RURAL ECONOMY ciEcnmiIuationofsIishiaig Activity uthern All

W I Adamowicz, P. BoxaIl, D. Watson and T PLtcrs I Project Report 92-01

PROJECT REPORT

Departmnt of Rural [conom F It R \ ,r u1tur o

Alberta,

University

The

Forest

authors

Economist,

Edmonton.

of

are

Alberta,

Associate

Forestry

Edmonton

Professor,

Canada,

W.

A

Adamowicz,

and

Socio-Economic

Edmonton;

Department

Research

Activity

Project

P.

Associate,

Boxall,

Research

in

of

Evaluation

Southern

Report

Rural

D.

Associate,

Department

Watson

Economy,

92-01

Alberta

of

Sportsfishing

and

Department

University

of

T.

Rural

Peters

Economy,

of

of

Alberta,

Rural

Economy,

University

Edmonton; of

to will

anglers

the

do

fishing

recreational

recreational

information region

of

broad

in

important

and

Sports

INTROI)UCTION

angler

this

they

Alberta

demand

also

the

and

of

opportunities.

study

go?

Fishing

participate

A

help

Recreational

demands

total

Alberta.

aggregate

National

recreational

and

for

fishing

Why fishing on

to

in

population

angling

in

over

fish

examine

A

planning

do

Alberta,

or

in

Socio-Economic

Fish

opportunities

are

habitat,

Angler

$130

they

in

in

a

fishing

Why

experiences

activity

examined.

season?

nature

an

and

in

choose

million

habitat

of

attempt

1985,

detail

do

Survey

water

Wildlife

anglers

is

insofar

individual

and

one

What

states

these

while

the

was

improvement,

quality,

The

is

and

to the

Evaluation

of

exceeded

agencies

conducted

characteristics

spent

improve

that

are

sites? the

that

fishery

bio-physical

the

the

choose

biology

the

most

Interim

they

social/economic

attitudes

over

on

The

have

430,000.

factors

resource

the

fishing

of

do

fish

every

important

to

340,000

and

Sportsfishing

answers

quality

Project

not

collected

participate

information

of

stocking

and

affecting

five

ecology.

related

anglers,

address

is

Approximately

angling

values

the

years.

of

Report

to recreational

information

considerable

the

and

these

source

activities.

in

fishing

and

issues

Activity

In

of

helps

recreational

licences

However,

other

recreational

this

recreational

angling

questions

of

about

define

intensity?

study

5.4

activities

management

significant

helps

in

Clearly,

were

amounts

million

Southern

site

the

specific

the

the

experience.

will

define

fishing?

purchased

anglers.

results

choices,

social

in

potential

sportsfishing

Where

provide

angler

social

of

Alberta.

sites.

Alberta

changes the

bio-physical

of

elements

How

in

This

do

demand

benefits.

this

days

in

information

It

supply

the

recreational

the

many is

The

in information

survey

were

Southern is

the

response

province

of

an

for

of

report

times

purpose

spent

are

on on

BACKC

This

the

and

impact

designed

are

Fish

resource.

The

represents

original

interim

presented.

the

Management information

ROUND

In

physical

(3)

of

characteristics

(2)

the

(1)

impact

This

Social/economic

October

to

management

to

to

to

report

the

recreational

research

measure

develop

report

use

develop

of

information first

In

should

the

quality

1989

addresses

subsequent

Areas

major

presents

proposal

the

data

a

of

a

options

a

model

demand

survey

sportfishing

impact

be

task

1

factors

research

project

collected

and

about

valuable

objectives

the

force

research,

the

of

instrument

2)

(site

of

model.

(crowding,

results

recreational

following

fishing

recreationists

in

in

alternate

was

to

closures,

to

recreationists. Alberta

recreational

(1)

analyze

models

fisheries

developed

of

activity.

and

and

a

water

research

uses

survey

examining

stocking,

fishing

(2).

the

sampling

of

and

managers

of

fishing

quality,

fishing

to

In

3

demographic

The

of

water

fishing

objectives

site

examine

this

Southern

etc)

fishing

final

design

at

choice site

interim

etc)

resources

as

on

sites.

a

well

choice

report

regional

the

site

were

on

demand

to

and

using

region

report

valuation

as

collect

the

choice

on

will

will

socio-economic

other

listed:

social,

recreational

level

recreational

(Alberta

at

address descriptive

be

the

and

regional

parties

is

of

developed.

economic

data

somewhat

recreational

recreational

item

Fish

interested

required

fishing

and

results

fishing

and

(3).

and

subregional

These

limited.

Wildlife

experience.

fishing

fisheries

from

activity,

for

in

models

the

the

This

values,

division

fishery

the

levels.

in

survey

are

study In

for

the

Southern

on

to

decisions

intensity.

information.

focus

Enhancement

Analysis”

based

result

the

force,

the

to

Division,

the

historical

approximately

focus

Southern

address

project

water

Southern

of

upon

of

illustrates

Based

programs,

desirable,

the

There

pond There

on

region, or

recreationists

The

revealed

Land

resources.

the

from

changes

the survey

visitation

region.

sound

These

B,

Fund

region

model on

is

is

issue

Services

Southern

individuals

the

the

a

a

95%

the

the

what

and

the

was

need

lack

understanding

data

to

in

effect of

focus

The

would loss of

assessment The

patterns.

of

following:

provide

what

environmental

substituting

to

the

opportunities

of

Alberta.

to

Information

the

would

of

survey region

elicit

following

socioeconomic

of

of

assess

opportunity

from

be

are

fisheries

fishing

the

changing

for

used

information

the

be

While

was

fishing

by

group.

other

This

the

of

an

sites,

used

impacts

the

passage,

to

trips

based the

Division,

recreational

effectiveness

should

in

conditions

task

a

individuals

evaluate

regions

cost

sites.

task

depth

“...the

to

regulation,

social

or

data.

to

on

force

develop

crowding

on

of

of

Southern

force,

be

from

The

a

survey and

Division

recreational

alternative

and

fishing

in

provided,

the

geographical

included

surrounding

opportunities.

the

the

living

of

a

sampling

economic

a the

4

impact

the

proposal

fish

of effects

model

province

Alberta. minutes

preferences,

University

should

value

recreational

in

management

how

individuals

resource

of

the

fishery

of

design, caused

distribution

values

the

changes

of

was

cost

of

be

Southern

recreational

The

(notably

a

In

one

fishing

able

forwarded

of

fishing

losses

values,

developments.

effective

by

addition,

described

Southern

held

fishing

Alberta.

from

in

of

substitution,

to

programs

sites.

the

region

fishing

in

the

by

provide

which

experience,

and

the

fishing

the

in

are

the

Central

to

initial

management

below,

region,

Southern The

Alberta

attitudes

The

event

the

tend

was habitat

users.”

quality,

e.g.

estimates

site

task

Alberta

survey

need

meetings

expected

region)

stocking

was

to

what

of

the

Fish

choice

also development

force

as

A

management

Alberta. alternate

to

developed

Central

was

actions

well “Needs

makes

of

Fisheries

be

and

fish

also

of

was

pond

to

and

the

determined

as

designed

the

Wildlife

account

in

fish

region

fishing

initiated

The uses

costs

as

activity

A

the

task

based

a

in

or

of of

fishing

fishing

management

fishing

(1)

attached).

of

Demographic

of

examined

of

and

were

Lethbridge

individuals

designed

and

characteristics

SURVEY

activity

and

Recreational

the

Alberta

Attitudes

structure.

a

certain

handed

site.

survey variety

quality

experience,

This

in

The

by

to

DESIGN

anglers

the

at

Alberta

These

options individuals

communities

section

provide

and

survey

instrument

out

were of

Information.

the

south.

of

A

Fishing

socioeconomic

Opinions

to

more

a

Alberta

the

factors

(names

captured

typical

(February

was

was

individuals

and

information

type

formal

in

Opportunities

designed

constructed

contained

the

included

in

Fish

and

the

fishing

of

about

The

using

expenditures

the

activities

4-6,

Department

addresses

pretest

and

at

characteristics

structure

on eastern

Fishing

to

trip,

the

a

water

1991)

four

Wildlife

elicit

1-5

question

to

Great

involved

in

opinions

the

elicit

sections:

rating

obtained

and

quality,

slopes

Southern

of

on

information

average of

Division.

each

Plains

opinions

a

recreational

restructuring

Rural

of

scale

presentation

mailing

region

on

distance

the

(1)

section

from

Alberta,

angler

Fishery

fisheries

5

of

Economy,

Attitudes

respondents

about

on

Several

various

were

an

fishing

is

to

fishing.

perceptions

engages

early

and

Workers

outlined

(3)

informed

included

management

the

quality

forms

items

and

University

licences).

Fishing

design.

version

site,

and

The

in,

Opinions

factors

Association

below.

which

of

boat

to

opinions

participants

their

of

factors

Activity

pre-tests

After

of

account

a

The

of

options,

access,

the

quality

may

that

families.

Alberta,

(A

About

pretesting,

results

affecting

survey

about

copy in

affect

affect

were

Annual

for

etc.

fishing

about

fishing

1990

Fishing,

the

of

with The

of

fisheries

to

the

performed.

the

Individuals

recreational

and

the

these

a

majority

the

Meeting

the

experience,

activity

survey

choice

random

recreational

assistance

survey

(4)

survey

(2)

final

pretests

Awareness

was

of

of

in

in

were

version

sample

Surveys

is

design

fishing

1990

from were also asked about their favourite site, how many years they had visited this site, what attributes attracted

them and how they became aware of the site. In order to gauge the type of fishing activity occurring in

the Southern region, respondents were asked to described a typical fishing trip. The factors they were asked to describe included the mode of transportation chosen, the length of stay, the type of fishing, pounds of fish caught, years of experience, length of planning period before a trip, individuals accompanying the respondent and whether the respondent practices catch and release fishing. This section also elicited information on the respondent’s choice of fisheries management options if overfishing becomes a problem. Respondents were asked to choose from season length restrictions, size limits, cancelling bait fishing, increasing licence fees, increasing stocking, increasing enforcement, enforcing catch and release, increasing fines or other categories of management options. The average annual expenditures on fishing (transport costs, licence costs, food, bait, etc) were also elicited. Finally, as a screening variable for the remainder of the survey, individuals were asked if they fished in 1990. If they answered YES they were directed to the next section of the survey on fishing site awareness.

(2) Awareness of Recreational Fishing Opportunities in Southern Alberta

In order to gain an understanding of the awareness of fishing sites in the Southern region of

Alberta, respondents were presented with a map, illustrating 77 fishing sites in the Southern region, and were asked to indicate which of the sites they had ever visited or heard of as a fishing site. This section will provide information on the sites individuals consider when making fishing site choices. The results from this section may also he useful when generating information to promote recreational fishing. A site which is not recognized as a fishing spot may be promoted through recreational opportunity and tourism material. In the technical portion of the economic modelling, the awareness factor is an essential ingredient for a model predicting site choice.

(3) Fishing Activity in Southern Alberta in 1990

Respondents were asked to fill in a trip activity chart for each fishing trip between May 1, 1990

6

thereby was

Alberta

individuals

or

information

Wildlife

attached)

with

important

household

(4)

fishing chosen

constructing

detailed

asked

species

and

a

included

Demographic

reward

children

October

to

The

maintain

Fish

trips

The at

Division.

The sought,

view

included

mark

various

in

who

size

for

survey

for

and survey

to

demographic

made

determining

the

in

31,

of

and

those

were

facilitate

on

management

number

a

confidentiality

Wildlife

the

economic

1990.

Information

nearby

times

This

design

the

a

in

packet

structure,

calender

drawn

location

who

the

logos

letter

This

in caught

separation

pond

Division

1990

plays

the

took

section

included

the

model

from

of

and

chart

and

encouraged

number the

income,

season.

fishing

versus

Trout

a

and

the

and

the

conservation.

large

dates

duration

of

of

and

included

time

of

anonymity a

released

the

set

site

cover

Unlimited,

wilderness

of

education,

season.

the

role

Walleye

over

of

to

survey

fishing

choice

individuals

ballot

of

respondents

respond.

in

letter,

the

which

and

fishing

response

of

Respondents

Country

elicited

The

name

and

(with

trips,

trophy

the

and

the

the

a

these

7

survey

prize

the

University

to

activity.

type

Several

responses.

leisure

of

the

the

rates,

information

who

respond

fishing)

Lures.

calender

trips

the

ballot

of

respondent’s

type

and

were

water

filled

time

site,

prizes

occurred.

The

Research

a

of

of

The

was and

and

“prize

will

the

also

availability.

fishing

Out

Alberta

body

information

were

on

prizes

enclosed

the

emphasized

distance

add

asked

the

place

ballot”.

name)

has

visited.

timing

This

donated

experience

information

prize

and

were

shown

to

of

information

as

from

These

from

the

will

The

provide

of

residence,

ballot.

presented

an

The

the

by

fishing

Alberta

that

also

home,

incentive

cover

the

Trout

sought

importance

factors

respondents

on

A

a

the

survey

be

well

trips.

the

letter

separate

provides

gender,

party

to

Unlimited,

Fish

useful

total

(i.e.

may

to

those

type

designed

and

(copy

respond

and

size,

fishing

of

number

be

were

for

age,

of

ballot

a

this

fish

site

also of survey will significantly increase response. In the next section, the sampling design and the response to the

two mailings of the survey will be discussed.

SAMPLING DESIGN

1. Pretest

A small sample of 50 names were used for an initial mailout to test the response to the questionnaire on 5 Feb 1991. The 50 names were drawn at random from a list of 150 provided by the

Alberta Fish and Wildlife Division. This list was a surplus from a sample population created for The

National Sports Fishing Survey run concurrently by the division. After minor changes to the survey, the final instrument was ready for mailing.

2. Southern Region Sample

The goal was to sample the population of fishermen in Alberta that fish in the Southern region.

Based on previous research it was assumed that 60% of those people that fish in the Southern region live in that region. Another 20% live in the region from Southern region north to Calgary. Another 15% live in the area from Calgary to Leduc. By including all fishermen from Leduc south, the sample would cover

95% of the population that fish in the southern region. These assumptions would be verified by a separate sample (see below under “Provincial Sample”).

The copies of all fishing licences sold in Alberta in 1990 were made available by the Alberta Fish and Wildlife Division. These were evaluated on the basis of residence, with those living within the designated area separated for sampling. Any licence that had already been used for the concurrent

National Sportsfishing survey was excluded, regardless of place of residence. The licences were then counted to determine the method to be used to obtain the final sample size of 5,000. A total of 62,783 were found to he within the designated area.

The sample was created by picking one of every 12 licences, for a total of 6,001 cases within the sample. Given that the licences were stored on the basis of arrival, and not in any order by residence, the count was started with the first licence in each box, and then continued through the whole filebox. These

8 names were then entered into a computer database. In the instance where the 12th licence was not suitable for the sample, the next licence was used without interrupting the count. Licences were deemed to be unsuitable if they had an address that was incomplete, or in the case where a licence not from the designated region was inadvertently included among the 62,783.

The 6,001 cases were then further reduced to the final sample size of 5,000 through the use of a random selection. A random number generator was used to select a start point between I and 56 and then every 6th licence was deleted.

The 5,0(X)names were used for the first mailout of the survey, sent on March 13th, 1991. The questionnaire package included an entry form for a prize draw. Upon return of a questionnaire, the draw forms were separated from the questionnaire, and checked with the 5,000 name mailing list. Names of those who had returned completed questionnaires were removed from the mailing list. As well, the names of those questionnaires returned not completed (improper address, no longer at that address etc) were removed from the list. The total received to this point (1,051) and the total returned incomplete (374) reduced the list to 3575 names. This reduced list of 3575 was then used to send a second package to non- respondents on May 6, 1991.

3. Alberta Sample

A smaller sample of 478 was taken from a list of 1978 names provided by the Fish and Wildlife

Division to verify that the sample of 5000 truly approximated the population that fished in the Southern region. This sample included people residing in all parts of the province. The first mailout was sent on

May 6, 1991 with the second mailout of the main survey sample. Four weeks later a second package was sent to all the names on this list of 478 names.

RESPONSE RATES

The table below illustrates the response rates for the first and second mailing of the Southern region survey and the Alberta survey (the sample used to check the proportion of anglers in the Southern region from all residences in the province). The total Southern region survey mailout of 5000 provided a

9 response of 2,114 completed questionnaires and 580 surveys returned unopened (incorrect addresses, individuals who have moved, etc.). The effective response rate was 48%, a rate which is quite admirable given the complexity of the survey instrument and the fact that this was a mail survey. The Alberta survey sample of 500 resulted in a similar response rate (43%). In both cases approximately 10% of the sample resulted in questionnaires returned unopened. This figure is about average for mail surveys.

Some preliminary results examining the presence of non-response bias indicates that there is no evidence of non-response bias between the first and second mailings (those who responded to the second mailing were non-respondents to the first mailing) for demographic variables (age, income, education).

This indicates that there is no difference in demographic variables between the respondents to the first and second mailings. [—lowever,investigation of non-response bias on the factors of number of fishing trips and participation in fishing did reveal some evidence of non-response bias. The second mailing not only increased the effective response rate by 17% but ii probably decreased any non-response bias by including a group which showed less active interest in recreational angling. Additional investigation into non response bias was not-possible given the resources available, however, we feel that the second mailing has significantly reduced the presence of any non-response bias which may have been evident in the first mailing.

10 Table 1. Sample Size, Response and Response Rates for the Survey.

Mailout Number Number Percent Effective Number Percent of sent returned returned sample size completed effective Unopened Unopened completed

Southern region 5,000 431 9 4,569 1535 34 First Mailout

Southern region 3,575 149 4 3,426 579 17 Second Mailout

Total 5,000 580 12 4,420 2,115 48

Province wide 478 32 7 446 118 26 First Mailout

Province wide 478 15 3 463 69 15 Second Mailout

Total 478 47 10 431 187 43

11

where

that

ATFITUDES

data

set”

presented

responses

encompasses

SURVEY

to

Southern

therefore

the

Category

the

the

respondents

demographic

the

fishing

the

a

refers

attitudes

Southern

Southern

in

Southern

good

respondents

Southern

Appendix

Questions

survey.

Detailed

From

The

RESULTS

2

in

from

in region.

to

chance

represents

some

this

the

to

those

and

remainder

AND

characteristics

region.

region

region,

a

Category

the

Included

region.

management

data

section.

results

B.

opinions

Respondents

want

1.1 cases

to

responses

survey,

OPINIONS

survey

catch

a

in

through

those

summary

to

the

of

of

Appendix

2

in

As

fish.

expressed

(active this

and

the

trophy-size

attitudes

and

the

of

respondents

an

from

perspective,

1.16

survey

Southern

report

Category

from

discussion

ABOUT

they

explanatory

The

of

Southern

A,

Category

in

the

here

and

are

Category

results

and

Appendices

responses

discusses

fish

activities

who 2:

also

region

FISHING

opinions

are distinguishing

any

are

rates

the

region

1

note,

from

stratified

meaningful

took

reference

(the

the

1

set

the

anglers.

are

may

relatively

of

A

characteristics

any

the

may

of

anglers).

total

at

12 highlights

Southern

contained

and

or

respondents

least

entire

reference

into

not

made

may

set

between

B

These

when

low.

one

provide

accurately

of two

set

The not

Region

of

to

in

responses),

fishing

evaluating

results

categories,

of

in

the

A

of

“Southern

Appendices have

Category

descriptives

who

the

respondents

good

information

a

Southern

typical

anglers

reflect

fished

descriptives are

trip

took

chance

and

management

based

I

in

Category

region

at

trip,

and

in

those

A

and

the

from

region

Appendix

least

the

(Appendix

and

about

to

on

Category

the

a

Southern

anglers”

made

catch

characteristics

these

Southern

description

B.

the

1

1:

results

awareness

fishing

factors

the

policies

2,115

Appendix

B

the

to

results

A) 2

reflects

total

refers

region.

the

from

is

limit

region,

trip

influencing

responses

indicate

important.

of

“entire

for

of

will

set

within

to unique

the

and

A

sites

the

the

Hence,

of

be

the

and

a

in to good chance to catch a preferred fish species ranks somewhat important.

For over fifty percent of the respondents, knowing that the lake is stocked with fish was split

between somewhat important and very important, with responses in the order of twenty seven percent and

twenty eight percent respectively.

Over fifty percent of the respondents ranked privacy from other anglers as being important.

Natural beauty of the surroundings, access to wilderness areas, and water quality all ranked as being very

important. Natural beauty and access to wilderness areas was important for over seventy percent of the

respondents, and water quality was important for eighty five percent of the respondents.

For over seventy percent of the respondents, the fact that a site was limited to fly fishing was not

important.

Over seventy five percent of the respondents considered distance from home to be an important

factor in deciding where they wanted to fish. Of these seventy five percent, forty seven percent rank it

somewhat important. Similarly, familiarity with the area was important for over fifty percent of the

respondents. Access to picnic or camping facilities at or near the site, on average, rated somewhat

important, however the responses were fairly evenly distributed between not important and very important.

Fishing at a site with boat access was not important, whereas good road access to the site was somewhat

important. Finally, owning land or a cabin near the site, and having friends or relatives living nearby was

not important for an overwhelming ninety percent of the respondents.

Comparing the Southern region angler responses with those for the entire set, it was found that,

in most cases, the respondents exhibited similar attitudes and opinions. Ratings on good chances of

catching trophy-sized fish, catching the limit, and catching a preferred fish species were similar in both surveys. Knowing that the lake is stocked with fish ranked somewhat higher with the Southern

respondents.

Privacy from other anglers, natural beauty of surroundings, water quality, and access to wilderness areas, again, all ranked as somewhat important to very important. As is shown in questions 1.5 through

1.8 in Appendices A and B, the Southern region responses closely mirror those for the entire sample.

13 The fact that a site was limited to fly fishing was not important for the Southern respondents, but the Southern mean was slightly higher than that for the entire set.

The responses for questions 1.10 through 1.16 are almost identical (in terms of means and medians) for the Southern responses and the entire set, with only negligible differences between means.

FAVOURITE FISHING SITE

Question 2 in Appendix A examines responses from the entire set of respondents about their favourite fishing site. The most frequent response indicated that fourteen percent of the respondents have fished at their favourite site for 10 years. The median response was 7 years and the mean was 9.975 years.

The standard deviation was just over 9 years. There were some noticeable secondary peaks in frequency values at 3, 5,

15 and 20 years, with percentage of responses at 10, 12, 7 and 7 respectively.

Over the last five years, 24.6 percent of respondents visited their favourite site 6-10 times, while

21.7 percent visited more than thirty times. The mean number of visits was 16-20, and the median was 11-

15.

Over thirty seven percent of the respondents first became aware of the site from friends.

Information from family members and random chance were a distant second and third place with 16.5 and

15.3 percent respectively.

The survey revealed that the specific things about a favourite fishing site that are particularly enjoyed are good fishing (catch rate), scenic quality, and seclusion, with 18.4, 15.7, and 15.5 percent of responses respectively. All other site characteristics proposed in the survey each received less than seven percent of the total response. It is interesting to compare these site-specific characteristics with the general attitudes and opinions expressed about fishing in questions 1.1 through 1.16. There are several marked differences between general opinions and site specific characteristics, for example water quality and distance from home.

Data for the Southern region anglers show some differences from that of the entire survey. In the

14 southern region (Appendix B, 2A-2D), thirteen percent of the respondents indicated that they had been fishing at their favourite site for 10 years. The median and mean values were slightly higher at 8 and

10.790 respectively. Again, there were frequency peaks at 5, 11-15, and 16-20 years.

Over twenty six percent of the respondents visited their favourite site more than 30 times over the last 5 years. The mean and median were somewhat higher than for the entire survey at close to 15 times and 16-20 times.

Similar to those responses shown in Appendix A, the Southern region respondents first became aware of the site from friends. Family members and random chance were the second and third place sources of information.

Furthermore, good catch rates, seclusion and quietness, and scenic quality were the most popular specific things about the favourite fishing site that are particularly enjoyed. For the frequency distribution of all site-specific characteristics, refer to Appendix B - Question 2D. It is interesting to compare the rankings of these site specific characteristics to the general attitudes and opinions about fishing expressed in Appendix B - Question 1.1 through 1.16.

A TYPICAL FISHING TRIP

A typical fishing trip in Alberta involves a fisherman with an average of 21 years of fishing experience driving (in a car, truck or van) to the fishing site, and staying for a full day, or two to three days. The time spent travelling from home to the fishing site is, on average, found to be enjoyable. The trip is usually planned a few days before, and 38 percent of the time they go fishing with friends (36 percent of the time is with family). The fishermen typically employ spin casting from shore, with the most popular alternative method being ice fishing. An overwhelming majority of fishermen practice catch and release fishing. One to four pounds is the typical amount of fish that is taken home on a single trip.

Examining the Southern region anglers, a typical fishing trip is very comparable to that of the rest of Alberta except for two differences. First, a typical trip to a fishing site in Southern Alberta is for a full day, and usually fishermen go with friends.

15 Over a typical fishing season, the majority of fishermen throughout Alberta and the Southern region usually spend in excess of five hundred dollars. In both survey responses, the distribution patterns of expenditure are similar and are also fairly evenly distributed among each expenditure category, with some minor fluctuations.

MANAGEMENT OPTIONS

If overfishing becomes a problem in Alberta lakes and rivers, the management option that would most likely be seen in addressing the problem, (as the responses indicate in both Appendices A and B, and the histogram “Preferred Management Option”) is that of employing catch and release fishing. Increased stocking is a close second. In both the Southern responses and the entire set, it is worth noting that when other management options are chosen, the majority opinion lies in a combination of the management options presented in question 4. Also, as the histogram suggests, the active Southern region responses closely reflect those of the entire survey.

AWARENESS

The survey revealed that a large proportion of the respondents went sportfishing in Alberta in

1990. Active respondents in the Southern region went sportfishing over ninety eight percent of the time.

The results over the entire survey were slightly lower with only eighty eight percent of the respondents sportfishing in Alberta in 1990.

Question 7 (pages 4-5 in the survey) examines the issue of awareness of fishing sites. The seventy- seven Southern Alberta sites named in the survey were divided into fifteen regional groups. The awareness of sites within each regional group are graphically depicted in this section of the report, and frequency statistics for all respondents and the active respondents in the Southern region are found in Question 7 in

Appendices A and B. In all cases, awareness of the seventy seven sites was higher for the Southern respondents compared with those for the entire survey.

The descriptive analysis for these statistics will begin with a comparison and description within

16 each regional group, and will extend to an overall ranking of site-awareness over the entire Southern

Alberta region.

