Plan Change 24 (Private) “Waiata Shores Local Centre” to the Auckland Unitary Plan Under the Resource Management Act 1991

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Plan Change 24 (Private) “Waiata Shores Local Centre” to the Auckland Unitary Plan Under the Resource Management Act 1991 Decision following the hearing of Proposed Plan Change 24 (Private) “Waiata Shores Local Centre” to the Auckland Unitary Plan under the Resource Management Act 1991 PROPOSAL To rezone land at 2 Te Napi Drive, Waiata Shores from Residential - Mixed Housing Urban to Business - Local Centre Zone in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in Part). This plan modification is GRANTED. The reasons are set out below. Plan modification number: Private Plan Change 24 Site address: 2 Te Napi Drive, Waiata Shores Applicant: Woolworths New Zealand Limited Hearing commenced: Wednesday 04 September 2019, 9.30am Hearing panel: Peter Reaburn (Chairperson) Barry Kaye Juliane Chetham Appearances: For the Applicant: Allison Arthur-Young, Legal Counsel Matthew Grainger, Corporate Derek Foy, Economics Don McKenzie, Transport Lauren White, Urban Design Philip Brown, Planning Alan Blyde, Infrastructure (tabled) Benjamin Lawrence, Acoustic (tabled) For the Submitters: Auckland Transport Trevor Mackie, Planning Mehmet Ahmet, Transport Papakura Local Board Brent Catchpole (Chair) For Council: ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ Private Plan Change 24 1 Sanjay Bangs, Reporting Officer Craig Cairncross, Team Leader/Manager Terry Church, Traffic Engineer Tracy Ogden-Cork, Urban Designer Aaron Schiff, Economist Jon Styles, Acoustic Specialist Gemma Chuah, Stormwater Engineer Larissa Rew, Hearings Advisor Hearing adjourned 4 September 2019 Commissioners’ site visits 19 August, 30 August, 3 September 2019 Hearing Closed: 5 September 2019 Abbreviations used in this Decision Applicant Woolworths New Zealand Limited AUP(OP) Auckland Council Unitary Plan Operative in Part Council Auckland Council Panel / we Independent Commissioners Peter Reaburn, Barry Kaye, Juliane Chetham PPC24 Private Plan Change 24 RMA Resource Management Act 1991 Subject Site The land proposed to be rezoned by PPC24 INTRODUCTION 1. PPC24 is a private plan change that has been prepared following the standard RMA Schedule 1 process (that is, the plan change is not the result of an alternative, 'streamlined' or 'collaborative' process as enabled under the RMA). 2. The private plan change request was made under Clause 21 of Schedule 1 to the RMA. It was supported by the required section 32 analysis and a range of supporting documentation. PPC24 was accepted by the Council under clause 25(2)(b) of Schedule 1 to the RMA on 5 March 2019. 3. The plan change was publicly notified on 9 May 2019 following a feedback process involving Iwi, as required by Clause 4A of Schedule 1. Notification involved a public notice as well as letters to directly affected landowners and occupiers alerting them to the plan change. The latter step was aimed at ensuring that landowners and occupiers of properties affected by potentially significant changes were made aware of the changes. 4. The submission period closed on 7 June 2019. Eight submissions were received, with no late submissions. A summary of submissions was notified for further ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ Private Plan Change 24 2 submissions on 20 June 2019 with the period for making further submissions closing on 4 July 2019. No further submissions were received. 5. This Decision relates to the submissions received on PPC24. The Decision is made on behalf of the Council by a Panel of Independent Hearing Commissioners - Peter Reaburn (Chair), Barry Kaye and Juliane Chetham, appointed and acting under delegated authority pursuant to sections 34 and 34A of the RMA. The Decision has been made after considering all the submissions, the section 32 evaluation, the reports prepared by the officers for the hearing and evidence presented for the hearing. SUMMARY OF THE PLAN CHANGE 6. The proposed plan change is described in detail in the hearing report. In summary: • The PPC24 land sits within an area known as Waiata Shores, an area that was previously occupied by the Manukau Golf Course. In 2013, Fletcher Residential Living purchased the land and is currently undertaking a predominately residential development consistent with its Residential – Mixed Housing Urban zoning. • Key provisions of the Residential – Mixed Housing Urban Zone include: - Up to three dwellings per site are