DOCSLIB.ORG

Indian Archives Microfilm Guide Series 3: Choctaw National Records

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Indian Archives Microfilm Guide Series 3: Choctaw National Records Indian Archives Microfilm Guide Series 3: Choctaw National Records Compiled by Katie Bush Series 3: Choctaw National Records Table of Contents Census and Citizenship p. 4 Records and Documents of the General Council, Senate and House of Representatives p. 17 License and Permit Records of Traders, Physicians, Laborers, Renters, and others p. 24 Atoka County Records p. 26 Blue County Records p. 28 Boktuklo County Records p. 32 Cedar County Records p. 34 Eagle County Records p. 36 Gaines County Records p. 40 Jacks Fork County Records p. 40 Jackson County Records p. 44 Kiamichi County Records p. 45 Nashoba County Records p. 47 Red River County Records p. 50 Sans Bois County Records p. 55 Skullyville County Records p. 56 Sugar Loaf County Records p. 58 Tobucksy County Records p. 60 Towson County Records p. 63 Wade County Records p. 64 First (Mosholatubbee) District Records p. 67 Second (Apuckshunubbee) District Records p. 69 Third (Pushmataha) District Records p. 71 Choctaw Agency Records p. 73 Choctaw Agency Records: Letters Sent and Letters Received and other Documents (topics arranged in alphabetical order) p. 75 Choctaw Agency Records: National Treasurer and National Auditor p. 84 Volume Microfilm # Volume Microfilm # Volume Microfilm # Volume 1 CTN 22 Volume 48 CTN 27 Volume 93 CTN 30 Volume 2 CTN 23 Volume 49 CTN 27 Volume 94 CTN 30 Volume 3 CTN 23 Volume 50 CTN 27 Volume 95 CTN 30 Volume 4 CTN 22 Volume 51 CTN 51 Volume 96 CTN 30 Volume 5 CTN 23 Volume 52 CTN 27 Volume 97 CTN 30 Volume 6 CTN 22 Volume 53 CTN 27 Volume 98 CTN 30 Volume 7 CTN 1, CTN 24 Volume 54 CTN 27 Volume 99 CTN 30 Volume 8 CTN 22 Volume 55 CTN 39 Volume 100 CTN 30 Volume 9 CTN 23 Volume 56 CTN 27 Volume 101 CTN 30 Volume 10 CTN 22 Volume 57 CTN 28 Volume 102 CTN 30 Volume 11 CTN 23 Volume 58 CTN 28 Volume 103 CTN 31 Volume 12 CTN 22 Volume 58A CTN 28 Volume 104 CTN 31 Volume 13 CTN 25 Volume 59 CTN 28 Volume 105 CTN 31 Volume 14 CTN 26 Volume 60 CTN 28 Volume 106 CTN 31 Volume 15 CTN 24 Volume 61 CTN 28 Volume 107 CTN 31 Volume 16 CTN 24 Volume 61A CTN 28 Volume 108 CTN 31 Volume 17 CTN 2, CTN 24 Volume 62 CTN 28 Volume 109 CTN 31 Volume 18 CTN 25 Volume 63 CTN 28 Volume 110 CTN 31 Volume 19 CTN 25 Volume 64 CTN 28 Volume 111 CTN 31 Volume 20 CTN 24 Volume 65 CTN 29 Volume 112 CTN 31 Volume 21 CTN 26 Volume 66 CTN 29 Volume 113 CTN 31 Volume 22 CTN 24 Volume 67 CTN 29 Volume 114 CTN 31 Volume 23 CTN 26 Volume 68 CTN 29 Volume 115 CTN 31 Volume 24 CTN 26 Volume 69 CTN 29 Volume 116 CTN 31 Volume 25 CTN 26 Volume 70 CTN 29 Volume 117 CTN 32 Volume 26 CTN 26 Volume 71 CTN 28 Volume 118 CTN 32 Volume 27 CTN 26 Volume 72 CTN 2, CTN 29 Volume 119 CTN 32 Volume 28 CTN 26 Volume 73 CTN 29 Volume 120 CTN 32 Volume 29 CTN 26 Volume 74 CTN 29 Volume 121 CTN 32 Volume 30 CTN 25 Volume 75 CTN 29 Volume 122 CTN 32 Volume 31 CTN 26 Volume 76 CTN 29 Volume 123 CTN 32 Volume 32 CTN 26 Volume 77 CTN 29 Volume 124 CTN 32 Volume 33 CTN 25 Volume 78 CTN 29 Volume 125 CTN 33 Volume 34 CTN 26 Volume 79 CTN 29 Volume 126 CTN 33 Volume 35 CTN 25 Volume 80 CTN 29 Volume 127 CTN 33 Volume 36 CTN 25 Volume 81 CTN 29 Volume 128 CTN 33 Volume 37 CTN 27 Volume 82 CTN 30 Volume 129 CTN 33 Volume 38 CTN 27 Volume 83 CTN 29 Volume 130 CTN 33 Volume 39 CTN 27 Volume 84 CTN 30 Volume 131 CTN 33 Volume 40 CTN 27 Volume 85 CTN 30 Volume 132 CTN 33 Volume 41 CTN 90 Volume 86 CTN 30 Volume 133 CTN 33 Volume 42 CTN 52 Volume 87 CTN 30 Volume 134 CTN 33 Volume 43 CTN 90 Volume 88 CTN 30 Volume 135 CTN 33 Volume 44 CTN 27 Volume 89 CTN 30 Volume 136 CTN 33 Volume 45 CTN 27 Volume 90 CTN 30 Volume 137 CTN 33 Volume 46 CTN 90 Volume 91 CTN 