DOCSLIB.ORG

Bugesera District Burera District Gakenke District Gasabo District

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bugesera District Burera District Gakenke District Gasabo District Progress, but more effort Target achieved / on track Not on track N/A No data required Increase from last period Decrease from last period Proportion of Measles & Percentage of Proportion of Percentage of women Percentage of Rubella 2nd Delivery in Percentage of Newborn who new-born not Neonatal teenage receiving ANC 1 during ANC 4th mothers who dose (MR2) facility mother who received PNC 4 breathing service case delivery (19 postpartum 1st trimester standard visit Penta 3 received coverage, all coverage (w/ received PNC 4 Visit at 6 weeks successfully fatality years and Family coverage coverage BCG coverage coverage Iron+folic acid ages (BCG census-based Visit at 6 weeks after birth_new resuscitated rate_new under) planning (based on CBR) (based on CBR) (census-based) (census-based) during ANC denominator) target) 51.7 52.7 50.3 7.9 7.2 41.4 52 42.3 117 118.4 91.5 112.8 108 Bugesera District 76 75.3 84.3 5.3 8.3 71.6 51.7 40.5 84.8 87.4 96.7 121.2 69 Burera District 59.2 59.5 60.3 6.7 10.4 39.6 55.4 37.8 78.7 81.9 99.9 116.8 83 Gakenke District 24.4 24.5 70.7 4.4 3.3 28.3 52.8 35.7 123.2 117 59.6 87.7 124 Gasabo District 78.6 78 73.4 9.1 9.1 55 41.1 38 86.5 98.5 89.7 107.6 84 Gatsibo District 63.1 64.1 82 17.1 6.8 85.4 48.2 39.3 87.4 90.7 99 110.4 91 Gicumbi District 78.4 78.3 85.4 10.5 5.5 46.3 70.2 53.1 100.3 108.7 100 114.4 94 Gisagara District 61.6 63.2 68.2 15 4.4 64.5 50.8 36.1 91.5 89.8 100 101.1 95 Huye District 56 57.2 82.2 14.6 6.9 73.2 34.6 26.4 74.2 79.9 75.7 122.5 59 Kamonyi District 52.9 53 74.4 2.7 5.6 61.2 33.1 24 87.3 85.9 95.7 107.4 81 Karongi District 52.3 53.1 76.5 5.9 8.3 74.3 62.3 52.4 77.6 86.4 96.8 109.6 79 Kayonza District 33.2 33.3 82.3 0 4.1 30.3 51.5 60 111.3 97.5 89.6 73.4 102 Kicukiro District 59.7 58.9 34.6 10.6 8.8 69.4 47.1 24.4 98.6 102.9 87.4 101.2 97 Kirehe District 48.8 49.2 69.1 2.9 5.5 32.5 55.4 47.2 95.7 97.1 84.4 106 92 Muhanga District 92.9 95.3 27.4 13.8 6.6 62.3 43 34.5 88.8 90.8 96.9 95.8 89 Musanze District 66.7 67.6 84.1 12.1 9.6 56.1 40.6 40.9 89.5 93 93.8 106.7 81 Ngoma District 72.5 68.7 64.5 9.4 7.2 63.3 51.2 34.5 83.7 82.7 96.6 105.2 77 Ngororero District 63.8 64.1 81 11.5 7.4 58.1 44.7 42.1 88.3 86.8 99.8 92.9 87 Nyabihu District 51 50 77.2 8.9 10.2 83 30.1 21 89.7 91.1 88.9 95.4 75 Nyagatare District 78.7 79.6 79.8 13.5 4.7 68.1 40.4 27.8 77.7 83 100 113.2 72 Nyamagabe District 85.8 85.4 67.9 3.7 2.6 44.1 52 37.4 84 95.8 99.6 126.1 81 Nyamasheke District 65.6 67 58.6 0 6.9 70 47.1 33.9 72.7 78.8 99.1 116 64 Nyanza District 41.7 42 71 8.1 3.9 25.2 42.6 41.8 114.1 117.6 86.5 101.3 143 Nyarugenge District 72.3 70.2 63.2 6.7 4.6 55.1 62.6 43.1 79.8 87.7 101 116.6 69 Nyaruguru District 66.4 66.6 73.3 11.6 5 27.9 41.6 28.9 106.9 109.9 99.7 92 94 Rubavu District 61.9 61.2 56.3 5.5 6.1 74.9 45.3 28 81.1 86.3 99.8 121.2 77 Ruhango District 81.9 79.2 77.3 6.7 7 65.7 51 43.4 96.3 101.1 95.7 118.2 70 Rulindo District 72.3 72.4 73.2 1.2 4.1 20.5 47.2 33.1 103.6 106.3 96.6 103.2 96 Rusizi District 82 80.6 75.6 8.1 6.2 83.4 37 25.9 82.1 86.1 100 114.4 70 Rutsiro District 90.4 90.5 88.7 2.4 7.9 67.8 55 49.1 96.8 108.2 100 110.7 80 Rwamagana District Contraceptive prevalence all women methods Target achieved / on Progress, but more Not on track track effort required N/A No data Increase from last period Decrease from last period FP Contraceptive prevalence rate_2020 38.8 Bugesera District 52.1 Burera District 61.2 Gakenke District 44.8 Gasabo District 60.7 Gatsibo District 