permitted, provided that the relevant core development standards are met, including maximum height, height in relation to boundary, building coverage and maximum impervious area standards; - Retail activities limited to dairies up to 100m² gross floor area per site (as a restricted discretionary activity) and restaurants and cafes up to 100m² gross floor area per site discretionary activity) are provided for. All other retail activities are not provided for, and therefore are a non-complying activity; - Maximum building height of 11m, plus an additional 1m for roof form; - Maximum building height in relation to boundary of 3m plus 45 degrees; ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ Private Plan Change 24 3 - Maximum building coverage of 45% of the net site area, and maximum impervious area of 60% of the site area. • PPC24 seeks to rezone a 1.92ha part of Waiata Shores at 2 Te Napi Drive from Residential – Mixed Housing Urban Zone to Business – Local Centre Zone. • PPC24 seeks solely to change the zoning of the land. No further precincts, overlays or controls are proposed. • The Business – Local Centre Zone provisions are primarily contained in Chapter H11 of the AUP(OP). The zone applies to small centres across Auckland, and primarily provides for “the local convenience needs of surrounding residential areas, including local retail, commercial services, offices, food and beverage, and appropriately scaled supermarkets”. • Key provisions in the Business – Local Centre Zone include: - Retail activities (other than supermarkets) are permitted up to 450m² gross floor area per tenancy, and restricted discretionary above 450m² gross floor area per tenancy; - Supermarkets are permitted up to 2,000m² gross floor area per tenancy, and restricted discretionary above 2,000m² gross floor area per tenancy; - Offices are permitted up to 500m² gross floor area per site, and restricted discretionary greater than 500m² gross floor area per site; - Commercial services and food and beverage are permitted with no gross floor area thresholds; - Dwellings, supported residential care, visitor accommodation and boarding houses are permitted with no scale or density thresholds; - Maximum building height of 18m, of which the maximum occupiable building height is 16m and the remaining 2m set aside for roof form; - Height in relation to boundary standards applicable at the boundary with sites zoned residential or open space, including sites separated by a road. At the boundary with sites zoned Residential Mixed ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ Private Plan Change 24 4 Housing Urban, a height in relation to boundary of 3m + 45 degrees applies. • A number of other AUP(OP) provisions will apply to any development of the site under a Business – Local Centre zoning, including standards relating to transport matters in Chapter E27 and standards relating to noise and vibration in Chapter E25. OFFICERS REPORT 7. The Panel received a section 42A (s42A) report prepared by Mr. Sanjay Bangs with input from a number of Council and Council- appointed specialists. The s42A report included a recommendation to accept the plan change, with no amendment. HEARING 8. To expedite the hearing process the Panel issued a Direction requiring the pre-circulation of expert evidence. Pre-circulated evidence was provided as directed. 9. Panel members individually conducted site visits on August 20, August 30 and September 3 2019. 10. The hearing was held at the Manukau offices of the Auckland Council on Wednesday 4 September 2019. 11. At the hearing, submissions were presented by the applicant’s counsel, Ms Allison Arthur-Young. Expert evidence was generally taken as read, although in most cases summary statements were provided by experts. A number of questions were asked by the Panel. 12. There was one submitter present at the hearing, Auckland Transport. Mr. Brent Catchpole appeared on behalf of the Papakura Local Board. 13. Council advisors provided comments after hearing the cases presented by the applicant and submitter. 14. Ms. Allison Arthur-Young presented reply comments at the conclusion of the hearing. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ Private Plan Change 24 5 15. The hearing was adjourned at the conclusion of the hearing and closed the following day, 5 September 2019 with no further information sought. STATUTORY FRAMEWORK 16. PPC24 was a private plan change request. It was accepted by the Council under clause 25(2)(b) of Schedule 1 of the RMA. 17. As a private plan change, Clause 29 of Schedule 1 to the RMA is relevant. The provisions of a private plan change request must comply with the same mandatory requirements as Council initiated plan changes. As required, the PPC6 request contained an evaluation report in accordance with section 32 of the RMA (clause 22(1), Schedule 1, RMA). Clause 29(1) of Schedule 1 provides “except as provided in sub-clauses (1A) to (9), Part 1, with all necessary modifications, shall apply to any plan or change requested under this Part and accepted under clause 25(2)(b). 18. We are
