<<

AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF

Manggon Abot for the degree of Master of Science in Geology presented on July_9, 2009.

Title: Development of Continental Magmatic Systems: Insights from Amphi- bole Chemistry of the Altiplano Puna Volcanic Complex, Central .

Abstract approved:

______Anita L. Grunder

The pressure history of a continental magmatic system can be deci- phered by analyzing the composition of in the eruptive products where the pressure of equilibration correlates with the depth of the magmatic system. This can reveal vertical evolution of the magma as com- position varies significantly with temperature and pressure. The Altiplano

Puna Volcanic Complex (APVC) is a long-lived and large continental mag- matic system that has produced episodic eruptions during the last

10 m.y. The amphiboles from of the various stages during the 10

Ma history have been analyzed, classified and the pressure and temperature calculated using thermodynamic calculation. The APVC amphiboles are cal- cic amphiboles and are magnesiohornblende, , magnesiohast- ingsite, and based on the Leake et al. (1997) classification and based on the Deer et al. (1992) scheme. The amphiboles are also calcic, namely, , tschermakite, , and edenite. They are broadly similar to amphiboles from other calc-alkaline dacitic systems through space and time.

The calculated P-T conditions range from 0.2 to 2.5 kbar and 765oC to

871oC. The P-T conditions are generally similar throughout the 10 Ma time frame of the APVC, although higher minimum and maximum pressures are recorded in the most voluminous 4 Ma pulse. The APVC magmas are repre- sentative of calc-alkaline dacitic magmas associated with and therefore it is a useful model for how large calc-alkaline dacitic systems might evolve. The lack of an obvious trend in P and T with time during the 10 million years history of the APVC, suggests that evolution of dacitic magmas prior to eruption is limited to a narrow depth range in the crust, which is probably pri- marily controlled by the density of the magmas.

©Copyright by Manggon Abot July 9, 2009

All Rights Reserved

Development of Continental Magmatic Systems: Insights from Amphibole Chemistry of the Altiplano Puna Volcanic Complex, Central Andes.

by

Manggon Abot

A THESIS

submitted to

Oregon State University

in partial fulfillment of

the requirements for the

degree of

Master of Science

Presented July 9, 2009

Commencement June 2010

Master of Science thesis of Manggon Abot presented on July 9, 2009.

APPROVED:

______Major Professor, representing Geology

______Chair of the Department of Geosciences

______Dean of the Graduate School

I understand that my thesis will become part of the permanent collection of Oregon State University libraries. My signature below authorizes release of my thesis to any reader upon request.

______Manggon Abot, Author

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would like to extend my gratitude to my main advisors, Shan de Silva and Anita L. Grunder, for providing me the opportunity to undertake this re- search project, and also, for their continued guidance, and patience with me, as I endeavor learning igneous petrology. Committee members Frank Tepley

III and Roger L. Nielsen offered direction in my approach to understanding aspects of Volcanology and amphiboles chemistry, and various aspects of this research. A special thank you to William H. Warnes for his willingness and excitement to act as the GCR on my thesis committee.

I would like to thank the following additional people, who through their technical support and discussion help me to refine various aspects of this thesis: Mike Iademarco, Erin Lieuallen, Allison Weinsteiger and BJ Walker. I would also like to acknowledge the VIPER (Volcanology, Igneous Petrology and Economic Research) Group for conducting series of talks and discussion on amphibole. Lastly, I would like to thank my family for their understanding and continued support that helped me moving forward to get through my masters work.

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page

1. Introduction……………………….……………………………………..….....…1

1.1 Purpose and Scope……………………………………….…….……1

2. Geologic Setting…….………………………….…………………………….….3

2.1 Background……………………….………………………………..….3

2.2 Andes………………………………….………………………….……5

2.3 Central Andes………………………….……………………….……..7

2.4 Evolution of the Altiplano Puna Volcanic Complex…….……..…10

2.5 Rock chemistry……………………………………………………....13

2.6 Spatiotemporal eruption………………………………….………...16

3. Methodology………………………………………………………...….………20

3.1 Selection of samples…………………………………...…….….….20

3.2 Petrography……………………………………………...……...... 20

3.3 Electron Microprobe………………………………………....…..….21

3.4 Calculation of pressure and temperature………………....……...23

3.5 Al-in-hornblende geobarometry…………………………….……...23

4. Result……………………………………………………………………….…...31

4.1 Amphibole classification………………………………………...….31

4.1.1 Leake et al. Classification Scheme…………………………..…..32

4.1.2 Deer et al. Classification Scheme…………………………..…....36

4.3 Classification of APVC amphiboles as a single suite………..…..37

TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)

Page

4.3.1 Lower Rio San Pedro Ignimbrite (LRSPI); 10 Ma……………………………………………………………..……41

4.3.2 Sifon; 8.3 Ma…………………………………………….……..…..41

4.3.3 ; 6.4 Ma …………………………………..…………...... 43

4.3.4 ; 5.3 Ma……………………………………………...……....44

4.3.5 Puripicar; 4.18 Ma…………………………………………..…...... 44

4.3.6 Purico; 1.1 Ma……………………………………………….……..46

4.3.7 Tatio; 0.75 Ma………………………………………………...…....47 . 5. Discussion and Interpretation………………………………………………...49 5.1 APVC Unit comparison………………………………………….….49

5.2 P and T trend with time………………………………………….….50

5.3 Comparison of APVC to Other Silicic system…………...……….56

6. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………....…61

Bibliography……………………………………………………………..…..…….63

Appendices………………………………………………………………….……..69

Appendix A Representative samples……………………..…………….69

Appendix B Microprobe results……...…………………………………..76

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure Page

1. The evolution of AVC consists of four pulses ………………………………..4

2. Map of western showing the plate tectonic framework………………………………………………………...6

3. Isotopic composition. Schematic illustration of Sr- and Nd-isotopic compositions relative to MORB…………………………....10

4. Distribution of major ignimbrite sources of APVC…………………………..11

5. APVC ignimbrites can be classified as high-K to . …………………………………………………………………...13

6. Summary of the Sr- and Nd-isotopic characterization of APVC Ignimbrites………………………………………………………….15

7. Age-volume data for known major ignimbrite in APVC………….….……...17

8. Summary of empirical and experimental calibrations of the Al-in-Hornblende Barometer………………………………...……23

9. Classification of the calcic amphiboles…………………………………..…..32

10. Deer et al. Classification scheme…………………………………………...35

11. The APVC amphiboles………………………………………….……..……..37

12. The APVC amphiboles with alkali concentration >0.5…………………....37

13. The classification based on Deer et al.(1992)…………….…………..…...38

14. Fractured magnesiohornblende from the Sifon ignimbrite with inclusion of feldspar………………………………….……..40

15. Inclusion of plagioclase feldspar and thin rim reaction (<10 um) of magnesiohornblende from the Puripicar ignimbrite…….…………….……..……………………………………….43

16. BSE image of amphibole from the Purico Ignimbrite showing inclusions and perfect cleavages……………………………..44

LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)

Figure Page

17. Plot showing the magmatic pressure of each units against age……………………………………………………………………..…...50

18. Plot showing the depth of each unit against age…...…..…….……….….50

19. Plot showing the temperature of each unit against age……...... …….51

20. Plot showing the pressure versus temperature of each unit based on Holland and Blundy (1994). ………………………….....52

LIST OF TABLES

Table Page

1. Samples used for microprobe analysis……………………………………….2

2. Major ignimbrites and sources of the Altiplano Puna Volcanic Complex of the Central Andes………...………………16

3. Reproducibility and accuracy of hornblende standard……………………..22

4. Reproducibility and accuracy of plagioclase standard…...…….……...…..22

5. Summary of APVC amphiboles petrography and classification………..…39

6. Summary of pressure and temperature of APVC ignimbrite……..…….….39

7. Temperature range obtained from two geothermometers……..……….....52

8. Summary of other silicic volcanic field in comparison with APVC………...54

1. Introduction

1.1 Purpose and Scope

This study was undertaken to gain an understanding of the vertical de- velopment and evolution of the Altiplano Puna Volcanic Complex (APVC) continental magmatic system by using amphibole chemistry to test the hy- pothesis that the APVC magmatic system is getting shallower with time. This study focused on the texture, composition and of the amphibole phenocrysts and microphenocrysts that are susceptible to changes in pres- sure and temperature. Amphibole is a common phenocryst in all samples evaluated and the pattern of compositional profiles in amphibole portrays the temporal evolution of pressure and temperature in the magma system in gen- eral (Spear, 1981; Hammarstrom and Zen, 1986; Vyhnal et al., 1991). The changes of compositional profiles recorded in amphibole could also be inter- preted as changes in the composition of magma in the chamber due to physi- cal changes or recharge. Textural evidence such as reaction rims and zoning can represent periods of disequilibrium within the magma chamber (Sato et al., 2005). From this information a better understanding of the evolutionary history of the APVC can be gained.

In order to test the central hypothesis that the APVC magmatic system is getting shallower with time samples were selected on the basis of timing of

APVC flare-ups between 10 Ma and 1 Ma. New and existing thin sections were studied under the petrographic microscope. Electron microprobe analy-

2 ses were carried out on the represen- Table 1: Samples used for micro- probe analysis. tative ignimbrite samples (Table 1).

Amphibole-plagioclase pairs were selected for the Al-in-hornblende barometry based on using euhedral amphibole grains without reacted or zoned margins that are in contact with plagioclase crystals. Pressures and temperatures of the magma system were calculated using the Al-in-hornblende geobarometer as it potentially offers a basis for understanding the depths relevant to the magmatic systems evolu- tion. Hornblende-plagioclase thermometry along with the Al-in-hornblende barometry of representative samples from the five major pulses of eruption provide new data sets to supplement data obtained by de Silva et al. (1987),

Lindsay et al.(2001), and Schmitt et al.(2001). The integration of new and old data provides new insights into the evolution history of the APVC magmatic system.

3

2. Geologic Setting 2.1 Background

Many large continental volcanic provinces remain active for several million years and their eruptive materials could represent a continuous record of the development of the system (Smith, 1979; Hildreth, 1981; Lipman,

1984; Bachmann et al., 2007; Grunder et al., 2008). Recent work has shown that silicic volcanic fields are characterized by episodic eruptive patterns sug- gesting that the associated sub-volcanic magmatic system also develops epi- sodically (de Silva and Gosnold., 2007; Grunder et. al.,2008). At the Aucan- quilcha Volcanic Complex (AVC) on the northwest edge of the APVC, Grun- der et al. (2008) have shown that the most recent pulse corresponds to the construction of the central, and largest, edifice of the Volcanic

Cluster, Volcan Aucanquilcha (1.1 Ma). As a whole, the AVC has a spatial pattern of volcanism from peripheral to central. They suggested that the mag- matic system of the AVC is getting shallower with time (Figure 2). The AVC may represent a small version of large silicic volcanic field like the APVC (de

Silva and Gosnold., 2007; Grunder et. al., 2007). This study focused on test- ing the hypothesis that the APVC magmatic system may also have become shallower with time. De Silva et al. (2006) suggests that this large silicic vol- canic province has a similar time volume pattern as the AVC, suggesting the

APVC may be used as a model for these large systems. Similarities between the APVC and other large systems has also been documented by Lipman

4

Figure 1: The evolution of AVC consists of four pulses of eruption with the magmatic system getting shallower with time (source Grunder et al., 2008).