55.1 Gicumbi District 60.8 Gisagara District 66.3 Huye District 48.6 Kamonyi District 49.4 Karongi District 59.9 Kayonza District 40.5 Kicukiro District 62.3 Kirehe District 63.6 Muhanga District 55 Musanze District 43.6 Ngoma District 50.2 Ngororero District 51.4 Nyabihu District 48.6 Nyagatare District 49.2 Nyamagabe District 48.7 Nyamasheke District 58.7 Nyanza District 36 Nyarugenge District 49.6 Nyaruguru District 47.4 Rubavu District 61.9 Ruhango District 63.5 Rulindo District 29.9 Rusizi District 53.7 Rutsiro District 56.2 Rwamagana District.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rwanda Irrigation Master Plan
    Rwanda Irrigation Master Plan The Government of Rwanda, Ministry of Agriculture & Animal Resources Ebony Enterprises Ltd The World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Rwanda Irrigation Master Plan The Government of Rwanda, Ministry of Agriculture & Animal Resources Ebony Enterprises Limited The World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) i Rwanda Irrigation Master Plan The Government of Rwanda, Ministry of Agriculture & Animal Resources Ebony Enterprises Limited The World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Coordinators of IMP Study: NGABONZIZA Prime MAIMBO Mabanga Malesu Supervisor of IMP study: DVOSKIN Dan Authors: MAIMBO Mabanga Malesu ODUOR Alex Raymonds KIPRUTO Cherogony NYOLEI Douglas GACHENE Charles BIAMAH Elijah Kipngetich O’NEIL Mick MIYUKI Ilyama JEPHINE Mogoi Steering Committee Members: SENDEGE Norbert NGABONZIZA Prime NZEYIMANA Innocent MUSABYIMANA Innocent MUSABYIMANA J. Claude AZENE BEKELE Tesemma KAGABO Desire HARINDINTWALI Reverien BAYOULI Amor MOULAYE Abdou Enterprises Ltd. Republic of Rwanda Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Resources, MINAGRI ii Acknowledgement The World Agroforestry Centre greatly appreciates the opportunity accorded by the Managing Director of Ebony Enterprises Limited, Brigadier General (Rtd) Danny Kassif, to participate in the Rwanda Irrigation Master Plan through a sub-contractual agreement signed in March 2009. Upon inception of Phase I study, a number of Ebony personnel provided administrative and logistical support which cannot go unrecognized. These include Pini Moria, Ram Lustgarten, Arik Almog, Adina Avisar and Avi Evron. Cognizance is also extended to the Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Resources for providing technical backstopping and logistical support while carrying out the study in Rwanda. The following Officers are highly appreciated for their contributions to ensuring that Phase I of the study was a success: The Permanent Secretary – MINAGRI, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Rwanda Ministry of Education P.O.Box 622
    REPUBLIC OF RWANDA MINISTRY OF EDUCATION P.O.BOX 622 KIGALI Rwanda Report on Variable Tranche linked to two Indicators: 1.Equity Indicator: Pre-Primary Gross Enrolment Rate (GER) increased from an average of 10% in 2014 to 17% by 2017 in the 22 poorest performing districts (defined as those that had GER of less than 17% in 2014). $2.52million will be disbursed once the report demonstrating meeting the target is submitted in October 2017 2. Efficiency: Education Statistics 2016, disaggregated at district level, available. $2.52million will be disbursed once the report demonstrating meeting the target is submitted in October 2017 October 2017 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 SECTION 1: EQUITY INDICATOR: PRE-PRIMARY GROSS ENROLMENT RATE (GER) IN 22 POOREST PERFORMING DISTRICTS ............................................................ 3 Table 1. Pre-Primary Enrolment in 2016 and 2017 (All Distrcits) ................................. 3 Table 2. Pre-Primary Gross Enrolement Rate in Rwanda (as per GPE requirement) 5 Table 3. Pre-Primary GER in 2017 in 22 poorest performing districts current status 5 Table 4. Average of GER in Pre-Primary in 8 better performing districts in 2017 ...... 6 Table 5. GER in Pre-Primary Comparison between 2014 and 2017 in 22 Poorest Performing Districts ............................................................................................................ 7 Table 6. Classrooms Rehabilitated
