DOCSLIB.ORG

Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey Extended phase 1 habitat survey Field to north of Ysgol Bro Hyddgen and Gasworks lane access route Machynlleth, Powys Powys County Council Ref: Vital-WLGL-EP1-17-08-2020 17th August 2020 Author: Scott Roe BSc (Hons), ACIEEM, AMRSB Signed Date 17/8/2020 Vital Ecology Unti 1 Dyfi Eco Park, Powys, Machynlleth, SY20 8JB 01654 701 499 / 07805 618 595 [email protected] / www.itsvital.co.uk Field to North of Ysgol Bro Hyddgen and Gasworks lane access route, Machynlleth, Powys Executive summary Report overview This extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey was commissioned by Powys County Council. The purpose of this survey was to assess the site, recording habitat types and noting any presence or signs of protected species. Habitats that could support protected species are also noted where appropriate. Any potential constraints to development due to habitats, species or features recorded are clearly shown along with recommendations for mitigation, compensation or further surveys. Summary of 25 designated or priority habitats were recorded within the 1km search radius of the proposed findings development. One hundred and twenty four priority species were found to be recorded within 1km of the central development grid reference. One priority habitat were found within the survey area; Hedgerows. No priority species were recorded during the survey. A previous Phase 1 survey in 2018 recorded two priority species; Coenonympha pamphilus (Small Heath) and (Boloria selene) Small Pearl-Bordered Fritillary. One invasive species was recorded during the survey; Impatiens glandulifera (Himalyan Balsam). Suitable habitat was found for a number of priority or conservation concern species, including but not limited to: Tyto alba (Barn Owl), Emberiza citrinella (Yellowhammer), Cuculus canorus (Cuckoo) and Sturnus vulgaris (Starling). Zootoca vivipara (Common Lizard), Natrix helvetica (Grass snake), Anguis fragilis (Slow worm), Bufo bufo (Common Toad), Lutra lutra (Otter), Arvicola amphibius (Water Vole), Emberiza citrinella, (Small Heath) and Boloria selene (Small Pearl-Bordered Fritillary). Overview of It is recommended that Water Vole, Otter and Reptile surveys are conducted and if recommendations species are found to be present that appropriate mitigation and/or compensation measures are applied. Any development proposals should consider mitigation and biosecurity measures to avoid the possibility of spreading Impatiens glandulifera (Himalyan Balsam). Further recommendations are detailed in Appendix 5. Other Widespread Reptiles: Slow-worm, Viviparous lizard, Grass snake and Adder have protection under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. Water voles are now fully protected under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended). This protection has implications for developers and planners who wish to carry out work where water voles are present. The Otter is protected under the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017, known as the ‘Habitats Regulations’ Contents 1. Introduction 1.1. Site details and description 1.2. Proposed development or project 1.2.2.Disclaimer 2. Methods 2.1. Desk study 2.2. Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey and methodology statement 3. Survey Results: Desk study 3.1.1.Designated sites of importance for nature conservation 3.2. Protected, Priority and notable species 3.3. Geological and soil data 3.3.1.Basic geological overview 3.3.2. Basic Soil Overview 3.4. Phase 1 Habitat Survey - Habitats 3.5. Phase 1 Habitat Survey - Species 3.6. Survey Constraints 4. Evaluation and recommendations and field survey findings 4.1. Designations 4.2. Habitats 4.3. Species 4.3.9 Field study constraints 4.4. Concluding statement 5.Wildlife legislation and planning policy 5.1. European protected species 5.2. Other protected species 5.3. Planning policy Wales or National planning policy framework 5.4. Schedule 9 plant species 5.5.Trees and the law 6. References 7. Appendices Appendix 1. Phase 1 habitat map Appendix 2. Site photographs Appendix 3. Species list Appendix 4. Ecological statements Appendix 5. Ecological enhancement opportunities Appendix 6. Guide to designation names Appendix 7. Guide to species and habitat protection codes Field to north of Ysgol Bro Hyddgen and Gasworks lane access route, Machynlleth, Powys 1. Introduction This extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey was commissioned by Powys County Council. The survey was a combined Phase 1 Habitat survey and protected species survey. The purpose of this survey was to assess the site, recording habitat types and noting any presence or signs of protected species. Habitats that could support any protected species are also noted where appropriate. Any potential constraints to development due to habitats, species or features recorded are clearly shown along with recommendations for mitigation, compensation or further surveys. 