Ceremonial Conformity and Laudian Writing

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ceremonial Conformity and Laudian Writing ANTI-CALVINIST? CEREMONIAL CONFORMITY AND LAUDIAN WRITING, RECONSIDERED (c. 1590-1640) ________________________________________________________________________ A Dissertation presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri-Columbia _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy _____________________________________________________ By TRAVIS KNAPP Dr. Anne Myers, Dissertation Supervisor May 2021 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled ANTI-CALVINIST? CEREMONIAL CONFORMITY AND LAUDIAN WRITING, RECONSIDERED (c. 1590-1640) presented by Travis Knapp, a candidate for the degree of doctor of philosophy, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. _____________________________________________________ Professor Anne Myers _____________________________________________________ Professor John Frymire _____________________________________________________ Professor William Kerwin _____________________________________________________ Professor David Read ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The intellectual and emotional debts I have accrued while completing this project are many. While personal relationships tend to be relegated to the end of the acknowledgements, I begin with them. I would like to start by thanking my parents for their unfailing and unending support. I have been extremely fortunate to have such loving parents who have offered encouragement and support at every step of my life, which has made my graduate school experience much more comfortable, even amidst the various struggles and chaos that emerge in the process. Part of the reason I chose to attend the University of Missouri was to stay close to my family, and being within driving distance to my parents, my brothers and their families, has made the far-too-short holiday breaks quite enjoyable and pleasant. Although I am sure I will inevitably omit meaningful friendships I have made over the years, no other has meant so much to me during grad school as my dear friend Allie’s. I never would have imagined this friendship would have outlasted jokes about HR tabs and quips about who has played DnD more recently (not me) and turned into something so meaningful. From my trivial text rantings to her presence and support for me, especially when I began this project, which coincided with one of the lowest emotional points of my life, I cannot express my thankfulness enough for her friendship. Similarly, I hope in a few years I will be able to repay the favors to another friend from my undergraduate years, Allison, who was happy to listen to me vent about the ups and downs of the job market. While I have known Maggie since she began her master’s at iii Mizzou, I only met her husband Joel this past year, when they moved into the house in front of mine. I have appreciated their friendship, camaraderie, and support (in long porch chats and leftover baked goods) as I finished this dissertation. I have been fortunate to receive much institutional and professional support over the course of this project. Through Mizzou’s participation in the Newberry Library Consortium, I have been lucky to attend workshops and receive research support from the Newberry and the Folger Shakespeare Libraries, the staff of which at both institutions have encouraged this project from its infancy. In addition to my assistantship, this project was funded in part by two fellowships, the MU English Department’s Harry J. and Richard A. Hocks Dissertation Fellowship and the University of Missouri Graduate School’s Raymond White Dissertation Year Fellowship. For finishing this project during a pandemic, the support has been instrumental, even if I did have to postpone a research trip to the UK. This work has benefited from many mentorships and academic relationships over the year. I probably would never have gone to graduate school in English if not for the support of Edward Jones, whose research mentorship got me into the early modern period and without whom, I doubt I would have come across or recognize the name Lancelot Andrewes, whose writings and sermons got me into this research path. Almost every chapter of this dissertation was workshopped by the MU English Department’s Critical Writing Workshop. My thanks to Emma Lipton, Nicole Songstad, Johanna Kramer, Elijah Guerra, McKenzie Peck, Thanh Nguyen, and Peter Land for their comments on various drafts and getting this project into decent argumentative shape. The professional iv mentorship of Steve Karian and Becca Hayes has helped me immensely in terms of refining my textual scholarship and preparing myself for the academic job market. Lastly, the support and rapport of my dissertation committee has done much in terms of improving my ability as a scholar. Their genial attitudes and warmth in humoring my questions made all of the required meetings and examinations something to enjoy and look forward to rather than fear. To John Frymire, I appreciate the casual reminders that, for as much