    [Show full text]
  • RWANDA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY (REMA) Public Disclosure Authorized
    RWANDA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY (REMA) Public Disclosure Authorized THE LANDSCAPE APPROACH TO FOREST RESTORATION AND CONSERVATION (LAFREC) PROJECT IN RWANDA (GISHWATI AND MUKURA FOREST RESERVES) Public Disclosure Authorized SOCIAL ASSESSMENT FINAL REPORT Public Disclosure Authorized THARCISSE MUSABYIMANA Tel. +250 788640812 Email: [email protected] Public Disclosure Authorized April 2014 Page 1 of 93 Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................ 0 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................... 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Objective of the Study .................................................................................................................. 5 1.2 Methodology ................................................................................................................................ 5 1.2.1 Desk review .............................................................................................................................................. 6 1.2.2 Field Research .......................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2.3 Sample and sampling technique .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • RWANDA Poverty Assessment
    RWANDA Poverty Assessment April 2015 Public Disclosure Authorized Poverty Global Practice Africa Region Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized April 2015 1 ׀ RWANDA Poverty Assessment April 2015 ׀ RWANDA Poverty Assessment 2 RWANDA Poverty Assessment Poverty Global Practice Africa Region April 2015 3 ׀ RWANDA Poverty Assessment Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ................................................................................................10.... I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................... VIII11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................................................12 IX 1. A Snapshot of Poverty in Rwanda ..........................................................................................................................12ix Rwanda‘s Poverty Profile: The Expected… ............................................................................................................13 x And the Rather Unexpected … .............................................................................................................................15 xii Inequality is high, driven by location, education, and occupation .......................................................................16 xiii Strong performance in health and basic education ................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • The Study on Improvement of Rural Water Supply in the Eastern Province in the Republic of Rwanda
