World News Pittsburgh Catholic

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

World News Pittsburgh Catholic World news Pittsburgh Catholic. Friday. February 14. 1986 — Page 9 Survey» find: Many women frustrated with Church but still loyal Bjr NC News Service or discrim inated against in the church? In society?" The m ajority of About 25 people mentioned abortion, moat of them affirm ing the Many women surveyed by two U .S. dioceses expressed frustration the women said they experienced some degree of oppression or church's teaching against It. Five respondents urged that the arlth some church practices but added that they were still loyal, ac­ discrim ination. church's teaching should be changed, saying tt Is unacceptable for cording to diocesan officials conducting surveys on the role of “I don't feel the church knows who 1 am. or much cares." one men to set rules which affect women's bodies. One person said It women in the church. woman wrote should be allowed In case of rape. Surveys In the dtoceaea of W orcester. M aas., and Rockville Centre. Fifty-three of the 175 m arried women who responded and eight of Being allowed to serve aa lectors and m inisters of the Eucharist N .Y., were part of the U .S. bishops' consultation for thetr proposed the 17 widows tn the survey said they did not experience oppression was mentioned as a positive factor by at least 30 women Five pastoral tetter on the concerns of women tn church and society or discrim ination In the church. Seven of 34 single women said they women were against women in thoae roles. Hearings have been held in dioceses around the country. did not experience oppression, while only one out of 12 nuns said About 850 women attended four meetings In the Diocese of The committee preparing the pastoral is headed by Bishop Joaeph she did not experience oppression Albany. N .Y.. according to Kathleen McCloskey. a member of the lmesch of Jo liet. Ql. Although none of the questions dealt specifically with the ordina­ lO-peraon committee that planned the hearings. St. Joseph Stater Anna Marie Kane, director of the Worcester tion of women, that topic waa the moat frequently raised in the According to Ms. McCloskey. the committee received written diocesan Office for Women, said women respondents expressed feel­ Rockville Centre survey. testimony from “each extrem e," that Is. from one group calling for ings of "second-class citizenship" in the church, but she added that About a quarter of a ll the responses mentioned the all-m ale clergy the ordination of women and another expressing complete satisfac­ while many said they felt frustrated they also said "we're still here." In a negative way. Many cited women's ineligibility for ordination aa tion with the current status of women In the church The survey drew a response from 115 women and 20 men. evidence of discrim ination and urged that women be allowed to be Moot of the women attending the meeting did advocate some The six-part questionnaire found that "there were both women o rd a in e d . change, stye added. and men who were totally satisfied with the present reality of Seventy of the respondents wrote that they favored ordination of She estimated that 10 percent at the participants at the meetings church and the present rede of women in that church and there were women to the priesthood or dlaconate or both were men. To Fred Kowal. another member of the committee, that both women and men who were totally diaaatlfled with the present A smaller group of 22 women said women should never be reflects a society-wide problem. reality," said Slater Kane. o rd a in e d . "When a group gathers to discuss an issue that concerns them, Some said they saw women to be the "drones" of the church, Another Issue that came up frequently waa that of altar servers. everybody else considers themselves to be part of that. heroic in their patience, constituting the majority of "volunteer Nearly 40 women wrote of being hurt by this exclusion from the "That'a a problem tn society, not only the church. 1 would like m inistry." and performing the beat tn family roles and with time they were young girls None of the respondents specifically have aeen more men there just so they could learn about women's children, according to Sister Kane. defended the practice of having only male acolytes. concerns," he said. In the Rockville Centre Diocese more than 275 people. Including a The church's teaching on birth control was another major Attendance of people under 30 alao waa disappointing. Kowal dozen men. responded to the survey. alienating Issue, according to the survey. At least 30 women «aid. suggesting that young people may have felt cut off from the One of the questions asked. "In what ways do you feel oppressed specifically mentioned it as a problem area c h u rc h . Theologians disagree on woman’s excommunication By JOB MICHAEL FEIST man of the theology department In a law or in a precept incur an McBrien is "m issing an important "She obviously didn’t know," side red to Incur excommuntca NC News Service at the University of Notre Dame, automatic penalty attached to an p o in t." he added. tlon; the person who performs la.