1.1. Site The site is located on the western edge of the town of Machynlleth in Powys with a central survey grid reference of SH 74301 00692, (Appendix 1). The site consists of marshy grassland, improved grassland, hedgerows and ditch habitats and is approximately 1.7 ha in size. The surrounding land largely consists of, improved grassland, semi- natural broadleaved woodland, poor semi-improved grassland and buildings. Other less extensive habitats found within 1km of the core survey site include, bare ground, dense scrub, bracken, standing water and planted coniferous woodland. A complete list of habitats present can be found in section 3.4. 1.2. Proposed development, project or action Powys County Council propose the construction of a new grass-pitch for Ysgol Bro Hyddgen. Access for maintenance and emergency vehicles would be via Gasworks lane. 1.2.2. Disclaimer Vital Ecology has exercised due care in preparing this report and the content has been provided in accordance with the CIEEM Code of Professional Conduct. We have not independently verified information provided by others. No other warranty, express or implied, is made in relation to the content of this report and Vital Ecology assumes no liability for any loss resulting from errors, omissions or misrepresentation made by others. Nothing in this report constitutes legal opinion. If legal opinion is required the advice of a qualified legal professional should be secured. Any observations relating to built structures or trees have been made from an ecological point of view and, unless stated otherwise, do not constitute structural or arboricultural advice. 2. Methods 2.1. Desk Study A biological data search was carried out through the local biological records centre ‘Biodiversity Information Service for Powys & Brecon Beacons National Park’. This initial search identified priority species, species of conservation concern and locally important species that have been recorded within 1km of the survey area. The Multi-Agency Geographical information for the countryside (MAGIC) was consulted to obtain information relating to site designations within the area. Consultation of The National Biodiversity Network (NBN) website provided us with further information and cross-checking relating to protected, priority or notable species in the area. The British Geological Society’s ‘iGeology application’ and The European Soil Data Centre’s ‘mySoil application’ were consulted for relevant data. Aerial photography was used as a tool for initial examination of the sites characteristics and to view the surrounding area. The use of aerial photography was also used to locate any potential features of interest on the site and within the wider landscape. 2.2. Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey and methodology statement An extended Phase 1 Habitat survey was carried out by Scott Roe, an experienced ecological consultant and associate member of CIEEM. The survey was carried out in warm, calm and dry conditions on Tuesday 28th July 2020. The extended phase 1 habitat survey was carried out in accordance with JNCC guidelines. Phase 1 habitat survey is a standard survey method and classification tool that allows the categorisation and mapping of habitats in an accurate and consistent way. Extended phase 1 habitat surveys include initial surveys and searches for signs of protected, priority and notable species. The potential suitability of habitats on site and within the surrounding area for supporting protected, priority and notable species is also noted. Badgers Survey sites are searched for signs such as latrines, setts, footprints, hairs caught on fences and feeding scrapes. Water Voles Where suitable habitat exists careful searches are carried out to locate field signs such as plant stems, other feeding remains, latrines, runs and burrows. Otters All riparian zones when reasonably and safely accessible are