Animals in the Gift Exchange Diplomacy of the Ilkhanate (1260-1335)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Animals in the Gift Exchange Diplomacy of the Ilkhanate (1260-1335) האוניברסיטה העברית בירושלים The Hebrew University of Jerusalem הפקולטה למדעי הרוח Faculty of Humanities החוג ללימוד האסלאם והמזרח התיכון Department of Islamic and Middle Eastern Studies עבודה סמינריונית מחקרית בנושא: Animals in the Gift Exchange Diplomacy of the Ilkhanate (1260-1335) In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master in Islamic and Middle Eastern Studies The Hebrew University of Jerusalem May 2019 מוגש על ידי לאון וולפובסקי Submitted by Leon Volfovsky בהנחיית פרופסור מיכל בירן Supervisor: Prof. Michal Biran Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Chapter 1: Livestock Animals .................................................................................................................. 9 Chapter 2: Hunting Animals .................................................................................................................. 30 Chapter 3: Exotic Animals ..................................................................................................................... 53 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................................... 70 Bibliography ......................................................................................................................................... 81 Appendix I – List of Delegations and Gifts ............................................................................................ 93 Abstract Hülegü Khan (1256-1265) established the Ilkhanid dynasty (1256-1335) following a military campaign in the Middle East. The dynasty was one of the Mongol dynasties that rose to power as the result of the dissolution of the Mongol Empire, established by Chinggis Khan (1206-1227). The Ilkhans maintained diplomatic relations with multiple contemporary dynasties in Asia, Europa and Africa, both Mongol and otherwise, including also hostile polities, such as the Mamluk Sultanate of Egypt (with which peace was established in 1323). These diplomatic relations involved gift exchange, of which animals played a significant role. This thesis examines how did the establishment of the Ilkhanid dynasty in the Iranian region and the dynasty’s diplomatic relations influence the movement of animals in Eurasia. Who were the individuals who chose the exchanged animals; why were the animals chosen as diplomatic gifts; what was the role of the animals in comparison to other royal gifts; which transformations in the exchange of animals occurred throughout the Ilkhanid period. This adds another facet to the ongoing study of mobility of people, knowledge, commodities and artifacts across Eurasia due to Mongol policies. While some arenas of exchange, such as historiography, astronomy, geography, medicine and agriculture, have received extensive scholarly attention, the influence of the Mongols in general and the Ilkhans in particular on the movement of animals was only partially examined. The thesis examines the exchange of three kind of animals in Ilkhanid diplomacy: livestock, hunting partners and exotic animals. In each case it reveiwes the functions of such animals to the Mongols and their use in diplomatic exchange in the United Mongol Empire (1206-60) and in the Ilkhanid realm, sometimes bringing also examples from the other Mongol khanates. The thesis demonstrates that the Ilkhanid dynasty contributed to the movement of animals in Eurasia through the use of diplomatic missions. Out of 120 embassies which the Ilkhanid dynasty 1 exchanged with contemporary dynasties, 42 included animals that were chosen as gifts to foreign rulers or were received as gifts to the Ilkhans. Througout its exisatnce, the Ilkhanid dynasty was able to establish diplomatic relations with dynsties in Eastern and Western Asia, in Africa and in Europe, and exchanged animals with all of these polities. This thesis demonstrates that the Ilkhans received animals from across Eurasia; moreover, they connected the remote corners of Eurasia by sending embassies to their various allies, often carrying more than one specie of the same animal. More importantly, the Mongols had direct influence on the movement of animals throughout the continent. Their nomadic background influenced their