DOCSLIB.ORG

Project Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project Document PROJECT DOCUMENT SECTION 1: PROJECT IDENTIFICATION 1.1 Project title: Alliance for Zero Extinction (AZE): Conserving Earth’s Most Irreplaceable Sites for Endangered Biodiversity 1.2 Project number: GEF ID 5201/ UNEP ID: 009309 1.3 Project type: MSP 1.4 Trust Fund: GEF 1.5 GEF Strategic objectives: BD1 BD2 1.6 UNEP priority: Ecosystem Management The proposed project is consistent with the Ecosystem Programme of Work for 2014-2017. This project specifically addresses UNEP’s expected accomplishment of “use of the ecosystem approach in countries to maintain ecosystem services and sustainable productivity of terrestrial and aquatic systems is increased” and “ services and benefits derived from ecosystems are integrated with development planning and accounting, and the implementation of biodiversity and ecosystem related multilateral agreements” and will specifically contribute to output (a) (1) Methodologies, partnerships and tools to maintain or restore ecosystem services and integrate the ecosystem management approach with the conservation and management of ecosystems and output (c) (5) Synergies between tools, approaches and multilateral initiatives on biodiversity, ecosystem resilience, climate change adaptation and disaster prevention identified and integrated with development planning, poverty reduction measures, strategic investment partnerships along with the ecosystem approach and national obligations for biodiversity related MEAS. 1.7 Geographical scope: Global 1.8 Mode of execution: External 1.9 Project executing organization: Birdlife International, AZE Partnership and Secretariat (American Bird Conservancy - ABC), Ministerio del Medio Ambiente (Chile), Ministry of Environment, Ecology, Sea and Forests (Madagascar), Ministry of Environment (Brazil) 1.10 Duration of project: 36 months Commencing: September 2015 Technical completion: August 2018 Validity of legal instrument: 42 months 1.11 Cost of project US$ % Cost to the GEF Trust Fund 1,922,813 29% Co-financing 4,797,171 71% Cash 0% BirdLife International 748,244 11% American Bird 300,000 4% Conservancy/AZE Secretariat Rio Tinto-QMM 300,000 4% MMA Chile 93,040 1% CONAF Chile 7,700 0% Sub-total 1,448,984 22% In-kind 0% Project Document: AZE – Conserving Earth’s Most Irreplaceable Sites for Endangered Biodiversity BirdLife International 645,187 10% American Bird 1,200,000 18% Conservancy/AZE Secretariat UNEP 200,000 3% Rio Tinto - QMM 95,000 1% Government of Brazil 300,000 4% Government of Chile - MMA 112,560 2% Government of Chile - CONAF 10,440 0% Government of Madagascar 150,000 2% 1.12 Project summary The Alliance for Zero Extinction (AZE) is a joint initiative of biodiversity conservation organizations around the world, aiming to prevent extinctions by identifying and safeguarding key sites, each one of which is the last remaining refuge of one or more Endangered or Critically Endangered species. These key sites are amongst the top priorities if global biodiversity loss is to be halted and reversed. The two main root causes of threat to these sites and species are habitat loss caused by small scale deforestation and the presence of invasive species. Of particular concern to AZE is that species with tiny global ranges are especially vulnerable to such external threats. In addressing these threats, the project will build on ongoing and planned national and international conservation efforts sustained by AZE member organizations as well as participating national governments and stakeholders at local, national and regional levels. The project objective is to prevent species extinctions at priority sites identified through the AZE. It consists of two components, the first of which will result in the creation and improved management effectiveness of five demonstration sites in Brazil, Chile, and Madagascar that will result in the improved conservation status of at least 17 AZE species: a bird (Stresemann’s Bristlefront Merulaxis stresemanni); 9 frogs (2 Eupsophus spp., Insuetophrynus sp., 2 Boophis spp., Mantidactylus sp., Gephyromantis sp., Spinomantis sp. and Vatomantis sp.); 3 lizards (Brookesia sp., Lygodactylus sp. and Phelsuma sp.), 2 snakes (Liophidium sp. and Liopholidophis sp.) and 2 plants (Ravenea musicalis and Micronychia bemangidiensis), along with many other threatened species. This will then be scaled up globally at an additional 10 sites holding AZE species, covering a total of at least 160,000 ha. The second component will result in two outcomes. First, the conservation of threatened species and the protection of AZE sites is mainstreamed into the safeguard policies of key International Financial Institutions (IFIs) such as Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) and Equator Principles Financial Institutions (EPFI). Second, AZE site conservation is mainstreamed into National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans, Programme of Work on Protected Areas (PoWPA) Action Plans and other national conservation plans in support of CBD targets. The project will support the expansion and updating of global AZE species/site databases, upgrading of the AZE website to enable improved online access to information, capacity building and awareness raising for key target audiences at different levels, technical guidance documents, and strengthening of national AZE partnerships and stakeholder collaboration. 