DOCSLIB.ORG

THE CASE for the CROWN 9 Key Advantages

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE CASE for the CROWN 9 Key Advantages THE MONARCHIST LEAGUE OF CANADA LA LIGUE MONARCHISTE DU CANADA monarchist.ca PO Box 1057, RPO Lakeshore West, Oakville, ON L6K 0B2 [email protected] THE CASE FOR THE CROWN 9 Key advantages NATIONAL IDENTITY, STABILITY & PRIDE: GUARANTOR OF FREEDOM: Parliament – 1Easy travel to and from the USA, trade and 3The Queen, the Senate, the elected Commons. military alliances and American media can No bill, regulation or spending is authorized muddle Canada’s distinct identity. Our governance without the Royal Assent. Parliament is summoned focuses loyalty via allegiance to a monarch rather and dissolved in The Queen’s name. Also in her name, than to a politician or ideology. This difference public officials and diplomats are appointed, treaties underlies our distinct culture, energetic and yet approved, cabinets commissioned. Normally, this is a tranquil. Constitutional monarchy – the Canadian formality. However, “the Royal Prerogative” ensures way – provides stability. This is confirmed each year that the rules of law prevails, and provides a non- in the United Nations’ Human Development Index, partisan, non-violent safeguard – a constitutional which regularly ranks Canada high up in the fire extinguisher as Alberta political scientist Frank countries the world. Change is inevitable, and MacKinnon has put it – should usual democratic much of it good; political leaders also come and go. processes ever be threatened. For example, even a Canadians have voted in 22 federal elections during popular government could not simply dispense The Queen’s reign! The Crown provides constancy with holding an election! amidst so much change. The Sovereign has the REFEREE OF FEDERALISM: ELEVEN experience of decades, without the taint of a CROWNS – Canada is a federal state: our personal agenda. Such continuity constitutes 4 Constitution gives law-making power in an important anchor in our society. certain areas to Ottawa, others to the provinces. HEAD OF THE NATION VS HEAD Governments exercise this authority in the name of 2OF GOVERNMENT: Day to day our The Queen. Thus 11 Crowns exist in Canada – legally democratically elected representatives referred to as “The Queen in right of Canada” or engage in healthy partisan debate on issues about “The Queen in right of” a province. The premiers, which Canadians disagree. That is good. It encourages including the separatist René Levesque, underlined striving for partisan goals and personal success. the importance of the Crown in their key 1978 The Prime Minister is our head of government and Constitutional statement. Since the monarchy leader of a political party. As such, his actions are gives authority to each law-making entity, it also often controversial. The Sovereign, however, is a guarantees that the rule of law will be followed in force of unity as head of the nation, and with her dealing with disputes between Ottawa and the team of representatives is trusted by all Canadians. provinces. These facts explain the strong support by The monarchy protects and exemplifies the things the provinces for the institution of monarchy, which Canadians agree about, and remain constant, reconciles regional identity with national unity. regardless of an election: a notably tolerant, mature OATHS: USEFUL & PERSONAL: The deepest society, By presiding at events such as the Montréal loyalties of humans are to other human beings. Olympics and Canada Day celebrations on Parliament 5 Oaths are taken to The Queen by our new Hill, The Queen and her family emphasize the non- fellow Canadians, legislators, judges, CF members and partisan, unifying nature of great national occasions. many other public officials. Making their promise to Canada’s form of government. In 1982, Canada’s the Sovereign rather than to a politician shows their new Constitution entrenched the Crown so that ultimate loyalty is not to elected figures, but to the only unanimous federal-provincial agreement could laws that make up the fabric of civilized society. ever alter it. Parliament unanimously passing the Such Oaths underline that following the rule of law Succession to the Throne Act in 2013 removed barriers applicable to all must prevail over partisanship – of gender in determining our future monarchs. acting to promote the well-being of a narrow COMMUNITY, VOLUNTEERISM, segment of society. Oaths to The Queen also reflect RECOGNITION – In their constant round Canada’s emphasis on the importance of the person, 8 of travels, The Queen, members of the Royal and of the dignity and equality of each individual: Family and her Canadian representatives bring the moment new citizens take the Citizenship Oath encouragement to the communities and volunteer they become full members of the Canadian family. sectors: a vital part of our national existence. They Each Canadian gives