(2008) on the regional time-space-volume progression from an earlier ignim- brite flare-up in the Southern Rocky Mountains Volcanic Field (SRMVF).

2.2 Andes.

The subduction of the beneath the

since 60 Ma has resulted in the formation of the Andean 250-

300 km inland from the Peru- trench (Wörner et al., 1992). Today, con-

vergence rate of the Nazca Plate subducting along the South American mar-

gin is 8.7 cm/yr (Scheuber et. al., 1999). The distribution of Wadati Benioff

zone seismicity provides evidence that the Andean Orogen is segmented

5

into zones of shallow (0-10o) to moderate dip (25-30o) along the strike

(Isacks, 1988). The Andean margin at the continental edge along the west-

ern edge of South America has produced 3 zones of active volcanism

(Figure 2). The three zones; the northern volcanic zone (NVZ) in Colombia

and Ecuador (5oN to 2oS), the central volcanic zone (CVZ) in south Peru and

northern Chile (16oS to 27oS), and the southern volcanic zone (SVZ) largely

in southern Chile (33oS to 55oS) are separated by magmatically inactive ar-

eas (Winter, 2001). The Austral Volcanic zone (46oS to 49oS) is another ac-

tive volcanic area within the SVZ that is occasionally grouped with the SVZ

(Figure 2). The active volcanic zones correspond to the steeply dipping (25o

to 30o) segment of the subducting slab with the inactive areas corresponding

to the segment of the Nazca plate with the shallower dip (10o to 15o) (Winter,

2001). The thickness of the continental crust of the NVZ and SVZ is between

45 km and 35 km, and more than 70 km in the CVZ (Zandt et al., 1994).

The composition of volcanic rocks varies systematically along strike of the arc within and between the zones. The NVZ consists of olivine and two , basaltic , andesites, and evolved dacites and rhyolites.

The of the SVZ consists of mainly high alumina and ba- saltic andesites with more evolved rocks in the northern part. The SiO2 is pre- dominantly ranges between 50-65%, with olivine, two , and plagio- clase as common phenocrysts. The CVZ has a more diverse assortment of

6

Figure 2. Map of western South America showing the plate tectonic frame- work, distribution of volcanic products, and crustal types. The crustal thick- ness, petrology and isotopic characteristics differ between the northern, cen- tral and southern volcanic zones (after Winter, 2001).

7 basaltic and rhyolitic volcanic rocks that tend to be more silicic than those found in the SVZ and NVZ.

2.3 Central Andes The volcanic rocks of western , northern Chile, southern Peru, and northwestern Argentina are from an area known for its relatively thick crust (James, 1971) and strong isotopic fingerprint of a crustal origin

(Davidson et al., 1990). Arc and back arc structural belts are the Western

Cordillera, the Altiplano, the Eastern Cordillera, Sub-Andean Zone, and the

Chaco Plain (Wörner et al., 1992). Thickness of the Central Andean crust has been evaluated by seismic refraction and gravimetric surveys (c.f. Schmitz et al., 1997). The continental crust reaches a maximum thickness of between 60

-70 km beneath the Western Cordillera and the Altiplano, and almost twice the crustal thickness in the forearc and the foreland regions of CVZ. Thicken- ing of the Andean crust has been explained by different mechanisms such as crustal shortening (Ruetter et al., 1988), magmatic addition (James, 1971), and thermal uplift coupled with shortening (Isacks, 1988). It is currently thought crustal thickening is mainly caused by horizontal shortening of the thermally softened lithosphere; but 10 -30% is produced by magma addition and other processes such as lithospheric thinning, upper mantle hydration, or tectonic underplating (Allmendinger et al., 1997). The maximum crustal thick- ening of 70 km is observed along the central sector of the Central Andes, where orogenic shortening is the greatest (Allmendinger et al., 1997). Recent

8 geophysical work in the CVZ has revealed a low seismic velocity zone (LSV) beneath the arc at depths from 70 km up to the base of the crust (Wigger et al., 1994). The thick weak crust is due to crustal thickening in the APVC and throughout the Central Andes that results in low crustal seismicity (Beck and

Zandt, 2002). A zone of exceptionally high electrical conductivity has been identified at a depth of 17 to 19 km that is associated with low seismic veloc- ity within the crust (Schwarz et al., 1994).

Large-scale silicic volcanism has been a characteristic feature of Ce- nozoic to Recent volcanism on the thick continental crust of the Central An- des where the Neogene volcanic stratigraphy is dominated by ignimbrites that led to the formation of APVC, the most extensive young ignimbrite prov- ince on the planet. The large-scale silicic volcanism of the APVC is made up of closely spaced calderas and volcanic structures that may be “nested”, rep- resenting multiple eruptions from a single magmatic system (de Silva and

Gosnold, 2007). The volcanic zone consists of nearly 1100 active volcanoes ranging in age from the Upper to recent composite volcanoes of the

Western Cordillera (de Silva and Francis, 1989).

The CVZ volcanic edifices are composed mainly of metaluminous, me- dium-to-high K calc-alkaline and . Trace element patterns are typical for subduction related settings, with a relative depletion in Nb and Ta and relative enrichment in large ion lithophile elements such as Ba, K, Sr, and Rb (Davidson et al., 1991). Sr and O isotope ratios are higher, and Nd

9 isotope ratios lower than when compared (Figure 3) to the northern and southern volcanic zones of the Andes (Davidson et al., 1991; Harmon et al.,

1984; Wörner et al., 1994). The 18O/16O ratios are consistently shifted to higher δ18O values than observed for primitive mantle-derived, little- differentiated) from oceanic regions. Differentiation trends among CVZ magmas can be subdivided into two broad types on the basis of geochemis- try; closed-system trends in which radiogenic isotopic composition does not change with differentiation, and open-system trends in which isotopic compo- sitions change with indices of magma chemical differentiation (Davidson et al., 1991).

The baseline magma compositions in CVZ are significantly differenti- ated relative to primitive composition. Mg numbers and Ni content are far too low to have been in equilibrium with the ultramafic mantle (Davidson et al.,

1991). They are isotopically and chemically distinct from mantle-derived mag- mas from other tectonic settings because of the extensive modification of mantle-derived magmas as they ascend through the thick crust of the Central

Andes (Figure 3, Davidson, 1991).

2.4 Evolution of the Altiplano Puna Volcanic Complex

The APVC is a volcanic field resulting from an Upper Tertiary ignim- brite flare-up. The complex has a spatiotemporal pattern of volcanism span- ning from 10 – 1 Ma, with eruptions becoming more spatially focused in time.

The erupted products cover an area about 70,000 km2 located at the inter-

10

Figure 3: Isotopic composition. Schematic illustration of Sr- and Nd-isotopic compositions relative to MORB, island arc volcanic, and southern, central, northern volcanic zones of the Andes (SVZ and NVZ, respectively) [source: Davidson, 1991]. section of the political boundaries of Chile, Argentina, and Bolivia (de Silva,

1989; de Silva and Gosnold, 2007) (Figure 4). The APVC forms a barren highland plateau with an average elevation of 4000 m and individual volcano summits of over 6000 m.

The Altiplano Puna magma body (APMB), a 2 km thick zone of ex- tremely low S-wave velocities (shear velocities of 1 km s-1) and high electri- cal conductivity has been recognized at between 17 to 19 km beneath the

APVC (Chmielowski et al.,1999; Zandt et al., 2003a; de Silva et al., 2006).

11

Figure 4: Distribution of major ignimbrite sources of APVC. The size of the symbols approximates the relative sizes of the eruptions (source: de Silva et al., 2006). Note the apparent centralization of activity with time. Older erup- tions are smaller and more widely distributed, younger eruption up to 4 Ma are large and focused in the central region.

12

High surface heat flow and a broad highly conductive zone in the middle crust support the existence of an extensive partial melt layer in the southern Alti- plano and Puna (Schwartz et al., 1994; Brasse et al., 2002). The APMB has been suggested to be the largest partially molten zone (20-40% melt) on earth and the remnant of an intermediate (andesitic) magma accumulation zone that fed the upper-crustal magma chamber of the APVC (de Silva et al.,

2006)

2.5 Rock chemistry

The APVC ignimbrites have a general resemblance in their petrologi- cal and chemical characteristics, suggesting that the processes responsible for the formation and evolution of magmas throughout the 10 Ma history are consistent (de Silva et al., 2006). The ignimbrites are crystal rich, calcalka- line, high-K dacites to rhyodacites and minor rhyolites (de Silva and Gosnold,

2007) (Figure 5). The rare andesitic compositions of pumices in some ignim- brites indicate a role for intermediate magmas in the evolution of dacitic mag- mas representing thermal and material input from the APMB into the upper- crustal system (de Silva and Gosnold, 2007).

Pumices contain low-pressure assemblages with , pla- gioclase, amphibole, , and Fe-Ti oxides as the major mineral phases.

Occasional sanidine, and titanite are present. High Ba/Nb and Ba/La suggest a relationship between the silicic volcanism and subduction proc- esses (de Silva and Gosnold, 2007).

13

Figure 5: APVC ignimbrites can be classified as high-K dacites to rhyolites. Andesitic compositions are found as bands and inclusions and rare in- dividual pumices. The inset shows the volumetric significance of different compositions represented in the ignimbrites and the overwhelming domi- nance of dacitic composition. (source: de Silva and Gosnold, 2007).

The APVC eruption volume is estimated at 11,000 km3 in a period of

3 3 10 Myr with 4% (400 km ) true rhyolites (72 % SiO2 and above). 100-120 km of the volume is the 76% silicic Toconoa ignimbrite, the evolved cap of the Atana dacite (Lindsay et al., 2001a). About 90% (9000 km3) of the

3 magmas consist of dacite with 63-68% SiO2. Approximately 6% (600 km ) consist of rhyodacites with 68 to 72% SiO2. Andesite compositions are volu- metrically insignificant. The rhyodacite and rhyolites can be linked to the crys- tal-rich dacites through fractionation processes that result in physical separa- tion of residual liquid (rhyolite) from the dacitic crystal mush (Lindsay et al.,

2001a). The APVC ignimbrite flare-up was largely fed by the accumulation of these dacitic magmas (de Silva, 2006b). The Central Andean ignimbrite mag-

14 mas were dominated by crustal melts, but there is evidence that it is a mix- ture of mantle-derived magmas and melts of the crust (de Silva 1989a). The detailed study of the La Pacana (Schmitt et al., 2001) system suggests that characteristics of the radiogenic isotope of Sr and Nd are best reconciled with a model where at least 30% mantle-derived magma is mixed with the crustal melts (Figure 6).