interaction with animals, for example their great interest in hunting partners and livestock animals. Moreover, Mongol and Ilkhanid preferences for specific animals accelersted the movement of such animals across the continent. The Ilkhans preferred livestock and hunting animals, such as horses, camels and various raptors to exotic animals, such as elephants or giraffes, which were popular among the rulers of sedentary dynasties, in the Mamluk Sultanate and Europe. In addition, following the establishment of diplomatic relations between the various Mongol dynasties, membrs of the Mongol elite personaly choose the animals which they wished to receive as gifts. 2 Introduction The State of Research The topic of this thesis combines three research fields: diplomacy, human-animal relations, and the exchange of gifts. The diplomatic relations between the various Mongol polities, as well as between the Mongols and the non-Mongol contemporary dynasties, have already received considerable scholarly attention.1 Reuven Amitai-Preiss and Anne Broadbridge examined the relations between the Ilkhanid dynasty and the Mamluk Sultanate.2 In addition, Na’ama Arom examined the development of the Ilkhanid diplomacy during the reign of the dynasty’s first two rulers, Hülegü and Abaqa.3 Other studies examined the diplomatic connections between the Golden Horde and the Mamluk Sultanate, and the Mongol diplomatic relations with the Delhi Sultanate.4 Thomas T. Allsen’s Culture and Conquest in Mongol Eurasia is a prominent example in the field of Mongol diplomatic and cultural exchange. Allsen examined the relations between the Ilkhans and the Qa’ans of the Yuan dynasty, the Ilkhans’ titular rulers.5 Allsen demonstrated how the diplomatic relations and the military alliance between the two Mongol dynasties led to an extensive exchange of knowledge and products between western and eastern Asia. Most 1 Michal Biran, “Diplomacy and Chancellery Practice in the Chagataid Khanate: Some Preliminary Remarks,” Oriente Moderno 88, 2 (2008): 382; Salikh Zakirov, Diplomaticheskie Otnoshenie Zolotoi Ordy s Egiptom (XII- XIV vv.) (Moscow: Nauka, 1966), pp. 39-97; Peter Jackson, The Delhi Sultanate: A Political and Military History, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 93, 141, 208-209, 302, 314. 2 Reuven Amitai-Preiss, Mongols and the Mamluks: the Mamluk-Ilkhanid War, 1260-1281 )Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995); Reuven Amitai, Holy War and Rapprochement: Studies in the Relations between the Mamluk Sultanate and the Mongol Ilkhanate (1260-1335) (Turnhout: Brepols, 2013); Anne F. Broadbridge, Kingship and Ideology in the Islamic and Mongol Worlds (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008). 3 Na’ama O. Arom, “Beyond Bow Range: The Formation of Mongol Foreign Relations in the Middle East 1253- 1282,” PhD. dissertation, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 2016: 1-2. 4 Zakirov, Diplomaticheskie Otnoshenie, pp. 39-97; Jackson, The Delhi Sultanate, pp. 93, 141, 208-209, 302, 314. 5 Thomas T. Allsen, Culture and Conquest in Mongol Eurasia (Cambridge, U.K.; New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 17-40. 3 importantly, Allsen explained that this exchange occurred under the supervision of the Mongol rulers who influenced the spheres of exchange, picking and choosing the mediators of knowledge and the topics of exchange.6 Thus Allsen established that the Mongol rise to power throughout Asia not only initiated a globalization process, but that the Mongol elites shaped it. However, Allsen presented only a brief examination of the exchange of animals between the two polities.7 In his other book, The Royal Hunt in Eurasian History, where Allsen elaborated on the Mongols’ use of animals, he did not focus on the aspect of exchange.8 An additional work on animals examining the Ilkhanid period is Housni Alkhateeb Shehada's book, Mamluks and Animals: Veterinary Medicine in Medieval Islam. However, it dealt with hunting, animal representations, and veterinary medicine during the Mamluk period (1250-1517), and mentioned only partial examples of exchange.9 Marcel Mauss developed the research of the gift exchange, focusing on the social perspective.10 Later works either expanded the theory of gift exchanges,11 or focused on gift exchanges in specific periods and areas, addressing also the Islamic and Middle Eastern perspectives.12 More recently, in her book Practicing Diplomacy in the Mamluk Sultanate: Gifts and Material Culture in the Medieval Islamic World, Doris Behrens-Abouseif examined the topic of the “Maussian gift” in the Ilkhanid context. However, as the book's title suggests, this research did not focus on the Mongols 6 Allsen, Culture and Conquest, pp. 189-211. 