DOCSLIB.ORG

Samtrans Market Segmentation Study Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Samtrans Market Segmentation Study Report SAMTRANS MARKET SEGMENTATION STUDY SPRING 2018 SUMMARY REPORT Prepared by COREY, CANAPARY & GALANIS RESEARCH 447 Sutter Street – Penthouse North San Francisco, CA 94108 SamTrans Market Segmentation Survey – Spring 2018 | Summary Report Table of Contents INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................... 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................................................................................. 5 DETAILED RESULTS – TELEPHONE STUDY............................................................................................... 13 Primary Weekday Destination............................................................................................................ 14 Mode Choice....................................................................................................................................... 15 Alternative Mode................................................................................................................................ 16 Travel Patterns.................................................................................................................................... 17 Likelihood of Using SamTrans............................................................................................................. 21 Incentives/Barriers to SamTrans Use (Likely to Use SamTrans)......................................................... 22 Incentives/Barriers to SamTrans Use (Not Likely to Use SamTrans).................................................. 24 Attitudinal Questions.......................................................................................................................... 26 Distance from El Camino Real............................................................................................................. 35 Familiarity with SamTrans Routes ...................................................................................................... 36 Fare Payment and Real Time Bus Information................................................................................... 37 Alternative Public Transit Systems Used - Non and Former Riders ................................................... 38 Non-Riders and Former Riders - Acceptable Trip Time...................................................................... 39 Suggestions......................................................................................................................................... 40 Demographics..................................................................................................................................... 41 DETAILED RESULTS – NOTES FROM FOCUS GROUPS ............................................................................. 44 Focus Group #1 (Riders) ..................................................................................................................... 45 Focus Group #2 (Former Riders)......................................................................................................... 61 Focus Group #3 (Non-Riders) ............................................................................................................. 77 Focus Group #4 (Spanish Language)................................................................................................... 88 APPENDICES.......................................................................................................................................... 101 APPENDIX A – TELEPHONE SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE...................................................................... 102 APPENDIX B – FOCUS GROUP SCREENING QUESTIONNAIRE ...........................................................114 APPENDIX C – FOCUS GROUP MODERATOR OUTLINE AND PARTICIPANT HANDOUTS...................122 2 SamTrans Market Segmentation Survey – Spring 2018 | Summary Report INTRODUCTION This report details the findings of the SamTrans Market Segmentation Study, conducted for SamTrans by Corey, Canapary & Galanis (CC&G). The Study consisted of two primary components: A qualitative portion, consisting of four focus groups. These groups were conducted December 15-16, 2017, and included one group each of riders, former riders, and non-riders, as well as a group of Spanish-speaking participants (which was a mix of current, former, and non-riders). All four groups were held at San Mateo County Transit District headquarters. Groups were led by professional moderators, and each group consisted of 9-12 participants. The primary goals of this portion of the study were to: o Help in the development of the quantitative questionnaire; and o Obtain input which was best suited for more of an in-depth, directional discussion, with a focus on what might motivate non-riders to try SamTrans, why former riders no longer use SamTrans, and other specialized aspects, such as