DOCSLIB.ORG

FY13 High-Level Deliverables

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FY13 High-Level Deliverables National Optical Astronomy Observatory Fiscal Year Annual Report for FY 2013 (1 October 2012 – 30 September 2013) Submitted to the National Science Foundation Pursuant to Cooperative Support Agreement No. AST-0950945 13 December 2013 Revised 18 September 2014 Contents NOAO MISSION PROFILE .................................................................................................... 1 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 2 2 NOAO ACCOMPLISHMENTS ....................................................................................... 4 2.1 Achievements ..................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Status of Vision and Goals ................................................................................. 5 2.2.1 Status of FY13 High-Level Deliverables ............................................ 5 2.2.2 FY13 Planned vs. Actual Spending and Revenues .............................. 8 2.3 Challenges and Their Impacts ............................................................................ 9 3 SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES AND FINDINGS .............................................................. 11 3.1 Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory ....................................................... 11 3.2 Kitt Peak National Observatory ....................................................................... 14 3.3 Gemini Observatory ......................................................................................... 17 3.4 Community Access Facilities ........................................................................... 19 4 GROUND-BASED O/IR OBSERVING SYSTEM OPERATIONS ............................ 20 4.1 NOAO South .................................................................................................... 20 4.1.1 CTIO .................................................................................................. 20 4.1.2 NOAO South Engineering & Technical Services ............................. 25 4.1.3 NOAO South Facilities Operations ................................................... 25 4.1.4 NOAO South Computer Infrastructure Services ............................... 27 4.2 NOAO North .................................................................................................... 28 4.2.1 KPNO ................................................................................................ 28 4.2.2 NOAO North Engineering & Technical Services ............................. 32 4.2.3 NOAO North Central Facilities Operations ...................................... 33 4.2.4 NOAO North Computer Infrastructure Services ............................... 34 i NOAO FISCAL YEAR ANNUAL REPORT FY 2013 (REVISED) 4.3 NOAO System Science Center ........................................................................ 36 4.3.1 System User Support......................................................................... 37 4.3.2 Science Data Management ................................................................ 38 4.3.3 Time Allocation Committee ............................................................. 41 4.3.4 System Community Development .................................................... 43 4.4 NOAO System Technology Center ................................................................. 47 4.4.1 System Instrumentation .................................................................... 47 4.4.2 ReSTAR Instrumentation.................................................................. 48 4.4.3 Telescope System Instrumentation Program ..................................... 49 4.4.4 LSST Technology ............................................................................. 50 5 NOAO-WIDE PROGRAMS ........................................................................................... 56 5.1 Office of Science ............................................................................................. 56 5.2 Education and Public Outreach ....................................................................... 57 5.3 NOAO Director’s Office ................................................................................. 64 5.4 ARRA Infrastructure Renewal ........................................................................ 67 APPENDICES ........................................................................................................................ 69 A FY13 BUDGET BY PROGRAM .................................................................................... 70 A.1 FY13 Expenditures .......................................................................................... 70 A.2 FY13 Revenue ................................................................................................. 75 A.3 FY13 Funds Carried Forward to FY14............................................................ 78 B NOAO KEY MANAGEMENT & SCIENTIFIC STAFF ACTIVITY ........................ 79 B.1 NOAO Key Management during FY13........................................................... 79 B.2 Scientific Staff Changes during FY13 ............................................................. 79 B.3 Division of Effort—NOAO Scientific/Management Staff .............................. 80 B.4 Scientific Staff Accomplishments and Plans ................................................... 88 C NOAO SCIENTIFIC STAFF PUBLICATIONS ........................................................ 117 D PUBLICATIONS USING DATA FROM NOAO TELESCOPES & ARCHIVES.. 130 D.1 Telescopes at Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory ............................. 