Recommended publications
  • Regional Assessment of Areas Susceptible to Coastal Erosion Volume 2: Appendices a - J February TR 2009/009
    Regional Assessment of Areas Susceptible to Coastal Erosion Volume 2: Appendices A - J February TR 2009/009 Auckland Regional Council Technical Report No. 009 February 2009 ISSN 1179-0504 (Print) ISSN 1179-0512 (Online) ISBN 978-1-877528-16-3 Contents Appendix A: Consultants Brief Appendix B: Peer reviewer’s comments Appendix C: Summary of Relevant Tonkin & Taylor Jobs Appendix D: Summary of Shoreline Characterization Appendix E: Field Investigation Data Appendix F: Summary of Regional Beach Properties Appendix G: Summary of Regional Cliff Properties Appendix H: Description of Physical Setting Appendix I: Heli-Survey DVDs (Contact ARC Librarian) Appendix J: Analysis of Beach Profile Changes Regional Assessment of Areas Susceptible to Coastal Erosion, Volume 2: Appendices A-J Appendix A: Consultants Brief Appendix B: Peer reviewer’s comments Appendix C: Summary of relevant Tonkin & Taylor jobs Job Number North East Year of Weathered Depth is Weathered Typical Cliff Cliff Slope Cliff Slope Composite Composite Final Slope Geology Rec Setback erosion rate Comments Street address Suburb investigation layer depth Estimated/ layer Slope weathered layer Height (deg) (rads) slope from slope from (degree) from Crest (m) (m/yr) (m) Greater than (deg) slope (rad) (m) calc (degree) profile (deg) 6 RIVERVIEW PANMURE 12531.000 2676066 6475685 1994 2.40 58 0.454 12.0 51.5 0.899 43.70 35 35 avt 6 ROAD 15590.000 6472865 2675315 2001 2.40 0.454 4.0 30.0 0.524 27.48 27 avt 8 29 MATAROA RD OTAHUHU 16619.000 6475823 2675659 1999 2.40 0.454 6.0 50.0 0.873 37.07 37 avt LAGOON DRIVE PANMURE long term recession ~ FIDELIS AVENUE 5890.000 2665773 6529758 1983 0.75 G 0.454 0.000 N.D Kk 15 - 20 0.050 50mm/yr 80m setback from toe FIDELIS AVE ALGIES BAY recc.
    [Show full text]
  • TOP MEDIAN SALE PRICE (OCT19—SEP20) Hatfields Beach
    Warkworth Makarau Waiwera Puhoi TOP MEDIAN SALE PRICE (OCT19—SEP20) Hatfields Beach Wainui EPSOM .............. $1,791,000 HILLSBOROUGH ....... $1,100,000 WATTLE DOWNS ......... $856,750 Orewa PONSONBY ........... $1,775,000 ONE TREE HILL ...... $1,100,000 WARKWORTH ............ $852,500 REMUERA ............ $1,730,000 BLOCKHOUSE BAY ..... $1,097,250 BAYVIEW .............. $850,000 Kaukapakapa GLENDOWIE .......... $1,700,000 GLEN INNES ......... $1,082,500 TE ATATŪ SOUTH ....... $850,000 WESTMERE ........... $1,700,000 EAST TĀMAKI ........ $1,080,000 UNSWORTH HEIGHTS ..... $850,000 Red Beach Army Bay PINEHILL ........... $1,694,000 LYNFIELD ........... $1,050,000 TITIRANGI ............ $843,000 KOHIMARAMA ......... $1,645,500 OREWA .............. $1,050,000 MOUNT WELLINGTON ..... $830,000 Tindalls Silverdale Beach SAINT HELIERS ...... $1,640,000 BIRKENHEAD ......... $1,045,500 HENDERSON ............ $828,000 Gulf Harbour DEVONPORT .......... $1,575,000 WAINUI ............. $1,030,000 BIRKDALE ............. $823,694 Matakatia GREY LYNN .......... $1,492,000 MOUNT ROSKILL ...... $1,015,000 STANMORE BAY ......... $817,500 Stanmore Bay MISSION BAY ........ $1,455,000 PAKURANGA .......... $1,010,000 PAPATOETOE ........... $815,000 Manly SCHNAPPER ROCK ..... $1,453,100 TORBAY ............. $1,001,000 MASSEY ............... $795,000 Waitoki Wade HAURAKI ............ $1,450,000 BOTANY DOWNS ....... $1,000,000 CONIFER GROVE ........ $783,500 Stillwater Heads Arkles MAIRANGI BAY ....... $1,450,000 KARAKA ............. $1,000,000 ALBANY ............... $782,000 Bay POINT CHEVALIER .... $1,450,000 OTEHA .............. $1,000,000 GLENDENE ............. $780,000 GREENLANE .......... $1,429,000 ONEHUNGA ............. $999,000 NEW LYNN ............. $780,000 Okura Bush GREENHITHE ......... $1,425,000 PAKURANGA HEIGHTS .... $985,350 TAKANINI ............. $780,000 SANDRINGHAM ........ $1,385,000 HELENSVILLE .......... $985,000 GULF HARBOUR ......... $778,000 TAKAPUNA ........... $1,356,000 SUNNYNOOK ............ $978,000 MĀNGERE .............