allegiance to The Queen, so inspire many to similar service. They create and reciprocating her decades of service to all Canada. award non-political honours to outstanding fellow A SHARED MONARCHY: Canadians are citizens. These Royal and vice-regal activities do not 6fortunate to have as our monarch an instantly often feature on national news programs. Opening a recognizable world figure. The Queen and new library, visiting a Legion Hall, speaking to a members of the Royal Family link our diverse school civics class or lunching with a local service population to a far-flung Commonwealth, unique in club are not on the media’s radar. But they constitute that it seeks no military advantage. These nations – the basis of our civil society, and bring significant from New Guinea to Belize, from New Zealand to pride and assistance to Canada’s communities. India – mirror the rich diversity of today’s Canada. A REPUBLIC = DISTRACTING & In 2010, our Queen flew from Toronto to New York, UNDESIRABLE – No one has yet proposed an where she addressed the United Nations. The night 9 alternative system of government for Canada before, The Queen proudly told an Official Dinner in which would in the same way reflect our nation’s Toronto that “I shall be travelling from this Northern history and be superior to constitutional monarchy Realm as Queen of Canada”. The Governor General in terms of the day-to-day functioning of the and the Lieutenant Governors represent The Queen Canadian state. Canadians remember the wrenching and perform most of the constitutional functions of constitutional debates of the last century . Such the Sovereign in her name. This arrangement allows arguments did nothing to help practical concerns: our country to share in the traditions of an ancient the environment, crowded classrooms, access to monarchy stemming out of Canada’s history, while at health care and support for single-parent and low- the same time we enjoy the services of distinguished income families. A presidential system would make fellow citizens – think of Major-General Georges Canada more closely resemble the United States, Vanier, Lincoln Alexander, David Lam and Lynda combining the role of head of state with head of Haverstock, to name but a few – who served Crown government. As our American friends re-discovered and country with great distinction. during impeachment processes in the Trump A REFLECTION OF OUR HISTORY administration, this proves an unhappy combination. 7& DEVELOPMENT: Today’s monarchy stems Alternatively, the election of a president or governor from our history. Many of Canada’s first general would simply create another politician, peoples chose chieftains whose role was much like offer another level of personal ambition, necessitate that of other leaders in ancient times. Settlement by another set of elections and make the holder of French and British people brought to Canada their that office beholden to the interests of the different own experience of monarchy. Many subsequent factions and groups to which the result was owed. immigrants have also known the monarchical system of government. In 1867, the Fathers of Confederation monarchist.ca unanimously chose constitutional monarchy as .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guidance Note
    Guidance note The Crown Estate – Escheat All general enquiries regarding escheat should be Burges Salmon LLP represents The Crown Estate in relation addressed in the first instance to property which may be subject to escheat to the Crown by email to escheat.queries@ under common law. This note is a brief explanation of this burges-salmon.com or by complex and arcane aspect of our legal system intended post to Escheats, Burges for the guidance of persons who may be affected by or Salmon LLP, One Glass Wharf, interested in such property. It is not a complete exposition Bristol BS2 0ZX. of the law nor a substitute for legal advice. Basic principles English land law has, since feudal times, vested in the joint tenants upon a trust determine the bankrupt’s interest and been based on a system of tenure. A of land. the trustee’s obligations and liabilities freeholder is not an absolute owner but • Freehold property held subject to a trust. with effect from the date of disclaimer. a“tenant in fee simple” holding, in most The property may then become subject Properties which may be subject to escheat cases, directly from the Sovereign, as lord to escheat. within England, Wales and Northern Ireland paramount of all the land in the realm. fall to be dealt with by Burges Salmon LLP • Disclaimer by liquidator Whenever a “tenancy in fee simple”comes on behalf of The Crown Estate, except for In the case of a company which is being to an end, for whatever reason, the land in properties within the County of Cornwall wound up in England and Wales, the liquidator may, by giving the prescribed question may become subject to escheat or the County Palatine of Lancaster.
