The [Hutu] Ten Commandments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

The [Hutu] Ten Commandments: The Ten Commandments were published in Kangura No. 6, in December 1990, within an article entitled Appeal to the Conscience of the Hutu . 1. Every Hutu male should know that Tutsi women, wherever they may be, are working in the pay of their Tutsi ethnic group. Consequently, [they] shall be deemed a traitor . 2. Every Hutu male must know that our Hutu daughters are more dignified and conscientious in their role of woman, wife and mother. Are they not pretty, good secretaries and more honest! 3. Hutu woman, be vigilant and bring your husbands, brothers and sons back to their senses. 4. Every Hutu male must know that all Tutsis are dishonest in their business dealings. 5. Strategic positions in the political, administrative, economic, military and security domain should, to a large extent, be entrusted to Hutus. 6. In the Education sector, (pupils, students, teachers) must be in the majority Hutu. 7. The Rwandan Armed Forces should be exclusively Hutu. 8. Hutus must cease having any pity for the Tutsi. 9. The Hutu male, wherever he may be, should be united, in solidarity and be concerned about the fate of their Hutu brothers . The Hutu must be firm and vigilant towards their common Tutsi enemy. 10. The 1959 social revolution, the 1961 referendum and the Hutu ideology must be taught to Hutus at all levels. Every Hutu must propagate the present ideology widely. Any Hutu who persecutes his brother for having read, disseminated and taught this ideology shall be deemed a traitor. -International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), Trial Chamber 1, “The Prosecutor v. Hassan Ngeze (judgment and sentence)” (2003) excerpt..

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Accepting the End of My Existence: Why the Tutsis Did Not Respond More Forcefully During the Rwandan Genocide
The Alexandrian II, no. 1 (2013) Accepting the End of my Existence: Why the Tutsis Did Not Respond More Forcefully during the Rwandan Genocide Theo M. Moore On April 6, 1994, in Rwanda, one of the most horrific events in human history took place, known as the Rwandan Genocide. This act of violence was planned and carried out by Hutu extremist with an objective to exterminate all Tutsis. The Hutu motives behind this act of violence dates back to the nineteenth century when the Tutsis ruled over Rwanda. Under Tutsi rule, the Hutu claimed to have been mistreated by the Tutsi. The conflict between the two ethnic groups would escalate when Europeans began colonizing countries in Africa. In 1916, under Belgium occupation of Rwanda, the Belgians supported the Tutsis until they began pursuing an attempt to become independent. In result, the Belgians began supporting the Hutu to assist them in overthrowing Tutsi rule. In the early 1960s, The Hutus came to power and used drastic measures to sustain their power. Throughout the Hutu reign, they displayed ominous signs of a possible genocide against the Tutsi. However, the Tutsi gave a minimum effort of resistance toward the Hutus. This paper questions why there was a limited effort of response from the Tutsi in the Rwandan Genocide in 1994.The goal is to answer the question with evidence to support reasons why the Tutsis did not respond effectively. Genocide is an effort to directly kill a group of people or indirectly by creating conditions such as starvation and rape.1 The majority of genocides consist of destroying national, ethnic, or religious groups.
[Show full text]
) 1 W~ Mathias Marcuss~
;) 1 W~ MATHIAS MARCUSS~ INTERNATIOI\AL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR RvVANDA ;.'- CASE NC J.:TR 19"; THE PROSECUTOR OF THE TRIB UNAL l~.·~'--'~l~C:-T ~~ AGAINST RECEIVED HASSAN NGEZE ,'; ;-, ~", 1" ~ 7 _, .....',~! V v ACTION :e..e",=,~~ COpy ~ ~ Il\DICTMENT I. The do;;eCcor ufthe International Criminal Tribun,j for Rwanda, pursuant to the authority stipulated in Article 17 of the Statute of the TribllfJaI 01' the L'lternational Crim: al Tribunal for Rwanda (the Statute oEthe Tribunal) charges Hi SSAN {GEZE with GENOCIDE, DIRECT ANi) PUBLIC INCITEMENT TO COMMIT CENOCll ~, and CRIM.!!:S AGAINST HUMANITY, all offenses stip:llated in Articles 2.ud 3 0 the Statut.: of the fribunal as set forth belo N: 2, THE ACCUSED HASSAN NGEZE was born in 1961 in the Commune of Rubavu, Prefecture of Gisenyi, ,he Republic of 'Zwand At the tim.: of the eV~:lts referred to in this indictment, HASSAN NGEZE was Editor-in-Chief of the .i' 'lirna: knewn :.IS, and published under tbe name ot~ KANGURA. PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/085c26/ 3. CONCISE STATENIENT OF THE ACTS 3.1. The crimes inthislnd';tmentr)l\! plse in Rwsnda, between January 1 and December :3 1 of 1994. 3.2. During the events n:rerred to III this indictment, Tutsis and Hutus were identified as ethnic or racial group<;. 3.3. DLL inlS the events referre, in thi' indi . (ment, there were in Rwanda \\idespre.d or sy ~ematic ,ttacL '1gain-t a civilian population, including Tutsis and certa:n 1{utus, Oil poliucal, etl lie or l'acial grounds.
