DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 13 -- Puget Sound, Washington

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 13 -- Puget Sound, Washington 514 Puget Sound, Washington Volume 7 WK50/2011 123° 122°30' 18428 SKAGIT BAY STRAIT OF JUAN DE FUCA S A R A T O 18423 G A D A M DUNGENESS BAY I P 18464 R A A L S T S Y A G Port Townsend I E N L E T 18443 SEQUIM BAY 18473 DISCOVERY BAY 48° 48° 18471 D Everett N U O S 18444 N O I S S E S S O P 18458 18446 Y 18477 A 18447 B B L O A B K A Seattle W E D W A S H I N ELLIOTT BAY G 18445 T O L Bremerton Port Orchard N A N 18450 A 18452 C 47° 47° 30' 18449 30' D O O E A H S 18476 T P 18474 A S S A G E T E L N 18453 I E S C COMMENCEMENT BAY A A C R R I N L E Shelton T Tacoma 18457 Puyallup BUDD INLET Olympia 47° 18456 47° General Index of Chart Coverage in Chapter 13 (see catalog for complete coverage) 123° 122°30' WK50/2011 Chapter 13 Puget Sound, Washington 515 Puget Sound, Washington (1) This chapter describes Puget Sound and its nu- (6) Other services offered by the Marine Exchange in- merous inlets, bays, and passages, and the waters of clude a daily newsletter about future marine traffic in Hood Canal, Lake Union, and Lake Washington. Also the Puget Sound area, communication services, and a discussed are the ports of Seattle, Tacoma, Everett, and variety of coordinative and statistical information. The Olympia, as well as other smaller ports and landings. office monitors VHF-FM channels 20 for Grays Harbor traffic, 9 for Strait of Juan de Fuca traffic to Protection COLREGS Demarcation Lines Island, and 20 for Puget Sound traffic from Protection (2) The International Regulations for Preventing Col- Island, 24 hours a day. The Marine Exchange may also lisions at Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS) apply on all the wa- be contacted by phone, 206–443–3830 or toll free 800– ters of Puget Sound and adjacent waters, including Lake 562–2856. Union, Lake Washington, Hood Canal, and all tributar- ies. (See 80.1395, chapter 2.) (7) Vessel Traffic Service Puget Sound, operated by the U.S. Coast Guard, has been established in the waters Chart 18440 of the Strait of Juan de Fuca, Rosario Strait, Admiralty Inlet, Puget Sound, and the navigable waters adjacent (3) Puget Sound, a bay with numerous channels and to these areas. (See 161.1 through 161.23 and 161.55, branches, extends about 90 miles S from the Strait of chapter 2, for regulations, and the beginning of chapter Juan de Fuca to Olympia. The N boundary of the sound 12 for additional information.) is formed, at its main entrance, by a line between Point Wilson on the Quimper Peninsula and Point Partridge (8) The U.S. Coast Guard and the Puget Sound Harbor on Whidbey Island; at a second entrance between West Safety Committee have developed and adopted a Harbor Point on Whidbey Island, Deception Island, and Sares Safety Plan that formally establishes a set of Standards Head on Fidalgo Island; at a third entrance, at the S end of Care for Puget Sound and surrounding waters. The of Swinomish Channel between Fidalgo Island and Mc- standards and protocols contained in the Puget Sound Glinn Island. Puget Sound was named by George Van- Harbor Safety Plan complement and supplement ex- couver for Lieutenant Peter Puget, who explored the S isting federal, state, and local laws. The Harbor Safety end in May 1792. Deep-draft traffic is considerable in the Plan is not intended to take the place of or otherwise larger passages, and small craft operate throughout the intended to replace the good judgement of a ship’s area. Unusually deep water and strong currents charac- master in the safe operation of his/her vessel. These terize these waters. standards and protocols were developed and adopted by (4) Navigation of the area is comparatively easy in clear local experts for insuring greater safety. Some sections weather; the outlying dangers are few and marked by of the plan provide important safety info for professional aids. The currents follow the general direction of the mariners transiting Puget Sound, while the Standards channels and have considerable velocity. In thick weath- of Care formalize and document good marine practice. er, because of the uncertainty of the currents and the The Harbor Safety Plan can be obtained by going to the great depths which render