High-Resolution Mosaics of the Galilean Satellites from Galileo SSI

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

High-Resolution Mosaics of the Galilean Satellites from Galileo SSI Lunar and Planetary Science XXIX 1833.pdf High-Resolution Mosaics of the Galilean Satellites from Galileo SSI. M. Milazzo, A. McEwen, C. B. Phillips, N. Dieter, J. Plassmann. Planetary Image Research Laboratory, LPL, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721; [email protected] The Galileo Spacecraft began mapping the Jovian orthographic projection centered at the latitude and system in June 1996. Twelve orbits of Jupiter and more longitude coordinates of the sub-spacecraft point to than 1000 images later, the Solid State Imager (SSI) is still preserve their perspective. Depending on the photometric collecting images, most far superior in resolution to geometry and scale, it may be necessary to apply a anything collected by the Voyager spacecraft. The data photometric normalization to the images. Next, the collected includes: low to medium resolution color data, individual frames are mosaicked together, and mosaicked medium resolution data to fill gaps in Voyager coverage, and onto a portion of the base map for regional context. Once very high-resolution data over selected areas. We have the mosaic is finished, it is checked to make sure that the tie been systematically processing the SSI images of the and match points were correct, and that the frames mesh. Galilean satellites to produce high-resolution mosaics and to We produce 3 final products: (i) an SSI-only mosaic, (ii) SSI place them into the regional context provided by medium- images mosaicked onto regional context, and (iii) the resolution mosaics from Voyager and/or Galileo. addition of a latitude-longitude grid to the context mosaic. Production of medium-resolution global mosaics is The purpose of this poster is to show the mosa- described in a companion abstract [1]. All processing is ics. The digital files will be released when all of the SSI completed with the ISIS software from USGS in Flagstaff, frames used in each mosaic are released (one year after re- AZ (see http://wwwflag.wr.usgs.gov/ISIS). ceipt on the ground). The mosaics may be acquired via the Galileo Navigator [2] at http://pele.wr.usgs.gov/Galileo (or After receiving the "raw" images from JPL, the links from that site). next steps are to update the label information and to apply the radiometric calibration. Next, the calibrated images are filtered to replace noisy pixels. Then, each frame is geometrically tied to its neighbors with match points. One References: frame must then be tied to a base map to correct the [1] Becker T. et al. (1998) Cartographic Processing of the pointing offset. After matching and tying the frames, the Galileo SSI DATA: An Update on the Production of Global camera angles are updated via a program called "jigsaw" that Mosaics of the Galilean Satellites, LPSC, this volume. minimizes their pointing errors while holding the position [2] Rosanova, T., et al. (1998) The Galileo Navigator: A of the frame tied to the base map. Next, the separate Tool for Cartographers and Scientists, LPSC, this volume. frames are re-projected to a common map projection and scaled. Usually, the images are also re-projected to an Lunar and Planetary Science XXIX 1833.pdf High-Resolution Galileo Mosaics: M. Milazzo, et al. Table 1. High-Resolution Mosaics of the Galilean Satellites Name Description Phase angle Km/ pixel Lat range Lon range Frame numbers Callisto Callisto Asgard C3 in Voyager context 53 1.139 -9, 80 80, 170 s0368292901 to s0368293200 Callisto Valhalla C9 in Voyager context 94 .8 -18, 50 18, 85 s0401510400.1 to s0401513423.2 Callisto High-Res Cratering C9 in Voyager context 102 .16 -14, 1 2, 13 s0401505500.1 to s0401505565.1 Callisto Smooth Plains C10 in Voyager context 61 .1 11, 18 348.5, 