[Show full text]
[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet]
GRASS-ROOTSPATHS TN THE LAl'lD OF ONE THOUSAND HILLS: WHAT RWANDANS ARE DOING TO TAKEPEACEBUILDING AND GENOCIDE PREVENTION It"TO THEIR OWN I-lANDS AND ITS IMPACT ON CONCEPTS OF SELF AND OTHER by Beth Robin Mandel AThesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of George Mason University in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Anthropology Director Department Chairperson Dean, College of Humanities and Social Sciences Date: Summer Semester 2014 George Mason University Fairfax, VA Grass-roots Paths in the Land of One Thousand Hills: What Rwandans are Doing to Take Peacebuilding and Genocide Prevention into Their Own Hands and Its Impact on Concepts of Self and Other A Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at George Mason University By Beth Robin Mandel Graduate Certificate George Mason University, 2009 Bachelor of Arts George Washington University, 1992 Director: Jeffrey Mantz, Professor Department of Sociology and Anthropology Summer Semester 2014 George Mason University Fairfax, VA Copyright 2014 Beth Robin Mandel All Rights Reserved ii DEDICATION I have never been a fan of dedications, but I almost always read them as it provides a chance to glimpse something personal about the author. As for me… the people I love the most –who also loved me dearly, who would have done anything for me, and who influenced my life in the most profound ways –are no longer living in this world. What I owe to my grandparents and my parents as positive influences in my life is immense, and dedicating this unfinished work to them seems insufficient.
[Show full text]
Genocide and Media
Genocide and Media A presentation to the Summer Program on Genocide and Reconstruction, organized by the Interdisciplinary Genocide Studies Center (IGSC) from 24 to 30 June 2013. CNLG, 26/06/2013. By Privat Rutazibwa1 Introduction I have been requested to make a presentation on Genocide and media. The topic is a bit broad and a number of aspects could be discussed under it. These aspects include: - The role of Rwandan media during the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi. The infamous contribution of RTLM, Kangura and other hate media to the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi has been widely commented on by authoritative authors and other scholars. Jean-Pierre Chrétien (sous la direction de) (1995). Rwanda. Les Medias du Génocide, Paris : Karthala, is the main reference in this respect. - The role of foreign media during the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi in the form of lack of sufficient coverage is another interesting aspect of this topic. Allan Thompson (edited by) (2007). The media and the Rwanda Genocide, London: Pluto Press, highlights the negative impact of the “vacuum of information” by foreign media in the 1994 genocide in Rwanda. - The use of the “hate media” precedent as an excuse for media censorship by the post-genocide Rwandan government is another aspect of the topic mainly developed by Human rights and media freedom activists. Lars Waldorf, “Censorship and Propaganda in Post-Genocide Rwanda”, in Allan Thompson, op.cit., pp 404-416, is an illustration of that sub-topic. I will discuss none of these aspects, though they may appear of great interest; mainly because they have been widely discussed elsewhere.
