DOCSLIB.ORG

Floral Morphology in : Relation. to Adaptation And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Floral Morphology in : Relation. to Adaptation And / FLORAL MORPHOLOGY IN : RELATION. TO ADAPTATION AND TAXONOMY IN, THE CARYOPHYLLACEAE BY . KATHERINE L NOVOSEL Thesis presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Edinburgh 1982 5.. ABSTRACT The floral morphology of several species in the 3 subfamilies of the family Caryophyllaceae has been investigated from different aspects. The reproductive biology of the family has been examined to determine if style number and stigmatic area are in any way related to ovule/seed number, and it has been found that there is no positive relationship. The genera in the family have also been placed in groups according to the distribution of the stigmatic papillae and the degree of style fusion. Species in 4 genera, Spergula, Spergularia, Stellaria, Myosoton have been examined in greater detail but again few correlations could be found. De-styling experiments on 3 5-styled species in the subfamily Dianthoideae have shown that pollen tubes readily cross between 'carpels' in these species and that if only 3 styles remain the number of seeds formed is the saine.as in 5-styled ovaries. The vascular tissue of the ovary and the position of the trans- mitting tissue has been studied in species in the subfamilies Dianthoideae and Paronychioideae. This has revealed that the trans- mitting tissue is part of the septal tissue and confirmed the views of other authors that the ovary in this family has not evolved from the traditional 'carpel' but that the ovary is composed of a sterile part and a fertile part. The taxonomy of the subfamily Paronychioideae has been investi- gated. A Key to the genera has been constructed and a description of each of the genera in this subfamily is given. CONTENTS Acknowledgements. List of Figures. List of Plates. List of.Tables. Chapter 1. Introduction ........•..•..•.••••. Chapter 2. 2.1 Introduction •...................................s.... 13 2.2 Materials and Methods ........................•..•... 18 2.3 Styles, stigmatic area and ovules in the family Caryophyllaceae 25 2.4 Comparisons between genera with three and five styled species. 38 2.5 De—styling experiments. 85 2.6 Discussion 95 Chapter 3. Ovary Morphology 3.1 Introductory Review . ... .. oo.0000. 97 3.2 Materials and Methods ooe00000000*4o*oo**e000eoe000000 116 3.3 Results ............................... 124 3.4 Discussion ..........•................................ 194 Chapter 4.. ParOnychioideae 4.1 Introduction 200 4.2 Floral Morphology 203 4.3 Classification 216 4.4 Description of Genera 234 Chapter 5. Conclusions. .. • 1 • • • • • . • . 31 Q Bibliography ....................................•.........•. 314 Appendix I Appendix II Index to Species in Chapters 2, 3, & 4. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. I am indebted to the Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland who funded this research. I wish to thank my supervisors, Prof. P. H. Davis and Dr. P. N. Smith for all their help and encouragement during the period of research and for constructive criticism of this thesis. I would also like to thank all members of the. Botany Department who have helped me, especially those in the electron microscope laboratory for their technical assistance. To the Curator and staff of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Edinburgh, for their help and for allowing me to work in the herbarium for many months, I am grateful. I also acknowledge my gratitude to all the institutions which donated seeds or living material. I would also like to thank my husband and family for their continuous support through some very difficult periods. I also wish to thank Mrs. Marion Sharp for typing this thesis. LIST OF FIGURES Fig. 1. Agrostemma githago L. ........ • • • • . 130 Fig. 2. Agrosternrna githago L. 134 Fig. 3. Cucubalus baccifer L. 151 Fig. 4. Sj.lenecoeli-rosa(L.)Godron .... ......... ......... 