how SamTrans is perceived within the Hispanic/Spanish-speaking community. A quantitative portion, consisting of a telephone survey of San Mateo County residents, which was conducted from January 30 to March 28, 2018. Of the 664 completed surveys, 625 were conducted in English and 39 were conducted in Spanish. Key objectives of the telephone survey included determining a respondent’s: o Current transportation mode; o Incentives and barriers to SamTrans use; o Rider and non-rider perception of SamTrans and its service; and o Preferred methods of communication. This report includes the following key sections: Executive Overview, Charts/Key Findings and Detailed Results. While the report focuses on the results from the quantitative questionnaire, findings from the focus groups (particularly those not covered in the quantitative questionnaire) are included throughout where relevant. The Appendix of this report includes a copy of the questionnaire, as well as the moderator outline, group notes, and handouts for the qualitative (focus group) portion. Questions regarding this project may be directed to: Julian Jest, SamTrans, 650-508-6245. Key Sub-Groups and Statistically Significant Differences from Telephone Survey For both the telephone survey and focus groups, potential respondents were initially asked about their use of SamTrans and were divided into three groups: Non-riders: those who had not used SamTrans; Former Riders: those who had used SamTrans but not within the past six months; and Riders: those who had used SamTrans in the past six months. 3 SamTrans Market Segmentation Survey – Spring 2018 | Summary Report For the focus groups, one group each was conducted among Non-riders, Former Riders, and Riders. From the telephone survey, 664 completed surveys were conducted. Of these, 280 (42%) were conducted with non-riders, 262 (40%) were conducted with former riders, and 122 (18%) were conducted with regular riders. Respondent Geographic Distribution ZONE TOTAL Non- Former Rider Rider Rider MID 45% 44% 45% 45% NORTH 31% 28% 32% 39% SOUTH 13% 17% 11% 6% COASTSIDE 11% 11% 11% 10% For the total number of respondents in the telephone survey (n = 664) who participated, the margin of error is +/- 3.74% at the 95% confidence level. The margin of error for some other key sub-groups which are shown in this report: - Non-Riders (n = 280) +/-5.82% at the 95% confidence level; - Former Riders (n = 262) +/-6.01% at the 95% confidence level; - Riders (n = 122) +/-8.85% at the 95% confidence level. 4 SamTrans Market Segmentation Survey – Spring 2018 | Summary Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Mode Choice and Timing of Primary Weekday Trip Among all respondents, the vast majority (85%) How do you typically get to this destination [primary used some form of car- weekday trip]? based transportation for All Respondents 71% 14% 7% 3% their primary weekday trip, with 71% driving alone, 14% driving with Non-Riders 71% 14% 7% others, and 1% using Uber/Lyft or a similar service. Coastside Former Riders 80% 14% 3% residents were most likely to use some form of car- Riders 48% 12% 14% 16% based transportation (89%), followed by Mid Drive Alone Drive w/Others Other Public Transit County (86%), North SamTrans Walk Bicycle County (83%), and South Other County (82%) residents. Only 10% used some form of public transportation, with 3% using SamTrans and 7% using some other form of public transit. North County residents were most likely to use SamTrans for their primary weekday trip (4%), followed closely by Mid-County residents (3%). Only 1% each of South County and Coastside respondents said they used SamTrans for their primary weekday trip. Only 16% of SamTrans riders use SamTrans for their primary weekday trip. While South County residents were least likely to say they use some form of car-based transportation, as well as the least likely to use any form of transit (SamTrans or otherwise), 10% say they bicycle and 5% say they walk for their primary trip (much higher than 3% of respondents overall who say they walk and 2% of respondents overall who say they bicycle). This coincides with the fact that 77% of South County respondents say their primary weekday trip takes 30 minutes or less. The heavy dependency on car-based transportation is not as surprising given that 96% of respondents indicated they have access to a [personal] car, making nearly every potential rider within San Mateo County a choice rider. 5 SamTrans Market Segmentation Survey – Spring 2018 | Summary Report Use of SamTrans More than half (58%) of respondents said they had used SamTrans at some point. North
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Local and Express Route Profiles
