Niche Occupancy of Two (Congeneric) Skinks in an Islands Environment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Niche Occupancy of Two (Congeneric) Skinks in an Islands Environment Amphibia-Reptilia 41 (2020): 337-347 brill.com/amre Niche occupancy of two (congeneric) skinks in an islands environment Emilio Civantos1,3,∗, Rosa Arribas2, Jose Martín3 Abstract. Among the scincid lizards inhabiting the Mediterranean region, the Ocellated skink (Chalcides ocellatus)andthe little-known and endangered Chafarinas’ skink (Chalcides parallelus) co-occur in sympatry at the Chafarinas Islands (NW Africa). Although both species are present in the archipelago, C. ocellatus is spread in the three islands, but C. parallelus is present only in one island. What factors influence this distribution, and whether these two species show evidence for syntopy is unknown. In this study, we investigated spatial niche occupancy at the level of microhabitat of both skinks at the Chafarinas Islands. We tested for microhabitat differences between islands and then, we tested the null hypothesis of no differences between microhabitat used by each of these skink species and a set of locations chosen at random from the general habitat. Results showed that the distribution and abundance of available microhabitats were different among islands, thus each island has different spatial niches that may be important in distinguishing the areas occupied by these skinks. Results also revealed that C. ocellatus did not use available microhabitats at random, but preferentially selected particular microhabitats. However, C. parallelus used microhabitats according to their availability, although it showed some aspects of habitat selection similar to C. ocellatus. Our results showed that the inclusion of detailed microhabitat descriptors could be useful for understanding patterns of niche occupancy by these skinks species. Furthermore, to our knowledge this is the first study documenting the spatial niche selection of C. parallelus and provides novel ecological information that may be of major importance to develop management strategies that will help to conserve this endangered species. Keywords: Chafarinas Islands, Chalcides ocellatus, Chalcides parallelus, conservation, distribution, niche partition, sympatry. Introduction geographical area (Schleich et al., 1996; Ander- son, 1999; Kalboussi and Nouira, 2004; Baha Among the 25 species of scincid lizards of the genus Chalcides inhabiting the Mediterranean Eldin, 2006; Taylor et al., 2012). The Chafari- region, two related species co-occur in sympatry nas’ or Doumergue skink (C. parallelus) is a lit- in one island at the Chafarinas archipelago (NW tle known species that was first time described Africa): Chalcides ocellatus and C. parallelus by Doumergue (1901). Mateo et al. (1995) re- (Carranza et al., 2008; Civantos et al., 2013; described and named the species as C. par- García-Roa et al., 2014; Martín et al., 2017). C. alleus from the study of individuals from the ocellatus is the most widespread species and oc- Rey Francisco island at Chafarinas archipelago curs in a broad range of habitats across a large and from the coastal areas of Morocco in front of the archipelago. This species has been found 1 - CIBIO-InBIO | Research Centre in Biodiversity & Ge- only along a narrow coastal strip of approxi- netic Resources, University of Porto, Campus de Vairão, mately 250 km between Nador in northeastern Rua Padre Armando Quintas n° 7, 4485-661 Vairão, Vila do Conde, Portugal Morocco and Cape Carbon in northwestern Al- 2 - Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de geria (Geniez et al., 2008). Thus, the known dis- Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria de Cantoblanco, 28049 tribution of this species is limited to a very small Madrid, Spain 3 - Departamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Museo Nacional area. In the Chafarinas archipelago (Spain), the de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), c/ José Gutiérrez Abas- species has only been found in the Rey Fran- cal, 2, E-28006 Madrid, Spain ∗Corresponding author; cisco island (Civantos et al., 2013; García-Roa e-mail: [email protected] et al., 2014) where it is