DOCSLIB.ORG

Home Range Analysis of Bull Trout (Salvelinus Confluentus)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Home Range Analysis of Bull Trout (Salvelinus Confluentus) HOME RANGE ANALYSIS OF BULL TROUT (SALVELINUS CONFLUENTUS) AND WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT (ONCORHYNCHUS CLARKI LEWISI) IN THE UPPER SALMON RIVER BASIN, IDAHO. by Gregory P. Schoby A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in the Department of Biology Idaho State University May 2006 Photocopy and Use Authorization In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for an advanced degree at Idaho State University, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for inspection. I further state that permission for extensive copying of my thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Dean of Graduate Studies, Dean of my academic division, or by the University Librarian. It is understood that any copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. ii Copyright 2006 Gregory P. Schoby iii To the Graduate Faculty: The members of the committee appointed to examine the thesis of Gregory P. Schoby find it satisfactory and recommend that it be accepted. iv Acknowledgements I would like to thank my major advisor, Dr. Ernest Keeley, whose advice, patience, and guidance were greatly appreciated, especially in the realm of statistical analysis. I would also like to thank the members of my committee, Dr. Ken Rodnick and Dr. Ken Bosworth. I would like to thank Scott Blum, Amy Jenkins, Sarra Moller, Steve and Meredith Seiler, and Chris Leesberg at the Fish Ecology Lab at Idaho State University for their support, both in the field and the lab. A special thanks is due to Tom Curet of the Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) for recognizing the need and importance of a project such as this. Also at IDFG, I would also like to Jeff Lutch, Paddy Murphy, Bob Esselman, Arnie Brimmer, Kim Andrews, Kevin Meyer, and Mark Hurley for their continued support, encouragement, and advice throughout the course of this project. I wish to thank Scott Feldhausen and Kate Forster of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Ted Koch, Deb Mignono, and Howard Burge of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Bruce Smith, Joe Vacirca, and Tom Montoya of the U.S. Forest Service (USFS), Steve Yundt with IDFG and the Idaho Governors Office of Species Conservation (OSC), and Richard Prange of Trout Unlimited (TU); all were instrumental in securing funding for such a large project and their efforts are greatly appreciated. I would also like to thank all of the landowners in the Upper Salmon River Basin that allowed access to their property. As far as the field work goes, I could not have completed such a large task without depending on some truly dedicated and wonderful people: Tom Coates, Matt Green, Elisabeth Major, and Ken John deserve the utmost recognition for the many long days spent in the field. I know at times it seemed v like looking for a needle in a haystack, but you all came through, all the time. Thanks for everything. I am deeply appreciative of the time I was able to spend with Tom and Sandi Coates. Tom, thanks for the many long hours spent afield, some sunburned, others in wind, snow, and hail storms. Thanks for sharing the secrets of a lifetime on the Salmon River with me. Sandi, you always knew we’d be back about an hour after dark, no matter the season. Thanks for all the hot meals and putting a roof over my head so many times. I would also like to thank Mark Morasch and Dr. Chris Peery at the University of Idaho for help with radio tracking and telemetry stations. I would like to thank everyone on the IDFG Sockeye crew for assistance with tracking in Redfish Lake. Also, to all the employees of the Salmon Region of IDFG, thanks for the time spent assisting with tagging and tracking. And finally, I would like to thank my parents, Margaret and Paul, and brother, Mike, for all of their support and encouragement. vi Table of Contents Acknowledgements............................................................................................................. v List of Figures..................................................................................................................viii List of Tables .................................................................................................................... xii List of Appendices ...........................................................................................................xiii Abstract............................................................................................................................ xiv Introduction......................................................................................................................... 1 Methods............................................................................................................................... 6 Study Area ...................................................................................................................... 6 Transmitter implantation................................................................................................. 8 Radio Tracking................................................................................................................ 9 Home Range Analysis................................................................................................... 10 Stomach Content Analysis............................................................................................ 11 Statistical Analyses ....................................................................................................... 