Cretaceous Diptera from Orapa, Botswana

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cretaceous Diptera from Orapa, Botswana CRETACEOUS DIPTERA FROM ORAPA, BOTSWANA VOLUME ONE SASKIA WATERS A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FJI.CULTY OF SClENCE, UNIVERSITY OP THE WITWATERSRAND, JOHANNES:SURG, FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY. JOHANNESBURG, 1990 ii ABSTRACT An assemblage of Cretaceous, Diptera, reC!overed from the sediments of the Orapa Di",mondI1ine, Bocswana, is described. The fossil Diptera are placed In the following families: TipuJidae, Empididae, Hybotidae, Bibionidae, and possibly the Mycetophilidae, Rhagionidae and Anisopodidae. A new pulad species, Helius gotswanensis (TipuJidae, subfal(dJ.y Limoniinae), is described; it is the oldest representative of the subfamily. Ele,'en other tipuJids are described; these are not as distinctly preserved and can not be classified to lower than family level with confidence (eight probably belong to the subfamily IJimoniinae). Two new species, Empis orapaensis sp. nov. (EmpiOidae, subfamily Empidinae) and Pseudoacarterus orapaensis ge,'!. et sp. nov. (Hybotidae, slJbfarnily Hybotinae) are the earliest record of their respective subfamilies (they are the only Mesozoic members of these families from the southern hemisphere). Specimens which probably belong to the families Mycetophilidae and Rhagionidae and/or Tabanidae are described, together with the wing of a possible Rhagionid. Ten poorly preserved dipterans of 'Ilnidentified families are also recorded and illustrated; some tentative identifications include the families Mycetophilidae and Anisopodidae. Four specimens of the J:aIrdJ.y Bibionidae :florm the basis of a new genus and Ispecies, Cretobibionid;~ anticus. iii The fossils reveal details of the )alaeoenv:ironment of the Orapa region. The fa\ma lived in a crater formed by the er~ption of a Kimberlite p.ipe. 7he Diptera fed and bred near the crater lake, in a warm, humid, pxobably well- wooded or shr ubbad hab_...a.t,. with seasonal ralluall. The Oiptera were early pofklnat.ors of ang:'osperms. The concept of fossil species is discussed. 1-1any of the oipterans show remarkable stasis. iv DECLARATION I declare that this dissertation js my own ui,crlded work. It is being submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. It has not been submitted before for any degree or examination in any other University. (Name of candidate) ------~----- day of -------------1990 v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the Office of the President and the National Museum of Botswana, and t:.he Debswana Mining Company for the invitation and pennission to collect fossils. The la tter also provided accommodation and financial support. Also, I acknowledge the financial SU1?Port provided by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research and the University of the Wihtatersrand. I am grateful for the help of the following people in the collection of fcssils from Orapa: Prof. J. Kitching; Drs R.J. Rayner, J. Maguire, C. Gow, J. Masters; Mr. I.J. McKay, Mrs. M.K. Bamford, Mr. 2\. pot.ts, Mr. and Mrs. P. Forchammer, Misi5 G. Goelst, Mrs. A. Cadman, Mr. A. Cambell, Miss C. Kleinjan, Mr. P. Bender and Hr. B. Weissanbacher. My grateful and special thanks to Dr. Richard Ra.yner for endless support and supervision, and, for helpful comments and discussion, I am indebted to my friends Ian McKay and Marion Bamford. With appreciation, I wi.sh to acknowledge the help of the follo\-,'ing people for providing me with valuable information or accoass to their faciliti.es: Dr. F.S. cranston and Dr. R.I. Vane-Wright (British Museum, Natural History), Dr. W. Krzeminski (polish academy of Sciences, Krakow) and various anonymous referees and Tipulid zpeciaJJsts for providing extensive comments on the tipulid described in Chapter 2 (and Appendix 1); Dr. K.G.V. Smith (British Museum, Natural '_ vi Ristery) for checking the identification of the empid and the hybotid in Chapters 4 & 5, and, for reading and improving