DOCSLIB.ORG

Journal of Double Star Observations V5

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Journal of Double Star Observations V5 Vol. 17 No. 1 January 1, 2021 Journal of Double Star Observations Page 27 Double Star Measurements at the Southern Sky with a 50 cm Reflector in 2019 Rainer Anton Altenholz/Kiel, Germany rainer.anton”at”ki.comcity.de Abstract: Recordings of 82 double and multiple systems, in total 92 pairs, were made with a fast CMOS camera attached to a 50 cm reflector, and were analyzed with “lucky imag- ing”. The scale was calibrated with reference systems, which were selected for the amount and precision of literature data, including from Gaia, so as to obtain trustworthy extrapolations to the epoch of own measurements. In particular, a number of binaries was found to fulfill this criterion, while other pairs exhibited more or less significant deviations from hitherto assumed orbits. A number of interesting systems are discussed in some detail, and a few images are also presented. Introduction measurements [4]), by data from Gaia DR2, and by the The telescope is of Ritchey-Chrétien type, and is recently revised ephemeris [Izm, 5]. Fourteen more maintained at the “Internationale Amateursternwarte” binaries were found, with separations between one and in Namibia, where I have already used it repeatedly in ten arcsec, with similarly trustworthy data, including the past [3]. The primary focal length of 4.1 m was from Gaia, so as to serve as reference. In two cases, extended by a 2x Barlow lens, resulting in an f-ratio of alpha Cen and gamma Vir, stars are too bright for about f/12. For any pair, series of up to 2000 images Gaia, but their orbits are well-known. The image scale each were recorded with a monochrome CMOS cam- was obtained in an iterative way by measuring all 15 era of type QHY5 III 178 M, with pixels of size 2.4 pairs and adjusting the calibration factor by minimiz- arcsec square. In some cases, the color version of the ing the mean value of the residuals, as well as their same type of camera was used instead. When using the standard deviation. The latter resulted in ±0.003 arcsec, monochrome version, a near infrared filter was insert- within a range of ±0.005 arcsec, which is then taken as ed, which reduces seeing effects, as well as chromatic standard error margin of the measurements. However, aberrations of the Barlow lens. Exposure times ranged in practice, it can actually be greater under bad seeing from less than a millisecond up to some tens of milli- conditions. seconds, depending on the star brightness, and on the The calibrated measurements of all 92 pairs are seeing. The resolution was 0.0665 arcsec/pixel, which listed in Table 1. Names, nominal coordinates, and was determined by calibration with reference systems, magnitudes are adopted from the WDS [6]. As many of as was mentioned above, and is described below. Be- the pairs are binaries, residuals mostly refer to actual fore stacking, the images were re-sampled 2x2 or 4x4, ephemeris data [5], or to trustworthy extrapolations of which resulted in smoothening of the intensity profiles literature data, if not otherwise noticed. In several cas- and better definition of the peak centroids. Position es, no reasonable residuals could be given, because of angles were measured by reference to star trails, which a dearth of data, and/or too