DOCSLIB.ORG

Pastoral Manual Are Offered to Assist Them in Serving the Faithful

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pastoral Manual Are Offered to Assist Them in Serving the Faithful SECTION I SACRAMENTS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Priests, deacons and pastoral ministers of the Diocese of Rockville Centre serve parishes and institutions through sacramental ministries. The following sections of the Pastoral Manual are offered to assist them in serving the faithful. They are a general guide and are not meant to be exhaustive in nature. The disciplines of the universal Church and the specific policies of the Diocese of Rockville Centre are summarized below. Note that this section is preceded by a table of contents. The general index at the end of the Pastoral Manual may also be helpful. For a more complete treatment of these sacraments, reference should be made to the 1983 Code of Canon Law which contains legislation for the universal Church; the rite for each sacrament also explains the details of sacramental celebration. Diocesan policies and procedures are coordinated by the Chancellor’s Office. Often parishes have their own sacramental policies which assist Church ministers in serving their parishioners. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SACRAMENTS: INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................1 A. CATECHESIS AND PREPARATION: READINESS FOR THE SACRAMENTS .................................................7 B. VALIDITY AND LAWFULNESS.............................................................................................................7 C. OFFERINGS: GENERAL PRINCIPLES ....................................................................................................8 II. READINESS FOR THE SACRAMENTS GUIDELINES FOR PREPARATION AND CATECHESIS ..............................................................................................................................................10 A. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................10 B. PRINCIPLES FOR SACRAMENTAL PREPARATION ...............................................................................11 C. SACRAMENTS OF INITIATION ...........................................................................................................14 D. CONFIRMATION ...............................................................................................................................18 E. EUCHARIST ......................................................................................................................................25 F. PENANCE .........................................................................................................................................32 G. FIRST PENANCE AND FIRST EUCHARIST...........................................................................................36 H. ANOINTING OF THE SICK..................................................................................................................40 I. MARRIAGE.......................................................................................................................................43 Sacraments III. BAPTISM AND RCIA: GENERAL NORMS.................................................................................49 A. FULL INITIATION..............................................................................................................................49 B. VALIDITY.........................................................................................................................................49 C. RITE OF BAPTISM.............................................................................................................................49 D. MINISTER.........................................................................................................................................50 E. WATER ............................................................................................................................................50 F. BAPTISMAL NAME ...........................................................................................................................50 G. DAY.................................................................................................................................................51 H. PARISH CHURCH AT THE FONT.........................................................................................................51 I. PROOF OF BAPTISM..........................................................................................................................52 J. BAPTISM IN HOSPITALS AND HEALTH CARE FACILITIES..................................................................52 K. “SUPPLYING CEREMONIES” .............................................................................................................53 L. INFANTS AND ADULTS .....................................................................................................................54 IV. RITE OF CHRISTIAN INITIATION OF ADULTS (RCIA) ........................................................57 A. SOURCES..........................................................................................................................................57 B. PRE-INITIATION INVENTORY............................................................................................................57 C. INFANTS AND ADULTS .....................................................................................................................57 D. TYPES OF PERSONS IN THE RCIA PROCESS......................................................................................58 E. INQUIRY OR PRE-CATECHUMENATE ................................................................................................62 F. ACCEPTANCE INTO THE CATECHUMENATE OR CANDIDACY FOR FULL COMMUNION.......................63 G. RIGHTS OF THE CATECHUMEN .........................................................................................................64 H. PERIOD OF CATECHESIS ...................................................................................................................64 I. ELECTION TO THE EASTER SACRAMENTS ........................................................................................65 J. PERIOD OF ENLIGHTENMENT ...........................................................................................................66 K. CELEBRATION OF THE EASTER SACRAMENTS ..................................................................................66 L. MEMBERS OF ORTHODOX CHURCHES AND RCIA............................................................................69 M. RECORD-KEEPING ............................................................................................................................70 V. INFANT BAPTISM ...........................................................................................................................73 A. DEFINITION......................................................................................................................................73 B. ROLE OF THE PARENTS AND SPONSORS ............................................................................................73 C. MINISTER.........................................................................................................................................74 D. REQUIREMENT: FOUNDED HOPE......................................................................................................74 E. CATECHESIS.....................................................................................................................................75 F. TIME ................................................................................................................................................75 G. BAPTISMAL NAME............................................................................................................................75 H. SPECIAL SITUATIONS........................................................................................................................75 I. ADOPTION........................................................................................................................................76 J. CHANGES IN THE BAPTISMAL REGISTER ..........................................................................................77 K. OTHER NOTES ON BAPTISM .............................................................................................................78 VI. SPONSORS: RCIA, INFANT BAPTISM, AND CONFIRMATION............................................79 A. NUMBER ..........................................................................................................................................79 B. REQUIREMENTS ...............................................................................................................................80 C. CHRISTIAN WITNESS - BAPTIZED NON-CATHOLIC WITH CATHOLIC SPONSOR ..................................80 D. CANON 874, §1:...............................................................................................................................81 E. SPECIAL QUESTIONS ........................................................................................................................81 VII. EUCHARIST.................................................................................................................................84 Pastoral Manual, 1997 edition Page 2 Sacraments A. EUCHARIST AND THE PRESBYTER ....................................................................................................84 B. MASS INTENTIONS ...........................................................................................................................85
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Preamble. His Excellency. Most Reverend Dom. Carlos Duarte
    Preamble. His Excellency. Most Reverend Dom. Carlos Duarte Costa was consecrated as the Roman Catholic Diocesan Bishop of Botucatu in Brazil on December !" #$%&" until certain views he expressed about the treatment of the Brazil’s poor, by both the civil (overnment and the Roman Catholic Church in Brazil caused his removal from the Diocese of Botucatu. His Excellency was subsequently named as punishment as *itular bishop of Maurensi by the late Pope Pius +, of the Roman Catholic Church in #$-.. His Excellency, Most Reverend /ord Carlos Duarte Costa had been a strong advocate in the #$-0s for the reform of the Roman Catholic Church" he challenged many of the 1ey issues such as • Divorce" • challenged mandatory celibacy for the clergy, and publicly stated his contempt re(arding. 2*his is not a theological point" but a disciplinary one 3 Even at this moment in time in an interview with 4ermany's Die 6eit magazine the current Bishop of Rome" Pope Francis is considering allowing married priests as was in the old time including lets not forget married bishops and we could quote many Bishops" Cardinals and Popes over the centurys prior to 8atican ,, who was married. • abuses of papal power, including the concept of Papal ,nfallibility, which the bishop considered a mis(uided and false dogma. His Excellency President 4et9lio Dornelles 8argas as1ed the Holy :ee of Rome for the removal of His Excellency Most Reverend Dom. Carlos Duarte Costa from the Diocese of Botucatu. *he 8atican could not do this directly. 1 | P a g e *herefore the Apostolic Nuncio to Brazil entered into an agreement with the :ecretary of the Diocese of Botucatu to obtain the resi(nation of His Excellency, Most Reverend /ord.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolutions to Censure the President: Procedure and History
    Resolutions to Censure the President: Procedure and History Updated February 1, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45087 Resolutions to Censure the President: Procedure and History Summary Censure is a reprimand adopted by one or both chambers of Congress against a Member of Congress, President, federal judge, or other government official. While Member censure is a disciplinary measure that is sanctioned by the Constitution (Article 1, Section 5), non-Member censure is not. Rather, it is a formal expression or “sense of” one or both houses of Congress. Censure resolutions targeting non-Members have utilized a range of statements to highlight conduct deemed by the resolutions’ sponsors to be inappropriate or unauthorized. Before the Nixon Administration, such resolutions included variations of the words or phrases unconstitutional, usurpation, reproof, and abuse of power. Beginning in 1972, the most clearly “censorious” resolutions have contained the word censure in the text. Resolutions attempting to censure the President are usually simple resolutions. These resolutions are not privileged for consideration in the House or Senate. They are, instead, considered under the regular parliamentary mechanisms used to process “sense of” legislation. Since 1800, Members of the House and Senate have introduced resolutions of censure against at least 12 sitting Presidents. Two additional Presidents received criticism via alternative means (a House committee report and an amendment to a resolution). The clearest instance of a successful presidential censure is Andrew Jackson. The Senate approved a resolution of censure in 1834. On three other occasions, critical resolutions were adopted, but their final language, as amended, obscured the original intention to censure the President.