drafts of the manusczi.ptrs (Appendix 2 & 3) ; Dr Paul Selden (Manchester University, U.K.) and Dianne Edwards (Cardiff University), for criticism and help with the aphid (Appendix 4) and Hybotid papers (Chapter 57 Appendix 3); Drs i. Gauld and J. Cox (British Museum, Natural History) who edited the Empid paper; Dr. O.E. Heie (Institute of Biology, Royal Danish School of Educab.oniil Studies) :Eor constaructdve criticism of the aphid (Chapters & 8; Appendix 4); Dr., Judith Masters for constructive advice on Chapter 9; Dr. B. Levey (British Museum, Natural History} and D. Cullinane (Botanical Museum, Harvard University) for sending references which were unobtainable in South Africa; Dr. C. Feather of AARL for permission to use bis company's microscope; Ian McKay and Desiree Pearce and especially Dick Rayner, and, my sister Sandra Schermacher and Brian Griffin (De Beers Marine, Cape Town) j or help with the photography and loan of equdpment; and matedals; the Graphics Department at the University of the Witwatersrand for photographing most drawings. Special thanks go to my husband Keith W'aters for constructive criticism and p:r.::inting of many drafts, plotting of fig. 39, and, especially for support; and encouragement, and, Mr. A.D. Waters (Barlow Rand Computer Division, Johannesburg ) for making his photocopier available to me. vii Page Title•••.••••••••.•••.•.•••••.•••••• ,>;,..', •••••• ~ ••••••• Abstract. • •••• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ",. •••••••• ii Declaraticn •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• - ••••••••• iv AcknowIedgenents ••••••••.•••••••••••••••••.••••••••••• v Cr.)ntents of volume I: Te'xt••••••••••••••••••••••••••• vii 'Jont~~ts of volume II: Figures and Plate.s••••••• ,•••• xiii VOIllME I CHAPTER ONE - INTROlJUCl'ION 1.1. !..ocality •••••••• , ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1 • 2 • Geology ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1.3. Fossil Fauna and Flora of Or,)pa••••••••••••••• 4 1.4. Methods and Materials ••••••••••••••••••••••••• 8 1.5. Dipterans as a Research Topic••••••••••••••••• 9 1.6. Introduction to the Diptera •••••••••••••• ~.••• 11 1.6.1. Diagnostic Characters of the Dipte'=a•••••• 12 1.6.2. Phylcgeny and Genealogy of the Diptera •••• 15 1.7. Introduction to the Mesozoic Insects •••••••••• ,2 1.8. Outli.~ of Contents of Chapters •••••••••••••• 22 C!1AP'I'ER TWO - SUPER!:"'AMILYTIl?ULOIDEA: TIPULIOAE 2.1. Introduction •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 25 2.2. Systematic Description and Diagnosis •••••••••• 26 viii 2. 3• Discussion....... •••••••.•••••.••••.••.••••••• 32 HeliuEJ •••............................................... .;,.......... " .... ·0 .. 'If .... 0 .. 32 Biology.•••••.••••••.••.••.•••.••••••••••••.••••. 33 Orig.ins of the Tipulidae . 34 stasis " •••••••••••••••••••• 37 SHRSand implications for evolutionary fheory •••• 39 CHAPTER THREE - O'IHER TIPt'rIDAE 3. 1. Introduction •••••••• " . 41 3.2. Descrip.tions and Discussions •••••••••••••••••• 42 3.2.1. Specimen 1••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 42 3.2.2. Specimen 2 . 45 3.2.3. Specimen 3 . 47 3.2.4. Specimen 4••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 51 3.2.5. Sr,ecimen5 . 54 3.2.6. Specim:m 6••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 57 3.2.7. Specimen 7••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 60 3.2.8. Specimen 8••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 62 3.2.9. Specimen 9 . 64 3.2.10. Specimen 10•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 67 3.2.11. Specimen 11•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 70 CHAPTER FOOR - SUPERFAMILY EMJ?IOOIDEA.: EMPIDIDAE 4.1. Introduction •••••••••••••.•••••••••••••••••••• 74 4.2. Systematic Description and Diagnosis •••••••••• 74 'he ix 4.3. Discussion •••••••••••••••••••••••••.•••••••.•••• 79 M tphology ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• , ••••••• 79 Primitive and AdV"dIlCed Features of the Venation •• 80 Biology ••••••••• < . 82 Courtship •.