National Instrument 43-101Technical Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

National Instrument 43-101Technical Report NI43-101 Technical Report – Koper Lake Project National Instrument 43-101Technical Report Koper Lake Project McFauld’s Lake Area, Ontario, Canada Porcupine Mining Division, NTS 43D16 Geology Technical Report Prepared For KWG Resources Inc. By Alan Aubut P.Geo. August 29, 2013 PO Box 304, Nipigon, Ontario, P0T 2J0 Tel: (807) 887-2300 Email: [email protected] i NI43-101 Technical Report – Koper Lake Project ii NI43-101 Technical Report – Koper Lake Project Table of Contents Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures .............................................................................................................................. v List of Tables .............................................................................................................................. vi 1. Summary..............................................................................................................................1 1.1. Cautionary Note ............................................................................................................2 2. Introduction .........................................................................................................................3 3. Reliance on Other Experts ....................................................................................................3 4. Property Description and Location .......................................................................................3 4.1. Property History and Underlying Agreements ...............................................................3 4.2. Parties to the Agreements ............................................................................................7 5. Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography .............................8 5.1. Accessibility ..................................................................................................................8 5.2. Climate .........................................................................................................................8 5.3. Local resources .............................................................................................................8 5.4. Infrastructure ................................................................................................................9 5.5. Physiography ................................................................................................................9 6. History ...............................................................................................................................10 6.1. General .......................................................................................................................10 6.2. Discovery history.........................................................................................................11 7. Geological Setting and Mineralization ................................................................................12 7.1. Regional geology .........................................................................................................12 7.1.1. Precambrian Basement Complex .........................................................................12 7.1.2. Paleozoic Platform Rocks .....................................................................................13 7.1.3. Quaternary Cover ................................................................................................13 7.2. Local Geology ..............................................................................................................13 7.2.1. Volcanics ..............................................................................................................14 7.2.2. Ultramafic Rocks ..................................................................................................14 7.2.3. Felsic Intrusive Rocks ...........................................................................................14 7.2.4. Faulting ................................................................................................................14 7.3 Mineralisation .............................................................................................................15 7.3.1 Chromite Mineralization ......................................................................................15 8. Deposit Types ....................................................................................................................15 9. Exploration.........................................................................................................................15 10. Drilling ...............................................................................................................................19 10.1 2008 and 2010 Drilling ................................................................................................19 10.2 2013 Drilling ................................................................................................................19 11. Sample Preparation, Analyses and Security ........................................................................20 11.1. QA/QC Procedure .......................................................................................................20 12. Data Verification ................................................................................................................22 13. Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing ....................................................................22 iii NI43-101 Technical Report – Koper Lake Project 14. Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimates ..............................................................23 14.1. Mineral Resource Estimation ......................................................................................23 14.1.1. Resource Estimation Methodology ......................................................................23 14.1.1.1. Software Used and Data Validation ...............................................................23 14.1.1.2. Geological Domains ......................................................................................23 14.1.1.3. Drill Hole Database .......................................................................................24 14.1.1.4. Sample Selection...........................................................................................25 14.1.1.5. Compositing ..................................................................................................26 14.1.1.6. Exploratory Data Analysis .............................................................................26 14.1.1.7 Unfolding ......................................................................................................27 14.1.1.8 Grade Variography ........................................................................................28 14.1.1.9 Block Size Determination ..............................................................................28 14.1.1.10 Nearest Neighbour Block Model ...................................................................29 14.1.1.11 Ordinary Kriging Block Model ........................................................................30 14.1.1.12 Block Model Validation .................................................................................30 14.1.1.13 Model Verification ........................................................................................31 14.2. Mineral Resource Reporting ........................................................................................31 14.2.1. Resource Classification – Koper Lake Project chromite deposit ............................31 14.2.2. Risks and Opportunities .......................................................................................33 14.2.2.1. Risks..............................................................................................................33 14.2.2.2. Opportunities ...............................................................................................33 15. Mineral Reserve Estimates .................................................................................................33 16. Mining Methods.................................................................................................................33 17. Recovery Methods .............................................................................................................33 18. Project Infrastructure .........................................................................................................33 19. Market Studies and Contracts ............................................................................................33 20. Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact .................................34 21. Capital and Operating Costs ...............................................................................................34 22. Economic Analysis ..............................................................................................................34 23. Adjacent Properties ...........................................................................................................35 23.1. Noront Eagle 1, Eagle 2 and Blackbird deposits ...........................................................35 23.2. Big Daddy Chromite Deposit .......................................................................................36
Recommended publications
  • Webequie Supply Road DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION
    Webequie Supply Road DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION Webequie First Nation The Picture is a Placeholder Only Prepared by: Prepared for: Submitted to: SNC-Lavalin Inc. Webequie First Nation Impact Assessment Agency of Canada 195 The West Mall Toronto, Ontario, M9C 5K1 www.snclavalin.com November 2019 661910 Webequie Supply Road Detailed Project Description PREFACE This Detailed Project Description for the Webequie Supply Road Project (“the Project”) has been prepared in accordance with subsection 15(1) of the Impact Assessment Act (“IAA”) and Schedule 2 of the Act’s Information and Management of Time Limits Regulations (“the Regulations”) of the Impact Assessment Act - Information Required in Detailed Description of Designated Project. In addition, the Detailed Project Description reflects the Webequie Supply Road Project Team’s recognition of issues identified in the Summary of Issues prepared by the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (the Agency) as a result of the Agency’s invitation to Indigenous groups, federal and provincial authorities, the public and other participants to provide their perspective on any issues that they consider relevant in relation to the Project. Information provided by the Agency (posted on the Canadian Impact Assessment Registry) for this purpose included the Initial Project Description. The document that was accepted by the Agency to serve as the Initial Project Description was prepared to comply with the requirements of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 and was initially released for public review under the CEAA, 2012 process in July 2019, during the period when the Government of Canada was preparing to bring into force and transition to the new Impact Assessment Act.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the Groundwater Resources of Northern Ontario