In the Upper Oldman River area, the site that respondents visited or heard of as a fishing site most was the Upper Oldman River. For the active Southern respondents, Dutch creek was second with

39.4 percent aware, and over the entire survey the Oldman River to the Piegan reserve was second with

29.0 percent.

The most well-known site in the Crowsnest River area for the Southern respondents was Castle

River, with 42.2 percent awareness. For the entire survey, it was a close tie for first place between

Crowsnest River (Passberg to Lundbreck) and Castle River, with 28.7 and 28.6 percent awareness.

In the Castle River area, Beavermines lake was the most familiar site, with 53.9 and 34.1 percent awareness for the Southern and overall respondents respectively.

Overall, awareness statistics for the Waterton Lakes area were relatively low. The site most were aware of was Mami (Paine) Lake, with 25.3 percent for active Southern respondents, and 15.0 percent over the entire survey.

The most familiar site in the Pincher Creek area was Beauvais Lake for both sets of respondents.

Over 47 percent of Southern Alberta respondents were aware of this site, with a corresponding figure for the entire set of responses at 29.7 percent. In both cases, the second most familiar site was the Waterton

Reservoir.

In the Claresholm area, Chain Lake was the site respondents were most aware of, with 61.9 percent aware for the active Southern responses, and 50.0 percent aware over the entire set of responses.

The most well-known site in the Vulcan area was McGregor reservoir, and in the Lethbridge area, Keho

Lake was the most familiar site.

The Claresholm, Lethbridge and Vulcan areas are combined on the bar chart. Chain Lake is the most well-known site in this set, with McGregor Reservoir and Travers Reservoir following in second and third place. It is worth noting that McGregor and Travers reservoir are both located in the Vulcan area, and awareness about the sites in the Lethbridge area were generally lower than that for the other two areas.

17 The best known site in the Cardston area is Police (Outpost) Lake with 44.5 percent aware in the

Southern region, and a notably lower 27.8 percent aware over the entire survey. In both surveys, St. Mary

Reservoir was second place, and the third place remaining sites had fairly evenly distributed awareness percentages.

Awareness of respondents to sites in the Milk River-Warner area were relatively lower than that for other areas. In both Appendices A and B, the site with the highest awareness percentage was Tyrell

Lake, In the Southern region, 26.2 percent of the respondents were aware of the location, and over the entire survey, awareness was a much lower 15.3 percent. Again, in both sets of survey results, the second and third sites for awareness were, respectively, the Milk River Ridge Reservoir and the Heninger

Reservoir. All other locations had awareness responses of less than 10 percent.

In the Taber area, the most familiar site was Chin Reservoir, with 37.2 percent of the Southern respondents and 23.3 percent of all respondents aware of the location. In the Vauxhall area, the most familiar site was Little Bow Reservoir, with 38.1 percent of active Southern respondents and 28.3 percent over the entire survey aware of the site. Examining the bar graph, it can be seen that the two previously mentioned sites rated significantly higher, in term of awareness, than the other location within these regions.

Sites in the Bassano area had relatively high awareness responses compared to other regions. The most familiar location was the Bow River (Carseland to Bassano) with 42.8 percent and 35.1 percent of responses attributable to the Southern and overall surveys respectively. The Bow River (Bassano to mouth) was in second places with 39.7 and 32.0 percent of the respondents aware, and the Red Deer River

(Finegan to Dinosaur) followed with 25.7 and 23.7 percent of respondents aware of the location.

The most well-known site in the Brooks area is Lake Newell, with over 50 percent of the Southern region respondents aware of the site, and a corresponding figure of 38.2 percent for the entire survey.

Other awareness statistics for sites in this region were fairly low.

A bar chart presented below encompasses awareness data for the Bassano/Brooks area. Within this region, Lake Newell is by far the most familiar site with over 50 percent awareness, and the two Bow

18 River locations follow in second place with approximately 40 percent of respondent awareness.

In the Medicine Hat area the most familiar site was Elkwater Lake, with 35.4 percent of the

Southern respondents aware of the location, and a corresponding value of 23.7 percent over the entire set of responses. Second place went to Reesor Lake with 29.3 percent and 17.7 percent of Southern and all respondents aware respectively.

Examining all the statistical data, the three most well-known sites that respondents have ever visited of heard of as a fishing site are Chain Lake, McGregor Reservoir, and Lake Newell, with 50 percent, 44 percent and 38 percent, respectively, of all respondents aware of these locations. These rankings are consistent in both the active Southern respondent data and the entire set of responses. For a complete set of rankings, refer to the frequency distribution tables in Appendices A and B. As a note, the site that fishermen were least aware of was Butcher Lake, which is in the Pincher Creek area.

FISHING TRIPS ACTUALLY TAKEN

Data from the entire set of respondents indicates that, on average, the number of fishing trips taken in 1990 was 9, with a median value of 5 and a standard deviation of just about 11 trips. The most frequent response was 3 trips with 13 percent of the respondents indicating so. There were noticeable frequency jumps at 20 and 30 trips, with, in each case, a 3 percent response rate.

Examining the data set from those respondents active in the Southern region, values for the mean, median and standard deviation were slightly higher, at 10, 6 and 11.833 respectively. Again, there were noticeable frequency jumps at 30 days with a 4 percent response rate, and at 15 and 20 days with a 3 percent response rate.

The entire set of respondents indicated that in 1990, they took fishing trips to a total of 581 sites in Alberta. The site data seemed to naturally separate into three distinct groups: the 77 Southern

Alberta sites named in the survey (refer to question 7), general locations referring to major rivers in

Alberta, and over 500 miscellaneous sites, most of which are not located in Southern Alberta.

19 Furthermore, the Southern angler respondents took fishing trips to a total of 439 1sites. At this point, an explanatory note is needed. In the data set in Appendices A and B for all parts of Question 8, there are two response percentages calculated. “Percent of responses” is the percentage response (or percent of total visits) of a particular location over all sites visited. Obviously, this number totals to 100. “Percent of cases” is a value reflecting the fact that a single site may be visited by more than one fisherman. Since only 15 sites are requested, and different survey respondents can visit the same site, the percent-of-cases value totals to greater than 100. Essentially, this figure denotes the percentage of respondents that visited the site as one of their fifteen visits.

Of the 77 Southern sites named in the survey, the site where most respondents took fishing trips was McGregor Reservoir, with 2.9 percent response rate over all the data, and 18.1 case-percent of respondents listing it as a fishing site they travelled to. Other most-visited sites, in descending order of rank and with case-percentages around the 10 percent mark, are: Chain Lake, Bow river (Bassano to mouth), Reesor Lake, Lake Newell, Travers Reservoir, and Beavermines Lake. For response and case percentages, refer to Question 8b in Appendix A.

The most visited general location was the Bow river, with over 60 percent of cases travelling to this site, and an individual response of 9.7 percent over all visited sites. In second place was the Red Deer

River, with a much lower 14.7 percent of all respondents travelling to this site, and 2.3 percent overall visiting percentage.

For the over 500 miscellaneous sites visited, two notable locations stand out. Gull lake was the most visited site, with 14.1 case-percent, and a 2.2 percent visiting rate over all 649 locations. Pine Lake followed with corresponding figures of 12.9 percent and 2.0 percent. Other conspicuous locations were

Crawling Valley Reservoir, Sylvan Lake, Highwood River, and Kananaskis Lake.

In the southern region, fishing trips were taken to a total of 635 sites. Of the 77 Southern sites, the most visited was McGregor reservoir, with case and overall survey response rates of 31.0 percent and

Site locations for all survey respondents and the subset of Southern anglers can be found under Question 8B in Appendices A and B respectively. Code numbers for each site were assigned by the researchers but not all sites were visited by respondents. Therefore, not all site numbers appear in the data.

20 4.4 percent respectively. Chain Lake and the Bow River (Carseland to Bassano) were the second and third most visited sites.

In the Southern region data, there were 16 other sites with case-percentages around the 10 percent mark. They are, in descending order of rank: Reesor Lake, Lake Newell, Beavermines Lake, Travers

Reservoir, Chin Reservoir, Spruce Coulee Reservoir, Mami Lake, Keho Lake, Murray Reservoir,

Sherburne Reservoir, Castle River, Bow River (Bassano to mouth), Elkwater Lake, Beauvais Lake,

Rattlesnake/Sander Reservoir, and Crowsnest River (Lundbreck to mouth).

For active Southern region respondents, the most visited general site was the Bow river, with a case-percentage of 45.2, and a response rate of 6.4. The second was the Crowsnest river with corresponding percentages of 16.2 and 2.3. All other general locations were not significant.

Of the 500-odd miscellaneous sites, only three stand out. Crawling Valley Reservoir, Highwood

River, and Kananaskis Lake are well-visited locations with case-percentages of 10.5, 7.5, and 6.4 respectively.

Examining the distance travelled from home to the site for each fishing visit, the data for the entire set of respondents suggests that most people travel less than 100 miles per visit. The Southern region data parallels this trend, but with significantly higher percentage response rates (refer to Question

8C in Appendices A and B for values).

For both the entire set of responses and the Southern region angler responses, over 90 percent of responses indicate that the size of the party that went fishing was 1-4 persons, with a frequency peak at 2 people.

Again, for both sets of data, the most popular type of fish sought was trout (unspecified species), with 36.9 percent response rate over the entire survey, and 38.9 percent response rate for the Southern region. Within the trout category, rainbow trout was the most preferred catch. The second most sought after species was northern pike, with 24.5 and 26.6 percentages for the entire and Southern surveys. A bar chart depicting the most sought after species distribution can be found below.

In over 85 percent of cases over the entire survey, and in over 96 percent of cases over active

21 Southern respondents, 2 fish were caught. Over 50 percent of the time, 4 or less fish were caught. In line

with these results, the typical number of fish released was 2, but the case percentages were lower with 78.8

percent of cases for the entire survey, and 84.5 percent of cases over the active Southern respondents. For

percentage response over the entire data set, refer to Question 8F & 8G in Appendices A and B.

Over 75 percent of the respondents fished in a river or lake, with the majority fishing in a lake.

Data for the southern region parallel that for the entire survey. In both cases, reservoirs were a distant

second place, with approximately 9 percent of respondents fishing there.

Most fishing trips were one day in length, and over 90 percent of trips were 3 days or less in

length.

DEMOGRAPHICS

The significant majority of survey respondents were male. The average age over the entire survey

was 39.17 with a standard deviation of almost 12 years, and the active Southern respondent was slightly

younger at 37.9 years with a standard deviation of 11 years.

Over half of the respondents for both sets of data did not have any children under the age of 16

years, and over ninety percent of the respondents did not have anyone over the age of 65 in their

household. For those respondents that did, the children under the age of 16 and over the age of 65

usually did not go fishing.

The average respondent across both data sets had 12 years of education. Average annual

household income for the entire survey was close to $40,000, and slightly lower in the Southern Region

respondents at about S35,000. There were frequency peaks at the $45,00i-50,000 range for the entire set

of responses, and at S45,001-50,000 for the Southern respondents, with 10.2 percent and 10.8 percent

respectively.

Most anglers worked (for pay) an average of 37 hours per week, with some flexibility allowed in working hours per week. The majority response was 40 hours per week for both the entire set of respondents and the active Southern respondents with percentage rates of 38 and 41 respectively.

22 The majority of survey respondents’ main occupation was in the professional and technical field.

Following in second and third places were tradesman and service sector employees. On average, these workers got almost 13 days of paid vacation, and seldom took time off work to go fishing.

CONCLUSIONS

This interim report presents descriptive results of the 1991 survey of Southern Region recreational anglers. The report illustrates the popularity of recreational fishing in the Southern Region and it describes the data that have been collected for future use in modelling fishing site choice and value. This report has only scratched the surface in terms of analysis of these data. Only direct descriptive statistics have been presented. Further analysis will make use of the reports on approximately 11,000 fishing trips, the wide variety of types of anglers and the variety of preferences and opinions on the use and management of recreational fishery resources. While the descriptives are of interest in themselves, there is a great deal of information in this data set which will be of use to managers and decision makers now and in the future.

23 ______

Preferred Management Option Management Options

Shorter Season Size Limits

No Bait Fishing Increase Licence Fee Increase Stocking

Mere Enforcement Catch and Release Larger Fines Other

S S it 15 SD 25 SO Percent of Respondents Active Southern Region Alt Respondeots R Respondents

24

trout tih Cutthroat torthtrtu (unspetufted) hr ,thutrfth atythuug gray) Ut g purth idryr trout C, ,u

ut m

__

Nj All

__

Pespondents in

__

Percent

25 I Respondents

Acttve

of Responses Southetn 30 Region ______

Awarene.s of Sistine Sites Awareness of Fishing Sites (Lpper tidman Ri ver Area) Crswsuest RI var Area)

I

I

% of Respondents IIL of Respondents a-

26

Awareness

(Castle

River of

,

Waterton

of

Fishing

Respondents

Lakes

Sites

Area)

27 Awareness 0

10

(Pincher of

00

of

Creek

Fishing Respondents

00 Area)

40 Sites 50 60

mh

of

Respoudents

28 Awf

_

€fSS

01

%

of

rshng

Respondeats Sites

Awareness

()fllk

ROve,

of

of

Eishrng

Respondents

Wae:

15

Mea)

20

Sites

25

30

29

0

Awareness

(Tbe

10

/

of

%

Vuxh11

of

20

Fishing

Respondents

A)

30

Sites

40 00

tear

(Ossano

iess

of

/

cf

Brcuts

Fz

Respondents

siiog

Area

Sir

as

30

Awareness

cdcie

of

of

Fishing

H

Respondents

20

Area)

Sites 30 APPENDIX A: DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS ALL RESPONDENTS

VARIANCE

MEAN

very

somewhat

not

VALUE

Question

VARIANCE MEAN

very

somewhat

not

VALUE

Question

VARIANCE

MEAN

very

somewhat

not

VALUE

Question

important

important

important

important

important

LABEL

important

LABEL

LABEL

important

1.3

important

1.2

important

1.1

3.220

1.696

2.670

1.608

2.253

1.455

Good

Good

Good

TOTAL

VALUE

TOTAL

VALUE

TOTAL

VALUE

chance

chance

MEDIAN

MINIMUM

chance

MEDIAN

MINIMUM

MINIMUM MEDIAN

0

5

4

3

2

1

0

5

4

3

2

1

0

4

5

3

2

1

FREQUENCY

FREQUENCY

to

FREQUENCY

to

to

2115

catch

2115

catch

387

529

625

2115

186

332

catch

199 330

641

510

393

56

174

116

614

378

787

42

46

3.000

1.000

1.000 3.000

preferred

2.000

1.000

limit

PERCENT

trophy-sized

PERCENT

100.0

PERCENT

100.0

18.3 25.0

29.6

100.0

15.7

30.3

15.6

24.1

18.6

2.6

8.8

29.0

17.9

37.2

2.0

9.4

2.2

5.5

8.2

MISSING

MAXIMUM

STD

PERCENT

fish

MISSING

MAXIMUM

STD

PERCENT

100.0

MISSING

VALID MAXIMUM

STD

PERCENT

100.

VALID

25.7

18.8

30.4

100.0

16.1

VALID

30.9

15.9

24.6

19.0

9.0

29.7

18.3

38.0

9.6

DEV

5.6

8.4

fish

DEV

DEV

species

0

PERCENT

PERCENT

100.0

PERCENT

100.0

81.2

55.5

25.2

16.1 CUN

100.0

90.4

74.5

43.6

24.6

CtJM

94

86.0

56.3

38.0

CUM

5.000

1,302

.

5.000

1.268

5.000

1.206 4

VARIANCE MEAN

very

somewhat

not VALUE

Question

MEAN

VARIANCE

very

VALUE

somewhat not

Question

MEAN

VARIANCE

very

VALUE

somewhat

not

Question

important

important

important

important

important

important

LABEL

LABEL

LABEL

important

1.6

important

1.5

important

1.4

4.079

1.064

3.278

1.638

3.363

1.897

Natural

Privacy

Knowing

TOTAL

VALUE

TOTAL

VALUE

TOTAL

VALUE

MEDIAN

MINIMUM

MEDIAN

MINIMUM

MEDIAN

MINIMUM

0

5 4

3

2

1 beauty

4

0

5

3

2

1

from

0 4

5

3

2

1

that

FREQUENCY

FREQUENCY

FREQUENCY

other

the

2115

of

2115

2115

914

404

612

432

489

623

249

266

604 345

574

235

288

46

71

68

56

69

lake

surroundings

anglers

4.000

1.

3.000

1.000

3.000

1.000

PERCENT

000

PERCENT

PERCENT

100.0

is

100.0

100.0

43.2

28.9

19.1

20.4

23.1

29.5

11.8

12.6

28.6

27.1

16.3

11.1

13.6

2.2

3.4

3.2

2.6

3.3

stocked

MISSING

MAXIMUM

STD PERCENT

MISSING

MAXIMUM

STD

PERCENT

MISSING

MAXIMUM

PERCENT

STD

100.0

VALID

100.0

VALID

100.0

VALID

44.2

29.6

19.5

21.0

23.7

30.3

12.1

12.9

29.5

28.1

16.9

with

11.5

14.1

3.4

3.3

DEV

DEV

DEV

fish

PERCENT

PERCENT

PERCENT

100.0

100.0

100.0

26.2

55.8

CUM

79.0

55.

25.0 CUM

12

70.5

53.6

25.6

CUN

14.1

6.7 3.3

.

5.000

1.032

5.000

1.280

3

9

5.000 1.377 VARIANCE MEAN very not somewhat VALUE VARIANCE Question MEAN very VALUE not somewhat Question VARIANCE MEAN very VALUE not Question somewhat important important important important important important LABEL LABEL LABEL important 1.9 important 1.8 important 1.7 1.844 1.498 3.325 1.620 4.477 .626 Site Access Water TOTAL TOTAL VALUE TOTAL VALUE VALUE limited MEDIAN MINIMUM quality MEDIAN MINIMUM MEDIAN MINIMUM to 0 5 4 3 2 1 4 0 5 3 2 1 0 5 4 3 2 1 wilderness FREQUENCY FREQUENCY FREQUENCY to 2115 1294 2115 1210 2115 216 510 117 266 130 323 fly 468 239 453 645 242 56 21 18 69 68 fishing 1. 1. 3.000 1.000 5.000 1.000 areas PERCENT PERCENT 000 000 PERCENT 100.0 100. 100.0 24.1 61.2 10. 12.6 57. 15. 22.1 21.4 30.5 11.3 11.4 2.6 1.0 3.3 6.1 5.5 3.2 .9 2 0 3 2 MISSING MISSING MAX PERCENT STD MISSING MAXIMUM PERCENT STD PERCENT 100.0 MAXIMUM STD 100. VALID 100.0 VALID VALID 62.8 24.8 10.5 59. 13 15.8 22.9 22.1 31.5 11.7 11.8 1.0 5.7 6.4 IMUN .9 DEV . DEV DEV 0 0 1 PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT 100.0 100.0 100.0 37.2 12.4 93.6 87.9 74.9 CUM 59. 77.1 23.5 55.0 CUN 11.8 CUN 1.9 .9 5.000 1.224 1 5.000 1.273 5.000 .791 Question 1.10 Distance from home

VALID CUM VALUE LABEL VALUE FREQUENCY PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT not important 1 264 12.5 12.8 12.8 2 201 9.5 9.7 22.5 somewhat important 3 1001 47.3 48.4 70.9 4 352 16.6 17.0 87.9 very important 5 251 11.9 12.1 100.0 0 46 2.2 MISSING

TOTAL 2115 100.0 100.0

MEAN 3.060 MEDIAN 3.000 STD DEV 1.122 VARIANCE 1.260 MINIMUM 1.000 MAXIMUM 5.000

Question 1.11 Familiarity with the area

VALID CUM VALUE LABEL VALUE FREQUENCY PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT not important 1 320 15.1 15.6 15.6 2 314 14.8 15.3 30.9 somewhat important 3 882 41.7 42.9 73.8 4 356 16.8 17.3 91.1 very important 5 182 8.6 8.9 100.0 0 61 2.9 MISSING

TOTAL 2115 100.0 100.0

MEAN 2.886 MEDIAN 3.000 STD DEV 1.136 VARIANCE 1.291 MINIMUM 1.000 MAXIMUM 5.000

Question 1.12 Owning land or a cabin near the site

VALID CUM VALUE LABEL VALUE FREQUENCY PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT not important 1 1646 77.8 80.1 80.1 2 199 9.4 9.7 89.8 somewhat important 3 114 5.4 5.5 95.3 4 44 2.1 2.1 97.5 very important 5 52 2.5 2.5 100.0 0 60 2.8 MISSING

TOTAL 2115 100.0 100.0

MEAN 1.373 MEDIAN 1.000 STD DEV .882 VARIANCE .777 MINIMUM 1.000 MAXIMUM 5.000

VARIANCE MEAN

very

somewhat VALUE

not

Question

VARIANCE MEAN

very

somewhat

not

VALUE

Question

VARIANCE

MEAN

very

somewhat

VALUE

not

Question

important

important

important

important

important

LABEL

important

LABEL

LABEL

important

1.15

important

1.14

important

1.13

3.043

2.004

2.497

2.076

3.062

1.648

Picnic/camping

Site

Good

TOTAL

VALUE

TOTAL

VALUE

TOTAL

VALUE

MINIMUM

MEDIAN

with

MEDIAN

MINIMUM

road

MEDIAN

MINIMUM

0

5

4

3

2

1

0

5 4

3

2

1

0

5

4

3

2

1

FREQUENCY

FREQUENCY

boat

FREQUENCY

access

2115

2115

410 420

541

230

461

2115

facilities

281

477

246

265

789

access

53

332 426

686

274

344

57

53

to

1.000 3.000

2.000

1.000

3.000

1.000

PERCENT

the

PERCENT

100.0

PERCENT

100.0

19.4

25.6

19.9

21.8

10.9

100.0

22.6

13.3 11.6

12.5

37.3

2.5

20.1

15.7

32.4

13

16.3

2.7

2.5

site

at

.

0

or

MISSING

MAXIMUM

STD

PERCENT

MISSING

MAXIMUM

STD

PERCENT

100.0

VALID

MISSING

MAXIMUM

STD

PERCENT

100.0

VALID

20.4

19.9

26.2

22.4

11.2

near 100.0

VALID

13.7

23.2

12.0

38.3

12.9

16.1 20.7

33.3

13.3

16.7

DEV

DEV

DEV

site

PERCENT

PERCENT

100.0

PERCENT

100.0

80.1

59.7

33.5

22.4

CUM

100.0

86.3

74.4

51.2

38.3

CUM

83.9

63.2

30.0

CUM

16.7

5.000

1.416

5.000

1.441

5.000 1.284

VARIANCE

MEAN

VALUE

Question

site?

Question

VARIANCE

MEAN

very

VALUE

somewhat not

Question

13

12

11

10

9

8

7

6 4

5

3

2

1

0

important

important

LABEL

FREQ

283

251

125

199

182

120

2A 2

84.649

44

12

important

81

99

62

1.16

45

9.975

9

9

1.283

Information

.513

PCT

Approximately

14

12

10

0

2

1

0

4

5

3

6

9 2

6

Friends

PCT

CUN

73

73

71

56

70 56

52

49

44

32

26

17

8

2

TOTAL

MISSING

VALUE

MEDIAN

MINIMUM

MINIMUM

MEDIAN

VALUE

0

4

5

2

3

1

about

or

28 25

26

23

24

22

21

20

VALUE

18

19

17 15

16

14

FREQUENCY

how

relatives

99

trips

2115

FREQ

1712

many

148

144

213

68

15

11

40

16

23

13

28

99

3

3

7

2 8

2

2

FREQ

7.000

PCT

DATA

36

1.000

1.000

.000

years

to

0

0

3

0

0

0

7

0

0

1

7

1

1

1

PERCENT

live

100.0

your

PCT

CUM

80.9

10.1

94

94

94

91

91 90

90

90

83

83

82

81

74

81

1.9

1.1

1.3

4.7

have

nearby

favorite

VALUE

MAXIMUM

STD

MISSING

MAXIMUM

STD

PERCENT

you

100.0

VALID

60

57

55

46

50 45

40

38

35

36

34

30

33 29

10.3

82.5

1.1 4.8

DEV

1.3

DEV

fished

FREQ

fishing

24

13

52

PERCENT

2

2

1 6

7

1

1

1

4

1

1

100.0

98.9

97.5

92.8

82.5

CUM

PCT

at

60.000

9.200

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

1

0 0

3

5.000

this

site

.716

100

100

100

100

PCT

CUM

99

99

99

98

98

98

97

97

97 94

VARIANCE

MEAN

while

maps

do

miscellaneous,

do

close

random

Alberta

tourist word

VALUE

from

from

Question

VARIANCE

MEAN

more

21—30

6—20

VALUE

6—10’

11—15

less

camping, highway Question

site

not

not

of

friends

family

than

hunting

than

to

in

LABEL

remember

LABEL

have

chance,

mouth,

Fishing

info,

home

the

signs,

2C

driving)

2B

3.458

5.842

30

5

3.381

3.382

a

member

last

How

favorite

(pamphlets,

paid

general

Approximately

(includes

derbies)

guide

did

5

TOTAL

VALUE

guide

years

MEDIAN

MINIMUM

you

TOTAL

MEDIAN

MINIMUM

VALUE

0

6 4

5

3

2

1

12

11

10

hiking

first

0

9

8

7

?

6

5

4

3

2

1

FREQUENCY

FREQUENCY

how

2115

become

444

243

221

255

502

379

71

2115

many

311

159

281

764

336

79

25

20

17

24

2

78

1.000

16

5

3 1.000

.

000

.000

PERCENT

aware

times

100.0

21.0

10.4

11.5

23.7

12.1

17.9

PERCENT

3.4

100.0

14

36.1

13.3

15.9

3.7

1.2

7.5

1.1

3.7

.2

.9 .8

.

.8

of

have

7

MAX

STD

MISSING

MAX

STD

PERCENT

this

100.0

VALID

MISSING

21.7

11.9

10.8

IMUM 24.6

12.5

18.5

PERCENT

100.

DEV you

IMTJN

VALID

DEV

15.

37.5

13

16.5

1.2

1.0

7.8

1.2

3.8

site?

.2

.8 .8

.

0

visited

3

8

PERCENT

100.0

78.3

66.4

55.6

43.1

18.5

CUM

PERCENT

12.000

100.0

2.417

98.8

98.5

97

96.7

95.5

87.

72.4

68.6

54.0

67

16.

CUM

6.

1.839 this .

.

