DOCSLIB.ORG

SAN JOAQUIN REGIONAL RAIL COMMISSION This Agenda Shall

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Chair, Steve Dresser, City of Lathrop Commissioner, Bob Elliott, San Joaquin County Vice Chair, Christina Fugazi, City of Stockton Commissioner, Leo Zuber, City of Ripon Commissioner, Bob Johnson, City of Lodi Commissioner, Scott Haggerty, Alameda County Commissioner, Debby Moorhead, City of Manteca Commissioner, John Marchand, City of Livermore Executive Director, Stacey Mortensen SAN JOAQUIN REGIONAL RAIL COMMISSION This Agenda shall be made available upon request in alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. § 12132) and the Ralph M. Brown Act (California Government Code § 54954.2). Persons requesting a disability related modification or accommodation in order to participate in the meeting should contact San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission staff, at (209) 944-6220, during regular business hours, at least twenty-four hours prior to the time of the meeting. All proceedings before the Commission are conducted in English. The San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission does not furnish interpreters and, if one is needed, it shall be the responsibility of the person needing one. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the Office of the Executive Director located at 949 East Channel Street, Stockton, California, 95202 during normal business hours or by calling (209) 944-6220. The Agenda is available on the San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission website: www.acerail.com. August 3, 2018 – 8:00 am Robert J. Cabral Station (Conference Call) (Conference Call) South Hall Meeting Room Heritage House Fairmont Rehabilitation Center 949 East Channel Street County of Alameda 950 Fairmont Avenue Stockton, CA 95202 4501 Pleasanton Avenue Lodi, CA 95240 Pleasanton, CA 94566 1. Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Roll Call Chair Dresser Roll Call: Haggerty, Marchand, Elliott, Johnson, Moorhead, Zuber, Vice Chair Fugazi, Chair Dresser Ex- Officios: Agar, Chesley, DeMartino, Zoslocki 2. Public Comments Persons wishing to address the Commission on any item of interest to the public regarding rail shall state their names and addresses and make their presentation. Please limit presentations to five minutes. The Commission cannot take action on matters not on the agenda unless the action is authorized by Section 54954.2 of the Government Code. Materials related to an item on the Agenda submitted to the Board of Directors after distribution of the agenda packet are available for the public inspection in the Commission Office at 949 E. Channel Street during normal business hours. These documents are also available on the San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission website at www.acerail.com/about-ace/sjrrc-board.html subject to staff’s ability to post the documents prior to the meeting. 949 East Channel Street Stockton, CA 95202 (800) 411-RAIL (7245) www.acerail.com 3. Consent Calendar 3.1 Minutes of July 6, 2018 ACTION 3.2.1 Rail Commission/ACE Monthly Expenditure INFORMATION 3.2.2 SJJPA Monthly Expenditure INFORMATION 3.3 ACE Monthly Fare Revenue INFORMATION 3.4 ACE Ridership INFORMATION 3.5 ACE On-Time Performance INFORMATION 3.6 Update on Positive Train Control INFORMATION 3.7 Approve a Resolution of the Board of Commissioners of the San ACTION Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Adopting the FY 2018-2027 Short Range Transit Plan 3.8 Approve a Resolution of the Board of Commissioners of the San ACTION Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Authorizing the Executive Director to Submit and Execute Any and All Grant Applications, Agreements, Amendments and Any Other Documents Necessary to Claim $198,960 in FY 2018-19 State of Good Repair (SGR) Program Funds for Facility Upgrades and Improvements 3.9 Construction & Installation of the Wayside Power - Contract Change INFORMATION Order #01 4. Conduct a Public Hearing on the Proposed ACE Fare Increase, Accept ACTION Report Summarizing Comments Received during the Public Comment Period, and Approve a Resolution of the Board of Commissioners of the San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Adopting a Fare Increase of 6% for all ACE Service Fare Media Rounded up to the Nearest 25¢, Effective January 2, 2019 for the Altamont Corridor Express Service (Brian Schmidt)(Regular and Special Voting Members) 5. Approve a Resolution of the Board of Commissioners of the San Joaquin ACTION Regional Rail Commission Certifying an Environmental Impact Report, Adopting Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations, Adopt the Associated Mitigation Monitoring Plan, Approve Phase 1 for the ACE Extension Lathrop to Ceres And Merced Project and Authorize and Direct the Executive Director to Execute and File a Notice Of Determination under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the Project (Kevin Sheridan)(Regular Voting Members) 6. Commissioner’s Comments 7. Ex-Officio Comments 8. Executive Director’s Report 9. Adjournment The next regular meeting is scheduled for: September 7, 2018 – 8:00 am Robert J. Cabral Station 949 East Channel Street, Stockton 2 of 158 SAN JOAQUIN REGIONAL RAIL COMMISSION Meeting of August 3, 2018 Item 3.1 ACTION Minutes of July 6, 2018 The regular meeting of the San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission was held at 8:00 am, July 6, 2018 at the Robert J. Cabral Station, 949 East Channel Street Stockton, CA 95202. 