United Nations Development Programme Review of Undp’S Partnership with Lithuania (1992-2005)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

United Nations Development Programme Review of Undp’S Partnership with Lithuania (1992-2005) UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME REVIEW OF UNDP’S PARTNERSHIP WITH LITHUANIA (1992-2005) 2005 December UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME REVIEW OF UNDP’S PARTNERSHIP WITH LITHUANIA (1992-2005) © UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME Gostauto str. 40A, LT-2001, Vilnius Lithuania www.undp.lt ISBN 9986-639-30-1 Mr. Arnoldas Puikis has done the layout, and cover. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Review of UNDP’s Partnership with Lithuania (1992-2005) was prepared by: Mr. Michael Reynolds, International Independent Development Consultant. The Preparion Phase for the Review was carried by: BDA Lietuva and the Bradley Dunbar Group. The Review has benefited from a contentful input by Ms. Cihan Sultanoglu, United Nations Resident Coordinator, UNDP Resident Representative and UNFPA Representative. Contributions were provided by national counterparts and project partners. UNDP Country Office team facilitated the Review preparation process. Ms. Ruta Svarinskaite, Programme Officer, was the focal point for the Review. UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms and Abbreviations 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE REVIEW 13 1.1 Overview of the UNDP Presence in Lithuania 14 1.2 Objectives and Scope 15 1.3 Methodology and Process 16 CHAPTER 2 NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT (1992-2005) 19 2.1 The Enabling Environment for Human Development 20 2.2 The State of Human Development 21 2.3 The EU Accession Process 22 CHAPTER 3 undp’s sTRATEGIC pOsITIOnInG 25 3.1 The Evolution of the UNDP Country Programme 26 3.2 UNDP and the EU Accession Process 31 3.3 Development of Partnerships and Resource Mobilisation 33 3.4 Programming and Implementation Approaches 37 3.5 UNDP on the Eve of Closing its Country Office 40 CHAPTER 4 undp’s COnTRIBuTIOn TO nATIOnAL dEVELOpMEnT REsuLTs 43 4.1 Poverty Reduction 44 4.2 Governance 48 4.3 Environment 52 4.4 Cross Cutting Issues 57 4.5 Emerging Issues 61 CHAPTER 5 FIndInGs And COnCLusIOns 67 CHAPTER 6 LESSONS LEARNED AND RECOMMENDATIONS 73 6.1 Lessons Learned 73 6.2 Recommendations 74 4 REVIEW OF UNDP’S PARTNERSHIP WITH LITHUANIA (1992-2005) ANNEXES 1. Terms of Reference 77 2. Persons Interviewed 86 3. Documentation Reviewed 88 4. UNDP Programme Resources by Theme 89 5. UNDP Programme Resources (1993-2005) 90 6. Map of Lithuania 92 7. Lithuania Basic Indicators 93 8. Overview of Official Aid (1992-2005) 94 9. Lithuania as an Emerging Donor 95 10. UNDP Projects (1992-2005) 96 11. UNDP Supported Reports (1992-2005) 99 12. UNDP Staff Members (1992-2005) 102 LIsT OF TABLEs 1.1 UNDP Country Programmes in Lithuania (1993-2005) 14 2.1 Evolution of Lithuania’s HDI ranking (Human Development Reports 1995-2005) 23 3.1 Basic Resource Mobilisation Indicators 35 3.2 Resource Mobilisation (1993-2005) 35 3.3 Recognition of UNDP’s MDG Advertisements (percentage of total) 39 3.4 Some Key Results from the 2004 UNDP Partners Survey 40 4.1 TI Perception of Corruption Index 49 4.2 Participation of Lithuania in Key Environmental Conventions 54 4.3 GEF SGP Projects by Theme 55 LIsT OF BOXEs 1.1 Triangulation 17 2.1 Membership of Major International Organizations (1991-2003) 22 3.1 UNDP Cooperation Frameworks 26 3.2 Examples of Inter-agency Partnerships 34 3.3 Key Partner – the Global Environmental Facility 35 3.4 Key Partner – The UNDP Baltic Trust Fund 35 3.5 Partnership with Microsoft 36 3.6 National Strategies, Programmes and Action Plans developed with UNDP Support 37 3.7 Millennium Development Goals 38 3.8 MDGs Awareness Campaign in 2003 39 4.1 Some of the Key Outputs of UNDP’s Support to Poverty Reduction Planning and Policy 44 4.2 Other GEF Interventions 53 4.3 Broad partnership in the SGP 55 4.4 Lithuanian Human Development Reports 57 4.5 Bridges without Barriers 62 4.6 The UN Global Compact 64 LIST OF CHARTS 3.1 Thematic Allocation CP-1 (1993-96) 27 3.2 Thematic Allocation CP-2 (1997-2000) 28 3.3 Thematic Allocation CP-3 (2001-2003) 30 3.4 Thematic Allocation CP-4 (2004-2005) 30 5 UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ACP Africa, Caribbean, Pacific NAPs/incl National Action Plan on Social Inclusion ADR Assessment of Development Results NPRS National Poverty Reduction Strategy BTF Baltic Trust Fund OA Official Aid BWI Bretton Woods institution ODA Official Development Assistance CBO Community Based Organisation OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation CCA Common Country Assessment and Development CCF Country Cooperation Framework OHCHR Office of the United Nations High CIDA Canadian International Development Agency Commissioner for Human Rights CO Country Office OSCE Organization for Security and CP County Programme Cooperation in Europe CPD Country Programme Document POP Persistent Organic Pollutant CPI Corruption