2 Project Document: AZE – Conserving Earth’s Most Irreplaceable Sites for Endangered Biodiversity TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: PROJECT IDENTIFICATION ............................................................................................... 1 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................... 4 SECTION 2: BACKGROUND AND SITUATION ANALYSIS (BASELINE COURSE OF ACTION) ................ 6 2.1. Background and context ....................................................................................................... 6 2.2. Global significance ................................................................................................................ 7 2.3. Threats, Root Causes and Barrier Analysis ........................................................................ 8 2.4. Institutional, sectoral and policy context ........................................................................... 13 2.5. Stakeholder mapping and analysis .................................................................................... 24 2.6. Baseline analysis and gaps .................................................................................................. 28 2.7. Linkages with other GEF and non-GEF Interventions ................................................... 36 SECTION 3: INTERVENTION STRATEGY (ALTERNATIVE) ................................................................. 43 3.1. Project rationale, policy conformity and expected global environmental benefits........ 43 3.2. Project goal and objective ................................................................................................... 47 3.3. Project components and expected results .......................................................................... 48 3.4. Intervention logic and key assumptions ............................................................................ 62 3.5. Risk analysis and risk management measures .................................................................. 67 3.6. Consistency with national priorities or plans ................................................................... 71 3.7. Incremental cost reasoning ................................................................................................. 72 3.8. Sustainability ....................................................................................................................... 74 3.9. Replication ........................................................................................................................... 77 3.10. Public awareness, communications and mainstreaming strategy ............................... 79 3.11. Environmental and social safeguards ............................................................................ 81 SECTION 4: INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK AND IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS .................. 83 SECTION 5: STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION ..................................................................................... 86 SECTION 6: MONITORING AND EVALUATION PLAN .......................................................................... 88 SECTION 7: PROJECT FINANCING AND BUDGET ............................................................................... 89 7.1. Overall project budget ........................................................................................................ 89 7.2. Project co-financing ............................................................................................................ 89 7.3. Project cost-effectiveness .................................................................................................... 90 APPENDICES 92 Appendix 1: Budget by project components and UNEP budget lines ......... separate document Appendix 2: Co-financing ......................................................................................................... 93 Appendix 3: Incremental cost analysis .................................................................................... 94 Appendix 4: Results Framework ............................................................................................. 96 Appendix 5: Workplan and timetable
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PRAVILNIK O PREKOGRANIĈNOM PROMETU I TRGOVINI ZAŠTIĆENIM VRSTAMA ("Sl
