DOCSLIB.ORG

485 1% Stockton

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
485 1% Stockton 1 SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS INTERAGENCY TRANSIT COMMITTEE SJCOG Conference Room 555 E. Weber Avenue, Stockton, CA 95202 Monday, March 2, 2020 1:30 PM Teleconference Number: 1-650-479-3208 Participant Code: 805 691 160 Attention Callers: Please mute the call unless speaking The San Joaquin Council of Governments is in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and will make all reasonable accommodations for the disabled to participate in employment, programs and facilities. Persons requiring assistance or auxiliary aid in order to participate should contact Rebecca Calija at (209) 235-0600 at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. A G E N D A 1. Call to Order / Introductions 2. Intercity Transit Service – Chesley DISCUSSION 3. ITC Voting Structure and Voting Procedures – Campos ACTION 4. Report on Van Go! Service in Manteca and Tracy Federal ACTION Urbanized Areas (UZA) – Campos 5. Low Carbon Transit Operations Program FY 19/20 DISCUSSION Funding Distribution – Niblock 6. Masabi Contract – Campos INFORMATION 7. Other Matters of Business 8. Meeting Adjourned to Monday, April 6, 2020 at 1:30 p.m. PARKING: For your convenience, parking is available at the COG Regional Center. There is additional parking available at Public Parking Lot K, located on American Street, just south of Weber Avenue. Additional meter parking is available on Weber Avenue. 2 AGENDA ITEM 2 3 Intercity Transit Facts Round Trips Per Day (Weekday): 90 - 8.5 91 - 7 93 - 8 97 - 3.5 23 - 7.5 Round Trips Per Day (Weekend): 90 - 0 91 - 0 93 - 0 97 - 4 23 - 7.5 4 5 6 7 8 Proposal for Consideration by RTD in response to Intercity Transit Services in San Joaquin County Revised: February 3, 2020 The Transit Managers from the Cities of Escalon, Lodi, Manteca and Tracy (“Transit Managers”) have met to discuss the San Joaquin Regional Transit District (RTD)’s concern regarding the provision of intercity transit services outside the City of Stockton and unincorporated County areas. It is understood that RTD wishes to have the service costs which exceed the deficit funded by the local jurisdictions served by the intercity service. The Transit Managers agree that, collectively, the cities of Escalon, Lathrop, Lodi, Manteca, Ripon and Tracy (“Expanded Area Cities,” as defined in the 1994 Measure K Master Agreement) should support the intercity system. The intercity system transports residents between our cities and Stockton and was originally created as a result of the Unmet Transit Needs process in 1994. The Transit Managers also believe that a redesigned intercity system to maximize ridership will ensure continued success and address the following principles: 1. Connects all seven incorporated cities in the most cost efficient manner possible (could mean a combination of demand response and/or deviated fixed route); 2. Integrating with the five municipal operated transit systems and RTD local routes in Stockton and unincorporated County areas; 3. Does not duplicate municipal operated transit systems or local routes provided by RTD in the City of Stockton or unincorporated County areas; 4. Utilizes all available regional funding as first priority for operational and capital needs; 5. Should operate at the baseline within available regional funding and proportionally based on an equitable formula for cost sharing between all jurisdictions should regional funding be exhausted; and 6. Should involve the participation of the Transit Managers of the municipal operated transit systems in the system design and coordination. Based on a review of the 1994 Measure K Master Agreement and the 2013 Measure K Finance Plan, it is believed that an intercity system can be funded without the need for Local Transportation Fund (LTF) support from the local jurisdictions. Using RTD’s factor of $133.04 per revenue hour of operation, the attached summary proposes an intercity system that would consist of five (5) weekday and a possible three (3) weekend routes, connecting all seven cities, including Modesto. These routes would operate between a span of service on weekdays from 6 a.m. to 7 p.m. and on weekends from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. at an estimated 18,139 revenue hours per year and at a cost of approximately $2,413,185.33. Without weekend service, the cost drops to $2,054,228.51. It is our understanding that through the current Measure K