••••••••••••••••••••• '" •••••.••••• , •••• 84 Distribution ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 86 Fossil Empididae•••••••..•••••.••••••••••••••••••• B'l Evolution of hunting, feeding & courtship habits. 87 Phylogeny of the Er.~idcidea •••••••••••••••••••••• 89 5. 1. Introduction •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 91 5.2. Systematic Description and Diagnosis •••••••••• 91 5.3. Discussioo ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 95 B~ology•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 95 Morphology••••••••••••••••••••.••••••••••••••••••• 97 Classification and Phylogeny••••••••••••••••••••• 98 Distributian •••••••••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••• 102 CIIl\P:rER SIX - SUPERF.AMI:LY MYCEI'OPHILOIDFA: MYCEI'OI:'HILIDAE AND TlIB1\OOIDEA: IDJAGIONIDllE 6.1. Introduction •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 104 6.2. Descriptions and Dis~ussions •••••••••••••••••• 104 6.2.1. Specimen 1, description ••••••••••••.••••••• 104 Ident:!.fication ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 107 Biology of the MYoatophilidae•••••••••••••••• 108 Distribution ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 110 Fossil Record •••••••••••••••••••••.••••••••••• 110 X 6.2.2. Spec:inten2" description ••••••••••••••••••• 1'11 Identification ••••••••••. , .• " •••••••••••••••• 112 Biology of the JlliagioniC!ae••••••••••••••••••• 113 Distribution •••••••••••••••••••••• .,.••••••••• 114 Fossil Record, . 114 6.2.3. Specimen 3, description ••••••••••••••••••• 116 Preservation ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 117 Identification .••••••••••••••••••••••• , ••••••• 118 Biology of the'rcbanidae ••••••••••••••••••••• 118 7. 1. In,traduction •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 120 7.2" Descriptions and Discussions . 120 7.2.1. Specinen 1••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 120 7.2.2. Spec:inten2••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 12.4- 7.2.3. Specimen 3••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 125 7.2.4. Spec:inten4•• eo . nJ 7.2.5. Specimen 5•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Recommended publications
  • Insect Orders V: Panorpida & Hymenoptera
    Insect Orders V: Panorpida & Hymenoptera • The Panorpida contain 5 orders: the Mecoptera, Siphonaptera, Diptera, Trichoptera and Lepidoptera. • Available evidence clearly indicates that the Lepidoptera and the Trichoptera are sister groups. • The Siphonaptera and Mecoptera are also closely related but it is not clear whether the Siponaptera is the sister group of all of the Mecoptera or a group (Boreidae) within the Mecoptera. If the latter is true, then the Mecoptera is paraphyletic as currently defined. • The Diptera is the sister group of the Siphonaptera + Mecoptera and together make up the Mecopteroids. • The Hymenoptera does not appear to be closely related to any of the other holometabolous orders. Mecoptera (Scorpionflies, hangingflies) • Classification. 600 species worldwide, arranged into 9 families (5 in the US). A very old group, many fossils from the Permian (260 mya) onward. • Structure. Most distinctive feature is the elongated clypeus and labrum that together form a rostrum. The order gets its common name from the gential segment of the male in the family Panorpodiae, which is bulbous and often curved forward above the abdomen, like the sting of a scorpion. Larvae are caterpillar-like or grub- like. • Natural history. Scorpionflies are most common in cool, moist habitats. They get the name “hangingflies” from their habit of hanging upside down on vegetation. Larvae and adult males are mostly predators or scavengers. Adult females are usually scavengers. Larvae and adults in some groups may feed on vegetation. Larvae of most species are terrestrial and caterpillar-like in body form. Larvae of some species are aquatic. In the family Bittacidae males attract females for mating by releasing a sex pheromone and then presenting the female with a nuptial gift.
