Extensions to the Time Lag Models for Practical Application to Rocket

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Extensions to the Time Lag Models for Practical Application to Rocket The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Engineering EXTENSIONS TO THE TIME LAG MODELS FOR PRACTICAL APPLICATION TO ROCKET ENGINE STABILITY DESIGN A Dissertation in Mechanical Engineering by Matthew J. Casiano © 2010 Matthew J. Casiano Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2010 The dissertation of Matthew J. Casiano was reviewed and approved* by the following: Domenic A. Santavicca Professor of Mechanical Engineering Co-chair of Committee Vigor Yang Adjunct Professor of Mechanical Engineering Dissertation Advisor Co-chair of Committee Richard A. Yetter Professor of Mechanical Engineering André L. Boehman Professor of Fuel Science and Materials Science and Engineering Tomas E. Nesman Aerospace Engineer at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Special Member Karen A. Thole Professor of Aerospace Engineering Head of the Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT The combustion instability problem in liquid-propellant rocket engines (LREs) has remained a tremendous challenge since their discovery in the 1930s. Improvements are usually made in solving the combustion instability problem primarily using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and also by testing demonstrator engines. Another approach is to use analytical models. Analytical models can be used such that design, redesign, or improvement of an engine system is feasible in a relatively short period of time. Improvements to the analytical models can greatly aid in design efforts. A thorough literature review is first conducted on liquid-propellant rocket engine (LRE) throttling. Throttling is usually studied in terms of vehicle descent or ballistic missile control however there are many other cases where throttling is important. It was found that combustion instabilities are one of a few major issues that occur during deep throttling (other major issues are heat transfer concerns, performance loss, and pump dynamics). In the past and again recently, gas injected into liquid propellants has shown to be a viable solution to throttle engines and to eliminate some forms of combustion instability. This review uncovered a clever solution that was used to eliminate a chug instability in the Common Extensible Cryogenic Engine (CECE), a modified RL10 engine. A separate review was also conducted on classic time lag combustion instability models. Several new stability models are developed by incorporating important features to the classic and contemporary models, which are commonly used in the aerospace rocket industry. The first two models are extensions of the original Crocco and Cheng concentrated combustion model with feed system contributions. A third new model is an extension to the Wenzel and Szuch double- time lag model also with feed system contributions. iv The first new model incorporates the appropriate injector acoustic boundary condition which is neglected in contemporary models. This new feature shows that the injector boundary can play a significant role for combustion stability, especially for gaseous injection systems or a system with an injector orifice on the order of the size of the chamber. The second new model additionally accounts for resistive effects. Advanced signal analysis techniques are used to extract frequency-dependent damping from a gas generator component data set. The damping values are then used in the new stability model to more accurately represent the chamber response of the component. The results show a more realistic representation of stability margin by incorporating the appropriate damping effects into the chamber response from data. The original Crocco model, a contemporary model, and the two new models are all compared and contrasted to a marginally stable test case showing their applicability. The model that incorporates resistive aspects shows the best comparison to the test data. Parametrics are also examined to show the influence of the new features and their applicability. The new features allow a more accurate representation of stability margin to be obtained. The third new model is an extension to the Wenzel and Szuch double-time lag chug model. The feed system chug model is extended to account for generic propellant flow rates. This model is also extended to incorporate aspects due to oxygen boiling and helium injection in the feed system. The solutions to the classic models, for the single-time lag and the double-time lag models, are often plotted on a practical engine operating map, however the models have presented some difficulties for numerical algorithms for several reasons. Closed-form solutions for use on these practical operating maps are formulated and developed. These models are incorporated in a graphical user interface tool and the new model is compared to an extensive data set. It correctly predicts the stability behavior at various operating conditions incorporating the influence of injected helium and boiling oxygen in the feed system. v TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................. vii LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................... xi NOMENCLATURE ................................................................................................................ xii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................... xxv Chapter 1 Introduction............