DOCSLIB.ORG

Terrorist Speech and the Future of Free Expression

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Terrorist Speech and the Future of Free Expression TERRORIST SPEECH AND THE FUTURE OF FREE EXPRESSION Laura K. Donohue* Introduction.......................................................................................... 234 I. State as Sovereign in Relation to Terrorist Speech ...................... 239 A. Persuasive Speech ............................................................ 239 1. Sedition and Incitement in the American Context ..... 239 a. Life Before Brandenburg................................. 240 b. Brandenburg and Beyond................................ 248 2. United Kingdom: Offences Against the State and Public Order ....................................................................... 250 a. Treason............................................................. 251 b. Unlawful Assembly ......................................... 254 c. Sedition ............................................................ 262 d. Monuments and Flags...................................... 268 B. Knowledge-Based Speech ................................................ 271 1. Prior Restraint in the American Context .................... 272 a. Invention Secrecy Act...................................... 274 b. Atomic Energy Act .......................................... 279 c. Information Relating to Explosives and Weapons of Mass Destruction............................................ 280 2. Strictures in the United Kingdom............................... 287 a. Informal Restrictions........................................ 287 b. Formal Strictures: The Export Control Act ..... 292 II. State in Privileged Position in Relation to Speech of Terrorist Value .................................................................................. 293 A. Deference and the National Security Claim in the United States....................................................................... 293 1. State as Employer or Contractor: Confidentiality Doctrines ............................................................................ 295 2. State as Information-Holder: Classification and Rights of Access................................................................. 298 B. Extreme Deference in the United Kingdom ..................... 301 1. State as Employer or Contractor: Breach of * Special thanks to Paul Lomio, at the Robert Crown Law Library, Stanford University, for his help in acquiring the materials used in this paper. I also am indebted to Tom Grey, Geoffrey Stone, and Eugene Volokh, for their comments on the American legal analysis, and Conor Gearty and Clive Walker, who provided feedback on the British legal exposition. Observations by Barbara Fried and members of Stanford Law School’s 2004-05 Legal Studies Colloquium helped further to refine the text. 234 CARDOZO LAW REVIEW [Vol. 27:1 Confidence.......................................................................... 302 2. State as Information-Holder: The Official Secrets Act ...................................................................................... 305 C. Freedom of Information.................................................... 311 III. Provisions with A Secondary Effect on Free Speech ................ 316 A. Executive Detention ......................................................... 316 B. Proscription....................................................................... 318 C. Evidentiary Rules Based on Speech and Expression........ 322 IV. Policy Considerations................................................................ 326 A. Persuasive Political Speech .............................................. 326 B. Knowledge-Based Speech ................................................ 329 1. Biological Speech as Different in Kind...................... 329 2. Access to Bombmaking Information.......................... 335 3. State Vulnerabilities ................................................... 336 C. Classification and Freedom of Information...................... 337 Conclusion ........................................................................................... 339 INTRODUCTION On June 16, 2002, Dennis Pluchinsky, a senior intelligence analyst at the U.S. Department of State, wrote an article in the Washington Post calling for censorship. The article began, “I accuse the media in the United States of treason.” Pluchinsky, who worked counterterrorism in the government for twenty-five years, pointed to post-9/11 articles that revealed not scientific advancements, but American vulnerabilities in regard to the food supply, electricity, chemical production, transportation, and border security. He suggested that research conducted by the media could not have been funded by one, single terrorist organization: “Our news media, and certain think tankers and academicians, have done and continue to do the target vulnerability research for them.”1 Pluchinsky has a point. Terrorist organizations can and do use the media—and the protections afforded speech in the United States and the United Kingdom—to obtain and disseminate critical information. Al Qaeda proves instructive: Their training manual, recovered from a safe house in Manchester, England, details how to make bombs, assassinate, conduct espionage and take hostages. It instructs how to avoid detection and withstand interrogation. And it offers advice on how to obtain operational data: 1 Dennis Pluchinsky, They Heard It All Here, and That’s the Trouble, WASH. POST, June 16, 2002, at B03. 