as England is on an island, early modern Protestantism was not so insular. To Bill Kerwin, I appreciate the early opportunities to explore Laudian poetics in your seminars and your enthusiasm in learning about what I have to contribute to the study of the religious landscape of 17th-century Britain. To David Read, I am thankful for your critical eye that has helped improve my prose and argumentation and for the reminders that I need to be more mindful of the puritans. And finally, to my adviser Anne Myers, I am thankful for everything: for constant encouragement, for the willingness to allow me to come into her office and ramble about my projects for hours at a time while still helping me narrow my focus, and support in reading and commenting on every abstract, application, and draft I have written these last seven years. I would not have had the academic success if not for her support as well as everyone else mentioned (and those I may unfortunately omitted). And, to end the way all academic acknowledgements end: my work has been made better by the care and support of all mentioned here. Any shortcomings and errors that remain, quite naturally, are my own. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................. ii ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................... vii Introduction: Reexamining Early Laudianism ................................................................................. 1 I. Project Overview ...................................................................................................................... 1 II. Theological and Ecclesiological Context ................................................................................ 3 III. Laudianism, Avant-Garde Conformity, and Calvinism ......................................................... 9 IV. Chapter Outline and Interventions ....................................................................................... 20 Chapter One: “I came hither to Preach, not to dispute” – Oratory and Polemic in 1618 Court Sermons ......................................................................................................................................... 39 I. “We bethinke our selves: how to doe him Service. Reverently to performe holy dueties: Laudably to have our conversation among men” (2, 25-6). ....................................................... 43 II. The Duties of the whole man: “Give me leave to joyne these three, Adoration, Prostration and Kneeling together: because in trueth they should never be separated” (10) .... 50 III. “The custome of Easter made a contention, would make it an Easter day Text” (1) .......... 61 Chapter Two: Merely Popish? John Cosin and his “barking Libellers” ........................................ 77 I. The Texts of Cosin, Prynne, and Burton ................................................................................ 82 II. Cum Privilegio – The True Complaint? ................................................................................ 86 III. A Different Type of Altar Controversy – a Jesuit Frontispiece? ......................................... 89 IV. Whose Tradition? Catholic and Protestant Sources in Cosin’s Primer Material ................. 95 V. Daniel Featley: A Case-study in English Protestant Conformity ........................................ 110 VI. “And if this bee superstition, what is Religion?” (536): Addressing the Controversies of Fasting, Feasting, and Saints .................................................................................................... 118 VII. Featley’s Catechism & Conclusion .................................................................................. 126 Chapter Three: Laudianism in Private Devotionals, 1612-1631 .................................................. 136 I. Thomas Tymme’s 1618 A Chariot of Devotion ................................................................... 139 II. Lewis Bayly’s 1612 The Practise of Pietie ......................................................................... 151 III. Exeter: Henry Tozer’s 1628 Directions for a Godly Life and Charles Herle’s 1631 Contemplations and Devotions ................................................................................................ 163 IV. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses The priesthood of Christ in Anglican doctrine and devotion: 1827 - 1900 Hancock, Christopher David How to cite: Hancock, Christopher David (1984) The priesthood of Christ in Anglican doctrine and devotion: 1827 - 1900, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/7473/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 VOLUME II 'THE PRIESTHOOD OF CHRIST IN ANGLICAN DOCTRINE AND DEVOTION: 1827 -1900' BY CHRISTOPHER DAVID HANCOCK The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University of Durham, Department of Theology, 1984 17. JUL. 1985 CONTENTS VOLUME. II NOTES PREFACE 1 INTRODUCTION 4 CHAPTER I 26 CHAPTER II 46 CHAPTER III 63 CHAPTER IV 76 CHAPTER V 91 CHAPTER VI 104 CHAPTER VII 122 CHAPTER VIII 137 ABBREVIATIONS 154 BIBLIOGRAPHY 155 1 NOTES PREFACE 1 Cf.
