DOCSLIB.ORG

Key Peninsula Community Plan Background

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Key Peninsula Community Plan Background PIERCE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Key Peninsula Community Plan Background Attachment B to LUAC Staff Report – March 2015 CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................... 1-1 General Description of the Plan Area ...................................................................................... 1-1 Demographics ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 Early History of Key Peninsula ................................................................................................. 1-2 Early Communities ............................................................................................................... 1-3 Planning History ....................................................................................................................... 1-6 County Planning ................................................................................................................... 1-6 Community Planning ............................................................................................................ 1-8 Scope of the Community Plan ................................................................................................. 1-9 Legislative Authority to Develop the Plan ........................................................................... 1-9 Purpose and Use of the Community Plan ............................................................................ 1-9 Visions, Goals, Objectives, Principles, and Standards ......................................................... 1-9 Public Involvement ................................................................................................................ 1-10 Key Peninsula Community Planning Board ........................................................................ 1-10 Timeline for Public Involvement ........................................................................................ 1-10 Survey ................................................................................................................................. 1-12 Summary of the Key Peninsula Community Plan .................................................................. 1-13 Implementation ................................................................................................................. 1-14 Vision Statement .................................................................................................................... 1-14 Chapter 2: Land Use Element .......................................................................... 2-1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 2-1 Description of Current Conditions ........................................................................................... 2-1 Existing Land Uses ................................................................................................................ 2-1 Current Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Classifications .............................. 2-2 Dwelling Unit Capacity ......................................................................................................... 2-3 Commercial Area Capacity ................................................................................................... 2-4 Description of Desired Conditions ........................................................................................... 2-5 Proposed Land Use Designations and Zoning Classifications .............................................. 2-5 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Classifications ........................... 2-6 Pierce County Comprehensive Plan | 0BIntroduction ii Attachment B to LUAC Staff Report – March 2015 Community Plan Development Potential ............................................................................ 2-8 Other Land Use Considerations ......................................................................................... 2-10 Implementing Actions ............................................................................................................ 2-10 Short Term Actions (Upon plan adoption to 1 year) ......................................................... 2-11 Mid-Term Actions (1-5 years) ............................................................................................ 2-12 Long Term Actions (5-10 years) ......................................................................................... 2-12 Chapter 3: Community Character and Design Element .................................... 3-1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 3-1 Description of Current Conditons ............................................................................................ 3-1 Rural Residential Area .......................................................................................................... 3-2 Rural Commercial Centers ................................................................................................... 