30 Volume 138 CTN 34 Volume 47 CTN 27 Volume 92 CTN 30 Volume 139 CTN 33 Volume Microfilm # Volume Microfilm # Volume Microfilm # Volume 140 CTN 33 Volume 187 CTN 38 Volume 232 CTN 42 Volume 141 CTN 34 Volume 188 CTN 38 Volume 233 CTN 42 Volume 142 CTN 34 Volume 189 CTN 38 Volume 234 CTN 42 Volume 143 CTN 33 Volume 190 CTN 38 Volume 235 CTN 42 Volume 144 CTN 34 Volume 191 CTN 38 Volume 236 CTN 50 Volume 145 CTN 34 Volume 192 CTN 38 Volume 237 CTN 42 Volume 146 CTN 34 Volume 193 CTN 38 Volume 238 CTN 42 Volume 147 CTN 34 Volume 194 CTN 38 Volume 239 CTN 42 Volume 148 CTN 34 Volume 195 CTN 38 Volume 240 CTN 42 Volume 149 CTN 35 Volume 196 CTN 38 Volume 241 CTN 42 Volume 150 CTN 35 Volume 197 CTN 39 Volume 242 CTN 43 Volume 151 CTN 35 Volume 198 CTN 39 Volume 243 CTN 43 Volume 152 CTN 35 Volume 199 CTN 39 Volume 244 CTN 43 Volume 153 CTN 35 Volume 200 CTN 39 Volume 245 CTN 43 Volume 154 CTN 35 Volume 201 CTN 39 Volume 246 CTN 43 Volume 155 CTN 36 Volume 201.5 CTN 39 Volume 247 CTN 48 Volume 156 CTN 35 Volume 202 CTN 39 Volume 248 CTN 43 Volume 157 CTN 35 Volume 203 CTN 39 Volume 249 CTN 43 Volume 158 CTN 35 Volume 204 CTN 39 Volume 250 CTN 44 Volume 159 CTN 35 Volume 205 CTN 39 Volume 251 CTN 44 Volume 160 CTN 35 Volume 206 CTN 39 Volume 252 CTN 44 Volume 161 CTN 35 Volume 207 CTN 39 Volume 253 CTN 43 Volume 162 CTN 36 Volume 208 CTN 39 Volume 254 CTN 44 Volume 163 CTN 36 Volume 209 CTN 39 Volume 255 CTN 44 Volume 164 CTN 36 Volume 210 CTN 40 Volume 256 CTN 44 Volume 165 CTN 36 Volume 210A CTN 40 Volume 257 CTN 44 Volume 166 CTN 36 Volume 211 CTN 40 Volume 258 CTN 45 Volume 167 CTN 36 Volume 212 CTN 40 Volume 259 CTN 44 Volume 168 CTN 36 Volume 213 CTN 40 Volume 260 CTN 45 Volume 169 CTN 36 Volume 214 CTN 40 Volume 261 CTN 45 Volume 170 CTN 36 Volume 215 CTN 40 Volume 262 CTN 45 Volume 171 CTN 36 Volume 216 CTN 40 Volume 263 CTN 45 Volume 172 CTN 36 Volume 217 CTN 53 Volume 264 CTN 46 Volume 173 CTN 36 Volume 218 CTN 41 Volume 265 CTN 51 Volume 174 CTN 36 Volume 219 CTN 41 Volume 266 CTN 46 Volume 175 CTN 37 Volume 220 CTN 41 Volume 267 CTN 46 Volume 176 CTN 37 Volume 221 CTN 41 Volume 268 CTN 4, CTN 46 Volume 177 CTN 37 Volume 222 CTN 41 Volume 269 CTN 47 Volume 178 CTN 37 Volume 223 CTN 41 Volume 270 CTN 51 Volume 179 CTN 37 Volume 224 CTN 41 Volume 271 CTN 46 Volume 180 CTN 37 Volume 225 CTN 42 Volume 272 CTN 46 Volume 181 CTN 37 Volume 226 CTN 42 Volume 273 CTN 46 Volume 182 CTN 37 Volume 227 CTN 42 Volume 274 CTN 46 Volume 183 CTN 37 Volume 228 CTN 42 Volume 275 CTN 46 Volume 184 CTN 37 Volume 229 CTN 42 Volume 276 CTN 47 Volume 185 CTN 37 Volume 230 CTN 42 Volume 277 CTN 47 Volume 186 CTN 37 Volume 231 CTN 42 Volume 278 CTN 47 Volume Microfilm # Volume Microfilm # Volume Microfilm # Volume 279 CTN 47 Volume 326 CTN 15 Volume 372 CTN 52 Volume 280 CTN 47 Volume 327 CTN 15 Volume 373 CTN 7 Volume 281 CTN 47 Volume 328 CTN 13 Volume 374 CTN 7 Volume 282 CTN 47 Volume 329 CTN 14 Volume 375 CTN 7 Volume 283 CTN 47 Volume 330 CTN 14 Volume 376 CTN 52 Volume 284 CTN 47 Volume 331 CTN 15 Volume 377 CTN 26 Volume 285 CTN 46 Volume 332 CTN 15 Volume 378 CTN 52 Volume 286 CTN 46 Volume 333 CTN 15 Volume 379 Not microfilmed Volume 287 CTN 47 Volume 334 CTN 15 Volume 380 CTN 1, CTN 2, Volume 288 CTN 47 Volume 335 CTN 48 CTN 3, CTN 4 Volume 289 CTN 47 Volume 336 CTN 48 Volume 381 CTN 52 Volume 290 CTN 47 Volume 337 CTN 48 Volume 382 CTN 7 Volume 291 CTN 9 Volume 338 CTN 48 Volume 383 CTN 33 Volume 292 CTN 9 Volume 339 CTN 49 Volume 384 CTN 52 Volume 293 CTN 8 Volume 340 CTN 7 Volume 385 CTN 52 Volume 294 CTN 9 Volume 341 CTN 7 Volume 386 CTN 52 Volume 295 CTN 8 Volume 342 CTN 49 Volume 387 CTN 52 Volume 296 CTN 8 Volume 343 CTN 50 Volume 388 CTN 52 Volume 297 CTN 8 Volume 344 CTN 50 Volume 389 CTN 2, CTN 3, Volume 298 CTN 8 Volume 345 CTN 50 CTN 52 Volume 299 CTN 11 Volume 