355 s0413386700.1 to s0413388168.3 Callisto Asgard C10 in C3 context 84 .09026 9, 40 135, 148 s0413382800.2 to s0413382953.4 Europa Europa Minos Linea G1 37.26 1.57 -50, 90 300, 150 s0349875100 to s0349875139 Europa Wedges C3 in Voyager context 64.99 .42 -30, 0 180, 210 s0368639400.9 Europa Pwyll crater E4 55.83 1.22 -83.35, 53.57 221.5, 329.17 s0374649000 to s0374649052 Europa Dark lineament E6 39.24 .18 5, 19 265, 280 s0383713700 to s0383713765 Europa Agenor Linea E6 36.54 1.6 -61.72, -26.47 139.19, 225.71 s0383694600.1 to s0383694605.1 Europa Bright Plain E6 in E6 context 39.34 .021 13, 17 272, 275.2 s0383718600.2 to s0383713701.1 Europa High-Res E11 59.59 .0327 33, 38 85, 88 s0420626700 to s0420626765 Europa Mannann’an E11 in G1 context 61.2 .22 25, -35 215, 260 s0420619200.3 to s0349875126.4 Ganymede Ganymede Uruk Sulcus G1 and G2 stereo 38.9 .04 10.45, 12.05 167.86, 169.14 s0349758978.6 to s0349758965.7, s0359945600.2 to s0359945613.2 Ganymede Uruk Sulcus G1 in Voyager context 14 .075 9, 14 165, 172 s0359945600.2 to s0359945613.2 Ganymede Memphis Facula G1 in Voyager context 23.7 .06 12.7, 18.2 132.4, 138 s0349760100.1 to s0349760268.1 Ganymede Dark Floor Crater G2 in Voyager context 23.8 .11 -4.6, 6.5 147.5, 158.6 s0359944145.2 Ganymede Light Dark G2 in Voyager context 18.46 .02 -60, 70 100, 280 x0359946135.2 to s0359946188.2 Boundary Ganymede Galileo Regio G2 in Voyager context 23.8 .09 16, 20.89 145.73, 151.88 s0359944739.6 Ganymede Groovelanes G2 in Voyager context 24.17 .09 37.54, 40.02 198.95, 202.95 s0359944639.3 to s0359944652.3 Ganymede Nippur Sulcus G2 in Voyager context 26.3 .1 44.8, 52.7 202, 206 s0359944439.2, s03599444562.3 Ganymede Pal.impsest G2 in Voyager context 36 .04 -17.89, 53.42 154.45, 246.89 s0359945484.2 to s0359945521.3 Ganymede Transitional G2 in G8 context 29.96 .18 28.53, 35.54 183.98, 191.59 s0359942400.1 to s0359942439.1 Terrain Ganymede Uruk Sulcus G2 in Voyager context 46.89 .04 8.75, 13.73 166.14, 171.19 s0359945600.2 to s0359945613.2 Ganymede Transitional G2 in G8 in Voyager 18.45 .1 24, 57 171, 221 so359944426.2 to s0359942439.1, Terrain, Nippur Sulcus, and context s0394517800.1 to s0394517800.4 Groovelanes Ganymede Achelous G7 in Voyager context 70 .178 59.54, 65.49 6.38, 19.5 s0389923200.1 to s0389923213.2 Ganymede Enki Catena G7 in Voyager context .278 35.5, 41.5 10, 16.8 s0389921100.1, s0389921101.1 Ganymede Kittu Dark Ray G7 in Voyager context 79 .14 -5, -4 330, 339 s0389923800.1 to s0389923946.1 Ganymede Neith G7 in Voyager context 72 .15 24, 35 -1, 11.5 s0389923600.2 to s0389923639.6 Ganymede Nicholson Regio G7 in Voyager context 72 .181 -17, -9.5 -14, -3.5 s0389923000.1 to s0389923027.2 Ganymede Nun Sulci G7 in Voyager context 76 .17 38, 50 312, 330 s0389923400.1 to s0389923413.2 Ganymede Palimpsest G7 in Voyager context 66 .44 22, 45 -40, -10 s0389917900.1, s0389917901.1 Ganymede Anshar Sulcus G8 in Voyager context 73.5 .15 10, 14 188, 195 s0394532865.1 to s0394532878.2 Ganymede Buto Facula G8 in Voyager context 69.2 .19 8, 17 197, 209 s0394532139.1 to s0394532153.1 Ganymede Caldera Features G8 in Voyager context 73 .18 -41, -21 172, 194 s0394532413.1 to s0394532478.2 Ganymede Fractured Dark G8 in Voyager context 78 .16 1.4, 9.9 152.8, 161.4 s0394532745.1, s0394532746.1 Terrain Ganymede Marius Regio G8 in Voyager context 70.1 .29 -29, -9 146, 166 s0394530265.1 to s0394530266.2 Ganymede Melkart Dome G8 in Voyager context 72 .18 -18, -3 179, 193 s0394532265.1 to s0394532279.1 Crater Ganymede Multi Ring Basin G8 in Voyager context 72.6 .24 -35, -5 125, 175 s0394531265.1 to s0394531278.3 Ganymede Pit Crater G8 in Voyager context 73.5 .15 20, 27 190, 197 s0394532965.1, s0394532966.1 Ganymede Regional Context G8 in Voyager context 62.1 .939 11, 68 146, 230 s0394517800.1 to s0394517800.4 Ganymede Tiamat Sulcus G8 in Voyager context 63.3 .496 -11, 10 192, 214 s0394526200.1, s0394526201.2.