130 D.2 Telescopes at Kitt Peak National observatory ............................................... 137 D.3 Gemini Telescopes (NOAO System Science Center) ................................... 147 D.4 W. M. Keck Observatory: Keck I and II ....................................................... 152 D.5 HET and MMT .............................................................................................. 153 D.6 Magellan I and II ........................................................................................... 153 D.7 CHARA and Hale .......................................................................................... 153 D.8 NOAO Science Archive ................................................................................ 153 ii CONTENTS E USAGE STATISTICS FOR ARCHIVED DATA ....................................................... 157 F TELESCOPE PROPOSAL STATISTICS ................................................................... 159 F.1 Semester 2013A Proposal Statistics ............................................................... 159 F.2 Semester 2013B Proposal Statistics ............................................................... 160 G OBSERVING PROGRAMS & INVESTIGATORS FOR 2013 ................................. 162 G.1 Demographics ................................................................................................ 162 G.2 Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory ..................................................... 164 G.3 Kitt Peak National Observatory ..................................................................... 171 G.4 Gemini Observatory ....................................................................................... 179 G.5 Community Access to Private Telescopes ..................................................... 194 H BROADENING PARTICIPATION ............................................................................. 198 I GRANTS OBTAINED IN Q4 ........................................................................................ 203 J SAFETY REPORT FOR Q4 ......................................................................................... 204 ERRATA The 13 December 2013 version of this report included an erroneous value for FY13 outside revenue in one table. The necessary Appendix A corrections are shown in this 18 September 2014 revision: 1. Section A.1 FY13 Expenditures, Table A-1 (continuation) on page 72: a. FY13 Program Outside Revenue was corrected from “(9,689,464)” to “(10,304,393)” b. FY13 Total NOAO Carry-Forward was corrected from “(1,935,360)” to “(1,935,361)” 2. Section A.3 FY13 Funds Carried Forward to FY14, Table A-3 on page 78: a. NOAO Funds Carried Forward was corrected from “1,935,360” to “1,935,361” b. Total Funds Carried Forward was corrected from “2,354,242” to “2,354,243” Cover Caption The top portion of the cover shows an image of the NGC 1398 galaxy taken by the Dark Energy Survey (DES) with the Dark Energy Camera (DECam) on the Blanco 4-m telescope at the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory (CTIO) in Chile. Commissioning of DECam was complete by the end of October 2012, science verification began November 1, the dedication was November 9, and community shared-risk observations started December 1. The DES began officially 31 August 2013; the survey team will use DECam, built by Fermilab, to systematically map one-eighth (5000 square degrees) of the sky. (Image credit: Dark Energy Survey.) The bottom portion of the cover shows a cropped image of the spiral galaxy M51 taken by One Degree Imager (ODI) on the WIYN 3.5-m telescope on Kitt Peak in Arizona. This image demon- strates the excellent sharpness of the ODI in its partially populated focal plane mode (pODI), which uses a little less than one fourth of the total detector locations. The wide field of the One Degree Imager camera made it possible to capture the entire galaxy and its companion in one pointing, something
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Where Are the Distant Worlds? Star Maps
    W here Are the Distant Worlds? Star Maps Abo ut the Activity Whe re are the distant worlds in the night sky? Use a star map to find constellations and to identify stars with extrasolar planets. (Northern Hemisphere only, naked eye) Topics Covered • How to find Constellations • Where we have found planets around other stars Participants Adults, teens, families with children 8 years and up If a school/youth group, 10 years and older 1 to 4 participants per map Materials Needed Location and Timing • Current month's Star Map for the Use this activity at a star party on a public (included) dark, clear night. Timing depends only • At least one set Planetary on how long you want to observe. Postcards with Key (included) • A small (red) flashlight • (Optional) Print list of Visible Stars with Planets (included) Included in This Packet Page Detailed Activity Description 2 Helpful Hints 4 Background Information 5 Planetary Postcards 7 Key Planetary Postcards 9 Star Maps 20 Visible Stars With Planets 33 © 2008 Astronomical Society of the Pacific www.astrosociety.org Copies for educational purposes are permitted. Additional astronomy activities can be found here: http://nightsky.jpl.nasa.gov Detailed Activity Description Leader’s Role Participants’ Roles (Anticipated) Introduction: To Ask: Who has heard that scientists have found planets around stars other than our own Sun? How many of these stars might you think have been found? Anyone ever see a star that has planets around it? (our own Sun, some may know of other stars) We can’t see the planets around other stars, but we can see the star.
    [Show full text]
  • Naming the Extrasolar Planets
    Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named.