“ Two prominent theologians said his position on the case “is offense If It would not have been "If you have someone taking a Father McBrien emphasized have expressed contrasting views committed without their efforts.” very public stance, advocating The canon lawyer. Father that she Is not excom m unicated.” that the church has a right to ex­ regarding the church's excom- and encouraging the accom plish­ James Provoat. executive coor­ He added that "the whole thing Father McBrien said that "a communicate members, but It Is muntcaton of Mary Ann Sorren­ Is unfortunate" and said Pro­ dinator of the Canon Law Society doubt exists (whether Canon ment of abortion on a rather wide not clear In this caae that the ex­ tino. head of Planned Parenthood vidence diocesan officials "didn't of America, said he has "never 1329) would extend to her posi­ scale. It would aeem Incredible to communication la automatic. of Rhode Island. handle It w ell.” tion" as adm inistrator of Planned suppose that there was no effec­ heard of this kind of thing" being done before. And a leading canon lawyer has The action, communicated to Parenthood. tiveness in her work, that she Ms. Sorrentlno told The New termed the action highly unusual. Ms. Sorrentlno by Father “The farther away you get from didn't really manage to encourage He said he did not know the ex­ York Times Jan. 24 that she Salvatore Matano. vicar for ad­ actually participating tn the ac­ and support abortions that actual­ act procedures followed by Plann­ could appeal the church's ruling, ~ Ms. Sorrentino waa notified last m inistration for the diocese, was tual (abortion procedure), the ly took place," said Father ed Parenthood In Rhode Island, so but "In the current clim ate It Isn't ■June by an official of the Diocese based on Canons 1398 and 1329 more doubt there is that the L a w le r. he could not comment directly on worth the postage to request a •of Providence, that, as a conse­ of the church's Code of Canon canon applies." Father McBrien According to Father McBrien. Ms. Sorrentlno's Involvement h e a rin g ." quence of her position with Plann­ L a w . sa id another factor is that to incur an with abortion or whether the ed Parenthood, an organization Canon 1398 states, "A person But Capuchin Father Ronald automatic excommunication it canon was correctly applied. Father McBrien Indicated that, that performs abortions at some who procures a successful abor­ Lawler, director of the Institute muat be clear beforehand to the He said, however, that "If a per­ should Ms. Sorrentlno appeal the .of its clinics, she had Incurred an tion Incurs an automatic excom­ for Advanced Studies In Catholic person that the penalty Involved son Is a director of a hospital In decision, the Provtdence Diocese automatic excommunication. m unication." Canon 1329 states. Doctrine at St. John's University for his or her activity is which abortions are performed, would be obliged to review the - Father Richard McBrien. chair - "Accom plices who are not named In Jamaica. N.Y.. said Father excommunication. the person who directs la not con case under canon law. News in brief Archbishop Foley on Catholic Press At the Vatican VATICAN CITY (NC) - The Catholic press The Catholic press can "challenge our faith should challenge people's faith by accurately through accurate reports of the situation of our reporting world problems and the moral Issues brothers and sisters In Christ in our cities and Involved, said the head of the Pontifical Commis­ farm s, tn our schools and hospitals — and Indeed sion for Social Communications. in every land,” he added. Faith "m ust be strengthened by reflection on Catholics need "a deepened understanding not and assim ilation of God's answers to our per­ only of sacred Scripture and the truths of faith sonal crises and to the moral dilemmas that face but also of their relationship to modern life and Pope says speed up marriage annulment cases the world," Archbishop John Foley said in a contemporary events." said Archbishop Foley. VATICAN CITY (NC) - The Vatican appeals time for concluding a case suggested tn the statement Issued Feb. 7 for Catholic Press "By faithful and timely reports of church court responsible for Judging marriage annul­ previous 1917 code.
Recommended publications
  • Canonlaw No.1No.1
    CATHOLICS FOR A FREE CHOICE CATHOLICSCATHOLICS ANDAND ABORTIONABORTION NOTES ON CANONLAW NO.1NO.1 If you are interested in this subject, you might also be interested in the following CFFC publications on Catholics and reproductive choice: • You Are Not Alone—Information for Catholic Women about the Abortion Decision • Reflections of a Catholic Theologian on Visiting an Abortion Clinic, by Daniel C. Maguire • The Facts Tell the Story: Catholics and Choice For order information, please call +1 (202) 986-6093 or visit the publications section of our webpage www.catholicsforchoice.org 1 INTRODUCTION Canon law, the Catholic church’s internal law, is a subject most Catholics think they will never need to study. However, the hotly debated and politically polarized issue of abortion has resulted in substantial public assertions about canon law and abortion, both in the case of women who have had abortions and Catholic legislators and activists who have favored legal abortion. Everyone is an expert, claiming that prochoice Catholics are “heretics” or have been “excommunicated” because they have had an abortion or have supported legal abortion. Such finger pointing may be politically useful, but it is not an honest way to deal with differences of belief about abortion. What does the church’s law really say about abortion? We have produced this pamphlet to explain the basics of canon law as it relates to abortion and to clarify what church punishments apply and when they apply. Whether you are a woman who has had an abortion, a doctor who has performed an abortion, a clinic escort, a prochoice legislator, or an interested “person in the pew,” we hope this publication will help you.
