Standard Norge 2016 Agenda

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Standard Norge 2016 Agenda 2016-10-28 Fylkesmannen i Hordaland Standardisering innen samfunnssikkerhet Noen relevante risikostandarder Lars Erik Jensen, [email protected] Prosjektleder Standardisering er helt naturlig Bilde inn her …. tenk deg en verden uten 2 Standard Norge 2016 Agenda 1. Kort presentasjon av Standard Norge 2. Hva er standardisering og hvordan standardisere 3. Samfunnssikkerhet i et nasjonalt og internasjonalt perspektiv 4. Kan standarder redusere risiko ? 5. Noen eksempler på standarder som bidrar til å styrke sikkerheten i samfunnet 3 01 Kort presentasjon av Standard Norge Standard Norge Privat, uavhengig, medlemsorganisasjon, non-profit Etablert 2003, røtter til 1923 Standarder på de fleste områder Medlem i CEN og ISO Ca. 70 ansatte Eier og utgir Norsk Standard, utgir NORSOK Sertifisert etter NS-EN ISO 9001 (kvalitet) og NS-EN ISO 14001 (miljø) 5 Standard Norge per juli 2016 Vi utvikler standarder på mange områder i samfunnet PLAN, BYGG OG BARNEHAGE VANN OG AVLØP UTDANNING SAMFUNSSIKKERHET EIENDOM KULTUR OG FRITID KLIMA TRANSPORT BANK OG FINANS AKVAKULTUR HELSE OG OMSORG BOMILJØ ARBEIDSLIV GRØNNE BYGG SMARTE BYER 6 Norges medlem i Over 95 % av alle nye Norsk Standard har europeisk (EN) eller internasjonal (ISO) opprinnelse Funn fra virksomheter på tvers av sektorer 89 % sier at standarder gjør det enklere å drive i samsvar med lover og forskrifter f.eks. på HMS-området 73 % sier at standarder gjør det enklere å kontrollere miljøutfordringer 84 % sier at det å bruke standarder forbedrer deres omdømme 8 Standard Norge per juli 2016 Standard Norges roller − Representerer og tar internasjonalt lederskap for Norge Påvirker internasjonalt – − Pådriver for at internasjonale standarder tas i bruk i Norge pådriver nasjonalt − Markedsfører og selger standarder − Enerett på å utgi og utarbeide samt sikrer vedlikehold av Norsk Standard Forvaltning og infrastruktur − Fastsetter europeiske og internasjonale standarder som Norsk Standard nasjonalt − Tilgang til dokumenter for «beste praksis» fra «hele verden» − Avdekker behov for standarder Fasilitator som etablere nøytral − Etablerer og drifter utarbeidelser av standarder arena − Informerer markedet om standarder og standardiseringsarbeid 9 Standarder gjør livet vårt enklere og tryggere Foto: Bernt Ove Reinertsen / CAN AS 02 Hva er standarder og hvordan standardisere Hva er en standard? ”Standard dokument til felles og gjentatt bruk, fremkommet ved konsensus og vedtatt av et anerkjent organ som gir regler, retningslinjer eller kjennetegn for aktiviteter eller resultatene av dem for å oppnå optimal orden i en gitt sammenheng.” [NS-EN 45020:2006, pkt. 3.2 og ISO/IEC Guide 2] • Standard Norge har rettighetene til å fastsette norske og internasjonale standarder som Norsk Standard (ref NFD) 12 Hvem lager standardene? Ekspertenes rolle: • Avgjør hvilke standarder som skal utvikles • Leder standardiseringskomiteene • Bestemmer innholdet i standardene Standard Norges rolle: • Regler og infrastruktur for arbeidet • Administrerer prosjektene Foto: Nicolas Tourrenc • Eier og utgir standardene 13 Standard Norge per juli 2016 Åpenhet Frivillighet Konsensus Foto: Nicolas Tourrenc Samfunnssikkerhet INTERESSENTER Kommuner Frivillige Fylkeskommuner organisasjoner Nødetater Fylkesmenn Direktorater Private bedrifter Sivilforsvaret Forsvaret 15 03 Risiko og risikostyring Hva er risiko? 