Depth of origin for magmas is constrained between 15 and 30 km based on isotope and trace element studies of Sr and the lack of HREE de- pletion. The ignimbrite-producing magmas were formed by invading mafic magma from mantle and crustal melts at depths of between 30 and 15 km

(de Silva et al., 2006).

Schmitt et al. (2001), based on study of the Purico system, also sug- gested that magmas originated in the depth range of 30 to 15 km; the upper limit being set by assimilation and fractional crystallization calculation that re- quire an assemblage poor in plagioclase when Sr would be incompatible

(DSr<1). In the upper crust, pre-eruption evolution of dacitic magmas took place at between 110 and 220 MPa or between 4 and 8 km before eruption

(Lindsay et al., 2001b; Schmitt et al., 2001). The petrological and geochemi- cal data support the interpretation of an extensive mantle source driven mag- matic system that becomes more silicic upwards through the crust at three distinct levels; production of intermediate compositions from the lower crustal

MASH zone (mixing of mafic magma and crustal melts), accumulation at 20

15 km (APMB) leading to fractionation producing dacitic melts that eventually separate and accumulate, followed by further evolution at between 4 and 8 km producing crystal-rich dacites prior to eruption (de Silva and Gosnold,

2007).

Figure 6: Summary of the Sr- and Nd-isotopic characterization of the APVC ignimbrites. The APVC is best reconciled with a model where at least 30- 40% mantle-derived magma is mixed with crustal melts. The similarity of the APVC ignimbrite isotope compositions with the range of available basement composition (e.g. Lucassen et al. 1999, 2001) is consistent with a dominantly upper-crustal source. The lower-crust field is from Taylor & McLennan (1985). The inset shows schematically the results of AFC (assimilation frac- tional crystallization) calculation. The APVC are best reconciled with a model assemblage poor in plagioclase; Sr would therefore incompatible (DSr<1). Note the apparent regional difference in isotopic compositions between east- ern and western APVC centers (source: de Silva et al., 2006).

16

2.6 Spatiotemporal eruption

The 10-1 Ma ignimbrite flare-up of APVC produced at least 11,000 km3 of dacitic magma (Table 2, Figure 7). The main features of the spatiotemporal pattern in APVC volcanism are; (1) Ignimbrite eruptions initiated ~ 10 Ma, (2)

Early eruptions were of relatively small volume and distributed broadly throughout the APVC, (3) Subsequent activity became more spatially focused with eruptions occurring in ever more distinct pulses of <1 Ma duration with peaks at ~ 10, 8, 6, and 4 Ma. While there is clearly an issue with the preci- sion of some older ages, the pulses are distinct and are not a function of age precision (error in ages are smaller than the separation of pulses), (4) The

Table 2. Major ignimbrites and source calderas of the Altiplano Puna Vol- canic Complex of the Central Andes (source: de Silva and Gosnold, 2007).

17

Figure 7: Age-volume data for known major ignimbrite eruptions in APVC. rectangles are for eruptions that have been well characterized by age dating, correlation criteria, and volcanological studies. Width of rectangles represents 2 sigma errors. Dashed rectangle outlines are for known eruptions but where the volumes are poorly known. All volumes are deposit volumes and are regarded as minimum estimates based on known distribution as no estimate of coignimbrite ash is included. Based on measured density data, DRE volumes will be about 60 to 70 % of the volumes of the units shown. 1 Artola ; 2. Vilama-Corutu I; 3. Sifon ignimbrite; 4. Panizos; 5.Vilama-Corutu II; 6. Chuhuhuilla; 7. Pujsa; 8. Pelon; 9. Toconao; 10; Atana; 11. Puripicar; 12; Tara; 13; Juvina; 14.Patao; 15; Pampa Chamaca; 16. Laguna Colorado; 17. Purico; 18. Filo Delgado. Also show is the eruption rate per Ma for the main pulses of activity (source: de Silva et al,. 2005).

18 eruption trend is toward larger volumes over time, culminating at ~4 Ma (5) and activity has diminished markedly since 4 Ma, although volcanism has continued until late times.

Major ignimbrites erupted from several centers throughout the APVC.

Of these centers the largest are La Pacana, Guacha, and Pastos Grandes, sites of repeated eruptions, with more than 50% of the magma erupted in the

APVC having been evacuated from these centers. The sources of the early ignimbrites, Artola and Granada (~10 Ma), are buried under younger struc- tures but their location has been inferred with some confidence on the basis of field mapping (Soler et al., 2007). During the 8 Ma pulse, the Sifon and

Vilama ignimbrites erupted in rapid succession from the Pastos Grandes/

Kapina and Vilama calderas respectively and were followed by the Panizos ignimbrites (de Silva and Gosnold, 2007). During the 6 Ma pulse, the Chuhu- huilla ignimbrite (also known as the Pastos Grandes I) was erupted from Pas- tos Grandes as was the Panizos II ignimbrite that erupted from the

Panizos caldera. Earliest eruptions from Guacha and La Pacana also started during this time. The most intense pulse was at ~4 Ma, with eruption of the

4.14 Ma Puripicar (1500 km3) and ~4 Ma Toconoa-Atana (2200 km3) and 3.8

Ma Tara ignimbrites. Minor ignimbrite eruptions from the Chaxas center oc- curred too. The eruption activity diminished after 4 Ma. Eruption from the ~1

Ma pulse produced the Laguna Colorado (~1 Ma) and Purico ignimbrite shield. The most recent activity produced small and distinct ignimbrites such

19 as the Filo Delgado, evacuated from a source on the northern edge of the La

Pacana resurgence dome, and the Tuyajto ignimbrite from beneath the bur- ied source of Cordon Puntas Negras on the Southern edge of La

Pacana Caldera.

Smaller but significant volumes have erupted from Cerro Panizos, the

Laguna Colorado shield, and Cerro Purico (de Silva and Gosnold, 2007).

Each nested caldera records the emplacement and eruption of distinct confo- cal magma batches and documents the episodic growth of large, long-lived, upper-crustal magmatic systems.

Once again, the purpose and scope of this work is to investigate the spatiotemporal development of the APVC magma system as an example of a major batholith scale continental magmatic system, with a magmatic system that is becoming shallower during its 10 Ma evolution.

20

3 Methodology

3.1 Selection of samples

The thin-sections and polished sections were selected from the 5 main eruption pulses at 10, 8, 6, 4, 2, and <1 Ma. The representative samples are from ignimbrites: LRSPI ( ~10 Ma): 83089; Sifon (~8.3 Ma): 83005, 83073,

83048, 84044; Toconce (~6.44 Ma): 83061; Linzor (~5.33 Ma): 83066; Pu- ripicar (~4.18 Ma) : 83017, 83018, 83029 ; Purico (~1.1 Ma): 83041, 83044,

83075) and Tatio (~0.75 Ma): 84065B, 84059. Polished sections were se- lected from the major eruption pulses and used to investigate the textural characteristics and chemical composition. This assisted in the correlation and linking of the respective magmatic system evolution with time. The samples were chosen from the peripheral center of the caldera that represent the eruption pulses, a geographically restricted area that minimizes lateral changes.

3.2 Petrography

Thin and polished sections were examined under the polarizing micro- scope to study textural relationships and mineral assemblages present, and ensure that the criteria for the selection of representative samples was met.

The ideal mineral assemblage that needs to be present in the rock for amphi- bole barometry is quartz, feldspar, plagioclase, amphibole, biotite, titanite, and an Fe-Ti oxide phase (Hammarstrom and Zen, 1986; Hollister et al. (1987). The composition of the coexisting amphibole and plagioclase de-

21 pends on both pressure and temperature (Holland and Blundy, 1994). Horn- blende composition and stability are likely to be important in resolving ques- tions concerning the timing of pressure and temperature variations. Textural relationships must be taken into account for the amphibole-plagioclase pairs selected for the Al-hornblende barometry. Euhedral grains without reacted or zoned margins in contact with plagioclase grains are preferred, however am- phibole having reacted or zoned margins with plagioclase inclusions were also used for the analyses.

3.3 Electron Microprobe

Major element analysis of amphiboles and plagioclase was performed using the CAMECA SX-50 Electron Microprobe at Oregon State University.

The amphibole and plagioclase analyses used a 15 kV accelerating voltage, current beam of 30 nA and a beam diameter size of 1um. Quantitative analy- ses used natural standards, wavelength dispersive spectrometers, off-peak background corrections, X-PHI for amphibole correction and PAP for plagio- clase correction.

The major and trace elements analyzed for amphibole are Na, Mg, F,

Si, K, Ca, Ti, Mn, Fe, Cl, Al, Si and P. The natural standard was used for pri- mary calibration of hornblende (Table 3) and plagioclase (Table 4) in order to get a satisfactory result from the quantitative analysis of the selected ele- ments. Backscattered electron (BSE) images of amphibole crystals were

22

Table 3: Reproducibility and accuracy of hornblende standard

Table 4: Reproducibility and accuracy of plagioclase standard

23 taken to determine the point analysis and for mapping the location of signifi- cant results. Appendix B contains the results of microprobe analyses.

3.4 Calculation of Pressure and Temperature

Since the main goal of this thesis is to test the hypothesis that the

APVC magmatic system is getting shallower with time microprobe analyses are used to estimate the pressure and temperature by the application of Al-in- hornblende barometry (c.f. Hammarstrom and Zen, 1986; Hollister et al.,

1987; Johnson and Rutherford, 1989; Rutherford and Devine, 1988; Schmidt,

1992; Vyhnal et al., 1991).

Figure 8: Summary of empirical and experimental calibrations of the Al-in-hornblende Barometer (after Anderson and Smith, 1995).

24

3.5 Al-in-hornblende geobarometry

Amphibole composition and structure are sensitive to the geological conditions of rock formation which can convey information about local and regional geologic processes. The chemistry of crystallizing amphibole is sen- sitive to pressure, temperature, water, and oxygen fugacity (Spear, 1981).

The Al-in-hornblende method has been shown to be useful in areas where tectonism and plutonism are intimately associated, since there are many con- tacts with country rocks, where the pressures their aureole metamorphic as- semblages might otherwise indicate, are often obscured by syn- and post- plutonic faulting (Tulloh and Challis, 2000). The aluminum-in-hornblende (AH) barometer has also been widely used to estimate the emplacement pressure of granitic rocks (Ague, 1997). Several studies have revealed that the Al con- tent of hornblende shows a linear relationship with pressure and temperature of crystallization (Figure 8).

Hammarstrom and Zen (1986) first calibrated a barometer empirically using total aluminum content in hornblende and estimated the depth of em- placement from contact metamorphic assemblages in the surrounding rock.

Initial observations show a linear relationship with total aluminum in horn- blende increasing as a function of pressure. Quartz, potassium feldspar, pla- gioclase, hornblende, biotite, titanite, the Fe-Ti oxide phase ( or il- menite) and should have crystallized at a similar temperature, or be

25 in apparent textural equilibrium. The calibration is based on the substitution of

2+ AlIV for Si in tetrahedral sites and AlVI for Mg and Fe on octahedral sites.