2005] TERRORIST SPEECH 235 Using . public source[s] openly and without resorting to illegal means, it is possible to gather at least 80% of information about the enemy. The percentage varies depending on the government’s policy on freedom of the press and publication. It is possible to gather information through newspapers, magazines, books, periodicals, official publications, and enemy broadcasts.2 What, exactly, can be learned from open source material? According to al Qaeda, it provides photographs of government and law enforcement personnel, data on state capabilities, information related to economic vulnerabilities, and announcements of events where the public can gain access to secure buildings. The text advises, “[t]hese may be used in assassination, kidnapping, and overthrowing the government.”3 With the advent of chemical, biological, nuclear, and radiological weapons (CBNRW), the range of information that may create vulnerabilities expands: Municipal data, such as the location of water sources or air intake vents, or the chemicals produced or stored at different facilities, may be essential to a group’s ability to launch an assault. Academic articles relating discoveries even in basic biology may prove devastating. Terrorist organizations may use open sources to organize, or to anticipate state surveillance. They may use coverage of past incidents to observe response times, staging grounds, and prophylactic measures used by first responders. Public commentary allows them to analyze their errors and gauge the success of future operations. The dissemination of critical information, however, is not the only harm caused by speech in the context of terrorism. Free expression allows organizations to persuade others to support the cause. They can draw attention to their aims and manipulate public opinion to reflect particular religious, political, social, military, and economic goals. The al Qaeda manual reads, “Islamic governments . are established as they [always] have been by pen and gun[,] by word and bullet[,] by tongue and teeth.”4 Osama bin Laden quickly followed 9/11 with a pre- recorded statement to persuade the world of the justness of his cause. Other non-state terrorist organizations also seek, ultimately, to convince: In Northern Ireland the Progressive Unionist Party and Ulster Democratic Party inject the aims of the Ulster Volunteer Force and the Ulster Defense Association into the political debate. The Provisional Irish Republican Army runs the Irish Republican Publicity Bureau. And 2 AL QAEDA MANUAL, UK/BM-80-81, http://www.usdoj.gov/ag/trainingmanual.htm (last visited July 21, 2005) [hereinafter AL QAEDA MANUAL]; see also Steve Mckenzie, War on Terrorism: Laden’s Blueprint to Destroy West; Trainees Told to Slaughter US Like Lambs, SUNDAY MAIL, Jan. 6, 2002, at 9. 3 AL QAEDA MANUAL, supra note 2. 4 Id. at UK/BM-3 236 CARDOZO LAW REVIEW [Vol. 27:1 left-wing organizations in the U.S. and U.K. in the 1970s issued lengthy, turgid prose that attempted to explain why they were doing what they were doing—an approach mimicked by the Unabomber in his manifesto, “Industrial Society and Its Future.”5 If successful, this persuasive aspect may legitimate violence as a way of redressing grievances—a course of action contrary to the fundamental structure of liberal democracy. And media coverage may be complicit, as efforts to report in a neutral manner provide terrorists with a platform. The power differential between the state and the non- state actors may encourage the media to go further, presenting those engaged in violence as underdogs in a broader struggle for self determination, freedom of religion, and other claims that resonate within liberal democracy. The legitimization of violence as a means of redressing grievances may lead to a copycat effect as it bolsters the confidence of adherents in the same struggle and other organizations employing a similar method to draw attention to their own claims.6 This persuasive element may help to establish and expand a base of support, generating assistance, money, and recruits from the uncommitted or sympathetic audience. Simultaneously,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta
    Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta Citation: AVI v MHVB, 2020 ABQB 790 Date:20201216 Docket: FL03 55142 Registry: Edmonton Between: AVI Applicant and MHVB Respondent and Jacqueline Robinson, a.k.a. Jacquie Phoenix Third Party and Unauthorized Alleged Representative _______________________________________________________ Memorandum of Decision of the Honourable Mr. Justice Robert A. Graesser _______________________________________________________ I. Introduction [1] This is a follow-up to my decision of August 26, 2020 in AVI v MHVB, 2020 ABQB 489 [AVI #1]. That decision centred on an intermeddler to a child custody dispute. The third party, whose actual name is Jacqueline Robinson, instead self-identified as “Jacquie Phoenix, Sovereign Woman Living on the Land, Legal Beneficiary / Soul Administrator To the Trust of Page: 2 the Legal Fiction Known as Jacqueline Robinson”. I will in this decision refer to Ms. Robinson by her actual name, “Jacqueline Robinson”, rather than the legally meaningless “Strawman” legal persona she has adopted. [2] As discussed in AVI #1, Ms. Robinson is a pseudolaw promoter, or “guru”. Pseudolaw is a collection of spurious legally incorrect ideas that superficially sound like law, and purport to be real law. In Meads v Meads, 2012 ABQB 571 [“Meads”], ACJ Rooke grouped these concepts together under the term “Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Arguments”, or “OPCA”. In layman’s terms, pseudolaw is pure nonsense. [3] Gurus are a particularly obnoxious component of the pseudolaw phenomenon. They operate as “Typhoid Marys” who spread the pseudolaw “disease of ideas” into new populations: Donald J Netolitzky, “The History of the Organized Pseudolaw Commercial Argument Phenomenon in Canada” (2016) 53:3 Alta LR 609 at 611.
    [Show full text]
  • "Third Way" Republicanism in the Formation of the Irish Republic Kenneth Lee Shonk, Jr
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects "Irish Blood, English Heart": Gender, Modernity, and "Third Way" Republicanism in the Formation of the Irish Republic Kenneth Lee Shonk, Jr. Marquette University Recommended Citation Shonk, Jr., Kenneth Lee, ""Irish Blood, English Heart": Gender, Modernity, and "Third Way" Republicanism in the Formation of the Irish Republic" (2010). Dissertations (2009 -). Paper 53. http://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/53 “IRISH BLOOD, ENGLISH HEART”: GENDER, MODERNITY, AND “THIRD-WAY” REPUBLICANISM IN THE FORMATION OF THE IRISH REPUBLIC By Kenneth L. Shonk, Jr., B.A., M.A., M.A.T. A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2010 ABSTRACT “IRISH BLOOD, ENGLISH HEART”: GENDER, MODERNITY, AND “THIRD-WAY” REPUBLICANISM IN THE FORMATION OF THE IRISH REPUBLIC Kenneth L. Shonk, Jr., B.A., M.A., M.A.T. Marquette University, 2010 Led by noted Irish statesman Eamon de Valera, a cadre of former members of the militaristic republican organization Sinn Féin split to form Fianna Fáil with the intent to reconstitute Irish republicanism so as to fit within the democratic frameworks of the Irish Free State. Beginning with its formation in 1926, up through the passage of a republican constitution in 1937 that was recognized by Great Britain the following year, Fianna Fáil had successfully rescued the seemingly moribund republican movement from complete marginalization. Using gendered language to forge a nexus between primordial cultural nationalism and modernity, Fianna Fáil’s nationalist project was tantamount to efforts anti- hegemonic as well as hegemonic.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF (159.1
    ·9· CONCLUSION A Social News Media Network Conclusion Conclusion The first decades of the new millennium have seen further fundamental trans- formations of the practices and processes through which we generate and en- gage with the news, and online and social media have been central to these transformations to an extent that we could now speak of the thoroughly in- tegrated complex that includes conventional news organisations, alternative and citizen media outlets, professional and citizen journalists, industry and freelance newsmakers, dedicated social news curators and ordinary social me- dia users, as a social news media network. Social media have clearly been crucial drivers of these transformations. In the industry, “a ‘new’ dynamic of newsgathering, production and dissemi- nation is taking shape that affects journalistic practices” (Heinrich 2008: 3), while amongst news users “there is a growing demand for more open, accessi- ble and informative news media. People like journalism so much they are pre- pared to help create it themselves—for free” (Beckett 2010: 3). This has led to the central role that social media now play in the context of breaking news events, as we have seen in Chapter 3, and to the habitual, demotic everyday newssharing practices that are enabling social media to become an increas- ingly important source of news for a growing share of Internet users, which we examined in Chapter 4; it has also forced journalists to develop strategies Axel Bruns - 9781433133213 Downloaded from PubFactory at 09/24/2021 03:42:45PM via free access 350 GATEWATCHING AND NEWS CURATION for engaging more directly with their readers and viewers by developing their personal social media presences, as outlined in Chapter 5, to an extent that would have been unthinkable during the first wave of citizen media; and it has led the news industry as a whole to confront social media as a tertiary space beyond its own imprints in which user engagement with the news must be an- ticipated, should be addressed, and can be measured, as shown in Chapter 6.