large scatter. In figure 2, were recorded while the telescope drive was switched residuals of own measurements are plotted versus rho. off. Residuals of the 15 calibration systems are indicated with full symbols, see above. Residuals of other pairs Results either result from statistical errors of measurements, Figures 1 a and b illustrate the procedure of cali- own and/or in the literature, or from systematic devia- bration of the image scale. The binary STF2272 (70 tions from ephemeris data. Exceptionally large values Ophiuchi) was chosen because of the virtually unam- of the latter are marked with their RA numbers. Indi- biguous evolution with time of both the position angle vidual remarks are listed in the notes following table 1 PA and the separation rho. This is documented by in order of RA values for identification. many literature data with low scatter (mostly speckle Received December 2, 2020 Vol. 17 No. 1 January 1, 2021 Journal of Double Star Observations Page 28 Double Star Measurements at the Southern Sky with a 50 cm Reflector in 2019 Figure 1: Evolution with time of the position angle PA (a, left), and of the separation rho (b, right) of the binary STF 2272 (70 Oph). Blue rhombs: speckle data [4], black squares: data from the WDS catalog [6], green star: position from Gaia DR2, circles in magenta: own measurements (since 2007, each after calibration as described in the text), red curves: ephemeris from Izmailov 2019 [5]. Figure 2: Plots of the residuals of own measurements. Semi-logarithmic scaling. Left: delta rho versus rho. Right: delta PA versus rho. Residuals of the 15 calibration pairs are indicated with full symbols. Symbols with crosses mark pairs with systematic deviations from ephemeris data. Numbers refer to notes following table 1. PAIR RA + Dec MAGS AP rho Date N delta PA delta rho COP 1 09 30.7 -40 28 3.91 5.12 31.231 0.958 2019.405 1 0.16 -0.007 * AC 5 AB 09 52.5 -08 06 5.43 6.41 17273 0.494 2019.405 1 0.50 0.005 I 173 10 06.2 -47 22 5.32 7.10 33213 0.973 2019.405 1 0.20 -0.005 I 13 AB 10 09.5 -68 41 6.63 6.47 33.213 0.562 2019.405 1 -0.86 0.002 BU 411 10 36.1 -26 41 6.68 7.77 1312.3 1.327 2019.416 1 -0.10 -0.001 I 860 AB 10 42.0 -63 30 8.01 8.14 .93253 0.444 2019.405 1 -- -- I 294 10 45.3 -80 28 6.15 6.49 052.3 0.831 2019.433 1 -- -- R 155 10 46.8 -49 25 2.82 5.65 902.3 2.287 2019.405 1 -0.40 -0.025 BSO 5 11 24.7 -61 39 7.68 8.76 ..0203 7.737 2019.399 1 -0.10 -0.001 I 78 11 33.6 -40 35 6.13 6.16 331213 0.486 2019.405 1 -- -- I 422 7.10 7.42 3312.3 0.350 1 -4.40 0.021 AB 11 38.3 -63 22 2019.405 AC 7.10 9.91 9237 1.658 1 -- -- HLD 114 11 55.0 -56 06 7.60 7.81 310213 3.868 2019.438 1 0.20 -0.002 Vol. 17 No. 1 January 1, 2021 Journal of Double Star Observations Page 29 Double Star Measurements at the Southern Sky with a 50 cm Reflector in 2019 SEE 143 12 03.6 -39 01 7.05 7.65 1.72.3 0.343 2019.405 2 -0.36 0.012 HJ 4498 AB 12 06.4 -65 43 6.13 7.74 95233 8.769 2019.405 1 0.10 -0.002 BU 920 Crv 12 15.8 -23 21 6.86 8.22 1372.3 1.978 2019.438 1 0.10 0.010 BSO 8 12 24.9 -58 07 7.84 7.98 11.203 5.223 2019.405 1 0.15 -0.003 DUN 252 AB 1.25 1.55 333237 3.841 1 -- -- 12 26.6 -63 06 2019.405 A-C 1.25 4.80 .3.237 89.544 1 -- -- CPO 12 AB 12 28.3 -61 46 7.32 8.24 30.2.3 2.092 2019.438 1 0.30 0.009 HJ 4539 AB * 12 41.5 -48 58 2.82 2.88 11231 0.341 2019.42 3 0.61 0.003 STF 1670 AB 12 41.7 -01 27 3.48 3.53 1972.3 2.852 