DOCSLIB.ORG

Heidegger and Levinas : the Problem of Ethics. Cheryl L

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Heidegger and Levinas : the Problem of Ethics. Cheryl L University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 1-1-1993 Heidegger and Levinas : the problem of ethics. Cheryl L. Hughes University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1 Recommended Citation Hughes, Cheryl L., "Heidegger and Levinas : the problem of ethics." (1993). Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014. 1887. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1/1887 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HEIDEGGER AND LEVINAS THE PROBLEM OF ETHICS A Dissertation Presented by CHERYL L. HUGHES Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY February 1993 Department of Philosophy (cT) Copyright by Cheryl Lynne Hughes 1993 All Rights Reserved HEIDEGGER AND LEVINAS THE PROBLEM OF ETHICS A Dissertation Presented by CHERYL L. HUGHES Leonard H. Ehrlich, Chair Robert J.'J Ackermann, Member . ABSTRACT HEIDEGGER AND LEVINAS THE PROBLEM OF ETHICS FEBRUARY 1993 CHERYL L. HUGHES, B.S., PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY Ph.D. , UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS Directed by: Professor Leonard H. Ehrlich This dissertation examines the contributions of Martin Heidegger and Emmanuel Levinas to an understanding of the fundamental meaning and possibility of ethical phenomena. I begin with the problem of ethics as it is articulated by Heidegger in his criticisms of Western metaphysical thinking. Heidegger claims that we need to rethink the meaning of ethics without reliance on traditional metaphysical categories, but this task remains secondary to his own concern over fundamental ontology. Since Heidegger does not concretely explore the meaning of ethics, I consider subseguent efforts to produce Heideggerian ethics. Focusing in particular on the work of Werner Marx, I question the adequacy of a Heideggerian analysis of human relations and the adequacy of any ethics that depends on an individualizing modification of the anonymous bonds of community In an effort to provide a more adequate description of human relations and the meaning of ethical responsibility, I turn to the work of Emmanuel Levinas. I explore Levinas 's iv radical and polemical response to Heidegger, his effort to rethink what it means to be for the human being including his distinctive descriptions of the face to face relation, his attempt to point to the elemental conditions that constitute human subjectivity, and his exploration of the possibility of ethics understood as infinite responsibility of one for another. Through a selective reading of Levinas 's texts and consideration of various critics of Levinas, this dissertation concludes that Levinas does not merely call into question some failure in Heidegger's existential phenomenology or add an analysis of the ethical relation of responsibility to Heidegger's Dasein analytic. Levinas's entire philosophical project challenges the primacy of ontology in an effort to point to the priority of ethics for human existence and thought. His work provides substantive criticisms of Heidegger, demands a radical rethinking about the meaning of ethics, politics, justice, goodness, and truth, and calls for a philosophy that is driven by the exigencies of ethical responsibility. v . TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT iv Chapter I INTRODUCTION II. MARTIN HEIDEGGER: THE MEANING OF BEING AND THE QUESTION OF ETHICS 16 A. Dasein and the Meaning of Being 17 1. Being-in-the-world as Being-with . 20 2 . Temporal Interpretation of Being- in-the-world: The Call of Conscience, Authenticity, and Solicitous Being With Others 26 B. The Question of Ethics in the "Letter on Humanism" 37 III. HEIDEGGERIAN ETHICS 45 A. Ontology as the Foundation of Ethics . 46 B. Werner Marx: Measures for Responsible Action 57 IV. EMMANUEL LEVINAS: A CRITICAL READING OF HEIDEGGER 76 A. Heidegger's Inspiration and Provocation . 77 B. Existence and Existents . 85 C. Time and the Other 105 V. THE CONTRIBUTION OF LEVINAS TO AN UNDERSTANDING OF ETHICAL PHENOMENA 122 A. The Idea of Infinity 125 1. Metaphysical Desire 127 2. Radical Separation 130 3. Discourse and the Quest for Truth . 132 4. Justice, Truth, and Freedom 133 B. The Phenomenological Descriptions .... 137 VI 1. Interiority and Economic Existence . 137 a. Enjoyment: An Elemental Condition of Human Being 138 b. Dwelling in a Home: Withdrawal and Intimacy 140 c. Labor and Possession 144 d. Liberation from Solitude 147 2. Exteriority, Discourse, and Responsibility 151 a. Ethical Resistance 152 b. Discourse: Expression, Response and Responsibility 154 c. The Other and the Others: "The Third Party" 156 d. Kinship and Community 158 e. Finite Freedom 159 f. Eros, Fecundity, and Paternity . 162 g. Plurality, Temporality, and Transcendence 164 C. Critics of Levinas 169 1. Criticisms and Clarifications 170 2. More Cautious Responses to Levinas . 175 3. Derrida's Reading of Levinas: Fundamental Thinking and Questions of Language 179 D. Beyond Being or Otherwise Said 186 1. The Saying and the Said 187 2. Exposure and Passivity 189 3. Obsession 192 4. Persecution 194 5. Substitution as One-for-another .... 