carefully searched for Otter signs such as spraint, footprints, feeding remains, lay-up sites, holts and slides. An in-stream/river survey is also carried out in all locations where this is safe to do so. Any likely layup sites are examined for signs of Otters and where necessary a torch may be used. Bats Surveys for bats vary hugely depending on the development and situation. Often the only survey required is an assessment of the habitat in terms of bat potential. Any natural roosting sites are noted and if required their location included in the report. If it is likely that bat roosts are present in sensitive areas of the site a scoping survey would be carried out and a separate specific bat survey may be recommended. Birds Checks are made for nests from the previous season. Depending on time of year breeding bird activity
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reviewing the Data Deficient Fungi List, 2009
    Using molecular techniques to combine taxonomic and ecological data for fungi Reviewing the Data Deficient fungi list, 2009 SCIENCE FOR CONSERVATION 306 Using molecular techniques to combine taxonomic and ecological data for fungi Reviewing the Data Deficient fungi list, 2009 Peter Johnston, Duckchul Park, Ian Dickie and Katrin Walbert SCIENCE FOR CONSERVATION 306 Published by Publishing Team Department of Conservation PO Box 10420, The Terrace Wellington 6143, New Zealand Cover: Cortinarius tessiae. Photo: Jerrie Cooper. Science for Conservation is a scientific monograph series presenting research funded by New Zealand Department of Conservation (DOC). Manuscripts are internally and externally peer-reviewed; resulting publications are considered part of the formal international scientific literature. This report is available from the departmental website in pdf form. Titles are listed in our catalogue on the website, refer www.doc.govt.nz under Publications, then Science & technical. © Copyright October 2010, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISSN 1177–9241 (web PDF) ISBN 978–0–478–14833–6 (web PDF) This report was prepared for publication by the Publishing Team; editing by Lynette Clelland and layout by Frith Hughes and Lynette Clelland. Publication was approved by the General Manager, Research and Development Group, Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand. In the interest of forest conservation, we support paperless electronic publishing. CONTENTS Abstract 5 1. Introduction 6 2. Objectives 7 3. Methods 7 3.1 Data sources 7 3.1.1 Ecological datasets 7 3.1.2 Dried herbarium specimens 8 3.1.3 Tissue samples stored in CTAB buffer 8 3.1.4 Updated collection data from PDD herbarium 8 3.2 Molecular methods 9 3.2.1 DNA extraction and amplification 9 3.2.2 DNA analysis 9 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Recorders' Newsletter Issue 24 – November 2017 Contents
    Unit 4, 6 The Bulwark, Brecon, Powys, LD3 7LB Recorders’ Newsletter 01874 610881 [email protected] www.bis.org.uk Issue 24 – November 2017 Facebook: @BISBrecon Welcome to the 2017 autumn edition of the BIS newsletter. In this bumper edition there are exciting articles on ladybirds, Hairy Dragonflies, Pearl-Bordered and Marsh Fritillaries, reviews of 2016 for Breconshire Birds and Brecknock Botany Group along with further ins and outs at BIS and our second Recorder of the Season. On page 19 is the programme for this year’s Recorders Forum on 28th November. Thank you to all of you who have contributed to this issue, we hope you all enjoy it. Please contact [email protected] for any questions, comments or ideas for future content. Contents Article Page BIS Update 2 Where the Wild Things Are 3 Skullcap Sawfly 3 Breconshire Bird Report for 2016 4 Llangorse Hairy Dragonfly 5 Penpont Fungal Foray 5 A Dung Beetle first 6 Black Mountains Land Use Partnership 6 A butterfly on the edge – Pearl Bordered Fritillary 7-8 New at BIS 9 Lovely Ladybirds 9 Dragonfly walk on the Begwns 10 Clubtail Survey 10 Marsh Fritillary Success 11 Wonderful Waxcaps 11 Llangorse Lake Wetland Mollusc Hunt 12-13 New Moths for Spain 13 Recorder of the Season 14 Brecknock Botany Report 15-16 Long Forest Launch 17 BIS Events 18 Recorders Forum 2017 Programme 19 Useful Links 20 Page 1 of 20 BIS Update Arrivals & Departures Welcome to Ben Mullen who has recently taken on the role of Communications Officer. Ben hit the ground running with enthusiastic new ideas to promote recording and editing this newsletter.