    PRAVILNIK O PREKOGRANIĈNOM PROMETU I TRGOVINI ZAŠTIĆENIM VRSTAMA ("Sl. glasnik RS", br. 99/2009 i 6/2014) I OSNOVNE ODREDBE Ĉlan 1 Ovim pravilnikom propisuju se: uslovi pod kojima se obavlja uvoz, izvoz, unos, iznos ili tranzit, trgovina i uzgoj ugroţenih i zaštićenih biljnih i ţivotinjskih divljih vrsta (u daljem tekstu: zaštićene vrste), njihovih delova i derivata; izdavanje dozvola i drugih akata (potvrde, sertifikati, mišljenja); dokumentacija koja se podnosi uz zahtev za izdavanje dozvola, sadrţina i izgled dozvole; spiskovi vrsta, njihovih delova i derivata koji podleţu izdavanju dozvola, odnosno drugih akata; vrste, njihovi delovi i derivati ĉiji je uvoz odnosno izvoz zabranjen, ograniĉen ili obustavljen; izuzeci od izdavanja dozvole; naĉin obeleţavanja ţivotinja ili pošiljki; naĉin sprovoĊenja nadzora i voĊenja evidencije i izrada izveštaja. Ĉlan 2 Izrazi upotrebljeni u ovom pravilniku imaju sledeće znaĉenje: 1) datum sticanja je datum kada je primerak uzet iz prirode, roĊen u zatoĉeništvu ili veštaĉki razmnoţen, ili ukoliko takav datum ne moţe biti dokazan, sledeći datum kojim se dokazuje prvo posedovanje primeraka; 2) deo je svaki deo ţivotinje, biljke ili gljive, nezavisno od toga da li je u sveţem, sirovom, osušenom ili preraĊenom stanju; 3) derivat je svaki preraĊeni deo ţivotinje, biljke, gljive ili telesna teĉnost. Derivati većinom nisu prepoznatljivi deo primerka od kojeg potiĉu; 4) država porekla je drţava u kojoj je primerak uzet iz prirode, roĊen i uzgojen u zatoĉeništvu ili veštaĉki razmnoţen; 5) druga generacija potomaka
    [Show full text]
  • Cop13 Analyses Cover 29 Jul 04.Qxd
    IUCN/TRAFFIC Analyses of the Proposals to Amend the CITES Appendices at the 13th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties Bangkok, Thailand 2-14 October 2004 Prepared by IUCN Species Survival Commission and TRAFFIC Production of the 2004 IUCN/TRAFFIC Analyses of the Proposals to Amend the CITES Appendices was made possible through the support of: The Commission of the European Union Canadian Wildlife Service Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, Department for Nature, the Netherlands Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Germany Federal Veterinary Office, Switzerland Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Dirección General para la Biodiversidad (Spain) Ministère de l'écologie et du développement durable, Direction de la nature et des paysages (France) IUCN-The World Conservation Union IUCN-The World Conservation Union brings together states, government agencies and a diverse range of non-governmental organizations in a unique global partnership - over 1 000 members in some 140 countries. As a Union, IUCN seeks to influence, encourage and assist societies throughout the world to conserve the integrity and diversity of nature and to ensure that any use of natural resources is equitable and ecologically sustainable. IUCN builds on the strengths of its members, networks and partners to enhance their capacity and to support global alliances to safeguard natural resources at local, regional and global levels. The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is the largest of IUCN’s six volunteer commissions. With 8 000 scientists, field researchers, government officials and conservation leaders, the SSC membership is an unmatched source of information about biodiversity conservation. SSC members provide technical and scientific advice to conservation activities throughout the world and to governments, international conventions and conservation organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Polyploidy and Sex Chromosome Evolution in Amphibians
    Chapter 18 Polyploidization and Sex Chromosome Evolution in Amphibians Ben J. Evans, R. Alexander Pyron and John J. Wiens Abstract Genome duplication, including polyploid speciation and spontaneous polyploidy in diploid species, occurs more frequently in amphibians than mammals. One possible explanation is that some amphibians, unlike almost all mammals, have young sex chromosomes that carry a similar suite of genes (apart from the genetic trigger for sex determination). These species potentially can experience genome duplication without disrupting dosage stoichiometry between interacting proteins encoded by genes on the sex chromosomes and autosomalPROOF chromosomes. To explore this possibility, we performed a permutation aimed at testing whether amphibian species that experienced polyploid speciation or spontaneous polyploidy have younger sex chromosomes than other amphibians. While the most conservative permutation was not significant, the frog genera Xenopus and Leiopelma provide anecdotal support for a negative correlation between the age of sex chromosomes and a species’ propensity to undergo genome duplication. This study also points to more frequent turnover of sex chromosomes than previously proposed, and suggests a lack of statistical support for male versus female heterogamy in the most recent common ancestors of frogs, salamanders, and amphibians in general. Future advances in genomics undoubtedly will further illuminate the relationship between amphibian sex chromosome degeneration and genome duplication. B. J. Evans (CORRECTED&) Department of Biology, McMaster University, Life Sciences Building Room 328, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada e-mail: [email protected] R. Alexander Pyron Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, 2023 G St. NW, Washington, DC 20052, USA J.