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Motivation .................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Background ................................................................................................................ 3 1.2.1 Time-Lag-Based Combustion Instability Models ........................................... 3 1.2.2 Liquid-Propellant Rocket Engine Throttling ................................................... 4 1.3 Objective .................................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 2 Liquid-Propellant Rocket Engine Throttling ......................................................... 8 2.1 Throttling Review ...................................................................................................... 11 2.1.1 High-Pressure-Drop Injectors.......................................................................... 11 2.1.2 Dual-Manifold Injectors .................................................................................. 30 2.1.3 Gaseous Injection ............................................................................................ 41 2.1.4 Multiple Chambers .......................................................................................... 47 2.1.5 Pulse Modulation ............................................................................................. 49 2.1.6 Throat Throttling ............................................................................................. 54 2.1.7 Variable Area Injectors ................................................................................... 58 2.1.8 Hydrodynamically Dissipative Injectors ......................................................... 70 2.1.9 Combined Methods ......................................................................................... 72 2.2 Review Summary ....................................................................................................... 73 2.2.1 High-Pressure-Drop Injectors Summary ......................................................... 73 2.2.2 Dual-Manifold Injectors Summary ................................................................. 74 2.2.3 Gaseous Injection Summary ............................................................................ 76 2.2.4 Multiple Chambers Summary ......................................................................... 77 2.2.5 Pulse Modulation Summary ............................................................................ 77 2.2.6 Throat Throttling Summary ............................................................................ 78 2.2.7 Variable Area Injectors Summary ................................................................... 79 2.2.8 Hydrodynamically Dissipative Injectors Summary......................................... 80 Chapter 3 Time Lag Stability Models .................................................................................... 81 3.1 Research Goal, Strategy, and Objectives ................................................................... 85 3.2 Gunder and Friant Time Lag Model .......................................................................... 89 3.3 Summerfield Time Lag Model ................................................................................... 91 3.4 Crocco and Cheng Monopropellant Time Lag Chug Model ...................................... 93 3.5 Crocco and Cheng Bipropellant Time Lag Model ..................................................... 105 3.6 Notes on Crocco and Cheng Chug Time Lag Models ............................................... 110 vi 3.7 Natanzon Monopropellant Chug Time Lag Model .................................................... 111 3.8 Crocco and Cheng Longitudinal High Frequency Time Lag Model .........................
Recommended publications
  • The Argonauta