7 Ibid, p. 44. 8 Thomas T. Allsen, The Royal Hunt in Eurasian History, (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, c2006). 9 Housni Alkhateeb Shehada, Mamluks and Animals: Veterinary Medicine in Medieval Islam (Boston: Brill 2013), p. 70. 10 Marcel Mauss, The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in
Recommended publications
  • States Systems and Universal Empires - David Wilkinson
    WORLD SYSTEM HISTORY – States Systems and Universal Empires - David Wilkinson STATES SYSTEMS AND UNIVERSAL EMPIRES David Wilkinson Department of Political Science, UCLA, USA Keywords: World system, civilization, states system, universal empire, world state. Contents 1. Civilizations and World Systems 2. The Character of States Systems. 2.1. Conditions Favorable to States Systems 2.2. Conditions Favored by States Systems 3. The Character of Universal Empires. 4. The Pathology and Survival of States Systems 5. The Pathology and Survival of Universal Empires. 6. Why is there no Universal Empire Today? Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary "Civilizations" and "world systems" are alternative labels for the largest macropolitical entities that have existed in human history. These historical civilizations/world systems may be seen as having two polar types of power structure, the "states system" and the "universal empire." Each form has certain characteristic accompaniments, which may promote it, be promoted by it, or both. For states systems, these are diversity, creativity, self-government and war. For universal empires, they are homogeneity, peace, repression. Universal empires tend to be late and short-lived formations, but also tend to recur. Each power structure also has its specific pathologies, which tend toward its transformation. States systems produce a great power oligarchy, out of which from time to time emerges a dominant power, which (again from time to time) establishes a universal empire. Universal empires, though
    [Show full text]
  • Politik Penguasaan Bangsa Mongol Terhadap Negeri- Negeri Muslim Pada Masa Dinasti Ilkhan (1260-1343)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by E-Jurnal UIN (Universitas Islam Negeri) Alauddin Makassar Politik Penguasaan Bangsa Mongol Budi dan Nita (1260-1343) POLITIK PENGUASAAN BANGSA MONGOL TERHADAP NEGERI- NEGERI MUSLIM PADA MASA DINASTI ILKHAN (1260-1343) Budi Sujati dan Nita Yuli Astuti Pascasarjana UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung Email: [email protected] Abstract In the history of Islam, the destruction of the Abbasid dynasty as the center of Islamic civilization in its time that occurred on February 10, 1258 by Mongol attacks caused Islam to lose its identity.The destruction had a tremendous impact whose influence could still be felt up to now, because at that time all the evidence of Islamic relics was destroyed and burnt down without the slightest left.But that does not mean that with the destruction of Islam as a conquered religion is lost as swallowed by the earth. It is precisely with Islam that the Mongol conquerors who finally after assimilated for a long time were drawn to the end of some of the Mongol descendants themselves embraced Islam by establishing the Ilkhaniyah dynasty based in Tabriz Persia (present Iran).This is certainly the author interest in describing a unique event that the rulers themselves who ultimately follow the beliefs held by the community is different from the conquests of a nation against othernations.In this study using historical method (historical study) which is descriptive-analytical approach by using as a medium in analyzing. So that events that have happened can be known by involving various scientific methods by using social science and humanities as an approach..By using social science and humanities will be able to answer events that happened to the Mongols as rulers over the Muslim world make Islam as the official religion of his government to their grandchildren.
