DOCSLIB.ORG

Decision Following the Hearing of an Application for Resource Consent Under the Resource Management Act 1991

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Decision Following the Hearing of an Application for Resource Consent Under the Resource Management Act 1991 Decision following the hearing of an application for resource consent under the Resource Management Act 1991 Proposal A Resource Consent application by Fletcher Residential Limited to undertake a two lot subdivision to subdivide land to create one residential lot and a road to vest, with associated land use consent for earthworks and construction works to facilitate a connection between the Waiata Shores development and Conifer Grove at 3 Te Napi Drive and the northern end of Brylee Drive, Conifer Grove. These GRANTED. The reasons are set out below. Application number: BUN60316780 Site address: 3 Te Napi Drive and the northern end of Brylee Drive, Conifer Grove Applicant: Fletcher Residential Limited Hearing commenced: Wednesday 11 September 2019, 9.30am Hearing panel: Robert Scott (Chairperson) Pamela Peters Michael Parsonson Appearances: For the Applicant: Sue Simons, Legal Tamsin Gorman, Legal Steven Evans, Fletchers Residential Vaughan Crang, Engineering Matthew Noonan, Air Quality Jon Styles, Acoustic Donald McKenzie, Traffic Angela Crang, Planning For the Submitters: • Auckland Transport represented by: - Margaret McCullough, Legal - Trevor Mackie, Planning - Michael Jongeneel, Traffic - Kelly Seekup, Planning Woolworths New Zealand Limited Philip Brown, Planning Lisa Blake - 52 Walter Stevens Drive, Conifer Grove Daniel Newman - 4 Glen Eagles Road, Wattle Downs Matthew Caldwell – 63 Brylee Drive, Conifer Grove Paul McSweeny - 38 Perotti Place, Conifer Grove 3 Te Napi Drive & and the northern end of Brylee Drive 1 BUN60316780 Robert Rose - 7 Chippewa Place, Conifer Grove Josie Faber - 40 Brylee Drive, Conifer Grove Kevin Everitt - 20 Aristoy close, Conifer Grove Papakura Local Board - Brent Catchpole, Chairperson For Council: Natalie Bedggood, Principal Specialist Planner Neil Mumby, Reporting Planner Andrew Temperley, Traffic Engineer Lindsay Leitch, Noise Consultant Tanisha Hazelwood, Hearings Advisor Hearing adjourned Wednesday 11 September 2019 Commissioners’ site visit Thursday 5 September 2019 Hearing Closed: 30 September 2019 INTRODUCTION 1. This decision is made on behalf of the Auckland Council (“the Council”) by Independent Hearing Commissioners Robert Scott, Pamela Peters and Michael Parsonson, appointed and acting under delegated authority under sections 34 and 34A of the Resource Management Act 1991 (“the RMA”). 2. This decision contains the findings from our deliberations on the application for resource consent and has been prepared in accordance with section 113 of the RMA. 3. The applications were publicly notified on 23 August 2018. A total of 514 submissions were received, with 16 in support and 497 in opposition. One submission was received late after the close of the submission period. 4. In reaching our decision we have considered: • The application, its AEE (prepared by Ms Angela Crang) and all its supporting documents and plans, including amended material provided at the hearing; • The Council planner’s (Mr Neil Mumby) section 42A hearing report (Hearing Report), with supporting reports attached to his s.42A report; • The pre-circulated expert Evidence in Chief from the applicant; • The pre-circulated expert evidence from Woolworths New Zealand Limited; • The verbal and written submissions and correspondence from the submitters; • The applicant’s Counsel’s legal submissions from Ms Sue Simons; 3 Te Napi Drive & and the northern end of Brylee Drive 2 BUN60316780 • The applicant’s evidence provided at the hearing by Steven Evans, Vaughan Crang, Matthew Noonan, Jon Styles, Donald McKenzie and Angela Crang; • The evidence of Auckland Transport provided by Mr Mackie, Mr Jongeneel and the legal submissions by Ms McCullough; • The evidence of Mr Philip Brown; • The written submissions from Lisa Blake, Daniel Newman, Matthew Caldwell, Paul Sweeney, Robert Rose, Josie Faber, and Kevin Everitt; • The presentation by Mr Brent Catchpole for the Papakura Local Board; • The responses to our questions from the parties during the hearing process; • The Applicant’s right of reply; • Relevant sections of the Auckland Unitary Plan: Operative in Part (Unitary Plan); and • The matters we identified during our site visits prior to and following the hearing of evidence. Summary of proposal and activity status 5. The proposal, consent history and the required resource consents are set out in detail within Section 3 of Mr Mumby’s hearing report. The proposal comprises three components which are described in the hearing report as: a. Subdivision creating one vacant lot for future residential purposes (Lot 4); b. One lot to be vested as road for the purposes of a road connection (Lot 820) c. Works to facilitate the formation of a road within Lot 820 and also within the Northern end of Brylee Drive. 