The aluminum content is then plotted against pressure and a line of best fit

(highest r2, lowest standard error of estimates) is drawn on the plot using the linear regression formula;

P = - 3.92 + 5.03AlT (r2= 0.80) (1)

Hammarstrom and Zen (1986) stated that their barometer is applicable to with pressure > 2 kbar due with an error of ~3 kbar.

Hollister et al. (1987) discussed the suitability of the granitic system for a barometer application and stated that there are 10 minimum chemical spe- cies needed to define the system namely; Na2O, CaO, FeO, MgO, K2O,

Al2O3, Fe2O3, H2O, TiO2 and SiO2.

Hollister et al. (1987) proposed another calibration by refining the

Hammarstrom and Zen (1986) calibration for a middle pressure range of 4-6 kbar that decreased error to ~ 1 kbar between pressures of 2 and 8 kbar. The result is a plot of total Al versus pressure with a line of best fit and r2 of 0.97 and the linear regression formula is slightly different.

P= -4.76 +5.64AlT (2) Johnson and Rutherford (1989) proposed another Al-in- hornblende barometer based on experiments and studies on natural volcanic and plu- tonic rock samples. By melting, then isobarically quenching silica-rich rocks over a range of pressures and temperatures they calculated the total alumi-

26 num content based on 23 Oxygen. A linear regression formula with an r2 value of 0.99 and error of ~0.5 kbar was obtained.

P= -3.46 +4.23AlT (3) The calibration is suitable for rocks solidified between 740-780oC but the normal saturated solidus is between 650-850oC and hornblende grains generated were more aluminous than the natural hornblende formed at similar inferred pressure.

Schmidt (1992) calibrated the Al-in-hornblende in a natural un- der H2O saturated conditions. The best-fit line of the plot is for pressure 2.5 -

13 kbar with r2=0.99 and error of ~0.6 kbar. The experimental data fit the lin- ear expression;

P= - 3.01 +4.76AlT (4)

This formula is proposed for use where total aluminum of hornblende increases with pressure due to tschermak-exchange which substitutes AlVI for Mg in the M2 site and AlIV for Si in the T site accompanied by minor pla- gioclase-substitution. The experimental studies by Ague (1997) also suggest that the change in Al Total is governed largely by tschermak-type substitu- tion. However, the calibration yields higher total aluminum content in horn- blendes due to increased edenite exchange at elevated temperature. There are a number of substitution mechanisms involving the coupling of cations with different valence states to maintain the charge balance. Some common coupled substitutions include aluminum tschermakite (2SiIV + 2MgVI = 2AlIV +

27

2AlVI), and edenite substitution (□A + SiIV = NaA + AlIV). This substitution are linearly independent.

Schmit (1992) calibrated the Al-in-hornblende in a natural tonalite un- der H2O saturated conditions. The best line fit is for pressure of 2.5 -13 kbar with an r2 value of 0.99 and error ~0.6 kbar. The experimental data fit the lin- ear expression;

P= -3.01 +4.76AlT (5)

This formula yields a temperature that depends on pressure values, a value quite similar to those calculated by Hammarstrom and Zen (1986), Hollister et al. (1987), and Johnson and Rutherford (1989).

Holland and Blundy (1990) also noted that Al content of hornblende is not only a function of pressure but temperature; sensitive mainly through an edenitic exchange involving the substitution of Al for Si in the T site coupled with Na and K substitution for vacancies in the A site. A geobarometer was established for aluminum-in-hornblende geothermometry at 700oC that in- cludes pressure as a variable and the equation of the correlation is

P= -3.53 + 5.03AlT (6)

Anderson and Smith (1995) developed a temperature-corrected Al-in- hornblende barometer developed by Schmit (1992) at approximately 675oC and by Johnson and Rutherford (1989) at approximately 760oC that incorpo- rates temperature as put forth in Holland and Blundy (1994).

28

They give a general expression:

P= -4.76AlT-3.01-{[T-675]/85}*{0.53 Al + 0.005294[T-675]} (7)

Blundy and Holland (1990; 1994) have created a geothermometer that uses the compositions of amphibole and plagioclase in equilibrium, combined with pressure to determine magmatic temperatures for edenite- (for as- semblages with quartz) and edenite-richterite (assemblages with or without quartz). The edenite-tremolite thermometer (for assemblages with quartz) is

A A M2 TA = (–76.95 + 0.79P + Yab + 39.4X Na + 22.4X K + (41.5 – 2.89P)•X Al) ______(8) A T pl A T –0.0650 – R•ln[(27•X □•X Si•Xab )/(256•X Na•X Al)]

–1 –1 where TA is expressed in Kelvin, R = 0.0083144 kJ K mol , Yab = 0 for Xab

2 T pl > 0.5 or else Yab = 12.0(1 – Xab pl) – 3.0 kJ. The X Al terms as an exam- ple denote the molar fraction of the Al species in site T (Holland & Blundy,

1994). The edenite-richterite thermometer (for assemblages with or without quartz);

M4 M2 T2 A TB = 78.44 + Yab-an - 33.6X Na – (66.8 – 2.92P).X Al + 78.5X Al + 9.4X Na) ______(9)

M4 T pl M4 T pl 0.0721 – R•ln[(27•X Na. •X Si•Xan )/(64•X Ca•X Al. X ab)]

–1 –1 where TB is expressed in Kelvin, R = 0.0083144 kJ K mol , Yab-an term is given by : for Xab pl > 0.5 than Yab-an = 3.0 kJ otherwise Yab-an = 12.0

29

(2Xab - 1) + 3.0 kJ, and various X terms are defined in Holland & Blundy

(1994).

Pressures and temperatures are calculated in a spreadsheet by step- wise interative process using Schmidt (1992):

P = -3.01 +4.76AlTotal (1) where P is in kbar and AlTotal is the total Al content of hornblende in atoms per formula unit, is used to obtain an initial estimate of pressure independent of temperature.

Pressure, P of equation (1) is substituted for the value of P in the edenite- tremolite thermometer of Holland & Blundy (1994);

A A M2 TA = (–76.95 + 0.79P + Yab + 39.4X Na + 22.4X K + (41.5 – 2.89P)•X Al) ______(9) A T pl A T –0.0650 – R•ln[(27•X □•X Si•Xab )/(256•X Na•X Al)]

–1 –1 where TA is expressed in °C, R = 0.0083144 kJ K mol , Yab = 0 for Xab pl >

0.5 or else Yab = 12.0(1 – Xab pl)2 – 3.0 kJ, and various X terms are defined in Holland & Blundy (1994).

TA is substituted into the temperature-dependent barometer of Anderson & Smith (1995):

PAS = 4.76AlT – 3.01 – {(TA – 675)/85}•{0.530AlT + 0.005294(TA – 675)} (10)

30

PAS of equation (10) is substituted back into equation (9) resulting in a revised

TA, which is then used in equation (10) for updated estimate of PAS. Normally after repeating the above substitutions three or four times, the new value of

0 TA does not change by 1 C and the new value of PAS does not change by more than 0.1 kbar from the previous values of TA and PAS respectively, and the iteration is terminated.

In this study P and T of the APVC magmatic systems using the me- tods of Holland and Blundy (1994) and compared the result to the other silicic systems such as the Atana, Toba, Pinatubo, and Fish Canyon .

31

4. Results 4.1 Amphibole classification In this chapter, microprobe analyses of amphiboles are discussed in terms of classification and petrology. First, amphiboles are discussed as a single suite and then compared to other well-studied dacitic systems to put the APVC data in context. Previous data from de Silva (1987) using the same thin sections, are compared with the newly acquired data from this the- sis. A comparison of the two data sets is shown in figure 9 and has no signifi- cant variation, allowing their combination as a single larger data set. Details of the representative units is in Appendix A. Second, the characteristics of each individual unit is presented and inter-intra unit variations are considered.

The amphibole classification schemes used are Leake et al.(1997), and Deer et al.(1992). Amphibole can be classified based on its chemical composition and crystal chemistry. In this study the classification is based on chemical contents using the standard amphibole formula AB2C5T8O22(OH,F)2.

The two schemes used are differentiated by the calculation and plotting of the

Y-axis using Mg# for Leake et al. (1997), and (Na+K)A content in Deer et al.

(1992).

4.1.1. Leake et al. Classification Scheme

The amphiboles are classified into 4 main groups: (1) The - iron-- group, (2) calcic group, (3) sodic-calcic group and,

32

Figure 9:Classification of the calcic amphiboles (Leake et al., 1997).

33

(4) sodic group. In the APVC the amphiboles fall into the calcic group (Figure

10).

According to Leake et al. (1997), the component of the formula is con- ventionally described as A, B, C, T and “OH” and correspond to the crystallo- graphic sites;

A one site per formula unit

B two M4 sites per formula unit

C a composite of 5 sites made up of 2M1, 2M2 and 1M3

site per formula unit

T eight sites, in two sets of four,

OH two sites per formula unit

These sites are normally occupied by the ions;

A only □ empty site and K

A or B Na

B only Ca

C or B L-type ions :Mg, Fe2+, Mn2+, Li and rarer ions of

similar size, such as Zn, Ni, Co

C or T M-type ions: Al

C only Fe3+, and rarely Mn3+, Cr3+

C or T Ti4+ (High-valence ions)

C only Zr4+

T only Si

34

“OH” Anions: OH, F, Cl, O

The standard amphibole formula calculations are based on arithmetic

convention that assigns ions to convenient and reasonable site-

occupancies. The following steps should be observed:

A). the formula should be calculated to 24 (O, OH, F, Cl) if the amount of

H2O and halogen is significant

B). If the H2O and halogen content is insignificant then the formula calcu

lation should be done on 23 (O) with 2 (OH, F, Cl) as assumed.

C). the sum of the T site elements should be 8.00, using Si, then Al, then

Ti. The normal maximum substitution for Si is 2, but this can be exceeded.

D). the sum of elements in site C is up to 5.00, using excess Al and Ti

from C, and then Zr, Cr3+, Fe3+, Mn3+, Mg, Fe2+, Mn2+, any L2+ type ions

and then Li.

E). Sum in site B is up to 2.00 using excess Mg, Fe2+, Mn2+ and Li from D,

then Ca, then Na.

f). The excess Na from E is assigned to A site, then all K. The total of site

“A” elements should be between 0 and 1.00.

4.1.2 Deer et al. Classification Scheme

The range of compositions for tremolite, hornblende, edenite, par- gasite and tschermakite is shown by the plot of (Na + K) atoms in A site and the number of Si atoms per formula unit (Figure 10).

Fe2+ replaces Mg, usually with (Fe2+ / Fe2+ + Mg) >0.5 and is indicated

35

Figure 10: Deer et al Classification scheme. The chemical variation of calcic amphibole expressed as numbers of (Na + K) in A sites and Si atoms per for- mula unit. by the prefix “ferro”. Tremolite- with (Fe2+ / Fe2+ + Mg) between 0.1 and 0.5 is called actinolite and those with Fe2+ / Fe2+ + Mg) >0.5 are ferro- actinolite.