17 Standard Norge - presentasjons norsk Hva er risiko? NS-EN ISO 9000:2015 LEDELSESSYSTEMER FOR KVALITET - GRUNNTREKK OG TERMINOLOGI Risiko = virkning av usikkerhet −Virkning er avvik fra det forventede (positivt eller negativt) −Usikkerhet skyldes manglende informasjon, manglende forståelse eller kunnskap om en hendelse I all enkelhet handler dette om: −Hvor overrasket ønsker du å bli? 18 Standard Norge - presentasjons norsk Vurderinger av RISIKO 19 Standard Norge - presentasjons norsk ISO 9001 utvider risikobegrepet • Organisasjoner, offentlig og privat skal ta hensyn til både risiko og muligheter for å nå sine mål. • Virksomheten må forstå kontekst omkring virksomhetens mål (4.1) • Bestemme risikoer som grunnlag for planlegging (6.1) • Planlegge tiltak for å ta hensyn til risiko (4.4) − Det er ikke krav om en formell metode for risikostyring eller en dokumentert risikostyringsprosess • Organisasjonen må dokumentere hvilke risiko (trusler og muligheter) som er identifisert og hvilke tiltak som er planlagt − Det er ikke lenger krav om å utarbeide en egen kvalitetshåndbok 20 Standard Norge - presentasjons norsk Organisatoriske sårbarheter Noen eksempler: • Det er mangelfull tilgang på nødvendige ressurser • Utydelige ansvars- og rapporteringslinjer • Ledere måles ikke på hvor godt de leverer • Mangelfulle (relevante) måleparametere • Manglende beredskapsplan for håndtering av hendelser • Manglende øving av beredskapsplaner • Manglende system for avviks- og hendelseshåndtering 21 Standard Norge - presentasjons norsk Planlegg-Utfør-Kontroller-Korriger-syklusen VERKTØY FOR ALLE LEDELSESSYSTEMER FOR Å DEFINERE, IMPLEMENTERE, KONTROLLERE OG IGANGSETTE KORREKTIVE TILTAK OG FORBEDRINGER Støtte PLANLEGGING UTFØR Hva skal jeg gjøre? Gjør det som er Hvordan gjør jeg det? planlagt Vurdere både risiko Prestasjons og Planlegging Lederskap evaluering muligheter KORRIGER KONTROLLER Hva kan gjøres bedre Ble alt gjort som til neste gang? planlagt? Forbedring 22 Standard Norge - presentasjons norsk ISO 31000 Risikostyring • Prinsipper, rammeverk og prosess for å håndtere risiko • Verktøy for organisasjoner til å utvikle egen tilnærming til styring av risiko • Myndigheter bruker standarden som basis for egne retningslinjer særskilt innenfor samfunnssikkerhet og beredskap 23 Hva bør jeg gjøre? 1. Identifisere risiko 3. Planlegg hvilke tiltak som kan/bør − trusler som hindrer oss i å nå målene gjøres (handlingsplan) våre? (negativt) − Hvordan kan jeg unngå eller eliminiere − Muligheter som kan bidra til at vi når truslene? målene? (positivt) − Hvordan kan jeg sannsynliggjøre mulighetene? 2. Analyser og prioriter risiko og muligheter 4. Igangsett handlingsplanen − Hva er akseptabelt? 5. Kontroller effekten av tiltakene − Hva er ikke akseptabelt? − Fungerte tiltakene etter hensikten? 6. Erfaringslæring − hva kan vi forbedre? 24 Standard Norge - presentasjons norsk Huskelapp • Risikobasert tenkning er hele virksomhetens ansvar – ikke bare ledelsens • Risikobasert tenkning bør bli en del av virksomhetens kultur • Eksempler på kulturbygging: − Petroleum: SJA (Sikker Jobb Analyse): Utføres som en naturlig forberedelse til alle arbeidsoperasjoner = bidrar til økt HMS sikkerhetskultur − Flyindustri: Bruk av sjekklister førhver arbeidsoperasjon = sikkerhet i luften • Risikobasert tenkning − Gjøres automatisk, ubevisst (normativt handlemønster) 25 Standard Norge - presentasjons norsk 04 Samfunnssikkerhet Samfunnssikkerhet og beredskap Arbeidet med samfunnssikkerhet og beredskap handler om å verne samfunnet mot hendelser som kan true grunnleggende verdier og funksjoner og sette liv og helse i fare, jf. St. Meld. 29 (2011–2012) Samfunnssikkerhet. Justis og beredskapsdepartementet har utformet 4 nye mål for arbeidet med samfunnssikkerhet og beredskap: • Redusere sårbarhet i samfunnet • Kunnskapsbasert forebygging • Styrket samhandling i beredskap og krisehåndtering • Bedre ledelse og