Genetic Structure of Coastal and Inland Populations of Spergularia Media (L.) C
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Floral Morphology in : Relation. to Adaptation And
/ FLORAL MORPHOLOGY IN : RELATION. TO ADAPTATION AND TAXONOMY IN, THE CARYOPHYLLACEAE BY . KATHERINE L NOVOSEL Thesis presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Edinburgh 1982 5.. ABSTRACT The floral morphology of several species in the 3 subfamilies of the family Caryophyllaceae has been investigated from different aspects. The reproductive biology of the family has been examined to determine if style number and stigmatic area are in any way related to ovule/seed number, and it has been found that there is no positive relationship. The genera in the family have also been placed in groups according to the distribution of the stigmatic papillae and the degree of style fusion. Species in 4 genera, Spergula, Spergularia, Stellaria, Myosoton have been examined in greater detail but again few correlations could be found. De-styling experiments on 3 5-styled species in the subfamily Dianthoideae have shown that pollen tubes readily cross between 'carpels' in these species and that if only 3 styles remain the number of seeds formed is the saine.as in 5-styled ovaries. The vascular tissue of the ovary and the position of the trans- mitting tissue has been studied in species in the subfamilies Dianthoideae and Paronychioideae. This has revealed that the trans- mitting tissue is part of the septal tissue and confirmed the views of other authors that the ovary in this family has not evolved from the traditional 'carpel' but that the ovary is composed of a sterile part and a fertile part. The taxonomy of the subfamily Paronychioideae has been investi- gated. -
Caryophyllaceae
Reduction of the androecium in Spergularia marina (Caryophyllaceae) A.A. Sterk Hugo de Vries-Laboratorium, Universiteit van Amsterdam SUMMARY A study of the variation in the number of fertile stamens in flowers of Spergularia marina revealed that this number fluctuates between 0 and 10 but is usually 2 to 5. A statistical ana- lysis showed that reduction did not take place at random, because certain stamens tend to dis- appear more often than other ones, the progressive reduction also proceeding according to certain rules. Although the causal explanation for these phenomana can only be a tentative one for the time being, the statistical data are put on record in order to draw the attention to the occurrence of such singular processes. A study of androecial variability in Spergularia marina (L.) Griseb. showed that the number of fertile stamens per flower fluctuates between 0 and 10. Flowers with an optimum development of the androecium (with two whorls of 5 fertile stamens) are very rare. The majority of the flowers have 2 to 5 fertile androecial elements and evidently the reduction of the androecium has progres- sed rather far in this species (Sterk 1968, 1969). It is a question whether the reduction proceeds according to a certain pattern first certain androecial or at random. In the case configurations may be expected to occur in relatively high frequencies, but in the second no such preference of occurrence of special configurations may be anticipated. The possibility to study the reduction is provided by the circumstance that, at least in the populations studied, all phases of a progressive reduction are represented, i.e., all intermediatestages between flowers without fertile stamens and flowers with 10 fertile stamens occur. -
Distributions of Vascular Plants in the Czech Republic. Part 2
