DOCSLIB.ORG

Heidegger's Philosophy of Disclosedness: a Relational

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Heidegger's Philosophy of Disclosedness: a Relational Heidegger’s Philosophy of Disclosedness: a Relational Interpretation of Being and Time Marco Motta BA Hons A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2014 School of History Philosophy Religion and Classics i Abstract Due to the lack of an established philosophical tradition in Australia, Heideggerian scholarship has relied heavily on readings coming from abroad, especially from North America. However, the same lack has granted a certain intellectual freedom, and some novel and exciting ideas have been able to emerge, a relatively large portion of which has been more or less directly influenced by Heidegger’s thought. This makes it all the more urgent for an independent interpretation of Being and Time to emerge within the Australian context. Needless to say, such a new and independent interpretation of Being and Time requires a careful engagement with those readings currently dominating Heideggerian scholarship. And since no influence has been stronger in Australia than that of commentators working in the United States, the primary aim of this dissertation will be to define and assess the major currents in the contemporary North American interpretation of Being and Time. Accordingly, I shall firstly identify four main readings of Being and Time which will be exemplified by the four scholars who I believe embody these readings most comprehensively. These are, the Pragmatic reading of Hubert Dreyfus, the Epistemological reading of Cristina Lafont, the Hermeneutical reading of Stephen Crowell and the Ethical reading of François Raffoul. Of these four interpretative trends, at least the first two, and to a lesser degree also the third, tend to pay excessive attention to Heidegger’s notion of understanding. Such readings run the risk of reducing Heidegger’s work to a search for that ground which allows for the discoveredness of entities in their ‘truth’. Once this reduction is carried out, the focus of Being and Time comes implicitly yet inevitably to shift from ontology to epistemology. As a result, the notion of Being developed in the Pragmatic and the Hermeneutic interpretation, as well as, partially, in the Phenomenological reading, is an incomplete one. For Dreyfus, Being is nothing more than the unspoken social background, a sort of preconscious knowing-how, which determines the ‘what’ of things. For Lafont, it is merely the function of a Language which determines the being of entities by conditioning the means through which entities are interpretatively understood by Dasein. In both cases, Being is reduced to the quasi-transcendental condition of the correctness of human understanding and Heidegger’s greatest ii achievement would be that of having definitively and inextricably bound human subjectivity to such a condition, lest it not be at all. Similarly, also Crowell runs the risk of reducing Being to a mere grounding space, i.e. the ‘space of meaning’, a transcendental-phenomenological clearing where entities can be discovered as what they ‘are’. It must be said, however, that the Phenomenological interpretation of Being and Time, far from Dreyfus’ and Lafont’s unsophisticated approaches, has the great merit of having released the study of Heidegger’s philosophy to the necessary confrontation with Husserl’s phenomenology, without which a satisfactory interpretation of Being and Time cannot be achieved. On the other hand, Raffoul’s Ethical reading, by paying close attention to the analysis of authentic Disclosedness, especially in relation to the call-response dynamic which characterises Dasein fundamental openness to its Being, shows Dasein’s existential subjectivity not as a static essence that Dasein ‘has’ and that can be ‘known’, but as the existential relation to that alterity which is Dasein’s own Being. Building upon some of Raffoul’s insights, this dissertation aims to demonstrate that, firstly, much of the interpretative tradition which has influenced the current Australian understanding of Being and Time has mistakenly taken the analysis of discoveredness as the principal aim of Heidegger’s book rather than his starting point, and overlooked the strategic role of the concept of Disclosedness in the economy of the book’s ontological project. Secondly, by conducting a critical study of the notion of Disclosedness and its constituents, paying special attention to Heidegger’s analysis of authentic Disclosedness, this essay attempts to bring to the fore what I believe is Heidegger’s fundamental concern, namely, that of constructing a phenomenology of the transcendent ground of phenomenology itself. As such, Disclosedness constitutes the bridging notion between the phenomenological ‘space of meaning’ and the ethical ‘call-response of alterity’, the unifying space of Heidegger’s phenomenological and mystical voice. Yet this unification can be achieved only if the notion of Disclosedness is interpreted not as the openness which results from having merely understood something, but as the existential relation with that otherness which characterises Dasein in its transcendence and, as such, manifests Dasein in its Being. This otherness is Dasein’s Being. iii In order to explore this relation more thoroughly, I shall introduce the notion of Otherness in the work of Emmanuel Levinas. This may seem an arbitrary move, but, as I shall demonstrate, the comparison between Levinas’ analysis of Alterity and Heidegger’s treatment of authentic Disclosedness proves extremely useful in justifying the grounding nature of the disclosing relation between Dasein and its Being, in respect to discoveredness of intraworldly entities, the Disclosedness of the World and, ultimately, the Disclosedness of Being itself. With the