DOCSLIB.ORG

Alkalic Rocks of Iron Hill Gunnison County, Colorado

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alkalic Rocks of Iron Hill Gunnison County, Colorado If yon do not need this publication after it has served your purpose, please return it to the Geological Survey, using the official mailing label at the end UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ALKALIC ROCKS OF IRON HILL GUNNISON COUNTY, COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 197-A UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director Professional Paper 197-A ALKALIC ROCKS OF IRON HILL GUNNISON COUNTY, COLORADO BY ESPER S. LARSEN Shorter contributions to general geology, 1941 (Pages 1-64) UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1942 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. ......... Price 40 cents CONTENTS Page Preface, by G. F. Loughlin_________________________ v Other dike rocks_______________-____________________ 29 Abstract____"_--__-___--__________________________ 1 Augite syenite and shonkinite ____.__--___--__--__ 29 Introduction. ______________________________________ 1 Olivine gabbro. ________________________________ 30 Location and topography. _______________________ 1 Carbonate veins_________----__---------__--_---___- 31 Field work and acknowledgments.________________ 2 Character __ __________________________________ 31 Geology of the surrounding area__________________ 2 Origin _______ _ ____ _ __ _.. __ __. ___ .__. 31 Age of the Iron Hill stock_____________________ 2 Hydrothermal processes- ______--_-___-_---_--__-___- 31 General geology of the Iron Hill stock _____________ 3 The hydrothermal products. _____________________ 32 Hydrothermal activity___.= ______________________ 4 Carbonate type _ __._--_______-___-_-_____- 32 Special features of the stock____________________ 4 Apatite-magnetite-carbonate veins and iron oxide "Marble" of Iron Hill_____________________________ 4 veins. ___________________________________ 32 Distribution__ _ _______________________________ 4 Aegirite-amphibole. _ ________________________ 32 Character___ _________________________________ 5 Hastingsite and diopside_________________-_._ 33 "Marble"—--------------------_--------_ 5 Melanite __ _ _ __ --____--__-___________ 33 Martite-apatite veins___-_____-___-_-______ 5 Alterations of melilite_ ______________________ 33 Siliceous iron oxide veins____________________ 5 Zeolites, cancrinite, and anal cime _____________ 33 Origin of the iron ore______________________ 5 Other types _____ __ _ , ______ - _ __ _ ___ 33 Silicate rock______________________________ 5 Conclusions. __________-_---_-_---_----__-__-___ 33 Carbonate bodies in the granitic rocks_______ 6 Chemistry ________ _ _ _ _ _ __ ___ __ _ _ 33 Origin of the marble__________________________ 6 Comparison with other areas_ ____________________ 34 Available facts _____________________________ 6 General character of the stock_______________-__._____ 34 Modes of origin___________________________ 7 Succession of events______-____-__-__---___---___ 34 Uncompahgrite. _____-_-_-_______----__ _ ___________ 9 Relative size of formations. ______________________ 35 Occurrence...--________________________________ 9 Mineral character of the stock __ ________________ 35 Fresh Uncompahgrite________________________ 9 Chemistry of the stock_______-___________-__- 35 Altered uncompahgiite__________________________ 10 Petrogenesis ___ _ __________________________________ 36 Chemistry of the alteration products._____________ 11 Comparison with similar masses. _________________ 36 Chemical analyses, norms, and modes.____________ 12 Rocks.. ___________ _ ___ _ ______ 38 '13 Pyroxenite_______________________________________ Mineralogy. _______________________________ 39 Distribution and age_______-_____-_-___________- 13 Chemical character. ________________________ 39 Character____________________________________ 14 Succession of intrusions______________________ 39 General features.