Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduction INTRODUCTION. THE Letters of the Lady Brilliana Harley are published from a collection of family papers in the possession of her descendant the Lady Frances Vernon Harcourt, of Brampton Bryan, Herefordshire. The MSS. had been neglected at Eywood, the seat of the Harleys in that county, until within the last few years, when they were rescued from ruin, and arranged by the Lady Frances, to whose charge they were committed by her father, Edward, the fifth Earl of Oxford. It is not improbable, that they were left at Eywood by Edward Har- ley, the Auditor of the Imprest, who resided there, being himself the second son of Sir Edward Harley, to whom most of the Letters are addressed, and to whose piety, no doubt, their preservation is due. It will be remembered, that upon failure of issue male of Robert Harley, the first Earl of Oxford, by the death of his son Edward, the founder of the Harleian Library, the title passed to the son of the auditor his brother, and thence descended to the late Earl, at whose death, whilst these pages are in the press ^January 1853) the title became extinct. The present volume comprises all the Letters in the collection written by the Lady Brilliana, which are printed from transcripts made by the Editor, with scrupulous fidelity to the originals. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.22, on 24 Sep 2021 at 22:45:21, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2042169900013250 VI INTRODUCTION. Referring to Collins' " Historical Collections of the noble families of Cavendish, Holies, Vere, Harley and Ogle," (Lond. 1752) for the earlier notices of the distinguished family of Harley, it may be well, for the illustration of these letters, to state that Sir Robert Harley, the husband of the Lady Brilliana, was the son of Thomas Harley, of Brampton Bryan Castle, by Margaret daughter of Sir Andrew Corbet, of Morton Corbet in the county of Salop, and born at » Wigmore Re- Wigmore Castle, and baptised there 1st March, 1579.a His father, S' r" born about 1548, was sheriff 36° Elizabeth, and again in the last year of that reign and in the first of James, in which year he had Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.22, onth 24e Sepgran 2021t atfro 22:45:21m th, esubject Kin tog theof Cambridge the honou Corer of Wigmore Castle. He was terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2042169900013250 b Collins, p. 197. in frequent state employments,11 in the council of William Lord Compton, President of the Marches of Wales, and " very consider- able for his affluence both of fortune and ability, and distinguished himself by the sagacity of his counsels to the King, against the measures then in pursuit, as tending to involve his Majesty or his son in a war with his people." Quitting public employment, he retired to his estate, where he lived in the exercise of a noble hos- pitality, and died at an advanced age, and was buried at Brampton * Brampton Bryan 19th March, 1631.° The mother of Sir Robert having died when he was young, his early education was entrusted to his uncle Richard Harley, an d The Auditor's accomplished scholar. He afterwards entered Oriel college,4 under Notes. ^ tutorage of the Rev. Cadwallader Owen,e reputed a great dis- = Wood's Fasti ° . by Bliss, i. 455. putant, and commonly known as " Sic Doceo;" at which place he must have been held in high esteem, for on the motion of the Letter in Ap- Provost, 1641/ his arms were placed in a window of the new pen ix. hull, built about this time, where they still are to be seen. Having taken the degree of Bachelor of Arts, he removed to the Inner s Collins, p.198. Temple,g where he associated with men of the first rank and in- fluence in that society, and remained there until the coronation of INTRODUCTION. Vll King James,'1 at which he was made one of the Knights of the Bath..h 15th July, In 16th July, 1604, he was made Forester of Boringwood or Bring- wood Chase, in the county of Hereford, with the office of the Pokership (the nature of which office is now involved in obscurity), Authorities and custody of the forest or chase of Prestwood, and in the 7 th ofgivenin King James he obtained a grant to himself, his heirs, and assigns for ever, for a weekly market and annual fair at Wigmore. Marrying early, in the life-time of his father," he resided for some a Notice of Ree- time at Stanage Lodge, in the parish of Brampton; and whilst