DOCSLIB.ORG

1917 Journal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1917 Journal ; SUPKEME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Monday, October 1, 1917. Present: The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice McKenna, Mr. Justice Holmes, Mr. Justice Day, Mr. Justice Van Devanter, Mr. Justice Pitney, Mr. Justice McReynolds, Mr. Justice Brandeis, and Mr. Justice Clarke. The Chief Justice said: The court will receive motions for admission to the bar and other motions noticed for to-day and which are ready for submission, and the call of the docket will commence to-morrow pursuant to the twenty-sixth rule. All motions and petitions noticed for to-day that are not ready for submission may be submitted to-morrow. At the conclusion of the business of to-day the court will adjourn until to-morrow at the usual hour, in order to enable it to pay its respects to the President of the United States. C. M. Hanna, of Parkersburg, W. Va.; Thomas G. Fewell, of Meridian, Miss.; Benjamin F. Harrah, of Washington, D. C; Wil- liam A. Morrow, of Chicago, 111.; Chauncey C. Colton, of Duluth, Minn. ; Charles Rosecrantz, M. of New York City ; Samuel A. Mitch- ell, of St. Louis, Mo. ; Charles F. Kelley, of New York City ; Nathan H. Frank, of San Francisco, Cal. ; Robert M. Riculfi, of Jackson- ville, Fla.; Will R. Miller, of Franklin, Ind.; Fred W. Milverton, of Honolulu, Hawaii; Frank Healy, of Providence, R. I.; Henry P. Dart, jr., of New Orleans, La.; Philip S. Ehrlich, of San Francisco, Cal. Harry H. Nayor, ; of Boston, Mass. ; Samuel Sigilman, of Bos- ton, Mass. Louis ; J. Warren, of Honolulu, Hawaii ; E. Curtis Rouse, of New York City; Henry O'B. Cooper, of Alexandria, Va.; Wil- liam Ellis Lady, of Los Angeles, Cal. ; Joseph William Sharts, of Dayton, Ohio; Edmund C. Strode, of Lincoln, Nebr.; Palmer Pil- lans, of Mobile, Ala. ; David B. Trammell, II, of Fort Worth, Tex. Alexander Johnston, of Okmulgee, Okla.; Harry S. Barger, of Washington, D. C; Hatton W. Sumners, of Dallas, Tex.; C. W. King, of Oklahoma City, Okla. ; Herbert G. Thompson, of Musca- tine, Iowa; Jeremiah B. Collins, of Michigan City, Ind.; Frank V. Barns, of New York City; O. T. Richey, of Tucson, Ariz.; and A. S. Baskett, of Dallas, Tex., were admitted to practice. 15897—17 1 2 No. 488. Northwestern Consolidated Milling Company, petitioner, V. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Eailroad Company. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota, submitted by Mr. William Furst for the petitioner. No. 7. Original. The State of Wisconsin, complainant, v. Frank- lin K. Lane, Secretary of the Interior. Joint motion to set a day certain for the trial and argument, submitted by Mr. C. Edward Wright of counsel for the defendant. No. 605. Mark J. Gretsch, petitioner, v. The United States of America. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Cir- cuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, submitted by Mr. Mark J. Gretsch, pro se. No. 146. The United States of America, as trustee and guardian of the Omaha Tribe of Indians, etc., petitioner, v. Hiram Chase. Leave granted to file brief as amicus curiae on motion of Mr. Charles J. Kappler in that behalf. No. 687. Florence McDonald et al., petitioners, v. John F. Ralston et al. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma, submitted by Mr. C. W. King for the petitioners. No. 564. J. W. Chapman and P. R. Thompson, copartners, etc., petitioners, v. Java Pacific Line et al. Petition for a writ of certi- orari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, submitted by Mr. Simon Lyon in behalf of Mr. Eustace Cullinan and Mr. Thomas W. Hickey for the petitioners. No. 207. The United States, appellant, v. United Shoe Machinery Company of New Jersey et al. Motion to advance submitted by Mr. F. L. Peckham in behalf of counsel for the appellees. No. 427. W. T. Hendrickson, judge, etc., petitioner, v. Lewis Apperson. Leave granted to file brief as amicus curiae on motion of Mr. Ernest MacPherson in that behalf. No. 572. Lewis H. Stanton et al., petitioners, v. The City of Pitts- burgh. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania, submitted by Mr. James T. Lloyd and Mr. Richard Townsend for the petitioners. No. 515. Tweedie Trading Company, petitioner, v. The United States. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Cir- cuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit submitted by Mr. Peyton Gordon in behalf of Mr. Ferdinand E. M. BuUowa and Mr. R. J. M. Bullowa for the petitioner, and by Mr. Solicitor General Davis and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Thompson for the respondent. No. 557. Guerini Stone Company, petitioner, v. P. J. Carlin Con- struction Company. