DOCSLIB.ORG

Liquid Rocket Analysis (Lira) R.R.L. Ernst

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Liquid Rocket Analysis (Lira) R.R.L. Ernst Liquid Rocket Analysis (LiRA) Development of a Liquid Bi-Propellant Rocket Engine Design, Analysis and Optimization Tool R.R.L. Ernst supervisor: Ir. B.T.C Zandbergen AE5810 Master of Science Thesis Space Systems Engineering Liquid Rocket Analysis (LiRA) Development of a Liquid Bi-Propellant Rocket Engine Design, Analysis and Optimization Tool Master of Science Thesis AE5810 For the degree of Master of Science in Spaceflight at Delft University of Technology R.R.L. Ernst Student nr. 1539833 supervisor: Ir. B.T.C Zandbergen May 8, 2014 Faculty of Aerospace Engineering (AE) · Delft University of Technology Cover photo: Artist’s Impression of Copyright c R.R.L. Ernst an Ariane 5 ECA c ESA-D. Ducros All rights reserved. http://spaceinimages.esa.int/ Delft University of Technology Department of Space Systems Engineering (SSE) The undersigned hereby certify that they have read and recommend to the Faculty of Aerospace Engineering (AE) for acceptance a thesis entitled Liquid Rocket Analysis (LiRA): Development of a Liquid Bi-Propellant Rocket Engine Design, Analysis and Optimization Tool by R.R.L. Ernst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Dated: May 8, 2014 Chairman of thesis committee: Prof.dr. E.K.A. Gill Supervisor of thesis: Ir. B.T.C Zandbergen Member of thesis committee: Dr. A. Gangoli Rao Abstract The need to increase specific impulse of rocket launcher engines has lead design engineers to start development of ever more complex engine cycles starting from simple gas pressure fed engines to the very complex staged combustion cycle en- gines. Currently a wide range of different cycles does exist. These cycles not only differ in terms of performance, but also in terms of mass, cost, reliability etc., which in general makes it difficult to quickly determine which cycle is best suited for a certain mission or task. For this a tool that is capable of analysing different cy- cles and the impact of design choices has been developed. The tool, named LiRA, has as goal giving the user better system level understanding of the different pos- sible engine cycles and the functions of the components; it can therefore provide valuable and time saving assistance during design or in analysis and optimisation studies. A modular approach is applied where engine components are sized using a performance, dimension and mass model who make use of corrected ideal rocket theory and empirical relations. This work focuses mainly on the methodology and the construction of the models, and further includes the optimisation of an upper stage and a verification, validation and uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of the tool and the optimisation to assess its accuracy, precision and applicability. The completed program has proved to confirm known trends and known cycle character- istics like the mass savings that can be achieved when using turbo-pump fed engines instead of pressure fed engines for mid- to high-thrust booster applications. Further the superior performance of closed cycles, especially staged combustion cycles has been confirmed, and some cycle specific design choices like the need of bypasses in expander cycles have been explained. The tool however is not complete and should be expanded; the addition of a cost and reliability assessment model is for example strongly recommended. There also remain issues with the accuracy and uncertainty of certain estimates which make that the current version should only be used for comparative studies. Master of Science Thesis R.R.L. Ernst ii R.R.L. Ernst Master of Science Thesis Table of Contents Acknowledgements vii Glossary ix List of Acronyms..................................... ix List of Symbols..................................... x 1 Introduction 1 2 Literature Study and State of the Art Review5 2-1 Liquid Rocket Engine Cycle Theory........................... 5 2-2 Software Development and Existing Models with Similar Purpose........... 11 2-3 Conclusions on User Requirements and Plan of Approach............... 13 3 Performance Model 17 3-1 Substance Property and Combustion Thermodynamic Data Tables.......... 17 3-2 Thrust Chamber..................................... 20 3-2-1 Main Combustion Chamber and Nozzle.................... 21 3-2-2 Injector..................................... 