    [Show full text]
  • Ingleborough NNR
    Ingleborough NNR Waxcap Grassland Survey January 2018 Ref: NEFU2017-243 Author: A.McLay Checked: Dr A.Jukes Natural England Field Unit CONTENTS Background 3 Introduction 3 Survey methodology 4 Survey results 4 Site evaluation 15 Recommendations 21 References 22 Appendices - Appendix 1. Location of units 23 - Appendix 2. List of non-CHEGD spp. 25 - Appendix 3. Grid locations for species 26 Appendix 4. Additional photographs 27 2 Introduction The term “waxcap grassland” was coined relatively recently to describe semi-natural grassland habitats containing distinctive assemblages of fungi, including waxcaps. Waxcaps are a group of fungi characterised by having thick waxy brittle gills, often bright colours and a preference for growing in unfertilised pastures or lawns. A waxcap grassland also frequently contains representatives of several other key grassland fungi groups, of which the fairy clubs (Clavariaceae family), earthtongues (Geoglossaceae) and pinkgills belonging to the genus Entoloma are the most prominent. Collectively these groups are often referred to as the CHEGD fungi, an acronymn derived from their initials. Additional grassland fungi representatives from the genera Dermoloma, Porpoloma and Camarophyllopsis are also included as honorary CHEGD fungi. The common factor linking these fungi groups is their requirement for nutrient-poor soil types, i.e. agriculturally unimproved grasslands. Such grasslands have usually received little or no input from modern agricultural nitrogen-based fertilisers and frequently support a semi-natural sward with fine-leaved grass species such as Festuca ovina, Agrostis capillaris and Anthoxanthum odoratum. A well-developed moss layer is almost always present and usually contains the widespread grassland moss species Rhytidiadelphus squarrosus. Waxcap grasslands usually have a well-grazed sward that is maintained by regular livestock browsing or frequent mowing.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes, Outline and Divergence Times of Basidiomycota
    Fungal Diversity (2019) 99:105–367 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-019-00435-4 (0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,- volV) Notes, outline and divergence times of Basidiomycota 1,2,3 1,4 3 5 5 Mao-Qiang He • Rui-Lin Zhao • Kevin D. Hyde • Dominik Begerow • Martin Kemler • 6 7 8,9 10 11 Andrey Yurkov • Eric H. C. McKenzie • Olivier Raspe´ • Makoto Kakishima • Santiago Sa´nchez-Ramı´rez • 12 13 14 15 16 Else C. Vellinga • Roy Halling • Viktor Papp • Ivan V. Zmitrovich • Bart Buyck • 8,9 3 17 18 1 Damien Ertz • Nalin N. Wijayawardene • Bao-Kai Cui • Nathan Schoutteten • Xin-Zhan Liu • 19 1 1,3 1 1 1 Tai-Hui Li • Yi-Jian Yao • Xin-Yu Zhu • An-Qi Liu • Guo-Jie Li • Ming-Zhe Zhang • 1 1 20 21,22 23 Zhi-Lin Ling • Bin Cao • Vladimı´r Antonı´n • Teun Boekhout • Bianca Denise Barbosa da Silva • 18 24 25 26 27 Eske De Crop • Cony Decock • Ba´lint Dima • Arun Kumar Dutta • Jack W. Fell • 28 29 30 31 Jo´ zsef Geml • Masoomeh Ghobad-Nejhad • Admir J. Giachini • Tatiana B. Gibertoni • 32 33,34 17 35 Sergio P. Gorjo´ n • Danny Haelewaters • Shuang-Hui He • Brendan P. Hodkinson • 36 37 38 39 40,41 Egon Horak • Tamotsu Hoshino • Alfredo Justo • Young Woon Lim • Nelson Menolli Jr. • 42 43,44 45 46 47 Armin Mesˇic´ • Jean-Marc Moncalvo • Gregory M. Mueller • La´szlo´ G. Nagy • R. Henrik Nilsson • 48 48 49 2 Machiel Noordeloos • Jorinde Nuytinck • Takamichi Orihara • Cheewangkoon Ratchadawan • 50,51 52 53 Mario Rajchenberg • Alexandre G.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Lespedeza Cuneata and Its Relationship to Soil Microbes and Plant-Soil Feedback
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository INVASIVE LESPEDEZA CUNEATA AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO SOIL MICROBES AND PLANT-SOIL FEEDBACK BY ALYSSA M. BECK DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2017 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Anthony Yannarell Associate Professor Angela Kent Professor Emeritus Jeffrey Dawson Assistant Professor Katy Heath Associate Professor Richard Phillips ABSTRACT Globalization has lead to increased frequencies of exotic plant invasions, which can reduce biodiversity and lead to extinction of native species. Physical traits that increase competitive ability and reproductive output encourage the invasiveness of exotic plants. Interactions with the soil microbial community can also increase invasiveness through plant-soil feedback, which occurs through shifts in the abundance of beneficial and deleterious organisms in soil that influence the growth of conspecific and heterospecific progeny. Lespedeza cuneata is an Asian legume that has become a problematic invader in grasslands throughout the United States. While L. cuneata has numerous traits that facilitate its success, it may also benefit from interactions with soil microbes. Previous studies have shown that L. cuneata can alter bacterial and fungal community composition, benefit more from preferential nitrogen-fixing symbionts than its native congener, L. virginica, and disrupt beneficial fungal communities associated with the native grass Panicum virgatum. L. cuneata litter and root exudates also have high condensed tannin contents, which may make them difficult to decompose and allow them to uniquely influence microbial communities in ways that benefit conspecific but not heterospecific plants.
