Weap) Model to Assess Future Water Demands and Water Balance of the Caledon River Basin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Weap) Model to Assess Future Water Demands and Water Balance of the Caledon River Basin APPLICATION OF WATER EVALUATION AND ALLOCATION PLANNING (WEAP) MODEL TO ASSESS FUTURE WATER DEMANDS AND WATER BALANCE OF THE CALEDON RIVER BASIN by ABEBE SEYOUM AYELE A dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Master of Engineering in Civil Engineering in the Department of Civil Engineering of the Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, of the Central University of Technology, Free State, South Africa Supervisor: Prof Y.E. Woyessa Co-supervisor: Dr D.C. Edossa June 2016 © Central University of Technology, Free State DECLARATION I, the undersigned, declare that the dissertation hereby submitted by me for the degree Magister Technologiae (Engineering: Civil) at the Central University of Technology, Free State, is my own independent work and has not been submitted by me to another University and/or Faculty in order to obtain a degree. I further cede copyright of this dissertation in favour of the Central University of Technology, Free State. ABEBE SEYOUM AYELE Signature: …………………………. Date: ............................................ Bloemfontein, South Africa i © Central University of Technology, Free State ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First of all, I would like to thank the Almighty God for giving me health and energy, and for helping me to complete this study. I would like to thank also my supervisor Prof Yali Woyessa and my co-supervisor Dr Desalegn Edossa for their advice and guidance throughout my study. I am grateful for the assistance of many staff members from the Water Supply and Hydrology Division of the Department of Water Affairs and Sanitation (DWA) in Bloemfontein and the local municipalities in the Free State. I am also grateful for the assistance of individuals and organisations from the Lesotho side including the Director of the Department of Water Affairs (DWALS) as well as the Department of Rural Water Supply (DRWS), the Water and Sewerage Company (WASCO), the Lesotho National Development Corporation (LNDC), the Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security (MoAFS) and the Bureau of Statistics (BoS) for their cooperation in providing important data. I would like to acknowledge also all my friends in Maseru (Lesotho) who have always supported me, encouraged me, prayed for me and kept me going. I say a big thank you! Finally, I am thankful to my wife, Frehiywot Getachew, and my children (Tsiyon Abebe, Selam Abebe and Mikias Abebe) for their support, love and comfort during stressing times, as a result of my workload and this study. ii © Central University of Technology, Free State ABSTRACT The Caledon catchment is one of the 19 catchments in South Africa and three catchments in Lesotho. It covers part of the south eastern Free State in South Africa and northern part of Lesotho. It is important to evaluate the water resources of the catchment to satisfy the projected water demands and in order to plan for the future and make wise decisions. The objective of this study was to apply the Water Evaluation and Planning System version 21 (WEAP21) as a Decision Support System (DSS) tool for the allocation and development of water resources in the Caledon catchment. The model was structured according to three scenarios with a current account (2014) and reference period (2015-2050) to predict their possible impacts on the water balance and allocation of the region due to varied water demands. The scenarios are as follows: scenario 1: increase in population growth rates; scenario 2: irrigation activities in Lesotho; and scenario 3: implementation of environmental flow requirement (EFR) on Caledon River at a site referred to as C6. The first two scenarios are consumptive scenarios whereas the third is a non-consumptive scenario. Scenario analysis answers “what if” questions for the future. Population growth has contributed to water scarcity problem in many parts of the world. In this context, scenario 1 deals with the impact of an increase in population growth on the water balance after 2020 by analysing the unmet demands that will be incurred over the reference period. Scenario 2 also analyses the unmet demands if irrigation activities in Lesotho are increased after 2020. Scenario 3 evaluates the impact of the implementation of an EFR site at C6 – which is situated downstream of all demand sites of the catchment – on upstream demands. Projected water demands and unmet demands were evaluated for four water use sectors, namely, domestic, industry, irrigation and livestock. The catchment comprised of 46 demand sites which were categorised into four use sectors: 20 domestic demand sites, 11 irrigation sites, 10 livestock sites and five industrial sites in both rural and urban areas. iii © Central University of Technology, Free State The modelling