DOCSLIB.ORG

Astronomy Binder

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Astronomy Binder Astronomy Binder Bloomington High School South 2011 Contents 1 Astronomical Distances 2 1.1 Geometric Methods . 2 1.2 Spectroscopic Methods . 4 1.3 Standard Candle Methods . 4 1.4 Cosmological Redshift . 5 1.5 Distances to Galaxies . 5 2 Age and Size 6 2.1 Measuring Age . 6 2.2 Measuring Size . 7 3 Variable Stars 7 3.1 Pulsating Variable Stars . 7 3.1.1 Cepheid Variables . 7 3.1.2 RR Lyrae Variables . 8 3.1.3 RV Tauri Variables . 8 3.1.4 Long Period/Semiregular Variables . 8 3.2 Binary Variables . 8 3.3 Cataclysmic Variables . 11 3.3.1 Classical Nova . 11 3.3.2 Recurrent Novae . 11 3.3.3 Dwarf Novae (U Geminorum) . 11 3.3.4 X-Ray Binary . 11 3.3.5 Polar (AM Herculis) star . 12 3.3.6 Intermediate Polar (DQ Herculis) star . 12 3.3.7 Super Soft Source (SSS) . 12 3.3.8 VY Sculptoris stars . 12 3.3.9 AM Canum Venaticorum stars . 12 3.3.10 SW Sextantis stars . 13 3.3.11 Symbiotic Stars . 13 3.3.12 Pulsating White Dwarfs . 13 4 Galaxy Classification 14 4.1 Elliptical Galaxies . 14 4.2 Spirals . 15 4.3 Classification . 16 4.4 The Milky Way Galaxy (MWG . 19 4.4.1 Scale Height . 19 4.4.2 Magellanic Clouds . 20 5 Galaxy Interactions 20 6 Interstellar Medium 21 7 Active Galactic Nuclei 22 7.1 AGN Equations . 23 1 8 Spectra 25 8.1 21 cm line . 26 9 Black Holes 26 9.1 Stellar Black Holes . 26 9.2 Super-massive Black Holes . 27 9.3 Mid-Sized black holes . 27 9.4 Micro-Black Holes . 27 10 Fates of Massive Stars and Supernovae 28 10.1 Supernovae Classification . 28 10.2 Process of core collapse . 29 10.3 Gamma Ray bursts . 30 10.4 Cosmic Rays and Background Radiation . 30 11 Red Giants 31 12 Star Formation 31 13 Classification of other DSOs 33 13.1 Globular Clusters . 33 13.2 Open Clusters . 33 13.3 Planetary Nebulae . 33 14 Special Relativity 34 15 Miscellaneous 35 15.1 The Moon . 36 15.2 Solar System, Orbits, and the Sky . 36 1 Astronomical Distances 1.1 Geometric Methods Trigonometric Parallax If one compares an object to an infinitely distant background from two different viewpoints, the object appears to move less with respect to the background between the viewpoints if it is more distant. Parallax can be measured using radio waves to achieve higher accuracy. 1 µ = d , where µ is parallax in arcsec and d is distance in parsecs. Range: 0 - 100 pc Angular Diameter If one knows the actual size of an object and its angular diameter, one can find its distance. tan θ r = 2 d 2 Where θ is angular diameter, r is actual radius, and d is distance Moving Cluster Method Suppose a star cluster exists where all of the stars can be assumed to be traveling in the same direction, but appear from earth to be converging on a single point (just as parallel lines in Euclidean geometry appear to meet at infinity even though they don't). The angle θ between the cluster and this convergence dθ point can be measured, as can the rate of change dt . Also, the initial radial velocity can be found via Doppler shifts. If the tangential (orthogonal to radial) velocity can be found, it can be compared with dθ dt to give distance. This method is obsolete as its range is not significantly more than that of standard parallax, and the clusters must be very tight. It has only been successfully used once to measure distance to the clusters Hyades and Pleiades. However, it has appeared in several textbooks. −1 vt vt vt(kms ) tan θ = and d = dθ or D(pc) = 00 −1 vr dt 4:74u( year ) Specular Parallax This