Resettlement Plan
49215-001 Loan: 3260
September 2017
NEP: Earthquake Emergency Assistance Project Ghyampesal-Bakot-Palkhu-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road Project
Prepared by the Government of Nepal for Asian Development Bank (ADB).
This resettlement plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the terms of use section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. iqrdswR ntrF{HrTfuTqrfufirq
q{€'qr: fu6Yl b7 qsrfri: W
Ftfr' RoeY-o\Flo frArdq snfqilo-rqfqtn{s'd,
T6qqmrortrqvdrr|fr r3f dq{r
cfcoW I
frqq:u,T{dffiqdrffit
q. dEr+1 i. q\q, FtF ?otgv/ovru oJ qrnre rrrkT ffifi ffiffir G,rf,rfu g-s$-Htrfi-
q. q, agfruqrs (q Fdtrdg, erfr'td r+cns-orqdru-+rfiRfi q. fugil fuf,i frwf, R \ Erdfue.g, q ;T. ildrsl qr.sq frrF ?orsv-oQ-oY o1 wNqfe qrq qRrdw trwr offifr riErq++rffi-E$ef,-
tduqrs (qv.qdq fudfca tfrfrfuffr errf'a tq-qffi{ R.qqF dFa) rililslqr. ?\o Frh ?obv-ote-qv +l wNqreffq{r+olqfuffir q Government of Nepal Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development Central Level Project Implementation Unit Earthquake Emergency Assistance Project Lalitpur, Nepal Earthquake Emergency Assistance Project (ADB Loan 3260-NEP) Detailed Project Report Ghyampesal-Bakot-Palkhu-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road (Ch: 9+100 to 17+300) Gorkha Section III : Social Safeguard Volume 2: Resettlement Plan September, 2017 Prepared By Central Implementation Support Consultants (CISC) DRILP-III, AF-Iteco Ltd. Switzerland Resettlement Plan of Ghyampesal-Bakot-Palkhu-Swara-Saurpapni-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...... a 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...... 2 2.1 Introduction of the Project ...... 2 3. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT ...... 4 a. Cadastral Survey ...... 4 b. Household survey and Asset Verification ...... 4 c. Losses of Land ...... 4 4. SOCIO-ECONOMIC INFORMATION AND PROFILE ...... 6 5. INFORMATIONDISCLOSURE, CONSULTATION, AND PARTICIPATION, ...... 9 a. Introduction ...... 9 6. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISMS ...... 10 5. RESETTLEMENT POLICY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK ...... 13 5.1 Nepal Government Applicable Legal and Policy Framework ...... 13 6. ADB's Involuntary Resettlement Policy Requirement ...... 16 a. Gap Filling Between ADB and Governmentof Nepal Policies ...... 17 b. Key Difference between ADB and Governmentof Nepal Legal Framework ...... 17 7. ENTITLEMENTS, ASSISTANCE AND BENEFITS ...... 19 8. RELOCATION OF HOUSING AND SETTLEMENTS ...... 20 8.1 Valuation and Compensation Determination ...... 20 9. INCOME RESTORATION AND REHABILITATION ...... 21 10. RESETTLEMENT BUDGET ...... 22 a. Cost of Compensation for Land ...... 22 b. Cost of Compensation for Trees ...... 22 c. Cost of Compensation for Agriculture Crops ...... 23 d. Other Supporting Cost ...... 23 f. Total Cost Estimate of RP ...... 24 11. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS ...... 25 12. IMPLEMENTAION SCHEDULE ...... 26 13. MONITORING AND EVALUATION ...... 30 Annex I: Poverty Analysis of Interviewed Household ...... 32 Annex II: List of Total Affected Private Land...... 33 Annex III: List of Affected Private Land with Estimated Cost ...... 34 Annex IV: List of Affected Private Land with Estimated Cost ...... 35 (Absentee) ...... 35 Annex V: List of Affected Trees and bamboos ...... 36 Annex VI : List of Community/National Forest Trees ...... 37 Annex VII: List of Private Trees ...... 38 VIII: List of Bamboos and Fruit tree ...... 39 Annex IX : List of Affected Agicultural Products ...... 40 Annex X : Meeting Minutes ...... 41 Annex XI: Entitlement Matrix ...... 42 i Earthquake Emergency Assistance Project, 2017 Resettlement Plan of Ghyampesal-Bakot-Palkhu-Swara-Saurpapni-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Land required by the Subproject ...... 5 Table 2: Summary of Land Loss ...... 5 Table 3: Land Loss and Poverty Level Variation of the Affected Households ...... 5 Table 4: Summary of Affected Households by the Subproject ...... 6 Table 5: Detail of Janajati (indigenous) households ...... 6 Table 6: Agricultural Income Variation of the Affected Households ...... 7 Table 7: Non- Agricultural Income Variation of the Affected Households ...... 7 Table 8: Food Sufficiency Months Variation of the Affected Households...... 8 Table 9: Key Difference between ADB Policy and GoN ...... 22 Table 10: Details of the land price of the affected plots (NRs. Per ropani and NRs per sqm) ...... 22 Table 11: Labor Requirement for Cutting & Transportation Trees ...... 23 Table 12: Details of the Lost of trees and compensation package ...... 23 Table 13: Budget for Resettlement Plan Implementation ...... 24 Table 14:RP Implementation Schedule for Ghyampesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani Road Sub Project, ...... 29 ii Earthquake Emergency Assistance Project, 2017 Resettlement Plan of Ghyampesal-Bakot-Palkhu-Swara-Saurpapni-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha ABBREVIATION ADB The Asian Development Bank AP(s) Affected Person(s)/People CDC Compensation Determination Committee CDO Chief District Officer CISC Central Implementation Support Consultant CLPIU Central level Project Implementation Unit CoI Corridor of Impact DLPIU District Level Project Implementation Unit EA Executing Agency EEAP Earthquake Emergency Assistance Project FGD Focus Group Discussion FY Fiscal Year GESI Gender Equality and Social Inclusion GoN Government of Nepal GRC Grievance Redress Committee GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism Ha Hectare IA Implementing Agency IOL Inventory of losses IR Involuntary Resettlement MoFALD Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development RF Resettlement Framework RP Resettlement Plan iii Earthquake Emergency Assistance Project, 2017 Resettlement Plan of Ghyampesal-Bakot-Palkhu-Swara-Saurpapni-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha GLOSSARY OF TERMS Affected Persons All persons who as of the cut-off-date stand to lose for the project all or part of (APs) their land or other assets, irrespective of legal or ownership title. Cut-off Date The date of census survey to count the APs and their affected land and assets. Land Donation Land owners’ willingness to provide part of their land for the project in expectation of project benefits. It must be voluntary or unforced and confirmed in written agreement witnessed by third party. Legalizable Those who do not have formal legal rights to land when APs are recorded, but could claim rights to such land under the law of Nepal. Non-titled Those who have no recognizable rights or claims to the land that they are occupying; termed as squatters or encroachers. However illegal inhabitants as per law of Nepal will be excluded from non-titled. Poverty Line The level of income below which an individual or a household is considered poor. Nepal’s national poverty line which is based on a food consumption basket of 2,124 calories and an allowance for non-food items of about two thirds of the cost of the basket will be adopted by the sub project to count APs under the poverty line. Whereas this poverty level may vary in accordance to district. Reference poverty line for poverty measurement 2015/2016 for Gorkha District is NRs 27948.27, calculated on the basis of NRs 18428.00for Rural hills-Eastern Region By Nepal Living Survey Standard 2014. The determination of poor households or persons will be based on the census and socio-economic survey and further confirmed by community meetings. Project Affected A family consisting of APs, his/her spouse, sons, unmarried daughters, daughters-in Family law, brothers or unmarried sisters, father, mother and other legally adopted members residing with him/her and dependent on him/her for their livelihood. Severely Project A Project Affected Family that is affected by the project such as: Affected a. There is a loss of land or income such that the affected family fall below the poverty Family/People line; and/or (SPAF) b. There is a loss of residential house such that the family members are physically displaced from housing. c. loss of more than 10 % of their productive land, livelihood loss and other accidential lost. Titled APs who have formal legal rights to land, including any customary of traditional rights recognized under the laws of Nepal. Third Party An agency or organization to witness and/or verify ―no coercion‖ clause in an agreement with APs in case of voluntary land donation. One independent agency (i.e. not involved in project implementation), preferably working on rights aspect, will be recruited in each development region to serve this function. Vulnerable Group Distinct group of people or persons who are considered to be more vulnerable to impoverishment risks than others. The poor, women-headed, Dalits and IPs households who may or may not fall below poverty line will be counted as vulnerable APs. Women-headed Household headed by women, the woman may be divorced, widowed or abandoned or household her husband can be working away from the District for long periods of time, where the woman takes decision about the use of and access to household resources. iv Earthquake Emergency Assistance Project, 2017 Resettlement Plan of Ghyampesal-Bakot-Palkhu-Swara-Saurpapni-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. This Resettlement Plan has been prepared for the Gyampesal-Bakot-Palkhu-Swara- Saurpaniroad subproject of Gorkha district under the Earthquake Emergency Assistance Project (EEAP). The major objective of the EEAP is to restore and reestablish use earthquake damanged infrastructures within existing facilities and corridor of impact (CoI) with minimal or no land acquisition. This RP has been prepared following the resettlement framework (RF) of EEAP and in accordance with land acquisition act 2034, the reconstruction related act 2072 and its working procedures 2072, and also following the ADB safeguard policy statement 2009. 2. The objectives of the RP are to ensure adequate safeguard measures and appropriate entitlements are provided to affected person wherever involuntary resettlement is observed. The RP explain process adopted for preparation of the resettlement plan impact due to construction of road, mitigation measures and implementation. 3. The RF will guide the preparation of resettlement plans during the project implementation, according to which EEAP subprojects will avoid or minimize land acquisition and involuntary resettlement wherever possible. In unavoidable situation, the project will ensure the AP’s rights and they will receive assistance 4. APs have been informed and consulted about the involuntary resettlement during the technical survey, cadastral survey and household survey of subproject. Special attention has been paid to ensure that the vulnerable groups and the women headed households receive appropriate assistance. The national laws, regulation, resstlement framework of EEAP and ADB's safeguard policy (2009) have been followed during the planning and preparation of this plan. During the diverse surveys, consultations, and formal and informal meetings with local people, none of households have found losing above 10 % of their productive land. Though, people are facing problem with least transport facilities due bad condition of road. So they are very much interested for upgrading this road network through this project. Thus,there is already average 5m existing road alignment so impact on their land seems very nominal as comparison to good transport facilities. During focused group discussion, many of participants had suggested for earlier and scheduled construction for the subproject. 5. The road alignment starts Bakkot junction of Sulikot rural municipality ward no6 . Moreover, the road alignment has considered the zero point at CH 9+100 from the Ghampesal which is small market centre and finally ends at Saurpani (Thapaguan). The total length of this subproject (Ghympesal-Bakot-Saurpani) is 8.2 km. Further, the CoI of district road is 20 m as per Nepal road standard 2070 and EEAP has followed the same but it has considered only 10 meter road as a corridor of impact which is 5 meter from the central line. However, construction work will be only in 7m except some loop and turning point. Existing breadh of the road is 5 meter in average so EEAP will take further 5 meter. Thus, it had shown that minimum impact on land and other structures of local people.However, some impact on land was identified during the cadastral survey and it was noticed that 4.12 hactor additional land is required for this subproject of which 1.78 hac is private and remaining 2.34 is public land. 6. Socio-economic survey of the project affected households was carried out to identify the impact of the project. It was social screeing to identify past, present and future scenario of the subproject a | P a g e Resettlement Plan of Ghyampesal-Bakot-Palkhu-Swara-Saurpapni-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha area with meaningful participation and consultation of local people. Altogether, 109 households including 10 non-interviewed HHs are found to be affected by the subproject. Out of total 109 HHs, 99 HHs were available for socio-economic survey. The APs included 613 with combination of 312 male and 301 female are belong to 19 Brahmin/Chhetri, 60 Janajati, and 10 dalithouseholds. Altogether, ther are 11 female headed households. The socio economic analysis of the affected population shows that impact of agricultural income in total annual income of the affected household is minimum.So land loss due to additional cutting to their land and its impact on their annual income is nominal. Thus, there is no negative impact of this road subproject to the affected families. Out of 99 HHs 4 households are found in below district poverty level which will remain same after the completion of the subproject. 7. The average food sufficiency of the APs from their own agriculture production is 7.4 months, which will reduce to 7.0 months after the subproject implementation. The food shortage is met from non-agricultural incomes like remittance, employment and wage labor 8. There are not any residential private structures within corridor of impact so there would not be any resettlements issues. Likewise, there were not identified any public as well as community structure along subproject within corridor of impact. Thus, this subproject has no impact on structures (private and public). Further, during the household survey, there were not found impact on community forestry, tap and other infrastructure which are to be affected due to project intervention. 9. This RP has been prepared as per the provision of RF followed by EEAP/MoFALD. One of the major objectives of this RP is to avoid or minimize land acquisition and involuntary resettlement wherever possible. In unavoidable situation, the project will ensure that the AP's rights and they will receive assistance so that their household economy may not be severegly affected. All involuntary land acquisition will be compensated at replacement cost. . Special attention has been paid to ensure that the vulnerable groups and the women-headed households receive appropriate assistance. The national laws, regulation, resettlement framework of EEAP and ADB’s resettlement safeguard policy 2009 have been followed during the planning and preparation of Resettlement Plan. During the survey APs were cleraly informed they are eligiable to get compensation of new cutting land hence new cutting has been estimated for compensation. 10. A Compensation Determination Committee will be at district level under the chairpersonship of the Chief District Officer. Altogether NRs 18,390,732.17 has been proposed for implementation of the RP and out of the total cost the compensatory costs will be decided by the CDC. APs will receive opportunity through income restoratation program to restore their livelihood in previous form. Some HHs expressed interest to join Life Skill Training and have expected to utilize the skill for developing entrepreneurship regarding income restoration program. The training participants will be choosen during construction and periority will be given to IPs, dalit and volunerable households. 11. A well-defined grievance redress and resolution mechanism has been established to resolve grievances and complaints in a timely and satisfactory manner. All affected persons will be made fully aware of their rights, and the detailed grievance redress procedures will be publicized through an effective public information campaign. First Level of GRM, Second Level of GRM, Third Level of GRM and Fourth Level of GRM has been established and oriented as per EEAP/ PAM. b | P a g e Resettlement Plan of Ghyampesal-Bakot-Palkhu-Swara-Saurpapni-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha 12. The Earthquake Emergency Assistance Project (EEAP) has been implementd to response the impact of April-2015 earthquake with reconstructing the district roads. The quake is one of the most destructive natural disasters in the country's history in this regards EEAP is working with slogan of Build Back Better. The target of the project is to restore and strengthen the resilience of rural roads. The project is being implemented with the loan financing of ADB, grant technical assistance from SDC and counterpart funding from the Government of Nepal (GON). 