2019.405 1 -0.50 0.002 R 207 AB 12 46.3 -68 07 3.52 3.98 97259 0.956 2019.405 2 0.20 0.004 RST 2819 12 55.0 -85 07 5.94 6.86 ..32.3 0.662 2019.433 1 -0.10 -0.033 I 83 12 56.7 -47 41 7.39 7.68 .17213 0.838 2019.399 1 1.00 -0.003 R 213 13 07.4 -59 52 6.59 7.04 35213 0.643 2019.405 1 -- -- I 424 A-C 13 12.3 -59 55 4.8 8.4 3.2.3 1.911 2019.405 1 -0.40 6E-4 I 1227 13 13.4 -50 42 6.56 6.78 31123 0.365 2019.405 1 0.80 0.013 * I 298 13 32.5 -69 14 7.36 8.54 393233 0.507 2019.438 1 4.80 0.072 STF 1757 AB 13 34.3 -00 19 7.82 8.75 3..233 1.645 2019.405 1 0.30 0 BU 932 AB * 13 34.7 -13 13 6.30 7.29 11253 0.429 2019.405 1 0 0.004 HWE 95 13 43.8 -40 11 7.51 7.85 3092.3 0.899 2019.438 1 0.40 0.009 STF 1781 13 46.1 +05 07 7.89 8.10 357233 1.030 2019.405 1 -0.70 -0.005 HWE 28 AB 6.27 6.38 13123. 1.011 3 0.06 0.001 H V 124 AE 13 53.5 -35 40 6.27 8.65 72.. 68.22 2019.42 1 0.15 0.025 BE 6.38 8.65 7253 67.58 1 0.18 -0.014 STF 1788 13 55.0 -08 04 6.68 7.26 333253 3.740 2019.438 1 -0.20 0.080 SLR 19 14 07.7 -49 52 7.14 7.38 1132.3 1.029 2019.399 1 0.25 -0.011 STF 1819 AB 14 15.3 +03 08 7.73 7.92 390203 0.888 2019.405 1 -- -- RHD 1 14 39.6 -60 50 -0.01 1.33 1.32.3 5.150 2019.41 2 0.80 0.004 I 236 14 53.2 -73 11 5.87 7.59 3.0233 2.298 2019.416 1 -0.90 -0.002 HJ 4707 14 54.2 -66 25 7.53 8.09 .17273 1.248 2019.438 1 -0.30 -0.012 BU 239 14 58.7 -27 39 6.17 6.79 312.3 0.467 2019.438 1 -0.80 0.013 HJ 4728 15 05.1 -47 03 4.56 4.60 1129.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mathématiques Et Espace
    Atelier disciplinaire AD 5 Mathématiques et Espace Anne-Cécile DHERS, Education Nationale (mathématiques) Peggy THILLET, Education Nationale (mathématiques) Yann BARSAMIAN, Education Nationale (mathématiques) Olivier BONNETON, Sciences - U (mathématiques) Cahier d'activités Activité 1 : L'HORIZON TERRESTRE ET SPATIAL Activité 2 : DENOMBREMENT D'ETOILES DANS LE CIEL ET L'UNIVERS Activité 3 : D'HIPPARCOS A BENFORD Activité 4 : OBSERVATION STATISTIQUE DES CRATERES LUNAIRES Activité 5 : DIAMETRE DES CRATERES D'IMPACT Activité 6 : LOI DE TITIUS-BODE Activité 7 : MODELISER UNE CONSTELLATION EN 3D Crédits photo : NASA / CNES L'HORIZON TERRESTRE ET SPATIAL (3 ème / 2 nde ) __________________________________________________ OBJECTIF : Détermination de la ligne d'horizon à une altitude donnée. COMPETENCES : ● Utilisation du théorème de Pythagore ● Utilisation de Google Earth pour évaluer des distances à vol d'oiseau ● Recherche personnelle de données REALISATION : Il s'agit ici de mettre en application le théorème de Pythagore mais avec une vision terrestre dans un premier temps suite à un questionnement de l'élève puis dans un second temps de réutiliser la même démarche dans le cadre spatial de la visibilité d'un satellite. Fiche élève ____________________________________________________________________________ 1. Victor Hugo a écrit dans Les Châtiments : "Les horizons aux horizons succèdent […] : on avance toujours, on n’arrive jamais ". Face à la mer, vous voyez l'horizon à perte de vue. Mais "est-ce loin, l'horizon ?". D'après toi, jusqu'à quelle distance peux-tu voir si le temps est clair ? Réponse 1 : " Sans instrument, je peux voir jusqu'à .................. km " Réponse 2 : " Avec une paire de jumelles, je peux voir jusqu'à ............... km " 2. Nous allons maintenant calculer à l'aide du théorème de Pythagore la ligne d'horizon pour une hauteur H donnée.