styrket ledelseskultur 27 Standard Norge - presentasjons norsk Standardisering innen samfunnssikkerhet • sikring mot uønskede hendelser • landsikkerhet Digital sikkerhet • organisert kriminalitet • sjøfartssikkerhet og personvern • anti-terrorberedskap • eksplosiver • luftfartsikkerhet • Sikre økonomi og • CBRN – kjemisk, biologisk, • grensekontroll sivile interesser radiologisk og nukleær sikring • automatisert passering • Forebygge angrep • Nettsikkerhet • brann og redning • teknologi/IKT • kriminalteknikk • Nødkommunikasjon • produktsikkerhet, vernetøy • cybercrime/digitalsikkerhet • Personvern og menneskerettigheter Sivil sikkerhet – Grensesikkerhet • Digitalt omdømme bekjempelse av og ekstern • IKT-komponenter, applikasjoner, krim og terror sikkerhet tjenester • Interoperabilitet • Biometriløsninger • kriseledelse, krisehåndtering • utforming av bygg og urbane miljø • Systemintegrasjon • akuttberedskap, resiliens • energi/transport/samferdsel • Alarmsystemer • planlegging • communication grids • Big data • øvelser - samhandling • overvåking • Etikk og justis • opplæring/kompetanse • forsyningslinjer • Finansielle tjenester • scenarieplanlegging • hendelsesrespons • klimaendring/naturkatastrofe …… • varslingssystem • sikre byer og lokalsamfunn • masseevakuering • krisehåndtering Gjenopprette Sikring av kritisk sikkerhet og infrastruktur - 28 sikring ved kriser robust samfunn Komitearbeid relatert til samfunnsikkerhet SNK 211 samfunnssikkerhet ISO/TC 292 Security & resilience • ISO 22320 Guidelines for incident • NS- EN 22300 response Terminologi • ISO 22326 Guidence for Samfunnssikkerhet monitoring of facilities with (arbeidet med identified hazards oversettelse starter • ISO 22396 Information exchange nå) between organizations • ISO 22395 Vulnerable people • ISO 22319 Spontanoius people • ISO 22327 Community Based landslide early warnings system 29 Komitearbeid relatert til samfunnssikkerhet Samfunnssikerhet CEN/TC 391 Societal and Citizen Security • prEN ISO 22300 rev (WI=00391016) Societal security – Terminology • prEN ISO 22315 Societal security - Mass evacuation - Guidelines for planning • WI 00391010 Glossary CBRNE 30 ISO/TC 292 Security & resilience Scope: Arbeidsgrupper i ISO/TC 292 • Standardization in the field of security • WG1: Terminology to enhance the safety and
Recommended publications
  • Best Practices on Public Warning Systems for Climate-Induced
    Best practices on Public Warning Systems for Climate-Induced Natural Hazards Abstract: This study presents an overview of the Public Warning System, focusing on approaches, technical standards and communication systems related to the generation and the public sharing of early warnings. The analysis focuses on the definition of a set of best practices and guidelines to implement an effective public warning system that can be deployed at multiple geographic scales, from local communities up to the national and also transboundary level. Finally, a set of recommendations are provided to support decision makers in upgrading the national Public Warning System and to help policy makers in outlining future directives. Authors: Claudio Rossi Giacomo Falcone Antonella Frisiello Fabrizio Dominici Version: 30 September 2018 Table of Contents List of Figures .................................................................................................................................. 2 List of Tables ................................................................................................................................... 4 Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Core Definitions .............................................................................................................................. 7 1. Introduction .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mandate M/487 to Establish Security Standards Final Report Phase 2