1 Call to Order/Pledge of Allegiance/Roll Call Chair Dresser called the meeting to order at 8:00 am and led the audience in the pledge of Allegiance. Commissioners Present: Haggerty, Marchand, Johnson, Zuber, Vice Chair Fugazi, Chair Dresser Commissioners Absent: Elliott, Moorhead Ex-Officio Members Present: Mr. Chesley, Mr. Knodt, Mr. Kline 2 Public Comments Vaughn Wolff, Pleasanton, mentioned an article published in the East Bay Times about the City of Stockton. 3 Presentations and Recognitions Ms. Mortensen mentioned that ridership and revenue for the ACE service are at all-time highs. 4 Consent Calendar 4.1 Minutes of June 1, 2018 ACTION 4.2.1 Rail Commission/ACE Monthly Expenditure INFORMATION 4.2.2 SJJPA Monthly Expenditure INFORMATION 4.3 ACE Monthly Fare Revenue INFORMATION 4.4 ACE Ridership INFORMATION 4.5 ACE On-Time Performance INFORMATION 4.6 Washington Update INFORMATION 4.7 Update on Positive Train Control INFORMATION 4.8 Approve a Resolution of the Board of Commissioners of the ACTION San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Approving the Fiscal Year 2017-18 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim and Authorizing Submission by the Executive Director to the San Joaquin Council of Governments for Local Transportation Funds (LTF) and State Assistance Funds (STA) for a Total of $4,361,362 M/S/C (Marchand/Zuber) Approve the Consent Calendar. Passed and Adopted by the San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission on the 6th day of July 2018 by the following vote to wit: 3 of 158 AYES: 6 Haggerty, Marchand, Johnson, Zuber, Fugazi, Chair Dresser NOES: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 ABSENT: 2 Elliott, Moorhead 5 Approve a Resolution of the Board of Commissioners of the San ACTION Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Authorizing the use of Competitive Negotiation Process to Procure Five (5) Passenger Rail Cab Cars with an Option to Purchase up to 29 Additional Passenger Rail Cars Mr. Schmidt presented on the procurement of new passenger rail cab cars. Vice Chair Fugazi asked what the total cost of the rail cars would be. Mr. Schmidt said each cab car would cost approximately four million dollars. Vice Chair Fugazi asked how the rail car purchase might be affected by a potential repeal of SB 1 and the loss of TIRCP funds. Mr. Schmidt said the SB 132 funds would be available regardless of what happens to SB 1 and TIRCP. Commissioner Johnson asked if the increase in ridership is expected to continue. Mr. Schmidt responded that ridership has steadily increased over the past six years. Commissioner Zuber asked if the item requires the full board vote or just regular members. Mr. Schroeder said the item requires the vote of the full board. Mr. Wolff asked if double decker DMUs were being considered. M/S/C (Fugazi/Johnson) Approve a Resolution of the Board of Commissioners of the San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Authorizing the use of Competitive Negotiation Process to Procure Five (5) Passenger Rail Cab Cars with an Option to Purchase up to 29 Additional Passenger Rail Cars Passed and Adopted by the San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission on the 6th day of July 2018 by the following vote to wit: AYES: 6 Haggerty, Marchand, Johnson, Zuber, Fugazi, Chair Dresser NOES: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 ABSENT: 2 Elliott, Moorhead 4 of 158 6 Approve a Resolution of the Board of Commissioners of the San ACTION Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Authorizing a Two-Year and Eleven Month Contract with Two One-Year Options for Federal Legislative Advocacy Services to Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC for an Amount- Not-To-Exceed $229,410 from August 1, 2018 through June 30, 2021, and Authorizing and Directing the Executive Director to Execute the Agreement Ms. Gowan presented on the solicitation process for legislative advocacy services. Commissioner Zuber asked how the annual cost of the contract compared to the previous vendor. Ms. Gowan said the annual cost has decreased compared to previous years. Commissioner Haggerty asked why the contract length is two-years and eleven months. Ms. Gowan said the contract length was set that way due to the start date of the contract. M/S/C (Zuber/Marchand) Approve a Resolution of the Board of Commissioners of the San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Authorizing a Two-Year and Eleven Month Contract with Two One-Year Options for Federal Legislative Advocacy Services to Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC for an Amount-Not-To-Exceed $229,410 from August 1, 2018 through June 30, 2021, and Authorizing and Directing the Executive Director to Execute the Agreement.
Recommended publications
  • ACE Train Time Schedule & Line Route