000

5

7

8 5

own

free

clean,

size

patrolled

do

undeveloped,

presence

other

familiarity outdoor

open

water

scenic

fresh

close

camping/picnic

commercial

boat

facilities road

type

seclusion,

numerous

good

favorite

fish

CATEGORY

particularly

Question

large

wildlife

not

91

land

camping

of

fires

access

access of

are

fishing

campers

air

quality

to

fish

MISSING

unpolluted,

have

quality

lake

experience

fishing

or

of

home/worksite

variety

species

stocked

LABEL

2D

officers

by

allowed

facilities

quietness

(unspecified)

cabin

a

with

other

wilderness

fish

enjoy?

(catch

favorite

What

(friendliness)

CASES

facilities

(fly,

site

present

of

nearby

wildlife

and

general

are

(general)

rate)

species

boat

(stores

the

site

TOTAL

specific

etc)

2024

RESPONSES

etc)

VALID

CODE

28

25

24

27

26

22 20

23 21

16

15

17

14

19

13

18

12

11

10

things

9

8

7

5 3

1

2

6 4

CASES

about

COUNT

3985

137

624

204

137

241

215

310

619

126 732

126

11

33

77

24

45

17

18

19

44

48

40

66

53

8

2

3

6

this

RESPONSES

100.0

15.7

PCT

15.5

18.4

0.3

0.2

site

0.8

0.1

1.9

0.6

3.4

0.4

1.1

0.5

0.1

3.4 0.5

5.1

6.0

7.8

1.2

5.4

1.1

0.2

3.2

1.7

1.0

3.2

1.3

OF

that

196.9

PCT

CASES

30.8

10.1

11.9

15.3

10.6

30.6

36.2

0.5

0.4

3.8

0.1

1.6

1.2 2.2

6.8

0.8

0.9

6.8

0.1

0.9

2.4

0.3

2.2

3.3

2.6

6.2 2.0

you

6.2 OF Question 3 Information about typical fishing trips Question 3A What type of transport do you usually use to go from your home to a fishing site?

VALID CUM VALUE LABEL VALUE FREQUENCY PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT walk/bicycle 1 52 2.5 2.5 2.5 motorb ike/ATV 2 14 .7 .7 3.2 car/truck/van 3 1518 71.8 74.3 77.5 camper/RV 4 444 21.0 21.7 99. 2 other 5 16 .8 .8 100.0 0 71 3.4 MISSING

TOTAL 2115 100.0 100.0

Question 3A.l Other transport to fishing site

VALID CUM VALUE LABEL VALUE FREQUENCY PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT airplane 1 6 37.5 46.2 46.2 horse 2 5 31.2 38.5 84.7 boat 3 2 12.5 15.3 100.0 4 3 18.8 MISSING

TOTAL 16 100.0 100.0

Question 3B How long do you stay at the site on a typical trip to a fishing site?

VALID CUM VALUE LABEL VALUE FREQUENCY PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT

1-2 hours 1 89 4.2 4.3 4.3 half day 2 472 22.3 22.8 27.1 full day 3 720 34.0 34.7 61.8 2—3 days 4 650 30.7 31.4 93.2 greater than 3 days 5 142 6.7 6.8 100.0 0 42 2.0 MISSING

TOTAL 2115 100.0 100. 0 Question 3C Generally speaking, how enjoyable do you find the time spent travelling to the fishing site?

VALID CUM VALUE LABEL VALUE FREQUENCY PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT very unerijoyable 1 101 4.8 4.8 4.8 2 212 10.0 10.2 15.0 3 881 41.7 42.2 57.2 4 493 23.3 23.6 80.8 very enjoyable 5 401 19.0 19.2 100.0 0 27 1.3 MISSING

TOTAL 2115 100.0 100.0

MEAN 3.422 MEDIAN 3.000 STD DEV 1.059 VARIANCE 1.122 MINIMUM 1.000 MAXIMUM 5.000

Question 3D What type of fishing do you usually do?

VALID CUM VALUE LABEL VALUE FREQUENCY PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT bait fishing 1 421 19.9 22.1 22.1 spin casting 2 863 40.8 45.3 67.3 trolling 3 271 12.8 14.2 81.5 fly fishing 4 301 14.2 15.8 97.3 ice fishing 5 51 2.4 2.7 100.0 0 208 9.8 MISSING

TOTAL 2115 100.0 100.0

Question 3E What method of fishing do you usually use?

VALID CUM VALUE LABEL VALUE FREQUENCY PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT from shore 1 1246 58.9 61.4 61.4 motorboat 2 558 26.4 27.5 88.9 canoe/rowing 3 120 5.7 5.9 94.8 other 4 105 5.0 5.2 100.0 0 86 4.1 MISSING

TOTAL 2115 100.0 100. 0

VARIANCE

MEAN

you

Question

>

5—10

VALUE

<

1—4

home

Question

wading

VALUE

ice

float

Question

10

1

60—64

55—59

50—54

40—44

45—49

35—39

30—34

25—29

20—24

VALUE

15—19

10—14

have?

lb

lb

fishing

lb

lb

on

5—9

0—4

LABEL

99

LABEL

149.442

a

3G

21.467

3F

3E.l

typical

FREQUENCY

Approximately

128

122 258

255

368

267

272

177

118

43

41

13

48

In

5

Other

pounds,

MISSING

fishing

MEDIAN

MINIMUM

TOTAL

VALUE

methods

PERCENT

VALUE

TOTAL

approximately

12.5

12.3 17.8

4

13.1 3

12.9

2

1

how

0.2 trip?

0.6

2.0

2.3

6.2

5.9

8.5

5.7

4

2

3

1

0

FREQUENCY

many

FREQUENCY of

CUMULATIVE

PERCENT

fishing

20.000

105

100.0

1054

81

15

years

2115

99.8

99.2

97.2

94.9

88.7

82.8

402

70.3

58.0

40.2

561

27.3

14.2 2

7

.000

74

5.7

24

how

PERCENT

PERCENT

used

of

100.0

77.1

14.3

100.0

49.8

19.0

26.5

much

1.9

6.7

fishing

3.5

1.1

MAXIMUM

STD

PERCENT

fish

DEV

PERCENT

VALID

100.0

MISSING

MISSING

29.2

62.5

experience

100.0

VALID

50.4

19.2

26.8

8.3

3.5

do

you

PERCENT

60.000

12.225

PERCENT

100.0

CUM

100.0

91.7

29.2

96.5

77.2

26.8

take

CUN do

nobody

VALUE

family

friends

spouse

Question

more

a

few

day

few on

VALUE

Question

no

yes VALUE

Question

week

the

weeks

days

before

than

LABEL

LABEL

LABEL

before

same

3J

before

31

3H

before

a

month

day

Who

How

Do

you

do

far

before

you

practice

ahead

VALUE

VALUE

TOTAL

VALUE

TOTAL

usually

TOTAL

0

4

5

6

4

3

2

3

2 1

do

1

0

2

1

0

FREQUENCY

FREQUENCY

catch

FREQUENCY

you

go

2115

usually

2115

fishing

1651

727

135

773

123

376

291

410

769

325

162

2115

and

104

452

35

12

release

PERCENT

PERCENT

PERCENT

100.0

plan

100.0

with?

34.4

36.5

17

13.8 36.4

19.4

15.4

100.0

21.4

78.1

6.4

5.8

1.7

7.7 4.9

.

8

.6

fishing

fishing?

PERCENT

PERCENT

PERCENT

MISSING

MISSING

100.0

VALID

MISSING

100.0

VALID

36.2

38.4

18.7

14.0

19.7

37.0

15.6

100.0

VALID

21.5

78.5

6.7

5.9

7.8

trips?

PERCENT

PERCENT

PERCENT

100.0

100.0

100.0

93.3

57.

18

CUN

94.1

80.1

60.4

23.4

CUM

78.5

CUN 7.8

.

1 7

no

less

increase

no

smaller barbless

rotational

combination

VALUE

no

Question

other

violations

more

catch

larger

no

increase VALUE

increase

size

shorter

rivers,

Question

like

fishing commercial

management

bait

netting,

enforcement

limit

to

LABEL

and

LABEL

fines

limits,

fishing

season

see

which

hooks

licence

4.1

stocking

licence

4

release

at

closures,

of

used

If

for

all

fishin

needed

(winte

alternate

above

of

overfishing

seas

fee

fees

to

the

TOTAL

address

VALUE

following

VALUE

management

TOTAL

9

8

7

5

6 4

3

2

1

0

becomes

9

8

FREQUENCY

7

2

5

6

3

4

1

0

the

FREQUENCY

management

problem?

168

111

10

11

10

12

1

8

1

1

3

option

2115

a

168

203

588

514

246

197

66

30 81

22

problem

PERCENT

100.0

PERCENT

66.1

(if

6.0

0.5

6.5

4.8

0.6

6.0

0.6

1.8 7.1

100.0

options

27.8

24.3

11.6

7.9

9.6

9.3

3.1

1.4

3.8

1.0

in

other

MISSING

PERCENT

Alberta

VALID

100.0

PERCENT

70.3

MISSING

would

7.0

0.6

5.1

0.6

6.3

0.6

7.6

1.9

chosen)

100.0

28.1 VALID

24.6

11.8

8.0

9.7

9.4

3.2

1.4

3.9

lakes

PERCENT

you

PERCENT

100.0

CUM

99.4

92.4

91.8

86.7

80.4

79.8

77.9

100.0

7.6

92.0

82.3

54..

44.8

20.2

18

15.

most

CUM

3.9 and

.

2

8 6

yes

VALUE

no

Question

> VALUE

$301—$500

$201—$300

$l01—$200 Question

$51—$l00

$0—$50 season?

VARIANCE

MEAN

$501

LABEL

LABEL

6

5

3.995

How

2.558

Did

much

you

go

do

MEDIAN

MINIMUM

VALUE

VALUE

sportfishing

you

TOTAL

TOTAL

spend

2

1

6

5 4

3

2

1

0

0

FREQUENCY

FREQUENCY

on

1847

2115

2115

253

503

415

365

358

313

149

4.000

1.000 fishing

in

15

12

Alberta

PERCENT

PERCENT

100.0

87.3

12.0

100.0

23.8

19.6

16.9

17.3

14.8

over

7.0

.7

.6

MAXIMUM

STD

in

a

PERCENT

PERCENT

1990?

typical

DEV

MISSING

MISSING

VALID

100.0

88.0

12.0

100.0

VALID

23.9

19.7

17.4

17.0

14.9

7.1

PERCENT

PERCENT

fishing

100.0

6.000

1.600

100.0

88.0

CUM

76.1

39.0

22.0

56.3

CUN 7.1

McQuillan

Henderson

Nicholas

Stafford Qidman

Keho

Travers

McGregor

Willow

Watertori

Chain Oldman

Waterton

Beauvais

Cochrane

Drywood

Butcher

Mami

Dipping

Bathing

Cottonwood

Crooked

South

Barnaby West

Beavermines

Lynx

Carbondale

Castle

Burinis

Crowsnest

Crowsnest

Passberg

Crowsnest Allison

Crowsnest

Racehorse

Oldman

Crowsnest

Dutch

Livingstone

Upper

heard

Question

mouth

to

Blairmore

Peigan

SITE

Lundbreck

Lake

Castle

Creek

(Paine)

Lake

Castle

Oldman

River-Monarch

Creek

NANE

River

Creek

of

River

Lake

River,

(Blairinore

Reservoir

Vat

Creek

Lake

Lake

Creek

(Southfork)

Reserve

Reservoir

Sheran

Reservoir

(Chinook)

River

Lake

Reservoir

Lake

bridge

Lake

Lake

as

7

River,Lundbreck

River,Passberg

River,Blairmore

River,

Lake

Creek

Creek

River

(Legion

Lake

Lake

River

River

Which

at a

River

Lake

River

Falls

Hwy

fishing

Park

Fort

(Byron

headwaters

Pincher

Lake

22

of

bridge)

Lake

Lake

MacLeod

to

bridge

the

site?

Cr)

Forks

bridge

following

Cr)

Falls

to

FREQUENCY

to

to

UNAWARE

2007

1718 1571

1911

1057

to

1430

1685

1182 1487

1896

1688

1890 2000

1821

2012

1529 2070

1896

1559

1977 1998

1798

1778

1690 1802 1433

1394

1510

1846

1786

1924

1509

1629

1501 1715

1522 1589

1730

1792

1636

1685

sites

OF

PERCENT

SITE

94.9

90.4

81.2

74.3

50.0

89.6

67.6 79.7

55.9

86.1

70.3

79.8

89.4

72.3

73.7 94.6

89.6

97.9

95.1

93.5

85.0

94.5

67.8

84.1

79.9 85.2

87.3

65.9

71.4

91.0 84.4

have

71.3

81.8

72.0

77.0

71.0 81.1

84.7 75.1

79.7

77.4

you

FREQUENCY

AWARE

ever

1058

397

108

204

219 544

294

933

685

430

427

556

628

225

682

586

115

219

317

138

103

337

117 721

425

313

191 269

605

329

593

606

385

430 323

486

614 400

526

479

45

OF

visited

PERCENT

SITE

18.8

25.7

10.4

13.9

44.1

32.4

50.0

32.2

20.3

26.3

20.2

29.7

27.7

10.6

10.4

15.0

15.9

20.1

34.1

12.7

28.6

14.8 28.0

15.6 28.7

18.2

20.3

9.6

5.1

23.0

29.0

15.3

24.9

18.9

22.6

5.4

2.1

4.9

6.5

5.5

9.0 or Question 7 (Continued) Which of the following sites have you ever visited or heard of as a fishing site?

UNAWARE OF SITE AWARE OF SITE SITE NAME FREQUENCY PERCENT FREQUENCY PERCENT Belly River 1861 88.0 254 12.0 St Mary River, Upper to Reservoir 1861 88.0 254 12.0 St Mary Reservoir 1696 80.2 419 19.8 St Mary River below Reservoir 1866 88.2 249 11.8 Police (Outpost) Lake 1527 72.2 588 27.8 Cross Coulee Reservoir 2005 94.8 110 5.2 Tyrrell Lake 1791 84.7 324 15.3 Milk River Ridge Reservoir 1875 88.7 240 11.3 Goldsprings Park pond 2041 96.5 74 3.5 Milk River, mouth of the N. Milk River to Miners Coulee Creek 1961 92.7 154 7.3 Heninger Reservoir 1928 91.2 187 8.8 Milk River, Miners Coulee Creek to Montana border 1984 93.8 131 6.2 Chin Reservoir 1622 76.7 493 23.3 Sherburne Reservoir 1955 92.4 160 7.6 Lake south of Burdett 1989 94.0 126 6.0 Little Bow Reservoir 1517 71.7 598 28.3 Stonehill Lake 1977 93.5 138 6.5 Badger Reservoir 1867 88.3 248 11.7 Bow River Bassano Dam to mouth 1439 68.0 676 32.0 Bow River Carseland to Bassano 1373 64.9 742 35.1 Red Deer River, Finegan to Dinosaur Provincial Park 1614 76.3 501 23.7 Brooks childrens pond 1933 91.4 182 8.6 Cowoki Reservoir 1976 93.4 139 6.6 Tilly B Reservoir 1847 87.3 268 12.7 Lake Newell 1308 61.8 807 38.2 South Saskatchewan River, Rattlesnake to Saskatchewan border 1777 84.0 338 16.0 Echo Dale Regional Park pond 1958 92.6 157 7.4 South Saskatchewan River, Forks to Rattlesnake 1850 87.5 265 12.5 Rattlesnake/Sauder Reservoir 1908 90.2 207 9.8 Cavan Lake 1913 90.4 202 9.6 Michell Reservoir 1937 91.6 178 8.4 Murray Reservoir 1940 91.7 175 8.3 Bulishead Reservoir 1941 91.8 174 8.2 Spruce Coulee Reservoir 1863 88.1 252 11.9 Elkwater Lake 1614 76,3 501 23.7 Reesor Lake 1740 82.3 375 17.7

VARIANCE

MEAN

VALUE

Question

16

15

13

14

12

11

10

9

7

8

6 4

5

2

3

1

FREQ

120.340

216

153

119 164

166

172

BA

51

17 40

19 46

62

71 95

77

9.124

6

PCT

10 10

13 10

How

0

3

1 2

4

4

1 3

4

6

9

7

PCT

CUM

86

86

83

82

80

78

75

72

68

63

58 42

51

20

32

10

many

MEDIAN

MINIMUM

MISSING

VALUE

trips

33

34 30

29

28

27

26

25

24

23

22

21

20

18

19

17

VALUE

did

FREQ

0

52

35

51

10

you

1

1

4

1

1

1

2

5

4

1

4

6

5.000

1.000

PCT

FREQ

399

0

take

0

3

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

3

0

0

1

DATA

PCT

CUM

96

96

96

93

93

93

93

93 90

91

90

90

87

90 87

86

in

VALUE

1990?

MAXIMUM

STD

99

75

70

61

60

50

52 48

45

42

40

41

39

38

36

35

DEV

FREQ

15

14

4

2

3

3

1

1

5

1

1

1

7

3

1 1

PCT

99.000

10.970

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

0 0

0 0

100

100

100

PCT

CUN

99

99

99

99

98

98

98

98

98

97

97

97 97 Cross Police St McQuillan St St Belly Henderson Nicholas Stafford Oldman Keho McGregor Travers Willow Chain Waterton Oldman Beauvais Waterton Cochrane Dipping Mami Butcher Bathing Cottonwood West Crooked Barnaby South Beavermines Carbondale Lynx Castle Burmis Crowsnest Passberg Crowsriest Crowsnest Blairmore Crowsnest Chinook Oldinan Crowsnest Racehorse Dutch Livingstone Upper Question SITE Lundbreck Peigan (Blairmore Mary Mary Mary Lake Castle Creek (Paine) NAME Coulee River Lake Castle Oldinan Creek River; River Creek (Outpost) River Lake River; River River; Reservoir Reservoir Vat Lake Lake Creek Lake Reserve (Southfork) Reservoir Reservoir Sheran River Lake Lake Reservoir bridge Lake SB Lake River; River; River; River; Lake Creek (Legion Creek River Falls Lake River Lake Pincher Reservoir River - Lake River River, below Monarch (Allison Upper Hwy Site near Park Lake (Byron Lundbreck Passberg headwaters Blairmore bridge) 22 Reservoir of Fort Lake Creek to Lake (NW bridge to Lake) fishing Creek) Reservoir Branch) MacLeod Forks areas) bridge Falls to to to trips CODE to to 42 44 41 36 33 47 39 46 40 32 35 34 30 29 28 23 45 25 38 24 27 21 20 22 14 17 43 13 37 16 12 19 15 31 10 18 11 mouth 3 5 6 4 2 8 9 7 1 COUNT 234 171 308 106 172 47 26 35 27 94 12 26 27 83 29 19 20 12 13 35 43 40 90 48 42 17 49 42 37 62 38 11 79 12 51 37 8 8 63 5 7 1 4 4 7 4 RESPONSES 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.9 2.2 0.1 0.3 1.6 2.9 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.4 1.6 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.1 PCT 0.0 0.8 0.5 0.7 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.3 0.5 0.6 OF PCT CASES 10.1 18.1 13.8 10.1 2.8 1.5 0.3 2.1 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.7 1.6 1.7 0.7 5.5 4.9 1.5 1.0 1.6 2.1 1.1 1.2 0.1 0.8 0.2 2.5 6.2 0.2 0.2 2.8 2.5 2.4 5.3 4.6 0.4 2.9 0.7 0.6 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.2 3.6 3.0 3.7 OF

Kananaskis

North

Little Weed

Severn

Catarack

Outside

Sharon

South

St Red

Oldman Milk

Bow

Crowsnest

Reesor

Elkwater

Murray

Spruce

Michell

Bulishead

Rattlesnake/Sauder

Cavan

Echo

South

South

Tilly

Lake

Cowoki

Brooks

Red

Bow

Bow

Badger

Stonehill Little

Unnamed

Sherburne

Chin

Milk

Heninger

Milk

Goldsprings

Milk

Tyrrell

to

SITE

Question

Saskatchewan

Dinosaur

to

to

Mary

Deer

River,

Rattlesnake

Lake

River;

River;

Deer

River,

Montana

Miners

Dale

Ram

Newell

Saskatchewan

Reservoir

River-Miners

Lake River;

River

NAME

Saskatchewan

Red

B

Reservoir

Saskatchewan

Lake

River,

Lake

Coulee

Reservoir

Reservoir

childrens

River

of

Reservoir

Bow

Reservoir

Reservoir

Creek

River,

Lake-near

Lake

Lake

River

River;

River,

Reservoir

Reservoir

Regional

Lake

Deer

88

province

Provincial

Lake

general

Reservoir

Carseland

Bassano

Reservoir

general

Coulee

Ridge

border

mouth

Park

general

general

Reservoir

border

River

Site

general

Finegan

general

pond

Reservoir

pond

River

Burdett

Creek

Coulee

reserve of

Park

River;

River;

Dam

of

to

Park

the

to fishing

general Bassano

to

Creek

North

Forks mouth

Rattlesnake

trips

Milk

CODE

92

91

89

86

90

88

87

85

77

83

82

81

78

80 76

79

71

73

84 72

75 74

69

66

68

70

67

65

64

63

59

58

62

57

54

61 55

60

53

52

56

48

51

50

49

River

(continued)

to

1048

COUNT

131

116

250

207

161

114

31

19 21 198

98

49

84 220

157

93

24

10

29

5

79

12 54

8

1 22

12

6

12

69

6 12

44

89

91

54

9

36

10

11

49

5

3

1

RESPONSES

0.3

1.2

0.0

0.2

0.2

0,1

0.0

1.1

0.1

2.3

0.5

0.9

9.7

0.1

1.9

1.5

0.8

1.1 0.1

0.9

0.2 0.1

0.7 0.3

0.1

0.5

1.8

0.2

0.1

0.0

0.1

2.0

0.6

0.8

0.1

0.4

0.5

0.8

1.5

PCTOF

0.0

0.3

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.5

14.7

61.6

PCTOF

12.2

7.7

1.8

CASES

1.1

0.3

0.5

1.2 11.6

0.1

6.8

2.9

0.4

5.8

12.9

9.5

0.4

4.9

6.7

0.6 5.5

1.4

4.6

0.5

1.7

0.7

3.2

1.3

0.7

0.3

0.7

4.1

5.2

0.7

2.6

5.4

3.2

9.2

0.2

2.1

0.1

0.6

2.9 0.6

Burnstick

Birch

Raven

Thunder

Pinehurst

Strubel Hastings

Stauffer James

Wabamum

Fork

Carson Ram

Black

Cow

Pigeon

Battle

Beaver

Jackson

Baptiste

Gull

Brazeau

Mckinnon

Buck

Floating

Elbow

Hidden

Crawling

Little Ridge

North

Dickson

Crandell Pine

Big

Lost Waterton

Park Krypt

Lake

Name

Lessor

Sylvan

Moose

Wolf

Pigeon

Spray

Lake Highwood

Sheep

SITE Question

River

Lake

Knife

Lake

Lake

Lake

Lake

Lake

Minnewanka

Lake

River

Lake unknown

Mindapore

River

Lake

Nugget NAME

River

park

Buck

Lake

Lake

Lake

River

Lake

Creek

Lake

Lake

Lake

Chestener

Lake

Lake Slave

Lake

Creek

Lake

River

Lake

dam

Creek

Lake

Lake

Stone Valley

flats,

Lake,

Nt

Lake

Lake

River

88

Park

(Vauxhall

Lake

Reservoir

Park

(Bragg

Minepit,

Lake

Site

Lake

(Battle

(Waterton)

Reservoir

(Bow

Lake

(chain

Creek

of

area)

River)

(Camrose)

fishing

River)

Lake)

area)

trips

CODE

150

149

151

147

143

138

139

142

140

141

132

137

136

131

129

130 128

122

127

124 119

121

118

112

120 109

110

113

106

133

104

114

116 102

100

117

103

ill

101

115 107

108

105

97

98 96

94

93

99

95

(continued)

COUNT

240

220

161

44

58

21 226

151

38

18

125

12

28

139

16

12

38

23

71

67

13

21

68

20

1

54

1

15

35

1 5 52

10

11 93

4

1

2

2

5

7

5

9

1

1

2

1 4

2

1

RESPONSES

0.0

0.4

0.5

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.4 0.2

0.1

0.0

0.1

0.3

0.1

0.0

0.4

0.2

2.2

0.1 0.0

0.0

0.0 0.6

0.7

0.1

0.0

0.2 0.1

1.5

0.0

2.0

0.6

0.0

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0 PCTOF

2.1

0.5

1.4

0.0

0.1

0.5

0.3

0.1

1.2

0.9

0.0

1.3

PCTOF

CASES

14.1

12.9

2.6

0.1

3.4

1.2 0.1

0.1

2.2

13.3

0.3

0.7

1.1

0.2

0.9

0.8

1.6

0.7

0.1

2.2

1.4

0.1

0.1

0.3

0.4

4.2

3.9

9.5

1.2 0.1

0.1

0.5

0.3

4.0

0.1

0.9

0.2

1.2

0.1

0.1

3.2

8.9

0.6

7.4

2.1

3.1

0.6

0.1

5.5 8.2

Thirteen

Ribbon

Sturgeon

Burnt

Dormer

Dixon

Swan

Fallen

Buffalo

Diplomat

Kerbes

Willison

Patricia

Strubel

Touchwood

Elenore

Ghost

Hinton

Swawell

Maligne

Chesterinere

Fortress

Chambers

Prairie

Medicine

Devils

Swan

Six Nakoka

Siebert

Sybil

Dickson

Banff

Peppers

Jumping

Saskatchewan Twin

Chester

Lac

Little

Rock

Gleninore

Smoke

Lougheed

Clearwater

Jackfish

Pierce

Forestburg

Phyllis

Cold

SITE

Question

Lakes

River

Ste

Lake

Timber

Lakes

pond

Lake

Lake

NAME

Lake

Lake

flats

Creek

Lake

Timber

Lake

pond

Lake

lodge

Bear

Lake

Lake Lake

Lake

Lake

Creek

Lake

pond

Lake

Lake Anne

Lake

Pound

pond

(13)

Lakes

Creek

Lake

Lake

Creek

Lake

Reservoir

Lake

Lake

Lake

8B

areas

River

Lake

Lake

Creek

Lake

mile

River

Creek

Creek

Site

of

fishing

trips

CODE

204

203

198

199

202

205

197

195

194

193

192

196

191 189

187

186

190

184

188

183

182

185

180

179

177

181

176

178

175

174

173

172

169

171 168

165

166

162

170

167

161

164

157

154

158

159

163

156

155

152

(continued)

COUNT

23

70

54

15

79

42

10

80

27

22

10

26

1 11

4 4

13

2

10 16

6 26

3

9 86

5

51

1 4

10

7

1

7 17

1

6

2

1

1

1

1

1

8

3

1

1

9

2

5

6

RESPONSES

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2 0.1

0.0

0.6

0.5 0.1

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.7 0.0

0.4

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.7

0.0

0.2

0.2

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.2

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.1 0.1

0.2

0.1

0.0

PCTOF

0.0

0.0

0.8

0.1

0.5

0.0

0.0 0.1

0.2

0.1

PCTOF

CASES

0.2

0.1

0.2

1.4

0.1

0.4

0.2

3.2

4.1

0.5

0.3

0.9

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.4

0.4

4.6

2.5

0.1

0.4

0.6

0.1

4.7

0.1

1.3 0.1

1.6

0.6

0.1

0.1

1.5

0.1

0.6

0.6

0.8

1.5

0.5

0.9

0.1

5.1

0.2

0.1

3.0

0.5

0.1

0.3

1.0

0.6 0.4

Anderson

Writing

Terrall

Forty

Carburn Bearspaw

Goat

Peinbina

ETnbrass

Barrier Kananaskis

Calling

Fish

Rock

Blood

Stirling Mclean

Grist

Elbow Bassano

Coronation

Lake

Michichi

Horseshoe

Beaver

Garner

Eagle

Langdon

Dutch

Rolling

Seebe

Todd

Gregoire

Ribbon

Watridge

Bragg

Obrien

Taylor

Boon Gap

Brown

Driedineat

Fickel Cold

Sheep

Pierre

Smokey

Lake

Coal

Fish

Question

SITE

Lake

pond

Creek

Island

Missawawi

Creek

mile

Lake

Creek

Lake Lake

Isle

NAME

Indian

Lake

Falls

Lake

dam

Lake

Creek

Creek

Creek

Creek

flat Lake

Lake

on

Reservoir Lake

Lake

Park

River

Lake

River

Lake

River

Grey

Lake

dam

Reservoir

Hills

dam

dam

trout

Reservoir

Lake

Lake

8B

power

darn

Stone

Lake

River

dam

Lake

Lake

Reservoir

(Calgary)

pond

Reservoir

pond

Site

plant

Park

of

(Oyen)

fishing

trips

265

264

260

259

CODE

262

263 258

256

257 254

261

253

255

252 249

247

251

246

248

245

243

244

239

240

237

236

241

250 242 234

238

232

231

233

227

230 225 223

226

235

224

221

215

222

213

212

208

207

206

211

(continued)

COUNT

27

21

16

32

22

71

29

38

2

34

12

24

2

1

1

10

3 3

23

1

5

3

3

9

1 20

2

7 26

8

4

1

6

1

1

9

2 2

5 4

1

5

1

2

7

1

3

1

6

1

RESPONSES

0.0

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 0.2

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.3

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.7

0.2

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.4

0.1 0.1

0.3

0.0

0.3

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.1 0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 0.2

PCTOF

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2

0.1 0.2

PCTOF

CASES

0.1

0.1

1.6

0.1

0.2

1.2

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.9

0.3

1.9

0.2

0.2

4.2

0.5

0.1

0.4

0.1

1.3

0.5

0.1

0.2

0.7

2.2

0.4

1.7

1.4

0.1

2.0

0.6

0.1

0.1

0.5

0.1

0.3

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.3

1.4

0.4

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.4

1.2 1.5

Lac

Lost

Cross

Glenifer Winnifred

Two Alford

Island

Wardens

Waterfowl

Long Rat

Windsor

Upper

Fairfax

Frenchmans Rainy

Yellow

Marvel

Hansen

Cypress

Meadow

Ford Pilot Mudd

Hector

Hilers

Dogpound

Wilson

Lower

Mirror

Allan

Sipperlies

East

Elbow

North

Mckenzie

Sibbald

Ghost Wal].