method attempts to expand the range of the trigonometric parallax method by increasing the distance traveled by the earth to more than 2 au. Specifically, it takes advantage of the sun's motion. au The sun moves 4.09 year with respect to the local standard of rest. If the group of stars one is measuring the distance to can be assumed to have an average motion of zero with respect to the local standard of rest, distance can be measured. There may be mathematical issues with the accuracy of this method in some circumstances. distance traveled by sun sin θ = distance to star Expansion parallax If an object is expanding uniformly, one can find the velocity of expansion using Doppler shifts. Then, if the apparent angular expansion is known, distance can be found. Useful for SN remnants but can be inaccurate if assumption of uniform expansion is not met. vexp d = dθ dt Light Echo A ring around a bright object which emits pulses will be illuminated by the object intermittently. If the time delay can be measured, the radius of the object can be found, which yields the distance when compared with angular diameter. t2 represents the time taken for light traveling to the farthest point on the ring to reach earth, t1 represents the time taken for light traveling to the nearest point on the ring to reach earth, and t0 represents the time taken for light traveling in a straight line from the object to reach earth. r (1 − cos i) r (1 + cos i) c (t − t + t − t ) r t − t = and t − t = so r = 1 0 2 0 ! d = 1 0 c 2 0 c 2 θ 3 1.2 Spectroscopic Methods Absorption Spectra One can use the absorption spectra of a star to find its spectral class and then absolute magnitude. With the apparent magnitude, one can find the distance to the star. m − M = 5 log d − 5 H-R diagram The apparent magnitudes of all stars in a cluster are plotted with surface temperature (calculated from absorption spectra). This H-R diagram is compared with the H-R diagram based on apparent magnitudes thus allowing the distance of the cluster to be found Equations: Same as above; Range 100 to 10,000 pc. Baade-Wesselink Method This applies to pulsating stars only. It involves setting up a ratio of radii at two points in a star's period. Once this has been achieved, the difference of radii can be found using Doppler shifts of the star's layers and the time taken for those shifts. The resulting equations can be solved for radius rt1 θt1 = and rt1 − rt2 = vave∆t so d = r/θ rt2 θt2 1.3 Standard Candle Methods Cepheids and RR Lyrae Cephied variable stars have a known period-luminosity relation, and RR Lyrae stars have a constant absolute magnitude. The apparent magnitudes can be used to find distances; this method is effective from 100 to 107pc. Cephieds: Mv = −2:76 (log(P ) − 1) − 4:16 RR Lyrae: Mv = :75 Type Ia Supernovae The absolute magnitude of any type Ia supernovae is -19.3, and this can be used to find distance. Range: > 106pc. 2 4 For SN events, L = 4π(vejectiont) σT Also, it is possible to match the shape of a type Ia light curve to find mv even if the peak was not itself recorded. Novae: there exists a relationship between M and the time needed to drop a given number of magnitudes: dm M max = −9:96 − 2:311 log v dt 4 dm where dt is the average rate of decline of the magnitude for the first two magnitudes. Other possibilities: Mv for the three brightest stars is -8 Mv for globular clusters is -6.6 Mv for plaetary nebulae at 5007A˚ is -4.53 1.4 Cosmological Redshift Hubble's Law The fabric of the universe is