    [Show full text]
  • British Museum (Natural History)
    Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Darwin's Insects Charles Darwin 's Entomological Notes Kenneth G. V. Smith (Editor) Historical series Vol 14 No 1 24 September 1987 The Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), instituted in 1949, is issued in four scientific series, Botany, Entomology, Geology (incorporating Mineralogy) and Zoology, and an Historical series. Papers in the Bulletin are primarily the results of research carried out on the unique and ever-growing collections of the Museum, both by the scientific staff of the Museum and by specialists from elsewhere who make use of the Museum's resources. Many of the papers are works of reference that will remain indispensable for years to come. Parts are published at irregular intervals as they become ready, each is complete in itself, available separately, and individually priced. Volumes contain about 300 pages and several volumes may appear within a calendar year. Subscriptions may be placed for one or more of the series on either an Annual or Per Volume basis. Prices vary according to the contents of the individual parts. Orders and enquiries should be sent to: Publications Sales, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, England. World List abbreviation: Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (hist. Ser.) © British Museum (Natural History), 1987 '""•-C-'- '.;.,, t •••v.'. ISSN 0068-2306 Historical series 0565 ISBN 09003 8 Vol 14 No. 1 pp 1-141 British Museum (Natural History) Cromwell Road London SW7 5BD Issued 24 September 1987 I Darwin's Insects Charles Darwin's Entomological Notes, with an introduction and comments by Kenneth G.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016
    Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016 April 1981 Revised, May 1982 2nd revision, April 1983 3rd revision, December 1999 4th revision, May 2011 Prepared for U.S. Department of Commerce Ohio Department of Natural Resources National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Division of Wildlife Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management 2045 Morse Road, Bldg. G Estuarine Reserves Division Columbus, Ohio 1305 East West Highway 43229-6693 Silver Spring, MD 20910 This management plan has been developed in accordance with NOAA regulations, including all provisions for public involvement. It is consistent with the congressional intent of Section 315 of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, and the provisions of the Ohio Coastal Management Program. OWC NERR Management Plan, 2011 - 2016 Acknowledgements This management plan was prepared by the staff and Advisory Council of the Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve (OWC NERR), in collaboration with the Ohio Department of Natural Resources-Division of Wildlife. Participants in the planning process included: Manager, Frank Lopez; Research Coordinator, Dr. David Klarer; Coastal Training Program Coordinator, Heather Elmer; Education Coordinator, Ann Keefe; Education Specialist Phoebe Van Zoest; and Office Assistant, Gloria Pasterak. Other Reserve staff including Dick Boyer and Marje Bernhardt contributed their expertise to numerous planning meetings. The Reserve is grateful for the input and recommendations provided by members of the Old Woman Creek NERR Advisory Council. The Reserve is appreciative of the review, guidance, and council of Division of Wildlife Executive Administrator Dave Scott and the mapping expertise of Keith Lott and the late Steve Barry.