    Reimagine SamTrans Existing Conditions Analysis of SamTrans Local and Express Routes This report describes SamTrans’ fixed local and express routes, including route characteristics, service span, frequency, destinations served, ridership, and schedule adherence/on-time performance. Ridership maps accompany each route profile. These maps depict boardings and alightings at each stop for each direction based on Automatic Passenger Count (APC) data provided by SamTrans for April 2019. The Reimagine SamTrans project team evaluated each route in the system in order to make proposals for the new network alternatives that would improve the function and efficiency of each existing bus route. REIMAGINE SAMTRANS Existing Conditions Analysis ROUTE 17 Route Characteristics Route 17 runs between Pacifica and Half Moon Bay, travelling through Montara, Moss Beach, and El Weekday Granada. The route serves the Linda Mar Park & Ride, Start Time 5:30 a.m. where riders can transfer to additional SamTrans routes. Key destinations along the route include Linda End Time 8:20 p.m. Mar Shopping Center, Half Moon Bay Airport, and Boardings 503 Nurseryman’s Exchange North and South. Service Hours 29.1 During weekdays there is one round trip in the morning Boardings per Service Hour 17.3 and one round trip in the evening that continues through Half Moon Bay to Pescadero. This extension Peak Headway 30 provides service to the rural areas south of Half Moon Off-Peak Headway 60 Bay. There is also limited service from Miramontes/Moonridge to Canada Cove which operates On Time 94% Schedule throughout the week. Early 1% Adherence Weekday service operates between 5:30 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • ACT BART S Ites by Region.Csv TB1 TB6 TB4 TB2 TB3 TB5 TB7
    Services Transit Outreach Materials Distribution Light Rail Station Maintenance and Inspection Photography—Capture Metadata and GPS Marketing Follow-Up Programs Service Locations Dallas, Los Angeles, Minneapolis/Saint Paul San Francisco/Oakland Bay Area Our Customer Service Pledge Our pledge is to organize and act with precision to provide you with excellent customer service. We will do all this with all the joy that comes with the morning sun! “I slept and dreamed that life was joy. I awoke and saw that life was service. I acted and behold, service was joy. “Tagore Email: [email protected] Website: URBANMARKETINGCHANNELS.COM Urban Marketing Channel’s services to businesses and organizations in Atlanta, Dallas, San Francisco, Oakland and the Twin Cities metro areas since 1981 have allowed us to develop a specialty client base providing marketing outreach with a focus on transit systems. Some examples of our services include: • Neighborhood demographic analysis • Tailored response and mailing lists • Community event monitoring • Transit site management of information display cases and kiosks • Transit center rider alerts • Community notification of construction and route changes • On-Site Surveys • Enhance photo and list data with geocoding • Photographic services Visit our website (www.urbanmarketingchannels.com) Contact us at [email protected] 612-239-5391 Bay Area Transit Sites (includes BART and AC Transit.) Prepared by Urban Marketing Channels ACT BART S ites by Region.csv TB1 TB6 TB4 TB2 TB3 TB5 TB7 UnSANtit
    [Show full text]
  • AQ Conformity Amended PBA 2040 Supplemental Report Mar.2018
    TRANSPORTATION-AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT Metropolitan Transportation Commission Association of Bay Area Governments MARCH 2018 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Jake Mackenzie, Chair Dorene M. Giacopini Julie Pierce Sonoma County and Cities U.S. Department of Transportation Association of Bay Area Governments Scott Haggerty, Vice Chair Federal D. Glover Alameda County Contra Costa County Bijan Sartipi California State Alicia C. Aguirre Anne W. Halsted Transportation Agency Cities of San Mateo County San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission Libby Schaaf Tom Azumbrado Oakland Mayor’s Appointee U.S. Department of Housing Nick Josefowitz and Urban Development San Francisco Mayor’s Appointee Warren Slocum San Mateo County Jeannie Bruins Jane Kim Cities of Santa Clara County City and County of San Francisco James P. Spering Solano County and Cities Damon Connolly Sam Liccardo Marin County and Cities San Jose Mayor’s Appointee Amy R. Worth Cities of Contra Costa County Dave Cortese Alfredo Pedroza Santa Clara County Napa County and Cities Carol Dutra-Vernaci Cities of Alameda County Association of Bay Area Governments Supervisor David Rabbit Supervisor David Cortese Councilmember Pradeep Gupta ABAG President Santa Clara City of South San Francisco / County of Sonoma San Mateo Supervisor Erin Hannigan Mayor Greg Scharff Solano Mayor Liz Gibbons ABAG Vice President City of Campbell / Santa Clara City of Palo Alto Representatives From Mayor Len Augustine Cities in Each County City of Vacaville
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Kors® Make Your Move at Sunglass Hut®