    [Show full text]
  • Kirby Catalogue Part 8 1891-1895
    Archival list The Kirby Collection Catalogue Irish College Rome ARCHIVES PONTIFICAL IRISH COLLEGE, ROME Code Date Description and Extent KIR/ 1890 / 494 circa 1890 Holograph letter from Sr. Mary, Rome, to Kirby: Writer thanks Kirby for consenting to be their confessor. Query as to steps to be taken. [see KIR/1890/316] ['Sr. Mary' would appear to be the Foundress of the Little Company of Mary.] 3pp 495 31 December Holograph letter from J.J. Farr, Chettendale, Marrickville, 1890 to Kirby: Personal letter. [Although this letter is dated 'December 31st 1890', the postscript which states 'All well but very hot here' is dated January 5th 1891.] 1p 1 1 January Holograph letter from Sr. M. Peter Frances O'Reilly, 1891 Lisbon, to Kirby: Convent news. Sisters M. de Ricci and Martha died during 1890. School has fallen off considerably of late years, probably due to number of schools now in the country and 'rage amongst the higher class for foreign governesses'. Requests Pope's blessing on 'his Irish children in Bon Successo, Lisbon' and a special one on the writer who celebrates Golden Jubilee of her profession on 5 October of present year. Necessary to re-open novitiate to admit 2 'promising novices', the one French and the other from Loanda, a former pupil'. 4pp 2 1 January Holograph letter from Sr. M. Ignatius Walsh, Yarrawonga, 1891 Victoria, to Kirby: Personal letter. 4pp 3 1 January Holograph letter from Sr. Mary A. Beckett, Birr, to Kirby: 1891 Thanks Kirby for painting of Our Lady of Mercy, which writer has had framed in Dublin and erected in their own chapel 'in time for St.
    [Show full text]
  • Pope Benedict XVI's Invitation Joseph Mele
    Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations Summer 2008 Homiletics at the Threshold: Pope Benedict XVI's Invitation Joseph Mele Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Recommended Citation Mele, J. (2008). Homiletics at the Threshold: Pope Benedict XVI's Invitation (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/919 This Immediate Access is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOMILETICS AT THE THRESHOLD: POPE BENEDICT XVI‘S INVITATION A Dissertation Submitted to The McAnulty College and Graduate School of Liberal Arts Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for The degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Joseph M. Mele May 2008 Copyright by Joseph M. Mele 2008 HOMILETICS AT THE THRESHOLD: POPE BENEDICT XVI‘S INVITATION By Joseph M. Mele Approved Month Day, 2008 ____________________________ ____________________________ Name of Professor Name of Professor Professor of Professor of (Dissertation Director) (Committee Member) ____________________________ ____________________________ Name of Professor Name of Professor Professor of Professor of (Committee Member) (Committee Member) ___________________________ ____________________________ Name of Dean Name of External Reviewer Dean, The McAnulty
    [Show full text]
  • 1700 Faculties
    Book IV The Sanctifying Office of the Church Part I Sacramental Life §1700 FACULTIES The following faculties or permissions apply to all priests who are in good standing and who are incardinated in the Diocese or who have been approved by the Bishop to minister within the Diocese, even if they may be retired. In a spirit of trust and in keeping with the principle of subsidiarity, every effort has been made to extend the discretionary authority of priests in the exercise of their ministry. Whatever special faculties or permissions have been given to pastors apply also to parochial administrators (c. 540, §1). These faculties and permissions are effective August 15, 1986 and remain in effect until revoked. Special Note The information contained in this section is, in many cases, repetitious of that in previous sections and has been included here for purposes of quick reference. Users are encouraged to consult specific sections for a more complete statement of Diocesan Policy and Procedures regarding sacramental matters. §1701 BAPTISM1 1701.1. Faculty To baptize those who are fourteen years of age or older. Procedures a) Canon 862 provides that outside the case of necessity, it is not lawful to confer baptism in the territory of another without permission. b) Without this faculty it would be necessary to refer such cases to the diocesan bishop (c. 863). c) As a rule, an adult is to be baptized in his or her own parish church (c. 857, §2). d) The sacrament of baptism is not to be conferred outside a legitimate canonically erected parish church or chapel, except in the case of necessity (c.
