CA PDF Page 1 of 12

Energy East Pipeline Ltd. Energy East Project Consolidated Application Volume 10: Aboriginal Engagement

Appendix 10-63A

Aroland, Constance Lake, and Ginoogaming ’ Collective: Community Summaries

May 2016

CA PDF Page 2 of 12

Energy East Pipeline Ltd. Appendix Vol 10-63A Consolidated Application Aroland, Constance Lake and Ginoogaming First Nations’ Volume 10: Aboriginal Engagement Collective: Community Summaries

1.0 COMMUNITY SUMMARY – AROLAND, CONSTANCE LAKE AND GINOOGAMING FIRST NATIONS’ COLLECTIVE

The following summaries detail the Project-related interests and concerns raised by Aroland, Constance Lake, and Ginoogaming First Nations Collective (formerly Tribal Council) during engagement activities within the period from April 1, 2013 to December 31, 2015.

1.1 April 1, 2013 to April 18, 2014

Matawa First Nations is a tribal council of nine northern First Nations located in the (NAN) territory and operating as a non-profit corporation to provide technical and professional advisory services and programs to its member First Nations. A Board of Directors and a Chiefs’ Council govern the corporation with representatives from each represented community. These communities are , Constance Lake First Nation, Ginoogaming First Nation, Long Lake 58 First Nation, , Marten Falls First Nation, , and . Communities under Matawa First Nations for the purpose of engaging with the Energy East Pipeline Project include:  Aroland First Nation  Constance Lake First Nation  Ginoogaming First Nation

In April 2013, a representative of the Energy East Aboriginal engagement team sent an email to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) for Matawa First Nations tribal council requesting a meeting to discuss the proposed Energy East Project and share information. At a June 2013, meeting, Energy East shared project information with the Matawa First Nations tribal council CEO.

In July 2013, a Matawa First Nations consultant emailed an Energy East representative and stated that a regional approach under Matawa Tribal Council was under review.

Following the initial meetings with the Matawa First Nations engaging under the collective (see community summaries for Aroland First Nation, Ginoogaming First Nation and Constance Lake First Nation) notifications and mailouts from this point are communicated through the consultant as per the Matawa First Nations collective approach.

In August 2013, Energy East received a Traditional Knowledge (TK) and engagement proposal from the consultant representing Matawa First Nations.

In September 2013, Energy East discussed the Energy East engagement budgets, project information sharing and community meetings with the consultant for

May 2016 Page 1 of 11

CA PDF Page 3 of 12

Appendix Vol 10-63A Energy East Pipeline Ltd. Aroland, Constance Lake and Ginoogaming First Nations’ Consolidated Application Collective: Community Summaries Volume 10: Aboriginal Engagement

Matawa First Nations. The Letter of Agreement (LOA) regarding the initial engagement process between Energy East and Matawa First Nations and Band Council Resolutions (BCR) delegating authority from the individual First Nations to the Matawa First Nations to engage with Energy East on their behalf were discussed. The consultant advised that he would follow up with the LOA.

In November 2013, Energy East received all three LOAs and the accompanying BCRs confirming that Matawa First Nations would be engaging on the Project on behalf of member communities Ginoogaming, Constance Lake and Aroland First Nation.

In November 2013, the Matawa First Nations consultant emailed a request for mapping and Geographic Information System (GIS) map files in advance of the next Energy East Pipeline project meeting. Energy East confirmed that the request had been forwarded to the appropriate contact and informed the consultant that the next phase in the Project would include a multi-year consultation agreement.

In December 2013, the Matawa Tribal Council collective entered into dialogue with Energy East to establish meetings discussing the energy requirements for Energy East Project pump stations. The Matawa First Nations raised issues during engagement that included:  access to mapping  TK information collection  protection of land and water  access to technical support funding, regulatory support funding  TK support funding  community liaison support funding

In December 2013, a call was held between the Energy East Aboriginal engagement team member and the community consultant to discuss power requirements. The consultant was concerned that Energy East would begin with the engineering solution for power without First Nations' input and it would then be too late to collaborate with First Nations. Energy East advised that dialogue with the Ontario Energy Board (OEB) and Hydro One Networks regarding the Project’s energy requirements were underway and that Energy East, as the customer, would rely on the provincial processes regarding power development. The consultant expressed the lack of consultation on the energy issue and requested a meeting with TransCanada’s power personnel. The consultant indicated that a letter would also be forwarded to the Premier of Ontario, OEB and Hydro One networks.