Preslia 88: 229–322, 2016 229 Distributions of vascular plants in the Czech Republic. Part 2 Rozšíření cévnatých rostlin v České republice. Část 2 Zdeněk K a p l a n1,JiříDanihelka1, 2,JitkaŠtěpánková1, Libor E k r t3, Jindřich C h r t e k Jr.1,JiříZázvorka1,VítGrulich2, Radomír Ř e p k a4, Jan P r a n č l1, 5,MichalDucháček6,PavelKúr3, Kateřina Š u m b e r o v á1 &JosefBrůna1 1Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, CZ-252 43 Průhonice, Czech Repub- lic, e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], zazvorka @ibot.cas.cz, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]; 2Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, CZ-611 37 Brno, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]; 3 Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic, email: [email protected], [email protected]; 4Department of Forest Botany, Dendrology and Geobiocenology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University, Zemědělská 3, CZ-613 00 Brno, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected]; 5Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Benátská 2, CZ-128 01 Prague, Czech Republic; 6Department of Botany, National Museum, Cirkusová 1740, CZ-193 00 Praha 9-Horní Počernice, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected] Kaplan Z., Danihelka J., Štěpánková J., Ekrt L., Chrtek J. Jr., Zázvorka J., Grulich V., Řepka R., Prančl J., Ducháček M., Kúr P., Šumberová K. -
SPECIES IDENTIFICATION GUIDE National Plant Monitoring Scheme SPECIES IDENTIFICATION GUIDE
National Plant Monitoring Scheme SPECIES IDENTIFICATION GUIDE National Plant Monitoring Scheme SPECIES IDENTIFICATION GUIDE Contents White / Cream ................................ 2 Grasses ...................................... 130 Yellow ..........................................33 Rushes ....................................... 138 Red .............................................63 Sedges ....................................... 140 Pink ............................................66 Shrubs / Trees .............................. 148 Blue / Purple .................................83 Wood-rushes ................................ 154 Green / Brown ............................. 106 Indexes Aquatics ..................................... 118 Common name ............................. 155 Clubmosses ................................. 124 Scientific name ............................. 160 Ferns / Horsetails .......................... 125 Appendix .................................... 165 Key Traffic light system WF symbol R A G Species with the symbol G are For those recording at the generally easier to identify; Wildflower Level only. species with the symbol A may be harder to identify and additional information is provided, particularly on illustrations, to support you. Those with the symbol R may be confused with other species. In this instance distinguishing features are provided. Introduction This guide has been produced to help you identify the plants we would like you to record for the National Plant Monitoring Scheme. There is an index at -
Microstructural Features of Seeds of Spergularia Marina (L.) Griseb., (Caryophyllaceae)
Pak. J. Bot., 42(3): 1423-1427, 2010. MICROSTRUCTURAL FEATURES OF SEEDS OF SPERGULARIA MARINA (L.) GRISEB., (CARYOPHYLLACEAE) RABIA ASMA MEMON1*, G. RAZA BHATTI2, SHAHIDA KHALID3 MUHAMMAD ARSHAD4, AMEER AHMED MIRBAHAR5 AND 6 RAHMATULLAH QURESHI 1Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Sindh, Jamshoo, Pakistan 2Department of Botany, Shah Abdul Latif University, Khairpur, Sindh, Pakistan 3Weed Science, National Agriculture Research centre, Islamabad, Pakistan 4Cholistan Institute of Desert Studies, the Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan 5Plant Biotechnology Wing, H.E.J. Research Institute of Chemistry, University of Karachi, Karachi-75270, Pakistan 6Department of Botany, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University, Murree Road, Rawalpind Abstract Seed morphology of Spergularia marina (L.) Griseb., occurring in wheat fields of Khairpur district, Sindh was carried out with Scanning electron microscope (SEM). Seed size, shape and surface were examined. The seed shape and surface exhibits great diversity, which provide valuable taxonomic information. In species under investigation both winged and unwinged type of seeds were found. Surface ornamentation showed heteromorphic characteristics of seed. Introduction Spergularia marina, a halophyte annual herb is native to California and is also found elsewhere in North America and beyond (Lum, 1975; Walker, 1992). It is commonly found in cultivated fields and waste lands of saline and sandy habitats (Ghazanfar & Nasir, 1986). It was first reported to occur in a wet saline marsh at Rittman, Ohio in 1978 by Riehl & Ungar (1980). According to Ungar (1988) this plant community contains the largest seed bank ever reported for a flowering plant community. Memon et al., (2003) reported it as a dominant weed found in fields of wheat crop in Khairpur district, Sindh, producing about 5000 seeds per plant. -
