DOCSLIB.ORG

LSSIP 2020 - BELGIUM LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2020 1 - Implementation Overview

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

LSSIP 2020 - BELGIUM LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2020 1 - Implementation Overview Document Title LSSIP Year 2020 for Belgium Info Centre Reference 20/12/22/53 Date of Edition 03/05/2021 LSSIP Focal Point Antoine Vincent [email protected] Federal Public Service Mobility and Transport LSSIP Contact Person Valerie Oblin - [email protected] EUROCONTROL / NMD/INF/PAS LSSIP Support Team [email protected] Status Released Intended for EUROCONTROL Stakeholders Available in https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky-implementation- monitoring Reference Documents LSSIP Documents https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky-implementation- monitoring Master Plan Level 3 – Plan https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan- Edition 2020 implementation-plan-level-3 Master Plan Level 3 – Report https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan- Year 2020 implementation-report-level-3 European ATM Portal https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ STATFOR Forecasts https://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor National AIP https://ops.skeyes.be/html/belgocontrol_static/eaip/eAIP_Main/html/index- en-GB.html FAB Performance Plan http://www.fabec.eu/fabec_homepage/en/Performance/Performance%20Pl an/ LSSIP Year 2020 Belgium Released Issue APPROVAL SHEET The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2020 document and the signatures confirm the correctness of the reported information and reflect the commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 (Implementation View) – Edition 2020. Stakeholder / Name Position Signature and date Organisation BCAA Koen Milis Director General skeyes Johan Decuyper Chief Executive Officer Defence Michel Hofman Chief of Defence Admiral Brussels Airport A. Feist Chief Executive Company Office LSSIP Year 2020 Belgium Released Issue TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................ 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 11 1. National ATM Environment .......................................................... 12 Geographical Scope .......................................................................................... 12 National Stakeholders ...................................................................................... 15 2. Traffic and Capacity ...................................................................... 24 Evolution of traffic in Belgium .......................................................................... 24 ACC Brussels ..................................................................................................... 25 3. Implementation Projects .............................................................. 27 National projects .............................................................................................. 27 FAB projects ...................................................................................................... 28 Multinational projects ...................................................................................... 32 4. Cooperation activities ................................................................... 33 FAB Co-ordination............................................................................................. 33 Multinational cooperation initiatives ............................................................... 33 5. Implementation Objectives Progress ............................................ 35 State View: Overall Objective Implementation Progress ................................. 35 Objective Progress per SESAR Essential Operational Changes ........................ 36 ICAO ASBU Implementation Progress .............................................................. 42 Detailed Objectives Implementation progress ................................................. 47 6. Annexes ........................................................................................ 78 A. Specialists involved in the ATM implementation reporting for Belgium ......... 78 B. National stakeholders organisation charts ....................................................... 79 C. Implementation Objectives’ links with other plans ......................................... 83 D. SESAR Solutions implemented in a voluntary way ........................................... 88 E. Surveillance (SUR) ........................................................................................... 107 F. Glossary of abbreviations ............................................................................... 111 LSSIP Year 2020 Belgium Released Issue Executive Summary National ATM Context Member State of: The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Belgium are the following: - The Federal Public Service (FPS) Mobility and Transport, through the Belgian Civil Aviation Authority (BCAA) - skeyes - MUAC - The Ministry of Defence (MoD), through the Air Component - Brussels Airport Company. Main airport covered by LSSIP: EBBR (Brussels Airport) Traffic and Capacity Traffic Growth Summer En-Route Delay Summer 2020 (May-Oct) 1.200. 000.00 -55% 2019 2020 2020 LSSIP Year 2020 Belgium 1 Released Issue Belgium is part of: The Functional Airspace Block Europe Central Number of national projects: 2 Number of FAB projects: 2 Number of multinational projects: none Summary of 2020 developments: Implementation of Objective FCM06 Traffic Complexity Assessment has been hampered in 2020 by the absence of dense traffic situations necessary to validate the tool due to the COVID-19 context, which will hopefully be resolved at the end of 2021. Technical issues are also prevented in 2020 the full implementation of objective ITY-AGVCS2 8,33 kHz Air-Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195, while most frequencies have already been converted. The implementation of objective INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD), now planned end 2021, has been postponed due to the redrafting of the corresponding national regulatory framework. Progress per SESAR Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the SESAR baseline (Pre-SESAR and SESAR1 non- PCP) and the PCP elements. It shows the average implementation progress for all objectives grouped by SESAR Phases, excluding those for which the State is outside the applicability area as defined on a yearly basis in the European ATM Master Plan (Level 3) 2020, i.e. disregarding the declared “NOT APPLICABLE” LSSIP progress status. The SESAR 1 (non-PCP) progress in the graphics below for this State is based on the following objectives: AOP14, AOP15, AOP16, ATC02.9, ATC19, ATC20, NAV12 and COM11.2. Pre-SESAR Phase 2000 2030 80% SESAR 1 (PCP only) 2011 2025 43% SESAR 1 (non-PCP) 2013 2030 12% LSSIP Year 2020 Belgium 2 Released Issue Progress per SESAR Essential Operational Changes and Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Essential Operational Changes, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per EOC, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph. ATM Interconnected 75 % Network 50 % Airport and TMA 84 % performance 0 % 35 % CNS Infrastructure and 94% Services 0 % 50 % Digital AIM and MET 64 % Services Fully Dynamic and 43 % Optimised Airspace 42 % Multimodal Mobility and integration of all 0 % Airspace Users Trajectory Based 100 % Operations 50 % Virtualisation of Service Provision 0 % 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Pre-SESAR Phase SESAR 1 (non-PCP) SESAR 1 (PCP only) LSSIP Year 2020 Belgium 3 Released Issue ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs Blocks. The overall percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is a summary of the table explained in Chapter 5.3 – ICAO ASBU Implementation Progress. Block 0 2000 2030 80% Block 1 2009 2030 46% Block 2 2013 2030 16% Block 3 2018 2025 23% LSSIP Year 2020 Belgium 4 Released Issue ATM Deployment Outlook State Objectives Deployed in 2019 - 2020 - Aircraft Identification ITY-ACID - 100 % progress - Surveillance Performance and Interoperability ITY-SPI - 100 % progress - Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) Handling AOM13.1 - 100 % progress - New Pan-European Network Service (NewPENS) COM12 - 100 % progress By 2021 By 2022 By 2023 By 2024+ - ASM Management of Real- - Arrival Management Time Airspace Data Extended to En-route AOM19.2 - 66 % progress Airspace - 8,33 kHz Air-Ground Voice ATC15.2 - 02 % progress Channel Spacing below FL195 - Information Exchange with ITY-AGVCS2 - 90 % progress En-route in Support of AMAN - Full Rolling ASM/ATFCM ATC15.1 - 05 % progress Process and ASM - Electronic Dialogue as Information Sharing Automated Assistance to AOM19.3 - 72 % progress Controller during - Electronic Terrain and Coordination and Transfer Obstacle Data (eTOD) ATC17 - 24 % progress INF07 - 38 % progress - RNP Approach Procedures - ASM Support Tools to to instrument RWY Support Advanced FUA NAV10 - 72 % progress (AFUA) - Information Exchanges AOM19.1 - 96 % progress using the SWIM Yellow TI - Traffic Complexity Profile Assessment INF08.1 - 23 % progress FCM06 - 40 % progress - Voice over Internet - Interactive Rolling NOP Protocol (VoIP) in En-Route FCM05 - 36 % progress COM11.1 - 50 % progress - Short
Recommended publications
  • Runway Performance Report 2020