13. The National Reconstruction Authority (NRA) is the executing agency of the project. The Central Level Project implementation Unit (CLPIU) under Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development (MOFALD) supported by Central Implementation Support Consultant (CISC) provides overall guide and monitoring of the project activities at central level. District Level Project Implementation Unit (DLPIU) supported by District Implementation Support Consultant (DISC) is responsible to implement overall activities at district. c | P a g e Resettlement Plan of Ghysmpesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Introduction of the Project 14. The Earthquake Emergency Assistance Project covers 12 earthquake affected districts like Solokhumbu, Okhaldhunga, Ramechhap, Sindhuli, Dolakha, Kavrepalanchok, Lalitpur, Bhaktapur, Kathmandu, Chitwan, Gorkha and Lamajung. The main objective of the project is to restore critical public and social infrastructure and services with strengthened resiliency. Under this Project, about 450 kilometers of rural roads damaged by the earthquake will be rehabilitated with feature of build back better for road safety and climate resilience. 15. The ReconstructionAuthority (NRA)is the exucative agency ofthe Project.The Central level Project Implementation Unit (CLPIU) supported by centra implementation Support Consultant under the MoFALD provides overall guidenance and supervision at central level. Further, District Level Project Implementation Unit (DLPIU) supported by district implementation support consultant (DISC) has been established under the CLPIU in each DTOs of the project district will resposible to implement all district level activities. 16. The total length of the Ghyampesal-Bakot-Swara- Barpak road is 30 km though, EEAP has decided to upgrade onlyin 8.2 km road from Bakot to Saurpani (9+100 to 17+300). The road alignment starts from Sulikot- 6 (thenTakukot-6) and ends at suliko -1 (then Saurpani-4) of Gorkha district. Proposed alignment is earthen and run only in dry season though, it links Ghyampesal (known as local market centre) and Barpak (epicentre area of earthquake, 2015).The road sub-project is located in the northen part from the district head quarter of the Gorkha. It starts from Bakot of Sulikot rural municipality-6 (then Takukot VDC) at an altitude of 1,058 m above msl. The major settlements are Takukot, Majhthar, Simbu, Jhaktiswara, Bhandari Gaun and ends at Sulikot rural municipality-4 (then Saurpani VDC) at an altitude of 1,358m above msl. However, the road does not pass through any protected areas, historically and archaeologically sensitive areas. 17. This Resettlement Plan has been prepared on the basis of approved resettlement framework of the Earthquake Emergency Assistance Project. The RP presents the process adopted for preparation of the involuntary resettlement plan, and its mitigating measures and implementation of the road subproject impacts in line with Government of Nepal Land Acquisition Act 1977, ADB Safeguard Policy Statement 2009, and land acquisition working procedures for the rebuilding of structures affected by earthquake 2072. 18. The RF has adopted ADB policy to ensure all persons affected by the project are able to maintain and, preferably, improve their pre-project living standards and income-earning capacity by providing compensation for the loss of physical and non-physical assets and, as required, other assistance and rehabilitation measures to reestablish affected livelihood. 19. The proposed subprojectGhyampesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani is of 8.2km length. The existing road surface is earthen, new track is seen in initial section, and some land slides areas is observed nearabout 3 km from the starting point.The existing road width of the alignment varies from 3m to 6m. 20. Ghyampesal – Bakot – Palku – Swara – Saurpani – Barpak road in Gorkha district is given a high priority as it provides access to the northern part of Gorkha district to district headquarter Gorkha Bazaar and other parts of the country. Upgrading of this road will provide easy physical and economical access to the people living within zone of influence (ZoI). After the road upgrading, it can be as a catalyst for different development activities. 2 | P a g e Resettlement Plan of Ghysmpesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha Local products can get better market facilities with improved transportation facility so that people may improve their livelihood by multiple form of earning opportunities. 21. The subproject considers the 20 meter right of way (CoI) as the rural roads standard of Nepal government. However EEAP has decided to acquire 10 meter (5 meter either side from central line) as a corridor of impact. . The existing road surface is earthen and alignment also passes through newly track open areas and some land slides area.The existing road width of the alignment varies from 3m to 6m so average width of the existing road is considered 5 meter after consultation with local people. The EEAP has proposed bituminous surface treatment for this road subproject. 3 | P a g e Resettlement Plan of Ghysmpesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha 3. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT a. Cadastral Survey 22. The cadastral survey team has been mobilized during the mid rainy season of July 2017 so it was quite challenging not only due to season but also the scattered settelements. However, cadastral surveyor and district implementation support consultant (DISC) team were involved to idenfiy land and structure loss along the subproject.The survey team had assesd the cadastral maps and detail design drawaing of road to uniform the techinal desing with cadastral map.The team pegged the alignment and impact boundaries and identified the affected land areas, assets and structures. The survey team then conducted the pilot study of affected households and it was initiation for socio- economic household survey. The identified land owners and the plot number of the affected lands have been takne from land revenue and survey office of gorkha. 23. Assets Inventory: - As a part of social impact assessment household survey and inventory of loss were carried out along DISC team, social mobilizers, and local government representive and affected people. The technical team had identified upgrading requirements and potential areas of land to be acquired. A detailed inventory of affected persons/households, land houses and other structures, private trees, public properties and common property resources was prepared and verified with the owners and related persons on site. The cadastral survey report was disclosed for further verification of land owner name, address and plot number after completion of survey. However, draft RP will be published for final verification. b. Household survey and Asset Verification 24. Socio economic household survey was carried out fromlate July to pre August of 2017.The objectives of the socio-economic survey was organized to prepare overall profile of affected persons, assess household income and expenditure, and identifies productive land, values of those assets, livelihood patern and other income generating activities. In addition, it assessed priority of project affected people for income restoration program which are bound to organize during the project implementation period. Further, it investigated marginalized communities, disadvantage people and endangerd affected people so the subproject could have asssureed that it might not affected the local scenario due to road construction. However, survey was focused to find out impact on land and structure alin the road alignment and their present living condition, and possible impact considering past, present and furture impact by the orad sub project. 25. The household survey was conducted to identify the project affected persons and to find out for potential impact after the identification of affected land plots of the household. The social survey team enumerated all types of loss due to the road improvement. During the survey project affected persons, the total land holding of the APs was enumerated. The total percentage of lost land, house, and number of different types of trees were also identified and recorded them as impact of the subproject. c. Losses of Land 26. A total of 194 plots of land are found to be affected by this road subproject of which 153 plots are from interviewed households, 14 plots from not interviewed (absentee) households, and 27 plots are from government land.Further, institution land were not found during the cadastral survey. Altogether 4.12 ha of additional land required for road extension of which 2.34 ha is government 4 | P a g e Resettlement Plan of Ghysmpesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha land and 1.78 ha is private land. Thus, 1.78 ha private land is nessesary for new cutting . The proposed costs for these lands are calculatedon the basis of land value published land revenue office of gorkha. These costs are found equivalent to replacement cost. Hence same cost is proposed as compensation cost for APs. However survey team didn't find the land transaction since many years in this area. In addtion, compensation will be provided with proper evident and documents shown by claimed affected person. Following Table 1 presents the detail of affected land to be acquired for the road subproject Land Holding and Land Loss. Table 1: Land required by the Subproject s.n. Land requirement within CoI (10 m) Area in hactor Total plots 1. Private land 3.02 1.1 Private land under existing area 1.26 167 1.2 Private land under new cutting area 1.78 2 Government land 5.18 27 Total land area 8.2 194 Source: Cadastral Survey, September 2017 27. The average land holding of affected households is 1.25 ha which will reduce to1.22 ha after intervention of the subproject. Table 2: Summary of Land Loss Pre Project Post Project Land Loss Measure No. of HHs Percentage No. of HHs Percentage 1. Land Holding <0.5 ha 24 24.2 27 27.2 0.5-1.0 ha 37 37.3 35 35.3 >1.0 ha 38 38.5 37 37.5 2. Average Holding (ha) 1.25 1.22 Source: Household Survey, August, 2017 28. The interviewed household shows that none of the interviewedhouseholds lose more than 10 percent of their total land holding. However, there are 27.3 % household will loss more than 5 % of their total land holding, and 72.7 % will loss below than 5 % of their total land holding. In addition, there are only 4 household were found below the district poverty level which will be remain the same. Table 3: Land Loss and Poverty Level Variation of the Affected Households SN Description No. of HHs Percentage 1 < 5% land loss 72 72.7 2 5% to <10 % land loss 27 27.3 3 Above Poverty (PCI) 95 95.95 4 Below Poverty (PCI) 4 4.05 Source: Household Survey, August, 2017 5 | P a g e Resettlement Plan of Ghysmpesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha 4. SOCIO-ECONOMIC INFORMATION AND PROFILE 29. After briefing to local government representative, government official and stakeholders the safeguard team has conducted the household survey. The household survey was like preliminary inventory of affected peoples, and social impact assessment. Initially, discussion, meetings and orientation were organized for gather their suggestions on how to minimize and mitigate impacts and discussed relocation options. In addition, socio-economic survey was conducted to investigate affected households income, food sufficiency, livelihood options, loss of land, structures, trees and other assets. The survey team was combination of ressttlement expert, social safeguard officer and six field enuemeters. The affected households are included withing 8.2 km from bakot to saurpani. During the the socico-economic survey of this road the safeguard team found that numerous land owner are far from the subproject area because these area are productive land and they are living little far. Total 109 affected households, socio-economic survey was carried for 99 households consisting of 613 populations. The table 4 provides summary of the affected households. Table 4: Summary of Affected Households by the Subproject SN Variable Count 1 Total Affected HHs 109 2 Interviewed HHs 99 3 Non interviewd (absentee) HHs 10 4 Interviewed Population 613 4.1 Male 312 4.2 Female 301 4.3 Average HHs Size 4.8 4.4 Dalit HHs 10 4.5 Janjati (indigenous) HHs 70 4.6 Brahmin/Chettri (BCT) HHs 29 4.7 Women Headed HHs 11 Source: Household Survey, August, 2017 30. Although the project administration manual of the EEAP states that project will not include subprojects that affect indigenous people, 70 janajati households are found in resettlement survey. Out of 70 janajati households newar are highest proportion of 44.28 % which is known as advanced Janjati (indigenous) as per GoN catetory. Similary, 28.58 % consists magar, 17.14 % constists gurung and 10.00 % constits of Baramu janajati households. In addition, these households are not affected by their local culture, tradtion, language, culture and overal livelihood partten because proposed subproject has been used as road since many years. Table 5 shows the details of the Janajati households residing along the road alignment. Table 5: Detail of Janajati (indigenous) households S. N. Varients of indigenous people No of HHs Percentage 1 Newar 31 44.28 2 Magar 20 28.58 3 Gurung 12 17.14 4 Baramu 7 10.00 Total 70 100.00 Source: Household Survey, August, 2017 6 | P a g e Resettlement Plan of Ghysmpesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha 31. This road will provide access to market, education, government institutions, non-government institutions, health centers situated at district headquarter, Gorkha. Not only this it will be the door to capital formation after improvement of market facilities and other parts of the country. Apart from this, this road will connect Barpak which is epicenter of earthquake and most potential destination of tourism. 32. Agriculture is the main occupation of the population residing along the road alignment and it providing better income but it seemed traditional. Though, some leading farmers were found starting new technologies, ideas in their field. However, the effort is very minimum so it is not sufficient for their food cocnsumtion and they are depending on non agriculture business. People in the area CoI mostly paddy, potato, millet, barley, wheat and buckwheat. Table 6 shows the agricultural income variation of the affected households. It shows that household earning more than 60000 in a year from agriculture is 95.96 percentages which is expected to reduce to 1% percentage after the implementation of the project. Table 6: Agricultural Income Variation of the Affected Households Annual Agricultural Pre-Project Post Project Income No of HHs Percentage No of HHs Percentage <=25000 0 0.00 0 0.00 25000-60000 4 4.04 5 5.05 >=60000 95 95.96 94 94.95 Average (NRs) 189,858.58 (Annual) 183456.04 (Annual) Source: Household Survey, August, 2017 33. Almost all household i.e. 80.8 percentage earn more than 60,000 annually from non agriculture sector. Foreign employment, government and private jobs, business, and non agricultural labour are the main sources of income outside agriculture. Household having less than 25000 is 5 households and 13 have not any sourece from non agriculture sector. Likewisee, 1 household earn 25000 annually from non agriculture sector which is 1.04 percentages in agreegate. Table 7: Non- Agricultural Income Variation of the Affected Households Annual Non-Agriculture Income (HH) <=25000 18 18.18 25000-60000 1 1.04 >=60000 80 80.8 Average (NRs) 432994.95 Source: Household Survey, August, 2017 34. The contribution of agricultural income and livelihood was assessed by measuring food sufficiency from agro-products. Table 10 gives food sufficiency in months for affected households and relates it to poverty levels. 7 | P a g e Resettlement Plan of Ghysmpesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha Table 8: Food Sufficiency Months Variation of the Affected Households Pre-Project Post-Project S.N. Food Sufficiency Months No of Percentage No of HHs Percentage HHs 1 <3 months 1 1.01 1 1.01 2 3 - 6 months 10 10.10 10 10.10 3 6-9 months 59 59.59 59 59.59 4 9-12 months 29 29.29 29 29.29 Average (Months) 7.48 7.48 Source: Household Survey, August, 2016 35. The average food sufficiency month of the APs is 7.48 months per year which will remain the same due to less impact on their productive land. In terms of food security, data reveals that households having less than 3 months of food security is 1.01 percentage, between 3 to 6 is 10.10 %, 6 to 9 is 59.59 % and 9 to 12 is 29.29%. Thus, majority people having food sufficiency of 6 to 9 months. 36. Impact upon income and food security is restored through income generation activities facilitated by the project and livelihood enhancement trainings will be conducted to those who are eligible to this criterion. For vulnerable groups and severely affected persons losing 5% or more of their productive assets and livelihoods regardless of tenure status, income restoration programs will be designed. Women Headed HHs, dalits, households which are below poverty level, indigenous households will be given higher priorities in LEST. 8 | P a g e Resettlement Plan of Ghysmpesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha 5. INFORMATIONDISCLOSURE, CONSULTATION, AND PARTICIPATION, a. Introduction 37. The public consultation and formal meeting and interviews were carried out with the land and structure owners as well as local stakeholders regarding the road upgrading program along the alignment.They were fully consulted about project norms, guidelines and overall ADB Policy on Involuntary resettlement, compensation and entitlement, RF of the EEAP. The local communities were explained about: 1. Relevancy of the road subproject scope and schedules, 2. Key features of RP and its impact on project, 3. About land acquisition, donation, compensation and other entitlements schemes, 4. About Grievance redress mechanism , and 5. Special consideration and assistance of all vulnerable groups 6. Overall projects norms, guidelines, websites and contact person for more details. 