Following this phone call, a TransCanada senior executive received a letter from the Chiefs of Aroland, Ginoogaming and Constance Lake First Nations to request consultation on the Energy East Pipeline Project before its National Energy Board (NEB) submission. The letter intended to make the Project aware that the three

Page 2 of 11 May 2016

CA PDF Page 4 of 12

Energy East Pipeline Ltd. Appendix Vol 10-63A Consolidated Application Aroland, Constance Lake and Ginoogaming First Nations’ Volume 10: Aboriginal Engagement Collective: Community Summaries

First Nations have expressed interest to provide the necessary power infrastructure to support the proposed Project and a further meeting was necessary. The Chiefs affirmed the interest to collaborate and leverage the substantial electricity requirements of pump stations in their territory and the possibility of joint-business arrangements to facilitate finance, construction and operation of transmission line services and support the development of additional renewable energy generation.

In December 2013, the Matawa First Nations consultant requested detailed maps as soon as possible, shape files compatible with ArcGIS software, detailed map images of the existing pipeline infrastructure, transmission line connections and proposed pipeline infrastructure, including pump stations and proposed transmission line infrastructure.

In January 2014, the Matawa collective met with Energy East to discuss the energy requirements for the proposed pump stations. Following this meeting it was agreed to collaborate on a solution to the power requirements for the pump stations along the Highway 11 corridor.

Communications and Engagement Funding Agreement (CEFA) negotiations occurred from December 2013 to March 2014. The CEFA is designed to provide funding to the First Nation to meaningfully participate in the engagement process.

In February 2014, an email was received from the Matawa First Nations consultant regarding the CEFA workplan and budget, advising that an amended proposal was forthcoming. The consultant advised that they were in discussion with Brookfield Power.

The Matawa Collective consultant and Energy East agreed to a workplan and budget for the CEFA in March 2014.

Discussions on the CEFA agreement language continued from March 2014 through April 2014 and are currently ongoing. Issues discussed during CEFA negotiations included pipeline integrity, Stage 1 Archaeological investigations on new disturbances and access to pipeline integrity work schedules and Aboriginal monitors during integrity work programs.

In early April 2014, Energy East introduced the community consultant to a member of the Aboriginal Contracting and Employment Team.

1.2 April 19, 2014 to August 31, 2014

In April 2014, Energy East received BCRs for the communities of Ginoogaming and Constance Lake for their LOAs. In May 2014, Energy East and Matawa First Nations discussed directing capacity funding to the communities for engagement activities. At a meeting in May 2014 with Brookfield Power, Matawa First Nations and Energy East,

May 2016 Page 3 of 11

CA PDF Page 5 of 12

Appendix Vol 10-63A Energy East Pipeline Ltd. Aroland, Constance Lake and Ginoogaming First Nations’ Consolidated Application Collective: Community Summaries Volume 10: Aboriginal Engagement

options for providing power to the Project in partnership with local First Nations were discussed. Energy East and Matawa First Nations continued to communicate regarding the CEFA and the TK study for the Project and the finalized CEFA, LOA and BCRs were received in June 2014.

In June 2014, Energy East met with Matawa First Nations and provided an update on the Project and the NEB process. Matawa First Nations requested a list of potential opportunities for Ginoogaming First Nation to provide services, including medical supplies, camps, emergency services and cleaning.

Between April 19 and August 31, 2014, Matawa First Nations did not raise additional Project-related issues or concerns through its engagement activities with Energy East.

Prior to the last quarter of 2014, the three First Nations were working collectively through Matawa First Nations Tribal Council for both engagement and administrative purposes. Since that time, Energy East was advised by these three First Nations, that they are engaging on the Project collectively through an independent consultant. Energy East will refer to these three communities collectively as the “Aroland, Constance Lake, and Ginoogaming First Nations Collective”.

1.3 September 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014

The three First Nations are currently engaged on the Project through an independent consultant and will be referred to as the Aroland, Constance Lake and Ginoogaming First Nations Collective (Collective).