    Michael Kors® Make Your Move at Sunglass Hut® Official Rules NO PURCHASE OR PAYMENT OF ANY KIND IS NECESSARY TO ENTER OR WIN. A PURCHASE OR PAYMENT WILL NOT INCREASE YOUR CHANCES OF WINNING. VOID WHERE PROHIBITED BY LAW OR REGULATION and outside the fifty United States (and the District of ColuMbia). Subject to all federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and ordinances. This Gift ProMotion (“Gift Promotion”) is open only to residents of the fifty (50) United States and the District of ColuMbia ("U.S.") who are at least eighteen (18) years old at the tiMe of entry (each who enters, an “Entrant”). 1. GIFT PROMOTION TIMING: Michael Kors® Make Your Move at Sunglass Hut® Gift Promotion (the “Gift ProMotion”) begins on Friday, March 22, 2019 at 12:01 a.m. Eastern Time (“ET”) and ends at 11:59:59 p.m. ET on Wednesday, April 3, 2019 (the “Gift Period”). Participation in the Gift Promotion does not constitute entry into any other promotion, contest or game. By participating in the Gift Promotion, each Entrant unconditionally accepts and agrees to comply with and abide by these Official Rules and the decisions of Luxottica of America Inc., 4000 Luxottica Place, Mason, OH 45040 d/b/a Sunglass Hut (the “Sponsor”) and WYNG, 360 Park Avenue S., 20th Floor, NY, NY 10010 (the “AdMinistrator”), whose decisions shall be final and legally binding in all respects. 2. ELIGIBILITY: Employees, officers, and directors of Sponsor, Administrator, and each of their respective directors, officers, shareholders, and employees, affiliates, subsidiaries, distributors,
    [Show full text]
  • Warm Springs Extension Title VI Equity Analysis and Public Participation Report
    Warm Springs Extension Title VI Equity Analysis and Public Participation Report May 7, 2015 Prepared jointly by CDM Smith and the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, Office of Civil Rights 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Section 1: Introduction 6 Section 2: Project Description 7 Section 3: Methodology 14 Section 4: Service Analysis Findings 23 Section 5: Fare Analysis Findings 27 Appendix A: 2011 Warm Springs Survey 33 Appendix B: Proposed Service Options Description 36 Public Participation Report 4 1 2 Warm Springs Extension Title VI Equity Analysis and Public Participation Report Executive Summary In June 2011, staff completed a Title VI Analysis for the Warm Springs Extension Project (Project). Per the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Title VI Circular (Circular) 4702.1B, Title VI Requirements and Guidelines for Federal Transit Administration Recipients (October 1, 2012), the District is required to conduct a Title VI Service and Fare Equity Analysis (Title VI Equity Analysis) for the Project's proposed service and fare plan six months prior to revenue service. Accordingly, staff completed an updated Title VI Equity Analysis for the Project’s service and fare plan, which evaluates whether the Project’s proposed service and fare will have a disparate impact on minority populations or a disproportionate burden on low-income populations based on the District’s Disparate Impact and Disproportionate Burden Policy (DI/DB Policy) adopted by the Board on July 11, 2013 and FTA approved Title VI service and fare methodologies. Discussion: The Warm Springs Extension will add 5.4-miles of new track from the existing Fremont Station south to a new station in the Warm Springs district of the City of Fremont, extending BART’s service in southern Alameda County.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Station Profiles
    2015 BART Station Profile Study Station Profiles – Non-Home Origins STATION PROFILES – NON-HOME ORIGINS This section contains a summary sheet for selected BART stations, based on data from customers who travel to the station from non-home origins, like work, school, etc. The selected stations listed below have a sample size of at least 200 non-home origin trips: • 12th St. / Oakland City Center • Glen Park • 16th St. Mission • Hayward • 19th St. / Oakland • Lake Merritt • 24th St. Mission • MacArthur • Ashby • Millbrae • Balboa Park • Montgomery St. • Civic Center / UN Plaza • North Berkeley • Coliseum • Oakland International Airport (OAK) • Concord • Powell St. • Daly City • Rockridge • Downtown Berkeley • San Bruno • Dublin / Pleasanton • San Francisco International Airport (SFO) • Embarcadero • San Leandro • Fremont • Walnut Creek • Fruitvale • West Dublin / Pleasanton Maps for these stations are contained in separate PDF files at www.bart.gov/stationprofile. The maps depict non-home origin points of customers who use each station, and the points are color coded by mode of access. The points are weighted to reflect average weekday ridership at the station. For example, an origin point with a weight of seven will appear on the map as seven points, scattered around the actual point of origin. Note that the number of trips may appear underrepresented in cases where multiple trips originate at the same location. The following summary sheets contain basic information about each station’s weekday non-home origin trips, such as: • absolute number of entries and estimated non-home origin entries • access mode share • trip origin types • customer demographics. Additionally, the total number of car and bicycle parking spaces at each station are included for context.