    ACE Train Time Schedule & Line Route

    ACE train time schedule & line map San Jose View In Website Mode The ACE train line (San Jose) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) San Jose: 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM (2) Stockton: 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest ACE train station near you and ƒnd out when is the next ACE train arriving. Direction: San Jose ACE train Time Schedule 10 stops San Jose Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Stockton Station 949 Channel St, Stockton Tuesday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Lathrop/Manteca Station Wednesday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Tracy Station Thursday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Friday 4:10 AM - 6:40 AM Vasco Road Station South Vasco Road, Livermore Saturday Not Operational Livermore Station Pleasanton Station 403 Old Bernal Av, Pleasanton ACE train Info Direction: San Jose Fremont Station Stops: 10 37275 Fremont Bl, Fremont Trip Duration: 132 min Line Summary: Stockton Station, Lathrop/Manteca Great America Station Station, Tracy Station, Vasco Road Station, West Tasman Drive, Santa Clara Livermore Station, Pleasanton Station, Fremont Station, Great America Station, Santa Clara Station, Santa Clara Station San Jose Station Railroad Avenue, Santa Clara San Jose Station Direction: Stockton ACE train Time Schedule 10 stops Stockton Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM San Jose Station Tuesday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM Santa Clara Station Railroad Avenue, Santa Clara Wednesday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM Great America Station Thursday 3:35 PM - 5:35 PM
  • Altamont Corridor Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor Altamontaltamont Corridor Corridor Vision: Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor

    Altamont Corridor Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor Altamontaltamont Corridor Corridor Vision: Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor

    Altamont Corridor Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor AltamontAltamont Corridor Corridor Vision: Vision Universal Infrastructure, Universal Corridor What is the Altamont Corridor Vision? The Altamont Corridor that connects the San Joaquin Valley to the Bay Area is one of the most heavily traveled, most congested, and fastest growing corridors in the Northern California megaregion. The Bay Area Council estimates that congestion will increase an additional 75% between 2016 and 2040. To achieve state and regional environmental and economic development goals, a robust alternative is needed to provide a sustainable / reliable travel choice and greater connectivity. The Altamont Corridor Vision is a long-term vision to establish a universal rail corridor connecting the San Joaquin Valley and the Tri-Valley to San Jose, Oakland, San Francisco and the Peninsula. This Vision complements other similar investments being planned for Caltrain, which is in the process of electrifying its corridor and rolling stock; Capitol Corridor, which is moving its operations to the Coast Subdivision as it improves its service frequency and separates freight from passenger service; a new Transbay Crossing, which would allow for passenger trains to flow from Oakland to San Francisco; the Dumbarton Rail Crossing, which is being studied to be brought back into service; and Valley Rail, which will connect Merced and Sacramento. The Vision also complements and connects with High- Speed Rail (HSR), and would enable a one-seat ride from the initial operating segment in the San Joaquin Valley throughout the Northern California Megaregion. One-Hour One-Seat One Shared Travel Time Ride Corridor Shared facilities, Oakland, Stockton, Express service, integrated Peninsula, Modesto modern rolling ticketing, San Jose stock timed connections • The limited stop (two intermediate stops) travel time between Stockton and San Jose is estimated to be 60 minutes.
  • BART to Antioch Extension Title VI Equity Analysis & Public

    BART to Antioch Extension Title VI Equity Analysis & Public

    BART to Antioch Extension Title VI Equity Analysis & Public Participation Report October 2017 Prepared by the Office of Civil Rights San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District Table of Contents I. BART to Antioch Title VI Equity Analysis Executive Summary 1 Section 1: Introduction 7 Section 2: Project Description 8 Section 3: Methodology 20 Section 4: Service Analysis Findings 30 Section 5: Fare Analysis Findings 39 II. Appendices Appendix A: 2017 BART to Antioch Survey Appendix B: Proposed Service Plan Appendix C: BART Ridership Project Analysis Appendix D: C-Line Vehicle Loading Analysis III. BART to Antioch Public Participation Report i ii BART to Antioch Title VI Equity Analysis and Public Participation Report Executive Summary In October 2011, staff completed a Title VI Analysis for Antioch Station (formerly known as Hillcrest Avenue Station). A Title VI/Environmental Justice analysis was conducted on the Pittsburg Center Station on March 19, 2015. Per the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Title VI Circular (Circular) 4702.1B, Title VI Requirements and Guidelines for Federal Transit Administration Recipients (October 1, 2012), the District is required to conduct a Title VI Service and Fare Equity Analysis (Title VI Equity Analysis) for the Project's proposed service and fare plan six months prior to revenue service. Accordingly, staff completed an updated Title VI Equity Analysis for the BART to Antioch (Project) service and fare plan, which evaluates whether the Project’s proposed service and fare will have a disparate impact on minority populations or a disproportionate burden on low-income populations based on the District’s Disparate Impact and Disproportionate Burden Policy (DI/DB Policy) adopted by the Board on July 11, 2013 and FTA approved Title VI service and fare methodologies.
  • City of Millbrae Climate Action Plan

    City of Millbrae Climate Action Plan

    City of Millbrae Climate Action Plan Final Initial Study–Negative Declaration prepared for City of Millbrae 621 Magnolia Avenue Millbrae, California 94030 prepared by Rincon Consultants, Inc. 449 15th Street, Suite 303 Oakland, California 94612 October 14, 2020 Table of Contents Table of Contents Initial Study .............................................................................................................................................1 Proposed Plan Title .........................................................................................................................1 Lead Agency/Plan Sponsor and Contact .........................................................................................1 Plan Location and Physical Setting .................................................................................................1 Existing Setting ................................................................................................................................4 General Plan Designation and Zoning .......................................................................................... 11 Description of Plan (2020 CAP) .................................................................................................... 11 Cumulative Projects Scenario ...................................................................................................... 20 Required Approvals ..................................................................................................................... 20 Environmental
  • Opportunities to Expand the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority’S Corporate Pass Program

    Opportunities to Expand the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority’S Corporate Pass Program