    [Show full text]
  • First Phase Lifting of Mass Suspension
    Mass in Church during COVID Pandemic: 1st Phase of Return 1 (Version of May 14, 2020) These directives are promulgated by the Archbishop of Santa Fe for the early lifting of the suspension of publicly-attended Mass General: Attendance limited to 10% of building capacity (per fire marshal assessment). Dispensation from Sunday obligation remains for all. Safety/ common good is priority. Coordination with staff will be essential, as will be clear and detailed communication to the people. Local pastors can make these directives more stringent as necessitated by local conditions; however, they cannot make them less strict. Reopening will be accomplished in phases. The Archbishop/Vicar General will continue to offer live stream/recorded Mass each Sunday and weekdays, and parishes are encouraged to do so as well. Social distancing/masks/increased cleaning are mandatory. Each measure presents an additional layer of protection, which individually may be insufficient. Cleaning staff should be present to disinfect commonly-touched surfaces after each Mass (pews, door handles, rails, etc.) Have on hand ample cleaning supplies, and masks if possible. Persons over 60 and with compromised immune systems should be pre-advised that they are at increased risk and be encouraged to remain home. Communicate that these guidelines are for the safety of lives and health for themselves and neighbors, and that continued opening depends on everyone’s cooperation. The Archdiocese remains responsive to changes in conditions/requirements, and will revise these instructions periodically as necessary. In Churches No open holy water present. There may be a dispenser for people to fill bottles if desired.
    [Show full text]
  • The Virtue of Penance in the United States, 1955-1975
    THE VIRTUE OF PENANCE IN THE UNITED STATES, 1955-1975 Dissertation Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Theology By Maria Christina Morrow UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON Dayton, Ohio December 2013 THE VIRTUE OF PENANCE IN THE UNITED STATES, 1955-1975 Name: Morrow, Maria Christina APPROVED BY: _______________________________________ Sandra A. Yocum, Ph.D. Committee Chair _______________________________________ William L. Portier, Ph.D. Committee Member Mary Ann Spearin Chair in Catholic Theology _______________________________________ Kelly S. Johnson, Ph.D. Committee Member _______________________________________ Jana M. Bennett, Ph.D. Committee Member _______________________________________ William C. Mattison, III, Ph.D. Committee Member iii ABSTRACT THE VIRTUE OF PENANCE IN THE UNITED STATES, 1955-1975 Name: Morrow, Maria Christina University of Dayton Advisor: Dr. Sandra A. Yocum This dissertation examines the conception of sin and the practice of penance among Catholics in the United States from 1955 to 1975. It begins with a brief historical account of sin and penance in Christian history, indicating the long tradition of performing penitential acts in response to the identification of one’s self as a sinner. The dissertation then considers the Thomistic account of sin and the response of penance, which is understood both as a sacrament (which destroys the sin) and as a virtue (the acts of which constitute the matter of the sacrament but also extend to include non-sacramental acts). This serves to provide a framework for understanding the way Catholics in the United States identified sin and sought to amend for it by use of the sacrament of penance as well as non-sacramental penitential acts of the virtue of penance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Subjective Element of Crime: a Comparison Between Ecclesiastical, and Belgian Criminal Law
    The Subjective Element of Crime: a Comparison between Ecclesiastical, and Belgian Criminal Law Word count: 36,697 Raphael Maesschalck Student number: 01204319 Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Jan Verplaetse Co-supervisor: Prof. Dr. Tom Vander Beken A dissertation submitted to Ghent University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Laws Academic year: 2017 - 2018 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS — DUTCH Een woord van dank gaat uit naar: - Mijn promotor, Prof. dr. Jan Verplaetse, wiens ideeën mij lieten durven denken, voor het interessante onderwerp; - Dr. William Richardson, voor het aanreiken van een literatuurlijst, het beantwoorden van mijn (vele) chaotische vragen en het ter beschikking stellen van verhelderende inzichten tijdens onze gesprekken; - Prof. em. dr. Ruud Huysmans, voor het delen zijn expertise en visie en de tijd die hij daarvoor vrijmaakte; - Mr. Eric