    [Show full text]
  • Occurrence and Core-Envelope Structure of 1–4× Earth-Size Planets Around Sun-Like Stars
    Occurrence and core-envelope structure of 1–4× SPECIAL FEATURE Earth-size planets around Sun-like stars Geoffrey W. Marcya,1, Lauren M. Weissa, Erik A. Petiguraa, Howard Isaacsona, Andrew W. Howardb, and Lars A. Buchhavec aDepartment of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; bInstitute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822; and cHarvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 Edited by Adam S. Burrows, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and accepted by the Editorial Board April 16, 2014 (received for review January 24, 2014) Small planets, 1–4× the size of Earth, are extremely common planets. The Doppler reflex velocity of an Earth-size planet − around Sun-like stars, and surprisingly so, as they are missing in orbiting at 0.3 AU is only 0.2 m s 1, difficult to detect with an − our solar system. Recent detections have yielded enough informa- observational precision of 1 m s 1. However, such Earth-size tion about this class of exoplanets to begin characterizing their planets show up as a ∼10-sigma dimming of the host star after occurrence rates, orbits, masses, densities, and internal structures. coadding the brightness measurements from each transit. The Kepler mission finds the smallest planets to be most common, The occurrence rate of Earth-size planets is a major goal of as 26% of Sun-like stars have small, 1–2 R⊕ planets with orbital exoplanet science. With three years of Kepler photometry in periods under 100 d, and 11% have 1–2 R⊕ planets that receive 1–4× hand, two groups worked to account for the detection biases in the incident stellar flux that warms our Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 16 the Sun and Stars
    Chapter 16 The Sun and Stars Stargazing is an awe-inspiring way to enjoy the night sky, but humans can learn only so much about stars from our position on Earth. The Hubble Space Telescope is a school-bus-size telescope that orbits Earth every 97 minutes at an altitude of 353 miles and a speed of about 17,500 miles per hour. The Hubble Space Telescope (HST) transmits images and data from space to computers on Earth. In fact, HST sends enough data back to Earth each week to fill 3,600 feet of books on a shelf. Scientists store the data on special disks. In January 2006, HST captured images of the Orion Nebula, a huge area where stars are being formed. HST’s detailed images revealed over 3,000 stars that were never seen before. Information from the Hubble will help scientists understand more about how stars form. In this chapter, you will learn all about the star of our solar system, the sun, and about the characteristics of other stars. 1. Why do stars shine? 2. What kinds of stars are there? 3. How are stars formed, and do any other stars have planets? 16.1 The Sun and the Stars What are stars? Where did they come from? How long do they last? During most of the star - an enormous hot ball of gas day, we see only one star, the sun, which is 150 million kilometers away. On a clear held together by gravity which night, about 6,000 stars can be seen without a telescope.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy Binder
    Astronomy Binder Bloomington High School South 2011 Contents 1 Astronomical Distances 2 1.1 Geometric Methods . 2 1.2 Spectroscopic Methods . 4 1.3 Standard Candle Methods . 4 1.4 Cosmological Redshift . 5 1.5 Distances to Galaxies . 5 2 Age and Size 6 2.1 Measuring Age . 6 2.2 Measuring Size . 7 3 Variable Stars 7 3.1 Pulsating Variable Stars . 7 3.1.1 Cepheid Variables . 7 3.1.2 RR Lyrae Variables . 8 3.1.3 RV Tauri Variables . 8 3.1.4 Long Period/Semiregular Variables . 8 3.2 Binary Variables . 8 3.3 Cataclysmic Variables . 11 3.3.1 Classical Nova . 11 3.3.2 Recurrent Novae . 11 3.3.3 Dwarf Novae (U Geminorum) . 11 3.3.4 X-Ray Binary . 11 3.3.5 Polar (AM Herculis) star . 12 3.3.6 Intermediate Polar (DQ Herculis) star . 12 3.3.7 Super Soft Source (SSS) . 12 3.3.8 VY Sculptoris stars . 12 3.3.9 AM Canum Venaticorum stars . 12 3.3.10 SW Sextantis stars . 13 3.3.11 Symbiotic Stars . 13 3.3.12 Pulsating White Dwarfs . 13 4 Galaxy Classification 14 4.1 Elliptical Galaxies . 14 4.2 Spirals . 15 4.3 Classification . 16 4.4 The Milky Way Galaxy (MWG . 19 4.4.1 Scale Height . 19 4.4.2 Magellanic Clouds . 20 5 Galaxy Interactions 20 6 Interstellar Medium 21 7 Active Galactic Nuclei 22 7.1 AGN Equations . 23 1 8 Spectra 25 8.1 21 cm line . 26 9 Black Holes 26 9.1 Stellar Black Holes .