Recommended publications
  • JUICE Red Book
    ESA/SRE(2014)1 September 2014 JUICE JUpiter ICy moons Explorer Exploring the emergence of habitable worlds around gas giants Definition Study Report European Space Agency 1 This page left intentionally blank 2 Mission Description Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer Key science goals The emergence of habitable worlds around gas giants Characterise Ganymede, Europa and Callisto as planetary objects and potential habitats Explore the Jupiter system as an archetype for gas giants Payload Ten instruments Laser Altimeter Radio Science Experiment Ice Penetrating Radar Visible-Infrared Hyperspectral Imaging Spectrometer Ultraviolet Imaging Spectrograph Imaging System Magnetometer Particle Package Submillimetre Wave Instrument Radio and Plasma Wave Instrument Overall mission profile 06/2022 - Launch by Ariane-5 ECA + EVEE Cruise 01/2030 - Jupiter orbit insertion Jupiter tour Transfer to Callisto (11 months) Europa phase: 2 Europa and 3 Callisto flybys (1 month) Jupiter High Latitude Phase: 9 Callisto flybys (9 months) Transfer to Ganymede (11 months) 09/2032 – Ganymede orbit insertion Ganymede tour Elliptical and high altitude circular phases (5 months) Low altitude (500 km) circular orbit (4 months) 06/2033 – End of nominal mission Spacecraft 3-axis stabilised Power: solar panels: ~900 W HGA: ~3 m, body fixed X and Ka bands Downlink ≥ 1.4 Gbit/day High Δv capability (2700 m/s) Radiation tolerance: 50 krad at equipment level Dry mass: ~1800 kg Ground TM stations ESTRAC network Key mission drivers Radiation tolerance and technology Power budget and solar arrays challenges Mass budget Responsibilities ESA: manufacturing, launch, operations of the spacecraft and data archiving PI Teams: science payload provision, operations, and data analysis 3 Foreword The JUICE (JUpiter ICy moon Explorer) mission, selected by ESA in May 2012 to be the first large mission within the Cosmic Vision Program 2015–2025, will provide the most comprehensive exploration to date of the Jovian system in all its complexity, with particular emphasis on Ganymede as a planetary body and potential habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Hermeticism Pt 1\374
    "I wish to learn about the things that are, to understand their nature and to know God. How much I want to hear!" from [Discourse] of Hermes Trismegistus : Poimandres Hermeticism "The fifteen tractates of the Corpus Hermeticum, along with the Perfect Sermon or Asclepius, are the foundation documents of the Hermetic tradition. Written by unknown authors in Egypt sometime before the end of the third century C.E., they were part of a once substantial literature attributed to the mythic figure of Hermes Trismegistus, a Hellenistic fusion of the Greek god Hermes and the Egyptian god Thoth. This literature came out of the same religious and philosophical ferment that produced Neoplatonism, Christianity, and the diverse collection of teachings usually lumped together under the label "Gnosticism": a ferment which had its roots in the impact of Platonic thought on the older traditions of the Hellenized East. There are obvious connections and common themes linking each of these traditions, although each had its own answer to the major questions of the time." John Michael Greer : An Introduction to the Corpus Hermeticum "The Corpus Hermeticum landed like a well-aimed bomb amid the philosophical systems of late medieval Europe. Quotations from the Hermetic literature in the Church Fathers (who were never shy of leaning on pagan sources to prove a point) accepted a traditional chronology which dated "Hermes Trismegistus," as a historical figure, to the time of Moses. As a result, the Hermetic tractates' borrowings from Jewish scripture and Platonic philosophy were seen, in the Renaissance, as evidence that the Corpus Hermeticum had anticipated and influenced both.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix Contains a Timeline, Galileo Mission Overview (June 1996–December 1997), and a Set of Quick–Look Orbit Facts Sheets