soundings useless in many Seattle Marine Exchange website at http://www.marine- places, strangers are advised to take a pilot. exchangesea.com or contact 206–443–3830. (5) The Marine Exchange of Puget Sound, located in Regulated navigation area Seattle, has a Vessel Monitoring/Vessel Reporting ser- (9) Due to heavy vessel concentrations, the waters of vice which tracks the arrival of a vessel from a time the Strait of Juan de Fuca, the San Juan Islands, the prior to arrival at the pilot station to a berth at one of Strait of Georgia, and Puget Sound, and all adjacent the Puget Sound ports. Constant updates of the ship’s waters, are a regulated navigation area. (See 165.1 position and estimated time of arrival are maintained through 165.13 and 165.1301, chapter 2, for regula- through a variety of sources. This information is avail- tions.) able to and is passed to the vessel’s agents and to other interested activities. These services continue until the (10) Floating logs and deadheads or sinkers may be en- vessel passes the pilot station on her outbound voyage. countered anywhere in Puget Sound; caution should be exercised. 516 Puget Sound, Washington Volume 7 WK50/2011 Washington State Requirements Reports of Oil Spills and Vessel Emergencies to carry, or that carries, oil in bulk as cargo or cargo All vessels must report oil spills or potential oil spills to residue. both: Washington State Ecology inspectors may conduct ves- 1. Washington State 800–258–5990 sel inspections on regulated cargo, passenger, and fi shing 2. National Response Center 800–424–8802 vessels when in Washington waters. Additional informa- Tank vessels and cargo and passenger ships 300 gross tion is available at: tons or larger must make notifi cations to Washington http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/spills/prevention/Ves- State for vessel emergencies, including a loss or serious selTechAssist/AISsubstantialrisk.html/ degradation of propulsion, steering, means of navigation, electrical generating capability and seakeeping capability Oil Transfer Requirements constituting a substantial threat of pollution affecting Safe bunkering procedures must be followed during Washington state natural resources. In addition to any fueling operations. For vessels 300 gross tons or greater, notifi cations to the USCG, the owner or operator must Washington State Ecology inspectors may conduct notify the state of any vessel emergency that results in inspections of these regulated oil transfers on vessels the discharge or substantial threat of a discharge of oil to receiving fuel for propulsion within Washington waters. state waters or that may affect the natural resources of Details can be found in state regulations at Washington the state within one hour of the onset of the emergency. Administrative Code (WAC) 317-40. Additional informa- tion is also available at: Tug Escorts for Laden Tankers http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/spills/prevention/Ves- Any laden oil tanker, whether enrolled or registered, selTechAssist/Bunkering.html/ proceeding east of a line extending from Discovery Island Light (British Columbia, CN) south to New Dungeness Tank vessels delivering oil in bulk to a non-recreational Light (Washington State, US) must be escorted by a tug vessel or facility within Washington waters must meet or tugs with an aggregate shaft horsepower equivalent to state oil transfer requirements. They may also be subject to Washington State oil transfer inspections for these fi ve percent of the deadweight tons of that tanker. For ad- regulated oil transfers. Details can be found in WAC 173- ditional details see Washington state law at 88.16 Revised 184. Additional information is available at: Code of Washington (RCW). http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/spills/prevention/Ves- selTechAssist/vessel_otr.html/ Emergency Response Tug at Neah Bay • For a transfer of more than 100 gallons of bulk oil to An industry-funded emergency response tug is located a facility or non-recreational vessel, the delivering vessel at Neah Bay at the entrance to the Strait of Juan de Fuca. must submit an Advance Notice of Transfer (ANT) report The tug is available 24 hours a day and can be under- to Ecology. This ANT must be submitted 24 hours prior to way within twenty minutes of