In September 2014, Energy East met with representatives of the Collective along with their consultants to discuss potential power transmission solutions for a select number of Project pump stations in . The collective raised the issue of the need for an emergency response plan. Energy East responded that they are working to integrate Aboriginal input in emergency response planning.

In October 2014, the Collective contacted Energy East regarding a Project emergency management planning process across the communities’ traditional territory in relation to the Project. This would include gathering baseline information on current conditions, determining scenarios for potential accidents, spills and malfunctions during construction and operations, and determining the resources and capabilities that must be in place to address those scenarios if such response capabilities are not currently in place. Subsequently, Energy East met with the Collective and Consultants of Brook Field Power to discuss the energy requirements for the pump stations in the communities’ territory and transmission capacity in northern Ontario.

Page 4 of 11 May 2016

CA PDF Page 6 of 12

Energy East Pipeline Ltd. Appendix Vol 10-63A Consolidated Application Aroland, Constance Lake and Ginoogaming First Nations’ Volume 10: Aboriginal Engagement Collective: Community Summaries

Also in October 2014, Energy East and a representative of Aroland First Nation discussed the Matawa Energy Working Group. 1 Energy East was advised that the four First Nations – Long Lake #58 First Nation, Ginoogaming First Nation, Aroland First Nation and Constance Lake First Nation – had signed a Memorandum of Understanding among themselves committing to work together to explore transmission opportunities.

In November 2014, Energy East received an email from the Collective regarding the Project development area, integrity digs and pipeline conversion maps. The collective raised the following concerns:  potential impact of integrity digs during the proposed conversion process on cultural heritage resources and other environmental impacts  Project approach to conduct and assess overall excavations for integrity digs  archaeological assessments and other environmental considerations beyond pump station locations and watercourse crossing replacements

Requests for additional information included a copy of the archaeological assessment completed for the original gas mainline in the traditional territories of the communities represented by the Council, and an update of the Collective’s outstanding request for Geographic Information System (GIS) map data.

On a conference call in December 2014, Energy East responded to the concerns raised in the November 2014 email. Energy East also discussed the archeological investigative requirements for the Project and stated that Energy East would advise if a report regarding the archaeological investigations from the construction of the original natural gas line is identified. Energy East also advised they would follow up on the GIS mapping request.

Throughout November 2014, Energy East held discussions with the Collective regarding emergency response and the development of emergency management planning from an Aboriginal perspective. Matawa advised that First Nations are interested in conducting their own baseline study pertaining to emergency management, and would like to be involved as emergency service providers along the pipeline route.

Throughout December 2014, Energy East and the Collective discussed TK work for the Project. The Collective requested information on opportunities for Aboriginal communities along the line to compete for the following types of work associated with the Project: conversion work, integrity digs and related archaeology work, cultural heritage, environmental protection involvement, reviews and participation,

1 The Matawa Energy Working Group is a collective of Ginoogaming First Nation, Constance Lake First Nation, and Aroland First Nation working together to explore power transmission opportunities in northern Ontario.

May 2016 Page 5 of 11

CA PDF Page 7 of 12

Appendix Vol 10-63A Energy East Pipeline Ltd. Aroland, Constance Lake and Ginoogaming First Nations’ Consolidated Application Collective: Community Summaries Volume 10: Aboriginal Engagement

environmental and biodiversity enhancement projects, and after the digs, any necessary repair or reclamation work. The Collective also advised it intended to raise concerns regarding emergency response for the Project and lack of control over how potential spills would be managed.

1.4 January 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015

During this time period, Energy East provided the communities of the Collective with Project information and notifications about Energy East’s NEB filings and regulatory processes.

In January 2015, Energy East had a conference call with the Collective’s Consultant regarding the Letter of Intent (LOI) for the Matawa Energy Working Group. The LOI was emailed to Energy East. Also discussed were requests for the management and resolution of issues set forth by the Collective’s Consultant.

In January 2015, the Consultant requested a phone call from Energy East to discuss the next steps for the CEFA. In this request, the Collective’s Consultant advised of outstanding items related to the CEFA for discussion, including requests: to revise the CEFA, for community meetings to discuss the proposal and opportunities with

Energy East, and to provide the First Nations with opportunities for oversight during integrity digs and other significant conversion activity. Energy East advised that integrity digs were a part of ongoing routine operations and maintenance and not specifically related to conversion.