in- t°™ Bryant teresting himself in rural pursuits, in the improvement of breeds of ^a.rl"^l?SS' & r » r jjrlt. Museum. cattle, sheep, and horses, and other branches of agriculture, devoted much of his time to everything connected with the business and welfare, religious and secular, of the county of Hereford, of which he was a magistrate and deputy lieutenant. He represented the borough of Radnor in the parliament 1° and 12° James,b and was u Willis's No- elected one of the knights for Herefordshire in 21° James, and intltia Parliamen" & tana. 15°, 16° of Charles, which last beginning 3rd Nov. 1640, continued sitting until 1653 ; a parliament which, notwithstanding the dissolu- tion of the monarchy and the summoning of no less than four parliaments by the usurping power, was re-assembled in 1659, when a Bill was passed for its dissolution,0 and for calling another«16 March, parliament, which met 25th April, 1660, and restored the monarchy. 1659-60- Sir Robert was a man of wit, learning, and piety, but of an austere and decided character. As a patriot, he was zealous and active for the redress of the many grievances under which the people of England had too just grounds of complaint; and in his religion he was deeply imbued with the views of the Puritans, of which party he was one of the most decided and influential members. The Journals of the House of Commons, especially during the Long Parliament, evince how incessantly and zealously he was occu- pied in committees of that house, and in conferences with the Lords, Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.22, on 24 Sep 2021 at 22:45:21, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2042169900013250 Vlll INTRODUCTION. on almost all the most important questions of the times. To him, in Hous™of Com committees with others, were referred the petitions of Leighton," 13 Nov. 1640. Prynne,b Bastwick,0 and other sufferers under the Star Chamber; also, the consideration of the jurisdiction of the High Commission Courts of Canterbury and York,—of the Star Chamber, and also of the court d d 23 Dec. 1640. of the Council of the Marches of Wales ; the acts and abuses of which courts had given such great cause of discontent. He was active in the proceedings against the Lord Strafford,—in the Scotch and Irish e 3 Dec. 1641. affairs,e—in carrying out also the scheme of adventures for Ire- 24 Feb. 1641." land/—of the joint committee of the Commons with the Lords, 20 May, 1642. i0 receive from the Scotch Commissioners what they had to commu- e 3 Feb. 1643-4. nicate to both or either house of parliaments He was busily engaged. in the organizing of the militia,—in providing means for carrying h 19 Sept. 1642. on the civil wars;h lending money and plate himself, and encouraging 6 Dec. 1643. .. p others to do the same, towards the suppert oi the .Parliamentary ' 23 Sept. 1643. cause; in which he was of the committee for the garrison' of Glouces- k 27 Oot. 1643. ter and the security of the western counties.1 Sir Robert was on 1 9 Oct. 1643. the committee for the Great Seal;1 and also on an ordinance of Par- ' Hament for upholding the trade and settling the government of the Company and Fellowship of Merchants trading to the East Indies, &c. and also to the Levant seas. He was chairman of the committees for Elections, for the Universities, for Emmanuel College, also of one of the subdivisions of the Grand Committee for Religion. To Sir Robert was entrusted the preparation of the order to prohibit the wearing of 1 «>30Sept.l643. tne surplice in cathedral, collegiate, and parish churches," and for the better observing of the Lord's Day. He was of the committee to take into consideration the removing of the Communion tables in n an< tne nns 30 Aug. 1641. tne Universities i I °f Court," the Book of Sports, and all other matters of innovation,—of the committee for superstitious °llFeb.l 641-2. pictures,—of a committee,0 consisting of Strode, Cromwell, Hamp- den, and himself, to prepare letters to be sent to the Uni- Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.22, on 24 Sep 2021 at 22:45:21, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2042169900013250 INTRODUCTION. IX versities concerning the complaint of pressing subscriptions upon young graduates, on taking their degrees; and also of the com- mittee on an Act to enable Members of Parliament to discharge their consciences in the proceedings of Parliament.* It would be tedious • Journals of n n o «rti.