346 CTN 50 Volume 390 CTN 53 Volume 300 CTN 11 Volume 347 CTN 49 Volume 391 CTN 53 Volume 301 CTN 12 Volume 348 CTN 48 Volume 392 CTN 53 Volume 302 CTN 5, CTN 13 Volume 349 CTN 5 Volume 393 CTN 53 Volume 303 CTN 12 Volume 350 CTN 50 Volume 394 CTN 53 Volume 304 CTN 12 Volume 351 CTN 46 Volume 395 CTN 53 Volume 305 CTN 12 Volume 352 CTN 28 Volume 396 CTN 53 Volume 306 CTN 13 Volume 353 CTN 51 Volume 397 CTN 90 Volume 307 CTN 13 Volume 354 CTN 51 Volume 398 CTN 90 Volume 308 CTN 13 Volume 355 CTN 7 Volume 399 CTN 90 Volume 309 CTN 9 Volume 355A CTN 7 Volume 400 CTN 53 Volume 310 CTN 9 Volume 356 CTN 51 Volume 401 Not microfilmed Volume 311 CTN 9 Volume 357 CTN 51 Volume 402 Not microfilmed Volume 312 CTN 10 Volume 358 CTN 51 Volume 403 Not microfilmed Volume 313 CTN 10 Volume 359 CTN 51 Volume 404 Not microfilmed Volume 314 CTN 10 Volume 360 CTN 46 Volume 405 CTN 90 Volume 315 CTN 10 Volume 361 CTN 7 Volume 406 CTN 90 Volume 316 CTN 11 Volume 362 CTN 51 Volume 407 Not microfilmed Volume 317 CTN 11 Volume 363 CTN 51 Volume 408 CTN 52 Volume 318 CTN 13 Volume 364 CTN 52 Volume 409 CTN 40 Volume 319 CTN 14 Volume 365 CTN 26 Volume 410 Not microfilmed Volume 320 CTN 14 Volume 366 CTN 23 Volume 411 CTN 47 Volume 321 CTN 14 Volume 367 CTN 23 Volume 412 Not microfilmed Volume 322 CTN 15 Volume 368 CTN 44, CTN 52 Volume 413 Not microfilmed Volume 323 CTN 15 Volume 369 CTN 48 Volume 414 Not microfilmed Volume 324 CTN 15 Volume 370 CTN 52 Volume 415 CTN 53 Volume 325 CTN 15 Volume 371 CTN 23 Volume 416 Not microfilmed Volume Microfilm # Volume Microfilm # Volume Microfilm # Volume 417 Not microfilmed Volume 438 CTN 1 Volume 461 CTN 7 Volume 418 Not microfilmed Volume 439 Not microfilmed Volume 462 CTN 3 Volume 419 Not microfilmed Volume 440 CTN 1, CTN 2 Volume 463 CTN 3 Volume 420 CTN 20 Volume 441 CTN 51 Volume 464 CTN 7 Volume 421 CTN 20 Volume 442 Not microfilmed Volume 465 CTN 3 Volume 422 CTN 20 Volume 443 Not microfilmed Volume 466 CTN 3 Volume 423 CTN 21 Volume 444 CTN 46 Volume 467 CTN 3 Volume 424 CTN 21 Volume 445 CTN 53 Volume 468 CTN 7 Volume 425 CTN 21 Volume 446 CTN 1, CTN 2 Volume 469 CTN 4 Volume
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Independent Freedpeople of the Five Slaveholding Tribes
    Anderson 1 “On the Forty Acres that the Government Give Me”1: Independent Freedpeople of the Five Slaveholding Tribes as Landholders, Indigenous Land Allotment Policy, and the Disruption of Racial, Gender, and Class Hierarchies in Jim Crow Oklahoma Keziah Anderson Undergraduate Senior Thesis Department of History Columbia University April 15th, 2020 Seminar Advisor: Professor George Chauncey Second Reader: Professor Celia Naylor 1 Kiziah Love, interview with Jessie R. Ervin, spring 1937, Colbert, OK, in The WPA Oklahoma Slave Narratives, ed. T. Lindsay Baker and Julie Philips Baker (Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 1996), 262. See Appendix 6 for a full transcript of Kiziah Love’s slave narrative. © 2020 Anderson 2 - Notice - None of the work included in this document may be cited or quoted without express written permission from the author. © 2020 Anderson 3 - Table of Contents - Acknowledgements 4 Introduction 5-15 Chapter 1: “You’ve an Indian Not a Negro”: Racecraft, 15-36 Land Allotment Policy, and Class Inequalities in Post-Allotment and Post-Statehood Oklahoma Racecraft and Land Use in the Pre-Allotment Period 15 Racecraft, Blood Quantum, and Ideology in the Jim Crow South & Indian Territory 18 Racecraft in the Allotment Process: Blood Quanta, One-Drop-of-Blood Rules, and Land Land Allotments, Indigeneity, and Racecraft in Post-Statehood Oklahoma 25 Chapter 2: The Reshaping of Gender in the Post-Allotment and 38-51 Post-Statehood Period: Independent Freedwomen Landowners, the (Re)Establishment of Black Infrastructure, and