    [Show full text]
  • JAMES USSHER Copyright Material: Irish Manuscripts Commission
    U3-030215 qxd.qxd:NEW USH3 3/2/15 11:20 Page i The Correspondence of JAMES USSHER Copyright material: Irish Manuscripts Commission Commission Manuscripts Irish material: Copyright U3-030215 qxd.qxd:NEW USH3 3/2/15 11:20 Page iii The Correspondence of JAMES USSHER 1600–1656 V O L U M E I I I 1640–1656 Commission Letters no. 475–680 editedManuscripts by Elizabethanne Boran Irish with Latin and Greek translations by David Money material: Copyright IRISH MANUSCRIPTS COMMISSION 2015 U3-030215 qxd.qxd:NEW USH3 3/2/15 11:20 Page iv For Gertie, Orla and Rosemary — one each. Published by Irish Manuscripts Commission 45 Merrion Square Dublin 2 Ireland www.irishmanuscripts.ie Commission Copyright © Irish Manuscripts Commission 2015 Elizabethanne Boran has asserted her right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright and Related Rights Act 2000, Section 107. Manuscripts ISBN 978-1-874280-89-7 (3 volume set) Irish No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the publisher. The index was completed with the support of the Arts andmaterial: Social Sciences Benefaction Fund, Trinity College, Dublin. Copyright Typeset by December Publications in Adobe Garamond and Times New Roman Printed by Brunswick Press Index prepared by Steve Flanders U3-030215 qxd.qxd:NEW USH3 3/2/15 11:20 Page v S E R I E S C O N T E N T S V O L U M E I Abbreviations xxv Acknowledgements xxix Introduction xxxi Correspondence of James Ussher: Letters no.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Grimston Rectors by Stephanie Hall © 2021
    Our Grimston Rectors By Stephanie Hall © 2021 Contents Page Our Medieval Rectors ............................................................................................................................. 2 Rev Thomas Hare .................................................................................................................................... 5 Rev Nicholas Carr- died 1530 .................................................................................................................. 6 Rev Richard (or Edward) Rochester died in 1560 ................................................................................... 7 Rev Rochester , 1530 – 1560 ................................................................................................................... 8 Rev William Pordage (Porridge) - died 1585 .......................................................................................... 9 Reverend William Thorowgood , 1544 – 1625 ..................................................................................... 10 Reverend Thomas Thorowgood, 1588 -1669........................................................................................ 12 Rev John Brockett 1613-1664 ............................................................................................................... 14 Reverend Thomas Cremer 1635 - 1694 ................................................................................................ 16 Reverend John Cremer 1663 - 1743 ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER Parish of St George Hanover Square St George’S Church Grosvenor Chapel March—June 2015: Issue 30
    NEWSLETTER Parish of St George Hanover Square St George’s Church Grosvenor Chapel March—June 2015: issue 30 ence these men exercised on Inside this issue musical life in the second half of the twentieth century: The Rector writes 2 Christopher Morris, the prodi- gious Anglican church musi- Services at St George’s 3 cian and organist of distinc- tion who befriended and Fr Richard Fermer writes 6 mentored a generation of Eng- lish, Welsh and Scottish com- Services at Grosvenor Chapel 7 posers and whose immensely practical publisher’s mind Lent Course 8 conceived and gave birth to Prisons Mission 10 that ubiquitous staple of An- glophone choirs worldwide, London Handel Festival 11 Carols for Choirs; and Denys Darlow who not only founded Mayfair Organ Concerts 13 major English festivals cele- brating the music of Bach and Hyde Park Place Estate Charity 15 Handel but who played a pro- found part, through his per- t is with great sadness that we formances of works by these I learned, just as this edition of Baroque masters and their the Parish Newsletter was going contemporaries, in our devel- to press, of the death at the age oping understanding of ‘early of 93 of Denys Darlow who served music’. as tenth organist and choirmaster of St George’s between 1972 and This year’s London Handel 2000. It is just two months since Festival - an annual event the demise of Darlow’s younger Darlow founded at St George’s predecessor, Christopher Morris back in 1978 - is about to (organist between 1947 and start.