    A P P E N D I X This appendix contains a timeline, Galileo Mission Overview (June 1996–December 1997), and a set of Quick–Look Orbit Facts sheets. The essentials of each orbit are listed. We have provided them as a handy reference while the orbiter’s tour progresses in the months to come. Appendix • Page A-1 Project Galileo Quick-Look Orbit Facts Appendix • Page A- 5 PROJECT GALILEO QUICK-LOOK ORBIT FACTS Fact Sheet Guide Title Quick Facts Indicates the target satellite and the number of the This section provides a summary listing of the orbit in the satellite tour. In this example, Ganymede is characteristics of the target satellite encounter as well the target satellite on the first orbit of the orbital tour. as the Jupiter encounter. PROJECT GALILEO QUICK-LOOK ORBIT FACTS PROJECT GALILEO QUICK-LOOK ORBIT FACTS Ganymede - Orbit 1 Ganymede - Orbit 1 Encounter Trajectory Quick Facts Ganymede Flyby Geometry +30 min Ganymede Encounter Earth Sun 27 June 1996 Ganymede C/A +15 min 06:29 UTC Ganymede C/A Altitude: 844 km Jupiter 6/27 6/26 133 times closer than VGR1 70 times closer than VGR2 Earth Speed: 7.8 km/s 0W -15 min Sun Jupiter C/A 6/28 Latitude: 30 deg N Longitude: 112 deg W 270W -30 min Perijove Io 28 June 1996 00:31 UTC Europa Jupiter Range: 11.0 Rj Time Ordered Listing Ganymede 6/29 Earth Range: 4.2 AU EVENT TIME (PDT-SCET) EVENT (continued) TIME (PDT-SCET) OWLT: 35 min Start Encounter 23 June 96 09:00 Europa C/A (156000 km) 18:22 Callisto Start Ganymede-1 real-time survey (F&P) 09:02 Europa global observation (NIMS/SSI) 18:43
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Colors of Ganymede As Seen by Galileo Ssi
    Lunar and Planetary Science XXX 1822.pdf THE GLOBAL COLORS OF GANYMEDE AS SEEN BY GALILEO SSI. T. Denk1, K.K. Khurana2, R.T. Pappalardo3, G. Neukum1, J.W. Head3, T.V. Rosanova4, and the Galileo SSI Team, 1DLR, Institute of Planetary Exploration, 12484 Berlin, Germany, e-mail: [email protected], 2UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 3Brown University, Providence, RI, 4USGS, Flagstaff, AZ. Ganymede, as observed by the Galileo SSI Dark vs. bright and polar terrain. The bright camera, shows a banded, latitude-dependent color ("sulci") and dark ("regio") areas as well as the polar structure which is partly independent of geologic caps are the most obvious surface features on Ganyme- units. A correlation of the surface color with the de when seen at global scale from large distances. The magnetic field of Ganymede is reported, with areas albedo of the polar caps on the leading side is highest, exposed to the charged particles coming from the of the "regio" areas lowest, and of the "sulci" areas in Jovian environment often being redder than shielded between. (The polar caps of the trailing side will be terrain. The northern polar cap can be subdivided discussed below.) The bright polar caps are probably into a whitish area on the pole and the leading side, caused by water frost (e.g., Smith et al. 1981, Hillier and a darker, reddish area on the trailing side. The frost of the south-polar cap appears less opaque than in the north. The spectra of the dark "regio" areas are redder at the long SSI wavelength range than those of the brighter "sulci" terrains, but not significantly different at short SSI wavelengths.