help of Levinas’ philosophy, this dissertation will show that while Heidegger begins his analysis with a study of the human understanding, initially described as grounded in a pre-emptive understanding-of-Being [Seinsverständnis], in Being and Time his final goal is the overcoming of a notion of the human existence centred exclusively on understanding in favour of a ‘relational’ interpretation of Dasein. Therefore, Dasein’s existential openness to its Being is no longer characterised as an understanding of Being but in terms of the relation of Disclosedness between Dasein itself and its Being [Seinserschlossenheit]. This is not merely a terminological shift, but constitutes an attempt to pay closer attention to what I believe is Heidegger’s original avenue for overcoming transcendental philosophy and paves the way to a true philosophy of the transcendent. Being and Time tries to achieve this quasi-mystical goal by radicalising the phenomenological notion of intentional space in terms of the disclosive relation between Dasein and its Being. As such, in this dissertation I shall, finally, propose a reading of Being and Time centred on the notion of Disclosedness, able therefore not only to acknowledge the presence of Heidegger’s two voices, but also to bring to the fore Heidegger’s effort to reconcile them. iv Declaration by author This thesis is composed of my original work, and contains no material previously published or written by another person except where due reference has been made in the text. I have clearly stated the contribution by others to jointly-authored works that I have included in my thesis. I have clearly stated the contribution of others to my thesis as a whole, including statistical assistance, survey design, data analysis, significant technical procedures, professional editorial advice, and any other original research work used or reported in my thesis. The content of my thesis is the result of work I have carried out since the commencement of my research higher degree candidature and does not include a substantial part of work that has been submitted to qualify for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution. I have clearly stated which parts of my thesis, if any, have been submitted to qualify for another award. I acknowledge that an electronic copy of my thesis must be lodged with the University Library and, subject to the General Award Rules of The University of Queensland, immediately made available for research and study in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. I acknowledge that copyright of all material contained in my thesis resides with the copyright holders of that material. Where appropriate I have obtained copyright permission from the copyright holder to reproduce material in this thesis. v Publications during candidature Peer-Reviewed Journals Marco Motta “Clear and Distinct Perceptions and Clear and Distinct Ideas: The Cartesian Circle”, Crossroads, Forthcoming Conference Abstracts Marco Motta “Dasein and its Other”, Perspectives on Power, Brisbane: The University of Queensland, 2011 Marco Motta “Dasein and its Other”, ASCP, Brisbane: The University of Queensland, 2010 “Burri and Heidegger: Beyond the Subjective Artist”, ASCP, Melbourne: Monash University, 2009 “Heidegger’s Jewish Ancestry”, The Alternative Expression of the Numinous, Brisbane: The University of Queensland, 2008 Publications included in this thesis “No publications included”. Contributions by others to the thesis “No contributions by others.” Statement of parts of the thesis submitted to qualify for the award of another degree “None” vi Acknowledgements During the six year journey through which this dissertation has slowly taken shape, I have been supported in different ways by a great number of individual people
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WSRC3290 ASCP 2018 Conference Program FA.Indd
    AUSTRALASIAN SOCIETY FOR CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY ANNUAL CONFERENCE 2018 AUSTRALASIAN SOCIETY FOR CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY ANNUAL CONFERENCE 2018 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF COUNTRY THANKS TO Western Sydney University would like to acknowledge the ≥ Professor Peter Hutchings, Dean of the School of Humanities Burramattagal people of the Darug tribe, who are the traditional and Communication Arts custodians of the land on which Western Sydney University at Jacinta Sassine and the student volunteers Parramatta stands. We respectfully acknowledge the Burramattagal ≥ people’s Ancestors and Elders, past and present and acknowledge ≥ Hannah Stark, Timothy Laurie and student volunteers their 60,000 year unceded occupation of these lands. who organized the PG event ≥ Panel organisers: Dr Suzi Adams and Dr Jeremy Smith; Professor WELCOME Thomas M. Besch; Professor Francesco Borghesi; Dr Sean Bowden; Associate Professor Diego Bubbio; Dr Millicent Churcher; Dr Richard The Conference Organising Committee for 2018 extends a warm Colledge; Dr Ingo Farin; Associate Professor Chris Fleming; Dr John welcome to all our international and Australian participants, and all Hadley; Professor Vanessa Lemm; Professor Li Zhi; Associate Professor others associated with the conference. The ASCP conference is this year hosted by Western Sydney University, at our new Parramatta David Macarthur; Associate Professor Sally Macarthur; Dr Jennifer City campus. The event has been planned and developed across Mensch; Professor Nick Mansfield; Dr Talia Morag; Associate Professor this year by members of the Philosophy Research Initiative. Eric S. Nelson; Professor Ping He; Dr Rebecca Hill; Associate Professor Janice Richardson and Dr Jon Rubin; Dr Marilyn Stendera; Dr Omid Tofighian; Professor Miguel Vatter and Dr Nicholas Heron; Dr Allison CONFERENCE ORGANIZING COMMITTEE Weir; Dr Magdalena Zolkos.
