DOCSLIB.ORG

Submitted to the Combined Faculties for the Natural Sciences and For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Submitted to the Combined Faculties for the Natural Sciences and For Dissertation submitted to the Combined Faculties for the Natural Sciences and for Mathematics of the Ruperto-Carola University of Heidelberg, Germany for the degree of Doctor of Natural Sciences presented by Diplombiologin Mascha Bischoff born in Aachen Date of oral examination: Pollination ecology of the New Zealand alpine flora Referees: Prof. Dr. Claudia Erbar Prof. Dr. Peter Leins Your head is humming, and it won’t go, in case you don’t know. The piper’s calling you to join him. (Led Zeppelin 1971) All data in the presented thesis was collected by myself. The plant phenology data was collected with Ms. Lisa R. Dobbie. The modelling in bee colour space was carried out in collaboration with Dr. Adrian Dyer, Monash University, Australia. The identification of floral scent compounds was done under supervisison of Dr. Andreas Jürgens, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Photographs were taken by myself, Frank Wellenreuther and Dr. Alastair W. Robertson. Table of contents 1 Summary........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 English summary.................................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Deutsche Zusammenfassung ................................................................................................................ 4 2 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 The principles of pollination ecology – then and now ......................................................................... 9 2.2 Pollination in the New Zealand flora – what do we know? ............................................................... 13 2.3 Do plants in alpine New Zealand depend on pollinator service at all? ............................................. 15 2.4 Are alpine pollination networks in New Zealand entirely generalised? ............................................ 17 2.5 Which floral traits maintain interaction patterns between flowers and insect visitors?.................... 19 3 Materials and methods................................................................................................... 21 3.1 Study area .......................................................................................................................................... 23 3.2 Study plants........................................................................................................................................ 25 3.3 Laboratory equipment........................................................................................................................ 27 3.4 Assessing the reproductive system ..................................................................................................... 27 3.4.1 Pollen/ovule ratios......................................................................................................................... 27 3.4.2 Pollen on stigma/ovule ratios under natural and experimental conditions .................................... 28 3.4.3 Fruit and seed set under natural and experimental conditions....................................................... 29 3.5 Analysing the plant-pollinator network.............................................................................................. 32 3.5.1 Plant phenology............................................................................................................................. 32 3.5.2 Insect phenology ........................................................................................................................... 32 3.5.3 Visitor observations....................................................................................................................... 33 3.5.4 Pollen library................................................................................................................................. 34 3.5.5 Pollen loads on insect bodies......................................................................................................... 35 3.5.6 Pollen loads on receptive stigmas.................................................................................................. 35 3.5.7 Analysis of pollination network parameters.................................................................................. 36 3.6 The floral attractants ......................................................................................................................... 37 3.6.1 Flower colour analysis .................................................................................................................. 37 3.6.2 Floral scent analysis ...................................................................................................................... 39 3.7 Data Analysis..................................................................................................................................... 41 4 Results ............................................................................................................................. 43 4.1 Summary of all experimental work..................................................................................................... 45 4.2 Reproductive system........................................................................................................................... 46 4.2.1 Pollen/ovule ratios......................................................................................................................... 46 4.2.2 Pollen on stigma/ovule ratios under natural and experimental conditions .................................... 48 4.2.3 Fruit and seed set under natural and experimental conditions....................................................... 52 4.2.4 Summary of the reproductive system results................................................................................. 55 4.3 Plant-pollinator network.................................................................................................................... 57 4.3.1 Plant phenology............................................................................................................................. 57 4.3.2 Insect phenology ........................................................................................................................... 58 4.3.3 Visitor observations....................................................................................................................... 59 4.3.4 Pollen loads on insect bodies......................................................................................................... 