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United 3 States Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit submitted by Mr. Edward S. Paine for the petitioner, and by Mr. Charles Hartzell for the respondent. No. 552. Fred B. Jones, petitioner, v, Bouker Contracting Com- pany, claimant, etc. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit submitted by Mr. Fayette B. Dow for the petitioner, and by Mr. Francis Martin for the respondent. No. 657. Peter Chelentis, petitioner, v. Luckenbach Steamship Company, Inc. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit submitted by Mr. Fayette B. Dow for the petitioner, with leave to counsel for the respondent to file brief within one week. No. 555. Daisy M. Linkous, administratrix, etc., petitioner, v. The Virginian Railway Company. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit submitted by Mr. W. L. Welborn for the petitioner. No. 689. S. D. Barrett, petitioner, v. The Virginian Railway Com- pany. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit submitted by Mr. W. L. Welborn for the petitioner. No. 556. Morris Herrmann, as surviving partner, etc., petitioner, V. Henry Bower Chemical Manufacturing Company. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit submitted by Mr. F. M. Brylawski in behalf of Mr. Louis Marshall for the petitioner, and by Mr. James Piper nnd Mr. George Wharton Pepper for the respondent. No. 568. International News Service, petitioner, v. The Associated Press. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit submitted by Mr. F. M. Brylawski in behalf of Mr. Samuel Untermyer, Mr. Henry A. Wise, Mr. Louis Marshall, and Mr. William A. De Ford for the petitioner and by Mr. F. B. Jennings, Mr. Peter S. Grosscup, and Mr. Winfred T. Denison for the respondent. No. 570. Alfred W. Church, appellant, v. Horace M. Swetland et al. Motion to advance submitted by Mr. Hector M. Hitchings for the appellant in support of the motion and by Mr. Daniel P. Hays for the appellees in opposition thereto. No. 601. Midland Valley Railroad Company, plaintiff in error, v. Mrs. Maude Griffith, administratrix, etc. Petition for a write of cer- tiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas submitted by Mr. L. T. Michener for the plaintiff in error. 4 No. 602. Midland Valley Eailroad Company, petitioner, v. Armor Bell, administrator, etc. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit sub- mitted by Mr. L. T. Michener and Mr. Farrar L. McCain for the petitioner. No. 637. The Morse Dry Dock & Repair Companj^, owner of the Steamship Oceana^ petitioner, v. Conron Brothers Company et al. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit submitted by Mr. L. T. Michener in behalf of Mr. Pierre M. Brown for the petitioner and by Mr. Mark Ash, Mr. Julius Offenbach, and Mr. H. T. Newcomb for the re- spondents, with leave to Mr. Peter S. Carter to file brief for a re- spondent within one week. No. 565. William E. Wallace, petitioner, v. The United States. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit submitted by Mr. William A. Mor- row and Mr. Roger L. Foote for the petitioner. No. 511. Bank of Inverness, petitioner, v. William T. Hayden. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit submitted by Mr. Frederick S. Tyler in behalf of Mr. John W. Cutrer and Mr. O. G. Johnson for the petitioner. No. 636. B. H. Drees, petitioner, v. Sarah J. Armstrong et al. Petition for a Avrit of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Iowa submitted by Mr. Frederick S. Tyler for the petitioner. No. 645. W. L. Bruce, as administrator, etc., et al., petitioners, v. William Tobin. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of South Dakota submitted by Mr. Frederick S. Tyler, Mr. E. A. Burgess, and Mr. B. 1. Salinger for the petitioners. No. 596. Societe Naphtes Transports, petitioner, v. Bisso Towboat Company et al. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit submitted by Mr. Frederick S. Tjder in behalf of Mr. Richard B. Montgomery for the petitioner, with leave to counsel for the respondent to file brief within one week.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Thesis-1972D-C289o.Pdf (5.212Mb)