196 6. Responsibility of the One For All: Justice 197 VI. CONCLUSION 213 BIBLIOGRAPHY 234 Vil CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION This dissertation treats the problem of ethics as it is articulated by Martin Heidegger and then concretely developed by Emmanuel Levinas. When Heidegger speaks of the problem of ethics, he refers both to the meaning of ethics as a branch of philosophy and to the problematic demand for directives for action. Heidegger deals with the problem of ethics in the context of his critical view of Western metaphysics. He claims that the Western philosophical tradition has been dependent on onto-theological metaphysics, dependent on assumptions that the human being is a worldless, solitary, rational subject created in the image of a rational creator, that reality is rational, and that there is therefore an objective world to be discovered by science and an absolute moral order to be discovered by reason and codified in universal moral principles. With the says unmasking of philosophy as onto-theology , Heidegger that we must ask again about the meaning of ethics; but we must also first break free from the categories of onto- theological metaphysics. We cannot therefore seek to define 1 moral rules or first principles of ethics until we undertake a fundamental inquiry into the meaning of ethics; we cannot consider the question of how one ouqht to live one's life until we have first concretely worked out the meaninq and possibility of ethical reality. Heideqqer does not take up this task himself. He gives priority instead to the work of deconstructing Western metaphysics? he breaks with the metaphysics of substance and subject and re-introduces a thinking of the world in its historical coming to be and passing away, a thinking of Being in its continual presencing and concealing, and a thinking of the human being as constituted by its existence in a shared world of constant flux. Even when directly asked about ethics, Heidegger gives priority to ontology and claims that the problem of ethics can only be dealt with in relation to the task of thinking that brings the truth of Being to language. For Heidegger, the problem of ethics is peripheral, secondary to the need to disclose the meaning of Being as such. According to Heidegger's analysis, the human being is primordially a disclosing being, and the human relation to Being constitutes the essence of human existence. The analysis of Dasein is therefore a useful entry point for Heidegger's project of rethinking the meaning of Being as such, and the problem of ethics is merely part of Heidegger's concern over the mistakes of Western metaphysical thinking since Plato. 2 By contrast, the problem of ethics is central to the work of Levinas and has an urgency that demands priority in philosophical thought. Levinas insists that the most urgent problem in the twentieth century is the problem of ethics. In particular, Levinas asks, can we speak of morality after Auschwitz? Can we speak of morality after the failure of morality? [ Levinas , 1988 ] . Although the work of Levinas cannot be understood apart from the pervasive influence of Heidegger, Levinas is extremely critical of the priority that Heidegger gives to the question concerning the meaning of Being as such. Levinas undertakes a fundamental inquiry into the meaning of the Good as that which transcends Being. His thinking about the Good is worked out concretely through phenomenological analyses of the desire for the Good in the human being and the traces of the Good in the fundamental ethical relation of responsibility. According to Levinas, the ethical relation of responsibility for another human being is the fundamental fact of human existence that precedes and makes possible all inquiry and disclosing, including the inquiry into the meaning of Being. The problem of ethics, the concern to make room for the Good which transcends Being, and the concern to describe ineluctable responsibility as a fundamental structure of human being lead Levinas to reject and rethink much of Heidegger's analysis of Dasein. 3 Levinas locates the problem of ethics, the need for a fundamental inquiry into the meaning and possibility of ethics, in the context of Western philosophical developments. Levinas is concerned with the suspicion cast on reason and philosophy by Marx, Nietzsche and Freud [Levinas , 1975a] . He focuses in particular on the suspicion that ethics is ideology, that morality is a set of illusions that are historically and culturally relative and dominated by class interests; and he claims that this suspicion of ideology marks the end of the traditional ethics of duty and value.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Final, 10.29.18
    IN SEARCH OF NON-IDENTITY: ADORNO’S CRITIQUE OF HEIDEGGER By Andrea Walsh A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Philosophy—Doctor of Philosophy 2018 ABSTRACT IN SEARCH OF NON-IDENTITY: ADORNO’S CRITIQUE OF HEIDEGGER By Andrea Walsh This dissertation explores Theodor Adorno’s career-long critique of Martin Heidegger’s Fundamental Ontology toward understanding how the latter may be inherently supportive of a negative dialectical approach to social critique and change. Adorno’s negative dialectics is motivated by the assumption that ethical rationality is primordially rooted in non-identity thinking, and it proposes that three basic conditions must be met for non-identity thinking to be truly engaged: the subject must acknowledge that the object takes socio-epistemic priority in constructions of meaning; she must attend to the object’s particular qualities that resist circumscription by the totalizing concepts of modern autonomous reason; and she must resolve to relate to the object through a “mimetic” form of rationality, which is passively attuned to the playful and unfinished elements of experience as much as it is inclined to critically interpret the particular socio-material conditions that shape consciousness and its environments. Without meeting these conditions, rationality tacitly sanctions subjects to reify experience as it takes an idealist form. While emphasizing that the problem of reification is endemic to public life at large, Adorno foregrounds its correlation with the persistence of philosophical idealism within the academy, leading him to target the phenomenological and existential traditions in general, and Heidegger’s Fundamental Ontology in particular, as inherently antagonistic to what he deems is philosophy’s central mission of normalizing non- identity thinking in both theory and praxis.
    [Show full text]
  • Overcoming the Tradition: Heidegger and Dewey Author(S): Richard Rorty Source: the Review of Metaphysics , Dec., 1976, Vol
    Overcoming the Tradition: Heidegger and Dewey Author(s): Richard Rorty Source: The Review of Metaphysics , Dec., 1976, Vol. 30, No. 2 (Dec., 1976), pp. 280-305 Published by: Philosophy Education Society Inc. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.com/stable/20126921 JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms Philosophy Education Society Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Review of Metaphysics This content downloaded from 132.174.255.116 on Sat, 27 Jun 2020 15:25:17 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms OVERCOMING THE TRADITION: HEIDEGGER AND DEWEY RICHARD RORTY I X HILOSOPHERS who envy scientists think that philosophy should deal only with problems formulated in neutral terms?terms satis factory to all those who argue for competing solutions. Without common problems and without argument, it would seem, we have no professional discipline, nor even a method for disciplining our own thoughts. Without discipline, we presumably have mysticism, or poetry, or inspiration?at any rate, something which permits an escape from our intellectual responsibilities. Heidegger is frequently
    [Show full text]
  • Heidegger, Hegel, Marx: Marcuse and the Theory of Historicity
    KRITIKE VOLUME TWO NUMBER TWO (DECEMBER 2008) 46-64 Article Heidegger, Hegel, Marx: Marcuse and the Theory of Historicity Jeffry V. Ocay he search for a historically conscious individual who is disposed to “radical action” is the main thrust of this paper. This is premised on T the following claims: first, that the modern society is a pathological society whose rules, most often but not necessarily, imply control and domination; thus a “refusal” to abide by these rules is the most appropriate alternative available; and, second, that there is still hope for the Enlightenment’s project of emancipation, that is, such “refusal,” which means a political fight for liberation, is still winnable no matter how formidable the forces of domination may be. But this paper can only do so much. I do not offer any universal and prefab solution to the pathological society. What I do instead is argue that the emergence of a historically conscious individual who is disposed to “radical action,” which eventually leads to a “collective radical action,” is still possible today. I also argue that “radical action” presupposes an awareness of the concrete socio-historical situations, thus the importance of “historicity.” This is done through a reconstructive reading of Marcuse’s Critical Theory. In fact, my argument is just an echo on what Marcuse did more than four decades ago. The paper starts with a brief discussion on “historicity” and the background of Marcuse’s conception of historicity as a requisite for a theory of liberation. The discussion on Marcuse’s engagement with Heidegger follows. This part is important in understanding Marcuse because, in my opinion, it was his reading of Being and Time that led Marcuse to believe that the fight for liberation must begin within the “individual” himself and not from the politically indoctrinated “proletariat” of Marx.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Ethics in Heidegger's Being
    THE ETHICS OF BEING-WITH: EXPLORING ETHICS IN HEIDEGGER’S BEING AND TIME A Thesis Submitted to the Committee on Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Faculty of Arts and Science TRENT UNIVERSITY Peterborough, Ontario, Canada (c) Copyright by Adam Rejak 2014 Theory, Culture and Politics M.A. Graduate Program September 2014 ABSTRACT The Ethics of Being-With: Exploring Ethics in Heidegger’s Being and Time Adam Rejak Martin Heidegger is perhaps best known for his work Being and Time, in which he tries to re-discover what he deems to be a forgotten question; the meaning of being. However, what many have missed in this work is the ethical potential it presents, particularly through his notion of Mitsein. This thesis will discuss how the history of philosophy has misunderstood the question of intersubjectivity. Throughout the history of philosophy, there has been a tendency to focus on detachment of the subject, rather than an engaged existence. Heidegger overcomes this by introducing the concept of Mitsein and allowing us to think of being-with one another as something which is integral to our very being, rather than something which comes to us through detached reflection. The consequences of this re-interpretation are significant for ethics because our starting point is always-already with others, rather than isolated and alone. Keywords: Heidegger, Mitsein, Ethics, Being-with, Intersubjectivity ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisor, Professor David Holdsworth, my reader Kathryn Norlock and my external supervisor Emilia Angelova. This project would not be possible without their hours of help and guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Copy 2020 01 23 Atkins