10 1 Fig. 5. Silene conoadea L. 16 7 Fig. 6. Scieranthus annuus L. 184 Pig. 7. Drymaria arenarioides Huxnb., & Bonpi. 209 Fig. 8. Paronychia 23 8.1 P. americana (Mutt. ) Fenzl 8.2 P.canadensis (L.) Wood 8.3 P. setacea Torr. & Gray 8.4 P. herniarioides (Nichx.) Mutt. 8.5 P. argentea Lam. 8.6 P. kapela (Hacq.) Kermer 8.7 P. argyrocorna (Michx.) Mutt. 8.8 P. capitata (L.) Lam. Fig. 9. Herniaria ..•... .... ................... 251 9.1 H. glabra L. 9.2 H. polygama J. Gay 9.3 H. fontanesli J. Gay Fig. 10.lLochiabracteataBalf.f. .......................... 251 10.2GymnocarposdecanderForsk. ...-.................... 251 Fig. 11.1 Scierocephalus arabicus Boiss. ..................... 258 11.2lllecebrumverticillatumL. ..................,.... 258 11.3 Chaetonychia cyinosa (L.) Sweet 11.4 Cardionema congesta (Berth.) Nels. & Macbride 11.5 Corrigiola litoralis 11 C. propinqua Cl. Gay Fig. 12.1 Pollichiacainpestris Solander .................... 263 12.2 P. campestris Solander 12.3 Achyronychia cooperi Hemsi. 12.4 A. parryi Torrey & Gray 12.5 Scopuluphila rix±'ordii (Brand.) Munz & Johnston Fig. 13.1 Pteranthus . •........... .. 268 13,2 P. d.ichotomus Forskal 13.3/ Fig. 13.3 Dicheranthus 13.4 D. plocainoides Webb 13.5 Cometes 13.6 C. surranttensis L. Fig. 14. Polycarpaea 275 14.1 P. longiflora F. Muell. 14.2 P. staminodina F. Muell. 14.3 P. teneriffae Lam. Fig. 15. Dryrnaria ... .. ... ............ ........• 282 15.1 D. pachyphylla Wooton & Standi. 15.2 D. leptophylla (Chain. & Schlecht) Fenzl 15.3 D. arena.rioides Hunib. & Bonpi. ex Roem. 15.4 D. cordata (L.) Wilid. ex Roem. & Schult. Fig. 16.1LoeflingiahispanicaL. ........................... 289 1,.2 Microphyes litoralis Phil. 16.3 Polycarpon tetraphyllum (L.) L. 16.4 P. coloinense Porta 16.5 P. robbairea 0. Kuntze Fig. 17.1StipulicidasetaceaMichx. ........................ 2%. 17.2 Ortegia hispanica L. 17.3 Sphaerocoma hookeri'T. Anderson Fig. 18.lCerdiacongestiflora ............................. 296 18.2 Haya obovata Balf. f. Fig. 19.1 Spergu.la arvensa.s L. 301 19.2 Spergularia rubra (L.) J. & C. Presi. Fig. 20.lTelephiumirnperatiL. ............................. 301 20.2 Krauseola mosambicina (Moss) Pax & Hoffm. Fig. 21.1 Scieranthus annuus L. ...... ...... .... ...... 308 21.2 S. biflorous (Forst.) Hook. f. 21.3 Habrosia spinuliflora (Ser. ex DC.) Fenzl. LIST OF PLATES Plate l.a Nyosoton aq.uatici (L.) Noench .................. 67 l.b Spergula arvensis L. 1.c Spergularia rubra (L.) J. & C. Presi. l.d Stellaria media (L.) J. & C. Presi. 1,e Nyosoton aquatic nl (L.) Moench Plate 2 AgrostemmagithagoL.............................. 135 Plate 3 AgrostemmagithagQL. ........................... 145 Plate 4 AgrosteminagithagoL. ........................... 147 Plate 5 Lychnit coronaria (L.) Desv. ................... 156 Cucubalus baccifer L. Silen? coeli-rosa (La) Godron Plate 6 Silene coeli-rosa (L) Godron ................... 163 Plate Silene conoidea L. ............................. 169 Plate S SperguJ.aria media (L.) C. Presi. ............... 174 S. rubra (L.) J. & C. Presi. Plate 9 Spergalaria media (L.) C. Presi. ............... 175 Plate 10 Polycarpon tetraphyllum (L.) L. ................ 180 Drymaria cordata Wilid. ex Roem. & Schult. Plate 11 Sclera nthusannuusL. 188 Corrigiola litoralis L. Plate 12 HerniariaglabraL. ............................ 190 Plate 13 Illecebrum verticillatum L. .................... 193 Paronychia echinulata Chater. LIST OF TAMES Table 1 Genera listed according to style number .......... 26 Table 2 Percentage of genera with 2, 3, 4 or 5 styles .... 27 Table `3 Style categories 400-46 a•aa.. • . a • • a a • • a • a • a . • • • • 30 Table 4 Percentage of genera in each style category ....... 33 Table 5 Style number compared to style length and ovule number ...............................•...•• 33 Table6 Two fused styles ..............................••• 34 Table 7 Three fused styles ............................... 