28 3-3 Heat Exchanger..................................... 31 3-3-1 Enthalpy and Determination of State...................... 33 3-3-2 Heat Transfer.................................. 35 3-3-3 Cooling Channel Geometry, Pressure Loss and Wall Material......... 37 3-3-4 Impact of Number of Segments on Cooling Mechanism............ 38 3-4 Gas Generator or Pre-burner.............................. 38 3-5 Pump.......................................... 42 3-6 Turbine.......................................... 43 Master of Science Thesis R.R.L. Ernst iv Table of Contents 3-6-1 Turbine Power and Required Mass Flow.................... 44 3-6-2 Turbine Efficiency................................ 45 3-6-3 Turbine Pressure Ratio............................. 45 3-6-4 Turbine Functioning within Cycle........................ 46 3-6-5 Turbine Inlet Temperature........................... 46 3-7 Propellant Tanks.................................... 47 3-8 Pressurant Tank..................................... 48 3-9 Feed Lines........................................ 49 3-10 Additional Performance Parameters Calculated..................... 51 3-11 Validity of Performance Model............................. 52 4 Mass and Size Model 55 4-1 Size Model........................................ 55 4-1-1 Overall Engine Size............................... 55 4-1-2 Propellant and Propellant Tank Volume.................... 56 4-1-3 Pressurant and Pressurant Tank Volume.................... 57 4-1-4 Nozzle...................................... 59 4-1-5 Combustion Chamber.............................. 61 4-1-6 Gas Generator or Pre-burner.......................... 61 4-1-7 Turbo-pump................................... 62 4-2 Mass Model....................................... 62 4-2-1 Overall Engine Mass............................... 64 4-2-2 Propellant Tank and Pressurant Tank Mass.................. 64 4-2-3 Stage Dry Mass................................. 65 4-2-4 Propellant Mass................................. 66 4-2-5 Pressurant Mass................................. 66 4-2-6 Thrust Chamber................................. 66 4-2-7 Gas Generator or Pre-burner.......................... 67 4-2-8 Turbo-Pump................................... 68 4-3 Validity of Mass and Size Model............................ 69 5 Program Set-up 71 5-1 Engine Analysis Calculation Order........................... 71 5-2 Model Parameters.................................... 72 5-3 Overview of Typical, Calculated and Assumed Parameter Values Used in LiRA.... 74 5-4 Overview Components.................................. 74 5-5 Model Output...................................... 77 5-6 Balancing of Propulsion System............................. 78 5-6-1 Thrust Chamber Assembly Calculation Routine................ 78 5-6-2 Balancing of the Feed System in the Presure-fed Cycle............ 78 R.R.L. Ernst Master of Science Thesis Table of Contents v 5-6-3 Balancing of the Feed System in the Gas Generator Cycle........... 80 5-6-4 Balancing of the Feed System in the Staged Combustion Cycle........ 80 5-6-5 Balancing of the Closed Expander Cycle.................... 81 5-6-6 Balancing of the Feed System in the Bleed Expander Cycle.......... 81 5-7 Overview Developed Code................................ 82 5-8 Large Figures and Tables................................ 82 6 Important General Statistical Analysis Theory Used for Verification, Validation and Sensitivity Analysis 95 6-1 Verification and Validation............................... 96 6-2 Sensitivity Analysis................................... 97 6-3 Data Interpretation and Acceptance.......................... 97 6-4 Repeatability or reproducibility............................. 98 6-5 Large Figures and Tables................................ 98 7 Verification and Validation of LiRA 101 7-1 Verification........................................ 102 7-1-1 Checking of Model Code on Errors by Comparison of Results with Hand Calculations................................... 102 7-1-2 Tool Build-up Structure, Operation, Input and Output Comparison with Other Similar Software................................. 103 7-1-3 Comparison of test cases with other models.................. 103 7-2 Validation........................................ 111 7-3 Conclusions on Verification and Validation....................... 111 7-4 Large Figures and Tables................................ 