12 Results............................................................................................................................... 13 Tagging ......................................................................................................................... 13 Tracking ........................................................................................................................ 15 Body Size and Home Range Analysis .......................................................................... 15 Monthly Movement Rates............................................................................................. 18 Stomach Content Analysis............................................................................................ 21 Discussion......................................................................................................................... 23 Literature Cited ................................................................................................................. 34 vii List of Figures Figure 1. The Upper Salmon River Basin, Idaho, USA, and its major watersheds. Towns are marked with stars. Locations of fixed telemetry sites are marked with black squares............................................................................................................................... 43 Figure 2. Capture and tagging location of bull trout in the Upper Salmon River Basin, ID. ..................................................................................................................................... 44 Figure 3. Capture and tagging location of westslope cutthroat trout in the Upper Salmon River Basin, ID. ................................................................................................................ 45 Figure 4. Length distribution of radio tagged bull trout (solid bars) and westslope cutthroat trout (open bars) in the Upper Salmon River Basin, ID. ................................... 46 Figure 5. The relationship between body length (mm) and home range size (km) of bull trout and westslope cutthroat trout (pooled data) in the Upper Salmon River Basin, Idaho; 2 log10 home range (km) = 0.86 log10 total length (mm) – 0.55, (r =0.026; n=78, P=0.16). ........................................................................................................................................... 47 Figure 6. The relationship between body mass (g) and home range size (km) of bull trout and westslope cutthroat trout (pooled data) in the Upper Salmon River Basin, Idaho; 2 log10 home range (km) = 0.31 log10 mass (g) + 0.82, (r =0.028; n=78, P=0.14). ............ 48 Figure 7. The relationships between body length (mm) and home range size (km) of bull trout and westslope cutthroat trout in the Upper Salmon River Basin, Idaho. The black circles and solid line represent bull trout: log10 home range (km) = 1.003 log10 total length (mm) – 0.95, (r2=0.036; n=44, P=0.21). The open squares and dashed line represent westslope cutthroat trout: log10 home range (km) = 2.06 log10 total length (mm) – 3.6, (r2=0.035; n=34, P=0.29)........................................................................................ 49 Figure 8. The relationships between body mass (g) and home range size (km) of bull trout and westslope cutthroat trout in the Upper Salmon River Basin, Idaho. The black circles and solid line represent bull trout: log10 home range (km) = 0.36 log10 mass (g) + 0.66, (r2=0.042; n=44, P=0.18). The open squares and dashed line represent westslope 2 cutthroat trout: log10 home range (km) = 0.50 log10 mass (g) + 0.34, (r =0.022; n=34, P=0.40). ............................................................................................................................ 50 Figure 9. Average home range size (± 1 SD) of radio tagged bull trout and westslope cutthroat trout in the Upper Salmon River Basin, ID. Solid bars represent raw home range measures, while open bars represent home
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RURAL ECONOMY Ciecnmiiuationofsiishiaig Activity Uthern All
    RURAL ECONOMY ciEcnmiIuationofsIishiaig Activity uthern All W Adamowicz, P. BoxaIl, D. Watson and T PLtcrs I I Project Report 92-01 PROJECT REPORT Departmnt of Rural [conom F It R \ ,r u1tur o A Socio-Economic Evaluation of Sportsfishing Activity in Southern Alberta W. Adamowicz, P. Boxall, D. Watson and T. Peters Project Report 92-01 The authors are Associate Professor, Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta, Edmonton; Forest Economist, Forestry Canada, Edmonton; Research Associate, Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta, Edmonton and Research Associate, Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta, Edmonton. A Socio-Economic Evaluation of Sportsfishing Activity in Southern Alberta Interim Project Report INTROI)UCTION Recreational fishing is one of the most important recreational activities in Alberta. The report on Sports Fishing in Alberta, 1985, states that over 340,000 angling licences were purchased in the province and the total population of anglers exceeded 430,000. Approximately 5.4 million angler days were spent in Alberta and over $130 million was spent on fishing related activities. Clearly, sportsfishing is an important recreational activity and the fishery resource is the source of significant social benefits. A National Angler Survey is conducted every five years. However, the results of this survey are broad and aggregate in nature insofar that they do not address issues about specific sites. It is the purpose of this study to examine in detail the characteristics of anglers, and angling site choices, in the Southern region of Alberta. Fish and Wildlife agencies have collected considerable amounts of bio-physical information on fish habitat, water quality, biology and ecology.