Subsequently in January 2015, Energy East received a telephone call from the Collective’s Consultant to advise that the Collective would like to establish a bilateral agreement with Energy East to resolve any issues related to the Project that might arise. It was advised that the Collective wanted to ensure that community issues and concerns were addressed in a timely manner. Energy East advised that it would continue to address the issues as they arose, and that it was currently in the process of designating personnel to address these issues, and that it would remain in communication. The Collective’s Consultant also expressed a concern about integrity work related to conversion and how it did not form a part of the Project application filed with the NEB. The Consultant advised that the concerns from the Collective’s communities centre around integrity dig and inspection work in the absence of community oversight. The Consultant further advised of a desire to develop a protocol or conditions of approval with Energy East surrounding cultural heritage and environmental work associated with the integrity work. Energy East advised that this request would be forwarded to appropriate Energy East personnel for consideration and follow-up.

Page 6 of 11 May 2016

CA PDF Page 8 of 12

Energy East Pipeline Ltd. Appendix Vol 10-63A Consolidated Application Aroland, Constance Lake and Ginoogaming First Nations’ Volume 10: Aboriginal Engagement Collective: Community Summaries

Energy East inquired with the Collective’s Consultant about the outstanding TK protocol. The Consultant advised that he did not see the need for a separate agreement for a TK protocol outside of the CEFA.

In January 2015, Energy East had a conference call with the Collective’s Consultant to discuss the Matawa Energy Working Group and the LOI. Following the call, Energy East forwarded the final version of the LOI regarding the

Matawa Transmission Working Group to the Collective’s Consultant. The Consultant approved the revisions and advised that he would prepare an internal package to have reviews conducted by the individual First Nations of the Collective and in order to draft the necessary supporting BCRs. The Collective’s Consultant advised Energy East that the communities were requesting quarterly engagement meetings through the CEFA with Energy East and requested that funding be provided to support internal community leadership meetings.

In January 2015, the Collective’s Consultant advised Energy East that representatives of the Collective’s First Nations were concerned about TransCanada’s engagement on ongoing integrity digs on the existing gas pipeline that have been observed.

Energy East requested a meeting to discuss the integrity digs issue with the communities and shared that a meeting with all the communities would include representatives of Senior Management for Energy East, if available. The Collective’s Consultant agreed and a number of dates were exchanged.

Energy East and the Collective’s Consultant exchanged email correspondence related to draft topics of discussion for the Bilateral Agreement under the existing CEFA.

The Collective’s Consultant advised that he understood there would be no funding for the Bilateral Agreement, but suggested there could be funding for specific studies and deliverables to advance the resolution of issues. Energy East followed up in February 2015 and suggested a Regional Technical Session, in lieu of a Bilateral Agreement with Energy East as a starting point for a resolution process. The Consultant stated that a Regional Technical Session would be considered.

In February 2015, Energy East received an email from the Collective’s Consultant advising that the Chief of Aroland First Nation had signed the BCR. The Consultant also advised that he would draft an agenda for the Regional Information Session that would address the concerns of the communities.

In February 2015, Energy East emailed the Consultant and representatives of the Collective attaching a reporting structure, and advised of the outstanding items related to the LOA and CEFA.

May 2016 Page 7 of 11

CA PDF Page 9 of 12

Appendix Vol 10-63A Energy East Pipeline Ltd. Aroland, Constance Lake and Ginoogaming First Nations’ Consolidated Application Collective: Community Summaries Volume 10: Aboriginal Engagement

In February 2015, Energy East met with the Chief, Councillors, Economic Development Officer, and Energy East Liaison of Constance Lake First Nation to have an initial discussion on the Project, and to answer any questions and identify any concerns. An overview of the CEFA was also provided. Constance Lake’s Chief articulated his views on industry engagement with Constance Lake First Nation prior to commencing any work on traditional lands, and that Constance Lake First Nation would need to consider community benefits such as revenue sharing, employment opportunities, and business opportunities before supporting the Energy East Project.

Energy East acknowledged this view and advised that while the Project was still in the early stages many potential employment opportunities remained available. Specific opportunities related to construction and integrity digs were discussed.

Beyond these discussions, an overview of the proposed March 2015 Regional Information Session format was shared. Also Energy East accepted an invitation to attend a tradeshow and set up a booth in Constance Lake First Nation in February 2015.