an abundant species, Downloaded from Brill.com02/25/2021 10:38:58AM via Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2020. DOI:10.1163/15685381-bja10002 338 E. Civantos, R. Arribas, J. Martín however it is thought to be rare along its nar- One interesting aspect of the biogeography row coastal range (Geniez et al., 2008). The is- of C. ocellatus and C. parallelus is that, al- land and mainland populations are highly re- though both species co-occur at the Chafari- lated genetically (Martín et al., 2017), probably nas archipelago, C. ocellatus is spread in the due to the flow of individuals travelling on float- three islands, but C. parallelus is present only ing items over the sea surface between the island in one island (Civantos et al., 2013; García-Roa and the coastal populations (Thiel and Gutow, et al., 2014). What factors influence this distri- 2005). The Chafarinas’ skink is considered as bution, and whether these two species show evi- Endangered by the IUCN (Geniez et al., 2008), dence for syntopy is unknown. Extended obser- and it is therefore considered to be facing a very vations (Civantos, unpubl. data) suggest that C. high risk of extinction in the wild. ocellatus and C. parallelus maybeverysimi- Islands environments are thought to be less lar in most aspect of their ecology as, for ex- complex than mainland ones, with lower num- ample, their similar diets (Çiçek and Göçmen, bers of predators and competitors and lower 2013; Civantos et al., 2013). We hypothesized that their differential distribution at Chafarinas diversity of habitats (Warren et al., 2015). archipelago could be explained by differences Thus, islands are good study areas to research in their spatial niche preferences. To minimize the mechanisms of co-existence of congeneric interspecific interactions, sympatric and closely species with similar ecological requirements related lizard species can often partition their (Schluter, 1988; Warren et al., 2015), which is niche and differentiate their microhabitat use still an ongoing area of research in ecology. (Huey and Webster, 1976; Harmon et al., 2007; When closely related species occur together, Corbalán et al., 2013). However, both skink they nearly always separate on at least one of species may also simply conserve their respec- three niches axes: food, time, or space (Pianka, tive ancestral habitat selection patterns existing 1974, 1976, 1986). In the case of lizards, species in the mainland populations (Arnold, 1987). that share the same habitat often have to ei- In this study, we investigated spatial niche se- ther differentiate their thermal or diet prefer- lection at the microhabitat level of C. ocellatus ences, or select different microhabitats (Arnold, and C. parallelus skinks at the Chafarinas Is- 1987; Scheers and Van Damme, 2002; Mur- lands. We tested for microhabitats differences ray et al., 2016). Many reptiles exploit avail- between islands and then we tested the null hy- able microhabitats according to their require- pothesis of no differences between microhabitat ments for thermoregulation (Christian et al., used by each of these skink species and a set 1983; Scheibe, 1987; Paulissen, 1988), forag- of locations chosen at random from the general ing (Paulissen, 1988), or predator avoidance habitat. We aimed to determine whether differ- (Stamps, 1983). Thus, for example, the selec- ences in microhabitat use may help to under- tive use of certain microhabitats allows many stand niche occupancy of these skinks in the reptiles to maintain body temperatures within archipelago. We also aim to provide novel eco- a range that optimizes physiological capacities logical information about the little known Cha- and ultimately ecological performance (Huey, farinas’ skink. 