    Hydrogeology of Ontario Series (Report 2) AN ASSESSMENT OF THE GROUNDWATER RESOURCES OF NORTHERN ONTARIO AREAS DRAINING INTO HUDSON BAY, JAMES BAY AND UPPER OTTAWA RIVER BY S. N. SINGER AND C. K. CHENG ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND REPORTING BRANCH MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT TORONTO ONTARIO 2002 KK PREFACE This report provides a regional assessment of the groundwater resources of areas draining into Hudson Bay, James Bay, and the Upper Ottawa River in northern Ontario in terms of the geologic conditions under which the groundwater flow systems operate. A hydrologic budget approach was used to assess precipitation, streamflow, baseflow, and potential and actual evapotranspiration in seven major basins in the study area on a monthly, annual and long-term basis. The report is intended to provide basic information that can be used for the wise management of the groundwater resources in the study area. Toronto, July 2002. DISCLAIMER The Ontario Ministry of the Environment does not make any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the ministry. KKK TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2. INTRODUCTION 7 2.1 LOCATION OF THE STUDY AREA 7 2.2 IMPORTANCE OF SCALE IN HYDROGEOLOGIC STUDIES 7 2.3 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE STUDY 8 2.4 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE GROUNDWATER RESOURCES 8 2.5 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS 9 2.6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 13 3.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 - 2013 Drill Report Cliffs Chromite Property
    2012 - 2013 DRILL REPORT CLIFFS CHROMITE PROPERTY JAMES BAY LOWLANDS NORTHERN ONTARIO LATITUDE 52º78’ N, LONGITUDE -86º20’ PORCUPINE MINING DIVISION AREA BMA 527 861 G-4306 January, 2014 By: Ryan Weston, P.Geo David Shinkle, P.Geo Bryan Maciag, G.I.T. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. Introduction 1 2. Property Description, Ownership and Access 2 3. Exploration History 7 4. Regional Geology 8 5. Property Geology 12 6. Chromite Mineralization 14 7. 2012-2013 Drill Results 21 8. Conclusions and Recommendations 33 9. References 35 10. Signature Page 37 LIST OF FIGURES Page 1. Location of the Cliffs Chromite property 4 2. Claim map of the Ring of Fire 5 3. Claim map of the Cliffs Chromite property 6 4. Geological map of the Canadian Superior Province 10 5. Regional geology map of the Ring of Fire 11 6. Cliffs Chromite Property Geology 15 7. Chromite textures of the BTCD 16 8. Chromite textures of the BLCD 16 9. Stratigraphic column of the BTIC 17 10. Generalized geological schematic of the Cliffs chromite property 18 11. Cross section along section 1100N in the southwest domain of the BTCD 19 12. Cross section along section 2100N in the central domain of the BTCD 19 13. Cross section along section 2900N in the northeast and faulted domains of the 20 BTCD LIST OF TABLES Page 1. Claim status of the Cliffs chromite property 2 2. Collar locations of the 2012-2013 Cliffs Chromite drill holes 21-22 3. 2012 high-grade chromite intersections from the BLCD 23-24 4. 2012 high-grade chromite intersections from the BTCD 25-28 5.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Existing Environmental Conditions
    Webequie Supply Road Environmental Assessment Terms of Reference 6 Existing Environmental Conditions This section describes the existing environmental conditions in the project area (refer to Figure 1.1) and the proposed approach to data collection to develop a fulsome understanding of the existing (or baseline) natural, socio-economic and cultural conditions for the Project. The EA will adopt a multi-scale approach for describing existing environmental conditions and predicting effects from the Project. As such, study areas will be used to define the geographic extent within which to capture the potential direct and indirect effects of the Project. The preliminary study area definitions for the purposes of the EA are provided in Section 8.1. 6.1 General Environmental Setting The Project is located in Northwestern Ontario, with the northern end of the road approximately 525 km northeast of Thunder Bay (refer to Figure 1.1). The Project is located on provincial Crown land, Webequie First Nation Reserve land under federal jurisdiction, and the traditional territories of Indigenous communities (refer also to Section 6.4.6 Land and Resource Use). Figure 6.1 illustrates the location of the alternative routes in relation to project area features and sensitivities. Due to confidentiality constraints (including those imposed by Webequie First Nation and Government of Ontario ministries), and the need to respect the wishes of potentially affected Indigenous communities with respect to divulging certain information on the use of lands in the project area, it is not possible to illustrate the location or bounds of a number of features and sensitivities, including First Nations’ traditional territories, individual camps/cabins, species at risk observations and government-regulated hunting areas (e.g., trapline licences).
    [Show full text]
  • Lichens of Canada Exsiccati, Fascicle I, Nos. 1-25
    Opuscula Philolichenum, 17: 335-341. 2018. *pdf effectively published online 12October2018 via (http://sweetgum.nybg.org/philolichenum/) Lichens of Canada Exsiccati, Fascicle I, Nos. 1-25 R. TROY MCMULLIN1* AND LYNDSEY SHARP2 ABSTRACT. – A new exsiccati is initiated, Lichens of Canada, disseminated by the National Herbarium of Canada (CANL) at the Canadian Museum of Nature. Thirty-one sets of 25 species from the Hudson Bay Lowlands in northern Ontario and Salt Spring Island in British Columbia are distributed to: B, BG, C, CANB, COLO, DUKE, E, EWU, FH, FR, GZU, H, HMAS, KANU, LD, M, MSC, NBM, NFLD, NY, O, OSU, PMAE, QFA, S, SWSG, TNS, TU, UBC, UPS, WIS. KEYWORDS. – Biodiversity, fungi, lichenology, mycology, natural history collections, scheda. INTRODUCTION Exsiccati are identically numbered sets of dried specimens distributed to herbaria (Sayre 1969, 1971). Their purpose is to disseminate material from particular areas, or of specific groups of taxa, for examination by researchers in other parts of the world (Stafleu 1972, Stevenson 1971). An exchange of duplicate specimens serves a similar function and is often done instead of exsiccati. The benefit of exsiccati however, is that sets are consistent and provide an alternative to sorting through herbaria to locate specimens from a particular region since they are all in one place and usually organised in a catalogue. In Canada, two exsiccati that contain lichens have been distributed in the past by the National Herbarium of Canada (CANL) at what is now the Canadian Museum of Nature. The first, ‘Canadian Lichens’, was prepared by John Macoun and disseminated in two series.