    [Show full text]
  • 04/21/2020 Agenda Packet
    “The City with a Heart” Rico E. Medina, Mayor Michael Salazar, Vice Mayor Laura Davis, Councilmember Linda Mason, Councilmember Marty Medina, Councilmember GOVERNOR’S EXECUTIVE ORDER N-25-20**** CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 AND SAN MATEO COUNTY HEALTH DIRECTIVE FROM MARCH 14, 2020 On March 17, 2020, the Governor of California issued Executive Order N-29-20 suspending certain provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act in order to allow for local legislative bodies to conduct their meetings telephonically or by other electronic means. Pursuant to the current Shelter-In-Place Order issued by the San Mateo County Health Officer which became effective on March 17, 2020, and which was updated and extended on March 31, 2020; the statewide Shelter-In-Place Order issued by the Governor in Executive Order N-33-20 on March 19, 2020; and the CDC’s social distancing guidelines which discourage large public gatherings, the San Bruno City Council Chambers at the Senior Center is no longer open to the public for meetings of the City Council. If you would like to make a Public Comment on an item not on the agenda, or comment on a particular agenda item, please email us at [email protected] or at [email protected]. The length of all emailed comments should be commensurate with the three minutes customarily allowed per speaker, which is approximately 300 words total. Emails received before the special or regular meeting start time will be forwarded to the City Council, posted on the City’s website and will become part of the public record for that meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • PRIMARY RECORD NRHP Status Code:7 Other Listings: Review Code: Reviewer: Survey #: Date: 44- DOE
    State of California - The Resource Agency Primary #:____________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#:_________________________________ Trinomial: PRIMARY RECORD NRHP Status Code:7 Other Listings: Review Code: Reviewer: Survey #: Date: 44- DOE #: *Resource Name or #:5 Chilton Av P1. Other Identifier: *P2 Location: not for publication Z unrestricted *a . County San Francisco and (P2c, P2e, and P21b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as Necessary) b. USGS 7.5' Quad: YEAR: T ;R ; of of Sec B.M. c. Address: 5 Chilton AV City: San Francisco State: CA Zip Code: 94131 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone: ; mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) 6738 031 & 032 (formerly lot 25) *133a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) See Continuation Sheet *P3b Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP02 5 P4 Resources Present: Z Building D Structure 0 Object 0 Site 0 District 0 Element of a District 0 Other 135b. Description of Photo: *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source: U Historic 0 PreHistoric 0 Both 0 Neither Year Built: 1908 - Documented p7 Owner and Address: Name: KINNEAR LESLEY / EAKIN-SZENTMIKLOSSY FMLY TR Address: 5 CHILTON AVE San Francisco,CA 94131 *P8 Recorded By: N. Moses Corrette City Planner San Francisco Planning Department 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94103 *9 Date Recorded: 08/10/2009
    [Show full text]
  • Route 140 - SFO Airtrain - West Manor / Palmetto