    [Show full text]
  • A Basic Requirement for Studying the Heavens Is Determining Where In
    Abasic requirement for studying the heavens is determining where in the sky things are. To specify sky positions, astronomers have developed several coordinate systems. Each uses a coordinate grid projected on to the celestial sphere, in analogy to the geographic coordinate system used on the surface of the Earth. The coordinate systems differ only in their choice of the fundamental plane, which divides the sky into two equal hemispheres along a great circle (the fundamental plane of the geographic system is the Earth's equator) . Each coordinate system is named for its choice of fundamental plane. The equatorial coordinate system is probably the most widely used celestial coordinate system. It is also the one most closely related to the geographic coordinate system, because they use the same fun­ damental plane and the same poles. The projection of the Earth's equator onto the celestial sphere is called the celestial equator. Similarly, projecting the geographic poles on to the celest ial sphere defines the north and south celestial poles. However, there is an important difference between the equatorial and geographic coordinate systems: the geographic system is fixed to the Earth; it rotates as the Earth does . The equatorial system is fixed to the stars, so it appears to rotate across the sky with the stars, but of course it's really the Earth rotating under the fixed sky. The latitudinal (latitude-like) angle of the equatorial system is called declination (Dec for short) . It measures the angle of an object above or below the celestial equator. The longitud inal angle is called the right ascension (RA for short).
    [Show full text]
  • The Maunder Minimum and the Variable Sun-Earth Connection
    The Maunder Minimum and the Variable Sun-Earth Connection (Front illustration: the Sun without spots, July 27, 1954) By Willie Wei-Hock Soon and Steven H. Yaskell To Soon Gim-Chuan, Chua Chiew-See, Pham Than (Lien+Van’s mother) and Ulla and Anna In Memory of Miriam Fuchs (baba Gil’s mother)---W.H.S. In Memory of Andrew Hoff---S.H.Y. To interrupt His Yellow Plan The Sun does not allow Caprices of the Atmosphere – And even when the Snow Heaves Balls of Specks, like Vicious Boy Directly in His Eye – Does not so much as turn His Head Busy with Majesty – ‘Tis His to stimulate the Earth And magnetize the Sea - And bind Astronomy, in place, Yet Any passing by Would deem Ourselves – the busier As the Minutest Bee That rides – emits a Thunder – A Bomb – to justify Emily Dickinson (poem 224. c. 1862) Since people are by nature poorly equipped to register any but short-term changes, it is not surprising that we fail to notice slower changes in either climate or the sun. John A. Eddy, The New Solar Physics (1977-78) Foreword By E. N. Parker In this time of global warming we are impelled by both the anticipated dire consequences and by scientific curiosity to investigate the factors that drive the climate. Climate has fluctuated strongly and abruptly in the past, with ice ages and interglacial warming as the long term extremes. Historical research in the last decades has shown short term climatic transients to be a frequent occurrence, often imposing disastrous hardship on the afflicted human populations.