    [Show full text]
  • PAPAKURA PLAY NETWORK GAP ANALYSIS November 2020 09 1:25,000 at A3 Papakura Local Board VILLAGE GREEN JOIN LINE
    PLAY NETWORK GAP ANALYSIS PAPAKURA LOCAL BOARD, AUCKLAND STUDY AND STRATEGIC ADVICE NOVEMBER 2020 W: www.bespokelandscape.co.nz | E: [email protected] | P: +64 9 520 2164 | A: PO Box 38319, Howick, Auckland, 2145 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION + METHODOLOGY Papakura Study Area ........................................................................01 Purpose .................................................................................................01 Policy Context .....................................................................................01 Scope and Limitations .....................................................................01 Open Space and Playspace Context ...........................................01 Methodology ......................................................................................03 CURRENT PLAY NETWORK Quantity and Distribution ..............................................................08 Play Experience Provision ...............................................................08 Age Group Provision ........................................................................08 PLAYSPACE TYPOLOGIES MAP ..................................................................................................................09 PLAY EXPERIENCES MAP ..................................................................................................................11 SPECIALISED PLAY EXPERIENCES MAP ..................................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Classified Summarised Notes. North Island, 1 July 1994 to 30 June 1995
    Journal of the Ornithological Society of New Zealand a- a- - -- ----" I VOLW43 PART 3 SEPTEMBER 1996 L-- L Classified Summarised Notes. North Island, 1 July 1994 to 30 June 1995 Compiled by G. RICHARD PARRISH' and J.W. LOCKZ '145 Church Street, Whangarei; 2118 The Ridgeway, Wellington, New Zealand Classified Summarised Notes (CSN) are a selection of observations provided by 204 members and friends of the Ornithological Society of New Zealand (OSNZ). This year observations were received from 11 Nonh ~slandregions and six members provided individual contributions. No observations were received from Taranaki and Wanganui Regions. The purpose of CSN is to record the results of bird census counts, anecdoml observations of behaviour and to improve our understanding of NZ bird d~stribution.In general, those observations that do not add to our knowledge of b~rddistribution as shown in The Atlas of Bird Distribution in NZ are ignored. Nest record observations, band recoveries and beach patrol summaries are covered by other OSNZ schemes and usually are not included In CSN. Contributors: D. J. & I>,J. Agnew, P. J. Anderson, I. G. Andrew, G N. Arnold, I- E. Bailey, 1). G. Baker, K. S. & P. C. Baker, H. W. Banks, R. Batcheler, P. F. Battley, A. J. Beauchamp, J. R. Berry, A. E. Billing, C. Bindon, D. Binney, L. &. G. Blackmore, B. \V. Boeson, D. F. Booth, P. D. Bovill. J. A. Brierley, l? Brindley, K. L. Buchanan. K. G.Buckley, T. A. Buckley, S. Bull, C. L. Bunt, E. K. Cameron, L. Cameron, R. Carmichael, A. B. Challinor, S P.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Local Property Report
    Takanini Your local property report This report covers your local suburbs of Alfriston, Alfriston, Ardmore, Conifer Grove, Manurewa, Manurewa, Manurewa East, Pahurehure, Papakura, Randwick Park, Randwick Park and Takanini. June 2019 Brought to you by the team at LJ Hooker Takanini pq ph. 09 320 5131 f. 09 320 5135 ef [email protected] wx takanini.ljhooker.co.nz/ Your local property report What’s happening in our local property market Recent Sales (12 months) At LJ Hooker Takanini our goal is to provide you with the information you need to make confident decisions about property - whether you are buying, selling, investing or renting. We have created this report which details local market conditions and how property is performing in your area which at times can be very different to the combined performance of the capital cities. Let us help you stay on top of changes in your local property market every month. Across our local market, we have seen 2,486 properties listed grew 3.6% across 503 individual sales with a median of for sale, over the past 12 months, which is higher than the $637,000. same time last year. This has impacted sales with 1,988 taking place over the past 12 months. Looking at the market, the The most traded suburb for homes in our area has been best performing suburb, over the past 12 months, has been Papakura with 504 homes sold over the past 12 months. Pahurehure which has seen its median sales price grow by Dwelling prices in Papakura have remained relatively stable with 4.4%.