expanding. Objects that are further away have more space between them and us. Since that space is expanding, further objects appear to be receding faster. This gives them a large redshift, which can be used to calculate distances, for objects sufficiently (> 106pc) far away. Note that K corrections must be used to account for the redshift of light from distant galaxies (i.e. received IR radiation may not actually be from the IR portion of the spectrum). km v ( ) = 70d (Mpc) s 1.5 Distances to Galaxies The following methods make use of rearrangements of the following three equations, with the assumption M of a constant surface brightness for all galaxies and also the assumption of a constant L ratio: r θ = d L f = 4πd2 GM v2 = R f Note that surface brightness, defined as θ2 , is constant regardless of distance because, if multiplied by 1 2 1 x, f is multiplied by x2 , but θ is cut by a factor of x, and θ is therefore multiplied by x2 as well, maintaining a constant ratio. mag Surface Brightness S ( ) = M + 2:5 log Area (in arcsec)2 arcsec2 mag L Unit Conversion: S ( ) = 26:402 − 2:5 log S ( sun ) arcsec2 pc2 Tully-Fisher Relation The rotational velocity of spiral galaxies is related to their luminosity. This relation's range is 106 to 109pc. 4 L α vmax 5 For Sa, MB = −9:95 log Vmax + 3:15 For Sb, MB = −10:2 log Vmax + 2:17 For Sc, MB = −11:0 log Vmax + 3:31 Faber-Jackson Relation The velocity dispersion of an elliptical galaxy is proportional to the 4th root of its luminosity. This relation's range is 106 to 109pc. L α σ4 log σ = −:1MB + :2 The Fundamental Plane The Faber-Jackson relation is imprecise.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • JOHN R. THORSTENSEN Address
    CURRICULUM VITAE: JOHN R. THORSTENSEN Address: Department of Physics and Astronomy Dartmouth College 6127 Wilder Laboratory Hanover, NH 03755-3528; (603)-646-2869 [email protected] Undergraduate Studies: Haverford College, B. A. 1974 Astronomy and Physics double major, High Honors in both. Graduate Studies: Ph. D., 1980, University of California, Berkeley Astronomy Department Dissertation : \Optical Studies of Faint Blue X-ray Stars" Graduate Advisor: Professor C. Stuart Bowyer Employment History: Department of Physics and Astronomy, Dartmouth College: { Professor, July 1991 { present { Associate Professor, July 1986 { July 1991 { Assistant Professor, September 1980 { June 1986 Research Assistant, Space Sciences Lab., U.C. Berkeley, 1975 { 1980. Summer Student, National Radio Astronomy Observatory, 1974. Summer Student, Bartol Research Foundation, 1973. Consultant, IBM Corporation, 1973. (STARMAP program). Honors and Awards: Phi Beta Kappa, 1974. National Science Foundation Graduate Fellow, 1974 { 1977. Dorothea Klumpke Roberts Award of the Berkeley Astronomy Dept., 1978. Professional Societies: American Astronomical Society Astronomical Society of the Pacific International Astronomical Union Lifetime Publication List * \Can Collapsed Stars Close the Universe?" Thorstensen, J. R., and Partridge, R. B. 1975, Ap. J., 200, 527. \Optical Identification of Nova Scuti 1975." Raff, M. I., and Thorstensen, J. 1975, P. A. S. P., 87, 593. \Photometry of Slow X-ray Pulsars II: The 13.9 Minute Period of X Persei." Margon, B., Thorstensen, J., Bowyer, S., Mason, K. O., White, N. E., Sanford, P. W., Parkes, G., Stone, R. P. S., and Bailey, J. 1977, Ap. J., 218, 504. \A Spectrophotometric Survey of the A 0535+26 Field." Margon, B., Thorstensen, J., Nelson, J., Chanan, G., and Bowyer, S.