    [Show full text]
  • The Soul of Azerbaijan
    A-PDFKarabagh Split DEMO : Purchase from www.A-PDF.com to remove the watermark Shusha Castle. Ganja Gate. 1750-1757 Vagif PIRIYEV Doctor of History, professor Karabagh - the Soul of Azerbaijan arabagh has been an inte- Derbent and from Lake Goycha (to- countered not only on Azerbaijani gral part of Azerbaijan for the day Sevan) to the Caspian Sea. As a territory, but also in the region Kwhole period of history, in- part of the Azerbaijani Safavid State of Kars (Asia Minor), northern cluding the XIII-XIV centuries. As was the country was divided into four Caucasus, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, correctly noted by the prominent Beylarbeyliys: Chuhur-Saad, Ganja Afghanistan and other countries. (3) Russian Orientalist A. Y. Yakubovsky, (Karabagh), Tabriz and Shirvan. In In Azerbaijan there were also locali- by the name Azerbaijan in that pe- this period Karabagh formed part of ties called Surkhab Karabagh, Tabriz riod was meant the present day ter- the historical region Arran and was Karabagh (4) and Karabagh Arran. ritory of South (Iranian) as well as its centre and soul (2), which prima- Marking these localities as Karabagh North (former Soviet) Azerbaijan. (1) ry source information attests to. means people and garden, the great Its borders stretched from Zanjan to The toponym Karabagh is en- garden and excellent place and de- 42 www.irs-az.com Kurachai riv. YEVLAKH v i r i a h c a r u GORANBOY K Chaykand NAFTALAN Tartar riv. K u r BARDA a r Tap Garagoyunlu i v . scribes the beauty of the land and its Fazlullah Rashid ad- Gulustan TARTAR Kalantarli Lev abundance.
    [Show full text]
  • Protagonist of Qubilai Khan's Unsuccessful
    BUQA CHĪNGSĀNG: PROTAGONIST OF QUBILAI KHAN’S UNSUCCESSFUL COUP ATTEMPT AGAINST THE HÜLEGÜID DYNASTY MUSTAFA UYAR* It is generally accepted that the dissolution of the Mongol Empire began in 1259, following the death of Möngke the Great Khan (1251–59)1. Fierce conflicts were to arise between the khan candidates for the empty throne of the Great Khanate. Qubilai (1260–94), the brother of Möngke in China, was declared Great Khan on 5 May 1260 in the emergency qurultai assembled in K’ai-p’ing, which is quite far from Qara-Qorum, the principal capital of Mongolia2. This event started the conflicts within the Mongolian Khanate. The first person to object to the election of the Great Khan was his younger brother Ariq Böke (1259–64), another son of Qubilai’s mother Sorqoqtani Beki. Being Möngke’s brother, just as Qubilai was, he saw himself as the real owner of the Great Khanate, since he was the ruler of Qara-Qorum, the main capital of the Mongol Khanate. Shortly after Qubilai was declared Khan, Ariq Böke was also declared Great Khan in June of the same year3. Now something unprecedented happened: there were two competing Great Khans present in the Mongol Empire, and both received support from different parts of the family of the empire. The four Mongol khanates, which should theo- retically have owed obedience to the Great Khan, began to act completely in their own interests: the Khan of the Golden Horde, Barka (1257–66) supported Böke. * Assoc. Prof., Ankara University, Faculty of Languages, History and Geography, Department of History, Ankara/TURKEY, [email protected] 1 For further information on the dissolution of the Mongol Empire, see D.
    [Show full text]
  • Continuity and Change in the Mongol Army of the Ilkhanate
    CHAPTER 2 Continuity and Change in the Mongol Army of the Ilkhanate Reuven Amitai One of the important trends of late medieval societies in much of the Islamic world is that the military elite became increasingly identified with the political ruling class. This tendency possibly reached its height in the Mamluk Sultanate of Egypt and Syria. One cannot go quite so far when describing the nature of Mongol rule in Iran and the surrounding countries, but it would be fair to state that the army was the most important institution in the Ilkhanid state (and Mongol states as a whole). It is thus not surprising that the study of mili- tary aspects of the Ilkhanate (and the Mongol armies that preceded it) have received some serious attention in modern scholarship. Mention can be made of the important studies on the Mongol armies in the Middle East (some of them parts of larger works) by Bertold Spuler,1 David Morgan,2 C. E. Bosworth,3 John M. Smith, Jr.4 and Arsenio Martinez.5 To this can be added very useful studies on the Mongol army as a whole by H. Desmond Martin,6 S. R. Turnbull,7 Robert Reid,8 Witold Świętosławski,9 Timothy May,10 and others, which help us understand the background of much of the Mongol military activity in the countries today known as the Middle East. My own contributions to the study of the Mongol military machine have generally been in connection with the ongoing Ilkhanid war with the Mamluks, and I have tried to put this war in 1 Spuler, Die Mongolen in Iran, 330–48.