    [Show full text]
  • 27 November 2003
    2. AEE – Assessment of Environmental Effects APPLICATION FOR A RESTRICTED DISCRETIONARY ACTIVITY RESOURCE CONSENT APPLICATION FOR LAND USE AND SUBDIVISION CONSENT FOR STAGE 7- 2 of WAIATA SHORES AT 1V GREAT SOUTH ROAD CONIFER GROVE AUCKLAND PREPARED BY: ANGELA CRANG DELTA PLANNING LTD Amended August 2018 Resource consent application, Stage 7-2, 1V Great South Road, Conifer Grove, Auckland Prepared by Angela Crang, Delta Planning Ltd, February 2018 APPLICATION FOR LAND USE RESOURCE CONSENT Pursuant to Section 88 of the RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT 1991 ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS 1. THE APPLICANT AND PROPERTY DETAILS To: Auckland Council Applicants Name: Fletcher Residential Living Address for Service: Angela Crang Delta Planning Ltd PO Box 25 804 St Heliers Tel: (09) 5752091 Mob: 027 3371395 Email: [email protected] Name and Address for Fees: Fletcher Residential Ltd Council Account: 2651424380 Site Address: 1V Great South Road and Brylee Drive ROAD (Cul-de- sac and berm) Conifer Grove Auckland Legal Description: Lot 1 DP 26562 (comprised in CT NA1830/50 = 36.9852ha) and Brylee Drive Road Owners of Site: Fletcher Residential Limited Site Area: 36.9852ha (Total Site) 1,104m2 (Lot 1004) 890m2 (Brylee Drive) Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in Part) (AUP(OP)) AUP(OP) Zoning: Residential – Mixed Housing Urban AUP(OP) Precinct: N/A AUP (OP) Overlays: Natural Resources: Significant Ecological Areas Overlay - SEA-M2-171, Marine 2 Resource consent application, Stage 7-2, 1V Great South Road, Conifer Grove, Auckland Prepared by Angela
    [Show full text]
  • Papakura District Council Development Code Manual June
    DEVELOPMENT CODE June 2009 Updated January 2010 Development Code Jun 2009 Updated Jan 2010 Page 1 of 129 PAPAKURA DISTRICT COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT CODE JUNE 2009 Part 1 - General Requirements and Procedures Part 2 - Earthworks and Foundations Part 3 - Roads Part 4 - Stormwater Drainage Part 5 - Waste Water Part 6 - Water Reticulation System Part 7 - Parks and Reserves Part 8 - Power, Telephone and Gas Appendices Appendix A: Statement of Professional Opinion Appendix B: Certificate of Construction Appendix C: Soakage Pit Design Appendix D: Assets to Vest Sheets Appendix E: Electronic As-Built Requirements Appendix F: Road Asset Data Standard Specification Appendix G: Standard Detail Drawings Appendix H: Standards and Guidelines Relevant to the Road Network Development Code Jun 2009 Updated Jan 2010 Page 2 of 128 Table of Contents PART 1: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES ........................................ 14 1.1 SCOPE ...................................................................................................................... 14 1.2 GENERAL ................................................................................................................. 14 1.3 INTERPRETATION ................................................................................................... 14 1.3.1 General ......................................................................................................... 14 1.3.1 Definitions ..................................................................................................... 15 1.4 DEVELOPER’S