    [Show full text]
  • Rampart Craters on Ganymede: Their Implications for Fluidized Ejecta Emplacement
    Meteoritics & Planetary Science 45, Nr 4, 638–661 (2010) doi: 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2010.01044.x Rampart craters on Ganymede: Their implications for fluidized ejecta emplacement Joseph BOYCE1*, Nadine BARLOW2, Peter MOUGINIS-MARK1, and Sarah STEWART3 1Hawaii Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96922, USA 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001, USA 3Department of Earth and Planetary Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (Received 03 December 2008; revision accepted 12 February 2010) Abstract–Some fresh impact craters on Ganymede have the overall ejecta morphology similar to Martian double-layer ejecta (DLE), with the exception of the crater Nergal that is most like Martian single layer ejecta (SLE) craters (as is the terrestrial crater Lonar). Similar craters also have been identified on Europa, but no outer ejecta layer has been found on these craters. The morphometry of these craters suggests that the types of layered ejecta craters identified by Barlow et al. (2000) are fundamental. In addition, the mere existence of these craters on Ganymede and Europa suggests that an atmosphere is not required for ejecta fluidization, nor can ejecta fluidization be explained by the flow of dry ejecta. Moreover, the absence of fluidized ejecta on other icy bodies suggests that abundant volatiles in the target also may not be the sole cause of ejecta fluidization. The restriction of these craters to the grooved terrain of Ganymede and the concentration of Martian DLE craters on the northern lowlands suggests that these terrains may share key characteristics that control the development of the ejecta of these craters.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Die Jupitersatelliten Im ¨Uberblick
    5. Die Jupitersatelliten im Uberblick¨ 5.1. Entdeckung der Jupitersatelliten und Bahnparameter Nach der Erfindung des Fernrohrs entdeckten Galileo Galilei und Simon Marius unabh¨angig voneinander im Jahre 1610 die vier gr¨oßten Jupitermonde. Der Mitentdecker, Simon Marius, regte an, diese vier Galileischen Satelliten nach Personen aus der griechisch-r¨omischen My- thologie zu benennen. Die vier Satelliten erhielten von innen nach außen die Namen Io (J1), Europa (J2), Ganymed (J3) und Callisto (J4)13. Erst 180 Jahre nach ihrer Entdeckung fand E. Barnard 1892 den innerhalb der Io-Bahn kreisen- den funften¨ Mond Amalthea (J5). Sieben weitere noch kleinere Monde (J6 bis J12) wurden zwischen 1904 und 1951 nachgewiesen. Kowal entdeckte 1974 einen dreizehnten Satelliten. Alle diese kleinen K¨orper befinden sich außerhalb der Callisto-Bahn. Diese dreizehn Monde (J1 bis J13) waren die ”klassischen” bekannten Jupitersatelliten vor der Voyager-Mission 1979. Auf den Voyager-Aufnahmen konnten drei weitere Satelliten (Metis, Adrastea und Thebe) identifiziert werden, die alle innerhalb der Io-Bahn kreisen. Auf den Galileo-Aufnahmen wurden keine weiteren Jupitersatelliten gefunden. Seit 1999 bis heute (Stand: zweites Halbjahr 2006) hat sich durch intensive Beobachtungen mit leistungsstarken Teleskopen die Zahl der bekannten Jupitersatelliten auf 63 erh¨oht, die meisten sehr kleine Objekte mit nur wenigen Kilometern Durchmesser14. Alle Satelliten k¨onnen wenigstens funf¨ verschiedenen Gruppen zugeordnet wer- den, die durch bestimmte Bahnelemente (Exzentrizit¨at, Inklination, prograde oder retrograde Rotationsrichtung) gekennzeichnet sind. Die beiden innersten Gruppen bestehen aus den kleinen Monden Metis, Adrastea, Amalthea und Thebe sowie aus den vier Galileischen Monden. Diese Monde rotieren prograd, d. h. im gleichen Sinn wie sich Jupiter selbst um seine Achse und um die Sonne dreht.
