DOCSLIB.ORG

The Irish Left Over 50 Years

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Irish Left Over 50 Years & Workers’ Liberty SolFor siociadl ownershaip of the branks aind intdustry y No 485 7 November 2018 50p/£1 The DEMAND EVERY Irish left over 50 LABOUR MP years VOTES AGAINST See pages 6-8 The May government and its Brexit process are bracing themselves to take the coming weeks at a run, trying to hurtle us all over a rickety bridge. Yet it looks like they could be saved by some Labour MPs voting for the To - ries’ Brexit formula. More page 5 NUS set to gut BREXIT democracy Maisie Sanders reports on financial troubles at NUS and how the left should respond. See page 3 “Fake news” within the left Cathy Nugent calls for the left to defend democracy and oppose smears. See page 10 Join Labour! Why Labour is losing Jews See page 4 2 NEWS More online at www.workersliberty.org Push Labour to “remain and reform” May will say that is still the ulti - trade deals is now for the birds. mate objective, but for not for years Britain will not be legally able to in - to come. troduce any new deals until the fu - The second option, which is often ture long-term treaty relationship John Palmer talked to equated with “hard” Brexit, is no with the EU has been negotiated, at deal. That is a theoretical possibil - the end of a tunnel which looks Solidarity ity. But I don’t think in practice cap - longer and longer. ital in Britain or elsewhere in The job of the left, the supporters S: You’ve talked about a Europe has any interest in that, and of the Corbyn leadership of the “Schrödinger’s Brexit”... the Government knows that. While Labour Party, is to argue for rejec - P: The great Austrian physicist it plays at right-wing populist pol - tion of these terms. Labour has set Erwin Schrodinger, who worked itics, I think at the end of the day out six tests which speak to the with Einstein, discovered that there the interests of capital will be a original Tory promises of reproduc - are particles that have the strange major restraining factor. ing exactly the same benefits as we characteristic of being in two places So we get the third option, this currently have. Those May cannot at the same time, or two states at ambiguous relationship. The key reproduce, because she will be ex - the same time. He illustrated it by issue is that we will only have ne - cluded from all decision-making a thought-experiment of a cat in a gotiated the terms of eventually ex - arenas. box subject to such particles which iting the EU. The Government will May’s deal will be clearly inferior is simultaneously alive and dead. not have yet negotiated a deal de - to what exists now. The question is, I use this metaphor to illustrate scribing in detail the future long- can it be defeated? There is a rea - the character of the Brexit deal term relationship. sonable chance that it can, because to Britain, but a desperate shortage. Party policy, from the “workable which Mrs May’s government will That is going to take years — not of the confluence of different polit - There has been a massive reflux of plan for Brexit”, to “remain and — fairly soon now, I expect — come just the already-agreed transition ical forces. Many on the hard right workers deterred by the “hostile reform”. back with. It will have many of the period, which will last from the end won’t like the deal, and the Tory environment” which the Govern - Yes, I agree with you. The Labour full obligations of EU membership of March 2019 to the end of Decem - majority even with the DUP is quite ment has created for European leadership has not explicitly re - — EU law, Single-Market align - ber 2020, but now, almost certainly, small. The DUP itself may abandon workers, and that has created great jected “remain and reform”. Dur - ment, de facto Customs Union way beyond that. May herself talks the government if arrangement for shortages in the health service, in ing the 2016 referendum, Jeremy membership, payments into the EU about December 2021. Others say it the Irish border involve some new social care, and in some other sec - Corbyn explicitly argued for “Re - budget, being subject to ECJ [Euro - could take seven, eight, nine years controls on trade between the north tors. main and Reform”. Now it has pean Court of Justice] jurisdiction — that is typical of the time it takes of Ireland and the rest of Britain I suspect there is here, as in other fallen silent about what – in detail in a whole range of areas — but we to construct a comprehensive new (some already exist). areas, scope for a Labour govern - – it would do in power if elected will no longer be members of the relationship. The biggest risk of May’s deal ment to negotiate changes which a after the fall of the Tory govern - European Union. We will not have This in/out state is going to go not being defeated comes not so Tory government wouldn’t be in - ment over the Brexit outcome. a voice in decision-making, we will on, I suspect, to 2022. It might last much from old-style Lexiters who terested in, but which would allow The position of the left must still have no votes in the Council of even longer. A general election think that there can be some kind of Labour, if successful, to return with