Recommended publications
  • Civil War: Parliamentarians Vs Royalists (KS2-KS3)
    BACK TO CONTENTS SELF-LED ACTIVITY CIVIL WAR: PARLIAMENTARIANS VS ROYALISTS KS2 KS3 Recommended for SUMMARY KS2–3 (History, English) This activity will explore the backgrounds, beliefs and perspectives of key people in the English Civil War to help the class gain a deeper understanding of the conflict. In small groups of about three, ask Learning objectives students to read the points of view of the six historical figures on • Learn about the different pages 33 and 34. They should decide whether they think each person figures leading up to the was a Royalist or a Parliamentarian, and why; answers can be found English Civil War and their in the Teachers’ Notes on page 32. Now conduct a class discussion perspectives on the conflict. about the points made by each figure and allow for personal thoughts • Understand the ideologies and responses. Collect these thoughts in a collaborative mind map. of the different sides in the Next, divide the class into ‘Parliamentarians’ and ‘Royalists’. Using the English Civil War. historical figures’ perspectives on pages 33 and 34, the points the • Use historical sources to class made, and the tips below, have the students prepare a speech to formulate a classroom persuade those in the other groups to join them. debate. Invite two students from each side to present their arguments; after both sides have spoken, discuss how effective their arguments were. Time to complete The Parliamentarians and the Royalists could not reach an agreement and so civil war broke out – is the group able to reach a compromise? Approx. 60 minutes TOP TIPS FOR PERSUASIVE WRITING Strong arguments follow a clear structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Geographies and Liminal Identities in Three Early Modern Women’S Life Writings About War I-Chun Wang Kaohsiung Medical University
    Personal Geographies and Liminal Identities in Three Early Modern Women’s Life Writings about War I-Chun Wang Kaohsiung Medical University 510 Throughout literary history, war has been a recurrent theme in life writing. This arti- cle discusses life writing as an important aspect of comparative literature or world literature, and focuses on three early modern women’s geographical experiences and liminal identities as found in their life writings: Marguerite of Valois (1553-1615), a Catholic and Queen consort of Navarre who served as a supporter of Protestants during the French wars of religion, Queen Henrietta Maria of England (1609-69), and Lady Brilliana Harley (1598-1643), the wife of a Parliamentarian representative of England. These three noblewomen used their writings as means of constructing their identities in the public sphere. While describing the forced transgressions of their gender boundaries, these women reveal their concern for suffering people, and their geographic mobility in uncharted territories in which they came to create for themselves a liminal identity. Marguerite of Valois saved the Huguenots and her husband during a time of religious struggles in Paris. Queen Henrietta Maria’s letters manifest her indomitable attempts to secure ammunition and support for King Charles I of England. Lady Brilliana Harley bravely participated in defending her home/garrison, Brampton Bryan Castle in northwestern England, when it was under siege by Royalist troops. These women contributed to life writing, a genre that traditional literary studies have generally associated with men. Men’s life writings mainly dealt with political ideologies, deci- sion making, and military conflicts with both enemies and lifelong friends.
    [Show full text]
  • Border Group Neighbourhood Plan October 2018
    BORDER GROUP Neighbourhood Development Plan 2011-2031 October 2018 2 Contents 1. Introduction 3 2 Vision, Objectives and Strategic Policies 7 Policies 3 Meeting Housing Needs 14 4 Supporting Local Enterprise 36 5 Infrastructure and Facilities 39 6 Environment and Character 42 7 Delivering the Plan 50 Appendix 1: Land at the Nursery, Lingen Development Brief 52 Appendix 2: Non-Statutory Enabling Policies 57 Acknowledgements Thanks go to David Thame and Harley Thomas for their work in defining the character of Lingen and including the preparation of Lingen Conservation Area Assessment and to Tony Swainson for defining the character of Adforton. Border Group Neighbourhood Plan – October 2018 3 1. Introduction Background 1.1 Border Group Neighbourhood Development Plan (the NDP) is a new type of planning document introduced by the Localism Act of 2011. It enables local communities to make a significant contribution to some of the planning decisions about how their areas should be developed. 1.2 Border Group Parish Council made a formal submission to Herefordshire Council to designate the Group Parish as a Neighbourhood Plan Area under the Localism Act 2011, with the intention of preparing this NDP on 28th May 2013. Following a consultation period this was approved on 18th July 2013. This NDP has been prepared in accordance with Herefordshire Local Plan Core Strategy which was adopted by Herefordshire Council on 16th October 2015. 1.3 In deciding to prepare a Neighbourhood Plan the Group Parish Council was aware of the alternatives which were: i) Not to prepare a plan but rely upon Herefordshire Core Strategy which would allow developers to bring forward sites in any of the settlements as they see fit in order to meet and potentially exceed the target for new housing set for the Group of Parishes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Royalist and Parliamentarian War Effort in Shropshire During the First and Second English Civil Wars, 1642-1648
    The Royalist and Parliamentarian War Effort in Shropshire During the First and Second English Civil Wars, 1642-1648 Item Type Thesis or dissertation Authors Worton, Jonathan Citation Worton, J. (2015). The royalist and parliamentarian war effort in Shropshire during the first and second English civil wars, 1642-1648. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Chester, United Kingdom. Publisher University of Chester Download date 24/09/2021 00:57:51 Item License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10034/612966 The Royalist and Parliamentarian War Effort in Shropshire During the First and Second English Civil Wars, 1642-1648 Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of The University of Chester For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Jonathan Worton June 2015 ABSTRACT The Royalist and Parliamentarian War Effort in Shropshire During the First and Second English Civil Wars, 1642-1648 Jonathan Worton Addressing the military organisation of both Royalists and Parliamentarians, the subject of this thesis is an examination of war effort during the mid-seventeenth century English Civil Wars by taking the example of Shropshire. The county was contested during the First Civil War of 1642-6 and also saw armed conflict on a smaller scale during the Second Civil War of 1648. This detailed study provides a comprehensive bipartisan analysis of military endeavour, in terms of organisation and of the engagements fought. Drawing on numerous primary sources, it explores: leadership and administration; recruitment and the armed forces; military finance; supply and logistics; and the nature and conduct of the fighting.