    [Show full text]
  • Alluvial Sampl Exam
    A SUMMARY REPORT ON THE EXAMINATION OF THE ALLUVIAL SAMPLES East River Block Attawapiskat River Project Porcupine District MICHAEL W. MILNER Geomorphologist Placer Specialist, Mineralogist April,2005 FOR PELE MOUNTAIN RESOURCES INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTlON 3 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 3 METHODOLOGY 4 GEOWGICAL SETTING 4 STRATIGRAPHY 5 STRllCTURE 6 IMP ACT HYPOTHESIS 7 GLACIAL HISTORY 8 RESllLTS AND CONCLUSIONS 9 SUMMARY OF DATA 10 CERTIFICATE 14 REFERENCES 15 2 I NTROD UCfION This report pertains to samples (040312A and 040313B, 17/04/2003) collected by Richard Daigle, of Dowling, Ontario on Pele Mountain Resources' Attawapiskat River Project, East River Block property, Claim 1167271 (Figure 1). The samples were provided to the author by Mr. Al Shefsky ofPele Mountain Resources to be processed in Toronto for diamonds and indicator minerals. The results were initially provided to Pele Mountain Resources verbally. This report represents a summary of analysis, photo documentation, reference material and descriptions relevant to the sample. A secondary purpose of this analysis is an academic study of the surface microtextures of minerals such as quartz and zircon (see Mahaney 2002; Mahaney and Milner 1997). Both spheroidal garnets, mainly spessartite, and quartz, which in Wawa lamprophyre, Ogoki River samples and these Attawapiskat River samples are close to pristine and are lacking in significant fracturing that might be incurred in either glacial or river transport. Kyanite is another mineral, present in this sample, with potential for further research (Fipkie et ai., 1999). Morphological changes for distance of transport from the pipe has been given for pyrope. Dummet (1984) described the spherical form, "orange peel" surface texture of the pyrope at the pipe and the subsequent breaking and rounding of the mineral with distance of transport.
    [Show full text]
  • James Bay Indicator Mineral
    Ontario Geological Survey Open File Report 6108 Preliminary Results from the James Bay Lowland Indicator Mineral Sampling Program 2003 ONTARIO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open File Report 6108 Preliminary Results from the James Bay Lowland Indicator Mineral Sampling Program by D.C. Crabtree 2003 Parts of this publication may be quoted if credit is given. It is recommended that reference to this publication be made in the following form: Crabtree, D.C. 2003. Preliminary results from the James Bay Lowland indicator mineral sampling program; Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 6108, 115p. e Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2003 e Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2003. Open File Reports of the Ontario Geological Survey are available for viewing at the Mines Library in Sudbury, at the Mines and Minerals Information Centre in Toronto, and at the regional Mines and Minerals office whose district includes the area covered by the report (see below). Copies can be purchased at Publication Sales and the office whose district includes the area covered by the report. Al- though a particular report may not be in stock at locations other than the Publication Sales office in Sudbury, they can generally be obtained within 3 working days. All telephone, fax, mail and e-mail orders should be directed to the Publica- tion Sales office in Sudbury. Use of VISA or MasterCard ensures the fastest possible service. Cheques or money orders should be made payable to the Minister of Finance. Mines and Minerals Information Centre (MMIC) Tel: (416) 314-3800 Macdonald Block, Room M2-17 1-800-665-4480(toll free inside Ontario) 900 Bay St.