In February 2015, Energy East, including representation from Aboriginal Contracting and Employment for the Project, met with the Chief and Council, staff, and consultant of Aroland First Nation to discuss the Project and to provide an opportunity for these community representatives to ask questions or voice concerns related to the Project. The Chief discussed potential employment and business opportunities. The representative of Aboriginal Contracting and Employment reiterated that there are many potential business contracts related to the Project, and advised that prime contractors will be required to have an Aboriginal participation plan.

The Chief advised that Aroland First Nation supports development, but that development needs to be balanced with the needs of the community. The Chief advised further that Aroland First Nation is in the process of developing a regional emergency response and power generation business to service the region and resource development projects. The Aboriginal Contracting and Employmentrepresentative agreed to return to Aroland First Nation for an in-depth discussion on potential business and employment opportunities associated with Energy East.

The Chief advised that Aroland First Nation requires resources to educate its membership, so it can effectively participate in dialogue with Energy East. The Chief advised that Aroland First Nation is concerned about potential water contamination. Energy East offered to hold an Information Session to further inform the community about emergency response measures and noted that a Regional Information Session was planned for the Collective for March 2015, in which discipline experts from Energy East will answer technical questions about the Project.

The Chief also requested advance notification as to which areas will be disturbed for integrity digs and pump stations in order to determine whether this work will take

Page 8 of 11 May 2016

CA PDF Page 10 of 12

Energy East Pipeline Ltd. Appendix Vol 10-63A Consolidated Application Aroland, Constance Lake and Ginoogaming First Nations’ Volume 10: Aboriginal Engagement Collective: Community Summaries

place in culturally sensitive areas. Energy East assured that any such sensitive areas will be identified in the TK Study process, and that TK information will be used to identify overlap between proposed activities and potential areas of concern, and inform mitigation strategies.

In February 2015, Energy East spoke with the Consultant for the Collective to discuss the Project, and the Matawa Energy Working Group’s capacity to construct, own, and operate any new power or transmission facilities that could be required to provide power for proposed Project facilities in northern Ontario.

The Consultant raised the issue of integrity digs and inspections as they relate to the Energy East Project. Energy East responded that a request for further information had been made and a response was forthcoming. Energy East inquired into the status of the LOI and the Consultant provided a progress report. Energy East inquired as to the status of discussion between the Matawa Energy Working Group and Long Lake #58 First Nation. The Consultant advised that they would be meeting with Long Lake #58 in March 2015.

Energy East attended the Constance Lake tradeshow in February 2015. General TransCanada and Project specific documentation was provided at the booth. Questions raised by tradeshow attendees related to: general Project information, pipeline integrity, emergency response plans, employment opportunities with Energy East, historical resources management, and capacity development. Members of the Energy East Project team responded to questions, and shared information on the Energy East Community Investment Fund.

In March 2015, Energy East participated in a conference call with the Collective’s Consultant to continue discussion regarding potential opportunities for the Collective to provide power to the Project in northern Ontario. The Consultant advised that the communities were not comfortable with signing the LOI for transmission in the absence of Bilateral Agreement or an issues resolution table and that the communities would proceed with transmission development without support from the Energy East Project. Subsequently, the Regional Information Sessions were cancelled. The Consultant advised that the Collective remains interested in such opportunities but re- iterated that the Collective’s communities have general concerns with spills, accidents and emergency response and that transmission issues are most likely not a priority.

On the call, Energy East also inquired as to the status of the CEFA work plan and was advised that it was almost complete. The Collective’s Consultant discussed the Emergency Response proposal that the communities would bring forward and advised Energy East that integrity digs continue to be a concern in relation to environmental protection, cultural heritage and archaeological guidelines, and opportunities for the Collective’s members to participate in the process. Energy East responded by stating that there currently are no integrity digs scheduled for 2015 and that any work being completed along the pipeline is regularly scheduled maintenance.

May 2016 Page 9 of 11

CA PDF Page 11 of 12

Appendix Vol 10-63A Energy East Pipeline Ltd. Aroland, Constance Lake and Ginoogaming First Nations’ Consolidated Application Collective: Community Summaries Volume 10: Aboriginal Engagement

1.5 April 1, 2015 to June 30, 2015

During this time period, Energy East provided the Collective with notificiation of updated and supplemental Project information filed with the NEB in April 2015, and a press release describing an alteration to the Québec portion of the Project, and decision not to build a marine terminal and associated facilities at Cacouna, Québec.