    ARGONAUTA The Newsletter of The Canadian Nautical Research Society / Société canadienne pour la recherche nautique Volume XXXVI Number 2 Spring 2019 ARGONAUTA Founded 1984 by Kenneth MacKenzie ISSN No. 2291-5427 Editors Isabel Campbell and Colleen McKee Winston (Kip) Scoville ~ Production/Distribution Manager Argonauta Editorial Office e-mail submissions to: [email protected] or [email protected] ARGONAUTA is published four times a year—Winter, Spring, Summer and Autumn Chair of the Editorial Board: Roger Sarty Editor The Northern Mariner/ William Glover Le marin du nord: Webmaster: Paul Adamthwaite Executive Officers President: Richard Gimblett 1st Vice President: Walter Lewis 2nd Vice President: Faye Kert Treasurer: Errolyn Humphreys Secretary: Michael Moir Membership Secretary: Sam McLean Councillor/Communications: Kip Scoville Councillor: Richard Goette Councillor: Tom Malcomson Councillor: David More Councillor: Jeff Noakes Councillor: Margaret Schotte Councillor: Ian Yeates Membership Business: P.O. Box 34029 Station B, Ottawa, Ontario, K2J 4B1, Canada e-mail: [email protected] Annual Membership including four issues of ARGONAUTA and four issues of THE NORTHERN MARINER/LE MARIN DU NORD: Canadian International Digital Only Individual $70 $80 $30 Benefactor $250 Institutional $95 $105 n/a Corporate $500 Student $35 $35 $35 Patron $1000 or above NASOH n/a n/a $30 Our Website: http://www.cnrs-scrn.org Copyright © CNRS/SCRN and all original copyright holders In this issue of the Argonauta Editorial 1 President’s Corner
    [Show full text]
  • Einicke Diplom.Pdf
    Zum Erlangen des akademischen Grades DIPLOMINGENIEUR (Dipl.-Ing.) Betreuer: Dr. Christian Bach Verantwortlicher Hochschullehrer: Prof. Dr. techn. Martin Tajmar Tag der Einreichung: 20.04.2021 Erster Gutachter: Prof. Dr. techn. Martin Tajmar Zweiter Gutachter: Dr. Christian Bach Hiermit erkläre ich, dass ich die von mir dem Institut für Luft-und Raumfahrttechnik der Fakultät Maschinenwesen eingereichte Diplomarbeit zum Thema Mischungsverhältnis- und Brennkammerdruckregelung eines Expander-Bleed Raketentriebwerks mit Reinforcement Learning (Mixture Ratio and Combustion Chamber Pressure Control of an Expander-Bleed Rocket Engine with Reinforcement Learning) selbstständig verfasst und keine anderen als die angegebenen Quellen und Hilfsmittel benutzt sowie Zitate kenntlich gemacht habe. Berlin, 20.04.2021 Karina Einicke Contents Nomenclature iv Acronyms vii 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Motivation . .1 1.2. Objectives and Approach . .2 2. Fundamentals of Liquid Rocket Engines 3 2.1. Control Loops . .5 2.1.1. Open-Loop Control . .5 2.1.2. Closed-Loop Control . .5 2.1.3. Reusable Liquid Rocket Engine Control . .6 2.2. Control Valves . .8 2.2.1. Flow Characteristics . .9 2.2.2. Valve Types . .9 2.3. Liquid Rocket Engine Control: Historical Background . 11 2.4. Summary . 13 3. LUMEN 15 3.1. LUMEN Components . 15 3.2. Operating Points . 17 3.3. EcosimPro/ESPSS Model . 18 3.3.1. LUMEN System Analysis . 21 3.3.2. LUMEN System Validation . 26 3.4. Summary . 27 4. Reinforcement Learning 28 4.1. Fundamentals of Reinforcement Learning . 28 4.2. Reinforcement Learning Algorithms . 31 4.2.1. Model-based and Model-free Reinforcement Learning . 31 4.2.2. Policy Optimization .
    [Show full text]
  • AIR-INDEPENDENT PROPULSION – AIP Technology Creates a New Undersea Threat Page 1 of 6
    AIR-INDEPENDENT PROPULSION – AIP Technology Creates a New Undersea Threat Page 1 of 6 AIR-INDEPENDENT PROPULSION AIP Technology Creates a New Undersea Threat Walter Type XVIIB up on the stocks. Pictured above is the German Walter Type XVIIB U-1406, partially dismantled shortly after the end of World War II. U-1406 was turned over to the U.S. Navy as a war prize and soon disposed of, but the Royal Navy later operated her sister ship, U-1407, as HMS Meteorite to gain experience in hydrogen-peroxide propulsion technologies. As interest mounts in "Air-Independent Propulsion" (AIP) for enhancing the performance of small, defensive submarines, a serious new underwater threat is developing in littoral waters. Increasingly, smaller nations unwilling or unable to accept the high cost of nuclear power to achieve greater underwater endurance and longer range are turning to lower-priced and less ambitious alternatives that still offer significant operational advantages over conventional diesel- electric submarines. The best of the latter boats, such as the German-designed Type 209 or the Russian KILO, can remain submerged on battery at slow speed for periods on the order of three to five days. But now, several AIP schemes in development or already in operation can increase slow-speed endurance to as much as three weeks or a month. While still dwarfed by the potential of nuclear power, AIP offers diesel submarines a remarkable increase in capability. AIP - The Early History Despite their initial successes, submarine pioneers were still eager to find some means to free their boats from the necessity of surfacing frequently for access to the atmospheric oxygen demanded by the gasoline or diesel engines that charged the batteries.
    [Show full text]
  • Orion Capsule Launch Abort System Analysis