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    ANNUAL REPORT Opening Dress Parade 2018 - St Anne Netball Club Mascot (Sonic the Hedgehog) Papakura Netball Centre Inc. trading as Papakura Netball Centre Annual Report 2018 Papakura Netball Centre Inc. is proud to be associated with the following Funding Partners & Sponsors. Papakura Netball Centre Inc. trading as Papakura Netball Centre Annual Report 2018 Page 2 CONTENTS PAGE Chair’s Report 4 General Manager’s Report 5 President’s Report 6 Strategic Plan 7 Board & Personnel 8 Financial Performance Report 9 Netball Life & Service Awards 31 Honours & Achievements 32 Programmes, Membership & Participants 33 In Season Competition Statistics 34 Papakura Netball Centre Committee 36 Coach Development 38 Umpire Development 40 Bench Officials Development 42 Performance 43 Representatives 44 Netball in Schools Programme 48 Tournaments, Programmes & Events 49 Club Competition Results 58 Special Awards 60 Meetings 61 Papakura Netball Centre Inc. trading as Papakura Netball Centre Annual Report 2018 Page 3 BOARD CHAIR’S REPORT Lance Watene I am pleased to pen my first Although within the context of a dynamic landscape, report as Chairman of the Netball continues to be a significant winter activity Papakura Netball Centre option. However, PNC will need to take notice of current activity trends, relevance and community (PNC). activity aspirations if it is to be sustainable and 2018 has been a busy year for meeting the needs of stakeholders and participants. PNC striving to meet our After 5 years as General Manager of PNC, we vision of “Community and farewell Briar Martindale. Briar leaves a legacy of individuals enriched through a strong organisational structure, sound policies and netball experiences” and our procedures, determination and leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Sales in Papakura March 2020
    REINZ PROPERTY EXPORT Generated: 20 Apr 2020 Subject to the REINZ Authorised User Agreement Generated By: Anil Kumar Sharma This table was created with the following query: The locations Acqua Place, Karaka, Papakura; Adios Place, Conifer Grove, Takanini; Adlam Lane, Takanini; Advocate Place, Randwick Park, Auckland; Aero Place, Takanini; Aeronautic Road, Takanini; Agria Avenue, Karaka, Papakura; Aicken Road, Hunua; Airfield Road, Ardmore, Papakura; Airfield Road, Takanini; Albert Street, Papakura; Albion Place, Papakura; Alderton Place, Opaheke, Papakura; Aldridge Road, Hunua; Alexander Street, Papakura; Alf Walker Place, Papakura; Alfriston Road, Alfriston, Auckland; Alfriston Road, Ardmore, Papakura; Alfriston-Ardmore Road, Ardmore, Papakura; Alfriston-ardmore Road, Ardmore, Papakura; Alliance Lane, Papakura; Allium Avenue, Karaka, Papakura; Alma Crescent, Papakura; Alpha Street, Papakura; Amberfields Way, Runciman, Drury; Ambush Road, Ramarama, Drury; Amokura Avenue, Takanini; Anchorage Drive, Karaka, Papakura; Ancroft Street, Papakura; Andalusian Way, Karaka, Papakura; Anton Place, Takanini; Appaloosa Street, Karaka, Papakura; Appleby Road, Drury; April Place, Red Hill, Papakura; Arana Drive, Karaka, Papakura; Ararimu Road, Hunua; Ararimu Road, Ramarama, Drury; Arawa Street, Papakura; Arawai Terrace, Papakura; Ardmore Quarry Road, Ardmore, Papakura; Argyle Avenue, Pahurehure, Papakura; Ariki Place, Red Hill, Papakura; Arimu Road, Papakura; Arion Road, Takanini; Aristoy Close, Conifer Grove, Takanini; Arthur Place, Opaheke, Papakura;
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Member Directory
    Commercial Member Directory Barfoot & Thompson Commercial 34 Shortland Street +64 9 3076300 [email protected] Auckland, 1140 www.barfoot.co.nz Title Name Email Phone # Commercial Referral Coordinator John Urlich [email protected] +64 21395396 Commercial Broker in Charge Peter Thompson [email protected] +64 9 3075523 Certifications Applies Service Tiers Applies ALC Commercial Division/Office BOMA Dedicated Commercial Agent(s) Build-to-suit Resi-Mercial Agent(s) CCIM CPM Lease negotiation SIOR Service Types Applies Network Affiliations Applies Hotel / Resort CBRE CORFAC Industrial CRESA Investment CW/DTZ Land / Agricultural JLL Knight Frank Landlord Rep NAI Leasing Newmark TCN Service Types Applies Logistics Medical Office Multi-Family Office Property Management Retail Tenant Rep City State / Province Country Ahuroa NZL Albany NZL Albany Heights NZL Alfriston NZL Algies Bay NZL