    MININFRA EASTERN PROVINCE REPUBLIC OF RWANDA THE STUDY ON IMPROVEMENT OF RURAL WATER SUPPLY IN THE EASTERN PROVINCE IN THE REPUBLIC OF RWANDA FINAL REPORT MAIN REPORT November 2010 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY JAPAN TECHNO CO., LTD. NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. GED JR 11-022 UGANDA RWANDA D.R.CONGO MUSHELI MATIMBA Northern Province 0 5 10 25km Eastern Province RWEMPASHA Western Province KIGALI RWIMIYAGA TABAGWE Southern Province NYAGATARE KARAMA RUKOMO TANZANIA BURUNDI KIYOMBE GATUNDA NYAGATARE KARANGAZI MIMULI KATABAGEMU MUKAMA NGARAMA RWIMBOGO NYAGIHANGA KABARORE GATSIBO GATSIBO GITOKI SUMMARY OF STUDY KAGEYO MURUNDI Study Area : 95 Secteurs of 7 Districts in Eastern Province REMERA RUGARAMA Design Population : 2,641,040 (2020) MUHURA Planned Water Supply Scheme : 92 KIZIGURO (Piped scheme : 81, Handpump scheme : 11) Planned Pipe Line 3,000 km MURAMBI RUKARA GAHINI Replace existing pipe 170 km GASANGE KIRAMURUZI Intake Facilities (spring) 28 MWIRI Intake Facilities (river) 3 FUMBWE Handpump (borehole) 37 MUHAZI KAYONZA MUSHA GISHARI MUKARANGE Existing Facilities (Out of Scope) MUNYIGINYA Existing Pipe Line GAHENGERI NYAMIRAMA RWINKWAVU Existing Water Source KIGABIRO Existing Handpump (working) MWULIRE NDEGO MUYUMBURWAMAGANA RURAMIRA NZIGE KABARONDO MUNYAGA NYAKARIRO MURAMA RUBONA REMERA MWOGO KABARE KARENGE MPANGA RURENGE NTARAMA JURU MUGESERA KAREMBO NASHO KIBUNGO NYAMATA RUKIRA ZAZA RILIMA RUKUMBERI GASHANDA MUSENYI NGOMA MUSHIKIRI KAZO MURAMA NYARUBUYE GASHORA SAKE SHYARA BUGESERAMAYANGE KIGINA KIREHEKIREHE MAREBA MAHAMA MUTENDERI JARAMA GATORE NYARUGENGE NGERUKA RUHUHA RWERU NYAMUGALI MUSAZA KIGARAMA GAHARA KAMABUYE THE STUDY ON IMPROVEMENT OF RURAL WATER SUPPLY IN THE EASTERN PROVINCE TARGET AREA MAP TABLE OF CONTENTS Target Area Map List of Tables List of Figures Abbreviations Page CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Study Background ………………………….……...…………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    SFG1006 REV Rwanda Great Lakes Emergency Sexual and Gender Based Violence and Women’s Health Project Public Disclosure Authorized Environmental and Social Management Approach, including Environmental Management Plan and Medical Waste Management Plan Executive Summary and Conclusions The Environmental and Social Management Approach (ESMA) provides general policies, guidelines, codes of practice and procedures to mainstream environmental and social (E&S) due diligence during the implementation of the World Bank supported Great Lakes Emergency Sexual and Gender Based Violence and Women’s Health Project. The objective of the abbreviated ESMA is to help ensure that activities will be in compliance with the national legislations of Rwanda and the World Bank’s E&S safeguards policies. Public Disclosure Authorized The document is the main due diligence instrument required by the World Bank as financer, and additionally covers and goes beyond the Rwandan national regulatory requirements for project- level environmental assessment and management. The Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) will be the main resource for environmental management and monitoring for the Client and set the standards and practices that will guide environmental and social project performance. It will become part of the tender package and environmental management and compliance will constitute a subsection of line items in the bill of quantities (BoQ). The selected bidders will be required to accept E&S conditions and tasks upon contract signature, and the implementation of the ESMP will be an integral part of the construction contracts. The monitoring of E&S performance will, much as other quality criteria, be tied to contractual penalties and damage restoration requirements via appropriate contractual clauses.