    [Show full text]
  • Metarepresentation in Lady Jane Cavendish and Lady Elizabeth Brackley's the Concealed Fancies Li
    ‘Come, what, a siege?’: Metarepresentation in Lady Jane Cavendish and Lady Elizabeth Brackley’s The Concealed Fancies Lisa Hopkins and Barbara MacMahon Sheffield Hallam University [email protected] [email protected] The Concealed Fancies is a play written by Lady Jane Cavendish and Lady Elizabeth Brackley, the two eldest daughters of William Cavendish, marquis (and later duke) of Newcastle, during the English Civil War.1 We can feel reasonably certain that the sisters wrote it in the hope that it could be performed; however, that would have required the presence of their father,2 whose return is the climax of the story, from the Continental exile to which he had fled after his comprehensive defeat at the Battle of Marston Moor. The idea of performance must, therefore, always have looked likely to be wishful thinking, and the play remained a closet drama. This was in any case a genre with which it had several features in common, since two of its most celebrated practitioners, the countess of Pembroke and Elizabeth Cary, had set the precedent for female dramatic authorship; moreover, a crucial scene in The Concealed Fancies is actually set in a closet, when the three ‘lady cousins’ pick the locks of Monsieur Calsindow’s cabinet and look through his possessions, and it is at least possible that the sisters envisaged any performance of the play at one of the two family homes of Bolsover or Welbeck as taking place in a promenade style which would have involved moving to an actual closet for part of this scene.
    [Show full text]
  • Cromwelliana 2013
    CROMWELLIANA 2013 Series III No 2 Editor: Dr Maxine Forshaw CONTENTS Editor’s Note 2 Cromwell Day Address (Sep 2012): The Cromwell Association 3 75th Anniversary By Prof Blair Worden Oliver Cromwell and the People of God (Cromwell Collection 8 Lecture, Nov 2011) By Dr David L Smith The Cromwell Association and its Presidents 27 By Dr Patrick Little WC Abbott and the Historical Reputation of Cromwell 42 By Dr David L Smith Cromwell and the Historians 59 By Prof Peter Gaunt Memorialising Cromwell: How Cromwell has been 77 remembered by the Association and others By John Goldsmith Book Reviews 94 By Prof Peter Gaunt, Dr Stephen Roberts, Prof Ivan Roots Bibliography of Books 109 By Dr David Smith Bibliography of Journals 114 By Prof Peter Gaunt Writings and Sources XV: New light on what Cromwell said to 121 the officers on 27th February 1657 By Prof Peter Gaunt ISBN 0-905729-29-3 EDITOR’S NOTE 2012 marked the 75th anniversary of the Cromwell Association and, accordingly, this edition of the journal of the Association acknowledges this event. Blair Worden celebrated the anniversary in his Cromwell Day address. The study day held in October 2012 ‘Cromwell and the Historians, 1937-2012’ looked at the development of studies of Cromwell over the period and the papers presented are included here. These cover diverse topics such as the editors of Cromwell’s letters and speeches, historians’ views of Cromwell since 1937, the activities of the Association and its presidents, and the memorials erected at Cromwellian sites both by the Association and others.