Lac

Headwall

Goodwin

Castle Nice

Three

Cripple Tay

Bridgeland

Bear

SITE Question

la Jack

Creek

des

Creek

Lake

Lake

Creek

Lake

Stony

Lake

Creek

pond

Lake

NAME

Man

Lake

pond

Stony

bill

Lake

River

Saskatchewan

Biche

Point

Lake

Creek

Lake

pond

Lake

Creek

Lake

dam

Reservoir

Creek

Falls

Lake

Lake Lake

Hills

Arc

flats

Lake

Creek

Lake

Lake

Creek

Lake

Lake

Lake

Lake

8B

Lake

(Kanaskis

Lake

Creek

dam

pond

Creek

Creek

Creek

Site

River

of

area)

fishing

trips

CODE

314

316

317

313

312

309

311 308

310 307

305

306 299

304

300 298

301

302 297

294

295

296

292

293

288

290

289

285

282

286

287 284

281

283 280 278 277

275

291

276

273 270

274 272 266

268

271

279

269

267

(continued)

COUNT

34

12

34

25

31 23

2

8 5

14

5

5

8

3

3

5

3 1

5 8

2 2

1

1 4

6

1 8

9

4

1

3

2

3

2 7

1

6

4

1

2

4

6

1 8

3

1

6

3

1

RESPONSES

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.3

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0

0.0 0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.1

PCTOF

0.3

0.2

0.0

0.1 0.0

0.0

0.0 0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.0

PCTOF

CASES

0.5

0.3

0.1

2.0

0.3

0.3

0.5

0.2

0.2

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.3

0.1

0.1

0.5

0.1

0.7

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.4

0.5

0.5

0.1

0.1

2.0 0.2

0.1 0.2

0.2 0.1

0.4

1.5 0.4

0.8

1.8

1.4 0.2

0.1

0.1

0.4

0.2

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.2

0.4 0.1 0.5

Goat

Georges

Pearce

Grass

Lost

Big

Bear

Midway

Landslide

Tucker

Mcvinnie

Dam

Clear

Hilda Muriel

Athabasca

Beartrap

Two

Wedge

Fawcett Bill

Snaring

Bourgeau

Egypt

Abraham

Enchant Amisk

Sunken

MacLeod

Shunda

Golden

Klaudts

Lees Minnie

Grizzly

Kehiwin

Tombstone

Tacis

Burns

Helmer

Thunder

Tay

Hidden

Devils

Johnson

Lesueur

Waiparous

William

Rawson

Cameron

SITE Question

Iron

H

Lakes

Lake

Guide

River

Lake

alien

Creek

Lake

Creek

NAME

Lake

pond

(Vauxhail)

Lake

Lake

Lake

Estate

Lake

Reservoir

Lake

Lake

Lake

Creek

Lake

Lake

pond

dam

Head

Creek

Lake

River

Lake

pond

Lake

River

dam

Lake

Lake

Mountain

Lake

Creek

Creek

Creek

pond

Lake,

Lake

Lake

Lake

River

8B

Lake

Lake

Creek

pond

Creek

Park

(Jasper

Site

(Waterton)

Lake

(Calgary)

of

Ntl

fishing

Park)

trips

375

CODE

374 372

370

369

371

368 366

367 364

362

363

365

360

358

361

373

356

357 349

347

350

348

346

345 343

344 342

339

335

341 336

333

334

332 330

329

355

331

328 326

324

323

322

325

327

321 319

320

318

(continued)

COUNT

10

18

12

26

1

1

1

8

15

3

18

2

2

1

1

1

6

4

18

3

1

1

5

1

1 4

4

1

4

3

2

2

1

2

4

6

3

3

6

4

1

1

3

4 9

4

1

4

5

3

RESPONSES

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0 0.0 0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 0.0

0.2

0.0 0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1 PCTOF

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.2

0.0

0.0

PCTOF

CASES

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.6

0.5

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.4

0.1

1.1

0.2

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.3

0.1

0.7

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.2

1.5

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.4

0.2

0.2

0.4

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.9

0.1

1.1

0.2

0.2

0.5

0.2

1.1

0.3

0.2 0.2

Seven Johnson

Flathead

Lee

Cameron

Allison

Scope

Horsefly Many

Daisy

Herbert

Pipestone Grotto

Elford

Picture Rainy

Panther

Pickle

Fincastle Utikuma

Bighorn

Blindman

Alexander

Storm

Michell

Elk

Lonesome

Sperser

Lilian

Snipe Rae

Green

Lys

Foremost

East

Yarrow Three

Dewits

Pincher

Winchell

Schroeder

Carnovon

Chickenhill Grassy

Margaret

Sauder Klein

Kramers

Keeney

Loretts

SITE

Question

Creek

River

Lake

Lake

Lakes

persons

dam

Creek

Scarpe

Ridge

Lake

NAME

Lake

Lake

pond

Isle

Creek

Jar

Lake

Lake

Lake

Creek

Creek

Creek

Lake pond

Butte

River

Lake

Reservoir

River

Lake

pond

Creek

Creek

Lake

Lake

Creek

pond

River

pond

Lake

dam

River

Lake

Lake

Lake

Lake

Creek

88

Lake Creek

Lake

Lake

Lake

Lake

Creek

Reservoir

Site

(Kananaskis

of

fishing

area)

trips

424 423

422

420

425

421

419

418

416

417

415

413

414

412

CODE

409

410

407 406

411 404

405

402

403

400

401

398 397

399

396

395

394

408 392

393

390

391

389

388

387

385

386

382

384

379

383

380

381

377

378

376

(continued)

COUNT

13

20

4

2 2

7

3

2

1

3

1

7

1

1

1

3 2

4

3 29

3

2 2

4

7

1 1

1 2

3

6

1

1 2

3

3

4

5 1

2

5

2

9

2

2 4

1

1 5

1

RESPONSES

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 0.0

0.1

0.2 0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 0.0

0.1

0.0 0.3

PCTOF

0.0 0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

PCTOF

0.1

0.1

0.2

CASES

0.4

0.2

0.8

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.4

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.4

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

1.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.4

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.3

0.1

0.1

0.3

0.1

0.5

0.1

1.7

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.3 0.1

Rat

Glacier

Elk

Dodds

Sugar Mcfinney

Sundance

Clarks

Limestone

Peace

Stoney

Ethel

Camp

Ponoka Vetch

Marie

Swan

Ironwood Powder

Lake

Factory

Emerald

Fisher Gooseberry

Dalmead

Bow Kenney

Lac

Duck

Spring

Goldeye

Cricket

Mud

Calolside

Skunk

Grand

Baptiste

Muskeg

Battle

Lick

Katherine

Ministikwan

Fall

Cow

Pekisko

Squaw

Gloria

Flat Owl

Botteral

SITE

Question

Lake

Creek

Island

la

Creek

Creek

Lake

Creek

Creek

Zeta

Lake

factory Creek

coal

Creek

River

Lake

Creek

NAME

Creek

Lake

Creek

Cache

Reservoir

Creek

Creek

Chain

Lake

Creek

Nonne

Coulee

Creek

River

River

River

Lake

Lake

Lake Reservoir

Lake

Lake

pond

Lake

Creek

Lake

River

Creek

Creek

8B

dam

mine

Lake

dam,

town

Lake

Lake

Lakes

Lake,

(Calgary)

Site

pond

(Lake)

Taber

of

fishing

trips

475

474

CODE

473

471

469

466 464

465

463

467

468

461

472

470

460

458

459

456

462 457

455

453

454

449

448

446

452

447

445

444

450 441

451 442

443

440 438

436

437

439

435

433

434

431 429

430

432 427

428

426

(continued)

COUNT

17

18

6

1

1

24

2

2

3

2 2

1 1

1

1

5

4 2

2

6

2

1

3

2

6

4

1 4

4

5

1

1

1

2

2 3

2

1

1

1 8

1

1

2

1

2

1

1

1 2

RESPONSES

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2 0.0 PCTOF

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

PCTOF

CASES

0.1

0.4

0.1

0.2

0.1

1.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.1

0.4

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.4

0.1

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

1.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

1.4

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.5

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1 0.1

Harlech

Rockbound

Trout

Gods

Carrington Maude

Christina

Stettler Kingman

Sparrows Lac

Hardistry

Miquelon

Hardistry Venice

Forestburg

Lougheed

Hanmore

Blackett

Lac Moore

Of

Frog

Bow

Open Missawawi

Libby

Battle

Long

Bourque

Bouquene

Lake Whitefish

Bower

Ravine

Blackstone

Laurier

Lawrence

Alix

Primrose

Sundance Trap

Berland Meeting

Hay

Little

Mann

Huber Mclaren

Capt

SITE Question

fram

Delorme

Sante

City

Lake

River

Lake

Creek

Haze

Island

Creek Creek

Creek

Lake

ere

Lake

NAME

Lake

dam

Lake

dam,

Lake

Lake

Creek

pond

Creek

Bow

Lake

Lake

Lake

Lake

Creek

Creek

pond

Egg

Lake Lake

trout

Lake

Lake

Lake

Lake

Creek

Lake

Creek

Lake

Lake

Lake

River

8B

Lake

Lake

River

trout

dam

Creek

River

(Coronation)

Lake

Lake

pond

Site

pond

of

fishing

trips

CODE

525

522

523

524

519

521

520

516

517 515

518

513

514

509

511

506

508

507 505

504

512 510

502

503

501

500

499

498

496 494

495 493

497

492 490

489

486

491 487

488

483

485 481

484

479

482

480

477

476

478

(continued)

COUNT

12

1

2

5

3

4

2

1

8

3

4

16

1

1

1

1 1

2

5 3 7

1

1

1

2

2

2

4

3

4

1 1

1

1

1 3

6 2

2

3

1

1 2

1

1

7

1

1

4

5

RESPONSES

0.0 0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0

0.1 0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0 PCTOF

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0 0.0

PCTOF

CASES

0.1

0.1

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.5

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.3

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.4

0.1

0.1

0.7

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.4

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.9

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.3

0.4 0.2

Lessard

Cat

Gardner

Bertha

Wardlow

Rummel

Cutoff

Coal

Smith George

Heart

Nimelas

Shannon

Brewster

Gorge

Crimson Mosquito

Peagan

Crypt

Langdon

Isabelle

Fitzsimmons Romeo

Canyon

James

Marsh

Wapiabi

Fox

Mill

Medicine

Little Wizzard

Wabasco

Orloff Victory

Maligne

Ripple Moab

Edward

Bearberry

Bracconer

Harold

Bow

Charron

Galatea

Burbank

Loomis

Smith

Surveyors Copper

Question

SITE

Creek

Creek

provincial

Creek

Creek

Lake

Creek

Lake

NAME

Creek

Lake

Lake

Lake

Lake

Lake

Lake

Creek

Lake

Creek

Lake

Creek

Bow

Lake

Lake

Lake Lake

Creek

River

Creek

Lake

Lake

dam Lake

Lake

River

River

Lake

Lake

Creek

River

Lakes

Lake

River

Creek

Lake

Lake

River

8B

Reservoir

Creek

Lake

Provincial

(Waterton)

(Waterton)

Creek

Site

park

of

Park

fishing

trips

575

574

CODE

573

571

569

570

567

568

566

572 565

563

564

561

562

560

559

558

557

552

555 553

551

550

549

554

556

546

548

544

543

545

542

540

541

539 537

538

547

534

536

530

532

531

527

535 533

529

528 526

(continued)

COUNT

1

1

1

2

3

1

3

2

1

2

1 2

1

4

3

1

2

1

1

4

9

1

3

2

1

1

1

1

3

2

4 3

1

4

1

1

2

1

1 3

2

1

2

4

1 1

1

1

1

RESPONSES

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0 0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

PCT

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0

OF

PCT

CASES

0.1

0.1 0.2

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1 OF

Arts

Allstones

Beaver University

Medicine

Angling

Gamier

Raven

Mosquito

Round

Spray

Rockyford

Borlun Adams

Cline Mable

Heart

Wilson

Crossfield

Hover

Bow

Chungo

Kickamen

Emerson

Lake

Onion

Red

losagin Magee

Policemans

Spring

Clampitt

Lake

Barre Nib

Skeleton Paddy

Dilberry

Private Jensen

Question

SITE

415

Lake

pond

Lodge

Kokanosa

of

Reservoir

River

Creek

Lake

NAME

River

Lake

River

Lake

dam

Creek

Lake

Creek

Lake

flats

River

beach

River

MISSING

Point

Lake

Lake

dam

Lake

Lake

Horns

Hat

dam/pond/dugout

Creek

Lake

Lake

Lake

Lake

provincial

Reservoir

BB

park

Reservoir,

Reservoir

flats

dam

College

beaver

Site

CASES

Bow

of

pond

pond

park

River

Lethbridge

fishing

TOTAL

1700

trips

RESPONSES

VALID

649

647 CODE

635

611

610

609

608

606

607

612

602

603

604 601

605

600

597

598

596

595

613

594

593

599

592 591

590

589

585

584 583

582

581 580

586

579

576

587

578

577

(continued)

CASES

COUNT

10803

1

1

1

2

3

2

2

3

1 2

1

1

1

1

1

1

4

8

1 10

5

1

1

2

1

1

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1 2

1

RESPONSES

100.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1 0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0

PCT

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

OF

635.5

PCT

CASES

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.3

0.5

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.6

0.1 OF

RESPONSES

TOTAL

DISTANCE

IN

Question

600—649

550—599

500—549

450—499

400—449

350—399

250—299

300—349

200—249

190—199

180—189

170—179

160—169

150—159

140—149

130—139

120—129

110—119

100—109

90—99

80—89

70—79

462

60—69

50—59

40—49 MILES

20—29

30—39

10—19

999

900

800

780

750

700

650

0—9

MISSING

8C

10348

COUNT

Distance

CASES

1015

1291

260

129

292

115

114

374

460

699

163

492

772

623

848

620 732

20

818

15

20

13

16 41

37

98

90

28

85

59

3

1

8

1

1 5

RESPONSES

100.0

PCT

from

0.2

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.1

12.5

0.0

0.2

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.4

0.4

0.9

0.9

2.5

0.3

1.2

0.6

0.8

2.8

1.1

1.1

3.6

4.4

6.8

1.6

4.8

7.5

6.0

6.0 4.2

8.2

7.9

9.8

OF

1653

home

626.0

PCT

CASES

15.7

17.7

VALID

22.6

42.3

27.8

29.8

46.7

37.7

1.2

37.5

0.2

0.9 51.3

44.3

49.5

0.1

0.1

78.1

0.5 61.4

0.1

1.2

to

0.3

0.8

2.2

1.0

2.5

5.9

5.4

1.7 7.8

5.1

3.6

7.0

6.9

9.9

OF

site CASES

CATEGORY Question

476

MISSING

LABEL

8D

Size

CASES

of

party

TOTAL

1639

RESPONSES

CODE

VALID

70

50

40

30

25

20

19

18

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

9

8

7

5

6 4

3

2

1

CASES

10423

COUNT

4727

1817

1530

1405

283

103

363

14 43

29

69

1

1

2

1

1

3

1

1 5

8

2

6

8

RESPONSES

100.0

PCT

45.4

17.4

14.7

13.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.4

0.3

1.0 2.7

0.7 3.5

OF

PCT

635.9

288.4

CASES

110.9

22.1

17.3 93.3

85.7

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.5

0.3

0.1

0.4

0.9

0.5

2.6

1.8 4.2

6.3 OF

pickeral

sturgeon

kokanee,

anything

other,

salmon perch

goldeye

whitefish

arctic

lake

northern

trout

cutthroat walleye

brook

brown

rainbow

CATEGORY Question

451

trout

trout

trout

(unspecified

grayling

(ling,

MISSING

trout

can

bass,

pike

LABEL

8E

trout

catch

sauger,

Fish

burbot)

CASES

elsewhere)

species

suckers,

TOTAL

sought

1664

RESPONSES

CODE

VALID

17

16

13

15

12

10

14

11

9

8

7

4

5

3

2

1

6

CASES

12975

COUNT

3177

4782

107

135 541

131

144 967

217

181

472

992

909

83

39

41

57

RESPONSES

100.0

24.5

PCT

36.9

0.3

0.6

0.8

0.3

1.0

4.2

1.1 7.5

0.4

1.0

1.4

1.7

7.0

3.6 7.6

OF

PCT

779.7

287.4

190.9

CASES

32.5

58.1

13.0 28.4

10.9

54.6

59.6

2.3

5.0

8.1

6.4

2.5

8.7

7.9

3.4 OF Question BY Number of fish caught PCT OF PCT OF CODE COUNT RESPONSES CASES 1 998 13.1 65.6 2 1295 17.0 85.1 3 927 12.2 60.9 4 819 10.8 53.8 5 650 8.5 42.7 6 503 6.6 33.1 7 209 2.7 13.7 8 296 3.9 19.5 9 114 1.5 7.5 10 458 6.0 30.1 11 44 0.6 2.9 12 171 2.2 11.2 13 44 0.6 2.9 14 36 0.5 2.4 15 200 2.6 13.1 16 34 0.4 2.2 17 16 0.2 1.1 18 42 0.6 2.8 19 16 0.2 1.1 20 179 2.4 11.8 21 13 0.2 0.9 22 14 0.2 0.9 23 13 0.2 0.9 24 11 0.1 0.7 25 67 0.9 4.4 26 7 0.1 0.5 27 7 0.1 0.5 28 7 0.1 0.5 29 2 0.0 0.1 30—39 163 2.1 10.7 40—49 82 1.1 5.4 50—59 49 0.6 3.2 60—69 38 0.5 2.5 70—79 17 0.2 1.1 80—89 11 0.1 0.7 90—99 5 0.1 0.3 100—149 31 0.4 2.0 150—199 10 0.1 0.7 200—249 11 0.1 0.7 250—299 2 0.0 0.1 300 2 0.0 0.1 354 1 0.0 0.1 400 1 0.0 0.1 450 1 0.0 0.1 TOTAL RESPONSES 7616 100.0 500.7 594 MISSING CASES 1521 VALID CASES Question 8G Number of fish released PCT OF PCT OF CODE COUNT RESPONSES CASES 1 702 15.0 60.4 2 917 19.6 78.8 3 526 11.2 45.2 4 431 9.2 37.1 5 425 9.1 36.5 6 300 6.4 25.8 7 104 2.2 8.9 8 139 3.0 12.0 9 49 1.0 4.2 10 309 6.6 26.6 11 28 0.6 2.4 12 68 1.5 5.8 13 31 0.7 2.7 14 19 0.4 1.6 15 113 2.4 9.7 16 17 0.4 1.5 17 10 0.2 0.9 18 18 0.4 1.5 19 11 0.2 0.9 20 128 2.7 11.0 21 10 0.2 0.9 22 4 0.1 0.3 23 4 0.1 0.3 24 5 0.1 0.4 25 36 0.8 3.1 26 5 0.1 0.4 27 5 0.1 0.4 28 8 0.2 0.7 29 3 0.1 0.3 30—39 94 2.0 8.1 40—49 46 1.0 4.0 50—59 36 0.8 3.1 60—69 13 0.3 1.1 70—79 13 0.3 1.1 80—89 11 0.2 0.9 90—99 7 0.1 0.6 100—149 18 0.4 1.5 150—199 7 0.1 0.6 200—299 5 0.1 0.4 250—299 3 0.1 0.3 375 1 0.0 0.1 400 1 0,0 0.1 TOTAL RESPONSES 4680 100.0 402.4 952 MISSING CASES 1163 VALID CASES

the

Question

reservoir

ocean pond,

stream,

river

CATEGORY Question

lake

1264

trip

‘Computed

418

mine

MISSING

calendar.

MISSING

TOTAL

creek,

81

LABEL

8H

pit

Type

by

RESPONSES

length

CASES

brook

CASES

subtracting

CODE

of

36

34

30

29

26

23

22

16

17

15

14

13

12

11

10

8

9

7

6

4

5

3

2

1

of

waterbody

fishing

TOTAL

COUNT

2811

the

1026

1194

851

1697

311

RESPONSES

14

14

21

22

42

81

46

2

1

1

1

1

1

1 4

1

3 7

5

6

6

trip’

end

CODE

VALID

VALID

RESPONSES

5

6

2

4

1

3

100.0

date

PCT

11.1

36.5

42.5

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.5

0.5

0.7

0.8

1.5

2.9

1.6

CASES

CASES

OF

from

COUNT

10730

1026

5168

3235

285

990

PCT

330.3

26

CASES

120.6

140.3

the

36.5

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.5

0.4

0.6

0.8

0.7

0.7

1.6

1.6

2.5

4.9

2.6

5.4

9.5

OF

RESPONSES

start

100.0

PCT

48.2

30.1

0.2

9.6

2.7

9.2

OF

date

PCT

632.3

304.5 CASES

190.6

60.5

58.3

16.8

on

1.5 OF 001 0 1 CC 66 0 1 60C 86 0 96 001 0 C 66 0 80C 1.6 0 1 S6 1.6 0 1 08 1 T IO 55 0 58 L6 0 1 6L I 861 99 1 1 178 1.6 0 C T6 81. 0 17 L61 175 0 1 18 L6 0 1 O6 8L 0 17 961 175 0 01 08 1.6 0 68 8L 0 1761 CS 0 1 9L 1.6 0 1 88 8L 0 5 C61 CS 0 9 SL L6 0 1 98 LL I LI 161 CS 0 171. L6 0 58 9L I 1 061 CS 0 IL 1.6 0 1 178 SL 0 1 881 CS 0 OL L6 0 C C8 SL 0 1.81 CS 0 1 69 1.6 0 1 91. 0 C 981 £9 0 89 L6 0 I8 51. 0 17 581 CS 0 17 L9 96 0 6L SL 0 C LLI S 0 £ 99 96 0 1 8L SL 0 51.1 S 0 L 99 96 0 LL SL 0 8 171.1 9 1 91 C9 96 0 1 CL 17L 0 C CL! 15 1 91 96 1 I 171. 9 01 L1 05 0 09 56 0 17 99 89 0 1 991 05 0 69 56 0 89 0 591 05 1 91 89 56 0 1 09 89 0 17 1791 617 0 9 19 56 0 I 69 89 0 1 91 617 0 5 617 96 0 9 9S 89 0 C 091 617 0 1 817 176 0 1 t9 89 9 91 691 617 0 8 917 176 0 1 CS 9 I 6 £91 617 0 £ 917 176 0 17 09 0 17 6171 817 0 8 1717 176 0 9 1S 09 0 C 9171 817 SC C17 176 0 1 0S 09 0 17 17171 917 017 L8 117 176 0 1 817 09 1 1171 9 SC 8C 176 0 17 L17 65 0 1 6CI 17 0 8 SC 176 CC 65 0 C 17C1 17 0 8 t’C 6 I S C17 65 1 91 CCI 17 0 CC 16 1 91 017 0 89 OCt 17 0 6 6 06 0 5 8C 89 1 IT LI C 0 1. L 06 0 1. LC 1.5 0 1 17I C 0 C 9 68 0 5 17Cc LS 0 T £ 0 68 1 51 CC LS 0 C 11 C 0 8 0 0 17 88 LS 0 C 601 0 C 61 88 0 IC LS 0 1 801 0 1 81 88 0 5 1 1.5 0 01 1701 0 C SI 88 0 I L1 95 0 9 01 0 9 171 88 0 C C1 95 0 C TOT 0 C CI 88 0 1 01 95 0 I 56 1 0 1 11 88 I 171 80 95 0 17 176 1 0 1 5 1.8 9 911 L0 99 0 06 1 0 17 18 1 LI 90 99 0 1 88 1 1 17 18 0 6 S0 99 0 8 L8 0 0 1 1 lDd lDd 3eM flTA lDd lDd baLI 2117VA lDd lDd bu fflYA NflD WflD IflD (uio io A;TD ;seu) 9DUepTs9z JO eD[d incA ST WM 01 uoT;sen

VALUE

city Question

307

306

305 304

303

302

301

299

300

298

or

FREQ

town)?