    [Show full text]
  • Keeping Alberta Wild Since 1968 Milner Public Library Suites 628 – 7 Sir Winston Churchill Square Edmonton, Alberta T5J 2V4
    Milner Public Library Suites 628 – 7 Sir Winston Churchill Square Edmonton, Alberta T5J 2V4 February 18, 2021 BRIEFING NOTE: Open-pit coal mining in the North Saskatchewan watershed and impacts to the City of Edmonton Prepared by CPAWS Northern Alberta for Edmonton City Council Executive Summary ● On June 1, 2020 the Government of Alberta rescinded the Coal Development Policy for Alberta (Coal Policy) ● No public consultation was conducted on the removal of the policy ● The recent reinstatement of the coal policy does not eliminate the risk of open pit coal mining and its impacts to Edmonton’s source of drinking water (the Bighorn region) ● While the policy was removed a large number of new leases were granted in the Bighorn ● The Valory Blackstone project was granted exploration permits (meaning they can build roads and drill test pits) that may be allowed to go forward as soon as this spring ● There is still no land-use plan for the North Saskatchewan Region to manage cumulative impacts of overlapping industrial and recreational land uses ● Any replacement of the Coal Policy should include full public and Indigenous consultation and the City of Edmonton should be considered as a major stakeholder ● Several communities have taken a stance against the removal of the Coal Policy and have requested that all exploration and development activities are stopped until robust consultation has been conducted on a replacement for the Policy Overview ● The 1976 Coal Policy, developed over years of work and public consultation, outlined four categories for coal development. Category 1 prohibited mining and Category 2 restricted open-pit coal mines.
    [Show full text]
  • Bighorn Backcountry Public Land Use Zones 2019
    Edson 16 EDMONTON Hinton 47 22 Jasper 39 734 Bighorn Backcountry PLUZs 2 22 National Bighorn The Bighorn Backcountry is managed to ensure the Backcountry Park protection of the environment, while allowing responsible 11 and sustainable recreational use. The area includes more than Rocky 11 5,000 square kilometres (1.2 million acres) of public lands east Mountain House 54 of Banff and Jasper National Parks. 734 27 The Bighorn Backcountry hosts a large variety of recreational Banff National 22 activities including camping, OHV and snow vehicle use, hiking, shing, Park hunting and cycling. CALGARY 1 It is your responsibility to become familiar with the rules and activities allowed in this area before you visit and to be informed of any trail closures. Please refer to the map and chart in this pamphlet for further details. Visitors who do not follow the rules could be ned or charged under provincial legislation. If you have any concerns about the condition of the trails and campsites or their appropriate use, please call Alberta Environment and Parks at the Rocky Mountain House Ofce, 403-845-8250. (Dial 310-0000 for toll-free service.) For current trail conditions and information kiosk locations, please visit the Bighorn Backcountry website at www.alberta.ca Definitions for the Bighorn Backcountry Motorized User ✑ recreational user of both off-highway vehicles and snow vehicles. Equestrian User or ✑ recreational user of both horses and/or mules, used for trail riding, pack Equine horse, buggy/cart, covered wagon or horse-drawn sleigh. Non-Motorized User ✑ recreational user which is non-motorized except equestrian user or equine where specified or restricted.
    [Show full text]
  • North Central Native Trout Recovery Program : North Saskatchewan
    NORTH CENTRAL NATIVE TROUT RECOVERY PROGRAM North Saskatchewan River & Lower Ram River Edmonton N o ³ North r t Saskatchewan Red Deer h Sa River ska tc Study Area h e w a n R i v e r Calgary B ig B ea ve r C reek Ca H ny a Sh on ve un C n da re C Cr ek re ee e k Su k n se ek k D t Cre C e ee r p re e e Gon C st C r ik e Bu a re k h C C e ree k ic y k k a e ek n k re C C n ut r u ro e S T Bighorn R e ive G k k r k a k ee e e r p re e C C r C ine !. k und C c re L o e n J r E k o a P s C h K eR y e oyc i h k l J v u ee o t e i Ro gh Cr Bull Creek i r w t dd li C i C p reek ek L r e r C e C C e a r in k r e ad e e Taw e K iska Creek k k Nort k h Ram e Riv e er r !. C k !.!. o t e e !. n i r C P l O l !. tt a e F !. r C Abraham r ee !. Lake k !. !. !. !. Lynx C !. Roadway Stream Crossing nion C reek O reek Inspection k !.