3-2 Signs ..................................................................................................................................... 3-5 Historic and Cultural Resources ........................................................................................... 3-5 Description of Desired Conditons ............................................................................................ 3-8 Rural Residential Areas ........................................................................................................ 3-8 Rural Commercial Centers ................................................................................................... 3-8 Signs ................................................................................................................................... 3-11 Implementing Actions ............................................................................................................ 3-11 Short Term Actions (Upon plan adoption to 1 year) ......................................................... 3-12 Mid-Term Actions (1-5 years) ............................................................................................ 3-13 Long Term Actions (5-10 years) ......................................................................................... 3-13 Chapter 4: Natural Environment Element ........................................................ 4-1 Description of Current Conditions ........................................................................................... 4-1 Water Resources .................................................................................................................. 4-1 Surface Water ...................................................................................................................... 4-2 Groundwater and Water Supply .......................................................................................... 4-4 Earth Resources ................................................................................................................... 4-7 Fish and Wildlife Resources ................................................................................................. 4-8 Open Space ........................................................................................................................ 4-10 Description of Desired Conditions ......................................................................................... 4-11 Water Resources ................................................................................................................ 4-11 Pierce County Comprehensive Plan | 0BIntroduction iii Attachment B to LUAC Staff Report – March 2015 Open Space ........................................................................................................................ 4-12 Implementing Actions ............................................................................................................ 4-13 Short Term Actions (Upon plan adoption to 1 year) ......................................................... 4-13 Mid-Term Actions (1-5 years) ............................................................................................ 4-14 Long Term Actions (5-10 years) ......................................................................................... 4-16 Chapter 5: Economic Element .......................................................................... 5-1 Description of Current Conditions ........................................................................................... 5-1 Income ................................................................................................................................. 5-1 Industry and Employment ................................................................................................... 5-2 Retail Sales ........................................................................................................................... 5-3 Workforce ............................................................................................................................ 5-4 Description of Desired Conditions ........................................................................................... 5-6 Implementing Actions .............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Quick Guide to Southeast Florida's Coral Reefs