6. The proposed residential lot would be 475m² in area and would have a finished floor level that is 500m above an identified 1% AEP floodplain. The lot comprising the road to vest would have an area of 628m² and would facilitate a road connection that will join Gosper Drive in the newly establish residential subdivision at Waiata Shores with Brylee Drive in the established suburb of Conifer Grove. The 30m road connection would comprise an 11-metre-wide carriageway from Gosper Drive transitioning down to 10.5m width carriage way at Brylee Drive. We were advised by Mr Mumby that the difference in carriage way width is due to the differences in legal road widths in existence in these two areas. 7. The physical construction works necessary to construct the road entail 1,212m³ of earthworks over an area of 0.2 hectares, with approximately 608m³ being used on the site and the balance being transported off site. 3 Te Napi Drive & and the northern end of Brylee Drive 3 BUN60316780 8. The proposed works located on the northern unformed portion of Brylee Drive are also to be carried out partially within the New Zealand Transport Agency Designation 6706. This designation encompasses the Takanini interchange and a small side link through to Brylee Drive and relates to the motorway between Takanini and Drury. There are no conditions on this designation. The applicant has provided the written approval of the New Zealand Transport Agency for the proposed works to satisfy the requirements of section 176 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA). 9. We were advised by the applicant and the Council officers that the road connection was being provided in accordance with a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the applicant and Auckland Transport (AT) to obtain the necessary consents and construct a permanent connecting road. We discuss this MOU and its genesis later in this decision. 10. In essence, the applicant seeks subdivision and land use consents to subdivide land to create one residential lot and a road to vest, with associated construction works to facilitate a connection between Waiata Shores and Conifer Grove in accordance with the MOU between the applicant and Auckland Transport. 11. We were advised by the applicant and the Council that a consequence of installing the proposed connection between the two residential areas and the predicted increase in vehicle numbers along Brylee Drive (which until this time has operated as a cul-de-sac with low vehicle flows, especially at its northern end), traffic calming devices, such as a speed tables to slow vehicles speeds would need to be installed. 12. There was no disagreement between the parties or the planners present at the hearing (Ms Crang, Mr Mumby, Ms Bedggood, Trevor Mackie and Mr Brown) regarding the consents required and as a result these are confirmed for our decision and summarised below from the hearing report: Land use consents • Restricted Discretionary Activity consent for 2000m2 of earthworks pursuant to E12.4.1 (A5) • Restricted Discretionary Activity consent for more than 250m3 of earthworks pursuant to E12.4.1 (A10) • Restricted Discretionary Activity for noncompliance with the following standards pursuant to C.1.9 (2); - E12.6.2(11) Earthworks in a 1% AEP floodplain. The proposal involves 2000m2 and 1212m3 of earthworks within the flood plain. 3 Te Napi Drive & and the northern end of Brylee Drive 4 BUN60316780 Subdivision Consent • Restricted Discretionary Activity consent for subdivision that is in accordance with E38.8.2.3 pursuant to Rule E38.4.1 (A16) • Restricted Discretionary Activity consent for subdivision in a flood plain pursuant to E38.4.1 (A11). 