supplemental agreement, RTD receives $1.8 million per year through FY 19/20 to operate the intercity system and that approximately $139,512 in fare revenue is collected annually on these routes as they exist today. To that end, and in accordance with the 1994 Measure K Agreement, the Transit Managers would consider the use of other funds (identified in the prioritized list below), as long as adequate Page 1 of 4 9 performance and cost data demonstrates the need for additional funding above and beyond the current level RTD already receives, as described in the aforementioned paragraph. Those sources of funding (described in more detail in the attached Summary of Proposed Intercity System) are as follows: 1. Measure K funds allocated by SJCOG; 2. Fare revenue; 3. FTA Section 5311 for the rural connections between Escalon and Manteca and Tracy and Lathrop (via Banta); 4. Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP); 5. SB 1 State of Good Repair (SGR) funds; 6. State Transit Assistance (STA) funds (regional 99313 and 99314); and 7. Modesto Measure K funding (as it is available from a sponsoring city eligible for these funds). While we understand some of these funds are restricted, (i.e., 5311 can only be used for rural routes, LCTOP can only be used for new services, SGR for preventative maintenance and STA can be used for regional transit systems purposes per the 2017 SJCOG policy), we believe that these are the most appropriate funds to support this type of system as opposed to LTF. The Transit Managers believe that with these future funding sources, which are permanent and sustainable, the use of LTF would no longer be needed from the City of Stockton and unincorporated County Areas to cover the provision of the intercity transit services. With the intercity system funded through the suggested sources above, should any City desire additional transit services that are “intracity” in nature, that City should enter into an agreement with RTD for that service with whatever funding source they choose. Van Go was launched as a new and premium service that could potentially duplicate the intercity system. While it can be a component of the intercity system, it should be at the reduction of a corresponding lower producing intercity deviated fixed route. Should Van Go be the preferred service for addressing intercity needs going forward, Van Go should be considered as a replacement to the intercity system or a supplement to the intercity system within available financial resources that do not require the use of LTF. cc: City Managers and Public Works Directors of the Cities of Escalon, Lodi, Manteca, Lathrop, Ripon and Tracy San Joaquin County Administrative Officer SJCOG Executive Director RTD Chief Executive Officer and Deputy Chief Executive Officer Attachment: Summary of Proposed Intercity System Page 2 of 4 10 Summary of Proposed Intercity System Proposed Routes Route 90: Tracy Transit Station to DTC via Lathrop Save Mart, Banta and San Joaquin General Hospital Route 91: DTC to Modesto Vintage Faire Mall via Ripon Bethany Home and Manteca Transit Center Route 93: Lodi Station to Hammer Triangle Station Route 95: DTC to Modesto Vintage Faire Mall via Manteca Transit Center and Escalon Park and Ride Lot Route 97: Tracy Transit Station to Manteca Transit Center via Lathrop/Louise Road Optional Weekend Service Route 790: Tracy Transit Station to DTC via Lathrop Save Mart, Banta and San Joaquin General Hospital Route 793: Lodi Station to Hammer Triangle Station Route 795: DTC to Modesto Vintage Faire Mall via Manteca Transit Center, Escalon Park and Ride Lot and Ripon Bethany Home. Available and Potential Funding Streams Priority Estimates based on FY 2018-2019 Funding Sources: 1 Measure K $ 1,800,000 2 Fare Revenue (15% minimum standard) $ 362,003 3 FTA 5311 (RTD + Escalon)*** $ 428,720 4 99313 LCTOP (Less SJRRC)* $ 1,034,546 5 99314 LCTOP (Less SJRRC)* $ 137,177 6 99313 State of Good Repair (Less SJRRC)**** $ 877,991 7 99314 State of Good Repair (Less SJRRC)**** $ 97,998 8 99313 STA (Less SJRRC)** $ 4,191,872 9 99314 STA (Less SJRRC)** $ 639,056 Potential Revenue Available $9,569,363 *Since the intercity transit system is redesigned, the Transit Managers have been advised by Caltrans that LCTOP funds could be eligible, especially with new Routes 95 and 97. **The 1994 Measure K Agreement mentions that STA funds would be used to fund the intercity system, however, RTD has not included these funds in their proposed budget. ***FTA Guidelines dictate that