    [Show full text]
  • National Observatories
    Sidney C Wolff NOAO/DIR NATIONAL OPTICAL ASTRONOMY OBSERVATORIES NATIONAL OPTICAL ASTRONOMY OBSERVATORIES Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory Kitt Peak National Observatory National Solar Observatory La Serena, Chile Tucson, Arizona 85726 Sunspot, New Mexico 88349 ANNUAL REPORT October 1996 - September 1997 October 30,1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS L INTRODUCTION IL AURA BOARD m. SCffiNTDJIC PROGRAM A. Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory (CTIO) 1. The Search for High Z Supernovae 2. Nearby Stars and Planets 2 B. Kitt Peak National Observatory (KPNO) 3 1. The History of Star Formation in Distant Galaxies 3 2. Oxygen Abundance and the Age of the Universe 4 3. The Age of Elliptical Galaxies - Is There Enough Time? 5 C. National Solar Observatory (NSO) 5 1. Results from GONG 5 2. High-Resolution Images of Solar Magnetic Fields 6 3. Active Optics Control Loop Closed at the Sac Peak Vacuum Tower Telescope 7 IV. DIVISION OPERATIONS 7 A. CTIO 7 Telescope Upgrades and Instrumentation 7 1. 4-m Upgrades 8 2. Major Instrumentation Efforts 9 3. SOAR 4-m Telescope Project 9 4. CCD Implementation and ARCON Controller Development 10 5. Existing Small General-User Telescopes on Cerro Tololo 10 6. New "Tenant" Installations and Upgrades 10 7. Other 11 B. KPNO 12 1. Image Quality Improvements 12 2. WTYN Queue Observing Experiment 12 3. WTYN 13 4. KPNO Instrumentation Improvements 14 5. Burrell-Schmidt 14 C. NSO 15 1. Kitt Peak 15 2. Sacramento Peak 17 3. Digital Library Development 21 D. USGP/ScOpe 21 E. NOAO Instrumentation 25 1. CCD Mosaic Imager 26 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Ghost Imaging of Space Objects
    Ghost Imaging of Space Objects Dmitry V. Strekalov, Baris I. Erkmen, Igor Kulikov, and Nan Yu Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, California 91109-8099 USA NIAC Final Report September 2014 Contents I. The proposed research 1 A. Origins and motivation of this research 1 B. Proposed approach in a nutshell 3 C. Proposed approach in the context of modern astronomy 7 D. Perceived benefits and perspectives 12 II. Phase I goals and accomplishments 18 A. Introducing the theoretical model 19 B. A Gaussian absorber 28 C. Unbalanced arms configuration 32 D. Phase I summary 34 III. Phase II goals and accomplishments 37 A. Advanced theoretical analysis 38 B. On observability of a shadow gradient 47 C. Signal-to-noise ratio 49 D. From detection to imaging 59 E. Experimental demonstration 72 F. On observation of phase objects 86 IV. Dissemination and outreach 90 V. Conclusion 92 References 95 1 I. THE PROPOSED RESEARCH The NIAC Ghost Imaging of Space Objects research program has been carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Caltech. The program consisted of Phase I (October 2011 to September 2012) and Phase II (October 2012 to September 2014). The research team consisted of Drs. Dmitry Strekalov (PI), Baris Erkmen, Igor Kulikov and Nan Yu. The team members acknowledge stimulating discussions with Drs. Leonidas Moustakas, Andrew Shapiro-Scharlotta, Victor Vilnrotter, Michael Werner and Paul Goldsmith of JPL; Maria Chekhova and Timur Iskhakov of Max Plank Institute for Physics of Light, Erlangen; Paul Nu˜nez of Coll`ege de France & Observatoire de la Cˆote d’Azur; and technical support from Victor White and Pierre Echternach of JPL.
    [Show full text]
  • Metadata of the Chapter That Will Be Visualized Online
    Metadata of the chapter that will be visualized online Chapter Title Binary Systems and Their Nuclear Explosions Copyright Year 2018 Copyright Holder The Author(s) Author Family Name Isern Particle Given Name Jordi Suffix Organization Institute of Space Sciences (ICE, CSIC) Address Barcelona, Spain Organization Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC) Address Barcelona, Spain Email [email protected] Corresponding Author Family Name Hernanz Particle Given Name Margarita Suffix Organization Institute of Space Sciences (ICE, CSIC) Address Barcelona, Spain Organization Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC) Address