results show that high population growth increases the water shortage to all water use sectors in the catchment. Under a high population growth scenario, the unmet demand occurred between May and October. However, under reference, EFR and irrigation scenarios, the unmet demand occurred only from June to September. The annual unmet demand will increase substantially after 2020 in a high population growth scenario and when the population growth rates are altered. The demand from the irrigation sector is covered or no unmet demands are registered in all years. This is because active irrigation activities happen from December to May when enough water is available from the rivers. The years 2025 and 2050 were chosen to evaluate the water balance situations in terms of supply and demand in the middle and at the end of the reference period under two water use scenarios (high population growth and irrigation added). The result shows that the river flows meet the projected demand in 2025. However, most rivers, including the main river (Caledon River), will not be able to meet the required demands in 2050. iv © Central University of Technology, Free State TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION ............................................................................................................... i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................. ii ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES........................................................................................................ xii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................ xiv LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................... xvi NOMENCLATURE ...................................................................................................... xvii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Problem Statement ............................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Objectives ........................................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Structure of Dissertation .................................................................................................................... 4 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................ 5 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Water policies and water laws ........................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Water Allocation Guidelines and Principles ....................................................................................... 7 2.4 Water Resources Management Models for River Basin Simulation .................................................. 8 2.4.1 MODSIM ................................................................................................................................ 9 2.4.2 MIKE BASIN ........................................................................................................................... 9 2.4.3. RIBASIM ............................................................................................................................... 10 2.4.4. REALM ................................................................................................................................. 11 2.4.5. WEAP21 ............................................................................................................................... 12 CHAPTER 3: MATERIALS AND METHODS ............................................................... 16 3.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 16 viii © Central University of Technology, Free State 3.2 Description of the Study Area ........................................................................................................... 16 3.2.1 Geography ........................................................................................................................... 16 3.2.2 Climate ...............................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • A Soilscape Survey to Evaluate Land for In-Field Rainwater Harvesting in the Free State Province, South Africa
    A SOILSCAPE SURVEY TO EVALUATE LAND FOR IN-FIELD RAINWATER HARVESTING IN THE FREE STATE PROVINCE, SOUTH AFRICA by Semere Alazar Tekle A dissertation submitted in accordance with the requirements for the Magister Scientiae Agriculturae degree in the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, Department of Soil, Crop and Climate Sciences at the University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa. September 2004 Supervisor: Dr. P.A.L. le Roux Co-supervisor: Dr. M. Hensley DECLARATION I declare that the thesis hereby submitted by me for the Masters of Science in Soil Science degree at the University of the Free State is my own independent work and has not previously been submitted by me to another University / Faculty. I further cede copyright of the thesis in favour of the University of the Free State. Semere Alazar Signature …………………………….. Date: September, 2004 Place: Bloemfontein, South Africa ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I am grateful to my promoter Dr. P.A.L. le Roux for his consistent guidance, timely responses, valuable suggestions, invaluable support and unfailing encouragement throughout the research period. My sincere gratitude to my co-promoter Dr. M. Hensley for his unreserved sharing of his long time research knowledge and experience and fatherly advices. My gratitude also to all the staff members of the Department of Soil, Crop and Climate Sciences, particularly to: Prof. C.C. du Preez, the Department Head, for his consistent care and guidance throughout my stay in the University; Mrss. Elmarie Kotze, and Rida van Heerden administrative and logistical things, throughout my study period in the University; and Yvonne Dessels for helping me in many ways regarding laboratory materials and analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Postal: PO Box 116, Ficksburg, 9730 Physical: 27 Voortrekker Street, Ficksburg Tel: 051 933 9300 Fax: 051 933 9309 Web: TABLE of CONTENTS
    Postal: PO Box 116, Ficksburg, 9730 Physical: 27 Voortrekker Street, Ficksburg Tel: 051 933 9300 Fax: 051 933 9309 Web: http://www2.setsoto.info/ TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures .........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................3 List of Maps ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................4 List of Tables ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................5 List of Acronyms ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................7 Definitions ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Report-Paul Roux
    Phase 1 Heritage Impact Assessment for proposed new 1.5 km-long underground sewerage pipeline in Paul Roux, Thabo Mofutsanyane District Municipality, Free State Province. Report prepared by Paleo Field Services PO Box 38806, Langenhovenpark 9330 16 / 02 / 2020 Summary A heritage impact assessment was carried for a proposed new 1.5 km-long underground sewerage pipeline in Paul Roux in the Thabo Mofutsanyane District Municipality, Free State Province. The study area is situated on the farm Farm Mary Ann 712, next to the N5 national road covering a section of the Sand River floodplain which is located on the eastern outskirts of Paul Roux . The proposed footprint is underlain by well-developed alluvial and geologically recent overbank sediments of the Sand River. Investigation of exposed alluvial cuttings next to the bridge crossing shows little evidence of intact Quaternary fossil remains. Potentially fossil-bearing Tarkastad Subgroup and younger Molteno Formation strata are exposed to the southwest of the study area. These outcrops will not be impacted by the proposed development. There are no major palaeontological grounds to suspend the proposed development. The study area consists for the most part of open grassland currently used for cattle grazing. The foot survey revealed little evidence of in situ Stone Age archaeological material, capped or distributed as surface scatters on the landscape. There are also no indications of rock art, prehistoric structures or other historical structures or buildings older than 60 years within the vicinity of the study area. A large cemetery is located directly west of the proposed footprint. The modern bridge construction at the Sand River crossing is not considered to be of historical significance.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological and Cultural Historic Assessment of the New Borrow Pits on the N5 Road Between Senekal & Paul Roux, Free State
    14 October 2005 ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND CULTURAL HISTORIC ASSESSMENT OF THE NEW BORROW PITS ON THE N5 ROAD BETWEEN SENEKAL & PAUL ROUX, FREE STATE INVESTIGATION Two new borrow pits on the N5 road between Senekal and Paul Roux, Free State, was inspected on 7 October 2005 in the company of Dr Johan du Preez of Cebo Environmental Consultants, Bloemfontein. The land was examined for possible archaeological and historical material and to establish the potential impact on any cultural material that might be found. The Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) is done in terms of the National Heritage Resources Act (NHRA), (25 of 1999) and under the Environmental Conservation Act, (73 of 1989). LOCALITY The proposed developments are located at the farms Oriel 1220 (Map 1) and Zyferfontein 246 (Map 2) outside Senekal respectively. The farm Oriel 1220 is located on the north side of the Sand River to the west of the town (Map 1). The farm is reached via the old Ventersburg road across the Hattingh Bridge on the old way to Steynsrust (2827BC). The proposed new borrow pit will be near the Sand River on the southern border of the farm (Fig.1). GPS co-ordinates are given in Cape scale: 2 BP 11 ORIEL 1220 SENEKAL 28°18’51”S. 027°35’59”E. Altitude 1428m. Surface grass-cover (Figs.3&4). Later Stone Age flakes and scrapers surface (Figs.5&6). Petrified wood fragments (Dadoxylon fossils) (Fig.7). Stone walling on top of hill (28°18’48”S 027°36’04”E Altitude 1433m) (Fig.8). Old road along the hill (Fig.4).