    [Show full text]
  • New Media, Free Expression, and the Offences Against the State Acts
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2020 New Media, Free Expression, and the Offences Against the State Acts Laura K. Donohue Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/2248 https://ssrn.com/abstract=3825722 Laura K. Donohue, New Media, Free Expression, and the Offences Against the State Acts, in The Offences Against the State Act 1939 at 80: A Model Counter-Terrorism Act? 163 (Mark Coen ed., Oxford: Hart Publishing 2021). This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, European Law Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, International Law Commons, Internet Law Commons, Legislation Commons, and the National Security Law Commons New Media, Free Expression, and the Offences Against the State Acts Laura K. Donohue1 Introduction Social media has become an integral part of modern human interaction: as of October 2019, Facebook reported 2.414 billion active users worldwide.2 YouTube, WhatsApp, and Instagram were not far behind, with 2 billion, 1.6 billion, and 1 billion users respectively.3 In Ireland, 3.2 million people (66% of the population) use social media for an average of nearly two hours per day.4 By 2022, the number of domestic Facebook users is expected to reach 2.92 million.5 Forty-one percent of the population uses Instagram (65% daily); 30% uses Twitter (40% daily), and another 30% uses LinkedIn.6 With social media most prevalent amongst the younger generations, these numbers will only rise.
    [Show full text]
  • | Oxford Literary Festival
    OXFORD literary Saturday 30 March to festival Sunday 7 April 2019 Kazuo Ishiguro Nobel Prize Winner Dr Mary Robinson Robert Harris Darcey Bussell Mary Beard Ranulph Fiennes Lucy Worsley Ben Okri Michael Morpurgo Jo Brand Ma Jian Joanne Harris Venki Ramakrishnan Val McDermid Simon Schama Nobel Prize Winner pocket guide Box Office 0333 666 3366 • www.oxfordliteraryfestival.org Welcome to your pocket guide to the 2019 Ft Weekend oxFord literary Festival Tickets Tickets can be booked up to one hour before the event. Online: www.oxfordliteraryfestival.org In person: Oxford Visitor Information Centre, Broad Street, Oxford, seven days a week.* Telephone box office: 0333 666 3366* Festival box office: The box office in the Blackwell’s marquee will be open during the festival. Immediately before events: Last-minute tickets are available for purchase from the festival box office in the marquee in the hour leading up to each event. You are strongly advised to book in advance as the box office can get busy in the period before events. * An agents’ booking fee of £1.75 will be added to all sales at the visitor information centre and through the telephone box office. This pocket guide was correct at the time of going to press. Venues are sometimes subject to change, and more events will be added to the programme. For all the latest times and venues, check our website at www.oxfordliteraryfestival.org General enquiries: 07444 318986 Email: [email protected] Ticket enquiries: [email protected] colour denotes children’s and young people’s events Blackwell’s bookshop marquee The festival marquee is located next to the Sheldonian Theatre.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Wikileaks Challenging the Paradigm of Journalism? Boundary Work and Beyond
    International Journal of Communication 8 (2014), Feature 2581–2592 1932–8036/2014FEA0002 Is WikiLeaks Challenging the Paradigm of Journalism? Boundary Work and Beyond KARIN WAHL-JORGENSEN Cardiff University, Wales Introduction WikiLeaks exists in a peculiar and illustrative tension with journalism that dramatizes larger unfolding debates about the authority, status, and future of journalism. This article explores what the WikiLeaks saga can tell us, in a broader sense, about pressing anxieties of the journalism profession and, relatedly, the discipline of journalism studies. The article explores how journalists and journalism scholars have discussed the revelations of WikiLeaks as well as the organization itself. I suggest that, whereas some observers have argued