<<

Social Science in Humanitarian Action Assessing key considerations for practices, and mourning in epidemics

Funeral of a 12-year-old girl in Ikoko Impenge in the Province of Équateur of the Democratic Republic of Congo. PHOTO: © NATHALIE BERTRAMS

This Practical Approaches brief highlights key considerations for rapidly appraising burial/funerary practices and beliefs around death/dying during an epidemic. It provides guidance on the relevant social science knowledge required to adapt epidemic preparedness and response to the local context. By using this tool, an overview of local knowledge, meaning and practice will be gained, which can help inform programming related to death and burial.

ocal social scientists or those in operational can then serve to support the design of more specific research roles embedded in an epidemic social science research questions and tools for primary Lresponse should use this tool to gain a background data collection as part of the epidemic response understanding of the contextual aspects that shape (e.g. community feedback mechanisms; Knowledge, vulnerability to a particular disease. This background Attitudes and Practices surveys).

Practical Approaches Issue 2 | April 2020 1 Social Science in Humanitarian Action

Please note that these are guiding questions. Questions modules Beliefs and practices vary widely across cultures, This tool is comprised of six modules that provide so some questions may be more relevant than insight into beliefs around death and the ; others in different contexts. Additionally, the nature post-death practices and those related to preparing of the disease itself will make some questions more the body, and the meaning this has for people; burial/ relevant than others, for example the transmission practicalities; practicalities of the rites pathways (contact, airborne, vector, etc.) of the and ceremonies following death, the meaning this pathogens will make particular issues, such as has for people and the perceived consequences of , more salient. Questions should be tailored not following customary practice. It also provides to a particular context and disease. insight into other relevant ceremonies related to Methodologies for use during death; alternative practices, looking at past local experiences, and appraising what adaptations would remote context analysis

Practical Approaches be acceptable and what processes could be followed. The following methods can be used for the rapid assessment of burial practices, death and The following research questions are relevant to mourning in the context of epidemic response: each of the methods listed above, but with careful adaptations (i.e. questions for a literature review will be • Desk review of relevant anthropological/ worded differently to those for use with communities). sociological literature to assess what we already know and provide critical evidence of knowledge These topics may be sensitive and asking these gaps. questions could arouse strong emotion and/or concern around intention. This means rapport- • Interviews with local relevant social scientists building, honesty, mutual respect and reinforcing trust and humanitarian/development agencies to is vital before, during and after the collection of this provide up-to-date information about social information. Recommended steps: science research and community engagement initiatives. • Give your name and where you are from, thank them for welcoming you to the community. • Stakeholder interviews in affected communities, community meetings and focus group • Explain why you are there, your job and why you discussions according to relevant social want to talk with them specifically. dimensions (age, gender, ethnicity, , • Explain you will keep their personal information income, etc.). private and invite them to feel comfortable with you. Where possible, community walk-throughs, • • Allow them to refrain from answering certain observations and other rapid ethnographic questions if they do not feel comfortable (however, techniques. if this happens, it provides information in itself by This assessment should be used in tandem indicating the particular sensitivity of the topic). with exploring, together with stakeholders and • Ask if they have any questions and be willing to communities, appropriate ways to adapt and answer questions about why you are there. react to the disease. It is not a mere analytical exercise, but rather an action-research one. • Be honest – if you don’t know, you don’t know and This assessment should be an integral part of that is okay. an ethnographic context analysis (see SSHAP • Inform them of the next steps and follow-up. Practical Approaches briefs Rapid Remote Context Analysis Tool (RR-CAT) in Epidemics and Rapid Identifying the proper community entry channels Anthropological Assessments in the Field), which and going through trusted leadership is crucial. focuses on rapidly gathering information around Convenient meeting times and places should be an operational context (including population agreed with community members (e.g. not during a movement, livelihoods, and trade patterns). feast day or celebration).