1991). In addition, some microhabitats may supply better refuges against predators or pro- vide more or higher-quality food (Martín and Materials and methods Salvador, 1992; Martín and López, 1998), and We conducted field work at the Chafarinas Islands (Spain). therefore, microhabitat use may influence sur- This archipelago is located in the southern-western area of the Mediterranean sea (35°1100N-2°2535W), 2.5 vival (Civantos et al., 1999; Civantos and Fors- nautical miles to the north of the Moroccan coast (Ras el man, 2000). Ma, Morocco) and 27 miles to the east of the Spanish city of Downloaded from Brill.com02/25/2021 10:38:58AM via Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales Microhabitat use by two sympatric skinks 339 Melilla. It consists of three islands named Congreso, Isabel area surrounding the skink (i.e., number of contacts with II (the only inhabited) and Rey Francisco. Congreso is the each substratum and vegetation type, and with vegetation westernmost, largest (25.6 ha) and the highest island (137 at each height). The sampling of multiple points to charac- meters above sea level), Isabel II (15.1 ha; 35 m. a.s.l.), terise surfaces near the skink rather than only measuring the located between Congreso (at 1 km) and Rey Francisco (at particular point at the skink location allowed a better char- 175 m) is the most oriental, smallest (13.9 ha) and lowest acterisation of the microhabitat in a skink’s home range (for (31 m. a.s.l.) island of the three. The islands present a a similar sampling methodology see (Scheibe, 1987). Given Mediterranean dry and warm climate very influenced by that we avoided walking routes taken previously, the proba- the dominant winds from east and west. The vegetation is bility of repeated sampling on the same individual was close conditioned by the aridity of the climate (average annual to null. We therefore treated all measurements as indepen- precipitation = 300 mm), the higher salinity and the guano dent. accumulation from numerous seabirds colonies (García et Availability of microhabitats in the three islands was al., 2002). The current vegetation is dominated by plants estimated along a series of random transects (3 in each adapted to the salinity and the drought such as species of island) located at least 50 m apart from each other and Atriplex, Lycium, Suaeda and Salsola bushes. In general, distributed for covering most of the vegetated surface of the the soils of the islands are little developed and immature, islands and the whole general habitat.
Recommended publications
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com10/06/2021 09:29:00AM Via Free Access 42 Luiselli Et Al
    Contributions to Zoology, 74 (1/2) 41-49 (2005) Analysis of a herpetofaunal community from an altered marshy area in Sicily; with special remarks on habitat use (niche breadth and overlap), relative abundance of lizards and snakes, and the correlation between predator abundance and tail loss in lizards Luca Luiselli1, Francesco M. Angelici2, Massimiliano Di Vittorio3, Antonio Spinnato3, Edoardo Politano4 1 F.I.Z.V. (Ecology), via Olona 7, I-00198 Rome, Italy. E-mail: [email protected] 2 F.I.Z.V. (Mammalogy), via Cleonia 30, I-00152 Rome, Italy. 3 Via Jevolella 2, Termini Imprese (PA), Italy. 4 Centre of Environmental Studies ‘Demetra’, via Tomassoni 17, I-61032 Fano (PU), Italy Abstract relationships, thus rendering the examination of the relationships between predators and prey an extreme- A field survey was conducted in a highly degraded barren en- ly complicated task for the ecologist (e.g., see Con- vironment in Sicily in order to investigate herpetofaunal com- nell, 1975; May, 1976; Schoener, 1986). However, munity composition and structure, habitat use (niche breadth and there is considerable literature (both theoretical and overlap) and relative abundance of a snake predator and two spe- empirical) indicating that case studies of extremely cies of lizard prey. The site was chosen because it has a simple community structure and thus there is potentially less ecological simple communities, together with the use of appropri- complexity to cloud any patterns observed. We found an unexpect- ate minimal models, can help us to understand the edly high overlap in habitat use between the two closely related basis of complex patterns of ecological relationships lizards that might be explained either by a high competition for among species (Thom, 1975; Arditi and Ginzburg, space or through predator-mediated co-existence i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview and Checklist of the Native and Alien Herpetofauna of the United Arab Emirates