    Runway Performance Report 2020

    Ostend Airport RUNWAY PERFORMANCE REPORT 2020 member of FABEC / www.skeyes.be EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Air Traffic Management (ATM) Performance is Looking at the distribution of traffic per runway, it driven by four Key Performance Areas (KPAs): safety, can be seen that 2020 follows the trends of 2017 and capacity, environment and cost-efficiency. This 2019, with runway 26 being preferentially used. 2018 report focuses on skeyes’ operations at Ostend- was a year with more north-easterly winds recorded Bruges International Airport (International Civil at all Belgian airports, implying a more frequent use Aviation Organization (ICAO) code EBOS). Its aim is of runway 08. In 2020, winds blew predominantly to provide our main stakeholders with traffic figures from the South-West, with an exception for the for 2020 and relevant data on the performance of our months of April and May where more easterly winds operations at Ostend Airport, namely on three of the were registered and the use of runway 26 dropped to four KPA’s: safety, capacity and environment. around 40% (being on average at 71% for the whole year). Traffic Safety The year 2020 will be remembered for the breakout of the coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic, which Three topics are presented in this report: greatly impacted aviation. Low records of traffic were missed approaches, runway incidents, such registered in Ostend-Bruges International Airport, as runway incursions, and improvements and with an average drop of 25% in comparison with 2019. recommendations. Regarding the first matter, Furthermore, in April 2020, during the COVID-19 first Ostend Airport registered 11 missed approaches wave, a reduction in flights of 76% was seen in the overall in 2020, ten on runway 26 and one on runway airport.
  • Internship Programme GUIDE for NEWCOMERS