113 8 Optimisation with LiRA 123 8-1 Optimisation Rationale................................. 124 8-2 Optimisation Methods.................................. 124 8-3 Optimisation Routine.................................. 125 8-4 Precision and Reproducibility of Results and Impact of Allowed Tolerance in Require- ments and Number of Samples Used on the Outcome................. 127 8-5 Example Optimisation of an Upper Stage....................... 128 8-5-1 Requirements and Constraints......................... 128 8-5-2 Results for a Stage with a Gas Generator Cycle................ 129 8-5-3 Results for Other Cycles............................. 134 8-5-4 Discussion of Results for All Cycles....................... 134 8-6 Validity of Optimisation................................. 138 8-7 Large Figures and Tables................................ 138 Master of Science
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Numerical Investigation of a 7-Element GOX/GCH4 Subscale Combustion Chamber
    DOI: 10.13009/EUCASS2017-173 7TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE FOR AERONAUTICS AND AEROSPACE SCIENCES (EUCASS) Numerical Investigation of a 7-Element GOX/GCH4 Subscale Combustion Chamber ? ? ? Daniel Eiringhaus †, Daniel Rahn‡, Hendrik Riedmann , Oliver Knab and Oskar Haidn‡ ?ArianeGroup Robert-Koch-Straße 1, 82024 Taufkirchen, Germany ‡Institute of Turbomachinery and Flight Propulsion (LTF), Technische Universität München (TUM) Boltzmannstr. 15, 85748 Garching, Germany [email protected] †Corresponding author Abstract For future liquid rocket engines methane has become the focus of several studies on alternative fuels in the western hemisphere. At ArianeGroup numerical simulation tools have been established as a powerful instrument in the design process. In order to achieve the same confidence level for CH4/O2 as for H2/O2 combustion, the applied numerical models have to be adapted and validated against sufficient test data. At the Chair of Space Propulsion at the Technical University of Munich (TUM) several combustion cham- bers have been designed and tests at different operating points have been conducted. In this paper one of these subscale combustion chambers with calorimetric cooling and seven shear coaxial injection elements running on gaseous methane and oxygen is used to examine ArianeGroup’s in-house tools for combustion chamber performance analysis. 1. Introduction Current development programs in many space-faring nations focus on launchers utilizing a propellant combination of liquid oxygen (LOX) and liquid methane (CH4). In Europe, hydrocarbons have been identified as an alternative fuel in the frame of the Future Launcher Preparatory Programme (FLPP).14, 23 Major industrial development of methane / oxy- gen rocket engines is ongoing in the United States at SpaceX with the Raptor engine (staged combustion), at Blue Origin with the BE-4 engine (staged combustion) and in Europe at ArianeGroup with the Prometheus engine (gas gen- erator).
    [Show full text]
  • Qualification Over Ariane's Lifetime
    r bulletin 94 — may 1998 Qualification Over Ariane’s Lifetime A. González Blázquez Directorate of Launchers, ESA, Paris M. Eymard Groupe Programme CNES/Arianespace, Evry, France Introduction Similarly, the RL10 engine on the Centaur stage The primary objectives of the qualification of the Atlas launcher has been the subject of an activities performed during the operational ongoing improvement programme. About 5000 lifetime of a launcher are: tests were performed before the first flight, and – to verify the qualification status of the vehicle 4000 during the subsequent ten years. – to resolve any technical problems relating to subsystem operations on the ground or in On-going qualification activities of a similar flight. nature were started for the Ariane-3 and 4 launchers in 1986, and for Ariane-5 in 1996. Before focussing on the European family of They can be classified into two main launchers, it is perhaps informative to review categories: ‘regular’ and ‘one-off’. just one or two of the US efforts in the area of solid and liquid propulsion in order to put the Ariane-3/4 accompanying activities Ariane-related activities into context. Regular activities These activities are mainly devoted to In principle, the development programme for a launcher ends with the verification of the qualification status of the qualification phase, after which it enters operational service. In various launcher subsystems. They include the practice, however, the assessment of a launcher’s reliability is a following work packages: continuing process and qualification-type activities proceed, as an – Periodic sampling of engines: one HM7 and extension of the development programme (as is done in aeronautics), one Viking per year, tested to the limits of the over the course of the vehicle’s lifetime.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace Engine Data