    In assignment of: European Commission DG Enterprise and Industry Security Research and Development Mandate M/487 to Establish Security Standards Final Report Phase 2 Proposed standardization work programmes and road maps NEN Industry P.O. Box 5059 2600 GB Delft Vlinderweg 6 2623 AX Delft The Netherlands T +31 15 2690135 F +31 15 2690207 [email protected] www.nen.nl Netherlands Standardization Institute M/487 has been accepted by the European Standards Organizations (ESOs). The work has been allocated to CEN/TC 391 ‘Societal and Citizen Security’ whose secretariat is provided by the Netherlands Standardization Institute (NEN). Mandate M/487 to Establish Security Standards Final Report Phase 2 Proposed standardization work programmes and road maps REPORT VERSION REPORT DATE Final report 05-07-2013 The copyright on this document produced in the Although the utmost care has been taken with framework of M/487 response, consisting of this publication, errors and omissions cannot be contributions from CEN/TC 391 and other security entirely excluded. The European Committee for stakeholders shall remain the exclusive property of Standardization (CEN) and/or the members of CEN and/or CENELEC and/ or ETSI in any and all the committees therefore accept no liability, not countries. even for direct or indirect damage, occurring due to or in relation with the application of publications issued by the European Committee for Standardization (CEN). Contents Page Executive summary ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Your Gateway to International Standards #111
    #111 focusYour gateway to International Standards when disasters strike #111 2 Being prepared : Yucun Village Committee 20 for the unprepared Photo Comment by Thomas Idermark. 4 Social feed Taking a cue from leaders who tweet. ISO focus 6 Mainstreaming disaster 32 28 July-August 2015 management Having the right tools can prepare us for life’s deadliest hazards. 14 Charting the road to resilience How ISO/TC 292 plans to safeguard our : Rory Hunter, AusAID : Rory Hunter, communities. : Asian Development Bank Development : Asian Photo Photo 20 Disasters... be prepared ! The broad panorama of ISO standards. ISOfocus July-August 2015 – ISSN 2226-1095 22 Crisis management ISOfocus, the magazine of the International Organization for Standardization, without borders is published six times a year. You can discover more content on our Website at iso.org/isofocus, or by staying connected with us on : Christian Friis Bach talks UNECE strategy. 28 Microsoft gives users TWITTER FACEBOOK googleplusYoutubeFlickrlinkedin confidence to move Director of Marketing, Communication and Information | Nicolas Fleury to the cloud Head of Communication and Content Strategy | Katie Bird Making a pledge for cloud privacy Editor-in-Chief | Elizabeth Gasiorowski-Denis with ISO/IEC 27018. Editors | Maria Lazarte, Sandrine Tranchard 14 6 32 High standards for Anji County Copy editor and Proofreader | Vivienne Rojas Contributing writers | Xinyu Hua, Dong Li, Clare Naden, Erick Stephens Why standards are the answer Designers | Xela Damond, Pierre Granier, Alexane Rosa to a beautiful China. : MSB Translators | Cécile Nicole Jeannet, Anita Rochedy, Catherine Vincent 40 Protecting digital consumers Subscriptions and back issues Photo Big Brother is watching you… and using If you enjoy ISOfocus, you can subscribe and download the pdf for free, or purchase single hard-copy issues through our Website iso.org/isofocus.