    [Show full text]
  • (Hebden Bridge, West Yorkshire) Using Nextgen DNA Sequencing of Soil Samples
    Natural England Commissioned Report NECR258 An assessment of the fungal conservation value of Hardcastle Crags (Hebden Bridge, West Yorkshire) using NextGen DNA sequencing of soil samples First published February 2019 Month XXXX www.gov.uk/natural-england Foreword Natural England commission a range of reports from external contractors to provide evidence and advice to assist us in delivering our duties. The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. Background DNA based applications have the potential to significantly change how we monitor and assess This report should be cited as: biodiversity. These techniques may provide cheaper alternatives to existing species GRIFFITHS, G.W., CAVALLI, O. & monitoring or an ability to detect species that we DETHERIDGE, A.P. 2019. An assessment of the cannot currently detect reliably. fungal conservation value of Hardcastle Crags (Hebden Bridge, West Yorkshire) using NextGen Natural England has been supporting the DNA sequencing of soil samples. Natural development of DNA techniques for a number of England Commissioned Reports, Number 258. years and has funded exploratory projects looking at different taxonomic groups in a range of different ecosystems and habitats. This report presents the results of a survey of fungi of conservation importance at Hardcastle . Crags, West Yorkshire, using DNA based methods. These results are compared to fruiting body surveys which had been carried out in the preceding two years. Natural England Project Manager – Andy Nisbet, Principal Adviser and Evidence Programme Manager, Natural England [email protected] Contractor – Gareth Griffith, Aberystwyth University [email protected] Keywords – DNA, eDNA, sequencing, metabarcoding, monitoring, fungi, waxcaps, grassland Further information This report can be downloaded from the Natural England Access to Evidence Catalogue: http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/ .
    [Show full text]
  • Do Fungal Fruitbodies and Edna Give Similar Biodiversity Assessments Across Broad Environmental Gradients?
    Supplementary material for Man against machine: Do fungal fruitbodies and eDNA give similar biodiversity assessments across broad environmental gradients? Tobias Guldberg Frøslev, Rasmus Kjøller, Hans Henrik Bruun, Rasmus Ejrnæs, Anders Johannes Hansen, Thomas Læssøe, Jacob Heilmann- Clausen 1 Supplementary methods. This study was part of the Biowide project, and many aspects are presented and discussed in more detail in Brunbjerg et al. (2017). Environmental variables. Soil samples (0-10 cm, 5 cm diameter) were collected within 4 subplots of the 130 sites and separated in organic (Oa) and mineral (A/B) soil horizons. Across all sites, a total of 664 soil samples were collected. Organic horizons were separated from the mineral horizons when both were present. Soil pH was measured on 10g soil in 30 ml deionized water, shaken vigorously for 20 seconds, and then settling for 30 minutes. Measurements were done with a Mettler Toledo Seven Compact pH meter. Soil pH of the 0-10 cm soil layer was calculated weighted for the proportion of organic matter to mineral soil (average of samples taken in 4 subplots). Organic matter content was measured as the percentage of the 0-10 cm core that was organic matter. 129 of the total samples were measured for carbon content (LECO elemental analyzer) and total phosphorus content (H2SO4-Se digestion and colorimetric analysis). NIR was used to analyze each sample for total carbon and phosphorus concentrations. Reflectance spectra was analyzed within a range of 10000-4000 cm-1 with a Antaris II NIR spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). A partial least square regression was used to test for a correlation between the NIR data and the subset reference analyses to calculate total carbon and phosphorous (see Brunbjerg et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Viewers and Editors Adhere to These Guidelines