    [Show full text]
  • John Tombes As a Correspondent
    JOM Tombes as a Correspondent. OHN TOMBES (1603.1676) is known t6 fame primarily as the Baptist protagonist in the disputations that characterised his J age. His 9'l"al debates were numerous, but his pen appears. to have been even more active than his tongue. Most of his books, and they number'ed 28, were controversial. As a cor. respondent little is' known 0[ him. Now, however, we have two letters. which he 'sent to. Sir Ro.bert Harley in 1642, just on the eve of the Civil War. From them we !learn of his sympathy and also. his. desire to keep his friend well informed· as to. the course of events locally. Sir Robert Harley (1579.1656) was an M.P. and Master o.f the Mint. His home was at Brampton Bryan Castle, in Herefo.r~hire. He was. made a Knight of the Bath by James I. at his coronation. Sir Robert. served on many important committees of the House of. Commons during· the Long Parliament, and on December 15th, 1643, he suc· ceeded Pym as a member 0[ the W.estminster Assembly of Divines. In 1643 his castle was beseiged .by the Royalists for six weeks; he was in London at the time, ',but his wife, Lady Brilliani Harley, ably 1iefended it until the siege was raised. The next }'leaf it fell to the Royalists. In 1646 Harley's losses during the civil war were estimated at £12,550. .. Earnest for Presbytery," a man of pure life, devoted to religious otbserv'ance, he loved to befriend the Puritans and Dissenters.
    [Show full text]
  • Nra River Teme Catchment Management Plan
    RIVER TEME CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSULTATION REPORT SEPTEMBER 1995 NRA National Rivers Authority Severn-Trent Region YOUR VIEWS This report is intended to form the basis for full consultation between the NRA and all those with interests in the catchment. You may wish to: * comment on the Vision for the Catchment * comment on the issues and options identified in the report * suggest alternative options for resolving identified issues * raise additional issues not identified in the report All comments received will be considered to be in the public domain unless consultees explicitly state otherwise in their responses. Following the consultation period all comments received on the Consultation Report will be considered in preparing the next phase, the Action Plan. This Consultation Report will not be rewritten as part of the Action Plan process. The NRA intends that the Plan should influence the policies and action of developers and planning authorities as well as assisting in the day to day management of the Catchment. A short paper on the issues was sent to Local Authorities, National Organisations, other representative bodies and representatives of the NRA Statutory Committees in April 1995. All the comments have been incorporated into this document where possible. A list of organisations who have commented is given in Appendix 4. The NRA is grateful for the useful suggestions received. Comments on the Consultation Report should be sent to: Dr J H Kalicki, Area Manager NRA Upper Severn Area Hafren House Welshpool Road Shelton Shrewsbury Shropshire, SY3 8BB All contributions should be made in writing by: Friday 1 December 1995 If you or your organisation need further information, or further copies of this Report, please contact Mrs D Murray at the above address or by telephone on 01743 272828.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pandolfini Portrait Reduced
    Edward de Vere? The Pandolfini Portrait David Shakespeare This is another presentation about a portrait, not quite as small as the Harley miniature which we looked at earlier. I have called it the Pandolfini Portrait of Edward de Vere, for reasons which will become apparent. The question of course is whether or not it is genuine, and finally that is for you to decide. I am going to tell you the story as my research progressed, so you won’t discover all of my findings until the end. I will just tell you that by the time we get there you will discover that the name of the portrait is wrong. So settle down for the story. As ever you will meet some very interesting people. You are looking at the details of the auction of a portrait of Edward de Vere at the Pandolfini auction house in Florence in April of 2015. It is reported as being of the English School, and having labels on the back. There are two very interesting facts. Firstly it had been in the collection of John Harley, and secondly it had been in an exhibition in 1890. !1 The name Harley stands out of course because the Harley family were the second creation of the Earls of Oxford in 1712. The main art collector being Edward Harley who died in 1749. The painting was expected to sell for 4-5000 euros, but was sold for 70,000 Euros. It belonged to an important private collection in Treviso, situated just north of Venice and was purchased by a French Antiquarian.