    [Show full text]
  • Explorando La Valoración De Los Ecosistemas Para Avanzar Hacia Un Impacto Neto Positivo Sobre La Biodiversidad En El Sector Minero
    Explorando la valoración de los ecosistemas para avanzar hacia un impacto neto positivo sobre la biodiversidad en el sector minero Nathalie Olsen, Joshua Bishop y Stuart Anstee Serie Técnica de UICN y Rio Tinto nro. 1 Explorando la valoración de los ecosistemas para avanzar hacia un impacto neto positivo sobre la biodiversidad en el sector minero Nathalie Olsen, Joshua Bishop y Stuart Anstee Serie Técnica de UICN y Rio Tinto nro. 1 ISBN: 978-2-8317-1408-0 Fotografía de la cubierta: © Ravoahangy Andriamandranto Traducción: Patricia Odio-Yglesias La designación de entidades geográficas y la presentación del material en este libro no implican la expresión de ninguna opinión por parte de la UICN o de Rio Diagramado por: Tinto respecto a la condición jurídica de ningún país, territorio o área, o de sus millerdesign.co.uk autoridades, o referente a la delimitación de sus fronteras y límites. Impreso por: Los puntos de vista que se expresan en esa publicación no reflejan SRO-Kundig SA necesariamente los de la UICN o de Rio Tinto. Disponible en: UICN La UICN y Rio Tinto declinan cualquier error u omisión en la traducción de este (Unión Internacional documento de la versión original en inglés al español. para la Conservación de la Naturaleza) Publicado por: UICN, Gland, Suiza Servicio de publicaciones Derechos reservados: © 2011 Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Rue Mauverney 28 Naturaleza y de los Recursos Naturales 1196 Gland Suiza Se autoriza la reproducción de esta publicación con fines educativos y otros fines no comerciales sin permiso escrito previo de parte de quien detenta los Tel +41 22 999 0000 derechos de autor con tal de que se mencione la fuente.
    [Show full text]
  • No 811/2008 of 13 August 2008 Suspending the Introduction Into the Community of Specimens of Certain Species of Wild Fauna and Flora
    14.8.2008EN Official Journal of the European Union L 219/17 COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 811/2008 of 13 August 2008 suspending the introduction into the Community of specimens of certain species of wild fauna and flora THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, — Accipiter erythropus, Aquila rapax, Gyps africanus, Lophaetus occipitalis and Poicephalus gulielmi from Guinea, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, — Hieraaetus ayresii, Hieraaetus spilogaster, Polemaetus bellicosus, Falco chicquera, Varanus ornatus (wild and Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 of ranched specimens) and Calabaria reinhardtii (wild 9 December 1996 on the protection of species of wild fauna specimens) from Togo, and flora by regulating trade therein (1), and in particular Article 19(2) thereof, — Agapornis pullarius and Poicephalus robustus from Côte d’Ivoire, After consulting the Scientific Review Group, — Stephanoaetus coronatus from Côte d’Ivoire and Togo, Whereas: — Pyrrhura caeruleiceps from Colombia; Pyrrhura pfrimeri (1) Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 338/97 provides that from Brazil, the Commission may establish restrictions to the intro­ duction of certain species into the Community in accordance with the conditions laid down in points (a) — Brookesia decaryi, Uroplatus ebenaui, Uroplatus fimbriatus, to (d) thereof. Furthermore, implementing measures for Uroplatus guentheri, Uroplatus henkeli, Uroplatus lineatus, such restrictions have been laid down in Commission Uroplatus malama, Uroplatus phantasticus, Uroplatus Regulation (EC) No 865/2006 of 4 May 2006 laying pietschmanni, Uroplatus sikorae, Euphorbia ankarensis, down detailed rules concerning the implementation of Euphorbia berorohae, Euphorbia bongolavensis, Euphorbia Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 of the protection duranii, Euphorbia fiananantsoae, Euphorbia iharanae, of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade Euphorbia labatii, Euphorbia lophogona, Euphorbia 2 therein ( ).