___________________________ 14 Origin of the rocks-________---_--__--_---__---_- 39 Common pyroxenite_______________________ 14 Uncompahgrite-- __________---_-_--_________ 40 Apatite-rich rock___________________________ 14 Pyroxenite- ________________________________ 40 Biotite rock._______________________________ 14 41 Magnetite-perofskite rock.—________________ 14 Syenite and nepheline syenite. _______ 41 Olivine rock______________________________ 15 Nepheline gabbro_-__---_____-_---__ 42 Garnet pyroxenite________-------___________ 15 Quartz gabbro __ ____________________ 42 Nepheline pyroxenite (melteigite)_____________ 16 Conclusions as to origin. ____________ 42 Feldspar-nepheline rock (shonkinite)__________ 16 Mineralogy, by E. S. Larsen and W. F. Jenks__ 43 Feldspar-bearing rock_______________________ 16 Sulfides. _ ___-________-_______--___-__ 43 Sphene pyroxenite-_______________________ 17 Fluorite... ___ ___ __ ______ _ _ . 43 Variations in the pyroxenite____________________ 17 Qu_jrtz__ __ ____ ___ _ __ ___ __-- _ 43 Order of crystallization and intrusion of the vari­ Spinel.. __________________ --__ 43 eties.. ______________________________________ 19 Oxides of titanium_________-__________-_ 43 Origin of the varieties_________________________ 19 Iron oxides __ ________________________ 43 Chemical analyses, norms, and modes.____________ 20 Carbonates _____________-_____-_-___-_- 4:4 Ijolite (melteigite)_______________________ T ________ 22 Brugnatellite_ _______--__-_-_-_______-__ 44 Distribution._________________________________ 22 Feldspar _ _________ __________-____-__- 4.4 Petrography ___________________________________ 22 Lime-soda feldspar _ _______________ 44 Chemical analyses, norms, and modes.____________ 24 Albite, microcline, and orthoclase _____ 44 Crystallization of ijolite.________________________ 24 Nepheline ___ _________________________ 44 Soda syenite.______________________________________ 25 Melilite. ___________ ____ __ _______ 44 Nepheline syenite_________________________________ 26 Pyroxenes. ____________________________ 45 Nepheline gabbro and quartz gabbro._______________ 28 Amphiboles. _-_______---____--_____-__- 48 Nepheline gabbro—____________________________ 28 Soda-tremolite and glaucophane group 50 Quartz gabbro——____________._,_.________ 28 Hastingsite group _ _____________--- 52 Chemical analyses, norms, and modes. ____________ 29 Wollastonite..- __ ________ __ _. ___ _ 52 m IV CONTENTS Mineralogy, by E. S. Larsen and W. F. Jenks—Continued. Page Mineralogy, by E. S. Larsen and W. F. Jenks—Continued. Page Olivines_ __________________________ 52 Analcime _______________________--__---.---_--- 55 Micas _________-___-____-__-_-_---_ 53 Juanite and cebollite_---___----__--_------------ 56 Muscovite, ____________________ 53 Minor constituents, by E. S. Larsen and George Steiger__ 56 Biotite and phlogopite_ ________ 53 Titanium __„____________________-_-----_--__--- 57 Apatite ____________________________ 53 Phosph orus__________»_____._-__-___--_-_-__--_ 58 Manganese__- _ __-____-__--__--__-__------------ 58 Sphene_ _.-________-_-_-___-___-___ 53 Barium and strontium__________-___-___--__-__ 59 Perofskite__ __ _ _____________________ 54 Zirconium, nickel, chromium, and vanadium.______ 60 Idocrase.__________________________ 54 Chlorine and fluorine-.______---__---_--__-_---__ 60 Melani te_____ ______________________ 54 Bearing on petrogenesis__________-__--_-"--___.- 60 Chlorites, serpentine, and vermiculites. 54 Spectroscopic tests.___________.__--___-__---__-_ 61 Cancrinite and sulfatic cancrinite_ _.