a decision to deploy. The the transfer for facilities or within the timeframe required purpose of the tug is to assist vessels having propulsion by local USCG Captain of the Port. and steering failures or that are directed by either the US • For convenience, the ANT report can be made either: or Canadian Coast Guard to obtain towing assistance. online using the Ecology website at: Among other capabilities, the tug is intended to be able to https://secureaccess.wa.gov/ecy/ants, by make up to, stop, hold, and tow a drifting or disabled ves- e-mail: OilTransferNotifi [email protected], or by sel of 180,000 metric dead weight tons in severe weather fax: 360–407–7288 or 800–664–9184. conditions. The tug can be contacted through the USCG VTS or the Puget Sound Marine Exchange. Contingency Plan Requirements Tank vessels and cargo and passenger ships 300 gross Washington State Vessel Inspections tons or larger transiting Washington waters must either The Washington State Department of Ecology regulates have a Washington State Department of Ecology approved cargo and passenger vessels and tank vessels operating in oil spill contingency plan or be a member of a non-profi t Washington waters.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 4: Destinations – Utilitarian And
    Jefferson County Non-Motorized Transportation and Recreational Trails Plan 2010 Chapter 4: Destinations – Utilitarian and Recreational 2010 Plan Update: Chapter 4 Destinations provides a broad picture of Jefferson County: where people live, work, go to school, shop, and recreate and the locations of tourist facilities and significant public facilities. This information is intended to inform decisions about connecting these destinations with non-motorized transportation facilities. It is not intended as an up-to-date guide. While Chapter 4 has not been updated, it still performs its intended function. This chapter has been retained in the original 2002 Plan format. County, City, Port, School District, State, Federal, and private enterprises have developed an extensive number of commercial, employment, business, educational, recreational, and other public facilities within the County. This extensive array of facilities is of interest to non-motorized transportation and recreational trail users. This chapter describes the most significant destinations. 4.1 Schools The Brinnon, Chimacum, Port Townsend, Queets-Clearwater, Quilcene, Quillayute Valley, and Sequim School Districts provide educational services to Jefferson County residents. Brinnon School District The school district collects students by bus within the district’s service area – which includes all of Brinnon and the areas along US-101 from the Mason County line to Mt Walker and transports them to the central school site. Upper grade students are bused to Quilcene High School. The district operates 6 school bus routes beginning at 6:35-9:00 am and ending at 3:46-4:23 pm for the collection and distribution of different school grades and after school programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Jefferson County Hazard Identification and Vulnerability Assessment 2011 2
    Jefferson County Department of Emergency Management 81 Elkins Road, Port Hadlock, Washington 98339 - Phone: (360) 385-9368 Email: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 I. INTRODUCTION 6 II. GEOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS 6 III. DEMOGRAPHIC ASPECTS 7 IV. SIGNIFICANT HISTORICAL DISASTER EVENTS 9 V. NATURAL HAZARDS 12 • AVALANCHE 13 • DROUGHT 14 • EARTHQUAKES 17 • FLOOD 24 • LANDSLIDE 32 • SEVERE LOCAL STORM 34 • TSUNAMI / SEICHE 38 • VOLCANO 42 • WILDLAND / FOREST / INTERFACE FIRES 45 VI. TECHNOLOGICAL (HUMAN MADE) HAZARDS 48 • CIVIL DISTURBANCE 49 • DAM FAILURE 51 • ENERGY EMERGENCY 53 • FOOD AND WATER CONTAMINATION 56 • HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 58 • MARINE OIL SPILL – MAJOR POLLUTION EVENT 60 • SHELTER / REFUGE SITE 62 • TERRORISM 64 • URBAN FIRE 67 RESOURCES / REFERENCES 69 Jefferson County Hazard Identification and Vulnerability Assessment 2011 2 PURPOSE This Hazard Identification and Vulnerability Assessment (HIVA) document describes known natural and technological (human-made) hazards that could potentially impact the lives, economy, environment, and property of residents of Jefferson County. It