be “remain and reform”. Sooner or Ministers on in the European Par - could and should happen much socialism in one country outside a new “remain and reform” agree - later, if Labour finds itself in power liament or in the selection of Com - sooner, but at the latest it has to the EU. It comes from moderate, so- ment which could be put to the it will face the realities of how to missioners. happen by June 2022. called centrist, Labour MPs, who vote. That has happened before. manage an economy in isolation We will be in as far as obligations are flirting with the idea of voting When Labour rejected the Heath from the rest of the European are concerned, and at the same time So some Labour MPs could with the Government. They argue Tory government’s terms for entry Union if we are Out and not In. But out as regards democratic powers argue that if May proposes a that this would be better than a into the (then) EEC, the newly there are already left political forces of decision-making. deal like that, it leaves things Hard Brexit or No Deal. In this way elected Harold Wilson initiated an — socialist, social democratic, left open, and isn’t it better to vote they could preserve the Tory gov - admittedly rather staged process of Greens, left regionalists/national - A lot of people on the left say for that than to risk another out - ernment in power. renegotiation and a renegotiated ists — fighting for some of the same that the Tories are heading for a come which could close things treaty deal was successfully put to objectives, sustainable growth, eco - very “hard” Brexit, or a “no-deal” off more? The six tests, however, expressly a referendum in 1975. logical reform, far greater democra - Brexit. Do you think this is a The job of the left in this compli - reject the free movement of tisation of the EU itself, greater scare story with the political cated discussion is to hold on to workers across European bor - But shouldn’t the left stand up labour and social rights, greater so - function of rationalising, maybe, some key strategic objectives. The ders which exists at the moment. for the rights of free movement cial equality. some Labour MPs voting for first is that any deal outside full The position of the Labour lead - which already exist, and oppose Labour in office must be part of May’s deal on the grounds that membership of the EU will repre - ership is ambiguous on this. Keir attempts to restrict them? that movement across Europe to those are the alternatives? sent a worsening of conditions, and Starmer, who speaks for the front Yes, of course it should. Defence have any chance of sustaining their There are broadly three alterna - one particularly affecting working bench on this, says that he has of workers’ rights of free move - own reform promises and counter - tives spoken of. One is a “hard” people and the likely level of social raised a number of issues which a ment within the EU (movement of ing the real risk of a swing to the far deal in which we are treated by the standards. future Labour government might capital and trade are already free) right. EU as an external country like Nobody seriously argues that the wish to discuss with the European is essential. The next British Labour “Remain and Reform” in Canada, or, more favourably, Nor - position of working people would, if it were to win an early general government should openly support Britain and in Europe is indivisi - way. The Canadian option, which is from day one, be in any way im - election after the May deal had trade unions in Britain and across ble. a free-trade deal virtually outside proved by Brexit. Even the right been rejected by Parliament. the EU which fight to protect wages the special relationships of the EU wing fears that talk of massive new Among those issues, in my opin - and employment standards.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "Third Way" Republicanism in the Formation of the Irish Republic Kenneth Lee Shonk, Jr
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects "Irish Blood, English Heart": Gender, Modernity, and "Third Way" Republicanism in the Formation of the Irish Republic Kenneth Lee Shonk, Jr. Marquette University Recommended Citation Shonk, Jr., Kenneth Lee, ""Irish Blood, English Heart": Gender, Modernity, and "Third Way" Republicanism in the Formation of the Irish Republic" (2010). Dissertations (2009 -). Paper 53. http://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/53 “IRISH BLOOD, ENGLISH HEART”: GENDER, MODERNITY, AND “THIRD-WAY” REPUBLICANISM IN THE FORMATION OF THE IRISH REPUBLIC By Kenneth L. Shonk, Jr., B.A., M.A., M.A.T. A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2010 ABSTRACT “IRISH BLOOD, ENGLISH HEART”: GENDER, MODERNITY, AND “THIRD-WAY” REPUBLICANISM IN THE FORMATION OF THE IRISH REPUBLIC Kenneth L. Shonk, Jr., B.A., M.A., M.A.T. Marquette University, 2010 Led by noted Irish statesman Eamon de Valera, a cadre of former members of the militaristic republican organization Sinn Féin split to form Fianna Fáil with the intent to reconstitute Irish republicanism so as to fit within the democratic frameworks of the Irish Free State. Beginning with its formation in 1926, up through the passage of a republican constitution in 1937 that was recognized by Great Britain the following year, Fianna Fáil had successfully rescued the seemingly moribund republican movement from complete marginalization. Using gendered language to forge a nexus between primordial cultural nationalism and modernity, Fianna Fáil’s nationalist project was tantamount to efforts anti- hegemonic as well as hegemonic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Irish Party System Sistemul Partidelor Politice În Irlanda