    Herpetological Conservation and Biology 5(3):529–536. Herpetological Conservation and Biology Symposium at the 6th World Congress of Herpetology. AN OVERVIEW AND CHECKLIST OF THE NATIVE AND ALIEN HERPETOFAUNA OF THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES 1 1 2 PRITPAL S. SOORAE , MYYAS AL QUARQAZ , AND ANDREW S. GARDNER 1Environment Agency-ABU DHABI, P.O. Box 45553, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, e-mail: [email protected] 2Natural Science and Public Health, College of Arts and Sciences, Zayed University, P.O. Box 4783, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates Abstract.—This paper provides an updated checklist of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) native and alien herpetofauna. The UAE, while largely a desert country with a hyper-arid climate, also has a range of more mesic habitats such as islands, mountains, and wadis. As such it has a diverse native herpetofauna of at least 72 species as follows: two amphibian species (Bufonidae), five marine turtle species (Cheloniidae [four] and Dermochelyidae [one]), 42 lizard species (Agamidae [six], Gekkonidae [19], Lacertidae [10], Scincidae [six], and Varanidae [one]), a single amphisbaenian, and 22 snake species (Leptotyphlopidae [one], Boidae [one], Colubridae [seven], Hydrophiidae [nine], and Viperidae [four]). Additionally, we recorded at least eight alien species, although only the Brahminy Blind Snake (Ramphotyplops braminus) appears to have become naturalized. We also list legislation and international conventions pertinent to the herpetofauna. Key Words.— amphibians; checklist; invasive; reptiles; United Arab Emirates INTRODUCTION (Arnold 1984, 1986; Balletto et al. 1985; Gasperetti 1988; Leviton et al. 1992; Gasperetti et al. 1993; Egan The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is a federation of 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Amphibians and Reptiles of Morocco: a Taxonomic Update and Standard Arabic Names
    Herpetology Notes, volume 14: 1-14 (2021) (published online on 08 January 2021) Checklist of amphibians and reptiles of Morocco: A taxonomic update and standard Arabic names Abdellah Bouazza1,*, El Hassan El Mouden2, and Abdeslam Rihane3,4 Abstract. Morocco has one of the highest levels of biodiversity and endemism in the Western Palaearctic, which is mainly attributable to the country’s complex topographic and climatic patterns that favoured allopatric speciation. Taxonomic studies of Moroccan amphibians and reptiles have increased noticeably during the last few decades, including the recognition of new species and the revision of other taxa. In this study, we provide a taxonomically updated checklist and notes on nomenclatural changes based on studies published before April 2020. The updated checklist includes 130 extant species (i.e., 14 amphibians and 116 reptiles, including six sea turtles), increasing considerably the number of species compared to previous recent assessments. Arabic names of the species are also provided as a response to the demands of many Moroccan naturalists. Keywords. North Africa, Morocco, Herpetofauna, Species list, Nomenclature Introduction mya) led to a major faunal exchange (e.g., Blain et al., 2013; Mendes et al., 2017) and the climatic events that Morocco has one of the most varied herpetofauna occurred since Miocene and during Plio-Pleistocene in the Western Palearctic and the highest diversities (i.e., shift from tropical to arid environments) promoted of endemism and European relict species among allopatric speciation (e.g., Escoriza et al., 2006; Salvi North African reptiles (Bons and Geniez, 1996; et al., 2018). Pleguezuelos et al., 2010; del Mármol et al., 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • Resorption of Oviductal Eggs and Embryos in Squamate Reptiles