    [Show full text]
  • Archives in Medieval Islam by ERNST POSNER
    Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/american-archivist/article-pdf/35/3-4/291/2745727/aarc_35_3-4_x1546224w7621152.pdf by guest on 03 October 2021 Archives in Medieval Islam By ERNST POSNER N A CHAPTER of his Muqaddimah: An Introduction to His- tory, which deals with royalty and government, Ibn-Khaldun I (1332-1406) observes, "Royal authority requires soldiers, money, and the means to communicate with those who are absent. The ruler, therefore, needs persons to help him in the matters concerned with 'the sword,' 'the pen,' and finances; and among them the pen ranks high."1 It may have been thought to rank even higher than the sword and finances, for, according to Muslim tradition, the pen was the first object God created.2 Of its power and creativeness in Islamic culture there can be no doubt, and those who wielded the pen enjoyed great esteem. Poets and literati lent their talents to the business of government and, according to Ibn al-Sayrafl, achieved "with the pen what the sword and the lance over a long period of years had been unable to produce."3 Unfortunately, the use of the pen as an instrument of Muslim policy and the preservation of the products of the pen, namely offi- cial documents, have received too little attention so far. As a re- sult, archives-keeping in the Muslim states during the Middle Ages has not been fully recognized as a continuation of preceding prac- The author, Fellow and past president of the Society, continues with this essay his history of archives administration begun in Archives in the Ancient World [Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press; xviii, 283 p., illus.; bibliography, index; $>io] pub- lished in May 1972.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomadic Incursion MMW 13, Lecture 3
    MMW 13, Lecture 3 Nomadic Incursion HOW and Why? The largest Empire before the British Empire What we talked about in last lecture 1) No pure originals 2) History is interrelated 3) Before Westernization (16th century) was southernization 4) Global integration happened because of human interaction: commerce, religion and war. Known by many names “Ruthless” “Bloodthirsty” “madman” “brilliant politician” “destroyer of civilizations” “The great conqueror” “Genghis Khan” Ruling through the saddle Helped the Eurasian Integration Euroasia in Fragments Afro-Eurasia Afro-Eurasian complex as interrelational societies Cultures circulated and accumulated in complex ways, but always interconnected. Contact Zones 1. Eurasia: (Hemispheric integration) a) Mediterranean-Mesopotamia b) Subcontinent 2) Euro-Africa a) Africa-Mesopotamia 3) By the late 15th century Transatlantic (Globalization) Africa-Americas 12th century Song and Jin dynasties Abbasids: fragmented: Fatimads in Egypt are overtaken by the Ayyubid dynasty (Saladin) Africa: North Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa Europe: in the periphery; Roman catholic is highly bureaucratic and society feudal How did these zones become connected? Nomadic incursions Xiongunu Huns (Romans) White Huns (Gupta state in India) Avars Slavs Bulgars Alans Uighur Turks ------------------------------------------------------- In Antiquity, nomads were known for: 1. War 2. Migration Who are the Nomads? Tribal clan-based people--at times formed into confederate forces-- organized based on pastoral or agricultural economies. 1) Migrate so to adapt to the ecological and changing climate conditions. 2) Highly competitive on a tribal basis. 3) Religion: Shamanistic & spirit-possession Two Types of Nomadic peoples 1. Pastoral: lifestyle revolves around living off the meat, milk and hides of animals that are domesticated as they travel through arid lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Power, Politics, and Tradition in the Mongol Empire and the Ilkhanate of Iran
    OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 08/08/16, SPi POWER, POLITICS, AND TRADITION IN THE MONGOL EMPIRE AND THE ĪlkhānaTE OF IRAN OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 08/08/16, SPi OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 08/08/16, SPi Power, Politics, and Tradition in the Mongol Empire and the Īlkhānate of Iran MICHAEL HOPE 1 OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 08/08/16, SPi 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6D P, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © Michael Hope 2016 The moral rights of the author have been asserted First Edition published in 2016 Impression: 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Control Number: 2016932271 ISBN 978–0–19–876859–3 Printed in Great Britain by Clays Ltd, St Ives plc Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and for information only.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Empires of Asia the Great Empires of Asia
    The Great Empires of Asia The Great Empires of Asia EDITED BY JIM MASSELOS FOREWORD BY JONATHAN FENBY WITH 27 ILLUSTRATIONS Note on spellings and transliterations There is no single agreed system for transliterating into the Western CONTENTS alphabet names, titles and terms from the different cultures and languages represented in this book. Each culture has separate traditions FOREWORD 8 for the most ‘correct’ way in which words should be transliterated from The Legacy of Empire Arabic and other scripts. However, to avoid any potential confusion JONATHAN FENBY to the non-specialist reader, in this volume we have adopted a single system of spellings and have generally used the versions of names and titles that will be most familiar to Western readers. INTRODUCTION 14 The Distinctiveness of Asian Empires JIM MASSELOS Elements of Empire Emperors and Empires Maintaining Empire Advancing Empire CHAPTER ONE 27 Central Asia: The Mongols 1206–1405 On the cover: Map of Unidentified Islands off the Southern Anatolian Coast, by Ottoman admiral and geographer Piri Reis (1465–1555). TIMOTHY MAY Photo: The Walters Art Museum, Baltimore. The Rise of Chinggis Khan The Empire after Chinggis Khan First published in the United Kingdom in 2010 by Thames & Hudson Ltd, 181A High Holborn, London WC1V 7QX The Army of the Empire Civil Government This compact paperback edition first published in 2018 The Rule of Law The Great Empires of Asia © 2010 and 2018 Decline and Dissolution Thames & Hudson Ltd, London The Greatness of the Mongol Empire Foreword © 2018 Jonathan Fenby All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced CHAPTER TWO 53 or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, China: The Ming 1368–1644 including photocopy, recording or any other information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • I —From Pre-History, to History
    KATUN (O n Turkish VVomen) E M E L ESİN* I —From pre-history, to history History and archaeology trace the origins of the Turkish Eve, from pre- to early historical times, in the north of inner-Asia, on a scene of snowy peaks, with forests of pines and birches, opening southvvards into vvide steppes. In the first centuries of the millenary before Christ, a change of existence had occurred in Inner Asia. The earlier small agricul- tural communities, possibly matriarchal units,1 had altered their way of life. Presumably as sequel of a wave of invasion, the communities had moved to pastoral seminomadism,2 in seasonal transhumane from fortified vvinter quarters, to estival pastures, vvhere the flocks could graze. The sea­ sonal alterance of the mode of life, vvhich continued into the historical period, beginning in ca the Vth century, caused a duplication of the femi- nine personality. In vvinter, vvithin the tribal circumvallation, woman pre- sided, both as cook and as priestess fire, at the family hearth and altar. She spun, dyed vvools and felts, wove and embroidered. The mother-god- dess of Turkish mythology, Umay,3 had been inspired from this feminine image. A petroglyph4 of the Sixth century, shovving a crowned figüre, in ritual frontally squatting posture (baghdaş,5 in Turkish) is thought to rep- resent her (pl. I/a).** With the advent of spring and the move of the flocks tovvards the pastures, the condition of women changed. The vvomen also must, need be on horseback, shepherd the herds, encounter or flee before an enemy * History of Art.