    [Show full text]
  • Berliner Entomologische Zeitschrift
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Berliner Entomologische Zeitschrift Jahr/Year: 1886 Band/Volume: 30 Autor(en)/Author(s): Sacken C. R. Osten Artikel/Article: Studies on Tipulidae. Part. I. Review of the published genera of the Tipulidae longipalpi. 153-188 © Biodiversity[Berliner HeritageEntomolog. Library,Zeitschrift http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/;Bd. XXX. 1886. Heft www.zobodat.atII.] 153 Studies on Tipulidae. Part. I. Review of the published genera of the Tipulidae longipalpi, C R. Osten Sachen. Introduction. For many years, in fact ever since the publication of the fourth volume of the Monographs on N. Am. Diptera (1868), it has been my intention to publish a Genera of the Tipulidae, consisting of a revföed reprint of whatever refers to genera in the above-named volume, with the addition of such new forms as I hoped to discover in different public and private collections. My hopes however were doomed to disappointment, as most of the european Museums which I visited offered very little material. The Tipulidae unfortunately still remain too much neglected by coUectors. Abandoning therefore my original plan, I concluded to publish without further delay some of the materials I had brought together towards its execution. In- complete and disconnected as these materials are they will be of use to those who, some time or other, will take up again the work of the Classification of the Tipulidae. I begin with the Tipulidae longipalpi, which I have not absolved in my monograph. The distinguishing characters between the Tipulidae longi- palpi and brevipalpi have been explained at length in the above- quoted volume of mine, p.
    [Show full text]
  • (Diptera, Culicidae) Donald H. Colless
    Mosquito Systematics Vol. ll(2) 1979 127 Two Little-Used Characters in the Mosquito Wing (Diptera, Culicidae) bY Donald H. Colless CSIRO, Division of Entomology P. 0. Box 1700 Canberra City, A.C.T. 2601 ABSTRACT. Attention is drawn to two folds in the cubital area of the culi- cid wing and to their potential as taxonomic characters. INTRODUCTION The wings of many insects exhibit ridges or furrows, sometimes with vein-like thickening, that are variously interpreted as, for instance, vestiges of veins that have suffered evolutionary loss or lines of stress or flexion in the membrane. They are generally inconspicuous and, unless corresponding to an important element of standard venation, are mostly ig- nored by taxonomists. There are notable exceptions, e.g., the "vena spurian of Syrphidae, but faint structures are, naturally, not favoured for purposes of identification. Nonetheless, if credible homologies can be established, any structure may be useful in classification or in reconstructing phylogeny. It is from this aspect that I draw attention here to two such features in the culicid wing. One is a ridge, the other a furrow, although the former is sometimes, and the latter usually, strengthened by vein-like thickening. Both are associated with vein CuA (Colless & McAlpine 1970; vein 5.2 in culicid numerical terminology). I have therefore named them the cubito-marginal (c?-& ridge and the precubital (PC) furrow. In what follows I refer to their appearance when the dorsal surface of the wing is viewed under a binocular dissecting microscope, using both re- flected and transmitted light. The cubito-marginal ridge The c-m ridge is most commonly seen as a rather faint ridge or convex fold in the membrane, running parallel to and close to the wing margin across the apex of CuA.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera) of Finland
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 441: 37–46Checklist (2014) of the familes Chaoboridae, Dixidae, Thaumaleidae, Psychodidae... 37 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7532 CHECKLIST www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Checklist of the familes Chaoboridae, Dixidae, Thaumaleidae, Psychodidae and Ptychopteridae (Diptera) of Finland Jukka Salmela1, Lauri Paasivirta2, Gunnar M. Kvifte3 1 Metsähallitus, Natural Heritage Services, P.O. Box 8016, FI-96101 Rovaniemi, Finland 2 Ruuhikosken- katu 17 B 5, 24240 Salo, Finland 3 Department of Limnology, University of Kassel, Heinrich-Plett-Str. 40, 34132 Kassel-Oberzwehren, Germany Corresponding author: Jukka Salmela ([email protected]) Academic editor: J. Kahanpää | Received 17 March 2014 | Accepted 22 May 2014 | Published 19 September 2014 http://zoobank.org/87CA3FF8-F041-48E7-8981-40A10BACC998 Citation: Salmela J, Paasivirta L, Kvifte GM (2014) Checklist of the familes Chaoboridae, Dixidae, Thaumaleidae, Psychodidae and Ptychopteridae (Diptera) of Finland. In: Kahanpää J, Salmela J (Eds) Checklist of the Diptera of Finland. ZooKeys 441: 37–46. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7532 Abstract A checklist of the families Chaoboridae, Dixidae, Thaumaleidae, Psychodidae and Ptychopteridae (Diptera) recorded from Finland is given. Four species, Dixella dyari Garret, 1924 (Dixidae), Threticus tridactilis (Kincaid, 1899), Panimerus albifacies (Tonnoir, 1919) and P. przhiboroi Wagner, 2005 (Psychodidae) are reported for the first time from Finland. Keywords Finland, Diptera, species list, biodiversity, faunistics Introduction Psychodidae or moth flies are an intermediately diverse family of nematocerous flies, comprising over 3000 species world-wide (Pape et al. 2011). Its taxonomy is still very unstable, and multiple conflicting classifications exist (Duckhouse 1987, Vaillant 1990, Ježek and van Harten 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Huchard Et Al., 2006 1.Pdf
    Acetylcholinesterase genes within the Diptera: takeover and loss in true flies Elise Huchard, Michel Martinez, Haoues Alout, Emmanuel Douzery, Georges Lutfalla, Arnaud Berthomieu, Claire Berticat, Michel Raymond, Mylene Weill To cite this version: Elise Huchard, Michel Martinez, Haoues Alout, Emmanuel Douzery, Georges Lutfalla, et al.. Acetyl- cholinesterase genes within the Diptera: takeover and loss in true flies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Royal Society, The, 2006, 273 (1601), pp.2595-2604. 10.1098/rspb.2006.3621. hal-01945529 HAL Id: hal-01945529 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01945529 Submitted on 29 May 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Proc. R. Soc. B (2006) 273, 2595–2604 doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3621 Published online 18 July 2006 Acetylcholinesterase genes within the Diptera: takeover and loss in true flies Elise Huchard1, Michel Martinez2, Haoues Alout1, Emmanuel J. P. Douzery1, Georges Lutfalla3, Arnaud Berthomieu1, Claire Berticat1, Michel Raymond1,* and Myle`ne Weill1 1Institut des Sciences
    [Show full text]
  • Nomenclatural Studies Toward a World List of Diptera Genus-Group Names
    Nomenclatural studies toward a world list of Diptera genus-group names. Part V Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart Evenhuis, Neal L.; Pape, Thomas; Pont, Adrian C. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 Publication date: 2016 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Evenhuis, N. L., Pape, T., & Pont, A. C. (2016). Nomenclatural studies toward a world list of Diptera genus- group names. Part V: Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart. Magnolia Press. Zootaxa Vol. 4172 No. 1 https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 Zootaxa 4172 (1): 001–211 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:22128906-32FA-4A80-85D6-10F114E81A7B ZOOTAXA 4172 Nomenclatural Studies Toward a World List of Diptera Genus-Group Names. Part V: Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart NEAL L. EVENHUIS1, THOMAS PAPE2 & ADRIAN C. PONT3 1 J. Linsley Gressitt Center for Entomological Research, Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817-2704, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Natural History Museum of Denmark, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected] 3Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PW, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by D. Whitmore: 15 Aug. 2016; published: 30 Sept. 2016 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 NEAL L.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, Empidoidea (Diptera)