    Orion Capsule Launch Abort System Analysis Assignment 2 AE 4802 Spring 2016 – Digital Design and Manufacturing Georgia Institute of Technology Authors: Tyler Scogin Michel Lacerda Jordan Marshall Table of Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Mission Profile ............................................................................................................................. 7 1.2 Literature Review ........................................................................................................................ 8 2. Conceptual Design ............................................................................................................................. 13 2.1 Design Process ........................................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Vehicle Performance Characteristics ......................................................................................... 15 2.3 Vehicle/Sub-Component Sizing ................................................................................................. 15 3. Vehicle 3D Model in CATIA ................................................................................................................ 22 3.1 3D Modeling Roles and Responsibilities: .................................................................................. 22 3.2 Design Parameters and Relations:............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Materials for Liquid Propulsion Systems
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20160008869 2019-08-29T17:47:59+00:00Z CHAPTER 12 Materials for Liquid Propulsion Systems John A. Halchak Consultant, Los Angeles, California James L. Cannon NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama Corey Brown Aerojet-Rocketdyne, West Palm Beach, Florida 12.1 Introduction Earth to orbit launch vehicles are propelled by rocket engines and motors, both liquid and solid. This chapter will discuss liquid engines. The heart of a launch vehicle is its engine. The remainder of the vehicle (with the notable exceptions of the payload and guidance system) is an aero structure to support the propellant tanks which provide the fuel and oxidizer to feed the engine or engines. The basic principle behind a rocket engine is straightforward. The engine is a means to convert potential thermochemical energy of one or more propellants into exhaust jet kinetic energy. Fuel and oxidizer are burned in a combustion chamber where they create hot gases under high pressure. These hot gases are allowed to expand through a nozzle. The molecules of hot gas are first constricted by the throat of the nozzle (de-Laval nozzle) which forces them to accelerate; then as the nozzle flares outwards, they expand and further accelerate. It is the mass of the combustion gases times their velocity, reacting against the walls of the combustion chamber and nozzle, which produce thrust according to Newton’s third law: for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. [1] Solid rocket motors are cheaper to manufacture and offer good values for their cost.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstellar Probe on Space Launch System (Sls)
    INTERSTELLAR PROBE ON SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM (SLS) David Alan Smith SLS Spacecraft/Payload Integration & Evolution (SPIE) NASA-MSFC December 13, 2019 0497 SLS EVOLVABILITY FOUNDATION FOR A GENERATION OF DEEP SPACE EXPLORATION 322 ft. Up to 313ft. 365 ft. 325 ft. 365 ft. 355 ft. Universal Universal Launch Abort System Stage Adapter 5m Class Stage Adapter Orion 8.4m Fairing 8.4m Fairing Fairing Long (Up to 90’) (up to 63’) Short (Up to 63’) Interim Cryogenic Exploration Exploration Exploration Propulsion Stage Upper Stage Upper Stage Upper Stage Launch Vehicle Interstage Interstage Interstage Stage Adapter Core Stage Core Stage Core Stage Solid Solid Evolved Rocket Rocket Boosters Boosters Boosters RS-25 RS-25 Engines Engines SLS Block 1 SLS Block 1 Cargo SLS Block 1B Crew SLS Block 1B Cargo SLS Block 2 Crew SLS Block 2 Cargo > 26 t (57k lbs) > 26 t (57k lbs) 38–41 t (84k-90k lbs) 41-44 t (90k–97k lbs) > 45 t (99k lbs) > 45 t (99k lbs) Payload to TLI/Moon Launch in the late 2020s and early 2030s 0497 IS THIS ROCKET REAL? 0497 SLS BLOCK 1 CONFIGURATION Launch Abort System (LAS) Utah, Alabama, Florida Orion Stage Adapter, California, Alabama Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle RL10 Engine Lockheed Martin, 5 Segment Solid Rocket Aerojet Rocketdyne, Louisiana, KSC Florida Booster (2) Interim Cryogenic Northrop Grumman, Propulsion Stage (ICPS) Utah, KSC Boeing/United Launch Alliance, California, Alabama Launch Vehicle Stage Adapter Teledyne Brown Engineering, California, Alabama Core Stage & Avionics Boeing Louisiana, Alabama RS-25 Engine (4)
    [Show full text]
  • Delta IV Parker Solar Probe Mission Booklet