    [Show full text]
  • Glaciers of the Canadian Rockies
    Glaciers of North America— GLACIERS OF CANADA GLACIERS OF THE CANADIAN ROCKIES By C. SIMON L. OMMANNEY SATELLITE IMAGE ATLAS OF GLACIERS OF THE WORLD Edited by RICHARD S. WILLIAMS, Jr., and JANE G. FERRIGNO U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1386–J–1 The Rocky Mountains of Canada include four distinct ranges from the U.S. border to northern British Columbia: Border, Continental, Hart, and Muskwa Ranges. They cover about 170,000 km2, are about 150 km wide, and have an estimated glacierized area of 38,613 km2. Mount Robson, at 3,954 m, is the highest peak. Glaciers range in size from ice fields, with major outlet glaciers, to glacierets. Small mountain-type glaciers in cirques, niches, and ice aprons are scattered throughout the ranges. Ice-cored moraines and rock glaciers are also common CONTENTS Page Abstract ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- J199 Introduction----------------------------------------------------------------------- 199 FIGURE 1. Mountain ranges of the southern Rocky Mountains------------ 201 2. Mountain ranges of the northern Rocky Mountains ------------ 202 3. Oblique aerial photograph of Mount Assiniboine, Banff National Park, Rocky Mountains----------------------------- 203 4. Sketch map showing glaciers of the Canadian Rocky Mountains -------------------------------------------- 204 5. Photograph of the Victoria Glacier, Rocky Mountains, Alberta, in August 1973 -------------------------------------- 209 TABLE 1. Named glaciers of the Rocky Mountains cited in the chapter
    [Show full text]
  • Westslope Cutthroat Trout Oncorhynchus Clarkii Lewisi
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the westslope cutthroat trout Oncorhynchus clarkii lewisi British Columbia population Alberta population in Canada British Columbia population – SPECIAL CONCERN Alberta population – THREATENED 2006 COSEWIC COSEPAC COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION ENDANGERED WILDLIFE DES ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL IN CANADA AU CANADA COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC 2006. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the westslope cutthroat trout Oncorhynchus clarkii lewisi (British Columbia population and Alberta population) in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vii + 67 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Allan B. Costello and Emily Rubidge for writing the status report on the westslope cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii lewisi) (British Columbia population and Alberta population) in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada, overseen and edited by Dr. Robert Campbell, Co-chair, Freshwater Fishes Species Specialist Subcommittee. The status report to support the May 2005 COSEWIC assessments of the westslope cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii lewisi) (Alberta population and British Columbia population) was not made available following the 2005 assessment. In November 2006, COSEWIC reassessed the westslope cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii lewisi)
    [Show full text]
  • Trails Parks, Provincial Recreations Areas and Events
    David Thompson PARKS The David Thompson Country Tourism Region Country encompasses the municipalities of Caroline, Clearwater County, and Rocky Mountain House. Crimson Lake Ram Falls Rocky Mountain House Landslide Hike Highlights of the area include Abraham Lake, Provincial Park Provincial Park National Historic Site Burnstick Lake, Cow Lake, Crimson Lake, Nordegg and Ya Ha Tinda. While the above parks are the most well-known, David Thompson Please visit our website for more information and Country has over twenty Provincial listings of hotels, restaurants, campgrounds, trails Parks, Provincial Recreations Areas and events. and Wilderness Areas for you to where explore. You can find them listed Alberta Parks Bighorn Backcountry at the link. Listing Link Trails link www.davidthompsoncountry.ca Clearwater River Horse Trails When in David Thompson Country you can find TRAILS more visitor information at: DTC has a variety of trails to explore, from multi use If you’re looking for motorized access for your ATV, Rocky Mountain House Visitor Information Centre trails to motorized and non-motorized specific trails. OHV, or Motorbike there are designated areas for you Monday – Friday, 9 AM – 5 PM Our hiking trails vary in difficulty from short walks to enjoy. One area to explore is the Clearwater Trails Ph: 403-845-5450 suitable for a soft adventure seeker to hikes that will Initiative west of Caroline and the Bighorn area also Toll Free: 1-800-565-3793 challenge the hard-core adventurer. has dedicated motorized trails as well. E-mail: [email protected] Mountain and trail biking are popular There are plenty of areas for horses activities as well, with Nordegg and and we have ranches and outfitters Village of Caroline Office Baseline Mountain being two popular offering guided trail rides if you have Tuesday – Friday, 9 AM – 4 PM destinations.