13. Overall the proposal has been considered as a restricted discretionary activity. Procedural matters 14. We note that there was a late submission received from Mr David Hopkins (submission 514) received on 10 October 2018. We have reviewed this submission and while the submission was 14 working days late, we consider that it raises matters that are somewhat generic and already covered in other submissions and does not introduce any new matters. Accordingly, it was not apparent that the applicant would be prejudiced if the submission were to be accepted and considered. We also note that the submitter did not indicate whether it wanted to be heard and did not attend the hearing. The applicant also indicated that it had no view on whether this late submission should be accepted or rejected. Finding 15. Under sections 37 and 37A of the RMA, the time limit for the receipt of submissions is waived to accept the late submission of Mr David Hopkins (submission 514). Relevant statutory provisions considered 16. We have considered the application in terms of the matters set out in section 104 which requires us to, subject to Part 2, have regard to– (a) any actual and potential effects on the environment of allowing the activity; and (b) any relevant provisions of— (i) a national environmental standard: (ii) other regulations: (iii) a national policy statement: (iv) a New Zealand coastal policy statement: (v) a regional policy statement or proposed regional policy statement: 3 Te Napi Drive & and the northern end of Brylee Drive 5 BUN60316780 (vi) a plan or proposed plan; and (c) any other matter the consent authority considers relevant and reasonably necessary to determine the application.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Benchmark Survey of the New Zealand Public's Knowledge And
    Benchmark survey of the New Zealand public’s knowledge and understanding of the First World War and its attitudes to centenary commemorations Report prepared for: First World War Centenary Programme Office Contact person: Colmar Brunton Date: 4 March 2013 Table of Contents Executive summary..........................................................................................................................................3 Conclusions......................................................................................................................................................6 Background and objectives..............................................................................................................................8 Research methodology ....................................................................................................................................9 Survey results ................................................................................................................................................11 Interest in history and engagement in learning about history.........................................................................11 History ..........................................................................................................................................................11 Local community history ..............................................................................................................................13 Genealogy.....................................................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Assessment of Areas Susceptible to Coastal Erosion Volume 2: Appendices a - J February TR 2009/009
    Regional Assessment of Areas Susceptible to Coastal Erosion Volume 2: Appendices A - J February TR 2009/009 Auckland Regional Council Technical Report No. 009 February 2009 ISSN 1179-0504 (Print) ISSN 1179-0512 (Online) ISBN 978-1-877528-16-3 Contents Appendix A: Consultants Brief Appendix B: Peer reviewer’s comments Appendix C: Summary of Relevant Tonkin & Taylor Jobs Appendix D: Summary of Shoreline Characterization Appendix E: Field Investigation Data Appendix F: Summary of Regional Beach Properties Appendix G: Summary of Regional Cliff Properties Appendix H: Description of Physical Setting Appendix I: Heli-Survey DVDs (Contact ARC Librarian) Appendix J: Analysis of Beach Profile Changes Regional Assessment of Areas Susceptible to Coastal Erosion, Volume 2: Appendices A-J Appendix A: Consultants Brief Appendix B: Peer reviewer’s comments Appendix C: Summary of relevant Tonkin & Taylor jobs Job Number North East Year of Weathered Depth is Weathered Typical Cliff Cliff Slope Cliff Slope Composite Composite Final Slope Geology Rec Setback erosion rate Comments Street address Suburb investigation layer depth Estimated/ layer Slope weathered layer Height (deg) (rads) slope from slope from (degree) from Crest (m) (m/yr) (m) Greater than (deg) slope (rad) (m) calc (degree) profile (deg) 6 RIVERVIEW PANMURE 12531.000 2676066 6475685 1994 2.40 58 0.454 12.0 51.5 0.899 43.70 35 35 avt 6 ROAD 15590.000 6472865 2675315 2001 2.40 0.454 4.0 30.0 0.524 27.48 27 avt 8 29 MATAROA RD OTAHUHU 16619.000 6475823 2675659 1999 2.40 0.454 6.0 50.0 0.873 37.07 37 avt LAGOON DRIVE PANMURE long term recession ~ FIDELIS AVENUE 5890.000 2665773 6529758 1983 0.75 G 0.454 0.000 N.D Kk 15 - 20 0.050 50mm/yr 80m setback from toe FIDELIS AVE ALGIES BAY recc.