    Reimagine SamTrans Alternatives 重塑 SamTrans Reimagina las Alternativas de SamTrans Route 140 - SFO Airtrain - West Manor / Palmetto Alternative 1 Alternativa 1 选择1 Alternative 2 Alternativa 2 选择2 Existing Existing Alternative 2 Daly City San Francisco Alternative 1 Daly City San Francisco BART Station BART Station Us Hwy 101 Us Hwy 101 121 Brisbane Brisbane State Hwy 1 Hwy State State Hwy 1 Hwy State Sierra Point Pkwy Sierra Point Pkwy Seton Medical Center Seton Medical Center State Hwy 35 State Hwy 35 Serramonte Center Serramonte Center South San Francisco South San Francisco Daly City Daly City State Hwy 35 State Hwy 35 South Airport Ave Oyster Pt Blvd South Airport Ave Oyster Pt Blvd Pacific Manor Grand Ave San Francisco Pacific Manor Grand Ave San Francisco Shopping City Hall Shopping City Hall Center Oyster Point Marina Center Oyster Point Marina Monterey Rd Monterey Rd El Camino Real El Camino Real Inverness Dr Glencourt Way Inverness Dr Glencourt Way Spruce Ave Spruce Ave Manor Dr Linden Ave Manor Dr Linden Ave Skyline Blvd Huntington Ave San Bruno Skyline Blvd Huntington Ave San Bruno BART Station BART Station Pacifica Pacifica The Shops at Tanforan The Shops at Tanforan College Dr College Dr Sneath Ln Cherry Ave San Bruno Ave Sneath Ln Cherry Ave San Bruno Ave State Hwy 1 Hwy State State Hwy 1 Hwy State I 380 I 380 Skyline Allen Dr N McDonnell Rd Skyline Allen Dr N McDonnell Rd College Rollingwood Dr College Rollingwood Dr San Bruno Ave San Bruno Ave Sequoia Ave San Bruno SFO AirTrain Station Sequoia Ave San Bruno SFO AirTrain Station Caltrain Caltrain Sneath Ln Sneath Sneath Ln Sneath Bayhill Rental Car Center Bayhill Rental Car Center Shopping Station Shopping Station Center Center San Bruno Data Sources: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx San Bruno Data Sources: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx EPX US Hwy 101 US Hwy 101 Millbrae Millbrae 0 0.6 1.2 0 0.6 1.2 Miles Miles Alternative 3 Alternativa 3 选择3 Existing Daly City San FranciscoAlternative 3 BART Station Frequency (min) Frecuencia (minuto) 频率（分钟） Peak Midday Evening Route Hora Pico Mediodía Noche Us Hwy 101 Day No.
    [Show full text]
  • Prologis Pinole Point Richmond, CA 94806 ±41,365 & ±224,154 Square Feet Industrial Space for Lease
    Prologis Pinole Point Richmond, CA 94806 ±41,365 & ±224,154 Square Feet Industrial Space For Lease Location Montana SAN PABLO AVENUE Bay Park Prologis Pinole Point is a master-planned development in Richmond, California Sobrante Avenue situated on approximately 80 acres of prime real estate. Centrally located at Montalvin e u n ROA Park e A T D v T N A L A e A I t S G n a R r O the intersection of Atlas Road and Giant Road, the complex offers prime b A o S D access to major interstate highways and close proximity to the Port of D Oakland, Oakland International Airport and the entire San Francisco Bay Area. A O R T AT N LAS IA RO G AD The Pinole Point development plan allows for ±515,000 square feet of SAN PABLO AVENUE warehouse, distribution and/or manufacturing space, comprised of three (3) AY RKW individual buildings ranging in size from 41,000 square feet to 250,000 square RICHMOND PA Richmond Country Club INTERSTATE feet. The BuildingCALIFORNIA 4 site was sold and developed as a 117,200 square foot food 80 distribution warehouse for Whole Foods Market, and Building 1 has been Hilltop Lake HI LL fully-leased to Williams-Sonoma. TO P D R I V Hilltop E Lake Park The ownership team works closely with each user to ensure that each Y A KW AR building is designed to satisfy the occupant’s unique business requirements. RICHMOND P Hilltop Mall Pinole Point is home to some of the premier Bay Area companies including E U N E INTERSTATE V CALIFORNIA A Bio-Rad Laboratories, Whole Foods Market, International Delicacies, Serena & O 80 L ARKWAY B H A I D P P L N LT O N OP Lily and Restoration Hardware.