10

1 3 2

2

1

3

3

2

1 5

PCT

(Continued)

0

0 0

0

0

0

0

0

0 0

PCT

CtJM

99

99

98

98

98

98

98

99

98 98

MISSING

VALUE

318

319

317

315

314

313

312

311

310

320

VALUE

What

0

FREQ

is

1 1

1 2

2

1 2

your

1 1

FREQ

1

PCT

54

DATA

0 0

0

0

0

0

0

0 0

0

place

PCT

CTJM

99 99

99

99

99

99

99

99 99

99

of

VALUE

337

334

333

332

331

329

326

residence

325

324

FREQ

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

(nearest

PCT

0 0

0

0

0

0

0

0 0

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

PCT

100

100 CUN

VARIANCE

MEAN

VALUE

Question

male

VALUE

female Question

33

32

31

30

29

28

27

26

25 24

23

22

21

20

19

18 17

16

15

LABEL

FREQ

143.131

12

11

39.167

69

67 44

57

75

39

68 53

53

37 32

25

23 22

25

25

15

3

3

PCT

What

Are

3

3

3

2

3

4 2

3 2 2

3

1

1 1

1

0

1

1

0

PCT

CUM

28

25

22

19 12

16

14

35 10

31

you

8

7

6 3

4

2

0

1

0

is

MEDIAN

TOTAL

MINIMUM

VALUE

your

male

MISSING

VALUE

2

0

50

49 1

48

46

47 44

45 43 42

41 40

39

38

37

36

35

34

52

51

VALUE

age?

or

FREQUENCY

female?

FREQ

0

41 2115

36

26

33

50 1723

43 43

37

47 51

74

60

75

99

77

64

86

35

34

385

37.000

15.000

FREQ

7

PCT

18

2

2

2 2

1 2 2

2

2

4

3 2

3

4

4 5

4

2

2

DATA

PERCENT

PCT

CUM

80

78

76

73

75

71

69

67

100.0

65

60 57

63 54

51

47

44

39

83 82

81.5

18.2

.3

VALUE

MAXIMUM

STD

72

70

69

68

65

63

64

62

61 MISSING

59

60 58 57

56

55 PERCENT

54

53

100.0

DEV

VALID

81.7

18.3

FREQ

23

18

21

30

19

26

37 27

29

21 35

23

36

1

2

1

2

PERCENT

PCT

100.0

72.000

11.964

81.7

0

0

0 0

1

1

1 1

1

2

1

1

1 2

1 2

1

CUM

100

100

100 100

100

PCT

CUM

99

97

96

95

94

93

90

91

89

88 86 85 VARIANCE MEAN how Question VARIANCE MEAN your Question TOTAL VALUE TOTAL VALUE many household? 99 99 5 4 2 3 0 1 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 of 13B 13A FREQUENCY FREQUENCY 1.230 .578 .840 them .853 2115 1377 2115 1163 How 295 330 129 458 303 If 23 72 17 20 31 1 fish? 9 1 1 there many PERCENT MINIMUM MEDIAN PERCENT MEDIAN MINIMUM 100.0 100. 13.9 65.1 15.6 21.7 55.0 14.3 1.1 children 3.4 1.5 6.1 are .0 .8 .9 .0 .0 .4 0 children MISSING PERCENT MISSING PERCENT 100.0 100.0 VALID 14.1 65.8 15.8 VALID 21.9 55.5 14.5 3.4 under 1.5 6.2 .0 .8 .0 .4 .0 .000 .000 .000 000 under PERCENT the PERCENT 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 99.1 95.7 81.6 65.8 99.9 99.5 98.0 91.8 70.0 55.5 CUN CUN age 16 MAXIMUM STD MAX STD in of IMUM DEV your DEV 16 are household, there 5.000 7.000 1. .916 109 in Question 14A How many adults over 65 are there in your household?

VALID CUN VALUE FREQUENCY PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT

0 1978 93.5 94.6 94.6 1 74 3.5 3.5 98.1 2 36 1.7 1.7 99.8 3 3 .1 .1 100.0 4 1 .0 .0 100.0 99 23 1.1 MISSING

TOTAL 2115 100.0 100.0

MEAN .076 MEDIAN .000 STD DEV .345 VARIANCE .119 MINIMUM .000 MAXIMUM 4.000

Question 14B If there are adults over 65 in your household, how many of them fish?

VALID CUN VALUE FREQUENCY PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT

0 2011 95.1 96.1 96.1 1 61 2.9 2.9 99.0 2 18 .9 .9 99.9 3 2 .1 .1 100.0 99 23 1.1 MISSING

TOTAL 2115 100.0 100.0

MEAN .049 MEDIAN .000 STD DEV .264 VARIANCE .070 MINIMUM .000 MAXIMUM 3.000 Question 15 Which of the following categories best represents your annual household income before taxes?

VALID CUM VALUE LABEL VALUE FREQUENCY PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT

0—5,000 1 26 1.2 1.3 1.3 5,001—10,000 2 35 1.7 1.8 3.2 10,001—15,000 3 72 3.4 3.7 6.9 15,001— 20,000 4 93 4.4 4.8 11.7 20,001—25,000 5 155 7.3 8.0 19.8 25,001—30,000 6 188 8.9 9.8 29.5 30,001—35,000 7 191 9.0 9.9 39.4 35,001—40,000 8 188 8.9 9.8 49.2 40,001—45,000 9 142 6.7 7.4 56.5 45,001—50,000 10 196 9.3 10.2 66.7 50,001—60,000 11 223 10.5 11.6 78.3 60,001—70,000 12 149 7.0 7.7 86.0 70,001—80,000 13 95 4.5 4.9 90.9 80,001—90,000 14 51 2.4 2.6 93.6 90,001—100,000 15 32 1.5 1.7 95.2 >100,000 16 92 4.3 4.8 100.0 0 153 7.2 MISSING 77 34 1.6 MISSING

TOTAL 2115 100.0 100.0

MEAN 8.718 MEDIAN 9.000 STD DEV 3.540 VARIANCE 12.533 MINIMUM 1.000 MAXIMUM 16.000

VALUE

week?

Question

VARIANCE

MEAN

education

Question

20

18

16

15

14

12

10

TOTAL

VALUE

8

7

6 4

5

3

0

1

20

19

18

17

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

0

9

8

7

5

6 4

3

FREQ

250

17

28

21

16

12.808

16

8

6

3

5

1

7

FREQUENCY

4 that

5

1

3

1

7.123

PCT

13

2115

0

0

0

1 0

0

1

1 0

0

0

0

0

0

How

198 208

130

636

156

190

168

108

you

53

29

32

51

74

62

10

PCT

CUM

Please

18

17 16

16 16

16

15

15

14

13

13 4

3 2

13

13

1

13

13

many

have

PERCENT

MINIMUM

MEDIAN

100.0

VALUE

30.1

2.5

1.4 2.4

3.5

hours 1.5 9.4

9.8

6.1

7.4

9.0

7.9

5.1

2.9

completed?

circle

47

46

44

45 43

42 40

41

39

38

37

35

36

32

30

.5

.2

.1

.0

.1

MISSING

FREQ

do

PERCENT

768 100.0

115

73

57

23

23

24

46

10.1

35

30.8

the

VALID

1

6 2

2

5

1.4

2.5

1.6

3.6

9.6

6

6.3

7.6

9.2

8.1

5.2

3.0

you

12.000

.5

.1

.2

.1

.0

PCT

3.000

38

0

4

0

0

3

1

0 0 highest

6

1

2

1

0

2

normally

PCT

CUM

PERCENT

79

79

79

72

75

72

71

71

32

32

25

24

31

21

21

100.0

98.6

97.0

94.6

91.0

81.4

75.1

57.4

65.0 26.6

17.4

9.2

4.0

1.0

CUM

.5

.3

.1

.1

VALUE

number

MAXIMUM

STD

work

86

88

85

84

80

77

78

76

75

72

70

66

68 65

62

DEV

for

FREQ

of

21

19

8

1

1

1

1

1

3

1 2

3

7

1

1

pay

years

PCT

20.000

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

2.669

each

PCT

CUM

99

99

99

99

98

97

97

97

97

97

97

96

96

96

96 of Question 17 (Continued) How many hours do you normally work for pay each week?

CUN CUN CTJN VALUE FREQ PCT PCT VALUE FREQ PCT PCT VALUE FREQ PCT PCT 21 2 0 18 48 28 1 80 90 4 0 99 22 1 0 18 50 183 9 89 96 1 0 99 23 1 0 18 51 1 0 89 98 1 0 99 24 8 0 19 52 2 0 90 100 8 0 100 25 13 1 19 54 3 0 90 112 1 0 100 26 2 0 19 55 27 1 91 120 2 0 100 27 1 0 19 56 14 1 92 168 2 0 100 28 1 0 19 60 74 4 95 MISSING DATA VALUE FREQ 999 119

MEAN 37.055 MEDIAN 40.000 STD DEV 19. 159 VARIANCE 367.061 MINIMUM .000 MAXIMUN 168.000

Question 18 What do you consider your main occupation to be?

VALID CUM VALUE LABEL VALUE FREQUENCY PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT

professional and technical 1 368 17 . 4 18. 1 18 . 1 managerial 2 174 8.2 8.6 26.6 contractor 3 9 .4 .4 27.1 farming (farmer, rancher) 4 127 6.0 6.2 33.3 tradesman 5 312 14. 8 15. 3 48.6 transportation and communication 6 106 5.0 5.2 53.9 service occupations 7 261 12 . 3 12 . 8 66.7 retail sales 8 26 1.2 1.3 68. 0 real estate 9 14 .7 .7 68 . 6 operative 10 105 5.0 5.2 73.8 armed forces 11 6 .3 .3 74. 1 clerical 12 53 2.5 2.6 76.7 labourers (unskilled) 13 56 2.6 2.8 79.5 homemaker 14 119 5.6 5.8 85.3 student 15 63 3.0 3.1 88.4 retired 16 ill 5.2 5.5 93.9 not in labour force 17 20 .9 1.0 94.8 self-employed 18 63 3.0 3.1 97.9 miscellaneous 19 42 2.0 2.1 100. 0 0 80 3.8 MISSING TOTAL 2115 100.0 100.0

MEAN 7.247 MEDIAN 6.000 STD DEV 5.391 VARIANCE 29.058 MINIMUM 1.000 MAXIMUM 19.000 Question 19 How many days of paid vacation do you get each year?

CUM CUN CUM VALUE FREQ PCT PCT VALUE FREQ PCT PCT VALUE FREQ PCT PCT

0 713 36 36 17 4 0 66 36 6 0 97 1 2 0 36 18 4 0 66 37 1 0 97 2 2 0 36 19 2 0 66 40 9 0 98 3 2 0 37 20 226 11 78 42 2 0 98 4 4 0 37 21 134 7 84 44 2 0 98 5 5 0 37 22 5 0 85 49 1 0 98 6 4 0 37 23 3 0 85 50 6 0 98 7 24 1 38 24 5 0 85 60 11 1 99 8 2 0 38 25 112 6 91 62 1 0 99 9 1 0 39 26 1 0 91 70 4 0 99 10 110 6 44 27 1 0 91 75 3 0 99 11 3 0 44 28 32 2 93 80 5 0 100 12 14 1 45 30 68 3 96 90 2 0 100 13 1 0 45 31 2 0 96 100 1 0 100 14 213 11 56 32 1 0 96 110 1 0 100 15 180 9 65 33 4 0 96 120 1 0 100 16 13 1 66 35 15 1 97 186 1 0 100 MISSING DATA VALUE FREQ 999 146

MEAN 12.840 MEDIAN 14.000 STD DEV 13.651 VARIANCE 186.349 MINIMUM .000 MAXIMUM 186.000

Question 20A I take time off work to go fishing

VALID CUN VALUE LABEL VALUE FREQUENCY PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT always 1 115 5.4 6.1 6.1 sometimes 2 495 23.4 26.1 32.2 seldom 3 407 19.2 21.5 53.7 never 4 877 41.5 46.3 100.0 0 221 10.4 MISSING

TOTAL 2115 100.0 100.0

MEAN 3.080 MEDIAN 3.000 STD DEV .980 VARIANCE .961 MINIMUM 1.000 MAXIMUM 4.000

VARIANCE

MEAN

never

seldom

sometimes always

VALUE

Question

VARIANCE

MEAN

never

seldom

VALUE

sometimes always

Question

LABEL

LABEL

20C

20B

2.542

1.278

2.835

1.158

My

I

could

job

TOTAL

VALUE

MEDIAN

MINIMUM

TOTAL

VALUE

MINIMUM MEDIAN

has

be

0 4

3

2

1

0 4

3

2

1

flexible

working

FREQUENCY

FREQUENCY

2115

2115

179

585

291

649 411

243

728

335

582

227

2.000

1.000

3.000

1.000

on

working

days

PERCENT

PERCENT

100.0

100.0

27.7

13.8 30.7

19.4

11.5

34.4

15.8 27.5

10.7

8.5

I

hours

MAXIMUM

take

STD

MAXIMUM

STD

MISSING

PERCENT

MISSING

PERCENT

100.0

VALID

100.0

VALID

DEV

30.2

15.0 33.5 21.2

DEV

38.9

17.9

31.1

12.1

fishing

PERCENT

PERCENT

100.0

100.0

trips?

69 54

21.2

CUM

4.000

1.130

61.1 43.2

12.1

CUN

4.000

1.076

.

.

8 8

RESPONDENTS

APPENDIX

WHO

B:

FISHED

DESCRIPTIVE

IN

THE

STATISTICS

SOUTHERN REGION Question 1.1 Good chance to catch trophy—sized fish

VALID CtJM VALUE LABEL VALUE FREQUENCY PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT not important 1 330 33.3 33.8 33.8 2 171 17.2 17.5 51.3 somewhat important 3 318 32.1 32.6 83.9 4 93 9.4 9.5 93.4 very important 5 64 6.5 6.6 100.0 0 16 1.6 MISSING TOTAL 992 100.0 100.0

MEAN 2.375 MEDIAN 2 . 000 STD DEV 1.223 VARIANCE 1.496 MINIMUM 1. 000 MAXIMUM 5. 000

Question 1.2 Good chance to catch limit

VALID CtJM VALUE LABEL VALUE FREQUENCY PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT not important 1 223 22.5 22.8 22.8 2 190 19 . 2 19. 4 42.3 somewhat important 3 299 30.1 30.6 72.9 4 165 16.6 16.9 89.8 very important 5 100 10.1 10.2 100. 0 0 15 1.5 MISSING

TOTAL 992 100.0 100.0

MEAN 2.723 MEDIAN 3.000 STD DEV 1.269 VARIANCE 1.610 MINIMUM 1. 000 MAXIMUM 5.000

Question 1.3 Good chance to catch a preferred species

VALID CUM VALUE LABEL VALUE FREQUENCY PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT not important 1 144 14.5 14.8 14.8 2 88 8.9 9.1 23.9 somewhat important 3 275 27.7 28.3 52.2 4 267 26.9 27.5 79.7 very important 5 197 19.9 20.3 100.0 0 21 2.1 MISSING

TOTAL 992 100.0 100.0

MEAN 3.294 MEDIAN 3 . 000 STD DEV 1.298 VARIANCE 1.686 MI NIMUM 1.000 MAXIMUM 5. 000

VARIANCE

MEAN

very

somewhat

not

VALUE

Question

VARIANCE

MEAN

very

somewhat

not

VALUE

Question

VARIANCE

MEAN

very

somewhat

VALUE

not

Question

important

important

important

important

important

LABEL

important

LABEL

LABEL

important

1.6

important

1.5

important

1.4

4.039

1.160

3.305

1.657

3.504

1.837

Natural

Privacy

Knowing

TOTAL

VALUE

TOTAL

VALUE

TOTAL

VALUE

MEDIAN

MINIMUM

MINIMUM

MEDIAN

beauty

MEDIAN

MINIMUM

0 from

4

5

3

2

1

that

0

5

4

2

3

1

0

4

5

3

2

1

FREQUENCY

FREQUENCY

FREQUENCY

other

the

of

992

429

275

194

992

216

232

277

129

119

15

40

39

992

surroundings

322

172 263

117

19

lake

24

94

anglers

4.000

1.000

3.000

1.000

4.000

1.000

PERCENT

is

PERCENT

100.0

PERCENT

100.0

43.2

27.7

19.6

100.0

21.8

23.4

27.9

13.0

12.0

1.5

4.0

3.9

32.5

26.5

17.3

11.8

1.9

stocked

2.4

9.5

MISSING

MAXIMUM

STD

PERCENT

MISSING

MAXIMUM

STD

PERCENT

100.0

VALID

MISSING

MAXIMUM

STD

PERCENT

100.0

VALID

43.9

28.1

19.9

100.0

VALID

with

22.2

23.8

28.5

13.3

12.2

4.1

4.0

33.3

17.8

27.2

12.1

DEV

9.7

DEV

DEV

fish

PERCENT

PERCENT

100.0

PERCENT

100.0

56.1

27.9

CUM

100.0

77.8

54.0

25.5

12.2

CUM

8.1

4.0

66.7 49.0

21.8

12.1

CUM

5.000

1.077

5.000

1.287

5.000 1.355

VARIANCE

MEAN

very

somewhat

not

VALUE

Question

VARIANCE

MEAN

very

somewhat

not VALUE

Question

VARIANCE MEAN

very

somewhat

not

VALUE

Question

important

important

important

important

important

LABEL

important

LABEL

LABEL

important

1.9

important

1.8

2.

important

1.674

1.7

3.322

1.625

4.499

009

.668

Site

Access

Water

TOTAL

VALUE

limited

TOTAL

VALUE

TOTAL

VALUE

MEDIAN

MINIMUM

quality

MINIMUM MEDIAN

to

MINIMUM MEDIAN

0

5 4

2

3

1

0

5

4

3

2

1

0 5

4

3

2

1

wilderness

FREQUENCY

FREQUENCY

to

FREQUENCY

fly

992

147

170 505

992

226

203

25

314

77

114

114

68

992

642 207

101

21

20

10

12

fishing

1. 1.000

1. 3.000

areas

5.000

1.000

000

PERCENT

100.0

000

PERCENT

100.0

PERCENT

14

17.

50.9

100.0

22.8

2.5 20.5

7.8

31.7

11.5

11.5

6.9

64.7 20.9

2.1

10.2

.

2.0

1.0 1.2

8

1

MAX

MISSING

STD

PERCENT

MAXIMUM

MISSING

STD

100.0

PERCENT

VALID

MAXIMUM MISSING

STD

100.0

PERCENT

VALID

15.

17.

52.2

100.0

23.3

VALID

20.9

IMUN

32.3

8.0

11.7

7.0

11.7

66.0 21.3

10.4

DEV

DEV

1.0

1.2

2

6

DEV

PERCENT

100.0

PERCENT

100.0

P

92.0

85.0

69

52.2

CUN

100.0

76.7

55.8

23.5

ERCENT

11.

CUM

34.0

12.7

CtJM

.

5.000

1.294

2.3

1.2

8

5.000

1.275

7

5.000 .818

VARIANCE

MEAN

very

somewhat not

VALUE

Question

VARIANCE

MEAN

very

VALUE

somewhat

not

Question

VARIANCE

MEAN

very

somewhat

VALUE

not

Question

important

important

important

important

important

important

LABEL

LABEL

LABEL

important

1.12

important

1.11

important

1.10

1.371

2.891

1.377

3.038

1.317

.765

Owning

Familiarity

Distance

TOTAL

VALUE

TOTAL

VALUE

TOTAL

VALUE

MEDIAN

MINIMUM

MEDIAN

MINIMUM

land

MEDIAN

MINIMUM

0

5

4

3

2

1

0

4

5

2

3

1

0

5

4

3

2

1

from

FREQUENCY

FREQUENCY

or

FREQUENCY

with

a

home

992

778

992

389

167

159

156

20

992

22 51

25

96 121

464

162

cabin 137

22

99

the

15

93

1.000

1.000

3.000

1.000

3.000

1.000

area

PERCENT

PERCENT

100.0

near

PERCENT

100.0

100.0

78.4

10.0

16.8

39.2

16.0

15.7

2.0

2.2

2.5

5.1

9.7

12

46.8

16.

13

2.2

1.5 9.4 .

.

2

3

the

8

MISSING

MAXIMUM

STD

PERCENT

MISSING

MAXIMUM

STD

PERCENT

100.0

MISSING

MAXIMUM

VALID

STD

site PERCENT

100.0

VALID

100.

80.0

VALID

10.2

40.1

17.2

16.4

16.1

2.3

2.6

5.2

9.9

47.5

12.4

16.6

14

DEV

9.5

DEV DEV

.

0

0

PERCENT

PERCENT

100.0

PERCENT

100.0

97.7

95.2

89.9

80.0

CUM

100.0

89.8

72.6

32.5

16.1

CTJM

87.6

71.0

23.5

14.

CUM

5.000

5.000

1.174

.875

5.000

1.148 0

VARIANCE

MEAN

very

somewhat

not

VALUE

Question

VARIANCE

MEAN

very

somewhat

not VALUE

Question

VARIANCE

MEAN

very

not VALUE

somewhat

Question

important

important

important

important

important

important

LABEL

LABEL

LABEL

important

1.15

important

1.14

important

1.13

3

1.999

2.436

2.057

3.006

1.679

.031

Picnic/Camping

Site

Good

TOTAL

VALUE

TOTAL

VALUE

TOTAL

VALUE

with

MEDIAN

road

MIN

MEDIAN

MINIMUM

MINIMUM

MEDIAN

0

5

4

2

3

1

5

0 4

3

2

1

0

4

5

2

3

1

IMUM

boat

FREQUENCY

access

FREQUENCY

FREQUENCY

facilities

access

992

195

262

186

216

114

992

127

107

220

127

391

19

992

154

184

320

142

172

20

20

to

3.000

1.000

2.000

1.000

the

3.000

1.000

PERCENT

PERCENT

100.0

PERCENT

100.0

19.7

26.4

18.8

11.5 100.0

21.8

12.8

10.8

22.2

12.8

39.4

1.9

15.5

18.5

32.3

14.3

17.3

site

2.0

2.0

at

or

MISSING

MAXIMUM

STD

PERCENT

MISSING

MAXIMUM

STD

PERCENT

100.0

MISSING

MAXIMUM

VALID

near

STD

PERCENT

100.0

VALID

20.0

26.9

19.1

11.7

22.2

100.0

VALID

13.1 22.6

11.0

40.2

13.1

15.8

18.9

32.9

14.6

17.7

DEV

DEV

DEV

site

PERCENT

PERCENT

100.

PERCENT

100.0

80.0

33.9

60.8

22.2

CUM

100.0

86.9

75.9

53.3

40.2

CUM

84.2

65.2

32.3

CtIM

17.7

5.000

1.414

0

5.000

1.434

5.000 1.296 Question 1.16 Friends or relatives live nearby

VALID CUN VALUE LABEL VALUE FREQUENCY PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT

not important 1 831 83.8 84.7 84.7 2 90 9.1 9.2 93.9 somewhat important 3 39 3.9 4.0 97.9 4 14 1.4 1.4 99.3 very important 5 7 .7 .7 100.0 0 11 1.1 MISSING TOTAL 992 100.0 100.0

MEAN 1.243 MEDIAN 1.000 STD DEV .660 VARIANCE .435 MINIMUM 1.000 MAXIMUM 5.000

Question 2.A Approximately how many years have you fished at this site?

VALID CUN VALUE LABEL VALUE FREQUENCY PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT

0 13 1.3 1.3 1.3 1 49 4.9 5.0 6.3 2 74 7.5 7.5 13.8 3 90 9.1 9.1 22.9 4 45 4.5 4.6 27.5 5 124 12.5 12.6 40.1 6 49 4.9 5.0 45.1 7 34 3.4 3.5 48.6 8 32 3.2 3.2 51.8 9 7 .7 .7 52.5 10 133 13.4 13.6 66.1 11—15 112 11.3 11.4 77.5 16—20 110 11.1 11.2 88.7 21—25 44 4.4 4.5 93.2 26—30 34 3.4 3.5 96.7 31—40 24 2.4 2.4 99.1 41—50 3 0.3 0.3 99.4 50+ 6 0.6 0.6 100.0 99 7 .7 MISSING

TOTAL 992 100.0 100.0

MEAN 10.790 MEDIAN 8.000 STD DEV 9.431 VARIANCE 88.953 MINIMUM .000 MAXIMUM 60.000

while

maps

do

miscellaneous,

do

hiking,

close

random

tourist Alberta

word

VALUE

from

from

Question

VARIANCE

MEAN

more

21—30

16—20 VALUE

11—15

less

6—10

Question

highway

in

not

not

the

of

friends

family

than

hunting

than

to

LABEL

remember

have

LABEL

chance,

driving)

last

mouth,

Fishing

info,

home

signs

2C

2B

30

5

3.699

3.311

a

member

Approximately

5

How

favorite

(pamphlets

paid

years?

etc)

general

(including

guide

did

TOTAL

VALUE

guide

you

MEDIAN

MINIMUM

VALUE

TOTAL

0

6

5

4

3

2

1

first

12

11

10

how

0

9

8

FREQUENCY

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

FREQUENCY

many

become

992

260

127

ill

220

126

124

24

148

times

130

365

180

992

22

10

11

77

4.000

1.000

29

1

9

7

3

PERCENT

aware

100.

26.2

12.

11.

22.2

12

12

PERCENT

2.4

have

.

.

100.0 0

8

2

7

5

14.9

13.1 36.8

18.1

2.2

1.0

1.1

7.8

2.9

of

.1

.9

.7

.3

you

MISSING

MAXIMUM

STD

PERCENT

VALID

this

100.