    The Irish Party System Sistemul Partidelor Politice în Irlanda Assistant Lecturer Javier Ruiz MARTÍNEZ Fco. Javier Ruiz Martínez: Assistant Lecturer of Polics and Public Administration. Department of Politics and Sociology, University Carlos III Madrid (Spain). Since September 2001. Lecturer of “European Union” and “Spanish Politics”. University Studies Abroad Consortium (Madrid). Ph.D. Thesis "Modernisation, Changes and Development in the Irish Party System, 1958-96", (European joint Ph.D. degree). Interests and activities: Steering Committee member of the Spanish National Association of Political Scientists and Sociologists; Steering committee member of the European Federation of Centres and Associations of Irish Studies, EFACIS; Member of the Political Science Association of Ireland; Founder of the Spanish-American Association of the University of Limerick (Éire) in 1992; User level in the command of Microsoft Office applications, graphics (Harvard Graphics), databases (Open Access) SPSSWIN and Internet applications. Abstract: The Irish Party System has been considered a unique case among the European party systems. Its singularity is based in the freezing of its actors. Since 1932 the three main parties has always gotten the same position in every election. How to explain this and which consequences produce these peculiarities are briefly explained in this article. Rezumat: Sistemul Irlandez al Partidelor Politice a fost considerat un caz unic între sistemele partidelor politice europene. Singularitatea sa este bazată pe menţinerea aceloraşi actori. Din 1932, primele trei partide politice ca importanţă au câştigat aceeaşi poziţie la fiecare scrutin electoral. Cum se explică acest lucru şi ce consecinţe produc aceste aspecte, se descrie pe larg în acest articol. At the end of the 1950s the term ‘system’ began to be used in Political Science coming from the natural and physical Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorist Speech and the Future of Free Expression
    TERRORIST SPEECH AND THE FUTURE OF FREE EXPRESSION Laura K. Donohue* Introduction.......................................................................................... 234 I. State as Sovereign in Relation to Terrorist Speech ...................... 239 A. Persuasive Speech ............................................................ 239 1. Sedition and Incitement in the American Context ..... 239 a. Life Before Brandenburg................................. 240 b. Brandenburg and Beyond................................ 248 2. United Kingdom: Offences Against the State and Public Order ....................................................................... 250 a. Treason............................................................. 251 b. Unlawful Assembly ......................................... 254 c. Sedition ............................................................ 262 d. Monuments and Flags...................................... 268 B. Knowledge-Based Speech ................................................ 271 1. Prior Restraint in the American Context .................... 272 a. Invention Secrecy Act...................................... 274 b. Atomic Energy Act .......................................... 279 c. Information Relating to Explosives and Weapons of Mass Destruction............................................ 280 2. Strictures in the United Kingdom............................... 287 a. Informal Restrictions........................................ 287 b. Formal Strictures: The Export Control Act ..... 292 II. State in
    [Show full text]
  • Survey: English
    The Economic and Social Research Institute 4 Burlington Road Dublin 4 Ph. 6671525 IRISH ELECTION SURVEY, SUMMER 2002 Interviewer’s Name ____________________ Interviewer’s Number Constituency Code Area Code Respondent Code Date of Interview: Day Month Time Interview Began (24hr clock) Introduction (Ask for named respondent) Good morning/afternoon/evening. I am from the Economic and Social Research Institute in Dublin. We have been commissioned by a team of researchers from Trinity College Dublin and University College Dublin to carry out a survey into the way people voted in the recent general election. You have been selected at random from the Electoral Register to participate in the survey. The interview will take about 60 minutes to complete and all information provided will be treated in the strictest confidence by the Economic and Social Research Institute. It will not be possible for anyone to identify your individual views or attitudes from the analysis undertaken on the data. __________________________________________________________________________________ SECTION A A1 First, I’d like to ask you a general question. What do you think has been the single most important issue facing Ireland over the last five years? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ A2 How good or bad a job do you think the Fianna Fail/Progressive Democrat government did over the past five years in terms of _______________________ [the Main issue mentioned at A1 above]. Did they do a: Very Good Job......... 1 Good Job ......... 2 Bad Job ..... 3 Very Bad Job…… 4 Don’t know ..... 5 A3.1a Looking back on the recent general election campaign in May of this year, could you tell me if a candidate called to your home? Yes ......