    [Show full text]
  • 1213 - 20 Street N.W., Calgary, AB, T2N 2K5, Canada [email protected]
    Provisional Evaluation of the Status of Westslope Cutthroat Trout in Canada David W. Mayhood Freshwater Research Limited 1213 - 20 Street N.W., Calgary, AB, T2N 2K5, Canada [email protected] ABSTRACT I surveyed existing publications, reports, historical documents, and selected agency files, conducted field surveys, and interviewed reliable observers knowledgeable about selected waters to determine the native and present distribution of westslope cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki lewisi) in Canada. I evaluated this information in the light of existing knowledge of potential threats to arrive at provisional determinations of risk status. In British Columbia, westslope cutthroats once occupied: the mainstem of the upper Kootenay River and its major tributaries below impassable barriers; certain Columbia River headwaters; and some small, disjunct headwaters, mostly above barrier falls in the lower Kootenay, Columbia, and South Thompson drainages. Most of the apparently genetically pure native stocks still extant in several upper Kootenay tributaries are vulnerable to hybridization with, or replacement by, accessible nonnative salmonids now widespread in that drainage. The population and genetic status of most British Columbia stocks, including many introduced populations, remains undocumented. In Alberta, westslope cutthroats once occupied the mainstems of the Bow and Oldman rivers and their major tributaries below impassable barriers, downstream far into the plains. Except in the upper Oldman and Castle river basins, native stocks are now rare in Alberta, existing only in short reaches of a few isolated headwaters. Genetically pure native stocks are endangered due to their limited and highly fragmented distribution, continued exposure to introgressive hybridization, probable competition from introduced salmonids, continued habitat damage and loss, inadequate legislation and enforcement, and continued exposure to overfishing of some small populations.
    [Show full text]
  • North Saskatchewan and Ram Rivers Bull Trout Spawning Stock Assessment, Alberta, 2007 - 2009
    North Saskatchewan and Ram Rivers Bull Trout Spawning Stock Assessment, Alberta, 2007 - 2009 CONSERVATION REPORT SERIES The Alberta Conservation Association is a Delegated Administrative Organization under Alberta’s Wildlife Act. CONSERVATION REPORT SERIES 25% Post Consumer Fibre When separated, both the binding and paper in this document are recyclable North Saskatchewan and Ram Rivers Bull Trout Spawning Stock Assessment, Alberta, 2007 ‐ 2009 Mike Rodtka1, Chad Judd1 and Kevin Fitzsimmons2 1 Alberta Conservation Association #4919, 51 Street Rocky Mountain House, Alberta, Canada T4T 1A3 2 Alberta Conservation Association Box 1420 Cochrane, Alberta, Canada T4C 1B4 Report Editors PETER AKU GLENDA SAMUELSON Alberta Conservation Association 2123 Crocus Road NW #101, 9 Chippewa Rd Calgary AB T2L 0Z7 Sherwood Park AB T8A 6J7 Conservation Report Series Type Technical ISBN printed: 978‐0‐7785‐9051‐4 ISBN online: 978‐0‐7785‐9052‐1 Publication No.: T/229 Disclaimer: This document is an independent report prepared by the Alberta Conservation Association. The authors are solely responsible for the interpretations of data and statements made within this report. Reproduction and Availability: This report and its contents may be reproduced in whole, or in part, provided that this title page is included with such reproduction and/or appropriate acknowledgements are provided to the authors and sponsors of this project. Suggested Citation: Rodtka. M., C. Judd, and K. Fitzsimmons. 2010. North Saskatchewan and Ram Rivers Bull Trout Spawning Stock Assessment,
    [Show full text]
  • The Hummingbird Creek Archaeological Site: an Ancient Hunting Camp in Alberta’S Central Rockies, Canada
    The Hummingbird Creek Archaeological Site: An Ancient Hunting Camp in Alberta’s Central Rockies, Canada. by Timothy E. Allan B.A., MacEwan University, 2015 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS The Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies (Anthropology) The University of British Columbia (Vancouver) April 2018 © Timothy E. Allan, 2018 Abstract This thesis focuses on the significance of the Hummingbird Creek site (FaPx-1), a pre-contact archaeological site occupied between ~2,500 to 1,000 years ago, in the Alberta Rocky Mountains. This site yielded approximately 1,400 stone artifacts, including throwing spear (atlatl) projectile points, hide scrapers, expedient knives and production debris. I use geochemical (Portable X-Ray Fluorescence, pXRF) and mineralogical (Raman Spectroscopy) analytical methods on artifacts and source samples. I compared samples from local rock, and material gathered from a nearby procurement area, Pineneedle Creek, with artifacts found at FaPx-1. Carbonate diagenesis, and silica (SiO2) content were key attributes of artifacts, and we successfully associated some artifacts from FaPx-1 with Pineneedle Creek material. I infer that the local rock around FaPx-1 was virtually ignored, perhaps because of very low silica content. Based on expectations made through ethnographic examples of other montane hunter-gatherers, the material culture from FaPx-1 likely represents a specialized hunting camp; intended for staging hunting expeditions to areas known to yield successful hunts. Local Stoney First Nation traditional place names and oral accounts corroborate the interpretations of archaeological data and emphasize the need for Indigenous perspectives in Rocky Mountain archaeology in Alberta.