    [Show full text]
  • Choctaw Resistance to Removal (Part III) in May, Iti Fabvssa Began a Four Part Editor’S Note: This Not Fully Concluded for More Than 60 Years
    BISKINIK | August 2014 11 Choctaw Resistance to Removal (Part III) In May, Iti Fabvssa began a four part Editor’s Note: This not fully concluded for more than 60 years. In 1845, as a partial series, looking at different ways the month’s Iti Fabvssa is result of investigation, Congress granted some of the Choctaws who Choctaw people resisted Removal from part three in a four part remained in Mississippi script for the amount of land they were our homeland and the Trail of Tears. Iti Fabussa entitled to under the Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek However, the series. First, we looked at armed resistance. full amount of script was redeemable only in Indian Territory Last month, we looked at ways Choctaw people resisted signing the (Oklahoma). Some Anglo-Americans quickly found ways of Dancing Rabbit Creek Treaty that ceded the last of the Choctaw defrauding Choctaw people out of this script. Businesses were even homeland, setting up the Trail of Tears. This month, we focus on set up for that sole purpose (Reeves 1985:225). Choctaw individuals who, after the Treaty was signed, refused to Some Anglo-Americans used increasingly brutal tactics. remove from the homeland. Choctaws who remained in Mississippi had their houses burned Several articles of the Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek granted down, fences destroyed, and cattle sent in to graze down their land to named Choctaw individuals, to men bearing certain growing gardens. They were physically abused, chained, and even leadership titles in Choctaw society, to Choctaw people who had beaten to death (Tolbert 1958:66-67).
    [Show full text]
  • Choctaw and Creek Removals
    Chapter 6 Choctaw and Creek Removals The idea of indian removal as a government obligation first reared its head in 1802 when officials of the state of Georgia made an agreement with federal government officials. In the Georgia Compact, the state of Georgia gave up its claims to territorial lands west of that state in exchange for $1,250,000 and a promise that the federal government would abolish Indian title to Georgia lands as soon as possible. How seriously the government took its obligation to Georgia at the time of the agreement is unknown. The following year, however, the Louisiana Purchase was made, and almost immedi- ately, the trans-Mississippi area was seen by some as the answer to “The Indian Problem.” Not everyone agreed. Some congress- men argued that removal to the West was impractical because of land-hungry whites who could not be restrained from crossing the mighty river to obtain land. Although their conclusion was correct, it was probably made more in opposition to President Jefferson than from any real con- cern about the Indians or about practicality. Although some offers were made by government officials to officials of various tribes, little Pushmataha, Choctaw was done about removing the southeastern tribes before the War of 1812. warrior During that war several Indian tribes supported the British. After the war ended, many whites demanded that tribal lands be confiscated by Removals 67 the government as punishment for Indians’ treasonous activities. Many Americans included all tribes in their confiscationdemands , evidently feeling that all Indians were guilty, despite the fact that many tribes did not participate in the war.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal and House District Boundaries