    [Show full text]
  • Radar Imaging of Solar System Ices
    RADAR IMAGING OF SOLAR SYSTEM ICES A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Leif J. Harcke May 2005 © Copyright by Leif J. Harcke 2005 All Rights Reserved ii iv Abstract We map the planet Mercury and Jupiter’s moons Ganymede and Callisto using Earth-based radar telescopes and find that all bodies have regions exhibiting high, depolarized radar backscatter and polarization inversion (µc > 1). Both characteristics suggest volume scat- tering from water ice or similar cold-trapped volatiles. Synthetic aperture radar mapping of Mercury’s north and south polar regions at fine (6 km) resolution at 3.5 cm wavelength corroborates the results of previous 13 cm investigations of enhanced backscatter and po- larization inversion (0:9 µc 1:3) from areas on the floors of craters at high latitudes, ≤ ≤ where Mercury’s near-zero obliquity results in permanent Sun shadows. Co-registration with Mariner 10 optical images demonstrates that this enhanced scattering cannot be caused by simple double-bounce geometries, since the bright, reflective regions do not appear on the radar-facing wall but, instead, in shadowed regions not directly aligned with the radar look direction. A simple scattering model accounts for exponential, wavelength-dependent attenuation through a protective regolith layer. Thermal models require the existence of this layer to protect ice deposits in craters at other than high polar latitudes. The additional attenuation (factor 1:64 15%) of the 3.5 cm wavelength data from these experiments over previous 13 cm radar observations supports multiple interpretations of layer thickness, ranging from 0 11 to 35 15 cm, depending on the assumed scattering law exponent n.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin of Ganymede's Polar Caps
    Icarus 191 (2007) 193–202 www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus The origin of Ganymede’s polar caps Krishan K. Khurana a,∗, Robert T. Pappalardo b, Nate Murphy c, Tilmann Denk d a Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA b Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Dr., Pasadena, CA 91109, USA c Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0392, USA d Freie Universität Berlin, Institut für Geologische Wissenschaften, Malteserstraße 74-100, 12249 Berlin, Germany Received 7 August 2006; revised 13 April 2007 Available online 5 May 2007 Abstract Since their discovery in Voyager images, the origin of the bright polar caps of Ganymede has intrigued investigators. Some models attributed the polar cap formation to thermal migration of water vapor to higher latitudes, while other models implicated plasma bombardment in brightening ice. Only with the arrival of Galileo at Jupiter was it apparent that Ganymede possesses a strong internal magnetic field, which blocks most of the plasma from bombarding the satellite’s equatorial region while funneling plasma onto the polar regions. This discovery provides a plausible explanation for the polar caps as related to differences in plasma-induced brightening in the polar and the equatorial regions. In this context, we analyze global color and high resolution images of Ganymede obtained by Galileo, finding a very close correspondence between the observed polar cap boundary and the open/closed field lines boundary obtained from new modeling of the magnetic field environment. This establishes a clear link between plasma bombardment and polar cap brightening.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenging the Paradigm: the Legacy of Galileo Symposium