    [Show full text]
  • Winchester Cathedral Record 2020 Number 89
    Winchester Cathedral Record 2020 Number 89 Friends of Winchester Cathedral 2 The Close, Winchester, Hampshire SO23 9LS 01962 857 245 [email protected] www.winchester-cathedral.org.uk Registered Charity No. 220218 Friends of Winchester Cathedral 2020 Royal Patron Her Majesty the Queen Patron The Right Reverend Tim Dakin, Bishop of Winchester President The Very Reverend Catherine Ogle, Dean of Winchester Ex Officio Vice-Presidents Nigel Atkinson Esq, HM Lord Lieutenant of Hampshire Cllr Patrick Cunningham, The Right Worshipful, the Mayor of Winchester Ms Jean Ritchie QC, Cathedral Council Chairman Honorary Vice-President Mo Hearn BOARD OF TRUSTEES Bruce Parker, Chairman Tom Watson, Vice-Chairman David Fellowes, Treasurer Jenny Hilton, Natalie Shaw Nigel Spicer, Cindy Wood Ex Officio Chapter Trustees The Very Reverend Catherine Ogle, Dean of Winchester The Reverend Canon Andy Trenier, Precentor and Sacrist STAFF Lucy Hutchin, Director Lesley Mead Leisl Porter Friends’ Prayer Most glorious Lord of life, Who gave to your disciples the precious name of friends: accept our thanks for this Cathedral Church, built and adorned to your glory and alive with prayer and grant that its company of Friends may so serve and honour you in this life that they come to enjoy the fullness of your promises within the eternal fellowship of your grace; and this we ask for your name’s sake. Amen. Welcome What we have all missed most during this dreadfully long pandemic is human contact with others. Our own organisation is what it says in the official title it was given in 1931, an Association of Friends.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Registration in Medicine
    PUBLIC DOCUMENT . No. 56. NINTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ¡ova, Board of Registration in Medicine. J a n u a r y , 1903. BOSTON : WRIGHT & POTTER PRINTING CO., STATE PRINTERS, 18 P ost Offic e Square. 1903. APPBÎ>VjM> BY BÓARft’ Of/ P iTb t rt\iT j&n (ÌGmmnntomllf} of litas saxjjtisitls B o a r d o f R egistration in M e d ic in e , S t a t e H o u s e , D ec. 31, 1902. To His Excellency W. M u r r a y C r a n e , Governor. Sir : — The number of persons applying for registration this year is 390, all of whom except 6 have been examined. The number of applicants on the rejected lists of this and previous years who have been re-examined this year is 96, a small per­ centage of whom have been registered. The whole number of individual examinations given during the year is 480. The result of the several examinations is shown in tabular form, as follows : — Examined. Registered. Rejected. P ercentage rejected. March examination,.............................................. 96 54 42 44 May e x a m i n a t i o n , ............................................... 52 35 17 32 Ju ly exam ination...................................................... 178 133 45 25 September exam ination,..................................... 75 50 25 32 November exam ination,..................................... 79 49 30 38 T o ta ls ,................................................................. 480 321 159 33 In the following tabulated statement a few applicants who failed in their original examination this year, but who were successful in a re-examination, are included : — Y ear of N um ber N um ber Graduation of Name of Institution.
    [Show full text]
  • Bogomils of Bulgaria and Bosnia
    BOGOMILS OF BULGARIA AND BOSNIA The Early Protestants of the East. AN ATTEMPT TO RESTORE SOME LOST LEAVES OF PROTESTANT HISTORY. BY L. P. BROCKETT, M. D. Author of: "The Cross and the Crescent," "History of Religious Denominations," etc. PHILADELPHIA AMERICAN BAPTIST PUBLICATION SOCIETY, 1420 CHESTNUT STREET. Entered to Act of Congress, in the year 1879, by the AMERICAN BAPTIST PUBLICATION SOCIETY, In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington. CONTENTS _______ SECTION I. Introduction.—The Armenian and other Oriental churches. SECTION II. Dualism and the phantastic theory of our Lord's advent in the Oriental churches —The doctrines they rejected.—They held to baptism. SECTION III. Gradual decline of the dualistic doctrine —The holy and exemplary lives of the Paulicians. SECTION IV. The cruelty and bloodthirstiness of the Empress Theodora —The free state and city of Tephrice. SECTION V. The Sclavonic development of the Catharist or Paulician churches.—Bulgaria, Bosnia, and Servia its principal seats —Euchites, Massalians, and Bogomils SECTION VI. The Bulgarian Empire and its Bogomil czars. SECTION VII. A Bogomil congregation and its worship —Mostar, on the Narenta. SECTION VIII. The Bogomilian doctrines and practices —The Credentes and Perfecti —Were the Credentes baptized? SECTION IX. The orthodoxy of the Greek and Roman churches rather theological than practical —Fall of the Bulgarian Empire. SECTION X. The Emperor Alexius Comnenus and the Bogomil Elder Basil —The Alexiad of the Princess Anna Comnena. SECTION XI. The martyrdom of Basil —The Bogomil churches reinforced by the Armenian Paulicians under the Emperor John Zimisces. SECTION XII. The purity of life of the Bogomils —Their doctrines and practices —Their asceticism.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation Title Page