__ 54 Index _______________-__________--_--___-___--___-_ 63 Natrolite __________________________ 55 ILLUSTRATIONS Page PLATE 1. Geologic map of Iron Hill area, Gunnison County, Colo____---__,______-.___-___-_--___-_-_--_---___-__ In pocket 2. Panorama of the Iron Hill area_________________________________________________________________________ 2 3. A, B, Pyroxenite on south side of Stone Gulch; C, Banded syenite.______________-____--_-___-__-__----_____ 18 FIGURE 1. Marble-pyroxenite contact_____________________________________________________________________________ 5 2. Section south of Stone Gulch, showing variation in pyroxenite._____________________________________________ 17 3. Section on north side of Stone Gulch, showing variation in pyroxenite._______________________________________ 18 4. Section south of Deldorado Creek, showing variation in pyroxenite,_________________________________________ 18 5. Section northeast of gully B, showing complex relations of uncompahgrite and varieties of pyroxenite_--__-___-__ 19 6. Pseudo-binary diagram of equilibrium in mixtures of nepheline and diopside______.-___--______-___-______-___ 24 7. Optical properties of the pyroxenes carrying acmite plotted against content of Fe2O3 and acmite________________ 48 8. Soda tremolite and glaucophane amphiboles, atomic ratios plotted against Mg+Fe"-Al-Fe"'______ ____________ 51 9. Soda tremolite and glaucophane amphiboles, ft, YAc, and specific gravity plotted against Mg-j-Fe"-Al-Fe'"____ 51 PREFACE By G. F. Loughlin The author of this paper gives a thorough description growth of the science of petrology and help to guide of a complex of very unusual igneous rocks and associ­ future investigations. The description of this unusual ated hydrothermal deposits. Their unusual character complex and the author's interpretation of its origin, involves difficulties in interpretation of genesis and therefore, should be most interesting, especially to those modes of intrusion and deposition, and even in definition. studying the origin of igneous rocks. Obviously, the Perhaps the most puzzling deposit of all
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Minor Elements in Magnetic Concentrates from the Syenite-Shonkinite Province, Southern Asir, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Minor elements in Magnetic concentrates from the Syenite-Shonkinite Province, Southern Asir, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia I/ I/ I/ I/ W. C. Overstreet, G. W. Day, Theodore Botinelly, and George Van Trump, Jr. Open-File Report 87 r Report prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the Deputy Ministry for Mineral Resources, Saudi Arabia This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature, I/ USGS, Retired 2/ USGS, Denver, CO 1987 CONTENTS ABSTRACT............................................................ 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENT...................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION........................................................ 1 Areas covered and previous work................................ 1 Syenite plutons........................................... 3 Jabal Fayfa and Jabal Bani Malik..................... 3 Pluton southeast of Suq al Ithnayn................... 3 Shonkinite pluton at Jabal Atwid..................... 3 Mineral potential......................................... 3 Purpose of present investigation............................... 3 PROCEDURES.......................................................... 10 Collection and preparation of detrital magnetite............... 10 Mineralogical analyses......................................... 10 Semiquantitative spectrographic analyses....................... 11 Method...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Oxidation Ratio of Iron in Coexisting Biotite And