    [Show full text]
  • 10. Scientific Programme 10.1
    10. SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMME 10.1. OVERVIEW (a) Invited Discourses Plenary Hall B 18:00-19:30 ID1 “The Zoo of Galaxies” Karen Masters, University of Portsmouth, UK Monday, 20 August ID2 “Supernovae, the Accelerating Cosmos, and Dark Energy” Brian Schmidt, ANU, Australia Wednesday, 22 August ID3 “The Herschel View of Star Formation” Philippe André, CEA Saclay, France Wednesday, 29 August ID4 “Past, Present and Future of Chinese Astronomy” Cheng Fang, Nanjing University, China Nanjing Thursday, 30 August (b) Plenary Symposium Review Talks Plenary Hall B (B) 8:30-10:00 Or Rooms 309A+B (3) IAUS 288 Astrophysics from Antarctica John Storey (3) Mon. 20 IAUS 289 The Cosmic Distance Scale: Past, Present and Future Wendy Freedman (3) Mon. 27 IAUS 290 Probing General Relativity using Accreting Black Holes Andy Fabian (B) Wed. 22 IAUS 291 Pulsars are Cool – seriously Scott Ransom (3) Thu. 23 Magnetars: neutron stars with magnetic storms Nanda Rea (3) Thu. 23 Probing Gravitation with Pulsars Michael Kremer (3) Thu. 23 IAUS 292 From Gas to Stars over Cosmic Time Mordacai-Mark Mac Low (B) Tue. 21 IAUS 293 The Kepler Mission: NASA’s ExoEarth Census Natalie Batalha (3) Tue. 28 IAUS 294 The Origin and Evolution of Cosmic Magnetism Bryan Gaensler (B) Wed. 29 IAUS 295 Black Holes in Galaxies John Kormendy (B) Thu. 30 (c) Symposia - Week 1 IAUS 288 Astrophysics from Antartica IAUS 290 Accretion on all scales IAUS 291 Neutron Stars and Pulsars IAUS 292 Molecular gas, Dust, and Star Formation in Galaxies (d) Symposia –Week 2 IAUS 289 Advancing the Physics of Cosmic
    [Show full text]
  • GU Monocerotis: a High-Mass Eclipsing Overcontact Binary in the Young Open Cluster Dolidze 25? J
    A&A 590, A45 (2016) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628224 & c ESO 2016 Astrophysics GU Monocerotis: A high-mass eclipsing overcontact binary in the young open cluster Dolidze 25? J. Lorenzo1, I. Negueruela1, F. Vilardell2, S. Simón-Díaz3; 4, P. Pastor5, and M. Méndez Majuelos6 1 Departamento de Física, Ingeniería de Sistemas y Teoría de la Señal, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad de Alicante, Carretera de San Vicente del Raspeig s/n, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain e-mail: [email protected] 2 Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya, Edifici Nexus, c/ Capitá, 2−4, desp. 201, 08034 Barcelona, Spain 3 Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, Vía Láctea s/n, 38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 4 Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna, Facultad de Física y Matemáticas, Avda. Astrofísico Francisco Sánchez s/n, 38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 5 Departamento de Lenguajes y Sistemas Informáticos, Universidad de Alicante, Apdo. 99, 03080 Alicante, Spain 6 Departamento de Ciencias, IES Arroyo Hondo, c/ Maestro Manuel Casal 2, 11520 Rota, Cádiz, Spain Received 30 January 2016 / Accepted 3 March 2016 ABSTRACT Context. The eclipsing binary GU Mon is located in the star-forming cluster Dolidze 25, which has the lowest metallicity measured in a Milky Way young cluster. Aims. GU Mon has been identified as a short-period eclipsing binary with two early B-type components. We set out to derive its orbital and stellar parameters. Methods. We present a comprehensive analysis, including B and V light curves and 11 high-resolution spectra, to verify the orbital period and determine parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • Ghost Imaging of Space Objects