    HERPETOLOGICAL JOURNAL, Vol. 8, pp. 65-71 ( 1998) RESORPTION OF OVIDUCTAL EGGS AND EMBRYOS IN SQUAMATE REPTILES DANIEL G. BLACKBURN Department of Biology, Life Sciences Center, Tr inity College, Hartford, CT 06106, USA Among squamate reptiles, gravid females are frequently said to be able to resorb infertile and malformed eggs from their oviducts. This pattern, if it existed, would allow females to recycle nutrients from abortive attempts at reproduction, and to increase lifetime reproductive potential by modulating reproductive effort according to environmental circumstances. However, . a review of the literature reveals that evidence for oviductal egg resorption is weak, and does not preclude other fates for abortive eggs (egg retention or expulsion). Furthermore, for the oviduct to resorb eggs would require that it have the fu nctional properties of the digestive tract, properties that may be incompatible with its several reproductive fu nctions. Future work should not assume oviductal egg resorption in squamates without definitive evidence that the eggs are not simply aborted or retained by fe males following absorption of water. INTRODUCTION 1970a; Thompson, 1977, 1982; Stewart, 1989; Stewart et In literature dating back to the late 1800s, fe male liz­ al., 1990). However, as shown by these and other ards and snakes have been said to be able to resorb eggs studies (Thompson, 1981; Stewart & Castillo, 1984), and embryos from their oviducts under conditions of the yolk typically provides most of the nutrients for de­ physiological stress and infertility. Theoretically, such velopment. Therefore, given that most of female resorption could be an ideal way fora fe male to mini­ nutrient investment into the prospective neonate occurs mize loss of nutrients during failed attempts at at the time of ovulation in both oviparous and vivipa­ forms, a female that could resorb the yolk or the reproduction, and to control reproduction in such a way rous as to maximize lifetime reproductive potential.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of the Skink Chalcides in Coastal Areas of Guinea Bissau And
    ©Österreichische Gesellschaft für Herpetologie e.V., Wien, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at SHORT NOTE HERPETOZOA 20 (3/4) Wien, 30. Jänner 2008 SHORT NOTE 189 SCHNEIDER J. G. (1783): Allgemeine Naturgeschichte 1978; HÄKANSSON 1981; GRUSCHWITZ et al. der Schildkröten, nebst einem systematischen Verzeich- 1991; PAUWELS & MEIRTE 1996; BARNETT et nisse der einzelnen Arten und zwey Kupfern. Leipzig (J. G Müllersche Buchhandlung), 364 pp., 2 pts. VON al. 2001), Senegal (GRANDISON 1956; CON- SCHREBER, J. Ch. D. (1774-1792): Die Säugthiere in DAMIN & VlLLIERS 1962; ClSSE & KARNS Abbildungen nach der Natur mit Beschreibungen, fort- 1978; BÖHME 1978; JOGER & LAMBERT gesetzt (H. 65-69, 1817-1824) von GOLDFUSS, A. und (MANACAS (1834 ff.) WAGNER, J. A., Erlangen (W. Walther). WAG- 2002) and Guinea Bissau 1955). LER, J. (1821): Die Amphibien. (Lieferung 1). Nürnberg Of the four known specimens, three are pre- (J. B.Geyer), 12 pp., 6 pts. served in the British Museum (BMNH KEY WORDS: Reptilia, Testudines, Emydidae, 1927.2.2.64-66). One of these is from Cape Chrysemys picta picta, Hydrochelys picta, junior syn- St. Mary (13°29'N, 16°40'W) on the At- onym; nomenclature, priority, nomen oblitum, nomen lantic coast near the capital city of Banjul, protectum, taxonomy while the two other specimens are simply SUBMITTED: August 29, 2007 labelled "Gambia" (HÄKANSSON 1981). The AUTHORS: Richard GEMEL, Heinz GRILLITSCH, fourth known specimen of C. armitagei First Zoological Department, Herpetological Collection, Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, A-1010 (stored at Makasutu Wildlife Trust, Serre- Wien < [email protected] > kunda, Gambia; collection number: MWTR 003) is also from the coast of The Gambia, north of Kartung village (13°06'N, 16°45' W) (GREENBAUM 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: 2019
    UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles 2019 www.moccae.gov.ae UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna: Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles April 2019 A report to the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment, United Arab Emirates Johannes Els, David Allen, Craig Hilton-Taylor and Kate Harding IUCN Global Species Programme, Cambridge Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles Table of Contents Acknowledgements Executive Summary 1 Introduction 1.1 The United Arab Emirates context 1.2 Amphibians 1.3 Terrestrial reptiles 1.4 Marine reptiles 1.5 Assessment of species extinction risk 1.6 Objectives of the UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna 2 Assessment methodology 2.1 Geographic scope 2.2 Taxonomic scope 2.3 Assessment protocol 2.4 Species distribution mapping 2.5 Red List Index datapoint 3 Results 3.1 Threat status 3.2 Status and distribution of amphibians 3.3 Status and distribution of terrestrial reptiles 3.4 Status and distribution of marine reptiles 3.5 Major threats to amphibians, terrestrial and marine reptiles in the UAE 3.6 Population trends 3.7 Protected areas 3.8 Gaps in knowledge 3.9 Red List Index datapoint 4 Conservation measures 4.1 Conservation of amphibians, terrestrial and marine reptiles in the UAE 4.2 Red List versus priority for conservation action 5 Recommendations 5.1 Recommended actions 5.2 Application of project outputs 5.3 Future work References Appendix 1. Red List status of amphibians, terrestrial and marine reptiles in the UAE. Appendix 2. List of participants in the UAE National Red List Assessment Workshop 5 UAE National Red List of Herpetofauna 2019 Amphibians & Terrestrial Reptiles, Sea Snakes & Marine Turtles Acknowledgements We would like to thank the many experts who have contributed to the UAE Peter Uetz (The Reptile Database) contributed to discussions of taxonomic National Red List herpetofauna assessments and distribution maps.
    [Show full text]
  • Chalcides Ocellatus
    Report under the Article 17 of the Habitats Directive European Environment Period 2007-2012 Agency European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity Chalcides ocellatus Annex IV Priority No Species group Reptiles Regions Mediterranean Chalcides ocellatus The Ocellated Skink is widespread across the Mediterranean basin, both in southern Europe and northern Africa. It was introduced to Malta in the late 19th century and it is now naturalised. According to the IUCN Red List it is a highly adaptable and often associated with arid to moist sandy areas or places with sparse scrub. The species is reported by Cyprus, Greece, Italy and Malta for the Mediterranean biogeographical region. The overall conservation status of the region is assessed as ‘favourable’, which marks a change from ‘unknown’ in the previous reporting period. All Member States reported the species as ‘favourable’ for the current reporting period, with the exception of Greece, which did not deliver an Article 17 report. Pressures and threats reported for the species include antagonism with domestic animals, removal of animals, mowing of grassland, use of biocides, hormones and chemicals and cultivation. The IUCN Red List classifies the species as least concern due to its wide distribution, presumed large population, and tolerance for a broad range of habitats (http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/157283/1 consulted on 27 February 2015). Page 1 Species: Chalcides ocellatus Report under the Article 17 of the Habitats Directive Assessment of conservation status at the European biogeographical level Conservation status (CS) of parameters Current Trend in % in Previous Reason for Region Future CS CS region CS change Range Population Habitat prospects MED FV FV FV FV FV 100 XX Not genuine See the endnote for more informationi Assessment of conservation status at the Member State level Page 2 Species: Chalcides ocellatus Report under the Article 17 of the Habitats Directive Assessment of conservation status at the Member State level The map shows both Conservation Status and distribution using a 10 km x 10 km grid.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Appendix: Supporting Information Drake Et Al SI Text 1
    Appendix: Supporting Information Drake et al SI Text 1) Trans-Saharan Species Distributions Maps of the fauna of North Africa have been compiled from Van Damme (1) and Le Berre (2) with additional distributional and species information from more up to date sources (3 to 9). This information was evaluated to identify species found north and south of the Sahara, along the Nile, in isolated oases within the desert, and combinations of the above spatial distributions. A comprehensive literature review of these species was then conducted to assess the numerous changes in their status since publication of their ranges. Some species had been subdivided, thus