VALID

26.9

13.

11.5

22.7

13.

12

PERCENT visited

MISSING

DEV

.

0

100.0

1

0

8

15.3

13.4 37.6

18.6

site?

1.0

1.1

7.9

3.0

.1

.9

.7

.3

PERCENT

100.0

this

CUM

73.1

60.0 48.6

35.5

12

CUM

PERCENT

100.0

.

6.000

1.820

99.0

98.9

97.7

96.8

96.1

8

88.1

72.9

69.9

69.6

56.2

18.6 site motorbike/ATV other walk/bicycle caxnper/RV car/truck/van VALUE your Question own patrolled clean, size free do undeveloped, presence other outdoor open water familiarity scenic fresh close boat camping/picnic commercial facilities road type numerous seclusion, good favorite CATEGORY fish large particularly Question wildlife not 27 land home camping of fires access access of are fishing LABEL campers air quality to fish MISSING unpolluted, have quality Lake experience fishing 3A or of home/worksite variety stocked species LABEL 2D to by officers allowed facilities quietness (unspecified) cabin a with other What a wilderness fish enjoy? (catch What favorite (friendliness) fishing CASES facilities (fly, site present of type nearby wildlife and are general (general) species rate) boat VALUE (stores the site? of site TOTAL TOTAL transport specific 5 2 etc) 1 0 965 FREQUENCY RESPONSES etc) VALID CODE 28 25 27 24 26 16 20 15 23 22 21 14 17 19 18 13 12 195 735 11 10 things 992 do 8 9 7 3 1 20 2 5 4 6 2 2 38 you CASES PERCENT about 100.0 COUNT usually 19.7 74.1 1921 2.0 307 101 109 103 285 144 382 .2 .2 18 36 11 64 29 10 3.8 64 22 20 17 64 61 25 30 1 1 1 7 2 3 1 this PERCENT RESPONSES use 100.0 MISSING 100.0 VALID 20.4 77.0 16.0 PCT 14.8 2.1 19.9 site 0.2 0.1 0.9 0.1 1.9 0.4 3.3 1.5 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.6 5.3 3.3 5.7 1.0 5.4 7.5 1.1 0.1 3.2 0.9 1.6 3.3 .2 1.3 .2 to OF PERCENT go that 100.0 PCT 199.1 99.8 79.4 CASES CUM from 31.8 10. 11. 14 10.7 29.5 2.3 2.1 39.6 0.4 0.1 3.7 1.9 0.1 0.7 6.6 3.0 1.0 0.3 6.6 0.2 1.1 2.1 2.3 0.1 3.1 2.6 6.3 1.8 6.6 you . OF 5 3 9

trolling

fly bait

ice spin VALUE

Question

VARIANCE MEAN

very

VALUE

very

Question

spent

greater

half

VALUE

2—3

full

to

Question

1-2

a

fishing

fishing

days

hours

casting

fishing

enjoyable

unenjoyable

day

day

fishing

LABEL

LABEL

travelling

LABEL

than

3D

3C

3B

3.409

1.

How

Generally

What

118

3

site?

days

long

to

type

the

MINIWM

MEDIAN

do

VALUE

speaking,

of

VALUE

VALUE

TOTAL

TOTAL

fishing

TOTAL

you

fishing

4

5

3

2

1

0

5

1

4

2

0 3

4

5

3 2

1

0

stay

FREQUENCY

FREQUENCY

FREQUENCY

site?

how

at

do

176

132

389

184

3.000

1.000

190

992

215

426

296

104 212

388

992

20

enjoyable

992

91

the

45

you

48

29

12

19

PERCENT

PERCENT

site

usually

PERCENT

100.0

17.7

13.3

39.2

18.5 100.

19.

100.0

21.7

42.9

10.

29.8

39.1 21.4

2.0

4.5

9.2

4.8

2.9

1.2

1.9

on

do

MAXIMUM

STD

2

5

0

your

you

do?

PERCENT

PERCENT

PERCENT

DEV

MISSING

MISSING

MISSING

100.0

VALID

43.2

19 14.

20.4

100.

VALID

19

21.9

43.5

10.

100.0

VALID

30.4

39.9

find 21.8

2.2

4.6

4.9

typical 3.0 .

.

5

7

4

6

0

the

PERCENT

PERCENT

PERCENT

100.0

5.000

1.058

100.

100.0

97.8

78.2

63.6 20.4

CTJM

80.6 58.7

15

time

CUM

95.1

64.6

24.8

trip

CUM

4.6 3.0

.

0 2

VARIANCE

MEAN

45—49

50—60

40—44

35—39

30—34

25—29

20—24

VALUE

15—19

10—14

you

Question

>

5—10

< VALUE

1—4

home

Question

motorboat

other

canoe/rowing

VALUE

from

Question

5—9

0—4

10

1

99

have?

lb

lb

lb

lb

on

shore

LABEL

LABEL

FREQUENCY

136.657

a

3G

21.456

3F

3E

typical

Approximately

125

126

172 What

140

132

In

24

49

19

66

77

59

3

pounds,

fishing

method

MISSING

PERCENT

MEDIAN

MINIMUM

12.6

12.7

17.4

14.2

13.3

VALUE

VALUE

2.5

1.9

5.0

6.7

7.8

6.0

TOTAL

TOTAL

approximately

of

trip?

how

3

4

2

1

4

0 2

3 1

0

fishing

CUMULATIVE

PERCENT

FREQUENCY

FREQUENCY

many

100.0

97.5

95.6

90.6 71.3

83.9

41.2

58.6

27.1

13.8

6.0

20.000

years

239

538

173

218

625

.000

992

992

32

do

55

53

10

41

how

you

PERCENT

PERCENT

of

100.0

17.

24.1

54.

100.0

much

usually

22.0

63.0

fishing

3.2

5.5

5.3

1.0

MAXIMUM

4.1

STD

4

2

fish

PERCENT

DEV

PERCENT

MISSING

MISSING

do?

experience

100.0

VALID

17

24.3

54.8

100.0

VALID

22.9

65.7

3.3

5.8

5.6 do

.

6

you

PERCENT

60.000

11.690

PERCENT

100.

100.

96.7

79.

24.3

take

CUM

94.2

88.

65.7

CUM

do

0

1

0 6

nobody

VALUE

friends

family

spouse

Question

more

a

few

day

few VALUE

on

Question

yes

no

VALUE

Question

week

same

weeks

days

before

than

LABEL

LABEL

LABEL

before

day

3J

before

31

3H

a

before

month

How

Who

Do

far

do you

before

TOTAL

VALUE

you

ahead

practice

VALUE

VALUE

TOTAL

TOTAL

0 2

1

usually

do

FREQUENCY

4

0

2

3 6

4

5

1

3

2

1

0

FREQUENCY

you

FREQUENCY

catch

992

203

782

go

usually

7

fishing

328

378 992

179

126 201

380

157

992

and

60

20

41

67

47

PERCENT

100.0

20.5

78.8

release

PERCENT

PERCENT

plan

.7

100.0

100.0

with?

33.1

38.1

18.

20.3

12.7

38.3

15.8

6.0

2.0

4.1

6.8

4.7

0

fishing

MISSING

PERCENT

100.0

VALID

fishing?

20.6

79.4

PERCENT

PERCENT

MISSING

MISSING

100.0

VALID

100.0

VALID

34.7 40.0

18

20.7

13.0

39.1

16.2

6.3

4.2

6.9

.

trips?

9

PERCENT

100.0

PERCENT

79,4

CtJN

PERCENT

100.0

100.0

93-7

58

18.

CtJN

95.8

82.8

23.0

62.1

CtThfI

6.9

.

9 9

>

VALUE

$301—$500

$201—$300

$lOl—$200

$5l—$100

$0—$50

Question

season?

no

less smaller

no

barbless

combination VALUE

no

Question

other

more

catch

larger

no

VALUE

increased

increase

size

shorter

Question

rivers,

like

violations

$501

fishing management

commercial

bait

netting,

enforcement

LABEL

to

limit

LABEL

and

LABEL

fines

limits,

fishing

season

see

5

which

hooks

4A

licence

4

release

stocking

at

How

of

used

If

for

all

fishing

needed

Alternate

(winter)

of

above

much

season

overfishing

fee

to

the

TOTAL

VALUE

TOTAL

VALUE

do

address

following

VALUE

you

9

7

6

5

4

3

0

1

0

TOTAL 9

8

7

6 4

5

3

2

1

management

FREQUENCY

FREQUENCY

spend

6

4

5

3

2

1

0

becomes

the

FREQUENCY

992

265

238

102

127

72

51 management

72

92

16

38

problem?

on 34

7

4

2

1

5

1

1

8

283

204

180

163

116

option

fishing

992

43 a

PERCENT

PERCENT

3

problem

100.0

100.0

70.8

26.7

24.0

10.3

12.8

9.7

5.6

2.8

1.4 7.0

PERCENT

1.4

1.4

7.3

9.3

1.6

3.8

3.4

.8

100.0

28.5

20.6

18.1

16.4

11.7

over

options

4.3

.3

MISSING

in

PERCENT

MISSING

PERCENT

100.0

VALID

100.0

VALID

78.5

a

26.9

24.2

10.4

12.9

Alberta

PERCENT

6.2

3.1

1.5 7.7

1.5

1.5

7.3

9.3

1.6

3.9

3.5

typical

MISSING

would

100.0

VALID

28.6

20.6

18.2

16.5

11.7

4.3

PERCENT

PERCENT

100.0

100.0

lakes

93.8

92.3

89.2

81.5

80.0

CUN

92.7

83.3

56.4

21.8

46.0

20.2

you

CUN

PERCENT 16.4

fishing

1.5

3.5

100.0

71.4

50.8

32.6

16.1

CUN

most

4.3 and

Travers

Mcgregor

Willow

Chain

Waterton

Oldinan

Waterton

Beauvais

Cochrane

Drywood

Dipping

Butcher

Bathing Mami

Cottonwood

Crooked

South

Barnaby

West

Beavermines

Carbondale

Lynx

Castle

Burmis

Crowsnest

Crowsnest

Crowsnest

Allison

Crowsnest

Oldman

Crowsnest

Racehorse

Livingstone

Dutch

Upper

Fishing visited

Question

yes

rio

VALUE

Question

castle

Creek

(paine)

Lake

castle

Creek

Qidman

River

Creek

LABEL

River

Lake

River

Reservoir

vat

Creek

Lake

Lake

Creek

(southfork)

Reservoir

River

Lake

(Chinook)

Reservoir

Lake Site

or

7

River

River 6

River

River

Lake

Creek

Creek

River

heard

Lake

Lake

River

River

at

Lake

River

Did

to

River

Which

fort

to

to

peigan

to

to

you

of

Lake

mouth

lundbrook

byron

Blairmore

of

Lake

macleod

as

go

the

reserve

a VALUE

sportfishing

TOTAL

Creek

fishing

following

2

1

0

Falls

FREQUENCY

FREQUENCY

UNAWARE

site?

413

539

378

707

634

687

856

523

611

906

815

956

910

907

645

741

601

913

741

684

849

457 579

577 667

776

670

744

616

571

735

593

729

702

750

975

992

in

11

fishing

6

PERCENT

Alberta

OF

PERCENT

41.6

54.3

38,1

71.3

63.9

69.3

52.7

86.3

61.6

82.2

91.3

96.4

91.7

91.4

74.7

92.0

74.7 85.6

46.1

65.0

67.5 78.2

58.2

75.0 60.6

69.0

74.1

57.6 67.2

58.4

62.1

59.8

73.5

70.8

75.6

SITE

100.0

98.3

1.1

sites

.6

in

FREQUENCY

PERCENT

1990?

MISSING

have

AWARE

453

579

614

285

358

305

469

136

100.0

381

VALID

177

98.9

251

251

143

535

322

216

248

421

415

257

399 347

263

290

308

376 391

242 325

413

86

36

82

1.1

85

79

you

PERCENT

OF

PERCENT

45.7

58.4

61.9

28.7

36.1

30.7

47.3

13.7

38.4

17.8

25.3

25.3

14.4

53.9

32.5

21.8 100.0

25.0

42.4

25.9

40.2

41.8

26.5

29.2

24.4

35.0

37.9

31.0

39.4

41.6

32.8

8.7

SITE

3.6

ever

8.3

8.6

8.0

98.9 CUM Question 7 (Continued) Which of the following fishing sites have you ever visited or heard of as a fishing site?

Fishing Site UNAWARE OF SITE AWARE OF SITE FREQUENCY PERCENT FREQUENCY PERCENT Keho Lake 596 60.1 396 39.9 Oldman River to forks 772 77.8 220 22.2 Nicholas sheran park Lake 808 81.5 184 18.5 Henderson Lake 702 70.8 290 29.2 Stafford Reservoir 824 83.1 168 16.9 Mcquillan Lake 905 91.2 87 8.8 Belly River 802 80.8 190 19.2 St mary River to Reservoir 803 80.9 189 19.1 St mary Reservoir 688 69.4 304 30.6 St mary River below Reservoir 802 80.8 190 19.2 Police (outpost) Lake 551 55.5 441 44.5 Cross Coulee Reservoir 904 91.1 88 8.9 Tyrrell Lake 732 73.8 260 26.2 Milk River ridge Reservoir 821 82.8 171 17.2 Goldsprings park pond 928 93.5 64 6.5 Milk River to miners Coulee Creek 903 91.0 89 9.0 Heninger Reservoir 832 83.9 160 16.1 Milk River to montana border 912 91.9 80 8.1 Chin Reservoir 623 62.8 369 37.2 Sherburne Reservoir 863 87.0 129 13.0 Lake south of burdett 889 89.6 103 10.4 Little bow Reservoir 614 61.9 378 38.1 Stonehill Lake 882 88.9 110 11.1 Badger Reservoir 798 80.4 194 19.6 Bow River bassano to mouth 598 60.3 394 39.7 Bow River carseland to bassano 567 57.2 425 42.8 Red deer River to dinosaur park 737 74.3 255 25.7 Brooks childrens pond 872 87.9 120 12.1 Cowoki Reservoir 891 89.8 101 10.2 Tilly b Reservoir 802 80.8 190 19.2 Lake newell 467 47.1 525 52.9 South sask River to border 753 75.9 239 24.1 Echo dale regional park pond 858 86.5 134 13.5 South sask River to rattlesnake 802 80.8 190 19.2 Rattlesnake sauder Reservoir 823 83.0 169 17.0 Cavan Lake 825 83.2 167 16.8 Michel]. Reservoir 850 85.7 142 14.3 Murray Reservoir 845 85.2 147 14.8 Bullshead Reservoir 846 85.3 146 14.7 Spruce Coulee Reservoir 793 79.9 199 20.1 Elkwater Reservoir 641 64.6 351 35.4 Reesor Lake 701 70.7 291 29.3

Cottonwood Mami

Crooked

South

Barnaby

Beavermines West

Carbondale

Lynx

Castle

Burmis

Crowsnest

Crowsnest

Crowsnest

Crowsnest

Chinook

Crowsnest

Oldman Racehorse

Dutch

Upper

Livingstone

CATEGORY

Question

VARIANCE

MEAN

mouth

Lundbreck

Passberg

Blairmore

Peigan

VALUE

Question

14

13

12

11 10

Castle

(Paine)

Creek

9

8

7

6

4

5

3

2

1

Castle

Creek

Oldman

River

Lake

(Blairmore

River;

Creek

(Southfork)

Lake

Reserve

FREQ

115

LABEL

8B

140.022

River; 14

13

River; 27

34

48

bridge 35

River;

53

River;

61 73

Lake

89

88

75

Creek

67

Creek

8A

10.325

River

Falls

(Legion

River

Lake

River

Lake

River

PCT

River,

(Allison

Hwy

12

How

Site

1

1

3

3 4

5

5

7

6

9

9

8

7

Lundbreck

Passberg

Blairmore

headwaters

(Byron

PCT

CUM

Pincher

80

78

77

74

71

67

63

57

51 44

35

26

22 14

many

bridge)

7

Lake

of

(NW

bridge

Lake)

MEDIAN

MINIMUM

fishing

trips

Cr.)

Branch)

VALUE

Cr

bridge

28

Falls 27

26

25

24

to 23

22

21

20

19

18

17

16

15

to

to

area)

did

trips

FREQ

CODE

to

to

21

33

30

you

4

21

22 1

20

1

4

1

19

17 3

1

16

4

18

14

15

13 7

12 3

3

10

11

9

8

6

5

7

4

3

2

6.000

1 1.000

PCT

take

0

0

0

2

0

0

0 0

3

0

1

0

0

3

PCT

CUM

92

91

91

89

91

88

88

88

88

85

84

83

83

83

COUNT

in

106

172

43

48

42 40

90

49

79

12

42

11

37 37

1990?

4

38

62

4

51

4

63

7

MAXIMUM

STD

VALUE

RESPONSES

99

75

70

61

52

60

50

48

45

40

36

35

33

30

DEV

PCT

0.1

0.1

1.5

0.6

0.1 2.5

0.7

0.6

0.6

1.3 0.1

0.7

1.1

0.2

0.2

0.6

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.9

0.7

0.9

FREQ

11

OF

39

3

2

2

2

1

1

4

1

9

1 7

1

PCT

PCT

99.000

11.833

10.7

CASES

17.3

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

1 0

1

0.4 0

4

0.4

4.3

0.4

4.8

4.2 4.0

9.1

0.7 8.0

4.9

1.2

1.1

3.7

4.2

3.7

3.8

6.3

5.1

6.4

100

100

PCT

OF

CUN

99

99

99

99

99

98

98

97

96

96

96 95

South Echo

Lake

Tilly

South

Cowoki

Brooks

Red

Bow

Bow

Badger

Stonehill Little

Unnamed

Sherburne

Chin Milk

Heninger

Milk

Goldsprings

Rattlesnake

Milk

Tyrrell

to

Cross

Police

St

St

St McQuillan

Provincial Belly

Stafford Henderson

Nicholas

Keho

Oldman

Travers McGregor

Montana Willow

Chain

Oldman

Waterton

Milk

Beauvais

Cochrane Waterton

Dipping

Butcher

Bathing

CATEGORY

Question

Saskatchewan Mary

Mary Mary

River;

River;

Deer

Dale

Newell

Reservoir

River-Miners

River;

River

Saskatchewan

Saskatchewan

B

Lake

River

Coulee

Reservoir

River

Childrens

Reservoir

Bow

Lake

Reservoir

(Outpost)

River;

Lake-near

River

Creek

Lake

River

Reservoir River;

River;

Reservoir

border Reservoir

Vat

Lake

Regional

Lake

Reservoir

Sheran

Lake

Reservoir

Reservoir

River

Lake

Reservoir

Lake

LABEL

8B

Lake

Bassano

Carseland

Lake

Reservoir

Ridge

Park

to

mouth

Park

Lake

Reservoir

-

below

Monarch

Miners

Upper

Finegan

(Continued)

near

border

pond

Park

pond

Reservoir

Lake

Burdett

Coulee

River;

Park of

River;

Dam

Reservoir

to

Fort

the

to

Lake

Coulee

to

to

Bassano

to

Reservoir

Creek

North

forks

Rattlesnake

mouth

Forks

Macleod

Dinosaur

Site

Cr.

to

to

of

CODE

69

66

68

67

65 64

63 62

59

58

57

61 54

60

56 55

53

52

50 48

51

47

49

46

42

44

41

45

40

39

43

36

38

35 33

34

37

32

29

30

28

27

24

25

23

31

fishing

COUNT

198

220

157

29

trips

12 54

22

12

12

69

12

89

44

91

54 171 234

308

36

11

49

10

26

47

35

5

27

12

29 94

12

3

26

27

83

17

1 20

19

35

13

8

5

8

7

1

RESPONSES

0.4

0.2

0.8

2.8

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.1

3.1

1.3 0.2

1.0

0.6

0.8 2.2

1.3

0.0

0.5

0.0

0.2

PCT

0.7 0.1

0.4

0.7

0.1

0.1

0.5

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.4

0.4

0.2 1.3 2.4

4.4

3.3

0.4

0.2 0.4

1.2

0.3

0.5

0.3

0.0

0.2

OF

20.0

22.2

PCT

15.8

2.9

1.2 5.4

2.2

CASES

1.2

0.5

1.2

9.0 7.0

1.2 4.4

5.4

9.2

17.2

31.0

0.3 23.6

3.6

0.1

4.9

1.1

2.6

4.7

1.0

0.5

3.5

0.7

0.8

0.8

1.2 2.7

2.9

1.2 9.5

2.6

1.7

2.7

8.4

1.9 3.5

2.0

0.1

1.3 OF

Ram

Cow

Battle

Beaver

Gull

Brazeau

Mckinnon

Buck

Elbow

Hidden

Crawling

Little

Ridge

Dickson

Crandell

Pine

Lost Waterton

Park

Krypt

Lake

Lessor

Sylvan Name

Moose

Spray

Pigeon Wolf

Highwood

Sheep

Kananaskis Weed

North

Severn

Catarack

Outside

Red

South

Milk

St

Oldman

Crowsnest

Bow

Reesor

Murray

Elkwater

Michell

Bullshead

Spruce

Rattlesnake/Sauder

Cavan

CATEGORY

Question

River

Lake

Mary

Lake

Deer

Lake

River,

Lake

Lake

Lake

Minnewanka

unknown

Lake

Lake

River River,

park

Lake

Lake

Lake

River

Ram

Lake

Lake

Saskatchewan

Lake

Chestener

Lake

Lake

Slave

Lake

Reservoir

River

River,

Lake

Coulee

Reservoir

dam

of

River,

Valley

flats,

Reservoir

Lake,

Park

River

Creek

River,

Lake

LABEL

8B

(Vauxhall

River

River,

Reservoir

Reservoir

Lake

province

general

(Bragg

general

Lake

(chain

general

Reservoir

(Waterton

(Continued)

general

Reservoir

(Bow

general

Lake

general

Creek

River,

Reservoir

area)

River)

Lakes)

area)

Ntl

general

Site

Pk)

of

CODE

132

131

129

128

122

121

119

100

118

117

116

115

114

112

lii

110

109

107

106

105

104

103

102

101

98

99

97

96

94

93

92

89

91

87

88

85

83

77

82 80

81

78

76

84 79

75

73 71

74

72

70

fishing

COUNT

trips

104

448

207

161

114

15

94

31

69

37

48

74

12

63

15

48

14

68

20

98

49 65

31

16

84

93

10

24

4

7

1

79

8

6 2

9

1

3

5

1

1

5 8

2

4

1 6

1

6

5

9

RESPONSES

PCT

0.2

1.3

1.0

0.1 0.0

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.1 0.7

0.4

1.1

0.9

0.0 0.2

0.1

0.5

0.1

0.0

0.1

0.2

1.5

0.0

0.0

0.1

1.0

0.7

0.0 0.1

0.2 0.9

1.4

0.1

0.7 2.3

0.1

0.3 3.0

6.4

0.0

0.0

1.2

0.4

0.2 1.6

0.3

1.3

0.1 0.1

0.1

1.1

OF

PCT

10.5

CASES

1.5

0.4

0.1

0.7

3.1

0.1

0.9

3.7

0.3

0.1

0.1

0.5

0.2 45.2

4.8 16.2 20.9

1.4

0.4

2.0

11.5

0.1

0.1

3.1

1.6

9.5

0.5

7.0

0.6

0.8

4.8

0.2 7.5

6.4

1.2

0.5

1.5

0.8

6.9

4.9

0.6

6.6

9.9

0.6

8.5

9.4

1.0

2.4

0.9

8.0 OF

Boon

Brown

Gap

Fickel

Cold

Sheep

Smokey

Pierre

Lake

Coal

Thirteen

Fish

Sturgeon Burnt

Dixon

Swan

Buffalo

Fallen

Touchwood

Strubel

Swawell Ghost

Chestermere

Fortress Medicine

Prairie

Swan

Siebert

Dickson

Banff

Saskatchewan Peppers

Twin

Jumping

Chester Glenmore

Rock

Clearwater

Pierce

Forestburg

Cold

Phyllis

Burnstick Raven

Pinehurst

James

Stauffer

Wabamum

Fork

Carson

Black

CATEGORY

Question

Lake

Lake

Creek

Lake Lake

Isle

River

Creek

Lake

Creek

Lakes

Lake

Timber

pond

Lake

Lake

Lake

Lake

Lake

River

Grey

Timber

River

River

Nugget

Lake

Lake

Lake

Creek

Lake

Lake

pond

Lake

Pound

Lake

Lake

Lake

(13)

Lake

Lake

Lake

Reservoir

Lake

Creek

LABEL

8B

Lake

Lake

areas

Lake

River

Lake

Lake

Creek

River

mile

Creek

mine

Creek

(Continued)

pit,

(Camrose)

Site

225

224

223

221

215

213

of

212

211

208

207

206

205

203

CODE

202

198

197 196

195

192

188

187

186

185

182

180

178

177

175

172

171

170

169

168

167

166

163

162

159

157

155

154

152

151

149

147

141

139

138

137

136

133

fishing

COUNT

trips

10

11

16

40

19

1

2

27

9

1

12

1

1 2

4

1

1

6

4

10

4

55

1 2

12

8

1 4

17

1

15

1

3

2

1

9

3

4

1

3

7

1

3

1 9

4

5

1 3

3

3

RESPONSES

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

PCT

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.0

0.1

0.6

0.3

0.0

0.4

0.0

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.8

0.0

0.2

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

OF

PCT

0.1

0.2

0.9

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

CASES

0.1

0.4

0.1

0.6

0.4

0.4

1.0

0.1

0.2

1.1

1.6

0.8

0.1

4.0

0.4

1.9 0.1

2.7

0.1

1.2

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.9

0.3

0.4

1.0 0.1

5.5

0.3

1.2

0.1

0.7

0.3

0.1

0.9

1.7

0.4

1.5

0.5

0.1

0.3

0.3

0.3 OF

Hector

Mirror

Hilers

Dogpound

Allan

Elbow

North

Sibbald Ghost

Mckenzie

Lac

Wall

Headwall

Castle

Nice

Cripple

Three

Tay

Anderson

Bridgeland

Bear

Writing

Forty Terrall

Carburn

Bearspaw Kananaskis

Barrier

Rock

Fish

Calling

Mclean

Blood

Stirling

Bassano

Elbow Lake

Michichi

Horseshoe

Beaver

Garner

Eagle

Langdon

Dutch Rolling

Todd

Watridge

Ribbon

Seebe

Taylor

Obrien

CATEGORY Question

des

Lake

Lake

Creek

pond

Creek

Island

Missawawi

Lake

bill

River

Saskatchewan

Creek

point

mile

Indian

Falls

Lake

dam

Reservoir

Lake

Lake

dam

Falls

Creek

flat

Lake

Arc

flats

Lake

Lake

Lake

Creek

Reservoir

on

Park

Lake

Lake

dam

Creek

Reservoir

Hills

Lake

Lake

dam

dam

trout

Reservoir

Lake

LABEL

SB

power

pond

Creek

dam

Stone

River

Creek

Lake

Reservoir

pond

(Calgary)