    “Singing by Course” and the Politics of Worship in the Church of England, c1560–1640 By James Campbell Nelson Apgar A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Music in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Davitt Moroney, Chair Professor James Davies Professor Diego Pirillo Spring 2018 Abstract “Singing by Course” and the Politics of Worship in the Church of England, c1560–1640 by James Campbell Nelson Apgar Doctor of Philosophy in Music University of California, Berkeley Professor Davitt Moroney, Chair “Singing by course” was both a product of and a rhetorical tool within the religious discourses of post-Reformation England. Attached to a variety of ostensibly distinct practices, from choirs singing alternatim to congregations praying responsively, it was used to advance a variety of partisan agendas regarding performance and sound within the services of the English Church. This dissertation examines discourses of public worship that were conducted around and through “singing by course,” treating it as a linguistic and conceptual node within broader networks of contemporary religious debate. I thus attend less to the history of the vocal practices to which “by course” and similar descriptions were applied than to the polemical dynamics of these applications. Discussions of these terms and practices slipped both horizontally, to other matters of ritual practice, and vertically, to larger topics or frameworks such as the nature of the Christian Church, the production of piety, and the roles of sound and performance in corporate prayer. Through consideration of these issues, “singing by course” emerges as a rhetorical, political, and theological construction, one that circulated according to changing historical conditions and to the interests of various ecclesiastical constituencies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Democratic Party and the Transformation of American Conservatism, 1847-1860
    PRESERVING THE WHITE MAN’S REPUBLIC: THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF AMERICAN CONSERVATISM, 1847-1860 Joshua A. Lynn A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2015 Approved by: Harry L. Watson William L. Barney Laura F. Edwards Joseph T. Glatthaar Michael Lienesch © 2015 Joshua A. Lynn ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Joshua A. Lynn: Preserving the White Man’s Republic: The Democratic Party and the Transformation of American Conservatism, 1847-1860 (Under the direction of Harry L. Watson) In the late 1840s and 1850s, the American Democratic party redefined itself as “conservative.” Yet Democrats’ preexisting dedication to majoritarian democracy, liberal individualism, and white supremacy had not changed. Democrats believed that “fanatical” reformers, who opposed slavery and advanced the rights of African Americans and women, imperiled the white man’s republic they had crafted in the early 1800s. There were no more abstract notions of freedom to boundlessly unfold; there was only the existing liberty of white men to conserve. Democrats therefore recast democracy, previously a progressive means to expand rights, as a way for local majorities to police racial and gender boundaries. In the process, they reinvigorated American conservatism by placing it on a foundation of majoritarian democracy. Empowering white men to democratically govern all other Americans, Democrats contended, would preserve their prerogatives. With the policy of “popular sovereignty,” for instance, Democrats left slavery’s expansion to territorial settlers’ democratic decision-making.
    [Show full text]
  • Origins of Valentine's Day
    Origins of Valentine's Day Various Authors CHURCH OF GOD ARCHIVES Origins of Valentine's Day Valentine's Day - Christian Custom or Pagan Pageantry? by Herman L Hoeh "Will you be my valentine?" That question is asked by millions about this time of year. Why? Is there any religious significance to February 14? Where did St. Valentine's Day come from? You might suppose schoolteachers and educators would know. But do they? How many of you were ever taught the real origin of Valentine's Day — were ever told in school exactly why you should observe the custom of exchanging valentines? Teachers are all too often silent about the origin of the customs they are forced to teach in today's schools. If they were to speak out, many would lose their jobs! Today, candy makers unload tons of heart-shaped red boxes for February 14 — St. Valentine's Day — while millions of the younger set exchange valentines. Florists consider February 14 as one of their best business days. And young lovers pair off – at least for a dance or two — at St. Valentine's balls. Why? Where did these customs originate? How did we come to inherit these customs? Isn't it time we examined why we encourage our children to celebrate St. Valentine's Day? A Christian custom? Many have assumed that the traditional Valentine's Day celebrations are all in connection with an early Christian martyr by the name of Valentine. Nothing could be further from the truth! Notice what one encyclopedia says about this idea: "St.
