £1,279.83 - - - Lab - £4,261.70 £4,097.48 - Mallon34 - - Batley & Spen - - Kim-Elisabeth Rachel £4,519.03 - £97.5035 Batley & Spen - - - - - £8,996.48 - £425.71 C £50.00 Graham35 - Battersea £300.00 Con - £22.70 - - £566.68 Smithard - Alison Shirley Battersea £6,793.77 - £385.00 £516.97 - - B Duane £4,398.97 £10,714.00 - £672.00 - Neil - - £3,749.66 Sollitt UKI 71,372 £600.00 £853.17 £10,714.00 - - £20.00 - - £1,387.27 - £3,360.55 John Kevin £750.00 Donald Michael Ellison £258.00 £8,023.53 - £475.00 £500.00 £8,932.06 - £1,618.37 UKI £350.00 Hartley - £600.00 - £8,996.48 Foster - 63,665 LD Mann £154.00 £70.25 £959.88 - £61.60 Mike £3,948.36 £322.93 £332.00 £900.00 Holley - £10,714.00 £600.00 £827.00 - - SA £6,902.07 £559.53 £500.00 £7,535.73 Ashley Peter - £1,265.40 - LD £750.00 - £9,531.04 £1,946.12 £2,071.93 - £3,282.22 £58.00 Marilyn Ann £8,996.48 £10,714.00 £142.00 £8,996.48 - - Meloy - Lab - B £70.25 - £8,023.53 Elizabeth Joan £8,023.53 LD £40.47 £9,553.61 - Michael £433.42 £95.00 £100.00 £5,257.01 - Lab - £8,996.48 Taylor £8,932.06 - Kathryn Mary - - Con Andrew Martin £8,246.95 - £14.00 Clive Richard 67,495 £597.96 £41.00 £145.12 - £15.00 Martin £1,320.30 £1,370.41 £80.00 Fox Allen Frederick - £8,878.81 Wood - - £410.00 - Peacock £5,643.52 £9,553.61 £8,246.95 - - SL £68.40 Hawkings - £50.00 - £733.41 £571.73 Tettenborn - £1,632.39 Pinnock - LD £750.00 - - £50.00 £5,605.80 Lord Boulton £9,531.04 - Lucinda Caroline Anne Burton - - £5.00 Lab - Con £949.00 Shersby £9,133.14 - £4,600.09 £100.00 - Lab UKI Con - - - - £566.68 - £8,246.95 - £9,497.25 £9,497.25 £642.86 £385.00 LD £525.00 Linton £9,553.61 - - £20.00 £341.25 £772.10 - - £8,246.95 Grn £9,553.61 £478.78 £150.00 £1,012.61 - £750.00 UKI £150.00 Grn £125.00 - Con - £912.04 £1,818.94 £350.00 £438.50 - £9,553.61 £220.00 £717.80 - - £8,023.53 £841.00 £750.00 - - £35.00 - £1,687.60 Lab £54.00 - £8,682.94 £8,834.56 £10,018.81 £235.00 - - £6,764.85 £585.00 £1,304.99 £50.00 £10,388.13 £6,914.66 - £438.42 - £8,892.57 £9,261.49 - £3,108.02 - £8,892.57 - - £9,531.04 £140.76 - £632.96 - £6,713.81 £53.00 £1.50 £9,497.25 ------£250.00 - - - £5.00 - £250.00 - - - £165.88 - £3,042.72 £750.00 - £831.14 £7,334.81 - £1,316.00 £51.99 £1,706.33 - £9,497.25 £439.08 £63.17 - £15.00 £45.00 - £246.85 £72.00 - - £494.13 - £322.00 £10,202. Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 104 5.00 Christopher Harkness Armstrong Area Constituency No. Name3535 Battersea36 Battersea36 Beaconsfield Constitu- 36 Beaconsfield Electorate Candidate Beaconsfield3637 Beaconsfield ency type Beckenham3737 C Beckenham Candidate37 Beckenham Forename37 Beckenham 69,34237 Beckenham Dominic Charles Roberts Party Grieve38 Beckenham38 Bedford Siobhan Moyra B38 Bedford Thomas Edward Personal 38 Stephen Michael Bedford Surname 72,77238 Stephen Anthony Con Bedford Jacqueline Anne Vitelli39 Bedford Barber39 Andrew Bedfordshire Mid Lathrope Lloyd39 Bedfordshire Mid £125.00 Lait39 Bedfordshire Mid40 Bedfordshire Mid Richard Frederick £980.00 B LD Lab Ind40 Bedfordshire North East Alexander David40 Bedfordshire North East expenses Karen Anne £250.00 C LD40 Bedfordshire North East Watts 67,762 Moffatt Christopher Norman Patrick41 Con Bedfordshire North East C Rif Feakes £15.00 £3,580.07 Agents Bedfordshire South West 70,794 Pratt Expenses subject to legal maximum Jonathan41 - £41.86 £210.23 - 69,87741 Bedfordshire South West £598.73 Moran Alastair James Hendrie UKI Charlotte Nicola Clerks Lab41 C Bedfordshire South West Burt Michael Paul LD £1,274.0042 Bedfordshire South West £8.00 James Emmanuel - Richard Duddingston42 Belfast East UKI Hall 70,666 Graham Arthur George Jennifer Bryant Printing42 Belfast East Attenborough Andrew Edmund £2,914.03 Philip Edward Rawlins - - Sayeed - Christopher George Mabbutt Grn42 Belfast East Daniel John Winfield Meetings Valentine £100.0042 Belfast East Con Headley Rosalind - - Committee - Con Laurence £7,942.3342 Belfast East - Selous £50.00 Lo Bianco42 £9,722.93 Belfast East Ind £25.00 Ross LD Con £6,884.28 Lab - Lab - Andrew Richard42 - Belfast East Lib £1,444.24 £75.00 £250.00 Martin James42 Belfast East LD Misc Rogerson UKI - B UKI £20.00 Thomas Harold43 Belfast East - £2,006.40 £4,865.79 Con - -43 £304.33 Belfast North £800.00 £75.00 Hill £400.00 £40.00 Legal Date £215.00 58,45543 Belfast North - Lab LD David Peter - £80.0043 Belfast North £500.00 Pantling £100.00 £15.00 £986.00 - Total - Wise £250.00 - -43 Belfast North £503.97 - - - - -43 Belfast North - - - £6,523.35 £592.00 £6,744.69 £618.99 £200.0044 Belfast North - £3,626.39 Max Tim £15.00 Lab £53.24 - UKI £58.00 £25.00 £8,897.25 £1,359.0044 Belfast South - LD £4,089.65 David Robinson £45.00 - £6,085.6744 £100.00 £8,854.29 B Belfast South £15.00 - - - David Walter £854.07 UKI £124.0044 Belfast South - £410.78 £855.40 Joseph Gerard - - £499.82 £130.00 £43.27 -44 £90.00 Belfast South £7,190.52 Ciara - - 60,941 - DUP44 Belfast South £76.39 Nigel Alexander - Terry - £1,472.38 £305.00 £2,475.18 £5,746.19 £265.0444 £200.00 Belfast South - - Joseph £1,487.51 ------£9,722.93 Ervine44 £9,722.93 Belfast South O'Donnell - £2,109.14 Rainbow George £500.00 - £8,588.00 £1,419.71 - £50.00 B Lemon45 £318.00 Belfast South £8,892.07 Alderdice - - - Dodds -45 Gerry Belfast West £6,859.47 £1,428.84 £9,81 - £77.00 -45 Alban Belfast West - £9,373.38 59,436 Weiss SF £8,446.35 £4,577.37 - £36.00 - Cecil - Belfast West William Martin £2,455.23 - £10.00 - Farren - Prog U £9,872.00 - - APNI £304.33 £8,603.78 Marcella £1,052.70 - UU - Dick £1,560.00 - Bell £8,588.00 - Rainbow George DUP - £305.00 £9,722.93 £70.00 £15.00 £3,641.39 - £5.00 - Alasdair Vote - - £8,854.29 Smyth £360.00 £4,139.65 - - - - - SDLP Monica £7,831.52 Kelly £210.61 - - Weiss £692.47 B - £8,854.29 - £1,800.14 Alex Maginness - £9,865.66 - - £95.60 £217.00 £1,084.60 £546.09 Con £5,896.85 Geraldine Ann Delaney WP Walker - £433.25 - £1,719.45 59,617 £2,831.61 Dawn £40.88 £854.07 - £85.00 £5.00 Gerry - UU £390.58 SDLP £9,872.00 Joseph Patrick £9,872.00 £25.30 £8,854.29 - £7,765.56 £499.82 £400.00 - Vote - Rainbow George - SF McDonnell - £8,603.78 £8,854.29 - - - £31.46 WP Rice - £6,173.76 £540.88 McWilliams UU £3,062.81 £4,698.27 - Alex - £8,603.78 - - £9,815.00 Lynn £433.25 - £8,603.78 - Weiss SDLP Eric Maskey £1,089.16 - - - NIWC - - £9,815.00 - - Purvis - £117.00 - £232.92 - - - Adams - APNI - £7,347.86 - - - - - £38.00 £1,785.00 £981.00 SF £100.00 £50.00 - £4,790.09 Vote - WP £2,038.06 - £30.00 - £9,865.66 £380.00 £6,036.36 - £1,462.52 £13.42 Prog U £286.25 - Attwood SF - - £1,184.60 - - £433.25 Smyth £5,926.85 - £9,872.00 - £9,865.66 £8,603.78 - - - - £1,183.49 - - £9,865.66 £7,686.28 - £8,854.29 - £465.00 - £8,189.46 - - - SDLP £9,815.00 - - - £4,014.04 - - - £1,337.40 - £286.25 DUP - £320.00 - £6,193.59 ------£7,684.36 - £4,536.46 £2.04 £1,298.64 - £4,626.13 - - - £1,523.60 - - £345.85 £3,253.85 - - - £1,800.46 - £7,655.00 - £6,465.10 £13.42 ------£8,189.46 £17.60 £8,308.23 £80.00 £5,135.94 £8,189.46 £7,747.86 - - - - £286.25 £1,918.88 - - - £8,189.46 - - £981.00 £303.85 - - - - - £2,759.27 £8,189.46 £8,189.46 - £1,470.40 £85.95 - - £995.00 £17.60 £48.60 - £58.76 - - £5,887.39 £1,183.49 - £4,099.99 - - £8,189.46 £8,189.46 - - £13.42 £6,242.19 - £303.85 £4,698.31 - - - £6,266.93 - £1,337.40 £8,308.23 £162.50 £8,308.23 £8,308.23 - - - £8,189.46 £1,141.87 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 105 Area Constituency No. Name4545 Belfast West45 Belfast West45 Belfast West Constitu- 46 Belfast West Electorate46 Candidate Berwick-upon-Tweed46 Berwick-upon-Tweed46 Berwick-upon-Tweed ency type47 Berwick-upon-Tweed47 Bethnal Green & Bow C47 Bethnal Green & Bow Candidate47 Bethnal Green & Bow 56,918 Forename47 Bethnal Green & Bow Alan James47 Bethnal Green & Bow B Party48 Bethnal Green & Bow Christopher48 Beverley & Holderness John 76,55648 Beverley & Holderness David Hugh Glen Howard Oona Tamsyn Personal 48 Beverley & Holderness Rainbow George Martin Beith Surname49 Beverley & Holderness John Samuel Sanderson C49 Bexhill & Battle McGimpsey49 Bexhill & Battle Shahagir Weiss King49 Bexhill & Battle Janet 74,741 Con UU James Douglas50 Bexhill & Battle Anna Leigh LD Lowry Pearson50 Bexleyheath & Crayford Kerr Michael50 Walker Bexleyheath & Crayford Dennis William £364.88 Vote50 Bexleyheath & Crayford expenses C Cran Lab Pippa £146.00 Bakth50 Bexleyheath & Crayford B UKI Brian Stewart51 WP Bexleyheath & Crayford Bragga - Stephen John 69,01051 Delderfield £433.25 Agents Billericay Ludlow UTW Lab Expenses subject to legal maximum Gregory Leonard George Barker51 63,580 Billericay Davidson - Christopher Nigel51 Billericay Con Con - Clerks52 NBP Billericay Willie - Grn £500.00 Wallis52 Birkenhead LD - Stephen Philip - Langford Beard BNP - -52 Birkenhead Con Anne Elizabeth David Anthony £400.00 - Printing £7,267.0553 Birkenhead - Nigel Paul Nicholas53 Birmingham Edgbaston - Meetings Colin £791.67 LD53 - Birmingham Edgbaston £65.00 Lab - Hardy C John William £387.45 UKI Committee -53 - Birmingham Edgbaston - Moore-Williams Lab - Evennett £7,892.31 -53 Birmingham Edgbaston - - B - Lab £950.00 - 78,52854 Birmingham Edgbaston £280.00 £100.00 B John Charles £95.00 Farage £760.3354 Birmingham Erdington Misc £286.25 O'Hare - - - £260.00 LD54 67,405 - Dunford Birmingham Erdington Con £25.00 - Gisela Gschaider No election expenses return submitted - £299.5454 Birmingham Erdington - 60,026 - Legal Smith £7,123.18 Frank £4,347.73 - -54 - Birmingham Erdington £7,457.18 - Amanda Nicole B Baron UKI -54 Birmingham Erdington - £179.53 - - - Francis £1,204.40 £391.00 Total Stuart LD UKI £22.0054 Birmingham Erdington - £5.00 Nigel Graham Nicholas John - - £2,387.74 £565.2855 Birmingham Erdington - Nicola Sian 65,668 £329.87 £600.00 Brian Joseph -55 - Campbell Birmingham Hall Green Sion Llewelyn - Max BNP £500.00 - £200.00 John Collis - Roy John - £3,315.67 £1,969.60 £7,832.0555 Birmingham Hall Green £500.00 £205.00 Samuel - Con £500.00 - - - - -55 £200.00 Birmingham Hall Green £9,011.91 £1,207.50 £8,317.18 £588.77 Lab £330.00 Yeomans Hastilow - Field -56 Birmingham Hall Green - £9,011.91 Lab £660.00 B Bellard £390.00 Oliver Arthur Wynlayne Stewart £6,249.8756 Birmingham Hodge Hill £3,330.42 - £3,319.14 Simon Davies - £17.60 £300.00 £102.50 £9,327.35 £15.00 Sandra -56 Lodge Birmingham Hodge Hill - - - £10,116.94 Gretton - Michael Patrick UKI56 - - Birmingham Hodge Hill - 57,563 - Wood Con £10.00 - £1,150.33 £1,830.81 £578.00 Stephen James Steven John56 Birmingham Hodge Hill - - £9,099.68 £4,562.73 £982.08 - B £7,558.87 £8,254.32 - Brackenbury Lab Mark £1,902.00 £303.8556 - LD Birmingham Hodge Hill Con - - £9,761.62 £9,061.00 LD Lab Judith56 £8,254.32 £8.50 Birmingham Hodge Hill - £425.00 Con - Shore £4,957.55 - - PEC56 Birmingham Hodge Hill SL £31.00 55,254 £575.00 McCabe - - Christopher Mark Francis - £2,293.00 £30.00 Terry - LD White - - Birmingham Hodge Hill Johnson £75.00 Godward - Punjab £40.00 - £9,011.91 - - £300.00 £7,577.65 £150.00 - - £5.00 Frank Peter £150.00 £2,418.74 - £1,475.13 £4,501.57 £42.68 £131.70 £9,061.00 - £1,204.40 £69.48 £361.80 - £550.00 £200.00 £9,011.91 - £800.00 Lab NF - - Deborah Anne £8,254.32 - LD - Nattrass SA £1,217.92 - Charles Alistair £7,967.55 Con £565.28 Sambrook-MarshallSL - £3,492.12 £153.50 - £180.00 £30.00 - - - £7,343.73 £3,398.62 £8,586.24 £10,116.94 - Lee £8,407.68 £8,254.32 - - - £10,116.94 £3,315.67 - £1,994.60 - - - £1,043.00 £637.44 £100.00 Johnson - Parwez Davis Singh £9,061.00 £9,061.00 £2,015.49 £2,000.00 - Lewis £176.55 £1,992.81 Dennis £450.00 £8,288.87 UKI £588.77 £27.00 Dow Harvey Bernard - £5,193.00 £9,761.62 - £8,407.68 £9,061.00 £9,794.81 £660.00 - - £53.41 - Ayub - £515.88 £1,596.38 - - - - £300.00 £9,761.62 £5,164.10 UKI £9,061.00 ------£9,761.62 £325.00 Lab LD £60.00 £3,024.46 Vivian Con £7,017.45 £5,078.23 - - £919.93 Hussain - £1,184.00 Windridge £982.08 £3,012.13 £4,877.37 LD £8,407.68 - - £684.85 £10,116.94 - - - Cridge £479.64 - - £410.00 - - - - £100.00 £1,073.35 - - - £828.11 BNP £1,876.03 £9,596.09 Khan UKI PJP - £8,383.37 £6,434.63 - £10,351.74 - - - - - £1,554.14 £100.00 - £8,599.68 £1,475.13 - £293.75 - SL - - £339.97 £2,897.01 £8,407.68 £7,479.03 - £300.00 - - £10,351.74 - - - £763.30 £8,599.68 £5,713.21 £50.00 £395.00 - £215.00 - £200.00 M - £1,019.63 - - - £140.82 - - - £1,043.00 - - - £3,713.21 £2,611.38 £8,4 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 106 Small Heath Small Heath Small Heath Small Heath Small Heath Small Heath Small Heath Small Heath Area Constituency No. Name5757 Birmingham Ladywood57 Birmingham Ladywood57 Birmingham Ladywood Constitu- 57 Birmingham Ladywood Electorate B57 Candidate Birmingham Ladywood57 Birmingham Ladywood57 Birmingham Ladywood 71,113 ency type Clare58 Birmingham Ladywood58 Birmingham Northfield58 Birmingham Northfield Candidate58 Birmingham Northfield Benjamin Henry Forename58 Birmingham Northfield Sultan Mahmood B58 Birmingham Northfield Party Allah58 Birmingham Northfield Surinder Pal Short59 Birmingham Northfield Prentice 55,922 Mahmood Chaudhry59 Barr Birmingham Perry Richard Haines Personal James59 Barr Birmingham Perry Surname Anneliese59 Barr Birmingham Perry Con LD59 Barr Birmingham Perry Virdee Lab Burden B Nils John59 Barr Birmingham Perry Peter Ditta Trevor Hussain59 Barr Birmingham Perry Stephen Leonard59 Barr Birmingham Perry 71,121 £100.00 Clive Richard Khalid60 Barr Birmingham Perry Nattrass Caffery SL Zane Lab60 Birmingham Selly Oak - Andrew Mark M Rogers60 Birmingham Selly Oak expenses - Purser Sword PJP60 Birmingham Selly Oak Robert Davidson UKI60 Birmingham Selly Oak Walder - PL £605.00 £50.00 Alastair Jonathan Paul B61 Agents Birmingham Selly Oak Expenses subject to legal maximum Singh Avtar Birmingham Sparkbrook & UKI Hunt £100.00 Chaffer - Mahmood Caroline Nicola Binns61 Con LD - 71,237 Clerks Natalya Carpenter Birmingham Sparkbrook & Mary Lynne - B SA Michael Francis -61 - - - Robert Lowington Lab Birmingham Sparkbrook & £450.00 Comm Johnson - Jouhl - 74,358 - Printing61 LD £25.00 SL Roger Duncan Con - - £944.00 George Kenneth Birmingham Sparkbrook & Roche Meetings £300.00 Davidson £500.00 David61 - Jones £100.00 £2,455.64 Committee £310.00 - - Barney Nattrass £3,667.46 Birmingham Sparkbrook & SA - - Sheila Beryl61 Hardeman - - Godsiff SL - Birmingham Sparkbrook & M £30.00 £5,149.35 Qassim Hussain - Marx -61 Misc ------Lab £4,207.27 UKI - - Birmingham Sparkbrook & £425.00 Shafaq Con -61 - - Legal £5,702.88 £640.00 Afzal Lab £100.00 £56.26 £15.00 - Williams Osborne Birmingham Sparkbrook & - Iftkhar - - Smith £453.20 £75.0562 - £27.00 £300.00 Total - -62 Birmingham Yardley - - Gul £88.22 - - £86.95 £275.00 - £240.0062 Birmingham Yardley £5.00 - £917.22 - LD - £4,197.51 UKI £300.00 - -62 Birmingham Yardley £253.02 - Max Wayne £1,061.60 - LD - Hussain £8,774.81 £5,682.2462 - Birmingham Yardley Grn £2,557.59 £1,254.00 £302.00 £1,436.15 £15.0063 Birmingham Yardley - Abdul £8,774.81 - £3,455.11 - £8,774.81 - B £992.94 - -63 Hussain Bishop Auckland - - £25.34 - -63 Bishop Auckland - - Mohammad Salman £5,456.35 £531.46 £6,283.42 - - PJP £3,853.38 - £20.00 -63 Bishop Auckland - 52,444 £8,073.17 £8,774.81 - - Estelle Mohammed64 Mirza Bishop Auckland - £6,378.08 - - Vincent - Con £270.00 £6,549.3464 - Blaby £6,000.00 - - - £1,000.00 £540.45 -64 - £8,073.17 Blaby - - Ind - £200.00 - C - - £364.57 - £5,446.2164 Blaby Aziz £286.00 - John Alexander Melvin £1,282.99 -65 £100.00 Blaby - £3,809.00 Barrie Moelwyn Antony £453.20 £25.00 - SA Hemming UKI Blackburn 67,368 £1,596.48 £92.61 £143.00 £58.41 Alan James - £13.10 Roberts - £206.44 Derek - £6,238.24 - - - - £100.00 Morris Colin Dennis - £8,776.14 - £453.20 £20.00 - - £942.22 £3,847.72 - LD £8,774.81 - M £1,074.70 - - £311.43 - £8,073.17 £1,217.90 £620.00 £8,776.14 £8,774.81 £8,073.17 £275.00 £88.22 £654.12 Fiona Priscilla Con £3,205.50 £8,073.17 ------Ware C £8,774.81 £8,774.81 - £100.00 Chris - £1,012.94 - - Lab Wren £300.00 £241.00 Carl David £8,073.17 - £7,352.20 £340.00 Foster £5,298.20 £180.00 £150.00 C £264.00 73,907 £726.00 £96.55 £1,860.62 - - £8,778.53 Andrew Robert George McNish - £6,307.21 - £195.00 - £430.00 - - Robathan £3,853.38 £1,765.99 £300.00 £8,778.53 UKI - - 72,611 - £4,173.00 £1,096.55 - £8,776.14 £8,776.14 SL £720.45 £1.00 John Whitaker £8,933.37 £8,776.14 Bennett Lab £8,776.14 - £125.00 - John David Wood Foote Con Con - - £376.50 Geoffrey Lee £70.29 - - - - - Edward £3,703.90 - - - Straw LD £350.00 £1,333.22 £4,246.57 Grn - - £173.45 £453.20 £1,289.19 - - £8,933.37 - £8,073.17 £1,318.63 £8,776.14 Morgan £206.44 £8,778.53 - Welsh £7,061.42 - - - £450.00 £8,776.14 - £350.00 - - £200.00 £8,933.37 £20.00 Lab - - Scott £5,610.00 £150.00 £4,439.44 - £20.00 - Lab £50.00 - £2,160.62 - £453.20 - LD £8,933.37 - - £35.00 - - - £726.00 - - £50.00 - - £5,542.95 BNP - £8,778.53 - - - £500.20 - £12.10 £4,183.90 £603.25 £5,649.16 £39.00 £3,459.53 £7,910.33 £250.00 - - £2,168.50 - £930.50 £1,838.83 £8,778.53 £448.50 - £555.11 - £8,933.37 ------£7,211.19 £613.00 - £221.63 - £7,910.33 - £217.50 - - - £73.50 £6,223.00 - £6,808.69 £5,672.84 - £8,933.37 £10,065.23 - £7,910.33 £251.00 - - - £140.00 £3,082.45 - - £1,506.08 £6,117.66 £390.00 £453.20 £25.50 - £9,659.81 - - £8,933.37 - - £8,933.37 £349.66 £25.00 £3,683.03 - - - £9,659.81 £490.31 £6,802.50 £360.72 - £9,885.44 - £980.50 £448.50 £3,493.67 - £9,659.81 £10,065.23 £7,910.33 - £11.97 - £7,910.33 £11.97 - - £9,659.81 £1,506.08 £399.71 £10,0 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 107 Area Constituency No. Name6565 Blackburn65 Blackburn65 Blackburn Constitu- 65 Blackburn Electorate65 Candidate Blackburn66 Blackburn66 Blackpool North & Fleetwood ency type66 Blackpool North & Fleetwood B66 Blackpool North & Fleetwood67 Blackpool North & Fleetwood Candidate67 Blackpool South 74,456 Jovanka Joan Forename67 Blackpool South67 Blackpool South Party68 Blackpool South68 John Anthony Blaenau Gwent Alan Thomas Humble68 Imtiaz Blaenau Gwent Personal Steven B68 Dorothy Blaenau Gwent Surname John Colin69 Terence Blaenau Gwent James69 Frederick Blaydon Cotton 74,311 Lab Vincent Robert69 Paul Blaydon Gordon70 Blaydon C70 Blyth Valley Nichol Porter Patel70 Bate Blyth Valley Baxter Con 53,353 David Thomas71 Con Blyth Valley Cullen Llewellyn Thomas Doreen Morris71 Bognor Regis & Littlehampton expenses - Lilian Valerie 71 Bognor Regis & Littlehampton C Marsden SA71 Bognor Regis & Littlehampton £275.50 Smith UKI B UKI LD Morris71 Agents Bognor Regis & Littlehampton LD Adam John Expenses subject to legal maximum SL 66,90372 Bognor Regis & Littlehampton - Charles Edward Ind Nicholas John B £500.0072 Lab Bolsover 64,574 Huw Benedict £432.30 - Cowell Clerks John David72 Bolsover Holt £94.15 £600.00 £300.00 Lab73 Bolsover 63,183 Con Townsend Ronald73 Bolton North East - Rykala George Keith Gibb - Printing £6,913.1473 Bolton North East - Grace Pamela Williams James Peter - - UKI73 Bolton North East - George Yarver £740.87 - Meetings £465.00 Mark Anthony - LD McWilliam -73 Bolton North East - Lilias Rider Haggard LD Committee Jeffrey Stewart74 Bolton North East £6,585.62 Wayne PC O'Neill -74 Bolton South East - Cheyne Con Peskett £5,231.01 Con B C - -74 Bolton South East Lab Stride Campbell Maughan - - Watson74 - Bolton South East Misc - £202.46 - Reid - - -75 67,693 69,514 Bolton South East - £180.00 Dennis Edward David Anthony £50.00 - £3,835.4675 Bolton West Lab Grn £600.00 Legal - LD - £272.00 - Lab LD75 Bolton West - B £560.00 - - £750.00 £126.50 UKI Con £800.00 -75 Bolton West Daley - Total - £8,040.83 £1,082.78 - £40.00 -76 Bolton West £8,187.60 Skinner - Michael William £1,379.00 Simon Adrian LD Crausby £800.57 68,140 £250.0076 Bootle £8,907.98 £205.00 £678.00 James Timothy Wilhemina Marie Brian - - £2,496.52 £2,432.88 £454.0076 Bootle £807.95 Max £196.37 - £7,997.00 Graeme Kenneth - - -76 Bootle - - £6,658.55 - £7,946.19 Lynne - - Con -76 £20.00 Winstanley Bootle C Lab Lab - £8,907.98 £50.00 - - Bradley Massey - £6,067.3877 Bootle Perkins Haroon £309.80 McIver - -77 - £9,885.44 Boston & Skegness - - - £55.75 Frank £1,664.53 - - 66,033 -77 Con Boston & Skegness £1,198.93 - William John - Ruth Maria - - -77 Boston & Skegness - £4,271.76 - £97.00 - £311.00 Iddon Con LD77 - Boston & Skegness - £629.00 £9,885.44 - LD - - £480.00 £690.00 Grn78 - Boston & Skegness - £1,141.54 - £115.00 Lowe B - - - - C £393.86 £404.1978 Bosworth - Winston James - £5,298.53 - Rashid £50.00 Kelly £250.0078 Bosworth - - - Barbara Olwyn - £250.00 Kelly - £50.00 55,455 £100.00 - £75.00 Bosworth Harasiwka - 69,165 Lab £8,845.83 David £18.00 Joseph Edward £2,987.38 £8,712.19 - £1,138.53 - £2,891.69 £55.75 Mark Jonathan Mortlock - - £500.00 - - £3,176.00 £8,901.31 £1,429.00 £150.00 £8,790.88 Simmonds £8,901.31 - £8,907.98 - £4,820.76 - Stevens £3,140.07 SL £417.00 £110.51 £5,219.70 £750.00 - £308.62 - £9,885.44 - Con £2,450.88 £728.00 £1,100.00 £3,035.23 Ronson £123.00 LD £9,885.44 SL £7,251.10 £8,188.55 Benton £9,885.44 £8,907.98 James Peter £25.00 £270.00 £212.00 £20.00 Con - Lab Elaine Louise - £1,870.04 £9,630.98 Judith Rosemary - - - - £454.00 £1,455.12 Duncan Paul - Con - - £580.00 £8,790.88 - David C - - - £6,724.04 Cyril £9,885.44 £294.64 £207.11 LD Toomer Peter - - - Martin Edmund Ranby £1,342.84 - - Lab £1,254.68 Symes £600.00 £50.00 £15.00 69,992 £2,387.25 Murray Harrison Bird - - £8,901.31 David Arthur Stephen - - £3,764.95 £5,717.64 - - - £5.00 - - Moffatt - £90.00 - £9,630.98 £8,453.40 - - - £834.98 - Tredinnick £25.00 £1,156.54 SA £4,726.66 - - £687.50 - £486.28 - £8,790.88 £200.00 £900.00 Con Grn £629.00 £987.49 £401.00 - - - £372.95 Flynn LD Andrew Charles £378.73 £690.00 £5,705.74 £600.00 £8,790.88 - Wakefield Con - £392.60 Jonathan Mark Henry Glover Lab LD £8,901.31 £8,389.42 - - £178.00 £3,376.00 - £640.53 £5,384.35 - £8,142.10 - - £3,513.02 £0.30 Ellis £231.21 £250.00 £5,598.43 - £138.00 £9,630.98 - - - £8,680.64 £2,048.36 Furlong £9,630.98 £3,158.22 - £8,453.40 - £120.00 - UKI £3,040.23 £4,271.35 £8,377.06 SL £9,608.91 £640.00 £300.00 £258.50 £7,303.08 - £8,389.42 - SA £417.00 £8,680.64 £1,100.00 - - £4,613.61 £6,768.73 £33.00 - - £800.00 £50.00 - £9,630.98 - - £8,453.40 £220.00 £9,608.91 - £119.85 Lab £3.00 - £82.01 £2,977.70 LD £110.00 £23.50 £726.67 £7,809.25 - £1,375.84 £220.00 £550.00 - £7,943.04 £203.00 £8,389.42 £1,214.97 - - £90.00 - - £609.69 - £846.79 - - - - - £10.00 £1,420.26 - £536.36 - £9,608.91 £2,851.82 £1,949.37 £7,309.32 - - - £4,696.07 - £5,657.71 - £8 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 108 Edward Area Constituency No. Name7979 Bournemouth East79 Bournemouth East79 Bournemouth East Constitu- 80 Bournemouth East Electorate80 Candidate Bournemouth West80 Bournemouth West B80 Bournemouth West ency type81 Bournemouth West 61,52081 Bracknell David Anthony B81 Bracknell Candidate81 Bracknell Forename81 Bracknell 63,19682 Bracknell Andrew Charles William John Valentine Atkinson Party82 Garratt Bradford North Matthew Paul 82 Bradford North John George Frederick 82 Bradford North Chamberlaine Personal David Llewellyn Kelsey Con82 Butterfill Bradford North C Surname Fiona Clare83 Bradford North UKI Stokes LD Nicholson Cynthia Nina83 Bradford South 81,11883 Bradford South B Andrew James £18.80 Con Bradford South £200.00 Lab83 £56.00 Lab Hornby £600.00 66,44383 Bradford South Blake Henry Terence 83 Bradford South MacKay Janet Hazel £50.00 £158.21 £600.0083 Bradford South expenses B Raymond William £251.1484 Bradford South - Lawrence John Alan £840.0084 LD Bradford West - Dominica Mary £6,351.69 Zahid Rooney 68,44184 Agents Bradford West Con UKI Earwicker Boxall David Gerry Expenses subject to legal maximum84 Bradford West Keene £50.00 John -84 Bradford West Steven - - Clerks84 Roberts Bradford West £75.00 - Lab - LD £4,395.19 £25.00 £37.0085 Bradford West Graham Stuart Gareth UKI85 Braintree Alexander Charles £127.00 £1,060.00 £374.00 B Lab Tennyson £566.16 Printing £7,773.4985 Braintree - Iqbal £120.00 -85 PL Braintree Ward Peter Meetings £560.00 Sutcliffe £80.00 Wilson Fletcher £10.00 £295.18 -85 Braintree £20.00 71,611 Anthony Brayshaw Committee £2,611.17 - Marsha Schofield85 Con Braintree LD Ateeq £3,047.89 £359.65 -86 Braintree £20.00 George Frank £8,220.87 -86 Brecon & Radnorshire £20.00 Con - Lab - £8,301.19 BNP86 Brecon & Radnorshire Misc LD £338.40 £7,852.93 - Grn - £6,331.84 - Mohammed -86 £24.90 Brecon & Radnorshire - C - John Edward £8,380.86 86 Brecon & Radnorshire £20.00 Legal Kelly North £320.00 Riseborough £85.50 £100.00 Abdul Rauf £3,040.66 C86 Brecon & Radnorshire Singh £35.00 - - £150.00 Imran - 79,15786 Brecon & Radnorshire - Siddique £750.00 £621.06 Hussain Farhan Alan Arthur Total DW £200.00 £20.00 £85.00 -87 Brecon & Radnorshire - Riaz - - £8,301.19 53,247 £101.33 Robinson87 Brent East Roger Hugh - - £25.00 £5,420.82 - £200.00 -87 Brent East UKI Max £220.00 £1,925.99 SL £100.00 Khan SA Lab - £7,793.4987 - Khokhar Brent East £2,747.50 - Brooks Phillip Victor - £15.00 £3,465.54 £3,222.8987 Brent East £8,301.19 £5,914.00 £8,301.19 - Grn £3,074.40 John Russell Peter Hurst Elfed £9,303.43 Franc Felix £1,305.0087 £8,380.86 Brent East - £1,006.58 James Edward Hussain Con Newmark - £10,621.56 £106.00 Williams - - Ifor Huw87 Brent East £594.20 Michael Anthony - £10.00 £10.00 £1,303.56 AL Turner Brynach -88 £57.30 Brent East Charles John £56.31 - LD - - Ian Randall88 Brent North £65.00 Aubel - - £13.78 £285.00 B £38.50 Elizabeth Fletcher Con88 Brent North Abbott £5,947.67 UKI £8,044.38 Lab - Nolan LD £3,117.96 Robert Douglas89 Brent North - - £115.80 - - £306.00 £498.77 £8,539.38 £8,380.86 - £300.0089 Brent South - £159.33 LD 55,891 Cole Phillips - Irranca-Davies89 Brent South Andrew £300.00 Paul - £500.00 - £183.13 £4,614.22 Con - - Mitchell Parri £100.00 Brent South £3,962.54 £120.00 - £298.00 £400.00 Nicholson - - Grn Lab £10,621.56 £3,382.23 No election expenses return submitted £629.25 LCA £750.00 - - - £20.00 £8,631.29 - - £100.00 £6,612.93 £7,643.04 £40.00 B - £750.00 David Michael £2,045.99 UKI £8,539.38 £10,621.56 Daisley Ind - UKI Nowsheen Mahfuz £1,692.14 £150.00 £8,380.86 Ind - £10.00 £67.00 - £10,621.56 £6,009.52 £660.00 - - £300.00 £50.00 Simone Florence - - PC 58,789 - B - Barry Strachan Sarah - - £434.28 - £112.40 - Bhatti Iris Mary Jessie - £31.50 Gauke - £117.00 £676.49 £6.50 Lab Ashwinkumar 55,891 Aspis £607.98 - - £7,826.49 £150.00 Yaw Paul £10,621.56 £18.00 - £5,218.50 - - - £573.00 £755.75 Philip David - - - Gardiner - - - £6,724.16 £8,539.38 £1,904.02 - Cremer Paul - £8,631.29 LD - - Con - - £2,065.50 £10.00 £6,568.79 - £8,714.54 £516.77 £1,128.56 £900.00 Tanna £750.00 - Carupiah - Macken Grn £8,275.94 - £8,777.11 £8,631.29 Lab £750.00 - Havard - - £183.70 £1,042.00 £16.77 £5,983.15 £8,777.11 - No election expenses return submitted Allott - Boateng - £337.00 SL - £479.60 £410.00 £91.00 £216.52 £345.00 - - £14.00 £8,539.38 £500.00 - - £25.00 PL UKI - £361.15 - £390.00 £8,539.38 £9.49 £1,991.67 Lorber - - £5,060.53 - Lab - Selvarajah - - - - - £30.00 - Con - £9,274.64 £8,631.29 Hughes - - £160.00 £10,341.44 - £8,758.16 £967.43 - - - - Con £867.00 £660.00 - £8,784.31 £8,657.89 £1,038.53 - £810.00 £548.73 - - LD £8,631.29 £200.00 - £8,631.29 - - - £3,349.70 £935.43 £20.00 - LD - - - £10,341.44 £735.00 £7,181.68 - - £10,341.44 £4,969.33 £27.00 - £7,766.33 - - - - £1,294.82 £560.00 £755.75 - £1,148.56 - £10.00 - - £8,777.11 - - - £8,777.11 £1,387.00 £408.85 - £10.00 £10.00 - £8,732.85 £8,631.29 £8,777.11 £4,590.06 £7,090.35 - £432.00 £900. Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 109 Beatrice Seymour Webber Area Constituency No. Name8989 Brent South90 Brent South90 Brentford & Isleworth Constitu- 90 Brentford & Isleworth Electorate90 Candidate Brentford & Isleworth90 Brentford & Isleworth90 Brentford & Isleworth B ency type90 Brentford & Isleworth91 Brentford & Isleworth 82,87891 Brentwood & Ongar Candidate Ann91 Brentwood & Ongar Forename91 Brentwood & Ongar91 Brentwood & Ongar Party91 Brentwood & Ongar Andrew Kenneth Timothy Michael C Mack91 Brentwood & Ongar Gareth Gerard Tomas91 Brentwood & Ongar Nicholas Peter Personal 92 Brentwood & Ongar 64,693 Gerald Aleck Surname Eric Jack92 Keen Bridgend Daniel Philip Bridgend Hartwell Asa Singh Con92 Ferriday McDonnell92 Bridgend Martin Ingram MacStiofain92 Bridgend David John Lab Faith93 Bridgend LD Pickles Diana Ruth SA93 Bridgwater Grn RM Arnold Kenneth Khaira93 Bridgwater - expenses Leonard Peter 93 Bridgwater UKI C David Laurence94 Bridgwater Tony Kendall Con £20.00 SA94 Agents Brigg & Goole Gulleford Bell Expenses subject to legal maximum - Johnson 61,49694 Brigg & Goole Ind - Winston James - Pryke -94 Brigg & Goole Bishop - Clerks94 £425.00 Brigg & Goole LD C UKI - £534.0095 Brigg & Goole Lab -95 Brighton Kemptown Griffiths Alexandra Teofana Tania £500.00 - Brisby Ind Printing -95 - Brighton Kemptown £7,350.88 74,273 Elvis Ind - C Appleton Ian Richard95 Brighton Kemptown - - Jean Meetings £62.50 £239.33 £15.0095 Brighton Kemptown Monica Emma Committee - Brighton Kemptown - 64,647 Lab Sara Hazel £40.00 B Ian Arthur - -95 Con - no label - Ian Leslie - -95 Brighton Kemptown £2,040.00 - William James - - Liddell-Grainger95 Brighton Kemptown Misc £7,684.51 Mahoney £7,418.73 68,119 - - £270.00 - - Victoria Charmaine £3,751.50 £84.01 Desmond Stanley96 Brighton Kemptown - Con £2,663.20 Donald McIntyre96 Brighton Pavilion Legal £50.00 Jeremy - Barraclough David Patrick £508.42 - £273.9996 £195.00 Brighton Pavilion Gardner - Cawsey Godfrey William - - Monteith PC Turner £1,120.0096 Brighton Pavilion £750.00 £203.34 - - Thorn Total Michael Albert - Geoffrey Trevor - Stewart96 - LD - - Brighton Pavilion £110.00 - £8,428.87 £1,227.43 - Janet Laura96 £750.00 Brighton Pavilion £455.00 £9,295.38 PL £300.00 Hugh - - Nolan96 Brighton Pavilion UKI Bloom £1,028.00 Max Lab £3,118.05 £6,873.56 £214.22 Lab - James Anthony Amyas B96 Brighton Pavilion - - Lab Theobald Chamberlain- - Kenny £150.00 £516.3397 Con £40.13 Brighton Pavilion £114.10 LD - £5,699.63 - £52.00 - John - - -97 Bristol East £3,182.42 - 69,568 £168.95 - Marshall £100.00 UKI Dave David97 £200.00 Bristol East £6,922.99 £150.00 £8,053.99 £8,588.73 - - £9,155.84 UKI £100.00 LD Elaine Dupree Con97 - Bristol East £103.94 £330.00 £9,295.38 £9,493.97 £6,993.38 - - £6,435.20 -97 Bristol East £977.00 £54.70 SL - £28.50 £1,516.18 £759.11 Miller £90.00 - - -97 Bristol East - - LD - £600.00 David Stanley £50.00 £178.8297 Bristol East - - £145.00 £30.00 - £950.53 £2,040.00 £97.00 Ruth Cook £8,541.7498 Bristol East - £4,141.26 - - £10.00 - £9,295.38 Richard Keith McLeod £2,132.96 £3,751.50 £28.5098 £400.00 Bristol North West £9,493.97 - £19.00 £9,493.97 - - - B Ian Christopher Dobbs Lepper - Bristol North West £9,295.38 £7,827.16 - £40.00 - Grn £781.60 Bob - Gold - - - £9,493.97 £1,128.00 £596.76 £508.42 £9,679.45 £1,255.93 - Stuart James £600.00 - - - 70,279 £10,087.42 £9,493.97 £1,213.65 - £8,053.99 PL £1,057.00 Marie Margaret £9,295.38 SL £513.00 £750.00 - Jean Ann Taylor - £1,731.60 £8,292.56 Fyvie - £9,295.38 - - £1,313.35 £8,231.96 Lab FP £5,613.54 B - Berry £8,988.63 £9,295.75 - - - Con £513.00 Hutchin £9,295.75 - - - Paragallo £19.50 - Jack £1,841.80 - - 76,903 £218.86 £9,295.38 - - John Douglas - £8,269.25 Brian William Grn - - Dobbs SL - Corston - £6,702.44 Geoff - £6,537.47 - £1,319.45 £370.00 £767.00 Roger Clive - £1.00 £1,300.00 - LD PL £1,184.44 £74.20 UKI - - Michael Paul £103.94 £30.00 - - - £6.66 £9,493.97 Charles Christopher £602.00 £2,244.75 - Andrew Mark Naysmith - £140.00 £9,493.97 - £1,491.80 Niblett Lab £54.00 FP - £359.50 Hansard - - - £10.00 - - £178.82 £105.00 Lo Presti £600.00 £9,158.29 - - Marsh £9,402.56 - £9,493.97 Langley - £1,112.00 £6.73 Lab £9,487.15 £220.00 - - Collard - - £9,487.15 £232.52 - - Pryor - - £9,295.75 £85.72 LD Con £1,178.13 - Con £1,738.33 - £7,146.97 - - - - - £57.45 £494.83 £617.73 - - £10,087.42 - SL £9,295.75 £7,404.82 UKI - - - Grn £3,019.93 - £1,313.35 £8,616.47 - £10,087.42 - £19.25 - £6,342.98 - £10,087.42 - SA £820.00 £8.00 £500.00 £780.00 £8,374.25 £7,484.66 £276.31 £8,616.47 - - - £9,295.75 £15.00 £11.00 - - - £1,338.70 - - £1,684.44 £9,487.15 £8,616.47 - £500.00 - - - £2,052.95 - - - - - £10.00 - £500.00 - - - £613.00 £767.00 £496.28 - - £9,487.15 £5,210.99 £9,487.15 £110.00 £238.00 - - £1,491.80 £650.00 £750.00 £821.00 - - £8,616.47 ------£129.25 £6,834.45 - £7,205.98 - - £8,683.13 - - £7,327.67 - £500.00 £1,551.67 - - - £2,761.97 £7,723.91 - £325.00 £250.00 - - £8,683.13 - - - - £1,280.00 - £5.00 £617.73 - £8,616.4 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 110 ayne LD £30.00 £15.00 - £1,858.02 £20.00 £10.00 - £1,903.02 £8,597.29 Trevor Alexander Geoffrey Donald Stephen P Area Constituency No. Name98 Bristol North West9898 Bristol North West Constitu- 99 Bristol North west Electorate99 Candidate Bristol South99 Bristol South99 Bristol South ency type99 Bristol South99 Bristol South Bristol South Candidate99 Forename100 Bristol South B Laurence Peter Bristol West100 Party Bristol West100 Dianne Mary Bristol West 72,490100 Dawn Vincent Michael Bristol West100 Tyzack Personal Bristol West100 Surname Bristol West101 Bromley & Chislehurst Carr Horrigan101 Richard Stephen Bromley & Chislehurst101 B James Russell LD Bromley & Chislehurst 101 Glenn Royston Bromley & Chislehurst102 Christopher Primarolo Eddy B 84,821 Bromsgrove SL102 Bernard Marius Valerie Bromsgrove102 Main UKI Bromsgrove Vowles102 67,183 Giles Barralet expenses Bromsgrove Lab Eric103 - Drummond Broxbourne Stephen Roy103 Prasad Con Broxbourne Joy Pamela 103 Agents Expenses subject to legal maximum Broxbourne - Laird John Fraser 103 LD Shorter Grn SA Susan Ann Broxbourne Davey - C Bernard Joseph103 Broxbourne Clerks Simon David104 - UKI - Williams Robert Michael Broxtowe Devaney104 68,081 Broxtowe £399.00 - Chesters104 Julie Forth £5.00 SL Kennedy - Broxtowe Printing105 B £10.00 Lab £443.91 - Buckingham Polydorou105 £500.00 Bryant LD Meetings - Muir Grn - Buckingham105 Con Committee Buckingham 67,987 Michael Peter 105 SL Marion Audrey £47.74 - Buckingham Lab Alexandra Margaret £2,863.65106 - - Con - Burnley Ian Neil106 - £50.00 - - Burnley UKI C106 - Misc Rowley - Kirkbride Burnley UKI £5,611.15106 David McDonald Roe - Burnley £57.00 C - - £1,566.67106 £750.00 Julia Mary - - Legal 73,665 - Burnley107 Nicholas Douglas Martin £10.00 - - - Burton £255.00 Con107 £880.00 John Arthur - £1,175.45 £2,464.20 Lab - 65,270 LD £500.00 Total Burton - - John Simon107 Gregory - £567.61 Burton Palmer107 £550.00 - - - Con - Burton Elizabeth Pauline 107 £2,709.29 £453.85 Max B Davies - - Burton David Kenneth Prendergast -108 - £55.00 - - - £4,872.96 - Bury North - Mark Anthony Paul Cope -108 UKI £62.00 - £20.69 £250.00 Bury North £750.00 - Bercow Isobel Rosemary Harvey £420.12 Latham -108 66,271 Lab - Lab - Bury North Leslie Peter - Christopher Robin £1,200.80 £8,614.73109 £325.90 - Seddon £7,913.62 £8,844.00 Bury South Watts LD109 £2,884.34 - - £6,051.27 - Bury South C £30.00 - - - Wilson - £335.00109 £35.00 - £9,051.17 £4,496.01 Silcock £263.51 BNP £694.74 Bury South £8,855.26 £258.80 £47.20 Con110 Con UKI - - - Robert John James £835.00 Bury St Edmunds - -110 £219.00 £5,244.23 Lab £395.13 75,259 £641.39 Richard Paul - Pike £2,321.67 Bury St Edmunds - - Janet Elizabeth Ann110 £3,360.70 £90.00 B LD Steven Bury St Edmunds Frost £8,855.26 - £761.00110 £580.00 £8,855.26 LD - £150.00 - Richard Granville £231.25 - - - Bury St Edmunds UKI - - £2,859.33 Dean - - £186.40 £869.20 £750.00 - 71,108 - £8,855.26 - - B - - £750.00 - David Michael £7,898.96 Margaret Alison £393.13 £48.00 £9,051.17 Wright C - £9,099.98 £1,223.19 Buttrey £893.23 - David Alan £8,597.29 Lab - £600.00 £9,167.60 £9,461.17 £6,029.87 £8,855.26 £210.00 £250.00 £1,318.34 Con £2,232.00 Ian Edward 67,276 - - - £567.61 £9,461.17 £9,141.75 Ivan - - 76,146 - John Dominic Wace - - Lab Smith - David Laurie Punyer - £232.00 John £8,855.26 £9,461.17 Chaytor £9,051.17 £287.46 - £7,020.79 - - £7,313.15 - Bryn LD - Roberts UKI £854.00 - £9,746.36 £2,106.79 - - - Fletcher Nicola Lesley £5,741.69 - - Crompton - Mark Alan - - David Timothy - - £180.00 £7,725.76 £40.00 £8,597.29 - Con Lab BNP - Ruffley Alan Richard - - £38.50 - £15.00 - - - PL - £1,699.00 John Edward - - £200.00 £400.00 £148.00 LD Lewis UKI £852.17 £330.00 - £694.74 - Walsh £180.00 Le Page £895.08 £6,654.69 £987.61 Pickstone - £9,461.17 - Hackley - £130.84 - £641.39 Con £509.59 £6,357.87 Ereira £3,412.23 Williams - - - - £9,461.17 £2,450.50 £5.00 - - - - Howlett £100.00 - £8,636.00 £7.00 - £441.45 £30.00 - - £3,211.32 - £9,746.36 £8,855.26 Con £2,677.63 LD Lab - £1,421.60 Con £8,860.38 - £869.20 £1,082.20 - £400.00 LD £8,636.00 - £60.00 £10,050.23 £65.00 £836.07 £3,996.68 £10.00 LD £9,461.17 - Lab £893.23 UKI £777.78 £599.00 - - - - - £9,249.41 £600.00 £4,150.47 - - - £320.00 £65.00 £9,746.36 £846.96 - £10,050.23 - £46.00 - - £864.00 - - £7,236.02 £309.92 £500.00 £5,706.38 £8,597.29 £85.00 £475.00 - - £675.00 - £782.00 £9,746.36 £200.00 £7,573.65 £315.31 - £1,200.00 £9,568.00 - - - £6,991.43 - £164.00 - £200.00 - - £400.00 £2.00 £1,784.00 - - £297.19 - - £3,773.54 £8,636.00 - £120.00 £380.00 - £82.00 - £208.14 £321.40 - £5,519.01 £7,140.79 £236.05 £9,568.00 £350.00 - £607.00 - £834.00 £150.00 £550.00 - £95.34 £989.61 £370.00 - £225.13 £852.17 £1,127.08 £2,986.69 £7,812.04 £8,636.00 £4,682.08 - - £3,447.37 £1,333.77 £8,636.00 £9,568.00 £2,387.55 £10,050.23 £878.69 £8,537.08 £1,516.94 - - - £4,755.60 £25.00 - - - - - £6,956.55 - £9,568.00 £8,537.08 £9,897.57 - £8,463.93 - £440.00 £10,145.03 £9,640.12 - £210.00 £10,145.03 £30.00 £5,203.94 £323.40 £10,204.05 - £1,077.00 £3,836.45 £1,98 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 111 .24 Easter Ross Easter Ross Easter Ross Easter Ross Easter Ross Easter Ross Area Constituency No. Name110 Bury St Edmunds110 Bury St Edmunds111 Caernarfon111 Caernarfon Constitu- 111 Electorate Caernarfon111 Candidate Caernarfon111 Caernarfon112 ency type Caerphilly112 Caerphilly112 Caerphilly112 C Candidate Caerphilly113 Caithness, Sutherland & Forename Michael Frederick 46,850113 Michael Charles Hywel Party Caithness, Sutherland & C Brundle113 Caithness, Sutherland & C Personal Benwell113 41,315 Martin Robert Surname Caithness, Sutherland & John Archibald 67,300 Bronwen Wayne Ind113 Evan Melvyn Caithness, Sutherland & Williams Ifor Dilwyn SL113 Eaglestone Thurso Caithness, Sutherland & Michael Lindsay Geoffrey114 Calder Valley David Timothy Ab-Owain114 PC Naish Lab John Hector Robert Calder Valley Robert William -114 expenses David Lloyd Calder Valley Whittle LD114 Robert Iain - Calder Valley Macadam114 LD £235.20 £200.00 Calder Valley Simmonds114 Agents Expenses subject to legal maximum Karn Christina Janet Roffe Calder Valley Con Meighan115 £495.00 Camberwell & Peckham -115 Lab SNP PC UKI C James Gordon Paul Mabon Camberwell & Peckham Con Clerks115 £15.00 - Camberwell & Peckham Rowantree115 £94.00 £40.00 - - Lab Camberwell & Peckham Campbell B115 75,298 £215.00 LD £10.00 Camberwell & Peckham Christine £200.00 Printing115 £20.00 - Camberwell & Peckham £70.30 £500.00 Con SSP115 Meetings 53,687 Camberwell & Peckham £465.21 - -116 Ind Harriet - £90.02 £2,450.00 Committee Cambridge £673.00 - - £1.00116 £6,819.54 £84.02 Susan Kay Cambridge £993.34 £437.50116 - Michael Francis Cambridge £192.20 - £1,000.00116 £4,020.49 £7,104.24 £3,715.11 Steven Robert McCafferty Cambridge Donnachadh116 Misc £10.00 £309.85 - John David - - Cambridge - Jonathan -116 £60.00 - - Philip David Cambridge Storm116 Taylor Legal - Lab Cambridge Harman Robson-Catling John Anthony116 £5,846.89 - - - - - Hutton Cambridge - £1,797.04 Robert William £52.65117 Con B McCarthy Total Cambridgeshire North East - - £136.00 Frank £6,990.33117 - - - £300.00 - £650.00 £200.00 - Nunn Cambridgeshire North East £1,000.00117 Lockwood Morgan Lab £7,288.69 Cambridgeshire North East LD 70,665 C117 Mulrenan £4,936.62 Max £564.00 £4,045.66 Anne - Cambridgeshire North East £866.00 £8,044.53 LD £5,011.15 £140.52 £275.00 Adams £50.00 - Grn117 - - Cambridgeshire North East Poorun £141.85118 - - 79,891 LCA Cambridgeshire North West £507.57 - - - Malcolm Douglas118 - UKI £7,894.76 £4,190.11 £2,500.00 £6,683.00 SA Con Cambridgeshire North West118 £341.00 David Ross £10,204.05 £8,387.70 £8,387.70 - C Cambridgeshire North West Sweeney - - -118 £12.50 SL Graham Charles - - Cambridgeshire North West £411.12 - £5,493.49 £1,098.79 Grn Moss118 - Stephen Roger - £520.00 Cambridgeshire North West £500.00 - £574.10 - Dil £8,387.70 119 - 71,247 Howard Andrew - Campbell Cambridgeshire South - - £6,085.41 Brian Stanley Richard Ian119 Arthur Leonard £20.00 WRP Stuart £8,430.12 Cambridgeshire South John £8,044.53 £728.20119 £250.00 Howarth Clare Joan Therese - - £7,344.33 - £10.00 £9,682.00 Cambridgeshire South - Thomas Anthony - Lawrence119 - Margaret Mary - - Senter Cambridgeshire South Con £1,818.04 Lab - - C Underwood - - - Anthea Jane £5,293.86 £500.00 £9,682.00 Baynes £16.00 - - Mawhinney Alastair Stephen £8,044.53 Renaut Hoey £7,190.50 LD £993.34 Con Grn No election expenses return submitted - - Barry James - - £5,388.32 £200.00 72,095 £10,204.05 Courtney PL £8,387.70 £102.15 - £1,376.00 - - Andrew David - David Owen £5,027.15 £1,000.00 £8,044.53 - Con SA £9,682.00 £1,050.00 £9,682.00 £8,387.70 Taylor £1,820.70 Stevens - - - - UKI Cox £5.00 £91.73 £3,672.25 - LD - £3,571.54 £313.37 WRP PL £300.00 Hudson £1,271.50 £1,659.40 Amanda Joan £1,355.69 - Lansley - - £350.10 - £400.00 - £600.00 - - Joan Lab £13.10 £6,683.00 UKI £5,844.03 - £1,061.30 - Simon Peter - LD £990.00 £8,044.53 £9,128.40 £200.00 - - £2,808.93 Hall Lab £10,151.48 £116.80 £400.00 - £100.00 UKI £5.00 £411.12 Taylor - Con £9,607.49 £119.00 ------£6,463.74 £8,044.53 £25.00 £10,151.48 - - - £80.00 £71.85 £55.00 £73.00 - - £10.00 Saggers - - £7,466.02 - £1,677.35 - £80.00 £723.13 - £75.00 Herbert Ind - LD £10.00 - £5,747.56 - £2,243.70 - - - £3,599.64 - - £21.33 - - - £10,151.48 £9,081.55 £7,750.92 £600.00 - Grn £10,436 - £25.00 - £365.00 £385.40 £18.00 - - - £139.64 £63.65 - - - £23.93 £7,359.03 Lab - £200.00 £3,697.25 £475.30 £10,151.48 £47.50 £374.45 - £7,750.92 £250.00 - - - - £3,313.33 £1,677.40 £836.00 £30.00 £687.85 £1,699.38 £70.00 £6,924.15 - - £7,750.92 £7,750.92 £7.00 - £955.20 - £153.40 - - £8,003.19 £1,071.62 - - - £723.13 £8,238.85 - £350.10 £400.00 £8,751.90 £579.50 £1,045.72 £10,151.48 £10,151.48 - £8,751.90 - - £1,799.14 £45.00 - £407.00 £7,765.26 - - - £1,190.30 £774.09 - £7,750.92 £9,900.31 - £1,684.26 £413.02 £280.00 - - - - £11.35 - £973.13 - - - - - £7,750.92 £418.80 - £2,310.80 £1,029.40 - - £4.65 - £50.00 - £8,751.90 £6.76 £130.28 - £25.00 £28.00 - £8,751.90 £8,422.95 £7,429.03 £3,830.70 - - £9,952.89 - £349.13 £8,75 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 112 39.50 Pembrokeshire South Pembrokeshire South Pembrokeshire South Pembrokeshire South Pembrokeshire Area Constituency No. Name119 Cambridgeshire South119 Cambridgeshire South120 Cambridgeshire South East120 Cambridgeshire South East Constitu- 120 Electorate Cambridgeshire South East B120 Candidate Cambridgeshire South East121 Cannock Chase121 81,663 ency type Cannock Chase James Edward Thornton121 Paice Cannock Chase122 Canterbury122 Candidate Helene Yvette Canterbury122 Beata Anna Canterbury Sarah Virginia Forename122 C Canterbury Andrew Philip122 Con Party Canterbury Neil John123 Davies Cardiff Central123 74,172 Cardiff Central Anthony Wayland Brinton123 Klepacka Personal £105.00 Cardiff Central Inchley123 C Surname Cardiff Central123 Cardiff Central Wright £600.00 UKI123 Scarr Gavin Roderick Nigel Cardiff Central PL 74,144123 LD Julian William Hendy Stewart Cardiff Central £200.00123 B Lab Smithers Cardiff Central124 Brazier Cardiff North124 £7,109.71 Lab Cardiff North 59,785124 UKI Emily Anne Jon Cardiff North - Con124 expenses Richard Peter £12.80 Cardiff North -124 - Hazel Frances Con Cardiff North Reynolds -125 Lisa Diane £290.00 Cardiff South & Penarth £20.00125 Agents £127.00 Jennifer Nancy Expenses subject to legal maximum Cardiff South & Penarth -125 Gregory Huw Thornberry - Wales Cardiff South & Penarth £858.75 B £315.00125 Richard Rhys Dawe LD £245.00 Cardiff South & Penarth - Clerks -125 B Stephen James £1,500.00 Cardiff South & Penarth - Willott Owen Jones125 Julian Beresford 62,634 Lab £9,071.26 Moore Cardiff South & Penarth - Julie125 Roger Frank £9,2 Walker 62,627 Cardiff South & Penarth - Printing -126 LD Madeleine Elise Alun Edward Lab £25.00 Grigg Cardiff West Bartley - Grn126 - Meetings - Goss Cardiff West -126 - LD Committee Cardiff West Alastair £982.09126 UKI - £3,713.96 Cardiff West Jeremy John Leslie £100.00 £6,217.34 Hughes Con126 Maureen Kelly - - £657.31 £6,908.80 £2,537.38 Cardiff West Sion Tomos Michael Grn127 Rodney Simon - PC Carlisle Donald Edwin £38.40127 Lila Eilis Maire - Misc £132.50 Morgan £763.80 WSA £3,664.21 Carlisle -127 Justin Patrick - £32.50 - Carlisle UKI PL B127 David Charles Owen - Legal - - Carlisle - Dixon - Lab - Berman127 Anne Watson Jobbins £150.00 Carlisle - £900.00 Hulston128 Haines Lab - - 58,348 £170.00 Total Carmarthen East & Dinefwr - - - -128 Denis Kevin £750.00 £50.00 - Callan - - Carmarthen East & Dinefwr - £10.00128 £1,124.55 Bartlett Carmarthen East & Dinefwr £180.00 Con £191.36 - £560.00 C LD -128 Con Max - LD PC £420.99 - Carmarthen East & Dinefwr UKI £975.83128 - - PC - B Carmarthen East & Dinefwr - Andrew Robert Tudor129 £6,647.96 - 54,035 £6,447.10 - £9,138.80 - - & £6,426.05 Carmarthen West Jacqueline Anne UKI Brennan - - - Adam Savoury £3,008.37 - £10,080.11 £420.00 WSA Davies - £9,239.50 £3,993.66 £1,957.92 - Delme Ifor £36.00 £4,108.96129 58,811 £9,239.50 £20.00 - - £10,035.85 & Carmarthen West £7,053.16 £9,952.89 Eric Anthony £7,274.54 Joyce Lilian £7.00 £1,100.00 £15.00 - - £45.00 £446.00 £70.00129 Gasson - - - - & Carmarthen West Lab - Alan Wynne £15.00 - PL £3,844.21 C - - - Con David Nicholas £10,035.85 £657.31 - £169.60129 - £770.80 Michael Robert - & Carmarthen West - - David Doiran £160.00 - £70.00 £351.00 £9,952.89 Bowen - Martlew £9,239.50 - John Michael 56,518 Jenking £2,928.52 - Michael Price £706.00 - LD - - - £15.00 £1,042.56 Nicholas Richard £45.00 Colin £1,549.63 £1,339.15 - £320.00 £123.00 - £532.00 £10,035.85 - George Paul Thomas Williams £34.17 £6,126.63 - Mitchelson £755.00 £17.50 £6,764.69 - - £619.25 £8,135.68 Evans Lab Ainger - - PC - - UKI Guest £10,080.11 - £8,172.54 £15.00 - £6,752.13 - - £6,543.44 - - - PC £10,080.11 £8,233.11 Robert - Con - Con £6,764.69 Lab £4,926.16 - - £7,992.41 - £2,079.38 Squires Wilcox £300.00 £8,233.11 £7.50 £2,567.05 £500.00 £86.50 £3,687.09 - £515.00 £8,233.11 Llyr Hughes - Paisley LD Lab - - - £3,120.50 £200.00 - £296.00 LD £2.50 £123.00 - - £113.18 £772.00 - William Blair Richard £573.00 £650.00 - - £1,335.00 - - - £3.50 UKI £85.00 £946.00 £10,080.11 £311.00 SA £395.00 - £750.00 £10,080.11 £885.69 £11.00 - Jeremy - - - £170.00 £535.59 £650.00 Wilson LCA £1,702.06 Griffiths £5,570.87 - £2,939.52 - - £8,233.11 £7,737.63 - - £695.42 £650.00 - - £200.00 £50.00 - - £8,233.11 £49.56 £140.00 £81.43 £535.59 £8,364.16 - - £7,950.28 - - - £3,532.47 - - LD £8,340.75 £7,633.86 £10.00 - £117.10 £503.70 PC Con - - £500.00 £650.00 £2,142.44 - £706.00 £7,950.28 £8,364.16 £322.23 - - - £8,364.16 - £8,233.11 - £8,340.75 £123.00 - - £161.40 £4,786.45 - £2,700.05 £3,854.19 - - £100.00 £8,233.11 - - £755.00 - - £8,340.75 £3,527.73 £8,340.75 £7,555.56 £2,102.37 £5,440.06 £2,169.53 £75.00 - £6,299.00 - £8,233.11 £1,026.79 - £8,364.16 £4,147.39 - - £750.00 - - £91.11 £25.00 - - £209.00 £7,834.64 £5,972.28 £100.00 - - £604.28 £8,167.00 - £750.00 - - - - £30.00 £140.07 - £30.00 - £772.00 - - £73.00 - - £617.00 £8,364.16 - £500.00 - £10.00 £116.10 £20.00 - £5,210.52 £750.00 £885.69 £25.50 - - £8,207.12 - £1,953.83 £8,340.75 £8,340.75 £650.00 £638.92 £3,605.4 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 113 Pembrokeshire South Pembrokeshire South Pembrokeshire Area Constituency No. Name129 & Carmarthen West 129 & Carmarthen West Constitu- 130 Electorate Carrick, Cumnock & Doon Valley C130 Candidate Carrick, Cumnock & Doon Valley130 Carrick, Cumnock & Doon Valley130 ency type 64,919 Carrick, Cumnock & Doon Valley130 George Carrick, Cumnock & Doon Valley130 Carrick, Cumnock & Doon Valley131 Candidate Carshalton & Wallington131 Ian Robert Carshalton & Wallington Forename Gordon Forsyth131 Carshalton & Wallington Thomas131 Nicholas Robin Party Carshalton & Wallington B Rebecca Amy131 Foulkes Carshalton & Wallington Amanda Jane132 Millar Castle Point James132 Personal 67,337 Phillips Castle Point Turner132 Thomas Anthony Surname Castle Point132 Rodger Lab Castle Point132 Wilson McFarlane Castle Point132 Brake Con Castle Point UKI Kenneth133 Cust Ceredigion £300.00 Margaret Kathleen133 SSP LD McDaid Ceredigion Simon Neil B133 SNP £537.55 Ceredigion Martin Arthur133 £336.80 £500.00 Cooper Ceredigion LD134 expenses 68,108 Charnwood £150.00134 Robert Michael - SL Charnwood Andrew134 Charnwood -134 Agents Dixon - Haley - Expenses subject to legal maximum Lab Charnwood £52.50 -135 - C Chatham & Aylesford Spink Christine Margaret135 - £50.00 Chatham & Aylesford Clerks £5,258.67 Anthony Paul Con135 - Chatham & Aylesford 56,125 Ronald135 Simon - Butler Chatham & Aylesford £1,918.49 Grn Douglas Charles136 - UKI C - Cheadle - - C Printing Nik136 £231.58 - Con Cheadle £65.00136 - Boulton Meetings - 74,900 Cheadle -136 Roberts Stephen James Mark Fraser 69,759 £200.00 Committee £375.14 Cheadle £110.00 Jonathan Rowland -137 £550.00 Lab Windsor Paul - Chelmsford West £169.69137 - - David Hurrell - Chelmsford West £875.02 £3,144.07 -137 - Thomas LD Shaw £49.00 Chelmsford West Dorrell - £541.12137 Sean David Misc Ind £400.00 £7,623.25 £1,677.64 Chelmsford West - Sean Francis -137 Susan Mary Williams £9,289.54 Chelmsford West Searle Davies David137 James George £100.00 B £100.50 £2,292.49 Legal £9,507.98 Chelmsford West UKI Gregory John £850.00 - - -138 PC C - £7,672.08 £9,507.98 - - Cheltenham138 - Con £227.50 Lab £6,897.26 Total Cheltenham - 69,001 LD138 Sheahan - Grace Holden Patsy - Cheltenham 78,073 Bye King £2,711.80138 Con - Tr Simon Hugh McGuigan £298.50 Cheltenham138 - Knopp - £28.89 Max Burns - £467.22 - Cheltenham - -138 - £240.50 - - Cheltenham Lab - Lettington138 - Stephen Richard £8,249.75 Con £450.00 Cheltenham Lab £990.96 £26.00 -138 - - Howard - Adrian £8,580.50 Cheltenham £350.00 £490.70 - B LD139 £910.00 Vincent Lawrence Stephen John UKI £57.00 UKI - - - Chesham & Amersham £170.98 Con LD139 - Eleanor Jessy - £75.00 Day Calton - £1,732.53 Chesham & Amersham139 £235.00 £248.00 Alfred Ernest Kenneth £375.14 - - 67,563 Chesham & Amersham £9,507.98 -139 Cavanagh Nigel David Christopher Simon - £8,987.11 £8,493.06 - £6,076.63 - Chesham & Amersham Wedon - - £20.53 -139 £34.00 £105.00 £20.00 C - - Robinson £875.02 £8,580.50 Chesham & Amersham £7,995.26 -139 - - Burgess Dawber - £8,987.11 £5,728.10 Chesham & Amersham £541.12 £10.00 Philbin LD Longden £8,615.97 140 £1,029.00 - UKI - £450.00 £750.00 City of Chester Con 70,021 £3,055.94 £9.00 £9,507.98 - - Robert Edward - £7,663.54 - Cheryl Elise Kendall £57.50 £510.00 LD UKI Andrew Barnes Jones - - £100.00 £850.00 - - - - £75.00 Derek Keith Grn £30.00 Lab £2,720.80 Gillan Lab £1,306.71 £6,866.57 £9,507.98 £408.64 £942.82 £48.67 - Dancing Ken LCA - £8,580.50 £7,818.66 Garnham £6,614.39 - - James Bruce - £2,832.00 - John Edward £41.50 £7,375.63 - £902.00 £15.00 Erlam £81.37 £10.00 - Anthony John - £279.82 Kenneth £9,507.98 £7,903.34 £3,118.30 - LD £30.00 Roger Joseph C £1,000.00 Ian George Hamilton £8,615.97 - - £6.00 £2,852.41 - Bessant - £14.55 Nicholas John Eric Con Con £60.00 £70.00 Hanks £532.20 £400.00 - - £925.00 £7,465.02 - - Harvey - Gillian Sorel - Carver - £62.00 - - £10,122.83 Ford £8,580.50 70,382 £1,572.75 £8,580.50 £50.00 Gates Christine Margaret £807.06 - Lab £550.00 - £268.73 £312.75 Wilkins £8,667.09 - Everest - £275.00 £183.00 £25.00 £455.82 Grn £22.00 £1,936.06 - £33.00 £8,972.11 £23.00 Hulme £365.25 - - £1,036.66 - £345.78 Russell MRLP £6,853.10 - UKI £7,205.30 - £982.00 - UKI £770.00 - £53.00 Duval - £1,054.00 £751.57 £7,712.21 £8,972.11 - LD PL £3,078.94 - Grn £3,273.25 No election expenses return submitted £1,659.79 Ind £8,615.97 £62.93 - £4,084.08 £6,163.42 £9,808.06 £10,122.83 £200.00 - £8,615.97 £145.51 - - £560.39 - £8,972.11 Lab - £8,985.20 Lab - - £436.00 £54.00 - £1,000.00 - £10,323.53 £9,478.45 - £1,005.75 £789.88 £6,804.65 £200.00 - £750.00 £539.56 - - PL £9,808.06 - £4,182.80 £8,615.97 - £73.97 £100.00 £6,514.89 £20.00 £8,972.11 £2,000.00 £7,594.61 - - £4,763.26 - £5,197.41 - £2,674.13 - £394.08 £8,615.97 - £1,047.78 £350.01 £34.50 £1,668.72 - - £9,808.06 - - - - £489.90 £10,122.83 - £400.00 - - - £9.50 - £7,667.20 £8,015.86 £8,190.92 - £841.56 - £360.00 £8,657.05 - £8,657.05 - - £10,122.83 - - - £6.00 ------£12.00 - £55.00 £5,884.00 - - - £1,03 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 114 1 Jefferson Area Constituency No. Name140 City of Chester140 City of Chester140 City of Chester140 City of Chester Constitu- 141 Electorate Chesterfield141 Candidate Chesterfield141 Chesterfield141 ency type Chesterfield141 Chesterfield141 Chesterfield142 Candidate Chichester142 Chichester Forename B142 Chichester David Ian142 Party Chichester David Anthony142 73,216 Chichester Allan Andrew James143 Robert Paul Green Chingford & Woodford George143 Personal Green Chingford & Woodford Weddell143 B Surname Green Chingford & Woodford Dawson143 C Jones Green Chingford & Woodford Denys Alan Reg144 Chipping Barnet 63,252 Simon John144 Holmes George Iain Chipping Barnet UKI 77,703 Jean Pauline 144 Andrew Guy Chipping Barnet LD William145 Rogers Race Chorley Christopher145 Con Chorley145 Jessica Lilias LD £148.00 Chorley Hitchcock145 John Derek Duncan Smith expenses Lynne Penelope Robinson B Chorley146 Jean Tyrie Celia Anne £410.00 Ind Christchurch146 Con Lab Douglas Ernest Christchurch - Rawson146 Agents Con 70,239 £15.00 Gavin John Elliot Harrison Webb Expenses subject to legal maximum Christchurch Sydney Brooks £850.00 Ravenscroft SA -146 Christchurch147 Beanse £40.00 Cities of London & Westminster Clerks £400.00147 Denny Con B LD C Barlow Graham Cities of London & Westminster Ind147 SL Chapman John Damien Francis - - Cities of London & Westminster - -147 Lab £7,797.60 Griffin - Sean James Cities of London & Westminster C Printing 71,935 77,036147 LD Welfare £532.30 Mark Christopher Lindsay Harvey Cities of London & Westminster £250.00148 £192.68 - £20.00 Meetings Grn UKI Cleethorpes Con Lab148 73,447 £659.04 Committee Cleethorpes £500.00 Christopher Robert - £155.00 - Field - BNP148 £62.00 Hooker Hoyle Lab Michael David Charles Peter Cleethorpes - £250.00 £584.78 No election expenses return submitted148 Martin Charles Chope £42.00 Stephen John £1,928.29 - £352.50 - Cleethorpes £7,960.68 -149 Misc No election expenses return submitted Hugo John Graeme - Clwyd South Dorothy Jane149 £7,795.86 - Colin Ralph £130.00 - Clwyd South £880.00 Judith £6,384.25 £1,771.51149 - £9,575.10 LD Legal Katz Con Clwyd South Booth Margaret - C Lab149 No election expenses return submitted Horwood £98.00 - £9,846.68 Fenn - - No election expenses return submitted - Clwyd South Con £400.00 -149 - £5.00 Total £6,906.17 Frost Clwyd South150 - Webb £250.00 68,392 Clwyd West £162.70 - -150 £15.00 Shona £6,192.04 - Merton - £4,587.35 Clwyd West £20.00 £5.00 LD £422.00150 Max Con Charlton - £1,695.40 £5.49 Lab Clwyd West £621.15 C £552.50150 - - - £35.00 LD Begg Strange £1,000.00 Clwyd West - £210.00 - £15.00150 UKI Clwyd West LD £2,642.21 - Stephen Edmund 151 £8,101.17 £550.00 53,680 £680.48 £9,515.01 £3,608.94 £2,187.80 - £102.50 £1,482.06 UKI £200.00 - Clydebank & Milngavie - £92.95 - Martyn David151 £10,300.59 Grn £8,840.45 £1,958.29 - Clydebank & Milngavie Gordon -151 £8.90 UKI £40.00 £9,846.68 £535.00 Howd - Clydebank & Milngavie McIsaac £110.00 Janet Elizabeth £6,840.21151 £7,867.23 C £659.04 £8,618.23 £4,059.51 £50.00 - - £245.77 Lab £494.50 - Clydebank & Milngavie151 £8,411.59 £9,846.68 £8,840.45 C £6,213.38 - - £116.15 Clydebank & Milngavie £10.00 Thomas Henry £55.00152 £50.00 £8,592.04 Jones - £22.00 - 53,962 £49.97 £6,801.64 £227.64 £660.00 - Clydesdale Dyfed Wyn - £265.00152 Gareth £10.50 - £8,732.62 Lab Hatton £403.78 Clydesdale David Brandon 51,979152 £105.50 £305.00 Con £445.00 William Anthony £8,840.45 - Clydesdale - £40.00 Evelyn Edwina - - £1,771.51 Smith £4,747.32 £1,327.30 £90.00 Biggins £8,840.45 £10,300.59 £493.21 - £9,846.68 - - £681.00 - £784.40 £2,766.61 - Lab David Richard Timothy £6,851.80 - - - £95.00 £7,506.52 £200.00 Griffiths £123.79 £8,411.59 Worthington Edwards UKI Huw Elfed - - James James Law £4,505.93 £8,840.45 Theunissen £255.22 Robina Lynn £2,343.95 - £9,076.21 - £8,840.45 Rodney £5,310.91 £7,822.66 £4,505.50 - £500.10 - Con £8,411.59 £10,300.59 Thomas £10,036.71 LD George Matthew £10,300.59 £180.00 C Catherine Lab £8,387.57 - - - £55.00 - Dawn - UKI LD - £8,792.0 PC £19.20 £5,886.38 £7,436.74 - - - Con 64,423 £1,330.18 £1,002.17 Guest Yuill £8,732.62 Williams Jimmy - - Feeley Lab - £55.00 £49.56 £1,585.25 - - £98.90 £592.50 £1,032.00 - - - Ackland £755.00 £2,566.49 £8,542.20 £486.00 Jardine £60.00 - £10.00 - - £10,259.23 - £83.98 - £494.50 £9.00 James PC - £80.00 - - £1,502.54 £10,300.59 UKI £10,128.01 LD - Brennan Kevin £705.06 - £40.00 SNP £10,259.23 - £13.08 £7,653.16 - £660.00 LD - - - £60.00 £1,336.30 Con Hood - £8,411.59 - £7,253.82 £8,732.62 - - £5,220.56 - £59.37 £8,123.38 £198.00 - £5,543.62 SSP - £170.00 £8,792.01 - - - £8,792.01 £314.40 - - - £3,549.85 - - Wright £819.88 - - - - £57.10 £5,885.50 Lab £6,966.15 - Newton - - - £50.00 £30.00 £30.40 - £5,926.38 - £20.00 - £295.00 - £10,036.71 - - £531.49 £810.00 - - £5,370.86 £490.00 £296.53 £50.00 £400.00 - SNP - - - - - £5,340.46 £1,052.00 - £129.30 £3,898.97 £1,002.17 £4,369.41 Con £1,857.54 £830.12 £10,259.23 £5 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 115 Area Constituency No. Name152 Clydesdale152 Clydesdale152 Clydesdale153 Coatbridge & Chryston Constitu- 153 Electorate Coatbridge & Chryston153 Candidate Coatbridge & Chryston153 Coatbridge & Chryston153 B ency type Coatbridge & Chryston154 Colchester154 Colchester 52,178154 Candidate Thomas Colchester154 Colchester Forename154 Colchester155 Party Colne Valley155 Moira Peter Colne Valley155 William Alistair George Paul Colne Valley155 Patrick Donald Murdo Walter Personal B Clarke Colne Valley155 Lynn Surname Colne Valley156 Congleton 77,958156 Tough Robert Edward Congleton Cockshott156 MacKay Ross-Taylor Congleton C156 Lab Craig Kearney Congleton157 Conwy157 Con SSP Paul Kevin Russell 74,192 LD Conwy157 Kali Carol Jean UKI Christopher Sheridan Conwy157 SNP expenses Roger Gordon Conwy LD157 Leonard Thomas B Conwy -158 £2.50 LD £24.15 Copeland Mountford Philip Andrew158 Agents SSP Expenses subject to legal maximum Bentley Copeland - Gordon James158 71,941 £150.00 Fegan Lord Overy-Owen Copeland Jane Ann Richard -159 Corby - Clerks Arthur Lab159 Corby C Grey -159 - Davies - Beever Corby Con159 - John Anthony - - - Corby Lab Printing159 £500.00 54,637 UKI David Corby - Betty Helena160 £65.73 Meetings Winterton - William James Cornwall North C £5,879.49160 Plunkett £50.00 Con - Committee Cornwall North - - LD160 Quarmby £107.40 Cornwall North Flanagan -160 53,526 - - Cornwall North David Andrew John £600.00 Con John Anderson -161 - £545.97 Williams - Young £510.00 Cornwall South East Victoria Mercier £565.48 - C Grn161 - Misc - £1,217.51 Cornwall South East Ann Logan161 UKI Lab - £1,000.00 Lloyd-Griffiths Cornwall South East Allan Cyril161 C - £1,137.50 Legal 72,594 Cunningham Cornwall South East Michael - - -161 Philip Ian - Lab Macdonald £600.00 LD - - £1,311.29 Cornwall South East Mark Adrian UKI -162 C - - - £367.89 - - 84,662 Total Cotswold Lab -162 Paul £8,914.47 Con £7,676.87 Cotswold £7,084.82 - £4,303.85 £574.12162 LD £7.20 - £120.00 Cotswold 79,090 £250.00 - £1,724.43 - Andrew John162 £6,504.78 Barham Max £15.00 Colin Edward £30.00 Cotswold £18.00 - - £75.00 Leighton Kevin 163 £600.00 Owen £7,897.95 - Gayler Coventry North East - - Hope Graham - Ian Francis £60.00 John163 £15.00 - Coventry North East - £132.01 £17.50 - Andrew £527.00 Michael Neil163 - £40.00 £500.00 - Coventry North East - George Stephen163 - £5,378.45 UKI Ashley - - Griffith Coventry North East Breed - £2,327.30 - Scudder £305.00163 William - John - - £120.00 £440.00 £568.17 Tyler Coventry North East Con PC C LD164 - Graham Gordon B - £9,477.23 £8,060.49 Lab Coventry North West £12.50 - -164 Gillman John Kenneth - £479.07 Protz £7,233.15 - - £6,017.05 - Coventry North West Goodman - -164 £10,082.90 £8,774.87 - £8.00 68,140 - LD Coventry North West £17.00 Con - 74,017 £320.00 £230.00164 Geoffrey - - Weller £9,069.07 Dickson LD £1,150.00 £1,217.51 £210.00 Robert William Palmer £565.48 £5,099.23 - Coventry North West £20.00 Stevens £9,468.89 -164 - £8,946.97 £5,454.00 £7,897.95 £7,897.95 LD £10,082.90 £7,897.95 Coventry North West Gray Lab - £415.00 B UKI £6,111.31 £7,818.07 George £9,069.07 £3,565.57 - £216.23 - £10.00 UKI - - £32.00 £72.00 £90.78 - £1,311.29 Angela £285.43 - SL - Gordon Alexander £15.00 - Ainsworth 76,673 Lab - Con - UKI £9,477.23 Richard Leslie - £600.00 - Geoffrey Brian Geoffrey £600.00 - £255.75 Jill £750.00 Clifton-Brown - David John £851.59 - MK £86.71 £358.12 £293.00 £574.12 - Con Bell £1,724.43 £88.80 Edward John £476.00 £426.20 - - £7,897.95 - - Lab £4,315.99 £300.00 - - £9,069.07 Con £745.60 - £6,302.80 - - - £632.25 £400.00 £15.00 £9,477.23 £10,082.90 Wilkins Andrew £5,465.16 £8,620.49 - Sewards - £2,726.91 £7,308.64 - £55.00 Gilbert Napier - £9,069.07 - £8,793.11 Lawrence - £307.65 - Christine Margaret £137.77 £610.77 Robinson Nellist £520.00 - £7,610.15 £86.00 £4,098.59 Sheppard - - £7,326.56 Mark Edwin - - - Con £8,712.91 £6.00 - - £8,894.43 £5,375.04 - - - - LD £1,920.00 - £120.00 Lab £8,801.61 Oddy LD £8,793.11 £4,103.34 Stopps £8,763.84 - £200.00 £1,220.00 Penlington £9,069.07 £8,539.71 - Lab £600.00 £8,793.11 £8,894.43 BNP - £5,931.05 - £976.45 - Fairburn - £142.00 £7,916.89 - - £419.68 SA £170.53 - - £70.00 £410.30 £6,788.87 - £200.00 - Benson £63.09 - - - £206.85 LD £1,994.00 £272.10 - £250.50 UKI £1,068.42 £2,440.69 £55.00 £500.00 £16.00 Ind £50.00 £415.00 - £4,926.29 £8,357.14 Con - £161.00 £1,720.62 - - £10,082.90 £74.60 - £1,935.00 - £6,873.31 £1,295.55 - £8,894.43 - - £72.00 £9,523.06 - £328.00 UKI - £10,082.90 £117.00 - £70.00 - £9,981.97 - £78.00 £1,902.50 - - £157.20 £28.25 £425.00 £5,449.14 £110.00 £750.00 - - - £4,429.38 - - £2,767.79 - £9,514.44 - £8,801.61 - £8,793.11 £27.87 - - - £10,732.04 £500.00 £1,390.63 - £867.00 £450.00 £8,362.74 £3,048.83 £57.70 - £148.00 £10,386.51 £7,826.56 £17.50 - £8,768.84 - - £214.32 £1.50 - £40.00 - - - £8,894.43 £9,509.50 £9,981.97 - £40.00 - £33.87 £10,732.04 - - £587.50 £1,029.20 - £8,894.43 £30.58 - £2,590.57 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 116 Area Constituency No. Name165 Coventry South165 Coventry South165 Coventry South165 Coventry South Constitu- 165 Electorate Coventry South165 Candidate Coventry South166 Crawley B166 ency type Crawley166 Crawley166 72,570 Crawley166 James Dolan Candidate Crawley166 Crawley Forename166 Crawley166 Party Crawley Heather167 Cunningham Crewe & Nantwich Vincent John167 B Crewe & Nantwich Robert Piers167 Personal Crewe & Nantwich Lab Irene Elizabeth167 Surname Crewe & Nantwich Peter Timothy 71,629168 Laura Jean Crosby168 McKee Crosby C Wheeler168 £45.00 Windsor Crosby Rogers168 Crosby169 Logan 69,040 Henry Edward Millar Croydon Central Gwyneth Patricia169 Linda Ann LD Moffatt Croydon Central Con169 Brian Robert Smith SA Croydon Central Ind169 - expenses Claire Jane Croydon Central169 Dunwoody Arshad SL Croydon Central Donald Richard169 Karl James £80.40 £60.00 B Croydon Central David John Lab170 Agents Muriel Josephine B Expenses subject to legal maximum Croydon North Seekings Roger Philip Galloway170 Con Lab Croydon North - £750.00170 56,610 Potter Staniford - Croydon North Clerks Claire -170 77,568 Hirsch Croydon North Geraint Richard170 £4,495.87 £335.02 LD Stewart - UKI - Croydon North Khan Cannon171 Croston - Croydon South Printing MRLP171 - £600.00 Robert John Croydon South - Con171 B - Davies Meetings David Leonard Jason Timothy - Croydon South SA171 - £40.00 Jeremy Hudson Paul SL Committee Alan Mark £7,166.38 Croydon South LD -171 - UKI James Rosewell JP 78,675 Croydon South Curtis-Thomas172 £183.20 - Malcolm Hunt Booth - Lynda Cumbernauld & Kilsyth £20.00 -172 - Collinson Congdon Lab John Sydney Drake Lab - - Cumbernauld & Kilsyth £770.00 B172 - Misc - £253.23 Cumbernauld & Kilsyth Feisenberger172 - £10.70 £15.00 £2,811.64 Cumbernauld & Kilsyth - -172 £1,886.31 Simon Jeremy Holt C Legal Wicks 73,372 - Cumbernauld & Kilsyth Con - Con - LD172 UKI - Sandra Joy £797.39 Richard Geoffrey James £4,932.30 £167.24 Cumbernauld & Kilsyth - - Ottaway Cartwright -173 Alan George - LD £8,819.24 Total Cunninghame North 49,739173 Donald Andrew Edwin - £7,711.62 Miller - - Rosemary - - Cunninghame North £225.00 - £200.00173 Allison - £8,118.62 Madgwick £8,819.43 Cunninghame North - £15.52 Michael Gerard173 Lab MRLP - Max SL - £8,819.24 - - - Cunninghame North Con Anna-Nicolette £15.00173 Lawman - £600.00 £200.00 - £887.12 - Smith Cunninghame North Kathleen -173 C David - SA Cunninghame North - £1,182.98 - Mark Robin Lionel174 £21.73 BNP - - John £200.00 - Con Ryan - - Cunninghame South McKenna £200.00174 - Alison £138.90 - - £93.42 Cunninghame South - 54,993 Gallop LD -174 - Kenneth Brian Cunninghame South Samuel - - - - £467.15 £550.00 -174 £3,626.64 £60.00 £200.00 - Thomas Livingstone UKI - £659.22 £1,055.16 £400.00 Cunninghame South - £529.57 -174 £8,777.75 Lab - - Cunninghame South Garner £451.99 - -174 £924.50 C £6,630.81 £6,663.78 Taylor £436.94 Lab - - Cunninghame South £2,436.31 - - £200.00 £442.12175 - McGlashan Campbell LD £8,380.09 - £770.00 Cynon Valley £6,324.04 Ch £8,819.24 £120.00 £5,964.04 -175 - Richard O'Donnell - £8,777.75 - £8,819.24 49,982 Cynon Valley - - £6.15 - Ross £9,316.37 Ross Michael - - Brian Harold McEwan - £355.00 SNP - £106.40 £236.83 - UKI - Sean £9,763.48 - - Wilson £797.39 Sc Ref £77.97 - £3,254.82 - Louise - £63.84 - - - £1,198.00 - £393.43 £8,725.07 LD £8,819.24 - - £34.83 - £686.90 £25.00 Martin £1,096.90 - SSP £7.50 - Bill - £88.00 £552.00 £243.00 Chmiel - - - £3,270.62 Donohoe £831.17 Con Mildred Pamela £665.00 £965.09 - £9,298.62 Wilkinson - C Lab - £8,025.68 £600.59 John Robert £265.00 £8,777.75 £3,560.00 - £9,763.48 £500.00 - - £18.50 - £2,128.50 - - £10.00 - - £9,051.08 Rosemary £564.48 - £500.00 £1,182.98 - - Robert £101.30 48,639 Scott SNP Lab - £545.93 Paterson LD £7,856.40 McDaid - Ann - - Con £265.00 £500.00 £8,777.75 - £393.27 £1,555.16 - £1,100.00 £8,757.54 £8,819.24 - - £490.00 £8,140.33 £7,719.69 £950.50 - £8,777.75 - - £9,051.08 £93.42 Boyd £9.85 £215.00 £8,140.33 £2,745.60 - £9,763.48 - £4,353.75 £464.52 - £1,186.00 - - £8,777.75 £98.12 Kidd No election expenses return submitted £122.15 £659.22 £942.12 Con £8,858.16 - - Byrne £655.00 Steven SL - SSP £9,763.48 £200.00 £8,777.75 £451.99 - - - £2,157.03 - £4,210.14 - £281.51 £78.69 - - £8,777.75 Cochrane - £4,257.10 £431.00 £9,005.27 £13.35 £9,051.08 - - - LD - £45.00 - - Clwyd - £993.00 - SNP £353.00 SSP £270.00 - £478.27 - £4,646.00 £500.00 £1,110.25 SL - £2,706.00 - £150.00 - £9,051.08 - £1,198.00 £9,005.27 £4,374.68 - - - - £8,140.33 - Cornelius £100.26 - £970.79 £1,274.05 £9,051.08 - £12.00 £291.25 £1,815.00 £60.00 - Lab £410.00 - £525.00 - - £9,005.27 £556.12 - £4,538.39 £771.80 - PC - - - - - £8,589.26 - £3,328.53 - £75.00 - - - - £362.60 £500.00 - £857.94 - £1,506.83 - - £68.99 - £3,412.00 £8,140.33 - £3,332.85 - £4,742.10 £490.00 - £231.39 £6,393.79 £8,858.16 - £1,186.00 £9,051.08 - £2,226.02 - - - - £8,793.58 - £9,005.27 - - £8,858.16 ------£300.00 £200.00 - - - Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 117 Area Constituency No. Name175 Cynon Valley175 Cynon Valley176 Dagenham176 Dagenham Constitu- 176 Electorate Dagenham176 Candidate Dagenham176 Dagenham176 ency type Dagenham177 Darlington177 Darlington177 B Candidate Darlington177 Darlington Forename177 Darlington 59,340177 Jonathan Party Ian Huw Darlington178 Julian William Penrose Dartford178 Dartford Waters178 Personal B Dartford178 Michael John Surname Dartford178 Adrian John Dartford179 64,354 Cruddas David Daventry Parry Alan179 Con Berlyne Daventry179 Robert John White Daventry179 Daventry Lab180 Gee-Turner C £300.00 Edward Anthony Delyn180 Robert Moray LD Delyn180 expenses Alan Sidney Delyn 72,241 LD Siggins180 Hill Con Howard Geoffrey Alvan Craig Charles Hamilton Delyn Richmond181 Milburn Stoate Amanda May Denton & Reddish181 Agents C - £150.00 Expenses subject to legal maximum - Denton & Reddish Adamson181 £180.00 Denton & Reddish £64.84 Con181 SL SA Robert John Docherty 86,510 Denton & Reddish Clerks Platt182 Eric Timothy Lab Graham David Derby North BNP Rose Lab182 LD Mark Christopher - Derby North B -182 C £150.00 John Keith - Derby North £500.00 Printing SA183 - Derby South - Dunn £1,335.42 Martin183 Kevin Morgan Croucher Meetings 69,236 £200.00 54,732 Derby South £500.00 Boswell Ind183 Jamie Mackenzie Andrew Francis - David George Committee Derby South SL - Michael184 Peter - - £500.00 - Derbyshire North East -184 Davenport £80.00 - Derbyshire North East - £1,272.39 UKI B Calder184 - - LD Bennett Derbyshire North East Quigley Con Paul Con -185 Paul Misc £7,484.44 Hanson £2,657.81 Derbyshire South Roger -185 John Tudor Baden 76,248 £2,773.86 C FDP Derbyshire South £793.62 - Alan B -185 John Paul Robert £7,694.58 £5,985.84 Legal - - Derbyshire South - -185 - - £558.06 LD - Lab Derbyshire South Lab185 71,527 77,082 - Lab £77.00 - Total £920.66 Derbyshire South Harold £1,584.00 -185 Margaret Mary - £5,218.01 - Derbyshire South - UKI - Barrie Leslie £184.75186 £442.80 Jones C - £113.14 - £150.00 Derbyshire West - Robert Andrew - £400.00 -186 £500.00 £65.00 Newman - Max £1,462.06 Brierley Rowlinson Fletcher Derbyshire West - £150.00 £180.00 £25.00186 £469.06 £5,295.53 James £1,520.17 Derbyshire West Laxton £5.00 81,217 £502.26 Simon Andrew £241.47 Beckett £100.00186 Cadwallender - £6,445.59 - Mark Wainwright £350.00 £6,169.45 - £60.00 - Mark Anthony Derbyshire West £8,500.29 Anders Paul £924.00186 - Holden Derbyshire West LD Charlesworth PC Con £1,000.00186 UKI Barnes £8,099.84 £20.00 - £687.38 LD £6,654.31 Con £8,050.94 Derbyshire West - - £32.50 -187 - - - - C £662.70 £8,212.64 - £8,442.09 Todd Devizes Spencer - LD187 Lab Lab James Charles - - - Devizes £18.00 Higginbottom - - £623.00 £191.64 £200.00187 Russell David - Hanson Devizes £77.00 £600.00 £305.00 £818.62 Con187 74,651 £450.00 Hollingsworth £3,436.56 John £742.54 Lab Allen £480.50 Patrick Devizes - LD £8,212.64 187 Amos Paul - £8,212.64 - £6,316.01 - - £5,058.89 £136.66 Con Devizes - - - Hakewill -187 - £229.93 £623.00 James Bernard Con £8,442.09 Lab - £8,442.09 Devizes £800.00 - £437.98 - £8,500.29 - £58.97 Eagling LD £2,617.83 £3,883.67 - - £107.55 - - - - £18.00 £4,732.54 Stephen Joseph - - - £2,868.30 £242.18 £5,830.46 £19.43 £622.80 £370.00 McLoughlin £256.00 Jeremy William Ronald £66.00 £1,074.75 £150.00 Con Taylor £8,442.09 £1,040.00 £7,694.58 - Liversuch C £8,212.64 £1,064.05 £10.00 Stuart David - Beckett - - - £500.00 £9,998.95 £9,313.89 - Blunt Nick Charles Elsworth LD £8,442.09 £81.94 - £500.00 Clamp - £10,500.94 - Con - - £9,998.95 £250.00 Robert £10,848.29 - - - - 82,925 Delves - £285.00 - - Michael Andrew - £150.00 - £168.00 - SL £103.80 £469.06 - Ind - £2,945.09 £1,600.00 LD £791.63 - - - £3,075.11 £350.00 - Bavester £8,212.64 £3,183.03 £6,221.38 - £15.00 £75.00 - £384.00 £6,997.92 £1,864.19 £306.00 Lab £8,212.64 UKI - £55.00 - Ancram - - £33.75 MRLP £2,497.53 £1,010.00 James John £30.00 £5,784.17 - £251.45 £3,286.14 - - £750.00 - £18.00 £337.40 Helen £8,876.38 - £3,151.83 £256.50 UKI £4,293.47 - Goodall £50.00 - Alan Stephen £6,171.54 £450.00 £6,479.34 - £627.20 - £10,848.29 - £500.00 £10.00 £8,667.86 £4.50 - - £6.86 Ludovic Henry Coverley - - £450.00 Con £876.46 £285.42 £767.54 Kennedy Ann Vanessa £6,090.06 £26.23 £6,567.92 - £7,391.94 £8,442.09 £6,821.08 £5.00 - Thorpe - £9,998.95 - - £687.50 £14.75 £24.00 - - Ind - - £370.55 £4,767.13 £18.00 Wood £6.80 - - £398.05 £10.00 £1,066.23 £485.00 - - - £60.00 - £214.98 £159.01 - £10,848.29 Ind - £10.00 £3,160.86 - - Frances £33.75 £667.99 £475.00 £1,074.75 £428.16 Potter £2.00 - £335.31 £755.59 £8,975.60 Lab £550.00 £670.00 £10,848.29 £625.00 £3,050.09 - - £18.74 £7,834.35 £3,378.70 - - £8,667.86 £3,219.89 £45.00 £2,526.78 £307.39 £7,495.50 £912.76 UKI £89.00 £8,975.60 £503.57 £9,917.67 £9,998.95 £280.00 £22.00 - £8,876.38 - £8,876.38 - £6,771.38 £7,552.39 LD - £9,011.57 - £11.90 - - £3,864.88 - £3,413.26 - £8,876.38 £8,975.60 MRLP £94.04 £878.89 £8,968.31 - £8,359.45 £7,344.93 £9,011 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 118 Area Constituency No. Name188 Devon East188 Devon East188 Devon East188 Devon East Constitu- 189 Electorate Devon North189 Candidate Devon North189 Devon North189 ency type Devon North189 C Devon North190 Devon South West190 Candidate 69,542 Devon South West190 Hugo Devon South West C Forename190 Devon South West191 Party & Torridge Devon West 191 72,100 & Torridge Devon West C Nicholas Barton191 Roland Timothy & Torridge Devon West 191 Phil Personal & Torridge Devon West 191 David John C 70,922 Surname & Torridge Devon West Gary Nicholas192 Swire Harvey Dewsbury Dumper Clive Edward James192 Dewsbury 78,976 Vivian George192 John Patrick Dewsbury Allen Roger Maurice192 Dewsbury Christopher John Anthony John Streeter192 Wilson LD LD Dewsbury Philip Andrew192 Con Dewsbury Starr Roger Porter Gale193 Charles Geoffrey Knapman Don Valley Mavin Burnett193 David George expenses Con Don Valley Bown Con193 Robert Charles £215.00 £250.00 £600.00 UKI C Don Valley Hutty193 Martin Cox Don Valley UKI193 Agents Bullock £110.00 Expenses subject to legal maximum £375.00 Don Valley Lab £279.27 Lab193 £150.00 62,345 LD Brenton Lab Don Valley Winifred Ann £353.63 Edwards194 Grn Doncaster Central Clerks194 - £600.00 £600.00 Doncaster Central LD194 £211.61 C UKI Con Doncaster Central £586.50 -194 - £250.00 Lab £460.00 UKI Robert Ian Gawain Doncaster Central - Quinn Printing194 Taylor - - Ian Michael Doncaster Central 66,787195 - £153.07 £4,591.89 Meetings £7,020.36 - £7,761.30 Caroline Louise Russell Alexander Doncaster North £146.05 £59.99 £6,796.59 B195 £750.00 Cole - £564.77 Committee Joan Brenda Doncaster North -195 £100.00 £30.78 £86.13 David Trevor Doncaster North £7,780.20195 £575.00 - Smith Grn 65,690 £15.00 Doncaster North £100.00 Lab195 - Rosalie Flint - - James William £979.75 £350.00 £180.00 Cuthbertson - Doncaster North -196 - Misc £200.00 Phillip Ashley - North Dorset Mid & Poole 196 Smithson - Con £1,801.89 - Terry £2,753.09 C £110.00 North Dorset Mid & Poole £230.00 £489.90 - £8,117.03196 £190.00 LD Peace Legal David Arthur £8,279.88 North Dorset Mid & Poole £3,351.00 Gary -196 - BNP C - Browne Nigel £20.00 North £2,444.42 Dorset Mid & Poole £180.42 - Michael John £9,633.38 £630.00 62,124197 £445.40 - £106.52 - £4,058.74 Lab £6,202.32 Total Michael Grn Kevin Dorset North - Smith £98.75 David Alexander197 £9,813.64 £1,046.47 £2,226.47 Winterton £350.00 £9,813.64 Dorset North - £264.01 £2,298.18 £57.00 66,675 Janet Anita197 £2,300.60 £180.00 £10.00 Annette Lesley £8,700.20 Dorset North UKI £9,286.70 -197 - Cooper Max Con - £574.65 £8,145.34 Dorset North £250.00 £9,953.20 £50.00 £9,953.20 £219.02197 Gordon Southcombe £32.20 Anita Wilde £929.77 - £9,880.16 £515.00 - Dorset North Hughes £40.00 Lab197 - Colin Arthur - £27.00 LD - Dorset North £10,071.64198 £1.00 Meggitt - Christopher James - £10,379.51 Brooke £750.00 Martin - Ball LD £139.70 £3,342.11 Dorset South £10,271.17 £4,934.76 Terry198 UKI £356.26 James Sebastian John Swann £10,379.51 £200.00 Dorset South C £9,813.64 198 UKI - Jeff - - £70.00 £140.00 Dorset South Lab Fraser - - £200.00198 Ind - - Dorset South £4,565.00 -199 Con 72,140 - Ross Selby Bennett - LD - Dorset West £270.03 Robert John - £9,880.16 £240.00199 - - £362.62 £2,641.42 - Kapoor Dorset West SL SA199 Wallis £5,321.15 Lab £9,813.64 - £580.00 - Dorset West - - £4,128.00200 - Williams - - Con £1,264.98 £2,718.21 £3,066.52 £260.00 £99.00 C Dover £2,695.42 - £10,379.51 - £9,953.20 - £20.00 Emily Jane £9,953.20 £2,441.47 LD - £5,674.95 - £300.00 Walter £368.20 - Mark Anthony Con £19.98 £263.10 - Mager £76.03 69,223 £9,880.16 - £132.00 - - Peter Jim UKI £700.00 Ind £75.00 - £20.00 £150.00 - - Joseph Charles Martin - - C - - £61.07 £5,296.86 £330.00 Cora £100.00 - £378.21 Duthie £839.98 £10,379.51 £591.03 - £100.00 £220.00 £3,720.81 Gasson Wareham - Con - £9,880.16 - UKI 71,291 £9,953.20 Ian Cameron - £372.82 - - Oliver - £150.00 - Andrew James - £324.00 - £309.05 - - Laurence Alec Walter - - - - - C - £7,948.64 £250.00 Lab £352.99 - LE £299.00 Jenkins £410.00 LD - - £3,473.54 Moss £290.54 Knight £6,118.95 - - £4,035.57 - £523.78 Simon £2,613.30 Bruce £750.00 £1,905.64 Canning - 69,024 £900.00 £9,623.79 £9,623.79 - Richard John Bone £5,674.14 £420.00 - Gwynfor Mathews - £9,440.22 £3,124.09 £750.00 £100.90 £879.00 £1,555.52 £9,348.32 - - - - £10,379.51 £211.84 £889.00 £1.59 £709.50 - UKI No election expenses return submitted - Letwin £9,348.32 £1,592.40 - £140.73 Lab £3,125.09 Prosser - UKI - LD - £150.00 - Con £45.00 £753.58 - £9,348.32 £75.00 £10.00 Hyde £640.00 - - - - no label - £4,431.54 - Green - - £1,463.04 - £610.37 £8,504.74 £100.00 - £155.00 £7,209.10 - Con £575.27 - £339.61 £11.00 £93.93 Lab - £410.00 £700.00 - - - - £162.00 - - £1,339.42 £5,651.58 - £9,348.32 £9,076.83 - Lab £30.00 £977.00 £2,618.57 - £330.00 - £495.00 £9,334.69 - £9,616.85 LD - £450.00 £25.00 £9,616.85 £401.00 £13.25 £9,348.32 - £8,153.94 - - £230.54 - - - - £800.00 £1,710.84 £167 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 119 Area Constituency No. Name200 Dover200 Dover200 Dover201 Down North Constitu- 201 Electorate Down North201 Candidate Down North201 Down North201 ency type Down North201 Down North202 Down South202 Candidate Down South C202 Down South Forename202 Down South202 63,212 Party Down South203 Sylvia Dudley North203 Dudley North Alexander Paul 203 Personal Dudley North C Antony James203 Surname Dudley North Robert Law Lee204 Dudley South Marietta204 73,519 Dudley South Watkins Julian204 Eddie Dudley South Christopher Charles204 Hook Hermon B Dudley South Eamonn204 Dudley South McCartney205 Carter Norwood Dulwich & West Con Mick205 68,964 Norwood Dulwich & West Ross Frederick Dermot William Gibson UU205 Farrell expenses B Speakman Norwood Dulwich & West LD James Henry UKU Nesbitt205 B Norwood Dulwich & West Robertson Betty McGrady £150.00205 Ind Norwood Dulwich & West McConvey206 Agents 65,579 £200.00 Cranston Expenses subject to legal maximum Andrew James UKI Dumbarton Ian Phares £550.00 71,621206 Jane Richard George Tessa SDLP Dumbarton £90.67 Con206 UU Wells SDLP Simon Dumbarton Clerks £350.00206 SF Murphy Dumbarton -206 Lab Griffiths Jason Ashley Dumbarton207 Burt £437.00 £1,245.00 Nicholas Edward John Lorely Jane - Dumfries - Pearson Printing Campbell207 - Caroline Valerie John Frederick Jowell Vineall - Dumfries -207 DUP SF - Meetings £235.00 Jenny Angela £7,775.78 - Dumfries207 - C Brian John Con Committee Dumfries Sugarman207 - Darby APNI £4,192.10 Dumfries Lab - Pidgeon208 - Westwood LD - Burt £80.00 Dundee East 55,643208 Con Lab - - John - - Dundee East Con208 Misc - - £5,585.00 Dundee East £100.00 -208 - UKI £1,143.50 Kelly Dundee East £155.00 - LD BNP - Thompson C208 - Jones Legal - Dundee East - -209 Iain - - LD Dundee West £231.00 -209 Eric - £250.00 £55.00 63,571 Total - Dundee West - - £7,153.08 - - SA209 Russell Leslie John £5,454.44 Peter £15.00 - - - B - Dundee West £1,625.00209 - £337.39 Les £1,126.82 - McFall SA Dundee West Grn £4,279.00209 £9,230.78 - £3,610.32 Max £25.00 - Dundee West £3,125.52 £50.00 £4,083.82 - £460.00210 £9,762.49 56,535 - Dunfermline East £5,110.49 - Iain - John Anthony210 - - £975.00 - Brown - Dunfermline East £9,437.05 John Andrew Ross210 - - - Ramsay B - - £10.00 Dunfermline East Robertson £1,617.77 Lab Gerald Alexander -210 - £5,968.27 - Dunfermline East Thompson - - - - - John210 - Scott - - Stewart Dunfermline East - - £3,540.78210 53,760 Charteris £725.00 - £200.00 - £7,202.77 - James Alan Ernest Dunfermline East - Robertson Lab Fisher SNP211 - £5,757.04 C £50.00 Con £1,114.07 - - Raymond Alexander £9,437.05 Dunfermline West £3,612.65 LD - -211 £3,598.07 - - £485.47 Harvey Dunfermline West £150.75 £765.40 -211 - - £7,463.07 Luke £705.00 Lawrie Dunfermline West - Con 52,811 - SSP211 £18.00 - - LD £200.00 James Gordon Gordon - £680.00 £1,143.50 Dunfermline West £60.00 - £1,955.77 £5,489.47 £123.00 £7,303.83 £4,575.72 - Ian Stewart - Donnelly SNP - £9,762.49 £1,843.85 - Hosie £10,094.13 £1,969.94 Dennis - £1,421.33 £8,655.34 - Elizabeth Graham £2,004.43 - £9,437.05 - £3,293.52 - - £196.50 C £450.00 - Ross £10,094.13 James - - £6,039.59 £200.00 £236.86 LD Brown John Joseph James £5,454.44 £320.00 £10,094.13 - Lab - £154.68 - £8,388.21 - £1,625.00 Duke Con Dick Stuart Roy £737.50 £800.00 £9,437.05 £1,126.82 - 54,293 £530.00 - £590.73 - £8,655.34 - - £9,762.49 - £984.67 Rachel Anne John MacIver £669.07 Mellon SSP - Hail £9,437.05 - SNP £773.50 Archer Andrew - £11.05 £2,579.01 £150.00 £52.82 - £2,669.03 £179.00 £344.13 - Thomas Lab Lab - £4,941.72 - £975.00 - £4,691.57 £5.00 £6,908.65 - £3,551.83 SSP McFarlane £8,499.59 Brian John - £9,437.05 - £106.00 - LD - £8,499.59 Mainland Randall - £10,094.13 SNP £8,337.20 - - Squire - - Russel SNP £5,585.85 - - - £8,725.86 - Con - £15.00 - James Alexander - £15.50 £2,128.85 - £1,309.70 SSP - £5,782.04 £1,114.07 £147.00 Jackson £155.00 - - £8,499.59 £10,094.13 LD £4,810.99 £1,672.00 £7,820.17 Dunsmore - - £8,725.86 Con - - £2,024.93 - - Mackie £695.00 Lab Goodall - - £3,285.25 - £1,335.39 - £261.57 £355.00 £8,725.86 £791.76 - £705.00 £8,655.34 - - - - - £15.92 SSP £8,655.34 - UKI £100.00 McPhate £59.96 £594.19 £7.50 £662.62 - - - £1,421.33 £2,987.58 - £4,803.29 £1,476.62 - SNP Con - - £8,499.59 £8,725.86 £72.00 £8,971.55 - - - - £1,044.63£250.00 - £340.00 £606.65 £30.00 £8,876.27 - - - LD - £8,499.59 - - £8,725.86 - £1,162.15 £5,250.56 £7,162.47 £9,415.72 £1,100.57 - £3,198.87 £500.00 £500.00 £4,481.66 - £110.36 - £8,971.55 - £636.79 - £20.00 - £4,308.30 £184.89 £445.06 - £6,161.56 - - - £25.00 - £8,270.53 - £8,971.55 - - - £2,141.81 £1,774.82 £9,415.72 - £1,494.59 - - - - £9,415.72 - - £8,971.55 £1,621.00 - £505.77 - - £257.50 - £2,330.54 - £809.00 £257.50 £1,672.99 - - - £26.50 £900.00 £3,292.75 - £2,486.70 - £50.00 £496.98 - £633.13 - £484.46 £9,415.72 - £2,494.12 - - £521.64 - £666.19 - £383.30 £1,097.40 - - £6,005.04 £77.63 £61.00 - £8,971.55 £6,559.01 - £1,255.20 - £8,083.61 - - - £44 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 120 Area Constituency No. Name211 Dunfermline West211 Dunfermline West212 Durham North212 Durham North Constitu- 212 Electorate Durham North213 Candidate Durham North West213 Durham North West213 ency type Durham North West213 Durham North West214 C City of Durham214 Candidate C City of Durham214 City of Durham 67,755 Forename214 Catherine David Kevan City of Durham 67,062215 Alastair Douglas Hilary Jane Party Ealing Acton & Shepherd's Bush215 B Ealing Acton & Shepherd's Bush215 Ealing Acton & Shepherd's Bush B215 Matthew Roundell Personal Harper 70,697 Ealing Acton & Shepherd's Bush Jones215 Carole Ann Clive Stafford William Stuart James Surname Stewart Ealing Acton & Shepherd's Bush215 Alan Christopher 69,610 Armstrong Ealing Acton & Shepherd's Bush Palmer215 Clouston Gerald Neil Joan Ealing Acton & Shepherd's Bush216 Ealing North UKI216 Justine Ord Lab Soley Ealing North Lab SSP216 Niebuhr Martin Paul Field Ealing North Con Carol Ann216 Nicholas John Con Ealing North Nicholas James £600.00216 Andrew John George Steinberg Tod Ealing North Christine Ann £250.00217 Carlos Joseph Martinez expenses Ealing Southall Lawrie £212.31 Rule217 Rebecca Lab £112.00 Hartnell Ealing Southall LD217 Grant - LD - £110.33 Cartmell Greening Lab Ealing Southall B217 Agents Woods Expenses subject to legal maximum Ealing Southall -217 Williamson LD Ealing Southall217 UKI 77,524 £1.00 SL Ealing Southall - Clerks £60.00 £125.00 Con217 SL Stephen Pelham Con - Ealing Southall - SA Ng B217 - - UKI LD Ealing Southall217 - - Ealing Southall £47.53 Printing218 £6,144.99 Pound £323.36 82,373 Easington Charles Ashley Rupert -218 - Piara Singh Meetings - £212.10 Easington £300.00 - - - Francesco £100.00218 Walker £475.00 - Committee - - Easington Astra Inara -218 - £2,389.66 PL Easington Daniel William - £413.62219 £6,615.30 £39.50 East Ham - - Lab £6,502.70 £600.00 Daniel Robert219 - East Ham Avtar219 £14.00 Misc - - - Khabra - - - Con East Ham £757.97 Baldev Kumar £865.00219 Fruzza - - £27.60 - East Ham Moss - Margaret Jane219 Seibe - Legal £5,869.72 C - East Ham Salvinder Singh220 - £475.00 £460.00 - Kawczynski £7,152.79 £3,893.68 - - East Kilbride £5,644.00 Mushtaq220 £78.00 Lab £9,640.84 - - Total East Kilbride - - - Harpal Singh220 Sharma £239.60 61,532 LD £1,518.03 East Kilbride John Scott - Con Cook £6,478.16 Mohammed Zulkifal220 - - - £200.00 Dhillon - East Kilbride - B UKI Grn220 Lit - £1,539.68 £1,000.00 Max - - £556.00 - East Kilbride - -221 Bhutta £726.00 £400.00 East Lothian £346.00221 LD £300.00 - 71,255 - £465.00 Brar £61.34 £1,939.34 £36.00 £300.00 Philip Foster - - East Lothian Choudhry Stephen Creswell £170.00221 £100.20 - £7,298.30 - £3,012.19 £25.00 Christopher James East Lothian C Grn £7,552.22 - Ind221 Cummings £182.42 £3,115.66 £9,709.85 £195.00 - - - £600.00 David East Lothian - - £711.73221 £6,676.64 £9,640.84 £416.63 £197.70 £75.00 Ind £428.62 East Lothian Timms Ind £475.00221 Ord £40.00 Ind £9,709.85 66,572 £452.00 - John East Lothian Peter £6,698.14 - £8,849.00 £15.00 £523.00 Adam Lab222 £8,849.00 - Lovel - £769.00 - £20.00 £10.00 £10.00 £6,370.41 £360.00 SL Eastbourne Bridget £8,685.98 - - £284.29 £6,230.63222 - - £8,735.00 Eastbourne - Roderick £5,970.01 C -222 £8,735.00 £6,208.35 £539.00 £45.00 Eastbourne Johinda222 Lab £35.00 £6,837.45 Eastbourne Archie £485.00 £470.00 - - - £78.00 58,987 LD £32.50 Robinson - £8,685.98 Ewan Gordon - £500.00 Campbell £9,640.84 £9,709.85 - - Anne Con - - £1,599.68 - - - - - Margaret - - £8,744.92 £240.00 £8,735.00 - David Ingram - £44.06 Fox £2,166.84 £1,652.46 £9,049.00 Finlayson £1,518.03 £5,301.13 SL £2,022.50 £600.00 B £8,735.00 Con £777.00 £500.00 - - £8,735.00 £505.00 Pandhal Hamish John Garrow - Hawthorn £40.00 - £1,000.00 - - - - Judith Lynne - £509.06 £218.66 £8,685.98 - Buchanan - Mair £8,548.85 £1,627.13 - 75,170 Hilary Margaret SL Lab £8,735.00 Nigel Christopher £320.00 - McCulloch £500.00 £5,221.77 £1.63 £9,049.00 Derrick - £7,618.77 Picking LD £3,012.19 - LD UKI £9,640.84 £466.20 James Hunter £10.00 - £7,840.67 £8,685.98 Stevenson SNP - - £400.00 - £800.00 - £9,272.00 £98.00 Waterson Hayman - Brown Con £524.63 - Christopher John - - Con £3.00 - £8,735.00 - Gillian Mary £393.72 Lab £102.60 - SSP £1,487.20 £140.00 - - Herriot Barry Mark £4,790.97 - Con £250.00 LD Berry - - White - - £85.00 £250.00 - - - - £400.00 £6,494.85 SNP £964.06 - - £9,272.00 £19.00 £558.11 - £3,002.65 £1,246.29 £475.00 - £705.00 Roles £1,725.13 £1,692.46 £450.00 SL - - - - - £150.00 - £150.00 £9,272.00 £9,049.00 Jones - £1,330.80 No election expenses return submitted £390.00 £6,529.88 - SSP LD - - £581.45 - £450.00 - - £524.00 £579.90 £8,421.77 £9,272.00 £9,049.00 - £9,272.00 - - £777.00 £1,406.69 £100.00 - £6,339.98 £50.00 Lab - - £9,049.00 - - - £395.00 £12.50 £115.00 - - - UKI - £20.00 - - - - - £6,777.56 £1,837.20 £7,128.32 £3,112.40 £3,842.82 - £9,285.52 £674.00 £142.74 £9,272.00 £614.28 £466.20 - £320.48 - - £30.20 £106.60 £9,272.00 £525.00 £750 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 121 Craufurd Area Constituency No. Name222 Eastbourne223 Eastleigh223 Eastleigh223 Eastleigh Constitu- 223 Electorate Eastleigh223 Candidate Eastleigh224 Eastwood224 ency type Eastwood224 Eastwood224 Eastwood B224 Candidate Eastwood224 Eastwood Forename225 74,603 Eccles225 David William George Party Eccles225 Maria Theresia Chidgey Eccles C226 Eddisbury226 Personal Eddisbury Conor David226 68,297 Surname Eddisbury Jim Robert Harvey Williamson226 LD Eddisbury Stephen Charles227 Edinburgh Central Martha227 Edinburgh Central Lib227 Burns Raymond Scott Edinburgh Central C Jaffa227 Challis £30.00 Allan Richard Morison Edinburgh Central227 C William Stewart Edinburgh Central227 Steele 68,764 Joseph Peter Edinburgh Central B Ian228 expenses Robertson Murphy Manar Edinburgh East & Musselburgh228 69,181 Con Lyn B UKI Edinburgh East & Musselburgh Stephen Rothwell Lab -228 - Maxwell 66,089 Edinburgh East & Musselburgh228 Agents Alistair Maclean Con Expenses subject to legal maximum LD Edinburgh East & Musselburgh John Peter 228 Murray 59,241 Lab Edinburgh East & Musselburgh Gavin Steel O'Brien Robert Douglas229 £154.00 George William Edinburgh North & Leith Clerks229 SNP David Paul Darling Edinburgh North & Leith - - - Grn Andrew229 £110.00 - Tayan David John Edward Edinburgh North & Leith Stewart Alastair229 Boyd SSP Robert MacDougal Edinburgh North & Leith B Ian Hume Printing Con Caillard -229 £200.00 £8,629.41 Eyres Gary John Edinburgh North & Leith Strang Carson Graeme William -229 - Meetings Llewelyn Weldon Peter Edinburgh North & Leith Lab Kevin Munn230 - £600.00 62,731 Derek Andrew Michael Committee Edinburgh Pentlands Finnie Roberts - Lab Ind -230 - Marek Jerzy £463.00 - Edinburgh Pentlands Durkin230 Con Myles LD - £150.00 Farmer - Edinburgh Pentlands £1,000.00 - UKI230 Lab Lab £600.00 Orr McKee - Edinburgh Pentlands Peacock230 - Misc £136.75 SNP Edinburgh Pentlands £7,715.09 LD £425.00 Sebastian £7,967.49 B230 Con - - - - Edinburgh Pentlands £3,561.05 Lazarowicz Kaukab231 SSP £10.00 £401.21 Legal - - Sc Grn £131.50 Edinburgh South LD Williamson Iain Grant - £26.40231 £80.00 £7,673.25 - LD 60,484 - Edinburgh South SNP - £8,363.22 Catriona Mary £1,105.00231 Margaret Lynda - Total Edinburgh South Lab - Con - David Don £8,897.66 £30.00 £30.00 £280.00 £172.50 SSP -231 - - Tombs - £8,969.84 £127.60 Edinburgh South - - - £8,581.94 -231 - - Max - - £145.00 - Edinburgh South Clark - - Malcolm Leslie £112.00 Grant231 Stewart - £80.00 B Mitchell £30.00 - £5,057.32 Edinburgh South Stewart232 - £30.00 - - - Edinburgh West £593.35 £235.75 £375.00 David John232 - - Jacobsen £280.00 - LD Edinburgh West £478.87 - 64,437 James Angus £8,357.49 -232 - £638.36 - - Nigel - - - Edinburgh West Rifkind - William232 £8,969.84 - - SNP £385.00 £9,084.84 £9,509.00 £183.17 Con - Lab - - Edinburgh West SSP £35.00 -232 £199.80 £6,179.64 £19.80 £4,069.92 SL £9,782.39 £9,772.22 Edinburgh West - £2,582.42 - - £1,967.46233 - - £6,221.35 - £665.54 £8,969.84 £15.00 Edmonton £5,601.48 Walker233 £1,460.67 £772.75 Mearns - £1,552.47 Gibb Marilyne Angela £50.00 - £106.00 £8,678.22 B Edmonton £600.00233 £1,453.91 £22.00 - Con - £8,969.84 - Geoffrey Gordon £237.10 £4,396.47 - £9,782.39 Edmonton - £698.57233 £8,939.00 £338.13 Edmonton - - £2,250.11 - £8,887.74 62,503 - - Heather - McMurdo - £1,626.73 - £1,778.01 £90.50 - Griffiths MacLaren - John Andrew - £1,072.22 £7,261.88 £9,782.39 £173.00 - SSP Buchan LD Colin - - - - £261.70 £381.12 £9,782.39 - SNP Linda Margaret £425.00 - £100.00 - £1,916.07 £210.00 £6.70 - £1,201.12 £600.00 UKI - LD £5,013.62 £6,829.47 - B - Elspeth £88.13 - Lab - £121.00 £385.71 - - - - - Barrett Con £8,523.88 £50.00 Iain £77.82 £367.37 - - - Hendry - £664.86 - £88.13 Williams £1,207.76 Alyn Edward - - - 61,788 £9,782.39 - - £80.35 £4,972.68 Bill Andrew - £10.00 - £287.70 - £1,700.07 £6,554.30 £10.00 Fox £15.00 £375.00 £88.13 £8,208.78 - £300.00 - - £51.89 £7,429.11 £5,109.54 £8,523.88 - - - - £8,969.84 LD - - £2,604.42 £1,652.39 - LCA £596.96 £9,773.34 SNP - £7,105.35 - £1,840.17 - Alexandra £9,772.22 £675.54 £8,523.88 Smith £3,880.36 £197.97 David John Barrington - £758.57 £40.00 £787.75 - £2,390.13 £410.00 £7,182.31 £1,780.42 £9,773.34 £18.70 £9,773.34 - Douglas Alain £361.12 - £44.00 £9,772.22 Burrowes £9,782.39 £8,208.78 Whyte - - Gwyneth Wesley £400.00 £15.00 £452.38 SSP - Love £1,975.98 Lab - - £2,256.07 £1,699.05 £1,482.22 £225.00 £7,391.00 - - £8,208.78 £300.00 Scott - £8,523.88 £8,523.88 £120.84 - - £8,403.54 - SNP - Con £1,626.73 - Taylor £469.25 - Rolph - £1,786.53 £188.97 £3.00 - £9,772.22 £494.00 £8,208.78 £649.22 Con - £521.59 - - Lab £361.12 - £258.68 £1,201.12 - £1,798.00 - £8,163.32 £22.99 - £27.95 - £6,255.06 SSP £8,208.78 £6,483.76 - - £8,224.74 £8,236.06 £30.00 - LD UKI - - £8,403.54 £7,402.04 £8,236.06 £750.00 £5,925.57 £6,490.07 £250.00 £33.00 £1,723.06 £367.37 - £8,403.54 - - £8,403.54 £197.40 £8,523.88 - £117.72 - £825.00 £522.30 - - - - £20.00 - - - - £1,945.15 - - £88.38 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 122 Glanvile Area Constituency No. Name233 Edmonton233 Edmonton233 Edmonton234 & Neston Ellesmere Port Constitu- 234 Electorate & Neston Ellesmere Port 234 Candidate & Neston Ellesmere Port 234 & Neston Ellesmere Port C234 ency type & Neston Ellesmere Port 235 Elmet235 68,147 Elmet Andrew Peter Candidate235 Elmet Forename235 Elmet236 Party Eltham Gareth David236 Miller Erol Eltham Stuart Edward236 Howard William Eltham Henry Frederick236 Personal Ram Pralap Eltham Geoffrey Lane236 Surname Eltham237 C Williams Enfield North Kelly237 Lab Medwell Crocker Enfield North237 70,041 Enfield North Nicholls237 Colin Saxena Enfield North Con Basarik237 Enfield North B SA237 UKI Enfield North LD237 Enfield North Grn -238 Andrew Christopher expenses 57,554 Ind B Enfield Southgate Clive Stanley238 Ref Enfield Southgate £50.00 Millard238 Madeleine Anne - Enfield Southgate238 Agents Andrew Michael 67,204 Burgon Expenses subject to legal maximum Enfield Southgate Joan Marie -238 - Sharon Marina Enfield Southgate - £600.00238 Efford Kirk - Martin Enfield Southgate Clerks239 B Con - Spence Frederick Terence Epping Forest - £250.00 -239 Lab Nicholas Geoffrey Andrew James Epping Forest239 Massey Hilary Frances 65,957 Epping Forest - Printing Ryan239 - Stephen £3,312.52 Jones £150.00 Ramon Paul - Epping Forest Lab240 - Meetings De Bois UKI Brian John Epsom & Ewell £150.00 LD240 - - £5,631.90 Graham Committee Michael Frank Epsom & Ewell - £500.00240 Morris £1,180.68 Con Leighter Richard Epsom & Ewell240 John Christopher - C - £78.00 £1,275.22 Epsom & Ewell Lab UKI241 Wayne - £15.00 Johns Con Erewash - £20.00241 Elaine Amanda Misc Twigg Ind Erewash - - Akerman 72,589 Hall £30.00241 Roy Andrew Flack £750.00 - - Eleanor Fulton LD Erewash B LD -241 Andrew £914.44 Legal Erewash - -241 - £715.11 £3,210.00 Erewash £800.00 £7,868.29 Graham-Leigh Course BNP241 - PL £6,214.54 74,266 - Total - Erewash - Lab -241 Christopher Stephen £32.00 - Chris £237.96 - Laing - Grn £29.50 Hoban Erewash Freshwater £25.00 Con £6,455.01242 UKI Michael Anthony Cyril - - Erith & Thamesmead Grayling242 £9,708.11 Andrew George Max £600.00 £326.27 Erith & Thamesmead - Heavens - £290.00 £4,400.48 - -242 no label C Malakouna - - Erith & Thamesmead UKI Charles John242 £9,708.11 - - - - £97.15 - £1,053.08 Erith & Thamesmead £400.00 - John William LD £1,415.90 -243 Con £1,633.49 - - - 78,484 Esher & Walton - Smith Con Graham Robert B243 - Ind £8,328.80 Elizabeth Marion - LD £750.00 Esher & Walton £300.00 - -243 £684.36 £558.94 £541.26 - £9,736.37 Naylor £7,849.00 - - Esher & Walton -243 Mansell £401.13 £9,825.54 66,371 Esher & Walton - -244 - John Eric £6,273.08 - - Vincent Webster-Gardiner Blackman - Essex North £7,408.19 - £4,168.94 £9,352.38244 Neil Andrew Vincent UKI - - UKI - - Essex North - £8,328.80 -244 £9,825.54 - Martin Charles £100.00 £6,102.26 - - - - Essex North - Lab B £750.00244 - Louise - £1,280.00 - Gregor MacGregor - Lab Con - Essex North Lab £750.00 Mark James - Steven Eric - £370.00 LD £7,213.56 - £762.50 £914.44 James £20.00 - £9,708.11 R U £50.00 - 73,541 £100.00 - Austin - £9,708.11 Hardev Singh Ian Colin Garnett Alan Wayne Peter £300.00 - £959.74 - £315.00 £800.00 - £9,708.11 ------£8,328.80 - £350.00 C - £2,008.42 £5,547.63 £169.00 - £6,415.16 - Brooks - £771.49 £7.00 £45.00 - Waldock - - Belshaw - - £15.00 - £545.11 £1,050.88 - - Smith £13.50 Joe £4,782.00 - Dhillon LD Lab 71,605 £2,352.50 £23.50 £1,030.00 Mark John Powell £222.00 - Bernard Christison - £7,959.57 Kempton £6,743.90 - - - Bernard Michael Taylor - - - £8,577.38 £60.88 £240.00 Seerius SL £869.33 £699.36 - Con BNP - - £643.93 £8,499.76 - - £1,522.52 Marsh Jenkin - - £12.50 - £9,825.54 - - £20.00 - £750.00 £8,577.38 - £635.00 £7,849.00 UKI SL - Philip Kemplay £852.11 LD Collignon £4,152.67 £1,354.38 - £9,825.54 £8,128.69 £420.00 Keith £8,379.49 Trevor - £2,201.50 - £8,577.38 - Con - MRLP £1,389.20 - £7,408.19 George Seymour £8,517.02 £808.70 £16.25 McGowan - £6,140.00 £7,830.77 - - - - £8,128.69 - £307.86 Con - - LD - - - UKI - Hawkins £9,983.52 - - £8,384.13 - £29.71 £73.62 £32.97 £750.00 £1,204.80 £8,517.02 Curtis £2,807.72 £33.50 - - Lab £1,923.90 Ellis £8,246.76 £8,128.69 - £82.50 £15.00 - - £6,092.57 £10.00 £370.00 £966.74 - - £50.00 - - £130.00 £8,899.23 £14.30 - £105.40 - £2,082.04 £79.91 £8,128.69 £8,128.69 Lab £408.23 - £8,577.38 - - - £1,065.88 - £600.00 £73.89 £30.00 £627.61 £18.00 - £350.00 £640.00 £10.00 UKI £40.00 £8,577.38 £4,307.29 - - £1,964.25 - £8,517.02 - - £8,577.38 - - - £1,259.80 £9,983.52 £1,049.75 LD £4,782.00 £8,517.02 - - - £195.99 £8,577.38 £45.10 £1,549.38 £50.00 £350.00 £943.22 - £5,532.40 £2,116.83 - - - £8,517.02 - £10.00 £8,249.75 £500.00 - £1,053.02 - - £10,393.28 - £708.75 £3,123.62 - £1,274.20 £2,938.58 - - £9,983.52 £7,146.39 £8,899.23 £9,983.52 - £425.00 - £29.19 £6,414.73 £686.85 £7,495.59 - £818.70 - £500.00 - £1,075.00 £2,682.65 £10,393.28 £800.00 £8,899.23 - £8,517.02 £8,899.23 £3,235.09 - - £415.00 - £ Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 123 de la Valette Area Constituency No. Name245 Exeter245 Exeter245 Exeter245 Exeter Constitu- 245 Electorate Exeter245 Candidate Exeter245 Exeter246 ency type East Falkirk 246 East Falkirk 246 East Falkirk B246 Candidate East Falkirk 246 East Falkirk Forename246 81,946 East Falkirk 247 James Benjamin Peter Party West Falkirk 247 Bradshaw West Falkirk 247 C West Falkirk 247 Personal West Falkirk Anne Margaret247 Surname Lab West 58,201 Falkirk Richard Anthony Argent247 Michael West Falkirk Copus David John247 West Falkirk Anthony Paul 247 West Falkirk Jobson John Smeaton £450.00 C248 & Camborne Falmouth David Francis 248 Isabel & Camborne Falmouth 248 LD William 54,100 & Camborne Falmouth Morrish248 Eric Karen Edwards Connarty & Camborne Falmouth Stuart Con Anthony expenses C -248 Choules Raymond & Camborne Falmouth 248 & Camborne Falmouth 72,833 David Grn249 Lib Agents Lab Candice Kathleen Expenses subject to legal maximum Fareham Simon Hutton249 - UKI Stevenson Fareham Hugh SA249 - - Fareham Clerks William Utting249 Weir Atherton Joyce Fareham Stead Mhairi250 £1,125.00 Nicholas John £7,736.19 Mid & Kent Con Faversham Hugh250 SNP Julian Charles Martin Mid & Kent Faversham - - Printing Ronnie - -250 John Ernest Douglas Mid & Kent Faversham Kerr250 Brazil Lab - Meetings LD Murray Mid & Kent Faversham Browne -250 £30.00 Lab C Hilda SSP Serpell SL Committee Mid & Kent - Faversham - O'Donnell C250 Thomas Paul Buchanan Mid & Kent Faversham 251 - £230.00 - - & Heston Feltham £132.50 McAlpine £32.00 - - 67,995 £6,657.31251 Hugh 71,526 & Heston Feltham LD Lynch Con UKI251 - SNP Misc Mark Gerard LD Forbes Ind Con & Heston Feltham £2,999.07 -251 £160.50 - & Heston Feltham Holmes - -251 SSP Legal - & Heston Feltham -251 - £549.50 - - - - £125.00 Grahame George Wasley - & Heston Feltham £8,029.19 £210.00 £50.00 B James Wilson252 Michael John - Ind Total SL & South Tyrone Fermanagh Hoban £9,252.33 - Hugh William Lee252 £200.00 James Campbell £1,481.06 £3,914.80 - £1,000.00 - £1,092.98 & South Tyrone Fermanagh Lib William252 £768.50 Birchall Anne Penelope - - Robertson 73,458 - & South Tyrone Fermanagh - C -252 Alan - Max Norman Alfred £790.00 £200.00 £357.50 MK & South Tyrone - Fermanagh - £1,175.00 - Pritchard253 - - Carr £44.19 Gascoyne Sole - Fife Central253 Con 66,640 - - Con - Fife Central - Michelle £7,163.13 Kemp £8,303.39253 £8,182.31 - Lab £143.00 £2,195.45 - Fife Central - - Hazel Elizabeth253 - - Davidson - - £9,252.33 LD UKI £183.50 - Fife Central - - £128.20 Andrew -253 £200.00 - O'Brien - - Fife Central Surinder254 - Lab - £5,215.76 £287.86 Fife North East James LD £544.95 William Warwick - £266.91254 - £361.12 - - £3,127.27 Keen Mammatt Grn - RRL Fife North East £1,596.31 Tommy - £7,045.91 Asa Singh £200.00254 £10.00 £100.00 - - - £100.00 £8,520.63 £9,252.33 - - Fife North East William James - Gildernew254 - £285.00 C £15.00 - - £393.32 £68.44 £4,365.21 UKI Fife North East £70.77 £15.00254 - - £1,246.15 Prachar £600.00 Fife North East £9,056.25 £1,135.61 Con - Darley - £17.00 £1,206.00 - £987.69 £575.40 59,597 £400.00 - Cheema - - SF John William Lab £1,551.83 £89.98 - £9,252.33 - £1,107.98 Dixon - - - - - C £361.12 - - Cooper Khaira £9,252.33 £9,941.24 - £9,252.33 - - Gallagher £9,577.83 £100.00 - £50.00 - - Ind £9,998.65 £201.00 £7,246.82 - £2,678.75 £9,998.65 £294.17 - - 61,900 LD SL - - - - £1,247.80 - £9,056.25 David John Hogg Menzies Walter £1,066.15 £213.95 - - MacDougall £1,175.00 £67.86 Elizabeth - £790.00 - £7,749.22 SDLP UU no label - - Ind £5,609.93 £9,056.25 - - - Jeremy Ross - £7,355.98 £9,252.33 - - - £8,805.15 Alexander - £9,787.78 £7,359.86 Morag Anne - £25.00 Lab £1,088.90 Campbell Michael Dean Anthony £797.56 £9,998.65 - - £9,998.65 ------£204.00 Claire Josephine £1,369.38 Scott-Hayward ------£1,646.31 - Kris - - SNP - - - Balfour - £8,805.15 - Con Riches Stephen Keith - LD £464.97 - - £544.95 - £2,286.30 - Balfour £361.12 £8,719.06 - £50.00 Brennan - £1,013.00 £9,056.25 - - £50.00 £9,056.25 £9,957.29 - - - - £560.00 - - £254.08 £1,246.15 £595.61 - - - - - Con £563.00 - White £708.87 LD - - £8,805.15 - £450.00 £750.00 - - - Lab - SSP £5,133.12 £575.40 - £400.00 - - - £8,994.83 - - £8,805.15 Murray-Browne - £8,805.15 - £3,816.83 £1,825.80 £361.12 £8,826.27 £8,114.85 £9,698.69 - £9,056.25 £9,998.65 - £8,805.15 - - £9,698.69 SNP - £94.50 - £40.00 - - £37.50 SSP - £2,483.75 £35.00 - - - - - £7,283.89 - - - - - £3,879.40 £3,156.00 - - £1,183.40 £21.32 £519.06 - £7,533.06 - £35.00 £250.00 £3,611.15 £169.71 £9,957.29 - £35.00 - - - - £375.00 - £200.00 £99.00 £797.56 ------£8,326.58 - £9,698.69 - - - £8,805.15 ------£8,805.15 - £4,264.33 £5,583.12 £3,367.78 £9,998.65 £2,286.30 £49.00 £659.00 - £464.97 £8,862.06 £8,862.06 £1,013.00 £490.00 £9,957.29 - £7,186.80 - - - £9,698.69 - £9,698.69 £9,698.69 £1,663.63 £555.00 - - £1,109.58 - - - - £1,394.09 - £27.50 - - £169.87 £8,861.27 £186.00 £750.00 - £58.44 £5,660.73 £9,658.51 £155.25 £1,542.78 £ Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 124 Campbell Washington West Washington WestWashington West Washington West Washington Alexander Leslie Area Constituency No. Name254 Fife North East255 Finchley & Golders Green255 Finchley & Golders Green Constitu- 255 Electorate Finchley & Golders Green255 Candidate B Finchley & Golders Green255 Finchley & Golders Green256 ency type & Hythe Folkestone 76,178256 Rudi Jan & Hythe Folkestone 256 & Hythe Folkestone 256 Candidate & Hythe Folkestone 257 of Dean Forest Forename257 John Leslie C of Dean Forest Leslie Margaret 257 Sarah Louise Party of Dean Forest 257 Miranda Jane Vis of Dean Forest 71,585257 John Michael of Dean Forest 257 Personal Goetz Von of Dean Forest 258 Marshall Surname Foyle Teather C258 Dunn Foyle258 Damian Peter LCA Foyle Lab258 Albert Marin Auralio 66,240 Foyle258 Con Diana Mary John Albert Foyle Howard LD259 de Roeck £680.50 Catterall Fylde259 Grn Carroll Fylde259 £85.00 Fylde Mark James259 expenses Fylde - Con UKI David Richard260 Organ Baker Lab Gainsborough Christopher Simon Paul £900.00260 C - Gainsborough Pickering - Allen Gilbert260 Agents LD Expenses subject to legal maximum Gainsborough £150.00 Gerald Raymond261 £250.00 - Galloway & Upper Nithsdale Harper 70,943261 Gayler John - Lab Galloway & Upper Nithsdale Clerks261 UKI £990.00 Grn £6,711.57 C - Galloway & Upper Nithsdale -261 £95.00 Morgan C - - Galloway & Upper Nithsdale Prout261 £105.00 C £250.00 Galloway & Upper Nithsdale - Printing Con262 53,254 Mitchel LD John Peter Gateshead East & 73,460 £500.00 - £124.00 William John Michael Meetings £6,422.87 65,870262 Ind Andrew Edward Julian Egerton - - Committee Gateshead East & - - - - - £190.00 Colm Murray £7,719.29 £138.44 £826.32 Hume UKI Leigh262 £100.00 - Malcolm Gilchrist Gateshead East & - John Robert £115.00 £4,348.21 £94.50 Thomas Kelly £450.00 B Jack Duncan262 Misc John Lovet £8,916.89 Alan Neil Caven McLaughlin Gateshead East & £68.95 - - Lesley Frances Stephen Carl £9,005.81 £485.77 - - Andrew Fleming £650.00 - Hay Cavanagh £932.75 - £80.00263 - SDLP 64,041 Con Legal Davidson Gedling Joyce Gwendolen263 SF - - - Gedling £8,854.92 Sloan £1,000.00 £5,863.92 Con Stockton263 £606.00 £34.00 £8,849.06 £909.36 Total Gedling Con APNI Brown264 Begg - £140.00 SNP - £9,916.37 Quin Taylor - Wallace Gillingham UU £75.00264 £25.00 - - Gillingham DUP £8,499.79 £580.00264 - Max £180.00 Lab Rhodes Ronald Walter Gillingham £2,534.29 Harvey £147.00 - £7,143.54264 £9,005.81 - - £956.70 - - £1,311.75 Lab - Gillingham264 £605.81 UKI - LD Elizabeth Jennifer Gillingham £50.00 £488.31 -265 LD - LD £950.00 £14.30 Lab Glasgow Anniesland £207.34 - -265 C Beadle Lab £500.00 Martin Paul Glasgow Anniesland £150.00 - - -265 SSP - £200.00 - £7,372.30 - £9,663.23 Campbell - £9,320.00 Glasgow Anniesland £82.69 - -265 £100.00 - B - £4,373.21 £9,916.37 - Glasgow Anniesland £500.00 £154.60 68,519265 £10.00 £7,306.12 £1,447.50 £140.00 - - Rodney Vernon £9,005.81 £6,976.81 Glasgow Anniesland -265 - £6,888.41 B £9,589.00 - Glasgow Anniesland - LD Con £67.00 £38.60 £20.40 £568.46 70,901266 £9,632.98 £50.00 - - £378.58 - Gordon Paul £30.00 Rouse Glasgow Baillieston £133.15 £7,311.42266 £9,005.81 - - - Glasgow Baillieston 53,290 - - £9,916.37 - Coaker John £879.25 Jonathan Deryck - - £39.33 - £8,338.67 £356.00 - - £70.00 £7,662.12 £2,787.84 Anthony John - - - - - £9,632.98 Richard Timothy £9,632.98 - £180.00 £4,598.41 - £88.75 UKI £145.30 Clark £34.00 B Jonathan Nigel - Bullock - £1,088.07 - £712.14 - Grant Robert - Lab - Anthony John Edward £9,005.81 - £1,326.05 £6,577.41 £1,392.26 £1,844.13 - - Christopher Paul £9,632.98 - Wynford Vaughan £2,589.25 - Gillam - £9,916.37 £8,524.12 Butcher Scholefield £8,479.56 £2,267.87 49,268 Stewart McNulty - Jimmy - £3,529.26 £8,778.73 £9,567.00 Charlie Hunt - £9,699.07 £3,710.53 Robertson Con £1,454.53 £1,815.05 £10,037.52 - £5,578.99 Katharine Lab Thomas - McGinty - Thoms - - UKI - - - - £10.00 £990.75 Connell - £33.63 - Con LD - - Lachlan Lab £2,051.33 - - £1,000.00 £961.64 £614.12 - - - SA LD LD - - £9,632.98 SNP £40.00 £700.00 - £30.40 - Wray - - Con - McCarthy - McGavigan - £771.00 - - £725.40 £9,632.98 £5.00 £9,300.31 - - £2.00 - £180.00 £1,240.78 £80.00 - £315.67 £1,418.50 £153.92 £9,930.51 £277.10 - £55.75 - £40.00 - SL £442.51 McNeill £5,369.41 £100.00 SSP £237.98 £21.00 £9,930.51 £1,168.07 - £4,544.93 - Lab £6,731.33 - - - £12.08 £19.60 - £10,037.52 £98.32 £559.77 - - £9,930.51 - £6,816.90 - - £8,778.73 - - - £2,509.31 £455.54 - £1,477.53 £8,428.89 SNP £10,037.52 £1,882.73 - £750.00 - £9,567.00 - £1,144.82 £2,374.82 £3,744.16 £2,589.25 £260.68 £7,817.79 £8,778.73 £2,267.87 £10,037.52 £250.00 £8,418.19 - £8,778.73 £9,567.00 - £9,930.51 - - - - £9,930.51 - £255.00 £1,857.94 - - £300.00 - - £6,331.83 - £2,459.85 £6,900.38 - - £30.00 £35.91 - £626.20 - £788.88 - - - - £61.00 £90.00 £1,243.92 £8,778.73 £125.75 £4,875.52 £1,367.09 - - - £183.00 - - £1,679.18 £225.00 - £1,079.00 £30.00 £8,428.89 £291.32 £9,352.62 £520.00 £1,531.49 £215.00 - £107.57 £1,240.78 £2,347.50 £9,731.18 £200.00 - - - - £8,428.89 £279.32 £2,405.01 - Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 125 £80.00 £200.00 - £6,229.77 £141.00 - £385.00 £6,955.77 £7,996.07 Speaker Wilkinson Area Constituency No. Name266 Glasgow Baillieston266 Glasgow Baillieston266 Glasgow Baillieston267 Glasgow Cathcart Constitu- 267 Electorate Glasgow Cathcart267 Candidate Glasgow Cathcart267 Glasgow Cathcart267 ency type Glasgow Cathcart268 Glasgow Govan B268 Glasgow Govan268 Candidate Glasgow Govan268 David 52,094 Glasgow Govan Forename268 Tom James Glasgow Govan268 Charles Christopher Party Glasgow Govan268 B Glasgow Govan269 Dundas Glasgow Kelvin Josephine269 Personal Glasgow Kelvin Richard Elliot269 54,068 Surname Glasgow Kelvin Mohammad Thomas269 Comrie Glasgow Kelvin James Ronald McVicar269 LD Harris Glasgow Kelvin269 Glasgow Kelvin270 Docherty Cook Karen Glasgow Maryhill B270 Con Sarwar Robert Glasgow Maryhill SSP Stevenson270 Mark Andrew Glasgow Maryhill270 Henery Lab 61,534 William Glasgow Maryhill SNP George270 expenses - John Odell Glasgow Maryhill SSP Con Badar Islam Lab271 B £600.00 Glasgow Pollok Menzies271 Agents - LD Neary - Expenses subject to legal maximum Glasgow Pollok Tamsin271 Stewart Glasgow Pollok Anthony Francis 55,431271 - - Ann Glasgow Pollok Clerks Foster Davena271 McGartland Galloway Mirza - Glasgow Pollok - Heather Con272 - £35.00 - Glasgow Rutherglen John Cairns Tim -272 SNP Rankin - LD Glasgow Rutherglen SSP B Printing272 Alexander Glasgow Rutherglen - Lab272 Mayberry - James Stuart Comm Meetings £50.00 Glasgow Rutherglen272 Shand Ind Gordon 49,201 - - Committee - Glasgow Rutherglen Ian Graham273 Rankin - B Gawain Howard £30.00 - - SNP Glasgow Shettleston - £193.00 £17.00 Ritchie McKechin273 - £800.00 Glasgow Shettleston LD £4,007.02273 - Callison - £1,220.64 Glasgow Shettleston Dingwall 51,855273 Misc - Tommy Towler Sc Grn - Glasgow Shettleston £541.12 £200.00 David - £5,959.80273 Lab Con - Glasgow Shettleston Robert Keith - Davidson - £1,424.41273 B - - SSP Legal Scott Glasgow Shettleston - Isabella £200.00 £105.85 -274 - SNP LD Glasgow Springburn Rory - £180.00274 - Anne £5,570.81 £1,130.81 £779.00 Total - 51,557 Glasgow Springburn - - Con274 - David David Lab - Glasgow Springburn274 Malcolm - £10.00 - Baldassara - Glasgow Springburn McAvoy - - - £1,247.00274 £425.00 William £5,537.83 - Max SSP - Ritchie Glasgow Springburn - - - -275 £315.00 B £321.10 £7,852.83 - - Gloucester - - Nelson275 Jim SSP - £126.70 - £454.00 £1,238.65 - Gloucester £1,740.75 -275 Rosie £5,275.49 Lab Gloucester 55,192 -275 O'Brien - Lewis - - McLaughlin Michael John - £541.12 Gloucester £10.00 - - £884.38 SNP275 - Jackson James Campbell £550.96 Macaskill £7,311.50 Marshall £4,505.99 - - - Gloucester - - -276 Murdo - £100.00 £7,852.83 LD Bonnar £30.54 Gordon - £1,230.64 - - SNP276 - £179.00 - £193.00 £5,078.03 Gordon £7,862.52 £7,725.09 - £982.76276 Sandy Murdoch Con £7,725.09 Con Martin £1,745.51 Gordon - LD £7,942.67 Lab276 Carolyn - - - - - B - Gordon Byrne £7,852.83 £927.63 Kane276 Daniel - - - £25.00 £541.12 - Gordon £1,000.00 - SSP - - Hutton Richard Edward Warner - - - - £7,725.09 £257.59 £1,683.21 £2,467.47 - £120.00 Con £50.00 - Silvester 81,207 - £300.00 - £2,581.12 Singh Parmjit - £1,670.21 Ritchie £563.42 - £180.00 £1,473.85 £1,347.00 £620.75 £41.12 £18.00 - - - £1,506.24 £779.00 SNP £7,852.83 £7,942.67 Bain SSP £884.78 - - £8,087.11 - £7,942.67 - £7,852.83 Leckie £130.00 LD C £4,419.90 Ind - - - £144.00 £8,234.72 Simon Paul - - - - Houston - £6,159.87 Dhanda - SL - £612.78 £472.00 - - John Timothy - £459.44 £7,942.67 60,059 £639.76 £7,942.67 £7,942.67 Terence - - Malcolm Gray £5,842.78 - £2.00 Stewart James Wortley £15.89 - £41.12 - - - SSP - - SNP £8,234.72 £361.12 £373.02 - £10.00 - Smyth SU Lab £192.16 £5,282.71 - - - - James - - Bullamore - - £300.00 £1,557.17 £110.00 - Nanette Lilian Margaret £181.00 £256.00 £998.65 Bruce £3,299.93 - £2,365.49 £1,628.67 Milne Rhona Cormack Walker - £7,942.67 £1,119.79 £127.50 £8,234.72 £2,549.67 £7,996.21 £1,362.90 - £173.19 - Kemp - Ellis Lines - £8,234.72 - £1,713.85 LD - SA - - - - John - Con £7,996.21 - - £1,797.71 £2,320.32 - - - - - £4,893.09 £200.00 £7,996.21 LD - - £1,683.21 £7,725.27 - - £178.57 - Con - £200.00 £568.62 - £8,234.72 - SNP £1,184.46 £80.00 - UKI £313.19 - - £563.42 £627.12 - - £247.49 - - £8,234.72 - - - - £66.69 £1,194.00 £884.78 Thorpe - - £5,795.90 £41.12 £337.71 - Sangster £7,996.21 £568.12 - - £649.76 £20.00 - £180.00 - £7,868.33 - £193.00 - - £7,996.21 - - - £427.81 - £3,514.50 £467.50 £86.96 - £10.00 - £7,725.27 - - - Lab £7,829.28 £800.00 SSP - - - - £1,324.54 - £541.12 - - £1,610.39 - - £2,585.85 £1,557.17 £7,512.39 - - £250.00 £950.50 £7,868.33 - £256.00 £7,868.33 £7,725.27 £230.15 £2,365.49 £1,628.67 - £100.00 £3,261.37 £7,725.27 - - £7,868.33 £7,725.27 £1,101.00 ------£1,474.00 £75.00 £8,550.35 - £7,563.55 £1,194.46 - - £7,829.28 - £7,829.28 - - £1,287.58 £90.00 £6,446.75 £568.62 £137.60 - £1,606.50 - - £7,868.33 £1,120.72 - £25.00 - - - - - £309.00 £1,712.14 - - - £8,723.11 - £250.00 £7,996.07 £568.12 £41.12 £66.80 £65.00 £400.00 £9,218.52 £193.00 £7,829.28 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 126 Muschamp Stoke Newington Stoke Newington Stoke Newington Stoke Newington Stoke Newington Area Constituency No. Name277 Gosport277 Gosport277 Gosport277 Gosport Constitu- 277 Electorate Gosport278 Candidate Gower278 Gower278 ency type Gower278 Gower278 B Gower278 Candidate Gower279 Grantham & Stamford 69,626 Forename279 John Peter Grantham & Stamford279 Party Grantham & Stamford279 Grantham & Stamford C280 C Gravesham280 Richard Francis Personal Gravesham280 Roger Douglas Clayton 58,935 Surname Gravesham Viggers Martin Philip280 75,500 Roberts John Alan Gravesham John Quentin281 Kevin Great Grimsby Williams281 Great Grimsby281 Great Grimsby Con John Gunther282 LD John Caton Great Yarmouth Sheila Ramsay282 Davies C Jane Caroline Lab Great Yarmouth Bowles Sian Mair282 Marilyn Janice Great Yarmouth Sandra Christina £195.28282 expenses 69,588 Great Yarmouth Darran Charles283 Bushell B Chetwynd Christopher Richard Waye Greenock & Inverclyde283 Lab £200.00 Con Greenock & Inverclyde Carr UKI Shrewsbury283 Agents - Pond Expenses subject to legal maximum Swain Greenock & Inverclyde 63,157 C283 £400.00 Austin Vernon - Caiach SL Hickery Greenock & Inverclyde Robinson283 Jacques Arnold Con C £610.00 Greenock & Inverclyde Grn Clerks284 Bruce Edward 69,194 LD £6,129.25 Greenwich & Woolwich Anthony David284 William John £1,016.00 Greenwich & Woolwich 47,884 LD -284 - James Anthony Lab UKI Lab Mitchell John David £30.00 SL Arnold Greenwich & Woolwich - PC Printing284 Andrew - £208.00 Greenwich & Woolwich284 Parmenter B Meetings Greenwich & Woolwich Charles Joseph Wright - -284 - £103.00 Committee Greenwich & Woolwich Maurice Leonard Jenner Cousins £4,494.65 £45.00285 Charles Gilchrist - Lab - Guildford Bertie Robert - 60,114285 Con LD Andrew Robert - Wyvill Richard Nicolls - Cairns - Guildford £47.60 - -285 Reynolds Alistair Macdonald Guildford - - Leeke285 Raynsford Misc Lab - David William De Freitas £670.00 - Con Brodie Guildford £420.00 £5,785.00 UKI285 - £40.00 - £15.00 Guildford - Haw £1,074.61286 Poole Murie - Richard John - Legal Hackney North & Con - - Lab £1,324.85 £75.00 Russell David Lab LD - - £100.00286 Stanley James £500.00 - LD - - £4,301.33 Total Landels - Hackney North & £7,803.86 - LD Kirstie Anne £1,049.45 - £7,131.10 - £8,685.79 £893.30 - C -286 - - Margaret Mary £207.76 £10,164.00 £30.00 Forsdyke - Hackney North & UKI SNP Con Max £6,122.10 Pyne -286 B Gain - £2,494.75 - - 76,302 SSP Hackney North & £400.00 - £6,590.31 - £1,213.01 - - Susan Kathleen - - - £701.39 £1,774.95 - £80.00 - -286 Paton - Con Sharkey - £3,922.07 £5,340.28 60,444 £400.00 Hackney North & - - - £75.00 - Diane Julie £1,538.00 £2.00 £80.12 £7,634.95 £514.00287 - - £4,680.51 LD - Doughty - Hackney South & Shoreditch Nicholas Francis £120.00 £100.00287 £8,685.79 £772.57 UKI - - - - - Hackney South & Shoreditch - Joyce Edna - - SL - B - - £70.16 - SA - £10.00 Sonya Ann287 - - - - £248.05 £2,985.99 - Hackney South & Shoreditch - £1,108.56 £5,281.66 John Hugh £65.00 Anne Ruggles Pauline 287 - St Aubyn - Abbott LD £480.00 £825.00 £570.00 Hackney South & Shoreditch - £420.00 63,990 £9,133.00 287 £71.00 - £670.00 - Dye - £8,772.54 Brian Charles John £6,123.61 Hackney South & Shoreditch - - Meral £7,143.36 - £8,685.79 £3,294.88 £1,087.00 £120.94 £7,310.66 - £2,099.56 Still - £1,235.24 - - £9,797.46 - £1,129.57 - £9,133.00 - Con - - Sedgemore - £127.00 Yen-Chit Porter - £3,100.30 £8,685.79 - - £7,310.84 - Lab - - £6,317.67 Morris £1,335.95 £7,859.84 £1,628.09 Anthony James £5,228.31 £145.00 - - - - - Sukant £8,388.22 £9,133.00 £10,164.00 £2,504.75 £9,797.46 - £893.30 Lab - £667.65 Con £250.00 £10,164.00 - Graham Paul £25.00 - £8,685.79 - £397.68 £1,607.73 Lab £1,580.10 Cecilia Isabella - £800.40 £7.50 - UKI Vickers - - - £750.00 - - Ece - - Saim - £1,919.71 - Pac £400.00 £701.39 Chong - £601.05 - £10,164.00 £539.00 - £950.82 £489.16 £3,032.09 £1,538.00 - White - £9,133.00 £15.00 £88.10 Prosper £8,441.00 - - - £25.00 - £9,133.00 Chandan £10.00 LD - - £9.60 £3,250.99 - - £9,806.81 - £5,111.10 £9,669.20 £400.00 - - - £1,206.74 £8,388.22 £250.00 - LD Grn £180.00 £42.00 £8,497.19 £9,806.81 £803.00 - - - £9,133.00 £40.00 - £9,151.38 £9,353.06 SA SL £2,825.39 Koksal £507.06 Con £141.00 - £178.63 £77.00 - - - £1,685.09 £825.00 £570.00 - - £82.50 £500.00 - £24.70 - £35.00 £8,388.22 £9,797.46 £9,797.46 £1,998.73 - £1,294.56 £1,938.73 £435.00 £136.00 - £161.00 - - - - £8,497.19 £3,100.30 £1,290.00 - - £8,497.19 £7,310.84 Ref £10.00 - £8,497.19 £9,806.81 - - - £8,359.01 £6,013.29 £558.54 - £150.00 - - - £667.65 £1,386.44 - - £6,092.86 £2,442.85 - - - £9,806.81 - £9,953.42 £97.50 - - £10,197.85 £610.65 - £10.00 - - £8,497.19 - £2,097.63 - £10,000.56 - £3,032.09 - £1,205.00 - £10,197.85 £1,924.51 - - £703.00 £8,359.01 - - - £595.00 - - £555.59 £1,206.74 £961.85 £65.00 - £2,017.56 £2,603.25 £5,172.27 £8,359.01 - - £803.00 - - £8,263.42 £2,825.39 - £7,773.88 £198.00 £8,359.01 £507.06 - £8,359.01 £8,263.42 £8,359.01 - £85.00 £77.25 £88.50 - - - £6,355.86 - £8,426.54 £20.00 - £1,474.94 - £715.50 £1,314.0 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 127 Marshall Charles Knatchbull 297 Hampshire North West C 78,044 George Samuel Young Con £110.90 £600.00 £549.43 £7,091.10 - £260.00 £1,147.09 £9,647.62 £10,217.26 Area Constituency No. Name287 Hackney South & Shoreditch287 Hackney South & Shoreditch288 Halesowen & Rowley Regis288 Halesowen & Rowley Regis Constitu- 288 Electorate Halesowen & Rowley Regis B288 Candidate Halesowen & Rowley Regis289 Halifax289 65,683 ency type Halifax Sylvia Lloyd289 Ivan Halifax289 William Paul Halifax290 Candidate Haltemprice & Howden290 Haltemprice & Howden Leslie Forename290 Haltemprice & Howden Edward Patrick Heal290 Party Haltemprice & Howden Alan291 Rogers C Halton291 Halton Beavis B291 Personal Harley Halton 66,733292 David Michael Surname Hamilton North & Bellshill Lab292 WRP 69,870 Jones Hamilton North & Bellshill Alice292 Hamilton North & Bellshill292 Comm B Hamilton North & Bellshill LD292 Sheath Jon £300.00 Davis Hamilton North & Bellshill292 Leslie Colin £120.00 Hamilton North & Bellshill James Robert293 53,539 Joanne Con - John Hamilton South John B293 Hamilton South Helen Emily293 expenses UKI Hamilton South -293 Con Mahon £300.00 63,742 Hamilton South Walsh293 - John Derek Howell - Christopher Hamilton South293 Agents - William Expenses subject to legal maximum Hamilton South £800.00 Neal294 £80.32 Keith Robinson Martinek Hammersmith & Fulham B294 Shareen - Lab Hammersmith & Fulham Clerks Christopher Hugh Reid Durkin Con Stephen £750.00 Lab - - John Peter - Twigg294 Stephens 46,665 Hammersmith & Fulham B £5,251.77 - UKI294 Bill - UKI Davenport Hammersmith & Fulham LD Printing £1,390.00294 £500.00 £446.60 Hammersmith & Fulham Frain-Bell295 £6.80 LD Meetings 79,303 £6,334.59 Hampshire East SNP £723.13 Lab - Iain295 - - Blackall Legg Committee Lab Hampshire East £1,500.00 Con John Gordon £434.85 Walker295 - Mayes Hampshire East John £35.25295 £6.80 - Con - Hampshire East - Neil £475.91 £100.00296 - £489.36 £259.96 £740.00 £60.51 £20.00 Hampshire North East Matthew Hadrian Georgina - £440.00296 Misc £300.00 £60.33 SSP £60.00 Hampshire North East Janice Elizabeth Tynan £7,667.96 -296 Wilson £7,112.90 LD £6.80 LD C Hampshire North East Jon £7,247.93 SL -296 £15.00 £241.97 - Legal £205.00 £119.50 Carrington Hampshire North East £21.91 Daniel Lopez £8,504.42 - - C Coleman Gerald - - - - Murdoch 78,229 Total Michael John Oswald £50.00 - £7,646.39 - £1,220.29 - Lab - Mitchell SNP Con -297 71,304 £8,504.42 Richardson - £8,426.54 - Hampshire North West - James Norwich297 - Dias Lab Max - £701.27 - Hampshire North West UKI £5,345.85 - £30.00 - -297 £1,450.00 - - - Robert Anthony Hampshire North West - £110.00 £1,652.74 £100.00 £2,114.52298 £8,274.48 LD £7.50 Mates Con £8,426.54 Burden SSP - Barbara Anne Hampstead & Highgate £25.00298 £9,038.73 £746.50 Arbuthnot Roberts Michael Ian Stephen Ralph Hampstead & Highgate £4,717.09 £843.42298 - £40.00 £9,620.45 £500.00 £104.11 No election expenses return submitted £943.00 Barry - Hampstead & Highgate £1,240.21298 - Booker - Grn Graham Frederick £285.96 £517.00 Hampstead & Highgate - - £8,504.42 £8,424.25 - -298 B - - £267.10 £169.92 £486.00 - - LD Con Hampstead & Highgate Con Burfoot £3,100.66 £1,073.49298 £8,697.02 UKI - Coles Hampstead & Highgate -298 Mellstrom - - - - Plummer £1,108.30 £245.84 65,195 £7,015.69 Hampstead & Highgate £1,409.71 - £740.00298 £1,116.35 Glenda May Michael Joseph LD - Hampstead & Highgate - - £583.34 £565.00298 £8,504.42 - Alexander Michael £100.00 - £27.36 - £182.72 Hampstead & Highgate - - Lab - - - £8,972.21 - Stanley £7,486.25 UKI £1,000.00 Jones £100.00 £6,487.20 LD UKI £9,620.45 £7,971.37 - - £698.20 - £525.00 £139.00 £85.00 Mumford - £8,697.02 - - Bentley Karl Andrew £109.10 £368.00 - £4,182.25 £88.00 £594.23 Jackson Jonathan Andrew - £50.00 £500.00 £500.00 Andrew £816.73 - - - £1,791.74 £266.26 - - £1,426.79 £63.00 £193.00 - - £5,780.01 Helen Bridget £2,217.52 £1,119.99 Lab Lab £9,620.45 - - - Simpson - Thomas Brian LD £8,697.02 - - - - £8,895.45 £1,343.42 Oram Mennear Lab - £9,003.42 - Sister £3,734.92 £1,210.10 £5,869.80 £9,620.45 £9,148.46 £1,063.04 £167.11 Mary Christina Beatrice £8,415.13 £7,971.37 £1,475.00 - £404.30 - £266.60 - - £617.00 - - Amos Phillip Teale - £8,697.02 Cooper - £541.12 - £93.75 LD £8,415.13 McDermott - - £628.77 Cornwell - Con - £377.95 - £280.00 £1,355.78 £1,399.00 - UKI £31.20 £300.00 - - £7,971.37 - - - - £5,874.06 - UKI £75.00 £110.54 - - SA £889.00 - £200.00 £1,108.30 £35.00 £2,195.71 Klein PL £744.00 Xnunofhteabove - Grn £7,629.59 - £7,971.37 - £180.00 - no label - £1,618.75 £4,396.37 - - £1,915.28 - £628.00 - £8,543.24 - £1,770.13 £8,127.54 - - £7,629.59 £140.09 £9,903.45 £10,333.20 - - £12.00 £10.00 - - £200.00 - - £2,260.98 £698.20 - £525.00 £29.40 no label - - - £810.27 - - £8,415.13 - £7,971.37 - - - £1,602.04 £20.00 £5,775.24 - £13.50 £52.50 £8,970.45 - - £9,148.46 - - £19.00 - £131.51 - - - - £1,418.28 - - - - £2,880.83 - £750.00 - £6,702.18 - - - £9,148.46 £1,475.00 - £150.00 £99.28 - - £7,971.37 - - £6,544.46 £2,347.22 £131.74 £7,629.59 £10,333.20 £541.12 £1,368.76 £420.00 £5,286.46 £511.06 £7,629.59 £1,737.03 £1,464.9 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 128 Area Constituency No. Name299 Harborough299 Harborough299 Harborough299 Harborough Constitu- 300 Electorate Harlow300 Candidate Harlow300 Harlow300 ency type Harlow C300 Harlow301 Harrogate & Knaresborough301 Candidate 73,300 Harrogate & Knaresborough301 Edward Henry B Harrogate & Knaresborough Forename301 Harrogate & Knaresborough301 Party Harrogate & Knaresborough C302 65,243 Harrow East George Philip Jill Susan302 Garnier Harrow East Raj Kumar302 67,196 Personal Harrow East William Ernest David Edgar303 Surname Harrow West303 Andrew Hanson Harrow West Willis303 Con Alistair James Harrow West303 William John Hope Robert Henry Harrow West Rammell304 Jethwa John William Knight Lorna Helen Hartlepool Jones B304 £300.00 John Stuart Tony Hartlepool304 MacDonald John Michael Hartlepool LD304 82,269 Lab Hartlepool B £450.00 Brown Halfon304 Anthony James expenses LD Lab Hartlepool Bennett Cornforth304 UKI Lab Spenceley Con Hartlepool305 74,083 Harwich Gareth Richard Hobbs305 Agents £30.00 Expenses subject to legal maximum Harwich McNulty John Peter £398.66305 - Con PL LD UKI B Harwich £31.60 UKI George -305 Harwich Clerks305 - Thomas £6,362.64 Harwich Daniel William306 - - 68,164 SA Lab £160.00 Hastings & Rye Christopher David Benjamin Peter £455.54306 - £585.00 £10.00 £50.00 Jonathan Hastings & Rye Peter - Printing306 Wilding £7.50 £400.00 - - Hastings & Rye306 Meetings Noyce Lab Hastings & Rye Finkelstein £520.00 -306 Kershaw £122.50 £10.00 C Mandelson Augustine Alberto Committee Hastings & Rye -306 - Kefford Harrison Nigel Frederick - - Hastings & Rye -306 Boddy - Con - - Arthur £437.73 Hastings & Rye C 77,509 Con -306 - - Lab Robinson Ivan John Ian John Henry Hastings & Rye LD LD £7,080.00307 Misc - John Richard £6,444.65 Havant - -307 - £7,560.70 £7,380.37 - 70,734 £100.00 £7,117.10 UKI Havant - £10,017.92 Michael Jabez £785.16307 £70.00 - Legal - LD Havant £66.00 Con £2,336.51 - £100.00307 - £3,765.73 £123.00 Cameron Iain MacDonald Havant £1,482.13 £100.00307 £793.00 £7,693.93 Anthony Peter - £1,080.00 Total Havant Booth £15.00 Henderson307 - - £204.00 Anthony Cyril Scargill £10.00 Havant £321.60 Mark Steven £732.80 £40.00 - - Foster £216.44308 - - Clive Robert £966.00 £74.00 Hayes & Harlington Ind Graem £100.00 Sproat308 - - Max - - £1,120.80 £265.00 Hayes & Harlington Alan Roy £5.00 - Lab308 £7,742.75 £29.38 Wilcock - - Hayes & Harlington £40.70 Sally £200.00 £1,047.00308 £8,909.00 £120.00 SL no label B Finnegan-Butler Hayes & Harlington Gillian Edith - £8,185.49 - -308 £1,541.63 £132.75 £9,649.00 £7,709.10 Coote Lab - - Hayes & Harlington - - John £75.00 £8,100.08 UKI Lawrance309 £7,064.20 £288.00 Con £8,481.51 £600.00 - B £7,557.65 Hazel Grove - Brett Reginald £8,481.51 309 - 70,246 £10,017.92 - - LD Hazel Grove - £2,489.26 David Lindsay £7,722.84309 - £892.27 Peters £10,017.92 Coomber Hazel Grove £230.00 -309 £1,073.00 57,561 - £250.00 £560.00 - Ind - - £15.00 Bargery Hazel Grove John Martin Con310 - - - £616.04 - - - Hemel Hempstead McLean £8,661.20 - -310 Phillips £524.09 - Coulter - Peter £180.75 Hemel Hempstead £5,355.24 £2,555.13 £100.00 - Willetts £9,649.00 -310 UKI £3,790.73 £10.56 £510.00 - £1,656.67 £7,502.57 Catherine Helena Hemel Hempstead LD £8,481.51 Ord-Clarke £1,696.04 £380.00 £2,323.61 £9,649.00 - Robert Lauchlan - - Ind Michael Kevin £785.16 £1,764.89 C - £600.00 £8,481.51 £8,905.10 £10,017.92 Nahid £70.00 McDonnell £791.43 James Timothy - RRL £9,649.00 £832.80 £70.00 Grn - - £9,267.37 Gary - £900.00 Cole Roy - C £50.00 - MRLP £50.56 Guthrie £9,649.00 Con £250.00 65,105 Declan Walter - - McLean £387.00 £52.00 - £8,481.51 Andrew £45.00 - £11.75 £120.00 Lab Jacks £7,944.20 £6,729.62 £270.00 - £3,995.14 73,602 - Cuell - - £7,626.73 - £500.00 Tony £8,890.81 £90.00 £4,695.08 £135.00 £5.20 £8,179.84 £2,600.38 - £46.50 £7,084.39 - Lab £5.00 £8,245.19 - £8,890.81 Kennedy - Con LD Nadine Vanessa - £2,830.00 £8,185.49 £360.86 Boethe - £600.00 Martin - £12.00 £9,267.37 - £2,123.99 £8,225.62 - £1.50 Grn £1,673.83 Crago Paul Burch - - Gerald Stanley - UKI - Stunell £8,616.75 - £9,267.37 Neil £200.00 £8,363.43 £185.00 £180.00 £190.00 Bargery £535.00 - S Alt £25.00 - - £8,616.75 £1,748.17 - £2,313.00 - - - £80.00 LD - - £28.35 McWalter £6,369.73 - £8,890.81 £2,983.12 £50.00 £334.00 £101.20 - - £70.00 £350.00 Ind BNP £2,384.87 £40.00 £705.00 £158.00 LD Ivey £2,328.61 - - Con - £2,237.67 Miller - - £9,737.74 £8,616.75 - £8,640.39 £1,495.00 £16.43 - £819.78 £915.01 Price Lab £10,324.89 £10.00 £95.00 - £180.28 - £9,261.73 £9,868.51 - £8,890.81 - £10,324.89 Stuart £206.00 - - £4,530.14 £883.51 - £74.50 £2,370.42 £9,230.20 - £472.30 £3,050.28 - £227.69 - - £8,616.75 - £200.00 £8,616.75 - Con £9,868.51 - £182.08 £10,324.89 - - Lab - £98.20 - - UKI £62.00 £344.83 £7,254.91 £80.06 - £4,695.08 £3,338.61 - - LD - £600.00 - £420.00 £560.55 £8,616.75 - £2,617.20 - - £7,986.86 £10,324.89 £616.85 - £1,639.87 - - - £2,619.66 - £2,424.83 £8,742.97 £600.00 - £1,557.02 - £3, Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 129 MacSherry Area Constituency No. Name310 Hemel Hempstead311 Hemsworth311 Hemsworth311 Hemsworth Constitu- 311 Electorate Hemsworth312 Candidate Hendon312 Hendon312 ency type Hendon312 Hendon312 C Hendon312 Candidate Hendon313 Barry Henley 67,946 Forename313 Jon Hedley Henley313 Party Henley313 B Henley313 Elizabeth Personal Henley 78,213314 Edgar Joseph Trickett Surname Andrew Hartley Hereford314 Walter Paul Hereford Newton314 Hereford314 Hereford C314 Dismore Waller Richard George Lab Hereford Truss315 John Wayne Hertford & Stortford UKI315 Turek 69,081 Jonathan Craig Hertford & Stortford Alexander Boris315 Stella Hertford & Stortford Evans £250.00315 Lab expenses Michael Mashud Hertford & Stortford LD316 C £214.00 Hertfordshire North East Con Casey Crosbie316 Johnson C Hertfordshire North East Catherine Zena SL316 Agents Expenses subject to legal maximum Stewart 68,468 Hertfordshire North East Janet316 Stuart Paul Con - Hertfordshire North East Phillip Maurice £12.00 £250.00 C 75,794317 Mark Hertfordshire South West Clerks - - UKI317 Con Taylor Bearder LD Hertfordshire South West Oliver Thomas317 68,718 £160.98 Hertfordshire South West PD317 Mary Oliver Virginia Frances Collings C Hertfordshire South West Printing317 - David John Alfred - Simon Keetch Taylor - - Hertfordshire South West £500.00318 Clive Gwennap LD - Meetings Madeline Hermione £20.00 - Tickell Matthews Hertsmere WRP318 David Bright 73,247 Stuart Frederick £3,969.99 Committee Hertsmere - Richard Lewis - Ivan Anthony Hallam318 UKI Goldspink Hertsmere Prisk Alison Elaine318 £750.00 LD - Hertsmere Easton - Michael Joseph £200.00319 Lab £410.00 - - Con - Hexham Rising Heald -319 Misc Grn - Graham William - Hexham Gillett LD Page319 Speller Lab - Gibbons £3,412.09 - Edward Harry Hexham £6,829.17319 £300.00 £321.45 £140.82 £250.00 Legal £6,160.12 Virgo Kingman - Colin £391.64 Hexham Con320 UKI - - £300.00 - C - Julia Elaine Heywood & Middleton - £50.00320 Dale UKI £120.00 Con Total Heywood & Middleton £984.00 - £249.40320 Lab Lab Grn - Heywood & Middleton Con Featherstone £20.00 £131.30 £7,438.93 LD - -320 68,853 - £520.75 - Heywood & Middleton William James £92.00 - -320 - £2,497.66 - UKI Max C £249.00 £4,611.03 Heywood & Middleton - - LD321 £50.00 - £400.98 C £600.00 £250.00 Goffin High Peak - £9,695.78 £410.00 £25.00321 £41.12 Lab - £10.00 - £44.00 Dale-Mills High Peak £54.00 £47.00321 73,005 £89.00 - - £200.00 £3,409.00 £234.19 - Hilary Janet £4,156.75 £1,000.00 Clappison High Peak - James £2,468.50 59,810 - £8,050.15322 - - Landreth Peter Gerard Paul - £8,006.13 £200.00 - - Hitchin & Harpenden £1,029.69 £9,101.26 £1,057.24322 - James Douglas £700.00 £6,896.16 £46.00 Hitchin & Harpenden £75.00 £1,263.63 UKI £804.00322 £3,696.28 - - PL £8,653.62 - £24.00 Hitchin & Harpenden - £10,046.32 £30.00 Con - £8,668.62 £250.00 £2,359.56 -322 £9,695.78 £5,594.25 - £9,101.26 £9,216.62 Marilyn £150.00 £3,315.70 Hitchin & Harpenden - -322 Paul Atkinson - Broderick - Ian £9,766.02 - Hitchin & Harpenden £140.00 C £230.00323 Dry £3,066.91 £413.66 - Philip Ronald Thompson £22.85 Philip C Holborn & St Pancras - - £20.00323 - Alan Herbert Dobbin Christine Maria - - Holborn & St Pancras £2,003.16 - - £517.35 - No election expenses return submitted £8,724.09 - - 67,196 £2,559.39 - - Lab £300.00 £203.38 - - Con 73,833 Bruce Peter £2,550.51 - LD - £6,907.99 - - £110.00 Tom £130.75 £9,695.78 £3,387.73 - - £9,101.26 - £51.00 £830.00 Latham £14.55 £1,816.40 B £9,671.48 £1,099.04 Hopkins £983.00 West Lab SL £4,104.25 - £950.00 £1,701.90 Patterson £9,841.97 £7.97 - £4,312.75 £540.00 £1,051.03 - Brannen - £27.00 - £500.00 £501.86 Alan Thomas £9,766.02 62,722 - Greenhalgh - Burke Simon Charles - £92.00 £8,882.54 Gordon Frank John Charles Lilley - - - £2,585.41 £1,433.63 - John £600.00 £10,180.80 Peter LD - £3,416.97 Con - £9,770.65 £9,695.78 £125.50 £10.00 John Graham Charles - £236.15 - UKI £300.00 £9,101.26 £8,983.35 £15.54 - £9,101.26 Edward Peter - £9,841.97 LD £105.00 CD £10,025.00 - Lab Saunders £44.00 £15.00 £75.00 Levitt - £110.00 Amos Chapman £2,485.06 £9,101.26 £3,330.06 - Nathaniel Jacob £98.00 £752.11 £2.97 - Dobson - Lib £12.00 Murphy £239.24 - £5,032.45 £9,766.02 £60.00 £9,841.97 Con - £10.00 - £7,888.70 - - £500.00 Ashenden UKI £9,324.09 Rigby - - - £2,671.94 £8,660.10 £10,025.00 Con £3,315.70 £1,610.00 Green - £3,731.97 £10,180.80 £416.63 £2,133.91 £9,747.98 £467.25 £9,766.02 Lab - Lab Lab - - £100.00 - £5.00 £10.00 £9,747.98 £9,766.02 LD £9,841.97 £510.00 - LD - £612.50 - - - - £537.47 - £2,283.65 £500.00 - £1,126.00 £245.00 £1,109.04 - Ind £10,180.80 - - £176.80 £2,211.90 £250.00 - LD £4,116.25 £9,841.97 £452.00 £3,212.91 £3,737.84 £10,180.80 £900.00 - - £10,025.00 £9,747.98 - - £9,747.98 £543.30 - - - £2,504.00 - £14.55 £80.00 £23.50 - £7,448.81 - - - - - £750.00 £55.00 - £6,770.75 - £557.50 - £3,974.71 - - £8,893.70 £9,780.72 £8,253.02 - - £500.00 £768.00 £3,432.03 £9,191.22 - - - £11.40 - - £442.44 - £6,573.90 - - £1,2 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 130 Area Constituency No. Name323 Holborn & St Pancras323 Holborn & St Pancras323 Holborn & St Pancras323 Holborn & St Pancras Constitu- 323 Electorate Holborn & St Pancras324 Candidate Hornchurch324 Hornchurch324 ency type Hornchurch324 Hornchurch324 Hornchurch325 Candidate Green Hornsey & Wood Roseanne325 Green Hornsey & Wood Rob Forename325 Green Hornsey & Wood Candy325 B Party Green Hornsey & Wood Novjot B325 Green Hornsey & Wood Magnus325 61,008 Green Hornsey & Wood 325 Serrelli John Robert Personal 75,974 Green Hornsey & Wood 326 Barbara Maureen Surname Horsham326 Horsham326 Whitley Udwin Horsham326 Robin Clifford Roche Brar Con Horsham Nielsen Choona Lynne Cryer326 Sarah Horsham Jason Daniel327 Lawrence James East Houghton & Washington Jayne Elizabeth327 David Grn East Houghton & Washington SA Louise B327 Squire Lab East Houghton & Washington Featherstone UKI Eloisa Joan328 Webb expenses SL Hove Lab C Erdil328 - Hollands Forbes 67,946 Hove328 LD £20.00 Fraser Hove £594.84 Lea328 Agents 79,604 Expenses subject to legal maximum Hove Con328 Anthony Aylmer Francis Hove UKI - Rule Durant Maude328 Con Christian Hove - Clerks Grn - Anthony Stuart328 £5.00 - Hove - - Richard Daniel328 £45.00 - Hove £200.00 John Hubert328 Ataman LD Hove Janet Christine Kemp Printing329 SA Con TW - £700.00 Huddersfield Devenish Hugo SL329 £30.00 £3,250.29 B Meetings - - - Huddersfield Ormerod James Joseph329 - - - - - Committee Huddersfield £100.00329 Ref £35.00 £25.00 £400.00 £6,694.78 Carr Huddersfield Sully £100.00 71,320329 Con Ivor Keith Lab Huddersfield329 £6,619.85 £1,000.00 - £849.00 £210.00 LD £15.00 Huddersfield Duggan -329 Misc - - - Huddersfield £150.00 - - -330 - £40.00 - £1,487.66 £311.00 £390.00 Hull East B £100.00 Miller330 - Jennifer Mary Legal - Hull East LD Lab £780.00330 £8,905.97 £7,177.19 £100.00 £165.00 Harold - - Hull East no label £584.81 £285.00330 Caplin Anthea Phyllis - 64,350 £3,785.29 Total Hull East - - Barry -330 Andrew Kenneth - £8,368.21 - £159.13 £500.00 £120.00 Hull East - - £7,266.61331 Richard Kimber - £40.35 Langston - £150.00 £7,414.78 Hull North UKI £50.40331 - - Nigel Robert £6,019.68 - Max - - Hull North £8,977.80 £155.00 -331 £81.13 £7,783.98 Simon Ballam Richards Lab Hull North Antony Paul £435.84331 Thomas Stephen £615.00 £8,290.79 £55.00 £2,469.72 - £796.01 Hull North Neil Darren De Souza Franklin - Con B331 £500.00 - £3.00 - - - £63.00 Hull North £58.00 John Lydon -331 - £140.00 - £360.00 - - £374.50 Hull North Judith Donovan - Sheerman331 SA £1,086.74 Major £146.00 - £700.00 £500.00 66,397 Hull North Grn Graham -332 LD £1,312.07 £250.00 £171.55 John Leslie £3.00 £506.32 £40.00 £4,689.10 Baverstock & Hessle Hull West George Micheal - UKI £500.00 £907.00332 - £8,166.69 B & Hessle Hull West Bentley - - £9,497.48 Dobbshead332 £8,368.21 £1,587.66 £1,204.81 Lab £35.00 £8,290.79 Lib Phillips £10,418.45 & Hessle Hull West - £8,911.97332 - - £8,368.21 £8,368.21 Con - £1,280.00 £5.00 - & Hessle Hull West - Jo332 Ind £8,977.80 Randall 62,938 - - - - FP £8,368.21 & Hessle Hull West £426.80 £155.00 Kevin - - Sandip £1,812.46 - Prescott £2,783.35 - £200.00 Longman B Hellawell £6,434.68 LD Jeanette - - - £100.00 £8.75 - Grn £750.00 £8,977.80 £300.00 Linda £2,781.27 - 63,035 - SL - Simone £8,977.80 Alan Arthur UKI - £238.96 - - - - Lab - - £7,273.70 SA - Barry Paul - - £809.76 - - - Shayne Tineke - - - £8,290.79 £100.00 - Verma £15.00 £155.00 - Roger £5,178.06 McNamara - Jenkinson Swinson £120.00 £435.84 John Caley - £8,290.79 Carl Anthony £8,608.51 £8.00 - £8,240.50 - - - £46.89 £450.30 £8,977.80 Angela Elisabeth Christopher Malcolm - - - Johnson Muir - £1,347.07 - Robinson John Henry £3,754.87 - - Lab - - Butterworth Charlson UKI £8,608.51 - - Veasey - David William £145.00 - LD - £450.86 Con £700.00 £49.00 - Wastling £40.00 £86.16 £3,275.37 £506.32 - Wagner £8,290.79 - £40.00 - Sharp Lab £568.38 - LD £1,589.00 UKI £150.00 £8,977.80 £4,837.38 - - Smith £831.19 £8,489.86 Con £8,977.80 £490.00 £690.75 £346.25 £300.00 SL £1,861.46 - £2,869.51 - Cornforth £55.00 - £8,763.72 Ind £10,418.45 £10,418.45 Harris - £10,418.45 - LD - £25.00 £70.00 LCA £925.11 - £426.80 - - - - - Con - £8,608.51 - - - UKI SA £127.85 - £2,476.61 £896.00 - - £5,329.98 - - - - £10,418.45 - Ind - £10.00 £760.00 £8,443.05 £1,460.46 - - - - - £5.00 £4,259.41 - - £4,016.60 £1,778.91 - - - £8,295.50 £8,763.72 £62.50 - - - - £8,763.72 - - - - £25.00 - - - - - £6,726.29 - - £3,305.61 - £664.60 - - - £8,443.05 - - £1,941.13 £40.00 ------£20.00 £500.00 - £1,355.35 £1,199.35 - - - - - £266.00 - - - - £8,763.72 £635.39 £1,589.00 - - £589.95 £432.00 £568.38 - - - - £27.60 £2,220.00 £8,763.72 - £1,120.73 £570.00 £8,763.72 - £1,808.00 - £414.00 £4,347.60 £8,763.72 £73.00 £2,112.91 - - £8,537.26 £15.00 £628.53 £2,504.21 £8,443.05 £215.00 ------£8,443.05 £617.68 - £500.00 - £4,034.00 - £2,605.76 - £30.00 - - - £8,378.15 £1,081.11 £20.00 - £831.16 £760.00 - £200.00 £8,443.05 £8,443.05 £787 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 131 & Lochaber & Lochaber & Lochaber & Lochaber& Lochaber Arthur Howard Area Constituency No. Name332 & Hessle Hull West 333 Huntingdon333 Huntingdon333 Huntingdon Constitu- 333 Electorate Huntingdon334 Candidate Hyndburn334 Hyndburn334 ency type Hyndburn334 Hyndburn335 C Ilford North335 Candidate Ilford North335 David Edward 80,335 Ilford North Forename335 Jonathan Simon Ilford North336 Party Ilford South B336 Ilford South336 Djanogly Skinner Ilford South336 Michael Robert 66,533 Personal Ilford South Gregory James Emmanouel337 Takki B Surname Inverness East, Nairn Derek Arthur337 Con Inverness East, Nairn SL Pope 68,893 Sulaiman Linda Pope Peter337 B C Inverness East, Nairn William Louis £160.74 Norman John Craig337 Lab Inverness East, Nairn 76,025 66,452 Hough Vivian Walter Michael John LD £460.00 David John337 Gavin Paul expenses Lab Inverness East, Nairn - Greene Martin Bendall UKI £250.00338 Perham Ipswich Britcliffe Tomlin338 Agents Suresh Expenses subject to legal maximum Ipswich Gapes338 - Ralph John £7,549.26 Angus Brendan Ipswich Stewart338 Harun LD £90.96 Con Stollar - Ipswich - Clerks338 - £41.50 Lab Margaret Patricia Ipswich Con338 UKI Ipswich Levin339 Lab MacNeil £207.00 £220.00 Richard William Isle of Wight - Printing Lab339 Scott £60.00 Kumar Isle of Wight Kenton LD339 - - Meetings - £162.00 Steven £516.00 Isle of Wight £600.00 -339 B Committee Isle of Wight Khan339 Jenkins SNP - - Isle of Wight UKI £240.00339 £9,023.76 - Isle of Wight - LD £37.82 Con LD £10,463.40 339 - 68,198 - - £390.19 Isle of Wight Jamie Charles -339 Misc £389.40 £6,518.23 - - - Isle of Wight £5,250.09 C340 Con £25.00 Islington North UKI -340 £190.00 Arnott £2,521.23 Legal £369.79 £326.00 Islington North £6,974.45 104,431340 £64.50 William Edward - - Andrew John Islington North Cann -340 - £300.00 Anthony - - Terence Total Islington North £38.50 - - - -340 William Joseph Islington North340 - - John Julian £172.00 Peter - £5,626.16 Islington North SSP - £250.00 -341 Wild Max - Shaun Christopher - Gilbert Islington South & Finsbury - Peter Turner341 - B £16.44 - £1,490.00 Lab £65.00 Islington South & Finsbury £7,169.53 £434.60 Deborah - -341 - - - Vinyard £453.05 - Leech Islington South & Finsbury David Charles Gratton341 B £5,510.49 £2,293.93 Islington South & Finsbury 61,970 £5,925.21 - David Laurence -341 £60.00 £700.00 £4,945.80 Jeremy Bernard - £7,964.83 Islington South & Finsbury £8,386.26 - Kevin Paul £38.80 £5,953.14 LD341 Con - - - - Con £8,652.08 £10,463.40 Islington South & Finsbury 59,516 Philip -342 - UKI Christopher Robert £66.85 £360.00 £5,989.45 Islwyn £402.96 £766.00 James Lightfoot £50.00 Lott -342 SA SL £5,786.07 - Holmes - £1,981.32 Islwyn - Gardiner Corbyn - Brand £480.00342 Laura £447.09 £500.00 £360.00 £45.00 £118.18 £220.76 Islwyn - Smith £10,463.40 £250.00342 £6,501.35 Neil David George £85.00 £7,377.41 £600.00 £640.00 Islwyn - - £156.00342 Christopher Scivier Keith - £2,963.11 £40.00 £8,539.47 Spensley £269.50 £1,200.46 £8,539.47 - £150.00 Islwyn £600.00 - Stephen Robert Nicola Ann £106.00 £1,337.94 £517.90 £40.77 £2,521.23 Ind Lab Rands - Lab £10,463.40 - Emine Janine Sandra £845.44 UKI LD £87.51 - £932.00 £8,335.76 Murray £86.88 £565.74 £7,919.03 - Thomas John - Lab £8,382.61 SL £9,653.36 £8,792.26 £7,488.43 - £8,652.08 Charles Geoffrey Grn - Cook £5.00 - £8,416.65 Ashby Willoughby £9,653.36 £8,980.15 £50.00 - - - £2,420.81 £7,450.19 £580.02 - £103.95 C £8,980.15 Booth - Con Morgan £4,487.50 £8,652.08 £9,653.36 - - £8,539.47 IOW £7,547.17 Sharp Thomson - McCarthy £34.00 £411.12 £6,403.59 - - LD - £1,882.69 £25.00 51,230 - £6,388.97 Hassan James Donnelly - £290.09 SL Grn £1,274.00 £9,653.36 - - £2,020.32 - Con - - SA Ind St £380.00 - £8,980.15 - - - £791.00 - - LD £29.55 - £8,539.47 - - - - Touhig £8,652.08 Ref Kevin £50.00 £50.00 £20.00 Leigh - - £20.00 £40.00 £958.94 - - £1,459.96 - £16.00 - Phillip Bernard £68.00 - - £989.00 - - £47.50 £1,271.08 Paul £944.92 - £500.00 £190.80 - - £2,929.46 - Lab - £952.00 £8,447.04 £560.00 - £6,126.50 - - £8,980.15 - £8,314.67 - £9,742.55 Howells - £1,609.65 £20.00 £8,620.11 - £7,309.14 £11,957.00 - - £8,620.11 - Etheridge - £200.00 - - £4,662.00 - - Thomas £2,996.04 - - - £482.97 - No election expenses return submitted - - £1,939.46 £431.12 £500.00 Con - £750.00 £4.00 - - Taylor LD £8,620.11 £9,653.36 - £4,267.31 - £60.00 £67.00 - PC - - - - - £171.59 £323.00 £4,400.10 - - £284.24 - - £3.35 £5,656.33 - - £526.27 £350.00 - £775.74 £7,473.94 - £15.00 - no label £3,851.05 £54.56 £1,650.76 £4,236.14 £11,957.00 £2,610.31 £6,283.33 - £9,413.31 £962.29 - £8,620.11 £11,957.00 - - £11,957.00 £18.00 - - £8,620.11 - - - - - £7,622.31 - - - £100.00 £6,595.42 - - £61.25 - - £8,232.24 - £235.94 £7,632.14 £90.00 £8,346.36 £100.00 £21.00 - £13.35 £3,057.29 £45.00 £1,609.65 - - - £4,375.31 £11,957.00 - - £8,346.36 - £718.91 - £149.47 £8,346.36 £4,600.10 £11,957.00 - - - £580.70 £6,595.42 £8,232.24 £130.00 £17.35 £8,620.11 - £11,957.00 £7,644.41 £452.25 £500.00 £5.00 - £1,081.92 £11,957.00 £4,861.84 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 132 Alexander Damian Area Constituency No. Name342 Islwyn343 Jarrow343 Jarrow343 Jarrow Constitu- 343 Electorate Jarrow343 Candidate Jarrow343 Jarrow344 ency type Keighley344 Keighley344 Keighley344 Candidate Keighley B345 & Chelsea Kensington Forename345 & Chelsea Kensington 345 62,631 Party & Chelsea Kensington Stephen345 & Chelsea Kensington 345 B & Chelsea Kensington Mary Elizabeth C Personal 345 Surname & Chelsea Kensington James345 64,707 & Chelsea Kensington 68,330 Michael Denzil Xavier Donald346 Constance Ann Kettering Alan Millington Hepburn346 Portillo Kettering Alan James346 Kettering John346 Simon Hugh Francis Kettering Cryer347 Andrew Simon SL Kishwer Kilmarnock & Loudoun Lab347 Michael Paul Selby Stanley Julia Caroline Kilmarnock & Loudoun Con347 Michael Wood expenses Nicholas Richard Le Blond Kilmarnock & Loudoun347 Kilmarnock & Loudoun347 Cooke Badger C Josephine Mary Kilmarnock & Loudoun Lab £200.00 C348 Agents Hockney Ginger Expenses subject to legal maximum Lab Doyle Kingston & Surbiton Stephenson Bissett348 LD Ind - - Falkner Kingston & Surbiton Con 61,048348 £750.00 Desmond Henry 78,946 Kingston & Surbiton Clerks Quintavalle348 £200.00 Philip Andrew UKI Cassidy Grn Con Kingston & Surbiton UKI348 £500.00 Kingston & Surbiton348 B no label LD Kingston & Surbiton Browne LD PL Printing348 - - John - £5,433.93 £278.83 Kingston & Surbiton Philip Thomas £15.00349 Crab £13.90 - - UKI Donald Hugh £247.78 - Meetings Sawford Kingswood - 72,687 Roger Joseph349 John David Edward Jonathon Committee Kingswood £510.00 Barry349 Jason - Kingswood £15.00 Lab £17.00349 - - Kingswood - £600.00350 Hollobone - Lab Davey - Reece Kirkcaldy - - - - JWP350 Aron - Misc - David Lawrence - Kirkcaldy £5,015.00 -350 £60.00 Philip James Stewart £7,280.43 Brady £460.00 Kirkcaldy350 Con Christopher John Legal - £250.00 - £7,573.30 Kirkcaldy - £1,292.00350 £12.50 Maureen B Amy Patricia - - Shaw Kirkcaldy LD351 Mahoney Muir Con - - John David - - - - Total - Knowsley North & Sefton East Burns £20.00351 LD £200.00 Jeremy St. John Spruce LD - - £8,035.93 Knowsley North & Sefton East - Woodford - 81,602 C £3,321.28351 SNP Roger Leslie Knowsley North & Sefton East £8,459.52 £1,350.08 £396.00 - £1,593.80351 - - £840.00 Max £598.75 - £905.31 £547.66 £306.87 UKI £35.00 Knowsley North & Sefton East - £80.00 C £94.00351 - 70,781 Con Middleton - Knowsley North & Sefton East351 George Edward Lab £45.00 £830.40 £1,624.18 SSP Hayball UKI £3,464.03 Grn £1,000.00 £1,702.57 Knowsley North & Sefton East £155.26352 - £5,775.16 - Robert - - £40.00 51,559 Knowsley South £100.00 -352 Berry Lewis George - Christopher John £8,363.98 - - - - £150.00 - £820.00 Knowsley South - £8,819.70 UPP £1.00352 - David Howarth £8,852.56 Knowsley South - - Anthony Keith £9,719.46 £34.40352 £100.00 - SL £9,719.46 Knowsley South - Richard John - £8,945.17352 - £7,376.85 Greenfield - Knowsley South - - - £1.00 Ronald - Shirley-Anne353 - £6,098.97 - Moonie - £107.30 Lagan Valley - - - - Thomas Lawrence - Scott Lab -353 - £494.40 £99.50 Lab £750.00 - - C Lagan Valley Marven £185.03 David Arthur Andrew William353 Chapman £1,326.50 - £1,238.63 £8,672.00 - LD £39.69 Lagan Valley - Douglas - - £1,801.10 Roberts - Rossiter £77.00 £19.00 £900.00 Smith 70,681 £8,363.98 - Lab - £7,745.84 Somerville £3,506.31 - - Edward ------£3,505.72 Con £1,706.29 £38.00 £45.00 Weston - £8,459.52 - - £1,575.80 - - Con £137.26 - Waugh £8,459.52 - Jones £74.20 - £924.31 - - LD £994.00 Ind SNP C £188.00 £1,350.08 £38.50 - £60.74 Campbell £318.00 £9,259.64 £8,363.98 £7,398.71 £3,681.42 £1,669.18 £8,459.52 £320.00 David Julian Gardner £643.00 £15.00 £525.00 £10,424.21 UKI - £840.00 Kinnear £8,363.98 £598.75 - - - - £8,363.98 - - Louis Paul LD £100.00 £8,363.98 £8,459.52 - £10,321.17 72,671 Smithson SL Alan David £1,702.57 £10,424.21 - - Jeffrey Mark O'Hara £221.64 £162.85 Ind £553.70 £40.25 £880.74 Con £2,715.43 - - Mona Miller - £8,459.52 - £400.00 £628.77 - - - £9,719.46 £775.31 £50.00 - SSP - £194.00 - £150.00 - £8,684.68 £1,504.35 - LD £6,652.67 £500.00 - £500.00 £150.00 - £7.00 Seamus Anthony £8,826.46 £8,459.52 - Jemetta £9,267.98 £50.00 - Lab - Donaldson Edwin Cecil Fogg £1,472.63 - - £50.00 - McNee - £496.06 - - - £8,798.71 - £9,267.98 - - - £150.00 £4,561.12 - £1,664.30 Close - £8,826.46 - £6,823.22 - £10,424.21 UU - - £4,660.06 Con - £104.30 - - - - £315.38 £2,970.72 - - Poots SL £2,020.24 Ind £25.00 - £9,719.46 - - - £51.32 - - - £3,212.28 - - £120.00 - £5.00 - £67.69 - APNI - £3,180.81 £1,438.49 £504.39 - £858.63 £8,826.46 - - £1,326.63 £56.55 - £3,681.42 - £1,810.49 £318.00 - £80.00 £32.32 £8,826.46 £365.95 DUP - £525.00 £9,267.98 £10,424.21 £400.20 - - - - - £100.00 - £9,267.98 - - - £760.00 - £635.77 - £593.59 £10.00 £106.55 £4,702.74 - - - £5,555.40 £200.00 £9,267.98 £8,826.46 £1,356.63 £9,204.54 £450.00 - £9,871.42 - £190.00 £1,024.79 £300.00 - £7,496.81 - - - - £125.37 - £9,204.54 - - £2,191.14 - - - - - £4,437.07 £2,830.24 - £4,240.92 - - £7.50 £8, Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 133 Dunkerley Area Constituency No. Name353 Lagan Valley353 Lagan Valley354 Lancashire West354 Lancashire West Constitu- 354 Electorate Lancashire West354 Candidate Lancashire West354 Lancashire West355 ency type Lancaster & Wyre355 C Lancaster & Wyre355 Lancaster & Wyre355 Candidate Lancaster & Wyre 73,046355 Colin Lancaster & Wyre Forename356 Leeds Central356 C Party Leeds Central Patricia356 Leeds Central Anthony Paul 356 Jeremy 79,458 Leeds Central356 Thomas Hilton Personal John Lestock Leeds Central357 Surname David Leeds East357 David Oswald Leeds East Pickthall357 Butler B Leeds East357 Stephen Paul Lewsley Dawson Leeds East Thornton357 Elizabeth Leeds East Myers 65,497357 John Hilary James Braid Lab Leeds East358 John Leeds North East SF SDLP358 Lab Hill LD Barclay Leeds North East358 B expenses Leeds North East358 £40.00 Victoria May Con Leeds North East Scott Benn358 Stewart David Ind Leeds North East 56,400358 Agents David George Edward Con Expenses subject to legal maximum Leeds North East358 - B Whitelegg Stephen £100.00 Leeds North East - - Ind359 Whittaker - Leeds North West Clerks Richmond359 - Arnold £150.00 Leeds North West LD 64,123 Lab Mudie359 Barry John £70.00 Fabian Grn Leeds North West359 Brian David Timothy Leeds North West UKI - Printing £500.00360 Con Raymond - - Leeds West £29.00360 £150.00 Burgess - Mark Anthony Jennings £100.95 Johnston Meetings - Leeds West - LD B360 Owain Maredydd Lee Boswell Peter Lab Committee Leeds West360 £4,122.26 Jonathan Michael Anderson £300.00 Leeds West £4,676.13360 Celia - - - 72,945 No election expenses return submitted Leeds West SA LD Hamilton360 UKI - Socrates - Jeffrey Michael Harold Rhys King - - Leeds West - Northgreaves £20.00 Brown361 - Misc Colin £55.39 - Leicester East £1,280.00 Con £9,615.28361 Mohammed Sabir - £7,822.16 £2,195.00 Leicester East UKI - -361 £1,191.20 B £450.00 Legal £500.00 Lab Leicester East no label £56.00 £20.00 Miles Adam James £20.00 -361 £350.00 £30.75 Leicester East Zaman £100.00 David361 £455.38 Con - £3,852.95 SL LD - Total 64,218 Leicester East - - Simon Christopher -361 - John Foote £5.00 £35.00 £133.33 - £100.00 Leicester East Best362 - £590.23 £10.00 - Leicester South £2,104.73362 - Muir Max B £2,306.57 £200.00 Pritchard £1,072.49 - Jones - - - Leicester South UKI362 £27.00 Ind - £4,671.26 £342.33 Leicester South - - £1,890.70 £10,011.85 362 Kristan Frederick £5,721.74 - - - £10,292.81 £500.00 Leicester South £10,011.85 65,526 LA362 Darren - - £10,378.77 £10,197.28 £901.13 Keith - - - Leicester South Hall-Matthews £948.70 Lab Con362 David - £2,618.35 £38.00 £10,378.77 - - Leicester South £300.00 £500.00 £4,550.93363 William UKI - - £681.66 Hopkins SL Battle - £10.00 Leicester West LD B £126.75 -363 Noel Andrew Brittain - £5,453.98 £19.00 - Leicester West £40.40 £6,866.83 £250.00 - John Vincent £2,422.71 £1,070.01 £750.00 £8,495.86 - - Nowosielski363 Harpinder - 72,674 - £500.00 - £40.58 - £1,245.56 Leicester West James Con363 - - David Paul - £500.00 - £13.86 - Finlay Leicester West £74.67 £1,280.00 £10,011.85 -363 - Lab Clive - £10,028.47 £2,195.00 Vaz £455.00 Lib Leicester West £5,562.15 £198.82 Blackburn £1,191.20 - £10,028.47 Shirley - - - £500.00 Finley - - Mugglestone - £10,011.85 B £200.00 £57.50 £200.52 - Richard David - £15.00 - £750.00 - £280.00 £2,303.55 £300.00 Athwal £392.45 Singh Parmjit - £6,573.59 - - - Con £2,397.70 Grn LD £10,378.77 - - Roberts £2.00 £200.00 65,267 - Margaret Jean - £8,495.86 £2,444.01 Hope Patricia £2,945.62 £261.03 Marshall Arnold - - £10,378.77 Lab £926.13 UKI - £4,983.78 £43.00 £1,072.49 - Kirti £10,378.77 Hoile £501.00 - £382.47 - - £10,011.85 Potter £8,077.40 £6.50 - Bennett £10.00 - LD Gill £8,207.86 £15.00 - - SL - Layton £1,006.53 - £750.00 - - Thomas Christopher £2,765.71 - £7,963.66 - £8,432.66 Lab - Hewitt £22.00 £8,495.86 £1,078.51 £20.00 - £750.00 £4,267.92 Shaw - Andrew Kenneth - £7,090.25 £1,834.11 - £6,991.73 £8,077.40 - - £157.28 Con £15.00 £681.66 Ind - £150.00 Matthew James Charles BNP £1,149.04 £270.00 Gardner £5.00 - £8,432.66 £1,267.56 - Gough - £8,495.86 - Shaun Alan Grn - LD £8,077.40 Lab - £750.00 Vincent Ladwa £35.00 - - £8,742.63 £566.09 - - - £8,495.86 - - Con £460.00 - £8,838.47 SL - £5.00 - - - - £8,077.40 - - Grn - £2,494.01 £150.00 £113.73 £988.88 - £4,355.28 - - - Kirkpatrick £1,181.00 £8,432.66 £25.00 - LD £710.32 UKI £3,247.19 - £61.31 £158.46 - - £750.00 £724.38 - - - £958.85 £731.64 £8,077.40 £49.07 - - SL - £8,736.48 £150.00 £526.00 - - - £4,696.38 - £189.11 - - - - £8,803.51 £8,838.47 - £8,432.66 - - £8,432.66 £6,654.97 £1,508.84 £8,838.47 £1,134.02 - £230.00 - - £6,619.39 ------£20.00 £750.00 - - £218.94 £26.25 - £8,432.66 £5,303.01 £425.00 - - - - £10.00 - - £750.00 - £2,034.11 - - - - £205.66 - £3,921.55 £8,838.47 £8,077.40 £8,437.03 £20.00 £4,804.22 - £3,998.65 - - £442.49 £8,437.03 £563.00 £15.00 £450.00 - £3,622.85 - - £255.87 £425.27 - £7,043.97 £8,497.24 - - £518.94 - - - - £426.00 £425.27 - Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 134 Matthew Cameron Area Constituency No. Name363 Leicester West364 Leicestershire North West364 Leicestershire North West364 Leicestershire North West Constitu- 364 C Electorate Leicestershire North West364 Candidate Leicestershire North West365 Leigh 68,414365 ency type David Leslie Leigh365 Leigh365 Leigh365 Candidate Leigh366 Nick Peter Leominster Forename366 Taylor Charles Dennis Leominster366 Stephen Derek William Henry Party Leominster366 Robert Adcock Leominster366 Leominster366 Fraser-Fleming C Personal Leominster Weston Lab Score367 Surname LD Nattrass Lewes367 Nettleton Lewes 71,054367 C Andrew Murray Lewes367 £480.00 Lewes Con368 UKI SA Lewisham Deptford Ind 67,317368 William David Lewisham Deptford368 Burnham Andrew John - Lewisham Deptford368 Raymond George Lewisham Deptford -368 William expenses £18.00 Lewisham Deptford369 Christopher James Hugh Celia Mary - B Best Lab Lewisham East Wiggin C Atkins369 - Stephen James Scott Oxley Lewisham East -369 Agents Pippa - Expenses subject to legal maximum Lewisham East £800.00 Hart369 60,275 Christopher Rupert 66,332 - Joan Mary Lewisham East369 Norman John Jokn Bernard - Lewisham East Clerks369 Con Downie LD Kelly UKI Lewisham East Kingsley £7,142.14 -370 Con - - Lewisham West - B370 - Cordelia Emma Julia Lewisham West Randall Simon Peter Printing370 Lab £125.50 Baker Andrew David Haycock Lewisham West - Adrian Paul Ruddock370 Bennett McCartney Meetings Darren Paul UKI 56,657 £3,409.69 LD Lewisham West Sinnatt John Stuart £411.48 -370 Bridget Ian George - £974.00 Committee SL Lewisham West -371 - £300.00 - - Leyton & Wanstead £902.00 - £120.00371 Con Ind Lab Wiseman £250.00 Leyton & Wanstead B LD371 Grn £78.78 £109.99 £789.70 Leyton & Wanstead £1,434.20 - Richards David James £10.00 £240.00 - Con Misc Johnson Harvey David Colleton £6,533.57371 59,176 Page - Leyton & Wanstead £550.00 £400.00 Barry John James Patrick371 LD - - Legal £8,696.34 - B Prentice £203.00 Leyton & Wanstead - - £22.29 Jean £82.60371 Lab £9,724.66 - Leyton & Wanstead - Maurice Andrew James £4,589.51 - -372 Grn - £441.94 - McInnes - - Total Lichfield £175.00 Buxton Link 61,549372 UKI Harry Michael Lichfield - Gareth Alan Dowd372 SA Lab £1,260.18 - £50.00 - - Lichfield Richard Knight £153.66 £5,051.63 -372 Roberts - Max - Lichfield - George Frederick - £9,724.66 373 - £600.00 Con - - £120.00 - - - Lincoln Nicholas £2,343.17373 - LD £9,395.75 - - Edward Graham £1,684.86 £750.00 Lincoln - Cohen £192.50373 UKI £200.00 Kysow £966.00 £9,742.09 Alexander Iain Johnson Thomas Pearson Lab Lincoln £23.99 £3,813.28 £5,370.07 -373 - BNP £10.00 - Lincoln £1,447.87 -374 - - - - Ashley £6,725.00 £912.00 £411.48 Linlithgow Heckels - £70.00 £35.00374 - C - Sally Ann £1,179.94 - £8,485.28 - Linlithgow £9,724.66 - - -374 £813.69 £400.00 Lab Wilcock Con £50.00 Michael John LD UKI SA £2,157.56 £7,003.38 - £9,030.61 Long Linlithgow £220.00374 - £9,724.66 £15.00 £9,886.74 - Linlithgow 63,234 - £6.00 £5,652.60 -374 £816.00 - Michael Louis David - £60.00 Con £240.00 Linlithgow £55.00 -374 - - - £1,307.46 - B Linlithgow £9,724.66 £106.00 £1,214.50 - LD - £4,546.83 Fabricant - - - Skaife D'Ingerthorp £200.00 UKI Gunstock - Labern - £15.00 Ind £200.00 £1,198.55 £216.00 - - - - 66,299 Martin Edward £6,718.53 - - - - £2,464.17 - C Gillian Joanna - Roger Phillip - £9,742.09 £1,392.18 - £8,185.00 - £9,742.09 Con £750.00 £240.00 - John Joseph £600.00 - £30.00 £40.00 Grn - £9,598.58 £7,186.34 - - - - 54,603 - SA - £6,389.30 Tam - - £1,523.91 Machray - £251.00 Christine-Anne - - Merron £3,883.28 £10.00 - £100.00 £1,469.94 - - - - £570.00 £104.20 - £1,684.86 Lisa Marie - Bennion - £9,742.09 £60.80 £17.00 £8,123.50 £750.00 £10.00 £192.50 Rodger William - £9,100.61 - £9,886.74 Phazey - £3,302.99 - - £6,653.60 £65.80 £9,886.74 £455.00 James Gray Meiklem £9,886.74 £9,598.58 £24.23 - Lab £6,663.85 £750.00 £2,261.76 £3,467.00 £8,123.50 - Talbot Gordon £4,306.60 £6,142.67 Lab - £9,742.09 Sibbald £10.00 - - William LD £230.00 Martin - - - - £55.00 - £63.00 £25.00 Doughty £4,581.06 - Edward £525.00 £9,886.74 UKI - - Gabriel Dalyell £130.00 £9,598.58 - £50.00 £5.00 £4,485.85 - Helen Dawn £1,234.50 £1,200.45 £1,397.00 £188.14 - - £106.00 £750.00 £9,742.09 £7,477.30 Con £10.00 £9,598.58 - £54.00 SNP £89.75 Oliver £100.00 £1,699.00 - £8,164.89 UKI £1,203.55 £30.00 - £280.00 £15.00 - - - Lindhurst £1,498.18 LD £8,123.50 - - £200.40 Lab - £100.00 - £50.00 £1,594.91 £8,123.50 £550.00 - Cronin £8,102.34 - - £6,614.10 - Cornoch £763.00 £8,123.50 £7,186.99 £27.00 £8,164.89 - £689.00 £82.00 £45.00 £5,282.00 £8,286.56 £531.99 Con £57.40 LD £18.00 £850.00 - - £2,482.33 £37.99 £8,326.60 - £100.00 - £3,519.00 - £25.00 - £144.00 SSP £267.00 - RRL £3,347.99 - £367.04 - - £4,733.00 - £8,164.89 - £60.00 £8,164.89 £8,326.60 - - £4,083.77 £900.27 £3,775.98 £6,767.67 £2,134.04 - - - £5.00 - - - £1,487.00 £8,286.56 £30.69 - £8,326.60 £750.00 - £921.70 - £8,164.89 - £8,164.89 - - - £5,838.63 £1,205.45 £20.00 - - - - £20.00 £1 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 135 Area Constituency No. Name375 Liverpool Garston375 Liverpool Garston375 Liverpool Garston376 Liverpool Riverside Constitu- 376 Electorate Liverpool Riverside376 Candidate Liverpool Riverside376 B Liverpool Riverside377 ency type Liverpool Walton377 65,094 B Liverpool Walton377 Maria Liverpool Walton377 Candidate Liverpool Walton378 74,827 Liverpool Wavertree Louise Joyce Forename378 Liverpool Wavertree Clare378 Paula B Party Liverpool Wavertree378 Helen Clare Liverpool Wavertree378 Richard David Liverpool Wavertree 66,237378 Eagle Ellman B Personal Peter Judith Caroline Liverpool Wavertree379 Surname Cathy Derby Liverpool West Keaveney379 Derby Liverpool West Sutton 72,555379 Jane Elizabeth Derby Liverpool West Marbrow379 Kieron John Cuchulain Edwards Lab Derby Liverpool West Lab380 LD Stephen Reid Livingston B380 Ian James Paul Livingston380 Christopher Con LD Kennedy Livingston Kilfoyle380 Con Geoffrey Samuel 67,921 Wilson Livingston380 Robert Nelson expenses Michael John Livingston380 Forrest - Mark Terence - Livingston LD381 Lab - Neil Lawrence £49.00 Horgan Allen Llanelli Lab381 Agents Newby Expenses subject to legal maximum Llanelli Stephen Richard SA - Wareing381 C - Llanelli Lane Patrick381 UKI O'Brien Llanelli £15.00 Clerks William Geoffrey381 - Miney - Con Llanelli Radford £500.00381 - 64,852 - Con LD Llanelli Robin - Lab382 - Londonderry East - Printing382 Clare SL Londonderry East SA -382 Meetings - - Londonderry East - Lib382 UKI - £429.00 Moloney - Committee £12.00 - Graham Donald - Londonderry East C382 - Gordon Ferguson - Londonderry East £4,347.80383 - - £7,713.89 - £200.00 Ian Alastair McIvor Loughborough £3,095.01 £2,557.26 £2,241.50 Con383 C 58,148 Margaret Wendy Cook Loughborough - David John Denzil -383 Sutherland LD Misc £75.00 Mackenzie £100.00 £3,400.68 Robert Murray Loughborough - - -383 £25.00 Mowat - 60,215 Loughborough - - -384 - - Gregory Lloyd £1,499.07 Legal £164.00 Davies Louth & Horncastle Milne £3,893.74 - - -384 SNP - LD Louth & Horncastle Dyfan Rhys £4.00384 £20.00 - £5,597.00 Lab £50.00 Total - Kingdon Louth & Horncastle Simon Alexander - £163.31385 C £5,050.88 - £96.00 - - Con £10.00 Ludlow Denver Kenneth - William385 £1,526.98 Campbell - - - Ludlow - Janet Mary £94.77 Lab £500.00 John James385 - £50.00 £683.94 Max - £8,116.20 £44.00 C 70,078 Ludlow SSP John Hayes R.G. Francis 385 £5,129.93 Andrew John £750.00 UKI £8,453.00 - - Ludlow Jones £1,258.50 - £5,924.78 Yvonne385 £180.00 Rees £22.00 £2,681.03 - DUP Ludlow £1,691.13 -386 £8,873.00 - 71,556 - - £26.70 - £8,453.00 Luton North Hannay Bailey Peter -386 £50.00 - - - - £128.02 Luton North Dallat £179.00 £40.00 Cliff - Neil Barclay386 Con - - Ross Reed Brolly Luton North - Tapsell - £3,691.01 £450.00 Julie £613.88386 £2,251.50 - PC - - £4,171.88 Luton North £2,761.43 £33.00 - - £8,873.00 John Edgar LD387 £750.00 £166.43 £4,501.76 £8,873.00 £18.76 David John C £3,450.68 Luton South - £18.00 Willock -387 - £8,582.00 Boyle Fiona Margaret Luton South £8,453.00 - £2,463.84 -387 SDLP £5,680.00 Luton South £100.00 Lyon - Con387 63,514 Grn - - - UU SF Lab - £8,790.00 - Luton South £861.35 Matthew Roger - £764.70 - - B £15.00 - - - £1,499.07 - - £8,873.00 Bigger £120.00 SL Martin - £8,505.00 Bolland - £27.00 - - £300.00 APNI £2,142.88 £100.00 Simons - 67,554 £50.00 £2,925.20 Peter Kelvin £5,050.88 Green Martin Alan - - - £6,930.80 Con - - B - - £5,147.93 - £8,505.00 - Nigel - £1,770.03 - - - £0.01 - UKI £8,790.00 - James Edward Lab LD - £4,397.85 - - - LD - 71,439 Philip Gareth Llewellyn £1,442.92 - £1,258.50 £186.47 £750.00 Amanda Jacqueline - Margaret - - £764.52 - Gutteridge £1,691.13 £8,505.00 - Bob LD - Hopkins £8,505.00 - £100.00 - Taylor-Smith £6,825.31 £595.35 £8,790.00 - - Colin David £6,250.50 £18.00 £1,478.62 Sater - - £650.00 £135.00 Gaffney - £640.88 - £550.00 - - - £8,697.81 £30.00 - £106.00 £8,790.00 UKI Gordon Con - £60.38 - £4,171.88 £557.00 - Knowles £450.00 £3,261.43 Rabinder Filomeno Lab - - - £821.57 £600.00 £8,582.00 £1,186.15 £750.00 £8,790.00 - Marc Moran £8,582.00 - - £2,348.88 Grn - - - £2,463.84 £8,790.00 - Brown Con - £105.00 £2,493.69 Martins - £9,503.82 - - - - £8,582.00 £200.00 - £159.40 Lab Hoyle - - £6,624.98 - £888.05 - - - £250.00 £100.00 - - £5,357.41 - £7,491.54 £8,725.13 £2,760.00 Henderson £350.00 - £1,082.88 Lab £7,480.80 £9,503.82 - £9,088.18 - - - UKI LD £9,503.82 £457.62 - £350.00 £350.00 £30.00 £3,091.63 £1,148.75 £1,572.29 - - £509.50 £150.00 - - Scheimann £8,836.69 Con £9,503.82 LD - £17.00 £3,549.57 - £1,770.03 - - £7,202.98 £5,108.03 - £9,919.47 £756.50 - £60.00 - - £437.00 £8,397.60 £9,503.82 £1,514.13 £415.00 £129.10 £140.06 £9,254.03 Grn £3,598.06 - £1,595.62 - £8,624.63 - £68.00 - - £75.00 - - £5,812.99 £8,797.81 £88.12 £50.00 £764.52 - £9,088.18 - - - £431.85 £475.39 £9,088.18 £9,503.82 - £7.50 - £9,045.47 £170.70 - £200.00 - £1,274.27 £4,878.44 £9,827.70 £10.00 £8,165.37 - £99.10 - £9,254.03 £123.30 - - - - - £6,505.41 - £9,827.70 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 136 .00 James Area Constituency No. Name387 Luton South387 Luton South387 Luton South Constitu- 388 Electorate Macclesfield388 Candidate Macclesfield388 Macclesfield389 ency type Maidenhead389 Maidenhead389 Maidenhead389 Candidate Maidenhead389 Maidenhead C Forename390 Maidstone & The Weald390 Party Maidstone & The Weald Charles Samuel390 73,123 Maidstone & The Weald C Joseph Humphrey Nicholas Raymond390 Maidstone & The Weald C390 Personal Maidstone & The Weald Robert Ian391 Hearne 69,837 Winterton Lawman Surname Makerfield Theresa Mary391 74,002 Makerfield Stephen Frank391 Ann Noreen Makerfield Michael Francis 391 Makerfield Con392 UKI SA Maldon & Chelmsford East Kathryn Druscilla392 May Bolton Maldon & Chelmsford East Carter John Peter Mark Owen392 Flynn Maldon & Chelmsford East Denis Richard Widdecombe Allison Joan C392 Maldon & Chelmsford East Lloyd John Michael Newbound392 expenses C Maldon & Chelmsford East Neil393 Con - 70,252 Manchester Blackley WRP -393 John Flasby Lawrance Lab Con - Manchester Blackley Cooper LD Davis O'Farrell393 Agents 68,457 LD Whittingdale Expenses subject to legal maximum Manchester Blackley Wainman Ian £996.00393 £100.00 Botting £500.00 Manchester Blackley393 £164.32 Manchester Blackley Clerks Con Russell John393 B Manchester Blackley - Clarke Lab Jane Mary UKI394 LD - £1,010.69 Jane Lab Manchester Central Geoffrey -394 - Hunt UKI David 59,111 Manchester Central Walter Printing - -394 - Graham Eric - Malcolm John Manchester Central394 Meetings Kennedy £7,206.10 Manchester Central £550.00394 £25.00 - MRLP - McCartney Committee Manchester Central - -394 Jackson £204.38 B - Manchester Central - -395 Lance George - £5,903.75 Ind Jones Manchester Gorton - £980.00 Stringer Harris - -395 Gary Anthony Lab £1,190.00 £7,793.98 £952.18 - Lab Manchester Gorton Brooks 66,268 George Henry395 Kenneth Misc Crowther £30.00 Schwarz Anthony Joseph Manchester Gorton -395 Karen Joanna LD Barr £80.00 - Manchester Gorton £7.50 - £740.55 £500.00395 Aziz Ahmed Stanbury - - Legal - £839.00 Manchester Gorton Lab395 - £65.70 - SA Riding - - - UKI B £6,215.91 Manchester Gorton Con £25.20 LD Lloyd396 - Grn Phylip Andrew David £2,870.90 Total Manchester Withington - £818.47396 Reissmann £489.50 - Aaron James £5,726.57 Con Manchester Withington £99.20 £2,111.53396 - 63,834 - Hobson SL Vanessa - Manchester Withington Gerald Bernard - - Bhatti -396 - £28.40 Max Ronald £8,141.22 - Manchester Withington £45.00 £535.06 £113.00 LD £2,870.12 - £34.39 -396 SA £19.50 £10,071.12 B Maria Terrenia - - - Manchester Withington - Lab397 £4,265.23 - £8,406.48 £1,238.14 - - Mansfield Powell £10.00 £10,016.62 £1,656.99397 - £349.08 £22.00 LD £9,829.23 Kaufman Jacqueline - Mansfield 67,480 -397 £30.00 - - £15.50 £9,812.89 John Charles Keith £740.82 Christopher George AC Mansfield £15.00 - £310.52398 - £55.00 Hall - - Brosnan - Bruce Simon - Medway £7,837.19 -398 - - Rashid Ahmed - £437.29 £1,361.00 £1,197.50 Causer Medway £36.00 £9,799 Sinclair Bradley Lab398 - - - - Con £30.00 £6.35 Kirsty - Medway £168.45 £8,769.19 £3,972.58 - - £6.22398 Yasmin - Medway Pearcey £952.18399 - £608.25 £3,338.19 PL Edward Julian Patrick - - £4,037.84 - £765.75 Meirionnydd Nant Conwy £10,016.62 £8,769.19 Bingham399 - - Michelle Bhatti - £3,103.57 £375.00 - £5,793.57 £8,769.19 £84.19 Meirionnydd Nant Conwy Grn - C Samways - Con - Lab SL £10,071.12 John Anthony - - - £9,812.89 £1,844.18 £1,769.07 £4,924.98 ------£907.90 C LD £2,145.92 £9,812.89 - £6,342.02 66,765 £427.00 - £10,016.62 - Grn £10.00 Joseph Alan £410.23 £270.00 £480.00 C Con Muir £656.86 Zalzala - UKI 32,969 - - £184.00 - - £683.10 - Clegg Elfyn £2,457.06 - £1,345.30 £94.00 £9.50 - - - Valentine £1,248.14 - - £2,067.22 - 64,934 - - £7.50 - £10,071.12 - Robert Graham £9,812.89 £120.00 William Valerian £425.00 - £13.00 £6,699.64 Meale - £3,465.60 John Timothy - LD £1,580.22 £4,387.14 £834.82 - £518.00 - £9,726.03 Denise Idris - SL - - - £10,071.12 Grn - - - SA - £911.14 - £179.77 - - Marshall-Andrews - Mark John - Wellesley - - Lab £620.22 - - £25.00 £2,263.90 £1,351.75 Geoffrey William £3,597.08 £1,361.00 - Llwyd £3,415.73 - Hill £4,217.61 - Lab Nicole C - - £10,071.12 - £12.50 - £9,726.03 - £9,799.00 Jones £7,480.24 - - - Con £6.35 - - £9.48 £500.00 £8,202.11 Juby - £1,311.70 - - - £1,857.18 £9,812.89 ------Reckless £9,799.00 £920.40 - - - PC £301.21 - £402.00 £15.00 £200.00 £9,799.00 £5,818.03 £436.50 £723.80 £300.00 - LD £669.36 - - Lab - Sinclaire - £450.00 £9,799.00 £8,202.11 £664.36 - - Con - £30.00 £1,225.81 £3,775.00 £10.00 £619.00 £5,188.35 - - LD £9,726.03 - - £20.00 - £2,992.15 £8,531.33 £365.00 £200.00 £1,345.30 £184.00 - - £328.50 £1,500.00 - £3,495.60 - £5,122.89 UKI £1,590.22 £8,202.11 £9,726.03 - - £2,483.90 - £8,202.11 £8,419.36 £8,531.33 £120.00 - £120.00 - £500.00 £36.80 £20.00 - £8,531.33 - - - - £8,202.11 - - - £852.00 - £7,068.60 £3,554.18 - - £270.44 - £3,970.77 £1,531.70 - £10.00 £15.00 £2,691.18 £408.00 - £4,063.4 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 137 Galletly Gonzalez Cleveland East Cleveland East Cleveland East Area Constituency No. Name399 Meirionnydd Nant Conwy399 Meirionnydd Nant Conwy400 Meriden400 Meriden Constitu- 400 Electorate Meriden400 Candidate Meriden401 & Rhymney Merthyr Tydfil 401 ency type & Rhymney Merthyr Tydfil 401 & Rhymney Merthyr Tydfil 401 C Elizabeth Ann & Rhymney Merthyr Tydfil 401 Candidate Dafydd Ffredric & Rhymney Merthyr Tydfil 401 C & Rhymney Merthyr Tydfil Forename 54,919401 & Rhymney David Stuart Merthyr Tydfil 402 Party Middlesbrough Francis 73,787402 Raw-Rees Caroline Alice Middlesbrough402 Personal Robert Middlesbrough402 Havard LD Simon Keith Surname Middlesbrough Con402 Christine Linda Richard Andrew Spelman Middlesbrough403 Nigel Stuart Jeffrey Middlesbrough South & B Richard William Kenneth £516.67403 £263.62 Anthony Lab Middlesbrough South & Cuming Shawcroft Rogers Con 67,662 C Hughes403 Stuart Middlesbrough South & Adams Hicks404 expenses 72,104 Lab £250.00 Midlothian - - Con Ashok Edwards404 LD Evans Midlothian Alexander William PC404 - Lewis Midlothian £600.00404 Agents UKI Expenses subject to legal maximum Midlothian LD Keith404 £73.00 Finn Ind Midlothian Geoffrey Bell404 - - Midlothian Clerks Barbara Anne Kai SL405 - North East Milton Keynes £100.00 £15.00 -405 PL - - £3,257.16 North East Milton Keynes Kumar - Linda Jean405 £501.10 C North East Milton Keynes Printing405 C £5,991.14 North East Milton Keynes Con - Harpham406 Meetings Lab - South West Milton Keynes - Kerr-Morgan406 Miller 48,625 - - Committee South West - Milton Keynes David -406 72,909 Lab - - - South West Brian Arthur Robert Milton Keynes - £600.00406 Parrish B SA - Con £1,276.42 South West Milton Keynes Andersen - £4,131.86406 South West Milton Keynes -406 White Misc £300.00 - £248.89 - Ian Roy South West Milton Keynes 72,823 £910.97 LD406 - - - Phyllis Margaret Marion Jennifer Jacqueline Dianne £160.00 - South West Milton Keynes - -407 SL - Legal LD David James Robin James Mitcham & Morden £4,097.62 - -407 - £578.81 Michael Sheridan Robert Paul Hamilton £153.60 Mitcham & Morden407 £808.00 Bell - - £1,560.00 John Edward £466.00 Terence £3,067.91 Total £762.00 Mitcham & Morden - £100.00 Lab - Starkey407 Rix - Iain Aitken Mitcham & Morden £8,080.92 - Holden £178.57407 Nazar £3,410.76 - - Phillips £10,058.04 - Mitcham & Morden £943.92 Goldie - Yeoward Traquair407 £3,286.94 Alan Herbert £949.00 Lab Max £75.00 £7,527.08 - B Mitcham & Morden £488.50 £5.00408 £140.00 Clive Winston - - Goupillot £400.00 Mole Valley - - Lab408 - Thomas Patrick £450.00 £6,635.78 LD - Mole Valley £501.10408 65,671 PL David Clifford - £8,887.98 Stewart LD £1,481.42 Mole Valley UKI Con Siobhain Ann Con £7,530.19 - £7,527.08 408 SNP - - - Mole Valley £8,887.98 - Francis £5,544.91 - SSP408 Davies £265.00 Mole Valley £4,748.20 - Denning - - - - Mohammad409 - - £100.00 - - £621.31 Monmouth £155.59409 £500.00 £445.00 Bradbury Henry Armstrong Allen Con Monmouth - £670.83 £1,185.14409 McDonagh - £198.38 Nicholas Paul - LD £1,266.56 Monmouth £1,050.00 Stokes - £8.50 £4,034.38 Grn409 - C - £4,718.93 - - Thomas Joseph £871.46 LCA Monmouth - UKI - - £10,058.04 409 - - - John Hutchyns - £1,692.00 Monmouth £4,872.08 - £169.26 - SA Lab - £625.00 £3,266.29 James Adrian Kere 68,316 £8,646.05 £155.01 - £816.50 £8,887.98 £374.00 Alexander Paul - £1,150.69 £60.00 £8,361.02 £500.00 Harris £10,058.04 Walsh - £500.00 Con - - - £443.38 - - £24.00 Roberts - - £38.00 Tyndall £762.00 - C - £500.00 - - - £1,050.00 £8,569.19 £643.51 - - £8,887.98 £7,452.40 - £9,941.71 Beresford Celia Elizabeth £6,613.29 £8,887.98 £920.96 £260.59 - - £949.00 62,200 - - £69.40 Dan £9,941.71 LD - - Grn £4,450.01 Huw William Edmund £10,058.04 £5.00 - UKI - Ronald Geoffrey - - BNP - - - £543.25 - £450.00 William Edwards - £7,856.27 £1,044.42 £7,164.43 - - - Con - £4,817.60 - Savage £8,887.98 £1,333.27 - £38.50 £8,646.05 £8,646.05 £1,461.08 £300.00 £928.92 £1,549.59 £9.30 Roger Kenneth £120.00 - Walters £50.00 - £2.00 - - £920.96 Neil Martin - £361.12 Lab - £1,735.50 £150.00 - Marc Anthony - - - - £9,833.19 - - LD £9,941.71 - David John £10,003.00 Redford - £409.00 £688.00 - - Evans - £2,770.40 - £490.00 Newton UKI - - - - £8,887.98 £1,834.11 £871.46 £436.00 - - - £570.00 - - £8,646.05 £600.00 Hubbard £20.00 Parker £25.50 £305.90 £640.07 - - £6,270.32 Lab - £33.00 £9.30 - - - £9,154.96 - Rowlands £50.00 £400.00 - PL Con £10,003.00 - - £1,996.46 £317.00 £35.00 £8,986.34 - - £24.00 - - £10,003.00 - PC £4,076.68 - £9,006.92 £300.00 £291.63 £6,370.49 £10,003.00 £8,646.05 LD - - - UKI £568.23 £8,632.12 - - £1,158.32 - - - - £4,450.01 £25.50 £1,840.00 £56.00 £9,006.92 - £8,497.75 - £5.00 £3.85 - - £1,481.08 £13.80 £650.00 - £388.00 - £502.00 £176.00 £420.00 £30.00 £35.00 £8,497.75 - £1,333.27 £165.00 £660.00 £1,996.46 £35.00 - £4,262.56 £8,497.75 £1,549.59 - £9,006.92 £3,525.40 - £42.00 £120.00 £292.13 £8,497.75 £8,530.59 - £1,873.41 £78.00 £8,275.32 - £911.00 £864.00 £8,497.75 £361.12 - - £9,006.92 - £8,530.59 £5,578.43 £9,006.92 £9,006.92 - - Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 138 Area Constituency No. Name410 Montgomeryshire410 Montgomeryshire410 Montgomeryshire410 Montgomeryshire Constitu- 410 Electorate Montgomeryshire410 Candidate Montgomeryshire410 C Montgomeryshire411 ency type Moray411 Moray 44,243411 Lembit Moray411 Candidate Moray411 Moray Forename411 Moray411 David Richard Party Moray412 Malcolm Paul Morecambe & Lunesdale412 David Hugh Morecambe & Lunesdale Opik412 David William Lloyd Personal Morecambe & Lunesdale C412 Ruth Gwendoline Jones Surname C Morecambe & Lunesdale412 Reginald Rowlands Davies Morecambe & Lunesdale413 57,898 Morley & Rothwell Senior413 68,159 Angus Davies Morley & Rothwell Geraldine LD413 Morley & Rothwell UKI Con413 Morley & Rothwell Lab414 Motherwell & Wishaw Catriona Mary Taylor414 PC £400.00 David John PL Motherwell & Wishaw Christopher Frank £280.20 B414 £153.00 expenses Christopher Mark Motherwell & Wishaw Linda June414 £570.40 Smith Gregory Ronald Motherwell & Wishaw £1,100.00 Robertson Norma Catherine414 Cherith Mary 71,815 Motherwell & Wishaw Spencer-Nairn B William Munro414 Agents Colin Robert Cotton Expenses subject to legal maximum no label £15.00 Motherwell & Wishaw Charles Nigel415 - Con Nuttall Neath - SNP Anderson Beaman415 52,418 - Neath Clerks - Lab Gorn415 Frank - £15.00 Neath David415 Adams Lab Neath Challen - LD Barry Stewart415 Kenyon SSP £4,710.99 Neath - UKI Printing John Henry Con415 - Jappy Neath James416 - - - Meetings - £45.00 East New Forest £550.00 Mark - LD416 £6,274.71 Grn £386.97 Committee £1,671.00 East New Forest - Iain Lab416 £100.00 UKI Golton £909.75 £1,555.29 East - New Forest £400.00 Stephen £415.94 Roy416 East New Forest Claire £330.95 Schofield Bardsley Ind - C417 £454.87 £500.00 - £150.00 West New Forest - £91.21417 £214.98 Misc - - £317.55 West New Forest -417 - McGuigan - C 56,001 West LD New Forest £4,497.26417 - £2,265.78 - Gerald Peter - Con Legal UKI - West New Forest £6,470.97 Nolan -418 Lab Newark - £8,226.37 Smellie - 66,723418 - - - Brown £2,021.60 SNP Total Julian Murray - £623.30 Newark - -418 - C - Newark Watt - - £500.00 - Alun418 - £8,831.82 Newark Hain - David £6,120.60418 Max £7,313.95 £1,409.46 - - £385.50 Con Newark - 67,725 - David William £220.00419 SSP £1,594.36 - £6,681.23 £8,226.37 Desmond Angus Brian David - Newbury - - LD Lewis Huw -419 - Alan George William - Newbury - Gerardo419 - £870.00 £2,056.50 £170.00 William - - Newbury - SL419 - £2,129.81 £461.12 £1,651.14 - £8,226.37 Goodfellow - Swayne Newbury £1,646.50 Lab -420 - Michael Graham - Devine - C - Newcastle-under-Lyme £8,226.37 £27.00 £6,251.88420 - £250.00 - Crada £71.00 Llewelyn Dash £76.38 - Newcastle-under-Lyme Con - Davies420 - £9,072.68 £6,417.26 Lab Michael John £544.12 £300.00 £200.00 Newcastle-under-Lyme - - - 71,061420 - - - - Bignell £50.00 £345.95 £432.86 Con John Patrick Newcastle-under-Lyme -420 Brienza £2,342.16 B Pudner Con £8,226.37 Newcastle-under-Lyme £100.00 £258.14 Howe - -421 C £62.89 PC £3,406.57 £8,226.37 £37.84 Central Newcastle upon Tyne - - £10.00 - - £750.00 £6,803.46 LD LD - - - - £1,100.00 Clark £265.00 65,739 B £5.98 - £9,072.68 - Christopher Paul Fiona Elizabeth Ann £6,981.23 75,487 £1,957.25 - £1,328.00 - LD £681.66 - Onuegbu £250.00 PL David Digby - Mercer £9,358.82 £1,100.00 David WSA £87.90 £2,021.60 £9,736.63 £4,228.35 £9,736.63 - Donald Leslie £9,736.63 UKI Jones - £1,226.00 £8,226.37 67,970 - £1,415.44 £192.52 £320.00 - £30.00 - James Mackay - Ian Farrelly £2,450.81 - - £9,072.68 - - £1,749.04 Michael John £200.00 Lab UKI £575.00 £9,736.63 - Richard Henry Ronald - Jeremy Mark - - £9,072.68 Con - - - £7,937.78 £1,305.47 Rendel - Stephen Robert Charles Madocks £80.35 £4,533.61 £7.50 Benyon £781.12 £432.95 Fyson Haxby - £549.22 - £8,786.49 Delphine Isabel £5.00 Cousins - Lab - Hicks Thomas Paul £25.00 - £9,072.68 £480.00 - £262.76 Lab - £147.50 £5,905.38 £44.00 £593.04 £5,878.93 Harding-Price Flynn £560.00 - £4,909.52 £110.00 £1,146.58 Godfrey - - Roodhouse - - £350.00 LD - LD £549.12 £8,786.49 £353.00 Con Gray-Fisk - Lab - - £125.00 Ind Ind Thomson - £9,736.63 - - - Billcliffe £5,637.69 - £10.00 - - LD - £375.29 - £4,399.74 - - £147.84 - £7,308.19 - £7,913.50 Con UKI - £500.00 £9,072.68 £132.60 UKI £3,425.82 £40.00 £405.26 - £500.00 - SA £10.00 £1,153.13 £6,506.40 - £52.65 - - - £691.66 £1,987.03 £750.00 - £750.00 - - Lab £9,679.53 £9,072.68 - £6.00 £8,786.49 - - £640.87 - £8,786.49 - £529.33 - - £440.00 - £684.85 - £8.80 - £750.00 £1,226.00 - - - - - £25.00 £645.00 - - £1,775.05 £8,119.80 £25.37 - £6,444.71 - £7,913.50 £20.00 £30.00 - £7,204.30 - £750.00 - £146.85 £9,679.53 - £8,961.63 £120.00 - - £300.00 £107.00 - - £1,305.47 - - £7,389.83 £39.25 - £5,013.85 £9,278.57 £618.41 £1,816.54 £7,913.50 - - - £7,523.99 - - - £549.22 £17.50 £7,913.50 - - £3,588.82 - £9,679.53 £320.00 - - £7,913.50 £84.00 £9,679.53 - £3,083.66 £6,216.28 £30.00 £8,847.84 - £4,897.14 - - - - £1,290.63 - - £9,679.53 £721.43 - £45.00 - £8,961.63 £305.90 - £35.00 - £6,482.30 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 139 & Wallsend & Wallsend & Wallsend & Wallsend & Wallsend & Wallsend & Wallsend Area Constituency No. Name421 Central Newcastle upon Tyne 421 Central Newcastle upon Tyne 421 Central Newcastle upon Tyne 422 East Newcastle upon Tyne Constitu- Electorate422 Candidate East Newcastle upon Tyne B422 ency type East Newcastle upon Tyne Stephen Anthony 61,494 Nicholas Hugh422 Aidan Paul East Newcastle upon Tyne Gordon Graham Candidate422 Psallidas East Newcastle upon Tyne Forename Brown422 Potts East Party Newcastle upon Tyne David Ruff LD422 East Newcastle upon Tyne David Timothy Personal 423 Lab Surname North Newcastle upon Tyne Andrew John Plevins423 SL North Newcastle upon Tyne 423 North Con Gray B Newcastle upon Tyne Harash Kumar Troman424 Newport East Ord -424 Newport East Blanch424 63,208 Newport East £180.00 Douglas John424 - Newport East Narang Martin Richard Con424 - Grn Newport East424 expenses - Newport East LD424 Philip Roland Newport East £179.50 Henderson425 C - Graham Andrew Newport West Levy - Ind425 Carpenter Expenses subject to legal maximum Newport West £4.50425 - Newport West Lab 57,219425 - Alan Thomas Newport West Soult425 Smith SL Newport West - -425 - - £1,340.90 Newport West Comm426 - Newry and Armagh - -426 C £1,596.05 Ian £4,573.00 Newry and Armagh426 Howarth £641.50 Alistair Ronald - Newry and Armagh Con LD426 - Madoc Robert - £160.00 Newry and Armagh 59,345 -427 Phillip Paul Elizabeth Anne Norfolk Mid - £60.00 -427 Neal John - C - £1,596.03 Norfolk Mid - Lab £180.00427 Cameron Robert David Norfolk Mid427 - Batcup Norfolk Mid - £434.89427 - 72,466 Screen William £67.75 John - Norfolk Mid Seamus -428 Kathleen Oakley Veronica - Legal Agents £400.00 - Flynn Norfolk North - LD -428 - Anthony Michael Norfolk North £1,179.09 - £27.50 Reynolds Griffiths428 Hugh - £1,469.40 Norfolk North PC £5,008.56 Watkins428 C - Terrance - £2,250.00 Conor Terence SL Norfolk North £56.22 Morgan428 - Leslie £1,368.40 Paul Salkeld Con £180.00 Norfolk North - £47.00 - £33.00429 £154.00 - UKI Lab Sylvia £8,624.57 Norfolk North West 77,158 Mallon - Comm429 - Robert Keith £1,652.27 Norfolk North West £4,640.75 LD429 Murphy - £8,624.57 C - Norfolk North West £115.11 £8,326.35 Con £450.00 £26.83429 - £1,596.05 - PC Norfolk North West £100.00 £3.00430 £30.00 Cavill - Moelwyn Hughes - - - - - Norfolk South Berry430 UKI £250.00 80,061 Daniel Stephen SDLP - C Norfolk South £1,622.86 Norman Peter Simpson £20.00430 Vivienne Helen £160.00 SF £16.60 £1,255.68 Norfolk South £707.11 £8,326.35 -430 - John Stuart McRoberts - £8,624.57 - Norfolk South430 Henry Peter 78,707 - - - Norfolk South £15.00 Henry Campbell Zeichner - - BNP431 - £1,198.69 £2,301.20 - - £6,148.67 David Gifford Leathes - DUP Con - Norfolk South West Lamb Clifford-Jackson431 £8,326.35 - UU - Michael Anthony £8,408.32 Norfolk South West £434.89 - - Prior LD £1,746.91 £20.00 C Michael Paul - £1,576.40 £8,326.35 £2,612.05 £280.00 £2,404.00 Agnew - Bellingham - Creer Lab Paul George £300.00 £8,326.35 - - Reeve £8,326.35 - - - Ian James Clerks £45.00 Gates - £100.00 82,710 - C LD Richard Michael Ian Alan Frank £193.45 - £56.21 - - Con £400.00 - - £1,566.36 £4,238.80 - £1,122.84 Sheridan - Con - £850.00 UKI - £649.78 83,903 £500.00 £550.00 £1,656.00 - £30.00 Grn £1,652.26 Gillian Patricia - Simison Bacon - £150.00 £362.00 £3,489.04 £852.09 - £8,326.35 Lab Anne Durrant £8,408.32 - Turner Mack £112.00 £360.00 £8,983.27 Mark Adrian - £6,423.08 - - Grn - - - £5,156.93 £1,340.88 Stephanie £315.37 - - - - - £1,556.25 Joseph William Edward £308.00 Anne Margaret £750.00 £200.00 - UKI Shephard £9,977.25 - - Neal - Con £70.00 £1,255.68 UKI - £600.00 - £3,327.42 £1,806.68 - Lab £10.00 - £350.00 - £8,408.32 LD - £7,741.01 Wells £8,983.27 - - £28.80 - £70.74 - Con Hanson - £18.00 - - Lee £350.00 £250.00 Ross-Wagenknecht £6,353.48 Grn £7,367.25 - £81.09 £2,013.75 £3,630.31 - - - £9,187.00 - £1,746.91 £1,667.10 £150.00 - £1,821.88 UKI - - £20.00 £3,814.49 - - £412.76 - £48.28 £25.00 £8,983.27 £8,983.27 - - £1,849.09 - £9.95 Lab - £10,249.70 Lab £40.00 £7,414.41 £6,520.64 - £8,983.27 £9,394.96 £50.00 - - £1,541.65 - £600.00 - £10,383.85 - £750.00 LD £870.00 - £698.06 - - £927.74 - £8,983.27 £219.00 - £800.00 £8,983.27 - £58.80 - - £6,698.58 - - - £2,123.27 - £1,504.85 - - £9,187.00 - £1,410.88 - - - £64.85 £852.09 £8,415.57 - £7,581.14 - - - - £1,615.05 £406.00 £9,187.00 £387.60 £42.65 £100.00 £9,187.00 - £69.00 £10,191.10 £9,187.00 £40.00 - £10,446.78 £1,056.25 - £2,235.20 £9,977.25 - - £10.00 £2,489.95 - £10,023.57 £17.27 £2,092.70 - - - £10,383.85 - - - - - £10,349.61 - - £7,741.01 - £10,362.83 £7,687.70 - £9,050.59 £10,023.57 - - £143.75 £10,383.85 £45.00 £700.00 - - - £3,630.31 £139.86 - £10,292.35 £1,307.71 £10,023.57 £10,446.78 £389.50 £3,814.49 - - - - - £10,023.57 - £1,096.40 - £9,057.60 - £27.80 - £10,250.07 £10,446.78 £4,566.49 £10,611.02 £7,492.09 £2,847.39 - £10,985.00 £9,187.00 £250.00 £36.70 - - £1,815.97 - £825.00 £2,123.27 - £96.36 £424.30 - - - £10,383.85 - - £10,446.78 £9,753.67 £10,362.83 £406. Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 140 Graham Vincent Dominic Area Constituency No. Name431 Norfolk South West431 Norfolk South West432 Normanton432 Normanton Constitu- 432 Electorate Normanton432 Candidate Normanton433 Northampton North433 ency type Northampton North433 Northampton North433 Northampton North433 C Candidate Northampton North434 B Gordon Richard Northampton South Forename434 Ian Jonathan Northampton South 65,395434 William Party Northampton South434 74,124 Northampton South Sally Curtis Dean434 Northampton South434 Personal B Northampton South Smith435 Graham Paul Surname Northavon435 Stephen John John Anthony Northavon 85,668435 Thomas Michael Richard Wilfrid Anthony Richard Northavon LD Keeble O'Brien435 Dusan Northavon436 Gordon Smith Norwich North UKI436 Pearson Appleyard Norwich North Whelan Clarke436 Shailesh Lakhman £100.00 Church Norwich North436 Lab Lab Andrew Stuart John Norwich North436 expenses Derek Roland £32.00 C Norwich North SL436 Vara £30.00 LD Con Louise Tina Simpson Norwich North Con437 Torbica Lab Clare Denise LD Norwich South White437 Agents 78,840 C Expenses subject to legal maximum Norwich South Steven John437 Clark Norwich South - - £16.00437 - LD £20.00 - Norwich South Clerks 77,158437 Con UKI Harvey Ian Norwich South - Johnson437 £300.00 - SA Carrie Helen Norwich South £1,294.00437 - Webb Robert William - Norwich South Printing B £345.00 UKI Carmen Amanda - - -438 - Kay Frances Meetings PL LP Nottingham East438 Moira Phyliss - Committee - £250.00 71,276 Nottingham East - -438 - - Ruxton Robert Ross Templeton Charles Rodway Hall Carver Nottingham East - LD438 Tinch £14.40 Guy Rogi Southouse - Nottingham East -439 - £3,575.53 Gibson Michael Charles - Nottingham North £10.00 £17.50 Mason Cheyney439 Misc - Toye Clarke Nottingham North439 - - Andrew John - £3,888.76 £6,014.16 B Con - - Nottingham North - £7,309.20 UKI439 Andrew Paul - - Legal Betts Nottingham North Lab Grn -440 Adrian St. John - Lab £7,222.64 Nottingham South UKI No election expenses return submitted 65,339440 - Alun Con £26.20 £92.00 - £976.75 - John Total £7,131.79 Nottingham South B440 - Edward David Lab £3,707.39 French - - - LD Nottingham South £15.00 Alexander Tarquin £300.00 - - £10.00 Aalders-Dunthorne - Holmes LD -440 Max Ind £250.00 64,281 - Nottingham South - £1,441.54 £15.00441 £104.02 Graham William Richard Friend Mills - - - Nuneaton - - B - -441 £1,324.00 - Manningham £780.00 £1,153.05 Simon Timothy £600.00 - £69.36 - - Nuneaton - £10,985.00 Con441 £60.00 £191.00 Robert Peter Nuneaton £100.00 £3,994.55 Grn - - £123.75 £600.00441 £17.50 £2,279.56 £1,139.20 - SA £200.00 Buffry 73,049 - Nuneaton Allen Heppell £1,069.01 £9,537.30 £1,255.78 £7,417.21 Martin John442 - £600.00 Alan John Allan - Ochil Robert Andrew £4,094.76 -442 £8,892.70 - £83.76 Ball - - £20.00 £30.00 £7,459.15 £331.65 Ochil UKI £8,397.69 £10,985.00 - - Andrew George442 £250.00 £9,537.30 - £8,601.65 Ochil £8,892.70 Radcliff442 £10,002.82 - - - £9,423.73 - Ochil - Lab - Suzanne Wendy -442 LCA £1,096.75 £202.80 £7,480.94 - £6,497.46 - - Ochil Lab C Lee Wright Joseph Kevin 442 - £9,537.30 Con £9,423.73 - Botham Simpson Ochil £600.00 £3,653.41 ------LD - £483.00 £105.92 David Robert £3,910.19 SA Manning 72,101 - - £18.00 William John £100.00 - £771.75 £8,892.70 - - - - £14.63 £5,224.30 - Mulloy Lab - Con £205.00 - SL £1,547.46 £92.00 - £932.12 £149.50 - LD - - C £719.98 £150.40 £5,022.38 - £8,892.70 £32.08 £1,106.90 £267.00 - £9,423.73 £9,537.30 £31.19 - Con - £40.00 £3,202.03 £46.82 Bartrop £2,324.19 John Mark £150.40 - £41.00 £248.65 - £20.00 £9,423.73 Olner £3,182.18 £10,017.67 £2,089.84 Antony David 57,554 £25.00 £965.93 £500.00 £500.00 £10,405.06 £20.00 LD £1,170.39 Martin John Brian Norman - - £1,302.60 £780.00 - £10,248.82 £9,423.73 £25.00 - £18.00 - £4,069.56 - - £9,423.73 £8,892.70 £10,405.06 £320.91 - - - UKI £10,405.06 £8,580.39 - - £10,250.50 - - - - £443.00 - £320.94 Lancaster £1,187.39 Ferguson James Lab Keith £500.00 £5.00 - £10.00 - £5,720.61 James - Alasdair O'Neill - £10,250.50 £274.00 £280.00 - £500.00 £96.30 - Paul - £5,518.72 - £834.80 - £713.36 £4,410.52 - Naplan Coan Pauline Con - £53.94 LD £8,761.70 £503.01 - - £343.90 £49.00 £5,737.76 Flash Gordon - - Brown Thompson £87.04 £5,430.53 UKI - - £2,392.57 Lab - £2,166.78 - - £680.00 £483.00 £4,400.08 - - - £4,385.84 £8,761.70 - £10,250.50 - - Campbell £981.12 £466.00 £38.00 £1,193.94 £771.75 £8,761.70 - SSP £10,250.50 £3,212.03 - £10,250.50 - £10,405.06 Approaching - £145.19 £4,779.31 £10,250.50 £35.40 £200.00 - SNP £4,949.63 Edie £625.00 £15.00 Con - MRLP - £195.00 £1,612.58 - - - - £614.28 - - - - £60.00 £1,062.50 - £8,761.70 - £10.00 - £250.00 - £564.98 - - £3,056.57 £621.99 £27.00 £159.69 £1.00 £5,170.52 £7,425.26 LD £200.00 - - - - £8,488.59 - - £425.79 £8,488.59 £60.00 £6,190.51 - - £548.01 £443.00 - £3,480.56 £8,439.93 £8,488.59 £8,761.70 £760.36 £4,332.89 £60.00 £835.80 £8,488.59 £7,235.88 £728.53 - - - - £8,761.70 £500.00 £5,195.84 £10.00 £8,761.70 - - £725.00 £8,4 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 141 Chatterton Sadchatheswaran Area Constituency No. Name443 Ogmore443 Ogmore443 Ogmore443 Ogmore Constitu- 444 Electorate Old Bexley & Sidcup444 Candidate Old Bexley & Sidcup444 ency type Old Bexley & Sidcup444 Old Bexley & Sidcup445 B C Oldham East & Saddleworth445 Candidate Oldham East & Saddleworth445 C 67,841 Oldham East & Saddleworth 52,185 Forename445 Derek Leslie Raymond Oldham East & Saddleworth445 Party Oldham East & Saddleworth 74,511446 Philip James & Royton Oldham West 446 & Royton Oldham West 446 James Rowan Angela Personal & Royton Oldham West Conway446 Ian Rowland Surname & Royton Oldham West Powell446 Belinda Jane B Richard John Howard David & Royton Oldham West 447 Janice Woolas Craig Orkney & Shetland Dickson447 Michael 69,409 Orkney & Shetland Con447 Michael Hugh Barbara Ann Orkney & Shetland Lewis447 Lab Sykes Ford Hill Orkney & Shetland Pulman447 Lab Orkney & Shetland Lab448 Orpington C448 Duncan Eric Squire expenses Meacher Orpington Cronin £500.00448 Little Nicholas John Heeley - LD Treacy Orpington PC448 LD Marc Steven 31,909 Reed LD Orpington Alexander449 Agents John David Con Expenses subject to legal maximum Oxford East -449 Lab - Oxford East449 UKI Griffin £124.40 - Oxford East £171.00 Clerks £19.50 Con BNP449 UKI - £220.21 £89.76 Robert Irvine Oxford East Ramsbottom449 Con B John Lester Oxford East449 Roney £632.52 Carmichael £500.00 John Ross £200.00 Oxford East - Printing LD449 - £50.00 Michael Peter Oxford East BNP - - -449 78,853 Meetings - - £4,089.59 Oxford East £90.00 John Rhodes449 B LD Mochrie - - Committee Oxford East - £1,868.02 Firth Grn450 - £340.00 - - 71,357 & Abingdon Oxford West - - Mowat Andrews450 Andrew David - Christopher Stewart - & Abingdon Oxford West £872.20 - - - -450 Misc Lab Horam - £8,204.96 Christopher Arthur & Abingdon Oxford West 450 £6,404.94 £361.52 - £1,930.24 - - C John Brian - & Abingdon Oxford West Maines £325.00450 £50.00 £8,764.68 £1,685.60 Legal £991.89 £30.00 SSP - & Abingdon Oxford West - Con Stephen Howard450 SNP Purnell - Smith £559.63 £660.41 & Abingdon £6.00 Oxford West Cheryl450 79,915 £733.64 £3,355.50 Con Total & Abingdon Oxford West - Evan Leslie - £1,623.61 - Pritam451 £3,618.88 £1,190.30 - - - North Paisley £275.70 - £602.11 LD John Roger Walter451 - Goddard £213.30 - - - North Paisley £586.30 Youles £5,780.75 - Philip Peter 451 Max £746.00 Lab North Paisley £150.00 £60.00 £75.00 £8,603.69 £5,671.84 Fahim451 Lab £1,181.00 - - - £170.00 £3,130.54 Lister - Edmund St. John North Paisley £4.64 Linda Jane451 £750.00 - £945.32 - - £5,167.97 - Gillian £8,718.47 North Paisley Harris LD Pathmanathan 451 £434.69 £70.00 Michael Edward £100.00 North Paisley Potter £544.00 -452 - - £300.00 UKI £559.17 £43.70 Matts Marcus John Andrew £1,192.00 South Paisley Singh £9,736.58 £2,136.00452 - Gardner - - £847.86 - - £10,102.68 C - Sigrid Brigitta South Paisley - £6,899.63 £1,094.90 - £377.64452 £2,125.24 - £8,718.47 Watney - SA £210.00 £9,478.68 Ingram Robert Patrick South - Paisley £454.50 Mylvaganam £55.09 £58.88 £8,603.69 £1,638.99 Woodin452 Hodge £10,102.68 £8,603.69 LD £2,613.64 £100.00 South Paisley Ahmed452 Twigger 47,994 Con £375.50 £3,358.51 - South £3,883.14 £839.44 Paisley Katherine - - £253.28 UKI -452 Ind £120.50 £6,783.46 Con Kirk Grn £1,050.77 - South £8,675.81 Paisley - £8,675.81 - Shreeve452 UKI - £8,718.47 South Paisley - £15.00 £1,556.45 Grn - £200.00 - £80.00 £1,685.60 - PL C £250.00 £5,704.95 - £109.55 SL EC - - £322.00 £8,718.47 George £7,493.04 - £219.88 £10.00 £26.00 - £486.12 - - £344.22 £7,544.24 Jane Ind £20.00 £280.00 53,351 £3,618.88 - Adams - Craig £5,781.39 Douglas - Lab £12.60 £300.00 - £332.10 £8,603.69 - £10,102.68 Jim - - £7.25 £110.00 - £4,024.36 £969.88 Robert £7,691.93 - £200.00 £750.00 £10,102.68 - £1,181.00 - £7,493.04 - - £504.92 £10,102.68 £48.75 - £1,897.05 ------£3,937.77 Brian £23.00 Lab £8,632.45 Adam £8,252.23 Brian - - £817.04 - £9,140.87 £1,359.36 - Andrew James Alexander £3,308.29 £1,192.00 £5.12 Hook - £676.53 £2,136.00 - £7,493.04 Frances - Stevenson - £8,675.81 - £8,675.81 - - - - Margaret Patricia - - - £10.00 - Graham Halfpenny Kelly - £1,571.57 Terence SNP £8,705.52 £5.00 £1,211.82 Lab - - £3,232.68 - Cossar - £7,493.04 - £75.00 £327.00 £8,765.42 Con £1,184.36 £25.00 £100.00 £9,410.79 - £375.50 £566.01 - Lawson Graham LD £70.00 £49.00 £8,675.81 SSP £26.76 O'Malley £165.32 £244.07 PL £503.86 - - Curran O'Donnell - £511.12 £576.61 £104.00 - Con - - - £7,723.69 - £7,493.04 - PL - - SNP £2,137.37 £4,508.84 - - - £4,202.15 £1,080.40 £9,140.87 £250.00 - LD £9,140.87 £8,765.42 - £9,398.84 £8,765.42 Ind £205.43 £10,437.73 £9.30 - SSP - £5,475.12 £50.00 - £4,466.08 - - - - - £8,765.42 ------£826.34 - - - - £3,342.73 £9,140.87 - £12.00 - £504.97 ------£616.00 - - £9,616.22 £1,245.11 - - £1,070.98 £10,437.73 - - - £8,765.42 £1,961.82 - £8,765.42 - £463.26 £1,256.00 - £8,765.42 - £650.00 - £4,416.55 - - - £1,462.48 - - - - - £1,122.32 £6,554.38 £1,132.09 £1 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 142 Area Constituency No. Name453 Pendle453 Pendle453 Pendle453 Pendle Constitu- 453 Electorate Pendle454 Candidate & The Border Penrith 454 & The Border Penrith 454 ency type & The Border Penrith 454 & The Border Penrith 454 & The Border Penrith B C454 Candidate & The Border Penrith 455 Perth Forename455 62,870 68,605 Perth Gordon455 David John Party Perth455 Perth455 Perth456 Personal Rasjid Edward George Peterborough Geyve Kenneth 456 Surname David Michael Baxter Peterborough Skinner Michael William456 Maclean Christian Michael Peterborough Thomas Scott Anthony456 Prentice Whipp Graham Geoffrey Peterborough Mark457 Lowther Walker Plymouth Devonport John James457 C Boaden Plymouth Devonport Jackson Con Con457 Plymouth Devonport Cannon457 Lab B Plymouth Devonport 61,497 LD457 UKI Annabelle Plymouth Devonport LD457 £225.00 B expenses BNP Lab Moffat Plymouth Devonport 64,874458 Helen Rosemary UKI Plymouth Sutton458 Gibson £350.00 - Plymouth Sutton 73,666458 Agents Elizabeth Jane David Charles Expenses subject to legal maximum Plymouth Sutton - £57.60458 Marion Plymouth Sutton £550.00 - Brinton - Ewing458 Ind Vicki Stewart James Plymouth Sutton Clerks -459 Frank - LCA James Nicholas & Castleford Pontefract -459 John Philip Smith Julian Philip - Jamieson B & Castleford Pontefract 459 John Keith - & Castleford Pontefract - Printing459 Lab Michael Hamilton Jackson £5,488.72 - SNP - & Castleford - Pontefract Sandford459 68,438 Anthony Nicholas C Meetings & Castleford Pontefract Linda Dingwall - Lab459 - - Robert James Committee & Castleford £3,251.77 Pontefract Con -460 Glen Parker - Fairweather Harris Pontypridd 63,183 -460 Staunton Con Byrne - Yvette LD Baldry £391.63 - Pontypridd460 - £200.00 - Oliver Newton Lab Pontypridd - UKI -460 Misc - Hawkins £6,507.58 Alan Michael £205.11 - £2,130.54 Pontypridd £75.00 -460 Alan Derek £4,113.75 UKI - £75.00 - Pontypridd SA460 Con Anne Pamela LD Legal - Henry Antrobus Gilroy Pontypridd £622.52 SSP LD461 Wesley £350.00 £884.12 Colvile £64.38 Poole - £300.00 SL461 Howard John - - - Total - £850.98 Poole - - £900.00 Connett461 Cooper Trevor - - C £6,666.35 £15.00 - Poole - £260.96461 £250.00 Leary - John £4,332.78 Singleton £496.00 Whitton £8,390.52 Poole £250.00 £15.00462 Max Lab - £9,736.51 - & Canning Town - Poplar - 71,768 Con462 £70.00 £1,010.00 - £6,632.48 - Burdon Kim Scott & Canning Town Poplar - - LD462 - £530.00 £6,491.83 - Lab - - Paxton & Canning Town Poplar Con462 - - - - - & Canning Town Poplar UKI £7,625.88 - SL £67.50 £8,013.58 B462 £20.00 £6,999.51 £90.01 £123.67 £6,582.20 & Canning Town Poplar - - Bolderson463 £8,390.52 - - Bleddyn William £150.00 - - UKI North Portsmouth 463 - B - - - - Gill Prudence Mary Prior £4,251.25 £30.29 76,009 North - Portsmouth £82.20 £55.00 LD463 Howells James £2,254.21 Eric William - £8,390.52 North Portsmouth - £31.00 - - - - £24.00 - -463 SL £1,131.29 Dailey £9,736.51 Susan Marilyn - £185.00 North Portsmouth 64,644 Hancock £1,207.57463 £950.00 - Robert Andrew Raymond - Joseph Anthony £39.56 - - - Syms North Portsmouth £3,845.33 £1,255.69 - -464 £4,824.45 - £1,768.90 South Portsmouth - - - - £994.34 Robert Andrew £65.00 B Lab £915.12 £1,035.98 - £1,180.00 £8,666.83 SA Alexandra Elizabeth £9,736.51 Brooke £2,056.09 - £8,390.52 - - PC Warry £9,051.38 £715.00 Biddulph £1,010.72 - - Con £9,296.00 £350.00 - Paul David Thomas - 64,256 £9,296.00 £441.35 - Fitzpatrick Kambiz - £8,390.52 £429.56 Nicholas Shawne Edney - - Sugden - Sydney Norman John Con - - £661.10 £65.00 Westbrook - - Marr John - - £520.51 £1,410.00 £8,075.23 £7,206.48 - - - £36.00 Rapson £24.80 B £500.00 £7,547.97 PL LD £8,467.20 £8,467.20 - - Lab Watt £4,079.71 UKI £1,061.17 - - £8,286.98 £1,030.00 - £6,957.24 - LD £9,736.51 £22.00 Christopher John £1,832.24 LD - £8,871.64 - 77,095 - - £530.00 - - - Darren Michael Thomas - - - - £1,656.51 Lab £6,316.50 Con £9,736.51 William - - Boomla - £650.00 Borg £45.00 - £9,296.00 Brian Day £530.00 - £77.69 £153.62 - £750.00 £237.89 - £120.00 - Lab £218.42 - Bass - £100.00 - Hancock - - £30.00 - - £1,252.57 - £470.00 £150.00 - - - £687.88 £5,354.45 £2,563.34 - - £9,736.51 £8,467.20 - SA £1,114.34 £6,286.01 - £8,871.64 £2,090.78 £8,871.64 - £293.39 £670.38 £300.00 - BNP - - Sanders £8,467.20 - £95.00 - LD - £946.66 - Con £1,768.90 McCabe £49.71 - £92.00 UKI £20.00 - £780.00 - - £9,296.00 £1,180.00 £1,458.00 - - £6,640.49 £8,248.35 - Bundy - £11.00 £477.35 £8,871.64 £5,274.09 £23.00 £8,871.64 £9,400.22 - £8,631.15 £8,591.78 - £136.50 - LD £9,296.00 £300.00 £200.00 £8,631.15 £2,561.00 £570.22 - £109.28 UKI ------£8,871.64 £10.00 - - - £1,968.74 - £200.00 - - £28.20 - Ind - £9,400.22 - £5,377.59 - £135.00 - - £497.17 £49.70 £151.68 £643.20 - £206.73 - £6,220.37 £195.00 £8,631.15 - £743.00 - £2,671.04 £10.00 £750.00 - £2,942.58 - - £1,656.51 £1,048.20 - £1,038.70 £7,689.21 - £1,550.12 £8,631.15 £268.12 - - £255.00 £7,209.55 £8,456.62 - £9,400.22 - £8,631.15 £750.00 - - - - - £6,262.63 - £6 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 143 Edwards Kensington North Kensington North Kensington North Kensington North Kensington Area Constituency No. Name464 South Portsmouth 464 South Portsmouth 464 South Portsmouth 464 South Portsmouth Constitu- 465 Electorate Preseli Pembrokeshire465 Candidate Preseli Pembrokeshire465 Preseli Pembrokeshire465 ency type Preseli Pembrokeshire465 C Preseli Pembrokeshire465 Preseli Pembrokeshire466 Candidate Preston466 54,283 Jacqueline Rita Preston Forename Philip Henry466 Preston Graham Philip466 Party Preston Jonathan Christopher466 Preston Michael Norman Alan466 Lawrence Stephen Molyneux Preston467 Personal David Rhys Tarrant Pudsey Warr Heaney467 Surname Alexander James Pudsey467 Ann Patricia Pudsey Lab SA467 B Hugh William Pudsey468 Dauncey Putney UKI468 Lab Sinnett Crabb Putney Con £565.00 73,309 £109.00 Mark Phillip468 Bowen Putney Jones468 £200.00 LD Putney £435.00468 expenses B Putney PC Con469 Graham Rayleigh - -469 £500.00 - William David SL Hendrick Rayleigh £640.00469 71,405 Bilal Moosa UKI Expenses subject to legal maximum Rayleigh Anthony Paul -469 £200.00 Richard John £77.57 Rayleigh B470 David Oswald Reading East470 Lab - - Reading East £7,085.51 £15.00 Chadwick - £100.00 - £125.00470 60,643 John Michael O'Hare - Reading East Anthony John470 Truswell Patel - Stephen Paul £5,497.24 Reading East Merrick470 £1,293.76 David Braid Reading East470 LD C Reading East - £112.84 -470 £760.00 - - - - Reading East Michael Richard Con Procter - Lab -471 Colman B 70,653 Reading West - Boddy £325.00 £104.00 Grn471 Ind Mark Gino £7,320.34 Reading West Anthony Kenneth £6,908.51471 £2,216.99 Ind Reading West Ann Patricia £646.67 Simpson471 74,637 £415.36 £115.18 £150.00 - Reading West Jane Patricia Yvonne Margaret Clare - -472 - Con - Lab Sewards £1,638.58 Redcar - Burrett Windsor472 Paul LD Legal Agents - - Redcar £8,525.87 - £1,625.78472 Geoffrey £4,860.22 Con - Francois Redcar - £9,046.80 £825.00472 £9,046.80 Colin Robert £7,782.49 - C Barry John Wild £430.00 Redcar £7.70 £305.15 -473 - UKI Griffiths £8,848.54 - Thomas PL Redditch -473 LD - £10.00 Miriam Frances - Redditch 71,089 - £681.79473 - £639.00 Con Martin John Amy Louise - Redditch -473 - - Darren James £8,035.10 Redditch Morgan - -473 Williams - Lab Roy Clark Peter - £8,432.13 Tanswell Redditch UKI £229.19 - £7,977.66474 Kennet - - £312.89 £191.43 C £15.00 & Regent's Park £9,046.80 - - £8,848.54 Stephen Henry - £200.00 Dobrashian - - - £6,033.75 -474 Polly Salter Thornton Williams & Regent's Park - UKI LD - £2,529.88 £760.00 67,798 David Michael £946.63 - Con £50.00 £150.00 - Vera B £10.00474 £1,510.05 £8,848.54 £9,046.80 LD Grn Lab - - & Regent's Park £110.00 - Hammerson Reid - - - - £7,675.20 £731.80 - UKI474 £503.18 - B SA £918.50 £150.00 - 62,565 & Regent's Park £890.00 - Lab £573.76 Jacqueline Jill £660.00 Black - Ind Christopher Douglas Roy £525.90 £8,848.54 £2,077.43 £2,828.00 £214.80 Main - - £7,575.65 £7,509.70 - Stanley William £900.00 - 75,886 - £4,860.22 Martin John Roy Karen Patricia £5,748.48 - £8,718.86 - - £105.00 - - - Con - £160.02 £8,624.36 £8,848.54 £50.00 - Clerks £8,855.21 Karen Elizabeth - Baird Smith £2,201.72 £8,767.63 - £90.50 - Michael Reeves £185.00 - UKI £7.70 Wilson - - £2,280.00 £100.00 - - Con George Stephen - £217.00 - £8,848.54 - Buck - £555.00 Richard Kevin £645.00 LD - - £425.00 David Peter £190.00 £10.00 Lumley ------£8.00 Taylor Ashall - £1,638.02 £6,849.09 £60.00 Lab Lab Flynn David Courtney £81.07 - £8,230.57 - LD £160.00 £278.61 - £8,435.20 £4,679.46 £14.20 - - - £150.00 £915.99 - £73.60 £60.50 £8,767.63 - Armstrong - - - £8,692.00 Anthony £954.63 Paul - Lab £52.50 Con £251.80 £600.40 £3,034.93 - Wilson £9,858.40 - £8,855.21 £8,125.65 £3,116.61 SL - £260.00 Boyle £7,659.70 LD £1,510.05 £73.93 £200.00 £8,273.00 £8,767.63 £746.00 - £100.00 £828.50 - UKI - £8,273.00 £700.00 £8,855.21 Grn - £25.00 £9.17 £8,855.21 - - £360.00 - £400.00 £315.00 - - - Miller - £2,425.65 £408.15 £918.50 £2.00 - Con £282.00 - £750.00 £226.92 £8,273.00 £16.00 £8,855.21 £7,018.85 - £516.50 LD £8,482.69 - £6,626.00 - - £30.00 - - £8,791.22 - - - £8,916.30 £22.77 £219.75 - £74.64 - - £5,327.37 - £8,916.30 - - Grn £18.50 £8,916.30 £750.00 £1,440.23 - £622.95 - £2,280.00 £400.00 £6,250.45 £30.00 ------£8,767.63 £7,512.56 £100.00 - - £8,855.21 - - £645.00 £123.00 £3,682.88 - £1,250.00 £5,986.28 - £275.00 - £8,273.00 £9,858.40 £30.01 - £2,190.15 - £690.03 - - £5,998.50 ------£35.00 £720.00 - £915.99 - - £9,428.75 £716.15 - £8,916.30 - £858.51 £8,273.00 - £7,985.33 £9,890.52 - £50.50 £992.38 £9,858.40 £6,936.00 - - £419.00 £25.67 £325.00 £8,916.30 £448.63 - - £9,890.52 £6,003.91 £5.34 £700.00 - £160.00 - - £9,858.40 £796.00 £440.00 £1.00 £566.61 £1,565.90 £27.00 £7,489.87 - £4,384.38 - £102.91 £750.00 £9,635.08 - £9,635.08 - £28.11 £8,916.30 £161.75 £215.00 £7,277.89 - £17.00 - £8,916.30 - £7,615.47 £8,359.98 £9,890.52 - £6,600.25 - £750.00 £90.00 - - £122.89 £708.03 £8,359.98 £9,890.52 £9,635.08 - £150.00 £7,585.91 - £15.00 £8,973.76 - £8,135.33 - - £15.00 £8,973.76 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 144 Kensington North Kensington North Kensington North Kensington Area Constituency No. Name474 & Regent's Park 474 & Regent's Park Constitu- 474 Electorate & Regent's Park Candidate 475 Reigate475 ency type Reigate475 Reigate475 Reigate475 Candidate Reigate476 Renfrewshire West Forename476 China Renfrewshire West476 Party Renfrewshire West476 Alan George Renfrewshire West476 B Renfrewshire West477 Personal Charlotte Ellen Rhondda C477 Surname Rhondda477 65,618 Crispin Jeremy Rupert Rhondda Crisp477 Mieville 52,889 Rhondda James Blunt477 Regan Rhondda478 Ribble South478 Simon Patrick Ribble South478 SA Jane Nicola Ribble South Carol UKI479 Stephen Philip Ribble Valley no label David John Con C479 expenses Harold Stephen Ribble Valley Clare Alison479 Sheridan Charleton Ribble Valley Arlene480 £86.00 56,121 Richmond (Yorks)480 Agents £565.00 Christopher John Kulka Smith Expenses subject to legal maximum Richmond (Yorks) C Green480 - - Richmond (Yorks) Sharpe Lab480 Lab £40.00 £600.00 Hamblen Richmond (Yorks) Clerks Puthucheary481 Bryant 73,794 Richmond Park C David Stanley Leanne481 Richmond Park James Peter C LD481 UKI SNP Nunnery RUK Richmond Park - Gavin Cameron Printing Con481 LD 74,319 - - Richmond Park Nigel Martin - Glyndwr John481 Meetings 65,360 Lab Richmond Park Adrian Edward - -481 Borrow William Jefferson Committee Richmond Park Mark Lindsay £37.00482 £1,675.06 £100.00 £6,418.32 SSP Cox Hobbins Rochdale B482 £50.00 Wood - Rochdale Michael - - £272.00 -482 - Summers £81.00 Hague £50.00 £528.75 Owens Evans Rochdale Marcus Fay482 Misc Lab 72,251 - - Rochdale Thomas Edward Alcock482 Jennifer Louise £648.50 Con - Rochdale £50.00 £752.00 Melodie Elizabeth483 Legal Ind Rochford & Southend East LD - PC -483 - - Con - Rochford & Southend East - Con - -483 £845.88 Con Forth £225.50 Total Rochford & Southend East Tonge Thomas Oliver Craig Staniforth Carr - C483 £1,544.89 - LD - Rochford & Southend East C Barry Francis £352.00 - Johnstone -483 - £3,934.78 £200.00 Rochford & Southend East Harris £7,964.20 James Richard £600.00484 Max £1,577.66 - £4,095.00 £3,676.01 71,005 Tinnion - Romford Peter £8,522.86 -484 Edward MacMillan - MRLP - 69,506 - £1,044.00 £2,148.06 Romford Raymond Arthur - Lorna484 £100.00 Lab LD - - LD £600.00 £40.00 Romford £8,973.76 - -484 LD Langford £5,736.07 £870.00 - - Page £36.88 Romford £2,730.00 Taylor -484 - £649.62 Con - £530.00 £960.00 - Romford Lab Christopher Ronald485 - £500.00 Perrin £26.00 Romsey £230.00 Paul £8.60 £150.00 Stephen Charles485 - - £1,345.83 - - £400.00 £200.00 Romsey - - Elaina Lab Adrian John485 £125.00 Dandridge - £250.00 Romsey Nicholas Andrew Lawton - - St. John Howe - Brian Trevor485 £551.12 - - Harvey - - Con Grn - Romsey Mohammed £360.14 Fitzsimons £674.50 £7,517.63 £7,555.72 £132.89485 £1,122.50 B - £8,081.84 - Newton £1,200.00 £5,124.72 UKI Romsey Ind486 £8,973.76 £8,962.68 £691.00 - Lab - - £6,403.46 - - Ross, Skye & Inverness West £2.00 £365.00 £17.58 - - £2,037.80 £752.00 59,893 £50.00 £4,008.90 Hedges Lab - C - Andrew Richard - Grn £8.00 £8,522.86 - £8,973.76 £240.00 Lynch £35.00 £8,762.12 - £653.17 £5,154.53 Rowen - LD - £5,769.78 £55.90 £1,098.46 Salim Cohen - £159.00 - - - - £8,762.12 C £8,522.86 55,915 - - - £40.00 - Charles Peter £1,491.34 - £61.23 £26.81 Grn Rosindell - £500.00 £1,267.31 Eileen - - £7,310.03 £2,787.90 £750.00 - - 72,128 £2,796.05 Nigel Lawrence - £8,522.86 - Lib £3,876.63 - Sandra Julia LD £8,038.27 - - - - - £5,744.67 Con Stephen Patrick £7,450.06 - £9,543.86 no label - £10,151.04 £8,762.12 £676.43 Frank £9,627.88 Con - £1,397.39 £55.00 £9,274.51 Kennedy £62.50 - £8,522.86 £24.00 £870.00 £746.77 £500.00 - - - £10,058.23 £20.25 - - Meyer £3,511.75 - - - £8,762.12 John Edward Paul - £75.00 - Ward - £1,474.64 - Gidley £3,472.84 - Stephen John - £200.00 - £9,428.61 Gordon £1.25 £1,142.75 £8,298.37 Anthony Martin LD - £10,058.23 - - Raynes - - - £2,898.56 £8,962.68 £40.00 Derrick Graham £7,268.42 - - £551.12 - - £710.00 - - - £364.17 £78.00 LD - £8,962.68 £300.00 £8,762.12 McAllister £5.99 £794.67 - - £246.31 Roberts UKI £419.57 LD - Lab McCabe - £50.00 - £24.00 £38.50 £1,523.36 Large £1,136.49 £978.67 Con - £710.00 - - - £1,274.55 £6.40 £4,177.94 £8,520.34 £7,968.11 £67.00 - £445.00 £8,962.68 BNP - - - - £10,058.23 £220.57 £9,627.88 £8,548.53 £8,806.55 Lab - £5,444.00 £2,676.06 - UKI £2,934.32 £8,806.55 £10,151.04 £20.00 £132.84 - £9,627.88 - - - £3,756.32 £502.00 LCA - - - - £484.88 - £10,151.04 - £9,461.70 - £322.50 £50.00 - £8,962.68 - £7,784.77 - - £9,626.21 £52.70 - - £4,976.00 - £277.02 £2,897.30 £25.50 £9,832.34 - £518.79 - - - - £2.25 - - £10.00 - £3,175.58 ------£8,556.90 £8,806.55 ------£414.17 £9,792.37 - £250.00 £37.50 £80.25 £1,332.77 - £7,683.39 £8,806.55 - - £9,627.88 - £8,806.55 - - - - £64.04 £115.00 - - - £1,523.36 - - £50.00 - £43.90 - £9,249.53 £4,699.65 £9,832.34 £2,944.32 - - £9,792.37 £9,551.24 £7,065.49 £5.00 £8,149.77 - £9,832.34 £505.85 £9,792.37 £8,234.58 £277.88 £350.00 £552.00 £464.71 - - £2,491.85 £9,792.37 - Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 145 McRobie Barraclough Area Constituency No. Name486 Ross, Skye & Inverness West486 Ross, Skye & Inverness West486 Ross, Skye & Inverness West486 Ross, Skye & Inverness West Constitu- 486 Electorate Ross, Skye & Inverness West486 Candidate Ross, Skye & Inverness West486 Ross, Skye & Inverness West487 ency type Rossendale & Darwen487 Donald Finlayson Rossendale & Darwen487 Jean Rossendale & Darwen488 Angus Wallace Candidate Rother Valley488 Crichton Eleanor Roberta C Rother Valley Forename488 Stuart Leslie Rother Valley488 Philip Andrew Party Rother Valley Laing489 70,884 James Scott Janet Rotherham Lab489 Rotherham489 Urquhart Personal Rotherham Topp489 Anderson Surname C Rotherham489 £212.75 George Anderton Rotherham Con489 Sc Grn Brian Frederick Rotherham489 SNP 69,174 Rotherham Crawford John UKI Kevin 490 Lee Anderson Roxburgh & Berwickshire SSP £207.20490 B Roxburgh & Berwickshire -490 Dunning £93.92 Roxburgh & Berwickshire490 - £400.00 Country C James Philip Roxburgh & Berwickshire 57,931 Lab expenses Denis Winifred Irene Barron490 £143.87 £70.76 - David Roxburgh & Berwickshire Con LD490 47,515 - - Roxburgh & Berwickshire Archibald Johnstone491 Agents Expenses subject to legal maximum Rugby & Kenilworth - -491 Duddridge Richard Kirkwood Rugby & Kenilworth Knight £2,103.78491 £250.00 Lab Alan Charles Rugby & Kenilworth Clerks - - -491 £4,021.52 Crichton Peter - George Park Rugby & Kenilworth £60.00492 - Con Richard William MacShane Catherine Ruislip Northwood492 - £2,755.36 LD Freda - C Cutts Roderick Alexander Ruislip Northwood Printing492 LD Geoffrey Charles £50.00 Ruislip Northwood - Hall492 - Griffith Meetings Lab - Powell Amanda Jane - Campbell Ruislip Northwood - 79,764 Penycate -492 Turnbull £978.25 Thomas Peter Andrew - Committee Ruislip Northwood £215.68493 £500.00 - Bartholomew Runnymede & Weybridge - - B493 Maxwell Stuart £16.60 £250.00 UKI £944.14 Runnymede & Weybridge £150.00 £143.00 SNP493 - - Grn £411.12 JLDP Millar Runnymede & Weybridge UKI Lab Con - £45.24 Con493 £200.00 Misc Smith LD David John Pattison C 60,788 - Neilson Runnymede & Weybridge493 John Arbuthnot Ducane Gwendoline - £7,136.54 £12.00 Runnymede & Weybridge - £2,213.78 Wilkinson494 £686.95 - Jonathan Paul Legal £6,512.27 £500.00 Martin - Rushcliffe £4,966.76 - King 75,569 - £8,949.73 494 - £500.00 £586.05 £125.00 - Philip Rushcliffe £8,949.73 494 £318.11 - - £1,985.54 SSP Total £1,260.00 Rushcliffe UKI Gillian Mary SA -494 £1,926.48 - Con £200.00 £600.00 - Rushcliffe - Michael Francis -494 - Fairweather - Garratt - Rushcliffe £3,144.23 Graham John Con495 - - Max Jane Rachel - £186.95 - £600.00 Rutland & Melton £44.00 Ian £762.00 £8,949.73 - Lab -495 £322.49 £4,157.48 Christopher Stanley £156.35 - Rutland & Melton - £61.00 - LD £20.00495 - - Cox Christopher Alan Rutland & Melton Travers £3,001.14 £2,407.90 -495 - £180.00 £129.38 £1,448.78 £6,297.79 £1,022.25 Charles Edward Lewis - Hammond Bushill UKI Rutland & Melton C - -495 Lee £18.00 £150.00 £675.00 £255.00 £8,949.73 Rutland & Melton - Gilman -496 Briginshaw - £443.12 - £500.00 - Browne Ryedale £8,027.92 - - £8,117.40496 £1,022.07 C 81,847 - £8,949.73 - Con Ryedale - Lab £50.00 Harry Kenneth £9,840.55 -496 £9,840.55 - - - £350.00 LD Ryedale - - - Lab LD496 £944.14 - £143.00 Edward Ryedale - - £3,453.55 73,264 Grn -497 £1,736.94 £8,949.73 £868.80 Alan James Carter Grn - £18.00 £720.00 £2,940.49 £8,949.73 UKI Saffron Walden £465.00 £9,773.09 £8,073.64 - - - £1,812.97 - £401.42 £9,773.09 John Paul - Clarke £5,204.40 - - £18.75 £66.25 Jeremy Arthur £285.83 Duncan £500.00 £90.54 £966.94 - £17.00 - BNP £1,844.35 - John Kenneth £132.00 - Matthew - - - £8.90 Ashley John £1,260.00 - £947.31 - - Kim - - C - £7,303.62 - - £535.00 £9.40 £9,840.55 £3,496.63 - £5,124.42 Charles John Peter £361.12 Con - £8,144.15 £7,737.82 Hargreaves C Con £8,144.15 £180.00 £8,428.93 £715.00 Christopher John Fallon £500.00 - £4,555.21 - 66,849 - Browne - £141.00 - - John Robert Baker £8,428.93 - £107.00 - - - £53.74 - 76,724 £468.03 Baxter £250.00 LD - - - £6,388.77 Alan Gordon £402.27 O'Callaghan £74.49 Davies - - - - - £3,327.81 £6,687.40 - £1,000.00 Lab - £8,303.90 UKI £31.90 £9,571.67 John Keith - £500.00 £2,857.46 £750.00 Lab Lee £10,428.37 - £2,387.46 - £570.00 Greenway £265.25 UKI David Brian £750.00 ------£8,428.93 - Grn Stephen £3,665.22 - - £50.00 Grn Haselhurst - £51.10 - - £392.86 - £1,728.50 £275.00 £7,525.66 £173.56 £1,295.29 £418.42 - £1,736.94 Con £898.90 - £420.02 - £868.80 - £8,144.15 £9,773.09 £8,428.93 £898.28 Orrell Con £10.00 - £15.00 £467.80 - £8,582.82 LD - £9,773.09 Ellis £52.00 - - - £10,428.37 £10.00 - - - £7,829.13 - £7,390.69 £560.36 - £1,844.35 £384.00 - - £10,168.28 - Feaster - £200.00 - £8,428.93 £1,333.80 - £8,144.15 £350.00 £822.00 - £197.40 £10.00 £8,144.15 - £25.00 £371.00 LD - - £8,144.15 £1,000.00 - - £361.12 - - - Lab - £14.00 - - £8,428.93 £377.00 £3,525.21 - UKI £10,045.66 £275.00 - £1,980.68 £10,428.37 £10,557.51 £8,144.15 - £750.00 - Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 146 Peter Area Constituency No. Name497 Saffron Walden497 Saffron Walden497 Saffron Walden498 St Albans Constitu- 498 Electorate St Albans498 Candidate St Albans498 St Albans499 ency type St Helens North499 St Helens North499 St Helens North499 Candidate St Helens North500 St Helens South C Forename500 St Helens South Elfreda Drusilla Sarah500 Party St Helens South C Tania500 66,040 Tealby-Watson St Helens South Richard Patrick Kerry 500 St Helens South500 LD 71,313 Personal St Helens South David Leonard500 Surname C St Helens South500 St Helens South Charles Brett Anthony501 Pollard St Ives Nicholas David501 65,741 Elphicke St Ives Simon Nicholas Charles Watts Shaun Anthony Christopher Arthur Rogers501 Glover Pearce St Ives John501 - St Ives Stephen Benjamin502 Sherwin Rijke Salford Lab Con502 Woodward Brian Thomas Salford502 Lab expenses Whatham Lab UKI Lee Stuart Salford Con502 Neil Salford -502 UKI Lab Michael Roy Salford502 Agents £260.00 LD Expenses subject to legal maximum Bryan Hilton Salford Spencer SL C £592.60 Beirne503 - Michael Anastasio - Salisbury503 £1,050.00 David Oswald Salisbury Clerks Rotherham503 - - 74,256 - Salisbury Andrew Henry £600.00503 Perry Murphy LD B Salisbury503 - - Slater LD - Salisbury £7,390.42 Con Printing £125.00504 Thompson - - Scarborough & Whitby Braid - -504 54,152 Meetings Scarborough & Whitby Joanna Mary £35.95 Hazel Anne - George504 - Ind £6,731.47 Committee Scarborough & Whitby William504 SA SL £50.00 - Scarborough & Whitby Michael Patrick C - UKI504 - C - Scarborough & Whitby £9.00 -504 - - - Ind Norman - Scarborough & Whitby £1,853.38505 LD Misc Richardson - £3,545.56 80,527 - - Christopher John Scunthorpe Blears 75,213505 £179.01 Simon Robert £6,966.82 Faulkner Lawrence William Michael Peter Scunthorpe £7,356.12 £80.31505 £18.90 - - Legal - £245.00 £10.00 Sheilah Hazel Scunthorpe £4,065.10 £250.00 Con505 - Morris - - £179.01 Roy King Scunthorpe £130.00 £7,614.38 -505 - - £10,285.33 £15.00 Quinn Total Scunthorpe £572.96 £165.00 £15.00 Yvonne Lesley506 UKI Lab Key John David £750.00 - Sedgefield Owen Grant - Sue506 £6,470.28 Thomas Henry - £90.01 £1,121.96 Sedgefield - Wallace Christopher Malcolm506 - - £450.00 Max £59.99 Jonathan Mark £8,274.43 - Sedgefield Lab - £585.00 Hamish Douglas -506 - C £50.00 John Howard - - £9,577.48 Sedgefield Con Wood Emmerson-Peirce506 £2,649.35 Lab £8,503.78 Theresa Bernadette - LD - Sedgefield £1,947.27506 £2,530.44 £314.85 - Pearce LD Sykes £9,577.48 SA £10,285.33 59,367 Con Sedgefield Ind - £1,243.94 - - Masterson Soutar £1.00 Dixon - Elliot Anthony - - Murray £114.01 - £125.00506 - - £150.00 - Sedgefield Jacob £8,255.97 -507 £129.00 - £240.00 UKI C - Mallory Selby £1,821.13 £64.50 £579.88 £9,558.94 507 - Ind - £4,194.11 £184.33 £3,555.56 LD £50.00 Selby - £4,446.11 Con507 Bernard Andrew - £5,937.98 £592.00 £9,904.40 Morley Grn £9,904.40 Selby - £9,634.84 - - PL Grn 64,925507 Robert David - - £250.00 Anthony Charles Lynton £6,585.78 - Selby -507 Michael John William £128.00 - UKI Blair £39.60 Lab Selby - £9,577.48 £363.34 £14.00 - £1,000.00 - David Alexander - £174.90 - £10,285.33 Theobald - - Cliff - - £20.00 £1.15 Lab £500.00 £252.59 £200.00 - - - - £7.50 £76.00 John Douglas Wilson - Tress £125.01 - - - Andrew John Richard - Patterson - - - £1,421.33 Con - £2,141.73 Carswell £750.00 £50.00 £5,536.33 - Andrew £850.00 Lab £1,243.27 - £6,926.77 - £2,901.94 - £600.00 Duffield C £9,577.48 £261.02 - Brian - £450.00 £9,558.94 - £5,852.88 £116.51 no label - Christopher Anthony - - £8,126.81 £9,303.77 Ind £9,904.40 - £1,293.94 £3,392.00 £2,871.13 - LD - £10,086.87 - - 77,391 £107.88 Con - - £4,957.13 - Driver £9,904.40 £448.67 £9,558.94 £2,530.44 John Helen - - - - £30.00 LD £9,558.94 £9,558.94 - - - - £9,964.84 £786.00 £1,340.60 £1,129.25 - - £2,005.42 £50.00 - £10,086.87 - Spence - £57.47 £200.00 - - £151.59 £479.29 - £40.00 - £2,883.36 £720.00 £6,917.27 - £326.50 Andrew Michael £603.22 - Gibson £8,942.11 £579.88 £520.50 £2,535.77 RRL £9,558.94 £65.70 Jeremy David £579.23 - £10,475.55 - - £200.00 £515.50 £9,558.94 £472.00 £40.00 £495.63 Helen Mary Nightingale £1,741.41 £9,630.12 - £176.25 - £438.92 £12.00 - UKI £10,146.21 - Kenwright Graham Robert - John - £2,041.83 Grogan £703.71 - - Mitchell - £7,706.00 £700.00 £25.00 £325.00 £9,889.27 - £7,952.33 £100.00 SL £64.00 - £7,952.33 £1,760.95 £10,475.55 £386.36 Wilcock - - - - £1,946.98 £754.62 - - Grn £52.87 - - £5,140.81 Lewis £9.00 £10,086.87 - £144.03 £4,449.16 £30.00 £6,058.94 Lab - Con - - £2,657.93 Ind - - £9,011.89 £3,444.87 - - LD £10.30 £90.00 £10,146.21 £16.53 £10,086.87 £2,213.45 £3,104.69 - £9,558.94 - - £10,475.55 £750.00 - - £450.00 - £7,952.33 - - £210.00 - £20.00 UKI - £153.05 £45.00 £1,219.25 - - - £631.75 £7,952.33 - - £390.00 £40.00 - £124.00 £750.00 £10,146.21 £18.00 £100.00 - £1,200.00 - £1,479.51 ------£389.21 £151.59 - - £2,094.95 - £520.63 £7,952.33 - £4,604.46 £10,475.55 - £180.00 - £10,475.55 - - £9,163.75 £8,674.81 - £1, Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 147 Area Constituency No. Name508 Sevenoaks508 Sevenoaks508 Sevenoaks508 Sevenoaks Constitu- 508 Electorate Sevenoaks509 Candidate Sheffield Attercliffe509 Sheffield Attercliffe509 ency type Sheffield Attercliffe509 C Sheffield Attercliffe510 Sheffield Brightside510 Candidate Sheffield Brightside B 66,648510 Michael Cathel Sheffield Brightside Forename510 Sheffield Brightside510 67,697 Party Sheffield Brightside Clive James Charles510 B Sheffield Brightside511 Caroline Fallon Sheffield Central Betts511 Clive John Personal Sheffield Central511 54,134 Lisa Surname Sheffield Central David John511 Mark Caldor Sheffield Central Gail511 Sheffield Central Elizabeth Pauline Con511 Sheffield Central Lab511 Humphreys Matthew George B Gray Sheffield Central511 Alison Pamela Sheffield Central Arnott Ellis512 Brian Sheffield Hallam512 60,765 Lab £250.00 Robert Jonathan Blunkett Sheffield Hallam Richard George Wilson Hawkins Perry512 expenses Mark Anthony - Sheffield Hallam512 Smith £357.80 Firth LD Sheffield Hallam513 UKI Sheffield Heeley Morris £500.00513 Agents Caborn UKP Ali £108.15 Lab UKI Expenses subject to legal maximum Sheffield Heeley513 Con £1,061.23 Noelle C Suter Sheffield Heeley - Con513 Bernard Wilson £50.00 Sheffield Heeley Clerks £6,465.61 LD513 £15.00 Nicholas £6,753.24 LD Sheffield Heeley513 58,982 £30.00 SL Lab David £11.04 Sheffield Heeley Richard Beecroft £19.50514 Charlotte Elizabeth B Sheffield Hillsborough - Printing514 - Michael Robert UKI - Sheffield Hillsborough SA £430.00514 Meetings - - Sheffield Hillsborough - Allan Schofield -514 61,949 Brelsford Qadar John Paul Committee Little Sheffield Hillsborough Margaret Patricia - -515 £237.22 Riley - Gillian C Sherwood - -515 Driver £69.00 £15.00 - Leslie George - Sherwood515 - - Hadfield UKI Sherwood Con Munn -516 £7,618.28 £600.00 Misc 74,180 - - David Grant £869.00 £150.00 Shipley Helen Margaret LD LD -516 £8,593.06 £2,140.05 - Carolyn Grn Shipley - - Harthman516 £2,427.07 Legal SA Robert Dudley Arnott Shipley - WRP £1,115.00516 - - SL £15.00 £9,252.47 £763.00 Brian Bernhard - Shipley £3,181.32516 Furniss £1,182.30 £9,654.30 £29.38 Jackson - David Bryans Total Lab John Patrick Shipley - £90.00517 Con - Willis £32.68 - C Graham Shrewsbury & Atcham - £1,358.87517 £25.00 - Unwin Peter Shrewsbury & Atcham Commons517 - £1,037.97 - - Max UKI Fischer £730.86 - - - Shrewsbury & Atcham Abbott £150.00 - -517 75,558 Lab - - £200.00 Lab Shrewsbury & Atcham Simon Patrick -517 £373.70 - C C £3,859.08 £90.00 - Shrewsbury & Atcham LD £209.71517 - - - - - LD £758.60 £450.00 Shrewsbury & Atcham £220.00 - £15.00518 Grn - £600.00 £90.00 Dunn SL - Shropshire North King £104.90 -518 - 74,964 £64.00 69,564 Con £435.53 £432.17 - Brandon Kenneth £2,351.16 Shropshire North - William Barry Paul Christopher Michael £347.00 - Tipping518 - Richard Bloomfield Peter Shropshire North Webb - £3,056.45 £500.00 -518 Harris - - £163.64 - - - - Shropshire North - £43.28 Leslie £9,654.30 518 £3,826.56 £2,572.22 £8,253.95 £758.50 - Marsden Lewis - £15.00 Shropshire North - £100.00 - -519 £7,968.98 £9,654.30 UKI - - £6,865.10 - Anthea Elizabeth Joy David Norman £1,765.00 Sittingbourne & Sheppey Con - - £1,319.39519 Lab - C Jonathan Daniel Helen - £433.00 Sittingbourne & Sheppey - £9,654.30 - £500.00 £300.09 £600.00 McIntyre UKI £1,197.30 £786.65 Henry Malcolm Thomas - Martin John £18.00 £90.50 £1,306.46 LD - - - Lab - Curteis - - £115.45 £7,968.98 Lab £4,865.86 Emma Catherine Mary £1,484.86 Walter - £153.00 - C 73,716 £2,407.45 £100.00 £763.00 Con £160.00 - £230.16 Owen William Senior James Grimsahw £7,968.98 £391.00 £1,537.97 £90.00 Bullard £4,259.17 Rule - - - £287.06 £8,593.06 £100.00 £450.00 £35.00 £302.47 £8,593.06 £481.70 £8,274.23 £1,358.87 Con £15.00 65,824 - - £175.00 - £6,101.44 £112.13 Derek Murray £150.00 £8,593.06 £489.42 £1,072.12 £9,654.30 - £758.50 £1,361.63 £600.00 Love Gollins £30.00 UKI £201.52 - £2,801.86 - - - - Michael Gerard - Wright - £240.00 Paterson - £7,968.98 Con Grn £300.00 - Benedict John Alexander £387.24 £5,354.67 - - £7,836.02 Jephcott £100.00 LD - Whitaker David Hugh £17.96 £9,122.47 £96.00 Adrian Hughes £9,135.23 - - - £1,160.35 £438.00 Wyatt - - - £758.60 Russell £450.00 £50.00 - £9,135.23 - £450.00 - Ind £5,648.94 Ion £12.00 £6,360.22 £270.00 £7,968.98 Con £7,968.98 Grn £339.01 £115.45 - - LD £1,367.35 £8,328.93 £90.00 LD - - £5,821.41 £175.00 £576.00 £817.00 - £450.00 £644.45 UKI £90.00 £8,274.23 - - Lee £400.00 £1,408.46 - £8,274.23 Trevanion - £3,048.93 - £445.00 - £20.00 - £731.48 £8,274.23 Lab £793.00 - £8,307.03 - £52.29 - £1,026.65 £923.76 £758.50 £8,274.23 £200.00 £7,654.75 £8,274.23 £8,274.23 - £1,175.00 £50.00 Lab Maxfield £765.00 - - - £1,725.83 £5,568.29 £357.25 - - £752.00 - £8,655.08 £135.60 UKI £7,003.73 £32.00 £8,210.92 - - £10,077.32 - - £160.00 - Con - £92.00 £552.59 - £3,215.45 £50.00 - - £6,443.40 £404.98 £38.00 £6,798.30 £1,393.63 £10,077.32 Ind - - £420.00 - - £450.00 £8,328.93 £41.13 - - Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 148 Andrew Area Constituency No. Name519 Sittingbourne & Sheppey519 Sittingbourne & Sheppey519 Sittingbourne & Sheppey520 Skipton & Ripon Constitu- 520 Electorate Skipton & Ripon520 Candidate Skipton & Ripon520 Skipton & Ripon521 ency type Sleaford & North Hykeham521 Sleaford & North Hykeham521 C Elvina Heather Sleaford & North Hykeham C521 Candidate Michael John Sleaford & North Hykeham522 Robert Nigel Slough Forename522 74,326 75,061 Slough David Maurice522 Douglas Martin Lowe Party Slough522 Slough Young522 Slough522 Oakley Personal Bernard Arthur Slough Curry Hogg Elizabeth Anne523 Surname Michael Vincent Solihull Robert523 LD Nancy Solihull Michael Richard523 RRL Solihull523 Bateman UKI B Solihull Donnelly523 Dugher Con Con Solihull524 Ward-Barrow Somerton & Frome524 73,008 Somerton & Frome £500.00 Fiona Margaret524 LD - Lab Arbon UKI Somerton & Frome £204.00 -524 Lab Holdsworth expenses Somerton & Frome524 £1,350.00 B Somerton & Frome525 - Mactaggart C Diana Victoria £445.00 South Holland & The Deepings £287.46 UKI525 Agents £75.00 Expenses subject to legal maximum C Karl - Kenneth Keith South Holland & The Deepings £1,250.00525 LD - 76,298 Michael Anthony South Holland & The Deepings - John Mark525 £100.00 75,977 Lab John Watson South Holland & The Deepings Clerks David William St.John £300.00 - -526 74,390 Kerr Choudry Shahid South Shields John Henry Coad526 Heath - South Shields £200.00 Haines526 - - £7,903.65 £6,557.43 Josephine Margaret - South Shields - Printing526 - - Jonathan Peter Brendan Mark South Shields Nazir526 Lane Taylor Meetings £50.00 Graham Eric Andrew Mark Andrew South Shields - Byron £1,257.69527 - LD £30.00 Grace John Committee Peter Con Stephanie Mary Southampton Itchen Hayes LD - £3,593.12527 Ind - - Malcolm Jean - Southampton Itchen527 £8.49 Marland B £755.40 - £20.00 Southampton Itchen O'Brien527 £8,744.99 £354.00 £492.00 Southampton Itchen Con Ind Perkins - UKI527 Misc Walker - Pyne - LD £462.45 £564.92 Southampton Itchen 61,285 - Con B £40.00 David Wright £154.22 Bridgwood £527.05 Moore527 - - Con £1,133.03 Legal - £1,598.12 Southampton Itchen Lab -528 - - - Hill Charlesworth Southampton Test 76,557 £1,559.00 £7.00 £233.91528 Lab John Yorke £9,961.87 Lab £8,926.48 Total - Southampton Test - UKI Pollock528 £10,091.21 PL £10,135.05 £5,785.76 - - Joanna Mary £425.76 £2,414.50 Southampton Test UKI - - -528 Miliband £150.00 £331.41 £154.54 UKI Henry Marshall - - Southampton Test - -528 - Max Alan £560.93 Southampton Test £460.00 - -528 Caroline Fiona Ellen £103.00 Roger - £91.34 Southampton Test B LD £17.00 Lib £4,031.53529 £500.00 Mark Geoffrey - - - Denham - £10,135.05 Southend West £715.00 - Gardner Lab529 - Grainger Kim - Nokes - - Southend West £5,857.94 - £8,887.99 -529 - Gavin Lee Charles - 73,840 £260.00 - - £10,091.21 £50.00 Southend West £65.08 - Vincent529 Alan Patrick £7,233.72 £1,257.69 £9,991.94 £865.80 - - - Southend West £9,564.09 £15.00530 £4,216.17 Michael Andrew £9,564.09 Lab Cooper - £291.02 Marsh - Con Southport £867.59 LD - -530 £4,588.96 Whitehead £28.50 £1,265.11 £4,920.70 £4.00 Southport Hardy £2,015.87 Con £490.07 - - -530 - £10,135.05 - Nettleship - £8.49 - Southport Richard Stanley B £7,470.02530 - £1,889.14 - £7,668.75 Holmes £9,564.09 - Southport £576.00 £13.00 £26.53 John Daniel £375.20 £10,091.21 - £50.00 £530.00530 Lab £564.92 LD £8,841.37 Southport Rose - - £2,457.65 Garry Egerton £10,135.05 £721.08 £21.00 SA - Ind £1,001.74 64,461 - Mark Frank - £3,871.78 David Anthony Andrew £669.76 UKI - Gueterbock £2,441.03 - £215.00 - Singh Paramjit - £1,025.14 £540.00 £10,091.21 Amess - - - - SL £531.74 - £9,990.46 £1,827.22 - £10.00 - - Shaw - B £10,132.44 £134.10 £2,322.77 £1,321.24 Rankin-Moore £8,616.70 Con - - £1,098.19 UKI £295.05 £321.43 - Simon Luke Paul - £8,841.37 - - £240.00 £750.00 £4,078.04 £10,033.44 Bahia £6,688.00 UKI Abel Richard - - - 70,202 - £10,132.44 £9,852.26 Con - - - £8,992.39 Richard Brian John David £450.00 £7,416.43 £240.50 £10,095.18 £60.00 £15.00 - Fisher - £8,992.39 - - - LD £1,695.00 - £70.00 - - £6,861.62 - £54.33 - - £283.55 £5,038.96 - - £461.08 - - £2,034.90 SL £6,729.72 £169.52 Laurence Cresswell £8,841.37 - SA - - £8.10 Lee - - £72.50 £2,742.65 £6,281.55 David Paul Pugh £321.43 £400.00 De Ste Croix - £20.00 - £8,992.39 Lab - £4,392.86 David William £2,015.87 Jones £1,328.76 £10,132.44 £200.00 - - Gerald David - £8,841.37 £10,132.44 - £589.00 - - - LD £75.00 - - £669.14 £95.00 £1,956.50 £15.00 - - - - - £849.94 - - - UKI £6,627.31 - £200.00 £205.00 £721.08 LD £6,960.38 £785.92 Brant Green £35.00 - £2,991.91 Con £4,108.04 £8,841.37 £312.40 - Kelley £20.00 £10,095.18 - - £816.50 £7,984.06 £42.50 £245.00 £7,512.88 - £8,992.39 - £167.50 £524.00 - £8,302.06 - - £785.00 £235.50 - £2,015.50 £20.00 - £38.50 - - £10,095.18 £10,095.18 - Lib £20.00 - £2,402.40 - £7,458.72 Lab £750.00 £283.00 £5.20 £2,361.06 £240.00 - £10,132.44 - £8,841.37 UKI - £8,302.06 £195.00 £9,044.78 - £330.00 - £6,858.48 - £8 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 149 & Bermondsey & Bermondsey & Bermondsey & Bermondsey & Bermondsey & Bermondsey & Bermondsey Area Constituency No. Name531 Southwark North 531 Southwark North Constitu- 531 Electorate Southwark North Candidate 531 B Southwark North ency type531 Southwark North 73,529 Simon Henry Ward531 Candidate Southwark North Hughes Forename531 Southwark North Party532 Kingsley Joseph Spelthorne532 Spelthorne LD532 Ewan Personal Spelthorne532 Surname Abrams Spelthorne533 Ruth Gudren Stafford533 £553.80 Stafford533 Lianne Stafford533 Lab Stafford £112.34533 Robert B Stafford Jenkins534 Wallace Staffordshire Moorlands534 John Paul Staffordshire Moorlands 68,731534 expenses David Staffordshire Moorlands534 - Staffordshire Moorlands Grn Shore C535 Con - C Staffordshire South535 Agents Expenses subject to legal maximum £6,491.31 Staffordshire South McWhirter535 Andrew Martin 66,760 Davies Staffordshire South 67,934535 Charlotte Martin Edward David Neil Staffordshire South Clerks £23.00536 Farr Richard Peter NF Stalybridge & Hyde - UKI536 £1,098.35 Wilshire - C Stalybridge & Hyde -536 Shaw Stalybridge & Hyde Printing Marcus David no label536 Squire Rimmer Philip Andrew £305.23 Stalybridge & Hyde John Phillip537 69,959 Jeanne Meetings Stevenage £50.00 Thomas Patrick Atkins Kidney Paul537 Richard Thomas Orlando - C Con Committee Stevenage Bradford537 £8,030.23 - Michael Denis - Stevenage537 Lab Hayes - £8,865.33 LD UKI Cochrane Stevenage £7,918.45 66,265537 Cormack Paul £480.00 James Mark Dakin Stevenage Redfern537 Misc Lab UKI Lab - Josephine Kathleen Stevenage £50.00538 Hames Michael John Stirling Pinkerton - £83.55 Con - £500.00538 Purnell £39.35 Legal Con Stirling No election expenses return submitted Harrison Con538 - Gilbert C Andrew Robert Stirling £120.00 LD £20.00538 £3,059.13 - Brendon Total Stirling £430.00 -538 £440.00 LD - Frank RRL Stirling Lynch 69,897538 £243.40 - £20.00 - LD Lab - Daphne Barbara Stirling Kalinauckas539 - Max Reid £5,058.75 - Stockport UKI £643.86 £19.50539 - £800.00 £600.00 - Stockport - £5,695.66 -539 - Lab Stockport - Follett540 £8,612.31 Jones Graeme Brian UKI £25.00 £200.00 Stockton North C £180.00 - £50.00540 - - - Harry - £8,865.33 - Stockton North540 - Con Bennett Steve £150.00 Stockton North - £200.00 - -540 - - 53,097 £10.00 - £5,130.87 Antal - £3,859.13 - Stockton North Anne541 Anne - Sarah Teresa Lab £861.75 Quar £8,865.33 Stockton South £7,572.86 LD541 - £6,980.62 £7,560.58 - £40.00 £6,060.52 Stockton South B - £1,663.68 -541 - £10.50 - UKI £193.50 Stockton South £8,300.37 Bell B541 - - - - Stockton South £25.00 Geoff £6,326.19 - £460.13 - - 66,395 Davies - £200.00 Fiona Elizabeth Ann Glennon - £440.50 £309.86 £1,347.26 Con - 64,629 - £455.00 Clive Edward £23.20 - - Francis £250.00 £1,143.91 £6,695.79 - - £8,865.33 Losonczi Charles Clarke - £835.07 - B McGuire - - £8,865.33 £277.30 - £155.00 £8,644.62 £323.05 Mark Christopher - £950.59 - PL £10.00 Macaulay £115.00 - John Andrew LD £335.00 £9,460.27 - SA £5,058.75 70,337 £858.91 - Mark James £500.00 £115.00 £5,125.95 £280.08 Amanda Adele Dari Jean Freeman Ind £9,622.12 £3,866.87 £8,865.33 - Mullen £1,057.27 Mawdsley £7,491.11 Ruskell Lab - - - Mary - £750.00 - £795.00 SNP £9,694.91 - £27.75 - William £60.00 £8,557.92 Coffey £6,906.05 Cook £8,163.71 £87.00 - £3,709.99 £8,865.33 Allen £9,692.64 £37.80 £5,154.07 £9,820.45 - £9,694.91 £9,622.12 LD Vigar Robert Timothy £2,826.46 Con - - - £9,694.91 Hunter - £8,644.62 Suzanne Sc Grn SSP £889.50 - - - £1,239.57 - Taylor Lawrence William - £1,701.48 - - £8,644.62 - - £500.00 Lab £215.00 £8,644.62 £128.71 - - £230.60 Lab - Devlin - £650.81 £4,650.30 £5,774.51 - - Wallace Con Wennington Con LD Coombs £676.06 - - £850.00 £84.92 - - Lab - £765.00 £7,016.33 - - Fletcher £58.41 - Grn - £9,591.43 £5,042.93 £1,347.26 ------LD Con - - SA - £9,820.45 £9,622.12 - £845.07 - - - - £441.19 £917.32 - £43.00 - £30.00 £9,820.45 - LD - £880.10 - £9,694.91 - - - - - £1,061.26 £6,355.83 - - £430.00 - £683.00 - £4,401.18 - £817.62 - - £9,591.43 - £5,936.00 - - £795.00 - - £25.00 £7,615.77 £3,612.37 £1,887.63 - - - £441.49 £5,376.30 £9,622.12 - - £9,773.58 £2,826.46 - £9,773.58 - - - £30.00 - £9,820.45 - - £10.00 £20.00 - £9,694.91 - - - £18.00 - - - - £86.54 - - - - £10.20 - £4,769.20 £743.34 £65.84 £176.00 £3,970.09 - £785.00 - £830.00 - £7,026.07 - £2,978.48 - £1,216.49 £9,591.43 £2,908.88 £39.06 £84.92 £6,231.85 £281.00 - - - £6,355.46 £955.94 £843.92 - £9,591.43 £8,053.83 - - - £7,895.83 £9,773.58 - £516.50 £8,775.01 - £1,161.74 £8,775.01 - - £866.88 £1,592.75 £10.00 £150.00 £4,486.29 - £82.18 £600.00 £500.00 - £57.00 £9,773.58 - £8,775.01 - - £250.00 £820.71 £1,897.63 £250.00 £250.00 £757.06 £430.00 £963.53 £341.46 - £523.67 £8,775.01 - £9,773.58 £736.43 - £87.85 - - £8,775.01 £5,739.91 £44.50 £5,227.15 £755.76 £5.30 £7,648.53 £8,537.17 £10.00 £8,478.79 £3,964.91 £281.98 £8,537.17 £174.39 £8,478.79 - £6,702.35 £8,074.75 £8,775.01 £109.77 - £8,746.51 £828.80 £8,746.51 - £3,190.86 £8,478.79 £9,773.58 £59.90 £8,537.17 £1,712.52 £8,746.51 £1,221.64 - £8,4 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 150 Vincent Area Constituency No. Name542 Central Stoke-on-Trent 542 Central Stoke-on-Trent 542 Central Stoke-on-Trent 542 Central Stoke-on-Trent Constitu- 543 Electorate B North Stoke-on-Trent 543 Candidate North Stoke-on-Trent 59,750543 ency type North Mark Stoke-on-Trent 543 North Stoke-on-Trent B544 South Stoke-on-Trent 544 Candidate South Stoke-on-Trent 544 Jillian Mary 57,998 South Stoke-on-Trent Forename544 Joan Lorraine Gavin Geoffrey South Stoke-on-Trent 544 Richard South Party Stoke-on-Trent B545 Stone Fisher545 Stone Benjamin Andrew 545 Webb Personal Walley 70,032 Clark Stone546 George William Surname Stourbridge Gladwyn Henry Walter 546 Browning Stourbridge Charles Lee546 Jebb Lab Wise Stourbridge546 Stourbridge Stevenson Lab LD Philip Duncan546 Con Stourbridge Christopher Francis547 Con Strangford Adrian Mark547 Strangford Wanger Steven Reginald Lab547 C Coleman £200.00 LD Ind Strangford £13.00 Bastiman547 - B £300.00 expenses Strangford547 £200.00 68,847 Strangford -547 Batkin William Nigel Paul Knapper £15.00 64,610 LD Strangford Ind548 Agents £15.00 Debra Ann Con Expenses subject to legal maximum Stratford-on-Avon548 - Stratford-on-Avon - Cash548 - C - Stratford-on-Avon Clerks - £15.00548 John Ind £50.00 Stratford-on-Avon £12.00 BNP -548 Brendan Stephen John Arthur - Stratford-on-Avon 72,192549 Chris £4,257.56 Shipley Iris Strathkelvin & Bearsden Printing Eyre549 John Martin - C - - £40.00 £15.00 - Strathkelvin & Bearsden Con549 Michael Roy £916.34 £47.90 - Meetings - Strathkelvin & Bearsden549 - Committee 84,219 Strathkelvin & Bearsden £3,104.39 £1,890.86 C549 - John Cradock - David Strathkelvin & Bearsden Lab £1,009.03 McKeown550 £450.00 Palfreyman Kieran £1,553.95 Streatham - - - - Knotts550 Con - Danny Thomas £466.75 62,869 Streatham Atherton -550 - Misc John Bramall £465.00 Martin Liam Padraig Streatham - £220.00 -550 Susan Aysha Lab £3,746.23 £1,510.00 LD Maples Cedric Robinson Streatham £362.44 £912.04 - -550 Mushtaq £2.00 £1,223.60 £400.00 Legal Johnston Streatham -551 Ronald Alfred McCarthy £50.00 - UKI SL Stretford & Urmston Gordon Findlay551 Michael Edward LD McNarry - £5,286.75 Total £250.00 Stretford & Urmston - £2.50 £228.50 DUP Calum551 McCarthy £5.50 - - Juned Con - £8,150.00 £393.49 £1,653.65 Stretford & Urmston - William Murray551 SF - - - SDLP B Stretford & Urmston - £1,233.62 William552 £55.00 £5,512.22 - Max Lyons Mole £200.00 £300.00 Davies Macdonald Stroud Hussain552 £2.75 Wilson UU £59.20 B £3,547.88 APNI £938.84 £200.00 £250.00 Stroud552 - 76,021 £8,231.50 £850.00 £50.00 - £8,231.50 Stroud - £840.77 Keith - Roxburgh LD552 - - - £1,071.00 LD - Stroud £1,029.28 - 71,222552 - £7,296.20 Beverley June Smith - Stroud £8,150.00 Grn Lab Lab - -553 - - UKI £4,787.00 £600.00 NIU £5,896.51 Suffolk Central & Ipswich North £1,890.86 -553 - Con Telfer £491.35 £8,704.47 C Roger £50.00 - £100.00 Suffolk Central & Ipswich North £5.00 - £100.00553 - £8,150.00 - - - - Stephen John £1,553.95 Suffolk Central & Ipswich North £6,119.16 £1,850.00553 - Jonathan David £150.00 £19.45 Mohammed - Hughes Suffolk Central & Ipswich North £179.88 £966.36 £8,231.50 £8,150.00 554 - 74,200 £1,273.60 SNP John Richard - £149.94 Gregory Suffolk Coastal Michael Nicholson - C - Hill £932.04554 £21.45 £967.75 Katie £8,231.50 - - £200.00 - Suffolk Coastal - - £1,583.62 £8,704.47 £1,149.87 SSP £6,871.74 - £7,434.93 £150.00 - Hocking - - - Mackie - - £8,704.47 £24.00 Lord 78,818 £620.00 £9,751.51 Lab - £1,675.10 £1,202.23 David Elliott £235.49 £2,193.82 Sajid - O'Brien £720.46 Carole Elizabeth - Bridges £8,704.47 £1,257.17 - Ann Margaret £25.00 - £437.00 £7,224.40 - - Lab £10,283.92 Jonathan Peter Con - £7,981.69 Tucker - - - C Con - £7,766.84 £10,705.00 - - - - - £8,455.06 Neil Jones - £8,455.06 £975.00 Price Con £15.00 LD £500.00 LD Janice Joanna - Drew - £5,723.77 Grn - - £1,656.82 76,823 £1,814.50 £7,970.12 David Elvin Kevin £15.00 - £30.00 - John Selwyn £850.00 Wright £15.00 £95.52 - Adrian George - - £12.50 £654.17 SA £1,818.03 £8,704.47 - £4,055.94 £25.20 - £100.00 - Lab £600.00 - - Beasley £59.00 £1,087.27 £15.00 £3,465.81 Ind - £8,025.91 Lab - - £18.00 £1,525.16 - £541.12 Nigel Robert - - £9,751.51 £5,158.72 - - Cranston Blake Gummer - £73.00 UKI £9,751.51 LD - £20.00 - - Carmichael - £1,232.23 £694.00 £97.00 - £886.00 £8,849.56 £90.00 LD - - £8,455.06 - £8,455.06 £13.50 £4,436.94 - - £9,995.42 - Con Grn - - - Con £229.34 £171.44 Gardner - - - - £5,856.97 - £5,734.01 - - UKI £415.00 - - - - £10,705.00 - - - £450.50 - £7,886.38 £1,983.16 £95.86 £550.00 £1,257.17 - £521.04 - £8,455.06 - £437.50 - £577.10 £9,995.42 Lab £9,995.42 - - £13.47 - - - - £3,817.95 - - £7,509.02 - £995.00 - - £21.00 - - £7,377.05 - - £4,318.31 £2,395.13 - £975.00 - - - £4,069.41 £400.00 £10,705.00 £9,363.37 - £1,814.50 £7,970.12 £300.00 - £15.00 £9,995.42 £3,604.66 £9,995.42 £2,939.40 £9,363.37 £9,995.42 £903.65 £200.00 £385.00 - - - £1,200.00 - £671.84 - - £1,150.38 - £6,692.87 - - - - - £520.00 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 151 Brunette Maxwell Area Constituency No. Name554 Suffolk Coastal554 Suffolk Coastal555 Suffolk South555 Suffolk South Constitu- 555 Electorate Suffolk South555 Candidate Suffolk South556 Suffolk West556 ency type Suffolk West556 Suffolk West556 C Suffolk West557 Candidate Sunderland North557 Sunderland North Forename557 68,456 Sunderland North Stephen Kenneth Timothy Yeo Anthony Erwin557 Party Sunderland North C Michael Rollin557 Sunderland North558 Sunderland South558 B Personal 70,129 Marc Christopher Sunderland South Schur Richard John Granville558 Surname Jane Tessa Sunderland South558 Burn Con Spring Derek Clifford 60,846 Sunderland South558 William Young Sunderland South558 Sunderland South Michael John B559 £518.00 LD Surrey East Robin Barry559 Munt Con Surrey East Allen William559 Michael Ross UKI 64,577 Surrey East £950.00 Lab559 John Anthony Christopher John Surrey East560 Neil Andrew Jefferys £252.00 expenses Surrey Heath £475.00 Etherington560 David Edward Surrey Heath Martlew560 Mullin £419.00 Harris LD Surrey Heath UKI James William Murdoch £86.74560 Agents £6,281.18 - Lennox Lab Expenses subject to legal maximum Surrey Heath Boyd - Mark561 C Lab Burrows Surrey South West Herron Joseph Guynan £64.00 £18.83 LD Clerks Joseph Duncan561 £672.99 £23.50 Surrey South West 74,338 Lab Rosalyn Con561 - £680.00 Michael Peter LD C Surrey South West £3,095.17 -561 UKI Con - Surrey South West Printing562 BNP Ind - Moore £502.20 Sussex Mid C - £20.00562 £596.47 75,858 Meetings Sussex Mid Nicholas John -562 Greenfield Jeremy - Dobbie - Ainsworth Committee Sussex Mid - £75.00562 Jo £8,952.38 70,570 - - Sussex Mid £5.00 Virginia Hilda 562 Warner - Anthony Bernard £9,727.27 - Sussex Mid £3,130.00 UKI -563 - LD Mark Philip - Sutton & Cheam - Hawkins £8,259.94 Con -563 - Misc - BNP £3,822.58 £115.25 James Andrew Sutton & Cheam -563 Stone - Nigel James - Sutton & Cheam564 C Bottomley MRLP Legal - Pursehouse - £57.00 £250.00 £5,289.34 Sutton Coldfield Simon Robert564 £100.00 £2,290.53 - - Con Sutton Coldfield Martin James - -564 - £122.25 - - Norman Total 70,623 Sutton Coldfield - Lelliott Richard Timothy £1,000.00 - £333.54564 LD Tanner £3,225.74 Arthur Nicholas Winston - Con B Sutton Coldfield £2,932.71 £10,246.02 - UKI -564 Soames £220.00 - Hunt £300.00 £5,187.82 Sutton Coldfield £4,240.87 £430.00 - Cordon565 - - Max - £3,828.79 Swansea East - £1,196.36 63,648565 Whelton £21.00 Clark Lab - £122.00 Kenneth B £50.00 Paul Swansea East £527.51 £9,727.27 - £690.09565 £808.00 Irene Lesley LD - £6,554.46 - Lab - Swansea East £20.00 £273.43 £90.40 Con -565 Nigel James Paul £9,676.30 Swansea East £402.00 - £2,548.54 £599.90 -565 LD Alexandra Petrina - 71,856 UKI £6,239.10 £9,831.00 £600.00 Swansea East £2,350.48 - Andrew John Bower £444.35 Lab £180.00565 - Brian Peter Olga Helen £9,727.27 £3,969.98 - Swansea East £182.00 Burstow UKI566 £300.00 Mitchell - - £41.31 £10,246.02 - - Lisa Faith £542.00 Swansea West Wilkins Mitchell - -566 Holdsworth £282.80 - B £237.40 - Swansea West - -566 £50.00 - - - £900.00 £100.00 £767.18 £588.38 Robert Leonard £85.00 Swansea West - £50.56 £8,107.14 - £640.00 £2.50 -566 - Martin Marshall Swansea West £2,573.33 57,520 UKI LD £865.00566 - £3,350.11 Lab Berry £4,937.91 £305.00 Maitland Donald - Mike Swansea West £7,686.39 £6,731.35 - £393.00 £9,727.27 Con £6,005.00 £8,281.91 £385.00 LD Ian Raymond - - - Homan Pocock £9,831.00 - - £363.87 - - B - - Turner - - £9,074.78 £7,047.46 - - £23.00 £78.83 - £17.60 - £10,091.95 Con John Graham £2,318.54 £8,453.54 £173.35 - - - - MRLP £33.00 £150.00 £6,456.74 Robert - - 57,493 £2,680.63 - £4,240.87 Robinson Lab Raymond Paul Alan John Lab - - - - £831.00 Anderson £8,281.91 £692.59 - James Anthony - £8,251.64 £21.75 £30.00 £5,038.00 £2,721.89 £150.00 LD Nattrass £9,831.00 - - - £9,831.00 Charles Timothy - £435.00 Ball - £8,453.54 - - £500.00 £1,526.92 - £903.90 Ind £295.00 £8,281.91 - - - £11.21 £50.00 Margaret Mary - Morris £9,549.14 Lab £1,876.98 £29.50 - - £2,350.48 £10,186.20 Young £400.00 - Arthur Michael - £10.00 - £444.35 - Jenkins £1,180.41 UKI £9,834.96 Williams £15.00 Speht - £8,281.91 - Ian Richard £54.28 £8,281.91 £9,858.34 - Richard David - £620.59 £6,936.36 £1,703.83 - £256.00 PC £90.00 Harper - £8,453.54 - - - - £875.00 Con - - Day - - Grn - £25.00 £8,095.62 Lab UKI £8,453.54 £25.00 - £439.28 - £156.00 - £485.00 LD - £500.00 - £227.50 - £5,605.37 £7,681.74 £22.00 £8,453.54 Titherington Lewis £1,086.48 £1,890.82 - £215.00 - £20.00 £5,046.24 - £9,860.14 Con £2,343.54 £10,091.95 £5,450.00 £9,131.64 £32.42 £6,152.06 £10,091.95 £363.87 £10,186.20 - £2,958.69 £53.56 £133.00 PC £621.37 - £9,858.34 £10,091.95 - - - LD £8,453.54 ------UKI - £157.49 - £1,952.54 £296.65 £8,697.73 - - - £9,858.34 £1,952.00 - £1,538.12 £8,808.57 £1,886.80 - - - £8,406.11 - - £250.00 £1.50 - - £8,410.81 - - £903.90 - - - - - £10,186.20 - - £174.48 £234.80 £6,700.00 - - - £1,180.41 - £1,705.33 - £10,186.20 - £9,858.34 - £15.00 - £100.00 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 152 Area Constituency No. Name566 Swansea West566 Swansea West567 Swindon North567 Swindon North Constitu- 567 Electorate Swindon North567 Candidate Swindon North568 Swindon South568 ency type Swindon South568 Swindon South568 C Swindon South568 Candidate Swindon South569 69,355 Tamworth Forename569 Michael David Tamworth C569 Martyn John Party Tamworth569 Alec Tamworth570 71,080 Tatton Nicholas David570 Julia Kate Wills Personal Tatton David John570 Surname Tatton Shrewsbury Brian Edward570 Tatton570 Tatton C Martin Simon Christopher570 Grn Tatton Geoffrey Charles570 Lab Thraves Drown Tatton Victoria Davies Pamela 570 Nation 69,596 Lloyd Coombs Tatton Brian David Christopher Roland Sharp571 Taunton571 Brewer Con Taunton C571 Gillard expenses WSA Taunton571 Lab - Con LD Taunton Luise Victoria Margaretta572 - UKI Gunter 64,954 £600.00 North UKI Tayside Jennifer Jenkins572 Agents George Gideon Oliver LD Expenses subject to legal maximum North Balderson Tayside Paul 572 £600.00 Osborne North RRL Tayside 572 £300.00 £639.41 North Tayside Clerks - - £144.74572 Con North Tayside - - Lab Steven Graham £200.00572 - C Sootheran North Tayside Michael573 Con Teignbridge Pinkett Mark Brian Birch Printing573 - C £586.47 Teignbridge 81,651 - Nicholas Peter 573 - Meetings - Adrian John Conquest - UKI £55.00 Teignbridge - Viviane Chantale573 - £342.60 - Committee Teignbridge - - 61,645 William John £109.66574 Sheppard Peter Telford Jonathan Boyd574 LD £770.00 - Telford £7,139.42 £950.00 Lab Sharratt574 £7,692.38 Ash Allinson Jacqueline Margaret - Telford - -574 Misc Flook - Andrew James - £240.25 UKI No election expenses return submitted Telford £7,156.44 C574 - £97.00 Ballard - Michael Henry - Murdo MacKenzie Batchelor - Hunt Telford £1,293.04575 £1,508.73 Thomas Legal £165.00 - £1,193.94 Tewkesbury Ind £767.10575 Tatton - Julia Margaret £6,166.20 £7,501.57 85,533 £1,584.56 Tewkesbury £8,751.76 Fraser575 Govier £1,660.73 Richard - Roseanne LD - Wishart Total Tewkesbury - Ind Con575 £15.00 - Canton Tina LD £15.00 £50.00 Tewkesbury - £20.00576 - - - Ind Thanet North B - £9,205.40 -576 £120.00 £6,094.11 Max £75.00 Robertson £246.50 Thanet North - - £9,783.01 Charles Martyn Patrick - £380.00576 £555.00 £184.00 Docherty Con Lab Thanet North SNP - Christopher David576 - Nicholls 59,431 £2,761.08 £18.00 £119.00 UKI £462.66 £50.00 - Thanet North £125.00 Adams David Edward Paul C576 - Younger-Ross - LD £600.00 - Thanet North - £8,122.38 -576 - £455.00 £450.00 Thanet North Bain - £9,783.01 £9,188.78 Lab577 £326.62 £7,739.10 - LD £10.00 £100.00 70,930 - £889.00 Thanet South Macdonald £5.90 £795.30 - -577 £1,266.42 £9,889.96 Con Laurence Anthony £9,889.96 - - C Thanet South Andrew Douglas £8,126.07 £10.00 SSP £450.00577 £262.00 £8,420.30 - - Exmouth Thanet South Sallyann £9,000.19 £7,896.94577 - - £9,676.72 - - no label Thanet South Nicola £7,833.53 £9,510.14 Robertson -577 £450.00 £788.00 No election expenses return submitted 71,012 £84.50 £772.68 £9,778.24 £166.15 Thanet South Michael Paul - £38.15 Wright Roger James £9,778.24 Lab Henderson - Keir577 £8,126.07 - - - £715.80 Thanet South - £1,293.04 £1,962.04 Stephen - - £1,508.73 UKI - £7,127.94 £1,193.94 £9,783.01 - - Charles Delacey - Con £87.00 £600.00 £7,227.12 £9,889.96 £9,783.01 C - £2,172.46 £3,293.71 £1,584.56 £9,889.96 Con - £1,016.85 £20.00 James Stewart - Wiggin £60.00 £9,889.96 £1,430.72 - Gale Jeffries £22.50 Lab Seth - - 61,680 £360.00 - Vernall Brookes - £485.00 - - John David Stephen John £10,280.81 £394.86 £160.00 - - - - David John Skey £10,545.36 - - - Martin £1,249.10 - - Laing Dhillon - £200.00 Thomas Frank £485.90 £750.00 LD - - SA - £510.00 £1,898.73 £8,950.16 £5,838.15 £2,796.33 £8,196.32 Con UKI £17.00 - Mark Christopher £830.00 no label - Shortt £1,223.20 Ladyman £9,510.14 - - - £104.57 Guy Stuart Bennett £9,018.84 £308.90 Moore £8,763.32 £60.00 £760.00 - £7,929.62 - William LD Holmes £9,305.00 - - Lab £7,627.59 Proctor £55.00 £10,545.36 - £37.40 Lab £9,778.24 £206.61 £1,448.48 Alan Terry Macgregor - Voizey £900.00 - £85.00 £90.00 - Lab Bernard Frederick £877.25 - - - Ind - £500.00 - £361.12 - £9,778.24 - £686.13 UKI - £320.00 £100.00 £263.61 £840.65 £22.00 Con NF - - - LD - Franklin - - £3,310.71 - - £1,962.04 £3,127.00 - LD - £3,740.41 £10,035.87 £9,510.14 £40.95 £336.13 £9,510.14 £500.00 Baldwin - Eccott £7,061.76 £9,510.14 £10,786.05 £2,020.87 £2,172.46 - - - £9,305.00 - £15.00 - - - £150.00 £1,016.85 - £9,510.14 - £30.84 NF £3,523.41 £9,206.45 £9,510.14 - - £40.00 - - - £10,545.36 £10,786.05 - - £74.00 £7,576.86 £3,833.43 £1,293.20 Ind - - UKI £10,545.36 - £204.58 - £1,929.57 £467.55 - £1,249.10 £275.00 - £106.00 - - £81.20 - - £9,305.00 £25.00 £893.64 - £9,510.14 - £259.00 £9,125.14 - - - £1,080.88 £300.39 £77.11 £410.00 £1,529.68 £5,985.43 £9,880.66 £6,018.79 - No election expenses return submitted - - - £9,305.00 £250.00 £2,524.45 £340.00 - - - £86.33 - - - £10,786.05 - - £47.56 £4,290.80 £3,479.11 £2,847.17 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 153 McDiarmid Macdonald Area Constituency No. Name578 Thurrock578 Thurrock578 Thurrock578 Thurrock Constitu- 579 Electorate & Honiton Tiverton 579 Candidate & Honiton Tiverton 579 & Honiton Tiverton 579 ency type & Honiton Tiverton 579 & Honiton Tiverton 579 B & Honiton Tiverton C580 Candidate & Malling