61 4.3.5 Pollen loads on receptive stigmas.................................................................................................. 65 4.3.6 Comparing the emerging networks ............................................................................................... 68 4.4 Floral attractants ............................................................................................................................... 72 4.4.1 Flower colour ................................................................................................................................ 72 4.4.2 Floral scent.................................................................................................................................... 74 5 Discussion........................................................................................................................ 89 5.1 Do plants in alpine New Zealand depend on pollinator service at all? ............................................. 91 5.2 Are alpine pollination networks in New Zealand entirely generalised? ............................................ 95 5.3 Which floral traits maintain interaction patterns between flowers and insect visitors?.................. 100 5.4 General conclusions and future research ........................................................................................ 106 6 References ..................................................................................................................... 107 7 Appendix ....................................................................................................................... 119 7.1 Details of plant species under investigation ....................................................................................121 7.2 Phenology of plant species under investigation............................................................................... 132 7.3 Spectral reflectance curves of plant species under investigation..................................................... 138 7.4 Insect visitor groups......................................................................................................................... 146 8 Acknowledgements....................................................................................................... 151 Index of figures Fig. 2.1 Plant animal mutualistic interaction matrices (Bascompte et al. 2003, modified)................................... 18 Fig. 3.1 The experimental site (a) in July during the ski season and (b) in February during the field season....... 24 Fig. 3.2 Map of the experimental area in the Remarkables ski field area. ............................................................ 25 Fig. 3.3 Pollinator exclusion experiments on Viola cunninghamii (Violaceae). ................................................. 30
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evolutionary Ecology of Pollination and Reproduction of Tropical Plants
    TROPICAL BIOLOGY AND CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT - Vol. V - Evolutionary Ecology af Pollination and Reproduction of Tropical Plants - M. Quesada, F. Rosas, Y. Herrerias-Diego, R. Aguliar, J.A. Lobo and G. Sanchez-Montoya EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY OF POLLINATION AND REPRODUCTION OF TROPICAL PLANTS M. Quesada and F. Rosas Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México. Y. Herrerias-Diego Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Michoacán, México. R. Aguilar IMBIV - UNC - CONICET, C.C. 495,(5000) Córdoba, Argentina J.A. Lobo Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica G. Sanchez-Montoya Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México. Keywords: Pollination, tropical plants, diversity, mating systems, gender, conservation. Contents 1. Introduction 1.1. The Life Cycle of Angiosperms 1.2. Overview of Angiosperm Diversity 2. Degree of specificity of pollination system 3. Diversity of pollination systems 3.1. Beetle Pollination (Cantharophily) 3.2. Lepidoptera 3.2.1. Butterfly Pollination (Psychophily) 3.2.2. Moth Pollination (Phalaenophily) 3.3. Hymenoptera 3.3.1. Bee PollinationUNESCO (Melittophily) – EOLSS 3.3.2. Wasps 3.4. Fly Pollination (Myophily and Sapromyophily) 3.5. Bird Pollination (Ornitophily) 3.6. Bat PollinationSAMPLE (Chiropterophily) CHAPTERS 3.7. Pollination by No-Flying Mammals 3.8. Wind Pollination (Anemophily) 3.9. Water Pollination (Hydrophily) 4. Reproductive systems of angiosperms 4.1. Strategies that Reduce Selfing and/or Promote Cross-Pollination. 4.2. Self Incompatibility Systems 4.2.1. Incidence of Self Incompatibility in Tropical Forest 4.3. The Evolution of Separated Sexes from Hermaphroditism 4.3.1. From Distyly to Dioecy ©Encyclopedia Of. Life Support Systems (EOLSS) TROPICAL BIOLOGY AND CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT - Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Memoirs of the Queensland Museum | Culture
    Memoirs of the Queensland Museum | Culture Volume 7 Part 1 The Leichhardt diaries Early travels in Australia during 1842-1844 Edited by Thomas A. Darragh and Roderick J. Fensham © Queensland Museum PO Box 3300, South Brisbane 4101, Australia Phone: +61 (0) 7 3840 7555 Fax: +61 (0) 7 3846 1226 Web: qm.qld.gov.au National Library of Australia card number ISSN 1440-4788 NOTE Papers published in this volume and in all previous volumes of the Memoirs of the Queensland Museum may be reproduced for scientific research, individual study or other educational purposes. Properly acknowledged quotations may be made but queries regarding the republication of any papers should be addressed to the Editor in Chief. A Guide to Authors is displayed on the Queensland Museum website qm.qld.gov.au A Queensland Government Project 30 June 2013 The Leichhardt diaries. Early travels in Australia during 1842–1844 Diary No 2 28 December - 24 July 1843 (Hunter River - Liverpool Plains - Gwydir Des bords du Tanaïs au sommet du Cédar. - Darling Downs - Moreton Bay) Sur le bronze et le marbre et sur le sein des [Inside the front cover are two newspaper braves cuttings of poetry, The Lost Ship and The Et jusque dans le cœur de ces troupeaux Neglected Wife. Also there are manuscript d’esclaves stanzas of three pieces of poetry. The first Qu’il foulait tremblans sous son char. in German, the second in English from Jacob Faithful by Frederick Maryatt, and the third [On a reef lashed by the plaintive wave in French.] the navigator from afar sees whitening on the shore Die Gestalt, die die erste Liebe geweckt a tomb near the edge, dumped by the Vergisst sich nie billows; Um den grünsten Fleck in der Wüste der time has not yet darkened the narrow Zeit stone Schwebt zögernd sie and beneath the green fabric of the briar From the German poem of an English and of the ivy lady.