    [Show full text]
  • TOP MEDIAN SALE PRICE (OCT19—SEP20) Hatfields Beach
    Warkworth Makarau Waiwera Puhoi TOP MEDIAN SALE PRICE (OCT19—SEP20) Hatfields Beach Wainui EPSOM .............. $1,791,000 HILLSBOROUGH ....... $1,100,000 WATTLE DOWNS ......... $856,750 Orewa PONSONBY ........... $1,775,000 ONE TREE HILL ...... $1,100,000 WARKWORTH ............ $852,500 REMUERA ............ $1,730,000 BLOCKHOUSE BAY ..... $1,097,250 BAYVIEW .............. $850,000 Kaukapakapa GLENDOWIE .......... $1,700,000 GLEN INNES ......... $1,082,500 TE ATATŪ SOUTH ....... $850,000 WESTMERE ........... $1,700,000 EAST TĀMAKI ........ $1,080,000 UNSWORTH HEIGHTS ..... $850,000 Red Beach Army Bay PINEHILL ........... $1,694,000 LYNFIELD ........... $1,050,000 TITIRANGI ............ $843,000 KOHIMARAMA ......... $1,645,500 OREWA .............. $1,050,000 MOUNT WELLINGTON ..... $830,000 Tindalls Silverdale Beach SAINT HELIERS ...... $1,640,000 BIRKENHEAD ......... $1,045,500 HENDERSON ............ $828,000 Gulf Harbour DEVONPORT .......... $1,575,000 WAINUI ............. $1,030,000 BIRKDALE ............. $823,694 Matakatia GREY LYNN .......... $1,492,000 MOUNT ROSKILL ...... $1,015,000 STANMORE BAY ......... $817,500 Stanmore Bay MISSION BAY ........ $1,455,000 PAKURANGA .......... $1,010,000 PAPATOETOE ........... $815,000 Manly SCHNAPPER ROCK ..... $1,453,100 TORBAY ............. $1,001,000 MASSEY ............... $795,000 Waitoki Wade HAURAKI ............ $1,450,000 BOTANY DOWNS ....... $1,000,000 CONIFER GROVE ........ $783,500 Stillwater Heads Arkles MAIRANGI BAY ....... $1,450,000 KARAKA ............. $1,000,000 ALBANY ............... $782,000 Bay POINT CHEVALIER .... $1,450,000 OTEHA .............. $1,000,000 GLENDENE ............. $780,000 GREENLANE .......... $1,429,000 ONEHUNGA ............. $999,000 NEW LYNN ............. $780,000 Okura Bush GREENHITHE ......... $1,425,000 PAKURANGA HEIGHTS .... $985,350 TAKANINI ............. $780,000 SANDRINGHAM ........ $1,385,000 HELENSVILLE .......... $985,000 GULF HARBOUR ......... $778,000 TAKAPUNA ........... $1,356,000 SUNNYNOOK ............ $978,000 MĀNGERE .............
    [Show full text]
  • South & East Auckland
    G A p R D D Paremoremo O N R Sunnynook Course EM Y P R 18 U ParemoremoA O H N R D E M Schnapper Rock W S Y W R D O L R SUNSET RD E R L ABERDEEN T I A Castor Bay H H TARGE SUNNYNOOK S Unsworth T T T S Forrest C Heights E O South & East Auckland R G Hill R L Totara Vale R D E A D R 1 R N AIRA O S Matapihi Point F W F U I T Motutapu E U R RD Stony Batter D L Milford Waitemata THE R B O D Island Thompsons Point Historic HI D EN AR KITCHENER RD Waihihi Harbour RE H Hakaimango Point Reserve G Greenhithe R R TRISTRAM Bayview D Kauri Point TAUHINU E Wairau P Korakorahi Point P DIANA DR Valley U IPATIKI CHIVALRY RD HILLSIDERD 1 A R CHARTWELL NZAF Herald K D Lake Takapuna SUNNYBRAE RD SHAKESPEARE RD ase RNZAF T Pupuke t Island 18 Glenfield AVE Takapuna A Auckland nle H Takapuna OCEAN VIEW RD kland a I Golf Course A hi R Beach Golf Course ro O ia PT T a E O Holiday Palm Beach L R HURSTMERE RD W IL D Park D V BEACH HAVEN RD NORTHCOTE R BAY RD R N Beach ARCHERS RD Rangitoto B S P I O B E K A S D A O D Island Haven I R R B R A I R K O L N U R CORONATION RD O E Blackpool H E Hillcrest R D A A K R T N Church Bay Y O B A SM K N D E N R S Birkdale I R G Surfdale MAN O’WA Hobsonville G A D R North Shore A D L K A D E Rangitawhiri Point D E Holiday Park LAK T R R N OCEANRALEIGH VIEW RD I R H E A R E PUPUKE Northcote Hauraki A 18 Y D EXMOUTH RD 2 E Scott Pt D RD L R JUTLAND RD E D A E ORAPIU RD RD S Birkenhead V I W K D E A Belmont W A R R K ONEWA L HaurakiMotorway .