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Atkinson, Rachel N Title: A Phenomenological Approach to Contemporary Politics General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This license sets out your rights and the restrictions that apply to your access to the thesis so it is important you read this before proceeding. Take down policy Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions prior to having it been deposited in Explore Bristol Research. However, if you have discovered material within the thesis that you consider to be unlawful e.g. breaches of copyright (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please contact [email protected] and include the following information in your message: •Your contact details •Bibliographic details for the item, including a URL •An outline nature of the complaint Your claim will be investigated and, where appropriate, the item in question will be removed from public view as soon as possible. A Phenomenological Approach to Contemporary Politics Rachel Naomi Atkinson A dissertation submitted to the University of Bristol in accordance with the requirements for award of the degree of MPhil in the Faculty of Arts, Philosophy Department, September 2019 Word Count: 24604 1 Contemporary British politics seems to be rife with confusion, conflict, and complexities.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on Foundation and Truth in Phenomenology
    Opened Grounds: Studies on Foundation and Truth in Phenomenology Author: Tobias Keiling Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:104078 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2013 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Boston College The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Department of Philosophy OPENED GROUNDS. STUDIES ON FOUNDATION AND TRUTH IN PHENOMENOLOGY a dissertation by Tobias Keiling submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2013 © copyright by TOBIAS KEILING 2013 Opened Grounds. Studies on foundation and truth in Phenomenology a dissertation by Tobias Keiling Doctoral Supervisor: Prof. John Sallis Abstract: This dissertation gathers four studies on related topics in the phenomenological tradition and Martin Heidegger’s philosophy in particular. Methodologically, it addresses the question as to how a reading of a philosophical text can offer access to the phenomena relevant for philosophy. Beginning with a reading of one his latest lectures on the end of philosophy and the the potential of phenomenology (The End of Philosophy and the Task of Thinking), the first chapter questions Heidegger’s dismissal of the notion of ground in this lecture, arguing that an innovative reading of a passage from Contributions to Philosophy can address a problem left unresolved in the lecutre. Instead of reducing it to its alleged function in metaphysics, I propose to explore the semantic and descriptive potential of ‘ground’ and related notions outside of the ontological and metaphysical discourse. The second chapter inquires about the particular position of On the Origin of the Work of Art in the context of Heidegger’s theory of truth.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethics and Finitude: Heideggerian Contributions to Moral Philosophy
    (Old Dominion Univ.) Ethics and Finitude: Heideggerian Contributions to Moral Philosophy Lawrence J. Hatab ROM EARLY IN HIS THINKING Heidegger subordinated the question of F ethics to the question of Being. Like other ontical matters, ethics could not be addressed adequately until the ontological question of Dasein's general mode of Being was given priority. I Heidegger often indicated that this should not be taken to mean a rejection of, or indifference toward, ethics; rather, ethics, again like other ontic regions, has concealed within its mode of thinking a primordial dimension that can open up the way in which Dasein is in the world. My reading of this ontic-ontological differentiation is as follows. Ethics is rich in its analysis of normative topics but poor in attention to our being-ethical-in-the-world, in the fullest sense that Heidegger would give to such a phrase. This coordination of ethics and ontology suggests the possibility of taking up ethics anew once we have clarified the overall existential constitution of Dasein. Although Heidegger often gives the impression of segregating ontology from "practical" disciplines like ethics, I am convinced that this was an analytical division and not a substantive one. 2 Much in the early Heidegger has seemed promising for an investigation of ethics. 3 But there is also a good deal of suspicion about the ethical possibilities in Heidegger (notably in the work of Habermas and Levinas). Given the Olympian distance of Heidegger's later thought (e.g., the claim that Denken has "no result" and "no effect"4) and given his fascist politics together with the deceit and galling silence of the postwar years, the segregation of ethics from ontology can be interpreted as a more heinous division-that Heidegger's thought was or became indifferent to ethics, or worse, inseparable from something dark and barbaric.