    AEROSPACE ENGINE DATA Data for some concrete aerospace engines and their craft ................................................................................. 1 Data on rocket-engine types and comparison with large turbofans ................................................................... 1 Data on some large airliner engines ................................................................................................................... 2 Data on other aircraft engines and manufacturers .......................................................................................... 3 In this Appendix common to Aircraft propulsion and Space propulsion, data for thrust, weight, and specific fuel consumption, are presented for some different types of engines (Table 1), with some values of specific impulse and exit speed (Table 2), a plot of Mach number and specific impulse characteristic of different engine types (Fig. 1), and detailed characteristics of some modern turbofan engines, used in large airplanes (Table 3). DATA FOR SOME CONCRETE AEROSPACE ENGINES AND THEIR CRAFT Table 1. Thrust to weight ratio (F/W), for engines and their crafts, at take-off*, specific fuel consumption (TSFC), and initial and final mass of craft (intermediate values appear in [kN] when forces, and in tonnes [t] when masses). Engine Engine TSFC Whole craft Whole craft Whole craft mass, type thrust/weight (g/s)/kN type thrust/weight mini/mfin Trent 900 350/63=5.5 15.5 A380 4×350/5600=0.25 560/330=1.8 cruise 90/63=1.4 cruise 4×90/5000=0.1 CFM56-5A 110/23=4.8 16
    [Show full text]
  • Rocket Propulsion Fundamentals 2
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20140002716 2019-08-29T14:36:45+00:00Z Liquid Propulsion Systems – Evolution & Advancements Launch Vehicle Propulsion & Systems LPTC Liquid Propulsion Technical Committee Rick Ballard Liquid Engine Systems Lead SLS Liquid Engines Office NASA / MSFC All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted, unless for course participation and to a paid course student, in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of AIAA and/or course instructor. Contact the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Professional Development Program, Suite 500, 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Reston, VA 20191-4344 Modules 1. Rocket Propulsion Fundamentals 2. LRE Applications 3. Liquid Propellants 4. Engine Power Cycles 5. Engine Components Module 1: Rocket Propulsion TOPICS Fundamentals • Thrust • Specific Impulse • Mixture Ratio • Isp vs. MR • Density vs. Isp • Propellant Mass vs. Volume Warning: Contents deal with math, • Area Ratio physics and thermodynamics. Be afraid…be very afraid… Terms A Area a Acceleration F Force (thrust) g Gravity constant (32.2 ft/sec2) I Impulse m Mass P Pressure Subscripts t Time a Ambient T Temperature c Chamber e Exit V Velocity o Initial state r Reaction ∆ Delta / Difference s Stagnation sp Specific ε Area Ratio t Throat or Total γ Ratio of specific heats Thrust (1/3) Rocket thrust can be explained using Newton’s 2nd and 3rd laws of motion. 2nd Law: a force applied to a body is equal to the mass of the body and its acceleration in the direction of the force.
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Chemical-Nuclear Propulsion MAE 342 2016
    2/12/20 Chemical/Nuclear Propulsion Space System Design, MAE 342, Princeton University Robert Stengel • Thermal rockets • Performance parameters • Propellants and propellant storage Copyright 2016 by Robert Stengel. All rights reserved. For educational use only. http://www.princeton.edu/~stengel/MAE342.html 1 1 Chemical (Thermal) Rockets • Liquid/Gas Propellant –Monopropellant • Cold gas • Catalytic decomposition –Bipropellant • Separate oxidizer and fuel • Hypergolic (spontaneous) • Solid Propellant ignition –Mixed oxidizer and fuel • External ignition –External ignition • Storage –Burn to completion – Ambient temperature and pressure • Hybrid Propellant – Cryogenic –Liquid oxidizer, solid fuel – Pressurized tank –Throttlable –Throttlable –Start/stop cycling –Start/stop cycling 2 2 1 2/12/20 Cold Gas Thruster (used with inert gas) Moog Divert/Attitude Thruster and Valve 3 3 Monopropellant Hydrazine Thruster Aerojet Rocketdyne • Catalytic decomposition produces thrust • Reliable • Low performance • Toxic 4 4 2 2/12/20 Bi-Propellant Rocket Motor Thrust / Motor Weight ~ 70:1 5 5 Hypergolic, Storable Liquid- Propellant Thruster Titan 2 • Spontaneous combustion • Reliable • Corrosive, toxic 6 6 3 2/12/20 Pressure-Fed and Turbopump Engine Cycles Pressure-Fed Gas-Generator Rocket Rocket Cycle Cycle, with Nozzle Cooling 7 7 Staged Combustion Engine Cycles Staged Combustion Full-Flow Staged Rocket Cycle Combustion Rocket Cycle 8 8 4 2/12/20 German V-2 Rocket Motor, Fuel Injectors, and Turbopump 9 9 Combustion Chamber Injectors 10 10 5 2/12/20
    [Show full text]
  • Materials for Liquid Propulsion Systems
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20160008869 2019-08-29T17:47:59+00:00Z CHAPTER 12 Materials for Liquid Propulsion Systems John A. Halchak Consultant, Los Angeles, California James L. Cannon NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama Corey Brown Aerojet-Rocketdyne, West Palm Beach, Florida 12.1 Introduction Earth to orbit launch vehicles are propelled by rocket engines and motors, both liquid and solid. This chapter will discuss liquid engines. The heart of a launch vehicle is its engine. The remainder of the vehicle (with the notable exceptions of the payload and guidance system) is an aero structure to support the propellant tanks which provide the fuel and oxidizer to feed the engine or engines. The basic principle behind a rocket engine is straightforward. The engine is a means to convert potential thermochemical energy of one or more propellants into exhaust jet kinetic energy. Fuel and oxidizer are burned in a combustion chamber where they create hot gases under high pressure. These hot gases are allowed to expand through a nozzle. The molecules of hot gas are first constricted by the throat of the nozzle (de-Laval nozzle) which forces them to accelerate; then as the nozzle flares outwards, they expand and further accelerate. It is the mass of the combustion gases times their velocity, reacting against the walls of the combustion chamber and nozzle, which produce thrust according to Newton’s third law: for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. [1] Solid rocket motors are cheaper to manufacture and offer good values for their cost.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancement of Volumetric Specific Impulse in HTPB/Ammonium Nitrate Mixed
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Plan B and other Reports Graduate Studies 12-2016 Enhancement of Volumetric Specific Impulse in TPB/H Ammonium Nitrate Mixed Hybrid Rocket Systems Jacob Ward Forsyth Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/gradreports Part of the Propulsion and Power Commons Recommended Citation Forsyth, Jacob Ward, "Enhancement of Volumetric Specific Impulse in TPB/AmmoniumH Nitrate Mixed Hybrid Rocket Systems" (2016). All Graduate Plan B and other Reports. 876. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/gradreports/876 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Plan B and other Reports by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ENHANCEMENT OF VOLUMETRIC SPECIFIC IMPULSE IN HTPB/AMMONIUM NITRATE MIXED HYBRID ROCKET SYSTEMS by Jacob W. Forsyth A report submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Aerospace Engineering Approved: ______________________ ____________________ Stephen A. Whitmore Ph.D. David Geller Ph.D. Major Professor Committee Member ______________________ Rees Fullmer Ph.D. Committee Member UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2016 ii Copyright © Jacob W. Forsyth 2016 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Enhancement of Volumetric Specific Impulse in HTPB/Ammonium Nitrate Mixed Hybrid Rocket Systems by Jacob W. Forsyth, Master of Science Utah State University, 2016 Major Professor: Dr. Stephen A. Whitmore Department: Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Hybrid rocket systems are safer and have higher specific impulse than solid rockets. However, due to large oxidizer tanks and low regression rates, hybrid rockets have low volumetric efficiency and very long longitudinal profiles, which limit many of the applications for which hybrids can be used.