    1423 The Canadian Mineralo gist Vol.37. pp. 1423-1429(1999\ THE OXIDATIONRATIO OF IRON IN COEXISTINGBIOTITE AND HORNBLENDEFROM GRANITICAND METAMORPHICROCKS: THE ROLE OF P, T AND f(O2) NADINES. BORODINA, GERMAN B. FERSHTATER$erro SERGEI L. VOTYAKOV Institute of Geology and Geochemistry, RussianAcademy of Sciences,Pochtoty per., 7, Eknterinburg, 620151, Russia Assrnecr Previously published and new data on the composition of coexisting biotite and homblende from granitic and metamorphic rocks show that the degree of iron oxidation, R [= Fe3*/(Fe2*+ Fe3*)], is different in these two minerals; the R of hornblende is greater. Granulite-facies minerals have the greatest difference in R, whereas in granitic rocks, those minerals show the least difference The oxidation of biotite and hornblende under high-level conditions is accompaniedby the crystallization of magnet- ite, and newly formed oxidized mafic minerals have a lower Fe/(Fe + Mg) and R than the original ones. Under mesozonal and catazonalconditions, the increasein pressureprevents the formation of magnetite, and oxidation is accompaniedby a significant increase in R; these changes in the chemical composition of hornblende are supplementedby an increase in Al. Since the Al content of homblende is known to be an indicator of pressure, such a correlation of R and Fer+ content with aluminum content points to an increaseof theseparameters with a rise of pressure Keywords:biotite, hornblende,oxidation ratio, granitic rocks, metamorphic rocks, epizonal plutons, mesozonalplutons , cat^7'onal plutons. Sorravarnr, Les donn6esnouvelles et celles tirde de la litt6rature portant sur 1acomposition de la biotite et celle de la hornblendecoexistante des roches granitiques et m6tamorphiquesmontrent qui le degrd d'oxydation du fer, R [= Fe3*/(Fe2*+ Fe3+)],est diffdrent dans ces deux mindraux.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geological Newsletter
    JAN 90 THE GEOLOGICAL NEWSLETTER ·• GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF THE OREGON COUNTRY GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY Non-Profit Org. U.S. POSTAGE OF THE OREGON COUNTRY PAID P.O. BOX ?a 7- Portland, Oregon PORTLAND, OR 97207- -:· ·--~··, Permit No. 999 - -- '~ Dr. Frank Boersma 120 W. 33~d Street Vancouver, WA 98660 GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF THE OREGOt\ COllNTRY 1989-1990 ADMINISTRATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS President Directors Rosemary Kenney 221-0757 Peter E. Baer (3 years) 661-7995 4211 S\-1 Condor Charlene Holzwarth (2 years) 284-3444 Portland, OR 97201 Esther Kennedy (1 year) 287-3091 Vice President Margaret L. Steere 246-1670 Immediate Past Presidents Joline Robustelli 223-2852 6929 SW 34 Ave. ~ Portland, OR 97219 R.E. (Andy) Corcoran 244-5605 Secretary Alta B. Fosback 641-6323 THE GEOLOGICAL NEWSLETTER 8942 SW Fairview Place Tigard, OR 97223 Editor: Sandra Anderson 775-5538 Treasurer Calendar: Margaret Steere 246-1670 Braden Pillow 659-6318 Business Manager: Carol Cole 220-0078 19562 SE Cottonwood St. Assist: Cecelia Crater 235-5158 Milwaukie, OR 97267 ACTIVITIES CHAIRS Calligrapher Properties and PA System Wallace R.· McClung 637-3834 (Luncheon) Donald Botteron 245-6251 Field Trips (Evening) Walter A. Sunderland 625-6840 Charlene Holzwarth 284-3444 Publications Alta B. Fosback 641-6323 Geneva E. Reddekopp 654-9818 Geology Seminars Publicity Donald D. Barr 246-2785 Roberta L. Walter 235-3579 Historian Refreshments Phyllis G. Bonebrake 289-8597 (Friday Evening) Hospitality David and Marvel Gillespie 246-2368 254-0135 (Luncheon) Margaret Fink 289-0188 Harold and Patricia Gay Moore (Evening) Maxine Harrington 297-ll86 (Geology Seminars) Catherine Evenson 654-2636 Library: Esther Kennedy 287-3091 ' ' Betty Turner 246-3192 Telephone n Past Presidents Panel Jean L.