Perceptions Index PRSIP Lithuanian Republic Poverty Reduction Strategy Implementation Programme EEA European Economic Area for 2002-2004 EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction RBEC Regional Bureau for Europe and and Development Commonwealth of Independent States EO Evaluation Office RBM Results-based Management EOO Equal Opportunities Ombudsman RC Resident Coordinator EU European Union RR Resident Representative GCF Global Cooperation Framework RCF Regional Cooperation Framework GDP Gross Domestic Product SGP Small Grants Programme GBV Gender Based Violence SHD Sustainable Human Development GEF Global Environment Facility ToR Terms of Reference GLOC Government Contribution UNAIDS The Joint United Nations Programme to Local Office Costs on HIV/AIDS GNI Gross National Income UNCT United Nations Country team HDI Human Development Index UNDESA United Nations Department for Economic HDR Human Development Report and Social Affairs HRAP Human Rights Action Plan UNDP United Nations Development Programme HURIST Human Rights Strengthening UNEG United Nations Evaluation Group ICTD Information and Communication UNEP United Nations Environment Programme Technologies for Development UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific ILO International Labour Organisation and Cultural Organisation IT Information Technology UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention LEO Law on Equal Opportunities on Climate Change LHDR Lithuanian Human Development Report UNFPA United Nations Population Fund LOGIN Local Government Information Network UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner MDG Millennium Development Goals for Refugees NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organisation UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund NEX National Execution UNODC United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime NGO Non-Governmental Organisation UNTG UN Theme Group NHDR National Human Development Report WHO World Health Organisation NISC NGO Information and Support Centre YFSL Youth-friendly Services in Lithuania 6 REVIEW OF UNDP’S PARTNERSHIP WITH LITHUANIA (1992-2005) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OVERVIEW OF UNDP’S PARTNERSHIP WITH LITHUANIA THE PARTNERSHIP 1992-2005 REVIEW Since regaining independence in 1990 Lithuania The main purpose of this review is to examine the has made remarkable progress in terms of both its experience of UNDP in Lithuania. Specifically, it has transformation to a democratic market economy and three objectives: (a) First, as a retrospective study, to its advancement towards greater human development. identify lessons learned to be used not only at national, External assistance to Lithuania’s transformation has at UNDP corporate levels but also in the frame of been limited but important, especially in the early years development cooperation (b) Second, a forward-looking of the transition process. In the run-up to European perspective in the sense that it establishes solid Union (EU) accession, it is not surprising that the EU reasoning for the discussions on the added-value for became by far the most important donor and most Lithuania of continued activities of UNDP beyond 2005 external assistance agencies closed their offices and (c) Finally, the review will also act as a record of UNDP’s ended their programmes in Lithuania. The United presence in Lithuania since opening an office in Vilnius Nations Development Programme (UNDP) has been in 1992. Regarding the scope of the review, it will cover supporting this process since 1992, but will close its the following: representative office at the end of 2005 coinciding with Lithuania’s transition from a recipient of aid to Strategic Positioning: An analysis of how UNDP has a donor in its own right and its membership of the positioned itself strategically to bring added value EU since 1 May 2004. From a UNDP perspective, the to the development process and respond effectively country has reached a high level of Human Development to national development needs and priorities as well with a ranking of 39 in the 2005 UNDP Human as to changes in the national development situation. Development Report. Problems remain, however, most notably the issues of rural poverty and inequality, Development Results: An overall assessment low life expectancy and high rates of suicide. Other of the results achieved through UNDP support problems are still emerging, such as HIV/AIDS. and in partnership with other key development actors during 1992-2005 with specific in-depth Since 1992 UNDP has responded to Lithuania’s priority assessments within poverty, governance and needs with four country programmes as illustrated environment taking into account cross-cutting by the table below. Each of these has been financed issues such as gender equality and Information by a combination of core UNDP resources, third party and Communication Technologies for Development cost-sharing and a variety of trust fund
Recommended publications
  • A Short History of Poland and Lithuania