34 Table. 8 Two free styles ................................•. 35 Table 9 Three free styles . 35 Table 10 Four free styles .......*•se••••s•• 35 Table 11 Five free styles . a . • • • . 36 Table 12 Results for Stellaria/ media ...................... 40 Table 13 Ace, 30, Stellaria media •........................ 40 Table 14 Stellaria media, 4 styles ........................ 43 Table 15 Results for Stellaria graminea •.................. 44 Table 16 Results for Stellaria holostea ................... 48 Table 17 Stellaria holostea , 2 styles .................... 50 Table 18 Ace. 82,Nyosotonaquaticum •..................... 51 Table 19 Results for Myosoton aguaticum ................... 52 Table 20 6 styles ..............................a........s. 55 Table 21 7 styles •..••.•S•..S•S.....•••S.•..•.....•.S..e•• 55 Table 22 4 styles •.................................•...... 55 Table 23 Total results for Stellaria/yosotonN ............. 56 Table 24 Aces 321, Spergularia media ...................... 59 Table 25 Results for Spergularia media .................... Go Table 2 6.. Ace. 387, Spergularia marina, results. ........... 64 Table 27 Ace. 314, Spergularia rubra ...................... 68 Table 28 Results for Spergularia media .................... 6 9 Table 29 Ace. 20, Spergula arensis ...................... 72 Table 30 Results for Spergula arvensis ................... 74 Table 30A 4 styles •...................a.ss..•.s•t.s•••••a• 76 Table 31 Ace. 124, Spergula morisonhi ..................... 77 Table 32 Results for Spergula morisonii ................... 78 Table 33 4 styles •....a..•.....as.a••.•s....ae.eae•aes•et- 81 Table 34/ Table 34 Total results for Sperlaria/Sperla ........... 82 Table 35 Experiment 1 Silene coeli-rosa •................. 87 Table 36 Experiment S. coeli-rosa •..................... 88 Table 37 Experiment
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Untangling Phylogenetic Patterns and Taxonomic Confusion in Tribe Caryophylleae (Caryophyllaceae) with Special Focus on Generic
    TAXON 67 (1) • February 2018: 83–112 Madhani & al. • Phylogeny and taxonomy of Caryophylleae (Caryophyllaceae) Untangling phylogenetic patterns and taxonomic confusion in tribe Caryophylleae (Caryophyllaceae) with special focus on generic boundaries Hossein Madhani,1 Richard Rabeler,2 Atefeh Pirani,3 Bengt Oxelman,4 Guenther Heubl5 & Shahin Zarre1 1 Department of Plant Science, Center of Excellence in Phylogeny of Living Organisms, School of Biology, College of Science, University of Tehran, P.O. Box 14155-6455, Tehran, Iran 2 University of Michigan Herbarium-EEB, 3600 Varsity Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108-2228, U.S.A. 3 Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, P.O. Box 91775-1436, Mashhad, Iran 4 Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 461, 40530 Göteborg, Sweden 5 Biodiversity Research – Systematic Botany, Department of Biology I, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Menzinger Str. 67, 80638 München, Germany; and GeoBio Center LMU Author for correspondence: Shahin Zarre, [email protected] DOI https://doi.org/10.12705/671.6 Abstract Assigning correct names to taxa is a challenging goal in the taxonomy of many groups within the Caryophyllaceae. This challenge is most serious in tribe Caryophylleae since the supposed genera seem to be highly artificial, and the available morphological evidence cannot effectively be used for delimitation and exact determination of taxa. The main goal of the present study was to re-assess the monophyly of the genera currently recognized in this tribe using molecular phylogenetic data. We used the sequences of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and the chloroplast gene rps16 for 135 and 94 accessions, respectively, representing all 16 genera currently recognized in the tribe Caryophylleae, with a rich sampling of Gypsophila as one of the most heterogeneous groups in the tribe.