    [Show full text]
  • Holy Communion and Unholy Politics
    JUNE 21, 2004 ISSUE Holy Communion and Unholy Politics The Rev. John P. Beal June 21, 2004 When Cardinal Francis Arinze, prefect of the Vatican Congregation for Divine Worship and the Sacraments, was asked at a press conference in Rome on April 23 whether Senator John F. Kerry should be denied Communion, he responded: “The law of the church is clear. The church exists in the United States. There are bishops there, let them interpret it.” The flurry of conflicting statements prompted by the cardinal’s remark suggests that the law relevant to determining who can be barred from the reception of Communion may be clear, but its applicability to Senator Kerry (or any other politician) is not. Church Teaching and Politics The church’s magisterium has emphasized that politicians are not free to leave their moral principles in the cloakroom when they go to the floor of the legislature, or on the bus when they espouse public policy positions on the campaign trail. Pope John Paul II has clearly stated that all citizens, and by implication public officials, have “a grave and clear obligation to oppose” any law that attacks human life (Evangelium Vitae, No. 73). In a doctrinal note issued in 2002, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith gave the pope’s directive particular application to public officials. The note quotes from Evangelium Vitae (No. 73), “For them, as for every Catholic, it is impossible to promote such laws or to vote for them,” and then comments that nevertheless, when the politician’s personal opposition to abortion is a matter of record and it is impossible to overturn laws allowing abortion, it is permissible for politicians, as Evangelium Vitae says, “to support proposals aimed at limiting the harm done by such a law and at lessening its negative consequences at the level of general opinion or public morality.” In fact, most Catholic politicians in the United States more or less clearly assert their personal opposition to abortion, but this personal opposition is rarely put to the test in straight up-or-down votes on abortion or other life issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory of Policies and Procedures for Deacons Is Issued Under the Authority of the Bishop of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Phoenix
    DDiirreeccttoorryy ooff PPoolliicciieess aanndd PPrroocceedduurreess ffoorr DDeeaaccoonnss RRoommaann CCaatthhoolliicc DDiioocceessee ooff PPhhooeenniixx with Change Pages thru September 2010 revised & approved by Bishop Olmsted Sept 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 4 1.1 Issuing Authority 4 1.2 Applicability 4 1.3 Background 4 2.0 Mission Statement of the Diaconate of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Phoenix 6 2.1 Scriptural Basis 6 2.2 Mission Statement 6 2.3 Implementation 6 3.0 Structure of the Diaconate in the Diocese of Phoenix 7 3.1 Organization Chart 7 3.2 Deacon Council 8 3.3 Deacon Personnel Board 8 3.4 Office of the Diaconate 8 3.4.1 Introduction 8 3.4.2 Director of Office of the Diaconate / Director of Deacon Personnel 9 3.4.3 Associate Director of Formation 10 3.4.4 Coordinators 11 3.5 Committees 11 3.6 The Deacon 11 3.6.1 General Norms 11 3.6.2 Duties 13 3.6.3 Bi-Ritual Deacons 13 3.6.4 Extern Deacons 13 4.0 Deacon Policies 14 4.1 Assignment and Ministry 14 4.1.1 General 14 4.1.2 Title 14 4.1.3 Attire 14 4.1.4 Faculties 16 4.1.5 Decree of Appointment 16 4.1.6 Post-Ordination Supervised Ministry and Formation 16 4.1.7 Length of Assignment 18 4.1.8 Changes in / Review of Assignment 18 4.1.9 Ministry Evaluation 19 4.1.10 Leaves of Absence 19 4.1.11 Sabbaticals 20 4.1.12 Incardination/Excardination 21 4.2 Continuing Education 21 4.2.1 Introduction 21 4.2.2 Policy 22 4.3 Spiritual Life 24 revised & approved 2 by Bishop Olmsted Sept 2010 4.4 Married Deacons 25 4.4.1 Introduction 25 4.4.2 Marriages Experiencing Difficulty 25
    [Show full text]
  • Pastoral Outreach to Christian Marriage: FORMATION, PREPARATI ON, CELEBRATION, and CONTINUING EDUCATION
