MKF Post-Defence Edits Aug.14

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MKF Post-Defence Edits Aug.14 A Gathering of Names: On the Categories and Collections of Siberian Shamanic Materials in Late Imperial Russian Museums, 1880–1910 by Marisa Karyl Franz A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Study of Religion Department for the Study of Religion University of Toronto © Copyright by Marisa Karyl Franz 2019 A Gathering of Names: On the Categories and Collections of Siberian Shamanic Materials in Late Imperial Russian Museum, 1880-1910 Marisa Karyl Franz Doctor of Philosophy in the Study of Religion Department for the Study of Religion University of Toronto 2019 Abstract A Gathering of Names is an intellectual history of the ethnographic naming and systematising of Siberian shamanic materials by collectors for late imperial Russian museums, between approximately 1880-1910. The late imperial era was a time of social and political change in the Russian Empire, during which there was a dramatic increase in the number of local Siberian museums founded. This project approaches Siberia and the local Siberian museums within the context of late imperial Russian scientific modernity to argue that these museums were constructing a new local Siberian intellectual and scientific network of researchers who were defining shamanism through their collections. This project focuses on collectors and the museum communities in the cities of Yakutsk, Irkutsk, and St. Petersburg. It approaches these sites as increasingly interconnected through the ii academic and personal networks and infrastructural developments that brought increasing numbers of people, willingly and unwillingly, to Siberia at the turn of the century. Specifically looking at collection programmes, a form of desiderata, this dissertation traces what types of objects and categories of information were understood as shamanic in order to explore how the category circulated and became defined within the ethnographic museums in Siberia and in European Russia. iii Acknowledgements I grew up wanting to go to Siberia, and while it was not a straight path to get there, I like to think that there was something inevitable about it. Over the years, my project shifted, morphed, formed, and reformed, and I see the narratives of these changes in the my chapters. Finishing a dissertation means that there is a rigidity imposed on what had, for many years, been a malleable and unsettled text. Perhaps readers will find ghosts of earlier ideas and foreshadows of future ones throughout, and I hope these add a little bit of that unsettledness back into the work and keep it in a space of change rather than ossification. To those who saw first-hand the processes of researching and writing, I would like to express my thanks. I am particularly grateful for the support of my supervisor, Pamela Klassen, and my committee members, Alison Smith, J. Barton Scott, and Irina Mihalache. Without their mentorship throughout the different stages of my doctoral work, I would still be wandering in the wilds of research. I would also like to thank Judith Brunton, Nicholas Field, and Hannah Turner for their friendship and encouragement throughout our time together as graduate students. My research would not have been possible without financial support. I would like to thank the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, the Ontario Graduate Scholarship, the Canadian Corporations for Studies in Religion, American Councils, Massey College, and the University of Toronto for supporting my research abroad and providing me the financial assistance to fund my research trips to Siberia and European Russia. I would also like to thank the Northrop Frye Centre and Victoria College for supporting me once I returned to Toronto to write, and for providing me a college community within the University of Toronto. In Russia, the excellent archivists, librarians, and researchers in Yakutsk, Irkutsk, and St. Petersburg supported and facilitated my research. In Yakutsk, I would like to thank the National Library of the Republic of Sakha, the State Archive of the Republic of Sakha (who had to deal with my first attempts at navigating the Russian archive system and I appreciate their kindness and patience), and Northeastern Federal University for providing Sakha language classes. In Irkutsk, I am grateful for the assistance of the ethnographic and archaeological departments of the Irkutsk Museum of Local History, as well as their librarians. In St. Petersburg, I would like to iv thank Vladimir Davydov, the Siberian Department at the Kunstkamera, and the Academy of Science for supporting my research. I am also grateful to the staff at the National Library of Russia and at the Geographic Society Library. Finally, I would like to thank my friends in Yakutsk for taking me in and providing a home for me there. I am forever grateful for their kindness and their care. Here, at the end, I would like to thank my family. My chaotic assemblage of aunts, uncles, loved- ones, cousins, parents, brother, and husband formed a community that surrounded me throughout this project. They advised me on Russian translations, provided home-cooked meals, walked the dog, read and reread drafts, and encouraged me when I needed encouragement. This work is dedicated to them. v Table of Contents Acknowledgements........................................................................................................................ iv Table of Contents........................................................................................................................... vi List of Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................x Notes on Translation and Transliteration....................................................................................... xi Prologue ........................................................................................................................................ xii Introduction......................