[Show full text]
Entanglements of Modernity, Colonialism and Genocide Burundi and Rwanda in Historical-Sociological Perspective
UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS Entanglements of Modernity, Colonialism and Genocide Burundi and Rwanda in Historical-Sociological Perspective Jack Dominic Palmer University of Leeds School of Sociology and Social Policy January 2017 Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy ii The candidate confirms that the work submitted is their own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. ©2017 The University of Leeds and Jack Dominic Palmer. The right of Jack Dominic Palmer to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by Jack Dominic Palmer in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would firstly like to thank Dr Mark Davis and Dr Tom Campbell. The quality of their guidance, insight and friendship has been a huge source of support and has helped me through tough periods in which my motivation and enthusiasm for the project were tested to their limits. I drew great inspiration from the insightful and constructive critical comments and recommendations of Dr Shirley Tate and Dr Austin Harrington when the thesis was at the upgrade stage, and I am also grateful for generous follow-up discussions with the latter. I am very appreciative of the staff members in SSP with whom I have worked closely in my teaching capacities, as well as of the staff in the office who do such a great job at holding the department together.
[Show full text]
The Rwandan Genocide: Combating Stereotypes And
The Rwandan Genocide: Combating Stereotypes and Understanding the Origins Nicola Skakel Senior Honors Thesis Department of History April 9th 2018 Defense Committee: Dr. Susan K. Kent, Department of History, Primary Advisor Dr. Matthew Gerber, Department of History, Honors Council Representative Dr. Paul Shankman, Department of Anthropology, Advisor 1 Introduction On the 7th of April 1994, the small east African country of Rwanda erupted into one of the most deadly and intimate genocides the modern world had ever witnessed. Whilst the western world stood by and watched in just 100 days over 800,000 Rwandans out of a total population of 7 million, were systematically murdered in the most brutal and violent of ways. Those who were targeted made up the country’s minority ethnic group the Tutsis, and moderates from the majority group, the Hutus. For many, the legacy of Rwanda is a monstrous example of extreme pent up ethnic tensions that has its roots in European colonialism. In contrast, I will argue that the events not just of 1994 but also the unrest that proceeded it, arose from a highly complex culmination of long-standing historical tensions between ethnic groups that long pre-dated colonialism. In conjunction, a set of short-term triggers including foreign intervention, civil war, famine, state terrorism and ultimately the assassination of President Habyarimana also contributed to the outburst of genocide in 1994. Whilst it would be easy to place sole responsibility on European colonists for implementing a policy of divide and rule and therefore exacerbating ethnic tensions, it seems to me that genocide is never that cut and dried: it can never be explained by one factor.
[Show full text]
From the on Inal Document. What Can I Write About?
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 470 655 CS 511 615 TITLE What Can I Write about? 7,000 Topics for High School Students. Second Edition, Revised and Updated. INSTITUTION National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, IL. ISBN ISBN-0-8141-5654-1 PUB DATE 2002-00-00 NOTE 153p.; Based on the original edition by David Powell (ED 204 814). AVAILABLE FROM National Council of Teachers of English, 1111 W. Kenyon Road, Urbana, IL 61801-1096 (Stock no. 56541-1659: $17.95, members; $23.95, nonmembers). Tel: 800-369-6283 (Toll Free); Web site: http://www.ncte.org. PUB TYPE Books (010) Guides Classroom Learner (051) Guides Classroom Teacher (052) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PC07 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS High Schools; *Writing (Composition); Writing Assignments; *Writing Instruction; *Writing Strategies IDENTIFIERS Genre Approach; *Writing Topics ABSTRACT Substantially updated for today's world, this second edition offers chapters on 12 different categories of writing, each of which is briefly introduced with a definition, notes on appropriate writing strategies, and suggestions for using the book to locate topics. Types of writing covered include description, comparison/contrast, process, narrative, classification/division, cause-and-effect writing, exposition, argumentation, definition, research-and-report writing, creative writing, and critical writing. Ideas in the book range from the profound to the everyday to the topical--e.g., describe a terrible beauty; write a narrative about the ultimate eccentric; classify kinds of body alterations. With hundreds of new topics, the book is intended to be a resource for teachers and students alike. (NKA) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the on inal document.