    [Show full text]
  • LIS-133: Antigua and Barbuda: Archipelagic and Other Maritime
    United States Department of State Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs Limits in the Seas No. 133 Antigua and Barbuda: Archipelagic and other Maritime Claims and Boundaries LIMITS IN THE SEAS No. 133 ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA ARCHIPELAGIC AND OTHER MARITIME CLAIMS AND BOUNDARIES March 28, 2014 Office of Ocean and Polar Affairs Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs U.S. Department of State This study is one of a series issued by the Office of Ocean and Polar Affairs, Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs in the Department of State. The purpose of the series is to examine a coastal State’s maritime claims and/or boundaries and assess their consistency with international law. This study represents the views of the United States Government only on the specific matters discussed therein and does not necessarily reflect an acceptance of the limits claimed. This study, and earlier studies in this series, may be downloaded from http://www.state.gov/e/oes/ocns/opa/c16065.htm. Comments and questions should be emailed to [email protected]. Principal analysts for this study are Brian Melchior and Kevin Baumert. 1 Introduction This study analyzes the maritime claims and maritime boundaries of Antigua and Barbuda, including its archipelagic baseline claim. The Antigua and Barbuda Maritime Areas Act, 1982, Act Number 18 of August 17, 1982 (Annex 1 to this study), took effect September 1, 1982, and established a 12-nautical mile (nm) territorial sea, 24-nm contiguous zone and 200-nm exclusive economic zone (EEZ).1 Pursuant to Act No.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Monarchy
    Unit Portfolio: Interpreting Visual Images 1. What can you tell about this man based only on what you see in this picture? Make up a brief biography based on your perception of this photo. Use complete sentences Unit 2: Age of Reason Lesson 1: Unlimited vs. Limited Government Textbook Correlation: Chapter 4: Lesson 2 Today’s Standard 7-2.1 Analyze the characteristics of limited government and unlimited government that evolved in Europe in the 1600s and 1700s. Essential Questions • What is the difference between limited and unlimited government? • Which European nations developed these government systems ? • Key Vocabulary Legislative Executive Judicial Unlimited Government Absolutism Monarchy Divine Right Authoritarianism Limited Government Magna Carta Constitution Unwritten Constitution Constitutional Monarchy Democracy Separation of Powers Powers of the Government • Legislative Power: make laws • Executive Power: enforce laws • Judicial Power: interpret laws Unlimited Government • Any system where there are NO limits on what the government can do • Leaders have total power • Citizens have no power • Leaders don’t have to follow the same laws as the citizens • Dictatorships • Oligarchies • Absolute Monarchies Absolute Monarchies • Absolutism: all three government powers held by one person or ruling body • Monarchy: government authority passed through the family line (king, queen, czar, sultan, pharaoh, etc.) • Absolute Monarchy: • All government powers held by monarch • Unlimited government • Power passed down parent to child Divine Right
    [Show full text]
  • Opinion on the Balance of Powers in the Constitution
    Strasbourg, 18 June 2013 CDL-AD(2013)018 Opinion No. 695 / 2012 Engl./Fr. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) OPINION ON THE BALANCE OF POWERS IN THE CONSTITUTION AND THE LEGISLATION OF THE PRINCIPALITY OF MONACO Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 95th Plenary Session (Venice, 14-15 June 2013) on the basis of comments by Mr Jean-Claude SCHOLSEM (Substitute Member, Belgium) Mr Jorgen Steen SORENSEN (Member, Denmark) Mr Laszlo TROCSANYI (Substitute Member, Hungary) Mr Ben VERMEULEN (Member, Netherlands) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-AD(2013)018 - 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 3 II. Scope of the opinion ............................................................................................................ 3 III. European standards on democracy and the rule of law ................................................... 4 A. International principles on democracy .............................................................................. 4 Separation and balance of powers ...................................................................................... 5 Legislative power and autonomy ......................................................................................... 6 Accountability .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Theory, Application and the Canon: the Case of Mill and Jevons