    OKLAHOMA'S UNITED STATES HOUSE DELEGATION AND PROGRESSIVISM, 1901-1917 By GEORGE O. CARNE~ // . Bachelor of Arts Central Missouri State College Warrensburg, Missouri 1964 Master of Arts Central Missouri State College Warrensburg, Missouri 1965 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May, 1972 OKLAHOMA STATE UNiVERSITY LIBRARY MAY 30 1973 ::.a-:r...... ... ~·· .. , .• ··~.• .. ,..,,.·· ,,.,., OKLAHOMA'S UNITED STATES HOUSE DELEGATION AND PROGRESSIVIS~, 1901-1917 Thesis Approved: Oean of the Graduate College PREFACE This dissertation is a study for a single state, Oklahoma, and is designed to test the prevailing Mowry-Chandler-Hofstadter thesis concerning progressivism. The "progressive profile" as developed in the Mowry-Chandler-Hofstadter thesis characterizes the progressive as one who possessed distinctive social, economic, and political qualities that distinguished him from the non-progressive. In 1965 in a political history seminar at Central Missouri State College, Warrensburg, Missouri, I tested the above model by using a single United States House representative from the state of Missouri. When I came to the Oklahoma State University in 1967, I decided to expand my test of this model by examining the thirteen representatives from Oklahoma during the years 1901 through 1917. In testing the thesis for Oklahoma, I investigated the social, economic, and political characteristics of the members whom Oklahoma sent to the United States House of Representatives during those years, and scrutinized the role they played in the formulation of domestic policy. In addition, a geographical analysis of the various Congressional districts suggested the effects the characteristics of the constituents might have on the representatives.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of OKLAHOMA CONGRESSMEN U.S
    HISTORY OF OKLAHOMA CONGRESSMEN u.s. Senate - Thomas Pryor Gore (D) elected 1907; J. W. Harreld (R) elected 1920; Elmer Thomas (D) elected 1926; Mike Monroney (D) elected 1950; Henry Bellmon (R) elected 1968; Don Nickles (R) elected 1980. u.S. Senate - Robert L. Owen (D) elected 1907; W. B. Pine (R) elected 1924; ThomasP. Gore (D) elected 1930; Josh Lee (D) elected 1936; E. H. Moore (R) elected 1942; Robert S. Kerr (D) elected 1948 (died 1963); J. Howard Edmondson (D) appointed 1-6-63 to fill office until General Election, 1964; Fred R. Harris (D) elected 1964 (for unexpired 2-year term) elected full term 1966; Dewey F. Bartlett (R) elected 1972; David Boren (D) elected 1978. u.S. Representatives: District 1-Bird S. McGuire (R) elected 1907; James S. Davenport (D) elected 1914; T. A. Chandler (R) elected 1916; E. B. Howard (D) elected 1918; T. A. Chandler (R) elected 1920; E. B. Howard (D) elected 1922; S. J. Montgomery (R) elected 1924; E. B. Howard (D) elected 1926; Charles O'Connor (R) elected 1928; Wesley E. Disney (D) elected 1930; George R. Schwabe (R) elected 1944; Dixie Gilmer (D) elected 1948; George R. Schwabe (R) elected 1950; Page Belcher (R) elected 1952; James R. Jones (D) elected 1972. District 2 - Elmer L. Fulton (D) elected 1907; Dick T. Morgan (R) elected 1908; W. W. Hastings (D) elected 1914; Alice M. Robertson (R) elected 1920; W. W. Hastings (D) elected 1922; Jack Nichols (D) elected 1934 and resigned 1944; W. G. Stigler (D) elected 3-8-44 to fill unexpired term and elected full term 1944; Ed Edmondson (D) elected 1952; Clem Rogers McSpadden (D) elected 1972; Theodore M.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior
    United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE 1849 C Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20240 The attached property, the Cole Motor Car Company, in Marion County, Indiana, reference number 83000128, was listed in the National Register of Historic Places by the Keeper of the National Register on 03/3/1983, as evidenced by the FEDERAL REGISTER/WEEKLY LIST notice of Tuesday, February 7,1984, Part IV, Vol.49, No. 26, page 4624. The attached nomination form is a copy of the original documentation provided to the Keeper at the time of listing. The attached nomination form is a copy of the original documentation provided to the Keeper at the time of listing. Keeper of the National Register of Historic Places Date NFS Pom 1$WO ' ;;.o, 1Q24-Q018 '. (2/3i/34 United States Department off the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory—Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries—complete applicable sections 1. Name Historic Cole Motor Car Company and/or common Service Supply Company, Inc. 2. Location ............ ... _.__..__„.,,......_.. .._..._„„ street & number 730 East Washington Street (U.S. 40) |V£_ not for publication state Indiana C0de 018 county Marion code 097 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use __ district __ public _X_ occupied -._ agriculture __ museum JL_ building(s) JL_ private __ unoccupied __ commercial —— park _ _ structure _ — both __ work in progress __ educational —— private residence* site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious _ r object _ _ in process X yes: restricted .