    A Quick Guide to Southeast Florida’s Coral Reefs DAVID GILLIAM NATIONAL CORAL REEF INSTITUTE NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY Spring 2013 Prepared by the Land-based Sources of Pollution Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) of the Southeast Florida Coral Reef Initiative (SEFCRI) BRIAN WALKER NATIONAL CORAL REEF INSTITUTE, NOVA SOUTHEASTERN Southeast Florida’s coral-rich communities are more valuable than UNIVERSITY the Spanish treasures that sank nearby. Like the lost treasures, these amazing reefs lie just a few hundred yards off the shores of Martin, Palm Beach, Broward and Miami-Dade Counties where more than one-third of Florida’s 19 million residents live. Fishing, diving, and boating help attract millions of visitors to southeast Florida each year (30 million in 2008/2009). Reef-related expen- ditures generate $5.7 billion annually in income and sales, and support more than 61,000 local jobs. Such immense recreational activity, coupled with the pressures of coastal development, inland agriculture, and robust cruise and commercial shipping industries, threaten the very survival of our reefs. With your help, reefs will be protected from local stresses and future generations will be able to enjoy their beauty and economic benefits. Coral reefs are highly diverse and productive, yet surprisingly fragile, ecosystems. They are built by living creatures that require clean, clear seawater to settle, mature and reproduce. Reefs provide safe havens for spectacular forms of marine life. Unfortunately, reefs are vulnerable to impacts on scales ranging from local and regional to global. Global threats to reefs have increased along with expanding ART SEITZ human populations and industrialization. Now, warming seawater temperatures and changing ocean chemistry from carbon dioxide emitted by the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation are also starting to imperil corals.
    [Show full text]
  • Brighton Beach Groynes
    CASE STUDY: BRIGHTON BEACH GROYNES BRIGHTON, SOUTH AUSTRALIA FEBRUARY 2017 CLIENT: CITY OF HOLDFAST BAY Adelaide’s beaches are affected by a common phenomenon called ELCOROCK® longshore drift - the flow of water, in one direction, along a beach occurring as a result of winds and currents. In Adelaide longshore drift flows from south to north and it frequently erodes beaches The ELCOROCK system consists of sand- over time, particularly during storm events when tides are high and filled geotextile containers built to form sea is rough. a stabilising, defensive barrier against coastal erosion. Without sand replenishment, the southern end of Adelaide’s beaches will slowly erode and undermine existing infrastructure at The robustness and stability of Elcorock the sea/land interface. The objective of Elcorock sand container geotextile containers provide a solutions groynes, laid perpendicular to the beach, is to capture some of for other marine structures such as groynes and breakwaters. These the natural sand as well as dredged sand, that moves along the structures extend out into the wave zone coast. Over time, this process builds up the beach, particularly and provide marina and beach protection, between the groynes which results in the protection of the existing sand movement control and river training. infrastructure. The size of the container can easily be Geofabrics met with the city of Holdfast Bay in the early stages of selected based on the wave climate and the project to discuss the product, durability and previous projects other conditions ensuring stability under with a similar application. Due to recent weather events, the beach the most extreme conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of MIAMI BEACH DUNE MANAGEMENT PLAN January 2016
    CITY OF MIAMI BEACH DUNE MANAGEMENT PLAN January 2016 Prepared by: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH COASTAL MANAGEMENT 1700 Convention Center Drive AND CONSULTING Miami Beach, Florida 33139 7611 Lawrence Road Boynton Beach, Florida 33436 I. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE Coastal dunes are habitat for wildlife and support a high biodiversity of flora and fauna. They also keep beaches healthy by accreting sand and minimizing beach erosion rates. The dunes protect coastal infrastructure and upland properties from storm damage by blocking storm surge and absorbing wave energy. Therefore, a healthy dune system is an invaluable asset to coastal communities like Miami Beach. The purpose of the City of Miami Beach Dune Management Plan (“the Plan”) is to outline the framework and specifications that the City will use to foster and maintain a healthy, stable, and natural dune system that is appropriate for its location and reduces public safety and maintenance concerns. The Plan shall guide the City’s efforts in managing the urban, man-made dune as close to a natural system as possible and ensuring the dune provides storm protection, erosion control, and a biologically-rich habitat for local species. II. OBJECTIVES This plan was developed collaboratively with local government and community stakeholders, as well as local experts to meet the following primary objectives: 1. Reduce to the maximum extent possible the presence of invasive, non-native pest plant species within the dune system. Non-native species compete with and overwhelm more stable native dune plants, thereby threatening the stability and biodiversity of the dune system. Reducing the presence of aggressive, non-native vegetation preserves and promotes the structural integrity and biodiversity of the dune.
    [Show full text]
  • Safe Boating Through the St. Lucie Inlet