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Jepson School of Leadership Studies articles, book Jepson School of Leadership Studies chapters and other publications 2001 Theory, Application and the canon: The ac se of Mill and Jevons Sandra J. Peart University of Richmond, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/jepson-faculty-publications Part of the Economic Theory Commons, and the Political Economy Commons Recommended Citation Peart, Sandra J. "Theory, Application and the Canon: The asC e of Mill and Jevons." Reflections on the Classical Canon in Economics: Essays in Honor of Samuel Hollander. Ed. Evelyn L. Forget and Sandra J. Peart. London: Routledge, 2001. 356-77. Print. This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Jepson School of Leadership Studies at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Jepson School of Leadership Studies articles, book chapters and other publications by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 19 Theory, application and the canon The case of Mill and Jevons Sandra Peart Boundary questions, it has been well said, are always perplexing. (Economist 1882: 845) Introduction Whatever disputes remain about the nature and content of the "canon" of economics, it is widely accepted that the boundary of economic science was narrowed throughout the nineteenth century (Winch 1972). This chapter offers a partial explanation for that narrowing in the methodological develop­ ments that occurred during the second half of the century. For reasons of practicality in the face of pronounced "multiplicity of cause," John Stuart Mill called, ~n his 1836 Essay On the Definition ofPolitical Economy; and on the Method of Investigation Proper to It, and again in his 1843 Logi,c, for a separate and specialized science of political economy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Monarchy in Prince Edward Island
    The Monarchy in Prince Edward Island Canada’s History with the Royal Family per cent of the world’s people. Canada was created in 1867. By most standards, Canada, though a relatively young country, has a long- Constitutional Monarchy standing association with royal families. Thirty-two As a Constitutional Monarch, the Queen’s powers are kings and queens reigned over the country long before exercised by the Prime Minister or Premier who are Elizabeth II was crowned Queen of Canada. Canada responsible to the elected representatives of the people was explored, settled and grew during the reigns of in the House of Commons and the provincial British monarchs as far back as 1497. legislative assemblies. Though largely symbolic, the Crown is an integral part of our governmental Canada’s Governmental System structure. The Canadian Constitution limits the power and the Monarchy of the Crown in government, creating a primarily symbolic Canada is a federal state (that is, role for the Queen. Because the it has two levels of government, Queen resides in Britain, she is national and provincial) with a represented in Canada by the constitutional monarchy and a Governor General and in each of parliamentary democracy. Our the provinces by a Lieutenant head of state is the Queen of Governor. Canada. She is also the Queen of the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand and many other Did You Know? countries within the British The Honourable Antoinette Perry Commonwealth of Nations. Acts is our current Lieutenant of parliament and many actions Governor. She was sworn into of our national and provincial office on October 20, 2017 and is nd governments are made in the the 42 Lieutenant Governor of name of the Queen, though the Prince Edward Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's System of Government
    61 Australia’s system of government Australia is a federation, a constitutional monarchy and a parliamentary democracy. This means that Australia: Has a Queen, who resides in the United Kingdom and is represented in Australia by a Governor-General. Is governed by a ministry headed by the Prime Minister. Has a two-chamber Commonwealth Parliament to make laws. A government, led by the Prime Minister, which must have a majority of seats in the House of Representatives. Has eight State and Territory Parliaments. This model of government is often referred to as the Westminster System, because it derives from the United Kingdom parliament at Westminster. A Federation of States Australia is a federation of six states, each of which was until 1901 a separate British colony. The states – New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia and Tasmania - each have their own governments, which in most respects are very similar to those of the federal government. Each state has a Governor, with a Premier as head of government. Each state also has a two-chambered Parliament, except Queensland which has had only one chamber since 1921. There are also two self-governing territories: the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory. The federal government has no power to override the decisions of state governments except in accordance with the federal Constitution, but it can and does exercise that power over territories. A Constitutional Monarchy Australia is an independent nation, but it shares a monarchy with the United Kingdom and many other countries, including Canada and New Zealand. The Queen is the head of the Commonwealth of Australia, but with her powers delegated to the Governor-General by the Constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Selection Policy OSP2, the Crown Estate, 1975-1985