    [Show full text]
  • = Roster - ~ : of Members
    :1111111111111 "1"'111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111E § i = = ~ ~ = ROSTER - ~ : OF MEMBERS - OF THE 353RD - - INFANTRY i - - - - - - - = - - -ill lit IIIIIUUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIU UWtMtltolllllllll U UIUU I U 11111111 U I uro- iiiiiiiimiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiimiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii', THE 353RD INFANTRY | REGIMENTAL SOCIETY I SEPTEMBER. 1917 | JUNE. 1919 I IllltllUtll ................................................................................................. ..... ROSTER m u ......... ACCORDING TO THE PLACE ............... OF RESIDENCE iiiiiiiiiiii ......................................................... PREPARED FOR D 1 S T R IB U T 1 0 N TO ..... MEMBERS OF THE SOCIETY AT THE REGIMENTAL REUNION. SEPTEMBER. 1922 ................................ n 1111111111111 • 111111111<111111111111111111111•111111111•11111111ii11111111 it iiiiiiiiiiiiiiMiiiiiHimiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiumiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiintiiiitiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiifiiiiiiiiiiiiMiMiiiiiiiiMiiic1111111111«11111111111111 ■ 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 llj; PREFACE This little booklet contains the names and addresses of all former members of the Regiment whose names and addresses were known at the time the book was com­ piled. There are bound to be er­ rors. Men move from place to place and very seldom think of notifying the Secretary of change of address. This book is Intended to encour­ age visiting among former mem­ bers of the Regiment. It is too bad it cannot be absolutely cor­ rect for the will to visit a former
    [Show full text]
  • Rear View Mirror
    RReeaarr VViieeww MMiirrrroorr & Case History H. Donald Capps Volume 9 Number 2 / June 2011 Automobile Racing History From the Ashepoo & Combahee Drop Forge, Tool, Anvil & Research Works ◊ non semper ea sunt quae videntur – Phaedrus Pity the poor Historian! – Denis Jenkinson // Research is endlessly seductive; writing is hard work. – Barbara Tuchman Case History Indianapolis Motor Speedway: 1909 1 When the plans for the new speedway to be built on the outskirts of Indianapolis were released on 19 January 1909, the proposed circuit was to be a two-mile oval track with a three-mile road course located within the infield area; joining the two would create a five-mile (and three feet) combined track-road circuit. The land for the new speedway was about one and a half miles in length and about a half mile wide, covering an area of about 320 acres. 1 “Details of the New Motor Speedway Planned by the Hoosiers,” Motor Age, 21 January 1909, Volume XV No. 3, p. 27. The outside – or oval – track was to be fifty feet wide on the straights and sixty feet wide in the curves, while the inside – or road – track was to be twenty-five feet wide on the straights and thirty-five feet in the turns. The three main grandstands would have a capacity of thirty-five thousand with an additional twenty smaller grandstands, raised ten feet above the track, holding about fifty spectators at various locations along the outer track. The club house of the Indian- apolis Motor Car Club would be located on the grounds, along with buildings to house training quarters and storage for racing teams.