    [Show full text]
  • Lafayette - 800 Grams Nakhlite
    Lafayette - 800 grams Nakhlite Figure 1. Photograph showing fine ablation features Figure 2. Photograph of bottom surface of Lafayette of fusion crust on Lafayette meteorite. Sample is meteorite. Photograph from Field Museum Natural shaped like a truncated cone. This is a view of the top History, Chicago, number 62918. of the cone. Sample is 4-5 centimeters across. Photo- graph from Field Museum Natural History, Chicago, number 62913. Introduction According to Graham et al. (1985), “a mass of about 800 grams was noticed by Farrington in 1931 in the geological collections in Purdue University in Lafayette Indiana.” It was first described by Nininger (1935) and Mason (1962). Lafayette is very similar to the Nakhla and Governador Valadares meteorites, but apparently distinct from them (Berkley et al. 1980). Lafayette is a single stone with a fusion crust showing Figure 3. Side view of Lafayette. Photograph from well-developed flow features from ablation in the Field Museum Natural History, Chicago, number Earth’s atmosphere (figures 1,2,3). The specimen is 62917. shaped like a rounded cone with a blunt bottom end. It was apparently oriented during entry into the Earth’s that the water released during stepwise heating of atmosphere. Note that the fine ablation features seen Lafayette was enriched in deuterium. The alteration on Lafayette have not been reported on any of the assemblages in Lafayette continue to be an active field Nakhla specimens. of research, because it has been shown that the alteration in Lafayette occurred on Mars. Karlsson et al. (1992) found that Lafayette contained the most extra-terrestrial water of any Martian Lafayette is 1.32 b.y.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineralogy and Paragenesis of Amphiboles from Gibson Peak Pluton
    THE AIVIERICAN MINERALOGIST, VOL. 49, SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER. 1964 MINERALOGY AND PARAGENESIS OF AMPHIBOLES FROM GIBSON PEAK PLUTON. NORTHERN CALIFORNIA PBrBn W. Lrelrlx, U. S. Geotogi,calSurvey, Denaer,Colorad,o. Ansrnacr Ixrnooucrrow Gibson Peak pluton, a 3-squaremile compositeintrusion in the Trin- itv Aips of northern california, is particularly suitablefor investigation of relations between amphibole paragenesisand igneouscrystallization becauseseveral distinctive amphiboles are important constituents of geneticallyrelated rocks that range from gabbro to trondhjemitic tona- lite. This paper describesthe sequenceof amphibole crystallization in difierent parts of the intrusion and reiates the compositionsof three newly analyzedamphiboles to crystallizationsequence and composition of the enclosingrock. The main conclusionis that compositionsof the investigatedamphiboles are as dependenton time of crystallizationwithin their respectiverocks as on bulk rock composition. Pnrnocn.q.pnrcrNtrnpnBTATroN oF THE Alrpnrsolr panecnNpsrs The generalstructural and petrologicfeatures of Gibson peak pluton are describedelsewhere (Lipman, 1963),and onl1-relations bearing on the origin of the amphibolesare summarizedhere. The pluton is com- posite,and five discreteintrusive units have beenrecognized on the basis of field relations.rn order of intrusion theseare hypersthene-hornblende gabbro, (augite-)hornblendegabbro, hornblende diorite, porphyritic quartz-bearingdiorite, and trondhjemitic biotite tonalite. All units show intrusive contacts with the preceding rocks, are petrographically dis- tinctive, and contain at least one amphibole. An interpretation of th" peak complex paragenesisof the Gibson amphiboles,based mainly on the textural featuresdescribed below, is presentedin Fig. 1. The evi- denceis clear orr the occurrenceof the indicated reactions,but the rela- 1321 PETER W. LIPMAN I I I F I I F I 1 I I cd d l :d d9 z z t.i r F-] {Fl z z.zt- z .=l il.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Petrology of the Devils Tower, Missouri Buttes, and Barlow Canyon Area, Crook County, Wyoming Don L
    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects 1980 Geology and petrology of the Devils Tower, Missouri Buttes, and Barlow Canyon area, Crook County, Wyoming Don L. Halvorson University of North Dakota Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/theses Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Halvorson, Don L., "Geology and petrology of the Devils Tower, Missouri Buttes, and Barlow Canyon area, Crook County, Wyoming" (1980). Theses and Dissertations. 119. https://commons.und.edu/theses/119 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GEOLOGY AND PETROLOGY OF THE DEVILS TOWER, MISSOURI BUTTES, AND BARLOW CANYON AREA, CROOK c.OUNTY, WYOMING by Don L. Halvorson Bachelor of Science, University of Colorado, 1965 Master of Science Teaching, University of North Dakota, 1971 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of North Dakota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Grand Forks, North Dakota May 1980 Th:ls clisserratio.1 submitted by Don L. Halvol'.'son in partial ful­ fillment of the requirements fo1· the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy from the University of North Dakota is hereby approved by the Faculty Advisory Committee under whora the work has been done. This dissertation meets the standards for appearance aud con­ forms to the style and format requirements of the Graduate School of the University of North Dakota, and is hereby approved.