    Scroll down for Presione aquí por \Ç à{x fÑ|Ü|à Éy XÇ xÄ XáÑ•Ü|àâ wx VtÇt VtÇö Guidelines for Pastoral Guías Pastorales Para el Outreach to Matrimonio Cristiano: Christian Marriage: Formación, Preparación, Formation, Preparation, Celebración y Educación Celebration, and Continuing Continua Education In the Spirit of Cana Guidelines for Pastoral Outreach to Christian Marriage: FORMATION, PREPARATI ON, CELEBRATION, AND CONTINUING EDUCATION www.marriageandfamilyministries.org | 312.534.8351 © 2005 Marriage and Family Ministries Office, Archdiocese of Chicago Revised 2015 The following people were instrumental in the development of this document. They served as the Revision Committee who created the general framework of the document. We thank them for their dedication to this project: Rafael and Olga Anglada Father Jim Heneghan Bishop Tom Paprocki Valentín Araya–Mesén Father Tom Hickey Elsie P. Radtke Tim and Connie Bultema Father Patrick Lagges Father George Rassas Father John Cusick Mike and Pam Lilly Alicia Rivera Maria Garcia Bishop Jerome Listecki Deacon Larry and Fran Spohr John Green Andrew Lyke Kevin and Crystal Sullivan Frank Hannigan Father Bill McNulty Joanna Stroncek Particular thanks go to Martha Burke Tressler for her work on “Marriage After the Death of a Spouse” and “Prayers of the Faithful,” Sister Joan McGuire, Rita George, and Father John Kartje for their help with the “Ecumenical Marriages” and “Interfaith Marriages” sections; Nora O’Callahan for her guidance on the “Previous Abortion” section; Richard C. Sparks, C.S.P., Ph.D., for his input in the “Special Circumstances” section that deals with health concerns; Christine Zambricki–Flaherty for her work on the “Cross–Cultural Issues” section; and Father Richard Saudis for his final review and valuable input to the document.
    [Show full text]
  • Pastoral Manual Are Offered to Assist Them in Serving the Faithful
    SECTION I SACRAMENTS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Priests, deacons and pastoral ministers of the Diocese of Rockville Centre serve parishes and institutions through sacramental ministries. The following sections of the Pastoral Manual are offered to assist them in serving the faithful. They are a general guide and are not meant to be exhaustive in nature. The disciplines of the universal Church and the specific policies of the Diocese of Rockville Centre are summarized below. Note that this section is preceded by a table of contents. The general index at the end of the Pastoral Manual may also be helpful. For a more complete treatment of these sacraments, reference should be made to the 1983 Code of Canon Law which contains legislation for the universal Church; the rite for each sacrament also explains the details of sacramental celebration. Diocesan policies and procedures are coordinated by the Chancellor’s Office. Often parishes have their own sacramental policies which assist Church ministers in serving their parishioners. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SACRAMENTS: INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................1 A. CATECHESIS AND PREPARATION: READINESS FOR THE SACRAMENTS .................................................7 B. VALIDITY AND LAWFULNESS.............................................................................................................7 C. OFFERINGS: GENERAL PRINCIPLES ....................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Çr,A¡Yrw Archbishop of Saint Paul and Minneapolis Jèínifer Haselberger Chancellor for Canonical Affairs Faculties of All Priests
    ARCHDIOCESE OF SAINT PAUL AND MINNEAPOLß CLERGY BULLETIN l.fLay 26120ll Pagella of Faculties, Revised FACULTIES FORPRIESTS With due regard being given for the diversity of Orders, the faculties of priests are to be interpreted in the light of the general and specific norrns given in the Code of Canon Law andthe particular law of the Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis. The provisions of the Code of Canon Law state that priests 'share in the priesthood of Christ and, as his ministers under the authority of the Bishop, are consecrated to celebrate divine worship and sanctiff the people' (canon 835, $2). The Code also reminds us that 'Liturgical actions are not private but are celebrations of the Church itself as the 'sacrament of unity', that is, the holy people united and ordered under the Bishops' (canon 837, $l). Moreover, 'since clerics all work for the same purpose, namely, the building up of the Body of Christ, they are to be united among themselves by a bond of brotherhood and prayer and are to strive for cooperation among themselves according to the prescripts of particular law' (canon 275). It is my hope that the following faculties will assist priests in fulfilling their sacred ministry, in union with their Archbishop and allthe bishops. as well as the deacons, consecrated men and women, and lay faithful of this Archdiocese. Given at Saint Paul, Minnesota, this 26¡t' day of May in the year of Our Lord 201 1 . All things to the contrary notwith standing. 1çe@ The MosMerend John C. Nienstedt Çr,a¡YrW Archbishop of Saint Paul and Minneapolis JèÍnifer Haselberger Chancellor for Canonical Affairs Faculties of All Priests A priest receives these faculties from the Archbishop or his delegate by letter.