    [Show full text]
  • Provincial Gazette Provinsiale Koerant
    Provincial Provinsiale Gazette Koerant Free State Province Provinsie Vrystaat Published by Authority Uitgegee op Gesag NO. 48 FRIDAY, 02 AUGUST 2019 NR.48 VRYDAG, 02 AUGUSTUS 2019 PROVINCIAL NOTICES 72 Nketoana Local Municipality: 72 Nketoana Plaaslike Munisipaliteit: Notice of 2019/20120 Municipal Tariffs................. 2 Kennisgewing van 2019/20120 Munisipale Tariewe...... 2 GENERAL NOTICES ALGEMENE KENNISGEWINGS 69 Mangaung Municipal Land Use Planning By-Law: 69 Mangaung Munisipale Grongebruik-Beplanning By- Erf 13440 Bloemfontein (Oranjesig)................... 2 Wet: Erf 13440 Bloemfontein (Oranjesig)................... 2 70 Removal of Restrictive Condition of Title: 70 Ophef van Beperkende Voorwaarde uit Akte: (A) Portion 1 of Erf 133 Langenhoven Park, (A) Gedeelte 1 van Erf 133 Langenhoven Park, District Bloemfontein Distrik Bloemfontein (B) Plot 8 Pantydefaid Small Holdings, District (B) Plot 8 Pantydefaid Small Holdings, Distrik Bloemfontein... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .... 3 Bloemfontein................................................. 3 71 Mangaung Municipal Land Use Planning By-Law: 71 Mangaung Munisipale Grondgebruik-Beplanning By­ Erf 3446, 67 Genl. Dan Pienaar Drive, Wet: Erf 3446, 67 Genl. Dan Pienaar Drive, Bloemfontein... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ........ ..... 3 Bloemfontein........................................................ 3 72 Phumelela By-Law on Municipal Land Use Planning, 2017: Vrede: Rezoning: Erven 1115, 1117 and 1118 ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Banner of Light V11 N26 20 September 1862
    T 'll sLtl A Ito* HiV row fatrf wq«d-I Ir k* I ■tawrtlda pF ' J <h fai] j , i it tf a" “ Il .xft ail ra a- jtaAdri* tf doh, mo )i;J ,-j^ a «l [bp Mi .j .a >r <1 I'wlHNUfSId weir udUnk*D ' ft; , «a e. v< ;>i rf/'M, "SToyZtt - 1 ilW uj;: it ' 'Ji ‘ kip/li” t X |£S7*A*^4 oa [,«>? nj)k ” Hill It .Uii to t4uSj->4 m, IUIU ; w «u Jn gKixr” •won -3.j । M I t,f am i«r.) . itw' .11 J <+> - id •< u Ii ul Ml h» ''<■■ < W- clen- -yoL.'xi. , {*w ■ {W^W^W' .'.’/NO. 26/ I.. I .... .■■■■■.J. «■ ' ' i । - 1 ~ 7”r mnal I f- < ; . t -1 *1 ■ -I . n f . I. : •• •) J, ... ) V .f 2 ; “ Not so," replied George; “ my promise Is sacred,- ati the hedridp haspxlsjed.between tbe orphaa api- reoerabla pMtW Invoked a blearing upon the newly-' and*'inwardly rewired fo olbte up bfr bnslnefr and ifrorp Jhiarfineni and, by heaven, it shall ever be kept bo by ma" ’ ithe guardian, has vfawd-’Vtroog. aod;hp1y,yid,to-: wedded .J4lr, many of the qdnipany wore prophesy. < remove with Hi*idaogbier to a distant -dime, and hV ♦ j ___ ____________ ' Uy to “ Very, well," said- the partner; h do just as yon day। the ceremony atsthejdwrraud the'b)eseipg$,of ing In regard to their future, ■•'■s leave forever the being who bad canoed him soriftfeh pleases I hope you will meet with success In your. ।the angels, wilt bind tha^^dlan and ibe'prphM' .Written for iho Bonner of Ught.
    [Show full text]
  • ELECTION UPDATE 2006 SOUTH AFRICA Number 2 30 March 2006
    ELECTION UPDATE 2006 SOUTH AFRICA Number 2 30 March 2006 contents LOCAL GOVERNMENT ELECTION DAY Limpopo 1 Northern Cape 4 Western Cape 12 North West Province 16 Mpumalanga 19 KwaZulu-Natal 22 Eastern Cape 28 Gauteng 30 Free State 35 EISA Editorial Team Jackie Kalley, Khabele Matlosa, Denis Kadima Published with the assistance of the OPEN SOCIETY FOUNDATION – SOUTH AFRICA LIMPOPO area along the Lepelle River, manager in Limpopo, the electoral staff together with biggest problem in the Kholofelo Mashabela their electoral equipment had province was getting the University of Limpopo to cross the river using a senior IEC officials to the traditional form of cable car polling stations for Polling Stations called segwaigwai. In the monitoring purposes, but the Giyani area, only 100 people voting stations were not All 2175 voting districts in in one community cast their affected as the electoral Limpopo were operational votes because the voters had officers and electorate on the day of the local to cross a running river to get mainly lived in the areas government elections, 1 to the voting stations. where the polling stations March 2006. Thanks to the Furthermore, in other areas were located. An additional favourable weather, most of Giyani voters had to be was experienced in obtaining polling stations opened on transported in trucks to get confirmation from the time. However, in the far- them across waterlogged presiding officers at the flung rural areas of the areas to the voting stations. stations. It had been arranged province, a week of heavy that at 07h00 when the rains put the election process According to Mrs N C stations opened, all voting under pressure.