    [Show full text]
  • Madagascar Food Security Project
    Final Evaluation report: Madagascar Food Security Project September 2017 Author: Antilahy Herimpitia Estelle Rolande (Consultant) Acknowledgements The Malagasy Red Cross and the International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) would like to express their gratitude to all those who participated in the evaluation mission of the FIHAVOTSE Project in Antananarivo, Amboasary Atsimo and Taolagnaro, from 9 to 27 July 2017. The evaluation team comprised of Ms. Herimpitia Estelle Rolande Antilahy (the National Consultant), Messrs. Sammy Fwanga and Geofrey Odera working for IFRC Nairobi, Kenya as the Monitoring & Evaluation Officer and the Emergency Planning and Reporting Officer respectively, and Mr. Emmanuel Ntakirutimana, the Monitoring & Evaluation Officer at the Rwandan Red Cross Society (RRCS). Special thanks to the project team who provided valuation information, and to the communities supported by the project with who the evaluation team spent time talking through the project interventions. Cover photo: Description of photo © XXX XXX 2 Acronyms AINA Action Intégrée en Nutrition et Sécurité Alimentaire (Integrated Action in Nutrition and Food Security - Programme funded by the European Union in South and South-East Madagascar) ASARA Amélioration de la Sécurité Alimentaire et du Revenu Agricole (Improved Food Security and Agricultural Revenue- Programme funded by the European Union in South and South-East Madagascar) AtC Accountability to Communities AUE Association des usagers de l’eau (Water Users’ Association)
    [Show full text]
  • Office of the Resident Coordinator Madagascar • Dahalo1 Attack Displaces People in the South Situation Update
    United Nations Nations Unies Office of the Resident Coordinator Madagascar • Dahalo 1 Attack Displaces People in the South Situation Update - 15 June 2012 This update is produced by the Resident Coordinator’s Office in collaboration with humanitarian partners. I. HIGHLIGHTS/KEY PRIOR ITIES • On 09 June 2012, heavily armed and well organized groups of dahalo (operating mostly in rural areas of Madagascar) carried out violent attacks on Ilambohazo village in the extreme southeast region of Anosy. • The attack left 6 people dead, all members of security forces (5 military personnel and 1 gendarme ). Another 7 agents were wounded and 4 are still missing. • After the attack, the dahalo threatened to attack six villages of Anosy Region in the following days which led to a population’s displacement towards Taolagnaro town. • Various local sources put the number of displaced people from the communes at risk at around 1,800 persons. Local authorities talked about some hundreds of people have temporarily settled in a piece of land in the town centre of Taolagnaro. • On 13 June , local authorities met to discuss the support they would provide to the IDPs and any other vulnerable families. • On 14 June, the Prime Minister, with the Minister of