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnicising Ulster's Protestants
    Ethnicising Ulster’s Protestants Tolerance, Peoplehood, and Class in Ulster-Scots Ethnopedagogy Peter Robert Gardner Jesus College, The University of Cambridge This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Contents Figures and Tables iv Abbreviations and Short Forms v Acknowledgements vi Word Limit and Plagiarism Statement vii Abstract viii Chapter One: Introduction 1 1.1 Research Questions, Methods and Chapter Overview 5 1.2 Tolerance, Peoplehood, Dignity 7 Chapter Two: Protestantism, Unionism and Consociational Ideology 11 2.1 Shifting Peoplehoods 12 2.1.1 From British Rule to Unionist Rule 12 2.1.2 From Multiplicity toward Britishness 15 2.1.3 Defeatism and the Cultural Turn 18 2.2 Consociationalism, Normativity, Power 21 2.3 Ulster-Scots 26 2.3.1 Ethnic Peoplehood 26 2.3.2 Who are the Ulster-Scots? 30 2.3.3 “Revival” 35 2.4 Conclusion 38 Chapter Three: Communal Segregation and Educational Peace-Building 39 3.1 The Current State of Segregation 39 3.2 Segregated Education 45 3.3 Education and Peace-Building 55 3.4 Conclusion: De-segregating the Mind 63 Chapter Four: Methods 65 4.1 Research Design and Methods 65 4.1.1 Educational Materials 66 4.1.2 Interviews 67 4.1.3. Primary School Survey 69 4.2 Analysis 70 4.2.1 Euphemism, “Telling” and Reading Silences 72 4.2.2 Reflexivity, Stickiness and Power Dynamics 75 4.3 Conclusion 78 Chapter Five: The Development of Ulster-Scots Education 79 5.1 Processes of Peoplehood-Building 79 5.2 Three Phases of Development 81 5.2.1 Phase One: Grass-Roots Education, Elite Lobbying
    [Show full text]
  • Fianna Fáil: Past and Present
    Fianna Fáil: Past and Present Alan Byrne Fianna Fáil were the dominant political prompted what is usually referred to as party in Ireland from their first term in gov- a civil-war but as Kieran Allen argues in ernment in the 1930s up until their disas- an earlier issue of this journal, the Free trous 2011 election. The party managed to State in effect mounted a successful counter- enjoy large support from the working class, revolution which was thoroughly opposed to as well as court close links with the rich- the working class movement.3 The defeat est people in Irish society. Often described signalled the end of the aspirations of the as more of a ‘national movement’ than a Irish revolution and the stagnation of the party, their popular support base has now state economically. Emigration was par- plummeted. As this article goes to print, ticularly high in this period, and the state the party (officially in opposition but en- was thoroughly conservative. The Catholic abling a Fine Gael government) is polling Church fostered strong links with Cumann at 26% approval.1 How did a party which na nGaedheal, often denouncing republicans emerged from the losing side of the civil war in its sermons. come to dominate Irish political life so thor- There were distinctive class elements to oughly? This article aims to trace the his- both the pro and anti-treaty sides. The tory of the party, analyse their unique brand Cumann na nGaedheal government drew its of populist politics as well as their relation- base from large farmers, who could rely on ship with Irish capitalism and the working exports to Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Engagement: Irish Republicanism, Memory Politics
    Critical Engagement Critical Engagement Irish republicanism, memory politics and policing Kevin Hearty LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY PRESS First published 2017 by Liverpool University Press 4 Cambridge Street Liverpool L69 7ZU Copyright © 2017 Kevin Hearty The right of Kevin Hearty to be identified as the author of this book has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication data A British Library CIP record is available print ISBN 978-1-78694-047-6 epdf ISBN 978-1-78694-828-1 Typeset by Carnegie Book Production, Lancaster Contents Acknowledgements vii List of Figures and Tables x List of Abbreviations xi Introduction 1 1 Understanding a Fraught Historical Relationship 25 2 Irish Republican Memory as Counter-Memory 55 3 Ideology and Policing 87 4 The Patriot Dead 121 5 Transition, ‘Never Again’ and ‘Moving On’ 149 6 The PSNI and ‘Community Policing’ 183 7 The PSNI and ‘Political Policing’ 217 Conclusion 249 References 263 Index 303 Acknowledgements Acknowledgements This book has evolved from my PhD thesis that was undertaken at the Transitional Justice Institute, University of Ulster (TJI). When I moved to the University of Warwick in early 2015 as a post-doc, my plans to develop the book came with me too. It represents the culmination of approximately five years of research, reading and (re)writing, during which I often found the mere thought of re-reading some of my work again nauseating; yet, with the encour- agement of many others, I persevered.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Cahir Healy Papers Adobe