    A United Launch Alliance (ULA) Delta IV Heavy what is the source of high-energy solar particles. MISSION rocket will deliver NASA’s Parker Solar Probe to Parker Solar Probe will make 24 elliptical orbits an interplanetary trajectory to the sun. Liftoff of the sun and use seven flybys of Venus to will occur from Space Launch Complex-37 at shrink the orbit closer to the sun during the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida. NASA seven-year mission. selected ULA’s Delta IV Heavy for its unique MISSION ability to deliver the necessary energy to begin The probe will fly seven times closer to the the Parker Solar Probe’s journey to the sun. sun than any spacecraft before, a mere 3.9 million miles above the surface which is about 4 OVERVIEW The Parker percent the distance from the sun to the Earth. Solar Probe will At its closest approach, Parker Solar Probe will make repeated reach a top speed of 430,000 miles per hour journeys into the or 120 miles per second, making it the fastest sun’s corona and spacecraft in history. The incredible velocity trace the flow of is necessary so that the spacecraft does not energy to answer fall into the sun during the close approaches. fundamental Temperatures will climb to 2,500 degrees questions such Fahrenheit, but the science instruments will as why the solar remain at room temperature behind a 4.5-inch- atmosphere is thick carbon composite shield. dramatically Image courtesy of NASA hotter than the The mission was named in honor of Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Design of a 500 Lbf Liquid Oxygen and Liquid Methane Rocket Engine for Suborbital Flight Jesus Eduardo Trillo University of Texas at El Paso, [email protected]
    University of Texas at El Paso DigitalCommons@UTEP Open Access Theses & Dissertations 2016-01-01 Design Of A 500 Lbf Liquid Oxygen And Liquid Methane Rocket Engine For Suborbital Flight Jesus Eduardo Trillo University of Texas at El Paso, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd Part of the Aerospace Engineering Commons, and the Mechanical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Trillo, Jesus Eduardo, "Design Of A 500 Lbf Liquid Oxygen And Liquid Methane Rocket Engine For Suborbital Flight" (2016). Open Access Theses & Dissertations. 767. https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd/767 This is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UTEP. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UTEP. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DESIGN OF A 500 LBF LIQUID OXYGEN AND LIQUID METHANE ROCKET ENGINE FOR SUBORBITAL FLIGHT JESUS EDUARDO TRILLO Master’s Program in Mechanical Engineering APPROVED: Ahsan Choudhuri, Ph.D., Chair Norman Love, Ph.D. Luis Rene Contreras, Ph.D. Charles H. Ambler, Ph.D. Dean of the Graduate School Copyright © by Jesus Eduardo Trillo 2016 DESIGN OF A 500 LBF LIQUID OXYGEN AND LIQUID METHANE ROCKET ENGINE FOR SUBORBITAL FLIGHT by JESUS EDUARDO TRILLO, B.S.ME THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at El Paso in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Mechanical Engineering THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO December 2016 Acknowledgements Foremost, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my advisor Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Cryogenic Technology & Rocket Engines
    ISSN (O): 2393-8609 International Journal of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Volume 2 – No.5, August 2015 Cryogenic Technology & Rocket Engines AKHIL GARG KARTIK JAKHU KISHAN SINGH ABHINAV B.Tech – Aerospace B.Tech – Aerospace B.Tech – Aerospace MAURYA Engg. Engg. Engg. B.Tech – Aerospace PUNJAB PUNJAB PUNJAB Engg. TECHNICAL TECHNICAL TECHNICAL PUNJAB UNIVERSITY, UNIVERSITY, UNIVERSITY, TECHNICAL JALANDHAR JALANDHAR JALANDHAR UNIVERSITY, akhilgarg.313@g kartik.lphawk@g kishansngh1996 JALANDHAR mail.com mail.com @gmail.com abhinavguru123 @gmail.com ABSTRACT 3.2 What is Cryogenic Rocket Engine? This paper is all about the rocket engine involving the use of A cryogenic rocket engine is a rocket engine that cryogenic technology at a cryogenic temperature (123K). This uses a cryogenic fuel or oxidizer, that is, its fuel or basically uses the liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen as an oxidizer (or both) is gases liquefied and stored at oxidizer and fuel, which are very clean and non-pollutant very low temperatures. Notably, these engines were fuels compared to other hydrocarbon fuels like petrol, diesel, one of the main factors of the ultimate success in gasoline, LPG, CNG, etc., sometimes, liquid nitrogen is also reaching the Moon by the Saturn V rocket. used as an fuel. During World War II, when powerful rocket engines were first considered by the German, American and Keywords Soviet engineers independently, all discovered that Rocket engine, Cryogenic technology, Cryogenic temperature, rocket engines need high mass flow rate of both Liquid hydrogen and Oxygen. oxidizer and fuel to generate a sufficient thrust. At that time oxygen and low molecular weight 1.