From Cacti to Carnivores: Improved Phylotranscriptomic Sampling And
Article Type: Special Issue Article RESEARCH ARTICLE INVITED SPECIAL ARTICLE For the Special Issue: Using and Navigating the Plant Tree of Life Short Title: Walker et al.—Phylotranscriptomic analysis of Caryophyllales From cacti to carnivores: Improved phylotranscriptomic sampling and hierarchical homology inference provide further insight into the evolution of Caryophyllales Joseph F. Walker1,13, Ya Yang2, Tao Feng3, Alfonso Timoneda3, Jessica Mikenas4,5, Vera Hutchison4, Caroline Edwards4, Ning Wang1, Sonia Ahluwalia1, Julia Olivieri4,6, Nathanael Walker-Hale7, Lucas C. Majure8, Raúl Puente8, Gudrun Kadereit9,10, Maximilian Lauterbach9,10, Urs Eggli11, Hilda Flores-Olvera12, Helga Ochoterena12, Samuel F. Brockington3, Michael J. Moore,4 and Stephen A. Smith1,13 Manuscript received 13 October 2017; revision accepted 4 January 2018. 1 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 830 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1048 USA 2 Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 1445 Gortner Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108 USA 3 Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EA, UK 4 Department of Biology, Oberlin College, Science Center K111, 119 Woodland Street, Oberlin, OH 44074-1097 USA 5 Current address: USGS Canyonlands Research Station, Southwest Biological Science Center, 2290 S West Resource Blvd, Moab, UT 84532 USA 6 Institute of Computational and Mathematical Engineering (ICME), Stanford University, 475 Author Manuscript Via Ortega, Suite B060, Stanford, CA, 94305-4042 USA This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. -
Irish Botanical News
Irish Botanical News No. 26 March 2016 Editor: Paul R. Green Above: Beggarticks (Bidens frondosa) in Grand Canal Docks, Dublin. Photo: R. McMullen © 2015. See page 32. Below: Field meeting at Curragh Chase, Co. Limerick, 16 May 2015. Photo: J. Reynolds © 2015. See page 68. PAGE 1 Committee for Ireland 2015 -2016 The following is the Committee as elected at the Annual General Meeting at The Botanic Gardens, Glasnevin on 19th September 2015. Office bearers were subsequently elected at the first committee meeting. Two further members are co-opted to the Committee. The Committee is now: Mr R. H. Northridge (Chairman, Atlas Planning Group, Irish Officer Steering Group and NI Representative on Records and Research Committee) Dr J. Denyer (Vice-Chair, Irish Officer Steering Group) Mrs P. O’Meara (Hon. Secretary) Mr J. Conaghan (Field Secretary) Dr R. Hodd (Hon. Treasurer) Mr C. Breen Dr M. Sheehy Skeffington The following are co-opted members of the committee: Dr M. McCorry Mr G. Sharkey (ROI Representative on Records and Research Committee) The following are nominated observers to the committee: Mr M. Wright (Northern Ireland Environment Agency) Dr M.B. Wyse Jackson (National Parks & Wildlife Service) Irish Botanical News is published by the committee for Ireland, BSBI and edited by P.R. Green. © P.R. Green and the authors of individual articles, 2016. Front cover photo: Vicia sepium var. ochroleuca (Bush Vetch). Photo: Margaret Cahill © 2015. See page 28. All species and common names in Irish Botanical News follow those in the database on the BSBI website http://rbg-web2.rbge.org.uk/BSBI/ and Stace, C. -
Checklist of Vascular Plants of the Southern Rocky Mountain Region