    [Show full text]
  • Transactions Woolhope Naturalists' Field Club
    TRANSACTIONS OF TH E WOOLHOPE NATURALISTS' FIELD CLUB HEREFORDSHIRE %,‘ la A L, z • "HOPE ON" oa- rm "HOPE EVER" • • 1851 ESTABLISHED 1851 VOLUME XLVIII 1995 PART II TRANSACTIONS OF THE WOOLHOPE NATURALISTS' FIELD CLUB HEREFORDSHIRE * A "HOPE ON" 11111011111111111111111 -HOPE EVER" ESTABLISHED 1851 VOLUME XLVIII 1995 PART II TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Proceedings, 1995 179 Obituary - Richard Kay - - 192 Some Connected Thoughts on the Parks and Gardens of Herefordshire before the Age of Landscape Gardening, by D. A. Whitehead 193 Report on the excavation of Huntsham Romano-British Villa and Iron Age Enclosure 1959-1970, by Elizabeth Taylor 224 Two Herefordshire Minsters, by J. W. King. - 282 A Grant of the Manor of Kingstone, by B. Coplestone-Crow 295 The Mort mers of Wigmore 1282-1330, by Charles Hopkinson 303 Woolhope Naturalists' Field Club 1995 CO 1998 Archaeological and Historical Investigations at 9-19 Widemarsh Street and 41-43 Bewell Street, Hereford, by Richard Stone - 335 All contributions to The Woolhope Transactions are COPYRIGHT. None of them may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the writers. Applications to reproduce contributions, in whole or in part, should be addressed in the first instance, to the editor whose address is given in the LIST OF OFFICERS. REPORTS OF SECTIONAL RECORDERS The Woolhope Naturalists' Field Club is not responsible for any statement made, or opinion expressed, in these Transactions; the authors alone are responsible for their Archaeology, 1995, by R. Shoesmith - 346 own papers and reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Violence in the English Civil War, 1642-1646
    “God is pleased to be called a man of Warre”: Religious Violence in the English Civil War, 1642-1646 Micheline Jessica Astley-Boden BA (Hons) A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2014 School of History, Philosophy, Religion, and Classics Abstract In the seventeenth century, daily lives were shaped by religious observance; the Bible was the means by which the world was understood, and Biblical language was one of the most comprehensive tools of expression. However, religious orthodoxy was a hotly contested issue that pervaded political discourse and fired loyalties at all levels of society. This thesis therefore analyses the extent to which religious convictions and difference permeated the civil war armies and continued to drive soldiers’ actions throughout the First Civil War (1642-1646). Dedication to religious observance safeguarded the Christian soldiers’ immortal souls, but each side’s religiosity, and perception of the world, resulted in the use of religious doctrine to explain difference and validate violence against ‘God’s enemies’. Although providing evidence for the role of religion in both the Parliamentarian and Royalist armies, this thesis, at times, places emphasis on the Royalists due to their relative historiographical underrepresentation. While the Parliamentarian army has been viewed as deeply religious – ‘godly’ – there is evidence that the Royalist side, too, structured army life around divine services. It is also apparent that the high command on both sides undertook a determined campaign to disseminate the language of holy war to their troops. These ideas diffused through the civil war armies. They were reflected by the soldiers – those in high positions of power to those among the lower ranks – on military banners and in letters, diaries, and journals.
    [Show full text]
  • Hanley Castle
    Hanley Castle W.S. Symonds Hanley Castle Table of Contents Hanley Castle.............................................................................................................................................................1 W.S. Symonds................................................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1. UPTON−ON−SEVERNA ROMAN CAMPHANLEYHANLEY CASTLEBRICTRIC MEAWE AT HANLEY CASTLETHE DE CLARESBEAUCHAMPSISABEL DESPENSERTHE FAMILY OF FORESTERSMISTRESS TABITHA FORESTERHER DIARYDISFORESTING OF MALVERN CHASE (1632)A FOREST AND A CHASECOMMONS SUCCEEDED THE FORESTHANLEY CHURCH AND RECTORMASTER JOHN KELLYSNOW IN AUGUST, (1635)EARL OF WORCESTER AT HANLEY CASTLEROMAN STINGING NETTLES..............................4 Chapter 2. FIRST RELIGIOUS DIFFERENCESTHE STAR CHAMBER AND MESSRS. PRYNNE, BURTON, AND BASTWICKPURITANS AND ROYALISTSSCOTLAND AND THE PRAYER BOOKEARL OF STRAFFORD AND THOROUGHLAUD AND TORTUREISABEL FORESTERMEETING OF PURITANS AT UPTONDISCOURSE BY PREACHER COCKTAILAUNT TABITHA'S VIEWS THEREONESTRANGEMENTSMASSACRE OF PROTESTANTS IN IRELANDJOHN KELLY'S VIEWS THEREONROUNDHEADS AND CAVALIERS....................................8 Chapter 3. SIR GILES NANFANBRIDGETSQUIRE BARTLETTHAFOD THE FOOLTHE BROTHERS YATESLORD COCKAYNETHE BEACON UPON THE HEREFORDSHIRE BEACONTHE WELL OF ST. WAUMCOMMISSIONS OF ARRAYCAPTAIN BOUNDTHE PURITANS AND THE RECTOR OF UPTONTHE MEETING OF PURITANS AT UPTON..........................13 Chapter 4. FOOLS, REBELS, AND KNAVESPARSON
    [Show full text]