    [Show full text]
  • Entomology of the Aucklands and Other Islands South of New Zealand: Lepidoptera, Ex­ Cluding Non-Crambine Pyralidae
    Pacific Insects Monograph 27: 55-172 10 November 1971 ENTOMOLOGY OF THE AUCKLANDS AND OTHER ISLANDS SOUTH OF NEW ZEALAND: LEPIDOPTERA, EX­ CLUDING NON-CRAMBINE PYRALIDAE By J. S. Dugdale1 CONTENTS Introduction 55 Acknowledgements 58 Faunal Composition and Relationships 58 Faunal List 59 Key to Families 68 1. Arctiidae 71 2. Carposinidae 73 Coleophoridae 76 Cosmopterygidae 77 3. Crambinae (pt Pyralidae) 77 4. Elachistidae 79 5. Geometridae 89 Hyponomeutidae 115 6. Nepticulidae 115 7. Noctuidae 117 8. Oecophoridae 131 9. Psychidae 137 10. Pterophoridae 145 11. Tineidae... 148 12. Tortricidae 156 References 169 Note 172 Abstract: This paper deals with all Lepidoptera, excluding the non-crambine Pyralidae, of Auckland, Campbell, Antipodes and Snares Is. The native resident fauna of these islands consists of 42 species of which 21 (50%) are endemic, in 27 genera, of which 3 (11%) are endemic, in 12 families. The endemic fauna is characterised by brachyptery (66%), body size under 10 mm (72%) and concealed, or strictly ground- dwelling larval life. All species can be related to mainland forms; there is a distinctive pre-Pleistocene element as well as some instances of possible Pleistocene introductions, as suggested by the presence of pairs of species, one member of which is endemic but fully winged. A graph and tables are given showing the composition of the fauna, its distribution, habits, and presumed derivations. Host plants or host niches are discussed. An additional 7 species are considered to be non-resident waifs. The taxonomic part includes keys to families (applicable only to the subantarctic fauna), and to genera and species.
    [Show full text]
  • NZ Botanical Society Index
    Topic Type Author Year Date Number Page Ribes uva-crispa L. (Grossulariaceae) Cover illustration 1985 August 1 Matai planting in Auckland Domain Note Cameron, Ewen 1985 August 1 4 Auckland Botanical Society Society 1985 August 1 4 Rotorua Botanical Society Society 1985 August 1 5 Botany news from the University of Waikato University Silvester, Prof. Warwick B 1985 August 1 6 Forest Research Institute Herbarium (NZFRI) Herbarium Ecroyd, Chris 1985 August 1 7 Flora of New Zealand, Volume IV, Naturalised Dicotyledons Research Webb, Colin 1985 August 1 7 Clematis vitalba - "Old Man's Beard" Note West, Carol 1985 August 1 8 New Davallia in Puketi State Forest Note Wright, Anthony 1985 August 1 9 Forest ecology studies in Puketi Forest, Northland. Note Bellingham, Peter 1985 August 1 10 Miro (Prumnopitys ferruginea) Species Cameron, Ewen 1985 August 1 11 Lucy M Cranwell Lecture Note 1985 August 1 11 Lichen Workshop Meeting Wright, Anthony 1985 August 1 11 Hoheria seed Request Bates, David 1985 August 1 12 New Zealand Herbarium Curators Meeting Herbarium 1985 August 1 12 Systematics Association of New Zealand Conference Meeting 1985 August 1 12 NZ Marine Sciences Society Conference Meeting 1985 August 1 12 Ecological Society Conference and AGM Meeting 1985 August 1 13 Bryophyte Foray Meeting 1985 August 1 13 NZ Genetical Society Conference Meeting 1985 August 1 13 Theses in Botanical Science List 1985 August 1 13 Penium spp. (Desmidiaceae) Cover illustration 1985 December 2 Canterbury Botanical Society Society 1985 December 2 4 Wellington Botanical
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 73, Number
    New Zealand Science Review Vol 73 (3–4) 2016 Symposium on Systematics and Biodiversity in honour of Dr Dennis P. Gordon Official Journal of the New Zealand Association of Scientists ISSN 0028-8667 New Zealand Science Review Vol 73 (3–4) 2016 Official Journal of the New Zealand Association of Scientists P O Box 1874, Wellington www.scientists.org.nz A forum for the exchange of views on science and science policy Managing Editor: Allen Petrey Contents Guest Editor: Daniel Leduc Production Editor: Geoff Gregory Editorial .....................................................................................................................................................61 Proceedings of a Symposium