    [Show full text]
  • Deliverable D2.1 State-Of-The-Art Analysis
    Deliverable D2.1 State-of-the-Art Analysis Grant agreement number: 740872 Due date of Deliverable: 31/10/2017 Start date of the project: 1 May 2017 Actual submission date: 27/10/2017 Duration: 24 months Deliverable approved by the CO: ☒ Lead Beneficiary: Friedrich Steinhäusler, ISCC Contributing Beneficiaries: Matts Ahlsén, CNet Hanna Burkow, THW Georgios Eftychidis, KEMEA Stanley Greenstein, SU George Kowalczyk, PHE Rod McCall / Ulrich Leopold, LIST Stefanie Müller, DIN Abstract Crisis managers, working in a fast-paced and mobile environment, need timely access to the latest information and intelligence and decision support tools to filter the most important information information. A key element in successful crisis management (CM) is comprehensive Situational Awareness (SA) among all stakeholders involved. This report identifies the user needs and requirements of the future EU Multi- Stakeholder Situational Awareness System (MSSAS), based on dedicated international research results and survey-based data on SA systems used by EU crisis managers. The state-of-the-art research revealed a multiplicity of ready-to-use, mostly commercial-off-the-shelve (COTS), tools providing SA. These tools fall into the following categories: Satellite- and Airborne Remote Sensing Systems, Unmanned Ground Vehicles, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, Special Cameras, Special Detectors, Traffic Management and Decision Support Systems. In addition to these COTS tools, the report identifies EU FP7 projects on the development of advanced SA solutions supported by the European Commission with over € 100 million. This state-of-the-art analysis addresses also different models with regard to SA pertinent ICT architecture and technologies. An overview is provided for existing standards and ongoing standardisation activities, identifying the most important such standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Bureau of Standards (BOBS) Head Office: Main Airport Road Plot No
    Bureau of Standards (BOBS) Head Office: Main Airport Road Plot No. 55745 Block 8, Gaborone Private Bag BO 48 Tel: +267 3903200 Fax: +267 3903120 Email: [email protected] Website: www.bobstandards.bw Francistown Branch: Plot 23267 Donga, Adjacent to Metsef Wholesalers Private Bag F465, Francistown Tel: +267 2416232 Fax: +267 2416251 BOBS Standards Work Programme BULLETIN 1 April 2020 – 31 March 2021 [Issue No.26] Gaborone, Botswana Contents International Classification for Standards (ICS).............. 3 List of technical Committees........................................... 5 Draft Botswana Standards.............................................. 8 Project stages table........................................................ 32 International Classification for Standards (ICS) Main ICS Subject Fields 01 Generalities. Terminology. Standardization. Documentation 03 Sociology. Services. Company Organization and Management. Administration. Transport 07 Mathematics. Natural Sciences 11 Health Care Technology 13 Environment and Health Protection. Safety 17 Metrology and Measurement. Physical Phenomena 19 Testing 21 Mechanical Systems and Components for General Use 23 Fluid Systems and Components for General Use 25 Manufacturing Engineering 27 Energy and Heat Transfer Engineering 29 Electrical Engineering 31 Electronics 33 Telecommunications 35 Information Technology. Office Equipment 37 Image Technology 39 Precision Mechanics. Jewellery 43 Road Vehicle Engineering 45 Railway Engineering 47 Ship Building and Marine Structures 49 Aircraft
    [Show full text]
  • Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Plan for Information Security Vyshnavi Jorrigala St
    St. Cloud State University theRepository at St. Cloud State Culminating Projects in Information Assurance Department of Information Systems 12-2017 Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Plan for Information Security Vyshnavi Jorrigala St. Cloud State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/msia_etds Recommended Citation Jorrigala, Vyshnavi, "Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Plan for Information Security" (2017). Culminating Projects in Information Assurance. 44. https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/msia_etds/44 This Starred Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Information Systems at theRepository at St. Cloud State. It has been accepted for inclusion in Culminating Projects in Information Assurance by an authorized administrator of theRepository at St. Cloud State. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Plan for Information Security by Vyshnavi Devi Jorrigala A Starred Paper Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Saint Cloud State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree, of Master of Science in Information Assurance December, 2018 Starred Paper Committee: Susantha Herath, Chairperson Dien D. Phan Balasubramanian Kasi 2 Abstract Business continuity planning and Disaster recovery planning are the most crucial elements of a business but are often ignored. Businesses must make a well-structured plan and document for disaster recovery and business continuation, even before a catastrophe occurs. Disasters can be short or may last for a long time, but when an organization is ready for any adversity, it thrives hard and survives. This paper will clearly distinguish the difference between disaster recovery plan and business continuity plan, will describe the components of each plan and finally, will provide an approach that organizations can follow to make better contingency plan so that they will not go out of business when something unexpected happens.