    [Show full text]
  • EB WARD Diary
    THE DIARY OF SAMUEL WARD, A TRANSLATOR OF THE 1611 KING JAMES BIBLE Transcribed and prepared by Dr. M.M. Knappen, Professor of English History, University of Chicago. Edited by John W. Cowart Bluefish Books Cowart Communications Jacksonville, Florida www.bluefishbooks.info THE DIARY OF SAMUEL WARD, A TRANSLATOR OF THE 1611 KING JAMES BIBLE. Copyright © 2007 by John W. Cowart. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America by Lulu Press. Apart from reasonable fair use practices, no part of this book’s text may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission from the publisher except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews. For information address Bluefish Books, 2805 Ernest St., Jacksonville, Florida, 32205. Library of Congress Cataloging-in- Publication Data has been applied for. Lulu Press # 1009823. Bluefish Books Cowart Communications Jacksonville, Florida www.bluefishbooks.info SAMUEL WARD 1572 — 1643 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION …………………………………..…. 1 THE TWO SAMUEL WARDS……………………. …... 13 SAMUEL WARD’S LISTIING IN THE DICTIONARY OF NATIONAL BIOGRAPHY…. …. 17 DR. M.M. KNAPPEN’S PREFACE ………. …………. 21 THE PURITAN CHARACTER IN THE DIARY. ….. 27 DR. KNAPPEN’S LIFE OF SAMUEL WARD …. …... 43 THE DIARY TEXT …………………………….……… 59 THE 1611 TRANSLATORS’ DEDICATION TO THE KING……………………………………….… 97 THE 1611 TRANSLATORS’ PREFACE TO BIBLE READERS ………………………………………….….. 101 BIBLIOGRAPHY ……………………………….…….. 129 INTRODUCTION by John W. Cowart amuel Ward, a moderate Puritan minister, lived from 1572 to S1643. His life spanned from the reign of Britain’s Queen Elizabeth, through that of King James. and into the days of Charles I. Surviving pages of Ward’s dated diary entries run from May 11, 1595, to July 1, 1632.
    [Show full text]
  • Come, Holy Ghost
    Come, Holy Ghost John Cosin and 17th Century Anglicanism Notes from sabbatical study leave, Summer 2016 Donald Allister Come, Holy Ghost Sabbatical study Copyright © Donald Allister 2017 2 Come, Holy Ghost Sabbatical study Contents Come, Holy Ghost 4 Personal Interest 5 The Legacy of the 16th Century 8 Arminianism and the Durham House Group 10 The Origins of the Civil War 13 Cosin’s Collection of Private Devotions 14 Controversy, Cambridge, Catastrophe 16 Exile, Roman Catholicism, and the Huguenots 18 Breda, Savoy, the Book of Common Prayer, and the Act of Uniformity 22 Cosin’s Other Distinctive Views 25 Reflections 26 Collects written by Cosin and included in the 1662 Prayer Book 29 Cosin’s Last Testament 30 Some key dates 33 Bibliography 35 3 Come, Holy Ghost Sabbatical study Come, Holy Ghost, our souls inspire, and lighten with celestial fire. Thou the anointing Spirit art, who dost thy sevenfold gifts impart. Thy blessed unction from above is comfort, life, and fire of love. Enable with perpetual light the dullness of our blinded sight. Anoint and cheer our soiled face with the abundance of thy grace. Keep far from foes, give peace at home: where thou art guide, no ill can come. Teach us to know the Father, Son, and thee, of both, to be but One, that through the ages all along, this may be our endless song: Praise to thy eternal merit, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Amen.1 Original Latin ascribed to Rabanus Maurus (died AD 856), traditionally sung at Pentecost, Confirmations, and Ordinations: Veni, creator Spiritus, / mentes tuorum visita, / imple superna gratia, / quae tu creasti, pectora.
    [Show full text]