Section 5311 funds must connect rural areas to urban areas. Therefore, the routes would need to serve unincorporated areas and Escalon in San Joaquin County to be eligible. Page 3 of 4 11 ****SGR would cover the preventative maintenance costs paid to transit contractor for the intercity routes, and any future intercity bus replacement costs. Current and Proposed Costs Using RTD’s rate of $133.04, which includes contractor rate of $52.15 per revenue hour (which includes operations and maintenance). Summary Weekday (251 days) Proposed Difference Current cost Proposed cost Daily Between based off based off Current Daily Revenue Current and $133.04 per $133.04 per Route Revenue Hours Hours Proposed revenue
Load more

Recommended publications
  • City of Millbrae Climate Action Plan
    City of Millbrae Climate Action Plan Final Initial Study–Negative Declaration prepared for City of Millbrae 621 Magnolia Avenue Millbrae, California 94030 prepared by Rincon Consultants, Inc. 449 15th Street, Suite 303 Oakland, California 94612 October 14, 2020 Table of Contents Table of Contents Initial Study .............................................................................................................................................1 Proposed Plan Title .........................................................................................................................1 Lead Agency/Plan Sponsor and Contact .........................................................................................1 Plan Location and Physical Setting .................................................................................................1 Existing Setting ................................................................................................................................4 General Plan Designation and Zoning .......................................................................................... 11 Description of Plan (2020 CAP) .................................................................................................... 11 Cumulative Projects Scenario ...................................................................................................... 20 Required Approvals ..................................................................................................................... 20 Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities to Expand the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority’S Corporate Pass Program
    Opportunities to Expand the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority’s Corporate Pass Program APRIL 2015 © Streetka2004 | Dreamstime.com Acknowledgements A Better City (ABC) would like to thank the Barr Foundation whose generous support helped to make this report possible. ABC extends a thank you to Larry Filler of Contents LF Consulting for researching and authoring this report. 3 Summary We would like to thank the representatives from the 18 transit agencies that were inter- 6 Introduction viewed. Their insight and information helped 7 Methodology shape the best practices identified through our research. 8 Background on the MBTA Corporate Sales Program 10 Identification of Companies to Target in Boston, Cambridge and Somerville 11 National Scan of Corporate Sales Programs 12 Program Types A Better City improves the economic com- petitiveness and quality of life of the Boston 15 Transit Benefits region by advancing and providing leader- ship on significant transportation, land 16 Profile of Corporate Pass Sale Customers development, and environmental policies, 16 Program Growth and Goals projects, and initiatives related to the commercial real estate sector. 18 Websites 19 Marketing and Sales / Staffing 19 Marketing 19 Sales / Staffing 21 Trip Reduction Laws and Tax Credits 23 Best Practices Recommendations 24 Recommendations to Increase Program Participation 26 Conclusion 27 Appendices 27 A: Major Employers COVER PHOTOS 39 B: Business Organizations (Top) Charlie Card: © Mr.TinDC/CreativeCommons (Bottom, clockwise from upper left) 40 C: Corporate Sales Programs Bus: © Mr.TinDC/Creative Commons Subway: © JasonNobody/Creative Commons 42 D: Program Profiles Boat: © massmatt/CreativeCommons Commuter Rail: © jpitha/Creative Commons 47 E: Questionnaire Summary The goal of this project is to increase by 10% the number of small and medium-sized businesses participating in the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority’s (MBTA) Corporate Pass Program (“MBTA Program” or “Program”).