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • South American Cacti in Time and Space: Studies on the Diversification of the Tribe Cereeae, with Particular Focus on Subtribe Trichocereinae (Cactaceae)
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2013 South American Cacti in time and space: studies on the diversification of the tribe Cereeae, with particular focus on subtribe Trichocereinae (Cactaceae) Lendel, Anita Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-93287 Dissertation Published Version Originally published at: Lendel, Anita. South American Cacti in time and space: studies on the diversification of the tribe Cereeae, with particular focus on subtribe Trichocereinae (Cactaceae). 2013, University of Zurich, Faculty of Science. South American Cacti in Time and Space: Studies on the Diversification of the Tribe Cereeae, with Particular Focus on Subtribe Trichocereinae (Cactaceae) _________________________________________________________________________________ Dissertation zur Erlangung der naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorwürde (Dr.sc.nat.) vorgelegt der Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Zürich von Anita Lendel aus Kroatien Promotionskomitee: Prof. Dr. H. Peter Linder (Vorsitz) PD. Dr. Reto Nyffeler Prof. Dr. Elena Conti Zürich, 2013 Table of Contents Acknowledgments 1 Introduction 3 Chapter 1. Phylogenetics and taxonomy of the tribe Cereeae s.l., with particular focus 15 on the subtribe Trichocereinae (Cactaceae – Cactoideae) Chapter 2. Floral evolution in the South American tribe Cereeae s.l. (Cactaceae: 53 Cactoideae): Pollination syndromes in a comparative phylogenetic context Chapter 3. Contemporaneous and recent radiations of the world’s major succulent 86 plant lineages Chapter 4. Tackling the molecular dating paradox: underestimated pitfalls and best 121 strategies when fossils are scarce Outlook and Future Research 207 Curriculum Vitae 209 Summary 211 Zusammenfassung 213 Acknowledgments I really believe that no one can go through the process of doing a PhD and come out without being changed at a very profound level.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora and Vegetation Characteristics of the Natural Habitat of the Endangered Plant Pterygopleurum Neurophyllum
    diversity Article Flora and Vegetation Characteristics of the Natural Habitat of the Endangered Plant Pterygopleurum neurophyllum Hwan Joon Park 1,2,*, Seongjun Kim 1,* , Chang Woo Lee 1, Nam Young Kim 1, Jung Eun Hwang 1, Jiae An 1, Hyeong Bin Park 1, Pyoung Beom Kim 3 and Byoung-Doo Lee 1 1 Division of Restoration Research, Research Center for Endangered Species, National Institute of Ecology, Yeongyang 36531, Korea; [email protected] (C.W.L.); [email protected] (N.Y.K.); [email protected] (J.E.H.); [email protected] (J.A.); [email protected] (H.B.P.); [email protected] (B.-D.L.) 2 Department of Ecology Landscape Architecture-Design, Jeonbuk University, Iksan 54596, Korea 3 Wetland Center, National Institute of Ecology, Changnyeong 50303, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (H.J.P.); [email protected] (S.K.) Abstract: This study analyzed the flora, life form, and vegetation of the Nakdong River wetland. Vegetation analysis was performed on 37 plots using the phytosociological method of the Zürich- Montpellier School. PCA analysis was conducted by using the vegetation data (ground cover of class; 1~9) of 37 plots surveyed by phytosociological method. PCA (Principal Component Analysis) was used to statistically analyze the objectivity of the community classification and the character species. The traditional classification and mathematical statistic methods were used. A total of 82 taxa belonging to 28 families, 65 genera, 72 species, 2 subspecies, and 8 varieties were present in the vegetation of the survey area. The life form was analyzed to be the Th-R5-D4-e type.