    [Show full text]
  • H2O2) Is Commonly Used for Cleaning Cuts and Sores, and That a Bottle of Hydrogen Peroxide Can Turn a Brunette Into a Blonde
    Hydrogen Peroxide and Sugar Most people know that Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2) is commonly used for cleaning cuts and sores, and that a bottle of hydrogen peroxide can turn a brunette into a blonde. Yet, how many people know that hydrogen peroxide can also be used as a powerful rocket fuel? And how many people know that hydrogen peroxide accelerated the jet car Peroxide Thunder to 450 mph in 3.4 seconds? Hydrogen peroxide is commonly used (in very low concentrations, typically around 5%) to bleach human hair, hence the phrases "peroxide blonde" and "bottle blonde". It burns the skin upon contact in sufficient concentration. In lower concentrations (3%), it is used medically for cleaning wounds and removing dead tissue. Combined with urea as carbamide peroxide, it is used for whitening teeth. Hydrogen peroxide tends to decompose exothermically into water and oxygen gas. The rate of decomposition is dependent on the temperature and concentration of the peroxide, as well as the presence of impurities and stabilizers. The use of a catalyst (such as manganese dioxide, silver, or the enzyme catalase) vastly increases the rate of decomposition of hydrogen peroxide. High strength peroxide (also called high-test peroxide, or HTP) must be stored in a vented container to prevent the buildup of pressure leading to the eventual rupture of the container. In the 1930s and 40s, Hellmuth Walter pioneered methods of harnessing the rapid decomposition of hydrogen peroxide in gas turbines and rocket engines. Hydrogen peroxide works best as a propellant in extremely high concentrations of 90% or higher. Hydrogen peroxide - Wikipedia Online Encyclopedia Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) can store energy in the form of chemical energy, similar to hydrogen.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a 10 Kn LOX/HTPB Hybrid Rocket Engine Through Successive Development and Testing of Scaled Prototypes
    DOI: 10.13009/EUCASS2017-334 7TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE FOR AERONAUTICS AND AEROSPACE SCIENCES (EUCASS) Development of a 10 kN LOX/HTPB Hybrid Rocket Engine through Successive Development and Testing of Scaled Prototypes Maximilian Bambauer and Markus Brandl WARR (TUM) c/o TUM Lehrstuhl für Raumfahrttechnik Boltzmannstraße 15 D-85748 Garching bei München [email protected] [email protected] · Abstract The development of a hybrid flight engine for a sounding rocket requires intensive preparation work and pretests. To obtain better understanding of the difficulties in design and operation that occur with LOX/HTPB rocket engines, four rocket engines with increasing size and thrust level are successively developed and manufactured. Listed chronologically, those engines are the demonstrator engine, the sub- scale engine with a cylindrical grain geometry and later a star shaped geometry, the full-scale test engine and the full-scale flight version. At first a small-scale technology demonstrator was developed. It pro- duced a mean thrust of 160N for 5s and had the purpose to validate the design calculations and to gain first experiences with the use of cryogenic propellants, especially regarding cooldown procedures. Based on this test results the so-called sub-scale engine was developed and tested. The engine can be operated with two grain configurations, using either a cylindrical grain or a star shaped grain. The star shaped grain geometries are realized, using an additive manufactured core, outside of which the HTPB is casted. In the low thrust configuration, the engine is operated using a cylindrical single port HTPB grain and it produces a thrust of about 540 N for a duration of 10 s.
    [Show full text]
  • The Last Achievements in the Development of a Rocket Grade Hydrogen Peroxide Catalyst Chamber with Flow Capacity of 1 Kg/S
    SPACE PROPULSION 2014, ST-RCS-85, 19th to 22nd May 2014, Cologne, Germany THE LAST ACHIEVEMENTS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF A ROCKET GRADE HYDROGEN PEROXIDE CATALYST CHAMBER WITH FLOW CAPACITY OF 1 KG/S Ognjan Božić German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Aerodynamics and Flow Technology, Germany, [email protected] Dennis Porrmann, Daniel Lancelle and Stefan May German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Aerodynamics and Flow Technology, Germany ABSTRACT ABBREVIATIONS Worldwide, the hybrid rocket propulsion technology gained in importance recently. A new innovative hybrid AHRES Advanced Hybrid Rocket Engine rocket engine concept is developed at the German Simulation Aerospace Center (DLR) within the program “AHRES”. H2O Water This rocket engine is based on hydroxyl-terminated H2O2 Hydrogen peroxide polybutadiene with metallic additives as solid fuel and O2 Oxygen rocket grade hydrogen peroxide (high test peroxide: HTP) HRE Hybrid Rocket Engine as liquid oxidiser. Instead of a conventional ignition HTPB Hydroxyl-terminated Polybutadiene system, a catalyst chamber with a silver mesh catalyst is HTP High Test Peroxide designed, to decompose the HTP to steam and oxygen at LRE Liquid rocket engine high temperatures up to 615 °C. The newly modified NTO Dinitrogen Tetraoxide (N2O4) catalyst chamber is able to decompose up to 1.3 kg/s of SHAKIRA Simulation of High test peroxide Advanced 87,5% HTP. Used as a monopropellant thruster, this (K)Catalytic Ignition system for Rocket equals an average thrust of 1600 N. Applications The catalyst chamber consists of the catalyst itself, a mount for the catalyst material, a retainer, an injector NOMENCLATURE manifold and a casing.
    [Show full text]