38. There were several informal/formal public meeting and consulation with APs, and with the other stakeholders along the alignment. The details of consultation meeting have been presented in the Appendix VI. The local leaders and the villagers also facilitated for consultations with the affected people during cadastral and household listing and socio-economic and loss assessment survey of the families. During the community consultations, people expressed that they would fully support the project implementation. However, they also demanded compensation for the land loss, additional activities to prevent flood and soil loss which may be triggered by road construction. The HH survey forms also contained opinions regarding compensation and waste disposal management. Until RP preparation no complaints and grievances were received from affected people. 39. Further, notice publishing and other public consultation program for RP implementation, and overall safeguard issues DLPIU is playing the active role in this regards. In addition, project affected people will be informed more than before and make them aware about overall EEAP project norms, rules and regulations. Further, RP has to be approved by NRA, and disclosure will be conducted during the implementation period. 9 | P a g e Resettlement Plan of Ghysmpesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha 6. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISMS 40. The objective the grievance redress mechanism (GRM) is to resolve complaints as quickly as possible and at the local level through a process of conciliation; and, if that is not possible, to provide clear and transparent procedures for appeal. A well-defined grievance redress and resolution mechanism is guided by the RF which will be fully informed and made aware of the rights to the APs. The grievance redress process includes four levels which is shown in the figure. Figure 1: Grievance Redress Mechanism Grievance 1-2 days Field Level: Grievance 1st Level Grievance Contractor, Redressed DISC,DLPIU 7 days Grievance 2nd Level Grievance CLPIU Redressed 15 days Grievance 3rd Level Grievance Grievance Redress Redressed Committee 4th Level Higher Authority Grievance Court of Law Note: CLPIU-Central Level Project Implementation Unit, DLPIU-District Level Project Implementation Unit, DISC-District Level Implementation Support Consultant 10 | P a g e Resettlement Plan of Ghysmpesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha a. First level of GRM: The first level and most accessible and immediate contact for the fastest resolve of grievan- ces are the contractors, and design and supervision consultants on site. Prior to construction of any works, the CLPIU and DLPIU will ensure local community meetings are held to notify local residents and businesses of any temporary disturbances, and to inform them of the Project. If a local area committee (LAC) exists in the area, they should also be informed. If any complaints arise, the contractors, consultants, and DLPIU can immediately resolve the complaint on site. The CLPIU can also be involved in grievance redress at this stage. The CLPIU and DLPIU office phone number will be posted in public areas within the subproject areas and construction sites. b. Any person with a grievance related to the project works can contact the project to file a complaint. The DLPIU offices will have a safeguards focal person to field and resolve complaints. The safeguards (environment and resettlement) focal person will document the complaint, and immediately address and resolve the issue with the contractor within 1-2 days, if the complaint remains unresolved at the field level. The DLPIU may seek the assistance of the consultant safeguards specialists (the environmental specialist or social safeguards specialist) to resolve the issue. The DIU safeguards focal person will notify the CLPIU safeguards focal person that a complaint was received, and whether it was resolved. The DLPIU safeguards focal person will fully document the following information: (i) name of the person; (ii) date complaint was received; (iii) nature of complaint; (iv) location, and (v) how the complaint was resolved. c. Second level of GRM:If the grievances remain unresolved; the DLPIU will forward the complaint to the CLPIU safeguards focal person. The person filing the grievance will be notified by DLPIU safeguards focal person that the grievance was forwarded to the PIU safeguards focal person. The CLPIU will address the grievance. Grievances will be resolved through continuous interactions with affected persons, and the CLPIU will answer queries and resolve grievances regarding various issues including environmental or social impacts. Corrective measures will be undertaken at the field level by the CLPIU safeguards focal person within 7 days. He/she will fully document the following information: (i) name of the person; (ii) date complaint was received; (iii) nature of complaint; (iv) location and (v) how the complaint was resolved. d. Third level of GRM:If the grievance remain unresolved, the CLPIU’s project director will activate the third level of the GRM by referring the issue (with written documentation) to a Grievance Redress Committee (GRC) constituted by the EA, which will, based on review of the grievances, address them in consultation with the PMU, CLPIU, DLPIU, and affected persons. The GRC will consist of PMU leadership, affected persons, and local area committee, among others—determined to provide impartial, balanced views on any issues. The GRC should consist of at least five persons. A hearing will be called with the GRC, if necessary, where the affected person can present his/her concern and issues. The process will promote conflict resolution through mediation. The GRC will meet as necessary when there are grievances to be addressed. The GRC will suggest corrective measures at the field level and assign clear responsibilities for implementing its decision within 15 days. The functions of the GRC are as follows: (i) to provide support to affected persons on problems arising from environmental or social disruption, asset acquisition (where required), and eligibility for entitlements, compensation, and assistance; (ii) to record grievances of affected persons, categorize and prioritize them, and provide solutions within 15 days; and (iii) to report to the aggrieved parties developments regarding their grievances and decisions of the GRC. The PMU safeguards focal person will be responsible for processing and placing all papers before the GRC, recording decisions, issuing minutes of the meetings, and taking follow-up action to see that formal orders are issued and the decisions carried out. 11 | P a g e Resettlement Plan of Ghysmpesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha e. Fourth level of GRM: In the event that a grievance is not addressed by the contractor, DISC, DLPIU, CLPIU or GRC, the affected person can seek legal redress of the grievance in the appropriate courts, the fourth level of the GRM, which is the formal legal court system. The GRM however does not prevent affected persons from seeking legal redress at any time. 12 | P a g e Resettlement Plan of Ghysmpesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha 5. RESETTLEMENT POLICY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK 5.1 Nepal Government Applicable Legal and Policy Framework 1. This section provides the review of national laws, policies of the donor agency and the Resettlement Framework of the EEAP that applies to the project. 2. The Land Acquisition Act, 2034 (1977) is the main legal document on land acquisition and resettlement activities in Nepal. There is provision in Clause 3 of the Act to acquire land for any public purpose, subject to award of compensation. According to Clause 4, institutions seeking land acquisition may also request the Government of Nepal to acquire land under regular provisions, subject to compensation by such institutions. Clause 27 of the Act provides for land acquisition through negotiation with the plot owners, were all processes specified in the Act is not required. 3. The Reconstruction Related Act 2072 (2015)1 is the most recent Act promulgated after the earthquake of April 2015 for the reconstruction of earthquake affected structures. The Notice 2, Part 3 and Part 5 of this A t s ‘egulatio explai s the la d a uisitio a d o pe satio dete i atio p o ess a d p o edu es, a ed u de , the wo ki g p o edu es o la d a uisitio e ui ed fo e o st u tio of ea th uake affe ted st u tu es, 2072 . The major clauses of these working procedures related to land acquisition are highlighted under: Clause 3-4: the land required for reconstruction project can acquire land from anywhere for the project and reserves right to enter such land. Clause 5 (1): the project head should include the details of the land to be acquired and send for approval to NRA secretary. Clause 5 (3): after NRA approval, the project head should publish the details of the land plots to be acquired in national or local level newspaper requesting the land owners to register complain within 15 days if they do not agree. Clause 5 (4-10): processes of keeping such land plots on hold and resolve disagreements of the land owners if any. Clause 6 (1): the project head will write to land registration office for transferring the ownership of the land plots acquired according to Clause 5 (3) and Clause 5 (7) in the name of Government of Nepal. Clause 8 (2): formation of Compensation Determination Committee (CDC). Clause 10 (1-2): CDC should determine the compensation rate on the basis of market rate, vulnerability of the loss-owner and so on which should be stated in the decision minute. Clause 10 (3): CDC should make the compensation decisions public as soon as possible to notify the landowners, publish in national or local newspapers, notice in VDC or municipality board about details of compensation amount recipients, date and place to receive compensation and about place and duration to complain if not agree with the compensation amount. Clause 11 (1): Unsatisfied individuals can complain about the compensation amount within 15 days of the notice publication. Clause 11 (2-4): process of resolving complains received as per Clause 11 (1). Clause 12 (1): compensation should be given to any standing crops or trees or plants of the land plots while entering in lands as per Clause 4. Clause 13 (1-4): duration to receive compensation is 3 months from the date of notice publication as Clause 10(3). If not, the project head shall register the amount in the office and public the notice to receive the amount within 6 months. If the recipients still do not claim the amount, such amount will be no longer payable and register in reserve fund. 1 This is unofficial translation extracted from Nepal Gazet, Regulations on Reconstruction of Earthquake Affected Structures, 2072 (Nepali language), Part 3 and Part 5. 13 | P a g e Resettlement Plan of Ghysmpesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha Clause 16: if any public land needs to acquire but occupied by any individual, government can compensate with other public land to those individual, if land is available. Clause 17: If the remaining land area becomes unusable after land acquisition, the remaining land shall be acquired by the project if complained by the landowner within 35 days of notice publication as per Clause 10(3). 4. The National Policy on Land Acquisition, Resettlement and Rehabilitation in Infrastructure Development Projects 2015 provide clear guidelines to screen, assess and plan land acquisition and resettlement aspects in development projects. The Policy highlights the need to handle resettlement issues with utmost care and forethought particularly in case of vulnerable groups. There are provisions of voluntary land donation by non-poor. Voluntary donation will be accepted if a) donation of land is <10% of his agriculture land b) The donation is unforced, not the result of community pressure and MOU should be signed and is witnessed by third party c) Land donating HHs should not be from vulnerable group and poor families d) APs is fully consulted informed about their rights. Non-titled (encroachers/squatters) are eligible for compensation for their property except land compensation for structure; crops and tree should be calculated scientifically not less than market price. 5. The Constitution of Nepal 2015 guarantees the fundamental rights and duties of a citizen. Article 30(1) establishes the right to property for every citizen of Nepal, whereby every citizen is entitled to earn, use, sell and exercise their right to property under existing laws. Article 30 (2) states can impose taxes on the property of person as necessary on the basis of principles of progressive taxation. Article 30(3) states shall not except in the public interest, requisition or acquire, or otherwise create any encumbrance on, the property of the people. But not apply to any property acquired in an illicit manner. Article 30 (4) in requisition of private land for public interest according to sub-article (3), it shall be done on the basis of compensation and procedural law. Article 30 (5), Nothing in sub –articles (3) and (4) shall be deemed to prevent the state in enforcing land reform, management and regulation for the purpose of increasing production and productivity of land, modernization and commercialization of agriculture, environment preservation, organized housing and planned urbanization. 6. The Guthi Corporation Act 1976, in case of Guthi Land acquisition must also comply with the provisions set out in. The second amendment in 1993, section 44of the Act states that if Government of Nepal thinks that any Guthi land is required for social welfare or community interest, such a lad can be acquired at a concessional rate. In addition, the Act states that the compensation of Guthi land will be divided into Guthi and the tenants. The Guthi will receive 33 percent and the tenant will receive 67 percent of the total compensatory amount. 7. The Public Roads Act 1974 empowers the government to acquire any land on a temporary basis for storage facilities, construction camps and so on during construction and upgrading of roads. Any buildings and other structures such as houses, sheds, schools, and temples are to be avoided wherever possible. The government is required to pay compensation for any damages caused to buildings, standing crops and trees. Compensation rates are negotiated between the government and the landowners. 8. The Land Reform Act 1964 is also relevant. As per the Act, a landowner may not be compensated for more land than s/he is e titled to u de the law. This A t also esta lishes the tille s ight o the la d which s/he is tilling. The land reform act additionally specifies the compensation entitlements of registered tenants on land sold by the owner or acquired for the development purposes. The Act 14 | P a g e Resettlement Plan of Ghysmpesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha amendment most recently in 2001 has established a rule that when state acquires land under tenancy, the tenant and the landlord will each be entitled to 50 percent of the total compensation amount. 9. The Malpot Ain or Land Revenue (land administration and revenue) Act, 2034 is the main Act to carry out land administration including maintenance and updating records, collection of land revenue and settlement of the disputes after completion of survey and handing over the records to LRO by the Survey Parties. It authorizes the LRO for registration, ownership transfer and deed transfer of land. This Act also authorizes the LRO to transfer ownership and deeds of individual land, if any person applied for the ownership and deeds of individual land, if any person applied for the ownership transfer of his/her land with mutual understanding for public use with recommendation of relevant committee. 