    [Show full text]
  • Nota Lepidopterologica
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Nota lepidopterologica Jahr/Year: 1994 Band/Volume: 17 Autor(en)/Author(s): Fiedler Konrad, Schurian Klaus G. Artikel/Article: Oviposition behaviour in Lycaena thetis Klug (Lepidoptera : Lycaenidae) 25-29 ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ und www.zobodat.at Nota lepid. 17 (1/2) : 25-29 ; 30.XI.1994 ISSN 0342-7536 Oviposition behaviour in Lycaena thetis Klug (Lepidoptera : Lycaenidae) Konrad Fiedler* & Klaus G. Schurian** * Theodor-Boveri-Biozentrum der Universität, Zoologie II, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany ** Am Mannstein 13, D-65779 Kelkheim-Fischbach, Germany Summary The oviposition behaviour of Lycaena thetis was observed in the Aladag mountains, southern Turkey. Females drop their eggs singly into the spiny cushions of the larval foodplant (Acantholimon spp., Plumb aginaceae). Zusammenfassung Das Eiablageverhalten von Lycaena thetis wurde im Aladag-Gebirge (Süd- Türkei) beobachtet. Die Weibchen lassen ihre Eier einzeln in die dornigen Kugelpolster ihrer Wirtspflanze {Acantholimon spp., Plumbaginaceae) fallen. The life histories of European or North American species of the Lycaenini ("Copper butterflies") are, in general, well known. For most Asian Lycaena Fabricius, 1807, species, however, even basic biological information on hostplants, voltinism, or diapause stages is lacking (cf. Fiedler, 1991). Recently, Tolman (1993) published a detailed account of the larval biology of Lycaena thetis Klug, 1834, from southern Greece. Since Tolman based his description on field-collected young, hibernated larvae, the oviposition behaviour of L. thetis remained unknown. Furthermore, Tolman's paper deals with the westernmost populations of L. thetis. Because the distribution of L.
    [Show full text]
  • Caryophyllaceae
    Reduction of the androecium in Spergularia marina (Caryophyllaceae) A.A. Sterk Hugo de Vries-Laboratorium, Universiteit van Amsterdam SUMMARY A study of the variation in the number of fertile stamens in flowers of Spergularia marina revealed that this number fluctuates between 0 and 10 but is usually 2 to 5. A statistical ana- lysis showed that reduction did not take place at random, because certain stamens tend to dis- appear more often than other ones, the progressive reduction also proceeding according to certain rules. Although the causal explanation for these phenomana can only be a tentative one for the time being, the statistical data are put on record in order to draw the attention to the occurrence of such singular processes. A study of androecial variability in Spergularia marina (L.) Griseb. showed that the number of fertile stamens per flower fluctuates between 0 and 10. Flowers with an optimum development of the androecium (with two whorls of 5 fertile stamens) are very rare. The majority of the flowers have 2 to 5 fertile androecial elements and evidently the reduction of the androecium has progres- sed rather far in this species (Sterk 1968, 1969). It is a question whether the reduction proceeds according to a certain pattern first certain androecial or at random. In the case configurations may be expected to occur in relatively high frequencies, but in the second no such preference of occurrence of special configurations may be anticipated. The possibility to study the reduction is provided by the circumstance that, at least in the populations studied, all phases of a progressive reduction are represented, i.e., all intermediatestages between flowers without fertile stamens and flowers with 10 fertile stamens occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Batfish Genus Halicmetus Alcock, 1891 from Australian Waters, with Descriptions of Two New Species (Lophiiformes: Ogcocephalidae)
    Zootaxa 4508 (2): 179–196 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2018 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4508.2.2 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:28A35297-48D9-4CEE-97A7-B294C2D271E5 Review of the batfish genus Halicmetus Alcock, 1891 from Australian waters, with descriptions of two new species (Lophiiformes: Ogcocephalidae) HSUAN-CHING HO1,2,4 & PETER R. LAST3 1National Museum of Marine Biology & Aquarium, Pingtung, 944, Taiwan 2Institute of Marine Biology, National Dong Hwa University, Pingtung, 944, Taiwan 2CSIRO National Research Collections Australia, Australian National Fish Collection, Castray Esplanade, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Aus- tralia. E–mail: [email protected] 4Corresponding