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Sites of Research..................................................................................................................3 1.1.1 The Kunstkamera.....................................................................................................4 1.1.2 The Irkutsk Regional Museum of Local History (The Irkutsk Museum)................6 1.1.3 The Yakutsk State Museum of the History and Culture of the People of the North named after Emilian Iaroslavski (The Yakutsk Museum).............................7 1.2 Desired Documents and Research Methods ........................................................................9 1.3 An Overview of the Argument ..........................................................................................11 1.3.1 Systems and Structures: An Organizational Overview..........................................22 1 Chapter One: Museums and Modernity in Late Imperial Russia..............................................27 1.1 Introduction........................................................................................................................27 1.2 Late Imperial Russia ..........................................................................................................30 1.3 The Siberian Colony ..........................................................................................................35 1.4 Museums and Imperial Intellectuals ..................................................................................43 1.5 The Local Exotic................................................................................................................53 1.6 Conclusion .........................................................................................................................56 2 Chapter Two: Shamans and Shamanism...................................................................................58 2.1 Introduction........................................................................................................................58 vi 2.2 Defining Shamans and Shamanism: ..................................................................................59 2.2.1 Shaman: Etymology and Europeanization.............................................................59 2.2.2 Shamans and Shamanism: Locating a Central Definition .....................................63 2.3 Periodizing Shamanic Studies............................................................................................64 2.3.1 Intellectual Histories ..............................................................................................64 2.3.2 Shamans as Charlatans...........................................................................................66 2.3.3 Shamans and Psychology: Hysteria and Queerness...............................................73 2.3.4 Shamans as a Universal Type ................................................................................80 2.3.5 Shamans as Geographically Bound .......................................................................85 2.3.6 Shamanism: Deconstructing and Reconstructing the Shaman in Context.............88 2.3.7 Periodisation: In sum..............................................................................................93 2.4 Late Imperial Russian Shamanic Studies...........................................................................93 2.4.1 Hysteria in
Recommended publications
  • SITTING “UNDER the MOUTH”: DECLINE and REVITALIZATION in the SAKHA EPIC TRADITION OLONKHO by ROBIN GAIL HARRIS (Under the D
    SITTING “ UNDER THE MOUTH” : DECLINE AND REVITALIZATION IN THE SAKHA EPIC TRADITION OLONKHO by ROBIN GAIL HARRIS (Under the Direction of Jean N. Kidula) ABSTRACT The Sakha epic tradition, olonkho , features the longest and most complex epic tales of all the Siberian peoples. In its most traditional form, olonkho is a solo genre comprised of both dramatic narrative poetry and unaccompanied song alternating throughout the extensive, multiple-evening performance of the work. This work explores the current revival of interest in olonkho, examining what led to its decline during the Soviet era as well as the factors currently playing a role in its revitalization. It addresses the transformations of olonkho in the 21 st century and identifies keys for its long-term sustainability. These four areas—attenuation, revitalization, transformation, and sustainability—are the primary research categories. In order to more effectively posit potential future directions for olonkho, I trace olonkho performance practice historically, exploring the ways it interacted with the contextual milieu of each time period, beginning with those times immediately before and during Soviet power. The research questions are organized around the elements of time , place , and event . The event parameter is further divided into three areas of inquiry: the performers , audiences , and content of the olonkho tradition. The literature addressing these themes is drawn, not just from the discipline of ethnomusicology, but also from anthropology, comparative literature, culture studies, musicology, performance theory, post-Soviet and post-colonial studies, area studies, and sociolinguistic models. Data collection in the field largely relied on ethnographic interviews, documented in first person accounts, both in the text and the accompanying DVD.