Checklist of Vascular Plants of the Southern Rocky Mountain Region (VERSION 3) NEIL SNOW Herbarium Pacificum Bernice P. Bishop Museum 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, HI 96817 [email protected] Suggested citation: Snow, N. 2009. Checklist of Vascular Plants of the Southern Rocky Mountain Region (Version 3). 316 pp. Retrievable from the Colorado Native Plant Society (http://www.conps.org/plant_lists.html). The author retains the rights irrespective of its electronic posting. Please circulate freely. 1 Snow, N. January 2009. Checklist of Vascular Plants of the Southern Rocky Mountain Region. (Version 3). Dedication To all who work on behalf of the conservation of species and ecosystems. Abbreviated Table of Contents Fern Allies and Ferns.........................................................................................................12 Gymnopserms ....................................................................................................................19 Angiosperms ......................................................................................................................21 Amaranthaceae ............................................................................................................23 Apiaceae ......................................................................................................................31 Asteraceae....................................................................................................................38 Boraginaceae ...............................................................................................................98 -
Caryophyllaceae.Pdf
Flora of China 6: 1–113. 2001. CARYOPHYLLACEAE 石竹科 shi zhu ke Lu Dequan (鲁德全)1, Wu Zhengyi (吴征镒 Wu Cheng-yih)2, Zhou Lihua (周丽华)2, Chen Shilong (陈世龙)3; Michael G. Gilbert4, Magnus Lidén5, John McNeill6, John K. Morton7, Bengt Oxelman8, Richard K. Rabeler9, Mats Thulin8, Nicholas J. Turland10, Warren L. Wagner11 Herbs annual or perennial, rarely subshrubs or shrubs. Stems and branches usually swollen at nodes. Leaves opposite, decussate, rarely alternate or verticillate, simple, entire, usually connate at base; stipules scarious, bristly, or often absent. Inflorescence of cymes or cymose panicles, rarely flowers solitary or few in racemes, capitula, pseudoverticillasters, or umbels. Flowers actinomorphic, bisexual, rarely unisexual, occasionally cleistogamous. Sepals (4 or)5, free, imbricate, or connate into a tube, leaflike or scarious, persistent, sometimes bracteate below calyx. Petals (4 or)5, rarely absent, free, often comprising claw and limb; limb entire or split, usually with coronal scales at juncture of claw and limb. Stamens (2–)5–10, in 1 or 2 series. Pistil 1; carpels 2–5, united into a compound ovary. Ovary superior, 1-loculed or basally imperfectly 2–5-loculed. Gynophore present or absent. Placentation free, central, rarely basal; ovules (1 or) few or numerous, campylotropous. Styles (1 or)2–5, sometimes united at base. Fruit usually a capsule, with pericarp crustaceous, scarious, or papery, dehiscing by teeth or valves 1 or 2 × as many as styles, rarely berrylike with irregular dehiscence or an achene. Seeds 1 to numerous, reniform, ovoid, or rarely dorsiventrally compressed, abaxially grooved, blunt, or sharply pointed, rarely fimbriate-pectinate; testa granular, striate or tuberculate, rarely smooth or spongy; embryo strongly curved and surrounding perisperm or straight but eccentric; perisperm mealy. -
New Phytologist Supporting Information Methods S1 for the Article
New Phytologist Supporting Information Methods S1 for the Article Relaxation of Tyrosine Pathway Regulation Underlies the Evolution of Betalain Pigmentation in Caryophyllales Samuel Lopez-Nieves, Ya Yang, Alfonso Timoneda, Minmin Wang, Tao Feng, Stephen A. Smith, Samuel F. Brockington, and Hiroshi A. Maeda Article acceptance date: August 25, 2017 ADH activity from plant tissue extracts Spinach oleracea seeds (HighMowing, Wolcott, VT) and pink Dianthus barbatus (BloomIQ, Lansing, MI) seedlings were purchased from a nursery and were grown together with Arabidopsis thaliana (ecotype Columbia) in 22˚C, 60% humidity, and 12/12 h light cycle growth chamber. Leaves of spinach and Arabidopsis seedlings were harvested at 3-week-old, and Dianthus barbatus leaves were harvested at 6-week-old. The crude extracts of Arabidopsis or Dianthus barbatus were prepared from ~1 g leaf tissues according to Aryal et al. (2014). For spinach, ~10 g leaf tissues were used to isolate the plastids according to Aryal et al. (2014) in order to avoid the undesired cytosolic polyphenol oxidase activity. Crude or plastid fractions were desalted by Sephadex G50 column to obtain protein extracts, and protein concentration of all biological replicates were adjusted to 0.06, 0.85, and 0.6 mg/mL for spinach, Dianthus barbatus, and Arabidopsis extracts, respectively. Time course ADH activity assays at 0, 1, 2, and 3 hr were performed in the presence and absence of 500 μM Tyr analog, 3-fluoro-Tyr, in 10 μL reaction containing 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 8.0), 1 mM arogenate, 1 mM NADP+, 10 μg/mL tetracycline (to inhibit prokaryotic- type protein synthesis of plastids or bacterial contamination), and 0.3, 4.25, and 3 μg of spinach, Dianthus, and Arabidopsis protein, respectively. -