Barcelona, Spain Email [email protected] Author Family Name José Particle Given Name Jordi Suffix Organization Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC) Address Barcelona, Spain Organization Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC) Address Barcelona, Spain Email [email protected] Abstract The nuclear energy supply of a typical star like the Sun would be ∼ 1052 erg if all the hydrogen could be incinerated into iron peak elements. Chapter 5 1 Binary Systems and Their Nuclear 2 Explosions 3 Jordi Isern, Margarita Hernanz, and Jordi José 4 5.1 Accretion onto Compact Objects and Thermonuclear 5 Runaways 6 The nuclear energy supply of a typical star like the Sun would be ∼1052 erg if all 7 the hydrogen could be incinerated into iron peak elements. Since the gravitational 8 binding energy is ∼1049 erg, it is evident that the nuclear energy content is more 9 than enough to blow up the Sun. However, stars are stable thanks to the fact that their 10 matter obeys the equation of state of a classical ideal gas that acts as a thermostat: if 11 some energy is released as a consequence of a thermal fluctuation, the gas expands, 12 the temperature drops and the instability is quenched.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2103.07476V1 [Astro-Ph.GA] 12 Mar 2021
    FERMILAB-PUB-21-075-AE-LDRD Draft version September 3, 2021 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX63 The DECam Local Volume Exploration Survey: Overview and First Data Release A. Drlica-Wagner ,1, 2, 3 J. L. Carlin ,4 D. L. Nidever ,5, 6 P. S. Ferguson ,7, 8 N. Kuropatkin ,1 M. Adamow´ ,9, 10 W. Cerny ,2, 3 Y. Choi ,11 J. H. Esteves,12 C. E. Mart´ınez-Vazquez´ ,13 S. Mau ,14, 15 A. E. Miller,16, 17 B. Mutlu-Pakdil ,2, 3 E. H. Neilsen ,1 K. A. G. Olsen ,6 A. B. Pace ,18 A. H. Riley ,7, 8 J. D. Sakowska ,19 D. J. Sand ,20 L. Santana-Silva ,21 E. J. Tollerud ,11 D. L. Tucker ,1 A. K. Vivas ,13 E. Zaborowski,2 A. Zenteno ,13 T. M. C. Abbott ,13 S. Allam ,1 K. Bechtol ,22, 23 C. P. M. Bell ,16 E. F. Bell ,24 P. Bilaji,2, 3 C. R. Bom ,25 J. A. Carballo-Bello ,26 D. Crnojevic´ ,27 M.-R. L. Cioni ,16 A. Diaz-Ocampo,28 T. J. L. de Boer ,29 D. Erkal ,19 R. A. Gruendl ,30, 31 D. Hernandez-Lang,32, 13, 33 A. K. Hughes,20 D. J. James ,34 L. C. Johnson ,35 T. S. Li ,36, 37, 38 Y.-Y. Mao ,39, 38 D. Mart´ınez-Delgado ,40 P. Massana,19, 41 M. McNanna ,22 R. Morgan ,22 E. O. Nadler ,14, 15 N. E. D. Noel¨ ,19 A. Palmese ,1, 2 A. H. G. Peter ,42 E. S.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhodri Evans
    Rhodri Evans The Cosmic Microwave Background How It Changed Our Understanding of the Universe Astronomers’ Universe More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/6960 Rhodri Evans The Cosmic Microwave Background How It Changed Our Understanding of the Universe 123 Rhodri Evans School of Physics & Astronomy Cardiff University Cardiff United Kingdom ISSN 1614-659X ISSN 2197-6651 (electronic) ISBN 978-3-319-09927-9 ISBN 978-3-319-09928-6 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-09928-6 Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: : 2014957530 © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center. Violations are liable to prosecution under the respective Copyright Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyclotron Radiation from Magnetic Cataclysmic Variables (Polarization, Plasmas, Magnetized, Stars, Herculis, Puppis)
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1985 Cyclotron Radiation From Magnetic Cataclysmic Variables (Polarization, Plasmas, Magnetized, Stars, Herculis, Puppis). Paul Everett aB rrett Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Barrett, Paul Everett, "Cyclotron Radiation From Magnetic Cataclysmic Variables (Polarization, Plasmas, Magnetized, Stars, Herculis, Puppis)." (1985). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 4040. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/4040 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “ Missing Page(s)” . If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication of either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed.