    [Show full text]
  • LUTHERANS for LIFE in Support of Petitioners ______
    No. 19-1392 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States _________ THOMAS E. DOBBS, M.D., M.P.H., IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS STATE HEALTH OFFICER OF THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, et al., Petitioners, v. JACKSON WOMEN’S HEALTH ORGANIZATION, ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND ITS PATIENTS, et al., Respondents. __________ On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit __________ Brief for Amici Curiae FOUNDATION FOR MORAL LAW & LUTHERANS FOR LIFE In Support of Petitioners __________ JOHN A. EIDSMOE Counsel of Record ROY S. MOORE TALMADGE BUTTS FOUNDATION FOR MORAL LAW One Dexter Avenue Montgomery, AL 36104 (334) 262-1245 [email protected] Counsel for Amicus Curiae July 28, 2021 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .............................................. iii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE ........................................ 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ............................................. 2 ARGUMENT ........................................................................ 3 I. This Court’s jurisprudence since 1973 reflects a move away from Roe v. Wade ................... 3 A. Akron ................................................................... 5 B. Thornburgh .......................................................... 5 C. Webster ................................................................ 7 D. Casey .................................................................... 8 E. Carhart .............................................................. 11 F. Stenejhem .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Code of Canon Law 1983
    The Code of Canon Law 1983 Table of Contents BOOK I: GENERAL NORMS.......................................................................................................... 8 Title I: Ecclesiastical Laws .................................................................................................... 8 Title II: Custom ..................................................................................................................... 10 Title III: General Decrees And Instructions........................................................................ 11 Title IV: Singular Administrative Acts ................................................................................ 11 Chapter I: COMMON NORMS........................................................................................... 11 Chapter II: SINGULAR DECREES AND PRECEPTS ...................................................... 12 Chapter III: RESCRIPTS ................................................................................................... 13 Chapter IV: PRIVILEGES.................................................................................................. 15 Chapter V: DISPENSATIONS ........................................................................................... 16 Title V: Statutes And Ordinances ....................................................................................... 17 Title VI: Physical And Juridical Persons............................................................................ 17 Chapter I: The Canonical Status Of Physical
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL-2010-FACULTIES-BOOK.Pdf
    TO THE PRIESTS AND DEACONS OF THE DIOCESE OF PHOENIX: THE FOLLOWING FACULTIES ARE PROMULGATED AND EFFECTIVE ON THIS 1st DAY OF MAY IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD 2010 UPON PROMULGATION, THIS DOCUMENT REVOKES ALL PREVIOUS GENERAL FACULTIES PAGELLAE FOR THE DIOCESE OF PHOENIX AND REMAINS IN EFFECT UNTIL EXPRESSLY REVOKED BY MYSELF, MY DELEGATE OR MY SUCCESSORS. Most Rev. Thomas J. Olmsted Bishop of Phoenix Chancellor † † † 2010 Faculties Book Page 1 Introduction Related to the rights and duties of clerics are the “faculties” that they are often granted. The following Pagella Facultatum consists of a discussion of those faculties granted to priests and deacons by law, ipso iure, and those delegated them by the Bishop. They extend to an ordained minister the authorization additional to their ordination which is needed to perform certain functions. Therefore, it is important to note that certain actions may not be valid unless they are performed by a cleric with the proper faculties. They may extend to the authority of the cleric in his exercise of the teaching, sanctifying, and ruling roles he has obtained by virtue of ordination. There are also included at the end several notes on matters of specific importance to the priests and deacons of this Diocese. In this document, “priests” and “deacons” refers to only those priests and deacons with canonical assignment and in good standing in the Diocese of Phoenix, and extern priests and deacons who have been granted temporary approval to minister within the Diocese of Phoenix. Retired priests and deacons in good standing and incardinated in this Diocese or who have been approved by the Bishop to minister within the Diocese are granted these faculties and permissions Unless otherwise specified, “cleric,” “clergy,” or “sacred minister” refers to both priests and deacons.