Spergularia Tasmanica
Spergularia tasmanica COMMON NAME New Zealand sea spurrey, native sea spurrey SYNONYMS Lepigonum tasmanicum Kindb. FAMILY Caryophyllaceae AUTHORITY Spergularia tasmanica (Kindb.) L.G.Adams FLORA CATEGORY Vascular – Native ENDEMIC TAXON No ENDEMIC GENUS Motumorirau, Coromandel. November. No Photographer: John Smith-Dodsworth ENDEMIC FAMILY No STRUCTURAL CLASS Herbs - Dicotyledons other than Composites CHROMOSOME NUMBER 2n = 72 CURRENT CONSERVATION STATUS 2012 | Not Threatened Motumorirau, Coromandel. November. Photographer: John Smith-Dodsworth PREVIOUS CONSERVATION STATUSES 2009 | Not Threatened 2004 | Not Threatened DISTRIBUTION Indigenous. New Zealand (North, South and Stewart Islands) and Australia (Western Australia, South Australia, New South Wales, Victoria and Tasmania) HABITAT Coastal (rarely inland in lowland saline areas). A locally common, often sparsely distributed species of mudflats (especially the upper Sarcocornia dominated reaches of estuaries), also on consolidated sand, cliff faces and rubble slopes. FEATURES Perennial with thick, woody rootstock. Branches erect to ± decumbent from base. Leaves 10-60(-80) × 1-2 mm, yellow-green to ± green or reddish green, flattened, mucronate to shortly caudate, glabrous to sparsely glandular- ciliate. Stipules (3-)4-6(-7) mm long, acute to acuminate, sometimes furcate, shortly connate in the inflorescence. Inflorescence lax, densely invested in glandular hairs (0.1-)0.15-0.25(-0.5) mm long. Pedicels much longer than sepals. Sepals 3.0-3.5(-5.0) mm (mostly 4-6 mm long in fruit), ovate-lanceolate; glaucescent, occasionally with dark purple spots at base. Petals c.4 mm long, pink or mauve soon fading to white flushed pink or white. Stamens 5-10. Capsules 6-9 mm long (up to 2 mm longer than sepals), ovoid. -
Floral Species As Environmental Quality Indicators in Jordan: High Salinity and Alkalinity Environments
Journal of Environmental Protection, 2015, 6, 494-514 Published Online May 2015 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/jep http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jep.2015.65047 Floral Species as Environmental Quality Indicators in Jordan: High Salinity and Alkalinity Environments Ikhlas Alhejoj1*, Klaus Bandel2, Elias Salameh1 1Department of Environmental and Applied Geology, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan 2Geologisch-Paläontologisches Institut und Museum Hamburg, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany Email: *[email protected], *[email protected] Received 25 November 2014; accepted 10 April 2015; published 22 May 2015 Copyright © 2015 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract In this study the occurrence and ecology of plant assemblages are investigated, mainly for use as indicator plants of saline grounds in several locations in Jordan. High alkalinity and H2S-rich water tolerant species of plants are also discussed. Plants growing on salty grounds have distinct compo- sition regarding their place in the taxonomic system. Plant assemblages and their degree of toler- ance to salinity as in Karama area in the Jordan Valley are found to be distinct from that of Azraq Sabkha (Cental Jordan) with salt-tolerant flora. Karama area provides the living space for Mesem- bryanthemum on the saltiest ground, Suaeda further up on wetter surrounding and Salicornia succeeding on moist and less salty grounds. Drier places with rather salty grounds have bushes of Arthrocnemum, while slightly less salty places are preferred by Tamarix tetragyna. When Pro- sopis bushes appear, salt is only present periodically in the ground, as is also the case with Atriplex halimus and Capparis.