4.3 Classification of APVC Amphiboles as a single suite The two distinctive groups of the calcic amphiboles in the APVC are characterized by the CaB >1.50, Ti< 0.50 and CaA< 0.50 but they are also dif- ferentiated by the alkali concentration in the A-site, (Na+K)A >0.50 or (Na+K)

A<0.50. The tschermakite and magnesiohornblende with (Na+K)A<0.50 con- centration will extend toward or pargasite and edenite composition as (Na+K)A>0.50. The naming of the magnesiohastingsite and

36 pargasite is governed by the AlVI and Fe3+ concentration in the C-site. Amphi- bole is classified as magnesiohastingsite when AlVI < Fe3+ and pargasite when

AlVI > Fe3+ (Figure 9). The AlVI and Fe3+ concentration in the C-site also affect

the naming of amphibole with alkali concentration in the A-site, (Na+K) A

>0.50 and the Mg# <0.50 and Si in formula between 5.5 to 6.5 into either fer- ropargasite (AlVI < Fe3+) or hastingsite (AlVI > Fe3+).

The amphiboles of the APVC classified according to Leake et al.

(1997) are magnesiohornblende and tschermakite (Figure 11). Amphiboles with alkali concentration more than 0.50 (Na+K)A>0.50 are further classified as magnesiohastingsite and edenite (Figure 12; Table 5 ). Based on the classification scheme of Deer et al. (1992) , the amphiboles are classified as hornblende, tschermakite, pargasite and edenite (Figure 13; Table 5).

APVC amphiboles are now discussed in their age and unit context to help address the central hypothesis of whether the APVC magmatic system shows variation with time and, specifically whether it becomes shallower with time. Table 4 summarizes petrographic data for the APVC amphiboles. Geo- barometry and geothermometry results are summarized in Table 6.

4.3.1. Lower Rio San Pedro Ignimbrite (LRSPI); 10 Ma

The amphiboles are anhedral to euhedral with the size range from 0.5-

2.0 mm. Crystals are mostly brown to greenish brown with embayed margins, and thin reaction rims of opaque oxide.

37

Figure 11: The APVC amphiboles. All APVC units plotted on classification of A Leake (1997). The diagram parameters: (CaB>1.50; (Na+K) <0.50, CaA<0.50).

Figure 12: The APVC amphiboles with alkali concentration > 0.5. The dia- A gram parameters: (CaB>1.50; (Na+K) >0.50, Ti<0.50).

38

Figure 13: The classification based on Deer et al. (1992). The APVC amphi- boles are hornblende, tschermakite, pargasite and edenite.

Amphibole composition in the LRSPI ignimbrite varies slightly with

Mg# (100xMg/Mg+Fe total) varying from 74 to 85 with Al2O3 contents varying from 7.49 to 11.21 weight percent. Amphibole rims are magnesiohornblende and tschermakite but are relatively uniform in composition. Average Mg# are between 74 to 83 and Al2O3 content of 7.49 – 10.96 weight percent.

Using the Johnson and Rutherford (1989) calibration of the Al-in- hornblende geobarometer, the amphibole rims (74.90 – 10.96 weight percent

Al2O3) indicate a pressure of 1.9 – 4.5 kbar; the Schmidt (1992) calibration at

800°C yields a pressure of 3.0 – 6.0 kbar.

39

Table 5: Summary of APVC amphiboles petrography and classification

Table 6: Summary of pressure and temperature of APVC ignimbrite.

40

4.3.2 Sifon; 8.3 Ma The amphibole occurs as anhedral to euhedral crystals with a size ranging up to 4 mm. Crystals are greenish brown to brown. Phenocrysts and microphenocrysts are fractured, broken and generally have inclusions of glass, plagioclase and Fe-oxide (Figure 14). Thin reaction rims (< 10 um) of plagioclase, pyroxene and oxide are observed.

The composition of amphibole in the Sifon ignimbrite varies slightly with Mg#, ranging from 51 to 77 with Al2O3 contents varying from 7.49 to

11.21 oxide weight percent. Amphibole rims are of magnesiohornblende and tschermakite that is relatively uniform in composition. Average Mg# is be- tween 51 - 75; Al2O3 content is 7.24 – 9.41 weight percent. Using the John- son and Rutherford (1989) calibration of the Al-in-hornblende geobarometer, the amphibole rims (7.24 – 9.41 weight percent Al2O3) indicate a pressure of

1.7 – 3.2 kbar; the Schmidt (1992) calibration at 800°C yields a pressure of

0.7 – 4.5 kbar. Magma pressure calculation based on Holland and Blundy Figure 14: Fractured magnesiohorn- blende from the Sifon ignimbrite with inclusion of plagioclase feldspar. The P and T is 1.9 kbar and 789oC.

41

(1994) shows a range from 1.1 - 2.0 kbar (sample 83073), 0.8 - 1.9 kbar

(sample 84044) and 0.4 – 1.7 kbar (sample 84048). Pressure calculated based, on Blundy and Holland (1990) calibration is within the range of 0.4 -

1.8 kbar. The range of temperature obtained from three samples (83073,

84044 and 84048) on amphibole-plagioclase analysis is from 765 - 860oC.

4.3.3 Toconce; 6.4 Ma

Amphibole has anhedral to euhedral crystals up to 3 mm. Crystals are mainly pleochroic greenish brown to brown. Phenocrysts are fractured, bro- ken and generally have inclusions of biotite, plagioclase and Fe-oxide.

The composition of amphibole in the Toconce ignimbrite changes slightly with Mg# varying from 54 to 75. Al2O3 contents vary from 7.46 to

10.48 weight percent. Amphibole rims are of magnesiohornblende and tschermakite and are relatively uniform in composition with an average Mg# of 54 - 65 and Al2O3 content of 7.57 – 10.48 weight percent.

Using the Johnson and Rutherford (1989) calibration of the Al-in- hornblende geobarometer, the amphibole rims (7.57 – 10.48 weight percent

Al2O3) indicate a pressure of 1.9 – 4.4 kbar; the Schmidt (1992) calibration at

800°C yields a pressure of 3.1 – 5.9 kbar. Magma pressure calculated based on Holland and Blundy (1994) shows a range from 0.6 – 2.0 kbar. Calculated pressure based on Blundy and Holland (1990) ranges from 0.4 – 1.6 kbar.

The temperatures obtained from amphibole-plagioclase analysis is between

781 - 871oC.

42

4.3.4 Linzor ; 5.3 Ma Amphibole phenocrysts range in size up to 3 mm and are generally anhedral to euhedral, abraded, rounded, resorbed, fractured and broken. The amphiboles are rather uniform, unzoned and exhibit brown to brownish green and are rimmed by a 5-10 um thick opaque oxide with inclusions of glass, biotite, plagioclase and pyroxene.

The composition of amphibole in the Linzor ignimbrite varies little with

Mg#’s that range from 65 to 74. Al2O3 contents varies from 7.41 to 10.91 weight percent. Amphibole rims are magnesiohornblende and tschermakite and are relatively uniform in composition, with an average Mg# of 65 - 74 and an Al2O3 content of 7.41 – 10.77 weight percent. Using Johnson and Ruther- ford (1989), the amphibole rims (7.41 – 10.77 weight percent Al2O3) indicate a pressure of 1.8 – 4.3 kbar; the Schmidt (1992) geobarometer at 800°C yields a pressure of 2.9 – 5.7 kbar.

4.3.5 Puripicar ; 4.18 Ma Amphibole grains range in size from phenocrysts < 2.5 mm long to mi- crophenocrysts between 20 to 50 um long. Amphibole is greenish brown to brown, anhedral to subhedral, fractured, broken fragmented and abraded along margins. Amphibole with embayed and rounded margins are observed.

Phenocrysts have inclusions of biotite, glass, plagioclase and Fe-oxide. Thin reaction rims (< 10 um) replace the outer edges of subhedral to euhedral crystals (Figure 15).

43

Amphiboles in the Puripicar ignimbrite have Mg#’s varying from 51 to

75 and Al2O3 contents varying from 7.42 to 10.29 weight percent. The amphi- bole rims are magnesiohornblende and tschermakite, relatively uniform in composition, with an average Mg# of 56 - 75 and an Al2O3 content of 7.42 –

10.29 weight percent.

Using the Johnson and Rutherford (1989) calibration of the Al-in- hornblende geobarometer, the amphibole rims (7.42 – 10.29 weight percent

Al2O3) indicate a pressure of 2.0 – 4.0 kbar; the Schmidt (1992) geobarome- ter at 800°C yields a pressure of 3.1 – 5.1 kbar. Magma pressure, calculated using Holland and Blundy (1994), shows a range of 1.0 – 3.7 kbar. Pressure based on Blundy and Holland (1990) is within the range of 0.7 – 4.1 kbar.

Temperatures obtained from amphibole-plagioclase analyses is be- tween 708 - 851oC. This range is very wide. Closer examination shows that sample 83017 has a range of 708 - 822oC, sample 83029 (778 - 851oC) is also consistent with Fe-Ti oxide thermometry (de Silva, 1987) (Table 7).

Figure 15: Inclusion of plagio- clase feldspar and thin rims reaction (<10 um) of magne- siohornblende from the Pu- ripicar ignimbrite.

44

Sample 83017 represents mixed magmas (de Silva, 1987), therefore the pla- gioclase-amphiboles may come from different sources and will be discussed later.

4.3.6 Purico ; 1.1 Ma

Amphibole grains are anhedral to subhedral, angular to equant, rounded to abraded, and range in size from phenocrysts < 1 mm to micro- phenocrysts ranging from 10-50 um (Figure 16). Phenocrysts are irregularly shaped and broken along the planes. The amphibole grains are commonly greenish brown to brown.

The composition of amphibole in the Purico ignimbrite has Mg#’s vary- ing from 63 to 79 and Al2O3 contents varying from 5.72 to 10.99 weight per- cent. The amphibole rims are dominantly magnesiohornblende to tscherma- kite, magnesiohastingsite, and edenite, and relatively uniform in composition

Figure 16: BSE image of amphi- bole from the Purico ignimbrite showing inclusions and perfect cleavages.

45

with an average Mg# of 63 - 79 and an Al2O3 content of 5.72 – 10.99 weight percent. Using the Johnson and Rutherford (1989) calibration of the Al-in- hornblende geobarometer, the amphibole rims (5.72 – 10.99 weight percent

Al2O3) indicate a pressure of 1.3 – 4.3 kbar; the Schmidt (1992) geobarome- ter, at 800°C, yields a pressure of 1.5 – 5.9 kbar. Magma pressure, calcu- lated based on Holland and Blundy (1994), indicates a range of 0.2 – 3.0 kbar. The pressure calculated based on Blundy and Holland (1990) is within the range of 0.4 – 1.9 kbar. The temperature obtained from amphibole- plagioclase pair analysis is between 703 to 845oC.