    [Show full text]
  • Stars and Their Spectra: an Introduction to the Spectral Sequence Second Edition James B
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-89954-3 - Stars and Their Spectra: An Introduction to the Spectral Sequence Second Edition James B. Kaler Index More information Star index Stars are arranged by the Latin genitive of their constellation of residence, with other star names interspersed alphabetically. Within a constellation, Bayer Greek letters are given first, followed by Roman letters, Flamsteed numbers, variable stars arranged in traditional order (see Section 1.11), and then other names that take on genitive form. Stellar spectra are indicated by an asterisk. The best-known proper names have priority over their Greek-letter names. Spectra of the Sun and of nebulae are included as well. Abell 21 nucleus, see a Aurigae, see Capella Abell 78 nucleus, 327* ε Aurigae, 178, 186 Achernar, 9, 243, 264, 274 z Aurigae, 177, 186 Acrux, see Alpha Crucis Z Aurigae, 186, 269* Adhara, see Epsilon Canis Majoris AB Aurigae, 255 Albireo, 26 Alcor, 26, 177, 241, 243, 272* Barnard’s Star, 129–130, 131 Aldebaran, 9, 27, 80*, 163, 165 Betelgeuse, 2, 9, 16, 18, 20, 73, 74*, 79, Algol, 20, 26, 176–177, 271*, 333, 366 80*, 88, 104–105, 106*, 110*, 113, Altair, 9, 236, 241, 250 115, 118, 122, 187, 216, 264 a Andromedae, 273, 273* image of, 114 b Andromedae, 164 BDþ284211, 285* g Andromedae, 26 Bl 253* u Andromedae A, 218* a Boo¨tis, see Arcturus u Andromedae B, 109* g Boo¨tis, 243 Z Andromedae, 337 Z Boo¨tis, 185 Antares, 10, 73, 104–105, 113, 115, 118, l Boo¨tis, 254, 280, 314 122, 174* s Boo¨tis, 218* 53 Aquarii A, 195 53 Aquarii B, 195 T Camelopardalis,
    [Show full text]
  • April 14 2018 7:00Pm at the April 2018 Herrett Center for Arts & Science College of Southern Idaho
    Snake River Skies The Newsletter of the Magic Valley Astronomical Society www.mvastro.org Membership Meeting President’s Message Tim Frazier Saturday, April 14th 2018 April 2018 7:00pm at the Herrett Center for Arts & Science College of Southern Idaho. It really is beginning to feel like spring. The weather is more moderate and there will be, hopefully, clearer skies. (I write this with some trepidation as I don’t want to jinx Public Star Party Follows at the it in a manner similar to buying new equipment will ensure at least two weeks of Centennial Observatory cloudy weather.) Along with the season comes some great spring viewing. Leo is high overhead in the early evening with its compliment of galaxies as is Coma Club Officers Berenices and Virgo with that dense cluster of extragalactic objects. Tim Frazier, President One of my first forays into the Coma-Virgo cluster was in the early 1960’s with my [email protected] new 4 ¼ inch f/10 reflector and my first star chart, the epoch 1960 version of Norton’s Star Atlas. I figured from the maps I couldn’t miss seeing something since Robert Mayer, Vice President there were so many so closely packed. That became the real problem as they all [email protected] appeared as fuzzy spots and the maps were not detailed enough to distinguish one galaxy from another. I still have that atlas as it was a precious Christmas gift from Gary Leavitt, Secretary my grandparents but now I use better maps, larger scopes and GOTO to make sure [email protected] it is M84 or M86.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeremiah P. Ostriker
    JEREMIAH P. OSTRIKER Section I: Curriculum Vitae Born: New York, New York, April 13, 1937 A.B. in Physics and Chemistry, Harvard, 1959 Ph.D. in Astrophysics, University of Chicago, 1964 H.D., Doctor of Science, University of Chicago, 1992 Master of Arts, University of Cambridge (England), 2002 Postdoctoral Fellow, University of Cambridge (England), 1964-65 Research Associate and Lecturer, Princeton University, 1965-66 Assistant Professor, Princeton University, 1966-68 Associate Professor, Princeton University, 1968-71 Professor, Princeton University, 1971- Chairman, Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University and Director, Princeton University Observatory, 1979-1995 Charles A. Young Professor of Astronomy, Princeton University, 1982-2002 Member of the Editorial Board and Trustee, Princeton University Press, 1982-84, 1986 Visiting Professor, Harvard University, and Regents Fellow, Smithsonian Institute, 1984-85, Regents Fellow 1987 Visiting Miller Professor, University of California-Berkeley, 1990 Provost, Princeton University, 1995-2001 American Museum of Natural History, Trustee, 1997-2006; Honorary Trustee, 2007-present Plumian Professor of Astronomy & Experimental Philosophy, IoA, Univ. of Cambridge (UK) 2001-2004 Distinguished Visitor, Institute for Advanced Study, 2004-2007 Director, Princeton Institute for Computational Science and Engineering, Princeton University, 2005-present Treasurer, National Academy of Sciences, July 2008-2012 Awards, Prizes and Fellowships National Science Foundation Fellowship, 1960-65 Alfred P. Sloan Fellowship, 1970-72 Helen B. Warner Prize of the American Astronomical Society, 1972 Sherman Fairchild Fellowship of California Institute of Technology, 1977 Henry Norris Russell Prize of the American Astronomical Society, 1980 Smithsonian Institution's Regents Fellowship, 1985 Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1992 Vainu Bappu Memorial Award of the Indian National Science Academy, 1993 Karl Schwarzschild Medal of the Astronomische Gesellschaft, 1999 U.