    A Short History of Poland and Lithuania Chapter 1. The Origin of the Polish Nation.................................3 Chapter 2. The Piast Dynasty...................................................4 Chapter 3. Lithuania until the Union with Poland.........................7 Chapter 4. The Personal Union of Poland and Lithuania under the Jagiellon Dynasty. ..................................................8 Chapter 5. The Full Union of Poland and Lithuania. ................... 11 Chapter 6. The Decline of Poland-Lithuania.............................. 13 Chapter 7. The Partitions of Poland-Lithuania : The Napoleonic Interlude............................................................. 16 Chapter 8. Divided Poland-Lithuania in the 19th Century. .......... 18 Chapter 9. The Early 20th Century : The First World War and The Revival of Poland and Lithuania. ............................. 21 Chapter 10. Independent Poland and Lithuania between the bTwo World Wars.......................................................... 25 Chapter 11. The Second World War. ......................................... 28 Appendix. Some Population Statistics..................................... 33 Map 1: Early Times ......................................................... 35 Map 2: Poland Lithuania in the 15th Century........................ 36 Map 3: The Partitions of Poland-Lithuania ........................... 38 Map 4: Modern North-east Europe ..................................... 40 1 Foreword. Poland and Lithuania have been linked together in this history because
    [Show full text]
  • Part 2: Reform of the United Nations
    Part 2 Reform of the United Nations Reform of the United Nations During 1999, UN Secretary General Annan continued to move forward with his program of administrative and budgetary reforms. The 2000– 2001 UN budget came in at virtually the same level as the initial budget approved for the previous biennium, 1998–1999; administrative overhead costs were steadily reduced; and the Office of Internal Oversight Services identified millions of dollars in cost savings. Many of the Secretary General’s “Track One” and “Track Two” reforms were implemented, improving the efficiency of UN activities in the areas of development, humanitarian relief, human rights, and peace- keeping. By the end of 1999, however, the General Assembly had not yet acted on some other recommendations put forward by the Secretary Gen- eral that are priorities for the United States: results–based budgeting, which uses performance indicators to assess progress toward specific objectives, and sunset provisions for new UN programs. The United States continues to press for implementation of these measures. Apart from these efforts, discussions continued on reforming peace- keeping operations and possibly expanding the Security Council to 20 or 21 members, including permanent seats for Germany and Japan. Secretary General’s Reform Initiatives UN Secretary General Kofi Annan incorporated many U.S. ideas on improving UN economic and social institutions, activities, and programs into his two 1997 reform packages (“Track One” and “Track Two” reforms). The United States worked to generate member state support for their prompt implementation. In December 1997, the General Assembly adopted the Track One measures and most of the Track Two recommenda- tions by consensus.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithuania Country Chapter
    EU Coalition Explorer Results of the EU28 Survey on coalition building in the European Union an initiative of Results for Lithuania © ECFR May 2017 Design Findings Chapters Preferences Influence Partners Policies ecfr.eu/eucoalitionexplorer Findings Lithuania Coalition Potential Preferences Policies Ranks 1 to 14 Top 3 for LT Ranks 15 to 28 Lithuania ranks overall #21 at Preferences Lithuania ranks #11 at ‘More Europe’ Top 3 for LT 1. Latvia 2. Estonia Country Findings 1. Latvia #11 3. CZ EL AT Austria #19 Q1 Most Contacted 2. Estonia Q14 Deeper Integration BE Belgium 3. Poland BG Bulgaria 1. Latvia Q16 Expert View Level of Decision-Making Q17 Public View HR Croatia #22 Q2 Shared Interests 2. Poland 3. Sweden CY Cyprus 63% 52% All EU member states 50% 46% CZ Czech Rep. 1. Latvia 13% 19% Legally bound core 14% 18% DK Denmark #22 Q3 Most Responsive 2. Sweden 17% 15% Coalition of states 14% 21% EE Estonia 3. Slovenia 7% 8% Only national level 22% 15% FI Finland LT EU EU LT FR France DE Germany EL Greece HU Hungary Partners Networks IE Ireland Lithuania ranks overall #20 at Partners Voting for IT Italy Top 3 for LT Latvia LV Lithuania Latvia 1. Latvia Top 8 for LT LT Lithuania #19 Q10 Foreign and Development Policy 2. Poland Poland LU Luxembourg 3. Sweden MT Malta Estonia 1. Latvia NL Netherlands #12 Q11 Security and Defense Policy 2. HR RO PL Poland 3. DK PL SE Sweden PT Portugal LT 1. Estonia RO Romania #21 Q12 Economic and Social Policy 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Labour Organization and the Quest for Social Justice, 1919–2009