    [Show full text]
  • Upland Watershed Management and Global Change – Canada's Rocky
    Fifth Biennial Rosenberg Forum on Water Policy, September 6-11, 2006, Banff, Alberta Upland Watershed Management and Global Change – Canada’s Rocky Mountains and Western Plains Dave Sauchyn1, Alain Pietroniro2 and Michael Demuth3 1 Prairie Adaptation Research Collaborative, University of Regina, SK; [email protected] 2 National Hydrology Research Centre, Environment Canada, Saskatoon, SK; [email protected] 3 Glaciology Section, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa; [email protected] Introduction “No country on Earth has such contrasts of drought and water plenty as Canada. None has so much water ready and available for use. But Canada is learning that national statistics do not begin to portray the complexity of its relationship with its most vital resource. .. a new reality is emerging. It is a reality in which water is in increasingly short supply in some places at some times, where water suddenly has a real value rather than being an unlimited resource - and where rivers truly can run dry.” (Pearce 2006) A “myth of abundance” has historically influenced Canadian water policy and management (Mitchell and Shrubsol, 1994: 1). So has an explicit assumption that “the hydrological regime is stationary and will continue to be stationary in the future” (Whitfield et al. 2004: 89). There is “limited availability of freshwater in Canada at different times and places” (Quinn et al. 2004: 1). The place and time of least freshwater is the western plains during recurrent drought. This paper is about the hydroclimate of this region (Figure 1) and specifically how water policy and management might be adjusted to compensate for a long view of the surface hydrology.
    [Show full text]
  • National Energy Board
    CANADA ENERGY REGULATOR RÉGIE DE L’ÉNERGIE DU CANADA Hearing / L'audience GH-001-2019 NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. Edson Mainline Expansion Project NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. Projet d’agrandissement du réseau principal à Edson VOLUME 2 Hearing held at L’audience tenue à Holiday Inn and Suites 33 Petrolia Drive Red Deer, Alberta January 22, 2020 Le 22 janvier 2020 International Reporting Inc. Ottawa, Ontario (613) 748-6043 © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2020 © Sa Majesté du Chef du Canada 2020 as represented by the Canada Energy Regulator représentée par la Régie de l’énergie du Canada This publication is the recorded verbatim transcript Cette publication est un compte rendu textuel des and, as such, is taped and transcribed in either of the délibérations et, en tant que tel, est enregistrée et official languages, depending on the languages transcrite dans l’une ou l’autre des deux langues spoken by the participant at the public hearing. officielles, compte tenu de la langue utilisée par le participant à l’audience publique. Printed in Canada Imprimé au Canada Transcript HEARING / L’AUDIENCE GH-001-2019 IN THE MATTER OF NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. Edson Mainline Expansion Project HEARING LOCATION/LIEU DE L’AUDIENCE Hearing held in Red Deer, Alberta, Wednesday, January 22, 2020 Audience tenue à Red Deer (Alberta), mercredi, le 22 janvier 2020 COMMISSION PANEL/COMITÉ D'AUDIENCE DE LA COMMISSION Stephania Luciuk Presiding Commissioner/Commissaire présidant l’audience Wilma Jacknife Commissioner/Commissaire Damien Côté Commissioner/Commissaire Transcript GH-001-2019 APPEARANCES/COMPARUTIONS (i) Applicant/Demandeur NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd.
    [Show full text]