10. Local Self Governance Act 1999: The Clause 258 in the Part – 5, General Provisions relating to Local Body Chapter – 3, Miscellaneous of the Local Self-Governance Act, 1999 has provision of land acquisition. The Clause states that in case the Local body has to acquire land to carry out any development and construction works within its area, it may acquire the land required for that work by following the requirements of the prevailing law and providing compensation to the concerned land-owner for the land. The Clause 149 of the LSGA has provision of prohibition on construction of building without obtaining approval. The clause states that no person shall, without obtaining construction approval from the Mayor, do 'construction of a building'2 in the municipal area. According to the Clause 161(1) the Mayor may depute any engineer, overseer or employee to inquire into the following matters in respect to any building constructed or being constructed by anyone in the municipal area: Whether or not approval has been obtained pursuant to this Act to construct such a building, Whether or not such a building has been constructed or is being constructed in accordance with the design approved pursuant to this Act, and Whether or not any public land, road, temple, courtyard, sewerage, canal, pond etc. is encroached upon from such a building. (2) The person deputed to inquire into the matters pursuant to Subsection (1) shall have to inquire into the matter according to the prevailing law and submit a report, along with his/her suggestions, to the Mayor within fifteen days of his/her deputation. (4) In case it is held, as per the report submitted pursuant to Subsection (2) above, that anyone has constructed or is constructing a building without obtaining approval pursuant to this Act or by encroaching upon any public land, road, temple, courtyard sewerage, canal, pond, etc., the Mayor shall have to order to demolish the building or any portion thereof. (5) In case it is held, as per the report submitted pursuant to Subsection (2), that any person has constructed or is constructing a building by altering the design approved pursuant to this Act without obtaining approval of the Mayor, the Mayor may order to punish such a person with a fine of up to one hundred thousand rupees or to demolish the building or any portion thereof. 11. The Clause 163 (1) mentioned that in cases where an order has been issued pursuant to Sub-section (4) or (5) of Clause 161 to demolish any building or any portion thereof, the concerned person shall have to demolish such a building or any portion thereof according to the order of the Mayor or the decision of the Appellate Court within thirty-five days of the decision made by the Appellate Court requiring the demolition of such a building or any portion thereof. (2) If the concerned person does not demolish such a building or any portion thereof within the time-limit referred to in Sub- section (1), the Municipality itself may demolish such a building or any portion thereof, and the expenditures incurred for so demolishing shall be realized from the concerned person. 2 The act of "construction of building" means the act to construct a new building, to reconstruct by demolishing the old building, to add a storey or to alter the facade, or to construct a window, door, veranda, attic, porch, shed, stable or garage or erecting a compound wall in alternation of the existing design 15 | P a g e Resettlement Plan of Ghysmpesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha 6. ADB's Involuntary Resettlement Policy Requirement 41. The objectives of ADB's Safeguards Policy Statement, 2009 (SPS) with regard to involuntary resettlement are: (i) to avoid involuntary resettlement wherever possible; (ii) to minimize involuntary resettlement by exploring project and design alternatives; (iii) to enhance, or at least restore, the livelihoods of all displaced persons in real terms relative to pre-project levels; and (iv) to improve the standards of living of the displaced poor and other vulnerable groups. 42. ADB's SPS covers permanent and temporary physical displacement (relocation, loss of residential land, or loss of shelter) and economic displacement (loss of land, assets, access to assets, income sources, or means of livelihoods) as a result of (i) involuntary acquisition of land, or (ii) involuntary restrictions on land use or on access to legally designated parks and protected areas. The SPS covers them whether such losses and involuntary restrictions are full or partial, permanent or temporary. 43. For any ADB operation requiring involuntary resettlement, resettlement planning is an integral part of project design, to be dealt with from the earliest stages of the project cycle, taking into account the following basic principles: i) Screen the project early on to identify past, present, and future involuntary resettlement impacts and risks. Determine the scope of resettlement planning through a survey and/or census of displaced persons, including a gender analysis, specifically related to resettlement impacts and risks. ii) Carry out meaningful consultations with affected persons, host communities, and concerned nongovernment organizations (NGOs). Inform all displaced persons of their entitlements and resettlement options. Ensure their participation in planning, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation of resettlement programs. Pay particular attention to the needs of vulnerable groups, especially those below the poverty line, the landless, the elderly, women and children, and indigenous people, and those without legal title to land, and ensure their participation in consultations. Establish a grievance redress mechanism to receive and facilitate resolution of the affected persons’ concerns. Support the social and cultural institutions of displaced persons and their host population. Where involuntary resettlement impacts and risks are highly complex and sensitive, compensation and resettlement decisions should be preceded by social preparation. (iii) Improve, or at least restore, the livelihoods of all displaced persons through (a) land-based resettlement strategies when affected livelihoods are land-based, or cash compensation at replacement value for land when the loss of land does not undermine livelihoods; (b) prompt replacement of assets with access to assets of equal or higher value; (c) prompt compensation at full replacement cost for assets that cannot be restored; and (d) additional revenues and services through benefit sharing schemes where possible. (iv) Provide physically and economically displaced persons with needed assistant including the following: (a) if there is relocation, secured tenure to relocation land, better housing at resettlement sites with comparable access to employment and production opportunities, economic and social integration of resettled persons into their host communities, and extension of project benefits to host communities; (b) transitional support and development assistance, such as land development, credit facilities, training, or employment opportunities; and (c) civic infrastructure and community services, as required. (v) Improve the standards of living of the displaced poor and other vulnerable groups, including women, to at least national minimum standards. In rural areas, provide them with legal and affordable access to land and resources, and in urban areas, provide them with appropriate income sources and legal and affordable access to adequate housing. 16 | P a g e Resettlement Plan of Ghysmpesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha (vi) Develop procedures in a transparent, consistent, and equitable manner if land acquisition is through negotiated settlement, to ensure that people who enter into negotiated settlements will maintain the same or better income and livelihood status. (vii) Ensure that displaced persons without titles to land or any recognizable legal rights to land are eligible for resettlement assistance and compensation for loss of non-land assets. (viii) Prepare a resettlement plan elaborating on displaced persons’ entitlements, the income and livelihood restoration strategy, institutional arrangements, monitoring and reporting framework, budget, and time-bound implementation schedule. (ix) Disclose a draft resettlement plan, including documentation of the consultation process in a timely manner, before project appraisal, in an accessible place and in a form and language(s) understandable to affected persons and other stakeholders. Disclose the final resettlement plan and its updates to affected persons and other stakeholders. (x) Conceive and execute involuntary resettlement as part of a development project or program. Include the full costs of resettlement in the presentation of the project’s costs and benefits. For a project with significant involuntary resettlement impacts, consider implementing the involuntary resettlement component of the project as a stand-alone operation. (xi) Pay compensation and provide other resettlement entitlements before physical or economic displacement. Implement the resettlement plan under close supervision throughout project implementation. xii) Monitor and assess resettlement outcomes, their impacts on the standards of living of displaced persons, and whether the objectives of the resettlement plan have been achieved by taking into account the baseline conditions and the results of resettlement monitoring. Disclose monitoring reports a. Gap Filling Between ADB and Governmentof Nepal Policies 44. The Government of Nepal’s legal frameworks and ADB’s SPS share the following: (i) Both permanent and temporary involuntary resettlement shall be avoided to the extent possible or minimized where feasible, exploring all viable alternative project designs. (ii) Where displacement is unavoidable, people losing assets, livelihood, or other resources shall be assisted in improving status at no cost to them. 45. The e a e e tai diffe e es as show i Ta le 9, a d whe e diffe e t, ADB s SPS will e applied for subprojects. b. Key Difference between ADB Policy and Government of Nepal Legal Framework Table 9: Key Difference between ADB Policy and GoN S.N. ADB Policy Government of Nepal Legal Framework Legal ownership is required for compensation eligibility; Compensation for assets regardless of legal 1 however, tenants registered with the Land Revenue ownership. Office are also recognized. Compensation to all affected persons 2 Encroachers are not entitled to compensation. regardless of tenure for all affected structures. Compensation is to be determined by the compensation Compensation for affected assets at 3 Fixation Committee to be formed under the Chief District replacement cost. Office which May be replacement cost. 17 | P a g e Resettlement Plan of Ghysmpesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha 46. In cases where subprojects involve voluntary donation and no other land acquisition and involuntary resettlement impacts, the subproject will be classified as Category C, but the CLPIU will prepare a report to ADB (to be attached to the classification form) which will document that: (i) the subproject site is selected in full consultation with landowners and any non-titled affected persons; (ii) voluntary donations do not severely affect the living standards of affected persons and the amount of agricultural or other productive land to be acquired from each affected household does not exceed 5% of the total productive landholdings of the household; (iii) voluntary donations are linked directly to benefits for the affected persons; (iv) any voluntary donation will be confirmed through written record and identified by an independent third party; (v) there is an adequate grievance process (vi) no affected household will be displaced from housing and severely affected; (viii) no affected household is vulnerable; and (ix) a process is in place to provide official documentation to those who donated land of their landholding post- donation. In cases where the subproject is classified as B and involves voluntary donation, the voluntary donation report will be attached to the resettlement plan. 47. All involuntary land acquisition will be compensated at replacement cost and APs assisted so that their economic and social future would generally be as favorable as it would have been in the absence of the project. The absence to formal title to land will not be a bar to compensation assistance for loss of assets and special attention will be paid to ensuring that households headed by women and other vulnerable groups receive appropriate assistance to help them and improve their status. The APs whose land will be affected by the road was informed through publishing general notice during census survey, which will remain the ―cut-off-date (March 5, 2017) for the entitlement and owners (including non-titled) of affected assets till such a date will be eligible to be categorized as APs. The entitlement policy/matrix is in Annex VII. 18 | P a g e Resettlement Plan of Ghysmpesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha 7. ENTITLEMENTS, ASSISTANCE AND BENEFITS 48. The APs whose land is being affected by the road subproject was informed to the local people by publishing a general notice during the socioeconomic survey. The Socio-economic survey was held on last week of August and first week of September, 2017. And considering the absentee land owners, they will be addressed till March 5, 2017(cut off date) as affected people as per project norms. The owners, including non-titled, of the affected assets till the cut-off-date are eligible to be categorized as APs. 49. The compensation to be paid for affected assets will be based on the principle of replacement cost, which is the amount needed to replace an affected asset without deduction for taxes and/or costs of transaction before displacement and which is operationally defined as follows: i. Productive land (agricultural, ponds, and forest) based on replacement cost that reflect recent land sales, and in the absence of such recent sales, based on productive value; ii. Residential land based on replacement cost that reflect resent land sales, and in the absence of such resent land sales, based on similar location attributes; iii. Houses and other related structures based on replacement cost reflecting current market prices of materials and labor without depreciation nor deductions for salvaged building materials; iv. Annual crops equivalent to current market value of crops at the time of compensation. v. For perennial corps and trees, cash compensation at replacement cost is equivalent to current market value given the type, age, and productive value (future production) at the time of compensation. Timber trees based on diameter at four feet height at current market value; vi. For temporary impacts, no compensation for land if returned to the legal owners, promissory and non-legal right users, and the land restored to pre-project condition within 3 months after use. If the land is not returned and restored to pre-project condition within 3 months, the affected person will receive compensation at replacement cost for the land. Apenalty clause will be included in the contractor’s contract to ensure that the cost of such compensation is recovered from the contractor. 50. The residential and commercial loss will be addressed from indirect and contingency cost of RP budget if needed in future. Howerver, there were not found any residential, and commercial structure during the household survey and inventory of loss during walk through survey.Similarly, if there is loss of income due to disruption of business or employment, material transport and one time assistance allowance is provided. Loss of standing crops and trees will also be compensated on the current market provision. Further the policies on compensation and other entitlements are annexed in Appendix V. 51. A Gender Equality and Social Inclusion Action Plan (GESI/AP) has been prepared for the Project and subprojects will be prepared and implemented in accordance with the GESI/AP. Consistent with the GESI/AP, resettlement planning and implementation will ensure that women, as members of the affected households, are adequately considered when they are physically or economically displaced by subprojects. They will be given equal opportunity for participation in public consultations. To ensure gender-sensitive and culturally responsive measures, the executing agency and the implementing agencies will adopt suitable strategies to ensure the active involvement of women consistent with the GESI/AP. 19 | P a g e Resettlement Plan of Ghysmpesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha 8. RELOCATION OF HOUSING AND SETTLEMENTS 52. There are not found any structures (residential/commercial) affected by the road subproject.Though, some impact could be emerged during the construction period and these issues will be resolved from contingency cost of RP budget.Hence, eligible structure owners can get allowances based on entitlement matrix of RF. 53. RP has allocated full compensation amount for the physical structures and also allocated material transport allowances in accordance with entitlement matrix. The relocation of the affected residences will be initiated within civil works. However, physical displacement and impact of residential loss will be mitigated as per field reality and according to the CDC decision. 54. The safeguard issues regarding relocation of housing and settlements will be addressed as per policy, principle and entitlement matrix of ADB. Compensation will be provided as per replacement and relocation cost on the basis of entitlement matrix. In line withReconstruction Related Act 2072, the Compensation Determination Committee (CDC) will decide land compensation rates. The Notice 2, Part 3 and Part 5 of this Act’s Regulation explain about the detail of CDC working procedures. Clause 8 (2) states the composition of CDC as follows: Chief District Officer – Chairperson Land Revenue Officer – Member Officer appointed by NRA – Member President/Secretary/Executive Officer from VDC/Municipality – Member Survey Officer –Member Project Officer – Member Secretary# 8.1 Valuation and Compensation Determination 55. The survey and valuation of affected HHs’ properties were undertaken by safeguard team on the basis of respective district rate. The compensation rates have been proposed government rate (Gorkha district) considering better value than local market rate of subproject area. Land cost will be updated once after CDC meeting and cost will be finalized. Cadastral mapping has verified the land plots of road alignment for the deed transfer. 