    ZOOTAXA 1180 The morphology, higher-level phylogeny and classification of the Empidoidea (Diptera) BRADLEY J. SINCLAIR & JEFFREY M. CUMMING Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand BRADLEY J. SINCLAIR & JEFFREY M. CUMMING The morphology, higher-level phylogeny and classification of the Empidoidea (Diptera) (Zootaxa 1180) 172 pp.; 30 cm. 21 Apr. 2006 ISBN 1-877407-79-8 (paperback) ISBN 1-877407-80-1 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2006 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41383 Auckland 1030 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2006 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing. This authorization does not extend to any other kind of copying, by any means, in any form, and for any purpose other than private research use. ISSN 1175-5326 (Print edition) ISSN 1175-5334 (Online edition) Zootaxa 1180: 1–172 (2006) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA 1180 Copyright © 2006 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) The morphology, higher-level phylogeny and classification of the Empidoidea (Diptera) BRADLEY J. SINCLAIR1 & JEFFREY M. CUMMING2 1 Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Invertebrate Biodiversity, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, C.E.F., Ottawa, ON, Canada
    [Show full text]
  • Insecta Diptera) in Freshwater (Excluding Simulidae, Culicidae, Chironomidae, Tipulidae and Tabanidae) Rüdiger Wagner University of Kassel
    Entomology Publications Entomology 2008 Global diversity of dipteran families (Insecta Diptera) in freshwater (excluding Simulidae, Culicidae, Chironomidae, Tipulidae and Tabanidae) Rüdiger Wagner University of Kassel Miroslav Barták Czech University of Agriculture Art Borkent Salmon Arm Gregory W. Courtney Iowa State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ent_pubs BoudewPart ofijn the GoBddeeiodivrisersity Commons, Biology Commons, Entomology Commons, and the TRoyerarle Bestrlgiialan a Indnstit Aquaute of Nticat uErcaol Scienlogyce Cs ommons TheSee nex tompc page forle addte bitioniblaiol agruthorapshic information for this item can be found at http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ ent_pubs/41. For information on how to cite this item, please visit http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ howtocite.html. This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Entomology Publications by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Global diversity of dipteran families (Insecta Diptera) in freshwater (excluding Simulidae, Culicidae, Chironomidae, Tipulidae and Tabanidae) Abstract Today’s knowledge of worldwide species diversity of 19 families of aquatic Diptera in Continental Waters is presented. Nevertheless, we have to face for certain in most groups a restricted knowledge about distribution, ecology and systematic,
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • An Appraisal of the Higher Classification of Cicadas (Hemiptera: Cicadoidea) with Special Reference to the Australian Fauna
    © Copyright Australian Museum, 2005 Records of the Australian Museum (2005) Vol. 57: 375–446. ISSN 0067-1975 An Appraisal of the Higher Classification of Cicadas (Hemiptera: Cicadoidea) with Special Reference to the Australian Fauna M.S. MOULDS Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia [email protected] ABSTRACT. The history of cicada family classification is reviewed and the current status of all previously proposed families and subfamilies summarized. All tribal rankings associated with the Australian fauna are similarly documented. A cladistic analysis of generic relationships has been used to test the validity of currently held views on family and subfamily groupings. The analysis has been based upon an exhaustive study of nymphal and adult morphology, including both external and internal adult structures, and the first comparative study of male and female internal reproductive systems is included. Only two families are justified, the Tettigarctidae and Cicadidae. The latter are here considered to comprise three subfamilies, the Cicadinae, Cicadettinae n.stat. (= Tibicininae auct.) and the Tettigadinae (encompassing the Tibicinini, Platypediidae and Tettigadidae). Of particular note is the transfer of Tibicina Amyot, the type genus of the subfamily Tibicininae, to the subfamily Tettigadinae. The subfamily Plautillinae (containing only the genus Plautilla) is now placed at tribal rank within the Cicadinae. The subtribe Ydiellaria is raised to tribal rank. The American genus Magicicada Davis, previously of the tribe Tibicinini, now falls within the Taphurini. Three new tribes are recognized within the Australian fauna, the Tamasini n.tribe to accommodate Tamasa Distant and Parnkalla Distant, Jassopsaltriini n.tribe to accommodate Jassopsaltria Ashton and Burbungini n.tribe to accommodate Burbunga Distant.
    [Show full text]