    [Show full text]
  • Aleuts: an Outline of the Ethnic History
    i Aleuts: An Outline of the Ethnic History Roza G. Lyapunova Translated by Richard L. Bland ii As the nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has re- sponsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural and cultural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use of our land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places, and providing for enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Shared Beringian Heritage Program at the National Park Service is an international program that rec- ognizes and celebrates the natural resources and cultural heritage shared by the United States and Russia on both sides of the Bering Strait. The program seeks local, national, and international participation in the preservation and understanding of natural resources and protected lands and works to sustain and protect the cultural traditions and subsistence lifestyle of the Native peoples of the Beringia region. Aleuts: An Outline of the Ethnic History Author: Roza G. Lyapunova English translation by Richard L. Bland 2017 ISBN-13: 978-0-9965837-1-8 This book’s publication and translations were funded by the National Park Service, Shared Beringian Heritage Program. The book is provided without charge by the National Park Service. To order additional copies, please contact the Shared Beringian Heritage Program ([email protected]). National Park Service Shared Beringian Heritage Program © The Russian text of Aleuts: An Outline of the Ethnic History by Roza G. Lyapunova (Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo “Nauka” leningradskoe otdelenie, 1987), was translated into English by Richard L.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Museums Visit More Than 80 Million Visitors, 1/3 of Who Are Visitors Under 18
    Moscow 4 There are more than 3000 museums (and about 72 000 museum workers) in Russian Moscow region 92 Federation, not including school and company museums. Every year Russian museums visit more than 80 million visitors, 1/3 of who are visitors under 18 There are about 650 individual and institutional members in ICOM Russia. During two last St. Petersburg 117 years ICOM Russia membership was rapidly increasing more than 20% (or about 100 new members) a year Northwestern region 160 You will find the information aboutICOM Russia members in this book. All members (individual and institutional) are divided in two big groups – Museums which are institutional members of ICOM or are represented by individual members and Organizations. All the museums in this book are distributed by regional principle. Organizations are structured in profile groups Central region 192 Volga river region 224 Many thanks to all the museums who offered their help and assistance in the making of this collection South of Russia 258 Special thanks to Urals 270 Museum creation and consulting Culture heritage security in Russia with 3M(tm)Novec(tm)1230 Siberia and Far East 284 © ICOM Russia, 2012 Organizations 322 © K. Novokhatko, A. Gnedovsky, N. Kazantseva, O. Guzewska – compiling, translation, editing, 2012 [email protected] www.icom.org.ru © Leo Tolstoy museum-estate “Yasnaya Polyana”, design, 2012 Moscow MOSCOW A. N. SCRiAbiN MEMORiAl Capital of Russia. Major political, economic, cultural, scientific, religious, financial, educational, and transportation center of Russia and the continent MUSEUM Highlights: First reference to Moscow dates from 1147 when Moscow was already a pretty big town.
    [Show full text]
  • Preface Kunstkamera Buildings: Historical Information the Museum and Its Directors Administration of the Museum
    I PREFACE KUNSTKAMERA BUILDINGS: HISTORICAL INFORMATION THE MUSEUM AND ITS DIRECTORS ADMINISTRATION OF THE MUSEUM Электронная библиотека Музея антропологии и этнографии им. Петра Великого (Кунсткамера) РАН http://www.kunstkamera.ru/lib/rubrikator/08/08_04/978-5-88431-165-7/ © МАЭ РАН 10 Peter I. Engraving by N. A. Wortman from Tannauer’s portrait. After 1727. Электронная библиотека Музея антропологии и этнографии им. Петра Великого (Кунсткамера) РАН http://www.kunstkamera.ru/lib/rubrikator/08/08_04/978-5-88431-165-7/ © МАЭ РАН 11 PREFACE An establishment of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography (Kunstkamera) (MAE RAS) is one of world’s largest and oldest ethnographic museums. It is the successor of Russia’s first state public museum, the famous Kunstkamera founded in 1714 by Peter’s decree. The establishment of the museum was apparently a sequel of Peter’s order to move from Moscow to Russia’s new capital his already nu- merous personal collections including those purchased during his Great Embassy to Europe. In St. Petersburg, they were first placed in the newly built Summer Palace, and then in Kikin’s palace where, for Kunstkamera building Электронная библиотека Музея антропологии и этнографии им. Петра Великого (Кунсткамера) РАН http://www.kunstkamera.ru/lib/rubrikator/08/08_04/978-5-88431-165-7/ © МАЭ РАН 12 the first time, they were displayed before the public. At the same time, the construction of a special museum began (1718–27). Built on the bank of the Neva in the Baroque style, it adjoined the most important buildings of the new capital — the building of the Twelve Ministries, the palaces of the reformer Tsar’s closest associates and members of the royal family.