[Show full text]
“The Law of Incitement” (PDF)
THE LAW OF INCITEMENT United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Symposium "Speech, Power and Violence" ∗ by Gregory S. Gordon I. INTRODUCTION This essay will explore the origins and development of the crime of direct and public incitement to commit genocide. It will begin with an historical analysis of the epochal Nuremberg decisions regarding Nazi hate-mongers Julius Streicher, Hans Fritzsche and Otto Dietrich. Although these decisions did not deal explicitly with incitement as a separate crime, they laid the groundwork for future development of incitement as a crime in its own right. The essay will then examine the official birth of the incitement crime with the adoption of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide ("Genocide Convention"). From that point through the next forty-five years, the crime was not actually applied. But that changed with the creation of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), which vigorously prosecuted incitement to genocide. Through a series of cases that progressively fleshed out elements of the crime, the ICTR jurisprudence set out the materials necessary to construct a legal framework necessary to analyze incitement. That framework was put to good use in the Canadian immigration context in the case of Rwandan politician Leon Mugesera, who delivered an infamous pre-1994 speech calling for genocide through a series of violent and macabre metaphors. The essay will conclude with an analysis of the most recent ICTR case to apply and develop the incitement framework -- Prosecutor v. Simon Bikindi. Bikindi, a popular songwriter, composed music and lyrics that provoked ethnic hatred toward Tutsis.
[Show full text]
Rwandan Journalists Who Were Living in Uganda Went Back Home and Resumed Working
Because of this history, the media are no longer trusted by the public and government, and most people are suspicious of the journalism profession generally. Under the new government, a few journalists who had survived the genocide and other Rwandan journalists who were living in Uganda went back home and resumed working. RWANDA 268 MEDIA SUSTAINABILITY INDEX 2006–2007 INTRODUCTION OVERALL SCORE: 2.29 RWANDA Rwanda lost almost all its journalists during the 1994 genocide; they were among the roughly one million Tutsi and moderate Hutu Rwandans who were killed by extremist armed militia known by the name Interehemwa. The genocide came after the death of then-President Juvenile Habyarimana in a plane crash Rsuspected to have been caused by rebels hiding out in Uganda. During this genocide, which lasted for a period of about 100 days, the media stood accused of acting as a tool of hate. Some local radio stations and print media encouraged neighbors to turn against each other. Hutu extremists used the radio to mobilize the Hutu majority, coordinate killings, and try to ensure that the Tutsi were systematically eliminated. Rwandans are still bitter that it occurred with little intervention from Western governments, and it finally ended when the rebel group Rwanda Patriotic Front and the Ugandan Army wrested power away from the perpetrators and stopped the massacres. Some journalists who are believed to have actively participated in the genocide were investigated by international human-rights groups and were arrested and charged by the UN International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. Other journalists chose to go into exile.
[Show full text]
Report on the Rwanda Media Experience After The
IMS assessment mission: The Rwanda media experience from the genocide International Media Support • Report • March 2003 Monique Alexis, IMS Consultant Ines Mpambara, Co-director of Rwanda’s School of Journalism Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................. 3 1.1 Background for the mission .............................................................................3 1.2 Mission Objectives..........................................................................................3 1.3 Method and Scope of work ..............................................................................3 1.4 Structure of the report....................................................................................4 2 The Rwandan Context............................................................... 