    [Show full text]
  • 50 Properties Listed in Or Determined Eligible for the NRHP Indianapolis Public Library Branch No. 6
    Properties Listed In or Determined Eligible for the NRHP Indianapolis Public Library Branch No. 6 (NR-2410; IHSSI # 098-296-01173), 1801 Nowland Avenue The Indianapolis Public Library Branch No. 6 was listed in the NRHP in 2016 under Criteria A and C in the areas of Architecture and Education for its significance as a Carnegie Library (Figure 4, Sheet 8; Table 20; Photo 43). Constructed in 1911–1912, the building consists of a two-story central block with one-story wings and displays elements of the Italian Renaissance Revival and Craftsman styles. The building retains a high level of integrity, and no change in its NRHP-listed status is recommended. Photo 43. Indianapolis Public Library Branch No. 6 (NR-2410; IHSSI # 098-296-01173), 1801 Nowland Avenue. Prosser House (NR-0090; IHSSI # 098-296-01219), 1454 E. 10th Street The Prosser House was listed in the NRHP in 1975 under Criterion C in the areas of Architecture and Art (Figure 4, Sheet 8; Table 20; Photo 44). The one-and-one-half-story cross- plan house was built in 1886. The original owner was a decorative plaster worker who installed 50 elaborate plaster decoration throughout the interior of the house. The house retains a high level of integrity, and no change to its NRHP-listed status is recommended. Photo 44. Prosser House (NR-0090; IHSSI # 098-296-01219), 1454 E. 10th Street. Wyndham (NR-0616.33; IHSSI # 098-296-01367), 1040 N. Delaware Street The Wyndham apartment building was listed in the NRHP in 1983 as part of the Apartments and Flats of Downtown Indianapolis Thematic Resources nomination under Criteria A and C in the areas of Architecture, Commerce, Engineering, and Community Planning and Development (Figure 4, Sheet 1; Table 20; Photo 45).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4: INFORMAL FALLACIES I
    Essential Logic Ronald C. Pine Chapter 4: INFORMAL FALLACIES I All effective propaganda must be confined to a few bare necessities and then must be expressed in a few stereotyped formulas. Adolf Hitler Until the habit of thinking is well formed, facing the situation to discover the facts requires an effort. For the mind tends to dislike what is unpleasant and so to sheer off from an adequate notice of that which is especially annoying. John Dewey, How We Think Introduction In everyday speech you may have heard someone refer to a commonly accepted belief as a fallacy. What is usually meant is that the belief is false, although widely accepted. In logic, a fallacy refers to logically weak argument appeal (not a belief or statement) that is widely used and successful. Here is our definition: A logical fallacy is an argument that is usually psychologically persuasive but logically weak. By this definition we mean that fallacious arguments work in getting many people to accept conclusions, that they make bad arguments appear good even though a little commonsense reflection will reveal that people ought not to accept the conclusions of these arguments as strongly supported. Although logicians distinguish between formal and informal fallacies, our focus in this chapter and the next one will be on traditional informal fallacies.1 For our purposes, we can think of these fallacies as "informal" because they are most often found in the everyday exchanges of ideas, such as newspaper editorials, letters to the editor, political speeches, advertisements, conversational disagreements between people in social networking sites and Internet discussion boards, and so on.