    [Show full text]
  • Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants As Tracers of Planet Formation
    Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants as Tracers of Planet Formation Thesis by Marta Levesque Bryan In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California 2018 Defended May 1, 2018 ii © 2018 Marta Levesque Bryan ORCID: [0000-0002-6076-5967] All rights reserved iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank Heather Knutson, who I had the great privilege of working with as my thesis advisor. Her encouragement, guidance, and perspective helped me navigate many a challenging problem, and my conversations with her were a consistent source of positivity and learning throughout my time at Caltech. I leave graduate school a better scientist and person for having her as a role model. Heather fostered a wonderfully positive and supportive environment for her students, giving us the space to explore and grow - I could not have asked for a better advisor or research experience. I would also like to thank Konstantin Batygin for enthusiastic and illuminating discussions that always left me more excited to explore the result at hand. Thank you as well to Dimitri Mawet for providing both expertise and contagious optimism for some of my latest direct imaging endeavors. Thank you to the rest of my thesis committee, namely Geoff Blake, Evan Kirby, and Chuck Steidel for their support, helpful conversations, and insightful questions. I am grateful to have had the opportunity to collaborate with Brendan Bowler. His talk at Caltech my second year of graduate school introduced me to an unexpected population of massive wide-separation planetary-mass companions, and lead to a long-running collaboration from which several of my thesis projects were born.
    [Show full text]
  • Observing List
    day month year Epoch 2000 local clock time: 23.98 Observing List for 23 7 2019 RA DEC alt az Constellation object mag A mag B Separation description hr min deg min 20 50 Andromeda Gamma Andromedae (*266) 2.3 5.5 9.8 yellow & blue green double star 2 3.9 42 19 28 69 Andromeda Pi Andromedae 4.4 8.6 35.9 bright white & faint blue 0 36.9 33 43 30 55 Andromeda STF 79 (Struve) 6 7 7.8 bluish pair 1 0.1 44 42 16 52 Andromeda 59 Andromedae 6.5 7 16.6 neat pair, both greenish blue 2 10.9 39 2 45 67 Andromeda NGC 7662 (The Blue Snowball) planetary nebula, fairly bright & slightly elongated 23 25.9 42 32.1 31 60 Andromeda M31 (Andromeda Galaxy) large sprial arm galaxy like the Milky Way 0 42.7 41 16 31 61 Andromeda M32 satellite galaxy of Andromeda Galaxy 0 42.7 40 52 32 60 Andromeda M110 (NGC205) satellite galaxy of Andromeda Galaxy 0 40.4 41 41 17 55 Andromeda NGC752 large open cluster of 60 stars 1 57.8 37 41 17 48 Andromeda NGC891 edge on galaxy, needle-like in appearance 2 22.6 42 21 45 69 Andromeda NGC7640 elongated galaxy with mottled halo 23 22.1 40 51 46 57 Andromeda NGC7686 open cluster of 20 stars 23 30.2 49 8 30 121 Aquarius 55 Aquarii, Zeta 4.3 4.5 2.1 close, elegant pair of yellow stars 22 28.8 0 -1 12 120 Aquarius 94 Aquarii 5.3 7.3 12.7 pale rose & emerald 23 19.1 -13 28 32 152 Aquarius M72 globular cluster 20 53.5 -12 32 31 151 Aquarius M73 Y-shaped asterism of 4 stars 20 59 -12 38 16 117 Aquarius NGC7606 Galaxy 23 19.1 -8 29 32 149 Aquarius NGC7009 Saturn Neb planetary nebula, large & bright pale green oval 21 4.2 -11 21.8 38 135
    [Show full text]
  • Naming the Extrasolar Planets
    Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named.