4.3.7 Tatio; 0.75 Ma The euhedral to anhedral amphibole grains range in size from phenocrysts less than 3 mm long to microphenocrysts ranging from 20 to

100 um. The amphiboles are fractured, angular broken fragments and are abraded. Resorbed amphibole with embayed and cuspate margins are ob- served. Thick reaction rims (20-100 um) are found among the isolated amphi- bole crystals (sample 84065B1). These rims are defined by relatively coarse- grained plagioclase-pyroxene-oxide that surround resorbed amphibole grains and phenocrysts remnants. Typically, thin (< 20 um) reaction rims replace the outer edges of subhedral, rounded, or resorbed fragments. The phenocrysts have inclusions of glass, plagioclase, and Fe-oxide suggesting variable cool- ing or reaction rates among a mixed phenocryst population (Thornber et al.,

2008).

46

In the Tatio ignimbrite, the amphibole has Mg #’s varying from 67 to

79, and Al2O3 contents varying from 7.40 to 9.51 weight percent. Amphibole rims are predominantly magnesiohornblende relatively of uniform composi- tion and average Mg #’s of 67 – 79. Al2O3 content ranges from 7.40 – 9.51 weight percent. Using the Johnson and Rutherford (1989) calibration of the Al

-in-hornblende geobarometer, the amphibole rims (7.40 – 9.51 weight per- cent Al2O3) indicate a pressure of 2.1 – 3.2 kbar; the Schmidt (1992) calibra- tion at 800°C yields a pressure of 3.2 – 4.4 kbar. Magma pressure calculated based on Holland and Blundy (1994) gives the range as 0.2 –0.5 kbar. Based on Anderson and Smith (1995) the calibrated pressure is from 0.7 to 1.3 kbar.

Amphibole-plagioclase analysis gave a temperature between 834 - 848oC.

47

5. Discussion and Interpretations.

5.1 APVC Unit Comparison

Amphiboles are predominantly brown to green and generally anhedral to euhedral, fractured and broken crystals with inclusions of biotite, glass, py- roxene, plagioclase feldspar and iron- oxides. Inclusions are absent in the LRSPI and Purico ignimbrites. Thin reaction rims are also observed.

The Mg# is highest for the LRSPI ignimbrite (74-83) and lowest for Toconce ignimbrite (54-65). The amphiboles in the LRSPI and Purico units are classi- fied as magnesiohornblende, tschermakite and magnesiohastingsite. Amphi- boles in the Sifon and Linzor unit are classified as magnesiohornblende and tschermakite. Both the Toconce and Puripicar ignimbrites contain magnesio- hornblende, tschermakite, magnesiohastingsite and edenite. The Tatio ignim- brite amphiboles are all hornblende (Table 5).

All the studied APVC ignimbrites have rims and cores that define two populations: low-aluminum (6-9 wt% Al) and medium-aluminum (9-~11 wt%

Al) respectively (Table 5). No systematic relationship between rims and cores could be found in any unit except the Toconce ignimbrite. Most units show variable core and rim compositions. Cores have both higher and lower

Mg #’s than the rims. Some of crystal cores have high Al2O3 content and ir- regular zoning and may be xenocrystic due to pre-eruption magma mixing

(e.g. Nakamura, 1995). The lack of any systematic trend in core and rim composition, with the exception of the Toconce ignimbrites suggests that the

48 high Al and Mg cores are not necessarily representative of earlier high- temperature crystallization as might be expected from normal evolution (e.g.

Grunder et al., 2008). The Toconce ignimbrite (6.4 Ma) rims have high (Na +

K)A values; the cores have low (Na + K)A values. This represents a systematic edenite exchange reaction, that suggests a temperature decrease from core to rim.

5.2. P and T trend with time.

For the purpose of the P and T discussion, the Holland and Blundy

(1994) geothermometer is used as it takes into account the equilibrium be-

tween amphibole and plagioclase which is temperature controlled. This is

combined with the Al-hornblende geobarometer of Anderson and Smith

(1995) to yield temperatures in the range of 600-800oC, consistent with the

magmatic temperature of APVC. However, Schmidt (1992) and Johnson and

Rutherford (1989) will also be used to provide fill-in information for units with

no plagioclase-hornblende pairs. Ague (1997) noted that although there is

discrepancies up to 1.5 kbar, pressure generated correspond well with Al-in-

hornblende estimates using calibrations of Johnson and Rutherford (1989)

and Schmit (1992) over a range of 1 to 9 kbar. This could be a useful com-

parison for the APVC with a shallow pre-eruption magmatic system of 4-8 km

(de Silva and Gosnold, 2007).

Based on these calculations, the pressures and temperatures given in

Table 5 shows the lowest magma chamber pressure is of the Tatio ignimbrite

49

(0.2-0.5 kbar) with a temperatures between 834 - 837oC. The highest pres-

sure is from the Puripicar Ignimbrite (0.9-3.4 kbar) with a temperature range

from 708-822oC. The magmatic pressures are lowest in Tatio unit (0.2 kbar),

erupted at 0.75 Ma and Purico unit (2.1 kbar) erupted at 1.1 Ma. The highest

pressure are seen in the Puripicar unit (3.7 kbar), erupted at 4.18 Ma and To-

conce unit (0.6 kbar) erupted at 6.44 Ma. Pressure decreases in the Sifon

unit (0.4-2.0 kbar) erupted at 8.3 Ma (Figure 17, 18). The LRSPI magmatic

pressure is the highest based on Schmidt (1992) ranging from 3.0-6.0 kbar

and based on Johnson and Rutherford (1989), pressure ranges from 1.9-4.5

kbar (Table 6). There is an increasing then decreasing regional trend of

pressure with age (Figure 16). Deeper pressures are seen during the 4.0 Ma

pulse of the Puripicar ignimbrites.

This suggests that the high volumes of this biggest pulse were due to

a much larger volume of magma from a chamber that extended deeper into

the crust. This deep pressure is recorded in sample 83017.

The temperature for Tatio, Purico, Toconce and Sifon units are broadly simi- lar ranging from 765-871oC. The Puripicar unit has a wide range from 703-

851oC (Figure 19). The studied ignimbrites of APVC show two P and T mag- matic regions; high P (2.0-3.3 kbar) and low T (700-770oC), and low P (0.2-

2.0 kbar) and high T (770-870oC) (Figure 20). The data from the Puripicar sample (83017) yields higher pressure (P: 2.0-3.3 kbar), but lower tempera- ture (T: 700-770oC) than the main pumice from the Puripicar that is repre-

50

Figure 17: Plot showing the magmatic pressure of each unit against age.

Figure 18: Plot showing the depth of each unit against age.

51

Figure 19: Plot showing the temperature of each units against age. The temperature was calculated using Holland and Blundy (1994) geo- barometer. sented by sample 83029.

The temperature of the Purico, Puripicar, and Sifon magmatic systems calculated using Holland and Blundy (1994) and from Fe-Ti oxides from exist- ing data (de Silva, 1987) are compared in Table 6. The results of the two methods used for Purico, Puripicar (83029), Toconce, and Sifon units are all broadly in agreement. For the Atana ignimbrite, from the La Pacana caldera in the APVC, Lindsay et al. (2001) also found a general agreement between the Fe-Ti oxide and amphibole-plagioclase thermometer (Table 6). However,

52

Figure 20: Plot showing the pressure versus temperature of each unit based on Holland and Blundy (1994).

Table 7: Temperature range obtained from two geothermometers

53 the Puripicar ignimbrite (83017) shows different temperatures for plagioclase- hornblende and Fe-Ti oxides.

The lowest amphibole-plagioclase temperature in the Puripicar comes from sample 83017, representative of the Type B pumice from Puripicar (de

Silva, 1987). This does not agree with the Fe-Ti oxide temperature. The Fe-Ti oxide temperature is much higher, 796 ±15 oC. This pumice has been shown to represent a new magma that recharged the Puripicar system (de Silva,

1987;1991). The sample also gives a very large range in pressure (0.9-3.7 kbar) that suggests there may be some mixing or lack of equilibrium between the amphiboles and and that there may be a problem with the P-

T calculations. These results are treated with caution. If the data of sample

83017 is eliminated the Puripicar data still show the deeper pressures than the rest of the APVC (1.1 – 2.5 kbar). This is consistent with data from the

3.91 Ma Atana ignimbrite (Table 5) that also give relatively high pressures.

This suggests that the ~4.0 Ma pulse may have come from a slightly deeper region in the crust than the other APVC eruptions.

5.3 Comparison of APVC to Other Silicic system

The APVC is comparable to other large silicic volcanic fields such as the 74,000 year Toba Tuff (c.f. Chesner, 1998), in Indonesia; The Pinatubo

Tuff (c.f. Prouteau and Scaillet, 2003), in the Philippines; the Atana ignimbrite from La Pacana (c.f. Lindsay et al. 2003), in Chile (3.91 Ma); the Fish Canyon

Tuff (c.f. Bachmann and Dungan, 2002), in the USA (28 Ma); and the 1995

54

Soufriere Hills Volcanic system (c.f. Rutherford and Devine, 2003), in Mont- serrat (Table 8). All the silicic volcanic fields are high-K calc-alkaline andesite to rhyolites. All have high Si rhyolite glass compositions (64-77 SiO2), so dif- ferences in their bulk compositions can be attributed to crystal content. For instance the andesite of Soufriere Hills has up to 60% phenocrysts

(Rutherford and Devine, 2003).

The Fish Canyon Tuff is compositionally uniform (67.5%-68.5% SiO2), has a high phenocryst content (35%-50%), and near-solidus phenocryst as- semblage of plagioclase, sanidine, quartz, biotite, hornblende, sphene, apa- tite, zircon and Fe-Ti oxides (Steven and Lipman, 1976). Fish Canyon repre- sents a type example of "monotonous intermediate" eruptions from a cham- ber that lacked compositional gradients.

The Toba Tuff consists of: The Youngest Toba Tuff (YTT), erupted at

74 ka (Chesner et al., 1991); the Middle Toba Tuff (MTT), erupted 0.50 Ma

(Chesner et al., 1991); and the Oldest Toba Tuff (OTT), erupted 0.85 Ma

Table 8: Summary of other silicic volcanic fields compared to APVC

55

(Diehl et al., 1987). Collectively, the YTT, MTT and OTT are referred to as the quartz-bearing Toba Tuff (72-77% SiO2) and typically contain up to 40% phenocrysts, mostly quartz, sanidine, plagioclase, biotite, and amphibole, with minor Fe-Ti oxides, allanite, zircon, fayalite, and orthopyroxene

(Chesner, 1998).

The Pinatubo dacite, erupted in 1991 (62-67% SiO2), is a phenocryst- rich dacite (~50% by volume), containing mainly plagioclase (~30%) and hornblende (~10-15%) with overgrowths. Smaller amounts of biotite, quartz, ilmenite, magnetite, apatite, sulphides and anhydrite are pre- sent. Strontium and neodymium isotopic compositions of all 1991 dacite and andesites, and their phenocrysts, are identical with previous eruptions,

87Sr/86Sr = 0.7042 to 0.7043 and 143Nd/144Nd = 0.51286 to 0.51298. The iso- topic signatures are in agreement with the volcano's location (Bernard et al.,

1996).