    [Show full text]
  • Final, 10.29.18
    IN SEARCH OF NON-IDENTITY: ADORNO’S CRITIQUE OF HEIDEGGER By Andrea Walsh A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Philosophy—Doctor of Philosophy 2018 ABSTRACT IN SEARCH OF NON-IDENTITY: ADORNO’S CRITIQUE OF HEIDEGGER By Andrea Walsh This dissertation explores Theodor Adorno’s career-long critique of Martin Heidegger’s Fundamental Ontology toward understanding how the latter may be inherently supportive of a negative dialectical approach to social critique and change. Adorno’s negative dialectics is motivated by the assumption that ethical rationality is primordially rooted in non-identity thinking, and it proposes that three basic conditions must be met for non-identity thinking to be truly engaged: the subject must acknowledge that the object takes socio-epistemic priority in constructions of meaning; she must attend to the object’s particular qualities that resist circumscription by the totalizing concepts of modern autonomous reason; and she must resolve to relate to the object through a “mimetic” form of rationality, which is passively attuned to the playful and unfinished elements of experience as much as it is inclined to critically interpret the particular socio-material conditions that shape consciousness and its environments. Without meeting these conditions, rationality tacitly sanctions subjects to reify experience as it takes an idealist form. While emphasizing that the problem of reification is endemic to public life at large, Adorno foregrounds its correlation with the persistence of philosophical idealism within the academy, leading him to target the phenomenological and existential traditions in general, and Heidegger’s Fundamental Ontology in particular, as inherently antagonistic to what he deems is philosophy’s central mission of normalizing non- identity thinking in both theory and praxis.
    [Show full text]
  • Critique and Cognitive Capacities
    Article Philosophy and Social Criticism 1–24 Critique and cognitive ª The Author(s) 2021 capacities: Towards an Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions DOI: 10.1177/0191453720987864 action-oriented model journals.sagepub.com/home/psc Magnus Ho¨rnqvist Stockholm University, Sweden Abstract In response to an impasse, articulated in the late 1980s, the cognitive capacities of ordinary people assumed central place in contemporary critical social theory. The participants’ perspective gained precedence over scientific standards branded as external. The notion of cognition, however, went unchallenged. This article continues the move away from external standards, and discusses two models of critique, which differ based on their underlying notions of cognition. The representa- tional model builds on cognitive content, misrecognition and normativity; three features which are illustrated with positions adopted by prominent exponents of critical social theory. An alternative understanding relies on action-oriented disclosure and the participants’ basic familiarity with the social world. On this reading, what clashes with unequal structures is skilful coping, rather than representations and normative standards. The action-oriented approach may overcome the dilemma of understanding both the impact and the possible transcendence of unequal structures, although it cannot ultimately replace representational critique. Keywords action-oriented cognition, Bourdieu, cognitive capacities, critique, Heidegger, Honneth, power The role attributed to ordinary people’s cognitive capacities within critical social theory has undergone a decisive change since the 1980s. The change has been described as a move from ‘external’ to ‘immanent’ critique, which values the participants’ perspective over against the perspective of the scientific observer.1 The multitude of opinions close to everyday life gained precedence over theorizing at higher levels of abstraction.