Reservoir

(Continued)

pond

plant

Park

River

(Oyen)

Site

of

CODE

290

289

288

283

282

281

280

278

279

277

276

275

274

273

271

270

269

268

266

267

264

265

263

262

261

260

256

255

254

253

252

251

250

248

247

244

246

243

242

240

241 239

238

237

236

235

232

234

230

227

226

fishing

COUNT

trips

18

12

16

27

13

43

1

1

5 22

1 4

12

22

5

2 14

2

2

1

6

10

2 16

1

2

3

8

1

2

2

1

4

1

3

3

2

1

9

4

1

1

3

1

4

1

1

1

3

1

2

RESPONSES

PCT

0.0

0.3

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.0

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.6

0.1

0.0

0.3

0.0

0.0

0.2

0.3

0.0

0.2

0.1

0.0 0.1

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

OF

PCT

CASES

0.1

0.1

1.8 0.5

1.2

0.1

0.4

1.6

0.5

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.2

0.6

0.2

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.1

0.8

0.2

2.7

0.1

0.2

0.1

1.3

0.4

0.3

0.3

0.1

0.2 4.3

0.9

0.4

0.1

2.2

0.1

0.3

1.2

2.2

0.1

1.4

0.4

0.1

1.6

1.0

0.1

0.1

0.3

0.1

0.2 OF Question 8B (Continued) Site of fishing trips PCT OF PCT OF CATEGORY LABEL CODE COUNT RESPONSES CASES Mudd Lake (Kanaskis area) 291 1 0.0 0.1 Meadow Creek 292 9 0.1 0.9 Marvel Lake 293 5 0.1 0.5 Pilot pond 294 2 0.0 0.2 Cypress Hills 296 1 0.0 0.1 Ford Creek 297 1 0.0 0.1 Yellow Lake 298 12 0.2 1.2 Rainy Lake 299 2 0.0 0.2 Windsor Lake 300 8 0.1 0.8 Upper Man Lake 301 1 0.0 0.1 Frenchmans Lake 302 2 0.0 0.2 Fairfax Lake 304 1 0.0 0.1 Long Lake 307 1 0.0 0.1 Alford Creek 309 1 0.0 0.1 Two Jack Lake 310 1 0.0 0.1 Winnifred Lake 311 1 0.0 0.1 Glenifer Lake 312 7 0.1 0.7 Island Lake 313 3 0.0 0.3 Cross Lake 314 1 0.0 0.1 Lost Creek 316 5 0.1 0.5 Lac la Biche 317 3 0.0 0.3 Cameron Lake, (Waterton Ntl Pk) 318 3 0.0 0.3 Rawson Lake 319 4 0.1 0.4 William Creek 320 5 0.1 0.5 Waiparous Creek 321 11 0.2 1.1 Johnson Creek 322 4 0.1 0.4 Lesueur Creek 323 9 0.1 0.9 Hidden Creek 324 3 0.0 0.3 Devils head Creek 325 4 0.1 0.4 Tay River 326 7 0.1 0.7 Thunder mountain Lake 327 1 0.0 0.1 Heliner dam 328 2 0.0 0.2 Tombstone Lake 331 1 0.0 0.1 Grizzly Lake 334 3 0.0 0.3 Lees Creek 335 6 0.1 0.6 Klaudts dam 336 4 0.1 0.4 Golden Lake 339 2 0.0 0.2 Shunda Creek 343 7 0.1 0.7 Sunken Lake 345 3 0.0 0.3 Enchant pond 346 4 0.1 0.4 Snaring River (Jasper Ntl Pk) 355 2 0.0 0.2 Fawcett Lake 356 2 0.0 0.2 Athabasca River 357 1 0.0 0.1 Two Lakes 358 1 0.0 0.1 Muriel Lake 360 1 0.0 0.1 Mcvinnie pond 363 10 0.1 1.0 Clear Creek 364 1 0.0 0.1 Dam H (Vauxhall) 365 6 0.1 0.6 Midway Reservoir 367 1 0.0 0.1 Bear Lake 369 7 0.1 0.7 Big Iron Lake 370 10 0.1 1.0

Cow

Pekisko

Squaw

Gloria

Flat

Owl

Botteral

Seven

Johnson

Flathead

Lee

Allison

Cameron

Scope

Daisy Horsefly

Herbert

Grotto

Pipestone

Elford Picture Rainy

Pickle

Fincastle Utikuma

Bighorn

Alexander

Storm

Michell

Elk

Lonesome

Sperser

Snipe Lilian

Green

Foremost Lys

East

Yarrow Three

Dewits

Winchell

Pincher

Carnovon Grassy

Margaret

Keeney

Sauder

Pearce

Grass

Lost

CATEGORY

Question

Creek

Lake

Creek

River

Creek

Lake

Creek

persons

dam

Scarpe

Creek

Ridge

Guide

Lake

Lake

Lake

Lake

Isle

pond

Creek

Jar

Lake

Creek

Lake

Lake

Creek

Creek pond

Creek

Lake

Lake

Reservoir

pond

Butte

Estate

River

Lake

Creek

Lake

Creek

Creek

Creek

Lake

Lake

dam

Lake

River Lake

Lake

Lake

LABEL

8B

Creek

Lake

Lake

Lake

Lake

Lake

Creek

Reservoir

Park

(Continued)

(Kananaskis

(Calgary)

area)

Site

433

431 430

of

429

428

427

426

425

424

CODE

423 422

421

420

419

418

417

415

414

413

412

411

410

408

407

406

405

404

401

402

400

399

398

397

396

393

394

392

391

390

389

388

387

385

384

382

381

380

377

372

373

371

fishing

COUNT

trips

13

8

1

1

1

2

1

2

2

2

2 7

3

1

2

3

1

1 2

4

1 29

3

3

3

3

1

1

3

1

1

1 2

4

1

1 3

2

3

4

1

1

2

7

1

2

4

5

1

1

1

RESPONSES

0.1

0.0

0.0 PCT

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0

0.1 0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.4

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

OF

PCT

0.8

0.1

0.1

0.1

CASES

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.7

0.3

1.3

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.4

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.1

0.1

0.3

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.4

0.1

0.3

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.7

2.9

0.2

0.4

0.5

0.1

0.1

0.1 OF

Bow

Harlech

Surveyors Loomis

Rockbound

Trout

Maude

Carrington

Christina

Moore

Bow

Sparrows

Libby

Missawawi

Battle

Lake

Blackstone

Lawrence

Berland Trap

Sundance

Little

Meeting

Hay

Mann

Mclaren

Ncfinney

Glacier

Sugar

Clarks

Camp

Vetch

Marie

Swan

Powder

Factory

Emerald

Fisher

Dalmead

Bow Kenney

Duck

Spring

Goldeye

Mud

Calolside

Skunk Muskeg

Baptiste

Grand

Battle

CATEGORY

Question

Provincial

City

River

Island

Haze

Creek

Creek

Lake

Creek

Creek

Creek

Lake

Lake

dam

Lake

factory

Lake

Creek

Lake

Creek

Creek

Bow Cache

Reservoir

pond

Lake

Creek

Coulee

Creek

Creek

River

River

Creek

Lake

River

Lake

Lake

Reservoir

egg Lake

Lake

Creek

Creek

pond

Lake

Lake

Lake

Lake

River

LABEL

8B

River

dam

Creek

River

town

Lake

Lake

Lake,

Park

(Continued)

pond

Taber

Site

of

528

533

527

525

524

CODE

523

521

520

519

518

503

502

499

501

498

494

491

488

485

484

483

482

481

480

477

476

473

472

469

468

463

461

460

458

457

455

454

453

452

450

448

447

446

444

443

442

441

440

439

438

437

fishing

COUNT

trips

12

16

2

1

1

1

1

1

1 2

4

1

1

2

3

1

4

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

3

2

1

2

1

2

2

1

2

3

4

4

1

4

1

1

1 2

1

3

1

1

5

1

RESPONSES

PCT

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

OF

PCT

CASES

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.4

0.1

1.2

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.1

0.1

0.4

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

1.6

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.3

0.2

0.4

0.1

0.4

0.4

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.3

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.5 OF

Medicine

Beaver University

Mosquito

Heart

Spray Chungo

Kickamen

Red

Lake

Emerson

Policemans

Lake

Spring

Milo

Barre

Paddy

Jensen

Private

Cat

Gardner Wardlow

Bertha

Coal

George

Heart

Shannon

Brewster

Crypt

Langdon

Marsh

Romeo Mill

Fitzsimmons

Canyon

Wabasco

Wizzard Victory

Little

Harold

Question

CATEGORY

Lodge

Creek

Kokariosa

of

Reservoir

Creek

Creek

River

River

Lake

flats

Lake

Lake

Lake

Lake

Creek

River

Point

dam

Lake

Creek

Creek

Bow

Creek

Lake

Horns

dam/pond/dugout

River

Creek

Lake

River

Lake

Lake

Creek

hat

Creek

Lake

Creek

LABEL

8B

Park

Reservoir,

flats,

Provincial

(Waterton

dam

Creek

(Waterton

College

beaver

(Continued)

Bow

pond

pond

Ntl

Lethbridge

River

Ntl

Park

TOTAL

Pk)

PK)

Site

RESPONSES

of

CODE

613

635

612

608

607

600 594

595

593

592

589

587

586

583

580

582

579

577

576

574

573

572

571

567

566 565

562

563

556

555

554

553

552

549

546

547

544

542

541

534

fishing

COUNT

6998

trips

1

1

3

1

1

1

2

1

1 2

1

1

1

1

1

1

6

2

1

1

1

3

1

1

2

1

2

1

1

1

1 9

1

1

4

2

1

1

1

3

RESPONSES

100.0

PCT

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0 0.0

0.0

0.0

OF

705.4

PCT

CASES

0.1

0.1

0.3

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1 0.6

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.3

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.9

0.1

0.4

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.3 OF

DISTANCE

Question

TOTAL

900_9991

750—799

800—899

700—749

650—699

600—649

550—599

500—549

450—400

400—449

350—399

300—349

250—299

200—249

190—199

180—190

170—180

160—169

150—159

140—149

130—139

120—129

110—119

100—109

‘The

33

90—99

80—89

70—79

60—69

50—59

40—49

30—39

20—29

11—19

1—10

MISSING

value

RESPONSES

TO

8C

SITE

of

Distance

CASES

999

was

6665

COUNT

to

178

10

187

269

479

113

332

470

356

529

418

592

398 486

352

956

12

10

17 49

50

20

90

33

68

74

87

used

5

1

1

6

4

9

4

site

959

for

RESPONSES

PCT

VALID

100.0

any

OF

0.2

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.2 14.3

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.7

0.8

2.7

0.3

1.4

0.5

1.0

2.8

4.0

1.1

1.3

7.2

1.7

5.0

5.3

7.1

7.9

8.9

6.3

7.3

6.0

5.3

value

CASES

695.0

CASES

PCT

137.6

25.6

1.4

12.9

26.9

10.6

12.5

38.7

68.9

16.3

47.8

51.2

76.1

0.7 67.6

0.1

85.2

60.1

57.3

0.9

0.1

1.7

50.6

69.9

0.6

1.3

0.6

2.4

1.4

7.1

7.2

2.9

4.7

9.8

of

OF

999

or greater.

pickeral

sturgeon

anything

other,

Lake

salmon

arctic goldeye

perch

whitefish

northern

trout

cutthroat brook

brown

walleye

rainbow

CATEGORY

Question

TOTAL

PARTY

Question

23

36

trout

trout trout

(unspecified

MISSING RESPONSES

grayling

(ling,

SIZE

MISSING

trout

50 40

can

30

25

18

16

15

pike

14

13

12

11

10

LABEL

8E

trout

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

SD

catch

Fish

sauger,

Size

CASES

CASES

COUNT

6772

1030

3172

1170

species

elsewhere)

160 245

820

of

27

18 55

46

1

1

1

1

1

3

5

5

2

6

3

suckers,

party

TOTAL

RESPONSES

100.0

sought

15.2

46.8

17.3

PCT

12.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.4

0.3

0.8

0.7

2.4

3.6

969

RESPONSES

956

OF

VALID

CODE

VALID

17

16

13

15

12

10

11

14

708.4

9

107.7

122.4

331.8 CASES

PCT

7

8

5

4 3

2

1

6

16.7 25.6

85.8

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.3

0.5

0.5

0.2

0.6

0.3 2.8

5.8

1.9

4.8

CASES

OF

CASES

COUNT

8265

2195

3218

233

108

518

238

163

633

511

38

33

70 20

86

40

74

87

RESPONSES

100.0

26.6

38.9

PCT

0.5

0.4

0.8

0.2

1.3

1.0

0.5

0.9 2.8

6.3

2.0

1.1 2.9

7.7

6.2

OF

852.9

PCT

226.5

332.1

CASES

11.1

24.0

53.5

16.8

24.6

65.3

52.7

3,9

3.4

7.2

2.1

8.9

4.1

7.6

9.0 OF Question 8F Number of fish caught

PCT OF PCT OF FISH CAUGHT COUNT RESPONSES CASES 1 661 13.5 73.3 2 872 17.8 96.7 3 606 12.4 67.2 4 542 11.0 60.1 5 406 8.3 45.0 6 301 6.1 33.4 7 134 2.7 14.9 8 192 3.9 21.3 9 85 1.7 9.4 10 275 5.6 30.5 11 34 0.7 3.8 12 97 2.0 10.8 13 34 0.7 3.8 14 24 0.5 2.7 15 135 2.8 15.0 16 22 0.4 2.4 17 11 0.2 1.2 18 30 0.6 3.3 19 13 0.3 1.4 20 108 2.2 12.0 21 10 0.2 1.1 22 9 0.2 1.0 23 11 0.2 1.2 24 9 0.2 1.0 25 43 0.9 4.8 26 5 0.1 0.6 27 4 0.1 0.4 28 7 0.1 0.8 29 1 0.0 0.1 30—39 94 1.9 10.4 40—49 44 0.9 4.9 50—59 28 0.6 3.1 60—69 18 0.4 2.0 70—79 8 0.2 0.9 80—89 6 0.1 0.7 90—99 3 0.1 0.3 100—149 13 0.3 1.4 150 1 0.0 0.1 200 7 0.1 0.8 225 1 0.0 0.1 300 1 0.0 0.1 354 1 0.0 0.1 450 1 0.0 0.1

TOTAL RESPONSES 4906 100.0 543.9 90 MISSING CASES 902 VALID CASES

Question

307

TOTAL

MISSING

FISH

8G

RESPONSES

150—199

100—149

NUNBER

90—99 Number

80—89

70—79

60—69

50—59

40—49

30—39

CASES

400

270

220

200

29

28

27

26

25

24

23

22

21

20

19

18

17

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

9

8

7

5

6 4

3

2

1

of

fish

2974

COUNT

199

242

183 286

337

453

579

10

27

18 57

24

83

10

16

76

24

15 38

685

17

99

35

1 75

1

2

1 5

9

3

4

5

released

3

5

2

2

4

2

3

5

9

5

VALID

RESPONSES

100.0

PCT

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.1 11.3

19.5

0.1

15.2

0.2 0.3

0.6

0.9

1.9

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.8

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

2.8

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.5

2.6

0.5

0.8

1.3

0.6

6.7

1.2

3.3

2.5

8.1

6.2 9.6

CASES

OF

434.2

PCT

CASES

12.1

11.1

29.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

14.5

0.3 26.7

0.7

10.9

41.8

35.3 49.2

1.3

0.4

0.7 84.5

0.6

2.6 66.1

1.5

8.3

3.9

0.4

0.7

0.3

0.3

3.5

0.6

0.3

0.4

0.7

1.3

1.5 2.3

0.7

2.2

5.5

3.5

2.5

5.1 OF

date

Question

Ocean Reservoir

Pond,

Lake River

Stream,

CATEGORY

Question

503

2 This

on

mine

3

the

MISSING

MISSING

Creek,

TOTAL

81

LABEL

8H

is

trip

pit

Length

computed

Type

RESPONSES

brook

CASES

calendar.

CASES

CODE

of

of

34

22

16 15

14

13 12

11

10

9

8

7

6 5

4

3

2

1

waterbody

by

fishing

TOTAL

subtracting

COUNT

1852

489

190

826

695 RESPONSES

trip 2

989

28

23

33

1

1

4

4

4

1

6

3

8

9

8

8

CODE

VALID

VALID

RESPONSES

6

5 2

4

1

3

100.0

the

PCT

44.6

10.3 37.5

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.3

0.2

0.4

0.5

0.4

0.4

1.5 1.2

1.8

CASES

CASES

end

OF

COUNT

3425

2007

6971

777

137

613

date

PCT

378.7

12

CASES

142.1

168.9

38.9

0.2

0.2

0.8

0.2

0.8

0.8

0.6

1.2

1.6

1.8

1.6 1.6

5.7

4.7

6.7

OF

RESPONSES

from

100.0

PCT

49.1

11.1

28.8

0.2

2.0

8.8

the

OF

start

PCT

704.9

346.3

CASES

202.9

78.6

13.9

62.0

1.2 OF

male

female

VALUE

Question

VALUE

town)

Question

127

122

121

104

101

95

90

85

87

80

84

69

68

66

65

63

62

60

59

58

51

46

45

43

41

38

35

34

29

26

19

18

14

13

2

LABEL

M

FREQ

391

11

10

14

14

27

I

2

1

3

6

3

13

1

1

2

1

2

2

1

5

1

4

1

1

10

8

1

2 2

5

1 7

2

2

1 5

3

S

Are

PCT

40

S

0

0

0

1 0

0

0

0

0

1 0

0

0

0

1

0

1

0

0

1

0

0

1

0

3

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

1

I

What

you

56

56

56

56

55

55

55 PCT

GUM

55

54

54

53

53

53

53

53

52

52

50

50

49

50

48

48

47

47

N

TOTAL

VALUE

7

4

4

3

3

2

2

2

2

1

G

male

is

0

2

1

D

VALUE

your

254

252

251

244

243

237

234

233

232

213

208

207

206

205

201

198

197

193

190

191

FREQUENCY

188

or 185

A

175

177

173

172

165

162

159

153

145

141

139

134

133

T

female?

A

place

992

815

176

FREQ

100

106

28

14

15

18

1

13

VALUE

2

1

1

5

4

4

3

1

2

2

8

5

4

2

1

2

1

2

1

2

1

1

3

3

3

1

9

3

PCT

of

PERCENT

10

0

0

0 11

3

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

2

1

1 2

100.0

0

0

0

1 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

17.7 82.2

residence

0 95

95

94

94

91

91

90

90

90

PCT

90

89 CUM

89

88

86

85

85

83

83

82

82

81

.1 81

81

80

80

70

80

70

70

59

58

58

58

58

57

FREQ

MISSING

PERCENT

100.0

VALID

VALUE

82.2

17.8

333

332

331

326

324

323

322

320

312

315

307

306

305

304

302

301

300

299

298

296

294

291

290

289

288

284

283

281

278

273

272

266

262

256

24

(nearest

FREQ

PERCENT

100.0

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

3

82.2

1

2

2

1

CtJN

5

1

1

1

2

2

1

1

1 2

2

1

1

2

1

5

1

city

PCT

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

100

100

100

100

100

99

99

99

PCT

99

99 CUM

99

99

99

98

98

98

98

98

98

97

97

97

97

97

96

96

96

96

96

96

96

95

95

95 or

VARIANCE

MEAN

VALUE

your

Question

VARIANCE

MEAN

VALUE

Question

33

32

31

30

29

28

27

25

26

24

23

22

21

20

19

18

17 16

household?

LABEL

FREQ

133.849

13A

38

1.194

30

34

35

35

29

21

24

22

18

16

13

14

13

10

37.989

15

12

.870

9

1

PCT

What

How

4

3

3

4

4

3 2

2 2

2

2

1

1

1

1

1 2

0

P

CTJN

38

34

31

28

24

21

18

16

13

11

CT

many

TOTAL

VALUE

9

8

6

4

5

3

2

0

is

MINIMUM

MEDIAN

99

MEDIAN

MINIMUM

your

5

4

3

2

1 0

MISSING

children

VALUE

FREQUENCY

51

50 49

48

47

46

45

44

43

42

41

40

39

38

37

36

35

34

VALUE

age

992

218

158 527

FREQ

0

in

10

11

62

under

16

16

12

10

14

6

17 25

21

18

25

29

33

31

22

43

37

52

38

years?

36.000

16.000

FREQ

.000

.000

PCT

PERCENT

2

2

100.0

1

1

1

2

3

2

2

3

3

3

3

2

4

4

5

4

5

the

22.0

15.

53.1

DATA

1.0

1.1 6.3

PCT

CUM

85

83

81

80

79

78

76

74

71

.6 70

67

64

61

58

55

51 47

42

9

age

MAXIMUM

STD

MISSING

PERCENT

MAXIMUM

STD

100.0

of

VALID

VALUE

22.2

16. 53.7

1.1

6.3

DEV

72

70

69

68

65

64

63

62

61

.6

59

60

16

58

57

56

55

54

53

52

DEV

1

are

FREQ

PERCENT

100.0

10

15

11

12

10

17

13

17

1

1

1

7

99.4

1

9

98.3

5

92.0

53

69.8

6

CUM

there

8

7

.

72.000

PCT

5.000

11.569

1.093

7

0

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

1 2

1

1

1

1

2

1

2

1

100

100

100

100

100

in

PCT

CUM

99

98

97

96

96

94

93

92

91

90

88

88 86

VARIANCE

MEAN

VALUE

how

Question

VARIANCE

MEAW

VALUE

Question

VARIANCE

MEAN

VALUE

how

Question

many

many

LABEL

LABEL

LABEL

of

14B

14A

13B

of

.050

.068

them

.083

.135

.595

.857

them

How

If

If

fish?

there

there

many

fish?

TOTAL

VALUE

TOTAL

VALUE

TOTAL

VALUE

MEDIAN

MINIMUM

MEDIAN

MINIMUM

99

MEDIAN

MINIMUM

99

3

2

99

0

1

adults

4 are

3

2

are

1

0

5

4

2

3

1

0

FREQUENCY

FREQUENCY

FREQUENCY

any

any

over

992

939

children

992

922

adults

13

992

32

142

161

635

13

17

37

7

1

11

34

1

2

8

1

65

.000

.000

.000

.000

PERCENT

.000

.000

PERCENT

100.0

are

PERCENT

100.0

over

94.7

100.0

92.9

1.3

under

3.2

14.3

16.2

64.0

1.3

3.7

1.7

.1

.7

1.1

3.4

.1

.2

there

.1

.8

65

MISSING

MAXIMUM

STD

16

PERCENT

MISSING

MAXIMUM

STD

PERCENT

100.0

MISSING

VALID

MAXIMUM

in

STD

PERCENT

100.0

VALID

95.9 in

100.0

VALID

94.2

in

3.3

14.5

64.7

16.4

3.8

1.7

0EV

your

.1

.7

3.5

DEV

.1

.2

your

DEV

.1

.8

your

PERCENT

household,

PERCENT

household?

100.0

PERCENT

household,

100.0

99.9

99.2

95.9

CUM

100.0

99.9

99.7

98.0

94.2

CUM

99.9

99.1

95.6

81.1

64.7 CUN

3.000

4.000

.261

5.000

.368 .926

VARIANCE

MEAN

VALUE

that

Question

VARIANCE

MEAN

>100,000

90,001—100,000

80,001—90,000

70,001—80,000

60,001—70,000 45,001—50,000

50,001—60,000

40,001—45,000

35,001—40,000 25,001—30,000

30,001—35,000

20,001—25,000

VALUE

10,001—15,000

15,001—

5,001—10,000

0—5,000

annual

Question

you

LABEL

LABEL

household

20,000

16

have

12.785

15

11.641

6.458

8.536

Please

Which

completed?

income

of

circle

MINIMUM MEDIAN

MEDIAN

MINIMUM

the

VALUE

TOTAL

VALUE

TOTAL

before

following

the

20

19

18

17

16

15

14

13 12

11

10

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

77

0

9

8

7

6

5

9

7

8

0

6

5

4

3

2 1

FREQUENCY

highest

FREQUENCY

taxes?

12.000

5.000

992

313

8.000

categories

1.000

105

107

10 103

12 27

32

84 992

66 96

79

23

92

79

46

26

36

13

45

16

60

91

66 93

46

69

4].

15 16

61

5

1

1

number

9

PERCENT

PERCENT

100.0

31.6

100.0

1.0

1.2

2.7

3.2 10.8

10.

8.5

6.7

9.7

10.4

8.0

9.3

8.0

4.6

2.6

2.3

of

3.6

1.3

1.6

4.5

6.0

6.7

9.2

9.4

7.0

4.6

4.1

1.6

MAXIMUM

1.5

6.1

STD

.5

.1

.1

MAXIMUM

.9

STD

best

6

years

PERCENT

DEV

PERCENT

MISSING

DEV

MISSING

MISSING

represents

100.0

32.3 VALID

100.0

1.0

1.2 2.8

8.7

3.3

11.5

6.8 11.7

8.2

9.9

11.2 VALID

9.5

8.2 10.2

4.7

2.7

of

3.9

1.4

4.9

1.7

6.6

7.2

9.9

7.5

5.0

4.5

1.0

1.7

.5

.1

.1

education

PERCENT

20.000

PERCENT

2.541

16.000

100.0

3.412

99.0

97.7

100.0

94.9

91.6

83.0

76.2

58.1

66.3 25.8

16.3

CUM

96.1

94.7

92.9

88.

81.4

70.0

58

51.1

41.2

8.2 29.9

3.4

19.

12

your

CUM

7.2

2.7

1.0

.7

.2

.1 .

.