that WikiLeaks heralds a radical transformation in understandings of journalism, others are keen to see it as just another source—a phenomenon easily subsumed under existing definitions of journalism and deployed in its service. The article investigates the ways in which WikiLeaks challenges conventional paradigms of news coverage insofar as it provides—and publishes—the investigative materials that journalists themselves usually take pride in uncovering. Through this activity, the organization’s emergence reflects larger developments representing a shake-up in conventional hierarchies of voice and access to the public sphere. At the same time, WikiLeaks has also served as a novel and unique type of news source, and the ambiguous figure of Julian Assange has been variously appropriated in news narratives as a heroic defender of free expression—described as a courageous whistleblower willing to speak truth to power on the one hand, and an autistic renegade, recluse, and alleged rapist on the other (e.g., Rusbridger, 2011, p.
    [Show full text]
  • BBC TV\S Panorama, Conflict Coverage and the Μwestminster
    %%&79¶VPanorama, conflict coverage and WKHµ:HVWPLQVWHU FRQVHQVXV¶ David McQueen This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and due acknowledgement must always be made of the use of any material contained in, or derived from, this thesis. %%&79¶VPanorama, conflict coverage and the µ:HVWPLQVWHUFRQVHQVXV¶ David Adrian McQueen A thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Bournemouth University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2010 µLet nation speak peace unto nation¶ RIILFLDO%%&PRWWRXQWLO) µQuaecunque¶>:KDWVRHYHU@(official BBC motto from 1934) 2 Abstract %%&79¶VPanoramaFRQIOLFWFRYHUDJHDQGWKHµ:HVWPLQVWHUFRQVHQVXV¶ David Adrian McQueen 7KH%%&¶VµIODJVKLS¶FXUUHQWDIIDLUVVHULHVPanorama, occupies a central place in %ULWDLQ¶VWHOHYLVLRQKLVWRU\DQG\HWVXUSULVLQJO\LWLVUHODWLYHO\QHJOHFWHGLQDFDGHPLF studies of the medium. Much that has been written focuses on Panorama¶VFRYHUDJHRI armed conflicts (notably Suez, Northern Ireland and the Falklands) and deals, primarily, with programmes which met with Government disapproval and censure. However, little has been written on Panorama¶VOHVVFRQWURYHUVLDOPRUHURXWLQHZDUUeporting, or on WKHSURJUDPPH¶VPRUHUHFHQWKLVWRU\LWVHYROYLQJMRXUQDOLVWLFSUDFWLFHVDQGSODFHZLWKLQ the current affairs form. This thesis explores these areas and examines the framing of war narratives within Panorama¶VFRYHUDJHRIWKH*XOIFRQIOLFWV of 1991 and 2003. One accusation in studies looking beyond Panorama¶VPRUHFRQWHQWLRXVHSLVRGHVLVWKDW
    [Show full text]
  • The Irish Left Over 50 Years
    & Workers’ Liberty SolFor siociadl ownershaip of the branks aind intdustry y No 485 7 November 2018 50p/£1 The DEMAND EVERY Irish left over 50 LABOUR MP years VOTES AGAINST See pages 6-8 The May government and its Brexit process are bracing themselves to take the coming weeks at a run, trying to hurtle us all over a rickety bridge. Yet it looks like they could be saved by some Labour MPs voting for the To - ries’ Brexit formula. More page 5 NUS set to gut BREXIT democracy Maisie Sanders reports on financial troubles at NUS and how the left should respond. See page 3 “Fake news” within the left Cathy Nugent calls for the left to defend democracy and oppose smears. See page 10 Join Labour! Why Labour is losing Jews See page 4 2 NEWS More online at www.workersliberty.org Push Labour to “remain and reform” May will say that is still the ulti - trade deals is now for the birds. mate objective, but for not for years Britain will not be legally able to in - to come. troduce any new deals until the fu - The second option, which is often ture long-term treaty relationship John Palmer talked to equated with “hard” Brexit, is no with the EU has been negotiated, at deal. That is a theoretical possibil - the end of a tunnel which looks Solidarity ity. But I don’t think in practice cap - longer and longer. ital in Britain or elsewhere in The job of the left, the supporters S: You’ve talked about a Europe has any interest in that, and of the Corbyn leadership of the “Schrödinger’s Brexit”..