provides a foundation for further planning to ensure that County leadership, agencies, and citizens are aware and prepared to meet the effects of disasters and emergencies. Incident management cannot be event driven. Through increased awareness and preventive measures, the ultimate goal is to help ensure a unified approach that will lesson vulnerability to hazards over time. The HIVA is not a detailed study, but a general overview of known hazards that can affect Jefferson County. Jefferson County Hazard Identification and Vulnerability Assessment 2011 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY An integrated emergency management approach involves hazard identification, risk assessment, and vulnerability analysis. This document, the Hazard Identification and Vulnerability Assessment (HIVA) describes the hazard identification and assessment of both natural hazards and technological, or human caused hazards, which exist for the people of Jefferson County.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Stability of the Duwamish River Delta, Seattle, Washington
    Seismic Stability of the Duwamish River Delta, Seattle, Washington Professional Paper 1661-E U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Other than this note, this page left intentionally blank. Earthquake Hazards of the Pacific Northwest Coastal and Marine Regions Robert Kayen, Editor Seismic Stability of the Duwamish River Delta, Seattle, Washington By Robert E. Kayen and Walter A. Barnhardt The delta front of the Duwamish River valley near Elliott Bay and Harbor Island is founded on young Holocene deposits shaped by sea-level rise, episodic volcanism, and seismicity. These river-mouth deposits are highly susceptible to seismic soil liquefac- tion and are potentially prone to submarine landsliding and disintegrative flow failure. Professional Paper 1661-E U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey ii U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007 This report and any updates to it are available at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/pp1661e/ For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS — the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Manuscript approved for publication, May 29, 2007 Text edited by Peter Stauffer Layout by David R. Jones Suggested citation: Kayen, R.E., and Barnhardt, W.A., 2007, Seismic stability of the Duwamish River delta, Seattle, Washington: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Worden State Park Fort Worden State Park
    $ Q ! B % > B ! > ! ! ¼ ! ! D ! $ ! ¼ ! ¼ % ¼ ! ! ¼% $ ! ¼ % % !$ ! ! ! ! %% $¼ $ ¼ % ! ¼ ¼ % % % % ¼ % % % ¼$ % % ¼ > ¼ $ ! ! ¼ ! ! ¼ !! ¼ % ¼ % Q % ¼ %$ B $ ¼ ! ! ! ! % $ ¼ % ! : ! ¼ ! ! ¼ % $ % ¼ ¼ % % % ¼ D $ : > B % > % % ¼ % ! ! !$ ¼ % $ % B > ! % D ¼ D > > $ % B % : $ North Sound North Sound/Fort Worden State Park Fort Worden State Park Cascadia Marine Trail Fort Worden State Park Take a walk along the 11,000 feet of beach or hike up the bluffs to take in a Number of Sites: Overflow Camping: bird's-eye view at the entrance to Puget Sound. Be sure to take a flashlight 3 In the rest of campground and explore the haunted house-like maze of the underground passageways. Port Townsend is a popular destination and the park hosts many conferences including several musical Water: Sanitation Facilities: workshops (Centrum's Festival of American Fiddle Tunes, Jazz Port Townsend, and the Port Available in the day-use area N of the Toilets opposite of pier and showers at Townsend Acoustic Blues Festival. pier and across the road campground; open year-round Natural History: Extras: Ownership: # Mingle with intertidal plants and animals indigenous to Puget Sound at the Port Townsend Picnic areas, food concessions in day-use Washington State Parks and Recreation Marine Science Center. The Marine Exhibit at the end of the pier houses touch pools andCoupeville area and Marine Science Center aquaria highlighting local marine habitats. On shore, a current Natural History Exhibit is ! Fees: Fire Restrictions: "Learning# from Whales...the! story of Hope," which inlcudes a fully reconstructed Orca Ebey's Landing SP $12/night for up to 8 in site Fireplaces available skeleton. ^ ! Known Hazards: Special Considerations: Whidbey ^ Currents N of Pt. Wilson are potentially Very popular day-use beach.