    [Show full text]
  • Overcoming the Tradition: Heidegger and Dewey Author(S): Richard Rorty Source: the Review of Metaphysics , Dec., 1976, Vol
    Overcoming the Tradition: Heidegger and Dewey Author(s): Richard Rorty Source: The Review of Metaphysics , Dec., 1976, Vol. 30, No. 2 (Dec., 1976), pp. 280-305 Published by: Philosophy Education Society Inc. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.com/stable/20126921 JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms Philosophy Education Society Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Review of Metaphysics This content downloaded from 132.174.255.116 on Sat, 27 Jun 2020 15:25:17 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms OVERCOMING THE TRADITION: HEIDEGGER AND DEWEY RICHARD RORTY I X HILOSOPHERS who envy scientists think that philosophy should deal only with problems formulated in neutral terms?terms satis factory to all those who argue for competing solutions. Without common problems and without argument, it would seem, we have no professional discipline, nor even a method for disciplining our own thoughts. Without discipline, we presumably have mysticism, or poetry, or inspiration?at any rate, something which permits an escape from our intellectual responsibilities. Heidegger is frequently
    [Show full text]
  • CRITICAL THEORY Past, Present, Future Anders Bartonek and Sven-Olov Wallensein (Eds.) SÖDERTÖRN PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES
    CRITICAL THEORY Past, Present, Future Anders Bartonek and Sven-Olov Wallensein (eds.) SÖDERTÖRN PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES The series is attached to Philosophy at Sder- trn University. Published in the series are es- says as well as anthologies, with a particular em- phasis on the continental tradition, understood in its broadest sense, from German idealism to phenomenology, hermeneutics, critical theory and contemporary French philosophy. The com- mission of the series is to provide a platform for the promotion of timely and innovative phil- osophical research. Contributions to the series are published in English or Swedish. Cover image: Kristofer Nilson, System (Portrait of a Swedish Tax Form), 2020, Lead pencil drawing on chalk paint, on mdf 59.2 x 42 cm. Photo: Jesper Petersen. Te Swedish tax form is one of many systems designed to handle and present information. Mapped onto the surface of an artwork, it opens a free space; an untouched surface where everything can exist at the same time. Kristofer Nilson Critical Theory Past, Present, Future Edited by Anders Bartonek & Sven-Olov Wallenstein Sdertrns hgskola Sdertrns University Library SE-141 89 Huddinge www.sh.se/publications © the Authors Published under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License Cover layout: Jonathan Robson Graphic form: Per Lindblom & Jonathan Robson Printed by Elanders, Stockholm 2021 Sdertrn Philosophical Studies 28 ISSN 1651-6834 Sdertrn Academic Studies 83 ISSN 1650-433X ISBN 978-91-89109-35-3 (print) ISBN 978-91-89109-36-0 (digital) Contents Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Colledge Between Ultra-Essentialism and Post
    Between Ultra-Essentialism and Post-Essentialism: Kierkegaard as Transitional and Contemporary Richard Colledge Søren Kierkegaard is an extraordinary figure in the history of philosophy. If one is prepared to use the broadest of brushstrokes, there is much to be said for seeing him as standing on the threshold of, and crucially contributing to, the transition between modern and contemporary European philosophy. In this contributory role of mediating between epochs of thought, it is fitting that he shares much in common with his predecessor and fellow herald of the transcendent God of Christianity—Augustine—in the latter’s standing astride the ancient and the medieval, and in likewise providing key elements for a momentous shift in the dominant philo-theological framework. Yet Kierkegaard is also something of an enigma; he is much too multi-dimensional in his concerns and subtle in his distinctions to be easily summed up in catch-phrases such as “the father of existentialism,” as justified as such ascriptions may be. Like Augustine, Kierkegaard’s influence in a range of purportedly distinct ‘disciplines’ is extensive, for like the former, he saw no difficulties in—indeed he saw an imperative for —addressing philosophy, theology and psychology together.1 In this way, Kierkegaard’s influence on twentieth century thought has been immense, from his impact on Jaspers, the early Heidegger, Sartre and the ‘existentialist’ movement generally; to his inspiration of Barth and Tillich and other seminal thinkers in Protestant theology; to his (largely indirect) influence on psychodynamic theory and practice developed by theorists such as May, Fromm and Becker; to the continuing influence of his work on contemporary post-secular and quasi-religious deconstructionist thought.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013-2014 Annual Report
    2013-2014 Annual Report The Clough CenTer for The STudy of ConSTiTuTional demoCraCy 2013-2014 Annual Report Table of Contents 2 from The direCTor 5 ConferenCeS 27 CenTer leCTureS 101 global viSiTorS 115 Clough junior fellowS 116 Clough graduaTe fellowS 123 Travel granTS 124 CiviC inTernShip granTS 128 publiC inTereST law scholar granTS 130 aCademiC law scholarS 131 Clough law fellowS 132 people AnnuAl RepoRt 2012–2013 | the Clough CenteR foR the study of ConstitutionAl democracy 1 From the Director Welcome to the 2013-2014 Annual Report of the Clough Center for the Study of Constitutional Democracy at Boston College. Now in its sixth year, the Clough Center has established itself as an interdisciplinary, innovative institution that seeks to reinvigorate and transform the study of the many facets of constitutional democracy. Our approach to the study of constitutionalism is holistic in nature and global in reach, as we foster original research and welcome thoughtful reflection on the promise and challenges of constitutional government in the United States and around the world. In this process, and in keeping with the vision of our benefactors and friends, Gloria and Chuck Clough, the Center offers life-changing educational opportunities to students at Boston College, at both the undergraduate and graduate levels. We aim to create a nurturing and vibrant intellectual environment for the entire academic community, and the public generally. At a time when public debate is too often distorted by the spin-room mentality, the fate of political communities committed to the ideals of freedom, dignity, and equality depends in large measure on learning the skills of civic engagement and thoughtful dialogue.