    [Show full text]
  • PAPAKURA PLAY NETWORK GAP ANALYSIS November 2020 09 1:25,000 at A3 Papakura Local Board VILLAGE GREEN JOIN LINE
    PLAY NETWORK GAP ANALYSIS PAPAKURA LOCAL BOARD, AUCKLAND STUDY AND STRATEGIC ADVICE NOVEMBER 2020 W: www.bespokelandscape.co.nz | E: [email protected] | P: +64 9 520 2164 | A: PO Box 38319, Howick, Auckland, 2145 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION + METHODOLOGY Papakura Study Area ........................................................................01 Purpose .................................................................................................01 Policy Context .....................................................................................01 Scope and Limitations .....................................................................01 Open Space and Playspace Context ...........................................01 Methodology ......................................................................................03 CURRENT PLAY NETWORK Quantity and Distribution ..............................................................08 Play Experience Provision ...............................................................08 Age Group Provision ........................................................................08 PLAYSPACE TYPOLOGIES MAP ..................................................................................................................09 PLAY EXPERIENCES MAP ..................................................................................................................11 SPECIALISED PLAY EXPERIENCES MAP ..................................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Classified Summarised Notes. North Island, 1 July 1994 to 30 June 1995
    Journal of the Ornithological Society of New Zealand a- a- - -- ----" I VOLW43 PART 3 SEPTEMBER 1996 L-- L Classified Summarised Notes. North Island, 1 July 1994 to 30 June 1995 Compiled by G. RICHARD PARRISH' and J.W. LOCKZ '145 Church Street, Whangarei; 2118 The Ridgeway, Wellington, New Zealand Classified Summarised Notes (CSN) are a selection of observations provided by 204 members and friends of the Ornithological Society of New Zealand (OSNZ). This year observations were received from 11 Nonh ~slandregions and six members provided individual contributions. No observations were received from Taranaki and Wanganui Regions. The purpose of CSN is to record the results of bird census counts, anecdoml observations of behaviour and to improve our understanding of NZ bird d~stribution.In general, those observations that do not add to our knowledge of b~rddistribution as shown in The Atlas of Bird Distribution in NZ are ignored. Nest record observations, band recoveries and beach patrol summaries are covered by other OSNZ schemes and usually are not included In CSN. Contributors: D. J. & I>,J. Agnew, P. J. Anderson, I. G. Andrew, G N. Arnold, I- E. Bailey, 1). G. Baker, K. S. & P. C. Baker, H. W. Banks, R. Batcheler, P. F. Battley, A. J. Beauchamp, J. R. Berry, A. E. Billing, C. Bindon, D. Binney, L. &. G. Blackmore, B. \V. Boeson, D. F. Booth, P. D. Bovill. J. A. Brierley, l? Brindley, K. L. Buchanan. K. G.Buckley, T. A. Buckley, S. Bull, C. L. Bunt, E. K. Cameron, L. Cameron, R. Carmichael, A. B. Challinor, S P.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Local Property Report
    Takanini Your local property report This report covers your local suburbs of Alfriston, Alfriston, Ardmore, Conifer Grove, Manurewa, Manurewa, Manurewa East, Pahurehure, Papakura, Randwick Park, Randwick Park and Takanini. June 2019 Brought to you by the team at LJ Hooker Takanini pq ph. 09 320 5131 f. 09 320 5135 ef [email protected] wx takanini.ljhooker.co.nz/ Your local property report What’s happening in our local property market Recent Sales (12 months) At LJ Hooker Takanini our goal is to provide you with the information you need to make confident decisions about property - whether you are buying, selling, investing or renting. We have created this report which details local market conditions and how property is performing in your area which at times can be very different to the combined performance of the capital cities. Let us help you stay on top of changes in your local property market every month. Across our local market, we have seen 2,486 properties listed grew 3.6% across 503 individual sales with a median of for sale, over the past 12 months, which is higher than the $637,000. same time last year. This has impacted sales with 1,988 taking place over the past 12 months. Looking at the market, the The most traded suburb for homes in our area has been best performing suburb, over the past 12 months, has been Papakura with 504 homes sold over the past 12 months. Pahurehure which has seen its median sales price grow by Dwelling prices in Papakura have remained relatively stable with 4.4%.