    [Show full text]
  • On-Site Sewage System Management Plan January 7, 2008
    Thurston County Public Health and Social Services Department Environmental Health Division On-Site Sewage System Management Plan January 7, 2008 Thurston County On-site Sewage System Management Plan January 7, 2008 Table of Contents: Section Page Acknowledgements 3 Executive Summary 4 On-site Sewage System Management Plan 8 Part I – Database Enhancement 10 Part 2 – Identification of Sensitive Areas 16 Part 3 – Operation, Monitoring and Maintenance in Sensitive Areas 28 Part 4 – Marine Recovery and Sensitive Area Strategy 34 Part 5 – Education 39 Part 6 – Plan Summary 42 Appendices A – Amanda Reports 53 B – Henderson Watershed Protection Area Description 58 C – Process for Evaluation of Potential MRA’s and LMA’s 62 D – Marine Recovery Area and Local Management Area Designation Tool 63 E – Measurable Outcomes 70 F – Thurston County Septic Park 71 Page 2 of 71 Thurston County On-site Sewage System Management Plan January 7, 2008 Acknowledgements Thurston County Public Health and Social Services would like to acknowledge all those who have been instrumental in our process to develop our Local Management Plan (LMA). First of all we appreciate the contributions of the Article IV Advisory Committee in assisting the Environmental Health Division. Your dedication to providing direction and tone for the LMA has been invaluable. We would also like to recognize the Environmental Health, Development Services and Geodata staff for supplying input, recommendations and attending committee meetings to offer insight into our program areas. Our appreciation is also extended to the Washington State Department of Health. We are grateful for their staff support and funding. We especially appreciate the use of the guidance document, which has provided section descriptions and format for our plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase 1 Final Report
    AMHS GOVERNANCE STUDY Phase 1 Final Report Prepared for: Southeast Conference • Juneau, AK Ref: 16086-001-030-0 Rev. - December 31, 2016 Southeast Conference AMHS Governance Study 12/31/16 PREPARED BY Elliott Bay Design Group 5305 Shilshole Ave. NW, Ste. 100 Seattle, WA 98107 McDowell Group 9360 Glacier Hwy., Ste. 201 Juneau, AK 99801 NOTES Cover photo courtesy of Alaska Floats My Boat. ELLIOTT BAY DESIGN GROUP Job: 16086 By: RIW AMHS Reform Final Report.docx Rev. - Page: i Southeast Conference AMHS Governance Study 12/31/16 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Project Overview Phase One of the AMHS Strategic Operational and Business Plan was developed by Elliott Bay Design Group (EBDG) and McDowell Group. The study identified alternative governance structures that could help the Alaska Marine Highway System (AMHS) achieve financial sustainability. This statewide effort was managed by Southeast Conference and guided by a 12- member steering committee of stakeholders from across Alaska. Project tasks included a high-level examination of six basic ferry governance models to assess their suitability for Alaska’s unique geography, markets, and transportation needs. More detailed case studies were conducted with three ferry systems to identify ideas and lessons applicable to AMHS: British Columbia Ferry System, Steamship Authority (Massachusetts), and CalMac Ferries (Scotland). The study also included review of relevant AMHS reports and interviews with key AMHS contacts including senior management and union representatives. The project incorporated extensive public involvement including convening a Statewide Marine Transportation Summit, solicitation of feedback through the project website, outreach to municipal governments and trade organizations throughout Alaska, and a presentation and discussion at Southeast Conference Annual Meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • PROPOSED NEW TITLE 6 7 8 TITLE 18S 9 10 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS – SHORELINES 11 12 13 CHAPTERS: 14 15 18S.10 Introduction
    1 Exhibit G to Ordinance No. 2012- 2 3 4 5 PROPOSED NEW TITLE 6 7 8 TITLE 18S 9 10 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS – SHORELINES 11 12 13 CHAPTERS: 14 15 18S.10 Introduction. 16 18S.20 Shorelines of Statewide Significance and Shoreline Environment Designations. 17 18S.30 General Policies and Regulations. 18 18S.40 Development Policies and Regulations. 19 18S.50 Development Tables. 20 18S.60 Permits and Approvals. 21 18S.70 Appendices. 22 A. Definitions. 23 B. Farm Management Plan Requirements. 24 C. Aquaculture Applications Requirements. 25 D. Commercial, Civic and Industrial Applications Requirements. 26 E. Shoreline Jurisdiction Descriptions. 27 F. Shoreline Environment Designation Maps. 28 G. Parks and Public Access Maps. 29 H. Shoreline Environment Township Atlas. 30 Exhibit “G” to Ordinance No. 2012- Pierce County Council 930 Tacoma Ave S, Rm 1046 Page 1 of 92 Tacoma, WA 98402 1 2 3 Chapter 18S.10 4 5 INTRODUCTION 6 7 8 Sections: 9 18S.10.010 Title. 10 18S.10.020 Purpose. 11 18S.10.030 Applicability. 12 18S.10.040 Exemption. 13 18S.10.050 Interpretation. 14 18S.10.060 Coordination with Other Titles. 15 18S.10.070 Compliance. 16 18S.10.080 Severability. 17 18S.10.090 Warning and Disclaimer of Liability. 18 19 18S.10.010 Title. 20 Title 18S PCC shall be officially cited as Title 18S PCC, Development Regulations – 21 Shorelines and may be referred to as Title 18S PCC. Title 18S PCC, which includes the 22 shoreline policies, regulations, and shoreline environment designation maps is the Pierce County 23 Shoreline Master Program (SMP).