    [Show full text]
  • Resettlement Action Plan Estimates/ Budget
    Resettlement Action Plan For Selected Feeder Roads in the District of Karongi in Rwanda - Project ID: P 126498 REPUBLIC OF RWANDA Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND ANIMAL RESOURCES (MINAGRI) RWANDA FEEDER ROADS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (RFRDP) FINAL REPORT Public Disclosure Authorized UPDATED RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN FOR SELECTED FEEDER ROADS OF KARONGI DISTRICT Prepared in November 2013 and Revised in February 2017 Public Disclosure Authorized | P a g e PROJECT BASIC DATA No Description Impacts in Quantity 1 District Karongi 2 Province Western Province Construction/Rehabilitation/upgr ading of Roads, Drainage and 3 Planned Civil works Bridges 4 Cost of Civil works (priority roads for 72.25 km) 6,816,881 million $ 5 Cost by km 92,495 USD 6 Cost of RAP 151,534,305 Frw 7 Number of households to be physically displaced 38 8 Private fences affected in meters 13,094 9 Number of institutional buildings affected fully 1 10 Number of institutional buildings affected partially No 11 Number of institutional fences in meters No Loss of agricultural lands permanently in 22.41 12 hectares* 13 Loss of Crops and trees in hectares 19.99 14 settlements in Hectares 2.42 15 Number of households who lose strips of lands in 1,021 RoW 16 Loss of trees in Number 30,000 17 Loss of telephone line affected in meters No 18 Public water taps 2 19 Cemeteries No 20 Partially affected households 983 21 Total number of project affected households 1,021 22 Project Affected Persons (PAPs) 5,105 2 | P a g e EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Rwanda has four provinces (East, West, North and South) and Kigali City1.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening Health Systems
    Strengthening health systems Evidence-informed approaches and lessons learned from Rwanda ‘Institutional Support to Ministry of Health – Phase IV’ (Minisanté IV) Program Capitalization and Knowledge Management: generating lessons from program implementation and translating them into concrete actions at managerial and technical levels for increased ownership, evidence-based policy development and sharing of good practices This booklet is a product of the Ministry of Health in Rwanda in collaboration with the ‘Institutional Support to Ministry of Health – Phase IV’ (Minisanté IV) Program through support from the Belgian Development Agency. The book capitalizes on the work done within the BTC- Rwanda partnership and reflects on different components such as health system strengthening, Strengtheningmaternal health, mental health, urban health, health health technologies and ecologicalsystems interventions, decentralization and aid modalities reflections. It is also a reflection on the value of results achieved and the progress made through the whole institutional support process while providing an appreciation of the relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, sustainability and impact of planned Evidence-informedinterventions. In addition, this book is seen approaches as an intensive sharing and and learning lessons opportunity in order to draw useful lessons for other similar interventions, new policies and strategies in other learnedcountries and future from partnerships Rwanda in Rwanda. Strengthening health systems Evidence-informed approaches
    [Show full text]
  • Government of Rwanda (Gor) 2015 Local Government PEFA PFM
    Government of Rwanda (GoR) 2015 Local Government PEFA PFM Performance Assessment Kicukiro District Final Report Prepared by AECOM International Team of Chinedum Nwoko (Team Leader) Jorge Shepherd Stephen Hitimana Theo Frank Munya 31 July 2017 i Basic Information Currency Rwanda Franc = 100 cents Official Exchange Rate ((US $, June 2015) 765 RwF (Average) Fiscal/Budget Year 1 July – 30 June Weights and Measures Metric System Kicukiro District Location City of Kigali, Rwanda Government Elected Mayor (Chief Executive) and District Council Political arrangement Administrative decentralization HQs Kicukiro Industrial/Commercial Cities Kicukuro / Urban district Population 318,564 (2012 census) Area 167 km2 Population Density 1,911 persons/km2 (2012 census) Official Languages Kinyarwanda, English, & French ii Kicukiro District PEFA PFM-PR 2015 - Final Government of Rwanda – 2015 Local Government PEFA PFM Performance Assessment – Kicukiro District – Final Report – 31 July 2017 The quality assurance process followed in the production of this report satisfies all the requirements of the PEFA Secretariat and hence receives the ‘PEFA CHECK’. PEFA Secretariat August 28, 2017 iii Kicukiro District PEFA PFM-PR 2015 - Final Disclosure of Quality Assurance Mechanism The following quality assurance arrangements have been established in the planning and preparation of the PEFA assessment report for the District of Kicukiro, Rwanda, and final report dated July 31, 2017. 1. Review of Concept Note - Draft concept note and/or terms of reference dated November 2014 was submitted for review on November 4, 2014 to the following reviewers: - 1) District of Kicukiro - 2) Government of Rwanda - 3) World Bank - 4) Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau (KFW) - 5) Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) - 6) UK Department for International Development (DFID) - 7) EU Delegation - 8) Agence Belge de Développement (BTC) - 9) PEFA Secretariat Final concept note dated February 25, 2015 was forwarded to reviewers.