The Atana ignimbrite (66-70% SiO2), is a moderate to strongly ho- mogenous dacite. The ignimbrite is crystal-rich, containing 30-40% crystals consisting of plagioclase, quartz, biotite, hornblende, minor sanidine and py- roxene. Accessory are magnetite, titanite, ilmenite, zircon, apatite and allanite (Lindsay et al., 2001). This is a well documented APVC unit that was not used in this thesis but is included here as an example.

The Soufriere Hills andesite (57-61 SiO2) is crystal-rich (~59%) with

56 plagioclase, hornblende, low-Ca pyroxene, titanomagnetite, ilmenite, quartz, and apatite.

The petrographic characteristics of the Fish Canyon Tuff, Atana ignim- brites, Toba Tuff, Pinatubo Tuff and the Soufriere Hills andesite are very simi- lar to the APVC and are thus very useful analogs.

APVC amphiboles are classified as magnesiohornblende, tscherma- kite, magnesiohastingsite, and edenite (Leake et al., 1997). The amphibole data of the Toba Tuff, Pinatubo Tuff, Atana ignimbrite, Fish Canyon Tuff and the Soufriere Hills andesite were recalculated and classified based on Leake et al. (1997). The Fish Canyon amphiboles are classified as magnesiohorn- blende and magnesiohastingsite, the Atana amphiboles as magnesiohorn- blende and edenite, and the Pinatubo amphiboles as magnesiohornblende, tschermakite, edenite, magnesiohastingsite and pargasite. The Toba amphi- boles are classified as magnesiohornblende, ferrohornblende, edenite and ferroedenite. The Soufriere amphiboles are classified as tschermakite, mag- nesiohornblende and pargasite. In comparison to all other silicic magma sys- tems mentioned, the APVC amphiboles are all of similar types, except for those in the Young Toba tuff. The Toba tuff has exceptionally high FeO (18.0-

23.3) wt%, low Mg #’s (34-51) and the Silica pfu in T-sites is >6.5. Amphi- boles are classified as ferrohornblende and ferroedenite.

The amphiboles of the APVC and other silicic systems such as the

Fish Canyon Tuff, Atana ignimbrites, Toba Tuff, Pinatubo Tuff and the Soufri-

57 ere Hills andesite were reclassified based on Deer et al. (1992) and then compared. The APVC amphiboles are hornblende, pargasite, edenite and tschermakite. The amphibole of Atana crystal-rich pumices and the Atana grey pumice inclusion from La Pacana tuff are edenite and hornblende. The

Fish Canyon tuff amphiboles are pargasite and hornblende. The amphiboles of Soufriere are hornblende, tschermakite and pargasite. Pinatubo amphi- boles are hornblende, pargasite, edenite and tschermakite, while representa- tive amphiboles of the Toba tuff are hornblende and edenite. The APVC am- phiboles are in the same group of amphiboles as the Atana, Fish Canyon,

Pinatubo, Toba and Soufriere systems, with the bulk of the amphibole classi- fied as hornblende, the remainder as tschermakite. The wt% silica of the whole rock composition of APVC (64-47) is within the same range as the

Toba and Atana ignimbrite. The Mg#’s of APVC amphiboles (51-75) is in the same range with Fish Canyon Tuff, Atana ignimbrite and Soufriere andesites.

The APVC amphiboles wt% FeO (9.5-16.5), is also in the same range as Fish

Canyon Tuff, Atana ignimbrite and Soufriere andesites.

Pressure estimates using the amphiboles from other silicic systems vary from 1.3 to 2.4 kbar. Those for the Atana, Toba, Fish Canyon, and Sou- friere Hills Magma are similar; 1.3 to 3.4 kbar, but deep pressures are ob- tained for the Pinatubo Tuff. Since Holland and Blundy is the calibration used in this thesis, only those pressures calculated using this method are consid- ered valid for comparison. In comparison with APVC we can see that pres-

58 sures of other well known dacitic systems are broadly similar. Since the sys- tems being compared came from around the Earth and range in age from 28

Ma to 74 Ka the data suggests that Earth-wide, throughout time, large dacitic magmas in the crust are of similar composition. Since they are all of similar composition, the density of the magmas must be the main factor in controlling their final evolution as recorded in amphiboles.

59

6. CONCLUSION

This study addresses the hypothesis that the silicic continental mag- matic systems become shallower with time by using the Altiplano Puna Vol- canic Complex (APVC) as a case study. Amphiboles have been found to be useful recorders of pressure in silicic magmatic systems when combined with plagioclase to yield magmatic temperatures. This study using amphiboles and plagioclase from various stages during the 10 Ma history of the APVC, has yielded useful pressure and temperature data for making thermody- namic calculations.

The data obtained shows that the amphiboles are the calcic amphi- boles magnesiohornblende, tschermakite, magnesiohastingsite, and edenite, based on the classification of Leake et al (1997). Based on Deer et al. (1992), the amphiboles are also classified as calcic, namely; hornblende, tscherma- kite, pargasite, and edenite. There is little variation in magma composition over time. The inter and intra unit variability is limited throughout the units studied. As such they are broadly similar to amphiboles from other calc- alkaline dacitic systems through space and time. The calculated P-T condi- tions range from 0.2 to 2.5 kbar and 765oC to 871oC, conditions generally similar throughout the 10 Ma time frame of the APVC, although higher mini- mum and maximum pressures are recorded in the most voluminous 4 Ma pulse.

60

This implies that the APVC magmas are representative of calc-alkaline dacitic magmas associated with subduction, and the APVC is therefore a useful model for how large calc-alkaline dacitic systems might evolve. The lack of an obvious trend in P and T with time during the 10 million year history of the APVC suggests that evolution of dacitic magmas prior to eruption is limited to a narrow depth range in the crust, which is likely primarily controlled by the density of the magmas.

.

61

Bibliography

62

Ague, J. J., 1997. Thermodynamic calculation of emplacement pressures for Batholithic rocks, California: Implications for the aluminum-in- hornblende barometer. Geology. Vol. 25. P. 563-566.

Allmendinger, R.C., Jordan,T.E., Kay, S.M and Isacks, B.L. 1997. The evolution of the Altiplano Puna Plateau of Central Andes. Annual Rev. Earth Planet. Vol. 25. P. 139-174.

Anderson, J. L and Smith, D. R. 1995. The effects of temperature and fo2 on the Al-in-hornblende. American Mineralogist. Vol. 80. P. 549-559.

Bachmann, O., and Dungan, M.A., 2002, Temperature-induced Al-zoning in of the Fish Canyon magma, Colorado. American Mineralogist, Vol.87. P. 1062–1076.

Bachmann, O., Miller, C.F., de Silva, S.L., 2007. The volcanic-plutonic connection as a stage for understanding crustal magmatism. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research.oi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores. 2007.08.002.

Beck, S.L and Zandt, G. 2002. The nature of orogenic crust in the central Andes. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 107, No. B10, P. 7.1- 7.11.

Bernard, A., Knittel, U., Weber, B., Weis, D., Albrecht, A., Hattori, K., Klein, J. & Oles, D. 1996. Petrology and of the 1991 eruption products of Mount Pinatubo (Luzon, Philippines). In: Newhall, C. G. & unongbayan, R. S. (eds) Fire and Mud: Eruptions and Lahars of Mount Pinatubo. Quezon City: Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology; Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. P. 767– 798.

Blundy, J.D and Holland,T.J.B. 1990. Calcic amphibole equilibria and a new amphibole- plagioclase geothermometer. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology. Vol. 104. P. 208-224.

Brasse, H., Lezaeta, P., Rath, V., Schwalenberg, K., Soyer, W., Haak, V. 2002. The Bolivian Altiplano conductivity anomaly. Journal of Geophysical Research, 107(B5), doi: 10.1029/2001JB000391.

Chmielowski, J., Zandt, G. and Haberland, C. 1999. The central Andean Altiplano–Puna Magma Body. Geophysical Research Letters. Vol. 26. P. 783–786.

63

Chesner, C.A. 1998. Petrogenesis of the Toba Tuffs, Sumatra, Indonesia. Journal of Petrology. Vol. 39. No. 3. P. 397-438.

Chesner, C. A., Rose, W. I., Deino, A. & Drake, R. 1991. Eruptive history of Earth’s largest Quaternary caldera (Toba, Indonesia) clarified. Geol ogy. Vol. 19. P. 200– 203.

Davidson, J.P & De Silva, S.L. 1995. Late Cenozoic magmatism of the Bolivian Altiplano. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology. Vol. 119. P. 378-408.

Davidson J.P., McMillan, N.J., Moorbath, S., Worner, G., Harmon, S., Lopez- Escobar, L., 1990. The Nevados de Payachata volcanic region (180S/690W., N.Chile) II. Evidence for widespread crustal involvement in Andean magmatism. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology. Vol. 105. P. 412-432.

Davidson, J.P., Harmon, R.S., Worner, G. 1991. The source of central An dean magmas; some considerations. Geological Society of America Bulletin; Special Paper 265. P. 233-244.

Deer, W.A., Howie, R.A & Zussman, J.(1992). An Introduction to the Rock- forming minerals, 2nd edition. Harlow, UK: Longman. P. 223-258. de Silva, S. L. 1989a. The Altiplano–Puna Volcanic Complex of the Central Andes. Geology. Vol. 17. P. 1102–1106. de Silva, S.L. 1989. Geochronology and stratigraphy of the ignimbrites from the 210 30’ S to 23030’ S portion of the Central Andes of Northern Chile. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research. Vol. 37. P. 93-131.

De Silva, S. L. and Francis, P. W. 1989 Correlation of large volume ignim brites – two case studies from the Central Andes of Northern Chile. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research. Vol. 37. P. 133– 149. de Silva. S.L, Self, S., Francis, P.W., Drake, R.E. and Carlos, R.R. 1994. Ef fusive silicic volcanism in the Central Andes: The Chao dacite and other young lavas of the Altiplano Puna Volcanic Complex. Journal of Geophysical Research. Vol. 99. No. B9. P. 17,805-17,825.

64 de Silva, S.L. and Gosnold, W.L., 2007. Episodic construction of batholiths: Insights from the spatiotemporal development of an ignimbrite. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research. Vol. 167, P. 301-320. de Silva, S.L., Zandt, G., Trumbull, R., Viramonte, J.G., Salas, G., Jiminez, N.2006. Large ignimbrite eruptions and volcano-tectonic depressions in the Central Andes: a thermomechanical perspective. Geological Society, London, Special Publication. Vol. 26. P. 47-63.

Diehl, J. F., Onstott, T. C., Chesner, C. A. & Knight, M. D. 1987. No short re- versals of Brunhes age recorded in the Toba tuffs, north Sumatra, In donesia. Geophysical Research Letters. Vol.14. No.7. P. 753–756.