    Internship Programme GUIDE for NEWCOMERS

    Internship Programme GUIDE FOR NEWCOMERS Internship Programme GUIDE FOR NEWCOMERS 2017 Internship Programme GUIDE FOR NEWCOMERS 4 Internship Programme GUIDE FOR NEWCOMERS TABLE OF CONTENTS Welcome Note from the Secretary General ............................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 1. ABOUT THE INTERNSHIP PROGRAMME ..................................................................................................................................................................... 10 A. Background ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 11 B. General Conditions ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 12 C. Proceduress ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
  • Runway Performance Report 2020

    Runway Performance Report 2020

    Brussels Airport RUNWAY PERFORMANCE REPORT 2020 member of FABEC / www.skeyes.be EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Air Traffic Management (ATM) Performance is Safety driven by four Key Performance Areas (KPAs): safety, capacity, environment and cost-efficiency. This Two types of events are analysed in this report, both report focuses on skeyes’ operations at Brussels giving a view on airport safety performance: missed Airport (ICAO code EBBR). Its aim is to provide our approaches and runway incursions (RI). Overall, main stakeholders with traffic figures for 2020 and 2020 has seen a decrease in terms of missed relevant data on the performance of the operations approaches by 49%. Even though the number at EBBR, namely on three of four KPA’s: safety, of arrivals has decreased by nearly 60%, capacity and environment. an increase of 25% in the rate of missed approaches per 1,000 arrivals has been registered. The reasons The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant for rates to increase were various: low level social and economic impacts throughout the world. of traffic, single runway operations where one (1) Many countries, including Belgium, decided to of the three (3) runways was used simultaneously, impose a variety of measures in order to prevent the three (3) storms that occurred in February 2020, spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. Those measures Northeast wind in April and May and/or closure of mainly affected people movements which eventual- RWY 07L/25R due to the runway renovation works. ly lead to unprecedented levels of disruption In 2020 the most common reason for missed in countries throughout the world.
  • VFE Workshop Final Report

    VFE Workshop Final Report

    FABEC Vertical Flight Efficiency (VFE) Workshop Report 10 December 2020 Maastricht UAC / Online virtual meeting DOCUMENT SUMMARY Objective: A workshop with FABEC ANSPs and industry stakeholders (mainly aircraft operators) to discuss vertical flight efficiency, to exchange views and to explore how to improve VFE and new VFE indicators. Origin: FABEC SC ENV Audience: Members of the FABEC ANSP teams along with representatives from NM, airlines, CFSPs. Title : FABEC Vertical Flight Efficiency Workshop Reference: FABEC VFE Workshop Report v1.0 Version : 1.0 Date : 12/02/2021 Status : Classification : Public FABEC limited Draft Addressees Released limited DOCUMENT CHANGE RECORD Version Date Changes Author 0.1 15/01/2021 Draft Jean-Michel Edard & Alexander Vanwelsenaere 0.2 21/01/2021 Amendments Nadine Meesen 0.3 11/02/2021 Amendments Theo Hendriks, David Brain, Michaël Sanczuk, Sophie Baranes, Robert Sklorz 1.0 12/02/2021 Jean-Michel Edard APPROVALS Approved Approved by Approval date Approval outcome version and reference 1.0 Ilona Sitova 12/02/2021 1.1 FX Prach 12/02/2021 2020-12-10-FABEC_VFE_ Workshop_Report_v1.1.docx - 10 Dec 2020 2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 4 2 Agenda ................................................................................................................................ 5 3 Attendees ...........................................................................................................................
  • LSSIP 2019 - BELGIUM LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2019 1 - Implementation Overview

    LSSIP 2019 - BELGIUM LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2019 1 - Implementation Overview