    [Show full text]
  • BIBLIOGRAPHY Acta Et Decretum Sacrorum
    BIBLIOGRAPHY Acta et decretum sacrorum Conciliorum recentiorum (1789-1870). Collectio Lacensis. Auctoribus presbyteris S.J. e Domo B.V.M. sine labe conceptae ad lacum. 7 vols. Freiburg in Briesgau: Sumtibus Herder, 1870 (vol. 1) to 1890 (vol. 7). Acta Sanctae Sedis: Ephemerides Romanae a ssmo d.n. Pio X. Authenticae et officiales Apostolicae Sedis actis publice evulgandis declaratae. 41 vols. plus index. Rome: Ex Typographia Polyglotta S.C. de Propaganda Fide, 1865-1908. This series of official Vatican pronouncements was succeeded by the Acta Apostolicae Sedis. Allport, Gordon. The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Inc., 1954. Altaner, Berthold. “Zur Frage der Definibilität der Assumptio B.V.M.” Theologische Revue 44 (1948): 129-140, 45 (1949): 129-142, and 46 (1950): 5-20. Ancilla to the Pre-Socratic Philosophers: A Complete Translation of the Fragments in Diels, Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Translated by Kathleen Freeman. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1962. Aristotle. Aristotelis Opera. Edited by the Academia Regia Borusica. Greek text prepared by Immanuel Bekker (vols. 1-2), Latin text prepared by various others (vols. 3-4), and the Index Aristotelicus prepared by Hermann Bonitz (vol. 5). 5 vols. Berlin: George Reimerus, 1831. Aristotle. The Works of Aristotle. Translated into English under the editorship of W. D. Ross. 12 vols. London: Oxford University Press (Geoffrey Cumberlege, Publisher to the University), 1928. Aubenque, Pierre. Le problème de l’être chez Aristote: Essai sur la problématique aristotélicienne. 2nd revised edition. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1966. Aubert, Roger. Le pontificat de Pie IX (1846-1878). Vol. 21 of the series Histoire de l’Eglise, founded by Augustin Fliche and Victor Martin.
    [Show full text]
  • Kritik Zwischen Sorge Und Gelassenheit Grundformen
    Kritik zwischen Sorge und Gelassenheit Grundformen ethischer Praxis im Denken Martin Heideggers und Michel Foucaults Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Philosophie (Dr. phil.) am Fachbereich Philosophie und Geisteswissenschaften der Freien Universität Berlin vorgelegt von Marcel Mietzel (M.A.) 10318 Berlin 1. Gutachterin: Prof. Dr. Hilge Landweer 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Gunter Gebauer eingereicht im Juni 2018 Tag der Disputation: 20. Mai 2019 Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Einleitung........................................................................................................................................3 1.1 Zwischenbilanz zur Forschung.............................................................................................14 1.2 Methodische Vorbemerkungen.............................................................................................37 2. Zum ethos der Kritik bei Foucault und Heidegger...................................................................49 2.1 Zum Begriff ethos..................................................................................................................63 2.2 Ethos bei Heidegger .............................................................................................................69 2.3 Aufenthalt im Sein ................................................................................................................78 2.4 Ethos bei Foucault ................................................................................................................89
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER SIX the BEGINNING of the HISTORY of BEING By
    CHAPTER SIX THE BEGINNING OF THE HISTORY OF BEING By providing a detailed reading of Heidegger's account of the beginning of the understanding of Being as presencing with the ancient Greeks, this chapter shows Heidegger's notion of the Temporality of Being "in action." Heidegger claims that, though the pre-Socratics originally glimpsed the role of Being as the cultural ordering of what-is, this insight, and hence Being itself, has sunk further and further into "oblivion" as the history of metaphysics has unfolded. The pre-Socratics grasped the relationship between the cultural practices and how things show themselves as well as the role of Time in the presencing of the Being of what-is, but Heidegger's contribution to the history of Being is the explicit recognition of what they only tacitly recognized. By now the reader should be forewarned that Heidegger's reflections assimilate a philosopher's thinking into his own view of the history of metaphysics. He does not attempt to give what we might regard as an "historically objective" analysis of their views, but, then, Heidegger's work brings into question the meaning of this phrase in a way that we have already seen. Here I only try to trace his own vision, not argue with him about what a philosopher really meant, but, then, Heidegger's philosophy is this vision and in our context such arguments seem irrelevant. The chapter starts with a discussion of the beginning of Dasein's history in ancient Greece, and then, in section 6.2, we examine Heidegger's account of the rise of 307 metaphysical thinking with Anaximander.