    INTRODUCTION CAHIR HEALY PAPERS November 2007 Cahir Healy Papers (D2991) Table of Contents Summary .................................................................................................................2 Cahir Healy's early years .........................................................................................3 The Gaelic League and Sinn Fein ...........................................................................4 The 'republican' courts.............................................................................................6 The Treaty and partition...........................................................................................7 Internment on the 'Argenta'......................................................................................8 The Boundary Commission......................................................................................9 Divisions among the nationalists............................................................................10 The National League .............................................................................................11 The wilderness years, 1935-1945..........................................................................12 Internment in Brixton..............................................................................................13 The Anti-Partition League ......................................................................................14 Physical force and abstentionism ..........................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • February 2004
    Nations and Regions: The Dynamics of Devolution Quarterly Monitoring Programme Northern Ireland Quarterly Report February 2004 The monitoring programme is jointly funded by the ESRC and the Leverhulme Trust Devolution Monitoring Programme Northern Ireland report 18 February 2004 • Assembly election ends in triumph for DUP, SF • Result means continued suspension of devolution • Review of Belfast agreement opens amid low expectations • Ministers continue business-as-usual decision-making 2 Contents 1. Summary Robin Wilson ..............................................4 2. The ‘peace process’ Rick Wilford & Robin Wilson ..................5 2.1 The post-election scene ......................................................................................5 2.2 The review...........................................................................................................5 2.3 Prospects ...........................................................................................................13 3. Devolved government Robin Wilson ............................................16 3.1 Does it matter? .................................................................................................16 3.2 Programme for Government ..........................................................................16 3.3 Community relations .......................................................................................17 4. The assembly Rick Wilford & Robin Wilson ................20 5. The media Robin Wilson ............................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: Parties and Policy Making in Ireland
    Introduction: Parties and policy making in Ireland C o n t i n u i t y One of the most remarkable aspects of post-Treaty Ireland was how well the political institutions established by the British colonial administration survived. This is not altogether surprising when one considers that the Irish struggle for independence ended in ‘a compromise with the former coloniser which denied true emancipation’. 1 Many members of the new elite ‘found nothing better to do with their freedom than to duplicate the British system’ while ‘a new use was found for the Irish language as a kind of green spray-paint to be coated over the remaining British pillar boxes, systems and titles, in order to conceal the ever-growing similarity with the British way of life’. 2 Kevin O’Higgins ’ s conviction that they ‘were probably the most conservative-minded revolutionaries that ever put through a successful revolution’ 3 gives some idea of the limitations and parameters within which the Free State would take shape. The survival of the British civil service, based in Dublin Castle, provides a striking example of the basic continuity that followed the Treaty. ‘Independence’, Basil Chubb notes, ‘did not much aff ect the well-established and powerful departments’ and for the former British civil service ‘life went on much as before’. 4 Under the Treaty, the position of former colonial administration employees was protected and most managed to exchange political masters with equanimity. A small number (about one hundred) voluntarily transferred to Belfast to serve the Northern Ireland administration. The transition from colonial power to a native administration did not, therefore, impinge greatly on the civil service.