    [Show full text]
  • Heidegger, Hegel, Marx: Marcuse and the Theory of Historicity
    KRITIKE VOLUME TWO NUMBER TWO (DECEMBER 2008) 46-64 Article Heidegger, Hegel, Marx: Marcuse and the Theory of Historicity Jeffry V. Ocay he search for a historically conscious individual who is disposed to “radical action” is the main thrust of this paper. This is premised on T the following claims: first, that the modern society is a pathological society whose rules, most often but not necessarily, imply control and domination; thus a “refusal” to abide by these rules is the most appropriate alternative available; and, second, that there is still hope for the Enlightenment’s project of emancipation, that is, such “refusal,” which means a political fight for liberation, is still winnable no matter how formidable the forces of domination may be. But this paper can only do so much. I do not offer any universal and prefab solution to the pathological society. What I do instead is argue that the emergence of a historically conscious individual who is disposed to “radical action,” which eventually leads to a “collective radical action,” is still possible today. I also argue that “radical action” presupposes an awareness of the concrete socio-historical situations, thus the importance of “historicity.” This is done through a reconstructive reading of Marcuse’s Critical Theory. In fact, my argument is just an echo on what Marcuse did more than four decades ago. The paper starts with a brief discussion on “historicity” and the background of Marcuse’s conception of historicity as a requisite for a theory of liberation. The discussion on Marcuse’s engagement with Heidegger follows. This part is important in understanding Marcuse because, in my opinion, it was his reading of Being and Time that led Marcuse to believe that the fight for liberation must begin within the “individual” himself and not from the politically indoctrinated “proletariat” of Marx.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essays Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    BETWEEN NATURALISM AND RELIGION: PHILOSOPHICAL ESSAYS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Jürgen Habermas | 344 pages | 10 Jun 2008 | Polity Press | 9780745638256 | English | Oxford, United Kingdom Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essays PDF Book Skip to main content. Swindal James F. Show More. Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essays. The observer perspective does not undermine the participant perspective if we can show that the two are complementary but irreducible, and then show how perspectival dualism is itself "part of our nature. Average rating 3. Bohman Jeremy J. The tension between naturalism and religion is the central theme of this major new book by Jrgen Habermas. Please login or register to read this article. Like Rorty and other pragmatists, Habermas has come to believe that religion is not going away, and that it is better engaged within its moderate forms, especially when fundamentalism seems resurgent. Charlie Stephen rated it really liked it Mar 13, There is a nice convergence here between the philosophical task Habermas sets himself in working out the self-critical relation of reason to religion in Chapter 8 and the burden placed on secular citizens in a "postsecular society. He also views 'modernized' religions as partners in the public sphere to combat the results of uncontrolled capitalism and reductionist, simple-minded thinking. Sign in to use this feature. Deven rated it really liked it Apr 29, Hyung S. Ciaran P. See all jobs. In Chapter 2, for example, Davidson is criticized for analyzing language from the perspective of an empirical theorist making behavioral observations Political Theory - Habermas and Rawls Loading Have your say Log in or register to post comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Morganna F. Lambeth Department of Philosophy [email protected] Purdue University 773-682-2320 West Lafayette, in 47907-2098
    Morganna F. Lambeth Department of Philosophy [email protected] Purdue University 773-682-2320 West Lafayette, IN 47907-2098 Current Position 2018-2021 Purdue University, Postdoctoral Fellow in Philosophy and Cornerstone Fall 2018 Instruction: PHIL 111: Ethics (2 x 35 students) Spring 2019 Instruction: SCLA 101: Transformative Texts (30 students) PHIL 411: Modern Ethical Theories (35 students) Education 2011-2018 Northwestern University, Doctoral Program in Philosophy Ph.D. in Philosophy Dissertation: Rethinking the Structure of Events: Heidegger on Kant and the Concept of Cause Committee: Cristina Lafont (Chair), Rachel Zuckert, Mark Wrathall ABSTRACT: I draw on Heidegger’s interpretation of Kant to argue that Kant