    [Show full text]
  • Document Number Title Most Recent Publication Date Scope Sector 1 Sector 2 Sector 3 Sector 4 Contents
    Document Number Title Most Recent Scope Sector 1 Sector 2 Sector 3 Sector 4 Contents Publication Date ARINC 654 ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN 9/12/1994 Refers electromagnetic Transportation Systems 1.0 INTRODUCTION GUIDELINES FOR compatibility, shielding, 1.1 Objectives INTEGRATED MODULAR thermal management, 1.2 Scope AVIONICS PACKAGING AND vibration and shock of IMA 1.3 References INTERFACES systems. Emphasis is placed 2.0 VIBRATION AND SHOCK both on the design of IMA 2.1 Introduction components and their 2.2 Vibration and Shock Isolation electrical, optical and electro- 3.0 THERMAL CONSIDERATIONS mechanical interfaces. 3.1 Thermal Management 3.1.1 Electronic System Thermal Design Objectives 3.1.2 Design Condition Definitions 3.1.3 Air Flow 3.1.4 Fully Enclosed and Flow- Through Cooling 3.1.5 Thermal Design Conditions 3.1.6 Cooling Hole Sizes - Limit Cases 3.2 Electronic Parts Application 3.3 Ambient Temperatures 3.4 Equipment Sidewall Temperature 3.5 LRM Thermal Appraisal 3.6 Thermal Interface Information 3.7 Materials for Thermal Design 4.0 DESIGN LIFE 4.1 Operational Design Life 4.2 Failure Modes ARINC 666 ITEM 7.0 Encryption and 2002 Information Technology f l/ Authentication ATIS 0300100 IP NETWORK DISASTER 1/12/2009 Pertains to enumerate Information Technology Emergency Services RECOVERY FRAMEWORK potential proactive or automatic policy-driven network traffic management actions that should be performed prior to, during, and immediately following disaster conditions. ATIS 0300202 Internetwork Operations 1/11/2009 Describes the cooperative Information Technology Emergency Services communications Guidelines for Network network management Management of the Public actions (that may be) Telecommunications required of interconnected Networks under Disaster network operators during Conditions emergency conditions associated with disasters that threaten life or property and case congestion in the public telecommunications networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Relevant Standards Which Was Conducted by Using the Standards Database Perinorm [2]
    D6.1 EXISTING STANDARDS AND STANDARDIZATION ACTIVITIES REPORT. SMART MATURE RESILIENCE D6.1 EXISTING STANDARDS AND STANDARDIZATION ACTIVITIES REPORT DIN | 31/05/2016 www.smr-project.eu 1 D6.1 EXISTING STANDARDS AND STANDARDIZATION ACTIVITIES REPORT. Existing standards and standardization activities report Deliverable no. D6.1 Work package WP6 Dissemination Level Public Author (s) René Lindner and Bernhard Kempen (DIN) Co-author(s) Maider Sainz (TECNUN) Date 31/05/2016 File Name D6.1.SMR_Existing_standards_report Revision Reviewed by (if Jose J. Gonzalez (CIEM), Torbjørg Træland Meum (CIEM), Jaziar applicable) Radianti (CIEM), Vasileios P. Latinos (ICLEI) This document has been prepared in the framework of the European project SMR – SMART MATURE RESILIENCE. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme under Grant Agreement no. 653569. The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the European Union. Neither the REA nor the European Commission is responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. Funded by the Horizon 2020 programme of the European Union www.smr-project.eu 2 D6.1 EXISTING STANDARDS AND STANDARDIZATION ACTIVITIES REPORT. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The aim of this report is to disseminate knowledge about relevant existing standards and standardization activities amongst project partners and to support the awareness rising of possible missing standards. Thus this document will show the current resilience and Smart City standardization landscape, specifically taken into consideration the security aspects, and will list and briefly assess the standards relevant for this project.