Defence, the Minister Internal Security and the Secretary of State for Gendarmerie and parliamentarians from the areas concerned, left the country’s capital city, Antananarivo, for Taolagnaro, to assess the security and humanitarian situation. • UN joint mission, chaired by the UNRC a.i. and composed of OCHA/RCO, WFP and UNICEF, also joined the Government mission to assess the humanitarian situation and prepare rapid needs assessment if necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Rep 2 out Public 2010 S Tlet Sur of Ma Urvey Rvey Adagas Repor Scar Rt
    Evidence for Malaria Medicines Policy Outlet Survey Republic of Madagascar 2010 Survey Report MINSTERE DE LA SANTE PUBLIQUE www. ACTwatch.info Copyright © 2010 Population Services International (PSI). All rights reserved. Acknowledgements ACTwatch is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. This study was implemented by Population Services International (PSI). ACTwatch’s Advisory Committee: Mr. Suprotik Basu Advisor to the UN Secretary General's Special Envoy for Malaria Mr. Rik Bosman Supply Chain Expert, Former Senior Vice President, Unilever Ms. Renia Coghlan Global Access Associate Director, Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV) Dr. Thom Eisele Assistant Professor, Tulane University Mr. Louis Da Gama Malaria Advocacy & Communications Director, Global Health Advocates Dr. Paul Lavani Executive Director, RaPID Pharmacovigilance Program Dr. Ramanan Senior Fellow, Resources for the Future Dr. Matthew Lynch Project Director, VOICES, Johns Hopkins University Centre for Dr. Bernard Nahlen Deputy Coordinator, President's Malaria Initiative (PMI) Dr. Jayesh M. Pandit Head, Pharmacovigilance Department, Pharmacy and Poisons Board‐Kenya Dr. Melanie Renshaw Advisor to the UN Secretary General's Special Envoy for Malaria Mr. Oliver Sabot Vice‐President, Vaccines Clinton Foundation Ms. Rima Shretta Senior Program Associate, Strengthening Pharmaceutical Systems Dr. Rick Steketee Science Director, Malaria Control and Evaluation Partnership in Africa Dr. Warren Stevens Health Economist Dr. Gladys Tetteh CDC Resident Advisor, President’s Malaria
    [Show full text]
  • ZANABAVY, Dolline MED DOC 04 N°
    ZANABAVY Dolline « ANALYSE EPIDEMIOLOGIQUE DES HYPERTHERMIES DANS LE DISTRICT SANITAIRE DE FORT-DAUPHIN » Thèse de Doctorat en Médecine 1 UNIVERSITE D’ANTANANARIVO FACULTE DE MEDECINE ANNEE : 2004 N°6930 « ANALYSE EPIDEMIOLOGIQUE DES HYPERTHERMIES DANS LE DISTRICT SANITAIRE DE FORT-DAUPHIN » THESE Présentée et soutenue publiquement le 29 juin 2004 à Antananarivo par Madame ZANABAVY Dolline Née le 18 Mars 1967 à Amboasary Sud Pour obtenir le grade de DOCTEUR EN MEDECINE (Diplôme d’Etat) MEMBRES DU JURY : Président : Professeur RAMAKAVELO Maurice Philippe Juges : Professeur RATOVO Fortunat Cadet : Professeur ANDRIANASOLO Roger Rapporteur : Docteur RANDRIAMANJAKA Jean Rémi 2 UNIVERSITE D’ANTANANARIVO FACULTE DE MEDECINE Année Universitaire 2003-2004 I- DIRECTION A. DOYEN : M. RAJAONARIVELO