    Opportunities to Expand the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority’s Corporate Pass Program APRIL 2015 © Streetka2004 | Dreamstime.com Acknowledgements A Better City (ABC) would like to thank the Barr Foundation whose generous support helped to make this report possible. ABC extends a thank you to Larry Filler of Contents LF Consulting for researching and authoring this report. 3 Summary We would like to thank the representatives from the 18 transit agencies that were inter- 6 Introduction viewed. Their insight and information helped 7 Methodology shape the best practices identified through our research. 8 Background on the MBTA Corporate Sales Program 10 Identification of Companies to Target in Boston, Cambridge and Somerville 11 National Scan of Corporate Sales Programs 12 Program Types A Better City improves the economic com- petitiveness and quality of life of the Boston 15 Transit Benefits region by advancing and providing leader- ship on significant transportation, land 16 Profile of Corporate Pass Sale Customers development, and environmental policies, 16 Program Growth and Goals projects, and initiatives related to the commercial real estate sector. 18 Websites 19 Marketing and Sales / Staffing 19 Marketing 19 Sales / Staffing 21 Trip Reduction Laws and Tax Credits 23 Best Practices Recommendations 24 Recommendations to Increase Program Participation 26 Conclusion 27 Appendices 27 A: Major Employers COVER PHOTOS 39 B: Business Organizations (Top) Charlie Card: © Mr.TinDC/CreativeCommons (Bottom, clockwise from upper left) 40 C: Corporate Sales Programs Bus: © Mr.TinDC/Creative Commons Subway: © JasonNobody/Creative Commons 42 D: Program Profiles Boat: © massmatt/CreativeCommons Commuter Rail: © jpitha/Creative Commons 47 E: Questionnaire Summary The goal of this project is to increase by 10% the number of small and medium-sized businesses participating in the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority’s (MBTA) Corporate Pass Program (“MBTA Program” or “Program”).

  • Council Authorizes Development Agreement for Eastside Hotel by Bruce Gach Scale-Branded Hotel

    Thursday, JULY 25, 2019 VOLUME LVI, NUMBER 30 Your Local News Source Since 1963 SERVING DUBLIN, LIVERMORE, PLEASANTON, SUNOL Council Authorizes Development Agreement for Eastside Hotel By Bruce Gach scale-branded hotel. The hotel will signatures must be qualified vot- council’s highest duty was to At the July 22 Livermore City include 1,400 to 2,000 square feet ers. On Friday, July 19, the Al- honor the community directed Council meeting, the council voted of conference space and a rooftop ameda County Registrar of Voters initiative, not subvert it. unanimously to direct staff to file deck. reported to the city that 6959 sig- William Dunlop, Chair of the See Inside Section A a Notice of Determination to in- Speakers in favor of the pres- natures were valid, 32.08% more Citizens for the Central Park Com- Section A is filled with troduce an ordinance authorizing ent City Plan with the hotel on the than needed. mittee, declared that the council information about arts, execution of a development agree- eastside of South Livermore and During the public hearing, Ta- moving forward “is intended to people, entertainment and ment with Presidio Co. to build a Railroad Avenues numbered 31, mara Reus related “If you proceed, cut off the rights of Livermore’s special events. There are downtown hotel on the eastside of with 29 against. we will file a referendum. You voters. The voters will use the education stories, a variety The initiative supporting the need to stop your illegal interfer- referendum power to reject any of features, and the arts Livermore Avenue.
  • Bikeways Master Plan Table of Contents Page