    EUROCONTROL LSSIP 2019 - BELGIUM LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2019 1 - Implementation Overview Document Title LSSIP Year 2019 for Belgium Info Centre Reference 20/01/15/05 Date of Edition 25/06/19 LSSIP Focal Point Antoine Vincent [email protected] Federal Public Service Mobility and Transport LSSIP Contact Person Valerie Oblin - [email protected] EUROCONTROL / NMD/INF/PAS LSSIP Support Team [email protected] Status Released Intended for Agency Stakeholders Available in https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky- implementation-monitoring Reference Documents LSSIP Documents https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky-implementation- monitoring Master Plan Level 3 – Plan https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan- Edition 2019 implementation-plan-level-3-2019 Master Plan Level 3 – Report https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan- Year 2019 implementation-report-level-3-2019 European ATM Portal https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ STATFOR Forecasts https://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor National AIP https://ops.skeyes.be/html/belgocontrol_static/eaip/eAIP_Main/html /index-en-GB.html FAB Performance Plan http://www.fabec.eu/fabec_homepage/en/Performance/Performanc e%20Plan/ LSSIP Year 2019 Belgium- Level 1 Released Issue APPROVAL SHEET The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2019 document and the signatures confirm the correctness of the reported information and reflect the commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 (Implementation View) – Edition 2019. No signature received from skeyes for the 2019 Belgium LSSIP document LSSIP Year 2019 Belgium- Level 1 Released Issue TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...........................................................................................
  • “Gissing”: Hisgis Analysis for Mapping Urban Transformation and Military Reuse of Suppressed Convents in Brussels, Antwerp and Bruges (1773-1860)

    “Gissing”: Hisgis Analysis for Mapping Urban Transformation and Military Reuse of Suppressed Convents in Brussels, Antwerp and Bruges (1773-1860)

    en 364From guessing to “gissing”: HisGIS analysis for mapping urban transformation and military reuse of suppressed convents in Brussels, Antwerp and Bruges (1773-1860) Reinout Klaarenbeek Thomas Coomans Processing data with GIS The secularisation of all monastic properties at the end of the 18th century 365 caused a remarkable metamorphosis of urban space in Belgium. Large numbers of monastic complexes, material witnesses of a society entrenched by the Catholic religion for centuries, were erased from the townscape and replaced by new urban fabric. This process, however, was gradual and far from complete. Many former monasteries survived to a certain extent, as they were reused by state and urban institutions (e.g. charities, schools, prisons, hospitals, barracks, etc.) as well as private actors (industries and housing). Taking the case of military reuse as an example, this article de- scribes how this transformation process can be mapped using historical GIS. Historical GIS, or HisGIS, is the application of geographic information science Introduction in the field of history. Although this marriage between GIS and history has sometimes been received with scepticism,1 a large and growing number of studies in the field of urban history have shown its value: most importantly, HisGIS is able to map historical sources, thereby adding a hitherto neglected geographical dimension to historical explanations.2 Furthermore, HisGIS makes it possible to use location as a central means of collecting, storing and combining a wide range of historical sources.3 In this contribution, the design and application of HisGIS are described for a problem at the interface of urban history, architectural history, and historical geography: the urban transformation that occurred after the suppression of convents in the late 18th-century Belgian cities.
  • Brussels 1 Brussels

    Brussels 1 Brussels

    Brussels 1 Brussels Brussels • Bruxelles • Brussel — Region of Belgium — • Brussels-Capital Region • Région de Bruxelles-Capitale • Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest A collage with several views of Brussels, Top: View of the Northern Quarter business district, 2nd left: Floral carpet event in the Grand Place, 2nd right: Brussels City Hall and Mont des Arts area, 3rd: Cinquantenaire Park, 4th left: Manneken Pis, 4th middle: St. Michael and St. Gudula Cathedral, 4th right: Congress Column, Bottom: Royal Palace of Brussels Flag Emblem [1] [2][3] Nickname(s): Capital of Europe Comic city Brussels 2 Location of Brussels(red) – in the European Union(brown & light brown) – in Belgium(brown) Coordinates: 50°51′0″N 4°21′0″E Country Belgium Settled c. 580 Founded 979 Region 18 June 1989 Municipalities Government • Minister-President Charles Picqué (2004–) • Governor Jean Clément (acting) (2010–) • Parl. President Eric Tomas Area • Region 161.38 km2 (62.2 sq mi) Elevation 13 m (43 ft) [4] Population (1 January 2011) • Region 1,119,088 • Density 7,025/km2 (16,857/sq mi) • Metro 1,830,000 Time zone CET (UTC+1) • Summer (DST) CEST (UTC+2) ISO 3166 BE-BRU [5] Website www.brussels.irisnet.be Brussels (French: Bruxelles, [bʁysɛl] ( listen); Dutch: Brussel, Dutch pronunciation: [ˈbrʏsəɫ] ( listen)), officially the Brussels Region or Brussels-Capital Region[6][7] (French: Région de Bruxelles-Capitale, [ʁe'ʒjɔ̃ də bʁy'sɛlkapi'tal] ( listen), Dutch: Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest, Dutch pronunciation: [ˈbrʏsəɫs ɦoːft'steːdələk xəʋɛst] ( listen)), is the capital
  • Brussels Studies , Notes De Synthèse a Mediapark in Brussels? the Media Industry and Its Regional Dynamics 2