5 2.1 Political background .......................................................................................5 3 The media and the genocide ................................................... 10 3.1 Historical development of the Rwandan media before the genocide .................... 10 3.2 The media during the genocide: the hate media............................................... 14 4 The media after the genocide ................................................. 19 4.1 Reconstruction of a destroyed media sector (1994 - 2003)................................ 19 4.2 Today: Absence of pluralism and constant threats and pressures ....................... 20 4.3 The new Press Law and the High Press Council
[Show full text]
The Prosecutor V Ferdinand Nahimana, Jean-Bosco Barayagwiza, Hassan Ngeze, ICTR-99-52-T International Criminal Tribunal for Rwan
TheProsecutor v Ferdinand Nahimana, Jean-Bosco Barayagwiza, Hassan Ngeze, ICTR-99-52-T InternationalCriminal Tribunal for Rwanda Tribunalp~nal international pour le Rwanda OR: ENG TRIAL CHAMBER I Before: JudgeNavanethem Pillay, presiding JudgeErik Mose JudgeAsoka de ZoysaGunawardana Registrar: Adama Dieng Date: 9 May 2003 THE PROSECUTOR V. FERDINAND NAHIMANA JEAN-BOSCO BARAYAGWIZA HASSAN NGEZE Case No. ICTR-99-52-T DECISION ON THE PROSECUTOR’S APPLICATION FOR REBUTTAL WITNESSES Officeof the Prosecutor: Mr StephenRapp Ms SimoneMonasebian Ms CharityKagwi Mr WilliamEgbe Counselfor FerdinandNahimana: r,,,,+.,Ib Jean-MarieBiju-Duval DianaEllis, Q.C. ! Counselfor HassanNReze: -O Mr JohnFloyd, III Mr Ren6 Martel 73 r.~ Counselfor Jean-BoscoBarayagwiza: N CO Mr GiacomoBarletta-Caldarera TheProsecutor v Ferdinand Nahimana, Jean-Bosco Barayagwiza, Hassan Ngeze, ICTR-99-52-T THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR RWANDA ("the Tribunal") SITTINGas TrialChamber I, composedof JudgeNavanethem Pillay, presiding, Judge ErikMose, and JudgeAsoka de ZoysaGunawardana ("the Chamber"); CONSIDERING: 1. The Prosecutor’sApplication for RebuttalWitnesses, filed on 24 April2003 (the "Motion")in whichthe Prosecutor requests ten witnesses in rebuttal; 2. The Prosecutor’sSupplementary Application for additionalrebuttal witnesses on HassanNgeze’s alibi defence filed on 28 April2003 (the "Supplementary Motion"), requestingone further witness in rebuttal; 3.The Replyof the Defencefor HassanNgeze, filed on 1 May 2003; 4.TheReply of the Defencefor Jean-BoscoBarayagwiza,
[Show full text]
Kangura 27 Special
Ubwanditsi hwa KANGURA buramamaza lshyaka P.D.R. (Parti Dknocratiqur pour la Reiolution). Tumaze kubona ko rubanda nyamwinshi ikrncyr ishyka ryayo riyigeza kuri Demokarasi nyayo. rikayitoza kwivugirr nn kuvudra abadafitc aho havugira. dusabye abanyarwanda bose mu madini gose. kuyoboka P.D.R. Iry shyaka ritangiranye abayoboke benshi mu Rwanda, crane cyme abushgigikiye ibitekeiezn bya Dr. KAYIBANDA Gr6goire. byo kurenpera inyungu za ruhanda nyamwinshi. n'ibitekerezo bya HABYARIMANA, ~.eushyigikiye amahoro n'amajyatnbere. Abashaka kuba mu buyobori br'iruo shywku. n'abifuza ibisobanurii ku buryo hurambuye,nimuhaze GISEYYI-IYFORMATION B.P. I9 GISEW'I. ryqwaR.P. 1312 KIGALI. Amahurnerr. te7o iryo shyaka rizagenderaho ubu arimo aratrgurwa n'akanama kahixohereymo. ITmuco wu kupry si uu'abany~rwsnda.Muzi ncza ko hari abashinlishwa no kuvuga ko zcmhi ntacyo zakozc. yaba ipa HABYARtMANA yaba nlyn KAYIBAKDA. Twehwr icy'inpni ni ugushima ibyakorwe n'abategetsi b'u Rwanda kuva twipakururn ingoma ya gihake tukarebcra hamwc ukuntu ibyiza h!akorwr bgakon~erwa. Ahaxagana iryo shyaka rero muzaze muzi ko tudashinzwr pusehanya no kuba bantamunnea. Muze tmunganire abatuhanfiri.ie muri Politiki. n'aharanpijc akar; k'ubusirikarr. N~iryoishyaka ryanyu. ahahwe kivupira nahahwirs iki! KUBERA KO BIMA7.E KI'GARAGARA KO ABATUTSIBOMU BLIGANDA - RWANDA - ZAYIRE NO MI7 BIrRl?NDI BfFIlZ.4 KZTDITTEGEKA BABINYIfJIdE MI'KI CORRIDOR-HIMA. HAGOMBA ABAHUTU BENSHI BAKWIB17MBIRA MIIRI P.D.R. PARMEHLITZT. BYABA NGOMBWA JRYO SHYAKA RIGAKORANA NA PA1,IPEHI:Tl~ YO MU BURUNDI. BITYO ABAHUTU BOSE BAKABONA AH0BAVVCJRA. NTIBAKOMEZE KWJCWA URUBOZO. IlKIMARA GUSOMA IYI KANGLIRA. HtTA UBARIZA AH0 USANZWE TTGURIRA IBIKYAMAKURU HARI KANGI-RA KO 27 SPECIAL CYANGWA NIBA UFITE SPECIAI. MZJ NTOKI ZAWE.
[Show full text]