20 | P a g e Resettlement Plan of Ghysmpesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha 9. INCOME RESTORATION AND REHABILITATION 56. During the socioeconomic survey, 99 interviewed HHs have expressed their interest to be the part of the training and benefit from entrepreneurial skills. 30 HHs are proposed for the training and priority will be given to Dalits, Janajatis, women HH-heads, BPLs and those losing more than 5% land. Income restoration program (IRP) will be designed for the one person per family in 16-45 age- group. List of trainings are being finalized in the district and the tentative cost of the training program is NRs 1500,000.00. 57. 10 non-interviewed HHs, whenever they approach the project, will be given further consultation on entitlement, compensation. The amount of compensation has been separated in the absentee assistance cost NRs 10000.00 for non-interviewed owner as a precautionary measure. Further, they will be consulted about project norms and guidelines after available in subproject area during the project period. 21 | P a g e Resettlement Plan of Ghysmpesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha 10. RESETTLEMENT BUDGET 58. The total resettlement cost includes compensation and allowances, deed transfer feeds, operation and administration costs. A contingency of 20percent will be included in these cost estimates to be used as required during implementation of the resettlement plan. 59. The compensation package includes compensation for affected land plots and any standing crop, structures or trees in these plots. The compensation rates have been proposed government rate (Gorkha district). Land cost will be updated once CDC meeting will finalize the land rate. Compensation for structures is not applicable for this RP because none of the structures were found to be affected during household survey. Further, in any impact would arise during the project implementation the cost will be addressed from contingency as per field based inspection which will be finalized after CDC meeting. Similarly, compensation of affected crops is valued on the basis of rates provided by District Agriculture Development Office (DADO) and trees are compensated on the reference provided by Department of Forest (DoF). However, all these valuations will be endorsed by CDC before finalization of the compensation package. The detail cost estimation and basis of compensation is described under following paragraphs. a. Cost of Compensation for Land 60. The additional requirement of private land for upgrading is 1.78 ha which costs NRs 12298796.45. The rate is calculated on the basis of government rate of Gorkha district which is equavalent to replacement cost.During public consultation, the community has agreed on that rate for compensation. Additionally, there is no land transaction in most of the parts of the alignment for long time and uniformity of local land price is not available. The price of the additional land is calculated on the basis of following table 10. . Table 10: Details of the land price of the affected plots (NRs. Per ropani and NRs per sqm) s.n. Name of affected VDC District rate per ropani Per sqm (NRs) in (NRs ) 1 Takukot 400,000 786.22 2 Swara 250,000 491.39 3 Saurpani 300,000 589.66 Source: District Land Revenue office, Gorkha District b. Cost of Compensation for Trees 61. The affected trees are compensated not for their timber value but only for harvesting and transportation cost based on the girth and height of the tree. The man-days required for the calculation is provided by the Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation Norms 2060 explained in Table 11 and the unskilled wage rate NRS 580(2072/73). 22 | P a g e Resettlement Plan of Ghysmpesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha Table 11: Labor Requirement for Cutting and Transportation of Trees Girth of Tree Labor Requirement (Man days) Above 12 cm to 30 cm 0.13 Above 31 cm to 60 cm 0.39 Above 61 cm to 90 cm 0.52 Above 91 cm to 120 cm 1.56 Above 121 cm to 180 cm 2.50 Above 181 cm to 240 cm 4.00 Above 242 cm to 300 cm 12.99 Above 300 cm 41.67 Distance between felling spot and stacking yard Labor Requirement (mandays) First 10 m 0.5 For each additional 10 m 0.08 For first 1000 m 8.42 For each additional 1000 m 8.00 For first 5000 m 40.42 For small seedling less than 12 cm girth is NRs. 10 per seedling 3Source: Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation, 2060 62. A total no. of 41 community forest trees, 124 national forest and 83 private trees are found to be loss. Similary, 50 bamboos and 2 fruit tree (orange) are to be loss due to the project intervention. The cost for community and national trees is 192,757.80, and cost for private trees is 30164.17, cost for bamboos is 1250 and for 2 fruit tree cost is 3000. Cost for compensation is equivalent to Nrs. 227,171.97 which will be compensated as per the MoFSC Norms, which should be decided by the CDC meeting. Detail cost calculations of the trees are presented in Appendix. Table 9 Details of the Lost of trees and compensation package S.N Particulars Nos. Total Cost Remarks 1 Community/national Forest Trees 165 192757.80 2 Private Trees 83 30164.17 3 Private Fruits 2 3000 4 Bamboo 50 1250 Total 227,171.97 c. Cost of Compensation for Agriculture Crops 63. There are some agricultural products are found to be affected along the road alignment due to new costruction and the cost of those products is estimated to be NRs. 300163.90. This cost is on the basis of loss of cultivated area and district rate of those crops as per sqm. d. Other Supporting Cost 64. Other supporting costs in Resettlement Plan implementation includes, compensating the time given by the affected households during deed transfer and other purposes. This cost includes the 3MFSC. 2060. Norms, 2060. Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Kathmandu. 23 | P a g e Resettlement Plan of Ghysmpesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha amount required for deed assistant cost for absentee households. The estimated amount for supporting cost is NRs 76000.00. f. Total Cost Estimate of RP 65. Resettlement budget includes compensatory amounts, implementation and management costs for APs . The total ost esti ated fo i ple e tatio of this p oposed esettle e t pla for Ghysmpesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road subproject is NRs 18,390,732.16. Table 13 provides the details for the resettlement implementation budgeting. The total direct compensatory cost in the road subproject is NRs 13,929,110.14.The estimated training cost is NRs 1599000.00 Table 10: Budget for Resettlement Plan Implementation Amount S.N. Budget Unit Total loss in (NRs.) Remarks 1. DIRECT COST Land compensation of 1.1 interviewed HHs Ha 1.78 12298796.45 Land compensation of non 1.2 interviewed (absentee) HHs Ha 0.16 1102977.82 1.5 Community trees nos 165 192757.8 1.6 Private trees nos 83 30164.17 1.7 Private Fruits nos 2 3000 Compensation for Agriculture 1.8 Crops Sqm 30628 300163.9 1.9 Private bamboos nos 50 1250 Sub Total (A) 13,929,110.14 2. INDIRECT COST 2.2 Deed Transfer fees Plots 167 66800 @400 2.4 Deed Transfer Fees for Absentee HHs 10 10000 @1000 Sub Total (B) 76800 APs who are taken from Income Generation and Livelihood dalit,janajatisand 2.4 Improvement Program LS 30 1599000 women HHs 3. CONTINGENCY COST (20%) from direct costs only 3.1 (C) Sub Total (C) 2785822.02 GRAND TOTAL (A+B+C) 18,390,732.16 24 | P a g e Resettlement Plan of Ghysmpesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha 11. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS 66. The National Reconstruction Authority (NRA) is the executing agency of the project. The Central Level Project implementation Unit (CLPIU) under Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development (MOFALD) supported by Central Implementation Support Consultant(CISC) provides overall guide and monitoring of the project activities at central level. District Level Implementation Unit (DLPIU) supported by District Level Implementation Support Consultant (DISC) will be responsible to implement overall activities at district 67. The DISCs together with the CLPIU and DLPIU, will assist in developing and updating resettlement plans through the conduct of the DMS in a participatory and transparent way and consistent with the project resettlement principles and the resettlement framework. Once approved by the NRA and reviewed and concurred by ADB, the CISC will provide technical advice in the implementation of the approved resettlement plan. The CISC will likewise provide capacity-building orientation, as needed, to concerned personnel of the PMU, CLPIU and DLPIU. 68. Together with the CLPIU and DLPIU, CISC and DISC will supervise civil works activities to be carried out by contractor/s for quality assurance. Furthermore, the contractors will be responsible to pay appropriate compensation if the land is taken temporarily such as for labor camp, material storage etc. as stated in Resettlement Framework. In addition, CISC will assist the CLPIU in regular monitoring of resettlement plan implementation. 25 | P a g e Resettlement Plan of Ghysmpesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road Sub Project, Gorkha 12. IMPLEMENTAION SCHEDULE 69. An implementation schedule has been agreed upon for timely completion of implementation of RP. Table 14 below presents time-bound action plan to complete identified activities of the RP including compensation payment and transfer of deed of ownership. Draft Resettlement Plan has been disclosed to the APs and Local Government at subproject site. A translated copy of summary of resettlement plan (in Nepali) has also been shared with APs. The objective of disclosure was to inform APs regarding their entitlement and working approach and modality. 70. Though the contract has already been signed after approval of resettlement plan from NRA, contractor’s mobilization schedule has been synchronized with the RP implementation schedule. The contractor has been well instructed to initiate the works in the sections where compensation payment is not required or the activity falls in public land. The RP implementation schedule presented in the Tables below presents the section wise implementation plan matching with contractor’s mobilization schedule. DISC will monitor the implementation status and report to DLPIU and CISC in a periodic basis. In case of any deviation from the agreed schedule, updated schedule will be agreed and implemented in accordance with the new milestone. The DISC and DLPIU ensures that no physical possession will be taken prior to compensation payment. 26 | P a g e Resettlement Plan of Ghysmpesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani-BarpakRoad Sub Project, Gorkha Name of Project : Rehabilitation & Reconstruction Works of Ghyampsal-Bakot-Palkhu-Swara-Saurpani-Barpark Road, From km 9+100 to Km 17+300 Road Alignment Status for construction works Chainage Land Trees Compensation Compensation Planned S.No. Distribution/Proposed Remarks From To Public Private Com Private Distribution Contractor completion date Will start after 1 9+100 12+780 Yes Not yet, may be compensation 2 12+780 13+080 Yes start from 2nd week Will start after 3 13+080 13+130 Yes Janauary,2018 compensation 4 13+130 Khola Purposed slab culvert Not yet, may be start from 2nd week of Will start after 5 13+140 13+630 Yes Janauary,2018 compensation 6 13+630 Khola Not yet, may be start from 2nd week of Will start after 7 13+640 13+910 Yes Janauary,2018 compensation 8 13+910 Khola Not yet, may be start from 2nd week of Will start after 9 13+925 14+575 Yes Janauary,2018 compensation 10 14+575 Kholsi Purposed slab culvert Not yet, may be start from 2nd week of Will start after 11 14+580 14+790 Yes Janauary,2018 compensation 12 14+790 Khola 27 | P a g e Resettlement Plan of Ghysmpesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani-BarpakRoad Sub Project, Gorkha 13 14+810 14+880 Yes 14 14+880 Kholsi purposed slab culvert 15 14+890 15+200 Yes 16 15+200 Khola Not yet, may be start from 2nd week of Will start after 17 15+215 15+230 Yes Janauary,2018 compensation 18 15+330 Khola Not yet, may be start from 2nd week of Will start after 19 15+340 15+545 Yes Janauary,2018 compensation 20 15+545 Khola Not yet, may be start from 2nd week of Will start after 21 15+555 16+690 Yes Janauary,2018 compensation 22 16+690 Khola Not yet, may be start from 2nd week of Will start after 23 16+605 17+160 Yes Janauary,2018 compensation 24 17+160 Khola Not yet, may be start from 2nd week of 25 17+180 17+300 Yes Janauary,2018 End Point of Road Source: DLPIU/DISC, Gorkha 28 | P a g e Resettlement Plan of Ghysmpesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani-BarpakRoad Sub Project, Gorkha Table 114: RP Implementation Schedule for Ghyampesal-Bakot-Swara-Saurpani Road Sub Project, 2017/2018 Responsibility Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Jun Jul Aug S N Activities I 2 I 2 I 2 1 2 3 2 I 2 I 2 I 2 I 2 I 2 I 2 I 2 I 2 I 2 I 2 I 2 Contractor s mobilization Joint construction survey, equipment mobilization Excavation and civil works DLPIU/DISC/Contractor schedule and HR mobilization in 2, 13, 15 (Public Land) Excavation and civil works in reset of the Cadastral survey, Final list DLPIU/DISC of affected people, 2 consultation with APsConsu ltation and Throughout project duration CLPIU/DLPIU/DISC/GRC 3 grievances resolution HH survey and field CLPIU/DLPIU/DISC works, data analysis, 4 draft report preparation Submit final draft RP to CLPIU/DLPIU/DISC CLPIU/NRA/ADB for review 5 and approval Draft RP disclosure in site DLPIU/DISC ADB CLPIU/DLPIU 7 comments incorporated Notice publication and CLPIU/DLPIU/DISC grievance collection 8 CDC meeting for CDO/NRA/CLPIU/DISC compensation 9 determination Call APs application for DLPIU/DISC 10 compensation claim Verify application NRA/DLPIU/DISC 11 documents Pay compensation to APs CLPIU/DLPIU/DISC 12 Deed Transfer DLPIU/DISC 13 Implementation of AP s CLPIU/DLPIU/DISC 14 Trainings Regular monitoring Throughout project duration NRA/CLPIU/DLPIU/DISC Evaluation of RP Implementation progress 15 & achievement 29 | P a g e 13. MONITORING AND EVALUATION 71. The Project has a mechanism to monitor and evaluate the resettlement and compensation process. The CLPIU through the DLIU, CISC and DISC will conduct regular monitoring and evaluation of the updating and implementation of the resettlement plan. Monitoring and evaluation is intended to help ensure that the resettlement plan is prepared and implemented according to the resettlement framework. 72. The following key indicators will be monitored periodically by PIUs. (i) Compensation and entitlements are computed at rates and procedures as provided in the approved resettlement plan; (ii) Affected households are paid as per agreement with project authorities; (iii) Public information, public consultation and grievance redress procedures are followed as described in the approved resettlement plan; (iv) Public facilities and infrastructure affected by the Project are restored promptly; and, (v) The transition between resettlement and civil works is smooth. 