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribal Boundaries and Oklahoma House Boundaries ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 22 ! 18 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 13 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 20 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 7 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Cimarron ! ! ! ! 14 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 11 ! ! Texas ! ! Harper ! ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! n ! ! Beaver ! ! ! ! Ottawa ! ! ! ! Kay 9 o ! Woods ! ! ! ! Grant t ! 61 ! ! ! ! ! Nowata ! ! ! ! ! 37 ! ! ! g ! ! ! ! 7 ! 2 ! ! ! ! Alfalfa ! n ! ! ! ! ! 10 ! ! 27 i ! ! ! ! ! Craig ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! h ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 26 s ! ! Osage 25 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! a ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribes ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 16 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! W ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 21 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 58 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 38 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribes by House District ! 11 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 Absentee Shawnee* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Woodward ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 ! 36 ! Apache* ! ! ! 40 ! 17 ! ! ! 5 8 ! ! ! Rogers ! ! ! ! ! Garfield ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 40 ! ! ! ! ! 3 Noble ! ! ! Caddo* ! ! Major ! ! Delaware ! ! ! ! ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! Mayes ! ! Pawnee ! ! ! 19 ! ! 2 41 ! ! ! ! ! 9 ! 4 ! 74 ! ! ! Cherokee ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ellis ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 41 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 72 ! ! ! ! ! 35 4 8 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 5 3 42 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 77
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of United States Federal Indian Law and Policy
    Outline of United States federal Indian law and policy The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to United States federal Indian law and policy: Federal Indian policy – establishes the relationship between the United States Government and the Indian Tribes within its borders. The Constitution gives the federal government primary responsibility for dealing with tribes. Law and U.S. public policy related to Native Americans have evolved continuously since the founding of the United States. David R. Wrone argues that the failure of the treaty system was because of the inability of an individualistic, democratic society to recognize group rights or the value of an organic, corporatist culture represented by the tribes.[1] U.S. Supreme Court cases List of United States Supreme Court cases involving Indian tribes Citizenship Adoption Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30 (1989) Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, 530 U.S. _ (2013) Tribal Ex parte Joins, 191 U.S. 93 (1903) Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez, 436 U.S. 49 (1978) Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30 (1989) South Dakota v. Bourland, 508 U.S. 679 (1993) Civil rights Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe, 435 U.S. 191 (1978) United States v. Wheeler, 435 U.S. 313 (1978) Congressional authority Ex parte Joins, 191 U.S. 93 (1903) White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker, 448 U.S. 136 (1980) California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, 480 U.S. 202 (1987) South Dakota v. Bourland, 508 U.S. 679 (1993) United States v.
    [Show full text]
  • PR-CNO Arkansas Proposal 100219- FINAL[2]
    Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Reveals Plans for Pope County Casino RUSSELLVILLE, ARK., (Oct. 2, 2019) – Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma announced details of its proposal to build a four-diamond luxury casino and resort in Pope County today. Along with its plans to bring a world-class resort to the community, the proposal also includes an economic development package and scholarship program that will directly impact and meet the needs of the people of Pope County. “We are pleased to finally have the chance to unveil our plan to bring a world-class resort to Pope County,” states Janie Dillard, senior executive officer for Choctaw Nation. “I have seen first-hand how our properties can positively change communities and generations for years to come. Our goal is to bring jobs and have an economic investment in the community just like we currently do in rural southeastern Oklahoma. We look forward to engaging with the community and working alongside local businesses to bring an amazing experience to Arkansas.” The $247 million Choctaw Casino & Resort will include a premier gaming facility, luxury 4-Diamond hotel with spa and fitness center, outdoor amphitheater, conference/multi- purpose venue, three restaurants including a sports book, an entertainment bar, retail shop, and resort pool. The proposed casino will be located on the west side of Alaskan Trail just north of Hob Nob Road in Pope County. The project is expected to generate more than 1,000 jobs, and the estimated timeline for completion is 18-24 months. The Choctaw Nation believes that education is a critical foundation in changing generations.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PATH of EDUCATION AMONG the MISSISSIPPI CHOCTAW Stark
    FROM POVERTY TO PROSPERITY: THE PATH OF EDUCATION AMONG THE MISSISSIPPI CHOCTAW Stark D. Harbour A thesis submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History in the College of Arts & Sciences. Chapel Hill 2019 Approved by: Malinda Maynor Lowery Keith S. Richotte William Sturkey © 2019 Stark D. Harbour ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Stark D. Harbour: From Poverty to Prosperity: The Path of Education among the Mississippi Choctaw (Under the direction of Malinda Maynor Lowery) The Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians knew early in their post-recognition existence that education was the key to future success for the tribe. From 1945 to 1963, the MBCI methodically built the framework for an autonomous school district that would provide students with a comprehensive curriculum that addressed tribal needs. The crowning achievement of this project was a high school that kept tribal members in the community for their secondary education. This analysis traces the creation of Choctaw Central High School from conception to completion and highlights the contributions of tribal leaders in making the project a major tribal success. Tribal Chairmen like Emmet York and Philip Martin helped develop a progressive school curriculum and the capital necessary to fund the school as an independent entity. Choctaw Central High School serves as a prime example of Choctaw self-determination and shrewd diplomacy to advance tribal education and the MBCI’s external image. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: FROM POVERTY TO PROSPERITY ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Choctaw Nation and the Dawes Commission