    [Show full text]
  • X-Ray Magazine | Issue 43
    AquaCorps :: Dive Volunteerism :: UWPhoto Flash Photography British Columbia Port Hardy Sweden GLOBAL EDITION Tech Wreck July 2011 Number 43 Park Caribbean Southern Belize Ecology Mangroves China PACIFIC Qian Dao Lake Sharks Yap Broadnose Sevengill 1 X-RAY MAG : 43 : 2011 COVER PHOTO BY BARB ROY DIRECTORY X-RAY MAG is published by AquaScope Media ApS Frederiksberg, Denmark www.xray-mag.com PUBLISHER SENIOR EDITOR & EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Michael Symes, PhD Peter Symes [email protected] Hawksbill sea turtle, Southern Belize. Photo by Kate Clark [email protected] SECTION EDITORS PUBLISHER / EDITOR Michael Arvedlund, PhD contents & CREATIVE DIRECTOR - Ecology Gunild Symes Scott Bennett - Photo & Travel [email protected] Andrey Bizyukin, PhD - Features Mathias Carvalho - Wrecks ASSOCIATE EDITORS Wayne Fenior - Equipment & REPRESENTATIVES Simon Kong - News, Books Americas & Europe Kelly LaClaire - Whale Tales Arnold Weisz Catherine Lim - News, Books [email protected] Bonnie McKenna - Turtle Tales Cindy Ross - GirlDiver Russia Arnold Weisz - News, Features Andrey Bizyukin, PhD, Moscow [email protected] CORRESPONDENTS Robert Aston - CA, USA Svetlana Murashkina, PhD, Moscow Enrico Cappeletti - Italy [email protected] John Collins - Ireland Marcelo Mammana - Argentina South East Asia Nonoy Tan - The Philippines Catherine GS Lim, Singapore [email protected] CONTRIBUTORS THIS ISSUE Scott Bennett ASSISTANT EDITORS Daniel Brinckmann & REPRESENTATIVES Kate Clark UNITED KINGDOM Aaron Gekoski Roz Lunn, London Julia Golosiy [email protected] Wayne Grant Bob Halstead USA East Coast Tyge Dahl Hermansen Millis Keegan, Fort Lauderdale Scott Johnson [email protected] Brian Keegan Wayne Fenior, Orlando Millis Keegan [email protected] Elaine Kwee Kelly LaClaire USA Pacific Northwest/Canada Rosemary E Lunn Barb Roy, Vancouver Barb Roy [email protected] Don Silcock Kelly LaClaire, Oregon Gunild Symes [email protected] Peter Symes 18 26 34 60 plus..
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Qualifications Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project
    Submitted by: Kiewit Pacific Co. Statement of Qualifications Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project Specification No. PW10-0128F Submitted to: Purchasing Office, Tacoma Public Utilities 3628 South 35th Street, Tacoma, WA 98409 June 8, 2010 Tab No. 1 - General Company Information & Team Structure Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project Project TAB NO.1 - GENERAL COMPANY INFORMATION AND TEAM STRUCTURE Kiewit Pacific Co., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Kiewit Infrastructure Group, Inc., will be the contracting party for this project, as indicated on Forms 3 and 4 in Tab No. 4 - Appendix C. As a wholly-owned subsidiary, none of the officers of Kiewit Pacific Co. (Kiewit) own stock. Incorporated on May 18, 1982, we can trace our history back to 1884, when Peter and Andrew Kiewit formed Kiewit Brothers, an Omaha masonry contracting partnership. Today, we are part of one of North America's largest and most respected construction and mining organizations. We take our place in the corporate structure of our parent company, Kiewit Infrastructure Group Inc., alongside Kiewit Construction Company and Kiewit Southern Co. Our affiliates and subsidiaries, as well as those of our parent company, operate from a network of offices throughout North America. We draw upon the Kiewit Corporation’s collective experience and personnel to assemble the strongest team possible for a given project. Therefore, work experience of such affiliates and subsidiaries is relevant in demonstrating our capabilities. For the Murray Morgan Bridge, we are supplementing our local talent with extensive moveable bridge expertise from our east coast operations, Kiewit Constructors, Inc. We are also utilizing our local subsidiary, General Construction Company (General), for mechanical and electrical expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • Hood Canal Bridge Assessment Is a Floating Bridge Impacting the Hood Canal Ecosystem?