Grunder, A.L, Klementi, E.W., Freely, T.C. and Mckee, C.M. 2008. C.M. Eleven million years of arc volcanism at the Aucanquilcha Volcanic cluster, Northern Chilean Andes: Implications for the life span and emplacement of batholiths. Special Hutton Volume “Origin of Granites” Royal Society of Edinburgh. P. 1-64.

Hammarstrom, J. M. and E-an. Zen, 1986. Aluminum in hornblende : an Ig neous geobarometer. American Mineralogist. Vol. 71. P. 1297-1313.

Hildreth, W. 1981. Gradients in silicic magma chambers: Implications for lithospheric magmatism. Journal of Geophysical Research. Vol. 86 (B11), P. 10153-10192.

Holland, T and Blundy, J.D. 1994. Non-ideal interactions in calcic amphiboles and their bearing on amphiboles-plagioclase thermometry. Contribu tions to Mineralogy and Petrology. Vol. 116. P. 433-447.

Hollister et. al. 1987. Confirmation of the empirical correlation of Al in hornblende with pressure of solidification of calc-alkaline plutons. American Mineralogist. Vol. 72. P.231-239.

Isacks, B. L. 1988. Uplift of the central Andean plateau and bending of the Bolivian orocline. Journal of Geophysical Research. Vol. 93. P.3211– 3231.

James, D.E., 1971. Andean crustal and upper mantle structure. Journal of Geophysical Research Vol. 76. P.3246-3271.

65

Johnson, M.C. and Rutherford, M.J., 1989. Experimental calibration of the aluminum-in-hornblende geobarometer with application to Long Valley caldera (California) volcanic rock. Geology. Vol. 7. P.837-841.

Leake, B.E., Woolley, A.R., Arps, C.E.S., Birch, W.D., Gil•bert, M.C., Grice, J.D., Hawthorne, F.C., Kato, A., Kisch, H.J., Krivovichev, V.G., Linthout, K., Laird, J., Mandarino, J.A., Maresch, W.V., Nickel, E.H., Rock, N.M.S., Schu•macher, J.C., Smith, D.C., Stephenson, N.C.N., Ungaretti, L., Whittaker, E.J.W., and Youzhi, G., 1997, Nomenclature of amphiboles-report of the subcommittee on amphi boles of the International Mineralogical Association, Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names: The Canadian Mineralo•gist. Vol.35. P. 219-246.

Lindsay, J.M., Schmitt, A.K., Trumbull, R.B., De Silva, S.L., Siebel, W., Emmermann, R. 2001. Magmatic evolution of the La Pacana caldera system, Central Andes, Chile: Compositional variation of two coge netic, large-volume ignimbrites. Journal of Petrology. Vol. 42. No. 3. P. 459-486.

Lipman, P.W. 1984. The roots of ash-flow calderas in western North America: windows into the tops of granitic batholiths. Journal of Geophysical Research 89(B10). P. 8801-8841.

Lipman, P.W and McIntosh, W.C. 2008. Eruptive and non-eruptive calderas, northeastern San Juan Mountains, Colorado: Where did the Ignim brites come from? Geological Society of America Bulletin 2008; 120;771-795. doi:10.1130/B26330.1

Nakamura, M. 1995. Continous mixing of crystal mush and replenished magma in the ongoing Unzen eruption. Geology. Vol. 23. P. 807-810.

Prouteau, G. and Scaillet, B. 2003. Experimental constraints on the origin of the 1991 Pinatubo dacite. Journal of Petrology. Vol. 44. P. 2203–2241.

Reutter, K.J., Giese, P., Gotze, H.J., Scheuber, E., Scwab, K., Schwarz, G., Wigger, P. 1988. Structures and crustal development of the central Andes between 210 and 25 0 S, in Galhburg, H., et al., eds. The southern Central Andes: New York, Springer-Verlag. P. 231-261.

Rutherford, M.J. and Devine, J.D.1988. The May 18, Eruption St. Helens 3. Stability and chemistry of amphibole in the magma chamber. Journal of Geophysical Research. Vol. 93. P. 11,949-11,959.

66

Rutherford, M.J. and Devine, J.D. 2003. Magmatic conditions and magma ascent as indicated by hornblende phase equilibria and reactions in the 1995-2002 Soufriere Hills Magma. Journal of Petrology. Vol. 44. No. 8. P. 1433-1454.

Scheuber, E. and Giese, P. 1999. Architecture of the Central Andes- a compilation of geoscientific data along a transect at 21oS. Journal of South American Earth Sciences. Vol. 12. P. 103-107.

Schmit, M.W. 1992. Amphibole composition in tonalite as a function of pressure: an experimental calibration of the Al-in-hornblende barometer. Contribution to Mineralogy and Petrology. Vol. 110. P. 304 310.

Schmitt, A. K., De Silva, S. L., Trumball, R. and Emmermann, R. 2001. Magma evolution in the Purico ignimbrite complex, northern Chile: evidence for zoning of a dacitic magma by injection of rhyolitic melts following mafic recharge. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology. Vol. 140. P.680-700.

Schmitz, M., Heinsohn, W.D., Schilling, F.R. 1997. Seismic, gravity and petrological evidence for partial melt beneath the thickened Central Andean crust (21-230S). Tectonophysics, Vol. 270. P. 313-326.

Schwarz, G., Chong, D.G., Kruger, D., Martinez, M., Massow, W., Rath, V., Viromonte, J., 1994. Crustal high conductivity zones in the southern Central Andes. In: Reutter, K. J., Scheuber, E., Wigger, P.(Eds.), Tectonics of the Southern Central Andes, Springer, Berlin.

Soler, M.M., Caffe, P.J., Coira, B.L., Onoe, S., Mahlburg-Kay, S. 2007. Geology of the Vilama caldera: correlations and a new interpretation of a large scale explosive event in the Central Andean plateau during the Upper Miocene. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research. Vol. 164 (1–2). P. 27–53.

Spear, F.S.1981. An experimental study of hornblende stability and composi tional variability in . American Journal of Science. Vol. 281. P.679-734.

Steven, T.A., and Lipman, P.W.1976. Calderas of the , southwestern Colorado. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 958. P. 35.

67

Thornber, C.R., Pallister, J.S., Lowers, H.A., Rowe, M.C., Mandeville, C.W., Meeker, G.P. 2008. Chemistry, Mineralogy, and Petrology of Amphi bole in Mount St. Helens 2004-2006 dacite. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1750. P.727-754.

Tulloh, A.J and Challis, G.A. 2000. Emplacement depths of Paleozoic- Mesozoic plutons from western New Zealand estimated by hornblende Al geobarometry. New Zealand and Journal of Geology and Geo physics. Vol. 43. P. 555-567.

Vyhnal, C.R., McSween, H.Y. Jr. and Speer, J.A. 1991. Hornblende chemis try in southern Appalachian granitoids: implications for aluminum hornblende thermo barometry and magmatic epidote stability. Am. Mineral. 76, 176–188.

Wigger et al., 1994. Variation of the crustal structure of the southern Central Andes deduced from seismic refraction experiments, in Reutter, K.J et al., eds. Tectonics of the southern Central Andes: New York, Springer- Verlag. P. 23-48.

Winter, J. D. 2001. An Introduction to Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Prentice-Hall Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. P. 316-326.

Wörner, G., Moorbath, S., Harmon, R.S. 1992. Andean Cenozoic volcanic centers reflect basement isotopes domains: Geology, Vol.20. P.1103- 1106.

Zandt, G., Leiding, M., Chielowski, J., Baumont, D., Yuan, X., 2003a. Seismic detection and characterization of the Altiplano Puna magma body, Central Andes. Pure and Applied Geophysics. Vol. 160. P. 789-807.

68

Appendix

69

Appendix A

Representative samples

70

Appendix A (Continued)

71

Appendix A (Continued)

72

Appendix A (Continued)

73

Appendix A (Continued)

74

Appendix A (Continued)

75

Appendix A (Continued)

76

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Amphibole LRSPI 83089LRSPI Amphibole

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

77

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Amphibole LRSPI 83089LRSPI Amphibole

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

78

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Amphibole Sifon 83005 83005 Sifon Amphibole

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

79

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Amphibole Sifon 83005 83005 Sifon Amphibole

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

80

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Amphibole Sifon 83073 83073 Sifon Amphibole

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

81

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Amphibole Sifon 83073 83073 Sifon Amphibole

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

82

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Plagioclase Sifon 83073 Plagioclase

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

83

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Plagioclase Sifon 83073 Plagioclase

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

84

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Amphibole Sifon 83044 83044 Sifon Amphibole

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

85

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Amphibole Sifon 83044 83044 Sifon Amphibole

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

86

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Plagioclase Sifon 83044 Plagioclase

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

87

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Amphibole Sifon 84044 84044 Sifon Amphibole

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

88

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Amphibole Sifon 84044 84044 Sifon Amphibole

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

89

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Plagioclase Sifon 84044 Plagioclase

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

90

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Amphibole Toconce 83061 Toconce 83061 Amphibole

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

91

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Amphibole Toconce 83061 Toconce 83061 Amphibole

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

92

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Amphibole Toconce 83061 Toconce 83061 Amphibole

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

93

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Plagioclase Toconce 83061 Toconce Plagioclase

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

94

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Plagioclase Toconce 83061 Toconce Plagioclase

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

95

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Amphibole Linzor 83066 83066 Linzor Amphibole

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

96

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Plagioclase Linzor 83066 83066 Linzor Plagioclase

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

97

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Amphibole Puripicar 83017 83017 Puripicar Amphibole

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

98

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Amphibole Puripicar 83017 83017 Puripicar Amphibole

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

99

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Plagioclase Puripicar 83017 83017 Puripicar Plagioclase

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

100

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Amphibole Puripicar 83018 83018 Puripicar Amphibole

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

101

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Amphibole Puripicar 83018 83018 Puripicar Amphibole

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

102

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Amphibole Puripicar 83029 83029 Puripicar Amphibole

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

103

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Amphibole Puripicar 83029 83029 Puripicar Amphibole

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

104

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Amphibole Puripicar 83029 83029 Puripicar Amphibole

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

105

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Plagioclase Puripicar 83029 83029 Puripicar Plagioclase

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

106

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Amphibole Purico 83029 83029 Purico Amphibole

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

107

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Amphibole Purico 83044 83044 Purico Amphibole

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

108

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Amphibole Purico 83044 83044 Purico Amphibole

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

109

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Plagioclase Purico 83044 Plagioclase

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

110

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Amphibole Purico 83075 83075 Purico Amphibole

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

111

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Amphibole Purico 83075 83075 Purico Amphibole

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

112

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Plagioclase Purico 83075 Plagioclase

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

113

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Amphibole Tatio 84059Tatio Amphibole

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

114

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Plagioclase Tatio 84059 84059 Tatio Plagioclase

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

115

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Amphibole Tatio 84065BTatio Amphibole

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

116

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Amphibole Tatio 84065BTatio Amphibole

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix

117

Microprobe Results Results Microprobe

Plagioclase Tatio 84065B 84065B Tatio Plagioclase

Appendix B (Continued) B Appendix