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1954 The Choctaw Nation and the Dawes Commission Jeanne Francis Moore Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Moore, Jeanne Francis, "The Choctaw Nation and the Dawes Commission" (1954). Master's Theses. 1157. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/1157 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1954 Jeanne Francis Moore THE CHOCTAW INDIANS AND THE DAWES COMMISSION by ;' Sister. Jeanne Francis Moore A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate Scnoo1 of Loyola University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts June 1954 --------._-------------,------_.. -.. ,._-- \ LIFE Sister Jeanne Francis Moore was born in Indianapolis, Indiana, , May 20, 1906. ; She was graduated from the Saint John Acad.~, Indianapolis, IndianaI June 20, 1923 and entered the novitiate of the Sisters of Providence Q~ Septem-~ ber 7, 1923. She received her degree of Bachelor of Arts from Saint Mar.y-of- the-Woods College in June, 1942. From 1926 to 1942 she taught in the elementar.y parochial schools of Chicago, Illinois; Fort Wayne, Indiana; Washington, D.C. After receiving her degree she taught at the Immaculata Seminar.y in Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Accessions: 2001-2002
    The Primary Source Volume 24 | Issue 2 Article 8 2002 Accessions: 2001-2002 Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/theprimarysource Part of the Archival Science Commons Recommended Citation (2002) "Accessions: 2001-2002," The Primary Source: Vol. 24 : Iss. 2 , Article 8. DOI: 10.18785/ps.2402.08 Available at: https://aquila.usm.edu/theprimarysource/vol24/iss2/8 This Column is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in The rP imary Source by an authorized editor of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Preservation Assistance Grants The National Endowment for the Humanities, Division of Preservation and Access, is in its fourth year of awarding small grants, of up to $5000, to help libraries, archives, museums and historical organizations · enhance their capacity to preserve their humanities collections. Applicants may request support for general preservation assessments or consultations with preservation professionals to develop a specific plan for addressing an identified problem. Institutions may also apply for funding to attend prese1vation training workshops and to purchase basic preservation supplies, equipment, and storage furniture. The deadline for the 2003 Preservation Assistance Grants is approaching. Applications are due by May 15, 2003. For more information and updates on the guidelines, see the NEH website http://www.neh.gov/grants/guidelines/presassistance.html 2002-03 NEH Preservation Assistance Grant Recipients Announced In 2000 the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) began awarding these small preservation grants to libraries, archives, museums, and historical organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Place-Names in Mississippi. Lea Leslie Seale Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1939 Indian Place-Names in Mississippi. Lea Leslie Seale Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Seale, Lea Leslie, "Indian Place-Names in Mississippi." (1939). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 7812. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/7812 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MANUSCRIPT THESES Unpublished theses submitted for the master^ and doctorfs degrees and deposited in the Louisiana State University Library are available for inspection* Use of any thesis is limited by the rights of the author* Bibliographical references may be noted3 but passages may not be copied unless the author has given permission# Credit must be given in subsequent written or published work# A library which borrows this thesis for vise by its clientele is expected to make sure that the borrower is aware of the above restrictions, LOUISIANA. STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 119-a INDIAN PLACE-NAMES IN MISSISSIPPI A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisian© State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In The Department of English By Lea L # Seale M* A*, Louisiana State University* 1933 1 9 3 9 UMi Number: DP69190 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Native American Contacts