    Six simple guidelines for introducing new genera of MYCOLENS fungi Else C. Vellinga1, Thomas W. Kuyper2, Joe Ammirati3, Dennis E. Desjardin4, Roy E. Halling5, Alfredo Justo6, Thomas Læssøe7, Teresa Lebel8, D. Jean Lodge9, P. Brandon Matheny10, Andrew S. Methven11, Pierre-Arthur Moreau12, Gregory M. Mueller13, Machiel E. Noordeloos14, Jorinde Nuytinck14, Clark L. Ovrebo15, and Annemieke Verbeken16 1 Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-3102, USA; corresponding author e-mail: ecvellinga@comcast. net 2 Department of Soil Quality, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands; corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] 3 Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1800, USA 4 Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA 5 Institute of Systematic Botany, New York Botanical Garden, 2900 Southern Boulevard, Bronx, NY 10458, USA 6 Department of Botany, Institute of Biology, National Autonomous University of Mexico, 04510 Mexico City, Mexico 7 Department of Biology/Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark 8 Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria, Birdwood Ave, Melbourne 3004, Australia 9 Center for Forest Mycology Research, Northern Research Station, USDA-Forest Service, Luquillo, PR 00773-1377, USA 10 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-1610, USA 11 Department of Biological Sciences, Eastern Illinois University, Charleston, IL 61920, USA 12 Département des Sciences Végétales et Fongiques, Faculté des sciences pharmaceutiques et biologiques, Université de Lille, 59006 Lille, France 13 Chicago Botanic Garden, 1000 Lake Cook Road, Glencoe, IL 60022, USA 14 Naturalis Biodiversity Centre, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • MYCOLOGIST NEWS 1St Edition March 2018
    MYCOLOGIST NEWS 1st Edition March 2018 Newsletter Contents Special issue and 1. UKFD 2017 reports 2017 Introduction 2. Fungi Photo Corner 3. Reports on UKFD Dear Members, 2017 activities It gives me great pleasure to write a few words of Thanks in advance of our celebration of the fantastic efforts by 4. Field Meetings and so many in making UK Fungus Day 2017 and resounding Workshops success. Reading through your reports and feedback 5. Membership renewal forms, we can see that yet again you have encouraged 2018 more public involvement than ever with the bonus of increasing group and society membership. The BMS’s UK 6. Contact details Fungus Day 2017 (UKFD17) kick started this year’s Royal Society of Biology’s ‘Biology week’ activities for the fifth year running with over 65 events nationwide over the th weekend of 7-8 October 2017. Activities included fungus BMS Autumn Open walks, academic talks, school’s competitions, artistic Meeting and Annual workshops and large scale public engagement events. We were able to support academic outreach in schools and a General Meeting social enterprise project run by a school in Manchester, th teaching year 4 children about the recycling capability of 17 November 2018 the oyster mushroom by recycling spent coffee grounds from local coffee shops. The FEO worked alongside our Lady Lisa Sainsbury Lecture BMS recording group network to produce a set of genus Theatre, Jodrell Laboratories information sheets for use at UK Fungus Day outreach Royal Botanic Gardens events and local forays which were made available to Kew download from the UK Fungus Day website and were welcomed by the field mycology community.
    [Show full text]
  • The Leasowes SSSI Dudley
    The Leasowes SSSI Dudley Notification under section 28 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 Supporting Information Issued by Natural England’s West Midlands Team on 7 February 2019 Contact points and further information This supplement is issued on request by Natural England’s West Midlands Land Management Team and is intended to be read in conjunction with the notification document for owners, occupiers and other notified parties. Natural England Parkside Court, Hall Park Way Telford, TF3 4LR Telephone: 02080 261 271 Email: [email protected] Online: https://consult.defra.gov.uk/natural-england/the-leasowes Your contact point for specific enquiries relating to this notification is Katie Lloyd Page 2 of 26 Contents Summary 1. Information used to support the notification of The Leasowes SSSI 2. Explanation of how The Leasowes meets the SSSI selection guidelines 3. Assessment of the current condition of The Leasowes SSSI 4. Selection of ‘operations requiring Natural England’s consent’ 5. Site unit map 6. Photographs Page 3 of 26 Summary The Leasowes SSSI is notified under Section 28 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. The Leasowes SSSI is considered to be of special interest for its: • rich assemblage of grassland fungi • species-rich lowland neutral grassland of the nationally rare NVC type MG5 crested dog’s-tail Cynosurus cristatus – common knapweed Centaurea nigra grassland Page 4 of 26 1. Information used to support the selection of The Leasowes SSSI Feature Data source Author Date Content General Revised Guidelines for the Selection Bainbridge, I., 2013 National selection of Biological SSSIs. Part 1: Brown, A., guidelines for Rationale, Operational Approach Burnett, N., biological SSSIs and Criteria for Site Selection.