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle's Nest Draft Environmental Impact
    TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 1 1 – INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW ......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 THE PROPONENT ............................................................................................................... 1 1.3 EIS/EA REPORT................................................................................................................... 3 2 – REGULATORY PROCESS ............................................................................................................. 4 3 – ALTERNATIVES ASSESSMENT .................................................................................................... 6 3.1 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROJECT ................................................................................... 6 3.2 ALTERNATIVE METHODS .................................................................................................. 6 4 – PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................. 9 4.1 MINE SITE ............................................................................................................................ 9 4.2 TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography on the Limnology and Fisheries of Canadian Freshwaters
    BIBLIOGRAPHY ON THE LIMNOLOGY AND FISHERIES OF CANADIAN FRESHWATERS. N0.2(REVISED). by H.F.NICHOLSON Great Lakes Biolimnology Laboratory, Canada Centre for Inland Waters, 867 Lakeshore Road, Burlington, Ontario. L7R 4A6 1982 PREFACE This is a revised edition of Bibliography No.2, published in 1975 as Environm. Can., Fish.Mar.Serv., Techn.Rept., (504). Due to budget restrictions and the high cost of printing, combined with an expanding distribution list, it is no longer possible to publish this series as Technical Reports. Instead, each number will be issued in this present looseleaf form as an unpublished report of the Great Lakes Biolimnology Laboratory. Please note that those from outside Canada requesting copies of this series will be sent the Reference Indexes only, unless otherwise requested. This issue can be referenced as:- Nicholson, H.F. 1982. "Bibliography on the limnology and fisheries of Canadian freshwaters. No.2(revised)". Can.Dept.Fish.Oceans, Pacific & Freshw.Fish., Great Lakes Biolimnol.Lab., Unpubl.Rept. FORMAT The bibliography is divided into two sections:- (1). Reference Index Each of these references contains information on the limnology and fisheries of Canadian freshwaters. They are numbered and appear in num~rical order. This enumeration is consecutive and continuous through the bibliography series. (2). Freshwater Feature Index This section is divided into alphabetical order of provinces and within each province the freshwater feature names are in alphabetical order. The coordinates (in minutes and degrees, latitude and longitude) are given for each feature except for British Columbia where, for the most part, the quadrilateral indexing system is used. Apart from French names, it is usual for the specific name to precede the generic name, as in Elliot Lake, but in a few cases the reverse is true, such as Lake Nipissing, in which case the latter will appear as Nipissing, Lake, with a comma after the-specific name.