    [Show full text]
  • Bikeways Master Plan Table of Contents Page
    City of Tracy Bikew ays M aster Plan April 2005 With assistance from RRM Design Group, San Luis Obispo, California Acknowledgments Dan Bilbrey, Mayor Brent Ives, City Council Irene Sundberg, City Council Evelyn Tolbert, City Council Suzanne Tucker, City Council Parks and Community Services Commission James Atkins Gene Birk Dave Hardesty Richard Helzer Tim Jayne Mario Juarez James Vaughn Planning Commission Gordon Lindquist - Chair Ed Gable - Vice Chair Clyde Bland - Commissioner Mark Shishido - Commissioner Rupi Gill - Commissioner Prepared by: City of Tracy Parks and Community Services Department With assistance by: San Luis Obispo, California Tracy Bikeways Master Plan Table of Contents Page Introduction and Setting 1 1.0 Objectives 4 2.0 Background and Existing Conditions 8 2.1 Relationship Between This Plan and Other Planning Efforts 8 2.2 Definition of Bikeways 15 2.3 Existing Bicycle Facilities 15 2.4 Safety 19 2.5 Relevant Legislation and Policies 23 2.6 Bicycle Parking Facilities 25 2.7 Multi-Modal Connections 29 3.0 Recommended System Design and Improvements 33 3.1 Bicycle System 33 3.2 Existing Bicycle Design Standards and Classifications 41 3.3 Creating a Bikeway System 42 3.4 Description of Proposed Bikeway Improvements 43 3.5 Bicycle Parking and Other Support Facilities 51 3.6 Provision of Bike Facilities Through New Development 55 3.7 Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Education Programs 56 3.8 Safe Routes to School 57 3.9 Community and Employer Outreach 57 4.0 Maintenance and Security 59 4.1 Maintenance 59 4.2 Security 59 5.0
    [Show full text]
  • Victor Herbert Fazio, Jr. Papers Creator: Fazio, Victor H
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c81r6sr2 Online items available Inventory of the Victor Herbert Fazio Jr. Papers D-265 Finding aid created by Archives and Special Collections staff University of California, Davis Library, Dept. of Special Collections 2010 1st Floor, Shields Library, University of California 100 North West Quad Davis, CA 95616-5292 [email protected] URL: https://www.library.ucdavis.edu/archives-and-special-collections Inventory of the Victor Herbert D-265336 1 Fazio Jr. Papers D-265 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: University of California, Davis Library, Dept. of Special Collections Title: Victor Herbert Fazio, Jr. Papers Creator: Fazio, Victor H. (Victor Herbert), 1942- Identifier/Call Number: D-265 Identifier/Call Number: 336 Physical Description: 354.6 linear feet Date (inclusive): 1978-1999 Abstract: Office files, correspondence, photographs, awards, and memorabilia relating to U.S. Representative Victor H. (Vic) Fazio's more than 20 years in public life. Files on Auburn Dam and closure of McClellan Air Force Base, briefing books on policy decisions, proposals for Sacramento Valley water and flood issues, and details on the evolution of food quality acts are included in the collection. Researchers should contact Archives and Special Collections to request collections, as many are stored offsite. Biography U.S. Representative from California; co-founder, California Journal magazine, 1970; served in the California State assembly, 1975-1978; elected as a Democrat to the Ninety-sixth and to the nine succeeding Congresses (January 3, 1979-January 3, 1999); was not a candidate for reelection in 1998 to the One Hundred Sixth Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • (209) 943-1111. Para Información En Español, Por Favor Llame Al (209) 943-1111
    SAN JOAQUIN REGIONAL TRANSIT DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING – NOTICE AND AGENDA 10:00 A.M. ON FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 2020 This meeting is being held pursuant to Executive Order N-33-20 issued by California Governor Gavin Newsom on August 28, 2020. The Board of Directors will attend the meeting telephonically via Zoom Video Communications. Members of the public can attend the RTD Board Meeting (audio only) by dialing: (669) 900-9128 Meeting ID: 992 1345 4372, or by viewing a live broadcast of the meeting online at https://us02web.zoom.us/j/99213454372 Persons wishing to address the Board must submit a public comment request by sending an email to [email protected] or by calling (209) 467-6668. All comments must be received by 9:00 a.m. on Friday, November 13, 2020. RTD is committed to ensuring that all meetings are accessible regardless of an individual’s ability or access method. If you need a reasonable accommodation, please contact RTD’s Chief Executive Office at (209) 467-6668. For language assistance, interpreter services, please contact (209) 943-1111. Para información en Español, por favor llame al (209) 943-1111. 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER 2. MOMENT OF SILENCE/REFLECTION 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 4. ROLL CALL 5. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS A. EMPLOYEES OF THE MONTH Special recognition of the Administration, Maintenance, and Transportation Employees of the Month. B. YEAR OF SERVICE RECOGNITION Special recognition to retiring employees for their years of service. C. WHO WE ARE: HUMAN RESOURCES Special presentation on the Human Resources department.