    [Show full text]
  • Expedition 330 Core Descriptions, Site U1374 Thin Sections
    Site U1374 thin sections U1374A-3R-1-W 114_116 Proc. IODP THIN SECTION: 330-U1374A-3R-1-W 114_116-BILLET 114-SLIDE 114 Piece No: Unit:I OBSERVER:THIN SECTION:SLIDE 114 Site U1374 core descriptions ROCK NAME: moderately olivine-phyric basalt clast WHERE SAMPLED: clast type 2 GRAINSIZE: fine grained TEXTURE: moderately phyric | Volume 330 PRIMARY PERCENT REL. VOL. SIZE(mm) VESICLE VESICLE MINERALOGY ORIGINAL REPLACED min. max. mode. MORPHOLOGY SPHERICITY Infilling [%] COMMENTS PHENOCRYSTS 10 olivine 5 20 8 1.2 skeletal incomplete dome face (iddingsite); "skeletal olivine" & "euhedral to subhedral" MICROPHENOCRYST plagioclase 0.01 0.3 0.4 laths[330] just 2 grains olivine 4 40 0.9 0.4 skeletal incomplete dome face (iddingsite); "skeletal olivine" & "euhedral to subhedral" augite 1 0.3 0.3 subhedral sector-zoning titanaugite VESICLES 3 0.1 1.8 0.6 low[330] 100 filled by calcite GROUNDMASS 87 opaque mineral 5 olivine 4 95 0.09 0.06 subhedral to replaced by iddingsite (hematite?) anhedral[330] glass 68 100 palagonite augite 1 anhedral plagioclase 9 0.2 0.01 microlite[330] SECONDARY SIZE(mm) MINERALOGY min. max. mode. REPLACING/FILLING COMMENTS calcite vesicle STRUCTURE no structure in groundmass COMMENTS SUMMARY DESCRIPTION Thin sections 1 U1374A-3R-2-W 7_9 Proc. IODP THIN SECTION: 330-U1374A-3R-2-W 7_9-BILLET 115-SLIDE 115 Piece No: Unit:I OBSERVER:THIN SECTION:SLIDE 115 Site U1374 core descriptions ROCK NAME: highly olivine-phyric basalt clast WHERE SAMPLED: CLAST TYPE 1 GRAINSIZE: fine grained TEXTURE: highly phyric & glomeroporphyritic | Volume 330 PRIMARY PERCENT REL.
    [Show full text]
  • Adamsite-(Y), a New Sodium–Yttrium Carbonate Mineral
    1457 The Canadian Mineralogist Vol. 38, pp. 1457-1466 (2000) ADAMSITE-(Y), A NEW SODIUM–YTTRIUM CARBONATE MINERAL SPECIES FROM MONT SAINT-HILAIRE, QUEBEC JOEL D. GRICE§ and ROBERT A. GAULT Research Division, Canadian Museum of Nature, P.O. Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 6P4, Canada ANDREW C. ROBERTS Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E8, Canada MARK A. COOPER Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada ABSTRACT Adamsite-(Y), ideally NaY(CO3)2•6H2O, is a newly identified mineral from the Poudrette quarry, Mont Saint-Hilaire, Quebec. It occurs as groups of colorless to white and pale pink, rarely pale purple, flat, acicular to fibrous crystals. These crystals are up to 2.5 cm in length and form spherical radiating aggregates. Associated minerals include aegirine, albite, analcime, ancylite-(Ce), calcite, catapleiite, dawsonite, donnayite-(Y), elpidite, epididymite, eudialyte, eudidymite, fluorite, franconite, gaidonnayite, galena, genthelvite, gmelinite, gonnardite, horváthite-(Y), kupletskite, leifite, microcline, molybdenite, narsarsukite, natrolite, nenadkevichite, petersenite-(Ce), polylithionite, pyrochlore, quartz, rhodochrosite, rutile, sabinaite, sérandite, siderite, sphalerite, thomasclarkite-(Y), zircon and an unidentified Na–REE carbonate (UK 91). The transparent to translucent mineral has a vitreous to pearly luster and a white streak. It is soft (Mohs hardness 3) and brittle with perfect {001} and good {100} and {010} cleav- ␣ ␤ ␥ ° ° ages. Adamsite-(Y) is biaxial positive, = V 1.480(4), = 1.498(2), = 1.571(4), 2Vmeas. = 53(3) , 2Vcalc. = 55 and is nonpleochroic. Optical orientation: X = [001], Y = b, Z a = 14° (in ␤ obtuse). It is triclinic, space group P1,¯ with unit-cell parameters refined from powder data: a 6.262(2), b 13.047(6), c 13.220(5) Å, ␣ 91.17(4), ␤ 103.70(4), ␥ 89.99(4)°, V 1049.1(5) Å3 and Z = 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrare D Transmission Spectra of Carbonate Minerals