2 Social Science in Humanitarian Action

Complementary method MODULE 3 Burial and cremation How are bodies put to rest (cremation/burial/ It can be helpful to elicit a narrative from the • other)? Where are bodies supposed to be buried/ participant about normal burial/cremation and cremated (e.g. hometown of their kin, particular mourning practices in order to root the questions natural sites such as the forest etc.)? What meaning in a recent experience. Ask the participant to recall do burial/cremation sites have? Who can access a recent burial and the subsequent mourning. Whilst these burial/cremation sites? they describe what happened, the data collector can use the questions and prompts to elicit further details. • Who is responsible for physically transporting and burying the bodies? How is the body usually transported (e.g. ambulance, stretchers, MODULE 1 Meanings of death and the motorcycle)? afterlife • When dealing with high mortality: Is there space Practical Approaches • What happens after people die? What does the in ? How are decisions made over afterlife look like? What is the relationship between expansions of burial sites? Are people adequately the dead and the living? How does this differ across informed of any official procedures for the removal relevant populations (ethnicity, religion, etc.)? of bodies, and timing and procedures for burial/ • Is there a relation between the cremation? and the type of practices necessary (e.g. • If the person has died in hospital or in a treatment suspicions of witchcraft, unexplained death)? unit, are the family adequately informed? Can the family adequately engage with the body? Is the MODULE 2 Post-death practices, burial site agreed upon by the mourning family? including preparing the body What is the degree of participation of communities • Who should be informed when a person dies (e.g. in these processes? family members, religious/community leaders)? MODULE 4 Internment/cremation • How long is it customary for people to wait between death and the burial/funeral? and rites • How is the body prepared for burial/cremation (e.g. • Can you describe the rites or ceremonies that washing, clothing, closure of eyes and mouth)? How follow a person’s death? When does the burial or does this vary according to area/religion/gender/ cremation come into this? What (if any) are the ethnic group, etc.? mourning rites that must then be followed? • What is the meaning behind body preparation and • Who is responsible for organising each of these the different practices? steps? • Who is involved in preparing the body (position in • Who attends the different events (e.g. close the family, gender, age, professionals)? family, extended family, community)? How does • What elements of the preparation of the body (if attendance vary depending on the status of the any) contribute to spreading infection of disease deceased? How does this vary according to ______? How does this vary according to area/ religion/gender/ethnic group, etc.? religion/gender/ethnic group, etc.? • How do these practices vary depending on the • What are the social-cultural consequences if the status/religion/gender/ethnic group, etc. of the body is not prepared appropriately? Are there other deceased? rituals that can be used to compensate for deviations • How are condolences expressed when someone in the customary way of preparing the body? dies (e.g. gifts)? What are the appropriate • Is there a period of time in which the body is expressions of solidarity and support when honoured (e.g. a wake) before burial/cremation? engaging with those mourning? How long is it? Where is it conducted? Who • What meaning do these processes hold for the participates in it? deceased person/the community/the family?

2 3 Social Science in Humanitarian Action

• What elements of the processes described MODULE 6 Alternative Credits are risky in terms of the transmission of This SSHAP Practical disease______? (e.g. related to persistence practices and adaptations Approaches brief was prepared by Santiago of the pathogen and the potential ways of • Are there situations that allow for the Ripoll from the Institute transmission) suspension or alteration of the normal of Development burial practices? Have there been high Studies (IDS), and • What are the socio-cultural and mortalities and requirements of changes in Ingrid Gercama and economic consequences of not following Theresa Jones from burials in the past e.g. during conflict? conventional practices? (e.g. the deceased Anthrologica. Are there local cultural understandings not moving to the afterlife, a curse from • Citation: Ripoll S., ancestors, allocation of inheritance). of epidemic disease and mortality? Are Gercama I. and Jones T. there previous experiences of shifting (2020) Assessing key considerations for burial MODULE 5 practices accordingly (e.g. using gloves, Ceremonies and practices, death and disinfectants)? Are there culturally mourning in epidemics, Practical Approaches rituals acceptable ways of changing only those SSHAP Practical • Are there other mourning rituals or Approaches Issue 2, practices that are high risk of transmission? death related gatherings that represent a UNICEF, IDS & congregation of people commemorating • Who makes the decision about how a burial Anthrologica. a death? Do they represent risk of can be adjusted? Who would need to be This document has contagion? involved in these discussions? What should been funded by the U.S. Agency for International the process be? (Note: alternative practices • In some cultures, there are funerary Development (USAID) practices that apply to other people related should be made in agreement with Office of U.S. Foreign to the deceased (e.g. ritual isolation and communities and the mourning families). Disaster Assistance (OFDA) . However, cleansing of ). What are these • Has disease ______ever required the the views expressed practices and do they present a risk of deployment of burial teams? How are herein are those of contagion of disease ______or delayed care? these perceived by different segments of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect • Is there a risk attached to the catering of the population? How do they engage with those of USAID or food and drink during rites and ceremonies? families and communities when a death OFDA, or the partners occurs? How could these burial teams in the Social Science for • Are there exceptional circumstances in Humanitarian Action place that mean that people are not being be more trusted (e.g. composed of local Platform (SSHAP). buried according to custom (e.g. , inhabitants)? IDS_Master Logo armed conflict)? How does this affect the • How do people react to the use of body bags? This is an Open Access transmission of disease ______? If negative, can body bags be adapted? paper distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International About licence (CC BY), which The Social Science in Humanitarian Action Platform (SSHAP) aims to establish networks of social permits unrestricted scientists with regional and subject expertise to rapidly provide insight, analysis and advice, tailored to use, distribution, and demand and in accessible forms, to better design and implement emergency responses. SSHAP is a reproduction in any medium, provided the partnership between the Institute of Development Studies (IDS), the London School of Hygiene and original authors and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), Anthrologica and UNICEF Communication for Development (C4D). source are credited and any modifications or adaptations are indicated. http:// creativecommons. Social Science in Humanitarian Action org/licenses/by/4.0/ E [email protected] W www.socialscienceinaction.org legalcode. © SSHAP 2020 This Practical Approaches brief is part of a portfolio on Social Science Lessons Learned in Epidemics and was supported by the Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA)

4