De Wilde, voor het mij wegwijs maken in het doolhof van de bijzondere faculteit kerkelijk recht te Leuven en het gebruikelijke kopje koffie; - Mr. Philippe Tobback, niet alleen voor het ter beschikking stellen van een geairconditioneerde werkplaats in de moordende zomerhitte, maar vooral voor alle steun en hulp die mij steeds opnieuw werd aangeboden; - Dr. Nigel Coles, mr. Martin Jones en mr. Nils Van Damme, voor het nalezen dit werk; - Mijn vader, voor de economische en morele steun; - En tenslotte mijn moeder, voor veel meer dan dat wat een louter dankwoord verdient. !2 !3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS — DUTCH____________________________________ 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS______________________________________________ 4 GENERAL INTRODUCTION___________________________________________ 7 CHAPTER I: Introduction to the Legal and Institutional Frameworks____________ 9 1 The Church and Ecclesiastical Criminal Law.................................................................. 9 1.1 The Church as a Spiritual and Governing Institution..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Coptic Personal Status Law Ryan Rowberry Georgia State University College of Law, [email protected]
    Georgia State University College of Law Reading Room Faculty Publications By Year Faculty Publications 1-1-2010 A Brief History of Coptic Personal Status Law Ryan Rowberry Georgia State University College of Law, [email protected] John Khalil Follow this and additional works at: https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/faculty_pub Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the Human Rights Law Commons Recommended Citation Ryan Rowberry & John Khalil, A Brief History of Coptic Personal Status Law, 3 Berk. J. Middle E. & Islamic L. 81 (2010). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Reading Room. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications By Year by an authorized administrator of Reading Room. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Brief History of Coptic Personal Status Law Ryan Rowberry John Khalil* INTRODUCTION With the U.S.-led "War on Terror" and the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan, American legal scholars have understandably focused increased attention on the various schools and applications of Islamic law in Middle Eastern countries. 1 This focus on Shari'a law, however, has tended to elide the complexity of traditional legal pluralism in many Islamic nations. Numerous Christian communities across the Middle East (e.g., Syrian, Armenian, Coptic, Nestorian, Maronite), for example, adhere to personal status laws that are not based on Islamic legal principles. Christian minority groups form the largest non-Muslim . Ryan Rowberry and Jolin Khalil graduated from Harvard Law School in 2008. Ryan is currently a natural resources associate at Hogan Lovells US LLP in Washington D.C., and John Khalil is a litigation associate at Lowey, Dannenberg, Cowey & Hart P.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Rights in Canon Law for Persons with Mental Disabilities
    The Catholic Lawyer Volume 33 Number 2 Volume 33, Number 2 Article 4 Rights in Canon Law for Persons with Mental Disabilities Rev. Joseph N. Perry Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/tcl Part of the Religion Law Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Catholic Lawyer by an authorized editor of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RIGHTS IN CANON LAW FOR PERSONS WITH MENTAL DISABILITIES REV. JOSEPH N. PERRY* INTRODUCTION The Code of Canon Law (the "Code") continues to meet with genu- ine interest amidst various groupings in the Church. Its translation into the vernacular certainly evokes curiosity about the opportunities for Christian life and service offered in the various books of the Code. The Catholic Church has a venerable history of care for people who are in any way differently advantaged. Long before the medical and be- havioral sciences made inroads into retardation and long before special education became an art, church men and women, many of them founders of religious orders, pioneered skills and strategy with people of disabilities who are often misunderstood and excluded from society. Ministry to special people parallels, in many respects, the expanded social consciousness of our time. All kinds of so-called minority groups are asserting their rightful place in the fabric of society and religion. In the wake of the civil rights struggle, our society enjoys a heightened sense of social inclusion that involves a new responsiveness to the mentally, physically and emotionally disabled.