0

3

8 2 Question 17 How many hours do you normally work for pay each week? CUM CON VALUE CUN FREQ PC? PC? VALUE FREQ PC? PC? VALUE PREQ PC? PC? 0 104 11 11 26 2 0 19 54 2 0 91 3 2 0 11 30 17 2 20 55 4 10 1 92 1 0 11 32 3 0 21 56 6 1 93 5 3 012 35 18 223 60 31 396 6 1 012 36 13 65 7 124 2 096 4 0 12 37 49 5 29 68 1 0 96 8 9 1 13 38 12 1 30 70 10 7 1 97 8 1 14 39 4 0 31 77 1 0 97 12 2 0 14 40 389 41 72 80 15 11 1 98 1 014 42 12 173 84 4 099 16 3 0 14 43 1 0 73 88 18 1 0 99 2 0 15 44 30 3 76 90 3 0 99 20 16 2 16 45 33 3 80 21 96 1 0 99 2 017 46 5 180 98 1 099 22 1 017 47 1 100 23 080 5 1100 1 0 17 48 12 1 81 112 1 24 7 0100 1 18 50 86 9 90 168 2 0100 25 8 1 18 52 2 0 91 MISSING DATA VALUE PREQ VALUE PREQ VALUE PREQ 99 1 999 38 MEAN 37.559 MEDIAN 40.000 STD DEV VARIANCE 19.041 362.541 MINIMUM .000 MAXIMUM 168.000

VARIANCE

MEAN

VALUE

Question

miscellaneous

not

self—employed

retired

homemaker

student

clerical

armed

labourers operative

real

retail

service

transportation

tradesman

managerial

farming contractor

professional

VALUE

Question

communication

16

15

14

13

12

10

VALUE

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

0

in

estate

99

forces

LABEL

labour

sales

FREQ

189.467

116

occupations

317

(farmer,

19

13.073

82

56

15

18

8

5 1

2

1

3

2

1

(unskilled)

2

2

FREQ

PCT

How

12

and

34

force

1 0

1

9

0

6

1 0

2

0

0

0

0

0

What

and

PCT

many

CUM

44

44

56

43

37

65 37

65

35

36

34

34 34

34

rancher)

34

technical

do

MEDIAN

MINIMUM

days

MISSING

VALUE

you

VALUE

TOTAL

33 31

30

28

27

26

24

25

23

36

21

35 22

20

17

19

16

18

of 15

17 14 consider

12

VALUE

11

10

13

0

9

8

5

7

6

2

3

4

1

999

paid

FREQ

FREQUENCY

109

34

14

59

70

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

7

3

2

14.000

vacation

FREQ

PCT

.000

your

992

162

136

12

168

23

42

33

31

10 55

0

0 4

24

1 0 31

52

0

0

6 57

0

28

51

0 7

79

0

0

40

1

5

5

8

DATA

3

PCT

CtJM

97

97

97

92

93

91

91 85

85

85

84

77

98

65

98

main

PERCENT

100.0

do

13.7 16.3

16.9

2.3

4.2

3.3

1.0

3.1

5.5

2.4

3.1 5.2

5.7

VALUE

MAXIMUM

2.8 8.0

4.0

STD

.5

.5

occupation

.8

.3

186

110

100

you

90

80

75

70

60

50 49

44

40

37

DEV

PERCENT

get

MISSING

100.0

14.1

16.8

FREQ

VALID

17.4

2.4

3.4

4.4

1.0

3.2

5.7

2.5

3.2

5.4

5.9

8.2

4.1

.5

.5

each

.8

.3

1

1

1

1

1 2

3

1 4

1

1

1

1

186.000 to

PCT

13.765

PERCENT

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

year?

0

be?

100.0

97.6

94.2

88.8

100 93.2

85.6

100

79.9

100

76.7

100

74.2

100

73.7

68.3

67.7

52.8

66.9

46.9

PCT

30.1

25.9

CUM

25.6

17.4

CUN

99

99

99

99

98

98

98 98

never

seldom

sometimes always

VALUE

Question

never

seldom

always

sometimes

VALUE

Question

never

seldom

sometimes always

VALUE

Question

LABEL

LABEL

LABEL

20C

20B

20A

I

My

I

could

take

job

has

be

time

VALUE

VALUE

TOTAL

VALUE

TOTAL

working

TOTAL

flexible

off

4

3

2

1

4

0

3

2

1

0

4

3

2

1

0

FREQUENCY

FREQUENCY

FREQUENCY

work

on

working

276

150

313 181

days

347

992

161

275

108

to

414

992

195 241

101

72

992

54

88

go

PERCENT

I

PERCENT

PERCENT

hours

fishing

take

100.0

27.8

15.1

31.6

18.2

100.0

35.0

16.2

27.7

10.9

100.0

41.7

19.7

24.3

10.2

7.3

5.4

8.9

fishing

PERCENT

PERCENT

PERCENT

MISSING

MISSING

100.0 MISSING

30.0

VALID

16.3

34.0

19.7

100.0

38.9

VALID

18.1

30.9

12.1

100.0

45.8

VALID

26.7

21.6

6.0

trips

PERCENT

PERCENT

PERCENT

100.0

100.0

70.0

53.7

19.7

100.0

CUN

61.1 43.0

12.1

CUM

54.2

32.6

CUN 6.0 Appendix C: A Summary of Comments Provided by the Respondents

Space was left at the end of the questionnaire for additional written comments. A total of 658 respondents added comments to their form. These comments were broken down for ease of analysis into 4 basic categories: (1) management, (2) environment, (3) fishing experience, and (4) the questionnaire. The breakdown within these categories, and the response rate for each sub-category is outlined on the following page. The total of the listed comment categories is greater than 658 as each respondent could have a comment in more than one category.

(1) Management The comments on management were for the most part an elaboration of the response to question 4, which asked about management options in the face of overfishing. In the original question, there was a response code for other, with listed responses showing as question 4a. The outline here is similarly broken down, with other management comments also appearing. A total of 140 comments appear that are directly related to the question, with an additional 116 related to the ‘other” section of the question. The comments also show that some people are opposed to several of the options listed in the question. The largest opposition appears to be to any increase in the licence fees (19). This could be tempered somewhat, as there were several respondents who would agree with a higher fee if the fee was guaranteed to go to Fish and Wildlife. Those that showed a desire for bait fishing usually suggested that it was in the interest of their children, that bait fishing is easier for them. There was some opposition to stocking of particular fish species, however stocking is desired by a total of 40 respondents. There is a strong desire for stronger enforcement of the regulations, (40) and higher fines (4) for offenders, (see below under “other”). There are some who believe that the commercial and native fishing is destroying the recreational fishery, and that netting should be stopped or severely restricted (27 in total). In the “other” section, far and away the greatest response was for a combination of the options listed in the question (72 of 116). In particular, there were many within this category that wanted a combination of better enforcement and higher fines. There was some comparison with other jurisdictions, with more thinking Alberta is bad in comparison, than those thinking Alberta is better. Understanding of the regulations seems to be a concern (10). The desire for better access (16) should not be considered as contrary to those wishing to restrict development (29) in the Environment category. The desire for better access is to existing areas, and in particular access for the elderly or handicapped. This also includes more shoreline access to larger water bodies in the region. The desire to restrict development was basically meant for wilderness areas, and against commercial facilities such as golf courses.

(2) Fishing Experience Fishing experience refers to the enjoyment of the act of fishing, and not to how long the person has been fishing. The general trend of these comments is that catching fish is not nearly as important as the chance to get out of the city, spend time with the family, and provide a wholesome activity for their children, (44 total). There were also 14 people who feel that information about the quality of fishing at various locations is not sufficient. In

stated

remember

question

general

major also

the

27

(4)

to

agriculture.

or

littering.

specific

and

(3)

Montana.

that

connection

who

a

semi-wilderness

survey

The

Environment

stated

particular

general

they

that

complaint

Comments

Environmental

stated

mood

Questionnaire

was

mention

As

no

did

all

they

that

On

with

asked

The

stated

longer

pollution

of

was

not they

water

will

the

they

the

referee

the

people

of

cover

concerning

that

in

were

above, other

areas.

keep

fish

information

pulp

would

comparison

advance body,

concerns

levels

it

in

the

glad

to

who

a

hand

would

mill

the

Alberta,

fishing

The

the

such

appreciate

area

at

to

mentioned

the

of

development

pollution,

9

fishing

appeared

the

be

poor

be

the

on as

where

thought

of

questionnaire

log

included that

Police

more

their

management

fishing

fishing

habitat

from

diary\trip

a

the

the

but

survey

a

trips.

the

in

efficient

Lake

need

season.

respondent

sites

restriction

fishing

now

the

in

water

fishing

problem

the

comments,

However,

for

itself

(twice).

log to

on,

(49).

with

and was

survey.

raise

quality

Many

their

that

in

in

were

(29)

other

better

This

anticipation

lived\fished.

(13)

the

Alberta

water

was

area

stated

along

was

most

is

mostly

The

response

included

jurisdictions,

included

applied

included

elsewhere,

of

levels

not

to

largest

with

often

that

the

negative,

be

of

mentioned

Many

they

more

province. always

to

the

water

problems very

in

any

as

complaint

existing

relation

including

complaint,

question

simply

24

good.

future

of

accurate

except

were

pollution,

persons

these

as

wilderness,

The

created

could

to

surveys.

referring

was

much

BC.

8.

littering

people

for

if

some

other

stated

The

that

with

not

the

the

and

by as

category.

MANAGEMENT’

1 The

Other

Elaboration

Elaboration

numbers

management

The

Need

Too

Need

Fines Trout

Alberta

Should

Should

Hatchery

Alberta

Other

Regulations

Less

Desire

Smaller

No

Barbiess

Rotational

Combination

No

Larger

Do Prefer

More

Stock

Stock

Stock

Start

Opposed

Start

Increase Do

Increase

Desire

No Size

Shorter

to

in

fishing

commercial

many

management

of

not

not

netting bait

better

more

and

Unlimited

Question

brackets

limit

provinces

stocking

stocking

response

enforcement

Walleye

restrict more

Perch

control/restrict

larger

catch

does

fines

has

catch

agree

bait

increase

hooks

problems

fishing season

licence

studies/bureaucracy,

comments

stocking

licence

to

public

fly-in

required

closures

access

better

are

of

a Trout

fishing

needed

stocking

and

and

catch

of

limits

with

other

following

good

Perch

fish

Bass

4.9

and

should

fishing

too

to

does

have

management

camps

(2)

(opposed)

fees

needed

needs

fees

licence

release

Walleye

to management

(unspecified)

(Other) Question

caused

(1)

catch

(10)

limits

Trout

needed

desirable

hard

job

(7)

(7)

(1.)

activities

(4)

(4)

existing

good

(1)

better

should

native Bass

(2)

be

in

to

of

each

(1)

fees

to

and

(5)

(20)

(2)

lakes

used

(1)

(2)

be

problems

managing

work

(1)

(1)

(40)

understand

management

4

fishing

go

areas

category

(4)

release

better

(e.g.

techniques

(19)

not

(3)

(13)

than

directly

(32)

(2)

enough

water-skiing)

(16)

educated

recently

(4)

other

its

(2)

are

to

fish

(10)

needed

the

action

(11)

Fish

provinces

(12)

number

(3)

(14)

and

on

(72)

(5)

fishing

Wildlife

(3)

of

responses

lakes

(12)

(3)

for that

QUESTIONNAIRE

ENVIRONMENT

FISHING

Cannot

Glad

The

Do

Do

The

Should

Forestry

Habitat

Should

Pollution

Raise

Fish

Not

The

The

Trips

Usually Don’t

Fish

Want

Have

Fish

Fishing

EXPERIENCE

not

not

questions

survey

an

to

and

fishing

trip

at

less

water

are

been

information

plan

send

give

appreciate

understand

not

be

avid

for

one

fish

is

practices

is

Wildlife

and

than

a

a

a

does

develop

for

fish

only

my

in too

stress

out

levels

spot

fisherman

part

family

outside

littering

are

Alberta

in

the

fishing

is

ill

diary

not

one

only

of

the

stocks

too

poor

cause

questions

reliever,

to

the

sake

on

(6)

recreation

fishing

the

apply

of

response

past

fish

vague

before

good

are

trips

purpose

is

(7)

Alberta

(13)

survey of

problems

(13)

are

good

recently

major

to

children

sites

fishing

(8)

fishing

about

or

declining

(2)

the

my

experience

to

complicated

of

(24)

(9)

(27)

problems

area (29)

season

many

is

the

income

sites

(3)

(3)

(10)

not

of

(46)

survey

of

a

the

(14)

(27)

the

priority

or

(20)

(49)

province

(6)

occupation

questions

(2)

(24)

(67)

(11) (1) C C I

J

Friends

2.

Picnic/Camping

Site

where Good

Owning reason

Familiarity Distance Site

Access

1.

Water

Natural

Privacy

Knowing

Good

Good

Good

Alberta.

‘Tour

look

We

Please

When

with

D.

C.

limited

(please

B.

A.

road

would

chance

chance

quality:

chance

you

for

to

or

How

from

What

land

answers

is

beauty

Approximately

Approximately boat

from

wilderness

that

relatives

Fishing

important

L

you

access

answer

when with

to

want

or

other

check access:

like

to

to

to

the

did

home:

fly

are

olsurroundings:

a

facilities

decide

the

catch

catch

catch

Less

cabin

to fishing:

lake

to

choosing

to

you

to

live

anglers:

16

the

area:

the

areas:

he

OflC

the

fish?

than know

-

a

limit:

trophy-sized

is

nearby:

near or

in 20

first

site:

preferred

specific

to

at

following

stocked

NUMBER

following

box

not.

how

or

5

how

go

Alberta:

the

become Please

what

a

near

below) sportfishing,

fishing

site:

many

many

with

things

species:

the

you

fish:

questions

circle

questions

fish:

site:

OF

aware

times

years

site

think

about

Recreation

PREVIOUS

one

in

how

have

have

of

about

Important

Alberta?

about

this

will

response

21

6-

this

Not

I 1

1

1

1 1

1

1 I

1

1

1

1 1

1

important 1 1

-

you

you

10

30

site

help

Alberta’s

site?

trips

visited

fished

that

VISITS

Where

us Today

for

to

2

2

understand 2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

you

2

2 2

2

your

are

each

at

this

angling

do

this

particularly

(check

the

favorite

and

question

site

L

you

Somewhat

Important

following

site?

3

3

3

3

resources.

3

3

3

in

3

More

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

go

your

one

in

the

11

fishing

fishing?

to

the

than box): -

______

enjoy?

past

views

15

indicate

factors

30

4

4

4

Future 4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

5 4

4

4

What

site.

of

years?

How

fishing

in

years

if

do

deciding

Important

the

often?

Vety

you

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5 in

H.

G.

Please

F.

E.

Bait D.

From

site?

C.

the

Time

1-2

B. Less

Please A.

Do

Approximately

In

What

usually

3.

What

Fishing

Generally

Hours[

How

following.

What

pounds,

Shore

than

Please

you

spent

Please

check

check

method type

long 1

practice

do

travelling

lb

type

[

one

circle

answer

approximately

when

speaking,

of

do

one

of

of

Camper/R.V.

fishing

Walk/Bicycle

of

you

how

TRANSPORTATION

Hall

catch-and-release

one

transportation

of

the

Spin

to

you

fishing

each

the

the

stay

many

of Day

following.

Casting

Motorboat

go

do

how

site

the

following.

of

at

fishing.

do

you

1-4

is:

how

years

the

the

enjoyable

following.

you

lbs.

usually

following

site

much

do

usually

of

Unc.njoyablc

Full

on

you

fishing?

fishing

[er

I

Very

do

fish

do?

your

Day

1

j

Trolling

usually

Motorbike/ATV

USED

questions

use?

you

do

Please

experience

typical (please

_____J

Canoe/Rowing

you

find

Please

5-10

use

TO

take

check

the

spcciti)

trip

about

to

lbs.

GET

2

2-3

check

time

go

YES

home

do

to

Days

I one

from Fly

TO

a

you

a

spent

typical

fishing

one

of

J

Fishing

on

SITE

have?

your

J

the

3

of

a

travelling

typical

Car/Truck/Van

the

following.

site?

fishing

More

home

(check

More following.

______

Please

than

fishing

Other

to

NO

4

trip

Than

one

to

Ice

a

10

the

fishing

years

or

box):

check

Fishing

lbs.

3

trip?

Days

fishing

what Enjoyable

[

E

Very

5

one site? you

______

of I

6.

Please

as

5.

management

4.

J.

I.

vehicle

Did

How

Spouse

If

Who

1-low

Increase

of

The

Please

Catch

If

overfishing

If

Shorter

you

check

the

YES

NO

much

do

far

next

costs

and

following.

go

Licence

[

fl

you

I

(you

ahead

try

j

(you

On

the

Season

A

options

sportfishing Release

do

4

MANAGEMENT

your

Week

(gasoline,

usually

the

pages

S201-S300

AMOUNTSPENT

did

becomes

category

you

did

50-550

Fees

do

Same

j

best

not

Before

go

spend

you

would

of

YES

go

fishing

Day

I

go

to

questions

USUALLY

oil,

usually

Friends

below

in a

fishing

fishing

answer

problem

on

you

Alberta

etc.),

fishing

in

Larger

which

most

plan

with?

OPTION

Alberta

in

license

are

them

Few

______I

Increase

ONFISHINGPERSEASON(check:onè:ibx);::;

in

in

Alberta

Fines PLAN

like

fishing

over

Day

very

best

Size

Weeks

Alberta

1990?

Please

as

5301-5500

551-5100

in to

costs,

Before

Limit

for

Stocking

a

completely

important. represents

I

see

FISHING

1990),

typical

WOULD

trips?

in

Before

Violations

Please

check

lakes

1990),

food/accomodation

used

Family

Please

please

fishing

check

and

one

to

please

the

NO

as

USE

TRIPS

address

possible.

rivers,

of

continue.

amount

check

one

season?

More

the

(checkone

go

(cheek

box

following.

which

MoreThanSSOO

the

to

Few

one

Than

More

you

5101-5200

No

Question

below.

costs,

problem?

(include

Days

of

Bait

a

one

Enforcement

of

spend

Other

Month

the

Nobody

box):

Before

the

Fishing

bait

box):

following.

10 all following

on

Before

Please

costs,

on

costs,

fishing.

page

etc.).

check

such

8. I MANNA

CAL GARY

4 7. Which of the following fishing sites have von ever visited or heard of as a lishin site? (place site that you have visited or heard ot). a check mark beside every A map of these sites is provided on the page above found at the end of this survey. and a more detailed map can be II UPPER OLDMAN RIVER AREA 29 l3cauvais Lake I U ppr Oldnia n River TABER AREA (NW Branch) 3(1 Wa IC rio 2 Livingstone River n River 54 Chin Reservoir 3 I Oldman River—near 3 Dutch Creek Fort MacLeod 55 Sherburne Reservoir 4 Racehorse 56 Creek CLARESHOLM Unnamed Lake South of Bu rdct 5 Oldman AREA River—I Iwy 22 Bridge to Peigan 32 Willow Reserve Creek \‘AUXHALL 33 Chain Lake AREA 57 Little BOW Reservoir CROWSNEST RIVER AREA VULCAN 5$ Stonehill Lake 6 Crowsncst AREA 59_Badger Lake 34 McGregor Reservoir 7 Allison (Chinook) Reservoir Lake 35 Travers Reservoir S (iowsnest River—I leadwaters to Blairmore B,\SSANO AREA 60 (Letion I3ridie) LETHI3RIDGE Bow R iver—Bassa no Dam to mouth 9 (‘rowsnest AREA 61 River-I3lairmore to Passberg 36 Keho Bmv River—Carseland to Bassano Bridge Lake 62 Red (Byron Cr.) 37 Oldman Deer River- Li neta n to Dinosaur I)) Crowsnest River—Monarch to Forks Provincial River-Passberg Bridge to 3$ Nicholas Park Lundbrcck Falls Sheran Park Lake (in the city of I I (rowsnest Let h bridge) BROOKS River—Lu ndbreck Falls to 39 1 -lenderson AREA niouth (t3lairmore-Pincher Lake in the city of 63 Brook’s Creek Areas) Let h Child rens Pond 12 Burmis Lake bridge) 64 Cowoki 40 Stat lord Reservoir 13 Castle River Reservoir 65 _Tilly 41 McQuillan B Reservoir Lake 66 Lake Newell CASTLE RIVER AREA CARDSTON 14 Lynx AREA Creek 42 _BcIIy MEDICINE HAT AREA 15 Carbondale River 67 River 43 St. 5. Saskatchewan River-Rattlesnake to 16 West Castle River Mary River-Upper to Reservoir Saskatchewan 44 St. Mary Reservoir Border 17 Beavermines Lake 6$ _Echo Dale 45 _Si. Maty River-Below Regional Park Pond (in the 18 Bar naby (Soul h fork) Lake Reservoir city of Medicine Hat) 19 46 _Police (Out post) Lakc South Castle River 69 South Saskatchewan River-Forks to MILK Rattlesnake WATERTON RIVER-WARNER AREA 70 LAKES AREA 47 Cross Rattlesnake/Sauder Reservoir 20 Crooked Creek Coulec Reservoir 71 Cavan 48 Tyrrell Lake Lake 21 Maini (1>aine) Lake 72 Miehell Reservoir 49 Milk River Ridge 22 Cottonwood Creek Reservoir 73 _Murray Reservoir 50 _Goldsprings Park Pond 51 74 Bullshcad Reservoir Milk River - mow h of the PINCHER CREEK AREA N. Milk River _Sprucc Coulec Reservoir 23 _Bathing to Miners Coulec Creek 76 Lake 52 _Heninger Elkwater Lake 24 Butcher Reservoir 77 Lake 53 Milk _Rcesor Lake 25 _Dipping Vat River -Miners Coulec Creek to Lake Montana 26 Dr wood Creek Border 27 Waterton Reservoir 28 Cochranc Lake

S . 1or cjicti fishing toj) you took hetween May 1, 1990 and October 31, 1991, u do not reca 1111w exact details, please please complete the following inlormation. N( provide your hest guess. If you took [I )TF: Tlii s intormation is very more than 15 trips, please list the first important, please try your best to complete IS. this section and the section below. Trip Site Name Distance From Party Size Fish Species No. Sought Number (if in Southern Region, Home Caught / lype of Water Body To Site (number (eg. trout, pike) see list of sites Number Released (lake, stream, provided) (miles one way) in group) etc.) l\ impk. Kcho I iki (S) 120 mi 2 W ilicyL 2 caught/0 rclc iced I ike I mi. 2 mi. 3 mi. 4 mi. 5 mi. 6 mi. 7 mi. S mi. () mi. 10 nii. II mi. 12 mi. 13 mi. 14 mi. 15 mi.

If you took more than 15 fishing trips during the 1990 fishing season, how many trips in total did you take’? TRIPS

6 . Ihe eale nda r be low repi-ese nI s the 1110111 hs of indicate May to OcB ibe r of I 9O. Ioi- each lsh the dates that you took these trips on. ing trip you described above please the Please diaw a line through the days nil). that von spent on the trip and number lor example. it your Iirst fishing trip was on Monday, the 2nd, and the 7th and staed until Sunday on the second trip you went on Sat urdav the 5th. Your response would look like: the

ui uo iii

i,

i____i_ -

MAY 1990 JLi[ JUL’ 990 rrr tue cd 1 L II L V i T — {9 J --I1—V - -V—t- L- ---1i - k {V L_. L_Lj _LLiVr - __L_

AUGUST, 1990 SEPTEMBER, 1990 Vunn OCTOBER. 1990 TueJWedT i S Su ii 4on Tue Iec1 ITh u Fri Sat -— ;jz;;; LT T T L T lJ k E ii T Th Th 1I — —

— — O }I ?

— -—-p -- 8 9

- —o - -

-- :1

—--

7

appropriate

20,

19.

Mv

Postsecondarv

I I 18.

1

High

Elementary only

16.

taxes?

If

15.

7.

could

11. If

take

13.

12.

11.

10.

ques’uons

We

570001-80000

S4000

job 520001-25000

there

there

How

How

What

How

Please

Which

one

S0-S5000

F-low

How

time \Vhat

Are

What

School

be

has

would

(please

1-45000

working

well

are

many

are

number

many

ANNUAL

off

flexible

you

do

many

many

circle

is

is

number

of

work

tell

adults

children

you

your

like

do

your

male

the

days (University

hours

check

on

working

adults us

children

each

to

consider

the

to

below).

following

age?

days

place

10

1

about

go

over

or

of

know

for

HOUSEHOLD

highest

do

one

under

fishing

of

female

2

paid

I

over

11

hours

each

take

65

the 580001-90000

S4500

you

525001-30000 of S500

_____

under

the

category)

your some

3

or

residence

in

vacation

65

categories

fishing 12

following

lOin

normally

number

question.

people

1-10000

Technical

your

(check

1

years

-50000

4

are

main

the

things

your

trips

5

household,

there

age

do

who

occupation

one):

of

INCOME

(nearest

statements

work

about

household,

6

best

you

of

years

School)

in

use

16

7

your

represents

get

for

you

are

Alberta’s

S90001-100000

of

S5000

530001-35000

city

S

how

$

pay

each

10001-15000

BEFORE

household?

education

to

Male

there and

apply

Always

how

or

9

be? many

1-60000

each

13

1

1

1

year?

town):

your

your

[

many in

fishery

to

week?

14

of

your

you?

TAXES

family.

that

Sometimes

annual them

______

______

of 15

______

household? resources.

you

2

2

2

them Please

______

fish?

16

The

household

(check

More

have

fish?

S60001

535001-40000

SI

17

answers circle

______

Female

Seldom

5001-20000

Than

completed

days

one

3

3 3

______18

______

adults

-70000

the

5100000

income

box):

hours

to

19

these

children

adults.

Never

children.

(circle

20±

3

3

4 before

Division

Economy,

If

Thank

T6G

Edmonton,

University

The

stamped

your

address

entry you

fishery

Thank

page

If

you

have

responses

Department

you

2111

form

at

of

you

resources

have

on

University

-

403-422-4771.

this

again

questions

self

this for

for

any

survey

of

addressed

Alberta

our

will

completing

card.

for

Mberta

other

effectively.

prize

your

remain

of

about

or

The

Alberta of

in

comments

help.

draw.

envelope

Rural

the

this card

this

confidential.

A

space

survey

at

will

survey.

If

card

403-492-4603

you

or

to:

Economy

be

below. has

concerns,

please

wish

separated

Your

Please

been

to

9

call

cooperation

enter

included

or

please

return

Vic

from

Peter

this

Adamowicz,

your

do

this

draw,

in

Boxall,

not

is

your

survey,

survey

essential

hesitate please

envelope. Alberta

Department

when

and

write

to

to

the

Fish

manage

we

write

your

This

card,

receive

and

them

of

name card

in

Alberta’s

Wildlife

Rural

the

it

on

is

so and

an

any that CDH CCD CDC) CD0

C-)CD C 0

CD1

CD1

-4 C)C

C’-)C I CD SC)1 -i

VNNVH