73. The NRA as the project executing agency can monitor and supervise overall RP implementation and progress. CISC submits the monthly, quarterly semi-annual reports to CLPIU/NRA and ADB. DLPIU is primarily responsible to submit the report to CLPIU. DISC team will support to prepare the monthly report on behalf of DIPIU to be finally submitted to CLPIU through CISC. 30 Annexes 31 Annex I: Poverty Analysis of Interviewed Household 32 Annex II: List of Total Affected Private Land 33 Annex III: List of Affected Private Land with Estimated Cost (Interviewed) 34 Annex IV: List of Affected Private Land with Estimated Cost (Absentee) 35 Annex V: List of Affected Trees and bamboos 36 Annex VI : List of Community/National Forest Trees 37 Annex VII: List of Private Trees 38 VIII: List of Bamboos and Fruit tree 39 Annex IX : List of Affected Agicultural Products 40 Annex X : Meeting Minutes 41 Annex XI: Entitlement Matrix 42 Appendix II: Poverty Analysis of HHs Interviewed 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 41 40 39 38 37 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 S.N HH No. a dSri2 1 1 2 2 Dal Bd Sarki Chandra Man Sherestha Tapta Narayan Sherestha 1 3 Padhe Sarki 4 1 1 Mitthe Gurung Banmaya Gurung Samet Ratna Kumari Sherestha 2 1 Purna Man Sherestha 2 Santa bir Gurung 1 Chandra Bd Rana Magar Batte Gurung 1 2 Bd FewaliKhil Magar Bhadra Bd Ale Magar 1 Hasta Bd Ale 1 Bhakta Bd Ale Magar Kumari Magar Til 1 1 2 Chaynti Kumari Khan Khawas 1 1 Purna Bbd Khankhawash Kedar Dhakal Bd Thapa Kul 1 1 Tej Bd Thapa Magar Bir Bd Kami 2 Janga Bd Kami Bishanumaya Gurung 1 Bd khankhawash Krishn Bhola Bd Thapa Ram thapa Sinjali Magar i dAeMgr1 1 1 1 Phatta Kumari Bagale Jit Bd Ale Magar 2 1 6 Bd Bhim Saru Magar 1 Ran Bd Saru Magar Dham Bd Saru Magar Nar Bd Saru Magar 3 Lal Bd Thapa Lekh Bd Thapa Ek Bd Thapa Chhatri ut eiDaa 3 1 1 1 Ram Narayan Sherestha 2 Junta Devi Dhakal Chandra Narayan Sherestha Kamal Pd Sherestha Gyan Bd Gurung Name of HH Head No of Plot 5.6243 1.848.594 4381.75 5810.54 9.43 13512.88 5790.66 0.55 2.47 5.76 4381.75 5810.54 413.28 4312.20 13512.88 254.32 5790.66 333.81 7064.45 7.00 31.8 158.96 190.74 333.8 4.95 27079.40 143.07 13735.44 190.74 15.9 4312.20 13451.27 2.58 143.06 0.81 302.02 7064.45 5.58 15.9 190.75 349.69 24781.00 27079.40 13735.44 111.27 3289.24 190.74 699.39 1.29 13451.27 111.27 3567.00 158.95 389.43 7.73 751.17 4904.38 53.58 5.89 309.96 24781.00 447.17 5256.11 3.57 57.69 3289.24 319.9 3.02 14295.83 3567.00 254.32 304 184.78 209.96 158.95 0.33 4904.38 135.12 5256.11 44544.80 174.85 95.37 66.9 158.98 14295.83 0.71 95.37 17650.20 143.06 46.77 95.4 1.98 79.48 44544.80 5024.94 34.84 3751.81 63.58 13314.16 317.9 9.17 17650.20 3773.67 1.05 11.93 190.74 1.43 349.96 0.74 127.16 5024.94 222.8 5458.80 3751.81 11215.69 13314.16 460.96 127.16 190.74 3773.67 0.87 270.22 1.28 39.48 127.16 190.74 19957.32 27.83 23.58 11215.69 6619.32 63.58 5458.80 1.10 143.06 15.9 9637.86 2.79 15.9 47.69 2046.80 79.51 19957.32 1.26 11.93 31.79 4.47 218.58 6619.32 63.55 135.1 9637.86 15.9 184.7 2046.80 121.12 119.22 83.48 91.43 87.43 65.48 73.54 33.69 17.89 75 1.7188 48.011 14981.00 3664.37 1.19 10500.30 1289.68 1.14 4.11 0.31 14981.00 2907.26 178.83 3664.37 10500.30 111.27 0.89 1289.68 41.73 431.07 67.56 256.23 9498.00 32.49 3.98 2907.26 174.84 9.73 8513.11 3299.13 1.99 9.24 25.84 7.91 1.02 9498.00 15.9 1.99 924.01 8513.11 3299.13 8489.27 9.94 377.6 673.55 5.78 33.79 546.41 381.47 292.08 15.9 8489.27 17.89 490.87 51.76 439.11 53 5.5243 021 .44012.13 6.34 33782.00 12415.95 8020.29 2.05 4012.13 0.03 1.98 254.32 33782.00 37756.56 158.95 12415.95 691.38 8020.29 0.17 95.37 429.11 158.95 3.98 262.27 119.21 37756.56 1.99 39.74 63.58 31.79 1.99 31.79 Existing Sqm Affected Area (new Cutting) Total affected land (sqm) Total Land Holding % Loss Post Project Land Holding 6 12 6 6 6 10 12 6 6 6 8 6 6 9 5 12 12 12 12 9 12 12 8 8 9 12 12 6 12 12 6 12 12 12 6 6 6 10 6 7 5 Food Sufficiency 20 50 200300 20084000 80000 20250 420000 560000 33333 300000 225000 480000 162000 200000 12000 72400 120000 85000 83750 6000 80000 724000 50714 150000 335000 15000 33200 600000 115000 10000 220000 355000 6.00 166000 10000 224000 124000 12.00 47714 3000 115000 24000 6.00 131000 65000 334000 10000 6.00 142000 150000 390000 8000 63000 6.00 184000 10000 300000 28571 10.00 693000 10000 184000 12.00 615000 200000 5000 210000 63500 6.00 90000 14000 25000 167000 508000 6.00 15000 78000 240000 835000 6.00 5000 175000 128600 715000 8.00 31000 15000 268000 6.00 643000 10000 217000 120000 6.00 586000 77500 120000 16000 9.00 123000 60417 465000 10000 5.00 47909 57000 250000 725000 12.00 97000 48500 527000 7000 500000 57800 12.00 308000 388000 7000 215000 289000 7000 240000 35909 225000 12.00 204000 155000 219000 12000 12.00 395000 148000 775000 15000 9.00 250000 25000 85000 460000 12.00 14000 12.00 145000 10000 315000 8.00 12000 8.00 6000 9.00 12.00 12.00 .080 00 400390 54833 64000 329000 249000 64000 53375 24000 427000 80000 264000 40000 64571 8000 904000 163000 524000 2500 78000 10000 6.00 380000 12.00 3000 12.00 20000 6.00 12.00 74375 71714 595000 116222 350000 502000 1046000 208000 37800 706000 245000 54000 378000 294000 340000 250000 12000 486000 59286 53571 366000 14000 415000 18000 128000 12.00 375000 250000 30667 120000 250000 12.00 10000 6.00 460000 165000 20000 125000 140000 12000 6.00 10000 320000 6.00 10.00 22500 6.00 7.00 5.00 Post Food Sufficiency Month 20 200192000 124000 12000 Expenditure For Food Per Month Agr. Income 0 0 0 0 0 Income Non Agr. 20075000 225000 61333 184000 26250 210000 41000 123000 80 39000 78000 10028727 316000 Total Income Pre-Project Per Capita 2.68 2.19 0.94 1.47 1.40 3.01 2.86 0.72 1.19 2.59 3.00 1.81 1.19 1.71 2.33 2.25 1.02 2.27 5.98 4.60 1.11 2.77 2.16 1.71 1.74 2.07 1.28 5.55 1.96 2.29 1.91 2.31 2.66 2.57 4.16 1.35 1.93 2.12 1.92 1.10 1.03 Pre-Project Poverty Level 3 3 8 3 2 5 7 8 6 10 4 7 5 7 6 11 7 8 5 5 7 6 12 11 8 5 11 5 6 1 8 14 8 7 9 10 9 7 7 15 11 Total Family Member 078237 67926 203778 203778 60542 181625 24705 181625 197639 197639 37239 111717 111717 77 77 38987 77975 77975 106473 83407 79341 417036 555388 20147 117036 31991 161179 75388 71786 191946 149179 83007 717862 106946 50563 332030 117862 31614 353939 112030 158070 129939 45682 134070 319773 64465 169773 62786 386791 690641 28490 86791 63261 199427 75641 166524 506087 174427 832621 266087 117621 128437 30854 642183 215979 77236 56183 60178 463414 95979 47735 722130 213414 48297 525087 222130 57326 386379 217087 286628 35743 146379 152186 393178 82628 760929 143178 300929 42 29953988 63181 323929 63181 52971 74929 423770 39181 159770 64526 903360 379360 73118 71236 584942 498652 234942 116106 1044951 290652 37686 338951 52703 376862 57421 474326 126862 53389 401945 108326 373720 151945 29433 123720 441497 301497 250342 28593 314520 122520 Post project Agri-Income Post project Total Income Post Project Per Capita 2.43 2.17 0.88 1.33 1.39 2.98 2.84 0.72 1.14 2.57 2.97 1.81 1.13 1.63 2.31 2.25 1.02 2.26 5.96 4.60 1.10 2.76 2.15 1.71 1.73 2.05 1.28 5.45 1.93 2.26 1.90 2.31 2.62 2.55 4.15 1.35 1.89 2.05 1.91 1.05 1.02 Post Project Poverty Level 82 81 80 79 78 77 76 75 74 73 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 86 85 84 83 S.N HH No. hnr dsbd 1 1 1 2 1 Chandra Bd subedi 1 1 Sitaram Upparkoti 2 Dhan Kumari Sherestha kumari Jun Magar Bir Bd Baramu Purna Bd Gurung 5 1 Tek Bd Magar 1 6 Indra Baramu 1 1 Nar Maya Khankhawash 4 Laxmi Maya Sherestha 1 Kumari Sherestha Dil 1 1 Resam Lal Sherestha 3 1 Sandip Sherestha Ram Bd Khankhawash 2 Sita Maya Gurung Samet 1 Shyam Bd Gurung Rana Bd Gurung 2 2 Kumar Baramu 1 Khadka Bd Baramu Man Bir Sherestha 2 1 Janak Kumari Magarni Nandalal Khankhawas 1 1 Bal Bd Sherestha 1 Kesar Kumar Sherestha 1 1 Santa Kumar Sherestha 8 Shyam Bd Sherestha 1 Nare Sarki 1 2 Bimala Sherestha Bd Subedi Nim Tika Subedi 3 Dipendra Subedi 3 Dhan Bd Baramu 3 Sherestha Gynu 1 5 Mahalaxmi Sherestha Suk Bd Khankhawash 1 Dal Bd Khankhawash Hem Bd Khankhawash Kumari Khankhawas Bir Bd Khankhawas Dal Bd Sarki Santa Bd Gurung Khem) Shyam Narayan Sherestha( auaiSeeta1 1 8 1 Pasupati Sherestha Shyam Bd Baramu Pabitra Khankhawash Name of HH Head 1 1 6 7 812 .33841.23 7.03 3841.23 270 160 110 216 1 No of Plot 6 1 1 008350 .284375.00 27999.00 1.22 5134.89 10929.53 1.18 1530.13 0.78 2.33 84375.00 4.25 27999.00 1030 5134.89 8532.98 10929.53 330 1530.13 2.81 618 255 3801.49 40 11491.91 198 8532.98 65 8.42 4570.53 412 0.10 153 15454.36 24 0.77 132 240 2823.79 11491.91 7.28 39 3801.49 102 7.79 11.93 4570.53 11164.02 16 130 15454.36 320 5341.56 26 2.06 7.95 3.93 2823.79 1125 110 35 198 11164.02 3.98 635 220 5341.56 10885.81 6545.80 122 21 230 4705.66 9.98 0.46 132 490 210 7847.40 6.42 155 6577.59 14 10885.81 2.68 6545.80 125 2.08 88 4705.66 1086 75 30405.00 3000.65 302.01 7847.40 8443.56 30 85 6577.59 174.85 1.15 690 7.50 0.59 127.16 210 8835.04 30405.00 137 18 396 16062.44 3000.65 8443.56 5.21 126 0.87 350 83 12 7674.52 225 11881.39 8835.04 50 84 16062.44 1.25 210 2.95 135 54 6398.74 7595.03 460 140 30 140 11881.39 7674.52 0.94 3966.43 4.94 90 298 2.02 350 85 8672.09 20 6398.74 7595.03 96 17753.53 162 2.42 3966.43 210 0.51 55 375 61 60 14818.46 8672.09 140 17753.53 80 223 1.06 4886.49 36 35 210 7319.26 5.42 90 48 152 14818.46 9.89 125 24 95321.00 4886.49 157 55 32 1.22 7319.26 85 265 66 35 95321.00 724 11313.06 114 1163 7.77 91 425 11396.52 151 695 0.30 11313.06 299 879.42 31097.50 468 11396.52 526.05 1.23 353.37 33.79 17.89 31097.50 381.48 15.9 222.53 158.95 84 058.913 5383.29 11638.96 1.30 9.37 5383.29 11638.96 1090 70 654 42 436 28 4 2 7 24.128 12841.21 2.88 12841.21 370 222 148 Existing Sqm 3 141850 1114 736 22 313 .91341.35 1.49 1341.35 20 12 22 28.901 12487.49 0.16 12487.49 20 12 Affected Area (new Cutting) 080.201 8403.82 0.12 8403.82 10 Total affected land (sqm) 24593.91 Total Land Holding 7.52 % Loss 49.16 24593.91 Post Project Land Holding 6 2 3 12 8 6 12 6 8 6 3 6 6 4 6 6 6 6 3 6 6 10 6 6 6 6 3 6 6 6 6 8 6 12 6 10 10 6 6 8 9 4 8 6 Food Sufficiency .090 700220 60066000 462000 292000 115800 130333 579000 170000 391000 79875 450000 157000 292000 33077 639000 9000 129000 499000 430000 132917 6000 99000 244000 797500 10000 140000 612500 6.00 81833 186000 3000 220000 2.00 10000 491000 185000 3.00 660000 190000 12000 321000 110000 12.00 600000 760000 10000 111500 8.00 550000 170000 585000 6.00 480000 446000 60000 17938 12.00 360000 175000 8000 143500 157000 70000 6000 183000 86000 24000 785000 8000 148000 6.00 234000 680000 732000 4000 175000 8.00 119500 585000 444000 6000 6.00 105000 312000 700000 63714 8000 3.00 147000 624000 8000 446000 67583 6.00 132000 8000 336000 6.00 405500 8000 76000 236875 4.00 300500 332500 8000 110000 947500 6.00 140000 1330000 110300 10000 892500 1220000 6.00 105000 85500 10000 551500 6.00 6000 360000 940500 110000 6.00 55000 8000 852500 1865000 3.00 191500 10000 9325000 222500 6.00 8000 9250000 161200 1335000 6.00 88000 360000 806000 10.00 8000 105000 75000 706000 6.00 10000 630000 975000 100500 6.00 550000 100000 51364 6000 502500 6.00 103750 236000 8000 360000 565000 57200 80000 415000 5000 96000 405000 6.00 240000 286000 8000 142500 576000 3.00 8000 160000 96000 480000 6.00 175000 10000 96429 6.00 10000 190000 675000 6.00 96000 409222 8000 550000 6.00 3683000 7000 8.00 240000 8000 125000 6.00 3443000 12.00 10000 6.00 10000 10.00 10.00 .0100170 700320 47750 382000 186000 162800 275000 1116000 814000 900000 599000 107000 216000 215000 10000 10000 8000 6.00 6.00 8.00 .0100222000 10000 9.00 4.00 8.00 6.00 115200 576000 480000 96000 8000 6.00 Post Food Sufficiency Month 00120 24000 120000 142000 172000 3000 10000 640000 101000 6000 Expenditure For Food Per Month Agr. Income 0 0 0 0 0 Income Non Agr. 50039250 157000 58500 234000 46667 140000 59000 236000 20044400 222000 60041500 41714 166000 292000 185250 741000 Total Income Pre-Project Per Capita 1.40 2.09 1.67 2.11 1.59 2.36 4.14 4.66 2.86 1.18 4.76 2.93 7.87 6.80 3.94 3.99 0.64 5.62 6.55 5.30 6.26 2.28 2.42 11.90 8.48 3.95 3.06 66.73 7.96 5.77 3.76 3.60 1.84 3.71 2.05 3.43 3.45 14.64 1.71 6.66 5.83 .25 4.12 1.48 1.49 6.63 Pre-Project Poverty Level 7 9 13 11 11 Total Family 4 5 8 3 8 4 7 6 4 6 4 4 3 7 5 3 6 6 4 5 4 5 4 3 4 5 5 5 6 5 4 5 6 8 6 5 4 7 4 Member 341228 58120 232481 232481 510155 38787 155150 155150 52664 210655 210655 46390 139171 139171 163250 43121 215603 215603 79132 633053 134053 218442 655325 55325 17920 143358 119358 174781 699125 62536 437752 75125 66672 101752 400033 332260 1329041 99533 109041 218565 1311390 951390 96376 674629 404529 124629 3640764 3400764 695492 65704 459925 115198 167925 130076 575990 390229 125990 32675 98229 132885 424769 797308 180769 184808 81616 489698 189099 168698 109450 756395 110120 547248 171395 440481 67248 80481 156904 182017 784519 147084 728066 104519 441251 143066 129251 236470 945880 109821 85105 53380 549105 936155 189105 1864697 83655 9323487 161099 73487 805493 104859 99493 629152 98954 49925 494772 79152 103216 549173 134772 54246 412865 144173 94875 271230 172865 569252 175230 89252 67 79946497 371979 185532 162731 1113191 96979 813656 213191 214656 87 679113756 568779 88779 307144 38512 154047 39926 279479 130047 159479 185013 740053 100053 Post project Agri-Income Post project Total Income Post Project Per Capita 2.08 1.39 1.88 1.66 1.54 2.83 7.82 0.64 6.25 2.24 2.39 11.89 7.82 3.45 14.47 2.35 4.12 4.65 1.17 4.75 2.92 6.77 3.92 3.94 5.61 6.51 5.26 8.46 3.93 3.05 66.72 5.76 3.75 3.54 1.79 3.69 1.94 3.39 1.66 6.64 5.82 4.07 1.38 1.43 6.62 Post Project Poverty Level 99 98 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 S.N HH No. eaSeeta1 8 2 6 1 1 6 1 Hera Sherestha 4 1 4 mati Ishori Sherestha 1 Thakur Pd Sherestha 1 Bd Sherestha Dil Khagaraj Paneru 1 3 Bd Juddha Niraula 1 Khadka Bd Niraula Tap Bd Upparkoti 1 1 Ganesh Kumar Upparkoti Bd Upparkoti Kul Mansari Gurung Hasta Bd Khankhawash Kesar Bd Baramu Name of HH Head No of Plot 6 4 0 698 .74669.89 8763.50 8.57 4.22 8329.00 4669.89 3777.64 9.60 8763.50 4.08 400 9602.09 370 3.00 8329.00 240 3777.64 6555.73 222 800 5087.20 9602.09 0.76 160 154 0.98 148 484 288 102 6555.73 89932.00 5087.20 316 173 11452.16 1.35 5572.00 50 52 3.93 8.79 50 115 89932.00 11452.16 30 1210 5572.00 30 450 20 726 490 20 270 484 294 180 196 Existing Sqm 22 832 .23833.28 0.52 3833.28 20 12 Affected Area (new Cutting) 066.401 6663.04 6565.67 0.15 0.15 6663.04 6565.67 10 10 Total affected land (sqm) Total Land Holding % Loss Post Project Land Holding 8 12 6 3 6 8 8 6 6 6 3 12 6 Food Sufficiency .080 100600 150143100 715500 163250 89000 600500 653000 445000 100167 480000 360000 102000 115000 601000 114167 472500 510000 173000 342500 154500 85000 360000 8000 292500 128500 772500 6000 150000 652500 9000 8.00 137375 50000 8000 12.00 120000 549500 8000 6.00 128000 412500 4000 122400 3.00 146643 216500 8000 6.00 612000 1026500 137000 6000 8.00 524000 834000 162000 6000 8.00 6000 6.00 192500 88000 5000 6.00 10000 6.00 8000 3.00 12.00 6.00 Post Food Sufficiency Month Expenditure For Food Per Month Agr. Income 0 0 0 Income Non Agr. 20021333 43300 128000 216500 81000 162000 Total Income Pre-Project Per Capita 0.76 1.55 2.90 5.12 5.84 3.18 3.58 3.65 4.08 5.53 4.92 5.25 4.38 Pre-Project Poverty Level Total Family 2 5 6 5 5 4 5 6 5 3 5 4 7 Member 580192 79910 159820 159820 285170 21301 127805 42970 214849 127805 214849 06 021120852 604261 80261 010755 141130 161424 705650 88911 645696 105150 444557 98110 165696 100777 588658 84557 113667 503885 116158 341000 154464 143885 772320 48500 119820 137038 548153 145562 135653 1018936 184936 Post project Agri-Income Post project Total Income Post Project Per Capita 2.86 0.76 1.54 4.32 5.05 5.78 3.18 3.51 3.61 4.07 5.53 4.90 5.21 Post Project Poverty Level . HHNo the Nameof Landowner Name Father's father's Grand name V.D.C. no. ward plot Affected Cutting New area(sqm) affected affected Total Sqm per Price estimated cost Total (Ropani) price land 1 Ek Bd Thapa Chhatri Dhan Bd Ganesh Bd Swara 1 378,389,380 51.76 8489.27 491.41 25435.3816 250000 2 Lekh Bd Thapa Lila Bd Santabir Swara 1 582 15.9 3299.13 491.41 7813.419 250000 3 Lal Bd Thapa Chandra Bd Pahalman Swara 1 470,491 381.47 8513.11 491.41 187458.1727 250000 473.474,475,478,549,5 Nar Bd Saru Magar Bhairab Bd Gorkha Bd Swara 2 377.6 9248.37 4 21, 491.41 185556.416 250000 5 Dham Bd Saru Magar Nar Bd Bhairab Bd Takukot 3 520 15.9 2907.26 786.22 12500.898 400000 6 Ran Bd Saru Magar Khadga Bd Amar Singh Swara 3 479 1.99 1289.68 491.41 977.9059 250000 7 Bhim Bd Saru Magar Nar Bd Bhirab Bd Swara 1 548 32.49 3664.37 491.41 15965.9109 250000 8 Jit Bd Ale Magar Bahadur Ram Swara 2 481 256.23 10500.30 491.41 125913.9843 250000 9 Phatta Kumari Bagale Hari Prasad Tikaram Swara 1 482 111.27 649.81 491.41 54679.1907 250000 10 Ram thapa Sinjali Magar Santabir Lila Bd Swara 1 492 73.54 2046.80 491.41 36138.2914 250000 11 Bhola Bd Thapa Lal Bd Dal Bd Swara 1 492 87.43 9637.86 491.41 42963.9763 250000 12 Krishn Bd khankhawash Lalit Bd Dal Bd Swara 1 494,497 119.22 6619.32 491.41 58585.9002 250000 13 Bishanumaya Gurung Dhan Bd Amar Singh Swara 2 496 135.1 19957.32 491.41 66389.491 250000 14 Janga Bd Kami Man Bd Lure Swara 3 645 31.79 5458.80 491.41 15621.9239 250000 15 Bir Bd Kami Jit Bd Gaje Swara 4 644,618 79.51 11215.69 491.41 39072.0091 250000 Tej Bd Thapa Magar Dil Bd Makkal Bd Saurapani 3 1908 15.9 3773.67 16 589.66 9375.594 300000 Kul Bd Thapa Dil Bd Maila Singh Saurapani 3 1906 23.58 3751.81 17 589.66 13904.1828 300000 18 Kedar Dhakal Giri Prasad Hem Lal Sawara 1 5 127.16 13314.16 491.41 62487.6956 250000 Purna Bbd Khankhawash Muse Dhan Bd Sawara 1 7 270.22 2024.94 19 491.41 132788.8102 250000 Chaynti Kumari Khan Khawas Dalle Bd Dhan Bd Swara 1 6 222.8 17650.20 20 491.41 109486.148 250000 21 Til Kumari Magar Ranakesar Amrit Sawara 1 8 190.74 44544.80 491.41 93731.5434 250000 22 Bhakta Bd Ale Magar Bhim Bd Kul Bd Sawara 1 555,561 34.84 14295.83 491.41 17120.7244 250000 23 Hasta Bd Ale Bhim Bd Kul Bd Sawara 1 559 95.4 5256.11 491.41 46880.514 250000 24 Bhadra Bd Ale Magar Bhim Bd Kul Bd Sawara 1 560 95.37 4904.38 491.41 46865.7717 250000 25 Khil Bd Fewali Magar Janga Bd Bhim Bd Sawara 1 17,19 66.9 3567.00 491.41 32875.329 250000 26 Batte Gurung Dhan Bd Rana Bd Sawara 1 23 158.95 2289.24 491.41 78109.6195 250000 27 Chandra Bd Rana Magar Pahalman Rana Singh Sawara 1 20,45 184.78 1478.47 491.41 90802.7398 250000 28 Santa bir Gurung Bagdal Nandaram Sawara 1 44,46,47 447.17 13451.27 491.41 219743.8097 250000 29 Purna Man Sherestha Bahadur Laxmi Narayan Saurapani 5 48 53.58 13735.44 589.66 31593.9828 300000 Ratna Kumari Sherestha Narayan Pd Chhatra narayanSawara 1 52,53,55,56 389.43 27079.40 30 491.41 191369.7963 250000 31 Banmaya Gurung Samet Purna Bd Dhan Bd Sawara 1 60 190.74 7064.45 491.41 93731.5434 250000 32 Mitthe Gurung Sittal Bd Naina Singh Sawara 1 59,61 190.75 4312.20 491.41 93736.4575 250000 33 Padhe Sarki Maite Pudke Sawara 2 379 15.9 5810.54 491.41 7813.419 250000 Tapta Narayan Sherestha Gam Bd Laxmi Narayan Saurapani 5 586/378 190.74 5790.66 34 589.66 112471.7484 300000 35 Chandra Man Sherestha Man Bd Laxmi Narayan Sawara 2 377 190.74 13512.88 491.41 93731.5434 250000 36 Dal Bd Sarki Tik Bd Pudke Sawara 1 391,365 254.32 4381.75 491.41 124975.3912 250000 37 Gyan Bd Gurung Bir Bd Bhairab Bd Sawara 2 364 31.79 37756.56 491.41 15621.9239 250000 38 Kamal Pd Sherestha Man Bd Laxmi Narayan Sawara 5 778 1.99 12415.95 491.41 977.9059 250000 Chandra Narayan Sherestha Rambhakta Thakur Das Saurapani 5 791,793 119.21 8020.29 39 589.66 70293.3686 300000 Padham Junta Devi Dhakal Hari Datta Sawara 1 781,782,988 429.11 3378.22 40 Prasad 491.41 210868.9451 250000 41 Ram Narayan Sherestha Ran Man Chatra Nath