    [Show full text]
  • To Resolutions
    Index to Resolutions PAGE. PAGE. RESOLUTION NO. 1-MR. DOTY. Relative to the RESOLUTION NO. 13 - MR. MARRIOTT. Relative to election of a president of the Convention. adjournment. Offered . 26 Offered . 58 Adopted . 26 Adopted . 58 RESOLUTION NO. 2 - MR. DOTY. Relative to the RESOLUTION NO. 14 - MR. ELSON. Relative to the election of a secretary of the Convention. purchasing of supplies for the Convention. Offered . 33 ,Offered ,. 82 Adopted . 33 Adopted . ~2 RESOLUTION NO. 15 - MR. ANTRIM. Relative to RESOLUTION NO~3- MR. WATSON. Relative to the the distribution of the journals of the Convention. election of a sergeant-at-arms of the Convention. Offered 82 Offered . 34 Remarks on 85-87 Adopted . 34 Referred to select committee.. ........... .. ...... 87 RESOLUTION NO. 4 - MR. DOTY. Relative to the RESOLUTION NO. 16 - MR. READ. Relative to mile­ printing and distribution of the daily journals of age of the delegates. the Convention. • ,Offered . 82 Offered . 37 Adopted . 87 Adopted . 37 RESOLUTION NO. 17 - MR. STOKES. Inviting Gov­ RESOLUTION NO. 5 -- MR. DOTY. Relative to the ernor Judson Harmon to address the Convention. selection of seats. Offered . 83 Offered . 37 Adapted . 83 Adopted ' . 37 RESOLUTION NO. 18 - MR. EVANS. Relative to as- I certaining the names of surviving delegates to the RESOLUTION NO.6 - MR. HOSKINS. Relative to the Constitutional Convention of 1873. appointment of a permanent committee on Rules. Offered . 83 Offered 38 l\dopted . 92 Debated 38-51 Adopted ,.. 51 RESOLUTION NO. 19 - MR. KERR. Inviting President William H. Taft to address the Convention. RESOLUTION NO.7 - MR. ROEHM. Relative to the Offered .
    [Show full text]
  • No. 24 Mormon Pacific Historical Society
    Mormon Pacific Historical Society Proceedings 24th Annual Conference October 17-18th 2003 (Held at ‘Auwaiolimu Chapel in Honolulu) ‘Auwaiolimu Chapel (circa 1890’s) Built by Elder Matthew Noall Dedicated April 29, 1888 (attended by King Kalakaua and Queen Kapi’olani) 1 Mormon Pacific Historical Society 2003 Conference Proceedings October 17-18, 2003 Auwaiolimu (Honolulu) Chapel Significant LDS Historical Sites on Windward Oahu……………………………….1 Lukewarm in Paradise: A Mormon Poi Dog Political Journalist’s Journey ……..11 into Hawaii Politics Alf Pratte Musings of an Old “Pol” ………………………………………………………………32 Cecil Heftel World War Two in Hawaii: A watershed ……………………………………………36 Mark James It all Started with Basketball ………………………………………………………….60 Adney Komatsu Mormon Influences on the Waikiki entertainment Scene …………………………..62 Ishmael Stagner My Life in Music ……………………………………………………………………….72 James “Jimmy” Mo’ikeha King’s Falls (afternoon fieldtrip) ……………………………………………………….75 LDS Historical Sites (Windward Oahu) 2 Pounders Beach, Laie (narration by Wylie Swapp) Pier Pilings at Pounders Beach (Courtesy Mark James) Aloha …… there are so many notable historians in this group, but let me tell you a bit about this area that I know about, things that I’ve heard and read about. The pilings that are out there, that you have seen every time you have come here to this beach, are left over from the original pier that was built when the plantation was organized. They were out here in this remote area and they needed to get the sugar to market, and so that was built in order to get the sugar, and whatever else they were growing, to Honolulu to the markets. These (pilings) have been here ever since.