    [Show full text]
  • Mycokeys @: @@–@@DNA (2013) Barcoding and Morphological Studies Reveal Two New Species
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal MycoKeys @: @@–@@DNA (2013) barcoding and morphological studies reveal two new species... 1 doi: 10.3897/[email protected] RESEARCH ARTICLE MycoKeys www.pensoft.net/journals/mycokeys Launched to accelerate biodiversity research DNA barcoding and morphological studies reveal two new species of waxcap mushrooms (Hygrophoraceae) in Britain A. Martyn Ainsworth1, Paul F. Cannon1, Bryn T. M. Dentinger1 1 Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, U.K. Corresponding author: A. Martyn Ainsworth ([email protected]) Academic editor: Scott Redhead | Received 25 June 2013 | Accepted 15 August 2013 | Published @@ ###### 2013 Citation: Ainsworth AM, Cannon PF, Dentinger BTM (2013) DNA barcoding and morphological studies reveal two new species of waxcap mushrooms (Hygrophoraceae) in Britain. MycoKeys @: @@–@@. doi: 10.3897/[email protected] Abstract Rigorous diagnostics and documentation of fungal species are fundamental to their conservation. During the course of a species-level study of UK waxcap (Hygrophoraceae) diversity, two previously unrecognized species were discovered. We describe Gliophorus europerplexus sp. nov. and G. reginae sp. nov., respectively orange–brown and purple–pink waxcap mushrooms, from nutrient-poor grasslands in Britain. Both share some morphological features with specimens assigned to Gliophorus (=Hygrocybe) psittacinus. However, analysis of sequences of the nuclear ITS DNA barcode region from these and related taxa confirms the phylogenetic distinctness of these lineages. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the holotype of Hygropho- rus perplexus, a North American species morphologically resembling G. europerplexus, is phylogenetically divergent from all our collections. It is likely that further collections of G. europerplexus will be revealed by sequencing European material currently filed under G.
    [Show full text]
  • Gliophorus Glutinosus Sp. Nov. (Hygrophoraceae, Agaricales) from Eastern Himalayan Region of India
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal MycoKeys 44: 123–135Gliophorus (2018) glutinosus sp. nov. (Hygrophoraceae, Agaricales) from... 123 doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.44.28554 RESEARCH ARTICLE MycoKeys http://mycokeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Gliophorus glutinosus sp. nov. (Hygrophoraceae, Agaricales) from Eastern Himalayan region of India Dyutiparna Chakraborty1, Kanad Das1, Alfredo Vizzini2 1 Botanical Survey of India, Cryptogamic Unit, P.O. Botanic Garden, Howrah 711103, India 2 Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, Univ. of Torino, Torino, Italy Corresponding author: Kanad Das ([email protected]) Academic editor: Zai-Wei Ge | Received 22 July 2018 | Accepted 23 November 2018 | Published 21 December 2018 Citation: Chakraborty D, Das K, Vizzini A (2018) Gliophorus glutinosus sp. nov. (Hygrophoraceae, Agaricales) from Eastern Himalayan region of India. MycoKeys 44: 123–135. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.44.28554 Abstract An interesting species of the genus Gliophorus (sect. Glutinosae), collected from Sikkim Himalaya in India, is described here as G. glutinosus sp. nov. after thorough morphological examination and phylogenetic analysis. The species is mainly characterised by its strongly glutinous basidiomata throughout, particularly on the twisted stipe, decurrent lamellae with glutinous edge, gelatinised cheilocystidia, presence of pleu- ropseudocystidia and absence of clamps in hyphae of the pileipellis. This communication includes detailed morphological description, illustrations, comparison
    [Show full text]