    [Show full text]
  • A Great Place and Not Yet Another Declining Small Town: the Case of Clarens, South Africa
    138 UDC: 711.121:338.48(680Clarens) DOI: 10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2016-27-02-005 Received: 13 Jan. 2016 Accepted: 4 May 2016 Maléne CAMPBELL A great place and not yet another declining small town: The case of Clarens, South Africa Rural urban migration results in rural decline as well as ferent questionnaires: one for each target group to cover in congested cities, but how can towns avoid this fate a broad spectrum of stakeholders in the tourism milieu and also intercept these migrants on their way to the cit- of Clarens. The research indicates that allowing multina- ies in search of perceived better opportunities? Tourism tional enterprises in a small tourist town is something that development can play a central role in the development should be considered carefully because it might disturb a of rural areas in South Africa, and Clarens is a success small town’s ambience. story in this regard. This research investigates what made a tourist town such as Clarens succeed whereas other towns faltered and failed. Data was collected using three dif- Keywords: planning, small towns, tourism, second homes Urbani izziv, volume 27, no. 2, 2016 A great place and not yet another declining small town: The case of Clarens, South Africa 139 1 Introduction “The decline of towns is a common phenomenon. Since larg- er centres have strong economic bases and offer higher or- der services these cities attract people” (John, 2012: 4). The question is what towns should do to intercept migrants on their way to larger centres in search of perceived better op- portunities (Donaldson, 2007; Reynolds & Antrobus, 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Report Ladybrand Maseru N8 Enviro 2013
    3 JUNE 2013 FIRST PHASE ARCHAEOLOGICAL & HERITAGE ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSED REALIGNMENT OF THE N8 NATIONAL ROAD BETWEEN THE R26/N8 INTERSECTION & MASERU BRIDGE BORDER POST, LADYBRAND, FREE STATE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The N8 national road provides a vital link between Lesotho and South Africa. To improve the road connection, the South African National Road Agency LTD, is planning the realignment of a section of the N8 Ladybrand and the Maseru Bridge Border Post. The realignment will start from the existing N8/R26 intersection and will follow the S836 gravel road to tie in along the N8 between Ladybrand and the Maseru Bridge. The length of the realignment is approximately 13 kilometres. The whole region is part of intensive agricultural land, which has been cultivated for decades. Scars left by road building are also visible. No archaeological, cultural or any historical remains were found along the route. It is clear that the new developments will have no impact on any cultural heritage and historical remains in the area. Further planning of the proposed project may continue, and no mitigation measures will be needed. INTRODUCTION & DESCRIPTION Enviroworks Environmental Consultants from Bloemfontein had been commissioned by the National Roads Agency to compile the Environmental Impact Assessment for the proposed developments. 2 A list of the names and particulars of effected farm owners is enclosed herewith (See ANNEXURE 1). Scope and Limitations SANRAL is planning the realignment of a section of the N8 between the N8/R26 intersection near Ladybrand and the Maseru Bridge Border Post. The relocation of the road will start from the existing N8/R26 intersection and will follow the S836 gravel road to link-up with the N8 between Ladybrand and the Maseru Bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Head Office Free State Region
    PROVICES SUBURB OFFICE_TYPE TOWN HEAD OFFICE Pretoria Pretoria Head Office Pretoria FREE STATE REGION PROVICES SUBURB OFFICE_TYPE TOWN Free State Sasolburg District Office Sasolburg Free State Sasolburg Local Office Sasolburg Free State Hoopstad Service Point Hoopstad Free State Virginia Service Point Virginia Free State Dewetsdorp Service Point Dewetsdorp Free State Odendaalsrusrus Service Point Odendaalsrus Free State Phillippolis Service Point Phillippolis Free State Petrusburg Service Point Petrusburg Free State Senekal Local Office Senekal Free State Wesselsbron Service Point Wesselsbron Free State Virginia Service Point Virginia Free State De Brug Service Point De Brug Free State Edenburg Service Point Edenburg Free State Ventersburg Service Point Ventersburg Free State Kroonstad Local Office Kroonstad Free State Brandfort Service