Paul B. VICE-DOYENS - Relations avec les Institutions et M. RASAMINDRAKOTROKA Andry Partenariat - Troisième Cycle Long et Formation M. RAJAONA Hyacinthe Continue - Scolarité (1 er et 2 nd cycles) M. RANAIVOZANANY Andrianady M. RAKOTOARIMANANA Denis Roland - Ressources Humaines et Patrimoine M. RAMAKAVELO Maurice Philippe - Relations Internationales M. RAKOTOBE Pascal - Thèses, Mémoires, Recherche, M. RABENANTOANDRO Rakotomanantsoa Agrégation, Titularisation - Appui à la Pédagogie et Stages M. RANJALAHY RASOLOFOMANANA Hospitaliers Justin - Troisième Cycle Court M. RANDRIANJAFISAMINDRAKOTROKA (Stage interné et Examens de Clinique) Nantenaina Soa -Technologies de l’Information, de la M. RAPELANORO RABENJA Fahafahantsoa Communication et de la Télémédecine C. SECRETAIRE PRINCIPAL Mme RASOARIMANALINARIVO Sahondra H. II- PRESIDENT DU CONSEIL D’ETABLISSEMENT M. RAKOTOVAO Joseph Dieudonné 3 III- CHEFS DE DEPARTEMENT - Biologie M. RASAMINDRAKOTROKA Andry - Chirurgie M. RANAIVOZANANY Andrianady - Médecine M. RABENANTOANDRO Rakotomanantsoa - Mère et Enfant Mme. RAVELOMANANA RAZAFIARIVAO Noëline - Santé Publique M. RANJALAHY RASOLOFOMANANA Justin - Sciences Fondamentales et Mixtes Mme.
    [Show full text]
  • Boissiera 71
    Taxonomic treatment of Abrahamia Randrian. & Lowry, a new genus of Anacardiaceae BOISSIERA from Madagascar Armand RANDRIANASOLO, Porter P. LOWRY II & George E. SCHATZ 71 BOISSIERA vol.71 Director Pierre-André Loizeau Editor-in-chief Martin W. Callmander Guest editor of Patrick Perret this volume Graphic Design Matthieu Berthod Author instructions for www.ville-ge.ch/cjb/publications_boissiera.php manuscript submissions Boissiera 71 was published on 27 December 2017 © CONSERVATOIRE ET JARDIN BOTANIQUES DE LA VILLE DE GENÈVE BOISSIERA Systematic Botany Monographs vol.71 Boissiera is indexed in: BIOSIS ® ISSN 0373-2975 / ISBN 978-2-8277-0087-5 Taxonomic treatment of Abrahamia Randrian. & Lowry, a new genus of Anacardiaceae from Madagascar Armand Randrianasolo Porter P. Lowry II George E. Schatz Addresses of the authors AR William L. Brown Center, Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, MO, 63166-0299, U.S.A. [email protected] PPL Africa and Madagascar Program, Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, MO, 63166-0299, U.S.A. Institut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), UMR 7205, Centre national de la Recherche scientifique/Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle/École pratique des Hautes Etudes, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Sorbonne Universités, C.P. 39, 57 rue Cuvier, 75231 Paris CEDEX 05, France. GES Africa and Madagascar Program, Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, MO, 63166-0299, U.S.A. Taxonomic treatment of Abrahamia (Anacardiaceae) 7 Abstract he Malagasy endemic genus Abrahamia Randrian. & Lowry (Anacardiaceae) is T described and a taxonomic revision is presented in which 34 species are recog- nized, including 19 that are described as new.