    [Show full text]
  • S~Annanazro Mullen Professor of Philosophy, Chair
    RICE UNIVERSITY Feminist Interpretations of the Home and the Practice of Dwelling by Summer Henderson A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE Master of Arts APPROVED, THESIS COMMITTEE: S~annaNazro Mullen Professor of Philosophy, Chair HOUSTON, TEXAS JULY 2011 ABSTRACT Feminist Interpretations of the Home and the Practice of Dwelling by Summer Henderson This thesis explores a resignification of the home in light of Heidegger' s concept of dwelling. I begin by reviewing two opposing interpretations of the social and psychological dimensions ofhome: the traditional view, which sees the home as a site of comfort, refuge and centeredness, and the feminist view, which interprets the home as a site of objectification, difference and oppression. Seeking to cut through the debate, I develop an account of the home based on Heidegger' s description of dwelling, which understands the home to be a manifestation of our dwelling practices. That is, the home reveals our way of being open, provisional, historical and communal. In addition to bringing this account to bear on the prior interpretations, I end the thesis with an argument against postmodem proposals of "homelessness" and explore the relationship between the home as a site of dwelling and our understanding of self. A most sincere thank you to Dr. Steven Crowell for all his time, invaluable assistance and intellectual guidance, Dr. H. Tristam Engelhardt and Dr. Gwen Bradford for their help and encouragement, Vinod for always being my most supportive reader and keenest critic, and Rachel and Leigh for their conversation, understanding, and inspiration. TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Being and Technology PHAENOMENOLOGICA COLLECTION FONDEE PAR H.L
    Being and Technology PHAENOMENOLOGICA COLLECTION FONDEE PAR H.L. VAN BREDA ET PUBLIEE SOUS LE PATRON AGE DES CENTRES D' ARCHIVES-HUSSERL 82 JOHN LOSCERBO Being and Technology A STUDY IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF MARTIN HEIDEGGER Comite de redaction de la collection: President: S. IJsseling (Louvain); Membres: M. Farber (Buffalo). E. Finkt (Fribourg en Brisgau), L. Landgrebe (Cologne). W. Marx (Fribourg en Brisgau). J.N. Mohanty (New York). P. Ricoeur (Paris), E. Stroker (Cologne), J. Taminiaux (Louvain), K.H. Volkmann-Schluck (Cologne); Secretaire: J. Tam i n ia ux. JOHN LOSCERBO Being and Technology A STUDY IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF MARTIN HEIDEGGER 1981 MARTINUS NIJHOFF PUBLISHERS THE HAGUE / BOSTON / LONDON Distributors: for the United States and Canada Kluwer Boston Inc. 190 Old Derby Street Hingham, MA 02043 USA jor all other countries Kluwer Academic Publishers Group Distribution Center P.O. Box 322 3300 AH Dordrecht The Netherlands This volume is listed in the Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data ISBN-13: 978-94-009-8224-6 e-ISBN- 13: 978-94-009-8222-2 DOl: 10.1007/978-94-009-8222-2 Copyright © 1981 by Martinus Nijhojf Publishers bv, The Hague. Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1981 All rights reserved. No part oj this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in anyjorm or by any means, mechanical,photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permissIOn oj the publisher, Martinus Nijhojf Publishers bv, P.O. Box 566, 2501 eN The Hague, The Netherlands. TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface IX Abbreviations XI PART ONE: PREPARATION FOR THE QUESTION CONCERNING MODERN TECHNOLOGY 1 I.
    [Show full text]