    Challenging the Paradigm: The Legacy of Galileo Symposium November 19, 2009 California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Proceedings of the 2009 Symposium and Public Lecture Challenging the Paradigm: The Legacy of Galileo NOVEMBER 19, 2009 CAHILL BUILDING - HAMEETMAN AUDITORIUM CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY PASADENA, CALIFORNIA, USA © 2011 W. M. KECK INSTITUTE FOR SPACE STUDIES, ISBN-13: 978-1-60049-005-07 CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ISBN-10: 1-60049-005-0 Sponsored by The W.M. Keck Institute for Space Studies Supported by The Italian Consulate – Los Angeles The Italian Cultural Institute – Los Angeles Italian Scientists and Scholars in North America Foundation The Planetary Society Organizing Committee Dr. Cinzia Zuffada – Jet Propulsion Laboratory (Chair) Professor Mike Brown – California Institute of Technology (Co-Chair) Professor Giorgio Einaudi – Università di Pisa Dr. Rosaly Lopes – Jet Propulsion Laboratory Professor Jonathan Lunine - University of Arizona Dr. Marco Velli – Jet Propulsion Laboratory Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………………………………….. 1 Galileo's New Paradigm: The Ultimate Inconvenient Truth…………………………... 3 Professor Alberto Righini University of Florence, Italy Galileo and His Times…………………………………………………………………….. 11 Professor George V. Coyne, S.J. Vatican Observatory The Galileo Mission: Exploring the Jovian System…………………………………….. 19 Dr. Torrence V. Johnson Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology What We Don't Know About Europa……………………………………………………. 33 Dr. Robert T. Pappalardo Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology The Saturn System as Seen from the Cassini Mission…………………………………. 55 Dr. Angioletta Coradini IFSI – Istituto di Fisica dello Spazio Interplanetario dell’INAF - Roma Solar Activity: From Galileo's Sunspots to the Heliosphere………………………….. 67 Professor Eugene N. Parker University of Chicago From Galileo to Hubble and Beyond - The Contributions and Future of the Telescope: The Galactic Perspective…………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Gany 15Ppi.Pdf
    180° 0° 55° –55° . Geb Ur Sulcus 210° 330° 150° . Latpon 30° 60° –60° . Namtar . Agrotes Elam Philae Sulcus Sulci . Nigirsu Borsip Sulcus Lakhmu Fossae 70° –70° 240° 300° 60° 120° Galileo . Humbaba . Lagamal 80° . Wepwawet –80° . Teshub 90° 270° 90° 270° . Hathor Regio Bubastis Sulci Anubis . Neheh Dukug Sulcus 80° –80° Anzu Hamra. Patera . Adapa Etana GILGAMESH . Kishar . Aya 120° 60° 300° 240° . Ptah –70° . 70° Isis Ninkasi . Anu Enlil . Zaqar . Gula . Tanit . Sapas . Achelous Sebek 60° –60° 30° 150° 330° Mummu Sulci 210° . Adad 55° –55° 0° 180° North Pole South Pole 180° 170° 160° 150° 140° 130° 120° 110° 100° 90° 80° 70° 60° 50° 40° 30° 20° 10° 0° 350° 340° 330° 320° 310° 300° 290° 280° 270° 260° 250° 240° 230° 220° 210° 200° 190° 180° 57° 57° Geb . Enlil Elam Sulci . Asshur . Sin Ur Sulcus 50° 50° Aquarius Sulcus . Kadi Nun Sulci . Hershef Mashu Sulcus . Upuant Lakhmu Fossae . Galileo . Nefertum Mont Ur . Shu Byblus Sulcus Nippur Sulcus Sulcus Philus Sulcus 40° Enki Catena 40° Zu Fossae Nergal . Akitu Sulcus Tettu Facula . Lumha . Harakhtes . Halieus Abydos . Gir . Perrine Regio Khnum . Amon Facula Regio Kulla Catena . Anhur . Marius Nippur Sulcus M . Ammura Zakar . 30° Sati Mor a Bigeh . s 30° . Mehit Min . h Akhmin Facula Haroeris u Neith . Sicyon Sulcus Ta-urt S Facula Edfu Xibalba Sulcus Nineveh Sulcus u Anshar Sulcus l c Facula u . Ba'al s Epigeus . Bau Diment . Lugalmeslam Epigeus . Ilah Atra-hasis Hermopolis . Facula 20° Khepri Gushkin 20° . Ea . Heliopolis . Geinos Nidaba Nanshe . Facula Memphis Catena Seima . Agreus Busiris Chrysor.. Aleyin .