    [Show full text]
  • New Reality and Nagorno-Karabakh: the Cemre That Fell to Nagorno-Karabakh
    Tarih İncelemeleri Dergisi XXXVI / 1, 2021, 209-251 DOI: 10.18513/egetid.974614 THE WAR BETWEEN PERIOD AND EXCLAMATION MARK: NEW REALITY AND NAGORNO-KARABAKH: THE CEMRE THAT FELL TO NAGORNO-KARABAKH * ** Vefa KURBAN - Oğuzhan ERGÜN Abstract Having always been competition fields thanks to their geopolitical impact potential, the Caucasus and Turkestan have been among the Strategic Focus Centres of Russia since the Tsarist times. While Russia, whose strategic culture has produced expansionist policies for centuries, constantly expanded its political borders, it clashed with the Ottoman Empire and Iran in the Caucasus field of competition. From the second half of the 19th century, the Kazakh regions and independent Turkic states (Khiva, Kokand and Bukhara) were occupied by the Tsarist Russia. The Imperial Age was also a period in which Russia expanded its sphere of influence over the Ottoman Empire through its patronage policies. Having embraced “New Reality” in the regional power projection in the near past, Turkey stayed away from the region for a long time. In addition to some ethnic and cultural problems paused by the Cold War, problems in the partition of the territory came to light again following the end of the Cold War and the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the Caucasus geography, from south to north, went back into the period when various national issues were at the forefront and conflicts were experienced. The occupation Armenia carried out with the sponsorship and de facto military support of Russia violated the sovereignty rights of Azerbaijan, caused great social and economic harm, deteriorated the geopolitical impact potential of Azerbaijan and Turkey, and annihilated the possibility of direct connection between Turkey and Turkestan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Northern Black Sea Region in Classical Antiquity 4
    The Northern Black Sea Region by Kerstin Susanne Jobst In historical studies, the Black Sea region is viewed as a separate historical region which has been shaped in particular by vast migration and acculturation processes. Another prominent feature of the region's history is the great diversity of religions and cultures which existed there up to the 20th century. The region is understood as a complex interwoven entity. This article focuses on the northern Black Sea region, which in the present day is primarily inhabited by Slavic people. Most of this region currently belongs to Ukraine, which has been an independent state since 1991. It consists primarily of the former imperial Russian administrative province of Novorossiia (not including Bessarabia, which for a time was administered as part of Novorossiia) and the Crimean Peninsula, including the adjoining areas to the north. The article also discusses how the region, which has been inhabited by Scythians, Sarmatians, Greeks, Romans, Goths, Huns, Khazars, Italians, Tatars, East Slavs and others, fitted into broader geographical and political contexts. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Space of Myths and Legends 3. The Northern Black Sea Region in Classical Antiquity 4. From the Khazar Empire to the Crimean Khanate and the Ottomans 5. Russian Rule: The Region as Novorossiia 6. World War, Revolutions and Soviet Rule 7. From the Second World War until the End of the Soviet Union 8. Summary and Future Perspective 9. Appendix 1. Sources 2. Literature 3. Notes Indices Citation Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • St. Petersburg Is Recognized As One of the Most Beautiful Cities in the World. This City of a Unique Fate Attracts Lots of Touri
    I love you, Peter’s great creation, St. Petersburg is recognized as one of the most I love your view of stern and grace, beautiful cities in the world. This city of a unique fate The Neva wave’s regal procession, The grayish granite – her bank’s dress, attracts lots of tourists every year. Founded in 1703 The airy iron-casting fences, by Peter the Great, St. Petersburg is today the cultural The gentle transparent twilight, capital of Russia and the second largest metropolis The moonless gleam of your of Russia. The architectural look of the city was nights restless, When I so easy read and write created while Petersburg was the capital of the Without a lamp in my room lone, Russian Empire. The greatest architects of