    [Show full text]
  • Saving the Salish Sea: a Fight for Tribal Sovereignty and Climate Action
    Saving the Salish Sea: A Fight for Tribal Sovereignty and Climate Action Evaluator: Francesca Hillary Member of Round Valley Tribes, Public Affairs and Communications Specialist, Frogfoot Communications, LLC. Instructor: Patrick Christie Professor Jackson School of International Studies and School of Marine and Environmental Affairs ______________________________________________________________________ Coordinator: Editor: Casey Proulx Ellie Tieman Indigenous Student Liaison: Jade D. Dudoward Authors: Jade D. Dudoward Hannah Elzig Hanna Lundin Lexi Nguyen Jamie Olss Casey Proulx Yumeng Qiu Genevieve Rubinelli Irene Shim Mariama Sidibe Rachel Sun Ellie Tieman Shouyang Zong University of Washington Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies Seattle, Washington March 4, 2021 - 2 - - 3 - 1. Introduction 6 2. Social and Ecological Effects of Trans Mountain Extension 6 2.1. Alberta Tar Sands 8 2.2. The Coast Salish Peoples 10 2.3. Trans Mountain Expansion Project 11 2.3.1. Ecological Impacts Of Trans Mountain Expansion Project 16 2.3.2. Social Impacts Of Trans Mountain Expansion Project 20 2.4. Policy Recommendations 27 2.5. Conclusion 30 3. Social Movements and Allyship Best Practices 31 3.1. Tactics from Past Social Movements for TMX Resistance 31 3.1.1. The Fish Wars 32 3.1.2. A Rise of a New Priority 34 3.1.3 Social Movements and Opposition Tactics 35 3.1.3.1. Keystone XL 35 3.1.3.2. Dakota Access Pipeline 37 3.1.4. Steps To Stronger Allyship 38 3.1.5. Resistance Is Not Futile; It Is To Make Changes 40 3.2. Present Social Movements in Regards to TMX 40 3.2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ally, the Okla- Homa Story, (University of Oklahoma Press 1978), and Oklahoma: a History of Five Centuries (University of Oklahoma Press 1989)
    Oklahoma History 750 The following information was excerpted from the work of Arrell Morgan Gibson, specifically, The Okla- homa Story, (University of Oklahoma Press 1978), and Oklahoma: A History of Five Centuries (University of Oklahoma Press 1989). Oklahoma: A History of the Sooner State (University of Oklahoma Press 1964) by Edwin C. McReynolds was also used, along with Muriel Wright’s A Guide to the Indian Tribes of Oklahoma (University of Oklahoma Press 1951), and Don G. Wyckoff’s Oklahoma Archeology: A 1981 Perspective (Uni- versity of Oklahoma, Archeological Survey 1981). • Additional information was provided by Jenk Jones Jr., Tulsa • David Hampton, Tulsa • Office of Archives and Records, Oklahoma Department of Librar- ies • Oklahoma Historical Society. Guide to Oklahoma Museums by David C. Hunt (University of Oklahoma Press, 1981) was used as a reference. 751 A Brief History of Oklahoma The Prehistoric Age Substantial evidence exists to demonstrate the first people were in Oklahoma approximately 11,000 years ago and more than 550 generations of Native Americans have lived here. More than 10,000 prehistoric sites are recorded for the state, and they are estimated to represent about 10 percent of the actual number, according to archaeologist Don G. Wyckoff. Some of these sites pertain to the lives of Oklahoma’s original settlers—the Wichita and Caddo, and perhaps such relative latecomers as the Kiowa Apache, Osage, Kiowa, and Comanche. All of these sites comprise an invaluable resource for learning about Oklahoma’s remarkable and diverse The Clovis people lived Native American heritage. in Oklahoma at the Given the distribution and ages of studies sites, Okla- homa was widely inhabited during prehistory.
    [Show full text]
  • The War on Poverty, Lawyers, and the Tribal Sovereignty Movement, 1964-1974
    ‘The Sovereignty that Seemed Lost Forever’: The War on Poverty, Lawyers, and the Tribal Sovereignty Movement, 1964-1974 Aurélie A. Roy Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2017 © 2017 Aurélie A. Roy All rights reserved ‘The Sovereignty that Seemed Lost Forever’1: The War on Poverty, Lawyers, and the Tribal Sovereignty Movement, 1964-1974 Aurélie A. Roy ABSTRACT Relying on interviews of Indian rights lawyers as well as archival research, this collective history excavates a missing page in the history of the modern tribal sovereignty movement. At a time when vocal Native American political protests were raging from Washington State, to Alcatraz Island, to Washington, D.C., a small group of newly graduated lawyers started quietly resurrecting Indian rights through the law. Between 1964 and 1974, these non-Indian and Native American lawyers litigated on behalf of Indians, established legal assistance programs as part of the War on Poverty efforts to provide American citizens with equal access to a better life, and founded institutions to support the protection of tribal rights. In the process, they would also inadvertently create both a profession and an academic field—Indian law as we know it today— which has since attracted an increasing number of lawyers, including Native Americans. This story is an attempt at reconstituting a major dimension of the rise of tribal sovereignty in the postwar era, one that has until now remained in the shadows of history: how Indian rights, considered obsolete until the 1960s, gained legitimacy by seizing a series of opportunities made available in part through ‘accidents’ of history.
    [Show full text]