In April 2015, the Collective’s Consultant forwarded the second signed Letter of Agreement for the Matawa Energy Working Group. A final report from the Matawa Energy Working group was received by Energy East in May 2015.

In April 2015, Energy East forwarded a letter to the Collective confirming both the decision by Energy East and TransCanada not to proceed with the Cacouna Energy East Marine Terminal, and Energy East’s intent to file an amendment to the Application with the NEB in the last quarter of 2015. The letter also outlined the importance of TK in the assessment of potential Project effects on the environment and communities. In the letter, Energy East encouraged the community to make Project specific issues and concerns known to Energy East at the earliest opportunity, as well as to conduct TK studies and submit a TK report by the end of 2015.

In May 2015, Energy East inquired with the Consultant about the status of the Interim Reports for the CEFA, and the timing around the completion of the TK report. Energy East advised that the timelines had changed, and further elaborated on the implications to existing CEFA and TK agreements. A quarterly CEFA report was forwarded to Energy East in May 2015.

In May 2015, Energy East’s Aboriginal Contracting and Employmentmet with Ginoogaming First Nation to discuss Energy East’s community profile program that involves the development of a database to identify and review the capacity of local Aboriginal businesses for potential contracting and employment opportunities with the Project. Energy East provided Ginoogaming First Nation with information to assist the community decide on its participation with the program as well as contact information should the community have additional inquiries.

Throughout June 2015, logistical information was exchanged between the Consultant and Energy East to set up a meeting to discuss the TK protocol on behalf of the Collective.

1.6 July 1, 2015 to September 30, 2015

During this time period, Energy East engaged with the Collective, as well as directly with the individual communities. For a summary of engagement with the communities, see the individual summaries – Aroland First Nation at Appendix 10-62A, Constance Lake First Nation at Appendix 10-70A, and Ginoogaming First Nation at Appendices 10-74A.

Page 10 of 11 May 2016

CA PDF Page 12 of 12

Energy East Pipeline Ltd. Appendix Vol 10-63A Consolidated Application Aroland, Constance Lake and Ginoogaming First Nations’ Volume 10: Aboriginal Engagement Collective: Community Summaries

1.7 October 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015

During this time period, Energy East provided the communities with Project information, including notification of supplemental information filed with the NEB in September and December 2015. Energy East also provided information packages specific to the conversion portion of the Project and emergency response and management.

Throughout October 2015, Energy East spoke to the Consultant to advise on the amended Transmission LOA budget and agreement, and to discuss the collective TK protocol agreements for the communities.

Also in October 2015, Energy East had a conference call with the Consultant to discuss the outstanding reporting for the CEFA, and the reporting for the Transmission LOA. The Consultant expressed the concerns of Aroland First Nation, Constance Lake First Nation and Ginoogaming First Nation with respect to integrity digs and maintenance work for the TransCanada Mainline. Energy East advised it would raise the integrity dig issue with appropriate personnel at TransCanada.

Following the call, the Consultant emailed Energy East to provide preliminary TK study insights and to advise that preparation is underway for TK interviews with the communities. The Consultant also shared that an improved understanding is being developed regarding the current traditional lands along the pipeline corridor. In November 2015, the Consultant spoke with Energy East, and requested a response regarding:  where the pump stations and other facilities would be constructed  the power supply needs for the pump stations

In December 2015, Energy East met with the Consultant to discuss the CEFA reporting and the TK study status. Also during the Reporting Period, Energy East and Constance Lake First Nation discussed the community’s concerns regarding general operations and maintenance work that is occasionally conducted on the TransCanada Mainline. This information was shared with the appropriate TransCanada personnel for further discussion.

In December 2015, Energy East corresponded with the Consultant regarding the Geographic Information System (GIS) data and map request process for the Project and forwarded a Project GIS transmittal and along with the Project GIS data and map request form and the File Transfer Protocol site link.

For a summary of direct engagement with the communities, see the individual summaries – Aroland First Nation at Appendix 10-62A, Constance Lake First Nation at Appendix 10-70A, and Ginoogaming First Nation at Appendices 10-74A.

May 2016 Page 11 of 11