    Brussels Studies , Notes De Synthèse a Mediapark in Brussels? the Media Industry and Its Regional Dynamics 2

    Brussels Studies La revue scientifique électronique pour les recherches sur Bruxelles / Het elektronisch wetenschappelijk tijdschrift voor onderzoek over Brussel / The e-journal for academic research on Brussels Notes de synthèse | 2018 A mediapark in Brussels? The media industry and its regional dynamics BSI synopsis Un médiapark à Bruxelles ? L’industrie des médias et sa dynamique régionale Een mediapark in Brussel? De mediasector en zijn regionale dynamiek Marlen Komorowski, Victor Wiard, Sabri Derinöz, Ike Picone, David Domingo and Geoffroy Patriarche Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/brussels/1938 DOI: 10.4000/brussels.1938 ISSN: 2031-0293 Publisher Université Saint-Louis Bruxelles Electronic reference Marlen Komorowski, Victor Wiard, Sabri Derinöz, Ike Picone, David Domingo and Geoffroy Patriarche, « A mediapark in Brussels? The media industry and its regional dynamics », Brussels Studies [Online], Synopses, no 129, Online since 12 November 2018, connection on 19 February 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/brussels/1938 ; DOI : 10.4000/brussels.1938 This text was automatically generated on 19 February 2020. Licence CC BY A mediapark in Brussels? The media industry and its regional dynamics 1 A mediapark in Brussels? The media industry and its regional dynamics BSI synopsis Un médiapark à Bruxelles ? L’industrie des médias et sa dynamique régionale Een mediapark in Brussel? De mediasector en zijn regionale dynamiek Marlen Komorowski, Victor Wiard, Sabri Derinöz, Ike Picone, David Domingo and Geoffroy Patriarche AUTHOR'S NOTE This synopsis is based on the research findings of the Media Clusters Brussels (MCB) project (www.mediaclusters.brussels), financed by Innoviris under the Anticipate – Prospective Research for Brussels – programme under grant 2014-PRFB-66.
  • Sustainability Report 2019

    Sustainability Report 2019

    Sustainability report 2019 www.skeyes.be “ We have the responsibility to protect the environment beyond the statutory requirements.” / 02 Table of contents 1. CONTEXT AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY STRATEGY 04 1.1. About this report 05 1.2. Foreword 08 1.3. About skeyes 12 1.4. CSR strategy 16 1.5. Our stakeholders 19 2. PERFORMANCE AND ACHIEVEMENTS 22 2.1. Sustainable 23 2.2. Engaged 30 2.3. Shared 34 APPENDIX 38 GRI reference table 39 Abbreviations used 42 skeyes Sustainability report 2019 / 03 1. CONTEXT AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY STRATEGY 1.1. About this report skeyes proudly presents its first In this report you will find an overview sustainability report in accordance with the of our corporate social responsibility GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) Guidelines strategy and the actions we took in the for 2019. Not that sustainability hasn’t been past year. At a time when emissions important to skeyes in all the years leading originating from the aviation sector are up to this point. In fact, it is very simple: firmly in the spotlight, and sustainability anyone who engages in corporate social issues such as climate change are of responsibility must also be accountable to great concern to our stakeholders and society. This self-evidence deserves greater personnel, skeyes believes it crucial to focus, because it is important to society communicate about its sustainability that companies prove their sustainability. efforts, actions and performance in a more transparent manner. Moreover, this report naturally offers added value in terms of communication with customers, employees, stakeholders The specific results of the first CSR and supporters: we aim to demonstrate report reveal how a sustainability what we think, do and feel more clearly.
  • BRU Chapter Two Report (PUBLIC)

