Contact Angles and Surface Emrgetics
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CONTACT ANGLES AND SURFACE EMRGETICS Daniel Yu Hing Kwok A thesis submitted in codoxmity with the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Mechanical and Indusnial Engineering University of Toronto O Copyright by Daniel Yu Hing Kwok 1998 National Library Bibliothèque nationale 1*1 of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington OttawaON K1AON4 Ottawa ON KIA ON4 Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothkque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or seil reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la fome de microfiche/film, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fkom it Ni la thése ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. Thesis Title: Contact Angles and Surface Energetics Degree and Year: Doctor of Philosophy, 1998 Name: Daniel Yu Hing Kwok Department: Graduate Deparmient of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering University: University of Toronto ABSTRACT Low-rate dynamic contact angles of a large number of liquids are measured on various solid surfaces by Axisymmetric Drop Shape Analysis - Profile (ADSA-P). It is found that not ail experimental contact angles can be used for energeîic calculations: In a specific case, slip and stick contact angle behaviour OCCLUS where the contact angle fluctuates by as much as 35'. Thus, circmspection is necessaq in the decision whether or not the experimental contact angles can be used to interpret surface energetics in conjunction with Young's equation and whether the solid-liquid systems violate the basic assumptions made in aU contact angle approaches. It is shown that if one ornits the inconclusive contact angle measurements, the liquid-vapour surface tension times cosine of the contact angle changes smoothly with the liquid-vapour surface tension, Le. ybcos8 depends only on yt, for a given solid surface (or soiid surface tension). Changing the solid surface (and hence y,) shifts the curves in a very regular manner. Thus, ybcosO depends only on yb and y,. Intermolecular forces do not have an additional and independent effect on the contact angles. Because of Young's equation, the solid-liquid surface tension ysl can be expressed as a function of only yb and Y,- Goniorneter and ADSA-P contact angle measurements are also compared: they are shown to be essentially identical for solid-liquid systems which have constant contact angles. In the specific case of the slip/stick of the three-phase contact line using a goniometer technique, the observed static advancing angle corresponds to the maximum angle of the entire sIip/stick behaviour, as registered by the automated ADS A-P technique. Thus, conventional goniometer measurements may produce a mixture of rneaningfd and meanùigless contact angles, with no critena to dis~guish benveen the o. This provides partial explanation of the contact angle controversy in the literature. A large amount of dynamic contact angle data is generated. An equation which foUows these experimental patterns and which allows the detemination of solid surface tensions is discussed. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1 would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supavisor Rofessor A. W. Neumann for his valuable advice and assistance throughout this smdy. He led me into this interes~gand challenging areas of contact angles and surface themodynamics. 1 would like to thank my parents for their con~uedsupport and encouragement throughout my study in Canada. 1 am indebted to Miss Yvonne Chung. Yvonne's encouragement, suppon, and patience are a real conaibution to my study. Thanks are due Professor H. -J. Jacobasch, Dr. K. Grundke, and Dr. T. Gietzelt at the Institute of Polymer Research Dresden (Gmany) for their collaboration. Thanks are due Rofessor D. Li for his valuable advice and insight in surface themodynamics. 1 would also like to thank my laboratory coileagues for their help and advice, especially 2. Policova. TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ................................................................................................................... Acknow ledgements .............................................................................................. IV Table of Contents ................................................................................................... v ....... List of Tables ...................................... ....... X List of Figures ....................................................................................................... xiv List of Appendices .................................................................................................. xvii Chapter 1 .Introduction .................... ... .............................................................. i Chapter 2. Experimental Contact Angle Patterns ................................................... 10 Chapter 3 . Experimental Contact Angle Patterns from a Goniorneter ................... 15 3.1 Materials (Solid Surfaces and Liquids) .................................. ........ 15 3.2 Experimen ta1 Procedures ...................................................................... 3.3 Results and Discussion ......................................................................... Chapter 4. Axisymmehic Drop S hape Analy sis .Profile (ADS A-P) .................... 24 4.1 ADSA Methodology ........................................................................ 24 4.2 Theory ......................... ....... ..................................................... 25 4.3 Drop Profile Coordinates ......................... ... .........................*........ 27 4.4 Calibration Grid .................................................................................... 29 Chapter 5 .Low-Rate Dynmic Contact Angles from ADSA-P ....................... .... 34 5.1 Experimental Procedures ................... .... ...................................... 34 5.2 1nex-t (Non-polar)Surfaces: FC-722-Coated Mica ............................. 5.2.1 Materials (Solid Surfaces and Liquids) ................................. 5.2.2 Results and Discussion .......................................................... 5.3 Non-Inea (Polar) Surfaces: Poly(propene-alt-N-(n-pmpy1)- maleimide) and Poly(propene-ait-N-(n-hexy1)maleimide) ................ 5.3.1 Materials (Solid Surfaces and Liquids) ................................. 5.3.2 Results and Discussion .................................................... 5.4 Other Non-Polar and Polar Surfaces .................................................... Chapter 6. Universality of Contact Angle Patterns .............................................. 6.1 Reasons of Deviation fiom Smoothness ............................................. Chapter 7. Critena for Calculations of Surface Energetics ........................ .. ..... 7.1 Accepted Assumptions for Calculahons of Surface Energetics ......................................................................................... 7.2 Experimental Criteria ................... .... ... .... ........................................ Chapm 8. Contact Angle Interpretation ..................... ... ............*......................... 8.1 Surface Tension Component Approaches .............................. ...,... ...... 8.1.1 Fowkes Approach ...................... ... ...................................... 8.1.2 Owens-Wendt-Kaelble Approach ..................... ..... ......... 8.1.3 Lifshitz .van der Waals / Acid-Base (van Oss) Approach ................................................................................ 8.2 Equation of State Approach ............................................................... 8.2.1 Antonow's Rule ..................................................................... 8-22Berthelot's (Geometric Mean) Combining Rule ................... 8.2.3 Equation of Srate Approach: Modifïed Berthelot's Chapter 9. Applications ............................................................................. ......... 9.1 Evaluation of Existing Contact Angle Data ...................... ... ........... 9.2 Predictive Power of the Equarion of State Approach .......................... Chapter 10 .Conclusions .............................................. ... ................................... Chapter 1 1. Perspective ...................... ... ........................................................... Chapter 12 . Future Work ........................................................................................ References ............................................................................................................. Appendix A . S tatistical Criteria for Averaging of Contact Angle Data ................ Appendix B . Low-Rate Dynarnic Contact Angles on a Ruorocarbon FC-725-Coated Silicon Wafer Surface ..................................... .,. B .1 Materials (Solid Surfaces and Liquids) ...................................... B.2 Results .................................................................................................