    The International Labour Organization and the quest for social justice, 1919–2009 The International Labour Organization and the quest for social justice, 1919–2009 Gerry Rodgers, Eddy Lee, Lee Swepston and Jasmien Van Daele INTERNATIONAL LABOUR OFFICE GENEVA Copyright © International Labour Organization 2009 First published in paperback in 2009 by the International Labour Office, CH-1211, Geneva 22, Switzerland First published in hardback in 2009 by Cornell University Press, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, NY 14850, United States (available for sale in North America only) Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copy- right Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to ILO Publications (Rights and Permissions), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland, or by email: [email protected]. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered with reproduction rights organizations may make copies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. Visit www.ifrro.org to find the reproduction rights organization in your country. The International Labour Organization and the quest for social justice, 1919–2009 Gerry Rodgers, Eddy Lee, Lee Swepston and Jasmien Van Daele International Labour Office. – Geneva: ILO, 2009 ISBN 978-92-2-121955-2 (paperback) ILO / role of ILO / ILO standard setting / tripartism / workers rights / quality of working life / social security / promotion of employment / poverty alleviation / decent work / history / trend 01.03.7 Also available in hardback: The International Labour Organization and the quest for social justice, 1919–2009 (ISBN 978-0-8014-4849-2), Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Lithuanian Economic Review
    Lithuanian Economic Review 2019 MARCH 1 LITHUANIAN ECONOMIC REVIEW ISSN 2029-8471 (online) MARCH 2019 The Lithuanian Economic Review analyses the developments of the real sector, prices, public finance and credit in Lithuania, as well as the projected development of the domestic economy. The material presented in the review is the result of statistical data analysis, modelling and expert assessment. The review is prepared by the Bank of Lithuania. The cut-off date for the data used in the Lithuanian Economic Review was 1 March 2019. The Bank of Lithuania macroeconomic projections are based on external assumptions, constructed using information made available by 12 February 2019, and other information made available by 1 March 2019. Reproduction for educational and non-commercial purposes is permitted provided that the source is acknowledged. © Lietuvos bankas Gedimino pr. 6, LT-01103 Vilnius www.lb.lt 2 CONTENTS LITHUANIA’S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND OUTLOOK ........................................................... 6 I. INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENT........................................................................................... 9 Box 1. Potential impact of the US tariffs on car imports from the EU on the Lithuanian economy ......................................................................................................................... 12 II. MONETARY POLICY OF THE EUROSYSTEM .......................................................................... 14 III. REAL SECTOR ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Convention Against Corruption
    04-56160_c1-4.qxd 17/08/2004 12:33 Page 1 Vienna International Centre, PO Box 500, A 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel: +(43) (1) 26060-0, Fax: +(43) (1) 26060-5866, www.unodc.org UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTION Printed in Austria V.04-56160—August 2004—copies UNITED NATIONS UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTION UNITED NATIONS New York, 2004 Foreword Corruption is an insidious plague that has a wide range of corrosive effects on societies. It undermines democracy and the rule of law, leads to violations of human rights, distorts markets, erodes the quality of life and allows organized crime, terrorism and other threats to human security to flourish. This evil phenomenon is found in all countries—big and small, rich and poor—but it is in the developing world that its effects are most destructive. Corruption hurts the poor disproportionately by diverting funds intended for development, undermining a Government’s ability to provide basic services, feeding inequality and injustice and discouraging foreign aid and investment. Corruption is a key element in economic underperformance and a major obsta- cle to poverty alleviation and development. I am therefore very happy that we now have a new instrument to address this scourge at the global level. The adoption of the United Nations Convention against Corruption will send a clear message that the international community is determined to prevent and control corruption. It will warn the corrupt that betrayal of the public trust will no longer be tolerated. And it will reaffirm the importance of core values such as honesty, respect for the rule of law, account- ability and transparency in promoting development and making the world a better place for all.