    [Show full text]
  • Double Star Measurements at the Southern Sky with a 50 Cm Reflector in 2016
    Vol. 13 No. 4 October 1, 2017 Journal of Double Star Observations Page 495 Double Star Measurements at the Southern Sky with a 50 cm Reflector in 2016 Rainer Anton Altenholz/Kiel, Germany e-mail: rainer.anton”at”ki.comcity.de Abstract: A 50 cm Ritchey-Chrétien reflector was used for recordings of double stars with a CCD webcam, and measurements of 95 pairs were mostly obtained from “lucky images”, and in some cases by speckle interferometry. The image scale was calibrated with reference systems from the recently published Gaia catalogue of precise position data. For several pairs, deviations from currently assumed orbits were found. Some images of noteworthy systems are also pre- sented. “Chameleon” (PointGrey) with exposure times ranging Introduction from less than a millisecond to several tens of msec, Recordings of double star images were mostly eval- depending on the star brightness, on the filter being uated with “lucky imaging”: Seeing effects are effec- used, and on the seeing. Recordings were usually made tively reduced by using short exposure times, and selec- with a red or near infrared filter, in order to reduce ef- tion of only the best images for stacking, which results fects from chromatic aberrations of the Barlow lens, as in virtually diffraction limited images. In addition, well as from the seeing. Only the best frames, typically speckle interferometry was applied in some cases, as several tens and up to more than 100, were selected, large numbers of speckle images were found in several registered, and stacked. The pixel size of 3.75 µm recordings, caused by rather variable seeing conditions square results in a nominal resolution of 0.096 arcsec/ during this observing campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy Binder
    Astronomy Binder Bloomington High School South 2011 Contents 1 Astronomical Distances 2 1.1 Geometric Methods . 2 1.2 Spectroscopic Methods . 4 1.3 Standard Candle Methods . 4 1.4 Cosmological Redshift . 5 1.5 Distances to Galaxies . 5 2 Age and Size 6 2.1 Measuring Age . 6 2.2 Measuring Size . 7 3 Variable Stars 7 3.1 Pulsating Variable Stars . 7 3.1.1 Cepheid Variables . 7 3.1.2 RR Lyrae Variables . 8 3.1.3 RV Tauri Variables . 8 3.1.4 Long Period/Semiregular Variables . 8 3.2 Binary Variables . 8 3.3 Cataclysmic Variables . 11 3.3.1 Classical Nova . 11 3.3.2 Recurrent Novae . 11 3.3.3 Dwarf Novae (U Geminorum) . 11 3.3.4 X-Ray Binary . 11 3.3.5 Polar (AM Herculis) star . 12 3.3.6 Intermediate Polar (DQ Herculis) star . 12 3.3.7 Super Soft Source (SSS) . 12 3.3.8 VY Sculptoris stars . 12 3.3.9 AM Canum Venaticorum stars . 12 3.3.10 SW Sextantis stars . 13 3.3.11 Symbiotic Stars . 13 3.3.12 Pulsating White Dwarfs . 13 4 Galaxy Classification 14 4.1 Elliptical Galaxies . 14 4.2 Spirals . 15 4.3 Classification . 16 4.4 The Milky Way Galaxy (MWG . 19 4.4.1 Scale Height . 19 4.4.2 Magellanic Clouds . 20 5 Galaxy Interactions 20 6 Interstellar Medium 21 7 Active Galactic Nuclei 22 7.1 AGN Equations . 23 1 8 Spectra 25 8.1 21 cm line . 26 9 Black Holes 26 9.1 Stellar Black Holes .
    [Show full text]
  • A Basic Requirement for Studying the Heavens Is Determining Where In
    Abasic requirement for studying the heavens is determining where in the sky things are. To specify sky positions, astronomers have developed several coordinate systems. Each uses a coordinate grid projected on to the celestial sphere, in analogy to the geographic coordinate system used on the surface of the Earth. The coordinate systems differ only in their choice of the fundamental plane, which divides the sky into two equal hemispheres along a great circle (the fundamental plane of the geographic system is the Earth's equator) . Each coordinate system is named for its choice of fundamental plane. The equatorial coordinate system is probably the most widely used celestial coordinate system. It is also the one most closely related to the geographic coordinate system, because they use the same fun­ damental plane and the same poles. The projection of the Earth's equator onto the celestial sphere is called the celestial equator. Similarly, projecting the geographic poles on to the celest ial sphere defines the north and south celestial poles. However, there is an important difference between the equatorial and geographic coordinate systems: the geographic system is fixed to the Earth; it rotates as the Earth does . The equatorial system is fixed to the stars, so it appears to rotate across the sky with the stars, but of course it's really the Earth rotating under the fixed sky. The latitudinal (latitude-like) angle of the equatorial system is called declination (Dec for short) . It measures the angle of an object above or below the celestial equator. The longitud inal angle is called the right ascension (RA for short).