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorism Knows No Borders
    TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS October 2019 his is a special initiative for SEFF to be associated with, it is one part of a three part overall Project which includes; the production of a Book and DVD Twhich captures the testimonies and experiences of well over 20 innocent victims and survivors of terrorism from across Great Britain and The Republic of Ireland. The Project title; ‘Terrorism knows NO Borders’ aptly illustrates the broader point that we are seeking to make through our involvement in this work, namely that in the context of Northern Ireland terrorism and criminal violence was not curtailed to Northern Ireland alone but rather that individuals, families and communities experienced its’ impacts across the United Kingdom, Republic of Ireland and beyond these islands. This Memorial Quilt Project does not claim to represent the totality of lives lost across Great Britain and The Republic of Ireland but rather seeks to provide some understanding of the sacrifices paid by communities, families and individuals who have been victimised by ‘Republican’ or ‘Loyalist’ terrorism. SEFF’s ethos means that we are not purely concerned with victims/survivors who live within south Fermanagh or indeed the broader County.
    [Show full text]
  • High Treason
    11th October 2017 High Treason The first Treason Act in England was enacted by Parliament at the time of Edward III in 1351, which codified the common law of Treason and contained most of acts defined as Treason. It is still in force but has been very significantly amended (Wikipedia - Treason Act 1351). The main definitions relate to any person planning or imagined: “to harm the King or his immediate family, his sons and heirs or their companions; levying war against the King, plus actions against the King's officials, counterfeiting the Great Seal. Privy Seal or coinage of the realm.” The definitions also included that any person who "adhered to the King's enemies in his Realm, giving them aid and comfort in his Realm or elsewhere was guilty of High Treason" The penalty for these offences at the time was Hanging, Drawing and Quartering. The Act is still in force today (without the "drawing and quartering part") The Act was last used to prosecute William Joyce in 1945, who was subsequently hanged for collaborating with Germany during WWII More recently the Treason Felony Act (1848) declared that It is treason felony to: "compass, imagine, invent, devise, or intend: • to deprive the Queen of her crown, • to levy war against the Queen, or • to "move or stir" any foreigner to invade the United Kingdom or any other country belonging to the Queen.” Blair and the New Labour government enacted The Crime and Disorder Act (1998) which amended The Treason Felony Act (1848) and formally abolished the death penalty for the last offences carrying it, namely treason and piracy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wild Wild East