Saurapani 6 780 158.95 4012.13 589.66 93726.457 300000 42 Santa Bd Gurung Rana Bd Bagdal Saurapani 5 585 222.53 31097.50 589.66 131217.0398 300000 43 Dal Bd Sarki Bal Bd Tile Saurapani 5 987 17.89 11396.52 589.66 10549.0174 300000 44 Bir Bd Khankhawas Gangadhar Makan singh Takukot 4,5,6 215,220,27,27,14,15 1114 14593.91 786.22 875849.08 400000 45 Kumari Khankhawas Ram Dd Toran Bd Takukot 5 216 160 3841.23 786.22 125795.2 400000 46 Hem Bd Khankhawash Toran Bd Ratnaman Takukot 4,5 217,218,418,420,26 526.05 11313.06 786.22 413591.031 400000 47 Dal Bd Khankhawash Gangadhar Makan singh Takukot 5 3,21,224 695 8532.98 786.22 546422.9 400000 48 Suk Bd Khankhawash Gangadhar Makan singh Takukot 5 13,221,225 425 6319.26 786.22 334143.5 400000 49 Mahalaxmi Sherestha Padam NarayanMan Krishna Takukot 5 32,208,205 114 4886.49 786.22 89629.08 400000 50 Gynu Sherestha Dhij Narayan Mankrishna Takukot 5 205,88 66 14818.46 786.22 51890.52 400000 Dhan Bd Baramu Saman singh Sertu Takukot 5 946 12 1341.35 51 786.22 9434.64 400000 52 Dipendra Subedi Bishanu KumarHasta Bd Takukot 5 228 55 17753.53 786.22 43242.1 400000 53 Tika Subedi Ganesh Bd Hasta Bd Takukot 5 226 125 8672.09 786.22 98277.5 400000 54 Nim Bd Subedi Mukti Bd Hasta Bd Takukot 5 227 48 3966.43 786.22 37738.56 400000 55 Bimala Sherestha Buddh kumar Nandalal Takukot 5 955 36 6398.74 786.22 28303.92 400000 56 Nare Sarki Maitee Budhe Takukot 4 5,22 223 7595.03 786.22 175327.06 400000 57 Shyam Bd Sherestha Lek Bd Man Bd Takukot 5 20 61 7674.52 786.22 47959.42 400000 58 Santa Kumar Sherestha Lok Narayan Suj Narayan Takukot 5 29 210 11881.39 786.22 165106.2 400000 Chandranaray Kesar Kumar Sherestha Ekdev Takukot 5 30 85 16062.44 59 an 786.22 66828.7 400000 Sankha Bal Bd Sherestha Antanarayan Takukot 5 31,653 298 8835.04 60 Narayan 786.22 234293.56 400000 61 Nandalal Khankhawas Ran Bd Aiman Takukot 6 23 30 8443.56 786.22 23586.6 400000 62 Janak Kumari Magarni Prithibi Bd Lila Bd Takukot 6 29,30 135 3000.65 786.22 106139.7 400000 63 Man Bir Sherestha Bal Bd Santaman Takukot 6 34 210 6040.11 786.22 165106.2 400000 64 Khadka Bd Baramu Dil Bd Maila Singh Takukot 6 788,718 83 6577.59 786.22 65256.26 400000 65 Kumar Baramu Hasta Bd Man Singh Takukot 5 5 126 7847.40 786.22 99063.72 400000 66 Rana Bd Gurung Juthe Rana Bd Takukot 6 95 18 6545.80 786.22 14151.96 400000 67 Shyam Bd Gurung Bhakta Bir Mohan Sing Takukot 6 97 6 8403.82 786.22 4717.32 400000 Sita Maya Gurung Samet Dau Bd Mangal Takukot 6 38,105,112 690 10885.81 68 786.22 542491.8 400000 69 Ram Bd Khankhawash Toran Bd Ratnaman Takukot 4 419 174.85 4705.66 786.22 137470.567 400000 70 Sandip Sherestha Lekh Bd Man Bd Takukot 6 796 125 5341.56 786.22 98277.5 400000 71 Resam Lal Sherestha Lekh Bd Man Bd Takukot 6 805 155 11164.02 786.22 121864.1 400000 Dil Kumari Sherestha Ram kumar Lekh Narayan Takukot 6 806 132 2823.79 72 786.22 103781.04 400000 73 Laxmi Maya Sherestha Thakur Tek Narayan Takukot 6 658 21 4570.53 786.22 16510.62 400000 74 Nar Maya Khankhawash Lal Bd Hasta Bd Takukot 6 645,646,647,649,650 635 15454.36 786.22 499249.7 400000 75 Indra Baramu Bhim Bd Antare Takukot 6 644,641 198 3801.49 786.22 155671.56 400000 76 Tek Bd Magar Kol Bd Gorakh Bd Saurapani 3 1415 7.95 11491.91 589.66 4687.797 300000 77 Purna Bd Gurung Dirga Singh Chhabi lal Takukot 6 665 130 8532.98 786.22 102208.6 400000 78 Bir Bd Baramu Bal Bd Lalbir Takukot 6 26 39 1530.13 786.22 30662.58 400000 79 Jun kumari Magar Tirtha Lila Bd Takukot 4 2 24 5134.89 786.22 18869.28 400000 80 Dhan Kumari Sherestha Krishna Kumar Ratnaman Takukot 4 19 153 10929.53 786.22 120291.66 400000 81 Sitaram Upparkoti Karna Bd. Chamu Takukot 5 527 198 2799.95 786.22 155671.56 400000 82 Chandra Bd subedi Hasta Bd Katak Bd Takukot 4 83 618 8437.60 786.22 485883.96 400000 Shyam Narayan Sherestha( Bhim Bd Nandalal Takukot 5 84 222 12841.21 83 Khem) 786.22 174540.84 400000 84 Pabitra Khankhawash Bal Bd Maibakash Takukot 5 169 12 12487.49 786.22 9434.64 400000 85 Shyam Bd Baramu Lal Bd Dalu Takukot 5 36,82 42 5383.29 786.22 33021.24 400000 86 Pasupati Sherestha Bal Bd Shree Krishna Takukot 5 37,83 654 11638.96 786.22 514187.88 400000 87 Kesar Bd Baramu Lal Bd Dalu Takukot 5 84 294 4572.52 786.22 231148.68 400000 88 Hasta Bd Khankhawash Aaman Buddha Singh Takukot 5 85 270 11452.16 786.22 212279.4 400000 89 Mansari Gurung Prem Bd Mangal Bd Takukot 5 87,109,18 726 9993.57 786.22 570795.72 400000 90 Kul Bd Upparkoti Pradip Kumar Maite Takukot 5 912 30 5087.20 786.22 23586.6 400000 Ganesh Kumar Upparkoti Pradip Kumar Maite Takukot 5 913 30 6555.73 91 786.22 23586.6 400000 92 Tap Bd Upparkoti Pradip Kumar Maite Takukot 5 914 6 6565.67 786.22 4717.32 400000 93 Khadka Bd Niraula Bal Bd Hari Prasad Takukot 5 762 6 6663.04 786.22 4717.32 400000 94 Juddha Bd Niraula Bal Bd Hari Prasad Takukot 5 119 173 9602.09 786.22 136016.06 400000 95 Khagaraj Paneru Netralal Tikaballav Takukot 5 138,146 102 3777.64 786.22 80194.44 400000 96 Dil Bd Sherestha Kulman Bhajbir Takukot 5 145,139 484 6329.19 786.22 380530.48 400000 97 Thakur Pd Sherestha Ganesh Man Jujubir Takukot 5 882 12 3833.28 786.22 9434.64 400000 98 Ishori mati Sherestha Babu Lal Surjaman Takukot 5 137,886 222 8763.50 786.22 174540.84 400000 99 Hera Sherestha Purnaman Suryaman Takukot 4 885 240 4669.89 786.22 188692.8 400000 Total Cost 12298796.45 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 LandCalculation Cost ofGhyampesal-Bakot-Palkhu-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road HH No. agl ak ueGaje Dume Kalu Khuile JagatNarayan Bd Nar Sherestha Kumari Yam ChhatraNarayan MangaleSarki Kalidas Narayan Laxmi ResamKhankhawash Krishna Bd Bal Bd Bhairab Bd Dal SheresthaPrasad Kamal Bd Nar Singh Naina Bd Bhairab ElakeNarayanSherestha Sherestha Babu Kiran Bd Bel Chhetri Thapa Bd Thap Chhetri Thapa Bd Lila Magar MayaThapaKhuni Jyan Kumari Sherestha Name of the Landowner Chhatranarayan Jagat Narayan Father's Name Khadkanarayan auTkkt5 Takukot Kalu Grand father's name auo 5 5 5 Takukot 776,580 Takukot Takukot 5 498,499,500,503 5 1 Saurapani 1 Saurapani 1 Sawara Sawara Sawara auo 6 Takukot V.D.C. ward no. 144 120 170 787 502 469 140 35 Affected plot Gorkha 39 270 258 286.11 158.95 95.37 202.67 178.89 54 150 New Cutting affected area(sqm) 8.230662.58 212279.4 786.22 202844.76 786.22 786.22 168707.6226 93726.457 589.66 46865.7717 589.66 99594.0647 87908.3349 491.41 491.41 491.41 8.242455.88 786.22 786.22 Price per Sqm 193400000 117933 Total estimated cost 400000 400000 400000 300000 300000 250000 250000 250000 400000 land price per Ropani Cost Calculation of Crops District rate HH N Plot number Landowner Crop Use Cultivated area per sqm Total amount 1 378,389,380 Ek Bd Thapa Chhatri Rice Yes 490.87 9.8 4810.526 2 582 Lekh Bd Thapa Rice/Maize/Millet Yes 33.79 9.8 331.142 3 470,491 Lal Bd Thapa Rice/Maize/Millet Yes 673.55 9.8 6600.79 473.474,475,478, Nar Bd Saru Magar 924.01 9.8 4 549,521, Rice/Maize Yes 9055.298 5 520 Dham Bd Saru Magar Yes 25.84 9.8 253.232 6 479 Ran Bd Saru Magar Rice/Maize Yes 3.98 9.8 39.004 7 548 Bhim Bd Saru Magar Rice Yes 41.73 9.8 408.954 8 481 Jit Bd Ale Magar Rice Yes 431.07 9.8 4224.486 9 482 Phatta Kumari Bagale Rice/Maiza Yes 178.83 9.8 1752.534 10 492 Ram thapa Sinjali Magar Rice Yes 91.43 9.8 896.014 11 492 Bhola Bd Thapa Rice Yes 121.12 9.8 1186.976 12 494,497 Krishn Bd khankhawash Rice/Maize/Millet Yes 184.7 9.8 1810.06 13 496 Bishanumaya Gurung Rice/Maize/Millet Yes 218.58 9.8 2142.084 14 645 Janga Bd Kami Rice/Maize/Millet Yes 47.69 9.8 467.362 15 644,618 Bir Bd Kami Rice/Maize/Millet Yes 143.06 9.8 1401.988 16 1908 Tej Bd Thapa Magar Rice/Maize/Millet Yes 27.83 9.8 272.734 17 1906 Kul Bd Thapa Rice/Maize/Millet Yes 39.48 9.8 386.904 18 5 Kedar Dhakal Rice/Maize Yes 190.74 9.8 1869.252 19 7 Purna Bbd Khankhawash Rice/Maize Yes 460.96 9.8 4517.408 20 6 Chaynti Kumari Khan Khawas Rice/Maize Yes 349.96 9.8 3429.608 21 8 Til Kumari Magar Rice/Maize/Millet Yes 317.9 9.8 3115.42 22 555,561 Bhakta Bd Ale Magar Rice /Maize Yes 46.77 9.8 458.346 23 559 Hasta Bd Ale Rice /Maize Yes 158.98 9.8 1558.004 24 560 Bhadra Bd Ale Magar Rice/Maize/Millet Yes 174.85 9.8 1713.53 25 17,19 Khil Bd Fewali Magar Rice/Maize/Millet Yes 209.96 9.8 2057.608 26 23 Batte Gurung Rice/Maize/Millet Yes 254.32 9.8 2492.336 27 20,45 Chandra Bd Rana Magar Rice/Maize/Millet Yes 319.9 9.8 3135.02 28 44,46,47 Santa bir Gurung Rice /Maize Yes 751.17 9.8 7361.466 29 48 Purna Man Sherestha Rice Yes 111.27 9.8 1090.446 30 52,53,55,56 Ratna Kumari Sherestha Rice /Maize Yes 699.39 9.8 6854.022 31 60 Banmaya Gurung Samet Rice/Maize/Millet Yes 349.69 9.8 3426.962 32 59,61 Mitthe Gurung Rice /Maize Yes 302.02 9.8 2959.796 33 379 Padhe Sarki Rice/Maize/Millet Yes 31.8 9.8 311.64 34 586/378 Tapta Narayan Sherestha Rice/Maize Yes 333.8 9.8 3271.24 35 377 Chandra Man Sherestha Rice/Maize/Millet Yes 333.81 9.8 3271.338 36 391,365 Dal Bd Sarki Rice/Maize/Millet Yes 413.28 9.8 4050.144 37 364 Gyan Bd Gurung Rice/Maize/Millet Yes 63.58 9.8 623.084 38 778 Kamal Pd Sherestha Rice/Maize/Millet Yes 3.98 9.8 39.004 39 791,793 Chandra Narayan Sserestha Rice /Maize Yes 158.95 9.8 1557.71 40 781,782,988 Junta Devi Dhakal Rice /Maize Yes 691.38 9.8 6775.524 41 780 Ram Narayan Sherestha Rice/Maize Yes 254.32 9.8 2492.336 42 585 Santa Bd Gurung Rice/Maize/Millet Yes 381.48 9.8 3738.504 43 987 Dal Bd Sarki Rice Yes 33.79 9.8 331.142 44 1,6,26,28,63,64 Bir Bd Khankhawas Rice/Maize Yes 1850 9.8 18130 45 3 Kumari Khankhawas Rice/Maize Yes 270 9.8 2646 46 4,5,42,35,37 Hem Bd Khankhawash Rice/Maize Yes 879.42 9.8 8618.316 47 8,22,61 Dal Bd Khankhawash Rice/Maize Yes 1163 9.8 11397.4 48 7,9,62 Suk Bd Khankhawash Maize/Millet Yes 724 9.8 7095.2 49 10,12,73 Mahalaxmi Sherestha Rice/Maize/Millet Yes 265 9.8 2597 50 11,85 Gynu Sherestha Rice Yes 157 9.8 1538.6 51 13 Dhan Bd Baramu Rice/Maize Yes 20 9.8 196 52 14 Dipendra Subedi Rice Yes 90 9.8 882 53 15 Tika Subedi Rice Yes 210 9.8 2058 54 16 Nim Bd Subedi Rice Yes 80 9.8 784 55 18 Bimala Sherestha Rice/Maize Yes 60 9.8 588 56 19,69 Nare Sarki Rice Yes 375 9.8 3675 57 21 Shyam Bd Sherestha Rice/Maize Yes 96 9.8 940.8 58 23 Santa Kumar Sherestha Rice/Maize Yes 350 9.8 3430 59 24 Kesar Kumar Sherestha Rice/Maize Yes 140 9.8 1372 60 25,51 Bal Bd Sherestha Rice/Maize Yes 460 9.8 4508 61 27 Nandalal Khankhawas Rice/Maize Yes 50 9.8 490 62 29,30 Janak Kumari Magarni Rice Yes 225 9.8 2205 63 31 Man Bir Sherestha Rice Yes 350 9.8 3430 64 32,95 Khadka Bd Baramu Rice Yes 137 9.8 1342.6 65 33,94 Kumar Baramu Rice Yes 210 9.8 2058 66 34 Rana Bd Gurung Rice Yes 30 9.8 294 67 35 Shyam Bd Gurung Rice Yes 10 9.8 98 68 36,88,89 Sita Maya Gurung Samet Rice Yes 1086 9.8 10642.8 69 36 Fist Cadastral Ram Bd Khankhawash Rice Yes 302.01 9.8 2959.698 70 38 Sandip Sherestha Rice Yes 210 9.8 2058 71 39 Resam Lal Sherestha Rice Yes 230 9.8 2254 72 40 Dil Kumari Sherestha Rice Yes 220 9.8 2156 73 41 Laxmi Maya Sherestha Rice Yes 35 9.8 343 74 44,45,46,47,48 Nar Maya Khankhawash Rice Yes 1125 9.8 11025 75 49,54 Indra Baramu Rice Yes 320 9.8 3136 76 51 Fist Cadastral Tek Bd Magar Rice Yes 11.93 9.8 116.914 77 53 Purna Bd Gurung Rice Yes 240 9.8 2352 78 55 Bir Bd Baramu Rice Yes 65 9.8 637 79 60 Jun kumari Magar Rice Yes 40 9.8 392 80 67 Dhan Kumari Sherestha Rice Yes 255 9.8 2499 81 70 Sitaram Upparkoti Rice Yes 330 9.8 3234 82 71 Chandra Bd subedi Rice Yes 1030 9.8 10094 83 72 Shyam Narayan Sherestha( Khem) Rice Yes 370 9.8 3626 84 74 Pabitra Khankhawash Rice Yes 20 9.8 196 85 76,78 Shyam Bd Baramu Rice Yes 70 9.8 686 86 77,79 Pasupati Sherestha Rice Yes 1090 9.8 10682 87 80 Kesar Bd Baramu Rice 490 9.8 4802 88 82 Hasta Bd Khankhawash Rice 450 9.8 4410 89 84,87,96 Mansari Gurung Rice 1210 9.8 11858 90 91 Kul Bd Upparkoti Rice 50 9.8 490 91 92 Ganesh Kumar Upparkoti Rice 50 9.8 490 92 93 Tap Bd Upparkoti Rice 10 9.8 98 93 97 Khadka Bd Niraula Rice 10 9.8 98 94 98 Juddha Bd Niraula Rice 288 9.8 2822.4 95 100,104 Khagaraj Paneru Rice 154 9.8 1509.2 96 101,105 Dil Bd Sherestha Rice 800 9.8 7840 97 103 Thakur Pd Sherestha Rice 20 9.8 196 98 107,109 Ishori mati Sherestha Rice 370 9.8 3626 99 108 Hera Sherestha Rice 400 9.8 3920 30628.97 300163.906 Cost Calculation of Private Trees, Ghyampesal-Bakot-Palkhu-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road Gorkha Total District Name of the Girth Height Man Harvesti Volu Distance MDs/ MDs/ Volume Transport SN Species No Harvesti Rate, Total Cost Owner (cm) (m) days ng Cost me (m) cum Tree Cost ation Cost ng Cost Rs Dil Kumari Kutmiro 3 35.00 8 0.39 226.2 678.6 0.031 500 4.42 0.13536 580 78.5103 235.53075 914.13 Sherestha 1 Khanayo 3 40.00 6 0.39 226.2 678.6 0.03 500 4.42 0.1326 580 76.908 230.724 909.32 Chilaune 16 48.90 7 0.39 226.2 3619.2 0.052 500 4.42 0.2312 580 134.096 2145.5371 5764.74 Indra Baramu Kusum 9 33.20 7 0.39 226.2 2035.8 0.024 500 4.42 0.10657 580 61.8122 556.31017 2592.11 2 Uttish 11 63.50 5 0.52 301.6 3317.6 0.063 500 4.42 0.27848 580 161.517 1776.685 5094.28 Uttish 10 47.80 6 0.39 226.2 2262 0.043 500 4.42 0.18936 580 109.827 1098.2655 3360.27 Dhan Kumari Sherestha 3 Khanayo 10 88.90 3 0.52 301.6 3016 0.074 500 4.42 0.32749 580 189.944 1899.4377 4915.44 Purna Bd 4 Gurund Uttish 10 53.50 3 0.39 226.2 2262 0.027 500 4.42 0.1186 580 68.7906 687.90601 2949.91 Sitaram Chilaune 2 55.88 3 0.39 226.2 452.4 0.029 500 4.42 0.12939 580 75.0472 150.09434 602.49 Upparkoti 5 Bakaino 1 63.50 3 0.52 301.6 301.6 0.038 500 4.42 0.16709 580 96.9101 96.910088 398.51 Juddha Bd Chilaune 2 55.88 3 0.39 226.2 452.4 0.029 500 4.42 0.12939 580 75.0472 150.09434 602.49 6 Niraula Bakaino 1 63.50 3 0.52 301.6 301.6 0.038 500 4.42 0.16709 580 96.9101 96.910088 398.51 Dil Bd 7 Sherestha Khanayo 3 40.88 3 0.39 226.2 678.6 0.016 500 4.42 0.06925 580 40.1646 120.49376 799.09 Ishorimati 8 Sherestha Uttish 2 73.50 3 0.52 301.6 603.2 0.051 500 4.42 0.22386 580 129.836 259.67265 862.87 83 30164.17 Cost Calculation of Private Fruit Trees of Ghyampesal-Bakot-Palkhu-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road Gorkha S. N Name of the owner VDC Species Rate (per nos) Number Total Amount in NRs 1 Sudip Sherestha Takukot-5 Orange 1500.00 2 3000.00 3000 Cost Calculation of Private Trees Bamboo of Ghyampesal-Bakot-Palkhu-Swara-Saurpani-Barpak Road Gorkha S.N. Name VDC Species Rate (per piece) Number Total amount in NRs 1 Khagraj Paneru Takukot -5 Bamboo/Nigalo 25 50 1250 50 0 Community forest Trees cost Harve Total Distanc of Cost of Total Girth Girth Man sting harvesti e(meter Mds/ Mdays/ District Transpotati Transpotation S.N land owners name Address Species In cm in m Height m Nos Volume Days cost ng cost ) CuM Tree Rate on cost Cost 1 Tham Pakha Khirro 45 0.450 6 8 0.038 2.5 1450.0 11600 500 39.5 1.50 580 12.00 11612.00 Takukot-05 Pipal 120 1.200 35 2 1.575 2.5 1450.0 2900 500 39.5 62.21 580 124.43 3024.43 Sissoo 65 0.650 15 1 0.198 1.56 904.8 904.8 500 39.5 7.82 580 7.82 912.62 Bardhayaro 40 0.400 8 5 0.040 1.56 904.8 4524 500 39.5 1.58 580 7.90 4531.90 Chilaune 85 0.850 25 12 0.564 1.56 904.8 10857.6 500 39.5 22.30 580 267.55 11125.15 Lakuri 65 0.650 14 1 0.185 1.56 904.8 904.8 500 39.5 7.30 580 7.30 912.10 Dudhelo 45 0.450 12 1 0.076 1.56 904.8 904.8 500 39.5 3.00 580 3.00 907.80 Kaphal 90 0.900 25 1 0.633 2.5 1450.0 1450 500 39.5 25.00 580 25.00 1475.00 Utis 60 0.600 25 5 0.281 1.56 904.8 4524 500 39.5 11.11 580 55.55 4579.55 Saur 50 0.500 12 2 0.094 1.56 904.8 1809.6 500 39.5 3.70 580 7.41 1817.01 Lapsi 50 0.500 30 1 0.234 1.56 904.8 904.8 500 39.5 9.26 580 9.26 914.06 Bakaino 40 0.400 12 1 0.060 1.56 904.8 904.8 500 39.5 2.37 580 2.37 907.17 Pakhuri 60 0.600 18 1 0.203 1.56 904.8 904.8 500 39.5 8.00 580 8.00 912.80 41 580 2 National forest chilaune 110 1.1 25 62 0.945 2.5 1450.0 89900 500 39.5 37.34 580 2315.07 92215.07 Takukot-05 Utis 65 0.65 25 42 0.330 1.56 904.8 38001.6 500 39.5 13.04 580 547.60 38549.20 Khirro 50 0.5 12 3 0.094 1.56 904.8 2714.4 500 39.5 3.70 580 11.11 2725.51 lakuri 65 0.65 11 1 0.145 1.56 904.8 904.8 500 39.5 5.74 580 5.74 910.54 Faledo 60 0.6 8 5 0.090 1.56 904.8 4524 500 39.5 3.56 580 17.78 4541.78 Sisau 55 0.55 28 1 0.265 1.56 904.8 904.8 500 39.5 10.46 580 10.46 915.26 Siris 45 0.45 12 2 0.076 1.56 904.8 1809.6 500 39.5 3.00 580 6.00 1815.60 Padke 60 0.6 11 1 0.124 1.56 904.8 904.8 500 39.5 4.89 580 4.89 909.69 Kaphal 80 0.8 35 5 0.700 1.56 904.8 4524 500 39.5 27.65 580 138.25 4662.25 salla 90 0.9 45 1 1.139 1.56 904.8 904.8 500 39.5 44.99 580 44.99 949.79 Saur 85 0.85 30 1 0.677 1.56 904.8 904.8 500 39.5 26.76 580 26.76 931.56 124 Total= 192757.80 Total =165 No. Type of Loss/Impacts Application Eligible Persons Entitlements 1 Productive land Marginal loss (i.e., land Owners with legal or A. For the portion to be used (agricultural, is still economically legalizable/ temporarily during construction: fishpond, viable for use or meets recognized right No compensation for land if returned forest, etc.) the expected yield) to the legal owner and the land restored to pre-project condition within This will be confirmed by 3 months after use. If the land is not the implementing agency returned and restored to pre-project and concurred with by condition within 3 months, the affected the affected household person will receive compensation at during the detailed replacement cost for the land. A measurement survey penalty clause will be included in the (DMS). contractor's contract to ensure that the cost of such compensation is recovered from the contractor. Cash compensation at replacement cost for the loss of standing crops and trees. Compensation for loss of net income from subsequent crops that cannot be planted within the duration of the temporary use of the