    [Show full text]
  • Rhodri Evans
    Rhodri Evans The Cosmic Microwave Background How It Changed Our Understanding of the Universe Astronomers’ Universe More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/6960 Rhodri Evans The Cosmic Microwave Background How It Changed Our Understanding of the Universe 123 Rhodri Evans School of Physics & Astronomy Cardiff University Cardiff United Kingdom ISSN 1614-659X ISSN 2197-6651 (electronic) ISBN 978-3-319-09927-9 ISBN 978-3-319-09928-6 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-09928-6 Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: : 2014957530 © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center. Violations are liable to prosecution under the respective Copyright Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Constellation Is the Corona Australis
    CORONA AUSTRALIS, THE SOUTHERN CROWN Corona Australis is a constellation in the southern celestial hemisphere. Its Latin name means "southern crown", and it is the southern counterpart of Corona Borealis, the northern crown. One of the 48 constellations listed by the 2nd-century astronomer Ptolemy, it remains one of the 88 modern constellations. The Ancient Greeks saw Corona Australis as a wreath rather than a crown and associated it with Sagittarius or Centaurus. Other cultures have likened the pattern to a turtle, ostrich nest, a tent, or even a hut belonging to a rock hyrax (a shrewmouse; a small, well-furred, rotund animals with short tails). Although fainter than its northern namesake, the oval - or horseshoe-shaped pattern of its brighter stars renders it distinctive. Alpha and Beta Coronae Australis are its two brightest stars with an apparent magnitude of around 4.1. Epsilon Coronae Australis is the brightest example of a W Ursae Majoris variable in the southern sky (an eclipsing contact binary). Lying alongside the Milky Way, Corona Australis contains one of the closest star-forming regions to our Solar System —a dusty dark nebula known as the Corona Australis Molecular Cloud, lying about 430 light years away. Within it are stars at the earliest stages of their lifespan. The variable stars R and TY Coronae Australis light up parts of the nebula, which varies in brightness accordingly. Corona Australis is bordered by Sagittarius to the north, Scorpius to the west, Telescopium to the south, and Ara to the southwest. The three-letter abbreviation for the constellation, as adopted by the International Astronomical Union in 1922, is 'CrA'.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brightest Stars Seite 1 Von 9
    The Brightest Stars Seite 1 von 9 The Brightest Stars This is a list of the 300 brightest stars made using data from the Hipparcos catalogue. The stellar distances are only fairly accurate for stars well within 1000 light years. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 No. Star Names Equatorial Galactic Spectral Vis Abs Prllx Err Dist Coordinates Coordinates Type Mag Mag ly RA Dec l° b° 1. Alpha Canis Majoris Sirius 06 45 -16.7 227.2 -8.9 A1V -1.44 1.45 379.21 1.58 9 2. Alpha Carinae Canopus 06 24 -52.7 261.2 -25.3 F0Ib -0.62 -5.53 10.43 0.53 310 3. Alpha Centauri Rigil Kentaurus 14 40 -60.8 315.8 -0.7 G2V+K1V -0.27 4.08 742.12 1.40 4 4. Alpha Boötis Arcturus 14 16 +19.2 15.2 +69.0 K2III -0.05 -0.31 88.85 0.74 37 5. Alpha Lyrae Vega 18 37 +38.8 67.5 +19.2 A0V 0.03 0.58 128.93 0.55 25 6. Alpha Aurigae Capella 05 17 +46.0 162.6 +4.6 G5III+G0III 0.08 -0.48 77.29 0.89 42 7. Beta Orionis Rigel 05 15 -8.2 209.3 -25.1 B8Ia 0.18 -6.69 4.22 0.81 770 8. Alpha Canis Minoris Procyon 07 39 +5.2 213.7 +13.0 F5IV-V 0.40 2.68 285.93 0.88 11 9. Alpha Eridani Achernar 01 38 -57.2 290.7 -58.8 B3V 0.45 -2.77 22.68 0.57 144 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Anousheh Ansari