    [Show full text]
  • Clark (Eds.) Radical Or Redundant? Minor Parties in Irish Political Life Dublin: History Press, 2012
    To the left of Labour: The Workers’ Party and Democratic Left in L. Weeks and A. Clark (eds.) Radical or redundant? Minor Parties in Irish political life Dublin: History Press, 2012. 173-187. To the Left of Labour: the Workers’ Party and Democratic Left, 1982–97 Kevin Rafter Introduction Over the last 90 years new parties have repeatedly attempted to break into the national political arena in Ireland so as to challenge the longtime dominance of Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael and Labour. The new entrants have periodically challenged the established order in terms of shaping policy agendas, winning seats and participating in multi- party governmental arrangements. A limited number of small parties have achieved these three outcomes – impact on policy, Dáil representation and governmental involvement – including Clann na Poblachta, Clann na Talmhan, the Progressive Democrats, Democratic Left and the Green Party. Others, including the Workers’ Party, while not experiencing a period in power, have both impacted on policy formation and enjoyed national electoral success. All these new entrants, however, share one common trait – namely, a poor record in sustaining their challenge to the big three parties. It has been pointed out that smaller parties can ‘add a richness and depth that has an impact on democracy and representation’ (Copus et al, 2009: 4). In an Irish context, however, despite this democratic value, these parties have failed to sustain a lasting political and electoral presence. Ireland’s so-called ‘two and a half party system’ was defined – until the general election in 2011 – by Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael and Labour repeatedly filling the same pecking order in terms of votes and seats.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution and Government
    Date Printed: 04/21/2009 JTS Box Number: lFES 65 Tab Number: 20 Document Title: Ireland Constitution and Government Document Date: 1995 Document Country: Ireland Document Language: English lFES ID: CE00864 Constitution and Government The President, Mrs. Mary {?obinson, addressing a joint session.oj the houus ofthe Oireachtas. " Ireland is a parliamentary demo~racy. The CONSTITUTION Houses of the Oireachtas and the National Parliamem (in the·Irish language, Government. It also defines the structure Oireachras) consists of the President (an The Constitution ofireland is the basic and powers of the courts, sets out the rUachraran) and two Houses: a House of law of the State, It was adopted by fundamental rights of citizens and contain; Representatives (Diil Eireann) and a plebiscite in 1937. It is the successor of the a number of directive principles of social Senate (Seanad Eireann). The sole and Constitution of Diil Eireann (I 919) and policy for the general guidance of me exclusive power of making laws for the the Constitution of the Irish Free State Oireachtas. The Constitution may be State is vested in Parliament. The functions (I922). The Constitution states that all amended only by referendum. and powers of the President, Diil and legislative, executive and judicial powers of Seanad derive from the Constitution of Government derive from the people. It sets The Consrimtion outlines what are Ireland (Bunreacht na hEireann) and law. out the form of government and defines considered the fundamental rights of the the powers of the President, the two citizen. The definition of rights in the Fact Sheet 2/95 Issued by the Department of Foreign Affairs, Dublin.
    [Show full text]