Ararimu NZL Ardmore NZL Arkles Bay NZL Army Bay NZL Auckland NZL Avondale NZL Awhitu NZL Bay Of Islands NZL Bay View NZL Bay of Plenty NZL Bayswater NZL Bayview NZL Beach Haven NZL Beachlands NZL Belmont NZL Big Bay NZL Birkdale NZL Birkenhead NZL Birkenhead Point NZL Bland Bay NZL Blockhouse Bay NZL Bombay NZL Botany Downs NZL City State / Province Country Broadwood NZL Brookby NZL Browns Bay NZL Buckland NZL Bucklands Beach NZL Burswood NZL Cable Bay NZL Campbells Bay NZL Canterbury NZL Castor Bay NZL Central Otago NZL Chatswood NZL City Centre NZL Clarks Beach NZL Clendon Park NZL Clevedon NZL Clover Park NZL Coatesville NZL Cockle
    [Show full text]
  • Papakura, Randwick Park, Randwick Park and Takanini
    Takanini Your local property report This report covers your local suburbs of Alfriston, Alfriston, Ardmore, Conifer Grove, Manurewa, Manurewa, Manurewa East, Pahurehure, Papakura, Randwick Park, Randwick Park and Takanini. March 2020 Brought to you by the team at LJ Hooker Takanini pq ph. 09 320 5131 f. 09 320 5135 ef [email protected] wx takanini.ljhooker.co.nz/ Your local property report What’s happening in our local property market Recent Sales (12 months) At LJ Hooker Takanini our goal is to provide you with the information you need to make confident decisions about property - whether you are buying, selling, investing or renting. We have created this report which details local market conditions and how property is performing in your area which at times can be very different to the combined performance of the capital cities. Let us help you stay on top of changes in your local property market every month. Across our local market, we have seen 2,375 properties listed for of $589,000. sale, over the past 12 months, which is lower than the same time last year. This has impacted sales with 2,307 taking place over the The most traded suburb for homes in our area has been Papakura past 12 months. Looking at the market, the best performing suburb, with 612 homes sold over the past 12 months. Dwelling prices in over the past 12 months, has been Conifer Grove which has seen its Papakura have remained relatively stable with growth of 0.5% and median sales price grow by 2.7%.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Report (PDF 2
    Building for the Future New and changing secondary schools in NZ John Locke 2006 Introduction Page 1 Chapter 1 21st century context Page 3 Chapter 2 The Alfriston curriculum Page 7 Chapter 3 Meeting the needs of students Page 19 Chapter 4 Learning and teaching Page 25 Chapter 5 Learning leaders Page 39 Chapter 6 The Learning environment-Property Page 45 Chapter 7 The Learning environment-ICT Page 57 Chapter 8 Building culture Page 61 Chapter 9 Establishment process Page 69 Appendix Page 79 Bibliography Page 89 - 1 - Introduction The purpose of this manual is to share the story of designing and building a new secondary school in New Zealand, to meet the needs of 21st century students. The design process inevitably required the school community to think about the kinds of learning we wanted our young people to experience, in preparation for taking their places in a society wholly different from the world in which their teachers were young adults. The answers we found to questions about teaching and learning in a new century were supported by research and are now implicit in the buildings and the organizational structures of Alfriston College. Most chapters are presented in two sections; the first is a summary of research and evidence articulating the current situation in relation to student learning needs. The second describes the ways in which Alfriston College and other new schools have responded to these challenges. Although this document is focused on the establishment of a new school, I hope that its usefulness extends beyond its relevance to new school establishment.
    [Show full text]