    [Show full text]
  • Gross Trade in Appendix II FAUNA (Direct Trade Only), 1999-2010 (For
    AC25 Inf. 5 (1) Gross trade in Appendix II FAUNA (direct trade only), 1999‐2010 (for selection process) N.B. Data from 2009 and 2010 are incomplete. Data extracted 1 April 2011 Phylum Class TaxOrder Family Taxon Term Unit 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Total CHORDATA MAMMALIA ARTIODACTYLA Bovidae Ammotragus lervia BOD 0 00001000102 CHORDATA MAMMALIA ARTIODACTYLA Bovidae Ammotragus lervia BON 0 00080000008 CHORDATA MAMMALIA ARTIODACTYLA Bovidae Ammotragus lervia HOR 0 00000110406 CHORDATA MAMMALIA ARTIODACTYLA Bovidae Ammotragus lervia LIV 0 00060000006 CHORDATA MAMMALIA ARTIODACTYLA Bovidae Ammotragus lervia SKI 1 11311000008 CHORDATA MAMMALIA ARTIODACTYLA Bovidae Ammotragus lervia SKP 0 00000010001 CHORDATA MAMMALIA ARTIODACTYLA Bovidae Ammotragus lervia SKU 2 052101000011 CHORDATA MAMMALIA ARTIODACTYLA Bovidae Ammotragus lervia TRO 15 42 49 43 46 46 27 27 14 37 26 372 CHORDATA MAMMALIA ARTIODACTYLA Bovidae Antilope cervicapra TRO 0 00000020002 CHORDATA MAMMALIA ARTIODACTYLA Bovidae Bison bison athabascae BOD 0 00100001002 CHORDATA MAMMALIA ARTIODACTYLA Bovidae Bison bison athabascae HOP 0 00200000002 CHORDATA MAMMALIA ARTIODACTYLA Bovidae Bison bison athabascae HOR 0 0010100120216 CHORDATA MAMMALIA ARTIODACTYLA Bovidae Bison bison athabascae LIV 0 0 5 14 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 49 CHORDATA MAMMALIA ARTIODACTYLA Bovidae Bison bison athabascae MEA KIL 0 5 27.22 0 0 272.16 1000 00001304.38 CHORDATA MAMMALIA ARTIODACTYLA Bovidae Bison bison athabascae MEA 0 00000000101 CHORDATA MAMMALIA ARTIODACTYLA Bovidae Bison bison athabascae
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    HAMADRYAD Vol. 27. No. 2. August, 2003 Date of issue: 31 August, 2003 ISSN 0972-205X CONTENTS T. -M. LEONG,L.L.GRISMER &MUMPUNI. Preliminary checklists of the herpetofauna of the Anambas and Natuna Islands (South China Sea) ..................................................165–174 T.-M. LEONG & C-F. LIM. The tadpole of Rana miopus Boulenger, 1918 from Peninsular Malaysia ...............175–178 N. D. RATHNAYAKE,N.D.HERATH,K.K.HEWAMATHES &S.JAYALATH. The thermal behaviour, diurnal activity pattern and body temperature of Varanus salvator in central Sri Lanka .........................179–184 B. TRIPATHY,B.PANDAV &R.C.PANIGRAHY. Hatching success and orientation in Lepidochelys olivacea (Eschscholtz, 1829) at Rushikulya Rookery, Orissa, India ......................................185–192 L. QUYET &T.ZIEGLER. First record of the Chinese crocodile lizard from outside of China: report on a population of Shinisaurus crocodilurus Ahl, 1930 from north-eastern Vietnam ..................193–199 O. S. G. PAUWELS,V.MAMONEKENE,P.DUMONT,W.R.BRANCH,M.BURGER &S.LAVOUÉ. Diet records for Crocodylus cataphractus (Reptilia: Crocodylidae) at Lake Divangui, Ogooué-Maritime Province, south-western Gabon......................................................200–204 A. M. BAUER. On the status of the name Oligodon taeniolatus (Jerdon, 1853) and its long-ignored senior synonym and secondary homonym, Oligodon taeniolatus (Daudin, 1803) ........................205–213 W. P. MCCORD,O.S.G.PAUWELS,R.BOUR,F.CHÉROT,J.IVERSON,P.C.H.PRITCHARD,K.THIRAKHUPT, W. KITIMASAK &T.BUNDHITWONGRUT. Chitra burmanica sensu Jaruthanin, 2002 (Testudines: Trionychidae): an unavailable name ............................................................214–216 V. GIRI,A.M.BAUER &N.CHATURVEDI. Notes on the distribution, natural history and variation of Hemidactylus giganteus Stoliczka, 1871 ................................................217–221 V. WALLACH.
    [Show full text]