    [Show full text]
  • Nowhere to Go : Informal Settlement Eradication in Kigali, Rwanda
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository College of Arts & Sciences Senior Honors Theses College of Arts & Sciences 5-2017 Nowhere to go : informal settlement eradication in Kigali, Rwanda. Emily E Benken University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/honors Part of the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Benken, Emily E, "Nowhere to go : informal settlement eradication in Kigali, Rwanda." (2017). College of Arts & Sciences Senior Honors Theses. Paper 127. http://doi.org/10.18297/honors/127 This Senior Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts & Sciences at ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Arts & Sciences Senior Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOWHERE TO GO: INFORMAL SETTLEMENT ERADICATION IN KIGALI, RWANDA By Emily Elizabeth Benken Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Graduation summa cum laude and for Graduation with Honors from the Department of Anthropology University of Louisville May 2017 i ii NOWHERE TO GO: INFORMAL SETTLEMENT ERADICATION IN KIGALI, RWANDA By Emily Elizabeth Benken A Thesis Approved on March 27th, 2017 by the following Thesis Committee: Thesis Advisor Thesis Committee Member Thesis Committee Member iii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my grandmother Mrs. Joyce Graeter Whose unending support made this thesis possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Agroforestry Practices in Soil and Water Conservation
    USE OF AGROFORESTRY PRACTICES IN SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION A CASE STUDY OF KAGEYO SECTOR, GICUMBI DISTRICT, RWANDA BY MUTONI JOAN BEMJ10006/$1/DU A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT FOR THE AWARD OF A BACHELOR OF SCIENCE DEGREE IN ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT OF KAMPALA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY May, 2011 DECLARATION I Mutoni Joan, declare that all that is included in this work is my own effort and has not been presented by any other student for the award of a degree or its equivalent in this institution or any other. Where other individuals, groups, authors, organizations, reports and others have been used has clearly been indicated. STIJDENT: MUTONI JOAN (BEMJI0006/8l/DTJ) SIGNITURE DATE: APPROVAL This research report entitled Use of agroforestry practices in soil and water conservation; A Case Study of Kageyo sector, Gicumbi District, Rwanda”, is submitted to Kampala International University, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences with my approval as the Supervisor. SUPERVISOR: MR.ORJSHABA R. AMMON SIGNITURE DATE’ ii DEDICATION I dedicate this piece of work to my father Kabanda P.Claver and my mother Kabanda Annah whose heartfelt courage, kindness and love enabled me reach this far. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my sincere thanks to Almighty for the gift of life, wisdom and understanding He has given to me throughout my education. On the same note my heartfelt gratitude to my parents, Kabanda P.Claver and Kabanda Annah whose financial, material and emotional support enabled me go through my learning time, with their all seasons combined efforts to make my carrier a success.
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda USADF Country Portfolio
    Rwanda USADF Country Portfolio Overview: Country program was established in 1986 and resumed U.S. African Development Foundation Partner Organization: in 2005 after a pause. USADF currently manages a portfolio of 24 Country Program Coordinator: Geoffrey Kayigi Africa Development Consultants projects and one Cooperative Agreement in Rwanda. PO Box 7210, CCOAIB Building, 3rd Floor Program Director: Rebecca Ruzibuka Total active commitment is $4.33 million. Agricultural investments Remera 1, Plot 2280, Umuganda Bld, Kigali Tel: +250.78.841.5194 total $3.66 million, off-grid energy investments total $348,778, and Tel: +250.78.830.3934 Email: [email protected] youth-led enterprise investments total $25,000. Email: [email protected] Country Strategy: The program focuses on smallholder farmer organizations across the country. Enterprise Duration Grant Size Description Coopérative des Agriculteurs de 2013-2017 $186,800 Sector: Agro-Processing (Maize) Maïs de Nyanza Town/City: Nyanza District, Southern Province (COAMANYA) Summary: The project funds will be used to construct a new factory and purchase approved equipment 2904-RWA and to expand marshland cultivation to another 130 hectares which will directly contribute to an increase of income for over 2,000 persons and promote food security in the area. Funds are also being used to roll out a pilot version of an innovative plot-mapping information system. Coopérative pour le 2015-2017 $78,700 Sector: Processing (Honey) Développement des Apiculteurs et Town/City: Nyamagabe District, Southern Province la Protection de l'Environnement Summary: The project funds will be used to supply beehives, harvesting equipment and to develop an (CODAPE) administrative and financial procedures manual and business plan, as well as to cover key staff 4113-RWA members’ salaries and basic administrative costs to enhance the cooperative’s capacity and boost its honey production and sales revenues.
    [Show full text]