    [Show full text]
  • The Holy See: the Government of the Catholic Church What Is the Nature of the Holy See’S Obligation Under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child?
    THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHILDREN’S RIGHTS international journal of children’s rights 25 (2017) 779-816 brill.com/chil The Holy See: The Government of the Catholic Church What is the Nature of the Holy See’s Obligation under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child? Tseday Gizaw Hailu King’s College London, uk [email protected] Abstract The Holy See ratified the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (crc) in its dual personae as the government of the Catholic Church, and as the government of Vatican City State (vcs). The extent of the Holy See’s obligations under the crc in its former capacity is a current international debate, and the focus of this paper. The Committee on the Rights of the Child in its recent review process concluded that by ratifying the crc, the Holy See committed to its implementation, not only within the territory of vcs, but worldwide on behalf of Catholics “under its authority.” Con- versely, the Holy See restricts its duty to that of the transmission of moral principles recognised in the crc to all people. This paper critically reviews the Committee’s con- cluding observations on the Holy See’s second periodic report, and ends by presenting possible alternatives to the Committee’s recommendations. Keywords accountability – Catholic Church – children’s rights – crc – Holy See – moral authority Introduction The Holy See is a religious institution possessing a legal personality that en- ables it to enter into treaties equivalent to States. It participates in the United * Dissertation completed as part of ma in International Child Studies at King’s College London.
    [Show full text]
  • Download in PDF Version
    Country Profile: Holy See / Vatican City State Last Updated: 7 May 2017 Region: Southern Europe Identified policies and legal sources related to List of ratified human rights treaties: abortion: CERD Reproductive Health Act CCPR General Medical Health Act Xst Constitution OP Criminal / Penal Code 2nd Civil Code OP Ministerial Order / Decree CESCR Case Law CESCR-OP Health Regulation / Clinical Guidelines CAT EML / Registered List CAT-OP Medical Ethics Code CEDAW Document Relating to Funding CEDAW-OP Abortion Specific Law CRC Law on Medical Practicioners CRC:OPSC Law on Health Care Services CRC:OPAC Other CRC:OPIC CMW Related Documents CRPD * CRPD-OP From Criminal / Penal Code: CED ** Maputo Protocol Code of Canon Law Canons - 1397 and 1398 Code of Canon Law Canons - 1321 to 1330 Download data Code of Canon Law Canons - 1313 to 1320 Law N. IX: Amendments to the Criminal Code and the Code of Criminal Procedure, 2013 From Other: Act on Sources of Law Concluding Observations: CRC Persons who can be sanctioned: A woman or girl can be sanctioned Providers can be sanctioned A person who assists can be sanctioned Abortion at the woman's request No Legal Ground and Gestational Limit Economic or social No reasons Related documents: Code of Canon Law Canons - 1397 and 1398 (page 1 ) WHO Guidance The following descriptions and recommendations were extracted from WHO guidance on safe abortion. WHO defines health for member states as a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity. Safe Abortion Guidelines, § 4.2.1.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Bishops Wring Their Hands at the Whirlwind of Hell MONICA MIGLIORINO MILLER
    JANUARY 29, 2019 Bishops Wring Their Hands at the Whirlwind of Hell MONICA MIGLIORINO MILLER (Photo credit: Cuomo and Dolan at Columbus Day Parade, 2018 / Shutterstock) Several years ago, after a course I had taught on Church history, my students presented me with a gift. It was an eight-inch-tall action figure of Pope Innocent III they had purchased from a novelty store in Frankenmuth, MI. A pope of the thirteenth century, Innocent III—besides approving the Rule of St. Francis—is known for calling the Albigensian crusade. This odd children’s plaything came with a short biography which included: “Action-figure’s Weapon of Choice: Excommunication.” On January 22, appropriately and deliberately timed for the 46th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, the New York state legislature passed the “Reproductive Health Act” (RHA). It was immediately and happily signed into law by Catholic governor Andrew Cuomo. Abortion-on-demand was already permitted in the state through the sixth month of pregnancy, but the revision now permits the killing of the unborn through the ninth month, not only for the life, but even the health of the mother. The health of the mother doesn’t mean a serious threat to physical health. Consistent with Roe’s companion case Doe v. Bolton: “medical judgment may be exercised in the light of all factors—physical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman’s age—relevant to the wellbeing of the patient. All these factors may relate to health.” The new law is radical in that other health care professionals besides licensed physicians may perform abortions.
    [Show full text]