author. E-mail. [email protected] Abstract A taxonomic review of species of the Indo–Pacific batfish genus Halicmetus occurring in the Australian Exclusive Eco- nomic Zone is provided. Treatments of six species in the region, including diagnoses of the widespread Halicmetus niger Ho, Endo & Sakamaki, 2008, H. reticulatus Smith & Radcliffe, 1912 and H. ruber Alcock 1891, a reclassification of the poorly known H. marmoratus Weber, 1913, and descriptions of two new species, H. westraliensis n. sp. (an Australian endemic) and H. drypus n. sp. (from the northern sector of the Australian Exclusive Economic Zone off Norfolk Island). The Australian species can be distinguished from each other and regional congeners by a combination of morphometrics, meristics and colouration. A key is provided for all known species of the genus. Key words: Pisces, taxonomy, review, Halicmetus, new species, Australia Introduction The batfish genus Halicmetus was established by Alcock (1891) for his new species Halicmetus ruber based on two specimens collected from the Andaman Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Distributions of Vascular Plants in the Czech Republic. Part 2
    Preslia 88: 229–322, 2016 229 Distributions of vascular plants in the Czech Republic. Part 2 Rozšíření cévnatých rostlin v České republice. Část 2 Zdeněk K a p l a n1,JiříDanihelka1, 2,JitkaŠtěpánková1, Libor E k r t3, Jindřich C h r t e k Jr.1,JiříZázvorka1,VítGrulich2, Radomír Ř e p k a4, Jan P r a n č l1, 5,MichalDucháček6,PavelKúr3, Kateřina Š u m b e r o v á1 &JosefBrůna1 1Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, CZ-252 43 Průhonice, Czech Repub- lic, e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], zazvorka @ibot.cas.cz, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]; 2Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, CZ-611 37 Brno, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]; 3 Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic, email: [email protected], [email protected]; 4Department of Forest Botany, Dendrology and Geobiocenology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University, Zemědělská 3, CZ-613 00 Brno, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected]; 5Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Benátská 2, CZ-128 01 Prague, Czech Republic; 6Department of Botany, National Museum, Cirkusová 1740, CZ-193 00 Praha 9-Horní Počernice, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected] Kaplan Z., Danihelka J., Štěpánková J., Ekrt L., Chrtek J. Jr., Zázvorka J., Grulich V., Řepka R., Prančl J., Ducháček M., Kúr P., Šumberová K.
    [Show full text]
  • 10. STELLARIA Linnaeus, Sp. Pl. 1: 421. 1753
    Flora of China 6: 11–29. 2001. 10. STELLARIA Linnaeus, Sp. Pl. 1: 421. 1753. 繁缕属 fan lu shu Chen Shilong (陈世龙); Richard K. Rabeler Fimbripetalum (Turczaninow) Ikonnikov; Mesostemma Vvedensky. Herbs annual, biennial, or perennial. Roots or rhizomes filiform and slender, roots sometimes robust, fleshy. Stems erect, ascending, or prostrate. Leaves compressed, variously shaped, rarely needlelike; stipules absent. Flowers terminal, seldom only axillary, in cymes or solitary, small; bracts immediately subtending calyx absent. Sepals (4 or)5. Petals (4 or)5, white, rarely green, usually 2-cleft nearly to base, rarely retuse or multilobed, sometimes absent. Stamens 2–5 or (6–)10. Ovary 1-loculed, rarely 3-loculed when young; ovules numerous, rarely several and only 1 or 2 mature; styles (2 or)3(or 4). Capsule orbicular or ovoid, opening by valves (1 or)2 × number of styles. Seeds (1 to) numerous, reniform, slightly compressed, tuberculate or smooth; embryo curved. About 190 species: mainly in temperate and cold regions; 64 species (28 endemic) in China. 1a. Petals 5–7-cleft, longer than sepals .................................................................................................... 58. S. radians 1b. Petals 2-cleft either apically or often to base, longer or shorter than sepals, seldom absent. 2a. Styles 2(or 3) or 4; capsules 4(or 6)-valved. 3a. Styles 4. 4a. Sepals rounded apically ............................................................................................... 64. S. strongylosepala 4b. Sepals long acuminate apically ........................................................................................ 45. S. oxycoccoides 3b. Styles 2(or 3). 5a. Petals and sepals 4; stamens 8; petals ca. 1.5 × as long as sepals; styles 2 ........................ 59. S. martjanovii 5b. Petals and sepals 5; stamens 10; petals shorter than the sepals; styles 2(or 3).