    [Show full text]
  • PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM for 2020 As of July 2020
    BUREAU OF PHILIPPINE STANDARDS PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM FOR 2020 as of July 2020 SUBJECT PROJECT REFERENCE STATUS STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL COMMITTEE [New/Revision 1. Preparatory CLASSIFICATION FOR BUILDING, CONSTRUCTION, MECHANICAL AND TRASPORTATION PRODUCTS Standard Test Method for Time of Setting of Concrete ASTM C403 / C403M - 16 New Finalization 91.100.30 BPS/TC 5 Concrete, Reinforced Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Mixtures by Penetration Resistance Standard Test Method for Measuring Thickness of Concrete ASTM C174 / C174M - 17 New Finalization 91.100.30 BPS/TC 5 Concrete, Reinforced Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Elements Using Drilled Concrete Cores Standard Specification for Materials for Shotcrete ASTM C 1436-13 New Finalization 91.100.30 BPS/TC 5 Concrete, Reinforced Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete ASTM C293/C293M-16 New Finalization 91.100.30 BPS/TC 5 Concrete, Reinforced Concrete and Prestressed Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Center-Point Loading) Standard Specification for Grout for Masonry ASTM C476-19 New Drafting/Deliberation 91.100.30 BPS/TC 5 Concrete, Reinforced Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Standard Specification for Mortar for Unit Masonry ASTM C270-19e1 New Drafting/Deliberation 91.100.30 BPS/TC 5 Concrete, Reinforced Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete ASTM C78 / C78M - 18 New Preparatory 91.100.30 BPS/TC 5 Concrete, Reinforced Concrete and Prestressed Concrete (Using Simple
    [Show full text]
  • Iso/Tc292 規格開発状況(2021 年 6 月)
    ISO/TC292 規格開発状況(2021 年 6 月) 注:オレンジ色のハイライトは,日本提案案件 WG 規格番号 タイトル 現在のステータス 備 考 ISO/TR 22312:2011 Societal security — Technological capabilities 1 ISO 22300:2021 Security and resilience — Vocabulary 発行済み 2 ISO 22301:2019 Security and resilience — Business continuity 発行済み JIS Q 22301:2020 management systems — Requirements セキュリティ及びレジリエンス―事業継続マネジメント 更なる参考書 システム―要求事項 外部リンク(ISO) 2 ISO 22313:2020 Security and resilience — Business continuity 発行済み JIS Q22313 改正中 management systems — Guidance on the use of ISO 22301 2 ISO 22316:2017 Security and resilience — Organizational resilience — 発行済み Principles and attributes 2 ISO/TS 22317:2015 Societal security -- Business continuity management 発行済み 改定中(今夏発行予定) systems -- Guidelines for business impact analysis (BIA) 1 2 ISO/TS 22318:2015 Societal security — Business continuity management 発行済み 改定中(今夏発行予定) systems — Guidelines for supply chain continuity 2 ISO/TS 22330:2018 Security and resilience — Business continuity 発行済み management systems — Guidelines for people aspects of business continuity 2 ISO/TS 22331:2018 Security and resilience — Business continuity 発行済み management systems — Guidelines for business continuity strategy 2 ISO/TS 22332:2021 Security and resilience — Business continuity 発行済み management systems — Guidance for developing business continuity procedures CASCO ISO/IEC 17021-6 Conformity assessment — Requirements for bodies 定期見直し実施中 providing audit and certification of management (ISO/CASCO主導) systems — Part 6: Competence requirements for auditing and certification of business continuity
    [Show full text]
  • KRITIS-Normen-Matrix, Stand 2021-07-14