on Systematics and Biodiversity: Past, Present and Future, National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, Wellington, April 2016 Bryozoa—not a minor phylum – Dennis P. Gordon and Mark J. Costello ..................................................63 The contribution of Dennis P. Gordon to the understanding of New Zealand Bryozoa – Abigail M Smith, Philip Bock and Peter Batson ................................................................................67 The study of taxonomy and systematics enhances ecological and conservation science – Ashley A. Rowden ............................................................................................................................72 Taxonomic research, collections and associated databases – and the changing science scene in New Zealand – Wendy Nelson .............................................................................79
    [Show full text]
  • Pollination and Evolution of Plant and Insect Interaction JPP 2017; 6(3): 304-311 Received: 03-03-2017 Accepted: 04-04-2017 Showket a Dar, Gh
    Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2017; 6(3): 304-311 E-ISSN: 2278-4136 P-ISSN: 2349-8234 Pollination and evolution of plant and insect interaction JPP 2017; 6(3): 304-311 Received: 03-03-2017 Accepted: 04-04-2017 Showket A Dar, Gh. I Hassan, Bilal A Padder, Ab R Wani and Sajad H Showket A Dar Parey Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Science and Technology, Shalimar, Jammu Abstract and Kashmir-India Flowers exploit insects to achieve pollination; at the same time insects exploit flowers for food. Insects and flowers are a partnership. Each insect group has evolved different sets of mouthparts to exploit the Gh. I Hassan food that flowers provide. From the insects' point of view collecting nectar or pollen is rather like fitting Sher-e-Kashmir University of a key into a lock; the mouthparts of each species can only exploit flowers of a certain size and shape. Agricultural Science and This is why, to support insect diversity in our gardens, we need to plant a diversity of suitable flowers. It Technology, Shalimar, Jammu is definitely not a case of 'one size fits all'. While some insects are generalists and can exploit a wide and Kashmir-India range of flowers, others are specialists and are quite particular in their needs. In flowering plants, pollen grains germinate to form pollen tubes that transport male gametes (sperm cells) to the egg cell in the Bilal A Padder embryo sac during sexual reproduction. Pollen tube biology is complex, presenting parallels with axon Sher-e-Kashmir University of guidance and moving cell systems in animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollination Ecology and Evolution of Epacrids
    Pollination Ecology and Evolution of Epacrids by Karen A. Johnson BSc (Hons) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania February 2012 ii Declaration of originality This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis, nor does the thesis contain any material that infringes copyright. Karen A. Johnson Statement of authority of access This thesis may be made available for copying. Copying of any part of this thesis is prohibited for two years from the date this statement was signed; after that time limited copying is permitted in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Karen A. Johnson iii iv Abstract Relationships between plants and their pollinators are thought to have played a major role in the morphological diversification of angiosperms. The epacrids (subfamily Styphelioideae) comprise more than 550 species of woody plants ranging from small prostrate shrubs to temperate rainforest emergents. Their range extends from SE Asia through Oceania to Tierra del Fuego with their highest diversity in Australia. The overall aim of the thesis is to determine the relationships between epacrid floral features and potential pollinators, and assess the evolutionary status of any pollination syndromes. The main hypotheses were that flower characteristics relate to pollinators in predictable ways; and that there is convergent evolution in the development of pollination syndromes.