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIES IDENTIFICATION GUIDE National Plant Monitoring Scheme SPECIES IDENTIFICATION GUIDE
    National Plant Monitoring Scheme SPECIES IDENTIFICATION GUIDE National Plant Monitoring Scheme SPECIES IDENTIFICATION GUIDE Contents White / Cream ................................ 2 Grasses ...................................... 130 Yellow ..........................................33 Rushes ....................................... 138 Red .............................................63 Sedges ....................................... 140 Pink ............................................66 Shrubs / Trees .............................. 148 Blue / Purple .................................83 Wood-rushes ................................ 154 Green / Brown ............................. 106 Indexes Aquatics ..................................... 118 Common name ............................. 155 Clubmosses ................................. 124 Scientific name ............................. 160 Ferns / Horsetails .......................... 125 Appendix .................................... 165 Key Traffic light system WF symbol R A G Species with the symbol G are For those recording at the generally easier to identify; Wildflower Level only. species with the symbol A may be harder to identify and additional information is provided, particularly on illustrations, to support you. Those with the symbol R may be confused with other species. In this instance distinguishing features are provided. Introduction This guide has been produced to help you identify the plants we would like you to record for the National Plant Monitoring Scheme. There is an index at
    [Show full text]
  • Microstructural Features of Seeds of Spergularia Marina (L.) Griseb., (Caryophyllaceae)
    Pak. J. Bot., 42(3): 1423-1427, 2010. MICROSTRUCTURAL FEATURES OF SEEDS OF SPERGULARIA MARINA (L.) GRISEB., (CARYOPHYLLACEAE) RABIA ASMA MEMON1*, G. RAZA BHATTI2, SHAHIDA KHALID3 MUHAMMAD ARSHAD4, AMEER AHMED MIRBAHAR5 AND 6 RAHMATULLAH QURESHI 1Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Sindh, Jamshoo, Pakistan 2Department of Botany, Shah Abdul Latif University, Khairpur, Sindh, Pakistan 3Weed Science, National Agriculture Research centre, Islamabad, Pakistan 4Cholistan Institute of Desert Studies, the Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan 5Plant Biotechnology Wing, H.E.J. Research Institute of Chemistry, University of Karachi, Karachi-75270, Pakistan 6Department of Botany, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University, Murree Road, Rawalpind Abstract Seed morphology of Spergularia marina (L.) Griseb., occurring in wheat fields of Khairpur district, Sindh was carried out with Scanning electron microscope (SEM). Seed size, shape and surface were examined. The seed shape and surface exhibits great diversity, which provide valuable taxonomic information. In species under investigation both winged and unwinged type of seeds were found. Surface ornamentation showed heteromorphic characteristics of seed. Introduction Spergularia marina, a halophyte annual herb is native to California and is also found elsewhere in North America and beyond (Lum, 1975; Walker, 1992). It is commonly found in cultivated fields and waste lands of saline and sandy habitats (Ghazanfar & Nasir, 1986). It was first reported to occur in a wet saline marsh at Rittman, Ohio in 1978 by Riehl & Ungar (1980). According to Ungar (1988) this plant community contains the largest seed bank ever reported for a flowering plant community. Memon et al., (2003) reported it as a dominant weed found in fields of wheat crop in Khairpur district, Sindh, producing about 5000 seeds per plant.
    [Show full text]
  • 100 Years of Change in the Flora of the Carolinas
    ASTERACEAE 224 Zinnia Linnaeus 1759 (Zinnia) A genus of about 17 species, herbs, of sw. North America south to South America. References: Smith in FNA (2006c); Cronquist (1980)=SE. 1 Achenes wingless; receptacular bracts (chaff) toothed or erose on the lip..............................................................Z. peruviana 1 Achenes winged; receptacular bracts (chaff) with a differentiated fimbriate lip........................................................Z. violacea * Zinnia peruviana (Linnaeus) Linnaeus, Zinnia. Cp (GA, NC, SC): disturbed areas; rare (commonly cultivated), introduced from the New World tropics. May-November. [= FNA, K, SE; ? Z. pauciflora Linnaeus – S] * Zinnia violacea Cavanilles, Garden Zinnia. Cp (GA, NC, SC): disturbed areas; rare (commonly cultivated), introduced from the New World tropics. May-November. [= FNA, K; ? Z. elegans Jacquin – S, SE] BALSAMINACEAE A. Richard 1822 (Touch-me-not Family) A family of 2 genera and 850-1000 species, primarily of the Old World tropics. References: Fischer in Kubitzki (2004). Impatiens Linnaeus (Jewelweed, Touch-me-not, Snapweed, Balsam) A genus of 850-1000 species, herbs and subshrubs, primarily tropical and north temperate Old World. References: Fischer in Kubitzki (2004). 1 Corolla purple, pink, or white; plants 3-6 (-8) dm tall; stems puberulent or glabrous; [cultivated alien, rarely escaped]. 2 Sepal spur strongly recurved; stems puberulent..............................................................................................I. balsamina 2 Sepal spur slightly
    [Show full text]