    OPERATIONAL SELECTION POLICY OSP2 THE CROWN ESTATE 1975-1985 Revised November 2005 1 Authority 1.1 The National Archives’ Acquisition Policy statement announced the Office’s intention of developing, in consultation with departments, Operational Selection Policies across government. These Policies would apply the collection themes described in the policy to the records of individual departments and agencies. 1.2 Operational Selection Policies are intended to be working tools for those involved in the selection of public records. This policy may, therefore, be reviewed and revised in the light of comments received from the users of the records or from archive professionals, the department’s experience of using the policy, or as a result of newly discovered information. There is no formal cycle of review but we would welcome comments at any time. The extent of any review and revision exercise will be determined according to the nature of the comments received. 1.3 If you have any comments upon this policy, please e-mail records- [email protected] or write to: Acquisition and Disposition Policy Manager Records Management Department The National Archives Kew Richmond Surrey TW9 4DU 2 Scope 2.1 This policy relates to the records produced by The Crown Estate in England and Wales and, for marine estates only, Northern Ireland, from 1975 to 1985. It does not cover functions relating to the management of The Crown Estate in Scotland - records of which pass to the National Archives of Scotland. It also excludes records produced by the Managing Agents and others who manage properties in The Crown Estate on behalf of the Commissioners.
    [Show full text]
  • On Liberty John Stuart Mill Batoche Books
    On Liberty John Stuart Mill 1859 Batoche Books Kitchener 2001 Batoche Books Limited 52 Eby Street South Kitchener, Ontario N2G 3L1 Canada email: [email protected] Contents Chapter 1: Introductory...................................................................... 6 Chapter 2: Of the Liberty of Thought and Discussion. .................... 18 Chapter 3: Of Individuality, as one of the Elements of Well-being. 52 Chapter 4: Of the Limits to the Authority of Society over the Indi- vidual. ........................................................................................ 69 Chapter 5: Applications. .................................................................. 86 Notes .............................................................................................. 106 Dedication The grand, leading principle, towards which every argument unfolded in these pages directly converges, is the absolute and essential impor- tance of human development in its richest diversity. Wilhelm von Humboldt: Sphere and Duties of Government. To the beloved and deplored memory of her who was the inspirer, and in part the author, of all that is best in my writings- the friend and wife whose exalted sense of truth and right was my strongest incitement, and whose approbation was my chief reward—I dedicate this volume. Like all that I have written for many years, it belongs as much to her as to me; but the work as it stands has had, in a very insufficient degree, the inestimable advantage of her revision; some of the most important por- tions having been reserved for a more careful re-examination, which they are now never destined to receive. Were I but capable of interpret- ing to the world one half the great thoughts and noble feelings which are buried in her grave, I should be the medium of a greater benefit to it, than is ever likely to arise from anything that I can write, unprompted and unassisted by her all but unrivalled wisdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 14 Federalism-E