    [Show full text]
  • Universal Declaration of Human Rights
    Universal Declaration of Human Rights Preamble Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world, Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people, Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law, Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations, Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom, Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in cooperation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms, Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge, Now, therefore, The General Assembly, Proclaims this Universal Declaration of Human Rights as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • ITC by Country Report
    ITC by Country Report Lithuania 05/12/2014 ITC by country - Lithuania 1 Table of Contents 1. Country / Territory Brief 2. People and Economy 2.1 People 2.2 Economy 3. Trade Performance 3.1 General Trade Performance 3.2 Sector Trade Performance 4. Trade Strategy and Policy 4.1 Trade and Development Strategies 4.2 Domestic and Foreign Market Access 4.3 Trade Facilitation 4.4 Business and Regulatory Environment 4.5 Infrastructure 5. ITC and the Country/Territory 5.1 ITC Projects 5.2 Events 5.3 ITC Contacts 6. Trade Information Sources and Contacts 6.1 Trade Information Sources 6.2 Trade Contacts This is a pdf version of the captioned country contents in the intracen web site of the International Trade Centre. This document was generated on 05.12.2014. For the latest information about ITC's work and the country, please refer to www.intracen.org © International Trade Centre 2014 ITC encourages the reprinting and translation of its publications to achieve wider dissemination. Short extracts of this document may be freely reproduced, with due acknowledgement of the source. Permission should be requested for more extensive reproduction or translation. A copy of the reprinted or translated material should be sent to ITC. ITC by country - Lithuania 2 1. Country / Territory Brief ITC aims to assist Lithuania in creating sustainable trade linkages with the developing world by sourcing good quality products from these growing export markets. This page contains trade performance and investment data as well as highly innovative trade flow trends and analysis specially developed by ITC.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents of These Values Relate Not to Sovereign States but to the Individual Human Beings Who Are Their Constituent Members
    Opening Address Gaishi Hiraiwa Prime Minister Obuchi, Dr. Boutros-Ghali, ladies and gentlemen. As chairman of the Japan Institute of International Affairs (JIIA), I take pleasure in addressing you on the opening of this symposium commemorating the fortieth anni- versary of JIIA. JIIA was established in December 1959 on the initiative of Prime Minister Shigeru Yoshida to conduct wide-ranging research and surveys in fields related to international affairs and diplomacy. Its aims were “to create a major research facility in cooperation with academe, the bureaucracy, politics, business, the press, and other spheres, and prepare a system for empirical research oriented toward advancing our new democratic diplomacy.” Thus it was established on the basis of the consensus of opinion leaders in a variety of fields. In the 40 years since then, JIIA, true to the spirit of its founders, has expanded its fields of activity in response to international trends and changes. With the recent rise of so-called track-two diplomacy, JIIA, as a leading Japanese think tank, prides itself on having made significant contributions to the formulation of Japanese foreign policy. With the cooperation of Dr. Hans van Ginkel, rector of United Nations University, and others at UNU, we have organized this symposium on the theme “In Quest of Human Security.” During this symposium, we will have the opportunity to hear the valuable opinions, informed by penetrating insight, of eminent authorities from both Japan and overseas as they discuss measures for conflict prevention, promotion of sus- tainable development, and enhancement of human dignity—all core issues of human security.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade Union Responses to Globalization in Lithuania