    [Show full text]
  • Leaf Photosynthesis and Simulated Carbon Budget of Gentiana
    Journal of Plant Ecology Leaf photosynthesis and simulated VOLUME 2, NUMBER 4, PAGES 207–216 carbon budget of Gentiana DECEMBER 2009 doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtp025 straminea from a decade-long Advanced Access published on 20 November 2009 warming experiment available online at www.jpe.oxfordjournals.org Haihua Shen1,*, Julia A. Klein2, Xinquan Zhao3 and Yanhong Tang1 1 Environmental Biology Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8506, Japan 2 Department of Forest, Rangeland & Watershed Stewardship, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA and 3 Northwest Plateau Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, Qinghai, China *Correspondence address. Environmental Biology Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8506, Japan. Tel: +81-29-850-2481; Fax: 81-29-850-2483; E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Aims 2) Despite the small difference in the temperature environ- Alpine ecosystems may experience larger temperature increases due ment, there was strong tendency in the temperature acclima- to global warming as compared with lowland ecosystems. Informa- tion of photosynthesis. The estimated temperature optimum of tion on physiological adjustment of alpine plants to temperature light-saturated photosynthetic CO2 uptake (Amax) shifted changes can provide insights into our understanding how these ;1°C higher from the plants under the ambient regime to plants are responding to current and future warming. We tested those under the OTCs warming regime, and the Amax was sig- the hypothesis that alpine plants would exhibit acclimation in pho- nificantly lower in the warming-acclimated leaves than the tosynthesis and respiration under long-term elevated temperature, leaves outside the OTCs.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollination Syndrome Table Pollinator Flower Characteristics Nectar Color Shape Odor Bloom Time Pollen Guides Bat
    POLLINATION SYNDROME TABLE POLLINATOR FLOWER CHARACTERISTICS NECTAR COLOR SHAPE ODOR BLOOM TIME POLLEN GUIDES BAT Strong, musty, None Ample fruity Funnel or bowl shaped BEE Fresh, mild, Limited; often pleasant sticky, scented UV Closed lip with hori- zontal landing platform BUTTERFLY Faint but fresh Limited Composite with long, narrow tubes and landing platform HUMMINGBIRD None None Limited Tubular, hangs down- ward or sideways BATS Saguaro Agave Pollinator Characteristics: Color vision in white, green, purple range Good sense of smell, especially strong fragrances Large tongue to suck up hidden nectar Hairy head and body Good flyer Active during the night Flower Characteristics: BLOOM NECTAR COLOR SHAPE ODOR POLLEN TIME GUIDES Funnel or White or Strong, bowl shaped, Nighttime None Ample pale green high above musty, fruity ground Pollinated plants in Tohono Chul: Saguaro, Organ Pipe, Agave BEES Desert Willow Prickly Pear Mexican Sunflower Salvia Pollinator Characteristics: Large, compound eyes Good color vision in ultra-violet (UV), yellow, blue and green range Good sense of smell “Pack” pollen on hairy underside and between hairy legs to carry it back to nests to feed larvae Active during the day Flower Characteristics: BLOOM NECTAR COLOR SHAPE ODOR POLLEN TIME GUIDES Closed lip Bright white, with Limited; Fresh, mild, yellow, blue or horizontal Daytime Present often sticky, pleasant UV landing scented platform Pollinated plants in Tohono Chul: Carpenter bees: Desert Senna, Ocotillo (cheating), Squash, Tomatoes Bumblebees:
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Comparison of the Pollinators for the Purple-Fringed
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Supervised Undergraduate Student Research Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects and Creative Work Fall 1-2006 Identification and Comparison of the ollinatP ors for the Purple- fringed Orchids Platanthera psycodes and P.grandiflora John Richard Evans University of Tennessee-Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj Recommended Citation Evans, John Richard, "Identification and Comparison of the ollinatP ors for the Purple-fringed Orchids Platanthera psycodes and P.grandiflora" (2006). Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/953 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Supervised Undergraduate Student Research and Creative Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Identification and Comparison of the Pollinators for the Purple-fringed Orchids Platanthera psycodes and P. grandijlora John R. Evans Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology The University of Tennessee Advised by John A. Skinner Professor, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology The University of Tennessee Abstract The pollination ecologies of the two purple-fringed orchids, Platanthera psycodes and P. grandiflora, are compared to test the prediction that, despite an extraordinary similarity in appearance, internal differences in the position and shape of fertile structures contributes to a distinct difference in their respective pollination ecologies. Field observations and experiments conducted during the 2003 flowering season in Great Smoky Mountains National Park revealed a number of effective pollen vectors not previously documented for P.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACTS 117 Systematics Section, BSA / ASPT / IOPB
    Systematics Section, BSA / ASPT / IOPB 466 HARDY, CHRISTOPHER R.1,2*, JERROLD I DAVIS1, breeding system. This effectively reproductively isolates the species. ROBERT B. FADEN3, AND DENNIS W. STEVENSON1,2 Previous studies have provided extensive genetic, phylogenetic and 1Bailey Hortorium, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853; 2New York natural selection data which allow for a rare opportunity to now Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY 10458; 3Dept. of Botany, National study and interpret ontogenetic changes as sources of evolutionary Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, novelties in floral form. Three populations of M. cardinalis and four DC 20560 populations of M. lewisii (representing both described races) were studied from initiation of floral apex to anthesis using SEM and light Phylogenetics of Cochliostema, Geogenanthus, and microscopy. Allometric analyses were conducted on data derived an undescribed genus (Commelinaceae) using from floral organs. Sympatric populations of the species from morphology and DNA sequence data from 26S, 5S- Yosemite National Park were compared. Calyces of M. lewisii initi- NTS, rbcL, and trnL-F loci ate later than those of M. cardinalis relative to the inner whorls, and sepals are taller and more acute. Relative times of initiation of phylogenetic study was conducted on a group of three small petals, sepals and pistil are similar in both species. Petal shapes dif- genera of neotropical Commelinaceae that exhibit a variety fer between species throughout development. Corolla aperture of unusual floral morphologies and habits. Morphological A shape becomes dorso-ventrally narrow during development of M. characters and DNA sequence data from plastid (rbcL, trnL-F) and lewisii, and laterally narrow in M.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Is the Alpine Flora Comparatively Robust Against Climatic Warming?
    diversity Review Why Is the Alpine Flora Comparatively Robust against Climatic Warming? Christian Körner * and Erika Hiltbrunner Department of Environmental Sciences, Botany, University of Basel, Schönbeinstrasse 6, 4056 Basel, Switzerland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The alpine belt hosts the treeless vegetation above the high elevation climatic treeline. The way alpine plants manage to thrive in a climate that prevents tree growth is through small stature, apt seasonal development, and ‘managing’ the microclimate near the ground surface. Nested in a mosaic of micro-environmental conditions, these plants are in a unique position by a close-by neighborhood of strongly diverging microhabitats. The range of adjacent thermal niches that the alpine environment provides is exceeding the worst climate warming scenarios. The provided mountains are high and large enough, these are conditions that cause alpine plant species diversity to be robust against climatic change. However, the areal extent of certain habitat types will shrink as isotherms move upslope, with the potential areal loss by the advance of the treeline by far outranging the gain in new land by glacier retreat globally. Keywords: biodiversity; high-elevation; mountains; phenology; snow; species distribution; treeline; topography; vegetation; warming Citation: Körner, C.; Hiltbrunner, E. Why Is the Alpine Flora Comparatively Robust against 1. Introduction Climatic Warming? Diversity 2021, 13, The alpine world covers a small land fraction, simply since mountains get narrower 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/ with elevation [1]. Globally, 2.6% of the terrestrial area outside Antarctica meets the criteria d13080383 for ‘alpine’ [2,3], a terrain still including a lot of barren or glaciated areas, with the actual plant covered area closer to 2% (an example for the Eastern Alps in [4]).
    [Show full text]