    Hood Canal Bridge Assessment Is a Floating Bridge Impacting the Hood Canal Ecosystem? Purpose: The Hood Canal Bridge Ecosystem Impact Assessment will pinpoint the causes of high fish Project Duration mortality at the bridge and determine whether the bridge is lowering water quality in a 2016 2018 priority water body of Washington State. Solutions that do not substantially impact the bridge Phase 1 will then be identified and tested. Context: Estimated Total Coined “the wild side of Washington”, Project Cost many tourists and locals go to Hood $2.4 Million Canal to experience nature. However, vital elements of Hood Canal’s natural ecosystem are at risk. Wild salmon — including Chinook, chum, and Funds Raised steelhead — are listed as threatened To Date under the Endangered Species Act. Low $800,000 dissolved oxygen events periodically kill fish and ocean acidification threatens commercially important Project Status shellfish beds. Research Underway The Hood Canal Bridge carries State Route 104 across the northern outlet of Hood Canal, connecting the Olympic and Kitsap peninsulas. As a floating bridge, its pontoons span 83% of the width of Hood Canal and extend 15 feet into the upper water layer. Recent studies show higher mortality of juvenile steelhead Project Partners as they migrate past the bridge. Research also suggests that the bridge may disrupt water Hood Canal Coordinating circulation for all of Hood Canal, potentially increasing water temperatures, lowering dissolved Council oxygen levels and exacerbating the effects of ocean acidification and climate change. This dual Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribe threat to migrating fish and their local marine ecosystem may be limiting the effectiveness of Washington Department of millions already spent recovering steelhead, salmon and their habitat in Hood Canal.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Hydrodynamic Model of Puget Sound and Northwest Straits
    PNNL-17161 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Development of a Hydrodynamic Model of Puget Sound and Northwest Straits Z Yang TP Khangaonkar December 2007 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor Battelle Memorial Institute, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or Battelle Memorial Institute. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY operated by BATTELLE for the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Printed in the United States of America Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062; ph: (865) 576-8401 fax: (865) 576-5728 email: [email protected] Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161 ph: (800) 553-6847 fax: (703) 605-6900 email: [email protected] online ordering: http://www.ntis.gov/ordering.htm This document was printed on recycled paper.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download The
    Non-Profit Organization U.S. Postage PAID Permit No. 1 POSTAL CUSTOMER www.keypennews.org THE VOICE OF THE KEY PENINSULA September 2020 Vol. 47 No. 9 County Mandates Virtual School; Most Parents Want In-Person Teaching Schools must adjust to a landscape continually altered by COVID-19 while many in the community just want to get back to normal. SARA THOMPSON, KP NEWS reopening to creating the The Peninsula School District board of reopening guide approved directors approved a guide for the district by the board Aug. 13. to reopen for online teaching at its meeting Focus groups of 650 Aug. 13. Held virtually through Zoom and teachers, parents and streamed live on Facebook, the meeting students reviewed the initial included a discussion with Tacoma-Pierce guide draft. The partici- County Health Department Director Dr. pants emphasized a need for Anthony Chen about his mandate requiring balance between flexibility schools to open online classes only. and structure, and the need Chen clarified his July recommendation for better communication not to reopen any public or private school and lead time between each facilities. “I am not simply recommending reopening stage. Individual OSPI candidate Maia Espinoza speaks at a rally to fully reopen schools Aug. 13 across from the construction site but am requiring all schools to begin the schools will finetune the of Elementary No. 9 on Harbor Hill Drive in Gig Harbor. Photo: Lisa Bryan, KP News school year using distance learning until guide to meet the needs of local families. COVID-19 activity used by the state and in-person learning on a limited basis.
    [Show full text]