    Information: Florida Fish & Wildlife Commission 850-488-4676 SAFE BOATING US Coast Guard - Ft. Pierce 772-461-7606 THROUGH THE ST. LUCIE INLET US Coast Guard Auxiliary 772-465-8128 US Army Corps of Engineers 772-221-3349 St. Lucie Inlet Coastal 772-225-2300 Weather Station HERE ARE SOME THINGS TO REMEMBER: • Listen to the most recent weather forecast for the times you plan to go out AND come back in the inlet. • Look in the Tide Tables or local newspapers for the times St. Lucie Inlet of predicted high and low tides for the day you plan to go out. Remember the outgoing (ebb) tital current at low Newcomers tide is the worst time to make a passage through the St. Lucie Inlet. If you are a boater new to this area, it is highly • Safe boating practices are even more important in inlets. recommended that you make your first passage of Check your boat before you head out. Life preservers the St. Lucie Inlet as an observer. An experienced should be worn when going through inlets. boater with local knowledge at the helm can point • Expect the unexpected. Watch the clouds to anticipate out various hazards and conditions to avoid. This is severe weather such as thunderstorms. Be on the lookout for shifting shoals and changing channels. especially important if you have no prior experience • Engine failure is common in small boats in rough seas. with any ocean inlets. The extra roughness agitates gasoline and settled dirt or water in the fuel system, which can cause engine failure Notes on Navigation at Night at a crtical time.
    [Show full text]
  • PROPOSED NEW TITLE 6 7 8 TITLE 18S 9 10 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS – SHORELINES 11 12 13 CHAPTERS: 14 15 18S.10 Introduction
    1 Exhibit G to Ordinance No. 2012- 2 3 4 5 PROPOSED NEW TITLE 6 7 8 TITLE 18S 9 10 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS – SHORELINES 11 12 13 CHAPTERS: 14 15 18S.10 Introduction. 16 18S.20 Shorelines of Statewide Significance and Shoreline Environment Designations. 17 18S.30 General Policies and Regulations. 18 18S.40 Development Policies and Regulations. 19 18S.50 Development Tables. 20 18S.60 Permits and Approvals. 21 18S.70 Appendices. 22 A. Definitions. 23 B. Farm Management Plan Requirements. 24 C. Aquaculture Applications Requirements. 25 D. Commercial, Civic and Industrial Applications Requirements. 26 E. Shoreline Jurisdiction Descriptions. 27 F. Shoreline Environment Designation Maps. 28 G. Parks and Public Access Maps. 29 H. Shoreline Environment Township Atlas. 30 Exhibit “G” to Ordinance No. 2012- Pierce County Council 930 Tacoma Ave S, Rm 1046 Page 1 of 92 Tacoma, WA 98402 1 2 3 Chapter 18S.10 4 5 INTRODUCTION 6 7 8 Sections: 9 18S.10.010 Title. 10 18S.10.020 Purpose. 11 18S.10.030 Applicability. 12 18S.10.040 Exemption. 13 18S.10.050 Interpretation. 14 18S.10.060 Coordination with Other Titles. 15 18S.10.070 Compliance. 16 18S.10.080 Severability. 17 18S.10.090 Warning and Disclaimer of Liability. 18 19 18S.10.010 Title. 20 Title 18S PCC shall be officially cited as Title 18S PCC, Development Regulations – 21 Shorelines and may be referred to as Title 18S PCC. Title 18S PCC, which includes the 22 shoreline policies, regulations, and shoreline environment designation maps is the Pierce County 23 Shoreline Master Program (SMP).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Influence of Groyne Fields and Other Hard Defences on the Shoreline Configuration
    1 The Influence of Groyne Fields and Other Hard Defences on the Shoreline Configuration 2 of Soft Cliff Coastlines 3 4 Sally Brown1*, Max Barton1, Robert J Nicholls1 5 6 1. Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, 7 University Road, Highfield, Southampton, UK. S017 1BJ. 8 9 * Sally Brown ([email protected], Telephone: +44(0)2380 594796). 10 11 Abstract: Building defences, such as groynes, on eroding soft cliff coastlines alters the 12 sediment budget, changing the shoreline configuration adjacent to defences. On the 13 down-drift side, the coastline is set-back. This is often believed to be caused by increased 14 erosion via the ‘terminal groyne effect’, resulting in rapid land loss. This paper examines 15 whether the terminal groyne effect always occurs down-drift post defence construction 16 (i.e. whether or not the retreat rate increases down-drift) through case study analysis. 17 18 Nine cases were analysed at Holderness and Christchurch Bay, England. Seven out of 19 nine sites experienced an increase in down-drift retreat rates. For the two remaining sites, 20 retreat rates remained constant after construction, probably as a sediment deficit already 21 existed prior to construction or as sediment movement was restricted further down-drift. 22 For these two sites, a set-back still evolved, leading to the erroneous perception that a 23 terminal groyne effect had developed. Additionally, seven of the nine sites developed a 24 set back up-drift of the initial groyne, leading to the defended sections of coast acting as 1 25 a hard headland, inhabiting long-shore drift.
    [Show full text]
  • Pierce County Comprehensive Plan Washington State Legislature