    Updated February 2, 2016 List of Federally and State Recognized Native American Tribes and Other Contacts - State of Louisiana Federally Recognized Tribes Alabama Coushatta Tribe of Texas Caddo Nation Oscola Clayton Sylestine, Tamara Francis-Fourkiller, Chief Chairperson Ronnie Thomas, Chairman P.O. Box 487 www.alabama-coushatta.com Binger, OK 73009 Phone (405) 656-2344 *Bryant Celestine, Historic Fax (405) 656-2892 Preservation Officer [email protected] 571 State Park Rd. 56 www.caddonation-nsn.gov Livingston, TX 77351 Phone (936) 563-1181 Kim Penrod, Acting Fax (936) 563-1183 THPO Tribal AOI [email protected] Tribal AOI (405) 656-2344 [email protected] [email protected] Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma O'Neil J. Darden, Jr. Gary Batton, Chief Chairman P.O. Box 661 P.O. Drawer 1210 Charenton, LA 70523 Durant, OK 74702 Phone (337) 923-7215 Phone (800) 522-6170 Fax (337) 923-6848 www.choctawnation.com www.chitimacha.gov *Ian Thompson, THPO * Kimberly Walden, 580-924-8280, ext. 2216 Cultural Director/THPO [email protected] Phone (337) 923-9923 [email protected] Tribal AOI Tribal AOI Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana Jena Band of Choctaw Indians Lovelin Poncho, Chairman B. Cheryl Smith, Chief P.O. Box 818 P.O. Box 14 Elton, LA 70532 Jena, LA 71342-0014 Phone (337) 584-2261 Phone (318) 992-2717 Fax (337) 584-2998 Fax (318) 992-8244 www.coushattatribela.org [email protected] www.jenachoctaw.org * Dr. Linda Langley, THPO Heritage Department P.O. *Alina Shively, Deputy THPO Box 10 (318) 992-1205 Elton, LA 70352 [email protected] Phone (337) 584-1567 Tribal AOI Tribal AOI [email protected] Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma Phyllis J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mississippi Choctaw and Racial Politics
    The Mississippi Choctaw and Racial Politics In December of 1912, Mississippi Representative Pat Harrison stood before Congress and made an impassioned speech on behalf of the Choctaw Indians living in his district along the Gulf Coast. In a heavily edited version of the past, Harrison announced, “Mr. Chairman, the Choctaw Indians always stood with the white men of the South.”1 These Indians were the descendants of those who had remained in Mississippi when the Choctaw Nation ceded its territory in Mississippi, and the majority of Choctaws moved to Indian Territory, today Oklahoma, in the 1830s. Left landless, most Choctaws had withdrawn into isolated, poverty-stricken ethnic enclaves where virtually all survived as sharecroppers and low-paid day laborers. While the Choctaws were not officially classified under the segregation statutes as “colored,” they nonetheless suffered discrimination because of customary racial segregation. They had no access to “white” schools or other facilities. Yet Harrison and the Mississippi congressional delegation, all ardent supporters of segregation, were seeking redress for the injustice the Indians had suffered in the removal era and more recently when the United States closed the roll of the Choctaw Nation in Oklahoma, excluding most Mississippi Choctaws from the benefits stemming from Choctaw Nation citizenship. Their support of the Choctaws puts an interesting kink in the state’s racial politics. 1 The efforts of the congressmen reflected how the Choctaws’ relationship to Mississippi politicians had changed: in the nineteenth century, politicians had answered the Indians’ cries for justice with renewed attempts to hound them out of the state. The willingness of Mississippi’s civic leaders to carry the Choctaws’ banner in the early twentieth century raises significant questions.
    [Show full text]