    BRU Chapter Two Report (PUBLIC)

    ENVISA AVIATION & ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS Brussels National Airport Study of the impacts on the environment with regard to noise pollution – Chapter Two Report Study of the impacts on the environment with regard to noise pollution (BRU) Prepared for: Final Version (Public) Federal Public Service 31 May 2019 Mobility and Transport Ted Elliff – Coordinator Tel: +33 1 71 19 45 84 By ENVISA (Paris) Email: [email protected] www.env-isa.com 310519 Chapter 2 2/242 Study of the impacts on the environment with regard to noise pollution (BRU) Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................ 12 1 Introduction & Context .................................................................................................................................. 17 The Belgian Paradox .............................................................................................................................. 17 The Belgian Judicial System ................................................................................................................... 19 Local Context........................................................................................................................................... 19 Addressing Noise within the Airport Business ................................................................................... 21 2 Judicial Timeline (Revised) ............................................................................................................................
  • GEN 4.2 Air Navigation Services Charges

    GEN 4.2 Air Navigation Services Charges

    15-JUL-2021 AIP Belgium and Luxembourg GEN 4.2-1 15-JUL-2021 GEN 4.2 Air Navigation Services Charges 1 SKEYES 1.1 Amount of the Charges Skeyes levies a charge for each take-off in the charging zone of EBBR, the amount of which is equal to the product of the formula: α U x Wi x Ei x Di x Oi x in which: • “U” is the unit rate; •“Wi” is the number of chargeable terminal service units of this flight; •“Ei” is the environmental factor of this flight; •“Di” is the day/night factor of this flight; •“Oi” is the ATS optimisation factor of this flight; • “i” identification of the individual flight; •“α” is the compensation coefficient (set to 1.028311 for 2021) allowing to offset the revenue surplus or deficit due to the application of factors E, O and D. U: the unit rate (U) is set at 185.39 EUR for 2021. W: the number of terminal service units (W) equals the weight factor for the aircraft concerned. The weight factor, expressed according to Annex V of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) nr. 391/2013 as a figure taken to two decimal places, shall be the quotient, obtained by dividing by fifty the number of metric tons in the highest maximum certified take-off weight of the aircraft, referred to in Annex IV point 1.5 of the Regulation, to the power of 0.7. E: the environmental factor (E) is determined according to the noise categories of the aircraft and equals: • 0.85 for CAT A; • 0.90 for CAT B; • 0.95 for CAT C; • 1.05 for CAT D; • 1.20 for CAT E; • 1.70 for CAT F.
  • 19 & 20 Sept. 2020

    19 & 20 Sept. 2020

    heritage days 19 & 20 SEPT. 2020 urban.brussels new administration. new horizon. architecture and culture for the city. urbanism heritage urban renovation contemporary architecture urban.brussels (Brussels Urbanism & Heritage) is an administrative body in the Brussels Capital Region. It supports territorial development by implementing regional policies relating to urban development, cultural heritage and urban revitalisation. urban.brussels organises and coordinates a large number of public awareness campaigns concerning heritage and contemporary architecture. In addition, urban.brussels awards subsidies and grants for home renovation, facade embellishment and the restoration of heritage. urban.brussels also provides legal advice related, among other things, to the Brussels Land Management Code (CoBAT) and the Regional Urban Development Regulations (RRU). To accomplish this, urban.brussels offers a broad range of expertise, particularly in the fields of architecture, history, documentation and regulations, in order to optimise its response to citizens’ and users’ expectations. The Urbanism Directorate The Cultural Heritage Directorate The Urban Renovation Directorate The Knowledge & Communication Directorate The Legal Affairs Directorate The Staff & Organisation Directorate To carry out these tasks, urban.brussels urban.brussels tasks, these out carry To counts on a General Direction and six directorates: urban.brussels also hosts the secretariats of three independent bodies: the Royal Monuments and Sites Commission, the Urbanism College and the Environment College. urban.brussels mont des arts 10-13 1000 brussels +32 (0)2 432 83 00 [email protected] www.urban.brussels Legal deposit: D/2020/6860/009 heritage days / COLOR / 1 Over the years, the Heritage Days have become a highlight of the Brussels cultural events calendar, drawing thousands of visitors from Brussels, Wallonia, Flanders and further afield each September.