    [Show full text]
  • Opticianry Employers - USA
    www.Jobcorpsbook.org - Opticianry Employers - USA Company Business Street City State Zip Phone Fax Web Page Anchorage Opticians 600 E Northern Lights Boulevard, # 175 Anchorage AK 99503 (907) 277-8431 (907) 277-8724 LensCrafters - Anchorage Fifth Avenue Mall 320 West Fifth Avenue Ste, #174 Anchorage AK 99501 (907) 272-1102 (907) 272-1104 LensCrafters - Dimond Center 800 East Dimond Boulevard, #3-138 Anchorage AK 99515 (907) 344-5366 (907) 344-6607 http://www.lenscrafters.com LensCrafters - Sears Mall 600 E Northern Lights Boulevard Anchorage AK 99503 (907) 258-6920 (907) 278-7325 http://www.lenscrafters.com Sears Optical - Sears Mall 700 E Northern Lght Anchorage AK 99503 (907) 272-1622 Vista Optical Centers 12001 Business Boulevard Eagle River AK 99577 (907) 694-4743 Sears Optical - Fairbanks (Airport Way) 3115 Airportway Fairbanks AK 99709 (907) 474-4480 http://www.searsoptical.com Wal-Mart Vision Center 537 Johansen Expressway Fairbanks AK 99701 (907) 451-9938 Optical Shoppe 1501 E Parks Hy Wasilla AK 99654 (907) 357-1455 Sears Optical - Wasilla 1000 Seward Meridian Wasilla AK 99654 (907) 357-7620 Wal-Mart Vision Center 2643 Highway 280 West Alexander City AL 35010 (256) 234-3962 Wal-Mart Vision Center 973 Gilbert Ferry Road Southeast Attalla AL 35954 (256) 538-7902 Beckum Opticians 1805 Lakeside Circle Auburn AL 36830 (334) 466-0453 Wal-Mart Vision Center 750 Academy Drive Bessemer AL 35022 (205) 424-5810 Jim Clay Optician 1705 10th Avenue South Birmingham AL 35205 (205) 933-8615 John Sasser Opticians 1009 Montgomery Highway, # 101
    [Show full text]
  • Bart at Twenty: Land Use and Development Impacts
    ffional Development BART@20: Land Use and Development Impacts Robert Cervero with research assistance by Carlos Castellanos, Wicaksono Sarosa, and Kenneth Rich July 1995 University of California at Berkeley - 1 BART@20: Land Use and Development Impacts Robert Cervero with Research Assistance by Carlos Castellanos, Wicaksono Sarosa, and Kenneth Rich This paper was produced with support provided by the U.S. Department of Transportation and the California State Department of Transportation (Caltrans) through the University of California Transportation Center. University of California at Berkeley Institute of Urban and Regional Development Table of Contents ONE: BART at 20: An Analysis of Land Use Impacts 1 1. INTRODUCTION 1 TWO: Research Approach and Data Sources 3 THREE: Employment and Population Changes in BART and Non-BART Areas 6 3.1. Population Changes 6 3.2. Employment Changes 3.3. Population Densities 15 3.4. Employment Densities 15 3.5. Summary 20 FOUR: Land Use Changes Over Time and by Corridor 21 4.1. General Land-Use Trends 23 4.2. Pre-BART versus Post-BART 25 4.3. Early versus Later BART 30 4.4. Trends in Non-Residential Densities 33 4.4. Summary 37 FIVE: Land-Use Changes by Station Classes 38 5.1. Grouping Variables 38 5.2. Classification 38 5.3. Station Classes 41 5.4. Trends in Residential and Non-Residential Growth Among Station Classes 44 5.5. Percent Growth in Early- versus Later-BART Years Among Station Classes 46 5.6. Trends in Non-Residential Densities Among Station Classes 46 SLX: Matched-Pair Comparisons of Land-Use Changes near BART Stations Versus Freeway Interchanges 51 6.1.
    [Show full text]