    [Show full text]
  • Scanned Using Book Scancenter 5033
    Globalization ’s Impact on Mongolian Identity Issues and the Image of Chinggis Khan Alicia J. Campi PART I: The Mongols, this previously unheard-of nation that unexpectedly emerged to terrorize the whole world for two hundred years, disappeared again into obscurity with the advent of firearms. Even so, the name Mongol became one forever familiar to humankind, and the entire stretch of the thirteenth through the fifteenth centuries has come to be known as the Mongol era.' PART II; The historic science was the science, which has been badly affect­ ed, and the people of Mongolia bid farewell to their history and learned by heart the bistort' with distortion but fuU of ideolog}'. Because of this, the Mong ­ olians started to forget their religious rituals, customs and traditions and the pa­ triotic feelings of Mongolians turned to the side of perishing as the internation ­ alism was put above aU.^ PART III: For decades, Mongolia had subordinated national identity to So­ viet priorities __Now, they were set adrift in a sea of uncertainty, and Mongol ­ ians were determined to define themselves as a nation and as a people. The new freedom was an opportunity as well as a crisis." As the three above quotations indicate, identity issues for the Mongolian peoples have always been complicated. In our increas­ ingly interconnected, media-driven world culture, nations with Baabar, Histoij of Mongolia (Ulaanbaatar: Monsudar Publishing, 1999), 4. 2 “The Political Report of the First Congress of the Mongolian Social-Demo ­ cratic Party” (March 31, 1990), 14. " Tsedendamdyn Batbayar, Mongolia’s Foreign Folicy in the 1990s: New Identity and New Challenges (Ulaanbaatar: Institute for Strategic Studies, 2002), 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Altin Orda Devleti'nde Yerleşik Hayatin Ilk Izleri
    Cilt/Volume 3, Sayı/Issue 6, Temmuz/July 2021, ss. 229-240. Geliş Tarihi–Received Date: 18.03.2021 Kabul Tarihi–Accepted Date: 08.05.2021 ARAŞTIRMA MAKALESİ – RESEARCH ARTICLE ALTIN ORDA DEVLETİ’NDE YERLEŞİK HAYATIN İLK İZLERİ: SARAY ŞEHRİ FATİH BOSTANCI∗ ÖZ Çinggiz Han Moğol kabilelerini bileştirip devletini tesis ettikten sonra hanlığının on dördüncü yılında Batı Seferlerini başlattı. Bu seferler oğlu Cuci Han’ın kumandasında Cebe ve Sübütey Noyanların yardımlarıyla Moğol Devleti’nin Kuzey Batısı’na yapıldı. Seferler başarıyla tamamlanmış bunun sonucunda Azerbaycan topraklarını da içine alan batı toprakları Cuci Han’a bırakıldı. Çinggiz Han’dan önce ölen Cuci Han’ın topraklarına oğlu Batu Han ve kendisinden sonra gelenler sahip çıktılar. Çinggiz Han’ın ölümünden sonra Moğol Devleti’nin başına geçen Ögedey Han zamanında İkinci Batı Seferleri başlatıldı. Bu seferler yine Cuci Ulusu’nun komutasında gerçekleşti. Bu kez Moğol ordularının başında Batu Han ve yanında Cebe ve Sübütey Noyan yer aldı. İkinci Batı Seferleri neticesinde büyük bir alana yayılan Moğol Devleti, Rusya topraklarının büyük bir kısmını da ele geçirdi. Batu Han bu sefer sonucunda dedesi Çinggiz Han hayatta iken kendisinden elde etmiş olduğu Altın Busagalı Ak-Orda’nın temellerini Rusya topraklarında bulunan bugünkü Aktübe bölgesinde Saray adını verdiği şehirle attı. Bu devlete Altın Orda denildi. Çeşitli kaynaklarda farklı isimlerle anılan bu devlet birçok defa Cuci Ulusu şeklinde anılırken, bazen de başında bulunan hükümdarın adıyla anıldı. Batu Han Saray şehrini ilk kurduğu zaman Büyük Moğol Devleti’nin Kara-Kurum’daki Ordası’na benzer bir yapıda kurdu. Şehirleşme adına önemli teşebbüsleri olan Batu Han’dan sonra gelişim ve genişlemeye önem veren kardeşi Berke Han hükümdar oldu.
    [Show full text]