    [Show full text]
  • Keith Horne: Refereed Publications Papers Submitted: 425. “A
    Keith Horne: Refereed Publications Papers Submitted: 427. “The Lick AGN Monitoring Project 2016: Velocity-Resolved Hβ Lags in Luminous Seyfert Galaxies.” V.U, A.J.Barth, H.A.Vogler, H.Guo, T.Treu, et al. (202?). ApJ, submitted (01 Oct 2021). 426. “Multi-wavelength Optical and NIR Variability Analysis of the Blazar PKS 0027-426.” E.Guise, S.F.H¨onig, T.Almeyda, K.Horne M.Kishimoto, et al. (202?). (arXiv:2108.13386) 425. “A second planet transiting LTT 1445A and a determination of the masses of both worlds.” J.G.Winters, et al. (202?) ApJ, submitted (30 Jul 2021). (arXiv:2107.14737) 424. “A Different-Twin Pair of Sub-Neptunes orbiting TOI-1064 Discovered by TESS, Characterised by CHEOPS and HARPS” T.G.Wilson et al. (202?). ApJ, submitted (12 Jul 2021). 423. “The LHS 1678 System: Two Earth-Sized Transiting Planets and an Astrometric Companion Orbiting an M Dwarf Near the Convective Boundary at 20 pc” M.L.Silverstein, et al. (202?). AJ, submitted (24 Jun 2021). 422. “A temperate Earth-sized planet with strongly tidally-heated interior transiting the M8 dwarf LP 791-18.” M.Peterson, B.Benneke, et al. (202?). submitted (09 May 2021). 421. “The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Reverberation Mapping Project: UV-Optical Accretion Disk Measurements with Hubble Space Telescope.” Y.Homayouni, M.R.Sturm, J.R.Trump, K.Horne, C.J.Grier, Y.Shen, et al. (202?). ApJ submitted (06 May 2021). (arXiv:2105.02884) Papers in Press: 420. “Bayesian Analysis of Quasar Lightcurves with a Running Optimal Average: New Time Delay measurements of COSMOGRAIL Gravitationally Lensed Quasars.” F.R.Donnan, K.Horne, J.V.Hernandez Santisteban (202?) MNRAS, in press (28 Sep 2021).
    [Show full text]
  • FY13 High-Level Deliverables
    National Optical Astronomy Observatory Fiscal Year Annual Report for FY 2013 (1 October 2012 – 30 September 2013) Submitted to the National Science Foundation Pursuant to Cooperative Support Agreement No. AST-0950945 13 December 2013 Revised 18 September 2014 Contents NOAO MISSION PROFILE .................................................................................................... 1 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 2 2 NOAO ACCOMPLISHMENTS ....................................................................................... 4 2.1 Achievements ..................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Status of Vision and Goals ................................................................................. 5 2.2.1 Status of FY13 High-Level Deliverables ............................................ 5 2.2.2 FY13 Planned vs. Actual Spending and Revenues .............................. 8 2.3 Challenges and Their Impacts ............................................................................ 9 3 SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES AND FINDINGS .............................................................. 11 3.1 Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory ....................................................... 11 3.2 Kitt Peak National Observatory ....................................................................... 14 3.3 Gemini Observatory ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]