    [Show full text]
  • Canonlaw No.1No.1
    CATHOLICS FOR A FREE CHOICE CATHOLICSCATHOLICS ANDAND ABORTIONABORTION NOTES ON CANONLAW NO.1NO.1 If you are interested in this subject, you might also be interested in the following CFFC publications on Catholics and reproductive choice: • You Are Not Alone—Information for Catholic Women about the Abortion Decision • Reflections of a Catholic Theologian on Visiting an Abortion Clinic, by Daniel C. Maguire • The Facts Tell the Story: Catholics and Choice For order information, please call +1 (202) 986-6093 or visit the publications section of our webpage www.catholicsforchoice.org 1 INTRODUCTION Canon law, the Catholic church’s internal law, is a subject most Catholics think they will never need to study. However, the hotly debated and politically polarized issue of abortion has resulted in substantial public assertions about canon law and abortion, both in the case of women who have had abortions and Catholic legislators and activists who have favored legal abortion. Everyone is an expert, claiming that prochoice Catholics are “heretics” or have been “excommunicated” because they have had an abortion or have supported legal abortion. Such finger pointing may be politically useful, but it is not an honest way to deal with differences of belief about abortion. What does the church’s law really say about abortion? We have produced this pamphlet to explain the basics of canon law as it relates to abortion and to clarify what church punishments apply and when they apply. Whether you are a woman who has had an abortion, a doctor who has performed an abortion, a clinic escort, a prochoice legislator, or an interested “person in the pew,” we hope this publication will help you.
    [Show full text]
  • Process and Policy in the Courts of the Roman Curiat
    CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 58:628 The Steady Man: Process and Policy in the Courts of the Roman Curiat John T. Noonan, Jr.* The two marriages of Charles, Duke of Lorraine, led to one of the most fascinating canonical trials of the seventeenth century. Professor Noonan uses this trial and its attendant circumstances as a springboard from which to examine the policies, procedures, and politics of post-RenaissanceRoman Catholic law. His Article under- lines the problems faced by a legal system that attempts to regulate the relationshipbetween man and woman. In broader perspective, it analyzes the reaction of a legal system forced to compromise between abstract social values and practical necessity. Professor Noonan's analytical framework can be profitably utilized as a tool to examine the manner in which our current social policies are implemented and administered. Anthropology rightly devotes great effort to deciphering the primi- tive attempts of men to make law in the primordial patterns, for from this effort will come material to illuminate our own behavior. But just as child psychology does not exhaust the study of man, so there is need to understand critically the functions of law in a more sophisticated phase. In its developed uses we are more likely to see analogues to our present problems, more likely to gain insights into the purposes, perver- sions, characteristics, and limits of the legal way of ordering human behavior in a mature society. Especially is this true of a system far enough removed from our own to be looked at from a distance but close enough in its assumption and its methods so that comprehension is not strained.
    [Show full text]