    : Fort Worth Astronomical Society (Est. 1949) August 2010 Astronomical League Member At the August Meeting: Special Guest Anousheh Ansari Club Calendar – 2 – 3 Skyportunities Star Party & Club Reports – 5 House Calls by Ophiuchus – 6 Hubble’s Amazing Rescue – 8 Your Most Important Optics -- 9 Stargazers’ Diary – 11 1 Milky Way Over Colorado by Jim Murray August 2010 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Third Qtr Moon Challenge binary star for August: Make use of the New Viking 1 Orbiter 11:59 pm Moon Weekend for Alvan Clark 11 (ADS 11324) (Serpens Cauda) ceases operation better viewing at the 30 years ago Notable carbon star for August: Dark Sky Site Mars : Saturn O V Aquilae 1.9 Conjunction Mercury at greatest Challenge deep-sky object for August: eastern elongation Venus, Mars and Abell 53 (Aquila) Saturn all within a this evening binocular field of First in-flight New Moon view for the first 12 New Moon shuttle repair Neal Armstrong Weekend Weekend days of August. 15 years ago born 80 years ago 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 New Moon Moon at Perigee Double shadow (224,386 miles) transit on Jupiter 3RF Star Party 10:08 pm 1 pm 5:12am High in SSW Museum Star (A.T. @ 5:21 am) Party Venus : Saturn O . 3 of separation Perseid Meteor Watch Party @ 3RF New Moon Magellan enters Fairly consistent show Weekend orbit around Venus of about 60 per hour 20 years ago 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Algol at Minima 2:45 am - In NE First Qtr Moon Total Solar 1:14 pm Eclipse in 7 years Nearest arc of totality takes in FWAS Grand Island NE St Joseph MO Meeting With Neptune @ Columbia MO Venus at greatest Opposition Anousheh Algol at Minima eastern elongation N of Nashville TN 11:34pm Low In NE 5 am N of Charleston SC Ansari this evening 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Full Moon Moon at Apogee 2:05 pm (252,518.miles) GATE CODES Smallest of 2010 1 am to the (within 11 hrs of apogee) DARK SKY SITE will be changed st September 1 BE SURE YOU ARE CURRENT WITH DUES to Astroboy’s Day Job Venus : Mars receive new codes O 2 Conjunction 29 31 30 Anousheh Ansari’s Mission Patch at right.
    [Show full text]
  • To Trappist-1 RAIR Golaith Ship
    Mission Profile Navigator 10:07 AM - 12/2/2018 page 1 of 10 Interstellar Mission Profile for SGC Navigator - Report - Printable ver 4.3 Start: omicron 2 40 Eri (Star Trek Vulcan home star) (HD Dest: Trappist-1 2Mass J23062928-0502285 in Aquarii [X -9.150] [Y - 26965) (Keid) (HIP 19849) in Eridani [X 14.437] [Y - 38.296] [Z -3.452] 7.102] [Z -2.167] Rendezvous Earth date arrival: Tuesday, December 8, 2420 Ship Type: RAIR Golaith Ship date arrival: Tuesday, January 8, 2419 Type 2: Rendezvous with a coasting leg ( Top speed is reached before mid-point ) Start Position: Start Date: 2-December-2018 Star System omicron 2 40 Eri (Star Trek Vulcan home star) (HD 26965) (Keid) Earth Polar Primary Star: (HIP 19849) RA hours: inactive Type: K0 V Planets: 1e RA min: inactive Binary: B, C, b RA sec: inactive Type: M4.5V, DA2.9 dec. degrees inactive Rank from Earth: 69 Abs Mag.: 5.915956445 dec. minutes inactive dec. seconds inactive Galactic SGC Stats Distance l/y Sector X Y Z Earth to Start Position: 16.2346953 Kappa 14.43696547 -7.10221947 -2.16744969 Destination Arrival Date (Earth time): 8-December-2420 Star System Earth Polar Trappist-1 2Mass J23062928-0502285 Primary Star: RA hours: inactive Type: M8V Planets 4, 3e RA min: inactive Binary: B C RA sec: inactive Type: 0 dec. degrees inactive Rank from Earth 679 Abs Mag.: 18.4 dec. minutes inactive Course Headings SGC decimal dec. seconds inactive RA: (0 <360) 232.905748 dec: (0-180) 91.8817176 Galactic SGC Sector X Y Z Destination: Apparent position | Start of Mission Omega -9.09279603 -38.2336637 -3.46695345 Destination: Real position | Start of Mission Omega -9.09548281 -38.2366036 -3.46626331 Destination: Real position | End of Mission Omega -9.14988933 -38.2961361 -3.45228825 Shifts in distances of Destination Distance l/y X Y Z Change in Apparent vs.
    [Show full text]