Tonbridge 580 & Malling 76,180 Tonbridge Forename580 Andrew 80,646 & Malling Tonbridge Angela Frances580 & Malling Party Tonbridge 581 Tooting581 C Tooting Michael Allan Personal Browning James Andrew William581 John Barry Surname Tooting 65,979 Isabel Martha Barnard581 Christopher John Paul Mackinlay Tooting Alan582 Torbay Matthew Peter Con582 Penning Torbay Jennifer582 Torbay Lab LD Owen582 Victoria Lathan Torbay Sheppard582 £394.54 Jean Merilyn B Torbay Burgess Stanley583 Mary Florence Lynn Con Torfaen583 £250.00 expenses £975.00 £150.00 Torfaen583 68,447 Langmaid UKI Croucher LD Lab Torfaen Thomas Michael Roach583 £150.00 Grn Torfaen Canet Con583 Agents £63.78 Hayman Expenses subject to legal maximum Torfaen B583 UKI Torfaen £600.00 UKI - - Cox584 Alexander John Totnes Clerks584 76,072 £39.65 Lib Totnes Adrian Mark584 - £8,159.54 Lab - LD Simon Alexander - Totnes £209.15 -584 C Matthew - Totnes Nicoll Printing £217.90585 - - Tottenham585 £7,626.94 Lab £65.00 Meetings James - Tottenham Christian St. John £500.00 61,115 £140.33585 - Committee £5,975.09 Peter Paul Sanders Tottenham John Robert £6,854.90 - £125.00585 - - - Tottenham Graham Harry £250.00585 - - Sweeting Con Winwrite Tottenham Pamela 585 £83.50 Ledbury Tottenham C LD586 - Misc £7,529.37 - Jason Philip LD - & St Austell Truro - - - - £1,606.60586 - McKay Alan & St Austell - Truro Booth £152.00 - - Neale Murphy586 £164.00 Con 72,548 £1,172.84 Legal B Stephen Paul & St Austell Truro £560.50 - Anthony David586 - Grn Brenda Muriel £9,492.77 £431.39 & St Austell £9,505.82 Truro £2,431.19586 £850.00 £10,483.77 £1,500.27 £10,483.77 Stephen £39.60 - & St Austell Total Truro £718.10 - 65,568586 £91.00 £266.44 Evans £165.00 & St Austell David Lindon Truro Lab - -587 Lab £240.00 C UKI - Wells Ind Tunbridge - Rachel Clare Smith Steen £1,234.42587 £25.00 Max £1,650.00 £15.00 - Wells Vipass £625.00 Tunbridge - - Thomas Trerise £8,118.74 £7,402.03587 - - £7,006.27 Wells Tunbridge 79,219 Craig Masters £9,037.14 £695.35 £9,037.14 £100.00 -587 Matthew Owen John Uma Wells Tunbridge £4,076.82 £450.00 Con Lammy588 £200.00 - Meher Bell Ettrick & Lauderdale £920.71 Tweeddale, - -588 C - Oliver Taylor Wildy Peter - PC Con £9,138.72 Ettrick & Lauderdale Tweeddale, - - - UKI588 - - Earle Weyman - Ettrick & Lauderdale B £3,847.68 - £9,573.70 Tweeddale, LD - £140.00 £78.76588 Carleton Peter Timothy Unver Tuygun - Ettrick & Lauderdale 52,430 Tweeddale, - -588 £6,993.90 Lab David Mervyn Michael Kevin Bonner £6,867.26 - Ettrick & Lauderdale £475.00 Tweeddale, £317.00 - James Alan 64,534 - - £12.52 - £2,709.95 £15.00 Mackinlay Archibald John LD WSA - LD588 Conan James Trevenen Lab £30.00 £27.50 £91.85 £10,483.77 - £100.00 Bennett Ettrick & Lauderdale - Fernandes Tweeddale, - Jenkin - £400.00589 £189.00 Khan John Willis - Shefki £1,544.97 Twickenham - - Keith - £16.98 Phillips Moore £75.00 Con Budge - £283.72 £98.00 £415.00 - UKI Andrew £50.00 £436.80 - £200.00 £320.00 £748.10 John Norman Keith Con £8,602.27 - £50.00 Wonnacott Richard Gordon - - £431.39 £1,500.27 SA Ian Patrick £2,534.19 £172.50 £9,037.14 - £8,632.00 £10,483.77 £1,251.40 £117.50 £10,483.77 Norman Phillip - - £3,121.23 £4,452.39 MK - £20.00 Victor Charles £10,483.77 - - LD Ref - £50.00 £239.00 Lee £9,573.70 Lab £510.20 LD Grn - UKI John £1,650.00 £51.00 £2,399.08 - Con Thomson - £7,251.90 £7,381.01 - - £4,282.68 - £10.00 £50.00 £9,573.70 £1,529.25 - - - - Lockhart £919.00 £8,982.31 B Brown Geddes £8,632.00 Brocklehurst - £278.09 Webb - Carvell £170.00 - £7,715.76 £15.00 £505.00 £734.00 - £77.50 £9,037.14 SNP £88.15 £1,043.80 - £8,982.31 £20.00 - £920.71 75,225 - - Con no label - £64.00 John Vincent - SSP £9,573.70 - - - - - £9,718.15 - Lab - £15.00 - - LD £97.00 £1,643.12 £1,490.40 - £47.68 £47.50 Lab Hein UKI - - £42.50 - - £126.00 £8,632.00 £3,179.10 £35.00 - £6,509.01 £6,965.75 - £15.00 £1,025.00 - - - £946.90 £9,613.50 - Cable £2,601.87 - £204.56 £1,333.00 No election expenses return submitted - - - - £29.50 £9,980.98 £50.00 - £44.00 £8,982.31 - £6,953.32 £479.30 £108.68 - - £4,146.23 £2,834.18 - - £3,393.48 £8,632.00 - - - Lib £8,982.31 - £7,817.10 - £500.00 - - £2,554.37 £61.97 £10.00 £1,684.75 £9,267.36 £15.36 - £1,182.48 - £938.69 LD £9,267.36 - - £100.00 £1,490.98 £350.00 - £9,267.36 £191.00 - - £6,191.62 - £6,724.38 - £849.00 - - £934.36 £888.00 - - - £174.00 - £106.00 - £450.00 £728.75 - £8,982.31 - £884.00 £464.72 £10.00 £9,853.15 - £7,868.75 - - - - £10,394.57 £9,267.36 £150.00 - - £9,980.98 £70.00 - - £4,319.58 £25.00 £6,965.01 £800.00 - - £90.00 - £178.00 £8,499.12 £1,104.00 £2,116.10 - - £3,941.95 - £9,267.36 £94.00 £3,329.10 £42.50 - - £2,944.37 £280.00 £7,815.29 - £9,980.98 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 154 .52 Area Constituency No. Name589 Twickenham589 Twickenham589 Twickenham589 Twickenham Constitu- 590 Electorate Bridge Tyne 590 Candidate Bridge Tyne 590 Bridge Tyne 590 ency type Bridge Tyne 590 Bridge Tyne 591 Tynemouth591 Candidate Tynemouth591 Tynemouth Forename B591 Tynemouth592 North Party Tyneside Nicholas Roger Simon592 58,900 North Tyneside Dean Peter592 Longworth David Gordon North Tyneside Judy Sara592 Personal North Tyneside Raymond Thomas592 B Surname North Tyneside 592 Con North Tyneside James Stuart593 Clelland Hollebone West Tyrone Rogers 65,184 B Jonathan Charles593 Alan West Tyrone James593 Maciejowska £150.00 West Tyrone Samuel James594 64,914 UKI Ulster Mid Wallace594 Stephen John Lab Cook Grn £900.00 Ulster Mid594 Lab Karl Ulster Mid594 Anne Penelope expenses Ulster Mid Robson595 Michael George Upminster C LD Mark Beresford595 Byers £192.95 Fitzpatrick Upminster Campbell Simon Luke595 Agents - Con - Expenses subject to legal maximum Upminster - Alan Frank Reid595 - 60,739 Upminster Rollings SA Harbison William Peter Pat596 £7,566.47 Ruffell C Upper Bann SL Clerks £15.90 William Kenneth596 Burnett Lab Upper Bann Poulsen Lab596 - £40.00 Upper Bann Reed596 61,390 - £12.50 UKI Upper Bann - Martin - William John Printing596 LD - Taylor Capstick B Upper Bann Brid597 Con SA Meetings Uxbridge Con -597 Committee - Uxbridge - - £500.00597 - 56,829 Robert William LD Ian - Uxbridge - Doherty Angela Eileen C SL597 £14.00 - - £300.20 Thompson - - Eilis Uxbridge UKI £493.50 £3,956.72598 £77.40 Francis of Clwyd Vale £56.00598 Misc McCrea £1,384.29 72,574 £80.00 McGuinness £3,395.17 - of Clwyd Vale 598 £28.75 David UU £458.80 Ernest Keith - of Clwyd Vale - SF - Watkinson598 Rodgers Legal £8,562.47 Jonathan Peter of Clwyd Vale - SF -598 - - Patrick Terry £8,943.35 - - of Clwyd Vale B599 - - DUP - Total - of Glamorgan - Vale £575.00 David -599 - £100.00 Con - £1,100.00 - of Glamorgan £150.00 Vale Dara Mary Donnelly599 SDLP Haughey - - - Truesdale Darvill C 58,068 £255.68 of Glamorgan Vale £100.00 Dolores599 Alexander John £250.00 Max - £4,890.33 £1,043.00 £1,766.55 - of Glamorgan Vale - Tom Trimble £7,354.82599 Murray £480.00 - £6,591.66 - of Glamorgan Vale £400.00 - 50,842 -600 £706.90 £250.00 £180.00 - £15.00 - LD Christopher Shaun WP of York SDLP - Vale - B £280.00600 - £129.25 £427.00 £700.00 of York Vale Randall Lab £1,332.58 David Newton600 O'Hagan - - - of York Vale - £4,202.07 Simpson Catherine Margaret600 £1,667.47 UU Ruane - £802.85 67,774 UKI - £4,236.72 of York £100.00 £166.45 Vale £8,192.40 - Robert John William Patrick Paul 601 Kelly £8,192.40 - £2.25 - - Brendan - £120.00 £40.00 £170.00 £150.00 Vauxhall £8,943.35 - - -601 £4,914.13 £250.00 Royce Graham - - - £151.84 Vauxhall - Con SF Smith £6,564.35601 Salisbury-Jones £1,452.31 French John Penri DUP - £500.00 Vauxhall £979.55 £211.03601 £1,336.50 Lab £450.00 £47.35 William Darling Mill £359.17 Lab £461.05 - Vauxhall Susan Lilian £1.00 C601 - - £40.00 £7,675.60 Vauxhall £8,943.35 - Dewi Hywel Cannons - £6,542.64 - £28.75 SDLP - - - £8,481.46 £40.00 £1,424.03 Christopher Paul - LD Campbell - - £8,469.04 £2,063.90 £150.00 £8,113.99 £8,943.35 Murphy £9,200.00 WP 73,335 - Niall Lab Timothy £8,192.40 £250.00 - £50.00 £8,469.04 Anne Caroline Ballingall - - £9,195.37 £8,481.46 - - Rees £7,679.76 £43.01 Williams - - McIntosh £80.00 - £4,373.62 - UKI £1,100.00 Inkin £159.13 - Franks B UKI - £8,192.40 Smith - £10.00 £3.00 - - Con - £1,260.17 - £223.01 Christopher John - £7,713.48 Warry - PC Con £1,499.03 - - - - - 74,474 - - Gregory Martin £8,481.46 £52.00 £8,093.78 - LD - Catharine Letitia - £14.68 - - £8,469.04 £250.00 - - Michael Peter PC £8,237.90 Con £8,192.40 £427.00 Jukes £1,324.00 £8,736.84 LD - - - £425.00 - - - - £130.00 £8,481.46 £6,106.98 £764.15 Stone Hoey UKI £997.23 - - - Anthony Francis - - £1,000.00 - - - - £8,469.04 £5,164.13 - - Thomas - Gareth Francis Thornber - £155.00 - £3.00 £50.00 Compton William £9,290.17 Shane Barbor - - - £560.00 £6,575.14 £5,914.32 Lab - - £1,336.50 Theresa Cordelia - - £8,268.29 - Bottrall £2,460.36 £13.05 Collins - - - £450.00 £8,469.04 - £64.20 LD £27.00 Lab - £29.38 UKI £7,423.94 - - £8,469.04 £157.30 - £1,078.49 £880.00 Con - - - - £240.00 £2,067.13 £426.40 - - Bennett £4,386.67 £9,200.00 £224.00 £276.00 - £455.00 - £1,328.37 - £9,195.37 £9,328.80 £5,369.13 £9,290.17 - £7,679.76 £813.09 - LD £1,364.00 - £7,491.34 Grn £8,093.78 - £750.00 £9,290.17 £1,200.00 £27.00 £300.00 £3,548.58 £300.00 £9,328.80 £512.10 £111.63 ------£90.00 £6,453.28 SA - £7,077.37 - - £10.00 - - £20.00 £560.97 £700.00 £9,936.84 £8,173.63 £8,093.78 - £7,390.24 £7,876.27 £10.18 - £6,510.33 £13.00 £10,026.79 - - £400.00 - £6,216.22 £5.00 - £8,635.27 £8,173.63 £10,068.91 £55.00 - £8,237.90 - £10,098 - £150.00 £1,203.78 £1,324.00 £40.00 £600.00 - £9,328.80 £256.00 £108.75 £3,044.55 - - - £30.00 - - - £9,328.80 - £157.50 - - £1,694.14 - £6.00 - £171.14 £80.00 £8,868.29 £8,237.34 £1,19 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 155 Area Constituency No. Name601 Vauxhall602 Wakefield602 Wakefield602 Wakefield Constitu- 602 Electorate Wakefield602 Candidate Wakefield602 Wakefield602 ency type Wakefield603 Wallasey603 Wallasey C603 Candidate Wallasey604 North Walsall Forename604 75,750 North Walsall David Martin604 Party North Walsall 604 North Walsall 604 Martin Nisbet North Walsall 605 Personal South Walsall Thelma605 B Surname Hinchliffe South Walsall Douglas605 B South Walsall Sarah Frances605 Boyd 64,889 South Walsall Janice605 Angela South Walsall Abdul Lab606 65,981 Walthamstow Michael David Julian606 Greenwood Walthamstow606 Karran B Walthamstow Dale Lesley606 Ind Walthamstow Clifford Tomothy Peter 606 expenses Grn Melvin George Walthamstow606 62,626 Reisdorf Cannon Winnick Michael Arnold Walthamstow Bruce Thomas Eagle -606 Con Jenny Doreen Aziz Walthamstow Griffiths607 Agents B David John Expenses subject to legal maximum Wansbeck LD607 Pitt Wansbeck607 LD UKI Heap Michael Arthur Lab George Wansbeck Rennie Clerks607 64,403 - Lab William Leonard - Wansbeck Mayo Neil Francis SA607 Derek Wansbeck SL607 - Edward Peter Church Wansbeck £100.00 Printing608 £20.00 £20.00 Bird Lab Wansdyke - Tomlinson Con608 Con LD Meetings £750.00 Nicholas John No election expenses return submitted Wansdyke - -608 UKI Gerard C Peter Gerrard Committee Wansdyke608 - Simon Peter Wansdyke Smith SA £500.00608 LD - £320.00 £6,968.15 William - Wansdyke - - - 63,132609 Bennett Gerda Kamilla Boys Smith Denis - Wantage Con -609 Misc - Barbara Zofia £200.00 - Lab Wantage Dunphy609 - Wantage -609 Donovan - £6,577.23 Con Legal SA - C Wantage - - £250.00609 - UKI £592.00 - - James Alan Mayer Wantage - -610 - - Rachael Isabel £162.50 Total Warley Duffy Phillips LD -610 70,850 £250.00 - £4,429.92 Michael Raymond Warley Dan £1,938.45 S Alt -610 - - - Nicholas Francis Murphy Warley £19.95 £117.00 -610 £815.00 - £240.00 Max - £4,575.54 Gavin William - Hamilton Warley - C611 UKI - Kirkup Lake Thompson £135.00 - Attwell - North Warrington £7,596.17 -611 - BNP Christopher Dean - £7,247.65 £3,717.00 £7,072.56 PL £1,096.70 North Warrington Best - -611 £10,179.50 - Gail Marie 76,129 Lab North Warrington £344.87 - £60.00611 - - Robert Victor - - LD - Edward Francis - £215.00 £92.00 North Warrington £65.00 -612 £6,901.00 Watt Graham Peter South Warrington - Ind £550.00 UKI612 - Norris - - Con £915.00 £7,807.10 South Warrington - - B - -612 £10,179.50 B £8,979.97 £93.00 £92.50 - South - Warrington Grn Stephen612 Hayden £228.54 - £14.00 - Jackson South Warrington - - £326.34 - £120.00 - Coleshill - Neil Macgregor £898.55 -613 - £500.00 £740.00 58,065 £360.00 - £232.30 Sandell & Leamington Warwick - £316.17 72,445 - John Francis David £4,737.42613 - £1,371.25 Helen Mary Con - & Leamington Warwick - Lab £3,256.99 £8,434.71 Nicholai £8,517.39 £240.00 B - £220.51 - - £771.29 £300.00 £5.00 £42.60 £8,464.12 Grn £2,254.62 - Con £3,000.26 Fawcett LD £592.00 - £5,414.59 - - - C - - - - £8,464.12 - £857.57 £10,179.50 Mark Andrew 74,283 UKI £7,922.56 £4,996.05 Beer £192.93 - - - £8,366.79 James Robin £396.68 Helen Mary £8,125.29 Spellar £1,204.30 Ronald Ernest £8,366.79 - - £8,517.39 Roy Alfred £10,179.50 Jones £8,464.12 £120.00 £2,250.31 Harbhajan Singh 81,405 £1,198.46 - - John Humphrey £187.50 - - James Andrew LD - - £815.00 £19.95 Brooks-Saxl - Tolstoy £430.00 £10,179.50 £40.00 £10,179.50 £161.00 ------Pritchard Caroline Mary Elizabeth £9.95 £600.00 - - - - Usher £4,748.86 Lab Cockings - Dardi Mosley Lab Roger John Southworth £344.50 £22.00 Grn Kirkham - £490.00 £2,261.25 Lab Joan Plaskitt David Campbell - Smith £6.40 - £567.00 £6,146.72 - £9.95 - - UKI £924.95 £915.00 £92.00 Con - £4,031.49 Lab £10.00 LD - - £247.52 £10,179.50 £300.00 - £8,517.39 - - - - £8,451.61 Con Con - - £477.99 UKI - Bannerman SL £523.75 - Barlow £904.95 - £373.30 £571.83 £749.95 - Lab £500.00 £7,956.92 £400.00 £34.50 - - £8,517.39 - £60.00 £7,768.40 LD £8,366.79 £6.60 - £5,676.67 - - £3,478.25 £50.00 Con - £73.00 £82.00 £1,931.29 - - £8,451.61 Kelley - £90.00 £2,294.81 - £150.00 £30.00 - £5,410.73 - £5.00 - £8,451.61 - LD - - £8,451.61 £864.17 - - £600.00 - £600.00 - £1,153.12 - - £286.93 - £763.00 - £8,366.79 - - £385.00 £8,517.39 - £750.00 £8.50 - £257.50 £396.68 - - £78.49 £5,592.49 - - UKI £505.00 £7,389.84 £8,366.79 £65.00 - - - - - £5,108.86 - £9,388.31 - £780.18 - - - £772.00 £9,388.31 - - £3,838.22 £2,339.74 - - £6,554.78 - - - £1,072.00 £8,451.61 £2,697.83 - - - £9,388.31 - £1,348.96 - £8,451.61 £9,294.60 £7,491.78 £3,155.62 £4,117.90 - - £400.00 £490.00 £9,579.89 £10,202.99 - - - - £145.04 £5,127.18 £436.66 - £8,451.61 - £100.00 £9,868.14 £915.00 £9,717.36 - - £675.00 - - £7,703.26 - - £9,388.31 £750.00 £8,249.32 £9,868.14 £1,005.94 £5,899.93 £5,564.27 £506.20 - - - £178.37 £523.75 - £373.30 £9,868.14 - £750.00 - £9,388.31 £9,388.31 £240.00 - - £6,698.69 - - £10,202.99 - - - - - £877.00 £364.34 - - £169.37 - - £620.00 - £1,153.81 £800.00 £438.57 - £10 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 156 Area Constituency No. Name613 & Leamington Warwick 613 & Leamington Warwick 613 & Leamington Warwick 614 North Warwickshire Constitu- 614 Electorate North Warwickshire 614 Candidate North Warwickshire 614 North Warwickshire 615 ency type Watford615 C Watford615 Watford615 Linda Craig Candidate Watford615 73,825 Alison Claire Watford Michael Forename615 Greville James Guy Watford616 Party Waveney616 Warwick Waveney616 Forbes Geoffrey Peter Waveney Kime616 Personal B William Hugh Waveney616 Surname John Patrick Waveney O'Brien616 UKI Waveney 75,872617 LD Parsons Claire Wealden617 Wealden SA Powell617 Wealden C617 Lab Flynn Wealden617 Michael Noel Con £70.01 Wealden617 - Duncan 77,613 Wealden618 Bob expenses LD Denise Sara £100.00 Vale Weaver 618 Edmund Ward £395.00 Vale Weaver - UKI618 Jonathan Howard Vale Weaver McManus618 Agents C - Expenses subject to legal maximum Vale Weaver - Lee618 £25.00 Vale Weaver David Andrew619 Kingsley - Berry Hames 83,066 Wellingborough Clerks Brian619 Con Charles - Lab - Wellingborough Graham James619 £15.00 Stewart-Mole Blizzard Wellingborough - - C Rupert619 £135.00 - Wellingborough Grn Printing620 Young UKI - Wells LD £20.00620 Stephen John SA Meetings 68,236 Elliot Wells £986.66 £5,916.02 £1,810.00 Michael Thomas620 Katherine Elizabeth - Lab Scott Committee - Wells - C £5,238.02620 Alan Keith Hendry - Wells £10.00620 Aylett Julian Philip Fordham £1,455.66 LD Wells621 Cyril Oscar Murphy 79,549 Hall Mallin £979.25 - Hatfield Welwyn - Carl Robert - £363.33 David - Paul 621 Misc - £70.00 Grn Hatfield Welwyn Nigel - Trevor 621 - - Con - Hatfield Con Welwyn Michael John Lab -621 - £15.25 Legal Riddle £70.26 £40.38 Hatfield Welwyn UKI James Robert Salmon621 £395.71 LD £470.00 Hatfield Welwyn William - Peter 622 Thornton SA C - £20.00 - - Total Lab £131.23 Wentworth Kevin Peter Cross £250.00 £675.00 £52.70622 - Stinchcombe - £6,464.73 £176.00 Griffiths - C Wentworth Anthony Robin £7,542.40 - £10,060.15 622 £117.36 Cooksley £8,780.26 Wentworth £1,029.00 74,189 Grn Bradshaw UKI622 - £18.00 £900.00 Max Lab £18.00 £1,133.14 - £250.17 David Philip Wentworth - Pens £103.63 £10,528.25 623 - 67,004 Bone £5,809.73 Bromwich East West £320.00 £75.00 Melanie Jane - £10,060.15 623 - - £251.00 Con - Ellwood LD Bromwich East West Ind Gaskell £1,828.00623 - £1,775.83 - UKI - - £50.00 £10,528.25 Bromwich East £21.40 West £10,528.25 -623 £6,907.30 Graham John £60.00 - £6,423.58 Bromwich East West - £629.14623 - Andrew Philip Heathcoat-Amory £5,268.41 C £750.00 - £105.00 Grant V Bromwich East West £100.00 - £1,184.00 Con - -624 Con B - Johnson Andrew Stephen UKI - £46.24 - Daniel Edward Bromwich West £50.00 West £18.00 LD £4,038.20624 £1,983.93 Colin - Malcolm John Bromwich West West - £600.00 64,033624 - - Oakes - John Fiona Karen 61,180 Bromwich West West £350.00 - £24.00 - -624 £385.00 £103.20 £994.25 Thomas Anthony Merryfield Reed £686.65 - - Bromwich West West - £402.00 - Lab £10,060.15 624 - - £3,347.71 £20.00 - Cooke Bromwich West West £45.00 £1,311.32 - B - £382.50 - - - £65.00 - £150.00 £8,915.26 Biggs £4,293.24 Shapps £50.00 Watson £1,536.34 - £1,197.55 Mike David £1.00 £5,912.16 £8,414.40 £8,973.20 Lab LD £30.00 - - Ross David John Pinto David Basil 66,765 - £500.00 £8,973.20 - - £8,325.08 £10.00 £617.00 - Ian Anthony George £16.45 Adrian Edward - UKI Bex - £10,633.09 John £70.00 £675.00 £6,156.77 - LD Steven George - £18.00 £9,498.85 - - £10,060.15 £6.50 - Healey £10,282.54 £100.00 - £7,766.03 £509.39 - Con £500.00 Satbir Singh £496.76 £273.64 Garrett McFarlane UKI £4,744.20 £445.38 Lab £10.00 - £10,282.54 £2,120.00 - Roberts £6,881.15 £330.50 - £4,686.49 £1,252.00 Karen Elizabeth Bailey £20.00 - £5,039.03 - PL £5,275.91 £8,313.37 Wildgoose £561.00 £2,267.57 Grey Sadie Laureina £8,973.20 £868.81 - - - £72.91 - £729.14 Con £35.00 £216.00 £8,973.20 £10,282.54 - WR £136.82 £300.00 John Stephen £256.00 - Lab £8,973.20 - LD Johal Richard - Kevin £750.00 £985.00 £601.80 - £158.67 £379.80 Bissell - Con - LD Wilkinson - £4,354.69 - - £750.00 - £739.35 £1,478.14 - - £997.00 Lab £10,633.09 Smith - - £10,282.54 £8,973.20 £120.00 - £753.20 £7,323.16 - UKI £866.31 £3,999.51 Salvage £1,765.01 - £70.00 - - £10,633.09 £25.00 £10,282.54 - £9,713.63 - £85.00 Walker £9,431.38 UKI £705.72 - - - £23.00 SL £10,106.83 - £150.00 Con £259.89 - £75.00 £686.65 - £8,230.15 - - £10,282.54 - £10,415.04 - £6,230.98 £28.00 £806.76 LD - £3,103.24 BNP £7,324.40 - £200.00 - £7,288.45 £58.25 £6,831.77 £100.00 - - £343.49 - - £1,196.40 - UKI - - £133.50 - £9,713.63 £9,705.13 - - £20.00 £537.39 £2,915.37 £20.00 £10,415.04 - £134.10 £160.00 - £10,633.09 £77.00 £10.00 £4,488.06 - - £738.00 - - £5,382.52 - - £40.00 - £1,281.50 £32.00 £9,713.63 £5,911.66 £10.00 £2,120.00 £891.81 - - - - £4,686.49 - £10,633.09 £1,760.00 - - £729.69 £10,633.09 £5.00 £9,713.63 - - £10,415.04 £5,208.78 £142.00 £1,025.00 £7,772.48 - - £2,387.60 £1,588.72 - - - £9,713.63 - £1,735.00 - £9,637.25 £35.00 £12 Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 157 Joseph Area Constituency No. Name624 Bromwich West West 625 Ham West 625 Ham West 625 Ham West Constitu- 625 Electorate Ham West 625 Candidate Ham West 626 Westbury626 ency type Westbury626 Westbury626 B Westbury626 Candidate Westbury Baghwant627 Isles Western Forename627 59,828 Isles Western Anthony Louis627 Party Isles Western 627 Isles Western C627 Isles Western 628 Singh Personal Syed Salah & Lonsdale Westmorland Banks628 76,056 Surname Paul & Lonsdale Westmorland 628 Andrew William Jacqueline Mary C & Lonsdale Westmorland 628 Gerard Joseph C & Lonsdale Westmorland 628 & Lonsdale Westmorland SL629 21,706 Lab Kamall Weston-Super-Mare Calum Alasdair Murrison Chandler-Oatts David Charles629 70,637 Weston-Super-Mare William Timothy George Sarah Patricia629 Batten Grn Collins Weston-Super-Mare Colville Charles Vernon 629 Weston-Super-Mare Fox Bob Booth-Jones629 expenses MacDonald Con Alasdair Weston-Super-Mare Con Vigar629 C James Timothy Douglas Samuel Weston-Super-Mare - Cardy630 - UKI John John Anthony Wigan UKI Con630 Agents Lab Joanne Lindsay Robert Expenses subject to legal maximum £108.40 Wigan 74,322 £200.00630 - Brian Joseph John Timothy Wigan Taylor630 Farron LD Wigan Clerks LD £682.50 £200.00631 £400.00 £300.00 Lab Nicholson Wiltshire North Bateson - - Telfer631 Gledhill Wiltshire North £780.00 -631 John David £600.00 - Wiltshire North Bell - Cotter Printing631 Derek Con £132.14 LD Wiltshire Horne North SNP632 Gibson William James £7,103.56 £60.00 Meetings Lab Wimbledon -632 - - Charles John - - Grn Committee Wimbledon SSP C632 £41.50 Richard Sydney Wimbledon - -632 C £1,519.04 £100.00 - Penrose - LD £3,471.13 Wimbledon632 Ind LD £13.70 Lukins UKI £425.00 64,040 - Wimbledon -632 Neil - Misc £8,160.44 - £7.25 Peverelle 78,624 - Wimbledon Sibley633 - Kraft £217.37 James Whiteside £167.00 Winchester -633 Con - - £87.00 Legal - £60.00 Winchester - - £6,191.36633 - B £76.00 - Winchester UKI £506.38 Mark Lewis633 - £6,225.00 Ind Gray - Total Winchester - £39.00 £140.00 Rushforth Trevor 633 - Hugh Ruthven - £824.16 £226.00 - Ind - - Winchester £750.00 63,930 David634 Joanne Lab £56.00 Roger Mark £9,239.44 Windsor - £1,319.40634 Neil Francis £901.94 £721.63 - - £10,205.51 - Max £27.92 - £1,350.15 Turner £600.00 Windsor -634 - Beswick - Windsor Page634 £14.00 Pym - C Con - £39.00 - £100.00 Windsor £9,788.38 - - £4,332.76 £8,813.57 - - £183.51 No election expenses return submitted635 - Stephen William Wirral South £2,614.59 £9,862.49 £8,235.10 -635 Martin Dirk Casale - £2,490.13 - - Wirral - South 81,801 - - Dowdney LD £91.75 £6,434.24 £8,344.26635 Lab Rajeev Kumar £1,958.04 Garton Mark - £573.50 £7,856.16 Wirral South - Lowe £433.90636 Roger Edmund £140.00 £8,235.10 £10,205.51 - Hammond Wirral West Con £656.00636 £8,511.50 £30.00 £17.00 Mariana LD - - - £12.00 £431.12 Wirral - West £150.00 - - - C £5.00 UKI £282.90 Lab £290.98636 £425.00 - £250.00 Andrew Robert Thacker Pierce - - Con £6,847.36 Wirral West Lab £409.35 Glencross637 £8,554.79 £750.00 Stephen Michael £15.00 SA Witney - £6,845.76 73,854 - C £217.37 - - Joan Michael St. John £599.61 £1,624.38 - - - £8,235.10 - £10,205.51 Henrietta Elizabeth - - - £9,326.67 - Oaten - - £852.08 £288.87 Hayes CPA £62.67 Grn - Bell Wyeth 60,653 £9,862.49 - £10,205.51 £15.00 LD James Keith - - £9,910.87 C - - Trend £780.00 £9,000.87 Rous £10,090.96 Nicholas Peter - £14.50 £872.00 £750.00 - - - £2,692.26 £542.00 - Mark - £3,859.48 £8,235.10 £450.87 - 62,294 £93.40 £9,862.49 - - LD John Willoughby Feltrim Stephen Con - £300.00 - £10.00 Anthony Paul Fagan Lab - £2,630.13 Martin - £9,068.50 UKI Chapman - £192.50 - Phillip Norman - - £11.93 £14.50 £6,464.24 - Pinfield £6,845.76 Con £10,090.96 - £150.00 WR C - £8,235.10 £6,845.76 - - - £373.90 £438.90 Christopher James £192.89 - £10,205.51 £9,862.49 - - £6,674.59 Lab £443.05 - Millard 74,612 £3,412.61 £82.00 £1,060.00 UKI - - Gilchrist David William Donald UKI £10.00 Simon Andrew - £184.00 - LD - £6,845.76 Muller Hesford - Lynch - - - - £9,629.66 £1,899.57 - £600.00 Cameron £10,354.65 £1,960.00 £7,353.09 - - £282.90 £303.18 £120.40 - £6,368.80 £15.00 - £6,845.76 £500.00 £750.00 - Con LD £7,642.77 £571.12 £750.00 Holbrook - - £600.00 Lab - - - Lab Con £9,862.49 Con £4,172.66 - £300.00 - - - £200.00 £10,090.96 - - £798.59 £900.40 £59.11 - £10,090.96 - - £773.76 £1,782.00 £2,049.80 - £461.25 - £466.66 LD No election expenses return submitted £572.50 £250.00 - £5.00 £401.53 £20.00 - - - - £872.00 £345.00 - - - £10,090.96 £9,150.74 - £5,662.41 - - £7,885.84 £450.87 - £406.84 £373.82 £550.00 - - £1,545.60 £10,090.96 £1,158.32 £9,451.00 £5,619.23 £8,441.62 - - £20.00 £663.80 - £199.39 £2,674.77 - - £10,341.22 £300.80 - - £934.50 £25.00 £7,976.91 - £10,627.88 £8,259.40 £8.77 - - £15.00 £10,354.65 - - £29.00 - £8,441.62 £2,563.37 £2,085.45 £6,503.89 £653.00 - - £5,038.89 £425.00 £1,985.00 £9,451.00 - £10,354.65 £7,949.12 - £208.30 £234.48 - - - £5.93 £184.00 - £6,905.67 - £702.21 £6. Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 158 65 Gilfillan Area Constituency No. Name637 Witney637 Witney637 Witney637 Witney Constitu- 637 Electorate Witney638 Candidate Woking638 Woking638 ency type Woking638 Woking639 Wokingham639 Candidate Wokingham639 Wokingham Forename639 Wokingham639 Party Wokingham640 C North East Wolverhampton 640 North East Wolverhampton Michael James George640 Personal North East Wolverhampton Bartlet Gareth Daniel B C640 71,254 Surname North East Humfrey Jonathan Wolverhampton Mark Christopher Barry641 59,616 68,430 South East Wolverhampton Kenneth641 Kenneth John Alan Malins South East Wolverhampton Stevenson Epps641 Lab Alan Richard South East Wolverhampton B641 Sabir South East Wolverhampton 642 Michael James South West Wolverhampton Grn Lewis Maria Frances Royce Ekins642 53,243 £286.85 South West Wolverhampton Con Steven Melvyn Matthew Philip642 Dennis expenses Redwood B South West Wolverhampton Dukes LD Miller Beadle Thomas Patterson Joseph Franklin Hilliar642 Purchase South West Wolverhampton Thomas Peter 642 Harvey £65.00 South West Wolverhampton £350.00643 Agents 65,909 McCartney Expenses subject to legal maximum Longton Woodspring Adrian Norman Spencer Robert Howard Bourne Syed643 Con - Carstairs Pepper Hussain Lab Woodspring Peter £79.26 £900.00643 Ind UKI Woodspring Con Clerks LD James Michael643 Owen UKI UKI Turner Woodspring643 £283.30 LD Marris £45.48 David Ian Reginald Woodspring -643 LD UKI Lab Michael David Woodspring Con - £600.00 Lab Printing644 £118.44 - £900.00 Barry Anne Wendy Worcester £300.00644 Chambers £40.00 - Meetings James Douglas Sinclair Worcester MRLP C Lab644 - £6,218.09 £500.00 Hope Committee Worcester Wild644 - £5,887.91 Lab - £59.80 Worcester Dixon £79.42645 Con £52.00 71,018 - - Mid Worcestershire -645 Liam - - Walker - £3,885.40 NF - Mid Worcestershire 645 - Misc - Mid Worcestershire -645 - - UKI No election expenses return submitted £15.86 £200.00 £7,426.67 Mid Worcestershire - - - -646 LD Legal LD B West Worcestershire - - Chanel646 - £315.00 Grn C - - West Worcestershire £250.00 Colin William -646 - £190.00 - - Total - West Worcestershire David William646 £445.49 71,255 - - £3,527.00 - £300.00 £253.76 West Worcestershire - - Michael John Richard Hugh £5,800.85646 No election expenses return submitted 72,055 £34.20 £100.00 Fox - - £30.50 - West James Worcestershire Peter £1,447.50 Fraser £5,178.54647 - C £10.00 Max £200.00 £50.00 - Workington £6,715.58 £248.75647 £1,076.00 £45.00 £4,737.68 - £6,756.67 - Eldridge £10,108.94 £2,150.21 - Workington £27.00 £2,591.33 £2,577.03 -647 Shopland Stevens £9,900.75 Richard Douglas £200.00 £3.87 66,769 Workington £944.23647 Lawson Foster - William Michael Hardy David Charles £7,241.84 Jonathan £10.00 Paul £4,479.63 Workington - £98.70 £1,898.94648 - - £2,185.25 - Luff £10,108.94 £715.74 Robert Woodthorpe Richard John Spicer Con Worsley - £892.99648 - - - LD - Anthony Edward Ind £9,470.90 - Worsley Adams - - £983.29648 £335.00 Lab £10.00 £10,108.94 Crean Worsley £9,725.66 Browne648 James Michael Peter Grn £5,810.05 Bannister Chandler £4,669.99 Lab £56.30 Worsley - - £44.26 £1,684.73649 - Uzzaman £90.00 Waqar C - - - - - East & Shoreham Worthing - £392.53 £8,225.33 Eaves Hadley Chamings649 Ian Con £36.00 - - East & Shoreham Worthing Con £200.00649 Con Malcolm Gordon £479.26 - - - £700.98 £82.84 £7,198.27 East & Shoreham Worthing 65,965 LD C £170.00 £5,855.85 Lab LD UKI Azmi £672.16 Thomas Anthony £3,078.26 - - £720.67 £8,225.33 - £557.87 UKI £9,900.75 £520.00 £133.00 £9,900.75 £385.00 - £10,108.94 £500.00 £5,277.06 - - £358.00 - £17.00 £3,231.19 £1,215.14 - LD £51.88 £550.00 Victory - C UKI 72,101 £9,725.66 Paul - Timothy £30.00 £7,932.17 £9,725.66 £108.00 £155.65 Cunningham £672.02 £450.00 £8,249.71 £100.64 Tim £450.00 £59.93 £294.13 - £300.00 - £12.50 £1,921.79 £2,643.21 - £8,514.81 69,300 £1,447.50 £1,230.00 Ian William Lab - - Terence - £411.67 £44.00 Lab - Morris £8,225.33 - £6,374.84 £9,900.75 John - £200.00 - £10,108.94 £200.00 - Grn £9,725.66 £2,285.89 Daniel Jonathan £1,958.87 £4,429.58 £7,761.84 - Loughton Steven Paul £9,725.66 £728.24 £7,932.17 - - - £8,514.81 £120.86 £5,631.41 £6,790.07 - £150.00 £251.60 £8,225.33 - - - Tobias £5.00 - £6,628.49 - - - - Yates - £126.25 Robert Mark Francis UKI - - Con - £605.00 Dorothy Edna £6,859.00 Lewis Stoddart £15.00 £2,756.75 £4.30 £295.00 £109.17 £175.00 - £9.90 £2,669.67 - £4,463.87 Elgood £23.49 - - - - Peacock £1,135.60 - £519.90 - - £85.00 £1,181.77 £600.00 £82.50 LD £788.00 £72.00 £2,069.16 Lab Bleakley - £676.46 Con - Entwistle £20.00 £242.17 - £730.57 Ellwood £3,380.43 £408.49 - Lab £7,932.17 £7,273.20 £8,514.81 £7,764.43 - £280.00 £699.70 £8,514.81 LD LCA - £8,407.84 £8,514.81 - - - £9,622. £391.73 - £9,946.38 £726.01 £750.00 £9,886.12 - - £525.00 LD - - - SL £20.00 £7,005.99 £7,902.77 Con £358.83 £1,727.96 £500.00 - £290.20 £8,036.08 £9,886.12 - £5,638.85 - - £110.00 £10.00 - £100.00 - £131.90 £297.50 £40.00 £934.74 - £8,760.73 - - - £7,932.17 £7,609.56 - Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 159 the prescribed headings. Radcliffe TOTAL 44,403,238 £306,560.25 £289,740.59 £100,644.36 £10,076,829.65 £63,637.05 £356,654.28 £997,794.43 £11,885,785.24 * Area Constituency No. Name649 East & Shoreham Worthing 649 East & Shoreham Worthing 650 West Worthing 650 West Worthing Constitu- 650 Electorate West Worthing 650 Candidate West Worthing 651 The Wrekin651 ency type The Wrekin651 The Wrekin James651 B The Wrekin Christopher John652 Candidate Wrexham652 Wrexham 72,419 Forename652 James Peter Wrexham Baldwin652 Party Wrexham652 C Wrexham653 McCulloch Wycombe653 James Michael Meade Personal Wycombe 65,781 LCA Bottomley653 Alan Terence Walsh Charles Stephen Surname Peter Wycombe653 Phillip Timothy UKI Wycombe Bradley C £500.00653 Con Wycombe653 Jacob William 50,465 Butcher Wycombe £500.00 LD654 Ian Colin Cross Ian Clive Wyre Forest Lab654 Denis £400.00 B Wyre Forest654 Wyre Forest -654 expenses Rees-Mogg Lab Wyre Forest £600.00 Ann Ledgerwood Felicity 655 74,297 Elphick - Wythenshawe & Sale East UKI Alexander Cyril Ronald Albert Paul 655 Wythenshawe & Sale East £110.00 Malcolm William Lucas -655 Agents Con Jenkins - Expenses subject to legal maximum Wythenshawe & Sale East Jane Goodman655 B - Wythenshawe & Sale East C655 £4,513.89 Brookes Con Chauhdry Wythenshawe & Sale East Clerks656 - Davies Evans £400.00 - Deirdre Desiree Yeovil 72,127656 Con £750.00 LD Gerard Paul - Lab 72,152 Christopher Worley Yeovil -656 Richard Thomas - £450.00 Yeovil £655.00 Printing UKI656 £525.00 - John Stephen Yeovil Cooke656 Tomlin Meetings LD £175.00 David Arthur Hayden Yeovil £100.00 PC -656 Brookes Shafique Maria Susan Frances - Taylor £70.00 Committee Yeovil £48.00 David Anthony657 - Marie Vanessa Goggins - Fitton Ynys Mon - - Fildes George Mark £7,453.54657 Lance David - - Ynys Mon Laker Arthur James657 £149.00 Bernard Fredrick UKI £368.78 £65.00 £1,008.87 £4,608.87 LD Ynys Mon £210.00 - Lab UKI657 £5,286.20 Misc - - Ynys Mon - Lock - Lab KHHC657 C Tucker Ynys Mon £5,420.89 - £200.00657 Ind £55.00 Legal Simpson Shaw Con £4.55 Ynys Mon - £9,075.42 Crookes £1,969.49 £65.30658 - £200.00 £2,342.88 Millington £315.91 Grn 74,991 £75.00 York - -658 £1,339.24 £409.23 David Anthony - - Total York -658 LD £20.00 £100.00 - - York C Lab Con658 £40.00 £30.58 £707.50 £8,686.92 Grn - York - UKI £8,897.77 - -658 SL Max £3,737.19 - - York - £9,562.85 £2,048.26658 Marco Felice - Laws - - 53,398 - £60.00 £24.31 York £545.00 Albert £750.00 Joseph Anthony -658 Patrick £2,663.32 £308.00 £139.16 - £1,700.73 York £9,953.01 £10.00 Conway £1,075.67 -659 £9,953.01 Neil David - £96.00 East Yorkshire £8,041.96 - £1,200.00 £27.50 £500.00659 Alexander Lawrie £15.00 £6,743.56 - £15.00 - - - East £1,008.52 Yorkshire £9,562.85 659 Anthony John - £6,671.73 - Forgione East Yorkshire Eilian Stuart - - - - LD659 £253.80 £217.38 - B £960.00 East Yorkshire £1,894.13 Albert Lab -659 - - Begg £30.00 £3,431.40 £1,787.55 East Yorkshire Nicholas £9,075.42 - £4,165.54 £2,436.07 - £1,784.36 - - £8,611.83 Boxall £10,000.67 - £4,608.87 Charles Francis Owen - - 81,354 includes an extra £484.88. One candidate declared only the total amount spent, without giving detailed figures under Con £10,089.41 * Total Prior - - £190.00 Nona £9,075.42 Hugh £184.50 £1,999.49 - C £5,944.11 - Williams £3,034.57 £7,276.37 £6,481.55 £47.56 £9,075.42 - - £6,162.22 - £615.00 - - - £300.00 Grn £8,611.83 Wykes £400.00 - £50.00 £47.56 £110.00 - - 72,052 UKI £1,039.51 £110.00 £183.11 Gregory Lab Michael Fox Bennett £2,987.12 - - £200.00 £9,290.87 £222.25 Lib PC £200.00 Andrew Michael £963.12 - £560.00 £8,611.83 - £1,348.28 - William Tristram - £8,426.24 £6,901.12 - £234.00 £1,720.28 Frank £10,089.41 UKI £200.00 £240.00 Donald Bayley £786.01 £4,872.29 - - - £9,562.85 Tracey-Louise £40.00 - £400.00 £8,611.83 - Richard Fields £375.00 LD - £250.00 £9,956.86 - Waller Mary-Rose £12.50 Graham - - £20.00 Con £1,075.67 Shaw £7,881.03 John - Trevor £1,498.95 £8,015.77 - Knight £9,572.38 £10.00 McIntyre £280.00 £329.00 £9,562.85 William Paul £9,956.86 £50.00 £150.00 Ind Lab - £470.00 £1,987.55 £260.00 Simpson-Laing - Bate - - - £8,061.17 £10,089.41 - - £378.00 £6,001.67 - LD £25.00 Lab £8,800.84 - - - £65.00 - - Hardy £8,611.83 Ormston Con Grn Con Pearson £5,300.54 £2,436.07 £150.00 Cambridge £3,074.57 - Dessoy £10,089.41 - £9,595.87 £740.80 - £23.00 £8,800.84 - - - £150.00 - £9,956.86 UKI - - - - £540.00 £129.68 SA MRLP £6,082.62 - £1,608.38 - - UKI - £1,108.36 LD £9,636.83 £5,921.27 - - £1,608.28 £10,193.57 Ind - - £135.00 - £200.00 £9,956.86 £487.16 £183.11 £737.00 £9,697.15 £200.00 £70.00 - £640.33 £1,138.16 £10,089.41 £10,193.57 - - £21.50 £963.12 - £450.00 - - £10,089.41 - £750.00 - - - £450.00 £387.18 £1,077.59 £800.54 - £737.00 - - £7,670.48 - - - £1,546.84 £375.00 £8,800.84 - - £5,887.72 - £8,800.84 £8,206.32 - - £6,693.98 £10,193.57 £20.00 - £7,106.70 - - - £8,803.10 £7,988.11 - - £8,800.84 - £6.43 £3,886.71 - - £8,803.10 £55.00 £5,522.31 - - £1,528.07 - £990.20 - £130.00 £5,944.82 £444.93 - - £7.35 - £20.00 - - - - - £890.20 - £300.00 £286.00 £1,703.14 - - - - £678.90 £654.11 £1,108.36 - - £377. Election 2001 – Campaign spending November 2002 We are an independent body that was set up by Parliament. We aim to gain public confidence and encourage people to take part in the democratic process within the United Kingdom by modernising the electoral process, promoting public awareness of electoral matters, and regulating political parties.

On 1 April 2002, The Boundary Committee for England (formerly the Local Government Commission for England) became a statutory committee of The Electoral The Electoral Commission Commission. Its duties include reviewing Trevelyan House Great Peter Street local election boundaries. London SW1P 2HW

Tel 020 7271 0500 Fax 020 7271 0505 © The Electoral Commission 2002 [email protected] ISBN: 1-904363-08-3 www.electoralcommission.org.uk