land. Affected household will be notified 1 month in advance of the actual date that the land will be temporarily used or affected by the subproject. B. For the portion that will be acquired permanently: No. Type of Loss/Impacts Application Eligible Persons Entitlements Cash compensation at replacement cost for the acquired portion of the land. Cash compensation at replacement cost for the loss of standing crops and trees. Affected household will be notified 1 month in advance of the actual date that the land will be acquired by the subproject. Users with lease or A. For the portion to be used promissory right temporarily during construction: No compensation for loss of land use if returned to the lessee and the land restored to pre-project condition within 3 months after use. If the land is not returned and restored to pre-project condition within 3 months, the affected person will receive compensation at replacement cost for the subject land. A penalty clause will be included in the contractor's contract to ensure that the cost of such compensation is recovered from the contractor. Cash compensation at replacement cost for the loss of standing crops and trees. No. Type of Loss/Impacts Application Eligible Persons Entitlements Compensation for loss of net income from subsequent crops that cannot be planted within the duration of the temporary use of the land and within the remaining lease/assigned period. Affected household will be notified 1 month in advance of the actual date that the land will be temporarily used or affected by the subproject. B. For the portion that will be acquired permanently: Cash compensation for loss of net income for the remaining leased/assigned period. Cash compensation at replacement cost for the loss of standing crops and trees. Affected household will be notified 3 months in advance of the actual date that the land will be acquired by the subproject. Non-legal users A. For the portion to be used temporarily during construction: No cash assistance for loss of land use if returned to original user and the land restored to pre-project condition within 3 months after use. If the land is No. Type of Loss/Impacts Application Eligible Persons Entitlements not returned and restored to pre-project condition within 3 months, the affected person will receive cash assistance for permanent loss of land use equivalent to the net income from the affected land during the immediate past year multiplied by 2 years. A penalty clause will be included in the contractor's contract to ensure that the cost of such compensation is recovered from the contractor. Cash compensation at replacement cost for the loss of standing crops and trees. Compensation for loss of net income from subsequent crops that cannot be planted within the duration of the temporary use of the land. Affected household will be notified 1 month in advance of the actual date that the land will be temporarily used or affected by the subproject. B. For the portion that will be acquired permanently by the Project: Cash assistance for permanent loss of land use equivalent to the net income from the affected land during No. Type of Loss/Impacts Application Eligible Persons Entitlements the immediate past year multiplied by 2 years. Cash compensation for the loss of standing crops and trees at replacement cost. Affected household will be notified 3 months in advance of the actual date that the land will be temporarily used or affected by the subproject. Severe loss (i.e., land no Owners with legal or Cash compensation at replacement longer viable for legalizable/ cost for the entire land, or land-for-land continued use or does recognized right of equivalent productive value with not meet the expected secure tenure, and acceptable to the yield, therefore the entire affected household. property has to be Cash compensation at replacement acquired). cost for the loss of standing crops and trees. This will be confirmed by Entitled to take part in the income the implementing agency restoration program. and concurred with by If the loss is equivalent to 10% or the affected household more of the total productive assets of during the detailed the affected household, see Item 7 measurement survey. below. Affected household will be notified 3 months in advance of the actual date that the land will be acquired by the subproject. No. Type of Loss/Impacts Application Eligible Persons Entitlements Users with lease or Cash compensation for loss of net promissory right income from subsequent crops that cannot be planted within the remaining lease/assigned period. Cash compensation at replacement cost for the loss of standing crops and trees. Entitled to take part in the income restoration program. If the loss is equivalent to 10% or more of the total productive assets of the affected household, see Item 7 below. affected household will be notified 3 months in advance of the actual date that the land will be acquired by the subproject. Non-legal users Cash assistance for permanent loss of land use equivalent to the net income from the affected land during the immediate past year multiplied by 4 years. Cash compensation at replacement cost for the loss of standing crops and trees. Entitled to take part in the income restoration program. If the loss is equivalent to 10% or No. Type of Loss/Impacts Application Eligible Persons Entitlements more of the total productive assets of the affected household, see Item 7 below. Affected household will be notified 3 months in advance of the actual date that the land will be acquired by the subproject. 2 Residential / Marginal loss (i.e., land Owners with legal or A. For the portion to be used commercial is still economically legalizable/ temporarily during construction: land viable for use or meets recognized right Cash rental to be negotiated with the the expected personal affected household. yield) Restoration of the land within 3 months after use. If the land is not This will be confirmed by returned and restored to pre-project the implementing agency condition within 3 months, the affected and concurred with by household will receive compensation at the affected household replacement cost for the subject land. during the detailed A penalty clause will be included in the measurement survey. contractor's contract to ensure that the cost of such compensation is recovered from the contractor. For affected non-land assets, see Items 3-5 below. Affected household will be notified 1 month in advance of the actual date that the land will be acquired by the subproject. No. Type of Loss/Impacts Application Eligible Persons Entitlements B. For the portion that will be acquired permanently: Cash compensation at replacement cost. For affected non-land assets, see Items 3-5 below. Non-legal users No cash assistance or compensation for land, except affected properties on the land. For affected non-land assets, see Items 3-5 below. Severe loss (i.e., land no Owners with legal or Cash compensation at replacement longer viable for legalizable/ cost for the entire land, or land-for-land continued use; the entire recognized right of similar attributes with secure tenure property has to be and acceptable to the affected acquired). household. For affected non-land assets, see This will be confirmed by Items 3-5 below the implementing agency For allowances due to relocation of and concurred with by house, see Item 9 below. the affected household Affected household to be notified at during DMS least 3 months in advance of the date the land will actually be acquired by the Project. Non-legal users No cash assistance or compensation for land, except affected properties on No. Type of Loss/Impacts Application Eligible Persons Entitlements the land. Compensation at replacement cost for non-land assets. For allowances due to relocation of house, see Item 9 below. Affected household to be notified at least 3 months in advance of the date the land will actually be acquired by the Project. 3 House and Marginal impact (i.e., Owners of the Cash compensation at replacement shops unaffected portion of the structures with or cost for the affected portion. house is still viable for without acceptable Repair allowance equivalent to not use and no relocation proof of ownership less than 20% of replacement cost of required) over the land; with or the affected portion, or equivalent to without building the actual cost of repair. This will be confirmed by permit the implementing agency and concurred with by the affected household during the DMS Severe impact (i.e., Owners of the Cash compensation at replacement house is no longer viable structures with or cost for the entire structure. for continued use and without acceptable For allowances see Item 8 for shops the entire structure is to proof of ownership and Item 9 for houses below. be acquired over the land; with or without building This will be confirmed by permit No. Type of Loss/Impacts Application Eligible Persons Entitlements the implementing agency and concurred with by the affected household during the DMS 4 Secondary Loss of, or damage to, Owners of the Cash compensation at replacement structures Assets structures with or cost (kitchen, latrine, without acceptable etc.) proof of ownership over the land; with or without building permit 5 Crops and Loss of, or damage to, Owners regardless of Cash compensation at replacement trees Assets tenure status cost 6 Public facilities, Loss of, or damage to, Owners Cash compensation at replacement common Assets cost to restore the affected facilities. property structures and facilities 7 Loss of income Loss of 10% or more of Affected household One time assistance allowance of 3 / livelihood due total productive land losing productive months minimum wage per adult for to loss of land regardless of the household. productive land tenure status Entitled to take part in income restoration program. 8 Loss of income/ Marginal impact (i.e., Shop owners One time assistance allowance of 1 livelihood due disruption of business (regardless of tenure month minimum wage per adult for the to disruption of due to reorganization of status) and household No. Type of Loss/Impacts Application Eligible Persons Entitlements business or the shop on the residual employees/laborers employment land; disruption of of affected assets employment of less than 3 months) Severe impacts (i.e., Shop owners Materials transport allowance disruption of business (regardless of tenure equivalent to 1 month minimum wage due to relocation of status) and per adult for the household if relocating shop; and disruption of employees/laborers in the same village; 2 month minimum employment for more of affected assets wage per adult for the household if than 3 months) relocating elsewhere in the district. One time assistance allowance of 1 month minimum wage per adult for the household Entitled to take part in income restoration program. 9 Impacts on Severe impacts on Relocating affected Materials transport allowance houses that Houses households equivalent to 1 month minimum wage require regardless of tenure per adult for the household if relocating relocation status in the same village; 2 month minimum wage per adult for the household if relocating elsewhere in the district. One time assistance allowance of 2 month minimum wage per adult for the household for those who will move to another plot of land and 1 month minimum wage per adult for the household for those who will move No. Type of Loss/Impacts Application Eligible Persons Entitlements within their plot of land. 10 Higher risks of Loss of land and non- Affected vulnerable One time assistance allowance of 3 impoverishment land assets groups regardless of month minimum wage per adult for the /hardship due severity of impacts household to cover for additional to loss of human resources needed to help them, resource base rebuild their houses, and re-establish their livelihood. Entitled to take part in income restoration program. £ofDk];fn–afsf]6–:jfF/f–;f}/kfgL;8s v08 pkcfof]hgf -*=@ ls=dL_, uf]/vf k'g{af; of]hgfs]f sfo{sf/L ;f/f+z !=o; k'gj{f; of]hgf (Resettlement Plan) n] cfktsflng e"sDk ;xfotf of]hgf -EEAP_ cGtu{t £ofDk];fn–afsf]6–:jfF/f–;f}/kfgL ;8s v08 pk–cfof]hgfaf6 k|efljt 3/ w'/Lsf] ;fdflhs–cfly{s cj:yf,To; pk–cfof]hgfaf6 x'g] Iflt tyf IfltnfO{ Go"lgs/0f ug]{{ pkfox? ;fy} cfof]hgfaf6 k'Ug] kmfO{bf tyf d"ntM c:j}lR5s k'gjf{; of]hgfsf] k|s[of tyf gLltnfO{ JofVofu/]sf]] 5 . of] k'gjf{;of]hgf g]kfn ;/sf/sf] d'nt hUuf k|flKt P]g @)#$ tyf k'glg{df{0f ;DaGwL P]g / To;sf] sfo{ljlw @)&@ nfO{ cfwf/ dfGb} Pl;ofnL lasfz a}+ssf] ;'/Iff gLlt @))( cg'?k agfO{Psf] 5 . @=k"gjf{; of]hgfsf] k|d'v p2]Zo c:j}+lR5s k'gjf{;sf sf/0faf6 x'g] gsf/fTds c;/nfO{ Go"lgs/0f u/L k|efljt kl/jf/nfO{ Ifltk"lt{ tyf ljleGg tflndsf dfWodaf6 nfeflGjt u/fpg' xf] . EEAP cGt/ut cfof]hgfsf] k"gj{f; gLlt tyf lgb]{lzsf -RF) n] Joj:yf u/] cg';f/ c:j}+lR5s k"gjf{;sf] sf/0faf6 x'g] ;a} k|sf/sf] ;DklQsf] Ifltsf] nflu k|lt:yfkg d"No a/fj/sf] Ifltk"lt{ k|bfg ul/g]5 .c:j]+lR5s k"g{jf;nfO{ ;s] ;Dd lg?T;flxt u/L o; k"g{jf; of]hgfaf6 k|efljt JolQmx?sf] hLjg:t/df ;'wf/ Nofpg] gLlt cg'?k o; k'gjf{; of]hgf tof/ ul/Psf] 5 . #=k'gjf{; gLlt tyf lgb]{lzsf -RF_ sf l;4fGtnfO{ k"0f{tof kfngu/L cfjZos k/fdz{, e]nf, 5nkmn uf=lj=;= 6f]n a}7s / 3/w'/L ;a]{If0fsf] tYof+ssf] cfwf/df k'gjf{; of]hgf tof/ ul/Psf] xf] . o; k'gjf{; of]hgfsf] k|efjsf/L sfof{Gjogsf] nflu lgb]{lzt gLlt adf]lhd rflxg] cfjZos ljleGg ;ldltx? u7g ul/g]5 . o; k'gjf{; of]hgfdf hf]lvddf /x]sf kl/jf/, dlxnf 3/d'nL /x]sf] kl/jf/, blnt hghflt kl/jf/x?nfO{ ljz]if Wofg k'¥ofOPsf] 5 . $=of] ;8s pk–cfof]hgf u08sL c~rnsf] uf]/vf lhNnfdf kb{5 . of] ;8s uf]/vf lhNnfsf] pQ/L If]q ;'nLsf]6 ufpFkflnsf ^ jf6 z'? eO{ ;'nLsf]6 ufpFkflnsf ! ;f}/kfgL yfkfufpF eGg] :yfgdf 6'+luG5 . £ofDk];fn–afsf]6–:jfF/f–;f}/kfgL ;8s v08 pk– cfof]hgfsf] s"n nDafO{ *=@ ls=dL= /x]sf] 5 clg !) ld6/ ef]uclwsf/ If]q (CoI) tf]lsPsf] 5 . Page- 1 %=o; ;8s pkcfof]hgfaf6;jf/L;fwgnfO{ ;a} df};ddf rNg] u/L ;]jf k|bfg ug]{5 .lsQfgfkL gS;f ;j]{If0f cg';f/ o; pkcfof]hgfn]] !)( 3/w'/Lsf] s"n !^& lsQfaf6 hDdf #=)@ x]= hUuf dWo] !=@^ x] JolQmut tyf gLlh hUuf klxNo} ;8sdf k/]sf] / /xn !=&* x] AolQmut lghL hldg clws/0f ug' kg]{ b]lvG5 eg] ;/sf/L %=!* x]= If]q kg]{] b]lvG5 . o; pk–cfof]hgfn] JolQmut hldg afx]s ;/sf/L e"–efu ;d]tsf] hUuf clws/0f ug'{ kg]{ b]lvG5 . ^= s'n !)( 3/w'/L dWo] (( 3/w'/L ;j]{If0fsf] ;do e]6 ePsf]]n] tL 3/w'/Lx?sf] lj:t[t ;j]{If0fdf ljz]ifu/L k|efljt kl/jf/sf] cfly{s cj:yf, cfo Joo, s[lif hGo pTkfbgaf6 vfgk'Ug] dlxgf, of]hgf k"j{ tyf kZrft k|efljt kl/jf/sf] cfly{s cj:yfdf kg]{ k|efj, hflto jlu{s/0f tyf kx'Frsf] af/]df ljZn]if0f ul/Psf] 5 . ;j]{If0fsf] tYof+s cg';f/ !)( k|efljt 3/w'/L dWo] !) 3/w'/L blnt, &) 3/w'/L hghftL, @( 3/w'/L a|Xdf0f÷If]qL÷7s'/L÷/x]sf 5g\ . lo 3/w'/Lsf ;fdflhs cfly{s cj:yfsf] ljZn]if0f ubf{ s'lif pTkfbgsf] e"ldsf ;du cfDbfgLdf Psbd sd b]lvG5 . h;sf] cy{ ;8s cfof]hgf ;~rfng ubf{ x'g] yf]/ hdLgsf Ifltn] ;du|df x'g] c;/ Psbd} sd b]lvPsf] 5 . ;fy} ;Dk"0f{ 3/w'/L lhNnfsf] u/Lljsf /]vf eGbf dfly b]lvG5g . &=k|fljlws 6f]nLsf] lj:t[t k|fljlws cWoog (Detail Technical Design and Survey) kZrft lsQf gfkL gS;f -Cadastral Survey_ sf] cfwf/df tof/ ul/Psf] ;Dkltsf] Ifltsf] ljj/0f adf]lhd *=@ ls=ld= ;8s v08af6 k|efljt 3/w'/Lsf] ;fdflhs tyf cfly{s cj:yfsf] hfgsf/Lsf] nflu 3/w'/L ;j]{If0f tyf k/fdz{ kZrft of] k'gjf{; of]hgf tof/ ul/Psf] xf] . *= o; ;8s pkcfof]hgf If]q leq ;fd'bflos÷;/sf/L jgsf] ?v !^% j6f, *# gLhL ?v / @ j6f gLhL kmnkm'nsf jf]6, %) j6f gLhL jf; Iflt x'g] b]lvG5 eg] s'g} klg lghL tyf ;fj{hlgs ;+/rgf x6fpg' kg]{ b]lvb}g . (=o; pk–cfof]hgfsf kl/jf/sf] cf}ift s"n hUuf !=@% x]S6/ /x]sf]df cfof]hgf sfof{Gjog kZrft!=@@ x]= n] ;fdfGo sd ePsf] b]lvG5 . oxfFsf] dflg;x? s[lifdf sd tyf u}/ s[lif k]zfdf w]/} ;+nUg /x]sf 5g\ . 3/w'/Lsf] cf}ift s[lif cfDbfgL ?=!*(*%*=*% /x]sf] 5 . To:t} cf}ift cfkm\gf] pTkfbgaf6 @( 3/w'/LnfO{ !@ dlxgf vfg k'Ug] b]lvG5 . ko{6s ufO{8, gLhL tyf ;/sf/L hfuL/, ;fgf k;n, k]G;g, a}b]lzs /f]huf/ tyf Hofnf dhb'/L h:tf u}/ s[lif If]qsf] cfDbfgLdf TofxfFsf kl/jf/x? cfl>t 5g\ . k|efljt kl/jf/sf] hLjg:t/ psf:gsf] lglDt o; pkcfof]hgfn] tflnd of]hgf klg o; k'g{af; of]hgfn] ;d]6\5 . Page- 2 !)=o; ;8s v08df hghftL kl/jf/x?nfO{ c;/ kg]{ ePtf klg o; ;8s /]vfdf pgLx?sf] s'g} ;f+:s[lts tyf wfld{s cf:yfsf] hdLg kg]{ 5}g . To; cy{df of] ;8sn] ToxfF a;f]af; ul//x]sf hfthfltsf] ;d'bfonfO{ 7f]; c;/ kg]{ b]lvb}g . ;j]{If0f ul/Psf] hghflt kl/jf/sf] cfly{s, z}lIfs / cGo ;fdflhs :t/ cGo ;d'bfosf] t'ngfdf p:t} b]lvPsf] 5 . To;}n] o; ;8sn] Nofpg] ;sf/fTds kl/jt{g tyf cGo ;'ljwfx?df klg hghftL ;d'bfon] cGo ;d'bfo ;/x nfe p7fpg ;Sg] 7flgPsf] 5 . !!=cg'kl:yt !) 3/w'/Lsf ;b:ox? of]hgf :yndf kms]{kl5 pgLx?;Fusf] ;dGjodf hdLgsf] lsQfsf6 ul/g]5 . u'gf;f] lgbfg ;ldtLx? klxnf], bf];|f], t];|f] / rf}yf] txdf u/L rf/ r/0fsf] aGg]5 . t/ k|d'v lhNnf clwsf/Lsf] cWoIftfsf] a}7saf6 ;+/rgfsf] Ifltk"lt{b/ / /sd lg0f{o ul/G5 . !@=o; pk–cfof]hgfdf O{R5's k|efljt 3/w'/LnfO{ sfdbf/sf] ?kdf ljz]if k|fyldstf lbO{ /f]huf/ k|bfg ul/g] 5 . tflnd 5gf}6 ubf{ ljz]if ul/ blnt, hghftL, ul/jLasf] /]vfd'gL /x]sf 3/w'/L tyf dlxnf d'nL 3/w'/L nfO{ klxnf] k|fyldstfsf ;fy /flvg] 5 . o; pk– cfof]hgfn] k|f/lDes cfjZostf klxrfgaf6 #) JolQm 5gf}6 ul/ tflnddf k7fpg] of]hgf agfPsf] 5 . xfn o; tflnd of]hgfnfO{ rflxg] /sd ? !%,((,))).)) k|:tfj ul/Psf] 5 . !#=o; k'g{af; of]hgfsf] sfof{Gjogsf nflu sl/a ! s/f]8 *# nfv () xhf/ & ;o #@ ¿k}of !^ k};f ?k}of vr{ nfUg]5 h'g cGt/ut k|ToIf vr{ ! s/f]8 #( nfv @( xhf/ ! ;o !) ¿k}of !$ k};f d'cfAhfdf ljt/0f x'g]5 . cGo k'g{af; of]hgf vr{ cGt/u{t hldgsf] nfut s§f u/fpg nfUg] vr{, tflnd vr{ / @) k|ltzt eljiodf e}kl/ cfpg] vr{sf] nflu 5'§fOPsf]5 . Page- 3