    PRISON AS DISNEYLAND | CHRIS HEDGES WAISTBAND REACHING COULD GET YOU KILLED | JOHN ESKOW Tony blair’s dodgY AWARD | FELICITY ARBUTHNOT ColdType WRITING WORTH READING ISSUE 92 Dougie Wallace finds chaos in a London suburb where reality merges into scenes of crazy fantasy The Wild Wild East PLUS: EXCERPTS FROM NEW BOOKS ON THE LABOUR MOVEMENT AND DRONE WARFARE, BY THOMAS GEOGHEGAN AND GRÉGOIRE CHAMAYOU Cover Photo: Dougie Wallace, from his book, “Shoreditch Wild Life” ColdType ISSUE 92 / JANUARY 2015 3. ALCATRAZ: PRISON AS DISNEYLAND CHRIS HEDGES 7. WALKING WILBUR DELL FRANKLIN 10. KICKING THE DRONE HABIT KATHY KELLY 12. OF DRONE STRIKES AND SUICIDE BOMBS TIM HOLMES 14. DEMOCRACy’s moment of truth STAN WINER 17. BREAKING THE SILENCE GEORGE MONBIOT 19. A NATION BUILT ON THE RULE OF LAWLESSNESS RICK SALUTIN 22. WE ARE THE ENEMY JOHN W. WHITEHEAD 24. WAISTBAND-REACHING COULD GET YOU KILLED JOHN ESKOW 25. hurwitt’s eye MARK HURWITT 26. THE GHOSTS OF VIETNAM DANNY SCHECHTER 29. WAR BY MEDIA AND THE TRIUMPH OF PROPAGANDA JOHN PILGER 34. COVER STORY - THE WILD WILD EAST DOUGIE WALLACE 40. CLASHING ON TORTURE RAY MCGOVERN 44. WHY ONE BOSs isn’t wORTH 175 EMPLOYEES MICHAEL MEACHER 47. israel – americA’s biggest frenemy JUSTIN RAIMONDO 49. WORLD OF FANTASY THOMAS GEORGHEGAN 52. WILL GERMANY AND RUSSIA SAVE EUROPE? PEPE ESKOBAR 54. bendib’s wORLD KHALIL BENDIB 55. COUNTER-INSURGENCY FROM THE AIR GREGOIRE CHAMAYOU 62. Tony blair’s dodgY AWARD FELICITY ARBUTHNOT 66. WAS NELSON MANDELA A COMMUNIST TREVOR GRUNDY 72. US EXCEPTIONALISM AND US TORTURE? WILLIAM BLUM Editor: Tony Sutton – [email protected] 2 ColdType | January 2015 JAIL TALES Alcatraz: Prison ColdType as Disneyland Chris Hedges joins a group of sightseers on a trip to America’s most notorious prison, where he finds a distorted account of history took the ferry from Pier 33 on San Fran- in prison deserve it; in foreign lands they The Alcatraz cisco’s Embarcadero to Alcatraz.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parliamentary Bypass Operation
    The parliamentary bypass operation by Labour MP Robert Sheldon - reported to This is the story of a scandal. The government has failed to account to Parliament that they wished to 'reaffirm the Parliament for expenditure of half a billion pounds on a secret 'spy' satellite, importance' they attached to the statement 'as a due to be positioned over the Soviet Union. In doing so, it has flagrantly breached means of keeping Parliament reliably informed about the costs and progress of major Defence a solemn promise to inform Parliament, through its public Accounts Committee, projects' . of all major defence expenditure. This was to be the subject of the first At the time the agreement was made in 1982, Sheldon's predecessor as chair of the PAC, Lord programme in a forthcoming BBC2 series Secret Society, written and presented Barnett, wrote that 'full accountability to by New Statesman writer DUN CAN CAMPBELL. Last Thursday, BBC Parliament in future is imperative'. Yet within a year, the government was breaking that agreement director general Alasdair Milne banned the programme. Here, for the first time, by secretly developing Zircon. Campbell is able to tell the story of official deceit. (Additional research by Lord Barnett, ironically, is now the Deputy Chairman of the BBC. The man who made the Jolyon Jenkins and Patrick Forbes) agreement with Barnett was Sir Frank Cooper - then the Ministry of Defence Permanent PROJECT ZIRCON is the secret codename for Permanent Secretaries' Committee on the Secretary, but now a late convert to campaigning Britain's first ever spy satellite. Zircon, originally Intelligence Services (PSIS), and would have then for Freedom of Information and better planned to be launched in 1988, will be a 'signals been passed to the Prime Minister.
    [Show full text]