    [Show full text]
  • Routes Manurewa Fare Zones & Boundaries Routes
    Manurewa Routes Fare Zones 33 Papakura, Great South Rd, Manurewa, Manukau, Southern Bus Timetable Otahuhu Town Centre, Otahuhu Station & Boundaries 361 Manurewa, Clendon Park, Homai, Manukau, Tui Rd, Otara MIT North Campus Wellsford 362 Weymouth, Manurewa, Great South Rd, Manukau Station Omaha 363 Manurewa, Wattle Downs Matakana 365 Manukau Station, Homai, Manurewa, Randwick Park, Warkworth Takanini Station, Porchester Rd, Papakura Station 366 Manurewa, The Gardens, Everglade Dr, Manukau Station Warkworth Waiwera Helensville Hibiscus Coast Your guide to buses in this area Other timetables available in this area that may interest you Orewa Wainui Kaukapakapa Hibiscus Coast Gulf Harbour Timetable Routes Waitoki Mangere, Otahuhu, 31, 32, 309, 309X, 313, 321, 324, Upper North Shore Papatoetoe 25, 326, 380 Otara, Papatoetoe, Albany 31, 33, 314, 325, 351, 352, 353, 361 Waiheke Highbrook, East Tamaki Constellation Lower North Shore Riverhead Hauraki Gulf Takapuna Rangitoto Papakura 33, 365, 371, 372, 373, 376, 377, 378 Island 33 Huapai Westgate City Pukekohe, Waiuku Isthmus 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 398, 399 Waitemata Harbour Britomart Swanson Airporter 380 Kingsland Newmarket Beachlands Henderson Southern Line Train timetable Waitakere Panmure Eastern Line New Lynn Waitakere Onehunga 361 362 363 Ranges Otahuhu Botany Manukau Manukau Airport Manukau Harbour North Manukau South 365 366 Papakura Franklin Pukekohe Port Waikato Waiuku Tuakau Warkworth Huapai Manukau North Hibiscus Coast Waitakere Manukau South Upper North Shore City Franklin
    [Show full text]
  • 27 November 2003
    2. AEE – Assessment of Environmental Effects APPLICATION FOR A RESTRICTED DISCRETIONARY ACTIVITY RESOURCE CONSENT APPLICATION FOR LAND USE AND SUBDIVISION CONSENT FOR STAGE 7- 2 of WAIATA SHORES AT 1V GREAT SOUTH ROAD CONIFER GROVE AUCKLAND PREPARED BY: ANGELA CRANG DELTA PLANNING LTD Amended August 2018 Resource consent application, Stage 7-2, 1V Great South Road, Conifer Grove, Auckland Prepared by Angela Crang, Delta Planning Ltd, February 2018 APPLICATION FOR LAND USE RESOURCE CONSENT Pursuant to Section 88 of the RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT 1991 ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS 1. THE APPLICANT AND PROPERTY DETAILS To: Auckland Council Applicants Name: Fletcher Residential Living Address for Service: Angela Crang Delta Planning Ltd PO Box 25 804 St Heliers Tel: (09) 5752091 Mob: 027 3371395 Email: [email protected] Name and Address for Fees: Fletcher Residential Ltd Council Account: 2651424380 Site Address: 1V Great South Road and Brylee Drive ROAD (Cul-de- sac and berm) Conifer Grove Auckland Legal Description: Lot 1 DP 26562 (comprised in CT NA1830/50 = 36.9852ha) and Brylee Drive Road Owners of Site: Fletcher Residential Limited Site Area: 36.9852ha (Total Site) 1,104m2 (Lot 1004) 890m2 (Brylee Drive) Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in Part) (AUP(OP)) AUP(OP) Zoning: Residential – Mixed Housing Urban AUP(OP) Precinct: N/A AUP (OP) Overlays: Natural Resources: Significant Ecological Areas Overlay - SEA-M2-171, Marine 2 Resource consent application, Stage 7-2, 1V Great South Road, Conifer Grove, Auckland Prepared by Angela
    [Show full text]
  • Papakura District Council Annual Report 2008/2009
    Annual Report 2008-2009 PAPAKURA DISTRICT COUNCIL ANNUAL REPORT 2008/2009 Table of Contents Page Mayor and Councillors ........................................................................................................................ 2 Papakura District Ward Map............................................................................................................... 3 Papakura District Profile ..................................................................................................................... 4 Mayor and Chief Executive Officer‘s Message................................................................................... 