    [Show full text]
  • SAN JOAQUIN REGIONAL RAIL COMMISSION This Agenda Shall
    Chair, Steve Dresser, City of Lathrop Commissioner, Bob Elliott, San Joaquin County Vice Chair, Christina Fugazi, City of Stockton Commissioner, Leo Zuber, City of Ripon Commissioner, Bob Johnson, City of Lodi Commissioner, Scott Haggerty, Alameda County Commissioner, Debby Moorhead, City of Manteca Commissioner, John Marchand, City of Livermore Executive Director, Stacey Mortensen SAN JOAQUIN REGIONAL RAIL COMMISSION This Agenda shall be made available upon request in alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. § 12132) and the Ralph M. Brown Act (California Government Code § 54954.2). Persons requesting a disability related modification or accommodation in order to participate in the meeting should contact San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission staff, at (209) 944-6220, during regular business hours, at least twenty-four hours prior to the time of the meeting. All proceedings before the Commission are conducted in English. The San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission does not furnish interpreters and, if one is needed, it shall be the responsibility of the person needing one. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the Office of the Executive Director located at 949 East Channel Street, Stockton, California, 95202 during normal business hours or by calling (209) 944-6220. The Agenda is available on the San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission website: www.acerail.com. August 3, 2018 – 8:00 am Robert J. Cabral Station (Conference Call) (Conference Call) South Hall Meeting Room Heritage House Fairmont Rehabilitation Center 949 East Channel Street County of Alameda 950 Fairmont Avenue Stockton, CA 95202 4501 Pleasanton Avenue Lodi, CA 95240 Pleasanton, CA 94566 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Zinc Sources in California Urban Runoff
    Zinc Sources in California Urban Runoff Prepared by TDC Environmental, LLC California Stormwater Quality Association February 2015 Revised April 2015 PREFACE This report was prepared for the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) under the supervision of CASQA’s Watershed Management & Impaired Waters Subcommittee. It is a component of CASQA’s Source Control Initiative which seeks to address stormwater and urban runoff pollutants at their sources. The study was commissioned to develop scientific information to inform decision-making by CASQA and stormwater permittees for the reduction of zinc as a water pollutant and to identify major and minor sources of zinc in order to assist agencies focus control measures in a cost-effective manner. Copyright © 2014 California Stormwater Quality Association All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed three paragraphs, may be quoted without written permission provided that full attribution is given to the source. ZINC SOURCES IN CALIFORNIA URBAN RUNOFF TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 1 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Purpose and Scope of This Report .................................................................. 4 1.2 Report Organization ......................................................................................... 4 2.0 Methodology ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Short Range Transit
    SRTP – 2019 The preparation of this Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) has been funded in part by a grant from the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT), through Section 5304 of the Federal Transit Act. The contents of this SRTP reflect the views of the San Joaquin Regional Transit District (RTD) and are not necessarily those of the USDOT, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), or the San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG). RTD is solely responsible for the accuracy of the information presented in this SRTP. Civil Rights Compliance. In compliance with Title VI regulations of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, no person in the United States of America shall, on grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participating in, or denied the benefits of, or be subject to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. RTD must ensure that federally-supported transit service and related benefits are distributed in an equitable manner. RTD has certified that it is in compliance with Title VI regulations. Print date: WARNING! This document is uncontrolled when printed. Page 2 of 94 1/30/2019 Printed copies may be obsolete. Verify that you have a current copy before use. SRTP – 2019 Document Management Information Document Author: Nate Knodt, Director of Planning & Scheduling and Rahul Kumar, Special Projects Consultant Area of application: All RTD Document location: Sharepoint/PlansAndReports/ Original issue date: June 30, 2018 Revisions Rev. No. Date Description 001 Restructure document to include plans for Mobility Management Services and sustainability initiatives 002 Recurring Action Items Responsibility Frequency 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Profiles: 2014 Report Year Summary
