No. In the Supreme Court of the United States CHAD F. WOLF, ACTING SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. INNOVATION LAW LAB, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI NOEL J. FRANCISCO Solicitor General Counsel of Record JOSEPH H. HUNT Assistant Attorney General JEFFREY B. WALL EDWIN S. KNEEDLER Deputy Solicitors General SCOTT G. STEWART Deputy Assistant Attorney General MICHAEL R. HUSTON AUSTIN L. RAYNOR Assistants to the Solicitor General EREZ REUVENI ARCHITH RAMKUMAR Attorneys Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530-0001
[email protected] (202) 514-2217 QUESTIONS PRESENTED This case concerns a Department of Homeland Secu- rity (DHS) policy, known as the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP), which applies to aliens who have no legal entitlement to enter the United States but who depart from a third country and transit through Mexico to reach the United States land border. MPP is an exercise of DHS’s express authority under the Immi- gration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq., to return those aliens temporarily to Mexico during the pendency of their removal proceedings. See 8 U.S.C. 1225(b)(2)(C). The district court issued a universal pre- liminary injunction barring DHS from implementing MPP. The court of appeals affirmed. The courts con- cluded that MPP likely violates the INA and the Admin- istrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 551 et seq., 5 U.S.C. 701 et seq. The questions presented are: 1.