6 Statement of Compliance ................................................................................................................... 8 Audit Report ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Consolidated Statement of Financial Performance .......................................................................... 12 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity ................................................................................. 13 Consolidated Statement of Financial Position .................................................................................. 14 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows ........................................................................................... 16 Notes to the Financial Statements ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Papakura District Council Development Code Manual June
    DEVELOPMENT CODE June 2009 Updated January 2010 Development Code Jun 2009 Updated Jan 2010 Page 1 of 129 PAPAKURA DISTRICT COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT CODE JUNE 2009 Part 1 - General Requirements and Procedures Part 2 - Earthworks and Foundations Part 3 - Roads Part 4 - Stormwater Drainage Part 5 - Waste Water Part 6 - Water Reticulation System Part 7 - Parks and Reserves Part 8 - Power, Telephone and Gas Appendices Appendix A: Statement of Professional Opinion Appendix B: Certificate of Construction Appendix C: Soakage Pit Design Appendix D: Assets to Vest Sheets Appendix E: Electronic As-Built Requirements Appendix F: Road Asset Data Standard Specification Appendix G: Standard Detail Drawings Appendix H: Standards and Guidelines Relevant to the Road Network Development Code Jun 2009 Updated Jan 2010 Page 2 of 128 Table of Contents PART 1: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES ........................................ 14 1.1 SCOPE ...................................................................................................................... 14 1.2 GENERAL ................................................................................................................. 14 1.3 INTERPRETATION ................................................................................................... 14 1.3.1 General ......................................................................................................... 14 1.3.1 Definitions ..................................................................................................... 15 1.4 DEVELOPER’S
    [Show full text]
  • Papakuracourier.Co.Nz Wednesday, October 27, 2010 Theft Reignites Grief
    www.papakuracourier.co.nz Wednesday, October 27, 2010 Theft reignites grief By HINERANGI VAIMOSO IT’S been two years since members of Aaron Hubbard Tarry’s family first mourned his death. But their grief resurfaced this month after relatives arrived at Papakura South Cemetery to find his head- stone damaged and items, including a 22-inch mag wheel, missing. Aaron, 21, was well known in the Papakura district and took his life in July 2009. His family unveiled the headstone with inscriptions of love and remembrance embossed across it a year later. Laying across the grave were fluffy dice, the grille from a Mitsubishi VR-4 – Aaron’s last project before his death – a steering wheel and a big blue ceramic fish from one of the younger family members, dad Doug Tarry says. A 22-inch mag wheel was embedded in the top of the marble headstone to indicate Aaron’s passion for building and driving cars, brother Reece says. Another 17-inch chrome mag also adorned the grave. The chrome mag and the steering wheel were taken just over a week ago. The 22-inch mag was also chiselled off and stolen. Sitting in the centre of the mag was a picture of Aaron which was later found face-up on the stone fence along Gat- land Rd. The steering wheel was Desecrated: Reece Hubbard Tarry is ‘‘gutted’’ thieves have stolen a 22-inch mag wheel and other items from his brother Aaron’s grave in Papakura South Cemetery. also located. Photo: SHANE WENZLICK ‘‘He was all about mags.
    [Show full text]