their names and ranges needed to be updated. Sometimes they no longer had a spatial distribution indicative of trans-Saharan migration and these species were discarded. For example Lemniscomys barbarus was originally thought to be found in the Maghreb and the Sahel but was subsequently found to consist of two species, Lemniscomys zebra south of the Sahara and Lemniscomys barbarus to the north (10). Other phylogenetic studies revealed contrasting results indicating that animal populations to the north and south of the Sahara were closely related; thus suggesting their recent dispersal across the desert. For example, the morphological variation in the leaf-nosed bat, Hipposideros caffer and H. rubber, has led to suggestions that this species complex may contain more than two species. Phylogenetic analysis suggests four distinct lineages (11). Two distinct sister clades are found within H. caffer with Hipposideros caffer caffer restricted to southern Africa and Hipposideros caffer tephrus inhabiting the Maghreb, the Sahel and Arabia and thus retaining a trans-Saharan spatial distribution for one leaf-nosed bat species.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Composition of Ocellated Skink, Chalcides Ocellatus(Forskal, 1775
    Acta Herpetologica 8(2): 167-170, 2013 Food composition of Ocellated Skink, Chalcides ocellatus (Forskal, 1775) (Squamata: Scincidae), from the Cyprus Island Kerim Çiçek*, Bayram Göçmen Ege University, Faculty of Science, Biology Department, Zoology Section, TR-35100, Bornova-Izmir, Turkey. *Corresponding authr: E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected] Submitted on 2013, 10th October; revised on 2013, 2nd December; accepted on 2013, 6th December. Abstract. We examined the food composition of the museum specimens of Chalcides ocellatus (Forskal, 1775) col- lected from Morphou (= Güzelyurt) and Gönyeli (Nicosia District, Northern Cyprus). The stomach contents of 41 (23 males, 11 females, and 7 juveniles) individuals were analyzed, and totally 86 prey items were detected. The species was found to feed mainly on a variety of insects (94.3%) and particularly on coleopterans (62.1%). No statistically signifi- cant sex- or age-dependent difference was observed in the feeding regime. In conclusion, the diet of C.ocellatus was based mainly on insects and other arthropods. Keywords. Chalcides ocellatus, Ocellated skink, food analysis, Cyprus The Ocellated Skink, Chalcides ocellatus (Forskal, We examined 41 (23 males, 11 females, and 7 juve- 1775), is a medium-sized semi-fossorial lizard which is niles) preserved specimens of C. ocellatus deposited at mainly distributed from North Africa, the Middle East, the ZMHRU (The Zoology Museum of Harran Univer- and the most part of the Mediterranean basin (Anderson, sity, Şanlıurfa, Turkey). They were used to determine 1999; Kornilios et al., 2010; Uetz and Hošek, 2013). The the Northern Cypriot Herpetofauna as a continuation of species occupies a wide range of habitats such as archaeo- the previous study (Göçmen et al., 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Key and Checklist to the Lizards of Pakistan (Reptilia: Squamata: Sauria)
    ©Österreichische Gesellschaft für Herpetologie e.V., Wien, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at HERPETOZOA 15 (3/4): 99 - 119 99 Wien, 30. Dezember 2002 Key and checklist to the lizards of Pakistan (Reptilia: Squamata: Sauria) Schlüssel und Checklist der Eidechsen von Pakistan (Reptilia: Squamata: Sauria) MUHAMMAD SHARJF KHAN KURZFASSUNG In den vergangenen Jahren wurden der Liste der Eidechsen Pakistans verschiedene Taxa hinzugefügt, wobei die zugrundeliegenden Beschreibungen und Neunachweise weit über die herpetologische Literatur verstreut sind. Die vorliegende Arbeit stellt diese Informationen zusammen und liefert eine umfangreiche Bibliographie neuerer Publikationen über die Eidechsen von Pakistan. ABSTRACT During recent years several lizard taxa were added to the faunal list of Pakistan. Descriptions and new records are scattered in different publications in the herpetological literature. The present paper puts the informa- tion together, and provides a comprehensive list of recent publications on the lizards of