    MEETING AGENDA if applicable PRESENTATION Presentation Documents: 2014-03-05- Anderson-KetronIslands-Prez.pdf DOCUMENTS AND HANDOUTS Preliminary Mark -up Documents: 2014-03-05- Anderson-KetronIslands-Doc.pdf See all meeting information related to the Comprehensive Land Use Update Realize 2030 Honor the Past Look Ahead Overview of the Growth Management Act (GMA) Review of the Comprehensive Plan Update How do Community Plans Fit In? Overview of the Public Participation Plan 2 Realize 2030 Honor the Past Look Ahead Property Rights Citizen Participation Urban Growth Reduce Sprawl Transportation 14 planning goals that guide Affordable Housing the development of Economic Development comprehensive plans and Permits development regulations Natural Resource Industries Open Space and Recreation Environment Public Facilities and Services Historic Preservation 3 Shoreline Realize 2030 Honor the Past Look Ahead REQUIRED ELEMENTS Land Use (Urban & Rural) Housing Capital Facilities Pierce County has the Utilities obligation to review EconomicTransportation Development and IF NECESSARY Rural update the Comprehensive Plan policies and OPTIONAL ELEMENTS implementing Historic Preservation regulations by Park and Recreation June 30, 2015 Environment 4 Realize 2030 Honor the Past Look Ahead Policies are general in nature and made to help identify goals Regulations implement the policies, are more specific requirements (Zoning Code) “Sub-Plans” (Transportation Plan) provide more detail 5 Realize 2030 Honor the Past Look Ahead Washington State Legislature
    [Show full text]
  • A Nonlinear Relationship Between Marsh Size and Sediment Trapping Capacity Compromises Salt Marshes’ Stability Carmine Donatelli1*, Xiaohe Zhang2*, Neil K
    https://doi.org/10.1130/G47131.1 Manuscript received 22 October 2019 Revised manuscript received 9 March 2020 Manuscript accepted 26 April 2020 © 2020 The Authors. Gold Open Access: This paper is published under the terms of the CC-BY license. Published online 10 June 2020 A nonlinear relationship between marsh size and sediment trapping capacity compromises salt marshes’ stability Carmine Donatelli1*, Xiaohe Zhang2*, Neil K. Ganju3, Alfredo L. Aretxabaleta3, Sergio Fagherazzi2† and Nicoletta Leonardi1† 1 Department of Geography and Planning, School of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Liverpool, Roxby Building, Chatham Street, Liverpool L69 7ZT, UK 2 Department of Earth Sciences, Boston University, 675 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA 3 Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA ABSTRACT tidal flats to keep pace with sea-level rise (Mari- Global assessments predict the impact of sea-level rise on salt marshes with present-day otti and Fagherazzi, 2010). levels of sediment supply from rivers and the coastal ocean. However, these assessments do Regional effects are crucial when evaluating not consider that variations in marsh extent and the related reconfiguration of intertidal area coastal interventions under the management of affect local sediment dynamics, ultimately controlling the fate of the marshes themselves. multiple agencies. Though many studies have We conducted a meta-analysis of six bays along the United States East Coast to show that focused on local marsh dynamics, less atten- a reduction in the current salt marsh area decreases the sediment availability in estuarine tion has been paid to how changes in marsh systems through changes in regional-scale hydrodynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • KEY PENINSULA METROPOLITAN PARK DISTRICT Key Peninsula Metropolitan Park District Commissioner, Position No
    Special Election - Proposition No. 1 Submitted by Pierce County FORMATION OF NEW KEY PENINSULA METROPOLITAN PARK DISTRICT Key Peninsula Metropolitan Park District Commissioner, Position No. 1 Education: Official Ballot Title: Occupation: The Pierce County Council passed Resolution No. R2004-17, proposing formation of the Key Peninsula Professional Qualifications: Metropolitan Park District by election. If approved, Proposition No. 1 will create a new metropolitan park Personal Information: district with the statutory power, among others, to levy annually a general tax on all property in the Dis- Community Involvement: trict not to exceed seventy-five cents per thousand dollars of assessed valuation. The District’s boundaries Personal Views: I am running for the position as Park Commissioner to offer the will be identical to those of the existing Key Peninsula Park & Recreation District. A five-member board of voters a competent, informed, reliable candidate. I have been actively involved in the commissioners, elected at large, will govern the District. community in many ways for years. I have served as a Park Commissioner previ- ously, so that experience will come with me. I am one of the longest serving members Explanatory Statement: of the Key Peninsula Civic Center where I served as Vice-President and then as Mike Salatino President. I am one of the founding three organizers of the Key Peninsula Fair. I’ve If Proposition No. 1 passes, a new metropolitan park district will be created with boundaries identical to PO Box 640 lived in this community since 1968 so I am acutely aware of the wants and needs of those of the existing Key Peninsula Park & Recreation District.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download The