Point Brandfort Free State Jagersfontein Local Office Jagersfontein Free State Smithfield Service Point Smithfield Free State Wepener Service Point Wepener Free State Bloemfontein District Office Bloemfontein Free State Mangaung Service Point Bloemfontein Free State Heilbron Service Point Heilbron Free State Boshoff Service Point Boshoff Free State Trompsburg Local Office Trompsburg Free State Reddersburg Service Point Reddersburg Free State Rouxville Service Point Rouxville Free State Tweeling Service Point Tweeling Free State Verkeerdevlei Service Point Verkeerdevlei Free State Bothaville Service Point Bothaville Free State Oppermansgronde Service Point Oppermansgronde Free State Bloemfontein Regional
    [Show full text]
  • Provincial Gazette Provinsiale Koerant
    Provincial Provinsiale Gazette Koerant Free State Province Provinsie Vrystaat Published byAuthority Uitgegee opGesag No. 79 FRIDAY, 03 OCTOBER 2008 No. 79 VRYDAG, 03 OKTOBER 2008 No. Index Page No. Inhoud Bladsy PROCLAMATIONS PROKLAMASIES 48 Declaration of Township: Helicon Heights: 48 Dorpsverklaring: Helicon Hoogte: Extension 7 ,................................................... 2 Uitbreiding 7 2 49 Amendment of the Town-Planning Scheme of 49 Wysiging van die Dorpsaanlegskema van Clarens , , 3 Clarens ,................................. 3 PF10VINCIAL NOTICES PROVINSIALE KENNISGEWINGS 330 Removal of Restrictions Act, 1967 (Act No. 84of 1967): 330 Wet opOpheffing van Beperkings, 1967 (Wet No. 84van Langenhoven Park: Erf924 6 1967): Langenhovenpark: Erf924 ,..,........ 6 331 Removal of Restrictions Act, 1967 (ActNo. 84of 1967): 331 Wet opOpheffing van Beperkings, 1967 (Wet No. 84van Bloemfontein (Extension 32): (Oranjesig) 6 1967): Bloemfontein (Uitbreiding 32): (Oranjesig) 6 332 Removal of Restrictions Act, 1967 (ActNo. 84of 1967): 332 Wet opOpheffing van Beperkings, 1967 (Wet No. 84 van Bloemfontein: Erf2050 (Waverley) .....,.................... 7 1967): Bloemfontein: Erf 2050 (Waverley) 7 333 Removal of Restrictions Act, 1967 (Act No. 84of 1967) 333 Wet opOpheffing van Beperkings, 1967 (Wet No. 84van Bloemfontein: Erf7103 (Wilgehof) 7 1967): Bloemfontein: Erf7103 (Wilgehof) 7 334 Removal of Restrictions Act, 1967 (Act No. 84of 1967): 334 Wet opOpheffing van Beperkings, 1967 (Wet No. 84 van Clarens 8 1967): Clarens 8 335 Removal of Restrictions Act, 1967 (Act No. 84of 1967): 335 Wet opOpheffing van Beperkings, 1967 (Wet No. 84 van Bloemfontein: Erf533 (Arboretum) ...,. ..,......,......... 8 1967): Bloemfontein: Erf533(Arboretum) ,., ,.,.. 8 336 Removal of Restrictions Act, 1967 (Act No. 84of 1967): 336 Wet opOpheffing van Beperkings, 1967 (Wet No. 84van Sasolburg '......'..................................................... 8 1967): Sasolburg ,., ,.., ,.......
    [Show full text]
  • Water Governance and Collective Action
    5 HYDRO-HEGEMONY OR WATER SECURITY COMMUNITY? Collective action, cooperation and conflict in the SADC transboundary security complex Richard Meissner and Jeroen Warner Introduction After the Berlin Wall came down, the fragile Cold War equilibrium frayed. Dire Malthusian warnings of green wars, especially over water, in areas with high population pressures dominated the 1990s transboundary water literature. After Wolf (1995) showed that violent water conflict is extremely rare and cooperation the norm, attention started to shift to water cooperation and how to achieve it. In an anarchical global environment, the conflict potential of shared water resources has made rivers subject to high politics (i.e. security). While researchers and diplomats consider regional treaties as cooperation indicators (Wolf 1995), unequal treaties can also be sources of conflict (Warner and Zeitoun 2008). Inter- national regimes may institutionalize asymmetric power relations (Kistin 2011), and consequently constitute enmity instead of equity. According to Zeitoun and Warner (2006), the absence of war does not mean the absence of conflict or the presence of peace. Signing a treaty, or some form of cooperation over transboundary water, does not mean an end to conflict. Cooperation is not necessarily voluntary, while path dependency might also restrict the scope for resistance and change to existing interaction modes (Putnam 1993). While regime analysis deals with lengthening the ‘shadow of the future’ to create stable expecta- tions, Sebastian (2008) has noted the importance of the ‘shadow of the past’. Current state boundaries, cooperation habits, conflicts and frustrations over water in The Southern African Development Community (SADC) date back to colonial times.
    [Show full text]