    Ghost Imaging of Space Objects Dmitry V. Strekalov, Baris I. Erkmen, Igor Kulikov, and Nan Yu Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, California 91109-8099 USA NIAC Final Report September 2014 Contents I. The proposed research 1 A. Origins and motivation of this research 1 B. Proposed approach in a nutshell 3 C. Proposed approach in the context of modern astronomy 7 D. Perceived benefits and perspectives 12 II. Phase I goals and accomplishments 18 A. Introducing the theoretical model 19 B. A Gaussian absorber 28 C. Unbalanced arms configuration 32 D. Phase I summary 34 III. Phase II goals and accomplishments 37 A. Advanced theoretical analysis 38 B. On observability of a shadow gradient 47 C. Signal-to-noise ratio 49 D. From detection to imaging 59 E. Experimental demonstration 72 F. On observation of phase objects 86 IV. Dissemination and outreach 90 V. Conclusion 92 References 95 1 I. THE PROPOSED RESEARCH The NIAC Ghost Imaging of Space Objects research program has been carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Caltech. The program consisted of Phase I (October 2011 to September 2012) and Phase II (October 2012 to September 2014). The research team consisted of Drs. Dmitry Strekalov (PI), Baris Erkmen, Igor Kulikov and Nan Yu. The team members acknowledge stimulating discussions with Drs. Leonidas Moustakas, Andrew Shapiro-Scharlotta, Victor Vilnrotter, Michael Werner and Paul Goldsmith of JPL; Maria Chekhova and Timur Iskhakov of Max Plank Institute for Physics of Light, Erlangen; Paul Nu˜nez of Coll`ege de France & Observatoire de la Cˆote d’Azur; and technical support from Victor White and Pierre Echternach of JPL.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2103.07476V1 [Astro-Ph.GA] 12 Mar 2021
    FERMILAB-PUB-21-075-AE-LDRD Draft version September 3, 2021 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX63 The DECam Local Volume Exploration Survey: Overview and First Data Release A. Drlica-Wagner ,1, 2, 3 J. L. Carlin ,4 D. L. Nidever ,5, 6 P. S. Ferguson ,7, 8 N. Kuropatkin ,1 M. Adamow´ ,9, 10 W. Cerny ,2, 3 Y. Choi ,11 J. H. Esteves,12 C. E. Mart´ınez-Vazquez´ ,13 S. Mau ,14, 15 A. E. Miller,16, 17 B. Mutlu-Pakdil ,2, 3 E. H. Neilsen ,1 K. A. G. Olsen ,6 A. B. Pace ,18 A. H. Riley ,7, 8 J. D. Sakowska ,19 D. J. Sand ,20 L. Santana-Silva ,21 E. J. Tollerud ,11 D. L. Tucker ,1 A. K. Vivas ,13 E. Zaborowski,2 A. Zenteno ,13 T. M. C. Abbott ,13 S. Allam ,1 K. Bechtol ,22, 23 C. P. M. Bell ,16 E. F. Bell ,24 P. Bilaji,2, 3 C. R. Bom ,25 J. A. Carballo-Bello ,26 D. Crnojevic´ ,27 M.-R. L. Cioni ,16 A. Diaz-Ocampo,28 T. J. L. de Boer ,29 D. Erkal ,19 R. A. Gruendl ,30, 31 D. Hernandez-Lang,32, 13, 33 A. K. Hughes,20 D. J. James ,34 L. C. Johnson ,35 T. S. Li ,36, 37, 38 Y.-Y. Mao ,39, 38 D. Mart´ınez-Delgado ,40 P. Massana,19, 41 M. McNanna ,22 R. Morgan ,22 E. O. Nadler ,14, 15 N. E. D. Noel¨ ,19 A. Palmese ,1, 2 A. H. G. Peter ,42 E. S.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Universe to Discover: a Guide to Careers in Astronomy
    A New Universe to Discover A Guide to Careers in Astronomy Published by The American Astronomical Society What are Astronomy and Astrophysics? Ever since Galileo first turned his new-fangled one-inch “spyglass” on the moon in 1609, the popular image of the astronomer has been someone who peers through a telescope at the night sky. But astronomers virtually never put eye to lens these days. The main source of astronomical data is still photons (particles of light) from space, but the tools used to gather and analyze them are now so sophisticated that it’s no longer necessary (or even possible, in most cases) for a human eye to look through them. But for all the high-tech gadgetry, the 21st-Century astronomer is still trying to answer the same fundamental questions that puzzled Galileo: How does the universe work, and where did it come from? Webster’s dictionary defines “astronomy” as “the science that deals with the material universe beyond the earth’s atmosphere.” This definition is broad enough to include great theoretical physicists like Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein, and Stephen Hawking as well as astronomers like Copernicus, Johanes Kepler, Fred Hoyle, Edwin Hubble, Carl Sagan, Vera Rubin, and Margaret Burbidge. In fact, the words “astronomy” and “astrophysics” are pretty much interchangeable these days. Whatever you call them, astronomers seek the answers to many fascinating and fundamental questions. Among them: *Is there life beyond earth? *How did the sun and the planets form? *How old are the stars? *What exactly are dark matter and dark energy? *How did the Universe begin, and how will it end? Astronomy is a physical (non-biological) science, like physics and chemistry.
    [Show full text]