    Bikeways Master Plan Table of Contents Page

    City of Tracy Bikew ays M aster Plan April 2005 With assistance from RRM Design Group, San Luis Obispo, California Acknowledgments Dan Bilbrey, Mayor Brent Ives, City Council Irene Sundberg, City Council Evelyn Tolbert, City Council Suzanne Tucker, City Council Parks and Community Services Commission James Atkins Gene Birk Dave Hardesty Richard Helzer Tim Jayne Mario Juarez James Vaughn Planning Commission Gordon Lindquist - Chair Ed Gable - Vice Chair Clyde Bland - Commissioner Mark Shishido - Commissioner Rupi Gill - Commissioner Prepared by: City of Tracy Parks and Community Services Department With assistance by: San Luis Obispo, California Tracy Bikeways Master Plan Table of Contents Page Introduction and Setting 1 1.0 Objectives 4 2.0 Background and Existing Conditions 8 2.1 Relationship Between This Plan and Other Planning Efforts 8 2.2 Definition of Bikeways 15 2.3 Existing Bicycle Facilities 15 2.4 Safety 19 2.5 Relevant Legislation and Policies 23 2.6 Bicycle Parking Facilities 25 2.7 Multi-Modal Connections 29 3.0 Recommended System Design and Improvements 33 3.1 Bicycle System 33 3.2 Existing Bicycle Design Standards and Classifications 41 3.3 Creating a Bikeway System 42 3.4 Description of Proposed Bikeway Improvements 43 3.5 Bicycle Parking and Other Support Facilities 51 3.6 Provision of Bike Facilities Through New Development 55 3.7 Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Education Programs 56 3.8 Safe Routes to School 57 3.9 Community and Employer Outreach 57 4.0 Maintenance and Security 59 4.1 Maintenance 59 4.2 Security 59 5.0
  • This Weekinside Highland Games Bring Kilt-Wearing Action To

    This Weekinside Highland Games Bring Kilt-Wearing Action To

    Vol. VII, Number 32 • September 1, 2006 www.PleasantonWeekly.com It’s all about Pleasanton ScottishThe arecoming Highland Games bring kilt-wearing action to Pleasanton page 10 Neal to retire Moving on up Travel the tracks Don’t delay Police chief ends Two Foothill grads make Reasons why and why Local Realtor advises 30 years of service their mark in the minors not to skip the plane against waiting to buy page 5 page 19 Section 2 page 30 INSIDE this week this IT’S TIME TO VOTE WHO WILL BE BEST OF PLEASANTON ton W asan eekl Ple y’s VOTE at PleasantonWeekly.com by September 22 • V • O T M E O O .C NL LY INE EEK at PLEASANTONW All you have to do is go to PleasantonWeekly.com It’s easier than being a “Survivor” You don’t even haveto sit through Tribal Council. Just go to PleasantonWeekly.com Page 2 • September 1, 2006 • Pleasanton Weekly Around Pleasanton by Jeb Bing Time Is Money. For a timely sale Toby Brink a good choice AND the best price, choose the right agent! for business group A terrible thing can happen if you choose the oby Brink, who has been to one of the top chambers in the executive director of the state, with strong support from wrong agent-NOTHING! If you're serious about T the San Ramon Chamber of Chevron and AT&T as well as selling, hire an agent with a proven marketing Commerce for the last four years, other major businesses in that city’s has been tapped to take over the reins thriving Bishop Ranch complex.
  • Transit to the Outer East

    Transit to the Outer East

    TRANSIT TO THE OUTER EAST BAY BART is the main transit service for people trying to reach the outer East Bay: areas such as Walnut Creek, Concord, Pittsburg, Dublin, and Pleasanton. There are some alternative transit services, but they do not run very often and are expected to be very crowded. Carpooling is recommended for those who can. Or, check with your employer or school to see if alternative transportation is being provided. Not all services operate at all times. Check the Internet or call for information before taking any trip. Updated alternative information can be found on the Web at alert.511.org. DESTINATION GUIDE BART BUSES To reach See BART will provide charter bus service from Antioch Amtrak (other side of some East Bay BART stations to San Francisco. page) BART will be issuing round-trip tickets for Concord BART buses passengers in the morning: passengers who wish County Connection to return in the evening must have a round-trip ticket to return to the East Bay. Dublin BART buses Martinez Amtrak (other side of Current plans are for buses to operate from the page) following stations to a transfer point in West WestCAT Oakland, and then to San Francisco: Concord, Livermore ACE Fremont, Dublin/Pleasanton, Walnut Creek, San Leandro, and El Cerrito Del Norte. Pleasanton ACE BART buses Visit BART’s web site at www.bart.gov for more Walnut Creek BART buses information. ACE COUNTY CONNECTION ACE operates four trains daily from San Jose Up to three County Connection shuttles will and Fremont to Pleasanton, Livermore, Tracy, be provided to travel in the morning commute and Stockton.
  • Greenville Road Subdivision Project