    [Show full text]
  • Design for Demise Analysis for Launch Vehicles
    A first design for demise analysis for launch vehicles Henrik Simon, Stijn Lemmens Space debris: Inactive, manmade objects in space Source: ESA Overview Introduction Fundamentals Modelling approach Results and discussion Summary and outlook What is the motivation and task? INTRODUCTION Motivation . Mitigation: Prevention of creation and limitation of long-term presence . Guidelines: LEO removal within 25 years . LEO removal within 25 years after mission end . Casualty risk limit for re-entry: 1 in 10,000 Rising altitude Decay & re-entry above 2000 km Source: NASA Source: NASA Solution: Design for demise Source: ESA Scope of the thesis . Typical design of upper stages . General Risk assessment . Design for demise solutions to reduce the risk ? ? ? Risk A Risk B Risk C Source: CNES How do we assess the risk and simulate the re-entry? FUNDAMENTALS Fundamentals: Ground risk assessment Ah = + 2 Ai � ℎ = =1 � Source: NASA Source: NASA 3.5 m 5.0 m 2 2 ≈ ≈ Fundamentals: Re-entry simulation tools SCARAB: Spacecraft-oriented approach . CAD-like modelling . 6 DoF flight dynamics . Break-up / fragmentation computed How does a rocket upper stage look like? MODELLING Modelling approach . Research on typical design: . Elongated . Platform . Solid Rocket Motor . Lack of information: . Create common intersection . Deliberately stay top-level and only compare effects Modelling approach Modelling approach 12 Length [m] 9 7 5 3 2 150 300 500 700 800 1500 2200 Mass [kg] How much is the risk and how can we reduce it? SIMULATIONS Example of SCARAB re-entry simulation 6x Casualty risk of all reference cases Typical survivors Smaller Smaller fragments fragments Pressure tanks Pressure tanks Main tank Engine Main structure + tanks Design for Demise .
    [Show full text]
  • Variations of Solid Rocket Motor Preliminary Design for Small TSTO Launcher
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Institute of Transport Research:Publications Space Propulsion 2012 – ID 2394102 Variations of Solid Rocket Motor Preliminary Design for Small TSTO launcher Etienne Dumont Space Launcher Systems Analysis (SART), DLR, Bremen, Germany [email protected] NGL New/Next Generation Launcher Abstract SI Structural Index (mdry / mpropellant) Several combinations of solid rocket motors and ignition SRM Solid Rocket Motor strategies have been considered for a small Two Stage to TSTO Two Stage To Orbit Orbit (TSTO) launch vehicle based on a big solid rocket US Upper Stage motor first stage and cryogenic upper stage propelled by VENUS Vega New Upper Stage the Vinci engine. In order to reach the target payload avg average during the flight performance of about 1400 kg into GTO for the clean s.l. sea level version and 2700 to 3000 kg for the boosted version, the vac vacuum influence of the selected solid rocket motors on the upper 2 + 2 P23 4 P23: two ignited on ground and two with a stage structure has been studied. Preliminary structural delayed ignition designs have been performed and the thrust histories of the solid rocket motor have been tweaked to limit the upper stage structural mass. First stage and booster 1. Introduction combinations with acceptable general loads are proposed. Solid rocket motors (SRM) are commonly used for boosters or launcher first stage. Indeed they can provide high thrust levels while being compact, light and Nomenclature relatively simple compared to a liquid rocket engine Isp specific impulse s providing the same thrust level.
    [Show full text]
  • Cryogenic Technology & Rocket Engines
    ISSN (O): 2393-8609 International Journal of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Volume 2 – No.5, August 2015 Cryogenic Technology & Rocket Engines AKHIL GARG KARTIK JAKHU KISHAN SINGH ABHINAV B.Tech – Aerospace B.Tech – Aerospace B.Tech – Aerospace MAURYA Engg. Engg. Engg. B.Tech – Aerospace PUNJAB PUNJAB PUNJAB Engg. TECHNICAL TECHNICAL TECHNICAL PUNJAB UNIVERSITY, UNIVERSITY, UNIVERSITY, TECHNICAL JALANDHAR JALANDHAR JALANDHAR UNIVERSITY, akhilgarg.313@g kartik.lphawk@g kishansngh1996 JALANDHAR mail.com mail.com @gmail.com abhinavguru123 @gmail.com ABSTRACT 3.2 What is Cryogenic Rocket Engine? This paper is all about the rocket engine involving the use of A cryogenic rocket engine is a rocket engine that cryogenic technology at a cryogenic temperature (123K). This uses a cryogenic fuel or oxidizer, that is, its fuel or basically uses the liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen as an oxidizer (or both) is gases liquefied and stored at oxidizer and fuel, which are very clean and non-pollutant very low temperatures. Notably, these engines were fuels compared to other hydrocarbon fuels like petrol, diesel, one of the main factors of the ultimate success in gasoline, LPG, CNG, etc., sometimes, liquid nitrogen is also reaching the Moon by the Saturn V rocket. used as an fuel. During World War II, when powerful rocket engines were first considered by the German, American and Keywords Soviet engineers independently, all discovered that Rocket engine, Cryogenic technology, Cryogenic temperature, rocket engines need high mass flow rate of both Liquid hydrogen and Oxygen. oxidizer and fuel to generate a sufficient thrust. At that time oxygen and low molecular weight 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Motores Aeroespaciales, A-Z
    Sponsored by L’Aeroteca - BARCELONA ISBN 978-84-608-7523-9 < aeroteca.com > Depósito Legal B 9066-2016 Título: Los Motores Aeroespaciales A-Z. © Parte/Vers: 1/12 Página: 1 Autor: Ricardo Miguel Vidal Edición 2018-V12 = Rev. 01 Los Motores Aeroespaciales, A-Z (The Aerospace En- gines, A-Z) Versión 12 2018 por Ricardo Miguel Vidal * * * -MOTOR: Máquina que transforma en movimiento la energía que recibe. (sea química, eléctrica, vapor...) Sponsored by L’Aeroteca - BARCELONA ISBN 978-84-608-7523-9 Este facsímil es < aeroteca.com > Depósito Legal B 9066-2016 ORIGINAL si la Título: Los Motores Aeroespaciales A-Z. © página anterior tiene Parte/Vers: 1/12 Página: 2 el sello con tinta Autor: Ricardo Miguel Vidal VERDE Edición: 2018-V12 = Rev. 01 Presentación de la edición 2018-V12 (Incluye todas las anteriores versiones y sus Apéndices) La edición 2003 era una publicación en partes que se archiva en Binders por el propio lector (2,3,4 anillas, etc), anchos o estrechos y del color que desease durante el acopio parcial de la edición. Se entregaba por grupos de hojas impresas a una cara (edición 2003), a incluir en los Binders (archivadores). Cada hoja era sustituíble en el futuro si aparecía una nueva misma hoja ampliada o corregida. Este sistema de anillas admitia nuevas páginas con información adicional. Una hoja con adhesivos para portada y lomo identifi caba cada volumen provisional. Las tapas defi nitivas fueron metálicas, y se entregaraban con el 4 º volumen. O con la publicación completa desde el año 2005 en adelante. -Las Publicaciones -parcial y completa- están protegidas legalmente y mediante un sello de tinta especial color VERDE se identifi can los originales.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerojet Announces Successful Requalification of Its Delta II AJ10-118K Second Stage Engine
    March 14, 2013 Aerojet Announces Successful Requalification of Its Delta II AJ10-118K Second Stage Engine SACRAMENTO, Calif., March 14, 2013 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Aerojet, a GenCorp (NYSE:GY) company, announced that its Delta II second stage engine, the AJ10-118K, successfully passed a requalification test of its ablative chamber at Aerojet's J4 altitude simulation test facility in Sacramento. The intent of the requalification program was to replace the asbestos insulator material with a readily-available and environmentally-friendly alternative. The three-burn hot fire test simulated a "test-like-you-fly" duty cycle configuration, qualifying the new engine configuration for flight. The altitude test was preceded by a successful sea-level test in November 2012. "The Delta II is one of the most robust and reliable rocket engines ever flown," said Aerojet Vice President of Space and Launch Systems Julie Van Kleeck. "This test represents another successful milestone in a program with a rich history of successful milestones and 100 percent mission success. Additionally, it verifies that the past design rigor put into this heritage technology meets and exceeds the scrutiny of modern day expectations for flight." Under contract to United Launch Alliance, Aerojet's AJ10 has provided second-stage propulsion on 151 Delta II flights to date with a 100 percent success rate. The engine has helped deliver payloads for NASA's space exploration efforts such as the Phoenix Mars Lander, Mars Polar Lander, Deep Impact, Kepler, NEAR Shoemaker and the Mars Exploration Rovers, Spirit and Opportunity, as well as the U.S. Air Force Global Positioning System Block IIR fleet.
    [Show full text]