    Volume 14 Federalism-e Canada’s Constitutional Monarchy VERONIKA REICHERT Canadian institution.”2 Does the monarchy play University of Alberta an important, positive role in Canada today? Those who would answer “no” to its importance or its being positive have argued Anytime a royal makes an appearance at that we should abolish the Crown in Canada. an event, great public interest in royalty is However, by looking at the constitutional generated, and with that the monarchy as an structures of Canadian institutions, the design institution is brought to the attention of of our federalist democracy, and aspects of the Canadians and the Commonwealth. There is a Canadian identity, I will show that the popular opinion that the monarchy no longer monarchy does play an important, and positive, plays, and should no longer play, an important role in contemporary Canada. Further, the role in contemporary Canada, and with that a criticisms of the monarchy would be better view that the monarchy is a useless addressed through reform of the role of the appropriation of tradition, or even a harmful Crown, in terms of preserving the important symbol of oppression, the latter view taken by function the monarchy plays as well as being a Marc Chevrier who writes that “the Canadian much more accomplishable task. neomonarchy feeds illusions of false grandeur that have no meaning in America and distract One argument against the monarchy is the people from thinking that they can be that it is viewed as an archaic institution, and sovereign.”1 Others, however, see the thus it should have no place in today’s world, monarchy as an important part of modern and especially not in a federalist democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of the Crown
    proceedings of the British Academy, 89, 171-214 The Origins of the Crown GEORGE GARNETT SECRETEDAWAY IN THE MIDST OF his posthumously published lectures on English constitutional history is one of those thought-provoking observations by Maitland which have lain largely undisturbed for ninety years: There is one term against which I wish to warn you, and that term is ‘the crown’. You will certainly read that the crown does this and the crown does that. As a matter of fact we know that the crown does nothing but lie in the Tower of London to be gazed at by sight-seers. No, the crown is a convenient cover for ignorance: it saves us from asking difficult questions.. Partly under the influence of his reading of German scholars, most notably Gierke, Maitland had begun to address questions of this nature in a series of essays on corporate personality, and in a few luminous, tantalizing pages in the History of English Law? Plucknett conceded that the issues raised by these questions, which he characterized as metaphysical, formed the foundations of legal history, but added, severely, that ‘prolonged contemplation of them may warp the judge- ment.’ Not, of course, that Maitland had been found wanting: Plucknett thought him acutely aware of the potential dangers of abstraction. But less well-seasoned timbers would scarcely bear up under the strain? Plucknett need not have worried. The judgements of Enghsh his- 0 neBritish Academy 1996 Maitland, Constitutional History, p. 418; cf. Pollock and Maitland, i 525: ‘that “metaphor kept in the Tower,” as Tom Paine called it’; E W.
    [Show full text]
  • Dyarchy: Democracy, Autocracy and the Scalar Sovereignty of Interwar India
    Dyarchy: Democracy, Autocracy and the Scalar Sovereignty of Interwar India Stephen Legg School of Geography University of Nottingham Nottingham NG72RD [email protected] Abstract The 1919 Government of India Act instituted sweeping constitutional reforms that were inspired by the concept of “dyarchy”. This innovation in constitutional history devolved powers to the provinces and then divided these roles of government into reserved and transferred subjects, the latter of which would be administered by elected Indian ministers. Recent scholarship has been reassessing the local biopolitical potential unleashed by the 1919 Act. In this paper I revisit dyarchy at the national scale to show how this “All-India” re- visioning of Indian sovereignty was actually negotiated in relation to its imperial and international outsides and the exigencies of retaining governmental control inside the provinces. This paper will propose a constitutional historical geography of dyarchy, focusing on three scales and the forms of comparison they allow. First, Lionel Curtis’s political geometries and the international genealogies of his federalist aspirations are explored. Secondly, the partially democratic level of the province is shown to have been rigorously penetrated by, and categorically subordinated to, the central tier of colonial autocracy, which orchestrated a political geography of exclusion and exception. Finally, rival conceptions of time and sequentiality will be used to examine the basis for nationalist criticisms and exploitations of dyarchy’s reconfigurations of democracy, biopolitics, and the vital mass of the people. 1 Dyarchy: Democracy, Autocracy and the Scalar Sovereignty of Interwar India1 “The myriad problems of India must be and can be solved only by the Indians in India.
    [Show full text]