    [Show full text]
  • Planets Solar System Paper Contents
    Planets Solar system paper Contents 1 Jupiter 1 1.1 Structure ............................................... 1 1.1.1 Composition ......................................... 1 1.1.2 Mass and size ......................................... 2 1.1.3 Internal structure ....................................... 2 1.2 Atmosphere .............................................. 3 1.2.1 Cloud layers ......................................... 3 1.2.2 Great Red Spot and other vortices .............................. 4 1.3 Planetary rings ............................................ 4 1.4 Magnetosphere ............................................ 5 1.5 Orbit and rotation ........................................... 5 1.6 Observation .............................................. 6 1.7 Research and exploration ....................................... 6 1.7.1 Pre-telescopic research .................................... 6 1.7.2 Ground-based telescope research ............................... 7 1.7.3 Radiotelescope research ................................... 8 1.7.4 Exploration with space probes ................................ 8 1.8 Moons ................................................. 9 1.8.1 Galilean moons ........................................ 10 1.8.2 Classification of moons .................................... 10 1.9 Interaction with the Solar System ................................... 10 1.9.1 Impacts ............................................ 11 1.10 Possibility of life ........................................... 12 1.11 Mythology .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Faiths Embodied in Ancient Names (Vol. 1)
    Ex Libris Fra. Tripud. Stell. ANCIENT FAITHS EMBODIED IN ANCIENT NAMES ISIS, HORUS, AND FISH ANCIENT FAITHS EMBODIED IN ANCIENT NAMES OR AN ATTEMPT TO TRACE THE RELIGIOUS BELIEFS, SACRED RITES, AND HOLY EMBLEMS OF CERTAIN NATIONS BY AN INTERPRETATION OF THE NAMES GIVEN TO CHILDREN BY PRIESTLY AUTHORITY, OR ASSUMED BY PROPHETS, KINGS, AND HIERARCHS. BY THOMAS INMAN, M.D. (LONDON), CONSULTING PHYSICIAN TO THE ROYAL INFIRMARY, LIVERPOOL; LECTURER SUCCESSIVELY ON BOTANY, MEDICAL JURIPRUDENCE, MATERIA MEDICA WITH THERAPEUTICS, AND THE PRINCIPLES WITH THE PRACTICE OF MEDICINE. LATE PRESIDENT OF THE LIVERPOOL LITERARY AND PHILOSOHICAL SOCIETY. AUTHOR OF “TREATISE ON MYALGIA;” “FOUNDATION FOR A NEW THEORY AND PRACTICE OF MEDICINE;” “ON THE REAL NATURE OF INFLAMMATION,” “ATHEROMA IN ARTERIES,” “SPONTANEOUS COMBUSTION,” “THE PRESERVATION OF HEALTH,” “THE RESTORATION OF HEALTH,” AND “ANCIENT PAGAN AND MODERN CHRISTIAN SYMBOLISM EXPOSED AND EXPLAINED.” VOL. I. SECOND EDITION. LEEDS: CELEPHAÏS PRESS —— 2010. First published privately, London and Liverpool, 1868 Second edition London: Trübner & co., 1872 This electronic text produced by Celephaïs Press, Leeds 2010. This book is in the public domain. However, in accordance with the terms of use under which the page images employed in its preparation were posted, this edition is not to be included in any commercial release. Release 0.9 – October 2010 Please report errors through the Celephaïs Press blog (celephaispress.blogspot.com) citing revision number or release date. TO THOSE WHO THIRST AFTER KNOWLEDGE AND ARE NOT DETERRED FROM SEEKING IT BY THE FEAR OF IMAGINARY DANGERS, THIS VOLUME IS INSCRIBED, WITH GREAT RESPECT, BY THE AUTHOR. “Oátoi d Ãsan eÙgenšsteroi tîn ™n Qessalon…kh, o†tinej ™dšxanto tÕn lÒgon met¦ p£shj proqumiaj, tÕ kaq' ¹mšpan ¢nakr…nontej t£j graf¦j eˆ taàta oÛtwj.”—ACTS XVII.
    [Show full text]