    Greenville Road Subdivision Project

    INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SCH NUMBER: TBD GREENVILLE ROAD SUBDIVISION PROJECT Prepared For: COUNTY OF ALAMEDA Community Development Agency 224 West Winton Avenue Hayward, CA 94544 PREPARED BY: LAMPHIER -GREGORY 1944 EMBARCADERO OAKLAND, CA 94606 September 2011 Table of Contents Page Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 Purpose of Document ............................................................................................................................... 1 General Project Information ..................................................................................................................... 2 Mitigated Negative Declaration ................................................................................................................ 8 Proposed Findings .................................................................................................................................. 20 Lead Agency Determination ................................................................................................................... 21 Project Description ................................................................................................................... 23 Proposed Uses/Operations ...................................................................................................................... 23 Requested Actions and Required Approvals .........................................................................................
  • Integrated Transit/Park-And-Ride Study

    Integrated Transit/Park-And-Ride Study

    Table of Contents Table of Contents Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................... III Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 Study Overview ................................................................................................................................ 5 Background, Historical Context and Need for the Study ..................................................... 5 Study Objectives .......................................................................................................................... 6 Study Partners .............................................................................................................................. 7 Existing Facilities, Services and Utilization .................................................................................... 8 The Study Process .......................................................................................................................... 11 Existing Conditions Assessment ................................................................................................... 13 Travel Behavior and Market Analysis ......................................................................................... 16 Development and Evaluation of Potential Improvement Measures ................................... 19 Development of Potential Improvement Measures ...........................................................
  • Victor Herbert Fazio, Jr. Papers Creator: Fazio, Victor H

    Victor Herbert Fazio, Jr. Papers Creator: Fazio, Victor H

    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c81r6sr2 Online items available Inventory of the Victor Herbert Fazio Jr. Papers D-265 Finding aid created by Archives and Special Collections staff University of California, Davis Library, Dept. of Special Collections 2010 1st Floor, Shields Library, University of California 100 North West Quad Davis, CA 95616-5292 [email protected] URL: https://www.library.ucdavis.edu/archives-and-special-collections Inventory of the Victor Herbert D-265336 1 Fazio Jr. Papers D-265 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: University of California, Davis Library, Dept. of Special Collections Title: Victor Herbert Fazio, Jr. Papers Creator: Fazio, Victor H. (Victor Herbert), 1942- Identifier/Call Number: D-265 Identifier/Call Number: 336 Physical Description: 354.6 linear feet Date (inclusive): 1978-1999 Abstract: Office files, correspondence, photographs, awards, and memorabilia relating to U.S. Representative Victor H. (Vic) Fazio's more than 20 years in public life. Files on Auburn Dam and closure of McClellan Air Force Base, briefing books on policy decisions, proposals for Sacramento Valley water and flood issues, and details on the evolution of food quality acts are included in the collection. Researchers should contact Archives and Special Collections to request collections, as many are stored offsite. Biography U.S. Representative from California; co-founder, California Journal magazine, 1970; served in the California State assembly, 1975-1978; elected as a Democrat to the Ninety-sixth and to the nine succeeding Congresses (January 3, 1979-January 3, 1999); was not a candidate for reelection in 1998 to the One Hundred Sixth Congress.