their time And seen is each huge buildings’ stone worked at creating palaces and parks, cathedrals and Of the left streets, and is so bright The Admiralty spire’s flight… squares: Domenico Trezzini, Jean-Baptiste Le Blond, Georg Mattarnovi among many others. A. S. Pushkin, First named Saint Petersburg in honor of the a fragment from the poem Apostle Peter, the city on the Neva changed its name “The Bronze Horseman” three times in the XX century. During World War I, the city was renamed Petrograd, and after the death of the leader of the world revolution in 1924, Petrograd became Leningrad. The first mayor, Anatoly Sobchak, returned the city its historical name in 1991. It has been said that it is impossible to get acquainted with all the beauties of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference ABSTRACTS
    Conference Anthropology of Siberia in the Late 19th and 20th Centuries: Re-assessing the contribution of a ‘marginal’ field 10-12 March 2021 Convenors: Dmitriy Funk, J. Otto Habeck, Virginie Vaté ABSTRACTS David G. Anderson Terrestrial and Spiritual Imaginaries in Siberian Land-Rights Discourse Relationships between people and territory have become one of the defining qualities of international statutes recognizing indigenous rights. While reflecting important legacies and fissures within the colonial situation of the Americas, the land/person equation seems muted in Northeast Asia where declarations of rights focus primarily on culture, sparseness, masterhood, and enskillment. In this paper, based on fieldwork and historical ethnography from Evenkis and Orochens in the Baikal region, I will examine how the relationship between people and space has been represented in early Siberian ethnography. The paper will examine early Evenki-Tungus declarations of occupancy in the Imperial and early Soviet period. It will also look at the wide impact of key collaborations, such as those between the Maksimov family and Prince Kropotkin, on the geographic imagination. The paper will conclude with reflections on the perhaps too-tangible way that imagining the regulation of two-dimensional space has obscured the evocative imagination of hydrological flows, subterranean essences, roads, and destinies in the landscape. It will be argued that these cosmopolitical visions can continue to enrich this discussion internationally. ________________________________________________________________________________________________ 8 https://uni- hamburg.zoom.us/j/93462887602?pwd=Yit1bnZhd2pQd2N4WEVsY3B6TGJvQT09 Zoom Webinar (password available from the organisers) Dmitry Arzyutov I Know What You Want – We Know Who You Are: Mediating subjectivities of an Altai shep- herd between ‘his’ spirits and early Soviet ethnographers The history of anthropology traditionally writes as the history of institutions, ideas and anthropologists themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Úvod ...4. 1 . Slované ...7. 2. Rozdělení Bohů
    Obsah: Úvod . 4. 1. Slované . 7. 1.1 Příchod Slovanů . 7. 1.1 Slované a jejich víra v božstvo ( polyteizmus) . 7. 1.2 Kult uctívání božstva . 9. 2. Rozdělení bohů podle významu lidstva . 11. 2.1 Hlavní bohové . 11. Svarog . 12. Svarožic – Dažbog. 12. Perun . 12. Veles . 13. 2.2 Ruský okruh – bohové východních Slovanů. 14. Stribog . 15. Chors . 15. Simargl . 15. Mokoš . 16. Trojan . 16. 2.3 Polabsko pobaltský okruh – západní Slované . 17. Svarožic – Radogost . 17. Svantovít . 18. Triglav . 19. 2.4 Další božstvo uctívané Polabany a Pobalťany . 20. Prove . 20. Podala . 20. Živa . 20. Černoboh . 20. Pripegala . 20. 1 Rugievit . 21. Polevit . 21. Porenutius . 21. Gerovit . 21. Morana . 21. 2.5 Nepodložení bohové . 22. Lada . 22. Baba . 22. Děvana . 22. 3. Duchovno starých Slovanů . 23. 3.1 Kult uctívání zvířat, rostlin a věcí . 23. 3.2 Oslavy roku . 23. 3.3 Duchové a démoni . 24. 3.4 Lesní bytosti . 26. 3.5 Polní bytosti . 27. 3.6 Duchové času . 27. 4. Báje, balady, pověsti a pověry . 28. 4.1 Báje o Svarogovi . 28. 4.2 Báje o Svarožicovi . 28. 4.3 Báje o Radegastovi . 29. 4.4 Zrození Dažboga . 30. 4.5 Mokoš . 31. 4.6 Balady – Polednice, Vodník (Karel Jaromír Erben) . 33. 4.7 Pověry – Světlonoši, Zlatobaba . 36. 5. Vlastní tvorba . 39. 5.1 Zobrazování božstva . 39. 2 5.2 Pohled na svět Slovanských Bohů ve výtvarné výchově . 40. 5.3 Vlastní tvorba . 41. 6. Slovanství a Bohové očima dnešních umělců . 44. 6.1 Jak vidí Slovanské bohy Oldřich Unar . 44. 6.2 Smysl Slovanství pro Lojzu Baránka .