Pakistan. KEY WORDS Reptilia: Squamata: Sauria; keys and checklist, lizards, Pakistan INTRODUCTION Our knowledge ofsauria of the Indian 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1991a,b,c, subcontinent stems from GÜNTHER (1864), 1992, 1993a,b, 1997, 1999a,b, 2000a,b, "The Reptiles of British India", and, subse- 2001); BORNER (1974, 1976, 1981); KHAN, quently, BOULENGER'S (1890) volume in the M. & MIRZA (1977); GOLUBEV & SZCZER- "Fauna of British India" series. The saurian BAK (1981); KHAN, M. & AHMED (1987); part of it was later updated in an independ- KHAN, M. & BAIG (1988, 1992); BAIG ent volume in the series by SMITH (1935). (1988, 1989, 1990, 1998); KHAN, M. & TAS- After partition of the subcontinent, MINTON NIM (1990); SZCZERBAK (1991); AUFFEN- (1962, 1966) ushered in the modern era of BERG & REHMAN (1995); BAIG & BÖHME the herpetological studies in Pakistan, fol- (1996); KHAN, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Hot Trade in Cool Creatures
    HOT TRADE IN COOL CREATURES A review of the live reptile trade in the European Union in the 1990s with a focus on Germany by MARK AULIYA A TRAFFIC EUROPE REPORT This report was published with the kind support of Published by TRAFFIC Europe, Brussels, Belgium. © 2003 TRAFFIC Europe All rights reserved. All material appearing in this publication is copyrighted and may be produced with permission. Any reproduction in full or in part of this publication must credit TRAFFIC Europe as the copyright owner. The views of the author expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the TRAFFIC network, WWF or IUCN. The designations of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of TRAFFIC or its supporting organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The TRAFFIC symbol copyright and Registered Trademark ownership is held by WWF. TRAFFIC is a joint programme of WWF and IUCN. Suggested citation: Auliya, Mark. (2003). Hot trade in cool creatures: A review of the live reptile trade in the European Union in the 1990s with a focus on Germany. TRAFFIC Europe, Brussels, Belgium ISBN 2 9600505 9 2 EAN code: 9782960050592 Front cover photograph: The Green-eyed Gecko Gekko smithii from southern Sumatra. Photograph credit: Mark Auliya Printed on recycled paper HOT TRADE IN COOL CREATURES A REVIEW OF THE LIVE REPTILE TRADE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION IN THE 1990s WITH A FOCUS ON GERMANY The Yellow Monitor Varanus melinus.
    [Show full text]
  • The High-Level Classification of Skinks (Reptilia, Squamata, Scincomorpha)
    Zootaxa 3765 (4): 317–338 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3765.4.2 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:357DF033-D48E-4118-AAC9-859C3EA108A8 The high-level classification of skinks (Reptilia, Squamata, Scincomorpha) S. BLAIR HEDGES Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, 208 Mueller Lab, University Park, PA 16802, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Skinks are usually grouped in a single family, Scincidae (1,579 species) representing one-quarter of all lizard species. Oth- er large lizard families, such as Gekkonidae (s.l.) and Iguanidae (s.l.), have been partitioned into multiple families in recent years, based mainly on evidence from molecular phylogenies. Subfamilies and informal suprageneric groups have been used for skinks, defined by morphological traits and supported increasingly by molecular phylogenies. Recently, a seven- family classification for skinks was proposed to replace that largely informal classification, create more manageable taxa, and faciliate systematic research on skinks. Those families are Acontidae (26 sp.), Egerniidae (58 sp.), Eugongylidae (418 sp.), Lygosomidae (52 sp.), Mabuyidae (190 sp.), Sphenomorphidae (546 sp.), and Scincidae (273 sp.). Representatives of 125 (84%) of the 154 genera of skinks are available in the public sequence databases and have been placed in molecular phylogenies that support the recognition of these families. However, two other molecular clades with species that have long been considered distinctive morphologically belong to two new families described here, Ristellidae fam. nov. (14 sp.) and Ateuchosauridae fam. nov.
    [Show full text]