    Discussion papers DP/111/1999 Trade union responses to globalization Labour in Lithuania and Society Programme Roma Dovydeniene P.O. Box 6 CH-1211 Geneva 22 Tel.004122/7998496 Fax. 004122/7998542 E-mail: [email protected] The International Institute for Labour Studies was established in 1960 as an autonomous facility of the International Labour Organization (ILO). Its mandate is to promote policy research and public discussion on emerging issues of concern to the ILO and its constituents labour, business and government. The Labour and Society Programme examines the outlook for labour at the beginning of the new millennium in the light of changes at the workplace and in society at large. Focusing initially on organized labour, the programme seeks to identify approaches and strategies to enhance the profile of labour as a major actor in civil society, and as a contributor to dynamic and equitable growth. Specifically, the programme will review the changing environment of labour and unions; document trade union responses to these changes; highlight promising approaches for trade unions in civil society and the global economy in future; and outline the type of policy and institutional environment required for the growth of free and effective trade unions. This work is undertaken in close collaboration with international and national trade union organizations and international trade secretariats, and will be implemented through networks consisting of trade union practitioners, academics, research institutes and other policymakers. These networks, both international and regional, will also be a means of disseminating research outcomes to a wider audience. The Discussion Paper Series presents the preliminary results of research undertaken by the IILS.
    [Show full text]
  • His Excellency Ban Ki Moon, the United Nations Secretary General, UN Headquarters New York, NY 1007
    His Excellency Ban Ki Moon, The United Nations Secretary General, UN Headquarters New York, NY 1007 RE: The Government of Rwanda's report on information and observations on the scope and application of the principle of universal jurisdiction Your Excellency, Reference is made to the UN General Assembly resolution 64/117 of 16 December 2009 which, in its operative paragraph 1, requests the Secretary General to invite Member States to submit information and observations on the scope and application of the principle ofuniversal jurisdiction, including information on the relevant applicable intemational treaties, their domestic legal rules and judicial practice, and to prepare and submit to the General Assembly, at its sixty-fifth session, a report based on such information and observations; we hereby submit to you the mentioned report. GENERAL INFORMATION AND OBSERVATIONS ON THE SCOPE AND APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF UNIVERSAL JURISDICTION States generally exercise jurisdiction when the crime occurs in their territory. However, there is also a legal basis for extraterritorial jurisdiction provided that there is a connection between the alleged crime and the forum state. This connection or link can be based either on the Passive personality principle (e.g. when the victim is of the nationality of the prosecuting state) or the Active personality principle (e.g. when the defendant is of the nationality of a forurn state). In regard to universal jurisdiction, the first question that arises is whether it can be an effective tool for fighting
    [Show full text]
  • Deterring Russian Aggression in the Baltic States Through Resilience and Resistance
    Research Report C O R P O R A T I O N STEPHEN J. FLANAGAN, JAN OSBURG, ANIKA BINNENDIJK, MARTA KEPE, ANDREW RADIN Deterring Russian Aggression in the Baltic States Through Resilience and Resistance Introduction The governments and citizens of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania—the Baltic states—are subject to daily Russian strategic information operations and propaganda activities that are part of campaigns designed to undermine trust in their institutions, foment ethnic and social tensions, and erode confidence in North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) KEY FINDINGS collective defense commit- ■ Total Defense and Unconventional Warfare (TD/UW) techniques and ments. These three countries forces can support deterrence, early warning, de-escalation, defense are also vulnerable to low-level, against invading forces, and liberation from occupation during the hybrid, and full-scale attacks by course of a hybrid or conventional conflict. Russian special operations and ■ Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania are committed to enhancing the size and regular military forces deployed capabilities of their national guards and reserve forces and increasing close to their borders. In light whole-of society resilience and resistance efforts. All three countries of these concerns, and given are improving and expanding their small special operations forces. the imbalance between Russian ■ The United States, other NATO allies and partners, and the European and NATO conventional forces Union could take further concrete steps to support the development deployed in the Baltic region, of Baltic TD/UW capabilities by strengthening cooperation on crisis these governments and others management, intelligence sharing, civilian resilience, and countering Russian information warfare and hybrid attacks.
    [Show full text]