    Infrare d Transmission Spectra of Carbonate Mineral s THE NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM Infrare d Transmission Spectra of Carbonate Mineral s G. C. Jones Department of Mineralogy The Natural History Museum London, UK and B. Jackson Department of Geology Royal Museum of Scotland Edinburgh, UK A collaborative project of The Natural History Museum and National Museums of Scotland E3 SPRINGER-SCIENCE+BUSINESS MEDIA, B.V. Firs t editio n 1 993 © 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht Originally published by Chapman & Hall in 1993 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1993 Typese t at the Natura l Histor y Museu m ISBN 978-94-010-4940-5 ISBN 978-94-011-2120-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-94-011-2120-0 Apar t fro m any fair dealin g for the purpose s of researc h or privat e study , or criticis m or review , as permitte d unde r the UK Copyrigh t Design s and Patent s Act , 1988, thi s publicatio n may not be reproduced , stored , or transmitted , in any for m or by any means , withou t the prio r permissio n in writin g of the publishers , or in the case of reprographi c reproductio n onl y in accordanc e wit h the term s of the licence s issue d by the Copyrigh t Licensin g Agenc y in the UK, or in accordanc e wit h the term s of licence s issue d by the appropriat e Reproductio n Right s Organizatio n outsid e the UK. Enquirie s concernin g reproductio n outsid e the term s state d here shoul d be sent to the publisher s at the Londo n addres s printe d on thi s page.
    [Show full text]
  • Adsorption of RNA on Mineral Surfaces and Mineral Precipitates
    Adsorption of RNA on mineral surfaces and mineral precipitates Elisa Biondi1,2, Yoshihiro Furukawa3, Jun Kawai4 and Steven A. Benner*1,2,5 Full Research Paper Open Access Address: Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2017, 13, 393–404. 1Foundation for Applied Molecular Evolution, 13709 Progress doi:10.3762/bjoc.13.42 Boulevard, Alachua, FL, 32615, USA, 2Firebird Biomolecular Sciences LLC, 13709 Progress Boulevard, Alachua, FL, 32615, USA, Received: 23 November 2016 3Department of Earth Science, Tohoku University, 2 Chome-1-1 Accepted: 15 February 2017 Katahira, Aoba Ward, Sendai, Miyagi Prefecture 980-8577, Japan, Published: 01 March 2017 4Department of Material Science and Engineering, Yokohama National University, 79-5 Tokiwadai, Hodogaya-ku, Yokohama This article is part of the Thematic Series "From prebiotic chemistry to 240-8501, Japan and 5The Westheimer Institute for Science and molecular evolution". Technology, 13709 Progress Boulevard, Alachua, FL, 32615, USA Guest Editor: L. Cronin Email: Steven A. Benner* - [email protected] © 2017 Biondi et al.; licensee Beilstein-Institut. License and terms: see end of document. * Corresponding author Keywords: carbonates; natural minerals; origins of life; RNA adsorption; synthetic minerals Abstract The prebiotic significance of laboratory experiments that study the interactions between oligomeric RNA and mineral species is difficult to know. Natural exemplars of specific minerals can differ widely depending on their provenance. While laboratory-gener- ated samples of synthetic minerals can have controlled compositions, they are often viewed as "unnatural". Here, we show how trends in the interaction of RNA with natural mineral specimens, synthetic mineral specimens, and co-precipitated pairs of synthe- tic minerals, can make a persuasive case that the observed interactions reflect the composition of the minerals themselves, rather than their being simply examples of large molecules associating nonspecifically with large surfaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Aqueous Alteration of Yamato 000749 Based on Multi-Probe Microscopic Observation