overestimates the role that causality plays in structuring our experience. Heidegger suggests that Kant’s analysis of experience mistakenly universalizes a fraction of our experience: the experience of mechanical objects. I defend the merits of this suggestion by offering a careful reconstruction of Heidegger’s controversial interpretation of the imagination and applying this interpretation in detail to one of the most debated segments of the Critique of Pure Reason: the Second Analogy. In this chapter, Kant suggests that we must employ the concept of cause in order to be aware that an event (i.e. a change in states) has occurred. While Kant’s mechanical account of events captures our experience of mechanical objects, I argue that his analysis does not capture our experience of events initiated by humans. I suggest that we experience human events rather as components of an overarching project oriented toward some goal. 2009-2011 University of California at Riverside, Doctoral Program in Philosophy M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Media and the Existential Task of Existence
    SOCIAL MEDIA AND THE EXISTENTIAL TASK OF EXISTENCE A Report of a Senior Study By Branden Hunt Philosophy Maryville College Fall, 2013 Date Approved _______________, by ______________________________ Faculty Supervisor Date Approved _______________, by ______________________________ Division Chair ABSTRACT Modern technology continues to barrel ahead at breakneck speeds engulfing our lives in ever greater degrees. It is little wonder that the question of what technology holds in store for us is increasing in its significance. Focusing on one particular dimension of technology that has proved especially volatile and ubiquitous this thesis endeavors to ask what is going on at the meeting of social media and humanity. In an effort to ascertain a more critical ground from which to ask such a question, this project begins with a survey of two thinkers who devoted much due attention to the matter of human being: Soren Kierkegaard and Martin Heidegger. Both carved great and diverse inroads into the strangely proximal yet so often unasked question: what is it to be human? By drawing on and synthesizing significant aspects of their expositions, necessary pre-questions are asked to prepare the lingering question: what is going on with human being in a socially mediated world? The relatively brief conclusions given in response are an exercise in answering that question, revealing a fundamental altercation brought about in the mediation of human being through social media. That transformation is found to take place in technological enframent of human communication. iii Table of Contents Chapter I The Task of Existence 4 Chapter II On Being and Human Being 25 Chapter III Social Media and the Task of Human Being 81 Bibliography 123 iv AN INTRODUCTION It is difficult to decide where to begin this introduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Sherman, Rhetoric, and Racial Animus in the Rebirth of the Bogeyman Myth Nick J
    Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal Volume 37 | Number 2 Article 1 1-1-2015 Richard Sherman, Rhetoric, and Racial Animus in the Rebirth of the Bogeyman Myth Nick J. Sciullo Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_comm_ent_law_journal Part of the Communications Law Commons, Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Nick J. Sciullo, Richard Sherman, Rhetoric, and Racial Animus in the Rebirth of the Bogeyman Myth, 37 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 201 (2015). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_comm_ent_law_journal/vol37/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Richard Sherman, Rhetoric, and Racial Animus in the Rebirth of the Bogeyman Myth by NICK J. SCIULLO* I. Introduction ..................................................201 II. The Richard Sherman Interview in Theory .................. 204 III. The Rhetoric of Black Danger ...................... ..... 206 IV. Racial Animus in Sports Media ......... .......... ....... 212 V. The Rebirth of the Bogeyman Myth ................. ...... 220 A. The Legend of the Bogeyman; or, a Chance at Weak Ontology...221 B. Francisco Goya y Que viene el Coco .................... 225 C. Wer Hat Angst Vorm Schwarzen Mann?...... .. ................. 227 VI. Conclusion ................................... ..... 228 I. Introduction On January 19, 2014, the San Francisco 49ers faced off against the Seattle Seahawks in the National Football Conference (NFC) Championship Game at CenturyLink Field in Seattle, Washington.' The game, a hard-fought struggle between two superb teams, ended with the 2 Seattle Seahawks winning 23-17.
    [Show full text]