    Non-Profit Organization U.S. Postage PAID Permit No. 1 POSTAL CUSTOMER www.keypennews.org THE VOICE OF THE KEY PENINSULA September 2020 Vol. 47 No. 9 County Mandates Virtual School; Most Parents Want In-Person Teaching Schools must adjust to a landscape continually altered by COVID-19 while many in the community just want to get back to normal. SARA THOMPSON, KP NEWS reopening to creating the The Peninsula School District board of reopening guide approved directors approved a guide for the district by the board Aug. 13. to reopen for online teaching at its meeting Focus groups of 650 Aug. 13. Held virtually through Zoom and teachers, parents and streamed live on Facebook, the meeting students reviewed the initial included a discussion with Tacoma-Pierce guide draft. The partici- County Health Department Director Dr. pants emphasized a need for Anthony Chen about his mandate requiring balance between flexibility schools to open online classes only. and structure, and the need Chen clarified his July recommendation for better communication not to reopen any public or private school and lead time between each facilities. “I am not simply recommending reopening stage. Individual OSPI candidate Maia Espinoza speaks at a rally to fully reopen schools Aug. 13 across from the construction site but am requiring all schools to begin the schools will finetune the of Elementary No. 9 on Harbor Hill Drive in Gig Harbor. Photo: Lisa Bryan, KP News school year using distance learning until guide to meet the needs of local families. COVID-19 activity used by the state and in-person learning on a limited basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 13 -- Puget Sound, Washington
    514 Puget Sound, Washington Volume 7 WK50/2011 123° 122°30' 18428 SKAGIT BAY STRAIT OF JUAN DE FUCA S A R A T O 18423 G A D A M DUNGENESS BAY I P 18464 R A A L S T S Y A G Port Townsend I E N L E T 18443 SEQUIM BAY 18473 DISCOVERY BAY 48° 48° 18471 D Everett N U O S 18444 N O I S S E S S O P 18458 18446 Y 18477 A 18447 B B L O A B K A Seattle W E D W A S H I N ELLIOTT BAY G 18445 T O L Bremerton Port Orchard N A N 18450 A 18452 C 47° 47° 30' 18449 30' D O O E A H S 18476 T P 18474 A S S A G E T E L N 18453 I E S C COMMENCEMENT BAY A A C R R I N L E Shelton T Tacoma 18457 Puyallup BUDD INLET Olympia 47° 18456 47° General Index of Chart Coverage in Chapter 13 (see catalog for complete coverage) 123° 122°30' WK50/2011 Chapter 13 Puget Sound, Washington 515 Puget Sound, Washington (1) This chapter describes Puget Sound and its nu- (6) Other services offered by the Marine Exchange in- merous inlets, bays, and passages, and the waters of clude a daily newsletter about future marine traffic in Hood Canal, Lake Union, and Lake Washington. Also the Puget Sound area, communication services, and a discussed are the ports of Seattle, Tacoma, Everett, and variety of coordinative and statistical information.
    [Show full text]
  • Findings and Conclusions Comprehensive Update to the Pierce County Shoreline Master Program
    ATTACHMENT A: FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE PIERCE COUNTY SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM SMP Submittal accepted December 18, 2015 - Ordinance No. 2013-45s4 Prepared by Kim Van Zwalenburg on May 7, 2018 INTRODUCTION Ecology’s Findings and Conclusions (Attachment A), including reference to Attachment B (Required Changes) and Attachment C (Recommended Changes), provide the factual basis for the Department of Ecology’s (Ecology) decision on the Pierce County (County) comprehensively updated Shoreline Master Program (SMP). The document is divided into three sections providing an Introduction; Findings of Fact regarding the submittal, amendment history, and local and state review; and Conclusions. Description of Proposed Amendment Pierce County has submitted a comprehensive update to their Shoreline Master Program (SMP) for review and approval by Ecology. The updated master program will regulate approximately 225 miles of marine shoreline and 880 miles of freshwater shoreline throughout the unincorporated areas of the County. It contains locally tailored shoreline management policies, regulations, environment designations, a designation map folio and administrative provisions, as well as Title 18E Pierce County Code (PCC) Development Regulations - Critical Areas adopted by reference as part of the SMP. Additional reports and supporting information and analyses were included in the County’s submittal and, as noted below, have been considered by Ecology during its review. In addition, because of the lengthy process at both the local and state levels to conclude the comprehensive update, the statutory periodic review deadline is nearing. Pierce County is required on or before June 30, 2019, and every eight years thereafter, to review and, if necessary, revise their master program.
    [Show full text]