    Aqueous alteration of Yamato 000749 based on multi-probe microscopic observation Naoki Shiraishi1, Hiroki Suga1,2, Masaaki Miyahara1, Takuji Ohigashi3, Yuichi Inagaki3, Akira Yamaguchi4, Naotaka Tomioka 5, Yu Kodama6, and Eiji Ohtani7 1Hiroshima University, 2The University of Tokyo, 3UVSOR synchrotron facility, 4NIPR, 5Kochi Institute for Core Sample 6 7 Research, JAMSTEC, Marine Works Japan, Tohoku University Motivation Based on the results of Mars explorations and researches of Martian meteorites for many years, there is a high possibility that liquid water had existed extensively on Mars for a long time (Sekine, 2012). Martian meteorite is one of the important clues for restoring the past Martian surface environment that cannot be unveiled by Mars surface survey alone. It is expected that a member of Martian meteorites, nakhlites have evidences for a rock-fluid reaction occurred on Mars. One of the representative evidence for the rock-fluid reaction is “iddingsite”, which is an alteration texture formed in and around olivine grains in nakhlites. Many kinds of secondary minerals occur in the iddingsite through the rock-fluid reaction. The mineral assemblages, chemical compositions and chemical species of the secondary minerals depend on the varied parameters such as temperature and pH of the fluid. Suga et al. (2017) described the secondary minerals in the iddingsite of nakhlites Yamato (Y) 000593. Another Martian meteorites, Yamato (Y) 000749 is also a member of Yamato 00 nakhlites like Y 000593, containing abundant iddingsite. Based on Cohen et al. (2017), Y 000749 was located at the lower portion of the same nakhlites source compared to Y 000593. It is likely that these nakhlites have different mode of alteration even in the same source.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis Methods and Favorable Conditions for Spherical Vaterite Precipitation: a Review
    crystals Review Synthesis Methods and Favorable Conditions for Spherical Vaterite Precipitation: A Review Donata Konopacka-Łyskawa Department of Process Engineering and Chemical Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Gda´nskUniversity of Technology, Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gda´nsk,Poland; [email protected]; Tel.: +48-58-347-2910 Received: 15 March 2019; Accepted: 18 April 2019; Published: 25 April 2019 Abstract: Vaterite is the least thermodynamically stable anhydrous calcium carbonate polymorph. Its existence is very rare in nature, e.g., in some rock formations or as a component of biominerals produced by some fishes, crustaceans, or birds. Synthetic vaterite particles are proposed as carriers of active substances in medicines, additives in cosmetic preparations as well as adsorbents. Also, their utilization as a pump for microfluidic flow is also tested. In particular, vaterite particles produced as polycrystalline spheres have large potential for application. Various methods are proposed to precipitate vaterite particles, including the conventional solution-solution synthesis, gas-liquid method as well as special routes. Precipitation conditions should be carefully selected to obtain a high concentration of vaterite in all these methods. In this review, classical and new methods used for vaterite precipitation are presented. Furthermore, the key parameters affecting the formation of spherical vaterite are discussed. Keywords: vaterite; calcium carbonate; polymorph; precipitation; synthesis; carbonation 1. Introduction Vaterite is the least thermodynamically stable anhydrous calcium carbonate polymorph and it easily transforms into more stable calcite or aragonite in the presence of water. This form of calcium carbonate mineral was named to honor the German chemist and mineralogist, Heinrich Vater, in 1903.
    [Show full text]