    KRITIS-Normen-Matrix, Stand 2021-07-14 KRITIS-Sektor Informations- Transport Finanz- und Medien Norm zuständiges Gremium/Titel der Norm technik/ Staat und Energie und Gesundheit Wasser Ernährung Versiche- und Telekom- Verwaltung Verkehr rungswesen Kultur munikation DIN-Normenausschuss Feuerwehrwesen (FNFW) NA 031-05-02 AA Organisations- und Steuerungsnormen für den Bevölkerungsschutz DIN CEN/TS 17091:2019-01 Krisenmanagement - Strategische Grundsätze DIN EN ISO 22300:2021-06 Sicherheit und Resilienz - Begriffe Sicherheit und Resilienz - Business Continuity Management DIN EN ISO 22301:2020-06 System - Anforderungen Sicherheit und Resilienz - Business Continuity Management DIN EN ISO 22313:2020-10 System - Anleitung zur Verwendung von ISO 22301 Sicherheit und Schutz des Gemeinwesens - DIN EN ISO 22315:2018-12 Massenevakuierung - Leitfaden für die Planung Sicherheit und Resilienz - Resilienz der Gesellschaft - E DIN EN ISO 22319:2021-02 Leitfaden für die Planung der Einbindung spontaner freiwilliger Helfer Sicherheit und Resilienz - Gefahrenabwehr - Leitfaden für die Organisation der Gefahrenabwehr bei DIN ISO 22320:2019-07 Schadensereignissen Sicherheit und Schutz des Gemeinwesens - ISO 22322:2015-05 Gefahrenabwehr - System zur Warnung der Öffentlichkeit Sicherheit und Resilienz - Gefahrenabwehr - Leitfaden für die Nutzung sozialer Medien im ISO/DIS 22329:2020-12 Gefahrenabwehrmanagement Krisenmanagement: Leitlinien für die Entwicklung einer ISO/CD 22361 Strategie Security and resilience - Community resilience - Guidelines ISO/TS 22393
    [Show full text]
  • A Performance-Based Tabular Approach for Joint Systematic
    Environment Systems and Decisions (2021) 41:286–329 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-021-09811-5 (0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,- volV) A performance-based tabular approach for joint systematic improvement of risk control and resilience applied to telecommunication grid, gas network, and ultrasound localization system 1 1 1 1 1 Ivo Ha¨ring • Mirjam Fehling-Kaschek • Natalie Miller • Katja Faist • Sebastian Ganter • 1 1 1 1 1 Kushal Srivastava • Aishvarya Kumar Jain • Georg Fischer • Kai Fischer • Jo¨ rg Finger • 1 1 1 2 2 Alexander Stolz • Tobias Leismann • Stefan Hiermaier • Marco Carli • Federica Battisti • 3 4 5 5 6 Rodoula Makri • Giuseppe Celozzi • Maria Belesioti • Evangelos Sfakianakis • Evita Agrafioti • 6 6 7 7 8 Anastasia Chalkidou • George Papadakis • Clemente Fuggini • Fabio Bolletta • Alberto Neri • 9 10 11 11 12 Guiseppe Giunta • Hermann Scheithauer • Fabian Ho¨ flinger • Dominik J. Schott • Christian Schindelhauer • 12 13 Sven Ko¨ hler • Igor Linkov Accepted: 11 March 2021 / Published online: 10 April 2021 Ó The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Organizational and technical approaches have proven successful in increasing the performance and preventing risks at socio-technical systems at all scales. Nevertheless, damaging events are often unavoidable due to a wide and dynamic threat landscape and enabled by the increasing complexity of modern systems. For overall performance and risk control at the system level, resilience can be a versatile option, in particular for reducing resources needed for system development, maintenance, reuse, or disposal. This paper presents a framework for a resilience assessment and management process that builds on existing risk management practice before, during, and after potential and real events.
    [Show full text]