    2014 Report Year NTD National Transit Database Transit Profiles: 2014 Report Year Summary Office of Budget and Policy March 2016 Federal Transit Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Transit Profiles: 2014 Report Year Summary Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................. i Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 Profile Details ............................................................................................................... 1 Sections ....................................................................................................................... 5 Additional National Transit Database Publications ....................................................... 6 Full Reporting Agencies for Report Year 2014 ................................................................ 7 Small Systems Reporting Agencies .............................................................................. 29 Separate Service Reporting Agencies........................................................................... 41 Planning Reporting Agencies ........................................................................................ 41 Building Reporting Agencies ......................................................................................... 41 Rural General Public Transit Reporting Agencies ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions 3.2.1
    City of Fairfield - Hawthorne Mill Project Draft EIR/EIS Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions 3.2 - Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions 3.2.1 - Introduction This section describes the existing air quality setting and potential effects from project implementation on the site and its surrounding area. Michael Brandman Associates performed air quality modeling for the project; the model output is located in the Air Quality and Climate Change Model Output in Appendix B. Michael Brandman Associates also prepared a Health Risk Assessment, which is located in Appendix B. 3.2.2 - Affected Environment/Existing Conditions The project site is located in the City of Fairfield, which is within the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin (Air Basin) portion of Solano County. The Air Basin comprises all or portions of the nine Bay Area counties, including the southwestern portion of Solano County. The northeastern portion of Solano County is located in the Sacramento Valley Air Basin. The project site is under jurisdiction of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). Regional Air Quality Air quality is a function of both the rate and location of pollutant emissions under the influence of meteorological conditions and topographic features. Atmospheric conditions such as wind speed, wind direction, and air temperature gradients interact with the physical features of the landscape to determine the movement and dispersal of air pollutant emissions and, consequently, their effect on air quality. Climate and Meteorology The western portion of Solano County is located within the Carquinez Strait subregion of the Air Basin. The Carquinez Strait runs from Rodeo to Martinez.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation and Aviation Services
    2015-2016 OPERATING BUDGET TRANSPORTATION AND AVIATION SERVICES CSA T RANSPORTATION S ERVICES CSA AND A VIATION City Service Area Transportation and Aviation Services Mission: To provide the community with safe, secure, and efficient surface and air transportation systems that support San José’s livability and economic vitality CSA OUTCOMES Primary Partners Provide Safe and Secure Transportation Systems Airport Provide Viable Transportation Choices that Promote a Strong Economy Police Travelers Have a Positive, Reliable, and Efficient Transportation Experience Preserve and Improve Transportation Assets and Facilities Provide a Transportation System that Enhances Community Livability VII - 91 City Service Area Transportation and Aviation Services SERVICE DELIVERY FRAMEWORK Transportation & Aviation Services CSA CITY SERVICE AREA A cross-departmental collection of core Mission: services that form one of the City’s 6 key “lines of business” To provide the community with safe, secure, and efficient surface and air transportation systems that support San José’s livability and economic MISSION STATEMENT vitality Why the CSA exists Outcomes: . Preserve and Improve Transportation Assets and Facilities CSA OUTCOMES . Provide a Transportation System that Enhances The high level results of service delivery Community Livability sought by the CSA partners . Provide Safe and Secure Transportation Systems . Provide Viable Transportation Choices that Promote a Strong Economy . Travelers Have a Positive, Reliable, and Efficient Experience . ience
    [Show full text]
  • INTERREGIONAL MULTI-MODAL COMMUTE TRIP PLANNING STUDY FINAL REPORT June 2013
    SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS INTERREGIONAL MULTI-MODAL COMMUTE TRIP PLANNING STUDY FINAL REPORT June 2013 MOVINGFORWARDTHINKINGTM INTERREGIONAL MULTI-MODAL COMMUTE TRIP PLANNING STUDY FINAL REPORT Prepared For: San Joaquin Council of Governments 555 E. Weber Ave. Stockton, CA 95202 209.235.0600 Prepared By: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 428 J Street, Suite 500 Sacramento, California 95814 916.226.2190 Project Manager: David Reinke Project Principal: Jim Damkowitch Project No. 13101 June 2013 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ..................................................................................................... 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW ........................................................................... 1 1.2 REGIONAL COMMUTE CHARACTERISTICS ............................................................. 3 1.3 CURRENT TRIP PLANNING INFORMATION SOURCES .............................................. 5 1.4 DESIRED FEATURES OF AN INTERREGIONAL MULTIMODAL TRAVELER INFORMATION SYSTEM ................................................................................ 8 1.5 GETTING FROM HERE TO THERE: ALTERNATIVES ................................................. 10 1.6 RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................... 13 Regional Profile ..........................................................................................................15 2.1 OVERVIEW ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]