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article
    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), volume 312 International Conference "Topical Problems of Philology and Didactics: Interdisciplinary Approach in Humanities and Social Sciences" (TPHD 2018) Between Folklore and Literature: Mastery of A.N. Tolstoy-Storyteller (on the 135th anniversary of the writer) Varvara A. Golovko Evgenia A. Zhirkova Dept. of History of the Russian literature, theory of Dept. of History of the Russian literature, theory of literature and criticism literature and criticism Kuban State University Kuban State University Krasnodar, Russia Krasnodar, Russia [email protected] [email protected] Natalya V. Svitenko Dept. of History of the Russian literature, theory of literature and criticism Kuban State University Krasnodar, Russia [email protected] Abstract–The study of the interaction of traditional folk unfortunately incomplete project of the author, set of folk culture and professional art, folklore and literature for more tales. After the publication of the lyric collections, readers than a century is considered to be one of the main directions of became acquainted with the cycle “Magpie’s Tales”, first humanitarian knowledge. The article is devoted to the analysis of published by the St. Petersburg Publishing House “Public the author’s transformations of Russian folklore in the “fairy- Benefit” in 1910. tale” works of Alexei Nikolaevich Tolstoy (1883-1945). The relevance of the research is determined by the special role of Many times for different literary collections, the author has folklore images, motifs and plot patterns in the writer's works. rewritten the cycle “Magpie’s Tales”. In the Complete Works, The folklore-mythological aspect of the works of the “third” the authors of the comments note that “in 1923, when the State Tolstoy is less studied by scholars, although in a number of works Publishing house published a collection of fairy tales and about the writer there are judgments about the general influence poems by A.
    [Show full text]
  • Faerie Is a Complete Guide to the Other Folk, Be Used with Any Game System
    They lie, steal, kidnap, maim, and kill . and we put them in nurseries. They have been described as gods, demons, fallen angels, and ghosts – even aliens – but no one truly knows what they are. All through history, all around the world, they have been in the shadows, behind the trees, beneath the hills – and yes, even under the bed. Some are pretty, delicate little people with gossamer wings. But others are ten feet tall with a taste for human GURPS Basic Set, Third flesh, or wizened horrors with blue skins and claws of Edition Revised and GURPS iron. Some strike down those who unwittingly break Compendium I are required to use this supplement in a their laws. Others kill just for fun. GURPS campaign. The information in this book can GURPS Faerie is a complete guide to the Other Folk, be used with any game system. covering traditions from around the world. It describes their magic and worlds, and provides templates for THE STORYTELLERS: different faerie types and for the mortals who know them. You can incorporate the beautiful and sinister Fair Written by Ones into almost any existing game setting, or create a Graeme Davis new campaign set in the Unseelie Realms and beyond. Edited by Kimara Bernard Just keep cold iron and scripture close to hand, believe the opposite of what you hear, and don’t trust anything Illustrated by you see. Alex Fernandez And whatever you do, FIRST EDITION,FIRST PRINTING don’t eat their food. PUBLISHED OCTOBER 2003 ISBN9!BMF@JA:RSURQRoY`Z]ZgZnZ` 1-55634-632-8 Printed in SJG02295 6043 the USA By Graeme Davis Edited by Kimara Bernard Illustrated by Alex Fernandez Additional material by James L.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Issue of Origin of the Yakut Epic Olonkho
    Journal of History Culture and Art Research (ISSN: 2147-0626) Tarih Kültür ve Sanat Araştırmaları Dergisi Vol. 7, No. 1, March 2018 Revue des Recherches en Histoire Culture et Art Copyright © Karabuk University http://kutaksam.karabuk.edu.tr ﻣﺠﻠﺔ اﻟﺒﺤﻮث اﻟﺘﺎرﯾﺨﯿﺔ واﻟﺜﻘﺎﻓﯿﺔ واﻟﻔﻨﯿﺔ DOI: 10.7596/taksad.v7i1.1369 Citation: Ivanov, V., Koriakina, A., Savvinova, G., & Anisimov, R. (2018). On the Issue of Origin of the Yakut Epic Olonkho. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 7(1), 194-204. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v7i1.1369 On the Issue of Origin of the Yakut Epic Olonkho Vasiliy Nikolayevich Ivanov1, Antonina Fedorovna Koriakina2, Gulnara Egorovna Savvinova3, Ruslan Nikolayevich Anisimov4 Abstract The issue on the origin of the Yakut heroic epic Olonkho was covered in works in history and ethnography of the Yakuts back in the 19th century, for instance, in the famous monograph Yakuts. Experience of ethnographic research by a Polish exile V.L. Seroshevskiy (1896). Since that time, this issue was interesting for many, but no special monograph research has been done yet. Currently, the issue of Olonkho origin is gaining special scientific and general cultural significance, as on November 25, 2005 the Yakut heroic epic Olonkho according to the historical decision of UNESCO was granted the high status “Masterpiece of oral and non-material heritage of humanity”. The Yakut epic is a part of the multicomponent epic creative work of the Turkic nations but it was the only one to get such a high international recognition. This paper aims to revive the scientific interest to the issue of the Yakut epic’s genesis.
    [Show full text]