    [Show full text]
  • Blackbird Resource Estimate NI 43-101 Report
    NORONT RESOURCES LIMITED TECHNICAL REPORT ON THE MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE FOR THE BLACK BIRD CHROME DEPOSITS JAMES BAY LOWLANDS NORTHERN ONTARIO, CANADA Effective Date: December 31, 2009 Signing Date: January 22, 2010 Richard Gowans, P.Eng Jane Spooner, MSc, P.Geo Alan J. San Martin, MAusIMM Charley Murahwi, MSc., P.Geo., MAusIMM SUITE 900 - 390 BAY STREET, TORONTO ONTARIO, CANADA M5H 2Y2 Telephone (1) (416) 362-5135 Fax (1) (416) 362 5763 Table of Contents Page 1.0 SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................1 1.1 TERMS OF REFERENCE, PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND OWNERSHIP ..............................................................................................................1 1.2 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE, .................................................................................................2 1.3 GEOLOGICAL OUTLINE.........................................................................................3 1.4 DEPOSIT TYPE..........................................................................................................4 1.5 MINERALIZATION...................................................................................................4 1.6 EXPLORATION .........................................................................................................5 1.7 DRILLING...................................................................................................................7 1.8 SAMPLING, ANALYSES
    [Show full text]
  • Opuscula Philolichenum, 6: 1-XXXX
    Opuscula Philolichenum, 14: 93-108. 2015. *pdf effectively published online 29May2015 via (http://sweetgum.nybg.org/philolichenum/) New and interesting lichens from Ontario, Canada – II 1 2 3 RICHARD TROY MCMULLIN , JOSE R. MALOLES & STEVEN G. NEWMASTER ABSTRACT. – The lichen biota of Ontario has received considerable attention in recent years. Here we report more new species to the province and new records of infrequently reported species. Pyrenopsis phaeococca is new to Canada. Nine additional species are reported for the first time in Ontario: Abrothallus caerulescens, Absconditella lignicola, Chaenothecopsis marcineae, Ephebe hispidula, Ephebe perspinulosa, Epilichen scabrosus, Mycoblastus affinis, Normandina pulchella, and Punctelia perreticulata. Eighteen species are new provincial records of uncommon taxa: Acarospora sinopica, Anisomeridium biforme, Bagliettoa baldensis, Calicium denigratum, Candelariella lutella, Chaenotheca laevigata, Chaenothecopsis nana, Cladonia incrassata, C. maxima, C. norvegica, Clypeococcum hypocenomycis, Dermatocarpon dolomiticum, Lathagrium undulatum, Lecanora albescens, Phaeophyscia kairamoi, Physconia subpallida, Spilonema revertens, and Xanthomendoza weberi. Our records bring the number of lichens and allied fungi known from Ontario to 1,082. KEYWORDS. – Great Lakes, northeastern North America, rare species, phytogeography. INTRODUCTION Ongoing research on the lichens and allied fungi that occur in Ontario, Canada (Fig. 1) has resulted in continued discoveries of species new to the province and new records of rarely reported species. Several recent studies have contributed to knowledge of the lichen biota in the province (Brodo et al. 2013, Lewis 2014, McMullin & Lendemer 2013, McMullin & Lewis 2014, McMullin et al. 2014, Schram et al. 2013). The first paper in the present series also contained new and interesting records for the province, as well as descriptions of the location of the province, its ecological regions and climate, and the history of lichen collecting up to that time (McMullin & Lewis 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Spider Regional Kimberlite Indicator Mineral Geochemistry Survey
    Ontario Geological Survey Open File Report 6097 Results of the “Spider 3” Regional Kimberlite Indicator Mineral and Geochemistry Survey Carried Out in the Vicinity of the Upper Attawapiskat and Ekwan Rivers, Northern Ontario 2003 ONTARIO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open File Report 6097 Results of the “Spider 3” Regional Kimberlite Indicator Mineral and Geochemistry Survey Carried Out in the Vicinity of the Upper Attawapiskat and Ekwan Rivers, Northern Ontario by D.C. Crabtree and C.F. Gleeson 2003 Parts of this publication may be quoted if credit is given. It is recommended that reference to this publication be made in the following form: Crabtree, D.C. and Gleeson, C.F. 2003. Results of the “Spider 3” regional kimberlite indicator mineral and geochemistry survey carried out in the vicinity of the upper Attawapiskat and Ekwan rivers, northern Ontario; Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 6097, 127p. e Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2003 e Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2003. Open File Reports of the Ontario Geological Survey are available for viewing at the Mines Library in Sudbury, at the Mines and Minerals Information Centre in Toronto, and at the regional Mines and Minerals office whose district includes the area covered by the report (see below). Copies can be purchased at Publication Sales and the office whose district includes the area covered by the report. Al- though a particular report may not be in stock at locations other than the Publication Sales office in Sudbury, they can generally be obtained within 3 working days. All telephone, fax, mail and e-mail orders should be directed to the Publica- tion Sales office in Sudbury.
    [Show full text]